Item 10 Report 07272021.Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Item 10 Report 07272021.Pdf Item No. 10 CITYMANAGER'S OFFICE Ciffl of South Gate JUL 2 1 Zuxai CITYCOUNCIL 1,):i6 AvY'- AGENIDA BULL For the Regular Meeting of: July 27, 2021 riginating Department: Public Works Department Director.' 'at:J;C;'r>antes - Chris (Je,j SUBJECT: MASTER JOINT REVOCABLE PERMIT N0. 17-07 WITH THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES AND THE CITY OF LONG BEACH GRANTING THE CITY OF SOUTH GATE, THROUGH THE BOARD OF HARBOR COMMISIONERS, THE RIGHT TO OPERATE AND MAINT AIN IMPROVEMENTS AND STRUCTURES ON THE RAILROAD RIGHTS OF WAY PURPOSE: The City has ten active permits from the Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach (Ports) that authorize South Gate to operate and maintain public improvements and structures installed within the Union Pacific Railroad corridor (UPRR Corridor) which they operate on right-of-way the cities of Los Angeles and Long Beach own. The City of South Gate was in need of six more permits for improvements recently constructed. The Ports have a new policy which requires that all permits be consolidated, and new permits be issued, under one master permit, known as the Master Joint Revocable Permit (MJRP). Approval of the MJRP is needed to comply with this new policy. RECOMMENDED ACTIONS: The City Council will consider: a. Approving Master Joint Revocable Permit No. 17-07 (MJRP) which grants the City rights to operate and maintain certain improvements and structures on the right-of-way underlying the Union Pacific Railroad, which permit is issued by the ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach, through the Boards of Harbor Commissioners,, b. Appropriating$l4,420inWaterFundsand$7,680GasTaxFundstoAccountNo.41l-731-71- 6801 to fund the MJRP permit fees; and c. Authorizing the Mayor to execute Master Joint Revocable Permit No. 17-07 in a form acceptable to the City Attorney. FISCAL IMPACT: Under the MJRP, the City is required to pay aru'iual permit fees, a one-time processing fee and a security deposit as listed on the table below. The permit fees increase annually according to the Consumer Price Index. Fee Funds Account No. Roadway Improvements Permit Fee $7,680 Annually Gas Tax Funds 212-713-31-6801 Water Improvements Permit Fee $8,000 Annually Processing Fee $2,500 0ne-time Water Funds 411-731-71-6801 Refundable Security Deposit $3,920 0ne-time Total $22,100 ANALYSIS: The City currently has ten active permits from the cities of Los Angeles and Long Beach (Ports) that cover public improvements that the City has installed within the UPRR Corridor. The permits were issued by the Cities because they are the owners of the property underlying the UPRR Corridor. The Ports manage the corridor through the Boards of Harbor Commissioners (Boards), thus the Boards approves new permits. The City of South Gate is in need of six more permits for improvements recently constructed within the UPRR Corridor. A new policy of the Boards required that the City's permits be consolidated under one MJRP, and that the new permits be issued through the MJRP. The new policy requires annual payment of permit fees for any public improvements that generate revenue, such as a water systems. This new requirement was triggered after the City applied for a new permit (General Order 88-B (GO-88B) Permit) for a traffic signal system that the City installed at the intersection of Firestone Boulevard and Atlantic Avenue. Approval of the MJRP is required to meet this requirement. The MJRP has been reviewed by outside legal counsel, Olivarez Madruga Lemieux O'Neill, LLP as to form. Outside legal counsel was retained as the City Attorney's Office has recused themselves from the matter due to work they do or have done with one of the Ports. BACKGROUND: On December 21, 2015, South Gate completed the construction of two major roadway projects (Firestone Boulevard/Firestone Place UPRR and Atlantic Avenue/Patata Street Crossings) that resulted in installing public improvements on the UPRR ROW. As a condition