Signatures Volume 1 —

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Signatures Volume 1 — IGNATUATURES SVOLUMEUME O NE Contents Chapter Author Title Editorial Signatures Information 1 Duncan Salkeld Preface: Descartes’ ghost 2 Jill Kraye The Immortality of the Soul in the Renaissance: Between Natural Philosophy and Theology 3 Richard Sugg Donne,Vesalius, and the Anatomy of Body and Soul 4 Carola Scott-Luckens The Broken Tabernacle:Bodily and Cosmic paradigms in Henry Jessey’s 1647 narrative of Sarah Wight 5 Christa Knellwolf The Mechanic Powers of the Spirit: Medicine and Mock-Heroic in Samuel Garth’s The Dispensary 6 Roy Porter The Soul and the English Enlightenment 7 Stephanie Norgate Percentages SIGNATURES About Signatures Signatures is a peer-reviewed electronic journal (issn 1472–2178) which publishes interdisciplinary studies in the humanities, espe- cially in the areas of literary and cultural history, literary criticism, theory and philosophy, and creative writing. It is published twice yearly and is freely available on the Internet. The journal welcomes articles relating to all aspects of the humanities. particu- larly items that demonstrate originality in focus, contribution to knowledge, and literary excellence. Signatures will allow scholars and writers rapid publication and distribution. The journal will provide a forum for debate on matters of scholarly interest. Submitted manuscripts will be ‘blind-reviewed’ by at least two readers. Articles will appear within less than one year of acceptance. Submissions: Articles for publication should be submitted in hard copy and spaced (quotations indented not tabbed – and single-spaced), on disk to 12 point Times New Roman, with italics for all titles and emphases. Notes should be numbered in conventional Arabic Dr. Duncan Salkeld, Signatures, numerals and collected as a separate file (not as ‘Word’ School of English and Media Studies, footnotes or endnotes). Application ‘Style Sheets’ should be University College Chichester, Chichester, avoided except for italics. Any special fonts or characters West Sussex, po19 4pe should be clearly indicated on the hard copy. Contributors email: [email protected]. should include their academic place of work (if any). We do not require abstracts or keywords. A separate copy should be sent via email attachment to: [email protected]. For quicker response, correspondence will take place by email. Copies should be in ‘Rich Text Format’ Signatures is published as screen-optimised pdf. (‘.rtf’) or ‘Microsoft Word Document’ (‘.doc’) format, double- SIGNATURES Humanities Style Editorial All references, abbreviations, etc. should facilitate understand- Managing Editor ing of the work in question. Any abbreviations of journal titles Jan Ainsley (Chichester) should be transparent and should conform to international standards (‘International list of periodical title word abbrevia- Advisory Editorial Board tions', International Organization for Standardization (iso) Carol Banks (Hertfordshire) 833 (cf. British Standards Institution, bs 4148 and American Stephani Brusberg-Kiermeier (Humboldt, Berlin) National Standards Institute, asa z.39–5.1963) and updates). Dermot Cavanagh (Northumbria) For monographs, full citation of bibliographical details is Efterpe Mitsi (Athens) required in the first reference. Thereafter, a short title is Christopher Norris (Cardiff) normally used. Latinate humanities abbreviations should be Diane Elam (Cardiff) used sparingly. Manuscripts should be cited by location, Bernard O’Donoghue (Oxford) repository, title (if any), followed by signature, foliation/pagi- Cathy Shrank (Aberdeen) nation. After the first full citation, references to a manuscript Patricia Waugh (Durham) may be abbreviated. Jonathan Woolfson (Chichester) Signatures Volume 1, Summer 2000 © 2000 Editorial matter and selection – University College Chichester © 2000 Individual chapters – the respective authors Typeset in Minion and Gill Sans by Paul Burt SIGNATURES Preface: Descartes’ ghost Duncan Salkeld (University College, Chichester) The influence of critical theory over the last twenty years has tracing the Cartesian project’s susceptibilities to both logical led to an absorption of radical accounts of self-hood into the and empriricist objections, but go on to find Descartes’ ghost mainstream of academic teaching and research. Subjectivity still haunting the machinery of contemporary critical theory. theory now constitutes so plural and varied a field of enquiries In an effort towards reconsidering the ‘subject’ of human inte- that any singular concept of personal identity seems as out- riority, I shall outline the different accounts of personal moded an idea as dephlogisticated air. The direction of recent identity presented by Peter Strawson and Charles Taylor, thinking about ‘the subject’ has been to reverse the process of taking Shakespeare’s sonnets (27–39) as an illustrative case for philosophic introspection and turn the inner outward, such re-thinking. My point is not that theory is somehow construing identity as something ‘constructed’ by the material hopelessly misguided or redundant; merely that other ways of powers of language, ideology and institutions. A particular thinking about ‘the subject’, which seek to clarify rather than concern of such theories has been to ‘decenter’ the Cartesian break with its cultural and philosophical history, may help to Cogito, famously summarised in the phrase first published in avoid such circularities. 