2. the Goods Movement System

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

2. the Goods Movement System South Bay Goods Movement Study The Goods Movement System 2. The Goods Movement System The goods movement system in the South Bay is a major component of Southern California’s economic success. Its seaports, airports, roadways, railroads, intermodal facilities, and warehousing and distribution facilities are components of a large, complex system through which tons of freight, worth billions of dollars, are moved every day. The size and diversity of this system allows goods to easily switch to alternate methods, modes, and schedules to meet changing demands. While individual shipments of goods are moved through the system in an efficient manner, the full spectrum of goods movement, and the interaction of individual components, is bewildering. It is difficult for decision makers to make infrastructure investment choices given the complexity of goods movement and its sensitivity to economic forces. It is important to know the difference between commercial and passenger uses of the transportation system. Roadways serve two transportation systems simultaneously, one for passengers and one for goods movement. Despite this, decisions about major transportation improvements are generally based on passenger needs. Traditional methods of traffic impact analysis focuses on passenger trips, and cannot be used when studying goods movement because: Goods movement uses the system in different ways • The speed of trucks and freight rail is more limited than passenger equivalents • Trucks are restricted to certain roadways and generally to the right two lanes of highways • Trucks have different travel patterns than passenger trips, and in general do not have as high peak demands (morning and evening commute periods) • Freight uses the transportation system for commercial reasons and require comparatively more reliability than passenger vehicles Goods movement affects the system in different ways • Trucks and freight trains are longer and slower than their passenger counterparts • Trucks have a disproportionate impact on pavement deterioration Goods Movement in the South Bay Goods movement in the South Bay is conducted for local pickup and delivery services, domestic trade to other regions, and international trade through one of the South Bay’s trade gateways. The Commodity Flow Survey, compiled by the U.S. Bureau of Transportation Statistics, produces data on the movement of goods in the United States. It provides information on commodities shipped, their value, weight, and mode of transportation. The last survey for the Los Angeles–Long Beach–Riverside Consolidated Statistical Area was completed in 2002. The Table 11 describes which mode of transportation is used to move the domestic and foreign goods within the Los Angeles region. The data is compiled for the Los Angeles- Long Beach-Riverside consolidated statistical area for 2002. Data is not available for all Page 38 South Bay Goods Movement Study The Goods Movement System air freight, however most air freight originating or destined for Southern California is trucked to/from Los Angeles International Airport and Ontario International Airport. As part of this study, Los Angeles World Airport staff members were interviewed to obtain the best available data for air cargo movements. Table 11 Modes used for Goods Movement in the Los Angeles Region Percent of Mode Total Tons Total Tons Air & Truck 483 0.1% Other Intermodal 4,667 0.6% Pipeline & Unknown 136,202 17.8% Rail 37,910 5.0% Truck 574,942 75.2% Truck & Rail 5,082 0.7% Water 5,064 0.7% Nearly all of the freight in the Los Angeles Region is moved by pipeline and truck. Rail and intermodal freight serve the ports, with some bulk service as discussed in Section 2.2.2. Because this data was collected before the opening of the Alameda Corridor, it does not account for the shift of container traffic to/from the ports from truck to rail. However, because the ports account for only a portion of the truck trips in the region (13.5 percent according to the 2002 Commodity Flow Survey), trucks will continue to be the primary mode of goods movement in the South Bay. The following narrative is intended to cast the transportation infrastructure of the South Bay in goods movement terms so that improvements to accommodate or mitigate goods movement can be inventoried and evaluated. 