Production of Oil from Freshwater and Marine Water Microalgae for Biodiesel Production

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Production of Oil from Freshwater and Marine Water Microalgae for Biodiesel Production PRODUCTION OF OIL FROM FRESHWATER AND MARINE WATER MICROALGAE FOR BIODIESEL PRODUCTION by Mariam Al hattab Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Applied Science at Dalhousie University Halifax, Nova Scotia June 2014 © Copyright by Mariam Al hattab, 2014 DEDICATION TO: My Parents: Tayser and Manal Al hattab My Brothers: Mohammed and Ahmed Al hattab My Friends: Halah and Diana Shahin, Rasha Aludhaib, Niki and Tasha Moideen, Rabiya and Rabeyl Aslam, Amena and Hannan Fayad, Deepika Dave, Ian MacDonald, Vegneshwaran Ramakrishnan and Rishi Ananthashankar ii TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES ...............................................................................................................x LIST OF FIGURES ......................................................................................................... xiii ABSTRACT ..................................................................................................................... xvi LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND SYMBOLS USED ................................................ xvii ACKNOWLEDGMENT................................................................................................ xviii CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................1 CHAPTER 2. OBJECTIVES ...............................................................................................4 CHAPTER 3. LITERATURE REVIEW .............................................................................5 3.1. Types of algae .....................................................................................5 3.1.1. Macroalgae ..............................................................................5 3.1.1.1. Phaeophyta: ............................................................... 5 3.1.1.2. Rhodophyta: .............................................................. 6 3.1.1.3. Chlorophyta............................................................... 6 3.1.2. Microalgae ..............................................................................6 3.1.2.1. Eukaryotic Algae ...................................................... 8 3.1.2.2. Prokaryotic Cyanobacteria ........................................ 8 3.2. Microalgae Environment ....................................................................9 3.2.1. Freshwater Microalgae............................................................9 3.2.1.1. Scenedesmus obliquus ............................................... 9 3.2.1.2. Chlorella saccharophila ........................................... 9 3.2.1.3. Chlorella protothecoide ............................................ 9 3.2.2. Marine Microalgae ................................................................11 3.2.2.1. Nannochloropsis oculata ........................................ 11 3.2.2.2. Tetraselmis suecica ................................................. 11 3.2.2.3. Chaetoceros muelleri .............................................. 11 3.2.3. Wastewater Microalgae ........................................................14 iii 3.3. Biological Composition of Algae .....................................................14 3.3.1. Proteins .................................................................................14 3.3.1.1. Rhodopsin-like Proteins .......................................... 14 3.3.1.2. Flavoproteins........................................................... 16 3.3.2. Carbohydrates .......................................................................16 3.3.3. Lipids ....................................................................................16 3.3.4. Nucleic Acid .........................................................................17 3.4. Lipid Production ...............................................................................17 3.4.1. Fatty acids .............................................................................20 3.4.2. Membrane Lipids ..................................................................22 3.4.3. Triacylglycerols (TAGs) .......................................................22 3.4.3.1. Cytoplasm Lipid...................................................... 24 3.4.3.2. De Novo Lipids ....................................................... 24 3.4.3.3. Chloroplasts Lipids ................................................. 25 3.5. Environmental Factors Affecting the Production of TAGs ..............25 3.5.1. Temperature ..........................................................................26 3.5.2. pH ..........................................................................................27 3.5.3. Nutrients ................................................................................28 3.5.3.1. Carbon ..................................................................... 28 3.5.3.2. Nitrogen .................................................................. 33 3.5.3.3. Phosphorous ............................................................ 37 3.5.3.4. Sulfur....................................................................... 38 3.5.4. Light Requirements ...............................................................38 3.5.4.1. Light Intensity ......................................................... 39 3.5.4.2. Photocycling Protein ............................................... 40 3.6. Light Sources ....................................................................................41 iv 3.6.1. Natural Light .........................................................................41 3.6.2. Artificial Light ......................................................................41 3.6.2.1. Red LED ................................................................. 