COUNCIL CORRESPONDENCE – AGENDA PACKAGE October 12 – October 25, 2017

CORRESPONDENCE PAGES ACTION OUTCOME 1. Email dated October 12, Forwarded to Mayor Coordination duties 2017 from the Salvation and Council for District Army regarding support of involvement assigned Christmas Kettles to Arts, Culture and Communications Advisor.

2. Email dated October 16, Forwarded to Mayor, Bylaw Enforcement 2017 from T. Chesky Council, Corporate preparing a report to Officer and Bylaw Committee regarding the impact of cats on birds Officers

3. Email dated October 17, Forwarded to Mayor, 2017 from N. Brunemeyer Council and Development regarding a request to lease land Services Department.

4. Letter dated October 25, Forwarded to Mayor Council to consider 2017 from the United and Council recognition and Canadian Metis Nation advise

regarding Metis Communications so Recognition on November that arrangements for 16th “Louis Riel Day” a flag raising ceremony can be made.

From: Kettle Coordinator [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Kettle Coordinator Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2017 10:10 AM To: Council Subject: SalArmySC news ❤

News and updates @SalArmySC and more... View this email in your browser

Dear council,

The Salvation Army on the Sunshine Coast thank's you for graciously supporting Christmas kettles in past years. We would be delighted to have you participate in the kettle campaign again this year.

I (Inge Hardman 2017 kettle coordinator on the Sunshine Coast) am looking forward to reuniting with our devoted kettle hosts from past years and meet new kettle hosts this year. Our goal in 2017 is to fill over 500 kettle shifts to fund our feeding programs. It is a daunting task.

Our campaign kick off date is Friday November 17th. Book your shifts before the 18th to enter a draw for a magnificent gift basket. Every shift booked gives you one chance to win. Last years lucky winner was Don. Don has volunteered for the kettle campaign for several years.

If you have any questions, please email or call me. I can be reached on my cell. 604 818-0048 or email [email protected]

Here is a link to our 2017 schedule page: http://tsaonthecoast.com/news/kettles-schedule/

Location schedule calendar links: London Drugs Sunnycrest Mall (SuperValu) IGA (Gibsons) Independent Grocers Trail Bay Mall (Claytons) IGA (Wilson Creek) Canadian Tire

100% of the money raised at the kettles goes directly to funding services and programs locally on the coast.

2017 has been a very busy year at SalArmySC. Matthew Hardman, Family services coordinator said the primary feeding programs, food bank, lunch with friends, daily bread and produce line, have been busy in 2017. This year our lunch with friend’s hot meal program reached maximum capacity most Tuesdays and

Fridays. MORE INFO

This year our Ministry Unit welcomed new officers, Major Glen and Rosanne Fraser to the Sunshine Coast Community. Glen & Rosanne pledged, by God's help, to give leadership and direction; encouragement and counsel; a true ministry of the word; and, in all things, show Christ like example to those who have been entrusted in their care. More Info

In 2017 the Emergency Disaster Service canteen has been utilized for emergency training at numerous community events. BC Divisional Emergency Disaster Services Director John McEwan traines emergency preparedness to our community. If you are interested in becoming a Volunteer helping 1st responders in an emergency on the Sunshine Coast, please contact Matthew at 604 886-3665 to signup for the next training session. More Info

Warmest regards, Inge Hardman “Giving Hope Today” on the sunshine Coast

Inge Hardman CFRE candidate The Salvation Army Sunshine Coast Ministries 5-682 Gibsons Way | Mailing Address: PO Box 1625 Gibsons, BC V0N 1V0 Office: 604 886-3665 Cell: 604-818-0048 Email: [email protected] | www.tsaonthecoast.com

Copyright © 2017 The Salvation Army on the Sunshine Coast, All rights reserved. You are receiving this email because you are a friend and supporter of the Harvest of Hope food-bank and services at The Salvation Army on the Sunshine Coast.

Our mailing address is: The Salvation Army on the Sunshine Coast 5 - 682 Gibsons Way Gibsons, BC V0N 1V0 Canada

Add us to your address book

Want to change how you receive these emails? You can update your preferences or unsubscribe from this list

From: Connie Jordison Sent: Monday, October 16, 2017 2:17 PM To: Ted Cheskey Cc: Sara Tyne; Jo-Anne Frank; Greg Horning Subject: RE: Letter to the Mayor and Council re: Keeping cats safe and saving bird lives.

This is to acknowledge District receipt of your email. As your email was addressed to [email protected], it has been delivered to the email accounts of all members of District Council. Your email has also been referred for consideration of inclusion, as Council Correspondence, on our website and/or the agenda of a future Regular Council meeting.

I have also referred your email, for information, to our Corporate Officer and our Bylaw Enforcement Department. Thank you.

Connie Jordison Communications Manager District of Sechelt

Mayor Milne and Council PO Box 129 Sechelt, BC V0N 3A0 sent via email to: [email protected]

October 16, 2017

Dear Mayor Milne and Council,

We understand that the Sechelt Council has been approached by residents calling for action to keep birds safe by keeping cats from roaming freely. We wanted to write and express our sincere hope that Council will move to address the issue.

Nature Canada, in collaboration with our BC partner, the Stewardship Centre for British Columbia, are leading a campaign, Keep Cats Safe and Save Bird Lives, to increase public awareness of the impact on both cats and birds of the common practice of letting cats free-roam outdoors. Please visit http://www.catsandbirds.ca/to learn more about our initiative and the science behind it.

Being unsupervised outdoors is dangerous for cats. They are at risk of diseases, parasites, car accidents, getting lost, and fights with other cats, dogs and wildlife. It also impacts birds: Environment Canada estimates that cats, both pet and feral, kill between 100 and 350 million birds per year.

We recently conducted a survey through Nanos Research, and 59% of Canadians already keep their cat indoors, or supervise it while outdoors (leash or cat enclosure), so the social change we advocate is already well underway.

We strongly recommend that Sechelt adopt a no-free-roam bylaw for cats as both an animal welfare and environmental stewardship measure. It is most effective if any such bylaw be accompanied by a public-awareness campaign so that the citizenry understands the benefits of compliance. We would be pleased to offer you support in that effort, and can help you craft effective messaging. We have a lot of resources for cat-owners to help them make this change, and would be pleased to share them with you.

We have attached two documents that will be useful to you. One is a Briefing Note on the issue, the other is Recommended Policies & Bylaws.

We would be delighted to speak further with you or your staff about this, please don’t hesitate to get in touch with Ted at [email protected], or 613-562-3447 ext. 227, or with DG Blair at [email protected], or 1-866-456-7222.

Yours sincerely,

Ted Cheskey DG Blair Senior Manager, Bird Conservation Executive Director Nature Canada Stewardship Centre for BC

P.S. We also wanted to let you know that we have a prize for municipalities who are adopting progressive bylaws. We are currently accepting nominations for the 2018 award, and we hope Sechelt will be a contender in the future!

REDUCING THE IMPACT OF CATS ON BIRDS AND WILDLIFE:

A BRIEFING NOTE FOR LOCAL GOVERNMENTS

Adapted for Canadian Municipalities by Nature Canada

Originally created by:

July 2016

Acknowledgements

The original report was produced by the Stewardship Centre for British Columbia, 2016 © Funding for the original report was provided by the Environment Canada Habitat Stewardship Program, with in-kind support by BC SPCA, Canadian Wildlife Service, South Coast Conservation Program, Bird Studies Canada; Wildlife Conservation Through Cat Welfare Group and the South Okanagan Similkameen Conservation Program for their technical review and project support. The original document does not necessarily represent the views of all individual members of the advisory committee of the Stewardship Centre for BC, or the official positions of the organizations with which the individual committee members are associated.

Artwork by Manda Maggs The original document was revised and adapted for a national audience by Nature Canada in July, 2016.

The Stewardship Centre for BC The Stewardship Centre for BC (SCBC) was created to assist governments, businesses, conservation and environmental organizations, and citizens carry out stewardship activities in the most efficient, effective, and rewarding ways. A leader in promoting stewardship values as the foundation for sustainability, the SCBC wants to help make “shared stewardship” – the voluntary adoption of environmentally sustainable practices by all sectors of society – a reality in British Columbia.

We are committed to champion science-based best practices so that British Columbians understand, enjoy, and sustain healthy ecosystems. As good stewardship relies on good decision- making, we work closely with our partners to develop innovative technical, educational, and capacity building resources. For more information about the Stewardship Centre, go to www.stewardshipcentrebc.ca.

Nature Canada Nature Canada is the oldest national nature conservation charity in Canada. Our mission is to protect and conserve wildlife and habitats in Canada by engaging people and advocating on behalf of nature. Learn more at www.naturecanada.ca.

Nature Canada works with partners across Canada to keep cats safe and save bird lives. Please visit their websites (www.catsandbirds.ca) and take full advantage of their resources and on-the-ground reach. Keep Cats Safe and Save Bird Lives is a coalition of individuals and organizations concerned about the well-being of cats and birds. We believe all animals are important, and as humans we owe both cats and birds protection. Cats are at risk when they go outdoors unsupervised. Through improving our treatment of cats we, as a society, also limit their impact on the environment generally, and birds in particular. Disclaimer

The Stewardship Centre for BC and Nature Canada provide the information in this guide and its website for educational purposes only. Material contained within it carries no guarantee of any kind, express or implied. SCBC and Nature Canada do not endorse, recommend or control linked websites and accept no responsibility whatsoever for their contents or views. The Stewardship Centre for BC and Nature Canada accept no liability or blame for damages to any person or business entity because of using these websites, their information or any website linked to them. This guide is meant to complement but not replace other existing resources, including the BC Ministry of Environment’s Develop with Care series and Best Management Practices (BMPs) that have been developed for individual species. Following the guide also does not replace the need for due diligence regarding the legislative and regulatory requirements for projects involving species at risk. INTRODUCTION

Free-ranging domestic cats are considered to be one of the top sources of bird mortality in North America (Calvert et al., 2013), estimated to kill between 2 and 7% of the total bird population in southern Canada (Blancher, 2013) annually. Slightly more than one in three Canadian households keeps cats, and there are estimated to be between 1.4 and 4.2 million feral cats. The impacts of cat predation are believed to be highest in densely settled areas of Canada.

