DOCSLIB.ORG

Regional Transit Strategy: 2018 Regional Transportation Plan | June 29, 2018 I

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Regional Transit Strategy: 2018 Regional Transportation Plan | June 29, 2018 I PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 2018 Regional Transportation Plan Regional Transit Strategy A strategy for providing better transit service in the greater Portland region June 29, 2018 oregonmetro.gov/transit Metro respects civil rights Metro fully complies with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 that requires that no person be excluded from the participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination on the basis of race, color or national origin under any program or activity for which Metro receives federal financial assistance. Metro fully complies with Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act that requires that no otherwise qualified individual with a disability be excluded from the participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination solely by reason of their disability under any program or activity for which Metro receives federal financial assistance. If any person believes they have been discriminated against regarding the receipt of benefits or services because of race, color, national origin, sex, age or disability, they have the right to file a complaint with Metro. For information on Metro’s civil rights program, or to obtain a discrimination complaint form, visit www.oregonmetro.gov/civilrights or call 503-797-1536. Metro provides services or accommodations upon request to persons with disabilities and people who need an interpreter at public meetings. If you need a sign language interpreter, communication aid or language assistance, call 503-797-1700 or TDD/TTY 503-797-1804 (8 a.m. to 5 p.m. weekdays) 5 business days before the meeting. All Metro meetings are wheelchair accessible. For up-to-date public transportation information, visit TriMet’s website at www.trimet.org. Metro is the federally mandated metropolitan planning organization designated by the governor to develop an overall transportation plan and to allocate federal funds for the region. The Joint Policy Advisory Committee on Transportation (JPACT) is a 17-member committee that provides a forum for elected officials and representatives of agencies involved in transportation to evaluate transportation needs in the region and to make recommendations to the Metro Council. The established decision-making process assures a well-balanced regional transportation system and involves local elected officials directly in decisions that help the Metro Council develop regional transportation policies, including allocating transportation funds. Regional Transportation Plan website: oregonmetro.gov/rtp Regional Transit Strategy web site: oregonmetro.gov/transit The preparation of this strategy was financed in part by the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration and Federal Transit Administration. The opinions, findings and conclusions expressed in this strategy are not necessarily those of the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration and Federal Transit Administration. TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................... i Chapter 1: Introduction ................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Metro’s Role ..................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Policy Context .................................................................................................................. 2 1.3 Planning and Public Engagement Process ..................................................................... 10 1.4 Document Organization ................................................................................................. 14 Chapter 2: Our Current Transit System ......................................................................................... 15 2.1 Our region continues to grow and change .................................................................... 15 2.2 The role of transit in our region ..................................................................................... 17 Chapter 3: Trends, Challenges and Opportunities ......................................................................... 27 3.1 Implementing Climate Smart Strategy Goals ................................................................. 27 3.2 History of Racial Exclusion and Bias ............................................................................... 27 3.3 Economic Growth........................................................................................................... 29 3.4 Aging Infrastructure ....................................................................................................... 30 3.5 New Technology............................................................................................................. 30 3.6 Affordability ................................................................................................................... 30 3.7 Changing Travel Behavior .............................................................................................. 31 3.8 Public Health .................................................................................................................. 