The Battle of Hanging Rock the Second of the Three Camps, Where the by James Legg Defenders Were Mostly British Provincials

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Battle of Hanging Rock the Second of the Three Camps, Where the by James Legg Defenders Were Mostly British Provincials University of South Carolina Scholar Commons Archaeology and Anthropology, South Carolina Faculty & Staff ubP lications Institute of 8-2011 The aB ttle of aH nging Rock James B. Legg University of South Carolina - Columbia, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/sciaa_staffpub Part of the Anthropology Commons Publication Info Published in Legacy, Volume 15, Issue 2, 2011, pages 5-5. http://www.cas.sc.edu/sciaa/ © 2011 by The outhS Carolina Institute of Archaeology and Anthropology This Article is brought to you by the Archaeology and Anthropology, South Carolina Institute of at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty & Staff ubP lications by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Sumter’s men turned their attention to The Battle of Hanging Rock the second of the three camps, where the By James Legg defenders were mostly British provincials. Immediately after the fall of Charleston to increasingly active and dangerous The defenders employed light artillery the British in May 1780, the victors began beyond the frontier of British control. firing canister, and launched at least a campaign to subjugate the interior of Small posts and patrols of loyalists were two determined infantry counterattacks South Carolina. The task did not appear to variously captured, disarmed, ambushed, against the Americans, but Sumter’s be a serious challenge. The only remaining and slaughtered. A large uprising of riflemen nearly annihilated the musket- “Rebel” force of any importance was a loyalists in southern North Carolina wielding British. After a fierce struggle, ragged little army of South Carolina and was completely crushed. While there the second camp was also overrun, and the North Carolina militia, commanded (after was still clearly no American force that defenders retreated to the vicinity of the June 15th) by Thomas Sumter. This force might oppose a British field army, British third camp. There they formed a formal consisted largely of upcountry riflemen, authority in the backcountry was almost infantry square, and awaited their fate. most of them mounted. They were far non-existent. By this time, too few in number to directly oppose Several smaller, outlying posts however, the British occupation. Lord Cornwallis’ supplemented the major British post Sumter’s men strategy for returning South Carolina at Camden. About 20 miles north of were nearly to the Crown was two-fold. First, he Camden, an extensive camp complex exhausted, established a chain of fortified posts in was established along the south bank and were the interior, the most important of which of Hanging Rock Creek, north of the almost out of were at Augusta, Ninety-Six, and Camden. remarkable conglomerate outcrop called ammunition, Secondly, he expected a general popular Hanging Rock. The garrison there may including uprising of loyalist citizens to present have totaled as many as 1,300, including what they themselves for service with a royal militia. loyalist militia and provincial troops––the had captured. These two developments would surely latter were “semi-regular” British units Many had convince any remaining holdouts that whose personnel were recruited in the left the ranks their cause was lost, and Cornwallis might colonies. A small detachment of Royal to loot the turn his attention to reconquering the Artillery was also present. These forces enemy camps, Fig. 2: “Hanging Rock,” as remainder of the Southern colonies. were dispersed among three camps and some depicted by Benson Lossing The British interior posts were arrayed from west to east (or southeast) on had made in 1849. quickly established, but the effort to raise cultivated high ground south of the creek. liberal use of captured rum. When a small a loyalist militia was poorly organized Contrary to some sources, the positions reinforcement of provincial cavalry arrived and supplied, and the turnout was less were apparently not fortified. from Rocky Mount, the American advance than overwhelming. More ominously in On July 30th, Thomas Sumter’s force halted, and Sumter’s men began a gradual the summer of 1780, the Rebels became attacked a smaller, heavily fortified British withdrawal. Casualty figures for the battle post at Rocky Mount, about 15 miles west vary widely––it suffices to say that losses of Hanging Rock. The Americans were were serious on both sides. repulsed after a severe action. That same The attack on Hanging Rock was day, North Carolinians under William R. well planned, savage, and sustained. Davie, who was serving under Sumter, While it was not a complete American cut off a loyalist column nearing the victory, it must have given the British Hanging Rock camps. The loyalists were something to contemplate. But for the massacred, without quarter, within sight of timing, Hanging Rock might have a more the camps. substantial place among the battles of the On the morning of August 6th, 1780, Southern Campaign. As it was, it was Sumter threw his entire force of at least 600 followed on August 16th by the destruction (probably many more) against the post of of the new regular American army in the Hanging Rock. Attacking from the west South, at the Battle of Camden. Two days and north, the Americans surprised and later, Thomas Sumter’s militia army was immediately overran the left (western) routed and dispersed at Fishing Creek. camp, which was held by several hundred Once again, it must have seemed that there North Carolina loyalists under Col. Samuel was little to interfere with the British re- Fig. 1: Thomas Sumter, the “South Carolina Gamecock,” by Charles Willson Bryan. Bryan’s men fled in disorder, and conquest of the South. Peale. Legacy, Vol. 15, No. 2, August 2011 5.
