I. Applicant Clackamas, Multnomah, and Washington Counties

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

I. Applicant Clackamas, Multnomah, and Washington Counties FY19-FY21 Regional Coordination Program STIF FUNDING APPLICATION I. Applicant Clackamas, Multnomah, and Washington Counties and government operated transit providers are eligible to receive RCP funds and are therefore Grant Recipients. Other local government authorities, non-profit organizations, and private for-profit organizations are not directly eligible. However, such entities may be a Co-Applicant in an application. 1. Grant Recipient Name of Grant Recipient: Clackamas County Contact Person: Teresa Christopherson Address: 2051 Kaen Rd., Oregon City, OR 97045 Telephone: 503-650-5718 E-Mail: [email protected] 2. Type of Grant Recipient (check one) Clackamas County X Multnomah County Washington County Government Operated Transit Provider 3. Co-Applicant (if different than Grant Recipient) Name of Co-Applicant: Contact Person: Address: Telephone: E-Mail: Regional Coordination Program Page 1 Regional Coordination Program FY19-21 Application II. Project Details RCP eligible projects must appear in a Local Plan (see STIF Rules OARs 732-042-0015) and intend to improve or expand public transportation or maintain public transportation. 1. Project Details Project Title: Tualatin/West Linn/Oregon City Commuter Shuttle Start Date: January 1, 2019 End Date: Ongoing (application to 6/30/21) 2. Project Purpose (check one) Improve or Expand Public Transportation: X Maintain Public Transportation: 3. Local Plan Plan Name: TriMet Southwest Service Enhancement Plan Governing Body That TriMet Board of Directors Adopted Plan: Plan Adoption Date: December, 2015 Plan Web Address: https://trimet.org/future/ Plan Page Number P. 9, 13 Referencing Project: III. Funding Eligible use of STIF funds for the RCP may include planning, capital, and ongoing operations within the TriMet District. Eligible projects must target either last mile shuttles within TriMet’s district and/or services that reduce fragmentation between TriMet and communities outside TriMet’s service district, but inside Clackamas, Multnomah and Washington Counties. 1. Funding Proposal Dollar Amount Percent in TriMet District Total RCP Funding Request: $546,821 100% Total Project Cost $546,821 100% Regional Coordination Program Page 2 Regional Coordination Program FY19-21 Application 2. RCP Funding Request by Fiscal Year: Fiscal Year Planning Funding Capital Funding Operations Funding Request Request Request FY 2019 $22,000 $0 $0 FY 2020 $38,000 $231,000 $0 FY 2021 $0 $0 $285,821 Total $60,000 $231,000 $285,821 3. Total Estimated Project Cost by Fiscal Year: Fiscal Year Total Planning Cost Total Capital Cost Total Operating Cost FY 2019 $22,000 $0 $0 FY 2020 $38,000 $231,000 $0 FY 2021 $0 $0 $285,821 Total $60,000 $231,000 $285,821 4. Indicate the amount of other funds leveraged to support the total transportation program: Source of Funds Dollar Amount Percent of Total Project Cost Other Funds (specify): $ % Other Funds (specify): $ % Other Funds (specify): $ % Other Funds (specify): $ % Other Funds (specify): $ % 5. Please provide a cost estimate of your project as a separate, single page, letter sized attachment. IV. Project Projects should emphasize STIF criteria and Oregon Public Transportation Plan Goals where applicable. See Section 732-042-0020 of the Approved STIF Rules that specify the STIF criteria and the Oregon Public Transportation Plan Chapter 3 that specify Goals. Regional Coordination Program Page 3 Regional Coordination Program FY19-21 Application 1. Describe planning, capital, or operating investments to be provided by RCP funding. (Limit 200 words) Clackamas County in partnership with the City of Oregon City, the City of West Linn and the City of Tualatin propose to implement a commuter shuttle to provide enhanced transit access throughout the community, particularly for transit dependent and low income populations. The service would connect industrial and retail jobs in Bridgeport Village and downtown Tualatin with low income residents in Tualatin, West Linn and Oregon City. In addition, as Oregon City jobs increase, it will provide commuter access for Tualatin residents. Current bus service routes commuters through the Lake Oswego area. A direct link would reduce commute time and provide an essential link to entry level work opportunities. The project will begin with planning, including a public outreach component, to finalize routes and times to maximize the value of the shuttle service. Routes will be coordinated with TriMet as well as with other transit services that connect within Oregon City, such as South Clackamas Transit District, Clackamas Community College and Canby Area Transit. The initial phase will also include the purchase of three cutaway buses (includes a backup vehicle). Service will be implemented by July, 2020. 