DOCSLIB.ORG

DR18B Research Papers DR18B Research Papers

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
DR18B Research Papers DR18B Research Papers University of Sheffield Library. Special Collections and Archives Ref: MS 287 Title: Defence Regulation 18B Research Papers Scope: Documents relating to internment under Defence Regulation 18B during WWII Dates: 1934-1997 Level: Fonds Extent: 23 boxes Name of creator: Professor A.W. Brian Simpson Administrative / biographical history: The collection consists of documents and correspondence assembled by Professor A.W. Brian Simpson during the writing of his book In the Highest Degree Odious: Detention Without Trial in Wartime Britain (Clarendon Press, 1992). To quote from Professor Simpson’s preface to his work: ‘During the Second World War a very considerable number of people were detained by the British government without charge, or trial, or term set, on the broad ground that this was necessary for national security. Most were not British citizens, but technically enemy aliens – in fact most of these enemy aliens were refugees from Europe. A far smaller number of those detained were British citizens, and they were held under Regulation 18B [of September 1939, and more particularly the specially formulated section 18B (1A) introduced in November] of the Defence Regulations; it is with this regulation and those detained under it that this book is concerned’. The background to the implementation of the regulation was the threat of an imminent German invasion of Britain in May 1940 following the collapse of Allied forces in France. Under the legislation the Home Secretary of the day - initially Sir John Anderson, subsequently Herbert Morrison - was free to detain and imprison as he saw fit anyone against whom evidence of potential disloyalty, untested by legal process, was presented by the security services. The normal safeguards against abuse of executive power traditionally available to British citizens, such as the provisions of Magna Carta, Habeas Corpus and trial by jury, were effectively suspended. The regulation remained in use long after it became clear that no organised Fifth Column existed in Britain. Most of the British citizens detained were members of Fascist or extreme Right-wing groups, who were generally opposed to the war with Germany. In May 1940 there existed a fear of a potential ‘Fifth Column’ movement which might undermine the British war effort, such as had destabilised the Republican defence of Madrid during the recent Spanish Civil War, during which the phrase was coined, and more recently during the Nazi invasion of Holland. But the implementation of a measure associated with totalitarian and not with democratic government inevitably raised serious civil rights issues, and was justified only by the extreme danger of the time. Those affected were arrested not for offences against the law but for what they might conceivably do. Although a Home Office Advisory Committee was set up to oversee internment, individuals once arrested had little chance of redress, and could be kept in prison indefinitely with no attempt to charge or try them with any offence. The evidence on which they were arrested was secret and sometimes, as Professor Simpson shows, of dubious accuracy. Some individual detainees undertook legal action in the courts against the Home Secretary under Habeas Corpus or for wrongful imprisonment, but such actions almost invariably failed. The words which form the main title of Professor Simpson’s book are those of Winston Churchill who, originally a strong supporter of the regulation, came later to recognise its danger to democratic freedom and who described it as ‘in the highest degree odious’. 