DOCSLIB.ORG

Transit Development & Master Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

SOUTH CLACKAMAS TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT TRANSIT DEVELOPMENT AND MASTER PLAN South Clackamas Transportation District TRANSIT DEVELOPMENT & MASTER PLAN April 2020 — 1 — SCTD Transit Development and Master Plan Final TDMP This page intentionally left blank — 2 — SCTD Transit Development and Master Plan Final TDMP PREFACE The development of this plan was guided by the Project Management Team (PMT), Technical Advisory Committee (TAC), and South Clackamas Transportation District (SCTD) Board of Directors. Each individual devoted their time and effort to provide valuable input and feedback and their participation was instrumental in the development of the plan update. PROJECT MANAGEMENT TEAM (PMT) ODOT/TGM GRANT SOUTH CLACKAMAS LANDSMAN TRANSPORTATION MANAGER TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT PLANNING Héctor Rodríguez Ruiz Tom Strader Carol Landsman TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE (TAC) MEMBERS Gerald Fisher Dan Taylor City of Molalla Molalla Adult Center Karen Buehrig Virgil Foster Clackamas County Citizen Rider Julie Wehling Donna Walsh Canby Area Transit Molalla River School District Ray Atkinson Joseph Lowe Clackamas Community College Oregon Department of Human Services SCTD BOARD OF DIRECTORS David Weber Chair Doris Pence Kathy Roberson Cristina Reynaga Vice-Chair Shirley Lyons Patricia Torsen Sally Zeek Vice-Chair CONSULTANT TEAM KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. ANGELO PLANNING GROUP Susan Wright, PE Darci Rudzinski Krista Purser Shayna Rehberg Rachel Grosso ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ This project is partially funded by a grant from the Transportation and Growth Management (TGM) Program, a joint program of the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) and the Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Development (DLCD). This TGM grant is financed, in part, by federal Fixing America’s Surface Transportation Act (FAST Act), local government, and State of Oregon Funds. The contents of this document do not necessarily reflect views or policies of the State of Oregon. — 3 — SCTD Transit Development and Master Plan Final TDMP This page intentionally left blank — 4 — SCTD Transit Development and Master Plan Final TDMP TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................................... 6 History of SCTD ..................................................................................................................................................................... 6 SCTD Organizational & Funding Structure ........................................................................................................................ 6 Project Purpose & Process ................................................................................................................................................. 8 Related Plans & Programs .................................................................................................................................................. 9 Public Involvement Process ............................................................................................................................................. 10 Mission & Goals ................................................................................................................................................................... 11 Policy Framework .............................................................................................................................................................. 11 Mission & Goals ................................................................................................................................................................. 11 Baseline Conditions ............................................................................................................................................................ 12 Transportation System and Transit Service Overview .................................................................................................... 13 Fleet and Facilities ............................................................................................................................................................ 14 Population, Employment, and Land Use ........................................................................................................................ 16 Ridership Analysis .............................................................................................................................................................. 28 Financial Characteristics .................................................................................................................................................. 30 Needs Assessment .............................................................................................................................................................. 32 Future Population and Employment Forecasts .............................................................................................................. 32 Future Land Use Growth ................................................................................................................................................... 33 Outreach Findings ............................................................................................................................................................ 34 Existing and Future Transit Demand ................................................................................................................................ 35 Existing and Future Unmet Needs ................................................................................................................................... 36 Alternatives Evaluation Criteria and Development ......................................................................................................... 39 Transit Development and Master Plan .............................................................................................................................. 40 The Vision ........................................................................................................................................................................... 40 Service Plan ....................................................................................................................................................................... 40 Capital Plan ....................................................................................................................................................................... 45 Implementation Plan ........................................................................................................................................................ 51 Financial Plan .................................................................................................................................................................... 59 Management and Marketing Plan ................................................................................................................................. 64 Performance Management and Monitoring Program Plan ........................................................................................ 66 Policy and Code Amendments ...................................................................................................................................... 69 TDMP Update Schedule & Next Steps ............................................................................................................................... 69 References ........................................................................................................................................................................... 70 — 5 — SCTD Transit Development and Master Plan Final TDMP INTRODUCTION The following describes the history and organizational structure of SCTD, the Transit Development and Master Plan (TDMP) purpose and process, related plans and programs, and provides an overview of the public involvement that helped to inform and guide this TDMP. HISTORY OF SCTD Molalla withdrew from the TriMet district on January 1, 1989 and SCTD was formed by the Clackamas County Board of Commissioners in 1989, originally as the Molalla Transportation District. SCTD is classified as a mass transit district and operates under the provisions of ORS 267.010 to 267.394. SCTD is governed by a seven-member board. SCTD ORGANIZATIONAL & FUNDING STRUCTURE The SCTD service district is defined as the region in which services are provided and where employers and self- employed individuals are taxed for SCTD transit services. The service district includes the entirety of the City of Molalla and unincorporated areas and rural communities such as Liberal, Mulino, Carus, Lone Elder, Macksburg, Needy, Hamricks Corner, and Rural Dell. The SCTD tax rate is currently set at 0.5% of wages paid to employees or 0.5% of net earnings from self-employment in excess of $400. This tax rate is separate from Oregon House Bill 2017’s (HB2017) tax withholding of 0.1% of wages earned for residents of Oregon and wages of nonresidents who perform services in Oregon. Figure 1 breaks down the funding resources available to SCTD for the annual operating budget. As shown, approximately 31 percent of the 2019-2020 operating budget is provided by the payroll and self-employment taxes collected
Recommended publications
  • City of Wilsonville Transit Master Plan