of their permit for the projects, the Boards required the City to consolidate its existing permits under the MJRP, as well as to incorporate the six proposals for new permits in the MJRP. To date, South Gate has been issued ten permits, some of which are more than 50 years old. Each permit authorized the City to construct, operate and maintain public improvements on the UPRR ROW, such as, water mains, sidewalks, storm drains, power lines, sewer, traffic signal equipment, and an access road. The permit summary is tabulated below. It is noted that under the MJRP the City must only pay a fee for pertnits that involve public improvements that generate revenue, such as the water mains and the private road. Funding Index Permit Constructed Improvements Source for No. No. Year Permit Fee 20" Casing with traffic control wiring at Atlantic Ave. and 1 New 2016 No Fee Wright Pl. Electrical Service Cabinet for Traffic Control at Firestone 2 New 2016 No Fee Blvd. and Mason St, 20" Casing with traffic control wiring at Firestone Blvd. and 3 New 2016 No Fee Firestone Pl. 4 New Sidewalk on south side at Firestone Blvd. and Firestone Pl. 2016 No Fee Temporary Construction Easement at Firestone Blvd./Rayo 5 New 1950s No Fee Ave. Water Funds 6 P-00635 10" cast iron water pipeline at Atlantic Ave. and Wright Pl. 1953 ($2,000) 7 P-00636 30" storm drain pipe at Firestone Pl. and Mason St. 1954 No Fee 8 P-00629 30" storm drain pipe at Branyon Ave. 1952 No Fee Water Funds 9 P-0063l 2" Water Pipeline at South of Branyon Ave. 1949 ($2,000) 10 N/A Sidewalk at Firestone Blvd. and Rayo Ave. 1950s No Fee 11 P-00633 30" storm drain pipe at Salt Lake Ave. and Wood Ave. 1952 No Fee Gas Tax 12 P-00674 Private Road Crossing at SE [-710 and NW Rio Hondo. 1954 ($7,680) 2" Water Pipeline in 4" Steel Casing at SE I-710 and NW Rio Water Funds 13 P-00628 1960 Hondo. ($2,000) 2 Water Funds 14 P-00627 6" steel casing power line at SE I-710 and NW Rio Hondo. 1992 ($2,000) 15 N/A Sidewalk at Imperial Highway and Garfield Pl. 1990s No Fee 12" Sanitary Sewer pipe with 30" Steel Casing at Imperial Hwy 16 New 2021 No Fee and Garfield PI ATT ACHMENTS: A. Proposed Master Joint Revocable Permit B. Location Map KT:lc CAL PACIFIC LAND SERVICES, INC. RECEIVED June 7, 2021 JUN 0 9 2021 DEP7: City of South Gate ENGINEERING Public Works Department 8650 California Avenue South Gate, CA 90280 Attn: Arturo Cervantes, P.E. Assistant City Manager/Director of Public Works Dear Mr. Cervantes: The Ports have revised the form of Master Joint Revocable Permit for the City of South Gate facilities in their railroad right of way within your City and have included the new sewer line which has been installed in Imperial Highway. There is no additional charge for this facility. The revised form is enclosed. The permit form has been approved by the Ports' staffs only and has not yet been placed on the agendas of the Ports' Boards of Harbor Commissioners. Harbor Commission approval from each Port will be required before the MJRP goes into effect. Prior to the Ports' staff putting the MJRP on their respective agendas, the following must be received by us and forwarded to them. 1. MJRP Seven (7) original MJRP documents with Exhibits are enclosed. Please have the appropriate representative(s) authorized to sign such documents sign six (6) copies, have the signatures on all copies notarized, and return the six original copies to me at the address below. The seventh copy is for your records. 2. Fees & Deposit The first year's Permit Fee is $15,680 (MJRP Paragraph 3.1), the Ports' Processing Fee is $2,500.00 (MJRP Section 3.1), and the Security Deposit is $3,920 (MJRP Section 3.6). Unless the City wants to use a non-cash form of Security Deposit as outlined in MJRP Paragraph 3.6, submit a check for $22,100 made payable to Cal Pacific Land Services, Inc. - Trust Account and delivered to my attention with the executed copies of the MJRP. If the City wants to use a non- cash form of Security Deposit, please forward information about the alternative method immediately and we will discuss it with Ports' staff. 