32 3.9 Aging Population ............................................................................................................ 33 3.10 Public Funding ................................................................................................................ 34 Chapter 4: Regional Transit Vision and Policies ............................................................................. 35 4.1 Regional Transit Vision ................................................................................................... 35 4.2 Regional Transit Network Map and Functional Classifications ...................................... 40 4.3 Regional Transit Policies ................................................................................................ 44 Chapter 5: Strategies and Actions .................................................................................................. 60 5.1 Strategies ....................................................................................................................... 61 5.2 Regional Transit Strategy Actions .................................................................................. 66 Chapter 6: Transit Investments ...................................................................................................... 69 6.1 2018 RTP Transportation Investment Priorities ............................................................ 70 6.2 Regional Transit Investment Priorities ........................................................................... 73 Chapter 7: Monitoring and Measuring Progress ........................................................................... 79 7.1 Performance-Based Planning ......................................................................................... 79 7.2 Regional Transportation performance and findings ...................................................... 83 7.3 Regional transit performance and findings ................................................................... 87 7.4 High Capacity Transit (HCT) Assessment and Readiness Criteria ................................ 108 Chapter 8: Implementation ......................................................................................................... 111 8.1 Transit funding ............................................................................................................. 111 8.2 Transit planning and programs .................................................................................... 113 8.3 Transit Projects and Project Development .................................................................. 122 8.4 Next Steps .................................................................................................................... 132 TABLES AND FIGURES Table 4.1: Effects of Land Use Strategies on Transit Service 39 Table 4.2: Enhanced Transit treatments 52 Table 5.1: Regional Transit Strategy Actions 67 Table 6.1: Transit service provided by Investment Strategy 74 Table 6.2: Transit capital improvements by RTP Investment Strategy 76 Table 6.3: Transit Operating Capital Improvements by RTP Investment Strategy 77 Table 6.4: Transit Safety and Access Improvements by RTP Investment Strategy 78 Table7.1 RTP System Evaluation Measures and RTP Goals 81 Table 7.2: Daily person miles traveled per person 88 Table 7.3: Daily vehicle miles traveled per person 88 Table 7.4. Daily transit miles traveled per person 88 Table 7.5: Active transportation mode share within the MPA 93 Table 7.6: Access to travel options – access to transit 96 Table 7.7: Change in Total Number of jobs accessible by transit for 2027 and 2040 constrained scenarios 102 Table 7.8: Draft Comparison of Climate Smart monitoring targets by Investment Strategy 107 Table 7.9: High Capacity Transit (HCT) Assessment and Readiness Criteria 110 Table 8.1: Enhanced Transit Concept (ETC) projects 118 Table 8.2: Transit projects in the RTP Strategic Investment Scenario 131 Figure 1.1: RTP Modal and Topical Plans within Statewide Planning Hierarchy 1 Figure 1.2: Metro 2040 Growth Concept Map 3 Figure 1.3 2009 High Capacity Transit System Plan Map 6 Figure 1.4: 2018 Regional Transportation Timeline 13 Figure 2.1: Metro
Load more

Recommended publications
  • PBOT's Strategic Plan
    1 MOVING TO OUR FUTURE 2019-2022 2019-2022 PBOT’s Strategic Plan Moving to Our Future Index Letter from the Commissioner and Director ................................... 1 Introduction ......................................................................................... 3 How we will use this plan ................................................................... 7 What PBOT stands for ........................................................................ 9 Transportation justice ...................................................................... 12 One bureau, one mission ................................................................ 18 Goal 1: Safety ..................................................................................... 21 Goal 2: Moving People and Goods.................................................. 27 Goal 3: Asset Management .............................................................. 33 Appendix ............................................................................................ 44 Saving Lives, Saving Time, Saving Money Dear Portlanders, When we ask you what your top issues are related to getting around Portland, three answers lead the pack: safety, congestion, and road maintenance. In a recent survey, nine out of 10 Portlanders cited these three issues as their top priorities. Given these concerns, we think you will be pleased with Moving to Our Future, the strategic plan that will guide our work at the Portland Bureau of Transportation (PBOT) for the next three years. It’s built around