The domestic cat is now so common that many people do not realize they are a non-native species to North America and were introduced only a few hundred years ago. Their dramatic rise in population numbers during this time has been devastating to native wildlife. Virtually all cats are skilled hunters if given the opportunity, although some kill much more than others and individual cats vary in the types of prey they target. Being fed

© Jennifer Barnard/Wikepedia Commons by humans has little or no impact on predation rates. Younger cats (1-2 years) typically catch more prey. Most cat owners have little idea of the extent of the problem, in part because only a small proportion, less than 25%, of kills are brought home. Canada’s songbird population has Canada has a critical conservation and stewardship decreased 12% since 1970. Let’s help our responsibility for birds – with over 450 species that breed in backyards and natural areas safe from Canada each year. That number includes many migratory cats. birds that arrive in our communities over the course of the year. These birds all depend on the availability of food and suitable habitat to maintain their population numbers.

Reducing feral cat populations and keeping domestic cats indoors or under the owners control when outside would help to mitigate the impact of cats on wildlife populations. There is mounting evidence that changes in attitudes toward domestic cats, new animal control legislation and cat management policies are needed to bring about the human behavior change necessary to ameliorate this problem. (Holm 2014; Pearson and Blair 2013)

The purpose of this report is to provide decision-makers with a summary of the issues related to cat predation of vulnerable bird and wildlife species and provide some recommended actions to consider.

Reducing the impacts of cats on birds and wildlife: a briefing note for local governments, 4 THE CURRENT SITUATION

THE RISE IN CAT POPULATIONS IN CANADA

The Canadian Federation of Humane Societies (CFHS) undertook a multi-stakeholder research initiative to understand the scope of cat overpopulation in Canada (2012). The research found that there are an estimated 10.2 million owned cats in Canada growing at a rate faster than the rise in number of households across the country. While it is difficult to estimate the Canadian feral cat population it is thought that these cats are significant contributors to overpopulation because of their lower spay/neuter rates leading to unwanted litters (Slater, 2007, 2002, Centonze & Levy, 2002). Adding to the problem is inter-breeding between feral and domestic cats. At this point, if large-scale, targeted action is not taken, the cat overpopulation problem in Canada will worsen.

BIRD POPULATIONS ARE IN TROUBLE

Slow but steady declines in the populations of specific groups of birds in North American have prompted analysis of the factors related to these decreases. Although birds are small and somewhat secretive, they are well-censused. Annual bird counts and bird surveys have been conducted since 1900. “The State of Canadian Birds” published by Environment Canada on behalf of the North American Bird Conservation Initiative (2012), concludes that on average, Canadian breeding bird populations have decreased 12% since 1970. Bird species at risk have increased from 47 to 86 since since 2001. Some groups of birds such as aerial insectivores (i.e. swallows, swifts, nightjars, flycatchers), shorebirds and grassland birds show major declines of 40 % to 60% or more in this same period and individual species such as the Chestnut-collared Longspur, a ground-nesting, sparrow-like bird of the prairies, have declined by over 90%!

WHICH SPECIES ARE MOST VULNERABLE AND WHY?

SMALL MAMMALS

Small mammals are a common prey of cats. In Canada, hundreds of millions, most of them native species, are killed annually by cats. Shrews, voles and mice are most likely to be impacted because of their small size and likelihood of being found around farms and urbanizing areas. Species like the House Mouse or the Norway Rat are also vulnerable to cats, but cats 'employed' on farms as pest control officers are in a different category than pet or feral cats.

SONGBIRDS

Songbirds are also a common prey. Bird predation is highest in spring and summer when nestlings and fledglings are abundant. The number of birds killed by cats annually in urban areas is often greater than the number of young hatched and often up to 40% of the total population in the area. With such high death rates these areas reduce rather than contribute to regional bird populations. Species that nest on or near the ground are most vulnerable, as are birds found near residential neighbourhoods, farms and at bird feeders.

Reducing the impacts of cats on birds and wildlife: a briefing note for local governments, 5

Photo by Ted Cheskey Photo by Dave Semmelink

The White-throated Sparrow and the Barn

Swallow are just two of the species susceptible to cat predation.

Photo: by M. Pearson

REPTILES AND AMPHIBIANS

Reptiles and amphibians are reported as prey in almost all studies of free range and feral cats. They are rarely brought home by free-rooming cats and are likely more commonly killed than most owners realize.

SPECIES AT RISK

There are a number of species at risk that are impacted by cat predation, including the Sharp-tailed Snake in BC and the Woodland Vole in Quebec and Ontario. Both are small, land dwelling species found near urban and suburban areas and consequently very vulnerable to cat predation. Rare and threatened bird species plus species that nest or feed on the ground are prey for domestic and feral cats.

BIRDS IMPACTED BY CAT PREDATION:

• Common songbirds, such as the White-throated Sparrow, and American Robin and long- distance migrants such as Indigo Bunting and Yellow Warbler. • Rare and Threatened species, such as the Yellow-breasted Chat, Barn Swallow and Wood Thrush • Birds that nest or feed on the ground, such as the Killdeer.

Reducing the impacts of cats on birds and wildlife: a briefing note for local governments, 6 CAT MANAGEMENT ISSUES

POPULATION MANAGEMENT

Cats are prolific breeders, and can produce two to three litters per year of three to six kittens. The problem of cat fecundity is exacerbated by cat owners who let their cats roam free, fail to spay or neuter their pets, and abandon unwanted cats. When considering cat management, both domestic and feral cat populations need to be included –with different management strategies for each. Free-roaming owned cats interact and breed with feral cats, adding to the already serious overpopulation problem.

MULTIPLE STAKEHOLDERS

There is no one stakeholder or group responsible for the managing domestic and feral cats– it is truly a multi-stakeholder issue that requires a combined effort to resolve. The Canadian Federation of Humane Societies identifies six stakeholder groups that are concerned with domestic cat care and management: municipalities, veterinarians, humane societies, animal rescue groups, spay and neuter groups, and feral cat support groups (2012). Nature Canada’s Keep Cats Safe and Save Bird Lives campaign has coalesced many of the groups from both sides of the issue – cats and birds – in an multifaceted national Initiative to make measurable progress on this issue.

CAT IMPACTS ON HUMAN HEALTH

The American Association of Feline Practitioners (AAFP) has noted that cat overpopulation, if ignored, could impact human health as well as native wildlife populations. The AAFP published a comprehensive review of zoonotic disease1 carried by free- roaming cats that are vectors for serious diseases passed through direct contact or soil and water contaminated by cats (2003). Individuals most susceptible to zoonotic diseases include unborn children, the young, elderly and people with lowered immune systems.

1 Zoonotic disease is a disease that can be passed between animals and humans. Zoonotic diseases can be caused by viruses, bacteria, parasites, and fungi.

Reducing the impacts of cats on birds and wildlife: a briefing note for local governments, 7

STEWARDSHIP PRACTICES TO REDUCE CAT PREDATION

Most municipalities and regional districts in Canada have had dog control bylaws for years. Bylaws restrict dogs from freely roaming to protect domestic pets, wildlife, farm animals and humans from injury (BC SPCA, 2015). Historically, cats have been allowed to roam freely because of an attitude that cats are independent and need to roam. However, with the increasing domestic and feral cat populations, it is time to consider a different approach.

A multi-pronged approach which includes public education about responsible pet ownership; the enactment of local government bylaws to protect birds and other wildlife and reinforce responsible pet practices; and increased municipal support to humane shelters and societies will help address the cat overpopulation crisis and its impact on birds and wildlife.

Following are various actions, called Stewardship Practices, which can help reduce the impact of cat predation on bird and wildlife populations. It must be kept in mind that limiting the impacts of feral and free-roaming domestic cats requires different strategies.

EDUCATE PET OWNERS

Local governments have jurisdiction to implement a number of mechanisms to control cats, but none are likely to be effective or politically possible in the absence of public education efforts. Public attitudes towards control measures typically vary with pet ownership. Non–cat owners are more likely to recognize that cats may pose a threat to wildlife in urban and suburban areas and are more likely to favour control of cat movement. Finding and working with cat owners who do support strict controls, however, can be very effective in educating others and increasing public acceptance of these measures. Other potential partners include animal shelters, local veterinarians, and nature clubs.

Reducing the impacts of cats on birds and wildlife: a briefing note for local governments, 8

Key points for pet owners

KEEP DOMESTIC CATS INDOORS OR ON LEASHES

Pet owners can provide their pets with longer lives and better health and prevent the deaths of many birds and mammals by keeping the pet indoors or on a leash or in an enclosure outside. This is the single most effective stewardship practice to limit the impact of cat predation on wildlife and species at risk.

STERILIZE CATS Cats can breed at just 4 to 6 months of age and can produce two litters annually. With about 8.5 million pet cats in Canada, allowing pets to breed is unnecessary and contributes to the problem of cat predation on vulnerable wildlife. Neutered animals also range over smaller areas.