3. Insurance Evidence of Insurance coverage for both Ports (see MJRP Section 15) will need to be submitted to the Ports following the procedures set out in MJRP Section 15.2 prior to the MJRP going into effect. 7245 Garden Grove Boulevard, Suite M Garden Grove, CA 92841 Telephone 714-799-0900 CAL PACIFIC LAND SERVICES, INC. June 7, 2021 Mr. Cervantes Page 2 Please call me at 714/799-0900 or email me at [email protected] if you have any questions about the processing of these forms. Thank you for your assistance. Wadell, Jr. Joint Property Management Encl. cc: Kenneth Tang, P.E., via email 5 MASTER JOINT REVOCABLE PERMff CIT\ OF SOUTH GATE The City of Los Angeles, a municipal corporation duly organized and existing under its charter and the constitution and laws of the State of California, and the City of Long Beach, a municipal corporation duly organized andexisting underits charterandtheconstitution and laws of the, State of California (indi'vidually, a "City" and together, the "Cities"), by and through their respective Boards ofHarbor Cominissioners, jointly own certain real propertylocatedinthe County ofLosAngeles. PursuanttoarecommendationadoptedbytheBoardofHarborCommissionersof theCityofLosAngelesunderResolutionNo. atits ,20 meeting,and ResolutionNo.HD, adoptedbytheBoardofHarborCommissionersoftheCityofLong Beach at its , 20 , meeting, the Cities hereby issue this Master Joint Revocable Permit (the "Permit") and grant permission tO the City Of SOuth Gate, a Califoinia Municipal Corporation ("Perinittee"), to operate and maintain multiple improyements and structures ("Facilities"), more particularly describedon theScheduleof PerrnitAreas attachedhereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit A, and as may be subsequently tevised by Permit Supplements after the effective date as Exhibit A(x), within the various permitted areas as defined under Paragraph 1 below (collectively, the "Peimit Areas"), This Perinit shall be effectiye upon last execution by the Executive Directors of the respective Harbor Departments of the Cities (referred to hereinafter as "ExecutiveDirector"singularortbe"ExecutiveDirectors"plural).
Recommended publications
  • Federal Register/Vol. 79, No. 100/Friday, May 23
    29840 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 100 / Friday, May 23, 2014 / Notices Board decisions and notices are UP’s grant of certain operating rights to DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION available on our Web site at PHL over the Subject Track. Surface Transportation Board ‘‘www.stb.dot.gov.’’ PHL states that the agreement Decided: May 19, 2014. between PHL and UP does not contain [Docket No. FD 35827] By the Board, Rachel D. Campbell, any provision that may limit future Director, Office of Proceedings. interchange of traffic with any third- Union Pacific Railroad Company— Raina S. White, party connecting carrier. Temporary Trackage Rights Exemption—Dallas Area Rapid Transit Clearance Clerk. PHL intends to consummate the [FR Doc. 2014–11988 Filed 5–22–14; 8:45 am] and Fort Worth Transportation proposed transaction 30 days or more Authority BILLING CODE 4915–01–P after the exemption was filed (May 7, 2014), or 60 days or more after filing its Trinity Railway Express (TRE),1 certification with the Board pursuant to pursuant to a written trackage rights DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 49 CFR 1150.42(e). agreement dated May 2, 2014, has agreed to grant Union Pacific Railroad Surface Transportation Board PHL certifies that its projected annual Company (UP) temporary overhead revenues as a result of this transaction [Docket No. FD 35814] trackage rights over approximately 1.4 will not result in the creation of a Class miles of the TRE Rail Corridor in Ft. Pacific Harbor Line, Inc.—Operation II or Class I rail carrier. Because PHL’s Worth, Tex., between milepost 610.5 Exemption—Union Pacific Railroad projected annual revenues will exceed (the T&P Station) and milepost 611.9 Company $5 million, PHL certified to the Board (the 6th Street Junction).