1637 ‘I think therefore I am’, a phrase which has been taken as the historical moment par excellence when singularity in the In one of his earlier writings, entitled A Treatise on Man concept of human identity was established for subsequent (c.1633), Descartes promised a separate treatise on the soul philosophical reflection. It has long been suspected that in this which was either never written or remains lost.[1] Yet the phrase, Descartes argues in a circle, assuming his conclusion concept of the soul was to become at once the most significant within his premise(s). The ‘I’ that thinks is already precisely and problematic element in his work. In a later study, A the ‘I’ that is. In this essay, I want to highlight two specific Discourse on Method, published in 1637, Descartes had arrived respects in which recent attempts to re-think identity have at what he believed was a certain knowledge of the thinking remained caught in an equivalent circularity by assuming essence of man via a procedure of radical scepticism: doubt what they have been taken to demonstrate. I shall begin by the existence of everything and one may discover an Ch1.1 SIGNATURES undoubtable certainty. Descartes’ indubitable certainty was he would develop more fully in his last work, The Passions of that he was, if nothing else, a doubter, a thinker: and so a the Soul (1649). In this hypothesis, he suggested that very fine startling realisation struck him with all the obviousness of a fluids, the animal spirits, could well convey the influences of truism, that there must be a something that is doing the the soul into the body. The Princess was not impressed: she doubting – a self or soul.[2] accused him of absurdity in using the simile of gravity to explain the motions of the soul, finding in this again a One of Descartes’ more influential admirers (and there were confusion about material and immaterial forces. She pressed several) was Princess Elizabeth of the Low Countries who the objection home: ‘it is easier to ascribe matter and engaged in an epistolary dialogue with the philosopher on the extension to the soul than to ascribe to it the power of moving subject of the soul. Specifically, Elizabeth wanted to know how a body and being moved by it without having any matter’.Out- the soul stood in relation to the body. In an exchange of letters manoeuvered, Descartes could only respond with speculative between 6 and 16 May 1643, she asked Descartes to explain how distinctions suggesting that the ‘matter’ she ascribes to the ‘human soul can determine the movement of the animal consciousness ‘is not itself the consciousness; and that the spirits in the body so as to perform voluntary acts’. Descartes extension of the matter is essentially different from the had posited this thinking soul as an immaterial entity but, as extension of consciousness’.[4] Notwithstanding the powerful the Princess pointed out, ‘contact seems to me incompatible intellect of Princess Elizabeth, what substantially eroded with a thing’s being immaterial. I therefore ask you for a more confidence in Cartesian egotism was the rise of empiricism. specific definition of the soul than you give in your meta- William Harvey had already ruled out in the plainest terms physics: a definition of its substance, as distinct from its any need to postulate the existence of ‘medical spirits’ through activity’. These were tricky questions but Descartes responded which the soul might give life to the body. And it would not be by setting out what he saw as two essential facts about the soul long before Thomas Sydenham, physician and amanuensis to – one that it is conscious, and the other, that it is able to act, Locke, would express bafflement at the dissecting table, but he acknowledged that ‘of the second fact, I said almost observing in 1668: ‘Now it is certaine and beyonde controversy nothing’.[3] Three years earlier, Descartes had mentioned in a that nature performs all her operations on the body by parts so letter to his friend Mersenne that the pineal gland, or minute and insensible that I thinke noe body will ever hope or ‘Conarion’, in the brain might be the seat of the soul, an idea pretend, even by the assistance of glasses or any other Ch1.2 SIGNATURES invention, to come to a sight of them’.[5] Belief in an immortal separate entities. Entry into language – into the Symbolic – soul persisted, but aside from speculations about the status of enables the speaker to take up a subject position yet renders the mind in dreams, this tended to be grounded largely in this identity an effect of language, of the signifier ‘I’ which is metaphysical conjecture and unsupported by rational misrecognised as fixed, unified and essential: a soul or essence.