KEEP CATS AWAY FROM NESTS AND FEEDERS You can keep cats out of bird habitat by fencing the area to exclude all cats. If cats do have access to bird feeding areas for example, place feeders on high poles away from areas where cats have cover to stalk. Avoid providing bird seed on the ground as much as possible. For more ideas on deterrents visit the following website http://catsandbirds.ca/research/cat-proofing-your-garden/

ADOPT POLICIES AND BYLAWS TO REDUCE IMPACTS OF CATS ON BIRDS AND WILDLIFE

Bylaws and policies evolve to reflect the values and needs of communities. Bylaws for animal control often only stipulate regulations for dogs. Newer bylaws titled “Responsible Pet” or “Companion Animal’

Reducing the impacts of cats on birds and wildlife: a briefing note for local governments, 9 bylaws reflect a concern for general animal welfare as well as public safety. Recognizing the impact of human activities on birds and other wildlife, local governments have the opportunity modify or enact bylaws to protect birds and other small wildlife within their jurisdictions. Domestic free-roaming cats and feral cats have been shown to have a significant negative effect on local wildlife and bird populations. Nature Canada recommends the adoption of bylaws and policies to address cat predation of sensitive species. The recommended bylaws would also mitigate the current feline overpopulation problem which requires ever increasing resources of animal welfare organizations and animal control agencies.

Municipalities in Canada can require that cats be licensed, neutered and/or vaccinated with permits for exceptions such as licensed breeders or animals too old or medically unfit to be neutered safely. Microchips or tags can be used to positively identify animals, reducing the number of lost pets that are sent to shelters or euthanized. A licensing program can also be used to limiting the number of cats per household and to allow the return of lost pets to owners.

SEE ACCOMPANYING DOCUMENT: RECOMMENDED LOCAL GOVERNMENT POLICIES AND BYLAWS TO REDUCE THE IMPACT OF CATS ON BIRDS AND WILDLIFE FOR FURTHER DETAILS.

REFERENCES

American Association of Feline Practitioners (AAFP) no date

American Association of Feline Practitioners. 2003. American Association of Feline Practitioners 2003 Report on Feline Zoonoses.

BC SPCA. 2015. Model Animal Responsibility Bylaw.

Blancher, P. 2013. Estimated number of birds killed by house cats (Felis catus) in Canada. Avian Conservation and Ecology, 8(2): 3.

Calvert, A. M., C. A. Bishop, R. D. Elliot, E. A. Krebs, T. M. Kydd, C. S. Machtans, and G. J. Robertson. 2013. A synthesis of human-related avian mortality in Canada. Avian Conservation and Ecology 8(2): 11.

Canadian Federation of Humane Societies. 2012. Cats in Canada.

Canadian Federation of Humane Societies. 2014. Animal Shelter Statistics 2013. Centonze, L.A. & Levy, J. 2002. Characteristics of free-roaming cats and their caretakers. American Veterinary Medical Association, 220(11); 1627-1633.

Reducing the impacts of cats on birds and wildlife: a briefing note for local governments, 10 Environment Canada. 2012. The State of Canadian Birds.

Loss, S. R., T. Will, and P. P. Marra. 2013. The impact of free-ranging domestic cats on wildlife of the United States. Nature Communications, 4:1396.

Pearson, M. D. Blair. 2013. Species at Risk: voluntary stewardship practices: reducing domestic and feral cat predation.

Holm, M. pers. comm. 2014 Slater, M. Community Approaches to Feral Cats. Washington, DC: Humane Society Press, 2002. Web.

Slater, M. Welfare of Feral Cats. The Welfare of Cats. Ed. Irene Rochlitz. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer, 2007. Web.

WEB RESOURCES

Cats and Birds http://catsandbirds.ca/ Nature Canada invites Canadians to consider what they can do to make Canada a safer place for both cats and birds. See tips on caring for cats, research on cat and wildlife issues, information for municipalities, and ideas on how to take action. Cat owners can “Take the pledge” to keep cats safe and save bird lives. Stewardship Centre for BC http://www.stewardshipcentrebc.ca SCBC has produced a series of documents encouraging individuals, communities and local governments to adopt practices that can reduce the impact of cats on birds and wildlife. “The Happy Cat” brochure offers tips on responsible pet ownership. American Bird Conservancy http://www.abcbirds.org/abcprograms/policy/cats/index.html Information and educational resources on cat predation and how to transform outdoor cats into contented indoor cast. ABC has public educational brochures which are available to order. Cornell Lab of Ornithology http://www.allaboutbirds.org/Page.aspx?pid=2656 “View from Sapsucker Woods”, an excellent short essay on the impacts of cats on bird populations. BC SPCA http://www.spca.bc.ca/animal-issues/professional-resources/model-bylaw.html Recommended local government bylaws for all animals.

Rithets Bog Conservation Society http://www.rithetsbog.org/ Videos of domestic cat predation on songbirds in a Victoria Conservation Area Cat Bib Information http://catgoods.com/

Reducing the impacts of cats on birds and wildlife: a briefing note for local governments, 11

REDUCING THE IMPACT OF CATS ON BIRDS AND WILDLIFE:

RECOMMENDED POLICIES AND BYLAWS FOR LOCAL GOVERNMENTS

July 2016

Acknowledgements

Funding for the orignial BC version of this document was provided for this project by the Environment Canada Habitat Stewardship Program, with in-kind support by BC SPCA, Canadian Wildlife Service, South Coast Conservation Program, Bird Studies Canada; Wildlife Conservation Through Cat Welfare Group and the South Okanagan Similkameen Conservation Program for their technical review and project support.

This document does not necessarily represent the views of all individual members of the advisory committee, or the official positions of the organizations with which the individual committee members are associated.

This report was written by Margaret Holm. Artwork by Manda Maggs. Adaptation for national use in Canada was by Nature Canada.

The original report was produced by the Stewardship Centre for British Columbia, 2016 ©. The adaptation for national use was produced by Nature Canada in June, 2016.

The Stewardship Centre for BC and Nature Canada The Stewardship Centre for BC (SCBC) was created to assist governments, businesses, conservation and environmental organizations, and citizens carry out stewardship activities in the most efficient, effective, and rewarding ways. A leader in promoting stewardship values as the foundation for sustainability, the SCBC wants to help make “shared stewardship” – the voluntary adoption of environmentally sustainable practices by all sectors of society – a reality in British Columbia.

Nature Canada is the oldest national nature conservation charity in Canada. Our mission is to protect and conserve wildlife and habitats in Canada by engaging people and advocating on behalf of nature. Learn more at www.naturecanada.ca.

Disclaimer

RECOMMENDED LOCAL GOVERNMENT POLICIES AND BYLAWS TO ADDRESS CAT PREDATION OF BIRDS AND OTHER WILDLIFE

SUMMARY

“For cat welfare to be improved in any community, regulatory and educational initiatives are needed.“ (BC SPCA 2015)

This document suggests bylaws and policies that can be adopted by local and regional governments to address the serious impact of free-roaming and feral cats on birds and other small wildlife. The BC SPCA, the Canadian Federation of Humane Societies and Nature Canada have published model animal bylaws, and although many of the bylaws are compatible with conservation objectives to protect native species, the needs of domestic companion animals take priority. The recommendations and background information presented here have birds and other native wildlife as the top priority and are also compatible with animal welfare objectives of improving cat welfare and mitigating cat overpopulation. Included are recommendations on cats roaming at large, sterilization, spay/neuter funds, identification, licensing, feral cat colonies, humane trapping, and public education programs.

BACKGROUND

BIRD POPULATIONS ARE IN TROUBLE

Slow but steady declines in the populations of specific groups of birds in North America have prompted analysis of the factors related to these decreases. Although birds are small and somewhat secretive they are well-censused. Annual bird counts and bird surveys have been conducted since 1900. “The State of Canadian Birds”, published by Environment Canada on behalf of the North American Bird Conservation Initiative (2012), concludes that on average, Canadian breeding bird populations have decreased 12% since 1970. Some groups of birds such as aerial insectivores (i.e. swallows, swifts, nightjars, flycatchers), shorebirds and grassland birds show Figure 1. West Coast and Mountains: Indicators of the average population status of characteristic species. From the State of Canadian Birds, 2012.

Recommended Policies and Bylaws to Address Cat Predation, 1

major declines of 40 % to 60% or more in this same period.

The well-being of wildlife populations is affected by direct and indirect human activities. Indirect impacts include forestry and agricultural practices, habitat loss and pollution. Direct impacts include factors or practices that lead to direct deaths such as wind turbines, industrial machinery or collisions with buildings and vehicles (Calvert et al. 2013). Two recent studies have concluded that cats are one of the largest direct human-related sources of mortality for wild birds in the United States and Canada (Blancher, 2013, Loss et al. 2013). Blancher estimates that 2-7% of the bird population in southern Canada is killed by cats every year.

Bird species that nest or feed on or near the ground are especially vulnerable to cat predation. Impacts are highest in densely settled areas. southern Canada.

CAT OVERPOPULATION IS A WORLD-WIDE EPIDEMIC

Cat overpopulation in Canada is a tragedy for cats, for the environment and for our communities. At the same time that many bird populations are experiencing declines, North America, along with many other parts of the globe, is experiencing a cat overpopulation crisis.