42 3.6.2.2. Blue LED ................................................................ 42 3.6.2.3. Fluorescent light...................................................... 43 3.7. Algae Production Systems ................................................................43 3.7.1. Open ponds ...........................................................................43 3.7.1.1. Circular Pond .......................................................... 44 3.7.1.2. Raceway Pond ......................................................... 44 3.7.2. Enclosed Photobioreacters ....................................................47 3.7.2.1. Tubular Photoreactor .............................................. 47 3.7.3.2. Plate Type Photoreactors ........................................ 49 3.7.3. Hybrid Systems .....................................................................49 3.8. Utilization of Algae...........................................................................51 3.8.1. Non-Fuel Products ................................................................51 3.8.1.1. Food Supplements and Other Compounds ............. 51 3.8.1.2. Livestock Feed ........................................................ 52 3.8.2. Biofuel Products....................................................................53 3.8.2.1. Biodiesel ................................................................. 53 3.8.2.2. Biomethane ............................................................. 56 3.8.3.3. Bioethanol ............................................................... 57 3.9. Algae Harvesting Methods ...............................................................57 3.9.1. Membrane filtration ..............................................................58 3.9.2. Centrifugation .......................................................................58 3.9.3. Chemical Flocculation ..........................................................59 3.9.4. Air Flotation ..........................................................................59 v 3.9.5. Ultrasound Wave ..................................................................60 3.10. Oil Extraction ....................................................................................60 3.10.1. Oil Press ................................................................................60 3.10.2. Solvent Extraction .................................................................62 3.10.3. Supercritical Fluid .................................................................62 3.10.4. Ultrasound .............................................................................63 3.10.5. Liquefaction ..........................................................................63 CHAPTER 4. MATERIALS AND METHODS ...............................................................65 4.1. Selection of Microalgae ....................................................................65 4.1.1. Freshwater Microalgae..........................................................65 4.1.1.1. Botrycoccus brauni ................................................. 65 4.1.1.2. Chlorella protothecides .......................................... 65 4.1.1.3. Chlorella pyrenoidsa .............................................. 65 4.1.1.4. Chlorella saccharophila ......................................... 69 4.1.1.5. Chlorella sorokiniana ............................................. 69 4.1.1.6. Chlorella vulgaris ................................................... 69 4.1.1.7. Chlorococcum sp .................................................... 69 4.1.1.8. Scenedesmus obliquus ............................................. 72 4.1.2. Marine Microalgae ................................................................72 4.1.2.1. Chaetoceros muelleri .............................................
Recommended publications
  • Optimizing the Productivity and Sustainability of Algal
    OPTIMIZING THE PRODUCTIVITY AND SUSTAINABILITY OF ALGAL BIOFUEL SYSTEMS: INVESTIGATING THE BENEFITS OF ALGAL DIVERSITY AND UTILIZING BREWERY WASTEWATER FOR CULTIVATION By Jakob Owen Nalley A DISSERTATION Submitted to Michigan State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Integrative Biology—Doctor of Philosophy Ecology, Evolutionary Biology and Behavior—Dual Major 2016 ABSTRACT OPTIMIZING THE PRODUCTIVITY AND SUSTAINABILITY OF ALGAL BIOFUEL SYSTEMS: INVESTIGATING THE BENEFITS OF ALGAL DIVERSITY AND UTILIZING BREWERY WASTEWATER FOR CULTIVATION By Jakob Owen Nalley The era of inexpensive fossil fuels is coming to a close, while society is beginning to grapple with the byproducts of their combustion. Identifying alternative and more sustainable energy sources is of the utmost importance. One extremely promising option is biofuel derived from microalgae. Although algal biofuels have the capability to generate a substantial amount of biodiesel, there are a number of limitations that are hindering its commercialization. In this dissertation, I examine two main limitations concerning the economic and environmental sustainability of mass algal cultivation: (1) achieving and maintaining high algal productivity and (2) identifying an inexpensive water and nutrient source. Through the application of some core principles of ecological theory and employing a trait-based approach, I will illustrate how fostering algal diversity within these biofuel systems can lead to high productivity and stability. Knowledge of algal eco-physiological traits is essential for assembling optimal algal communities. Thus, I conducted a large thermal trait survey for 25 different algal species to better understand their biomass and fatty acid production across a range of temperatures. Finally, I will present two experiments I conducted investigating the feasibility of coupling algal cultivation with wastewater remediation generated at breweries.