2. Please describe the geographic boundaries of your project area such as streets, rivers or jurisdictional boundaries. Please provide a map of your service area as a separate, single page, letter sized attachment. The proposed service, as outlined in the Southwest Service Enhancement Plan Vision for Future Service as proposed by TriMet (attached), would include a route from destinations in West Linn and Oregon City that would travel along I-205 and Borland Road connecting to stops in Bridgeport Village and downtown Tualatin. 3. How does the Project improve last mile connections within the TriMet District and/or reduce fragmentation between TriMet and communities outside TriMet’s service district, but inside Clackamas, Multnomah and Washington Counties without duplicating existing transportation service? Describe improvements to connectivity using the service map below as a reference. (Limit 200 words) Regional Coordination Program Page 4 Regional Coordination Program FY19-21 Application The commuter shuttle will provide connections between the communities of Oregon City, West Linn and Tualatin to enhance access to work and education opportunities. With the implementation of the Oregon City shuttle, low income wage earners will have improved access to transit services and the commuter shuttle will be closely coordinated with that service, as well as public transit services offered by the Tualatin Shuttle, Clackamas Community College, Canby Area Transit and South Clackamas Transportation District to facilitate transfers and increase coordination between services. The service provides a direct link between the communities that is not duplicative of existing transit service. Improved commute times and coordination of transit access improvements will provide better service, particularly to transit dependent individuals. 4. How does the Project improve access to jobs and essential services for low- income and minority populations? Use the map below of high equity needs that Regional Coordination Program Page 5 Regional Coordination Program FY19-21 Application was approved by the TriMet HB2017 Transit Advisory Committee. (Limit 200 words) Oregon City and Tualatin are both identified as Equity Neighborhoods by TriMet with a 10 factor analysis including elements such as income, demographics, affordable housing and limited vehicle access. Based on the 2016 American Community Survey, 25% of Oregon City residents have household incomes at 200% of the Federal poverty rate or below. 19.6% of residents identify themselves as disabled and 11.2% are over the age of 65. The Oregon City School District reports that 23% of students identify themselves as non-white. In Tualatin, 10.9% of individuals have incomes below the poverty level and 4.8% in West Linn. Enhanced commuter service between all three communities would provide increased opportunities for employment access and access to other essential services. For example, 23,686 jobs in Tualatin are filled by commuters who don’t reside in the city. 11,686 individuals live in Tualatin but work outside of the city. This clearly demonstrates the commute patterns. Regional Coordination Program Page 6 Regional Coordination Program FY19-21 Application 5. Describe local support for the Project and, where applicable, regional coordination. (Limit 200 words) The City of Oregon City, the City of West Linn, the City of Tualatin, and Clackamas County are supportive of this project and find it will be helpful to both residents of their communities and employers. The project will enhance opportunities for Regional Coordination Program Page 7 Regional Coordination Program FY19-21 Application employment for low income residents in all three communities. It will also improve access to essential services such Willamette Falls Hospital and Clackamas Community College. The service will also improve regional coordination through connections to other public transit service providers providing service to Molalla, Canby, Woodburn, and Wilsonville. The attached letters of support from the City of Oregon City, the City of West Linn and the City of Tualatin demonstrate the commitment to provide improved transit access for their communities. 