Recent estimates of the number of cats owned by Canadians range from 8.5 to 10.2 million animals (Blancher 2013, Canadian Federation of Humane Societies, 2012), with a rough approximation of an additional 1.4 to 4.2 million feral cats. In 2013, shelter statistics submitted to the Canadian Federation of Humane Societies show that within participating shelters, an average of 3 % of cats were returned to their owners, 47% were adopted to new homes, and 33% had to be euthanized. Animal welfare organizations are often unable to accept cats and kittens due to overcrowding and inadequate staffing and financial resources. Pet owners with unwanted or pregnant cats who are unable to relinquish them to humane shelters may release them into the wild or a rural neighbourhood, or simply stop caring for them, arguably and offence under the Criminal Code of Canada. Newly born kittens are killed or left to die. Colonies of feral cats are now a common sight at dumps, industrial areas, parks and even in residential areas.

THE CONSEQUENCES OF ALLOWING CATS AT LARGE

Recommended Policies and Bylaws to Address Cat Predation, 2

• Conﬂicts between neighbours, complaints by residents about cats Conﬂict & Health running at large and howling at night. Risks • Public health risks to humans from zoonoc diseases and parasites.

Unwanted • High pregnancy rates lead to many unwanted kiens • Unwanted cats and kiens surrendered to shelters cats • High rates of euthanized animals

Feral • Unwanted cats and kiens abandoned in the wild cat problem • Growth of feral cat colonies

• Municipal animal control budgets Cost of animal • Humane shelter budgets control • Feral cat socieies Trap/Neuter/Vaccinate costs

Environmental • 2-7% of bird populaon killed by cats annually • Small mammals, amphibians and reples killed by cats. costs • Cats roam in sensive habitats and impact species at risk.

The outdoors can be a dangerous place for a cat. Far too many cats are injured by cars, other cats, dogs and wildlife. Roaming cats are exposed to ticks and fleas as well as fatal diseases like rabies, feline leukemia, cat scratch disease and distemper, some of which are transferable to humans. Veterinarians agree that indoor cats easily live for ten to fifteen years and need less medical care, while the average outdoor cat’s life span is two to five years and can involve more medical care. Lastly, roaming cats pick up and spread disease including those that can be transferred to humans. Cat feces in gardens, children’s play areas and parks spread these diseases, and parasites throughout the community, all due to cats that are allowed to roam free. Toxoplasma gondii is a parasite carried by cats that can be transmitted to humans, mainly through contact with cat feces. While it has no effect on most people, it can cause symptoms in people with weak immune systems. A number of recent studies have linked Toxoplasma gondiiinfection with mental illnesses, particularly schizophrenia.

Surveys of Canadian households show that over sixty percent of cat owners keep their pets indoors or allow their cat out but on a leash or in an enclosed yard.These cats, with care and attention, live

1 Zoonotic diseases are those that can be spread between animals and humans.

Recommended Policies and Bylaws to Address Cat Predation, 3

long fulfilling lives indoors. It is therefore, a smaller percentage of the public that are unaware or downplay their cat’s impact on wildlife and the nuisance factor of their cats’ roaming outdoors.

Cats allowed to roam at large cost taxpayers money through animal control costs, including investigation of complaints, catching stray and feral cats, and shelter costs. Humane societies and shelters allocate substantial budgets to sheltering and caring for animals and many must euthanize significant numbers of the cats who enter their care.

Each year in Canada hundreds of thousands of animals enter shelters and the vast majority of these are cats. Some are pets surrendered by their owners who can no longer care for them, while others are found roaming as strays… Some are never adopted… It is projected that more than 600,000 homeless cats in Canadian shelters did not find new homes in 2011. (Catsandbirds.ca)As Canada’s population grows, the number of unwanted companion animals also increases. Many factors contribute to cat overpopulation. A lack of adequate municipal bylaws and budgets allocated to enforcement and support of humane shelters and societies keeps the situation acute.

Companion animal overpopulation is an issue of significant relevance to municipal government for health and safety reasons and also as a matter of fiscal sustainability. As our population grows, so does the work load of animal control departments – and the control, housing, and euthanasia of unwanted animals are costly budget items. Municipalities that have invested in proactive strategies for reducing pet overpopulation have realized new financial efficiencies in their operational costs. BC SPCA 2015

CAT CONTROL BYLAWS: GOOD FOR CATS, BIRDS AND COMMUNITIES

Most municipalities and regional municipalities in Canada have had dog control bylaws for many years. Bylaws restrict dogs from freely roaming to protect domestic pets, wildlife, farm animals and humans from injury. Historically, cats have been allowed to be unsupervised because of a belief that cats are independent and need to explore outdoors. We think of cats as being able to ‘look after themselves’ more than other pets. This ignores the fact that cats have been domestic pets for thousands of years and do not belong in the wild.

Bylaws and policies evolve to reflect the values and needs of communities. Older bylaws for animal control often stipulated regulations for dogs. Newer bylaws called “Responsible Pet” or “Companion Animal’ bylaws reflect a concern for general animal welfare as well as public safety. Recognizing the

Recommended Policies and Bylaws to Address Cat Predation, 4

impact of human activities on birds and other wildlife, local governments have the opportunity to protect birds and other small wildlife within their jurisdictions.

Domestic free-roaming cats and feral cats have been shown to have a significant negative effect on local wildlife and bird populations. Conservation agencies and organizations should be encouraged to lobby local and regional governments to adopt the following bylaws and policies to address cat predation of sensitive species. The recommended bylaws would also mitigate the current feline overpopulation problem which not only threatens birds and other wildlife but requires ever increasing resources of animal welfare organizations and animal control agencies.

RESPONSIBLE CAT OWNERSHIP BYLAW RECOMMENDATIONS

1. ADDRESS CATS RUNNING AT LARGE

The single most important bylaw that can be adopted to mitigate wildlife mortality and reduce the number of lost, unwanted and feral cats is to restrict cats from roaming freely off their owner’s property.

OPTION 1: CATS TO BE KEPT SECURED IF OUTDOORS OR UNDER DIRECT SUPERVISION.

Although many municipalities state a preferred policy of keeping cats indoors, no Canadian bylaw explicitly restricts a cat from being outdoors. Bylaws can require a cat to be contained within a building (including outdoor enclosures), or under direct supervision on an owner’s property. Direct supervision includes walking a cat using a leash or supervising a cat within a fenced yard.

Example bylaw: Creston Bylaw 1704: section 4

Every person who owns, harbours or possesses a cat shall ensure that the cat is not running at large. No cat shall be allowed off the premises of its owner except on a leash or contained within a carrier designed for the transportation of animals.

“At large, run at large, or running at large” means being elsewhere than on the premises of the owner of the cat, including public or other private property and not being under the care and control of the owner, either by being securely leashed, tethered or penned, or confined within a building or other enclosure.

Benefits of a cat secured or supervised bylaw:

Recommended Policies and Bylaws to Address Cat Predation, 5

- Reduces expenses and resources required by municipal animal control and animal welfare organizations to manage and house stray and feral cats. - Significantly reduces bird and wildlife mortality and helps to maintain wildlife biodiversity. - Does not have to be accompanied by a cat licensing bylaw. - Reduces unwanted pregnancies and mitigates release into the wild of unwanted cats and kittens. - Reduces complaints and management actions needed to deal with cats at large such as cats defecating in gardens and the noise and fighting associated with females in heat. - Reduces the exposure of cats and their guardians to parasites and zoonotic disease (diseases that can be passed from pets and wildlife to humans). - Eliminates cat mortality and injury due to contact with vehicles, dogs and predatory wildlife.

Challenges:

- Residents may be resistant to following a “cats indoors or supervised only” bylaw because of historic attitudes to cats roaming free. - Bylaws must be accompanied by an education campaign to increase public awareness of cats being kept indoors. - Requires response by animal control officers to catch cats off premises. - Property owners who are the complainants and responding animal control officers must be able to live trap cats.

Considerations:

- A no-roaming bylaw is often accompanied by a cat licensing and identification program to identify the pet owners. Licensing provides funds for animal control but requires additional human resources. - An estimated 66 % of Canadian cat owners already have indoor cats so public perceptions are changing. Indoor cat owners and neighbours bothered by free-roaming cats will support the bylaw.

OPTION 2: NO RUNNING AT LARGE

No running at large is the mandatory confinement of cats to their owners’ property or use of a leash when off the owner’s premises. Since cats are not required to be contained or supervised, roaming off property is probable.

Example bylaw: City of Winnipeg Responsible Pet ownership Bylaw No. 92/2013

Subject to this section, the owner of a cat that is in the City of Winnipeg must,

Recommended Policies and Bylaws to Address Cat Predation, 6

…ensure that the cat does not run at large; ensure that, except when it is (i) on the owner’s property; or (ii) on the property of another person who has consented to the presence of the unleashed cat; the cat is at all times kept on a leash…

Benefits of no-roaming cat bylaws:

- Allows residents to register complaints for cats allowed to roam - Allows municipalities to respond to complaints and take management actions to deal with cats at large. - May reduce wildlife mortality due to cats at large of their owner’s property.

Challenges:

- Cats are allowed outside unsupervised on an owner’s property so cats may frequently wander off the premises. - Without education, the tendency of cat guardians is to ignore the bylaw and be unaware or indifferent to cats roaming off property. - The onus is on neighbouring property-owners to complain to the municipalities about cats roaming at large. - Requires response by animal control officers to catch cats off premises. - A no-roaming bylaw is often accompanied by a cat licensing and identification program to identify the pet owners. - Property owners who are the complainants and responding animal control officers must be able to live trap cats.

2. SPAY AND NEUTER REGULATIONS

Regulations stipulate the mandatory spaying or neutering of all cats over the age of six months and no running-at large for an unsterilized cat over six months of age.