Recommended publications
  • Vol. 3 No. 1.1 ______January 2006
    Vol. 3 No. 1.1 _____ ________________________________ _ __ January 2006 th Return to the Cow Pens! 225 Backyard Archaeology – ARCHH Up! The Archaeological Reconnaissance and Computerization of Hobkirk’s Hill (ARCHH) project has begun initial field operations on this built-over, urban battlefield in Camden, South Carolina. We are using the professional-amateur cooperative archaeology model, loosely based upon the successful BRAVO organization of New Jersey. We have identified an initial survey area and will only test properties within this initial survey area until we demonstrate artifact recoveries to any boundary. Metal detectorist director John Allison believes that this is at least two years' work. Since the battlefield is in well-landscaped yards and there are dozens of homeowners, we are only surveying areas with landowner permission and we will not be able to cover 100% of the land in the survey area. We have a neighborhood meeting planned to explain the archaeological survey project to the landowners. SCAR will provide project handouts and offer a walking battlefield tour for William T. Ranney’s masterpiece, painted in 1845, showing Hobkirk Hill neighbors and anyone else who wants to attend on the final cavalry hand-to-hand combat at Cowpens, hangs Sunday, January 29, 2006 at 3 pm. [Continued on p. 17.] in the South Carolina State House lobby. Most modern living historians believe that Ranney depicted the uniforms quite inaccurately. Lt. Col. Banastre Tarleton’s British Legion cavalry is thought to have been clothed in green tunics and Lt. Col. William Washington’s cavalry in white. The story of Washington’s trumpeter or waiter [Ball, Collin, Collins] shooting a legionnaire just in time as Washington’s sword broke is also not well substantiated or that he was a black youth as depicted.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to Canadian Sources Related to Southern Revolutionary War
    Research Project for Southern Revolutionary War National Parks National Parks Service Solicitation Number: 500010388 GUIDE TO CANADIAN SOURCES RELATED TO SOUTHERN REVOLUTIONARY WAR NATIONAL PARKS by Donald E. Graves Ensign Heritage Consulting PO Box 282 Carleton Place, Ontario Canada, K7C 3P4 in conjunction with REEP INC. PO Box 2524 Leesburg, VA 20177 TABLE OF CONTENTS PART 1: INTRODUCTION AND GUIDE TO CONTENTS OF STUDY 1A: Object of Study 1 1B: Summary of Survey of Relevant Primary Sources in Canada 1 1C: Expanding the Scope of the Study 3 1D: Criteria for the Inclusion of Material 3 1E: Special Interest Groups (1): The Southern Loyalists 4 1F: Special Interest Groups (2): Native Americans 7 1G: Special Interest Groups (3): African-American Loyalists 7 1H: Special Interest Groups (4): Women Loyalists 8 1I: Military Units that Fought in the South 9 1J: A Guide to the Component Parts of this Study 9 PART 2: SURVEY OF ARCHIVAL SOURCES IN CANADA Introduction 11 Ontario Queen's University Archives, Kingston 11 University of Western Ontario, London 11 National Archives of Canada, Ottawa 11 National Library of Canada, Ottawa 27 Archives of Ontario, Toronto 28 Metropolitan Toronto Reference Library 29 Quebec Archives Nationales de Quebec, Montreal 30 McCord Museum / McGill University Archives, Montreal 30 Archives de l'Universite de Montreal 30 New Brunswick 32 Provincial Archives of New Brunswick, Fredericton 32 Harriet Irving Memorial Library, Fredericton 32 University of New Brunswick Archives, Fredericton 32 New Brunswick Museum Archives,
    [Show full text]
  • Assault on Fort Granby May 15, 1781