    [Show full text]
  • Gc – Ms) Analysis
    Academic Sciences International Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences ISSN- 0975-1491 Vol 5, Issue 3, 2013 Research Article EVALUATION OF ANTIMICROBIAL METABOLITES FROM MARINE MICROALGAE TETRASELMIS SUECICA USING GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY – MASS SPECTROMETRY (GC – MS) ANALYSIS V. DOOSLIN MERCY BAI1 AND S. KRISHNAKUMAR2* 1Department of Biomedical Engineering Rajiv Gandhi College of Enginnering and Technology.Puducherry 607402, India, 2Department of Biomedical Engineering, Sathyabama University, Chennai 600119, Tamil Nadu, India. Email: [email protected] Received: 15 Mar 2013, Revised and Accepted: 23 Apr 2013 ABSTRACT Objective: Marine natural products have been considered as one of the most promising sources of antimicrobial compounds in recent years. Marine microalgae Tetraselmis suecica (Kylin) was selected for the present antimicrobial investigation. Methods: The effects of pH, temperature and salinity were tested for the growth of microalgae. The antibacterial effect of different solvent extracts of marine microalgae Tetraselmis suecica against selected human pathogens such as Vibrio cholerae, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Salmonella sp, Proteus sp., Streptococcus pyogens, Staphylococcus aureus, Bacillus megaterium and Bacillus subtilis were investigated. The GC-MS analysis was done with standard specification to identify the active principle of bioactive compound. Results: The highest cell density was observed when the medium adjusted with 40ppt of salinity in pH of 9.0 at 250C during 9th day of incubation period. Methanol + chloroform (1:1) crude extract of Tetraselmis suecica was confirmed considerable activity against gram negative bacteria than gram positive human pathogen. GC-MS analysis revealed the presence of unique chemical compounds like 1-ethyl butyl 3-hexyl hydroperoxide (MW: 100) and methyl heptanate (MW: 186) respectively for the crude extract of Tetraselmis suecica.
    [Show full text]
  • Airborne Microalgae: Insights, Opportunities, and Challenges
    crossmark MINIREVIEW Airborne Microalgae: Insights, Opportunities, and Challenges Sylvie V. M. Tesson,a,b Carsten Ambelas Skjøth,c Tina Šantl-Temkiv,d,e Jakob Löndahld Department of Marine Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Swedena; Department of Biology, Lund University, Lund, Swedenb; National Pollen and Aerobiology Research Unit, Institute of Science and the Environment, University of Worcester, Worcester, United Kingdomc; Department of Design Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Swedend; Stellar Astrophysics Centre, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmarke Airborne dispersal of microalgae has largely been a blind spot in environmental biological studies because of their low concen- tration in the atmosphere and the technical limitations in investigating microalgae from air samples. Recent studies show that airborne microalgae can survive air transportation and interact with the environment, possibly influencing their deposition rates. This minireview presents a summary of these studies and traces the possible route, step by step, from established ecosys- tems to new habitats through air transportation over a variety of geographic scales. Emission, transportation, deposition, and adaptation to atmospheric stress are discussed, as well as the consequences of their dispersal on health and the environment and Downloaded from state-of-the-art techniques to detect and model airborne microalga dispersal. More-detailed studies on the microalga atmo- spheric cycle, including, for instance, ice nucleation activity and transport simulations, are crucial for improving our under- standing of microalga ecology, identifying microalga interactions with the environment, and preventing unwanted contamina- tion events or invasions. he presence of microorganisms in the atmosphere has been phyta and Ochrophyta in the atmosphere (taxonomic classifica- Tdebated over centuries.
