Appendix B-1: Freight Rail ______

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Appendix B-1: Freight Rail ______ APPENDIX B-1: FREIGHT RAIL _____________________________________________________________________________________ California occupies an economically strategic lines were once branches from larger main position in our State, the Nation and the world. lines. All modes of freight transportation – trucking, This freight rail network supports the shipping, air cargo, and freight rail – are critical operations of industries throughout the State to this success. Commodities moved by rail tend and links California with domestic and to have a low transportation cost to international markets. weight/volume ratio, which makes them attractive to transport by freight rail lines instead of trucks. In order for California to CLASS I RAILROADS maintain its preeminent position, it is vital that Typically, the distance at which the economics the State’s current freight rail system be become favorable for using a Class I railroad is preserved and maintained. This network must approximately 500 miles. be reliable, accessible, cost-effective, and provide and enhance the mobility of people and goods, yet remain competitive with other Union Pacific (UP) modes. Overall, California’s railroads are stable, Created by the Pacific Railroad Act of 1862 productive, and competitive and they have signed by Abraham Lincoln, UP has evolved as enough business to operate profitably. the largest railroad in the United States. The UP ships a significant volume of intermodal freight, FREIGHT RAIL INVENTORY and is the largest shipper of chemicals in the Freight railroads in California are owned and country. operated by private companies ranging in size In California (2013), UP operates an expansive from the large transcontinental railroads to network of over 3,267 miles of track, has an short line holding companies such as Genesee & annual payroll of $429 million with 4,860 Wyoming Inc. and Omnitrax and small employees, and makes $228.4 million in in-state independent firms such as the Richmond purchases. Terminal Company and the Northwestern UP serves diverse regions including the San Pacific. These railroads are responsible for Joaquin Central Valley, the Port of Oakland and building and maintaining the system on which San Francisco Bay Area, and the Los Angeles they operate. California’s freight railroad metropolitan area. The UP Los Angeles Service system consists of 29 railroads, which are Unit operating from the Ports of Los Angeles categorized into two different classes: and Long Beach is the primary route to the four major gateways of St. Louis, Chicago, Memphis, • Class I railroads generate more than $433.2 and New Orleans. million in annual operating revenues. • Class III railroads referred to as “short line” Carload services include two system railroads; generate less than $34.6 million classification yards at West Colton (Southern in annual operating revenues. California) and Roseville (northern California). Regional yards are located in Lathrop (San BNSF Railway Company (BNSF) and Union Joaquin County), Commerce (Los Angeles Pacific Railroad (UP) are the only Class I County) and Yermo (San Bernardino County). railroads, and there are 27 short line railroads operating in California. Class I railroads are separated into subdivisions, and many short California Freight Mobility Plan Appendix B-1 1 BNSF INTERMODAL RAIL BNSF Railway is North America’s largest Intermodal rail, the long-haul transporting of intermodal carrier. It is the largest grain- shipping containers or truck trailers on railroad hauling railroad in the country and is the flat cars, continues to grow rapidly. According nation’s freight rail leader in intermodal to the American Association of Railroads, (container) volume. “Intermodal allows railroads, ocean carriers, BNSF is the product of mergers and acquisitions trucking companies, and intermodal customers of nearly 400 different railroad lines, including to take advantage of the best attributes of two major railroads (Burlington Northern various transportation modes to yield an Railroad and the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe efficient and cost-effective overall freight Railway), over the course of 160 years. movement…(it) represents a cost-effective, environmentally friendly alternative to In California, BNSF operates over 2,125 miles of excessive reliance on highways to transport track – 1,155 miles of which are owned by BNSF freight.” and 975 miles through trackage rights (rights of one railroad to operate on another’s tracks). The Transcontinental (Transcon) route east ECONOMIC IMPACT from the Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach is Nationwide, each freight rail job supports 4.5 an integral part of the California freight rail jobs elsewhere in the economy. According to network and is their land bridge link to markets United States (US) Department of Commerce in Kansas City, Memphis, and Chicago. economic models, every dollar spent on investments in our freight railroads — tracks, BNSF rail yards include Bakersfield, Barstow, equipment, locomotives, bridges, etc. — yields City of Commerce (Los Angeles), Fresno, $3 in economic output. In addition, each $1 Needles, Richmond, Riverbank, San Bernardino, billion of rail investment creates more than San Diego, Stockton, and Wilmington. 