    City of Wilsonville Transit Master Plan

    City of Wilsonville Transit Master Plan CONVENIENCE SAFETY RELIABILITY EFFICIENCY FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY FRIENDLY SERVICE EQUITY & ACCESS ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSIBILITY JUNE 2017 Acknowledgements The City of Wilsonville would like to acknowledge the following for their dedication to the development of this Transit Master Plan. Their insight and outlook toward the future of this City helped create a comprehensive plan that represents the needs of employers, residents and visitors of Wilsonville. Transit Master Plan Task Force Planning Commission Julie Fitzgerald, Chair* Jerry Greenfield, Chair Kristin Akervall Eric Postma, Vice Chair Caroline Berry Al Levit Paul Diller Phyllis Millan Lynnda Hale Peter Hurley Barb Leisy Simon Springall Peter Rapley Kamran Mesbah Pat Rehberg Jean Tsokos City Staff Stephanie Yager Dwight Brashear, Transit Director Eric Loomis, Operations Manager City Council Scott Simonton, Fleet Manager Tim Knapp, Mayor Gregg Johansen, Transit Field Supervisor Scott Star, President Patrick Edwards, Transit Field Supervisor Kristin Akervall Nicole Hendrix, Transit Management Analyst Charlotte Lehan Michelle Marston, Transit Program Coordinator Susie Stevens Brad Dillingham, Transit Planning Intern Julie Fitzgerald* Chris Neamtzu, Planning Director Charlie Tso, Assistant Planner Consultants Susan Cole, Finance Director Jarrett Walker Keith Katko, Finance Operations Manager Michelle Poyourow Tami Bergeron, Planning Administration Assistant Christian L Watchie Amanda Guile-Hinman, Assistant City Attorney Ellen Teninty Stephan Lashbrook,
  • Canby Transit Choices Report DECEMBER 14, 2016