2.1 Roadways The South Bay’s roadway infrastructure is dominated by a grid arterial pattern, much like the rest of the Los Angeles Basin. Many north/south and east/west arterial roadways cross multiple cities and serve regional, as well as local traffic. Two major freeway facilities serve the majority of South Bay Cities: Interstate 110 (Harbor Freeway) and Interstate 405 (San Diego Freeway). Two other freeways, State Route 91(Gardena Freeway) and Interstate 105 (Century Freeway), originate in the South Bay. State Route 47 (Terminal Island Freeway) is located in Wilmington, and connects the POLA with Sepulveda Boulevard. While Interstate 710 (Long Beach Freeway) is not located within the South Bay, its close proximity, and importance to goods movement, make it an important freeway facility for the South Bay. Caltrans data on 2005 auto and truck average daily traffic volumes for the Interstate and state highways of the South Bay are shown in Figure 18. Page 39 SLAUSON AV SAN DIEGO CENTINELA AV HYDE PARK VD FLORENCE AV NORTH JEFFERSON BL FWY 1 MILE 1 MILE WEST MANCHESTER BLVD 56,000 ARBOR VITAE ST VIST LINCOLN BLVD A DEL MAR 1,210 BLVD INGLEWOOD AV INGLEWOOD A BLVD A CENTURY BLVD P A 104TH ST 235,000 BRE LA 303,000 110 C I F I C D 10,881 W 16,089 INTERSTATE BLVD 112TH ST 198,000 IMPERIAL HWY CRENSHA IMPERIAL HWY 117,000 BLV CIENEGA LA 251,000 INTERSTATE208,000 105 4,025 11,266118TH ST AVIATION 35,190 CENTURY FWY 120TH ST 13,208 67,000 311,000 LVD BLVD BROADWAY GRAND AV 2,064 12,813 B THORNE EL SEGUNDO BLVD 259,000 HAW 132ND ST 132ND ST V 17,819 DIE T ST T EDA NORMAN VERMON IE AV IE 139TH ST 139TH ST A WESTERN SEPULV PRAIR ROSECRANS AV 147TH ST 147TH ST MARINE AV 220,000 MANHATTAN BEACH BLVD 238,000 CH BLVD 18,707 38,236 O C NDO BEA REDO AY 251,000 E A N 52,000 249,000 GARDENA FWY 208,000 64,000 BROADW SR-91 35,190 1,732 AV INGLEWOOD 188,000 ARTESIA BLVD 11,529 13,208 177ST ST 2,989 11,938ALBERTONI ST VICTORIA ST 191,000 GRANT AV 182ND 000 ST 270,000 RIPLEY AV 28,077 186TH1,411 ST 272,000 24,246 AVE TRAL CEN UNIVERSITY DR 190TH ST INTERST 14,742 BLVD AVALON AV ATE 40 SUSANA RD VALLEYDR ANITA ST 263,0005 DEL AMO BLVD NESS VAN DEL AMO DEL AMO BLVD BLVD 12,177SAN DIEGO 228,000 A FE AV MARICOPA ST 11,719 FWY SANT180,000 ALAMEDA ST TORRANCE BLVD 26,982 LE AV LE CARSON ST MAP T 295,000 BLVD 294,000 KNOB HI LL AV CIR MO PLAZA DEL AMO S EROA PALOS VERDES PALOS SEPULVEDA BLVD 223RD ST 16,078 FIGU 15,935 C AV A DEL ERN AV ERN C COAST HWY 163,000 DIE AV MAIN ST MAIN V WEST V BLVD PACIFI 22,298 ACH FWY ACH LON ANZA AV AV ANZA ANZA NORMAN MADISON ST MADISON AV OCEAN A OCEAN AVA LOMITA AV A WILMINGTON A ON ON BLVD ANI SEPULVEDA BE LONG NGT BLVD AV ARLI CRENSHAW BLVD CRENSHAW RNE SKYPARK PENNSYLV V DR V AIRP CABRILLO HAWTHO 147,000 40,500ORT V 152,000 DR FWY VERMONT A VERMONT 9,584A VERMONT 1,482 AV S ST S INTERSTATE 710 INTERSTATE V 22,390 K AV K NN AV NN RD RD E A E NARBONNE A NARBONNE BLI TUN CYPRES 40,000 EUBAN 25,500 SANFO AV 54,000 FWY 44,500 41,000 NEP TERMINAL IS. PORTE AV PORTE ST OAK ST 1,964 PACIFIC COAST HWY 6,291 8,464 2,468 SIDENT 2,916 PRE WALNUT ST HARBOR 133,000 112,000 ANAHEIM ST PALOS VERDES R W SR-103 19,591 D 7,885 ES D S VER ALAMEDA O SILVER SPU DR N 110 INTERSTATE PAL R RD GAFFEY B ST ST 16,100 PAL OCEAN BLVD OS 8,259 75,000 2,558 VINCENT VERDE SR-47 THOMAS DR E 53,000 S SUMMERLAND AV BRIDGE VERD ES 9,657 ERN AV PALOS DR S WEST A N O C E 75,000 AUTO VOLUME 2,558 TRUCK VOLUME F I C STREET P A C I FREEWAY 2005 Caltrans Average Daily Traffic Figure for Autos and Trucks 18 South Bay Goods Movement Study The Goods Movement System 2.1.1 Freeways For graphics illustrating auto and truck average daily traffic for each South Bay Freeway, refer to Appendix A. Interstate 110 (Harbor Freeway) Interstate 110 originates at the west end of the port area in San Pedro, and terminates in Pasadena. It passes through the South Bay communities of San Pedro, Wilmington, West Carson, Harbor Gateway, and Carson. According to 2005 Caltrans data, average daily truck traffic is approximately 2,500 at its beginning at Interstate 110, about 12,000 south of Interstate 405, about 25,000 between Interstate 405 and State Route 91, and about 18,000 north of State Route 91. Interstate 110 is a eight-lane facility south of State Route 91, and a ten-lane facility north of State Route 91. The South Bay portion of Interstate 110 includes a significant truck volume proportion at the Interstate 405 interchange. Interstate 405 (San Diego Freeway) Interstate 405 bisects the South Bay from the northwest to southeast through Inglewood, Lennox, El Segundo, Hawthorne, Redondo Beach, Lawndale, Torrance, Harbor Gateway, and Carson.