6. Describe how you measure cost-effectiveness and how this project improves the cost-effectiveness of transportation services in Clackamas, Multnomah, or Washington Counties within the TriMet District. (Limit 200 words) Commuter shuttles represent a cost effective alternative to providing enhanced public transportation service in the TriMet service district. The average cost of a revenue/vehicle hour of fixed route service for TriMet is $92.79 (FY16). The cost of a revenue hour of service for the commuter shuttle model is approximately $71.50, for a savings of $21.29 per hour. The
Recommended publications
  • City of Wilsonville Transit Master Plan
    City of Wilsonville Transit Master Plan CONVENIENCE SAFETY RELIABILITY EFFICIENCY FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY FRIENDLY SERVICE EQUITY & ACCESS ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSIBILITY JUNE 2017 Acknowledgements The City of Wilsonville would like to acknowledge the following for their dedication to the development of this Transit Master Plan. Their insight and outlook toward the future of this City helped create a comprehensive plan that represents the needs of employers, residents and visitors of Wilsonville. Transit Master Plan Task Force Planning Commission Julie Fitzgerald, Chair* Jerry Greenfield, Chair Kristin Akervall Eric Postma, Vice Chair Caroline Berry Al Levit Paul Diller Phyllis Millan Lynnda Hale Peter Hurley Barb Leisy Simon Springall Peter Rapley Kamran Mesbah Pat Rehberg Jean Tsokos City Staff Stephanie Yager Dwight Brashear, Transit Director Eric Loomis, Operations Manager City Council Scott Simonton, Fleet Manager Tim Knapp, Mayor Gregg Johansen, Transit Field Supervisor Scott Star, President Patrick Edwards, Transit Field Supervisor Kristin Akervall Nicole Hendrix, Transit Management Analyst Charlotte Lehan Michelle Marston, Transit Program Coordinator Susie Stevens Brad Dillingham, Transit Planning Intern Julie Fitzgerald* Chris Neamtzu, Planning Director Charlie Tso, Assistant Planner Consultants Susan Cole, Finance Director Jarrett Walker Keith Katko, Finance Operations Manager Michelle Poyourow Tami Bergeron, Planning Administration Assistant Christian L Watchie Amanda Guile-Hinman, Assistant City Attorney Ellen Teninty Stephan Lashbrook,
    [Show full text]
  • Canby Transit Choices Report DECEMBER 14, 2016
    Canby Transit Choices Report DECEMBER 14, 2016 For Canby Area Transit Table of Contents Summary . 4 Productivity . 28 Introduction Current Costs and Revenues . 29 The Variety of Transit Services in Canby . 6 Near Future . 30 Fixed-Route Transit . 6 Highway 99 corridor study . 30 Demand Responsive Transit . 8 Federal transit funding . 30 What causes transit ridership? . 10 Increasing hourly costs . 30 Transit’s conflicting goals . 12 Existing Ridership and Performance Choices for Canby . 13 Route 99 . 32 Market and Needs Assessment Dial-a-ride and ADA paratransit . 33 Density of Residents and Jobs . .15 . Operations Contract . 38 Low-Income Residents . .15 . Service Standards . 38 Younger and Older Residents . 15. Language . 39 Residents by Race/Ethnicity . 15 . Weekends . 39 Commuting Patterns . 23 Complexity . .41 History and Trends Future Alternatives Recent History . 25 Focus on Key Choices . 43 Amount of service provided . 26 Dial-a-ride and ADA Paratransit Efficiency . 43 Ridership . 27 Alternative 1: Local Fixed Route . 45 JARRETT WALKER + ASSOCIATES Table of Contents Local circulator . 45 Dial-a-ride and ADA paratransit . 46 Route 99 . 46 Alternative 2: More Route 99 Service . 47 Route 99 . 47 Dial-a-ride and ADA paratransit . 47 Weekend Service . 52 Measuring Impacts to Key Populations . 52 JARRETT WALKER + ASSOCIATES Canby’s answer to the first question were Following the release of this report, CAT Summary “Yes, we should slightly shift our invest- staff and consultants will be attending This report is the first step in the develop- ment toward fixed routes.” These two meetings, making presentations, distribut- ment of a new Transit Master Plan for the Alternatives show how much service of ing surveys, and taking input in other ways, City of Canby .