    Canby Transit Choices Report DECEMBER 14, 2016

    Canby Transit Choices Report DECEMBER 14, 2016 For Canby Area Transit Table of Contents Summary . 4 Productivity . 28 Introduction Current Costs and Revenues . 29 The Variety of Transit Services in Canby . 6 Near Future . 30 Fixed-Route Transit . 6 Highway 99 corridor study . 30 Demand Responsive Transit . 8 Federal transit funding . 30 What causes transit ridership? . 10 Increasing hourly costs . 30 Transit’s conflicting goals . 12 Existing Ridership and Performance Choices for Canby . 13 Route 99 . 32 Market and Needs Assessment Dial-a-ride and ADA paratransit . 33 Density of Residents and Jobs . .15 . Operations Contract . 38 Low-Income Residents . .15 . Service Standards . 38 Younger and Older Residents . 15. Language . 39 Residents by Race/Ethnicity . 15 . Weekends . 39 Commuting Patterns . 23 Complexity . .41 History and Trends Future Alternatives Recent History . 25 Focus on Key Choices . 43 Amount of service provided . 26 Dial-a-ride and ADA Paratransit Efficiency . 43 Ridership . 27 Alternative 1: Local Fixed Route . 45 JARRETT WALKER + ASSOCIATES Table of Contents Local circulator . 45 Dial-a-ride and ADA paratransit . 46 Route 99 . 46 Alternative 2: More Route 99 Service . 47 Route 99 . 47 Dial-a-ride and ADA paratransit . 47 Weekend Service . 52 Measuring Impacts to Key Populations . 52 JARRETT WALKER + ASSOCIATES Canby’s answer to the first question were Following the release of this report, CAT Summary “Yes, we should slightly shift our invest- staff and consultants will be attending This report is the first step in the develop- ment toward fixed routes.” These two meetings, making presentations, distribut- ment of a new Transit Master Plan for the Alternatives show how much service of ing surveys, and taking input in other ways, City of Canby .
  • Tramway Renaissance

    Tramway Renaissance

    THE INTERNATIONAL LIGHT RAIL MAGAZINE www.lrta.org www.tautonline.com OCTOBER 2018 NO. 970 FLORENCE CONTINUES ITS TRAMWAY RENAISSANCE InnoTrans 2018: Looking into light rail’s future Brussels, Suzhou and Aarhus openings Gmunden line linked to Traunseebahn Funding agreed for Vancouver projects LRT automation Bydgoszcz 10> £4.60 How much can and Growth in Poland’s should we aim for? tram-building capital 9 771460 832067 London, 3 October 2018 Join the world’s light and urban rail sectors in recognising excellence and innovation BOOK YOUR PLACE TODAY! HEADLINE SUPPORTER ColTram www.lightrailawards.com CONTENTS 364 The official journal of the Light Rail Transit Association OCTOBER 2018 Vol. 81 No. 970 www.tautonline.com EDITORIAL EDITOR – Simon Johnston [email protected] ASSOCIATE EDITOr – Tony Streeter [email protected] WORLDWIDE EDITOR – Michael Taplin 374 [email protected] NewS EDITOr – John Symons [email protected] SenIOR CONTRIBUTOR – Neil Pulling WORLDWIDE CONTRIBUTORS Tony Bailey, Richard Felski, Ed Havens, Andrew Moglestue, Paul Nicholson, Herbert Pence, Mike Russell, Nikolai Semyonov, Alain Senut, Vic Simons, Witold Urbanowicz, Bill Vigrass, Francis Wagner, Thomas Wagner, 379 Philip Webb, Rick Wilson PRODUCTION – Lanna Blyth NEWS 364 SYSTEMS FACTFILE: bydgosZCZ 384 Tel: +44 (0)1733 367604 [email protected] New tramlines in Brussels and Suzhou; Neil Pulling explores the recent expansion Gmunden joins the StadtRegioTram; Portland in what is now Poland’s main rolling stock DESIGN – Debbie Nolan and Washington prepare new rolling stock manufacturing centre. ADVertiSING plans; Federal and provincial funding COMMERCIAL ManageR – Geoff Butler Tel: +44 (0)1733 367610 agreed for two new Vancouver LRT projects.
  • I. Applicant Clackamas, Multnomah, and Washington Counties