Recommended publications
  • E Renaissance Society of America Annual Meeting Program
    e Renaissance Society of America Annual Meeting Program Philadelphia April 02 - 04, 2020 Table of Contents Links to Program Times and Sessions ursday at 6:00 pm RSA Awards Ceremony Friday at 6:00 pm CANCELLED: Josephine Waters Bennett Lecture Saturday at 6:30 pm RSA 2020 Philadelphia Closing Reception ursday at 11:00 am RSA Board of Directors Meeting ursday at 4:00 pm Cervantes Society of America Business Meeting and Society for Renaissance Studies (UK) Annual Lecture Annual Lecture Friday at 12:45 pm RSA Council Meeting Friday at 4:00 pm Margaret Mann Phillips Lecture Saturday at 2:00 pm e RSA High School Teaching Program Saturday at 4:00 pm American Cusanus Society Lecture Society for the Study of Early Modern Women and Gender Annual Lecture and Business Meeting Saturday at 5:30 pm Society for the Study of Early Modern Women and Gender Reception Saturday at 5:45 pm RSA Member Meeting ursday at 9:00 am (More an) irteen Ways of Looking at a Preacher: Netherlandish Printmaking Before Aux uatre Vents: Approaches to Early Modern Spanish Preaching Professionalism in the Graphic Arts, ca. 1500–50 CANCELLED: Barberiniana – Aspects of the Barberini New Perspectives on Italian Art I Reign (1623–44): A New Renaissance in Baroue Rome New Technologies and Renaissance Studies I: Trace I and Pattern CANCELLED: French Tragedy and the Wars of Pico, Machiavelli, and Ficino: Metaphysics, Ethics, and Religion eology CANCELLED: Impressed upon the Imagination: Reassessing Lucrezia Marinella's Oeuvre I Recreating Manuscript Cultures in the Age of Print Reconsidering
    [Show full text]
  • Europa E Italia. Studi in Onore Di Giorgio Chittolini
    21 CORE VENICE AND THE VENETO Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Reti Medievali Open Archive DURING THE RENAISSANCE THE LEGACY OF BENJAMIN KOHL Edited by Michael Knapton, John E. Law, Alison A. Smith thE LEgAcy of BEnJAMin KohL BEnJAMin of LEgAcy thE rEnAiSSAncE thE during VEnEto thE And VEnicE Smith A. Alison Law, E. John Knapton, Michael by Edited Benjamin G. Kohl (1938-2010) taught at Vassar College from 1966 till his retirement as Andrew W. Mellon Professor of the Humanities in 2001. His doctoral research at The Johns Hopkins University was directed by VEnicE And thE VEnEto Frederic C. Lane, and his principal historical interests focused on northern Italy during the Renaissance, especially on Padua and Venice. during thE rEnAiSSAncE His scholarly production includes the volumes Padua under the Carrara, 1318-1405 (1998), and Culture and Politics in Early Renaissance Padua thE LEgAcy of BEnJAMin KohL (2001), and the online database The Rulers of Venice, 1332-1524 (2009). The database is eloquent testimony of his priority attention to historical sources and to their accessibility, and also of his enthusiasm for collaboration and sharing among scholars. Michael Knapton teaches history at Udine University. Starting from Padua in the fifteenth century, his research interests have expanded towards more general coverage of Venetian history c. 1300-1797, though focusing primarily on the Terraferma state. John E. Law teaches history at Swansea University, and has also long served the Society for Renaissance Studies. Research on fifteenth- century Verona was the first step towards broad scholarly investigation of Renaissance Italy, including its historiography.