Example bylaw: Surrey Spay/Neuter By-law, 1998, No. 13548.

It shall be unlawful for any person to be or become an owner of a cat that is actually or apparently over six months of age unless the cat has been sterilized or unless the person holds a valid cat breeding permit for an unsterilized cat as provided for in this By-law.

It shall be unlawful for any person to allow an unsterilized cat that is actually or apparently over six months of age to be at large whether or not the person holds a valid cat breeding permit for the cat as provided for in this By-law.

OPTION: ALL CATS OFFERED FOR SALE OR ADOPTION MUST BE SPAYED/NEUTERED

Recommended Policies and Bylaws to Address Cat Predation, 7

Sample Bylaw: Any pet store, breeder or humane shelter that sells or offers kittens or cats for adoption or sale must sterilize animals prior to releasing them to their new owners, unless a breeder’s licence is obtained.

Benefits:

- Reduces unwanted pregnant cats and kittens which often are surrendered to human shelters, euthanized, or released into the wild to become feral. - Reduces nuisance complaints due to females in heat, male fighting and noise associated with mating interaction. - Reduces the number of unowned cats at large, thereby reducing the human resource and financial costs to local government and animal welfare organizations of managing cats at large. - Sterilized cats are less likely to roam and become lost and homeless.

Challenges:

- Cats can become fertile at three months of age or less so a six-month stipulation may be inadequate. Many shelters sterilize kittens over eight weeks old to prevent pregnancies. - Although cat overpopulation is addressed, sterilization has little impact on wildlife mortality due to cat predation. - It is difficult for bylaw control officers to assess on sight, whether a cat has been spayed or neutered - The bylaw is effective if accompanied by a cat licensing and education program.

Considerations:

- Ten municipalities in British Columbia have bylaws restricting unsterilized cats from being at large.2 - Municipalities should endeavour to support low-cost spay/neuter clinics for cat owners on limited incomes.

3. ESTABLISH A MUNICIPAL LOW-COST SPAY/NEUTER FUND

Many local governments have a policy of allocating dog and cat licence fees to a dedicated fund given to subsidize veterinary fees at low-income spay and neuter cat clinics. Larger cities with in- house veterinary services at animal shelters may offer spay and neuter services to residents who can offer proof of need. Smaller municipalities may allocate these funds to animal welfare organizations that sponsor low-cost spay/neuter clinics.

Benefits

2 BC SPCA (2015). Model Animal Responsibility Bylaw

Recommended Policies and Bylaws to Address Cat Predation, 8

- Makes veterinary services affordable for low-income pet owners. - Reduced number of animals that are given up for adoption due to pregnancy, unwanted kittens and fees or fines associated with unsterilized cats. - Reduces abandonment of cats and kittens into the wild to become feral. - May reduce overpopulation leading to overburdened humane shelters and cat care societies. - May reduce number of feral cats preying on birds.

Considerations

- The fund can be supported by dog and or cat licence fees, or as part of the municipal tax levy that supports animal control services. - Subsidized rather than free veterinary spay/neuter services may engender increased responsibility for animals among owners. - The fund can be for the benefit of animal shelters or registered animal care societies.

4. LICENCES AND IDENTIFICATION

Licences and/or identification, through collar tags, microchips or tattooing, assists in the return of lost cats to their owners but has little impact in the protection of birds and other wildlife from cat predation. It does allow cats found at large to be returned and the owners fined, which may encourage owners to supervise their cats.

OPTION 1: CAT IDENTIFICATION REQUIRED

Every owner of a cat shall affix an individual identification to a cat by a collar and tattoo or microchip to allow the identification of a cat and contact information for the owner. An identification program does not need to be accompanied by annual licensing. Cat welfare organizations recommend permanent identification methods over collar tags.

Example Bylaw: City of Surrey Animal Control Bylaw 13844

It shall be unlawful for any person to be an owner of a cat that is actually or apparently over six months of age unless the person maintains an identification worn by the cat.

"Identification" means: (1) a collar or tag worn by a cat which includes the current name, address and telephone number of the owner (2) a traceable tattoo; and (3) a traceable microchip.

OPTION 2: CAT LICENCING

Recommended Policies and Bylaws to Address Cat Predation, 9

Example bylaw: City of Toronto Bylaw 349-19

Registration; licence tags. Every owner of a cat shall:

A. Have registered the cat with the Executive Director, paid a licence fee in the amount specified in Chapter 441, Fees and Charges, and acquired a licence tag, including the payment of a licence fee in the amount specified in Chapter 441, Fees and Charges, for the cat.

B. Until ceasing to be the owner of the cat, renew a licence for the cat prior to the expiration of each licence issued for the cat.

C. Keep the cat licence tag securely fixed at all times on the cat for which the licence tag is issued.

Benefits:

- Licensing and identification not only assists in the return of cats to their owners but increases the value of the animal to the owner who has invested in the licensing. - Licence tags allow people with unwanted cats on their property to more easily identify the owners through the tag.

Challenges:

- A much lower percentage of residents purchase licences for cats than for dogs, reflecting the lower value of cats to owners. A cat licence program must be accompanied by an education campaign that emphasizes the benefits of licencing. - Permanent microchip and tattoo programs require owners to keep their addresses updated in a database. Several different databases and microchip readers may be needed to identify animals.

Considerations:

- Differential licences and fines for cats found at large will encourage owners to spay and neuter their cats to avoid higher fees. - Licence fees and fines may discourage owners to retrieve lost cats from animal shelters.

5. ADDRESS FERAL CAT COLONIES

Local governments often ignore feral cat populations and leave their management to individuals and cat welfare organizations. These colonies are a growing problem and not only threaten local bird and wildlife populations but are a source of disease that can be passed to domestic pets and humans. Municipalities and regional districts can address the feral cat epidemic by offering guidelines and support to animal welfare organizations that care for feral cats, and allow residents to trap feral cats on their properties. Colonies are often located near abandoned buildings, industrial

Recommended Policies and Bylaws to Address Cat Predation, 10

areas, farms and parkland. Where feral cats reside on land within the jurisdiction of a local government, management should be the responsibility of that government’s animal control agency.

OPTION 1: PUBLIC FEEDING OF STRAY AND FERAL CATS IS PROHIBITED EXCEPT BY REGISTERED FERAL CAT CARE SOCIETIES.

Municipalities can establish mutually beneficial relationships with animal welfare organizations who manage feral cat colonies with a program of spay, neuter, vaccination and rehome or release (TNVR). Public feeding of feral cats by individuals is discouraged.

Example bylaw: City of Toronto Feral Cats, Trap Neuter Return Program 349-22

The Executive Director may operate a trap, neuter, return program in respect of any feral cat or feral cat colony and maintain a record of the feral cat's sterilization- (The Executive Director of the Municipal Licensing and Standards Division of the City of Toronto or any person acting under his or her authority.)

FERAL CAT - A cat found in the City of Toronto that has no owner, is not socialized and is extremely fearful or resistant to humans. FERAL CAT COLONY - A collective term, referring to a group of mostly or all feral cats in the City of Toronto that congregate as a unit.

OPTION 2: TRAP, NEUTER AND REHOME -- THE ONLY OPTION FOR FERAL CAT COLONIES LOCATED IN AREAS DESIGNATED AS ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE.

Use spatial data from all levels of government to identify environmentally sensitive areas where unmanaged feral colonies should be removed and managed feral colonies should not be permitted:

1. Local government mapping identifying environmentally sensitive development permit areas or water course development permit areas.

2. Provincial Sensitive Ecosystem Inventory (SEI) mapping.

3. Federal critical habitat mapping.

4. Inter-agency biodiversity mapping identifying areas of high biodiversity.

5. Important Bird and Biodiversity Areas

Mapped sensitive habitat should be designated as inappropriate for feral cat release programs with adoption or permanent rehoming as the only option permitted.

Recommended Policies and Bylaws to Address Cat Predation, 11

The release of sterilized unowned cats back into the wild should be considered an unsatisfactory, short-term solution. It is recommended that local governments support registered TNVR groups that have the goal of reducing feral cat colony populations and securing a permanent sanctuary for cats that cannot be adopted. Local government funding, through taxation or animal licence fees, is needed to help feral cat welfare groups pay for veterinary fees and costs associated with feral cat sheltering and management.

Benefits:

- Reduced feral cat colony numbers will decrease cat predation on birds. - Feral cat management is regulated with the goal of not only feral cat welfare but reducing their populations.

Challenges:

- Frequently shelters and animal welfare organizations lack the capacity to accept owners’ requests to surrender cats. - Trapped feral cats are often unwelcome in municipal or humane society shelters due to veterinary care needs and unsuitability for adoption. - An education program is needed to discourage feeding stray and feral cats unless they can be caught and offered permanent homes.

Considerations:

- Management of feral cat colonies should be the responsibility of municipal animal control working with registered cat care societies. - All free-roaming abandoned and feral cats not in managed colonies should be removed from their environment and treated like any other invasive, non-native animal when they are found living in parks and sensitive areas under the jurisdiction of municipal, provincial or federal agencies. - Local governments must work with local humane and cat care societies to develop a feral cat response program including a feral population estimate tool.

6. ALLOW CAT LIVE TRAPPING

Residents in both urban and rural areas should have the opportunity of humanely trapping cats that regularly visit or reside on their property.