2 As the most prominent Fascist group active in Britain at the time, Sir Oswald Mosley’s movement British Union (whose full title was ‘ British Union of Fascists and National Socialists'), which had campaigned vigorously against the war up to and beyond its outbreak, was particularly affected by the measure, with many leading members arrested and interned. Both Mosley and his wife, Lady Mosley (Diana Mosley) were imprisoned. Mosley was released only in November 1943 when he developed serious health complications. Various other similar groups and individuals were similarly affected. Strong pressure was applied subsequently by political opponents to maintain internment even after the danger of invasion had long receded, whilst some in government sought to prolong its use even after the end of the war, though in the event it was abolished the day after VE day. Professor Simpson's book discusses the history of the Regulation and its implementation, its significance for civil liberties, the more prominent legal cases to which it gave rise and the parts played by the Home Office and MI5. It is based on extant official records, so far as these are now available, and on interviews with many of those directly or indirectly affected or involved, and others. Research has been hampered by the fact that many of the relevant government records have been destroyed, whilst access to other records was even at the time of writing still not allowed. In-depth attention is given to the cases of Benjamin Greene and R.W. Liversidge. Correspondence with Lady Mosley is also on file. In addition there is an appendix on another case of the time, though not directly relevant to the internment of British citizens, that of the spy Tyler Kent, an American citizen who worked at the U.S. Embassy in London. Kent stole highly sensitive documents relating to communications between Churchill and Roosevelt. Professor A.W. (Alfred William) Brian Simpson, DCL, FBA was born in 1931 and educated at Oakham School and Queen's College, Oxford. He taught law at various universities in Britain, the United States and elsewhere, being called to the Bar in 1994. The author of many books on law he was Professor of Law, University of Kent from 1973 to 1985, while from 1987 and at the time of writing his book on internment he was Charles F. and Edith J. Clyne Professor of Law, University of Michigan. Professor Simpson died in January 2011. [Notes based on In the Highest Degree Odious, documents in the collection, and Who's Who] Related collections: Robert Saunders Papers Source: Donated by Professor Simpson in 2002; accrual received in October 2013. System of arrangement: In sections and alphabetically by individual internees Subjects: World War, 1939-1945–Prisoners and prisons, British; Political prisoners—Great Britain—History—20th century; Fascism—Great Britain Names: Simpson, A.W.B. (Alfred William Brian); Greene, Benjamin; Liversidge, R.W.; Mosley, Sir Oswald; Mosley, Diana; Kent, Tyler Conditions of access: Available to all researchers, by appointment Restrictions: Certain documents are restricted (as noted in finding-aid) Copyright: According to document Finding aids: Listed 3 DEFENCE REGULATION 18B RESEARCH PAPERS Sections Page 1. General documents: DR 18B period Manuscript and typescript 3 Printed 4 2. General documents: Later publications 6 3. Individual internees and suspects 8 4. Alien detention and some other special cases 31 5. Brian Simpson's miscellaneous research notes: 5/1. Miscellaneous notes 34 5/2. Notes from Official files 35 6. Brian Simpson's general correspondence with individuals and institutions 40 7. Documents relating to the publication of In The Highest Degree Odious and other works by Brian Simpson 47 8. Miscellaneous documents relating to public records, the historical background to internment and to civil liberties 48 Indices Name index 50 Subject index 62 9. Accrual, October 2013 63 4 MS 287. DEFENCE REGULATION 18B RESEARCH PAPERS Documents (many are photocopies) are printed unless otherwise noted. (PRO} indicates copies of documents supplied by the Public Record Office, now known as the UK's National Archives. The following codes indicate: CAB - Cabinet Papers, FO - Foreign Office, HO - Home Office, LCO - Lord Chancellor's Office, TS - Treasury Solicitor's Department. FBI indicates United States Federal Bureau of Investigation. In the collection are various typescript documents with information about detainees. Where their authorship is not clear such material is listed by title only, without author. Information in square brackets has been added by the cataloguer, verified from other sources; dates in square brackets followed by ? are approximate. Note that not all the names mentioned in the text of In the Highest Degree Odious appear in the book's index, especially those mentioned in its footnotes (e.g. E. Quentin Joyce). 