    Vol. 4 No. 2.1_____________________________________________________ __April – June 2007 Assault on Fort Granby May 15, 1781 Fort Granby was built by the British and Loyalists around the Kershaw and Chesnut c. 1770 trading post on the western bluff overlooking the Congaree River. Located in an area historically called “the Congarees” which hosted two pre-revolutionary forts and trading posts dating back to 1715. German, Swiss and Scot-Irish immigrants established small farms in this area and Granby would later be the leading town for many years. This 1970 oil painting by Alfred Richardson Simson depicts the May 2-15, 1781 siege of the British post by the combined forces of SC militia Gen. Thomas Sumter and Continental Lt. Col. Henry “Light Horse Harry” Lee. A 263-man Loyalist force commanded by Maj. Andrew Maxwell defends the fortified frame house. Maxwell agreed to surrender provided he was allowed to maintain possession of his plunder. The green-jacketed Lt. Col. Lee, depicted to the left, watches his cannon engage the fort from the east side of the Congaree River as Gen. Sumter’s and Col. Thomas Taylor’s troops attack. The painting was photographed by Will Graves and enhanced for publication. Used by permission of The Cayce Historical Museum, 1800 12th Street, Cayce, SC where the original hangs. In This Edition: Book Reviews…….……………………………….………….....23 Southern Revolutionary War Institute……..….……..….……25 Editor / Publisher’s Notes………..……….…………..……….…2 Race for the Dan...…….…...…………………………...…....…28 Corps of Discovery……………..………….………………..……4 Calendar of Upcoming Events………………….………...……30 Marsh Tacky………………….………….…...……….…….……9 Kentish Guards in Savannah…………….………....…….……35 Letters to the Editor…………..…………………….…………..12 Col. Thomas Posey and the Virginia Regiment……..…..…....40 Upcoming SCAR events……………..……………..3 – 7 – 16 – 17 Lt.
    [Show full text]
  • Raising the Revolutionaries' Banner 1775-1776
    Vol. 4 No. 3_____________________________________________ __July-August-September 2007 Raising the Revolutionaries’ Banner 1775-1776 19th century magic lanternslide depicting SC Patriot Sgt. William Jasper of the 2d South Carolina Continental Line, commanded by Col. William Moultrie, heroically re-raising the battered South Carolina standard over the parapet of the sand and palmetto log Fort Sullivan during the British naval bombardment of June 28-29, 1776. Mike Coker, the South Carolina Historical Society’s image expert, reports that this image is from a lanternslide painted by artists at the C. W. Briggs Company. The title on the slide is: “Sergeant Jasper at Ft. Moultrie, 1776”; it is a transparency, collodion on glass; size 3 1/4 X 4 inches. The Briggs were an American family of lanternists, slide painters and manufacturers. Daniel Briggs started painting and selling slides in 1850. Later the firm became C. (Caspear) W. Briggs and Co. in Philadelphia. Slides were made from stock negatives and colored by hand. (1850-1930s) This slide’s artist is unknown. Image is courtesy of the SCII Regiment. Artist Lucy Brown made a painting of this image in 1975, the original of which hangs in the main offices of the South Carolina Forestry Commission, 5500 Broad River Road, Columbia. In This Edition: Native Americans and the Southern Revolution, Part II: Independence and the 1776 Cherokee War………......………21 Editor / Publisher’s Notes………………………....……….…2 Insubordination of Captain Polk’s Rangers During the Upcoming SCAR events……………………..……....3, 4 and 7 Summer of 1775….……………………….….………………....28 Southern Revolutionary War Institute…………………..…12 Subjects of the Crown “The Queen’s own Loyal Virginia Letters to the Editor…………………………….…..………..11 Regiment and Dunmore’s Ethiopian Regiment, 1775- Calendar of Upcoming Events………………….….…..……15 1776”……………………………..……………………………...34 “Under the Crown” Living History Event………………….19 1 Editor’s Notes flavor.