    [Show full text]
  • WSK Commuter Rail Study
    Oregon Department of Transportation – Rail Division Oregon Rail Study Appendix I Wilsonville to Salem Commuter Rail Assessment Prepared by: Parsons Brinckerhoff Team Parsons Brinckerhoff Simpson Consulting Sorin Garber Consulting Group Tangent Services Wilbur Smith and Associates April 2010 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.......................................................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................... 3 WHAT IS COMMUTER RAIL? ................................................................................................... 3 GLOSSARY OF TERMS............................................................................................................ 3 STUDY AREA....................................................................................................................... 4 WES COMMUTER RAIL.......................................................................................................... 6 OTHER PASSENGER RAIL SERVICES IN THE CORRIDOR .................................................................. 6 OUTREACH WITH RAILROADS: PNWR AND BNSF .................................................................. 7 PORTLAND & WESTERN RAILROAD........................................................................................... 7 BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY ..................................................................................................... 7 ROUTE CHARACTERISTICS..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Coordinated Transportation Plan for Seniors and Persons with Disabilities I Table of Contents June 2020
    Table of Contents June 2020 Table of Contents 1. Introduction .................................................................................................... 1-1 Development of the CTP .......................................................................................................... 1-3 Principles of the CTP ................................................................................................................ 1-5 Overview of relevant grant programs ..................................................................................... 1-7 TriMet Role as the Special Transportation Fund Agency ........................................................ 1-8 Other State Funding ................................................................................................................. 1-9 Coordination with Metro and Joint Policy Advisory Committee (JPACT) .............................. 1-11 2. Existing Transportation Services ...................................................................... 2-1 Regional Transit Service Providers .......................................................................................... 2-6 Community-Based Transit Providers ..................................................................................... 2-18 Statewide Transit Providers ................................................................................................... 2-26 3. Service Guidelines ........................................................................................... 3-1 History .....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Outreach Summary P a G E | 1 August 2020 REFERENCE B
    REFERENCE B Outreach #1 Summary Table of Contents Introduction..................................................................................................................................................1 Listening Sessions ........................................................................................................................................2 Online Survey................................................................................................................................................2 Key Findings..................................................................................................................................................3 Survey Questions and Summary ..................................................................................................................3 Demographics.............................................................................................................................................29 Appendix A..................................................................................................................................................39 Appendix B................................................................................................................................................136 Appendix C................................................................................................................................................139 Introduction The following report provides an overview of the results of the listening sessions and
    [Show full text]
  • PARSONS PHARMACY REDEVELOPMENT 294 NW 2Nd Avenue, Canby, OR 97013
    FOR SALE PARSONS PHARMACY REDEVELOPMENT 294 NW 2nd Avenue, Canby, OR 97013 RYAN IMBRIE | MANAGING DIRECTOR [email protected] O: 503.28.9403 | M: 503.705.7352 All SVN® Offices Independently Owned and Operated www.svnimbrie.com The information listed above has been obtained from sources we believe to be reliable, however, we accept no Lincoln Tower - 10260 SW Greenburg Road, Suite 530, Portland, OR 97223 responsibility for its correctness. 503.208.9400 ABOUT THE CITY OF CANBY | PARSONS PHARMACY | RETAIL REDEVELOPMENT | CANBY, OREGON 17,365 Canby, Oregon is a growing city with a population of just over 17,000 and total area of 3.78 miles. It is located 25 miles south of Portland in the Willamette Valley, surrounded by some of the best soils in the state. The Population (2016) community is easily accessible in the region via Interstate 5, Highway 99E and I-205 nearby. The area boasts an enviable banana belt climate in the Portland Metropolitan region with warm and dry summers, mild winters and long growing season. Its warm-summer Mediterranean climate ranges from an average high temperature of 73 to average low temperature of 43 degrees. It rains about $355,000 41 inches per year, and snows about 6 inches per year. Since 2002, the city has operated its own bus system, Canby Area Transit Median Home Value (CAT). The service connects with the Portland area's TriMet at the Oregon City Transit Center and with the Salem-Keizer Transit (Cherriots) bus system in Woodburn. Canby is also served by one route of South Metro Area Regional Transit (SMART), the bus division of the City of Wilsonville.