    [Show full text]
  • Railroad Industry Modal Profile an Outline of the Railroad Industry Workforce Trends, Challenges, and Opportunities
    Railroad Industry Modal Profile An Outline of the Railroad Industry Workforce Trends, Challenges, and Opportunities October 2011 Version: Release_v3.0 DOT/FRA/ORD-11/20 The opinions expressed herein do not necessarily reflect the views, positions, or policies of the U.S. Department of Transportation or the Federal Government. Reference to any specific programs does not constitute official Federal Government endorsement or approval of the programs, the views they express, or the services they offer. TABLE of CONTENTS 1. Overview of the Railroad Industry ....................................................................................... 7 2. Current Railroad Workforce ................................................................................................ 9 2.1 Total Estimated Railroad Workforce ............................................................................11 2.1.1 Class I Freight Railroad Companies .....................................................................12 2.1.2 Class I Passenger Railroad: Amtrak ...................................................................13 2.1.3 Regional and Short Line Railroad Companies......................................................14 2.1.4 Manufacturers and Suppliers ...............................................................................14 2.1.5 Union Representation ..........................................................................................14 2.1.6 Major Associations ...............................................................................................14
    [Show full text]
  • California Rail Fast Facts for 2019 Freight Railroads …
    Freight Railroads in California Rail Fast Facts For 2019 Freight railroads ….............................................................................................................................................................27 Freight railroad mileage …..........................................................................................................................................4,971 Freight rail employees …...............................................................................................................................................8,270 Average wages & benefits per employee …...................................................................................................$123,680 Railroad retirement beneficiaries …......................................................................................................................24,500 Railroad retirement benefits paid ….....................................................................................................................$606 million U.S. Economy: According to a Towson University study, in 2017, America's Class I railroads supported: Sustainability: Railroads are the most fuel efficient way to move freight over land. It would have taken approximately 9.3 million additional trucks to handle the 167.4 million tons of freight that moved by rail in California in 2019. Rail Traffic Originated in 2019 Total Tons: 64.0 million Total Carloads: 3,405,000 Commodity Tons (mil) Carloads Intermodal 43.4 3,141,900 Food Products 5.4 56,300 Chemicals
    [Show full text]
  • 25 29 Transmittal 1
    1 MASTER JOINT REVOCABLE PERMIT NO. 09-18 2 3 4 The City of Los Angeles, a municipal corporation duly organized and existing under its 5 charter and the constitution and laws of the State of California, and the City of Long Beach, a 6 municipal corporation duly organized and existing under its charter and the constitution and laws of 7 the State of California (individually, a "City" and together, the "Cities"), by and through their 8 respective Boards ofHarbor Commissioners, jointly own certain real property located in the County 9 ofLos Angeles. Pursuant to a recommendation adopted by the Board ofHarbor Commissioners of 10 the City of Los Angeles under Resolution No. at its , 20_ meeting, and 11 Resolution No. HD­ 2656 adopted by the Board of Harbor Commissioners ofthe City ofLong 12 Beach at its March 12, 20R meeting, the Cities hereby issue this Master Joint Revocable Permit 13 (the "Permit") and grant permission to Plains West Coast Terminals LLC, a Delaware limited 14 liability company C'Permittee") to operate and maintain various underground structures such as 15 pipes, pipelines, cables, conduits, casings, and similar structures ("Subsurface Facilities") and 16 facilities such as cathodic protection systems, manholes, communication lines, valves, and meters, 17 that are attached to the Subsurface Facilities ("Appurtenant Facilities"), more particularly described 18 on the Schedule ofPermit Areas attached hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit A or subsequent 19 Exhibit A(x), within the various permitted areas as defined under Paragraph 1 below (collectively, 20 the "Permit Areas"). This Permit shall be effective upon last execution by the Executive Directors 21 of the respective Harbor Departments of the Cities (the "Executive Directors").