    [Show full text]
  • Southern Campaign of the Revolution National Heritage Area Suitability / Feasibility Study North Carolina and South Carolina
    SOUTHERN CAMPAIGN OF THE REVOLUTION National Heritage Area Suitability / Feasibility Study North Carolina and South Carolina National Park Service | U.S. Department of the Interior July 2014 EX ECUTIVE SUMMARY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY INTRODUCTION Following consideration of the counties above, the National Park Service determined The Department of the Interior, National that a focused corridor containing the Park Service (NPS), has prepared this concentration of historic resources that are National Heritage Area Suitability / Feasibility representative of the story best meets Study to determine the suitability and national heritage area feasibility criteria. feasibility of designating areas of North Carolina and South Carolina as a national heritage area. This study meets the THE NATIONAL SIGNIFICANCE OF THE requirements of the NPS interim National SOUTHERN CAMPAIGN OF THE Heritage Area Feasibility Study Guidelines AMERICAN REVOLUTION (2003) and the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as amended. Just as the American Revolution shaped the course of American history, the Southern Campaign dramatically altered the course of LEGISLATIVE HISTORY the Revolution. The initial phase of the war in the South brought a string of American Congress directed the Secretary of the victories, drove British forces from the Interior to conduct a study regarding the region, cowed American Loyalists, and suitability and feasibility of designating the pacified the southern states. Southern Campaign of the Revolution National Heritage Area (Public Law 109- The second phase of the Southern Campaign 338). The study was conducted in opened after nearly five years of bloody consultation with state historic preservation combat in other parts of America that had officers; state historical societies; the North resulted in a frustrating stalemate.
    [Show full text]
  • John Bishop S9279
    Southern Campaigns American Revolution Pension Statements & Rosters Pension application of John Bishop S9279 f36SC Transcribed by Will Graves rev'd 7/26/10 & 9/8/14 & 8/19/18 [Methodology: Spelling, punctuation and/or grammar have been corrected in some instances for ease of reading and to facilitate searches of the database. Where the meaning is not compromised by adhering to the spelling, punctuation or grammar, no change has been made. Corrections or additional notes have been inserted within brackets or footnotes. Blanks appearing in the transcripts reflect blanks in the original. A bracketed question mark indicates that the word or words preceding it represent(s) a guess by me. The word 'illegible' or 'indecipherable' appearing in brackets indicates that at the time I made the transcription, I was unable to decipher the word or phrase in question. Only materials pertinent to the military service of the veteran and to contemporary events have been transcribed. Affidavits that provide additional information on these events are included and genealogical information is abstracted, while standard, 'boilerplate' affidavits and attestations related solely to the application, and later nineteenth and twentieth century research requests for information have been omitted. I use speech recognition software to make all my transcriptions. Such software misinterprets my southern accent with unfortunate regularity and my poor proofreading skills fail to catch all misinterpretations. Also, dates or numbers which the software treats as numerals rather
    [Show full text]
  • South Carolina Hall of Fame
    SOUTH CAROLINA HALL OF FAME Teacher Guide Andrew Jackson South Carolina Social Studies Standards Andrew Jackson The New Nation-A New Nation and State The Civil War-Forces of Unity and Division Topics include - War of 1812, Old Hickory, Battle of New Orleans, Popular vote/populist president, Industrial revolution, tariffs/nullification, John C. Calhoun, Indian Removal Act, Cherokee Trail of Tears Standard 4-5: The student will demonstrate an understanding of westward expansion of the United States and its impact on the institution of slavery. 4-5.4 - Summarize how territorial expansion related land policies, and specific legislation affected Native Americans, including the Northwest Ordinance of 1787 and the Indian Removal Act of 1830. Standard 8-3: The student will demonstrate an understanding of South Carolina's role in the development of the new national government. 