    [Show full text]
  • Needs Identification
    REFERENCE F NEEDS IDENTIFICATION AUGUST 14, 2020 1 | Clackamas County Transit Development Plan REFERENCE F Date August 14, 2020 To Karen Buehrig, Brett Setterfield, Teresa Christopherson, Ellen Rogalin, & Kristina Babcock, Clackamas County Hector Rodriguez-Ruiz, Oregon Department of Transportation From Susan Wright, Krista Purser, Paul Ryus, and Russ Doubleday Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Project Clackamas County Transit Development Plan Subject Needs Identification Memo (Subtask 3.2) 2 | Clackamas County Transit Development Plan REFERENCE F NEEDS IDENTIFICATION This memorandum inventories the existing performance, transit markets, and identified needs for transit in Clackamas County. The purpose of this memorandum is to summarize the performance and needs of the system as a foundation for future service opportunities. This information will help guide development of the Clackamas County Transit Development Plan (TDP). Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................... 3 Project Purpose ........................................................................................................................................... 6 Overview ...................................................................................................................................................... 6 Existing Transit Performance ...................................................................................................................... 6 Gaps
    [Show full text]
  • TRANSPORTATION RESOURCES NW Oregon & SW Washington
    TRANSPORTATION RESOURCES NW Oregon & SW Washington 7/20/2017 VA Portland Health Care System i | Page CONTENTS: General Information ............................................. 1 Veterans transportation Program ...................... 2 VA Transportation Resources ............................ 3 Beneficiary Travel program ............................ 3 Frequently Asked Eligibility Questions ...... 3 Frequently Asked Reimbursement Questions....................................................... 8 Veterans Transportation Service (VTS) ............ 17 VA Medical Center Shuttle Service .................. 19 Disabled American Veterans (DAV) ................ 21 Community Transportation Resources ........... 23 Oregon, Benton County .................................... 23 Oregon, Clackamas County .............................. 25 Oregon, Clatsop County.................................... 31 Oregon, Columbia County ................................ 32 Oregon, Crook County ...................................... 34 Oregon, Deschutes County ............................... 35 Oregon, Gilliam County.................................... 37 ii | Page Oregon, Hood River County ............................. 37 Oregon, Jefferson County ................................. 38 Oregon, Lincoln County ................................... 39 Oregon, Linn County ........................................ 41 Oregon, Marion County .................................... 42 Oregon, Morrow County ................................... 45 Oregon, Multnomah County ............................
    [Show full text]
  • SMART Transit Integration Project
    Transit Integration Project | Needs Assessment City of Wilsonville – South Metro Area Regional Transit City of Wilsonville – South Metro Area Regional Transit TRANSIT INTEGRATION PROJECT Final Report July 2015 IN ASSOCIATION WITH: COGAN OWENS GREENE Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates Inc. | i This page intentionally left blank Transit Integration Project | Final Report City of Wilsonville – South Metro Area Regional Transit Table of Contents Page 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................1-1 Study Overview ..................................................................................................................................... 1-1 Goals and Objectives ........................................................................................................................... 1-1 Public Involvement.................................................................................................................................. 1-3 2 Planning Context .............................................................................................................2-1 3 Existing Services ..............................................................................................................3-1 SMART System Overview ..................................................................................................................... 3-1 4 Community Input on Needs .............................................................................................4-1
    [Show full text]
  • Transit Development & Master Plan