    [Show full text]
  • Rethinking Savoldo's Magdalenes
    Rethinking Savoldo’s Magdalenes: A “Muddle of the Maries”?1 Charlotte Nichols The luminously veiled women in Giovanni Gerolamo Savoldo’s four Magdalene paintings—one of which resides at the Getty Museum—have consistently been identified by scholars as Mary Magdalene near Christ’s tomb on Easter morning. Yet these physically and emotionally self- contained figures are atypical representations of her in the early Cinquecento, when she is most often seen either as an exuberant observer of the Resurrection in scenes of the Noli me tangere or as a worldly penitent in half-length. A reconsideration of the pictures in connection with myriad early Christian, Byzantine, and Italian accounts of the Passion and devotional imagery suggests that Savoldo responded in an inventive way to a millennium-old discussion about the roles of the Virgin Mary and Mary Magdalene as the first witnesses of the risen Christ. The design, color, and positioning of the veil, which dominates the painted surface of the respective Magdalenes, encode layers of meaning explicated by textual and visual comparison; taken together they allow an alternate Marian interpretation of the presumed Magdalene figure’s biblical identity. At the expense of iconic clarity, the painter whom Giorgio Vasari described as “capriccioso e sofistico” appears to have created a multivalent image precisely in order to communicate the conflicting accounts in sacred and hagiographic texts, as well as the intellectual appeal of deliberately ambiguous, at times aporetic subject matter to northern Italian patrons in the sixteenth century.2 The Magdalenes: description, provenance, and subject The format of Savoldo’s Magdalenes is arresting, dominated by a silken waterfall of fabric that communicates both protective enclosure and luxuriant tactility (Figs.
    [Show full text]
  • Norberto Gramaccini Petrucci, Manutius Und Campagnola Die Medialisierung Der Künste Um 1500
    Norberto Gramaccini Petrucci, Manutius und Campagnola Die Medialisierungder Künste um 1500 Die Jahre um 1500 waren für die Medialisierung der Künste und Wissenschaften von entscheidender Bedeutung.1 Am 15.Mai 1501 brachte in Venedig der aus Fossombrone gebürtige Musikdrucker Ottaviano dei Petrucci (1466–1539) mitseinemmusikalischen BeraterPetrusCastellanus das Harmonicemusices OdhecatonA(RISM 15011)heraus: Es ist das erste im Typendruckverfahren hergestellte Buch in mehrstimmigen Mensuralnoten, enthaltend 100drei- und vierstimmige Chansons der bekanntesten zeitgenössischen Komponisten –die meisten Franzosen und Flamen.2 Bereits 1498 hatte Petrucci beim veneziani- schen Senat ein Gesuch gestellt, das ihm als Erfnder ein Monopol für die Dauer von 20 Jahren zusichern sollte: »… chome aprimo Inventore che niuno altro nel dominio de Vostra Signoria possi stampare Canto fgurado …per anni vinti«.3 Dem Erstling folgten gleichgeartete Publikationen (Canti B, Canti C), die ei- nen Hinweis liefern, dass Petruccis vorrangiges Ziel in den ersten Jahren sei- ner Herausgebertätigkeit (bis 1504)darin bestand, nicht die sakrale, sondern 1Hans Blumenberg, Die Lesbarkeit der Welt,Frankfurt 1983;David McKitterick, Print, Manuscript and the Search for Order, 1450–1830,Cambridge 2004,S.109. 2Helen Hewitt und Isabel Pope, Petrucci. Harmonice Musices Odhecaton A,New York 1978. Das Datum 15/V/1501geht aus der Widmung an Girolamo Donato hervor. Für eine andere Datierung, David Fallows, »Petrucci’s Canti Volumes: Scope and Repertory«, in: Basler Jahrbuch für Historische Musikpraxis 25: Musik –Druck –Musikdruck. 500Jahre Ottaviano Petrucci (2001), S.39–52: S.41.ZuCastellanus,dem »magistercapelle«der Kirche SS.Giovanni ePaolo, den die Zeitgenossen als »arte musice monarcha« bezeichneten, Bonnie J. Blackburn, »Petrucci’s Venetian Editor: Petrus Castellanus and His Musical Garden«, in: Musica Disciplina 40 (1995), S.15–41: S.25.Zuden späten Quellen, die Petrucci auch als Besitzer mehrerer Papiermühlen ausweisen, Teresa M.