17,000 jobs. Intermodal hub centers are located at Fresno, Richmond, San Bernardino, Stockton, and The Association of American Railroads in 2012 Vernon (Hobart). stated that “the more than 175,000 freight railroad employees are among America’s most CLASS III SHORT LINE RAILROADS highly compensated workers.” They further California is home to 27 active short line stated that in 2011, the average full-time rail railroads throughout the state (see table industry employee earned annual wages and labeled California Short Line Railroads). Some benefits totaling $110,470. have switching functions at the largest seaports Job Opportunities and others serve as shorter line haul functions Freight railroads plan to hire more than 11,000 for Class I railroads in urban and rural areas. people in 2013. According to the Association of Short line railroads play an important role in American Railroads, 23% of railroad workers moving goods to and from California regions will retire making well paying jobs available and local communities. throughout the country by 2015. Abandoned rail lines are an ongoing concern because once track is removed; it is very ENVIRONMENT difficult to restore the lines. The likelihood of One train can carry the same load as 280 trucks freight service is doubtful at best. For further and can move a ton of freight an average of 400 information, see Rail Preservation Programs: A miles on one gallon of fuel. In 2011, 155.6 Survey of National Guidance and State Practice, million tons of freight originated, terminated, or (Caltrans, June 2011) - passed through California by rail. It would have http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/tpp/offices/ogm/tra taken approximately 8.6 million trucks to ins/Rail_Preservation_PI_6-21-11.pdf) handle this freight. 2 California Freight Mobility Appendix B-1 trains per day on each line, Colton Crossing was The California Air Resources Board (ARB) has one of the busiest at-grade rail-to-rail crossings developed and implemented a number of in the nation. Putting the UP tracks above the measures to significantly reduce locomotive BNSF line allows both railroads to use the tracks and railyard emissions in California, including safely and eliminate waits as crossing trains regulations, enforceable agreements, and pass. This project, completed in August 2013, funding of clean technology. Programs include exemplified a successful public-private Rail Emission Reduction, Railyard Health Risk partnership between Caltrans, San Bernardino Assessments and Mitigation Plan, Locomotive Associated Governments, the city of Colton, UP, Technology and Locomotive Incentive Funding, and BNSF Railway. etc. Tehachapi Trade Corridor Rail Improvement KEY FREIGHT RAIL ROUTES Project: This project located in Kern County will A key route for both Class I railroads in improve capacity through the corridor by 70%. California is the Tehachapi Trade Corridor, It involves 15 miles of double tracking, adding 3 which is dispatched by the UP. The Tehachapi main bridges, connecting existing siding and Trade Corridor is a major trade route which signal system improvements to a very rugged connects the State with national markets. segment of rail through the Tehachapi Range. In Northern California, the Martinez Richmond Rail Connector Project: This project Subdivision, Feather River Canyon, and Donner will provide an at-grade rail connection to Pass routes serve the Port of Oakland and Port enhance BNSF’s access to the Port of Oakland. of Stockton, and are owned and dispatched by The project will allow slow-moving intermodal the UP but serve BNSF through trackage right trains to bypass the City of Richmond thus agreements. Donner Pass has replaced the reducing delays and congestion and improving Feather River Canyon route as UP’s primary safety in the local community. The project also intermodal service route eastward. Previously, enhances the Port of Oakland’s competitiveness only 5,000 foot trains could run through the and optimizes the Tehachapi Trade Corridor by rugged canyon route but now 9,000 foot trains providing a faster, more direct route through traverse the Pass, thus optimizing UP’s Northern California. intermodal operation. POSITIVE TRAIN CONTROL TRADE CORRIDOR Positive train control (PTC) is advanced IMPROVEMENT FUND (TCIF) technology designed to automatically