Recommended publications
  • Federal Register/Vol. 79, No. 100/Friday, May 23
    29840 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 100 / Friday, May 23, 2014 / Notices Board decisions and notices are UP’s grant of certain operating rights to DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION available on our Web site at PHL over the Subject Track. Surface Transportation Board ‘‘www.stb.dot.gov.’’ PHL states that the agreement Decided: May 19, 2014. between PHL and UP does not contain [Docket No. FD 35827] By the Board, Rachel D. Campbell, any provision that may limit future Director, Office of Proceedings. interchange of traffic with any third- Union Pacific Railroad Company— Raina S. White, party connecting carrier. Temporary Trackage Rights Exemption—Dallas Area Rapid Transit Clearance Clerk. PHL intends to consummate the [FR Doc. 2014–11988 Filed 5–22–14; 8:45 am] and Fort Worth Transportation proposed transaction 30 days or more Authority BILLING CODE 4915–01–P after the exemption was filed (May 7, 2014), or 60 days or more after filing its Trinity Railway Express (TRE),1 certification with the Board pursuant to pursuant to a written trackage rights DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 49 CFR 1150.42(e). agreement dated May 2, 2014, has agreed to grant Union Pacific Railroad Surface Transportation Board PHL certifies that its projected annual Company (UP) temporary overhead revenues as a result of this transaction [Docket No. FD 35814] trackage rights over approximately 1.4 will not result in the creation of a Class miles of the TRE Rail Corridor in Ft. Pacific Harbor Line, Inc.—Operation II or Class I rail carrier. Because PHL’s Worth, Tex., between milepost 610.5 Exemption—Union Pacific Railroad projected annual revenues will exceed (the T&P Station) and milepost 611.9 Company $5 million, PHL certified to the Board (the 6th Street Junction).
    [Show full text]
  • 2006 C.3 Harbor Subdivision Transit Analysis
    1JiIi~ ENGINEERS ?LAo~NERS •••••• ECONOMISTS ........~ro'" WilburSmith ASSOC, ... TlS Metro ---34937 TF OCT 02 2007 870 .H377 2006 c.3 Harbor Subdivision Transit Analysis Final Report Submitted to: The Los Angeles County Metropolitan Trausportation Authority Prepared by: Wilhur Smith Associates UltraSystems Environmental RAW International December 22, 2006 • Executive Summary HARBOR SUBDIVISION TRANSIT ANALYSIS ANALYSIS BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE In 1992, the former Los Angeles County Transportation Commission (LAcrq purchased the majority of the Harbor Subdivision, the mainline of the former Atchison Topc:ka & Santa Fe Railw:ay (ATSF or Santa Fe) ~tween downtown Los Angeles and the Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach. As part of that agreement, ATSF retained the right to provide freight rail servia on the portion of the line owned by the LAcre, and LAcre retained the right to operate passenger service on the line. Today, the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway (BNSF), the succ('ssor railroad to the ATSF, still operates freight trains on the line, although the total is a small fraction ofwhat it was at Ute time of the purchase. Neither LACfC nor its successor agency, the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro), ran any passenger service on the line. The line studied appears as Figure £5.1 on the following page. With this analysis, Metro has attempted to investigate the feasibility of the potential deployment of various transit modes on its portion of the Harbor Subdivision. The attempt has been to make use of as much of the 26.36-mile right-of-way as may be practical, realizing that some sections of the line run through primarily industrial land uses.