    [Show full text]
  • The Need for Freight Rail Electrification in Southern California
    The Need for Freight Rail Electrification in Southern California Brian Yanity Californians for Electric Rail [email protected] May 13, 2018 Executive Summary Full electrification of freight trains is the only proven zero-emissions freight railroad technology. Electric rail propulsion can take several different forms, including locomotives powered by overhead catenary wire, on-board batteries, or more advanced concepts such as battery tender cars and linear synchronous motors. This white paper is largely a literature review of previous studies on electric freight rail in the Southern California region, with information compiled about existing electric freight rail locomotives and systems from around the world. The two main benefits of freight rail electrification in the region would be reduced air pollution, and reduced consumption of diesel fuel for transportation. Electrification of freight rail in Southern California would reduce the public health impacts to local communities affected by diesel-powered freight transportation, and reduce greenhouse gas emissions of freight movement. The main challenge for electric freight rail is the high capital costs of electric rail infrastructure, especially the overhead catenary wire over tracks. A variety of options for public and/or private financing of freight rail electrification need to be explored. Electrification of the proposed short-haul rail service between the ports and the Inland Empire, currently under study, is an opportunity for using electric locomotives though the Alameda
    [Show full text]
  • Introducing the New and Improved Metrolinktrains.Com Fare Increase
    June 2007 Introducing the New and Improved Metrolinktrains.com Metrolink is proud to introduce the all-new Metrolinktrains.com, the official Web site of Metrolink. Metrolinktrains.com sports a completely new look and feel, with new content and images and a fresh design that makes the site more user-friendly. The new Web site features a Station Locator and an Interactive System Map. A Featured Items section on the home page highlights new features or current events, while a scrolling headline provides users fast access to important news and commuter updates. Many other functions of the old Web site are now more easily Did You Know? You can now see a daily navigable through the use of quick-links that offer visitors shortcuts to summary of prior-day Metrolink train operations on frequently used areas of the Web site. The new look is designed to make the new Metrolinktrains.com. This new feature, located it easier for visitors to find the information they need about Metrolink’s under the News Updates section of the home page, will list services and programs. trains that were delayed 15 minutes or more on the previous day We hope you’ll take a look at www.metrolinktrains.com. (weekdays only), and will indicate the primary reason for the delay. (continued on page 4) Fare Increase On May 11, Metrolink’s Board of Directors approved a three-year well as input about the operation of our trains. While many of those program of fare increases under which the system-wide average fare will comments have been addressed in an expanded FAQ section on the increase by 3.5 percent each year, effective July 1, 2007; July 1, 2008; metrolinktrains.com website, future issues of Metrolink Matters will and July 1, 2009.
    [Show full text]
  • CSRP Chapter 6-The State's Rail Service and Investment Program
    The State’s Rail Service and 6 Investment Program California’s multimodal transportation network is a complex system that moves people, goods, and services, furthering the state’s robust economy. As California moves forward to implement sustainable practices and build climate resiliency and adaptability while maintaining a technological and economic edge, effective solutions must be found to maintain efficiency in strategic interregional transportation corridors. Chapter 6 presents the proposed capital plan; federal, state, and local funding sources; program effects; and current and future rail studies and reports necessary for the implementation of the 2040 Vision. Details of the passenger rail Capital Program include implementation goals for the short-term (2022), mid-term (2027) and long-term (2040 Vision) time horizons, with appropriate funding sources; as well as the freight rail funding strategy, along with relevant shared-use corridor and safety programs. This chapter also explains the 2040 Vision program effects and benefits to both the passenger and freight networks, economic benefits, shared environmental impacts and benefits, and the regional balance in the distribution of benefits. Finally, ongoing coordination between existing rail plans is important for future implementation planning, and this chapter identifies those as well as other identified future planning needs and proposed studies. Chapter 6 • The State’s Rail Service and Investment Program 6.1 Passenger and Freight Rail Passenger Rail Program Capital Program Passenger rail services across California, where California needs to decide how best to invest public strategic and timely investments have been made, dollars strategically to maximize benefits without are serving record numbers of passengers and compromising LOS, while building and phasing achieving record growth rates.
    [Show full text]
  • Santa Cruz Branch Line Economic Analysis
    THE INFORMATION IN THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN SUPERSEDED BY THE AUGUST 2004 DRAFT SANTA CRUZ BRANCH LINE BUSINESS PLAN ADMINISTRATIVE DRAFT SANTA CRUZ BRANCH LINE ECONOMIC ANALYSIS Prepared for: Santa Cruz County Regional Transportation Commission Prepared by: Alta Transportation Consulting, Inc. R.L. Banks Associates November 2002 I. INTRODUCTION A. Summary of Analysis Alta Transportation Consultants, Inc., and R. L. Banks Associates (collectively, "Alta/Banks") are pleased to present this economic analysis of potential short line freight operations on the Santa Cruz Branch Line (the "Branch Line") following acquisition by the Santa Cruz County Regional Transportation Commission. Based on the data and analysis presented below, Alta/Banks concludes that the Commission’s assumption of freight operations on the Branch Line may be economically viable. The actual financial performance of the freight operations ultimately will depend on the interchange rate – that is, the division of freight shipping revenues between Branch Line operations (which will be received by the Commission and/or its short line contractor) and the main line operations (which will be received by Union Pacific Railroad (“UP”) for carrying the freight from Pajaro Junction to its ultimate destination). Alta/Banks projects that, depending on the interchange rate with UP, short line freight operations on the Branch Line, with the short line operator responsible for routine and program maintenance of the trackage, are likely to see an annual profit/loss range of a $391,000 loss to a profit of $41,000. In order to enable potential short line bidders to project reasonably profitable operations and submit favorable bids to the Commission, Alta/Banks projects that a freight interchange rate of $440 per carload would need to negotiated with UP.