5 Section 1. General documents: DR18B period Manuscript and typescript 1/1 Right Club. ‘Notes on the Right Club Ledger’. Transcript of the Ledger of 1939, with annotations by Brian Simpson. N.d. 1/2 Brian Simpson. 'R[igh]t Club'. Notes. Ms. 1/3 HO 863004. B.H. Bell. 'Case law on detention. Memo submitted by B.H. Bell to Sir Oscar Dowson'. Transcript. Ts. 10 Nov 1939 1/4 HO 45/25714 (PRO). ‘Schedule’. List of 37 women internees. Ts. [30 May 1940] 1/5 HO 45/25758 (PRO). Home Office. Letters to chief constables re amendments to the Defence Regulations. 14 Jun, 1 Jly 1940; 1/6 HO 45/25758 (PRO). Oswald Hickson. Letter to Sir Alexander Maxwell re ‘Sir Oswald Mosley and others’. 21 Aug 1940; Together with Oswald Hickson. Letter to Herbert Morrison, (Home Secretary) re ‘Emergency Defence Regulations. Regulation 18B (1A). 9 Oct 1940 1/7 British Union. 'To members of British Union and readers of "Action" and "Action News Service" '. Circular re arrests appealing for funds to aid dependants. [May? 1940] 1/8 British Union. ‘18B Club, York 1940-1-?’. Entries in autograph album from York and Peveril, Peel, Isle of Man, Camps. Ms. Dec 1940-Oct 1941 1/9 List of names transcribed from above, with notes. Ts. 1/10 'Autograph Album'. Notes on above. Ts. 1/11-34 HO 45/25754 (PRO). Documents circulated between Norman Birkett (Chairman, Advisory Committee), Sir Alexander Maxwell (Home Office), G.P. Churchill (Secretary, Advisory Committee), F. A. Newsam, Law Officers of the Crown and others on the interpretation of the regulation regarding right of appeal to the Advisory Committee, arising in the case of Heather Donovan.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • BDOHP Biographical Details and Index Lord Wright of Richmond
    BDOHP Biographical details and index Lord Wright of Richmond (28.06.31-06.03.20) - career outline with, on right, relevant page numbers in the memoir to the career stage. Served Royal Artillery, 1950–51 p 3 Joined Diplomatic Service, 1955 pp 2-3 Middle East Centre for Arabic Studies, 1956–57 pp 3-6 Third Secretary, British Embassy, Beirut, 1958–60 - Private Secretary to Ambassador and later First Secretary, pp 12-15 British Embassy, Washington, 1960–65 Private Secretary to Permanent Under-Secretary, FO, 1965–67 pp 10-11 First Secretary and Head of Chancery, Cairo, 1967–70 - Deputy Political Resident, Bahrain, 1971–72 - Head of Middle East Department, FCO, 1972–74 - Private Secretary (Overseas Affairs) to Prime Minister, 1974–77 pp 7-10, 25, 34-35 Ambassador to Luxembourg, 1977–79 pp 30-31 Ambassador to Syria, 1979–81 pp 30-33 Deputy Under-Secretary of State, FCO, 1982–84 - Ambassador to Saudi Arabia, 1984–86 pp 33-34, 36 Permanent Under-Secretary of State and Head pp 11-12, of Diplomatic Service, 1986–91. 16-18, 21, 30 Member, Security Commission, 1993–2002. - General comments on Middle East and United States, pp 6-8; political versus professional diplomatic appointments, pp 15-20; retirement age in diplomatic service, pp 21-23; recruitment, pp 23-25; Foreign Office image, pp 38-40; John Major, pp 40-42; leaking of restricted papers, pp 43-45. Lord Wright of Richmond This is Malcolm McBain interviewing Lord Wright of Richmond at his home in East Sheen on Monday, 16 October 2000. MMcB: “Lord Wright, you were born in 1931, educated at Marlborough and Merton College, Oxford, you did a couple of years’ national service in the Royal Artillery, and then joined the Diplomatic Service, presumably after going to Oxford, in 1965.