    I. Applicant Clackamas, Multnomah, and Washington Counties

    FY19-FY21 Regional Coordination Program STIF FUNDING APPLICATION I. Applicant Clackamas, Multnomah, and Washington Counties and government operated transit providers are eligible to receive RCP funds and are therefore Grant Recipients. Other local government authorities, non-profit organizations, and private for-profit organizations are not directly eligible. However, such entities may be a Co-Applicant in an application. 1. Grant Recipient Name of Grant Recipient: Clackamas County Contact Person: Teresa Christopherson Address: 2051 Kaen Rd., Oregon City, OR 97045 Telephone: 503-650-5718 E-Mail: [email protected] 2. Type of Grant Recipient (check one) Clackamas County X Multnomah County Washington County Government Operated Transit Provider 3. Co-Applicant (if different than Grant Recipient) Name of Co-Applicant: Contact Person: Address: Telephone: E-Mail: Regional Coordination Program Page 1 Regional Coordination Program FY19-21 Application II. Project Details RCP eligible projects must appear in a Local Plan (see STIF Rules OARs 732-042-0015) and intend to improve or expand public transportation or maintain public transportation. 1. Project Details Project Title: Tualatin/West Linn/Oregon City Commuter Shuttle Start Date: January 1, 2019 End Date: Ongoing (application to 6/30/21) 2. Project Purpose (check one) Improve or Expand Public Transportation: X Maintain Public Transportation: 3. Local Plan Plan Name: TriMet Southwest Service Enhancement Plan Governing Body That TriMet Board of Directors Adopted Plan: Plan Adoption Date: December, 2015 Plan Web Address: https://trimet.org/future/ Plan Page Number P. 9, 13 Referencing Project: III. Funding Eligible use of STIF funds for the RCP may include planning, capital, and ongoing operations within the TriMet District.
  • WSK Commuter Rail Study

    WSK Commuter Rail Study

    Oregon Department of Transportation – Rail Division Oregon Rail Study Appendix I Wilsonville to Salem Commuter Rail Assessment Prepared by: Parsons Brinckerhoff Team Parsons Brinckerhoff Simpson Consulting Sorin Garber Consulting Group Tangent Services Wilbur Smith and Associates April 2010 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.......................................................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................... 3 WHAT IS COMMUTER RAIL? ................................................................................................... 3 GLOSSARY OF TERMS............................................................................................................ 3 STUDY AREA....................................................................................................................... 4 WES COMMUTER RAIL.......................................................................................................... 6 OTHER PASSENGER RAIL SERVICES IN THE CORRIDOR .................................................................. 6 OUTREACH WITH RAILROADS: PNWR AND BNSF .................................................................. 7 PORTLAND & WESTERN RAILROAD........................................................................................... 7 BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY ..................................................................................................... 7 ROUTE CHARACTERISTICS..................................................................................................
  • Coordinated Transportation Plan for Seniors and Persons with Disabilities I Table of Contents June 2020

    Coordinated Transportation Plan for Seniors and Persons with Disabilities I Table of Contents June 2020

    Table of Contents June 2020 Table of Contents 1. Introduction .................................................................................................... 1-1 Development of the CTP .......................................................................................................... 1-3 Principles of the CTP ................................................................................................................ 1-5 Overview of relevant grant programs ..................................................................................... 1-7 TriMet Role as the Special Transportation Fund Agency ........................................................ 1-8 Other State Funding ................................................................................................................. 1-9 Coordination with Metro and Joint Policy Advisory Committee (JPACT) .............................. 1-11 2. Existing Transportation Services ...................................................................... 2-1 Regional Transit Service Providers .......................................................................................... 2-6 Community-Based Transit Providers ..................................................................................... 2-18 Statewide Transit Providers ................................................................................................... 2-26 3. Service Guidelines ........................................................................................... 3-1 History .....................................................................................................................................
  • Outreach Summary P a G E | 1 August 2020 REFERENCE B