    [Show full text]
  • LA County Goods Movement Strategic Plan    
    Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority LA County Goods Movement Strategic Plan 2020 In Memory In Tribute LA Metro honors the memory and legacy of Connie Rivera, the LA County owes a deep debt of gratitude to the truck drivers, Public Affairs Director for the Alameda Corridor Transportation warehouse workers and all essential members of the logistics Authority, who for many years provided tremendous insight, sector for keeping our homes, businesses and hospitals wisdom, leadership and her trademark great sense of humor supplied with food, medicine and other necessities during in many LA County goods movement forums and discussions. the COVID-19 crisis. Your dedication and bravery ensured our families would be fed and have access to necessary goods at a A product of Southern California, Connie resided in Long critical time in our history. Thank you. Beach, attended local schools and earned her bachelor’s degree from Cal State University, Long Beach. She was passionate about her family and serving her community through the YMCA and Rotary Club. She will be remembered fondly by her many colleagues, especially the Ladies of Logistics, an informal group of women in non-traditional jobs serving the Logistics Industry in Southern California. Connie led with humility and graced Metro as a member of the Freight Working Group – her vision and voice are embedded within the vision, principles and priorities of the LA County Goods Movement Strategic Plan. Metro dedicates this Plan to Connie’s memory and her unwavering belief that through hard work, collaboration and kindness people can come together to lift up and improve the quality of life for all LA County residents, families and communities.
    [Show full text]
  • CPY Document
    July 26, 2006 Honorable Members of the Antonio R. Villaraigosa, Mayor City of Los Angeles City Council of the City of Los Angeles CD No. 15 Board of Harbor Commissioners SUBJECT: EAST 74TH STREET BRIDGE OVER THE ALAMEDA CORRIDOR - EASEMENT DEED AND AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE PORTS OF LOS S. David Freeman President ANGELES AND LONG BEACH, THE ALAMEDA CORRIDOR TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, AND THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES Jerilyn Lopez Mendoza Vice President Pursuant to Section 385 of the City Charter and related implementing Kaylynn L. Kim provisions of the Los Angeles Administrative Code, enclosed for passage by your Honorable Body is an Ordinance, approved as to form by the City Douglas P. Krause Attorney, approving Order No. 6873, which was adopted by the Board of Harbor Commissioners at its meeting held Wednesday, May 17, 2006. Joseph R. Radisich RECOMMENDATION: Geraldine Knatz, Ph.D. The City Council adopt the Ordinance approving Order No. 6873 which Executive Director approves and authorizes the execution of proposed Easement Deed and Agreement (East 74th Street Bridge) (assigned Harbor Agreement No. 2481), by and among the City of Los Angeles acting by and through its Board of Harbor Commissioners, the City of Long Beach acting by and through its Board of Harbor Commissioners, the Alameda Corridor Transportation Authority (ACTA), and the County of Los Angeles (County) therein granting necessary easement rights to the County for public road and highway purposes to construct a new bridge and a new traffic signal over and across the Alameda Corridor at East 74th Street and Alameda 425 S. Palos Verdes Street Street to provide access to the Florence and Alameda Commercial Center.
    [Show full text]
  • Railroad Industry Modal Profile an Outline of the Railroad Industry Workforce Trends, Challenges, and Opportunities
    Railroad Industry Modal Profile An Outline of the Railroad Industry Workforce Trends, Challenges, and Opportunities October 2011 Version: Release_v3.0 DOT/FRA/ORD-11/20 The opinions expressed herein do not necessarily reflect the views, positions, or policies of the U.S. Department of Transportation or the Federal Government. Reference to any specific programs does not constitute official Federal Government endorsement or approval of the programs, the views they express, or the services they offer. TABLE of CONTENTS 1. Overview of the Railroad Industry ....................................................................................... 7 2. Current Railroad Workforce ................................................................................................ 9 2.1 Total Estimated Railroad Workforce ............................................................................11 2.1.1 Class I Freight Railroad Companies .....................................................................12 2.1.2 Class I Passenger Railroad: Amtrak ...................................................................13 2.1.3 Regional and Short Line Railroad Companies......................................................14 2.1.4 Manufacturers and Suppliers ...............................................................................14 2.1.5 Union Representation ..........................................................................................14 2.1.6 Major Associations ...............................................................................................14
    [Show full text]
  • BNSF Harbor Subdivision