    [Show full text]
  • Union Station Conceptual Engineering Study
    Portland Union Station Multimodal Conceptual Engineering Study Submitted to Portland Bureau of Transportation by IBI Group with LTK Engineering June 2009 This study is partially funded by the US Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Administration. IBI GROUP PORtlAND UNION STATION MultIMODAL CONceptuAL ENGINeeRING StuDY IBI Group is a multi-disciplinary consulting organization offering services in four areas of practice: Urban Land, Facilities, Transportation and Systems. We provide services from offices located strategically across the United States, Canada, Europe, the Middle East and Asia. JUNE 2009 www.ibigroup.com ii Table of Contents Executive Summary .................................................................................... ES-1 Chapter 1: Introduction .....................................................................................1 Introduction 1 Study Purpose 2 Previous Planning Efforts 2 Study Participants 2 Study Methodology 4 Chapter 2: Existing Conditions .........................................................................6 History and Character 6 Uses and Layout 7 Physical Conditions 9 Neighborhood 10 Transportation Conditions 14 Street Classification 24 Chapter 3: Future Transportation Conditions .................................................25 Introduction 25 Intercity Rail Requirements 26 Freight Railroad Requirements 28 Future Track Utilization at Portland Union Station 29 Terminal Capacity Requirements 31 Penetration of Local Transit into Union Station 37 Transit on Union Station Tracks
    [Show full text]
  • PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 2018 Regional Transportation Plan Chapter 8 Moving Forward Together
    PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 2018 Regional Transportation Plan Chapter 8 Moving Forward Together June 29, 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS Purpose and background ................................................................................................................ 1 8.1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 3 Connecting Our Shared Values and Vision for the Future: Setting a Course for Transportation 3 8.2 Planning and programs ......................................................................................................... 6 8.2.1 Local Implementation .................................................................................................... 6 8.2.2 Metro’s Regional Programs ............................................................................................ 7 8.2.2.1 Civil Rights and Environmental Justice program .................................................... 7 8.2.2.2 Regional Transportation Safety Program ............................................................... 8 8.2.2.3 Regional Active Transportation Program ............................................................... 9 8.2.2.4 Regional Freight Program ....................................................................................... 9 8.2.2.5 Transportation System Management and Operations (TSMO) Program ............... 9 8.2.2.6 Regional Travel Options (RTO) and Safe Routes to School Programs .................. 10 8.2.2.7 Air Quality and Climate
    [Show full text]
  • NS Streetcar Line Portland, Oregon
    Portland State University PDXScholar Urban Studies and Planning Faculty Nohad A. Toulan School of Urban Studies and Publications and Presentations Planning 6-24-2014 Do TODs Make a Difference? NS Streetcar Line Portland, Oregon Jenny H. Liu Portland State University, [email protected] Zakari Mumuni Portland State University Matt Berggren Portland State University Matt Miller University of Utah Arthur C. Nelson University of Utah SeeFollow next this page and for additional additional works authors at: https:/ /pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/usp_fac Part of the Transportation Commons, Urban Studies Commons, and the Urban Studies and Planning Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Citation Details Liu, Jenny H.; Mumuni, Zakari; Berggren, Matt; Miller, Matt; Nelson, Arthur C.; and Ewing, Reid, "Do TODs Make a Difference? NS Streetcar Line Portland, Oregon" (2014). Urban Studies and Planning Faculty Publications and Presentations. 124. https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/usp_fac/124 This Report is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Urban Studies and Planning Faculty Publications and Presentations by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. Authors Jenny H. Liu, Zakari Mumuni, Matt Berggren, Matt Miller, Arthur C. Nelson, and Reid Ewing This report is available at PDXScholar: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/usp_fac/124 NS Streetcar Line Portland, Oregon Do TODs Make a Difference? Jenny H. Liu, Zakari Mumuni, Matt Berggren, Matt Miller, Arthur C. Nelson & Reid Ewing Portland State University 6/24/2014 ______________________________________________________________________________ DO TODs MAKE A DIFFERENCE? 1 of 35 Section 1-INTRODUCTION 2 of 35 ______________________________________________________________________________ Table of Contents 1-INTRODUCTION .........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Policy Advisory Committee On