    [Show full text]
  • Discussing What Prime Ministers Are For
    Discussing what Prime Ministers are for PETER HENNESSY New Labour has a lot to answer for on this front. They On 13 October 2014, Lord Hennessy of Nympsfield FBA, had seen what the press was doing to John Major from Attlee Professor of Contemporary British History at Queen Black Wednesday onwards – relentless attacks on him, Mary, University of London, delivered the first British which bothered him deeply.1 And they were determined Academy Lecture in Politics and Government, on ‘What that this wouldn’t happen to them. So they went into are Prime Ministers for?’ A video recording of the lecture the business of creating permanent rebuttal capabilities. and an article published in the Journal of the British Academy If somebody said something offensive about the can be found via www.britishacademy.ac.uk/events/2014/ Government on the Today programme, they would make every effort to put it right by the World at One. They went The following article contains edited extracts from the into this kind of mania of permanent rebuttal, which question and answer session that followed the lecture. means that you don’t have time to reflect before reacting to events. It’s arguable now that, if the Government doesn’t Do we expect Prime Ministers to do too much? react to events immediately, other people’s versions of breaking stories (circulating through social media etc.) I think it was 1977 when the Procedure Committee in will make the pace, and it won’t be able to get back on the House of Commons wanted the Prime Minister to be top of an issue.
    [Show full text]
  • The Communist Party of Great Britain Since 1920 Also by David Renton
    The Communist Party of Great Britain since 1920 Also by David Renton RED SHIRTS AND BLACK: Fascism and Anti-Fascism in Oxford in the ‘Thirties FASCISM: Theory and Practice FASCISM, ANTI-FASCISM AND BRITAIN IN THE 1940s THE TWENTIETH CENTURY: A Century of Wars and Revolutions? (with Keith Flett) SOCIALISM IN LIVERPOOL: Episodes in a History of Working-Class Struggle THIS ROUGH GAME: Fascism and Anti-Fascism in European History MARX ON GLOBALISATION CLASSICAL MARXISM: Socialist Theory and the Second International The Communist Party of Great Britain since 1920 James Eaden and David Renton © James Eaden and David Renton 2002 Softcover reprint of the hardcover 1st edition 2002 978-0-333-94968-9 All rights reserved. No reproduction, copy or transmission of this publication may be made without written permission. No paragraph of this publication may be reproduced, copied or transmitted save with written permission or in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, or under the terms of any licence permitting limited copying issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency, 90 Tottenham Court Road, London W1T 4LP. Any person who does any unauthorised act in relation to this publication may be liable to criminal prosecution and civil claims for damages. The authors have asserted their rights to be identified as the authors of this work in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. First published 2002 by PALGRAVE Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire RG21 6XS and 175 Fifth Avenue, New York, N. Y. 10010 Companies and representatives throughout the world PALGRAVE is the new global academic imprint of St.
    [Show full text]
  • The Arms of the Baronial and Police Burghs of Scotland
    '^m^ ^k: UC-NRLF nil! |il!|l|ll|ll|l||il|l|l|||||i!|||!| C E 525 bm ^M^ "^ A \ THE ARMS OF THE BARONIAL AND POLICE BURGHS OF SCOTLAND Of this Volume THREE HUNDRED AND Fifteen Copies have been printed, of which One Hundred and twenty are offered for sale. THE ARMS OF THE BARONIAL AND POLICE BURGHS OF SCOTLAND BY JOHN MARQUESS OF BUTE, K.T. H. J. STEVENSON AND H. W. LONSDALE EDINBURGH WILLIAM BLACKWOOD & SONS 1903 UNIFORM WITH THIS VOLUME. THE ARMS OF THE ROYAL AND PARLIAMENTARY BURGHS OF SCOTLAND. BY JOHN, MARQUESS OF BUTE, K.T., J. R. N. MACPHAIL, AND H. W. LONSDALE. With 131 Engravings on Wood and 11 other Illustrations. Crown 4to, 2 Guineas net. ABERCHIRDER. Argent, a cross patee gules. The burgh seal leaves no doubt of the tinctures — the field being plain, and the cross scored to indicate gules. One of the points of difference between the bearings of the Royal and Parliamentary Burghs on the one hand and those of the I Police Burghs on the other lies in the fact that the former carry castles and ships to an extent which becomes almost monotonous, while among the latter these bearings are rare. On the other hand, the Police Burghs very frequently assume a charge of which A 079 2 Aberchirder. examples, in the blazonry of the Royal and Parliamentary Burghs, are very rare : this is the cross, derived apparently from the fact that their market-crosses are the most prominent of their ancient monuments. In cases where the cross calvary does not appear, a cross of some other kind is often found, as in the present instance.