8-3.4 - Analyze the position of South Carolina on the issues that divided the nation in the early 1800s, including the assumption of state debts, the creation of a national bank, the protective tariff and the role of the United States in the European conflict between France and England and in the War of 1812. Standard 8-4: The student will demonstrate an understanding of the multiple events that led to the Civil War. 8-4.3 - Analyze key issues that led to South Carolina's secession from the Union, including the nullification controversy and John C. Calhoun, the extension of slavery and the compromises over westward expansion, the Kansas-Nebraska Act, the Dred Scott decision, and the election of 1860. 2 S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • South Carolina State Library Digital Collections
    A~'5S2..Z.R~~ M. A~OR SITES Oo py t F THE REVOLUTION IN SOUTH CAROLINA: • 20 Gree nwood.. Battle of Fort Moultrie INTRODUCTION For a state which played such a large role in the American Kettle Creek Revolution , it is remarkable that many people probably never think of South Carolina except in connection with Confederate history . South Carolinians were active in all phases of the Revolution from its beginning in the 1760's, and the Palmetto State claims a larger share of the Revolution 's military history than an y other state . Above all , there is a great deal of living history in the form of historic buildings , battlefields , archeological remains , and fortifications, which offer the visitor a tangible link with the past. This brochure is your invitation to rediscover Am erica 's beginnin gs in South Carolina. Thirty places in South Carolina and four in Georgia are presented * SOUTH CAROLINA WELCOME CENTERS to you here . The war in the Savann ah Rive r area of South Carolina CHARLESTON LAND'S FORD cannot be understood without reference to the course of the HANGING ROCK Revolution in Georgia . The British occupation of that province made MIDDLETON PLACE South Carolina a frontier state and involved large numbers of South DORCHESTER 20 BUFORD MASSACRE Carolina troops in attempting to hold the enemy at the Savannah GOOSE CREEK CHURCH ANDREW JACKSON STATE PARK River or expel them from Georgia . MARION'S TOMB 22 BRATTONSVILLE COLOR KEY EUTAW SPRINGS 23 FISHDAM FORD Your best gu ide to the principal towns and cities , and the primary • The site or some part of it is operated as an historical HAYNE'S TOMB BLACKSTOCK'S Bri er Cree k attracti on.
    [Show full text]
  • Sons of the American Revolution 250Th Events
    REVOLUTIONARY WAR MASTER EVENT LIST Date Event Location 1763 The French and Indian War ends 1763 The Royal Proclamation Line is established 1764 The Stamp Act 1764 Patrick Henry’s Virginia Resolves April 12, 1767 The Townshend Acts are passed by Parliament May 16, 1771 Battle of Alamance (War of Regulation) Alamance, NC June 9, 1772 The Gaspee Affair Newport, RI March 12, 1773 Virginia establishes a Cmte of Correspondence Williamsburg, VA December 16, 1773 The Boston Tea Party Boston, MA Mar-Jun 1774 The Intolerable Acts North America Wide March 18 1774 British Occupy Boston Boston, MA September 1, 1774 The Powder Alarm Somerville, MA September 5, 1774 First Continental Congress Convened Philadelphia, PA September 9, 1774 The Suffolk Resolves Dedham, MA October 4-6, 1774 Battle of Point Pleasant (Lord Dunmore’s War) Point Pleasant, WV February 27, 1775 Battle of Moore's Creek Bridge Currie, NC March 23, 1775 Patrick Henry’s Give Me Liberty Speech Richmond, VA April 18, 1775 Battles of Lexington & Concord Concord, MA April 20, 1775 Gunpowder Incident Williamsburg, VA April 21, 1775 Gunpowder Removal Charleston, SC May 10, 1775 Capture of Fort Ticonderoga Ticonderoga, NY May 27-28, 1775 Battle of Chelsea Creek (Noddle’s or Hog Island) Suffolk, MA June 11, 1775 Action at Machias Machias, ME June 17, 1775 Battle of Bunker Hill Charlestown, MA July 5, 1775 The Olive Branch Petition Philadelphia, PA July 12, 1775 Battle of Fort Charlotte Mt Carmel, SC October 18, 1775 Burning of Falmouth Falmouth, MA November 17-18, 1775 Raid on Charlottetown
    [Show full text]
  • Revolutionary War Patriot's Pensions & Gravesites