    [Show full text]
  • UNIVERSITÉ DE SHERBROOKE Faculté De Génie Département De Génie Chimique Et Génie Biotechnologique
    UNIVERSITÉ DE SHERBROOKE Faculté de génie Département de génie chimique et génie biotechnologique UTILISATION DU LACTOSÉRUM DANS UN PROCÉDÉ DE CULTURE DE MICROALGUES MIXOTROPHES POUR LA PRODUCTION DE BIODIESEL Thèse de doctorat Spécialité : génie biotechnologique Jean-Michel Bergeron Girard Jury : Michèle Heitz (directrice) Jean-Sébastien Deschênes (co-directeur) Réjean Tremblay (co-directeur) Nathalie Faucheux (co-directrice) J. Peter Jones (rapporteur) Isabelle Marcotte (évaluatrice externe) Joël Sirois (évaluateur interne) Sherbrooke (Québec) Canada Septembre 2014 À ma mère, à mon père, à ma sœur et à Maud qui cultivent avec moi la légèreté du quotidien RÉSUMÉ L‘objectif général du présent travail est la conception et le développement d‘un procédé original de culture de microalgues pour la production à grande échelle d‘huiles végétales à faible coût pour le marché du biodiesel. Une procédure multicritères de sélection de souches a d‘abord été mise au point afin d‘identifier la souche la plus susceptible de répondre favorablement aux paramètres du procédé préalablement déterminés. Cette procédure permet d‘inclure un grand nombre de critères et de considérer l‘importance relative de chacun de ces critères dans le pointage final accordé aux souches présélectionnées. Elle peut aussi être transposée à d‘autres contextes techniques et géographiques pour la sélection de souches destinées à diverses applications commerciales. Par la suite, l‘évaluation de la croissance et de la productivité lipidique de la souche sélectionnée a été effectuée au laboratoire, en mode nutritionnel mixotrophe, en présence d‘un important coproduit de l‘industrie laitière : le perméat de lactosérum. Le profil lipidique de la souche privilégiée, ainsi que sa capacité à hydrolyser le lactose, mise au jour pour la première fois, ont permis de démontrer le potentiel du procédé.
    [Show full text]
  • Compartmentalization of Mrnas in the Giant, Unicellular Green Algae
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.09.18.303206; this version posted September 18, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 1 Compartmentalization of mRNAs in the giant, 2 unicellular green algae Acetabularia acetabulum 3 4 Authors 5 Ina J. Andresen1, Russell J. S. Orr2, Kamran Shalchian-Tabrizi3, Jon Bråte1* 6 7 Address 8 1: Section for Genetics and Evolutionary Biology, Department of Biosciences, University of 9 Oslo, Kristine Bonnevies Hus, Blindernveien 31, 0316 Oslo, Norway. 10 2: Natural History Museum, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway 11 3: Centre for Epigenetics, Development and Evolution, Department of Biosciences, University 12 of Oslo, Kristine Bonnevies Hus, Blindernveien 31, 0316 Oslo, Norway. 13 14 *Corresponding author 15 Jon Bråte, [email protected] 16 17 Keywords 18 Acetabularia acetabulum, Dasycladales, UMI, STL, compartmentalization, single-cell, mRNA. 19 20 Abstract 21 Acetabularia acetabulum is a single-celled green alga previously used as a model species for 22 studying the role of the nucleus in cell development and morphogenesis. The highly elongated 23 cell, which stretches several centimeters, harbors a single nucleus located in the basal end. 24 Although A. acetabulum historically has been an important model in cell biology, almost 25 nothing is known about its gene content, or how gene products are distributed in the cell. To 26 study the composition and distribution of mRNAs in A.
    [Show full text]
  • C3c5e116de51dfa5b9d704879f6
    GBE Gene Arrangement Convergence, Diverse Intron Content, and Genetic Code Modifications in Mitochondrial Genomes of Sphaeropleales (Chlorophyta) Karolina Fucˇı´kova´ 1,*, Paul O. Lewis1, Diego Gonza´lez-Halphen2, and Louise A. Lewis1 1Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Connecticut 2Instituto de Fisiologı´a Celular, Departamento de Gene´tica Molecular Universidad Nacional Auto´ nomadeMe´xico, Ciudad de Me´xico, Mexico *Corresponding author: E-mail: [email protected]. Accepted: August 3, 2014 Data deposition: Nine new complete mitochondrial genome sequences with annotated features have been deposited at GenBank under the accessions KJ806265–KJ806273. Genes from partially sequenced genomes have been deposited at GenBank under the accessions KJ845680– KJ845692, KJ845706–KJ845718, and KJ845693–KJ845705. Gene sequence alignments are available in TreeBase under study number 16246. Abstract The majority of our knowledge about mitochondrial genomes of Viridiplantae comes from land plants, but much less is known about their green algal relatives. In the green algal order Sphaeropleales (Chlorophyta), only one representative mitochondrial genome is currently available—that of Acutodesmus obliquus. Our study adds nine completely sequenced and three partially sequenced mi- tochondrial genomes spanning the phylogenetic diversity of Sphaeropleales. We show not only a size range of 25–53 kb and variation in intron content (0–11) and gene order but also conservation of 13 core respiratory genes and fragmented ribosomal RNA genes. We also report an unusual case of gene arrangement convergence in Neochloris aquatica, where the two rns fragments were secondarily placed in close proximity. Finally, we report the unprecedented usage of UCG as stop codon in Pseudomuriella schumacherensis.In addition, phylogenetic analyses of the mitochondrial protein-coding genes yield a fully resolved, well-supported phylogeny, showing promise for addressing systematic challenges in green algae.