Recommended Policies and Bylaws to Address Cat Predation, 12

Example Bylaw: City of Yorkton, Saskatchewan, BYLAW NO. 23/2003

Where an Animal Control Officer receives a complaint of a nuisance caused by a cat, the Animal Control Officer may at his discretion; (a) Issue a trap to the complainant upon execution by the complainant of an agreement as set out in Schedule “A”, attach hereto and forming part of this Bylaw; or (b) If deemed necessary by the Animal Control Officer, he may seize and impound any cat found causing a nuisance. (c) Any person may restrain any cat found running at large and becoming a nuisance in the City of Yorkton and shall deliver the cat so restrained to the Pound Keeper for impoundment. The person shall leave with the Pound Keeper a statement in writing, describing the name of the owner, name of the cat (if known) and the place and time of restraint.

Schedule A: The undersigned agrees to the following terms and conditions:

- to place the cat trap on his or her property which is within the City of Yorkton; - to personally check the cat trap every two (2) hours while the trap is set; - in the event a cat is trapped, to immediately deliver the cat to Yorkton Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals - A captured cat should be left in the trap and placed in a shed, garage, basement or other place that is warm, dry and secure with a blanket placed over the trap to pacify the animal. Do not attempt to remove an unfamiliar cat from the trap – this will be done by the Pound Keeper. - If the undersigned cannot comply with this condition, the trapped cat must be freed unharmed. - to ensure that no harm comes to any trapped cat while in their possession including exposure to inclement weather; cat traps are not to be used when the temperature falls below 0 degrees Celsius or rises above 25 degrees Celsius;

Benefits:

- Allows property owners to deal with nuisance cats so that no-roaming enforcement does not solely depend on animal control officers.

7. SUPPORT RESPONSIBLE CAT OWNERSHIP EDUCATION PROGRAMS

Encouraging community members to adopt cats from local shelters is one important factor in reducing cat overpopulation. When shelters are full, people who want to surrender cats and kittens are turned away, leading to some cats being released to the wild while others are euthanized.

Local government can support responsible cat ownership by working with animal welfare organizations and veterinarians to communicate the following messages to the public:

- Encourage people to adopt cats from shelters rather than from pet stores or breeders.

Recommended Policies and Bylaws to Address Cat Predation, 13

- Promote the benefits of sterilizing cats and the opportunity to apply for subsidized spay/neuter veterinary services. - Promote the benefits of keeping cats indoors or under supervision, including: cats living longer, healthy lives; the reduction of disease and parasite transfer which is healthier for cats and humans; the reduction of cats’ predation on birds and other wildlife; the reduction of unwanted pregnancies; and last but most importantly the reduction in lost and homeless cats. - Provide ideas on how to care for indoor cats and supervise cats enjoying the outdoors. - Inform the public that abandoning a pet cat is an offence under the Criminal Code of Canada.

CONCLUSION

Since cat predation of birds is a human-related cause of mortality, human attitudes and behaviours must be changed before this threat is mitigated. Although local government bylaws can draw attention to the problems associated with cats at large, committing funds for bylaw administration and enforcement is of equal importance. Groups that lobby decision-makers to enact legislation will face resistance about the costs of additional animal control measures.

Nature Canada and its regional and local partners have chosen a “cat-friendly” path forward to address this issue. With regard to Municipalities though, we have described many reasons why municipalities should strengthen their bylaws, enforcement, education and support to address the issues caused by roaming cats and feral cats. This is part of building healthier and more sustainable communities, something that we, as a nation are committed to. To improve our chances of making progress on this challenging issue, conservation organizations and wildlife agencies must collaborate with animal welfare organizations on campaigns about responsible cat ownership. Also, wildlife advocates must recognize the added costs of bylaw enforcement and be able to link enforcement results to community benefits such as lowering zoonotic disease risks to humans, benefitting biodiversity, lowering nuisance complaints and improving the general health and welfare of domestic cats. It is about creating healthier communities.

Recommended Policies and Bylaws to Address Cat Predation, 14

Table 1: Qualitative assessment of the costs and benefits of recommended bylawsi.

Bylaw Added Added Potential to Potential to administrative enforcement reduce bird reduce cat over costs cost mortality population

No Free Roam Nil Medium Very high Very high

Cats limited to owner's Nil High Medium Medium property

Spay/neuter requirement for Nil Low Low High cat sales/adoptions

Low-cost spay neuter fund Low Nil Low Medium

Licensing Medium High Nil Nil

Identification Nil High Nil Nil

No public feeding Nil High Nil Nil

Trap-Neuter & Rehome High Low High High

Trap-Neuter-Release High Low Low High

Live-trapping allowed Low Low Medium Low

Recommended Policies and Bylaws to Address Cat Predation, 15

REFERENCES

BC SPCA. 2015. Model Animal Responsibility Bylaw.

Blancher, P. 2013. Estimated number of birds killed by house cats (Felis catus) in Canada. Avian Conservation and Ecology 8(2): 3.

Canadian Federation of Humane Societies. 2012. Cats in Canada.

Canadian Federation of Humane Societies. 2014. Animal Shelter Statistics 2013.

Loss, S. R., T. Will, and P. P. Marra. 2013. The impact of free-ranging domestic cats on wildlife of the United States. Nature Communications, 4:1396, DOI:10.1038.

WEB RESOURCES

Stewardship Centre for BC http://www.stewardshipcentrebc.ca In addition to this document, SCBC has produced a series of documents encouraging individuals, communities and local governments to adopt practices that can reduce the impact of cats on birds and wildlife including “The Happy Cat” brochure which offers tips on responsible pet ownership; “Species at Risk: Voluntary Stewardship Practices to Reduce the Impacts of Cats on Birds and Wildlife”; and “Reducing the Impacts of Cats on Birds and Wildlife: a briefing note for local governments.”

American Bird Conservancy http://www.abcbirds.org/abcprograms/policy/cats/index.html Information and educational resources on cat predation and how to transform outdoor cats into contented indoor cast. ABC has public educational brochures which are available to order.

Cornell Lab of Ornithology http://www.allaboutbirds.org/Page.aspx?pid=2656 “View from Sapsucker Woods”, an excellent short essay on the impacts of cats on bird populations.

BC SPCA http://www.spca.bc.ca/animal-issues/professional-resources/model-bylaw.html Recommended local government bylaws for all animals.

Recommended Policies and Bylaws to Address Cat Predation, 16

Rithets Bog Conservation Society http://www.rithetsbog.org/ Videos of domestic cat predation on songbirds in a Victoria Conservation Area

Cat Bib Information http://catgoods.com/

END NOTES

i Table 1 estimates the costs and benefits of different cat control bylaws. Requiring the containment or supervision of cats is by far the most effective bylaw and is no more costly to enforce that the weaker “no running at large” bylaw.

Recommended Policies and Bylaws to Address Cat Predation, 17

From: Connie Jordison Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2017 8:46 AM To: Naomi Brunemeyer; Council Cc: [email protected]; Craig Crawford; Sara Tyne; Aaron Thompson Subject: RE: Request to Lease Ebbtide and Trail Site

This is to acknowledge District receipt of your email. As your email was directed to ‘[email protected]” it has been delivered to the email accounts of all members of Council. It has also been referred for consideration of inclusion as Council Correspondence for publication on our website and/or the agenda of a future meeting of Council.

A copy has also been forwarded to our Development Services Department for attention. Thank you.

Connie Jordison Communications Manager District of Sechelt

From: Naomi Brunemeyer [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2017 7:13 PM To: Council Cc: [email protected]; Craig Crawford Subject: Request to Lease Ebbtide and Trail Site

Dear Mayor and Council,

Please find attached request to lease Ebbtide and Trail site by the Provincial Rental Housing Corporation (BC Housing) from the District of Sechelt.

We look forward to your response.

thx in advance

Naomi

1701 – 4555 Kingsway Burnaby, BC V5H 4V8 T: 604 433 1711 F: 604 439 4722 www.bchousing.org

October 17, 2017

Dear Mayor and Council,

As you are aware, BC Housing, in conjunction with RainCity Housing and Support Services Society, municipal staff and the Sunshine Coast Affordable Housing Society have conducted an exhaustive site search for a new temporary location for the shelter operations currently offered at the St. Hilda’s Anglican Church location. This would relieve the housing pressures in Sechelt by increasing capacity from the St. Hilda’s site, provide better programming and allow time for the supportive housing to be built.

BC Housing after consultation with staff of the District of Sechelt has selected the municipally owned site located on Ebbtide and currently housing the old Waste Water Treatment plant and archives building to temporarily house the shelter.

Further to our proposal, BC Housing has conducted two public information meetings on August 16, 2017 and October 3, 2017 to engage the neighbourhood. Feedback from both of those meetings is enclosed. In addition, multiple meetings with community stakeholders have been held to provide information and receive information from the local community.

BC Housing is formally requesting to lease a portion of the Waste Water Treatment site from the District of Sechelt to house a temporary modular shelter of approximately 40 beds. BC Housing is requesting a three-year nominal lease and will apply for a temporary use permit and Official Community Plan amendment as required for the shelter for three years.

BC Housing intends to procure existing modular units to be placed on the site to house up to 40 residents. Our intention is to also add fencing to the site for the safety of residents and the protection of the remaining site, as well as landscaping for increased privacy.

We look forward to working in partnership with the District to help solve homelessness in your community.

Yours sincerely

Naomi Brunemeyer Director of Regional Development BC Housing

British Columbia Housing Management Commission

2’

Bruce Sechelt, Mayor recognize On its Our Dear President

of To In

The 70,000 The events Constitution Ends. If Ron Indigenous

UNITED

you

conjunction the

Floor, many

provide

behalf

purpose

Métis

UCMN

Paradis,

Mayor

Milne,

Métis

and

Awareness day To self-identif’ing formally Métis

(ii) (i)

BC,

and Sechelt,

members 5797

CANADIAN the

of e

have

again

activities

information

peoples

(a) any

(b) that

Milne:

Flag

request is

Act VON

the

President

Métis

several

therewith

twofold:

website

Cowrie

Re: a The

British The

Publicly British A Two questio BC. Flag

of United your

bring

and recognized

rich

3A0 BC.