    Outreach Summary P a G E | 1 August 2020 REFERENCE B

    REFERENCE B Outreach #1 Summary Table of Contents Introduction..................................................................................................................................................1 Listening Sessions ........................................................................................................................................2 Online Survey................................................................................................................................................2 Key Findings..................................................................................................................................................3 Survey Questions and Summary ..................................................................................................................3 Demographics.............................................................................................................................................29 Appendix A..................................................................................................................................................39 Appendix B................................................................................................................................................136 Appendix C................................................................................................................................................139 Introduction The following report provides an overview of the results of the listening sessions and
  • Changes to Transit Service in the MBTA District 1964-Present

    Changes to Transit Service in the MBTA District 1964-Present

    Changes to Transit Service in the MBTA district 1964-2021 By Jonathan Belcher with thanks to Richard Barber and Thomas J. Humphrey Compilation of this data would not have been possible without the information and input provided by Mr. Barber and Mr. Humphrey. Sources of data used in compiling this information include public timetables, maps, newspaper articles, MBTA press releases, Department of Public Utilities records, and MBTA records. Thanks also to Tadd Anderson, Charles Bahne, Alan Castaline, George Chiasson, Bradley Clarke, Robert Hussey, Scott Moore, Edward Ramsdell, George Sanborn, David Sindel, James Teed, and George Zeiba for additional comments and information. Thomas J. Humphrey’s original 1974 research on the origin and development of the MBTA bus network is now available here and has been updated through August 2020: http://www.transithistory.org/roster/MBTABUSDEV.pdf August 29, 2021 Version Discussion of changes is broken down into seven sections: 1) MBTA bus routes inherited from the MTA 2) MBTA bus routes inherited from the Eastern Mass. St. Ry. Co. Norwood Area Quincy Area Lynn Area Melrose Area Lowell Area Lawrence Area Brockton Area 3) MBTA bus routes inherited from the Middlesex and Boston St. Ry. Co 4) MBTA bus routes inherited from Service Bus Lines and Brush Hill Transportation 5) MBTA bus routes initiated by the MBTA 1964-present ROLLSIGN 3 5b) Silver Line bus rapid transit service 6) Private carrier transit and commuter bus routes within or to the MBTA district 7) The Suburban Transportation (mini-bus) Program 8) Rail routes 4 ROLLSIGN Changes in MBTA Bus Routes 1964-present Section 1) MBTA bus routes inherited from the MTA The Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA) succeeded the Metropolitan Transit Authority (MTA) on August 3, 1964.
  • 2016 Before-And-After Studies Report to Congress

    2016 Before-And-After Studies Report to Congress

    Before-and-After Studies of New Starts Projects Report to Congress March 2017 Prepared by: Office of Planning and Environment Federal Transit Administration U.S. Department of Transportation www.transit.dot.gov 2 FOREWORD This eighth annual report to Congress on Before-and-After Studies summarizes the findings for three projects that opened to service in 2011 and 2012, presented in order of their opening date: 1. Mid-Jordan Light Rail Project; Salt Lake City, UT (August 2011) 2. Northshore Connector Light Rail Project; Pittsburgh, PA (March 2012) 3. Streetcar Loop Project; Portland, OR (September 2012) Before-and-After Studies help sponsoring agencies and the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) to accumulate insights into the actual costs and impacts of major capital transit investments and to evaluate the accuracy of the predictions of the costs and impacts made for these projects. Each Before-and-After Study documents the actual outcomes of a New Starts or Small Starts project in five dimensions: physical scope, capital costs, transit service levels, operating and maintenance costs, and ridership. To support this part of the study, project sponsors collect data on actual conditions before and after implementation of the project. The “before” data collection occurs before any impacts of the project are realized – soon before the project opens to service or, in some cases, before project construction disrupts transit service and ridership in the corridor. The “after” data collection for physical scope and capital costs occurs immediately after project opening. The “after” data collection for changes in transit service, operating and maintenance costs, and ridership occurs two years after the project opens in order to permit conditions to stabilize.
  • PARSONS PHARMACY REDEVELOPMENT 294 NW 2Nd Avenue, Canby, OR 97013