    [Show full text]
  • An Unrecognized Ancient Lineage of Green Plants Persists in Deep Marine Waters
    FAU Institutional Repository http://purl.fcla.edu/fau/fauir This paper was submitted by the faculty of FAU’s Harbor Branch Oceanographic Institute. Notice: ©2010 Phycological Society of America. This manuscript is an author version with the final publication available at http://www.wiley.com/WileyCDA/ and may be cited as: Zechman, F. W., Verbruggen, H., Leliaert, F., Ashworth, M., Buchheim, M. A., Fawley, M. W., Spalding, H., Pueschel, C. M., Buchheim, J. A., Verghese, B., & Hanisak, M. D. (2010). An unrecognized ancient lineage of green plants persists in deep marine waters. Journal of Phycology, 46(6), 1288‐1295. (Suppl. material). doi:10.1111/j.1529‐8817.2010.00900.x J. Phycol. 46, 1288–1295 (2010) Ó 2010 Phycological Society of America DOI: 10.1111/j.1529-8817.2010.00900.x AN UNRECOGNIZED ANCIENT LINEAGE OF GREEN PLANTS PERSISTS IN DEEP MARINE WATERS1 Frederick W. Zechman2,3 Department of Biology, California State University Fresno, 2555 East San Ramon Ave, Fresno, California 93740, USA Heroen Verbruggen,3 Frederik Leliaert Phycology Research Group, Ghent University, Krijgslaan 281 S8, 9000 Ghent, Belgium Matt Ashworth University Station MS A6700, 311 Biological Laboratories, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712, USA Mark A. Buchheim Department of Biological Science, University of Tulsa, Tulsa, Oklahoma 74104, USA Marvin W. Fawley School of Mathematical and Natural Sciences, University of Arkansas at Monticello, Monticello, Arkansas 71656, USA Department of Biological Sciences, North Dakota State University, Fargo, North Dakota 58105, USA Heather Spalding Botany Department, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822, USA Curt M. Pueschel Department of Biological Sciences, State University of New York at Binghamton, Binghamton, New York 13901, USA Julie A.
    [Show full text]
  • Saline Microalgae for Biofuels: Outdoor Culture from Small-Scale to Pilot Scale
    SALINE MICROALGAE FOR BIOFUELS: OUTDOOR CULTURE FROM SMALL-SCALE TO PILOT SCALE Andreas Isdepsky DIPL.-ING. (BIOTECH) This thesis is presented for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of Murdoch University, Western Australia 2015 DECLARATION I declare that this thesis is my own account of my research and contains as its main content work which has not previously been submitted for a degree at any tertiary education institution. Andreas Isdepsky ii “Do not go where the path may lead, go instead where there is no path and leave a trail.” Ralph Waldo Emerson iii ABSTRACT Three local isolates of the green alga Tetraselmis sp. identified as the most promising microalgae species for outdoor mass cultivation with high potential for biodiesel production due to high amounts of total lipids and high lipid productivity were employed in this study. The aim of the study was to compare three halophilic Tetraselmis strains (Tetraselmis MUR-167, MUR-230 and MUR-233) grown in open raceway ponds over long periods with respect to their specific growth rate and lipid productivity without additional CO2 and with CO2 addition regulated at pH 7.5 by using a pH-stat system. Attention also was given to the overall culture condition including contaminating organisms, biofilm development due to cell adhesion and cell clump formation. All tested Tetraselmis strains in this study were successfully grown outdoors in open raceway ponds in hypersaline fertilised medium at 7 % w/v NaCl over a period of more than two years. A marked effect of CO2 addition on growth and productivities was observed at high solar irradiance and temperatures between 15 – 33 oC.