    SOUTH CLACKAMAS TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT TRANSIT DEVELOPMENT AND MASTER PLAN South Clackamas Transportation District TRANSIT DEVELOPMENT & MASTER PLAN April 2020 — 1 — SCTD Transit Development and Master Plan Final TDMP This page intentionally left blank — 2 — SCTD Transit Development and Master Plan Final TDMP PREFACE The development of this plan was guided by the Project Management Team (PMT), Technical Advisory Committee (TAC), and South Clackamas Transportation District (SCTD) Board of Directors. Each individual devoted their time and effort to provide valuable input and feedback and their participation was instrumental in the development of the plan update. PROJECT MANAGEMENT TEAM (PMT) ODOT/TGM GRANT SOUTH CLACKAMAS LANDSMAN TRANSPORTATION MANAGER TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT PLANNING Héctor Rodríguez Ruiz Tom Strader Carol Landsman TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE (TAC) MEMBERS Gerald Fisher Dan Taylor City of Molalla Molalla Adult Center Karen Buehrig Virgil Foster Clackamas County Citizen Rider Julie Wehling Donna Walsh Canby Area Transit Molalla River School District Ray Atkinson Joseph Lowe Clackamas Community College Oregon Department of Human Services SCTD BOARD OF DIRECTORS David Weber Chair Doris Pence Kathy Roberson Cristina Reynaga Vice-Chair Shirley Lyons Patricia Torsen Sally Zeek Vice-Chair CONSULTANT TEAM KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. ANGELO PLANNING GROUP Susan Wright, PE Darci Rudzinski Krista Purser Shayna Rehberg Rachel Grosso ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ This project is partially funded by a grant from the Transportation and Growth Management (TGM) Program, a joint program of the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) and the Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Development (DLCD). This TGM grant is financed, in part, by federal Fixing America’s Surface Transportation Act (FAST Act), local government, and State of Oregon Funds.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Transit Master Plan
    City of Wilsonville Transit Master Plan CONVENIENCE SAFETY RELIABILITY EFFICIENCY FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY FRIENDLY SERVICE EQUITY & ACCESS ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSIBILITY JUNE 2017 Acknowledgements The City of Wilsonville would like to acknowledge the following for their dedication to the development of this Transit Master Plan. Their insight and outlook toward the future of this City helped create a comprehensive plan that represents the needs of employers, residents and visitors of Wilsonville. Transit Master Plan Task Force Planning Commission Julie Fitzgerald, Chair* Jerry Greenfield, Chair Kristin Akervall Eric Postma, Vice Chair Caroline Berry Al Levit Paul Diller Phyllis Millan Lynnda Hale Peter Hurley Barb Leisy Simon Springall Peter Rapley Kamran Mesbah Pat Rehberg Jean Tsokos City Staff Stephanie Yager Dwight Brashear, Transit Director Eric Loomis, Operations Manager City Council Scott Simonton, Fleet Manager Tim Knapp, Mayor Gregg Johansen, Transit Field Supervisor Scott Star, President Patrick Edwards, Transit Field Supervisor Kristin Akervall Nicole Hendrix, Transit Management Analyst Charlotte Lehan Michelle Marston, Transit Program Coordinator Susie Stevens Brad Dillingham, Transit Planning Intern Julie Fitzgerald* Chris Neamtzu, Planning Director Charlie Tso, Assistant Planner Consultants Susan Cole, Finance Director Jarrett Walker Keith Katko, Finance Operations Manager Michelle Poyourow Tami Bergeron, Planning Administration Assistant Christian L Watchie Amanda Guile-Hinman, Assistant City Attorney Ellen Teninty Stephan Lashbrook,
    [Show full text]
  • A Resolution Adopting a Document Entitled Candy Area Transit - City of Candy Americans with Disarilities (Ada) Plan
    RESOLUTION NO. 1081 A RESOLUTION ADOPTING A DOCUMENT ENTITLED CANDY AREA TRANSIT - CITY OF CANDY AMERICANS WITH DISARILITIES (ADA) PLAN WHEREAS, the City was notified by Oregon Department of Transportation’s (ODOT) Public Transit Division that Canby Area Transit (CAT) is required to draft and maintain an Americans with Disabilities (ADA) Plan for its public transportation services. WHEREAS, on January 12, 2011 the Transit Advisory Committee approved the plan entitled Canby Area Transit - City of Canby Americans with Disabilities (ADA) Plan and recommends it for adoption. IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City of Canby Council that the document entitled Canby Area Transit - City of Canby Americans with Disabilities (ADA) Plan, attached hereto as Exhibit “A” and by this reference incorporated herein, is adopted by the Canby City Council. This resolution is effective January 19, 2011. ADOPTED by the Canby City Council on the 19th day of January 2011. Kandy Carson Mayor ATTEST: Resolution 1081 Page 1 of 1 Canby Area Transit - City of Canby AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES (ADA) PLAN January 19, 2011 Introduction Canby Area Transit (CAT) operates as a department of the City of Canby. The department's administrative offices are located at 123 NW 2nd Avenue in Canby. The Transit Director can be contacted by phone at 503.266.4024 extension 251, by fax at 503.263.6284, or [email protected] Address written correspondence to Canby Area Transit, PO Box 930, Canby, OR 97013. Canby Area Transit and the City of Canby are committed to providing equal opportunity for persons with disabilities. This commitment includes complying with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA) and the Rehabilitation Act of 1993 including Section 37.173 of DOT’s ADA regulations requiring transit operators to train their personnel to properly assist and treat individuals with disabilities with sensitivity and to operate vehicles and equipment safely.
    [Show full text]