    South Bay Cities Railroad Study BNSF Harbor Subdivision Final Report Prepared for: Southern California Association of Governments In Coordination with South Bay Cities Council of Governments The preparation of this report was financed in part through grants from the United States Department of Transportation – Federal Highway Administration and the Federal Transit Administration – under provisions of the Transportation Equity Act of the 21st Century. Additional financial assistance was provided by the California State Department of Transportation. Prepared by: Wilbur Smith Associates Schiermeyer Consulting Services Cheryl Downey February 28, 2002 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary Project Overview .................................................................................................... ES-1 How the Study was done......................................................................................... ES-1 Recommendations................................................................................................... ES-2 Next Steps ............................................................................................................... ES-2 1 Introduction 1.1 Purpose of the Study........................................................................................ 1-1 1.2 Study Process................................................................................................... 1-2 1.3 Agencies Consulted.......................................................................................... 1-3 1.4 Legal Framework
    [Show full text]
  • CPY Document
    December 7, 2005 Antonio R. Villaraigosa, Mayor City of Los Angeles Honorable Members of the Board of Harbor Commissioners City Council of the City of Los Angeles CD No. 15 S. David Freeman President SUBJECT: SECOND AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT NO. 1989 BElWEEN Jerilyn Lopez Mendoza V1ce President THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES AND PACIFIC HARBOR LINES Kaylynn L. Kim Transmitted herewith, pursuant to Section 606 of the City Charter, is a Douglas P. Krause copy of Order No. 6830, which was adopted by the Board of Harbor Commissioners at its meeting held Wednesday, August 31, 2005. Joseph R. Radisich RECOMMENDATION: Bruce E. Seaton The City Council approve Board of Harbor Commissioners Order No. 6830, Interim Executive Director approving and authorizing the Second Amendment to Agreement No. 1989 (assigned Harbor Department Agreement No. 1989-B), between the City of Los Angeles and Pacific Harbor Lines, and return to the Board of Harbor Commissioners for further processing. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: The Director of Environmental Management has determined that the proposed action is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in accordance with Article II, Section 425 S. Palos Verdes Street 2(f) of the Los Angeles City CEQA Guidelines. Financial Impact: Posl Office Box 151 A transfer from the Unappropriated Balance to Account 59965, Center San Pedro, CA 90733-0151 0330, Program 636 (Air Quality), Work Order 79236 for Fiscal Year Budget 2005/2006 will be required in the amount of $4,961,875 to cover the TelffDD 310 SEA-PORT 2005/2006 expenses for the Locomotive Fleet Modernization Program.
    [Show full text]
  • California Rail Fast Facts for 2019 Freight Railroads …
    Freight Railroads in California Rail Fast Facts For 2019 Freight railroads ….............................................................................................................................................................27 Freight railroad mileage …..........................................................................................................................................4,971 Freight rail employees …...............................................................................................................................................8,270 Average wages & benefits per employee …...................................................................................................$123,680 Railroad retirement beneficiaries …......................................................................................................................24,500 Railroad retirement benefits paid ….....................................................................................................................$606 million U.S. Economy: According to a Towson University study, in 2017, America's Class I railroads supported: Sustainability: Railroads are the most fuel efficient way to move freight over land. It would have taken approximately 9.3 million additional trucks to handle the 167.4 million tons of freight that moved by rail in California in 2019. Rail Traffic Originated in 2019 Total Tons: 64.0 million Total Carloads: 3,405,000 Commodity Tons (mil) Carloads Intermodal 43.4 3,141,900 Food Products 5.4 56,300 Chemicals
    [Show full text]
  • 25 29 Transmittal 1
    1 MASTER JOINT REVOCABLE PERMIT NO. 09-18 2 3 4 The City of Los Angeles, a municipal corporation duly organized and existing under its 5 charter and the constitution and laws of the State of California, and the City of Long Beach, a 6 municipal corporation duly organized and existing under its charter and the constitution and laws of 7 the State of California (individually, a "City" and together, the "Cities"), by and through their 8 respective Boards ofHarbor Commissioners, jointly own certain real property located in the County 9 ofLos Angeles. Pursuant to a recommendation adopted by the Board ofHarbor Commissioners of 10 the City of Los Angeles under Resolution No. at its , 20_ meeting, and 11 Resolution No. HD­ 2656 adopted by the Board of Harbor Commissioners ofthe City ofLong 12 Beach at its March 12, 20R meeting, the Cities hereby issue this Master Joint Revocable Permit 13 (the "Permit") and grant permission to Plains West Coast Terminals LLC, a Delaware limited 14 liability company C'Permittee") to operate and maintain various underground structures such as 15 pipes, pipelines, cables, conduits, casings, and similar structures ("Subsurface Facilities") and 16 facilities such as cathodic protection systems, manholes, communication lines, valves, and meters, 17 that are attached to the Subsurface Facilities ("Appurtenant Facilities"), more particularly described 18 on the Schedule ofPermit Areas attached hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit A or subsequent 19 Exhibit A(x), within the various permitted areas as defined under Paragraph 1 below (collectively, 20 the "Permit Areas"). This Permit shall be effective upon last execution by the Executive Directors 21 of the respective Harbor Departments of the Cities (the "Executive Directors").