    [Show full text]
  • Detention Without Trial in the Second World War: Comparing the British and American Experiences A.W
    Florida State University Law Review Volume 16 | Issue 2 Article 1 Summer 1988 Detention without Trial in the Second World War: Comparing the British and American Experiences A.W. Brian Simpson University of Michigan Law School Follow this and additional works at: http://ir.law.fsu.edu/lr Part of the Constitutional Law Commons, and the Military, War, and Peace Commons Recommended Citation A.W. B. Simpson, Detention without Trial in the Second World War: Comparing the British and American Experiences, 16 Fla. St. U. L. Rev. 225 (2017) . http://ir.law.fsu.edu/lr/vol16/iss2/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Florida State University Law Review by an authorized editor of Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW VOLUME 16 SUMMER 1988 NUMBER 2 DETENTION WITHOUT TRIAL IN THE SECOND WORLD WAR: COMPARING THE BRITISH AND AMERICAN EXPERIENCES A.W. BRIAN SIMPSON* National security has long been advanced as a justification for the abrogation of civil liberties. In this lecture, Professor Simpson examines through the analysis of particular cases how two nations dealt with these competing values in the internment without trial of their respective citizens during World War I. Condemning the secrecy and lack of accountability of the authorities responsible for protecting the nation, Simpson issues a call for vigilance and a warning that patterns and habits of respect for liberty will serve better than mere forms of procedure to effectively insure that liberties are not again abandoned to ill-founded claims of defense necessity.
    [Show full text]
  • Karas Alternatywna Wizja Histor
    ALTERNATYWNA WIZJA HISTORII PRACE HISTORYCZNE DAVIDA IRVINGA Marcin Karas Alternatywna wizja historii Prace historyczne Davida Irvinga Kraków 2013 Copyright by Marcin Karas, Kraków 2013 Recenzenci: Prof, dr hab. Marek Komat Dr hab. Jacek Widomski Opracowanie redakcyjne: Marta Stęplewska Korekta: Justyna Rybka Projekt okładki: Emilia Dajnowicz Skład i złamanie: Józef Paluch Publikacja wydana dzięki pomocy de minimis z Ministerstwa Nauki i Szkolnictwa Wyższego oraz dofinansowana przez Zakład Filozofii Polskiej UJ ISBN 978-83-763S-291-3 KSIĘGARNIA AKADEMICKA ul. św. Anny 6, 31-008 Kraków tel./faks: (12) 43-127-43 e-mail: akademicka@akademicka. pl Zamówienia przez księgarnię internetową www.akademicka. pl „W propagandzie nie ma miejsca na interpretację i niuanse” Walter Laqueur „Należy działać tak, by odbiorcy nie wyczuli, że chodzi nam o jakiś zamierzony efekt” Joseph Goebbels Spis treści Wstęp Współczesny rewizjonizm historyczny............................................................. 9 Rozdział pierwszy Alianci zachodni oczami Irvinga........................................................................ 35 Rozdział drugi Wizja Polski i Polaków........................................................................................ 67 Rozdział trzeci Naród żydowski ................................................................................................... 83 Rozdział czwarty Obraz III Rzeszy.....................................................................................................103 Rozdział piąty Niemieckie podboje
    [Show full text]
  • Verulam House Brochure
    City of St.Albans of City In the Heart of the Cathedral the of Heart the In NURSING HOME VERULAM HOUSE B e a u t i f u l L o c a t i o n Queen Victoria stayed at the With the ancient Roman City house when visiting St Albans. of Verulamium lying in close Since 1926 it has been used as a proximity, Verulam House is retreat and conference centre by surrounded by beautiful and the diocese of St Albans. During historic landmarks. the Second World War, the General Lying-In Hospital moved Idyllic Location here from London. Approximately Verulam House is situated in 2,000 babies were born in the heart of the historic City of Verulam House Verulam House. St.Albans, which dates back Formerly the Bishop’s Palace, 2,000 years. Verulam House is a grade II Lovely Surroundings St.Albans lies some 24 miles listed building and is of early Verulam House stands in from central London and benefits nineteenth century origin. attractive landscaped gardens in from it’s accessibility to the M1. The famous architect Caroe a mainly residential situation, M25 and A1(M). introduced a number of which forms a part of the The Nursing Home, located important features which have St.Albans Conservation area. in the tranquillity of it’s own been carefully preserved in the Within easy walking distance beautiful gardens is within easy refurbishment. of the Nursing Home lies walking distance of the town and The house is reputed to have St.Albans Cathedral amidst the main shopping precincts.