    [Show full text]
  • R E S O L U T I O N Resolution Adopting a Railroad
    RESOLUTION ROSB-002 Mailed 11/10/08 PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Consumer Protection and Safety Division San Francisco, California Railroad Operations Safety Branch Date: November 6, 2008 Resolution ROSB-002 R E S O L U T I O N RESOLUTION ADOPTING A RAILROAD CITATION PROGRAM FOR ENFORCING COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL ORDERS AND OTHER REQUIREMENTS INCLUDING PROCEDURES FOR APPEAL OF CITATIONS ISSUED TO RAILROAD CARRIERS. SUMMARY This resolution approves a citation program under the administration of the Director of the Consumer Protection and Safety Division (CPSD) for enforcing compliance with certain General Orders and other requirements for railroad carriers operating in California. Specifically, the citation program will enforce compliance with the requirements for walkways, clearances, and certain railroad operating rules agreed to by the Union Pacific Railroad Company (UPRR) and BNSF Railway Company (BNSF) in Union Pacific Railroad Co. v. CPUC, Case No. 07-cv-001 (E.D. Cal. June 1, 2007) (“AB 3023 Suit”). Staff is delegated authority to draft and issue citations for specific violations and levy penalties in specified amounts as set forth in Appendix A. Delegation of authority to CPSD will allow prompt action by Staff to protect the public and fulfill the objectives of the Commission’s rail safety responsibilities. Authority for this resolution is derived from provisions of: the California Constitution; California statutes and court decisions; and prior Commission decisions and orders. Nothing in this resolution diminishes, alters, or reduces the Commission's existing authority to promote and enforce public safety requirements. This citation program is designed to more efficiently utilize limited resources and improve overall railroad safety in California.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix B-1: Freight Rail ______
    APPENDIX B-1: FREIGHT RAIL _____________________________________________________________________________________ California occupies an economically strategic lines were once branches from larger main position in our State, the Nation and the world. lines. All modes of freight transportation – trucking, This freight rail network supports the shipping, air cargo, and freight rail – are critical operations of industries throughout the State to this success. Commodities moved by rail tend and links California with domestic and to have a low transportation cost to international markets. weight/volume ratio, which makes them attractive to transport by freight rail lines instead of trucks. In order for California to CLASS I RAILROADS maintain its preeminent position, it is vital that Typically, the distance at which the economics the State’s current freight rail system be become favorable for using a Class I railroad is preserved and maintained. This network must approximately 500 miles. be reliable, accessible, cost-effective, and provide and enhance the mobility of people and goods, yet remain competitive with other Union Pacific (UP) modes. Overall, California’s railroads are stable, Created by the Pacific Railroad Act of 1862 productive, and competitive and they have signed by Abraham Lincoln, UP has evolved as enough business to operate profitably. the largest railroad in the United States. The UP ships a significant volume of intermodal freight, FREIGHT RAIL INVENTORY and is the largest shipper of chemicals in the Freight railroads in California are owned and country. operated by private companies ranging in size In California (2013), UP operates an expansive from the large transcontinental railroads to network of over 3,267 miles of track, has an short line holding companies such as Genesee & annual payroll of $429 million with 4,860 Wyoming Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Sources Board (CARB) Put Into Effect New Regulations, Requiring Reductions of Air Pollutants Emitted from Ships Docked (At-Berth) at Most California Ports