    [Show full text]
  • The Need for Freight Rail Electrification in Southern California
    The Need for Freight Rail Electrification in Southern California Brian Yanity Californians for Electric Rail [email protected] May 13, 2018 Executive Summary Full electrification of freight trains is the only proven zero-emissions freight railroad technology. Electric rail propulsion can take several different forms, including locomotives powered by overhead catenary wire, on-board batteries, or more advanced concepts such as battery tender cars and linear synchronous motors. This white paper is largely a literature review of previous studies on electric freight rail in the Southern California region, with information compiled about existing electric freight rail locomotives and systems from around the world. The two main benefits of freight rail electrification in the region would be reduced air pollution, and reduced consumption of diesel fuel for transportation. Electrification of freight rail in Southern California would reduce the public health impacts to local communities affected by diesel-powered freight transportation, and reduce greenhouse gas emissions of freight movement. The main challenge for electric freight rail is the high capital costs of electric rail infrastructure, especially the overhead catenary wire over tracks. A variety of options for public and/or private financing of freight rail electrification need to be explored. Electrification of the proposed short-haul rail service between the ports and the Inland Empire, currently under study, is an opportunity for using electric locomotives though the Alameda
    [Show full text]
  • Introducing the New and Improved Metrolinktrains.Com Fare Increase
    June 2007 Introducing the New and Improved Metrolinktrains.com Metrolink is proud to introduce the all-new Metrolinktrains.com, the official Web site of Metrolink. Metrolinktrains.com sports a completely new look and feel, with new content and images and a fresh design that makes the site more user-friendly. The new Web site features a Station Locator and an Interactive System Map. A Featured Items section on the home page highlights new features or current events, while a scrolling headline provides users fast access to important news and commuter updates. Many other functions of the old Web site are now more easily Did You Know? You can now see a daily navigable through the use of quick-links that offer visitors shortcuts to summary of prior-day Metrolink train operations on frequently used areas of the Web site. The new look is designed to make the new Metrolinktrains.com. This new feature, located it easier for visitors to find the information they need about Metrolink’s under the News Updates section of the home page, will list services and programs. trains that were delayed 15 minutes or more on the previous day We hope you’ll take a look at www.metrolinktrains.com. (weekdays only), and will indicate the primary reason for the delay. (continued on page 4) Fare Increase On May 11, Metrolink’s Board of Directors approved a three-year well as input about the operation of our trains. While many of those program of fare increases under which the system-wide average fare will comments have been addressed in an expanded FAQ section on the increase by 3.5 percent each year, effective July 1, 2007; July 1, 2008; metrolinktrains.com website, future issues of Metrolink Matters will and July 1, 2009.
    [Show full text]
  • APPENDIX D SCIG Cultural and Paleontological Reports
    APPENDIX D SCIG Cultural and Paleontological Reports Southern California International Gateway Draft EIR September 2011 Historical, Paleontological, and Archaeological Assessment of the Southern California International Gateway Project Area Phase II – Northern Section of Southern California International Gateway Project Area ADP #041027-199 Prepared for: Los Angeles Harbor Department 425 South Palos Verdes Street San Pedro, CA 90733-0151 Contact: Dennis Hagner 310/732-3949 Prepared by: 811 West 7th Street, Suite 800 Los Angeles, CA 90017 Contact: David Greenwood 213/627-5376 September 2008 Table of Contents Project Overview ................................................................................................................1 Previous Surveys ..........................................................................................................1 Summary of Findings – Phase I ...................................................................................5 Phase II Technical Report .................................................................................................8 Addendum: Northern Portion of California Cartage Warehouse .................................8 Project Description ............................................................................................................8 Historic Setting - Review .............................................................................................9 Site Context ................................................................................................................10
    [Show full text]