Recommended publications
  • Valley & Spruce Project Initial Study and Mitigated
    VALLEY & SPRUCE PROJECT INITIAL STUDY AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Prepared for: City of Rialto December 2017 VALLEY & SPRUCE PROJECT INITIAL STUDY AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Prepared For: City of Rialto 150 S. Palm Avenue Rialto, CA 92376 Prepared By: Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 401 B Street, Suite 600 San Diego, California 92101 December 2017 095894012 Copyright © 2017 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Initial Study ............................................................................................................................................ 1 II. Description of Proposed Project ........................................................................................................... 2 III. Required Permits ................................................................................................................................... 8 IV. Environmental Factors Potentially Affected ......................................................................................... 9 V. Determination ........................................................................................................................................ 9 VI. Environmental Evaluation .................................................................................................................. 10 1. Aesthetics ................................................................................................................................ 10 2. Agricultural and Forestry Resources .....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Analysis
    SANTA CRUZ BRANCH LINE INTRA-COUNTY RECREATIONAL RAIL OPTIONS Preliminary Analysis Prepared for: Santa Cruz County Regional Transportation Commission Prepared at the direction of: Hyde, Miller, Owen & Trost March 2003 3/23/03 1 Recreational Rail Options – Preliminary Analysis TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION…………………………………………………………….4 A. Purpose of Study………………………………………………………4 B. Summary of Existing U.S. Recreational Rail Operations………………………………………………………..5 C. Potential for Recreational Rail Operations on the Branch Line………………………………………7 II. POTENTIAL OPERATING SCENARIOS…………………………………8 A. Capitola Village – Aptos Village……………………………………..9 B. Santa Cruz – Capitola Village……………………………………….9 C. Santa Cruz – Davenport…………………………………………….10 D. Santa Cruz – Junction of Highway 1 and Highway 9……………..10 III. ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF OPERATING SCENARIOS……………..11 A. Facility Needs and Assumptions……………………………………11 B. Preliminary Economic Forecasts…………………………………...11 1. Capitola Village – Aptos Village……………………………12 Notes to Table 1……………………………………………...13 2. Santa Cruz – Capitola Village………………………………14 3. Santa Cruz – Davenport…………………………………….14 4. Santa Cruz – Junction of Highway 1 and Highway 9……..15 IV. PRELIMINARY CONCLUSIONS…………………………………………16 3/23/03 2 Recreational Rail Options – Preliminary Analysis LIST OF TABLES TABLE 1. Economic Forecast – Capitola Village to Aptos Village Service………….12 TABLE 2. Economic Forecast – Santa Cruz to Capitola Village Service…………….14 TABLE 3. Economic Forecast – Santa Cruz to Junction of Highway 1 and Highway 9……………………………...….15 3/23/03 3 Recreational Rail Options – Preliminary Analysis I. INTRODUCTION A. Purpose of Study In 2000, the Santa Cruz County Regional Transportation Commission (“Commission”) established itself as the Rail/Trail Authority for the purpose of acquiring and overseeing the future development of, and operations on, the Santa Cruz Branch Line (“Branch Line”).
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 California Rail Adventure Tour
    LINEUP Official Newsletter Of Motorcar Operators West 2015 California Rail Adventure Tour Napa Valley Railroad Western Rail Museum Amador Central Railroad Ardenwood South Pacific Coast Railroad Niles Canyon Railroad Santa Cruz and Monterey Bay Railroad Santa Cruz Big Trees and Pacific Railroad Volume 23, No. 1 Summer 2015 1 Motorcar Operators West Board of Directors Officers and Members Motorcar Operators West Documents Dave Balestreri President Bruce Hilliard 2320 E Street 19 Pebble Court Available at www.mowonline.org Sacramento, CA 95816 Sacramento, CA 95831 H (916) 444-6374 [email protected] C (916) 531-7536 MOW Webmaster [email protected] Karl Hovanitz www.mowonline.org 2110 S Halcyon Road Jamie Foster Jim Culbertson Vice President Arroyo Grande, CA 93420 [email protected] PO Box 221 (805) 481-7353 Courtland, CA 95615 [email protected] NARCOA Rule Book Certification