    AGENDA DEBORAH ALE FLINT GILDA GONZALES Acting Executive Director PORT OF OAKLAND President JAMES W. HEAD BOARD OF PORT COMMISSIONERS First Vice-President DANNY WAN 530 Water Street 1 Oakland, California 94607 ALAN S. YEE Port Attorney (510) 627-1696(w)1(510) 839-5104(f)1TDD/TTY 711 Second Vice-President CESTRA BUTNER ARNEL ATIENZA Commissioner Port Auditor E-Mail: [email protected] EARL HAMLIN Website: www.portofoakland.com Commissioner JOHN T. BETTERTON BRYAN R. PARKER Secretary of the Board Commissioner AGENDA VICTOR UNO Commissioner Special Meeting of the Board of Port Commissioners Thursday January 10, 2013 – 1:00 p.m. Board Room – 2nd Floor ROLL CALL 1st Vice President Head, 2nd Vice-President Yee, Commissioner Butner, Commissioner Hamlin, Commissioner Parker, Commissioner Uno and President Gonzales. 1. CLOSED SESSION 1.1 CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION. Pursuant to Subdivision (a) of California Government Code Section 54956.9. SSA Terminals, LLC and SSA Terminals (Oakland), LLC v. the City of Oakland, Acting by and Through its Board of Port Commissioners Docket No. 09-08 1.2 CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION. Significant Exposure to Litigation Pursuant to Subdivision (b) of California Government Code Section 54956.9: 2 matter(s) 1.3 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE APPOINTMENT Titles: Executive Director & Director of Maritime 1.4 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION Titles: Acting Executive Director 1.5 CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR - As provided under California Government Code Section
    [Show full text]
  • Part 225 Reporting Railroads.Pdf
    Part 225 Reporting Railroads Total Records: 771 Report Created on: 4/30/2019 Notes: A railroad may be represented in multiple regions of the country. Region Railroad Reporting Railroad Name Code 1 ADCX Adirondack Scenic Railroad 1 APRR Albany Port Railroad 1 ARA Arcade & Attica Railroad Corporation 1 ARDJ American Rail Dispatching Center 1 BCRY BERKSHIRE SCENIC RAILWAY MUSEUM, INC. 1 BDRV BELVEDERE & DELAWARE RIVER RWY 1 BHR Brookhaven Rail, LLC 1 BHX B&H Rail Corp 1 BKRR Batten Kill Railroad 1 BSOR BUFFALO SOUTHERN RAILROAD, INC. 1 CDOT Connecticut Department Of Transportation 1 CLP Clarendon & Pittsford Railroad Company 1 CMQX CENTRAL MAINE & QUEBEC RAILWAY 1 CMRR Catskill Mountain Railroad 1 CMSX Cape May Seashore Lines, Inc. 1 CNYK Central New York Railroad Corporation 1 COGN COGN Railroad 1 CONW Conway Scenic Railroad 1 CRSH Consolidated Rail Corporation 1 CSO CONNECTICUT SOUTHERN RAILROAD INC. 1 DESR Downeast Scenic Railroad 1 DL DELAWARE LACKAWANNA RAILROAD 1 DLWR DEPEW, LANCASTER & WESTERN RAILROAD COMPANY, INC. 1 DRRV Dover and Rockaway River Railroad 1 DURR Delaware & Ulster Rail Ride 1 EBSR East Brookfield & Spencer Railroad LLC 1 EJR East Jersey Railroad & Terminal Company 1 EMRY EASTERN MAINE RAILROAD COMPANY 1 FGLK Finger Lakes Railway Corporation 1 FRR FALLS ROAD RAILROAD COMPANY, INC. 1 FRVT Fore River Transportation Corporation 1 GMRC Green Mountain Railroad Corporation 1 GRS Pan Am Railways/Guilford System 1 GU GRAFTON & UPTON RAILROAD COMPANY 1 HRRC HOUSATONIC RAILROAD COMPANY, INC. 1 LAL Livonia, Avon & Lakeville Railroad Corporation 1 LBR Lowville & Beaver River Railroad Company 1 LI Long Island Rail Road 1 LRWY LEHIGH RAILWAY 1 LSX LUZERNE & SUSQUEHANNA RAILWAY 1 MBRX Milford-Bennington Railroad Company 1 MBTA Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority 1 MCER MASSACHUSETTS CENTRAL RAILROAD CORPORATION 1 MCRL MASSACHUSETTS COASTAL RAILROAD, LLC 1 ME MORRISTOWN & ERIE RAILWAY, INC.
    [Show full text]