    Date: December 1, 2020 To: Joint Policy Advisory Committee on Transportation (JPACT) and interested parties From: Carrie MacLaren, Metro Attorney Michelle Bellia, Senior Attorney Margi Bradway, Planning & Development Deputy Director CC: Councilor Shirley Craddick, JPACT Chair Subject: JPACT Member and Alternate Appointment Process Purpose To provide guidance to cities and counties in the Portland Metro area about appointments to the Joint Policy Advisory Committee on Transportation (JPACT) based on the JPACT bylaws, written and adopted by JPACT and the Metro Council in 1990 and amended in 2008. Background Metro is the federally mandated metropolitan planning organization (MPO) designated by the governor to develop an overall transportation plan and to program federal funds. Comprised of transportation representatives from across the region, JPACT recommends priorities and develops plans for the region. Before adopting transportation policies, the Metro Council must consider JPACT’s recommendations. Federal law, MAP-21, requires that MPOs representing areas with populations over 200,000 (known as Transportation Management Areas, or TMAs) have a decision-making structure that incorporates input from local elected officials, transit agencies, and appropriate state officials. Across the country, MPO boards vary in size. Federal regulations further define the role of the “policy advisory committee” in terms provide oversight and guidance to the MPO on transportation planning and funding. Metro’s Code and the JPACT Bylaws describe the makeup
    [Show full text]
  • City of Wilsonville Transit Master Plan
    City of Wilsonville Transit Master Plan CONVENIENCE SAFETY RELIABILITY EFFICIENCY FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY FRIENDLY SERVICE EQUITY & ACCESS ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSIBILITY JUNE 2017 Acknowledgements The City of Wilsonville would like to acknowledge the following for their dedication to the development of this Transit Master Plan. Their insight and outlook toward the future of this City helped create a comprehensive plan that represents the needs of employers, residents and visitors of Wilsonville. Transit Master Plan Task Force Planning Commission Julie Fitzgerald, Chair* Jerry Greenfield, Chair Kristin Akervall Eric Postma, Vice Chair Caroline Berry Al Levit Paul Diller Phyllis Millan Lynnda Hale Peter Hurley Barb Leisy Simon Springall Peter Rapley Kamran Mesbah Pat Rehberg Jean Tsokos City Staff Stephanie Yager Dwight Brashear, Transit Director Eric Loomis, Operations Manager City Council Scott Simonton, Fleet Manager Tim Knapp, Mayor Gregg Johansen, Transit Field Supervisor Scott Star, President Patrick Edwards, Transit Field Supervisor Kristin Akervall Nicole Hendrix, Transit Management Analyst Charlotte Lehan Michelle Marston, Transit Program Coordinator Susie Stevens Brad Dillingham, Transit Planning Intern Julie Fitzgerald* Chris Neamtzu, Planning Director Charlie Tso, Assistant Planner Consultants Susan Cole, Finance Director Jarrett Walker Keith Katko, Finance Operations Manager Michelle Poyourow Tami Bergeron, Planning Administration Assistant Christian L Watchie Amanda Guile-Hinman, Assistant City Attorney Ellen Teninty Stephan Lashbrook,
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Oswego to Portland Transit Project: Health Impact Assessment
    Lake Oswego to Portland Transit Project: Health Impact Assessment Program Partner Metro Funders US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Network of Public Health Institutes Oregon Public Health Institute www.orphi.org Prepared by: Steve White, Sara Schooley, and Noelle Dobson, Oregon Public Health Institute For more information about this report contact: Steve White, [email protected] Acknowledgements: This project relied on the time and expertise of numerous groups and individuals. Metro staff members Kathryn Sofich, Jamie Snook, Brian Monberg, and Cliff Higgins served on the Project Team and provided documentation, data, and input for all phases of the HIA. They also helped create and sustain interest within Metro for participating in this project. Other Metro staff members also provided valuable comments and critiques at the five brown bags held at Metro to talk about this project and HIA more generally. Substantial input was also provided by the project’s Advisory Committee which provided input on scoping and assessment methodology, and reviewed drafts at various stages. AC members included: Julie Early-Alberts, State of Oregon Public Health Division Gerik Kransky, Bicycle Transportation Alliance Scott France, Clackamas County Community Health John MacArthur, Oregon Transportation Research and Education Consortium Mel Rader, Upstream Public Health Maya Bhat, MPH, Multnomah County Health Department Brendon Haggerty, Clark County Public Health Joe Recker, TriMet Amy Rose, Metro Daniel Kaempff, Metro Special thanks are also due to Aaron Wernham, project director for Pew Charitable Trust’s Health Impact Project, for providing valuable insight and advice at the project’s outset regarding the coordination of HIA and Environmental Impact Statements.