Test H (916) 775-1894 Al McCracken C (209) 483-0903 Lynne Maddy 2916 Taper Avenue Email: [email protected] 1220 16th Street Santa Clara, CA 95051 Los Osos, CA 93402 (408)249-3120 Robert Courtemanche Secretary H (805) 528-5560 [email protected] 5760 Lynx Trail C (805) 704-0607 Pollock Pines, CA 95726 [email protected] Membership Committee Coordinator 530-644-6710 Harry Fisher C530-417-6784 John Martin 28819 Shadow Valley Lane 1360 J Street Santa Clarita, CA 91390 Glen Ford Treasurer Wasco, CA 93280 H (661) 296-0636 PO Box 129 (661) 331-7916 C (661) 733-3084 Rough and Ready, CA 95975 [email protected] Email: [email protected] H (530) 432-5487 C (530) 913-2386 Mike Mitchell Line Up Editor [email protected] PO Box 245 Dan Berg, Editor Guinda, CA 93021 2017 Mule Creek Road Alan Borchardt H (530) 796-2350 Las Vegas, NV 89134 2452 Travis Court C (707) 421-6333 (702) 341-8617 McKinleyville, CA 95519 [email protected] [email protected] H (707) 839-0636 C (707) 601-4335 Dan Berg LINE UP [email protected] Excursion Committee Chairman Volume 23 Number 1 2017 Mule Creek Road Summer 2015 John Haverty Las Vegas, NV 89134 Motorcar Operators West, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix A.13 Public Outreach and Stakeholder Involvement (PDF)
    2018 California State Rail Plan Appendices Appendix A.13 Public Outreach and Stakeholder Involvement Details Freight Meetings Date Freight Railroad Type of Outreach 2/4/2016 California Freight Advisory Committee In-person meeting 5/5/2016 Santa Maria Railroad In-person Interview 5/6/2016 Pacific Harbor Lines In-person Interview 5/11/2016 Pacific Sun Railroad Phone Interview 5/19/2016 Central California Traction Phone Interview 5/24/2016 Northwestern Pacific Phone Interview 5/25/2016 Richmond Pacific Phone Interview 5/27/2016 Modesto & Empire Traction Phone Interview 6/8/2016 Sierra Northern In-person Interview 6/8/2016 Sacramento Valley Railroad In-person Interview 11/9/2016 BNSF In-person briefing 8/17/2016 CA Short Line Railroad Association In-person briefing 9/12/2016 California Freight Advisory Committee In-person meeting 11/10/2016 CA Short Line Railroad Association In-person briefing 11/14/2016 Union Pacific In-person briefing A-80 2018 California State Rail Plan Appendices Network Integration Strategic Service Planning (NI SSP) Agency Meetings Date Agency Type of Outreach 6/27/2016 Transportation Agency for Monterey County In-person meetings 6/27/2016 San Luis Obispo Council of Governments In-person meetings 6/27/2016 Santa Cruz County Regional Transportation Commission In-person meetings 6/27/2016 San Benito Council of Governments In-person meetings 6/28/2016 Caltrain In-person meetings 6/28/2016 Metropolitan Transportation Commission In-person meetings 7/6/2016 Southern California High Speed Rail Authority In-person meetings
    [Show full text]
  • California State Rail Plan 2005-06 to 2015-16
    California State Rail Plan 2005-06 to 2015-16 December 2005 California Department of Transportation ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, Governor SUNNE WRIGHT McPEAK, Secretary Business, Transportation and Housing Agency WILL KEMPTON, Director California Department of Transportation JOSEPH TAVAGLIONE, Chair STATE OF CALIFORNIA ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER JEREMIAH F. HALLISEY, Vice Chair GOVERNOR BOB BALGENORTH MARIAN BERGESON JOHN CHALKER JAMES C. GHIELMETTI ALLEN M. LAWRENCE R. K. LINDSEY ESTEBAN E. TORRES SENATOR TOM TORLAKSON, Ex Officio ASSEMBLYMEMBER JENNY OROPEZA, Ex Officio JOHN BARNA, Executive Director CALIFORNIA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION 1120 N STREET, MS-52 P. 0 . BOX 942873 SACRAMENTO, 94273-0001 FAX(916)653-2134 (916) 654-4245 http://www.catc.ca.gov December 29, 2005 Honorable Alan Lowenthal, Chairman Senate Transportation and Housing Committee State Capitol, Room 2209 Sacramento, CA 95814 Honorable Jenny Oropeza, Chair Assembly Transportation Committee 1020 N Street, Room 112 Sacramento, CA 95814 Dear: Senator Lowenthal Assembly Member Oropeza: On behalf of the California Transportation Commission, I am transmitting to the Legislature the 10-year California State Rail Plan for FY 2005-06 through FY 2015-16 by the Department of Transportation (Caltrans) with the Commission's resolution (#G-05-11) giving advice and consent, as required by Section 14036 of the Government Code. The ten-year plan provides Caltrans' vision for intercity rail service. Caltrans'l0-year plan goals are to provide intercity rail as an alternative mode of transportation, promote congestion relief, improve air quality, better fuel efficiency, and improved land use practices. This year's Plan includes: standards for meeting those goals; sets priorities for increased revenues, increased capacity, reduced running times; and cost effectiveness.