    REVOLUTIONARY WAR PATRIOT’S PENSIONS & GRAVESITES Of Knox and Surrounding Counties STEPHEN HOLSTON CHAPTER Tennessee SAR 0 This is document is comprised of a compiliation of content found on Revolutionary War Veterans who have either applied for a pension or are interred in Knox, or one of the immediate surrounding counties. The counties are arranged in alphabetical order, and the Patriots who are compiled in each county are in alphabetical order as well. This information is first separated by the county in which the Patriot applied for a war pension. If no pension is listed, the Patriot should be compilied inside the county that he/she is interred. Photos of homesteads and gravesites are included where available. Portraits of a few Patriots are also included. Multicolored tabs affixed to the outside of the pages mark the name indexes for each county. If a Patriot’s page has a gold stamp applied to it, this indicates that this Patriot’s grave has been marked by the Tennessee Sons of the American Revolution. As futher information is provided, or becomes available, this document will be updated. Stephen Holston Chapter, Tennessee SAR 1 Table of Contents Anderson County ..................................................................................................................................................... 3 Blount County ........................................................................................................................................................ 52 Cocke County .......................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Banastre Tarleton at the Waxhaws, May 29, 1780
    ________________________________________________________________________________________ Vol. 1 No. 2 October 2004 Uniforms re-colored by B. Caroline Baxley to show Lt. Col. Banastre Tarleton’s British Legion “Green Dragoons” in close combat such as at the Battle of the Waxhaws; excerpted from an engraving “The Battle of Camden - Death of DeKalb” from the original 19th century painting by Alonzo Chappel, and published by Johnson Fry & Co. of New York. MASSACRE OR MYTH? BANASTRE TARLETON AT THE WAXHAWS, MAY 29, 1780 Welcome to our second newsletter, “The Southern Campaigns of the American Revolution”, dedicated to the study of the War for American Independence in the Southern Department from 1760 to 1789. We want to encourage the exchange of information on the Southern Campaigns’ battle sites, their location, preservation, historic signage and interpretation, artifacts and archaeology, as well as the personalities, military tactics, units, logistics, strategy and the political leadership of the region. We will highlight professionals and amateurs actively engaged in Revolutionary War research, preservation and interpretation to encourage a dynamic exchange of information. All are invited to submit articles, pictures, documents, events, and suggestions. We will feature battles and skirmishes, documents, maps, artifacts, Internet links, and people involved in research. Charles B. Baxley, editor In This Edition: Mel Gibson and Hollywood picked up some of the Tarleton myth and reputation in his hit movie, “The Patriot”. As now in the Middle East, at some point I am sure Lord Cornwallis wondered if he was • Editor’s Notes…….……….………………..…..……..2 creating more Rebels than he was subjugating. • Current Research on the Battle of the Waxhaws....3 The initial focus of the newsletter has been on the • Massacre or Myth? Banastre Tarleton at the Revolution in South Carolina.
    [Show full text]
  • S32216 Edward Doyle
    Southern Campaigns American Revolution Pension Statements & Rosters Pension application of Edward Doyle S32216 f36SC Transcribed by Will Graves revised 8/4/08 & 12/8/14 [Methodology: Spelling, punctuation and/or grammar have been corrected in some instances for ease of reading and to facilitate searches of the database. Where the meaning is not compromised by adhering to the spelling, punctuation or grammar, no change has been made. Corrections or additional notes have been inserted within brackets or footnotes. Blanks appearing in the transcripts reflect blanks in the original. A bracketed question mark indicates that the word or words preceding it represent(s) a guess by me. The word 'illegible' or 'indecipherable' appearing in brackets indicates that at the time I made the transcription, I was unable to decipher the word or phrase in question. Only materials pertinent to the military service of the veteran and to contemporary events have been transcribed. Affidavits that provide additional information on these events are included and genealogical information is abstracted, while standard, 'boilerplate' affidavits and attestations related solely to the application, and later nineteenth and twentieth century research requests for information have been omitted. I use speech recognition software to make all my transcriptions. Such software misinterprets my southern accent with unfortunate regularity and my poor proofreading skills fail to catch all misinterpretations. Also, dates or numbers which the software treats as numerals rather
    [Show full text]