    [Show full text]
  • Leo Amery at the India Office, 1940 – 1945
    AN IMPERIALIST AT BAY: LEO AMERY AT THE INDIA OFFICE, 1940 – 1945 David Whittington A thesis submitted in part fulfilment of the requirements of the University of the West of England, Bristol For the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Faculty of Arts, Creative Industries and Education August 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS iii GLOSSARY iv INTRODUCTION 1 CHAPTERS I LITERATURE REVIEW 10 II AMERY’S VIEW OF ATTEMPTS AT INDIAN CONSTITUTIONAL 45 REFORM III AMERY FROM THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA ACT OF 1935 75 UNTIL THE AUGUST OFFER OF 1940 IV FROM SATYAGRAHA TO THE ATLANTIC CHARTER 113 V THE CRIPPS MISSION 155 VI ‘QUIT INDIA’, GANDHI’S FAST AND SOCIAL REFORM 205 IN INDIA VII A SUCCESSOR TO LINLITHGOW, THE STERLING BALANCES 253 AND THE FOOD SHORTAGES VIII FINAL ATTEMPTS AT CONSTITUTIONAL REFORM BEFORE THE 302 LABOUR ELECTION VICTORY CONCLUSION 349 APPENDICES 362 LIST OF SOURCES CONSULTED 370 ABSTRACT Pressure for Indian independence had been building up throughout the early decades of the twentieth century, initially through the efforts of the Indian National Congress, but also later, when matters were complicated by an increasingly vocal Muslim League. When, in May 1940, Leo Amery was appointed by Winston Churchill as Secretary of State for India, an already difficult assignment had been made more challenging by the demands of war. This thesis evaluates the extent to which Amery’s ultimate failure to move India towards self-government was due to factors beyond his control, or derived from his personal shortcomings and errors of judgment. Although there has to be some analysis of politics in wartime India, the study is primarily of Amery’s attempts at managing an increasingly insurgent dependency, entirely from his metropolitan base.
    [Show full text]
  • A Socialist Schism
    A Socialist Schism: British socialists' reaction to the downfall of Milošević by Andrew Michael William Cragg Submitted to Central European University Department of History In partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Supervisor: Professor Marsha Siefert Second Reader: Professor Vladimir Petrović CEU eTD Collection Budapest, Hungary 2017 Copyright notice Copyright in the text of this thesis rests with the Author. Copies by any process, either in full or part, may be made only in accordance with the instructions given by the Author and lodged in the Central European Library. Details may be obtained from the librarian. This page must form a part of any such copies made. Further copies made in accordance with such instructions may not be made without the written permission of the Author. CEU eTD Collection i Abstract This work charts the contemporary history of the socialist press in Britain, investigating its coverage of world events in the aftermath of the fall of state socialism. In order to do this, two case studies are considered: firstly, the seventy-eight day NATO bombing campaign over the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia in 1999, and secondly, the overthrow of Slobodan Milošević in October of 2000. The British socialist press analysis is focused on the Morning Star, the only English-language socialist daily newspaper in the world, and the multiple publications affiliated to minor British socialist parties such as the Socialist Workers’ Party and the Communist Party of Great Britain (Provisional Central Committee). The thesis outlines a broad history of the British socialist movement and its media, before moving on to consider the case studies in detail.