    [Show full text]
  • Final2018 RTP Projectsweb20190315
    Published 3/15/19 2018 Regional Transportation Plan Strategic List of Additional Priority Projects and Programs RTP Investment County Nominating Agency Primary Facility Owner RTP ID Project Name Start Location End Location Description Estimated Cost (2016 Time Period Financially Category dollars) Constrained project list Active Transportation Clackamas County Oregon City Oregon City 10147 Newell Creek Canyon/Holly Hwy 213 and Redland Maple Lane Road Add a shared-use path along the west side of $ 5,000,000 2028-2040 No Lane Shared-Use Path Road the gully between the Redland/Livesay and Holly/Donovan intersection and then along Holly Lane between Donovan and Maple Lane. Will require a bridge over the gully south of Redland Road (TSP Project S12, S13). The project or a portion of the project is outside the designated urban growth boundary. Active Transportation Clackamas County Oregon City Oregon City 10150 Barlow Road Shared-Use Trail Abernethy Road UGB Add a shared-use path on the west/south side $ 4,600,000 2028-2040 No of Redland Road, along the north side of the gully from the Redland/Livesay to Holcomb/Oak Tree intersection, and from Holcomb to Ames Street. Install enhanced crossings at Redland Road and Holcomb Blvd (TSP S6, S9, S10, S11, C5, C7). Active Transportation Clackamas County Lake Oswego Lake Oswego 11171 Tryon Creek Ped Bridge Foothills Park Tryon Cove Park 500' long, 10' wide asphalt pathway completes a $ 3,000,000 2028-2040 No (@Tryon Cove Park) connection at the existing north end Foothills pathway with to Tryon Cove Park with a pedestrian bridge (per Foothills District Plan).
    [Show full text]
  • Public Transit a History of Public Transit in Portland
    Hilary Pfeifer Meredith Dittmar PUBLIC TRANSIT A history of public transit in Portland Melody Owen Mark Richardson Smith Kristin Mitsu Shiga Chandra Bocci trimet.org/history Traveling through time Dear Reader, Transit plays a critical role in providing options for traveling throughout the region. It connects people to work, school, recreational destinations and essential services. It’s not just a commuter service. It’s a community asset. And the benefits extend far beyond those who ride. TriMet’s transit system is recognized as a national leader for its connection to land use. By linking land-use planning and transit, we have helped create livable communities, vibrant neighborhoods and provide alternatives to driving. Transit is also a catalyst for economic development. More than $10 billion in transit-oriented development has occurred within walking distance of MAX light rail stations since the decision to build in 1980. Developers like the permanence of rail when investing in projects. Transit is also valued by the community. Most of our riders— 81 percent—are choice riders. They have a car available or choose not to own one so they can ride TriMet. With more than 325,000 trips taken each weekday on our buses, MAX Light Rail and WES Commuter Rail, we eliminate 66 million annual car trips. That eases traffic congestion and helps keep our air clean. TriMet carries more people than any other U.S. transit system our size. Our many innovations have drawn the attention of government leaders, planners, transit providers and transit users from around the world. We didn’t start out that way.
    [Show full text]
  • Eastwick Intermodal Center
    Eastwick Intermodal Center January 2020 New vo,k City • p-~ d DELAWARE VALLEY DVRPC's vision for the Greater Ph iladelphia Region ~ is a prosperous, innovative, equitable, resilient, and fJ REGl!rpc sustainable region that increases mobility choices PLANNING COMMISSION by investing in a safe and modern transportation system; Ni that protects and preserves our nat ural resources w hile creating healthy communities; and that fosters greater opportunities for all. DVRPC's mission is to achieve this vision by convening the widest array of partners to inform and facilitate data-driven decision-making. We are engaged across the region, and strive to be lea ders and innovators, exploring new ideas and creating best practices. TITLE VI COMPLIANCE / DVRPC fully complies with Title VJ of the Civil Rights Act of 7964, the Civil Rights Restoration Act of 7987, Executive Order 72898 on Environmental Justice, and related nondiscrimination mandates in all programs and activities. DVRPC's website, www.dvrpc.org, may be translated into multiple languages. Publications and other public documents can usually be made available in alternative languages and formats, if requested. DVRPC's public meetings are always held in ADA-accessible facilities, and held in transit-accessible locations whenever possible. Translation, interpretation, or other auxiliary services can be provided to individuals who submit a request at least seven days prior to a public meeting. Translation and interpretation services for DVRPC's projects, products, and planning processes are available, generally free of charge, by calling (275) 592-7800. All requests will be accommodated to the greatest extent possible. Any person who believes they have been aggrieved by an unlawful discriminatory practice by DVRPC under Title VI has a right to file a formal complaint.