    PARSONS PHARMACY REDEVELOPMENT 294 NW 2Nd Avenue, Canby, OR 97013

    FOR SALE PARSONS PHARMACY REDEVELOPMENT 294 NW 2nd Avenue, Canby, OR 97013 RYAN IMBRIE | MANAGING DIRECTOR [email protected] O: 503.28.9403 | M: 503.705.7352 All SVN® Offices Independently Owned and Operated www.svnimbrie.com The information listed above has been obtained from sources we believe to be reliable, however, we accept no Lincoln Tower - 10260 SW Greenburg Road, Suite 530, Portland, OR 97223 responsibility for its correctness. 503.208.9400 ABOUT THE CITY OF CANBY | PARSONS PHARMACY | RETAIL REDEVELOPMENT | CANBY, OREGON 17,365 Canby, Oregon is a growing city with a population of just over 17,000 and total area of 3.78 miles. It is located 25 miles south of Portland in the Willamette Valley, surrounded by some of the best soils in the state. The Population (2016) community is easily accessible in the region via Interstate 5, Highway 99E and I-205 nearby. The area boasts an enviable banana belt climate in the Portland Metropolitan region with warm and dry summers, mild winters and long growing season. Its warm-summer Mediterranean climate ranges from an average high temperature of 73 to average low temperature of 43 degrees. It rains about $355,000 41 inches per year, and snows about 6 inches per year. Since 2002, the city has operated its own bus system, Canby Area Transit Median Home Value (CAT). The service connects with the Portland area's TriMet at the Oregon City Transit Center and with the Salem-Keizer Transit (Cherriots) bus system in Woodburn. Canby is also served by one route of South Metro Area Regional Transit (SMART), the bus division of the City of Wilsonville.
  • Columbia River Gorge Transit Study Final Report

    Columbia River Gorge Transit Study Final Report

    [NAME OF DOCUMENT] | VOLUME [Client Name] Columbia River Gorge Transit Study Final Report May 2016 Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates Inc. | i Columbia River Gorge Transit Study| Final Report Oregon Department of Transportation Table of Contents 1 Executive Summary .........................................................................................................1-1 Background ............................................................................................................................................. 1-1 Key Findings From Existing Conditions and Market Analysis ........................................................ 1-2 Service Concept Development Process .............................................................................................. 1-4 Proposed Pilot Service Plan ................................................................................................................. 1-5 Near-Term Service Concepts ............................................................................................................... 1-5 Funding Strategy ................................................................................................................................... 1-6 Report Purpose & Organization ......................................................................................................... 1-6 2 Document/Plan Review ...................................................................................................2-1 Ongoing Planning Efforts ....................................................................................................................
  • Needs Identification

    Needs Identification

    REFERENCE F NEEDS IDENTIFICATION AUGUST 14, 2020 1 | Clackamas County Transit Development Plan REFERENCE F Date August 14, 2020 To Karen Buehrig, Brett Setterfield, Teresa Christopherson, Ellen Rogalin, & Kristina Babcock, Clackamas County Hector Rodriguez-Ruiz, Oregon Department of Transportation From Susan Wright, Krista Purser, Paul Ryus, and Russ Doubleday Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Project Clackamas County Transit Development Plan Subject Needs Identification Memo (Subtask 3.2) 2 | Clackamas County Transit Development Plan REFERENCE F NEEDS IDENTIFICATION This memorandum inventories the existing performance, transit markets, and identified needs for transit in Clackamas County. The purpose of this memorandum is to summarize the performance and needs of the system as a foundation for future service opportunities. This information will help guide development of the Clackamas County Transit Development Plan (TDP). Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................... 3 Project Purpose ........................................................................................................................................... 6 Overview ...................................................................................................................................................... 6 Existing Transit Performance ...................................................................................................................... 6 Gaps