Proclamation

celebrated

Canada,

Week

living of

and

Métis

that

issuance

Proclamation

carried

informative of

any

and community

Canada. MÉTIS

Street, is

Columbia

with

their its Métis Canadian

Louis

you

UCMN

your flying

UNITED

Proclamation,

associated

p:\v.vmcs.ca

fabulous

Recognition

directors

1982

comments, respect again

contributions

attention the

Riel

the

previously

will

[Formerly

Métis

Sechelt

articles Proclamation

and

the

and Parliament

by:

Flail

Metis

the Sunshine

would this

Day”

history Métis

are

cultural

invite

Province. cities

Vancouver

year this

Email: CANADIAN

people

residents on

and please

section Nation

landmark

on Phone:

Sechelt, be

Infinity in

Vancouver

local Request November

issued

such formally

“Louis 5619 noted

Coast,

similar events 2014,

Buildings.

British

the

and

tnetisron(dgmail.com

contact

declaring

the

(UCMN)

Métis

The

of early

1(24)

British Métis

Curtis

Flag by (604)

BC,

it BC

day

flying

Riel Victoria, 2015,

we on we

the

contains

Columbia recognize Métis

the

Métis

people

VON

the

as 16th Louis development

of those enclose

Sunshine

wish

Citizens

741-3813 —

Place,

Louis

Columbia

Métis MÉTIS

was the

[formerly

and Citizens

undersigned.

“Louis

Métis

3A7,

the

Provincial

Historians

are

Surrey,

Riel articles

issued

Constitution to

done

the

Riel

dating 2016

copies

history

Métis

your

Society. request

officially

Coast.

Day.

Hero

Societyl

significance

Rid

and Day

Vancouver

Nanaimo, NA

by community

back

Infinity

2015 —

the

Government British

George

and

across

Day”

Métis or

November

that

the the

TION

Act

Métis

past

recognized

over

Icon”

and

following:

issuance

the

history, Flag

Columbia

Canada.

Penticton,

and

Métis

200

2016

Canada,

Cultural

November

and

District

Sechelt,

in Terry

participate

years.

6th

Citizens

on 2016.

heritage,

November —

This

“Raising IS and

the

Awareness a Goulet

and 1867 October

section

commemorative

the

TRICT

There

Métis

grounds 16,2017

Canada.

Sechelt

many

occasion

Society] in

Province

culture,

OCT

the

one

the

24,

16,

are

Cultural

Sechelt,

others.

raising

Week.

again

Métis 2016. of

2017

2k some

The

was

and

the the

the

2017

GRE

I .kirNpn.-r.tccc.na.ia,an.t 4 ..rnn.-rac,I..’n.’1ihcJcath.,ul,a.’,R,eInthcida, Wbcrca, .N.rciru N i,.ircnnaa (N Li NL W(.crcn (V.a Whirr.,, Ni ¼ iay ‘,.rfrjcrai,..n

l•:i.iiaulrll ((ia LI) (air,..., hire.,.. bc [N (I 4CM ,a.i it .S1P,IILNV [FL’Ln%ai I KNoW kcmm 0 ‘m’. anal VLL.iL1

to (ncntnhir iI iNc 11w Iii.. !tuictra, d.c ?..L.,.c

1.1 :a miNi, nor,, On (‘il)

ihc irada (Lit Pton’ac Mcii, Mcii. v.1

all VI. lot 14,rI .0. licnnnab’c ci. ØILOL.c WI lt.tc’ii mauL, auurrn.r

I )robiiuc (‘dumb., pxçc (ha nd .i ctpN lIlA). LLa.c’r IOt’a a,.

nil (3

to 1 RI ILLLi,LLKC,

IF a on. l’..Iiimhia It,nti.h ant

Whom ‘‘I .JILOJ nh. are aid 4.,

Icr Wi )ma.iah

SF rrai.rnan ii. (tiLt

.i,tii,tiiittitc’iIth. rcic.;nLL’CLI rr.;,.nIrR ce ibrir Wi hi .l. a.. L’...iatt.a

CON)). rcht.i,nnk tarn tlna ii NnLi,cILL 4 hair her hr Je.ndnc. c LLI(P.Ln.

tijist it ninth

1 I.c.c (cc bitt JaLaLL, ca_ic.! aid Realm’ aid

of urdir ;c.Li.c hr’iLctS’ ailir.! p

jJroclamatioll LU’L prc.c’0. .>mI’.’I.; I an

he nih

1.oui’ LCLItLULLI

Canaba

presrnts ajiaai,a(r LL(

IraiLLin JOrIttsh i.c.c t.sic

the lIce N..acrnk,. nd

and MILL

l)clcntlcr kin (Na prc,a.nL 0 (I,i, J.L .i4nit’,rih

Grace (0% rhi It*Satd 11.1k (LI I

t..a.n len Uia” rvnL’,7’ol rica, Cit.s ri,4i1,,.itL,c pock the Ow’ aid

shall

oi( unit ,.“ bkrin L,L ol aid

cal 4’L.’LLILLLJLL.L (h.LLLLJILLI ..etnhOcd 4cc(rr ii hi

Cotuintija Os ;iui,

ci.

the .aIIurr, h hi ro.lc ZIruIrr3nl ‘r.’ir. I’iLLL

comc Met, I’i,’i.’&i C (Lair Oat

4)1 I.iirh ticc ,LL,LrOrL PaLere Liar I a’ aid ,4et

the pccçic ..u. N.”.

rock d.c It, ii (LI — aid miNi, aid no

ø,ttrnor Ins.’ Rid, limutath

United (It

I I

ertttiii act.,, .1

cad lid. Ira hr ii . rca. d.c Oar iN, r(,c 4 (‘ciunLhL,. (air”..,. bIac,i,.4.a ccc ran III’

of \1d, ..,Ii.(.I(h 201’,

Kingdom. ci cad. Scat gn”aib

the i’ Lanai,’, ‘opt.’. thaN ci cas ;,.and Li icc. os I aid he a the developed •Did • Manitoba Rupert’s • •Did President •Did •Djd wanted part Métis •Did significant

•Did •Did •Did

•Did •Did

no Did

Provinces Métis citizens? Nations, Did parliamentary Métis Saskatchewan Nation Major Manitoba? for

and

him, sent only

The

In Subsequently It

fur

jurisdiction

is High

you without you

you you 1

you you you you

you and the you you

you

one,

870, since trade.

Canadian

historical

not him

under

but

Lief

representative Land

into

Canadian

and white

know

know their

know

know know know

know

know matters know know

Treason

know

possible Louis -

when to

know

Fitzpatrick Quebec,

Crozier, the

the

his

The

the

Provincial help

representation, own

“Gentleman

over

and

settlers

that that that

that that in

that history. that 1844.

authorization that leadership that

Provisional Métis

Riel, that

Canadian he

that

great

relating

that

them

Troops

1884

including

unique

Alberta) was

it,

during the at Ontario,

there Charles

McKay

there that of Riel’s

a during

was

Assywin,

among

and

were that

hero

was

short

obtain

status? the

these

armed only

Accordingly

Montana

were to

charged

Federation.

as shared

of the were

time

Joe” the

settlers

lawyers

and Louis

the the

crush Government

Fitzpatrick,

secret was the

shot article

New

Louis land attempted

law 72 those

their

Northwest

conflict result

time

who

descendants

time Red

icon years

serious

McKay?

Red

people,

customs,

Riel partner

Brunswick

under people grants Riel,

rights

correspondence

Riel

to colony

things disobeyed

had

point

River,

the of of

plead

River

the

old,

give

and

the

the judicial,

the

were the

an come the

Red

and

are A

charged and

Uprising Canadian

and

prove

blank

the

culture,

the

Métis they with as

first archaic of

Métis

Metis

lead Red Resistance

were

comprehensive

providing title, Red

River

1885

and

fighting

part

charismatic LOUIS

brother-in-law Canada

Métis

his

the

bloodshed

seek

Riel him

range

were

lawyer River

order political,

Nova

and

charged with

River Hero income

specific

Riel

history,

instructions Resistance

1351 Northwest union

colony between

Louis

people. insane

to remedies

Rupert’s

the

for

R1EL

attempting to

Treason

and and

Resistance

never Scotia? of

return

for

and

Statute

that

number

Northwest parley

basic

for

Riel with

and

Riel

1869-70

of and

instructions

killed

the

Riel,

account

European the

Icon

of hospitals

was the

fired

what

with

was

Land,

for

the

legal

was Uprising, human

heritage.

who

Treason-Felony residents

with

Adoiphe

Minister

had

Northwest

both

their

instruction

responsible

his

not

a Treasons

them

elected

and result

rhetorical Uprising?

was

improprieties

shot

was

Crozier

achieve

1869-70 now

rights?

Superior

men serious

and

the

grievances

for the

the

“rebellion”

born

They

not or were

the

Caron, of

Saskatchewan

Métis

schools,

by events the

and

killed

Northwest

of Uprising

the

Justice

and

part trial

were

in North

conflict Canada the

questions

were

North England? for

being

under

North

Northwest

First

some

the

McKay.

the

Isadore

George

Métis

surrounding anyone?

against

bringing

better

against

responsible

known

Canada,

Red

and

the Minister

Nations West treated West

was

mysterious

consisted

West

Uprising

Canadian

to and

the

merit

River sent

interest Dumont

Canada. provisions and

initiated

Uprising?

highlight Territories.