    [Show full text]
  • MCO Arrival Wayfnding Map
    MCO Arrival Wayfnding Map N SIDE Gates 1-29 Level 1 Gates 100-129 Ground Transportation & Baggage Claim (8A) Level 2 Baggage Claim Gates 10-19 Gates Ticketing Locations 20-29 Gates 100-111 A-1 A-2 Level 3 A-3 A-4 2 1 Gates Gates 1-9 112-129 Hyatt Regency - Lvl.4 - Lvl.4 Regency Hyatt Security Checkpoint To Gates 70 - 129 70 Gates To Food Court To Gates 1-59 1-59 Gates To Security Checkpoint Gates 70-79 Gates 50-59 To Parking “C” Gates 3 90-99 4 B-1 B-2 Level 3 B-3 B-4 Gates Gates 30-39 Ticketing Locations Gates 80-89 40-49 Gates 70-99 Level 2 Gates 30-59 Baggage Claim Level 1 Ground Transportation & Baggage Claim (28B) SIDE C Check-in and baggage claim locations subject to change. Please check signage on arrival. *Map not to scale Find it ALL in One Place Welcome to Orlando Download the Orlando MCO App Available for International Airport (MCO) OrlandoAirports.net /flymco @MCO @flymco Flight Arrival Guide 03/18 To reach the Main Terminal, The journey to the To retrieve checked baggage, take follow directions on the overhead Main Terminal (A-Side or B-Side) the stairs, escalator or elevator down signage to the shuttle station 2 takes just over one minute. As the 4 6 to the Arrivals/Baggage Claim on which is located in the center train transports you, observe the Level 2. Check the monitors to of the Airside Terminal. signage and listen to the instructions determine the correct carousel directing you to either Baggage Claim A for your flight.
    [Show full text]
  • Genesee & Wyoming Inc. 2016 Annual Report
    Genesee & Wyoming Inc. 2016 Annual Report Genesee & Wyoming Inc.*owns or leases 122 freight railroads worldwide that are organized into 10 operating regions with approximately 7,300 employees and 3,000 customers. * The terms “Genesee & Wyoming,” “G&W,” “the company,” “we,” “our,” and “us” refer collectively to Genesee & Wyoming Inc. and its subsidiaries and affiliated companies. Financial Highlights Years Ended December 31 (In thousands, except per share amounts) 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Statement of Operations Data Operating revenues $874,916 $1,568,643 $1,639,012 $2,000,401 $2,001,527 Operating income 190,322 380,188 421,571 384,261 289,612 Net income 52,433 271,296 261,006 225,037 141,096 Net income attributable to Genesee & Wyoming Inc. 48,058 269,157 260,755 225,037 141,137 Diluted earnings per common share attributable to Genesee & Wyoming Inc. common stockholders: Diluted earnings per common share (EPS) $1.02 $4.79 $4.58 $3.89 $2.42 Weighted average shares - Diluted 51,316 56,679 56,972 57,848 58,256 Balance Sheet Data as of Period End Total assets $5,226,115 $5,319,821 $5,595,753 $6,703,082 $7,634,958 Total debt 1,858,135 1,624,712 1,615,449 2,281,751 2,359,453 Total equity 1,500,462 2,149,070 2,357,980 2,519,461 3,187,121 Operating Revenues Operating Income Net Income Diluted Earnings ($ In Millions) ($ In Millions) ($ In Millions) 421.61,2 Per Common Share 2 2,001.5 401.6 1 $2,000 2,000.4 $400 394.12 $275 271.3 $5.00 1 2 4.79 1 374.3 1 380.21 384.3 261.0 4.581 1,800 250 4.50 350 1,639.0 225.01 225 2 1 1,600 233.5 4.00 2 3.89 1,568.6 4.10 2 300 2 200 213.9 213.3 2 3.78 2 1,400 1 3.50 3.69 289.6 183.32 3.142 250 175 1,200 3.00 211.