    [Show full text]
  • Acartia Tonsa Dana and Acute Testing with Copper on Different Life Cycle Stages
    Faculty of Bioscience Engineering Academic Year 2014 – 2015 Culturing Acartia tonsa Dana and Acute Testing with Copper on Different Life Cycle Stages Jonathan Baetens Promotor: Prof. Dr. Eng. Karel De Schamphelaere Tutor: Msc. Olivier Berteloot Thesis Prepared for the Degree of Master of Science in Biochemical Engineering Technology Faculty of Bioscience Engineering Academic Year 2014 – 2015 Culturing Acartia tonsa Dana and Acute Testing with Copper on Different Life Cycle Stages Jonathan Baetens Promotor: Prof. Dr. Eng. Karel De Schamphelaere Tutor: Msc. Olivier Berteloot Thesis Prepared for the Degree of Master of Science in Biochemical Engineering Technology Copyright The author, the tutor and the promoter give the permission to use this thesis for consultation and to copy parts of it for personal use. Every other use is subject to the copyright laws, more specifically the source must be extensively specified when using the results from this thesis. De auteur en de promotor geven de toelating deze scriptie voor consultatie beschikbaar te stellen en delen van de scriptie te kopiëren voor persoonlijk gebruik. Elk ander gebruik valt onder de beperkingen van het auteursrecht, in het bijzonder met betrekking tot de verplichting de bron uitdrukkelijk te vermelden bij het aanhalen van resultaten uit deze scriptie. Written in Dendermonde and Ghent on 21/08/2015 Geschreven in Dendermonde en Gent op 21/08/2015 Jonathan Baetens Prof. Dr. Eng. Karel De Schamphelaere Msc. Olivier Berteloot Acknowledgements When it was time to choose a thesis subject, I was certain of two things. One, I wanted a subject that had an environmental ‘ring’ to it. Two, I wanted to work in a laboratory.
    [Show full text]
  • Phytohormones and Effects on Growth and Metabolites of Microalgae: a Review
    fermentation Review Phytohormones and Effects on Growth and Metabolites of Microalgae: A Review Xingfeng Han 1,2, Huiru Zeng 1,2, Pietro Bartocci 3 ID , Francesco Fantozzi 3 and Yunjun Yan 2,* ID 1 China-EU Institute for Clean and Renewable Energy, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China; [email protected] (X.H.); [email protected] (H.Z.) 2 Key Laboratory of Molecular Biophysics of the Ministry of Education, College of Life Science and Technology, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China 3 Department of Engineering, University of Perugia, Via G. Duranti 67, Perugia 06125, Italy; [email protected] (P.B.); [email protected] (F.F.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +86-027-8779-2213 Received: 13 March 2018; Accepted: 4 April 2018; Published: 9 April 2018 Abstract: Microalgae cultivation is booming in agriculture, aquaculture, and bioenergy sectors. A wide range of bioactive compounds with attractive properties can be produced with microalgae, including pigments, vitamins, proteins, carbohydrates, and lipids. The biofuel yields from microalgae can exceed the yields obtained with energy crops by 10–100 times. Therefore, such cultivation is promising for the regulation of the biosynthesis of microalagae with phytohormones, which can enhance the production of high-valued bioproducts. This review reports the effect of auxins, abscisic acid, cytokinins, gibberellins, and ethylene on microalgal growth and metabolites, as well as the crosstalk of different phytohormones. The use of phytohormones is also promising because it can also reduce the inputs necessary to grow the selected microalgae and maximize the yields. Keywords: microalgae; phytohormones; auxins; gibberellins; cytokinins; abscissic acid; bioproducts 1.