Canada? as

Territories

the

Riel’s

white

that Chief

Mounted

women.

the

Terry

this

Settlement

delegation

government,

second-class

of Province

Canada

Militia

“others”?

children

his

Statute

and

settlers

not

important

Justice

1885

only

acting

1885

some

for

Goulet

actions,

Police

They

(now

First

four

who trial

had

and

the

for

of of as of

of of

of I

•Did •Did

•Did

other the leader,

was continue Parliament had some

rights

Louis

Aboriginal Canada Métis Members pass

city stamp. any in Métis Canada and others

but

“Realm” Realm,

The February The

His

Riel George Other

September Many

Riel Riel

Louis

Is founding

LONG

never

other

halls

fight under

“In after

Canadians.

you you

development you

prophetic

Riel obtained,

Riel

today

fascinating he

dynamic following

has

in 1992.

More has is is

and

conjoined

into

and notable of

Riel

for a and

person his know that

able know represents

LIVE

truly know

hero

honored

the which

a 1870;

just

rights-bearing

been

2011 the has

been

Parliament

consequently

hero?

Teny

the

can

basic

of unjust

Canada

other

the

books,

consisted is

534

and

mission

memorable. and

demands

THE

Parliament been cause,

Riel Manitoba, that

that

the

that

called

stands take outcomes be

is the

Goulet

future.

the life

year

human

fame

every

the their inspiration

public a If their

execution.

“PROUD people

MEMORY

all

was

named

Canadian the subject biographies,

brief

under on

his

combined

with

then

history

old —

in the

hero

only adjacent

those

greatest

and

lives Northwest of three

a seat. year to

rights.

people Riel

1886, places

Highly account

Canada English natural-born

and

inspired

the first respect

Louis

the lead

“Louis

is infamy;

Confederation

uplifted.

valiant

to in of what

separate

was

Bill

one Results

England,

the

stage,

Canadian

responsible prairie

the

to and

symbol.

Métis Canada. a including

and

Riel songs,

LOUIS

intelligent,

number

the improperly

Statute

to Riel

rights

who

Uprising

is heights

the

champion

the

Métis

Louis

radio,

Rights now levying

is METIS”. magnificent

Rid’s

people. occasions

populist

leader others Legislative

Day”.

Constitution

forfeits

Wales and

and

RIEL

his

Statute

under

his

hero

of Saskatchewan

Riel, government who

his

film,

took

Western articles he

leadership

life

well-educated Canadian

success

charged, war, grave whose

his

role,

and

politician.

not championed

his

which

fought

the Assembly

while the

His include

was is

place opera,

people,

Manitoba

and

the

only as

life

site

most

have Act

maximum life

fight

Canadians.

and

that a

Riel four

convicted

1351 in

cities

in for

as result

television,

of profoundly

iconoclast

the

and

the

of remarkable

been the what

the

was

1887,

St.

for

the

Manitoba basic

narrow was

Canada,

the

and

for

result

Legislative

Métis

Statute

Métis, Alberta

with plaque depths

Métis

Boniface.

basic

still

Métis,

Métis

written

penalty

the

charged,

and

his

and

human

now

His

flag

seas compelling

documentaries, people in

formally

Métis who

include

dedication, in

influenced

Provincial

human as

accompanying of

/982

executed

but person

fighting winning

his

having founders Saskatchewan,

impact

about

raising defeat,

for

abutting

Treasons

Buildings

became rights

he Manitoba’s

also

twenties

and

being

recognized and

those

could

Manitoba

rights

this

their to

for

the

continues

the under

ceremonies.

not

orator, Métis

status

his Canadian

leadership,

them? Manitoba.”

all specifically

charged

charismatic

Westerners applied

the be

right

in sacred

although

and

monuments, only

grievances

being

the

Canadians icon.

Riels

statutory

that

executed

Winnipeg

in history.

rights

and

becoming

democracy

monumental

for

1905.

and Statute? society

contribution

looked

was

only NOT

vote was

and

this

due the

These

recognized

the

Riel Métis

Family

on remedied,

imprisonment,

who elected his and

reads

in legacy

Métis

and

day a

1885

and

profane.

upon

conviction?

their

Province

the

in people

himself

politics

are

believe

icon

statue and

politics,

Western Holiday came

the

postage

that

King’s but King’s

elected

held

to iconic by

part:

their

than will

the and

for

the

at in their

halls Edmonton, Great Oshawa, for his what across various after Williams Métis

Day. every November the Legislative Confederation biographies, Manitoba. streets,

Legislative formally For “Métis 2015

high

people

raising

example,

his heroic

and Britain

year.

Many

In Riel,

On The flag Every

Some

Canada

Cultural

and

areas

now

November

execution)

treason

and the

recognized

1992,

November

2016

Lake,

Province

and date,

St.

Buildings of A

Building.

the

leader

RAISING

cities articles, cities

past

year

many

Saskatchewan.

Parliament

of the bridge.

the

Albert,

monumental

that

and other

Father

it Awareness

the

there

under

Canada,

Grand

the

was

city

Métis

Louis

and

others.

the

have

16th,

his

Parliament

the

November

songs,

Westerners, British

Province

16,

and

raised He

Regina,

Manitoba

city

municipalities

THE

role

the contribution

Forks,

Riel

flag

Hill

proudly

2016,

Nanaimo

Manitoba

Riel is

Louis

archaic

has

Week”.

pop

accompanied

day

statue

Columbia

MÉTIS

at and

Regina

been

has

Prince of

for

the

is culture

Toronto

Cranbrook, Riel

flying

has

commemorative

displayed

was

British

and

that

fascinating

Canada

been

the

Riel’s

designated

Parliament

memorialized

and

there

commemoration

of named

FLAG

flies

Albert,

in put

inapplicable

have of the first

Louis

and

Louis

champion

commemorated

Canada at

Columbia

unjust

the the

Métis

and

the the

time

a its issued

Dawson

Toronto,

trial

Métis

other

plaque to

Provincial

Riel

Métis November

Buildings

Métis Parliament

the

Statutory

execution

the note LOUIS Infinity

annually

ceremony

and

to 534

proclamations

Legislative areas.

stands flag

Government

outlining

held

the

democracy flag

that

Creek,

St.

hanged well

year

opera,

Founders

Louis Flag

RIEL

Family

Catherines, development

are honor

today

Buildings

its

adjacent

statues, in

British

GEORGE

old

the

1885.

City

Calgary, at

Victoria,

cities

honour in

this

Rid

Assembly

DAY

November

their

Statute

stamp,

rotunda

Holiday

Regina, the

(more

and

relating

Hall

achievement.

Columbia.

schools,

Day

and

Riel

Canada

Métis

to Welland,

city

human

the

TERRY

365

Prince

than

Medicine

documentaries,

Ontario

Louis

municipalities

the

ceremony

was

the

Province

Treasons

17,

people

the

days

Louis

the municipal

buildings,

raised

125

Manitoba capital Manitoba rights

Canadian

executed

GOULET

Riel.

Guelph,

George,

2012

Alberta

and

Métis.

years

year

Hat,

Riel

that and

and

the

for

of of

In of

in trade” Indigenous The in

its

recognized Province,

George

British

history,

historical

Goulet, The A

to In

By (iv)

who

(iii)

(i)

(ii)

and

October,

few “.... contributed

Métis Canada; leaders Province’s Manitoba culture, Province

the

recognition

Columbia

raising

the James

British Committee

term

Terry

Joseph

the

Simon

heritage

honor

Jack Josette

and

contributed (Aboriginal)

the

history,

Louis

B.Sc.

the

Métis

first

Goulet

British

people,

many

designated

“Métis”

2017

Province

who

(H.Ec.)

Poole, Douglas,

the

and

the Fraser Metis

Columbia.

William

Louis

joined

Legacé

and

Lady

Riel

over

valued by:

were

British

heritage

Métis

notable to

strived

notable

that

Columbia

and

culture.

primarily

George

people

Chairman

Tolmie;

the

and

the was

200

Riel’s

of Confederation;

“Father the a

McKay,

“Louis Work,

was

Flag

one

unique

Columbia.”

relationship British

British

for

Métis

exploration, role

paternal

years

and

contributions

exploration

Goulet,

and responsible

justice

Humanitarian

of various

and

place

pioneer

indicates

Riel

Government culture

that of

the

ago.

indigenous

Columbia

their

Columbia

British

the

BA..

European

the

Founder Day”

the

Métis

and

levels

and

They

with

descendants

history

LLB.

Matriarch

and

growth

Vancouver

Métis

Canadian rights

for

that

Columbia”);

and

the

person

LLM.

people’s

honours

development

have

the

and

Amelia

people.

in bringing

great

stated

the ancestry,

government

Nanaimo; of people

and

its

Métis

British

been

and

Métis

the

and

have

history,

Order

Métis Organizing

mixed in

foremost

advocate

Connolly

development

Trailblazing

Métis

grandmother

the

its called

played

people

mainly

beautiful

Columbia

have

significantly

Proclamation:

2010

history

maternal

dated

British

people

and

the

historic

made

for

Douglas

French

Winter

Committee

“children

Province

October

the

and

Métis

the the the

are:

Columbia

North

and

history

Métis

and

Olympics

(wife

first

continue

American

16,

Scottish.

Premier and

arrived

the

British British

and

2016

the the

fur

Sir