    [Show full text]
  • Canby Transit Choices Report DECEMBER 14, 2016
    Canby Transit Choices Report DECEMBER 14, 2016 For Canby Area Transit Table of Contents Summary . 4 Productivity . 28 Introduction Current Costs and Revenues . 29 The Variety of Transit Services in Canby . 6 Near Future . 30 Fixed-Route Transit . 6 Highway 99 corridor study . 30 Demand Responsive Transit . 8 Federal transit funding . 30 What causes transit ridership? . 10 Increasing hourly costs . 30 Transit’s conflicting goals . 12 Existing Ridership and Performance Choices for Canby . 13 Route 99 . 32 Market and Needs Assessment Dial-a-ride and ADA paratransit . 33 Density of Residents and Jobs . .15 . Operations Contract . 38 Low-Income Residents . .15 . Service Standards . 38 Younger and Older Residents . 15. Language . 39 Residents by Race/Ethnicity . 15 . Weekends . 39 Commuting Patterns . 23 Complexity . .41 History and Trends Future Alternatives Recent History . 25 Focus on Key Choices . 43 Amount of service provided . 26 Dial-a-ride and ADA Paratransit Efficiency . 43 Ridership . 27 Alternative 1: Local Fixed Route . 45 JARRETT WALKER + ASSOCIATES Table of Contents Local circulator . 45 Dial-a-ride and ADA paratransit . 46 Route 99 . 46 Alternative 2: More Route 99 Service . 47 Route 99 . 47 Dial-a-ride and ADA paratransit . 47 Weekend Service . 52 Measuring Impacts to Key Populations . 52 JARRETT WALKER + ASSOCIATES Canby’s answer to the first question were Following the release of this report, CAT Summary “Yes, we should slightly shift our invest- staff and consultants will be attending This report is the first step in the develop- ment toward fixed routes.” These two meetings, making presentations, distribut- ment of a new Transit Master Plan for the Alternatives show how much service of ing surveys, and taking input in other ways, City of Canby .
    [Show full text]
  • Planning for Active Transportation in the Western United States: an Alternative Future for Cache Valley, Utah
    Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU All Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate Studies 8-2018 Planning for Active Transportation in the Western United States: An Alternative Future for Cache Valley, Utah Stephanie A. Tomlin Utah State University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd Part of the Environmental Design Commons, and the Landscape Architecture Commons Recommended Citation Tomlin, Stephanie A., "Planning for Active Transportation in the Western United States: An Alternative Future for Cache Valley, Utah" (2018). All Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 7195. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/7195 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Studies at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. PLANNING FOR ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION IN THE WESTERN UNITED STATES: AN ALTERNATIVE FUTURE FOR CACHE VALLEY, UTAH by Stephanie A. Tomlin A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE in Bioregional Planning Approved: Bartlett Warren-Kretzschmar, Ph.D. Richard Toth, M.L.A. Major Professor Committee Member Jordy Guth, M.S. Mark R. McLellan, Ph.D. Committee Member Vice President for Research and Dean of the School of Graduate Studies UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY Logan, Utah 2018 ii Copyright © Stephanie A. Tomlin, 2018 All Rights Reserved iii ABSTRACT Planning for Active Transportation in the Western United States: An Alternative Future for Cache Valley, Utah by Stephanie A. Tomlin, Master of Bioregional Planning Utah State University, 2018 Major Professor: Bartlett (Barty) Warren-Kretzschmar, Ph.D.
    [Show full text]