    [Show full text]
  • As Famílias Chlorococcaceae E Coccomyxaceae No Estado
    SIDNEY FERNANDES As Famílias Chlorococcaceae e Coccomyxaceae no Estado de São Paulo: levantamento florístico Tese apresentada ao Instituto de Botânica da Secretaria do Meio Ambiente do Estado de São Paulo, como parte dos requisitos para a obtenção do título de Doutor em Biodiversidade Vegetal e Meio Ambiente, área de concentração Plantas Avasculares e Fungos em Análises Ambientais. SÃOPAULO 2008 ii SIDNEY FERNANDES As Famílias Chlorococcaceae e Coccomyxaceae no Estado de São Paulo: levantamento florístico Tese apresentada ao Instituto de Botânica da Secretaria do Meio Ambiente do Estado de São Paulo, como parte dos requisitos para a obtenção do título de Doutor em Biodiversidade Vegetal e Meio Ambiente, área de concentração Plantas Avasculares e Fungos em Análises Ambientais. ORIENTADOR: DR. CARLOS EDUARDO DE MATTOS BICUDO iii Ficha catalográfica elaborada pela Seção de Biblioteca do Instituto de Botânica. Fernandes,Sidney F363aAsfamíliasChlorococcaceaeeCoccomyxaceaenoEstadodeSãoPaulo: levantamentoflorístico/SidneyFernandes–SãoPaulo,2008. 158p.il. Tese(Doutorado)–InstitutodeBotânica.SecretariadeEstadodoMeio Ambiente.2008. Bibliografia. 1.Algas.2.Chlorococcaceae.3.Coccomyxaceae.I.Título CDU:582.26 iv Dedico este trabalho à minha família, que não mediu esforços para que esta tese se tornasse realidade. v “Spe salvi facti sumus” (É pela esperança que fomos salvos) SãoPaulo vi Agradecimentos Agradeço a Deus pela oportunidade de conhecer pessoas maravilhosas que me ajudaram muitoem minha formaçãoprofissional comoficólogoe na realizaçãode mais uma empreitada em minhacaminhada. Um agradecimentoespecial aomeuorientador Dr.Carlos Eduardode Mattos Bicudo que abriu as portas da Seção de Ecologia quando eu me encontrava “desorientado” e depositouconfiança em que otrabalhose tornaria realidade.Qualquer palavra escrita nesta teseserá poucodiantedoimensoprazerque tiveemconhecê-loeserseualuno. Aos pesquisadores da Seçãode Ecologia que sempre foram muitosolícitos comigo, em especial Dra.
    [Show full text]
  • Provides an Insight Into Genome Evolution And
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Raphidocelis subcapitata (=Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata) provides an insight into genome Received: 18 November 2017 Accepted: 8 May 2018 evolution and environmental Published: xx xx xxxx adaptations in the Sphaeropleales Shigekatsu Suzuki, Haruyo Yamaguchi , Nobuyoshi Nakajima & Masanobu Kawachi The Sphaeropleales are a dominant group of green algae, which contain species important to freshwater ecosystems and those that have potential applied usages. In particular, Raphidocelis subcapitata is widely used worldwide for bioassays in toxicological risk assessments. However, there are few comparative genome analyses of the Sphaeropleales. To reveal genome evolution in the Sphaeropleales based on well-resolved phylogenetic relationships, nuclear, mitochondrial, and plastid genomes were sequenced in this study. The plastid genome provides insights into the phylogenetic relationships of R. subcapitata, which is located in the most basal lineage of the four species in the family Selenastraceae. The mitochondrial genome shows dynamic evolutionary histories with intron expansion in the Selenastraceae. The 51.2 Mbp nuclear genome of R. subcapitata, encoding 13,383 protein-coding genes, is more compact than the genome of its closely related oil- rich species, Monoraphidium neglectum (Selenastraceae), Tetradesmus obliquus (Scenedesmaceae), and Chromochloris zofngiensis (Chromochloridaceae); however, the four species share most of their genes. The Sphaeropleales possess a large number of genes for glycerolipid metabolism and sugar assimilation, which suggests that this order is capable of both heterotrophic and mixotrophic lifestyles in nature. Comparison of transporter genes suggests that the Sphaeropleales can adapt to diferent natural environmental conditions, such as salinity and low metal concentrations. Chlorophyceae are genetically, morphologically, and ecologically diverse class of green algae1.
    [Show full text]