    [Show full text]
  • GOOGLE LLC V. ORACLE AMERICA, INC
    (Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2020 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co., 200 U. S. 321, 337. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Syllabus GOOGLE LLC v. ORACLE AMERICA, INC. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT No. 18–956. Argued October 7, 2020—Decided April 5, 2021 Oracle America, Inc., owns a copyright in Java SE, a computer platform that uses the popular Java computer programming language. In 2005, Google acquired Android and sought to build a new software platform for mobile devices. To allow the millions of programmers familiar with the Java programming language to work with its new Android plat- form, Google copied roughly 11,500 lines of code from the Java SE pro- gram. The copied lines are part of a tool called an Application Pro- gramming Interface (API). An API allows programmers to call upon prewritten computing tasks for use in their own programs. Over the course of protracted litigation, the lower courts have considered (1) whether Java SE’s owner could copyright the copied lines from the API, and (2) if so, whether Google’s copying constituted a permissible “fair use” of that material freeing Google from copyright liability. In the proceedings below, the Federal Circuit held that the copied lines are copyrightable.
    [Show full text]
  • Quarterly Rail Cost Adjustment Factor 70% Ownership Interest in Transrail 2 on February 3, 2012, in Docket No
    Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 57 / Friday, March 23, 2012 / Notices 17121 Issued in Washington, DC, on March 20, The MG Principals will retain the Class RailAmerica et al. states that: (1) W&C 2012. B Common Units of TransRail, thereby does not connect with any of Jeffrey D. Wiese, retaining a 30% interest in TransRail, RailAmerica’s subsidiary railroads; (2) Associate Administrator for Pipeline Safety. though they will not retain control or the proposed transaction is not part of [FR Doc. 2012–7080 Filed 3–22–12; 8:45 am] the power to control W&C. a series of anticipated transactions to BILLING CODE 4910–60–P Fortress’ noncarrier affiliate, RR connect W&C and any of RailAmerica’s Acquisition, currently owns about 60% subsidiary railroads; and (3) the of the publicly traded shares and proposed transaction does not involve a DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION controls the noncarrier RailAmerica, Class I rail carrier. The proposed which directly controls the noncarrier transaction is therefore exempt from the Surface Transportation Board Palm Beach, which directly controls the prior approval requirements of 49 U.S.C. [Docket No. FD 35605] noncarrier RTC. 11323 pursuant to 49 CFR 1180.2(d)(2). RailAmerica states that it controls the Under 49 U.S.C. 10502(g), the Board RailAmerica, Inc., Palm Beach Rail following Class III rail carriers: (1) may not use its exemption authority to Holding, Inc., RailAmerica Alabama & Gulf Coast Railway LLC; (2) relieve a rail carrier of its statutory Transportation Corp., RailTex, Inc., Arizona & California Railroad Company; obligation to protect the interests of its Fortress Investment Group, LLC, and (3) Bauxite & Northern Railway employees.
    [Show full text]
  • Of 6 GRADE SEPARATION PROGRAM TITLE 21
    I.05-07-016 CPSD/RWC/DAR/RXM APPENDIX 1 - California Administrative Code, Title 21, Division 2, Chapter 13, Grade Separation Projects Page 1 of 6 GRADE SEPARATION PROGRAM TITLE 21. Public Works Division 2. Department of Transportation Chapter 13. Grade Separation Projects -- Applications for Allocation or Supplemental Allocations (Register 82, No. 34, filed 8-21-82) Article 1. Applications §1552. Last Date to File. April 1 of each fiscal year is the last day on which applications for allocation of grade separation funds in that fiscal year can be filed; provided, however, if April 1 is a Saturday, Sunday or a State of California holiday, then the last date of filing shall be the next business day following April 1. Filing is accomplished by filing the application with the Department of Transportation in the manner hereafter stated. §1553. Place to File. The complete application in triplicate must be received in the Office of the District Director of Transportation, State of California, in the transportation district in which the applicant is located, no later than 4:00 p.m. on the last day for filing. §1554. Contents of Application. The complete application must include a written request for an allocation in a specified monetary amount along with copies of each of the following attached to it: (a) All necessary orders of the Public Utilities Commission of the State of California. Necessary orders of the Public Utilities Commission include: (1) An order authorizing construction of the project; I.05-07-016 CPSD/RWC/DAR/RXM APPENDIX 1 - California Administrative Code, Title 21, Division 2, Chapter 13, Grade Separation Projects Page 2 of 6 (2) A statement of the applicant's position on the annual priority list established by the Public Utilities Commission pursuant to Streets & Highways Code Section 2452.