    [Show full text]
  • Orwell George
    The Collected Essays, Journalism and Letters of George Orwell Volume II: My Country Right or Left 1940-1943 by George Orwell Edited by Sonia Orwell and Ian Angus a.b.e-book v3.0 / Notes at EOF Back Cover: "He was a man, like Lawrence, whose personality shines out in everything he said or wrote." -- Cyril Connolly George Orwell requested in his will that no biography of him should be written. This collection of essays, reviews, articles, and letters which he wrote between the ages of seventeen and forty-six (when he died) is arranged in chronological order. The four volumes provide at once a wonderfully intimate impression of, and a "splendid monument" to, one of the most honest and individual writers of this century -- a man who forged a unique literary manner from the process of thinking aloud, who possessed an unerring gift for going straight to the point, and who elevated political writing to an art. The second volume principally covers the two years when George Orwell worked as a Talks Assistant (and later Producer) in the Indian section of the B.B.C. At the same time he was writing for Horizon, New Statesman and other periodicals. His war-time diaries are included here. Penguin Books Ltd, Harmondsworth, Middlesex, England Penguin Books Australia Ltd, Ringwood, Victoria, Australia First published in England by Seeker & Warburg 1968 Published in Penguin Books 1970 Reprinted 1971 Copyright © Sonia Brownell Orwell, 1968 Made and printed in Great Britain by Hazell Watson & Viney Ltd, Aylesbury, Bucks Set in Linotype Times This book is sold subject to the condition that it shall not, by way of trade or otherwise, be lent, re-sold, hired out, or otherwise circulated without the publisher's prior consent in any form of binding or cover other than that in which it is published and without a similar condition including this condition being imposed on the subsequent purchaser Contents Acknowledgements A Note on the Editing 1940 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Home Office Appraisal Report 1953-2016
    Appraisal Report HOME OFFICE 1953 - 2016 Home Office Appraisal report CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................... 4 BACKGROUND INFORMATION .................................................................................................. 6 1.2 Type of agency ............................................................................................................... 11 1.3 Annual budget ................................................................................................................. 11 1.4 Number of employees ..................................................................................................... 11 1.5 History of organisation .................................................................................................... 12 1.6 Functions, activities, and recordkeeping ......................................................................... 25 1.7 Name of the parent or sponsoring department) .............................................................. 30 1.8 Relationship with parent department .............................................................................. 30 1.9 Relationship with other organisations ............................................................................. 30 SELECTION DECISIONS ............................................................................................................ 32 2.1 Areas of Policy Work undertaken in the organisation ....................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Relationship of the Home Office and the Ministry Of
    THE RELATIONSHIP OF THE HOME OFFICE AND THE MINISTRY OF LABOUR WITH THE TREASURY ESTABLISHMENT DIVISION 1919-1946 AN EVALUATION OF CONTRASTING NEEDS NORMAN GEORGE PRICE Thesis submitted for the degree of PhD London School of Economics (University of London) 1 UMI Number: U042642 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U042642 Published by ProQuest LLC 2014. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 t h e s e s F 68 nu-oaaiS ABSTRACT The thesis examines three Departments of the British Home Civil Service from 1919 to 1946: the Home Office, the Ministry of Labour and the Treasury Establishment Division. The study investigates the contrasting needs, in establishment terms, of an old "Secretary of State" department the Home Office, performing a largely regulatory role, with a new department the Ministry of Labour performing an administrative role, and the relationship of both over establishment matters with the Treasury. The study assesses the roles of individual Administrative Class civil servants in the three departments from the rank of Principal to Permanent Secretary: with particular reference to the relationships existing between the Permanent Secretaries of the two departments and the Permanent Secretaries of the Treasury and their Controllers of Establishments.
    [Show full text]