    [Show full text]
  • 016 Adopt Res 20-03 Approve NCTD PTASP[Icon]
    ATTACHMENT 16A RESOLUTION NO. 20-03 RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE NORTH COUNTY TRANSIT DISTRICT APPROVING THE PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION AGENCY SAFETY PLAN (PTASP) WHEREAS, the North County Transit District (“NCTD”) has safety as a core value of the agency; and WHEREAS, Title 49, Subtitle B, Chapter VI, Part 673 – Public Transportation Agency Safety Plan (“PTASP”) requires that an agency PTASP must be approved by its governing Board; and WHEREAS, Title 49, Subtitle B, Chapter VI, Part 674 – State Safety Oversight, requires the California Public Utilities Commission (“CPUC”), which is the State Safety Oversight Agency, ensure the transit agency has a PTASP compliant with 49 CFR Part 673 that has been approved by the governing Board; and WHEREAS, NCTD’s PTASP sets forth a sufficiently explicit process for safety risk management, with adequate means of risk mitigation for the rail fixed guideway public transportation system; which: • includes a process and timeline for annually reviewing and updating the safety plan; • includes a comprehensive staff training program for the operations personnel directly responsible for the safety of NCTD; • identifies an adequately trained safety officer who reports directly to the general manager, president, or equivalent officer of the Rail Transit Agency (RTA); • includes adequate methods to support the execution of the Public Transportation Agency Safety Plan by all employees, agents, and contractors for the rail fixed guideway public transportation system; and • sufficiently addresses other requirements under the regulations 49 CFR Part 673. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Directors of the North County Transit District hereby approves the NCTD Public Transportation Agency Safety Plan (“PTASP”) as set forth in full in Exhibit A to this Resolution.
    [Show full text]
  • AQ Conformity Amended PBA 2040 Supplemental Report Mar.2018
    TRANSPORTATION-AIR QUALITY CONFORMITY ANALYSIS FINAL SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT Metropolitan Transportation Commission Association of Bay Area Governments MARCH 2018 Metropolitan Transportation Commission Jake Mackenzie, Chair Dorene M. Giacopini Julie Pierce Sonoma County and Cities U.S. Department of Transportation Association of Bay Area Governments Scott Haggerty, Vice Chair Federal D. Glover Alameda County Contra Costa County Bijan Sartipi California State Alicia C. Aguirre Anne W. Halsted Transportation Agency Cities of San Mateo County San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission Libby Schaaf Tom Azumbrado Oakland Mayor’s Appointee U.S. Department of Housing Nick Josefowitz and Urban Development San Francisco Mayor’s Appointee Warren Slocum San Mateo County Jeannie Bruins Jane Kim Cities of Santa Clara County City and County of San Francisco James P. Spering Solano County and Cities Damon Connolly Sam Liccardo Marin County and Cities San Jose Mayor’s Appointee Amy R. Worth Cities of Contra Costa County Dave Cortese Alfredo Pedroza Santa Clara County Napa County and Cities Carol Dutra-Vernaci Cities of Alameda County Association of Bay Area Governments Supervisor David Rabbit Supervisor David Cortese Councilmember Pradeep Gupta ABAG President Santa Clara City of South San Francisco / County of Sonoma San Mateo Supervisor Erin Hannigan Mayor Greg Scharff Solano Mayor Liz Gibbons ABAG Vice President City of Campbell / Santa Clara City of Palo Alto Representatives From Mayor Len Augustine Cities in Each County City of Vacaville
    [Show full text]