    [Show full text]
  • The Hypnerotomachia Poliphili: Image and Text in a Renaissance Romance
    The Hypnerotomachia Poliphili: Image and Text in a Renaissance Romance April Oettinger Winston-Salem, North Carolina B.A., Colgate University, 1994 M.A., University of Virginia, 1996 A Dissertation presented to the Graduate Faculty of the University of Virginia in Candidacy for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy McIntire Department of Art University of Virginia May2000 To my parents, ever supportive guides in my ongoing discovery of the forestand the trees; To Carrie, my companionon those early journeys through the Dark Forest; and To Max, my Poliphilo. 11 © Copyright by April Oettinger AllRights Reserved May2000 ill Acknowledgments I am indebted to numerous friendsand colleagues who have guided and enriched my journey at every turn. My advisors Paul Barolskyand David Summers first encouraged me to pursue my studies of the Polifilo; their unflagging support sustained me throughout, and their example continues to inspire me to follow in Poliphilo's path. My other readers, Francesca Fiorani and David Van Der Muelen provided valuable suggestions andadvice on patronage, dedications, and incunabula. I also wish to expressmy gratitude to Anne Schutte, Alistair Fowler, Deborah Parker, Martin Colker, and Terry Bellanger for stimulating conversations and generous advice, and Martin Colker and Thomas Govero for their assistance with the translations of Leonardo Grassi's dedication of the Polifiloand Ludovico Odassio's dedication of the Comucopiae. I am also grateful to Linda Carroll, Wendy Steadman Sheard, Patricia Fortini Brown, Wolfgang Wolters, Louisa Matthews, Anne Barriault,Norman Land, Ralph Lieberman, DeborahHoward, Jurgen Schultz, Ann Markam Schultz, and Mark SamuelsLasner forthought-provoking conversations at home and abroad. A Dupont Fellowship fromthe University of Virginia in 1998-1999 and a Fulbright Fellowship in 1999-2000 enabled me to continue my research in Italy, where I was fortunate to explore the holdings of several marvelous libraries.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Jacob Boehme Copy
    5 Jacob Boehme’s Writings During the English Revolution and Afterwards Their Publication, Dissemination, and Infl uence Ariel Hessayon On August 4th , 1653, Samuel Herring of Swan Alley in Coleman Street, Lon- don petitioned Barebone’s Parliament to consider thirty propositions for the good of the nation. The second was that two colleges at Oxford and Cam- bridge should be devoted to the study of “attaining and enjoying the spirit of our Lord Jesus.” Few books would be needed besides the Bible and En- glish translations of “Jacob Behmen, and such like, who had true revelation from the true spirit.”1 This proposal was not adopted, nor is there evidence for how much support it attracted among Herring’s fellow parishioners or in Parliament. Though he may have acted alone, it is equally possible that Herring represented the public face of a group promoting the dissemination of English versions of the German mystic’s writings. Indeed, it is signifi cant that between 1645 and 1662 most of Boehme’s treatises and the majority of his letters were printed in English translation at London. Moreover, two shorter pieces were rendered from English into Welsh in 1655. This chapter begins by examining the processes through which transla- tions of Boehme’s works were made and circulated within the wider context of the breakdown of prepublication censorship during the English Revo- lution. Locating these translations within the broader framework of the dissemination of continental alchemical, astrological, millenarian, and mys- tical writings during a turbulent period of English history, I will also look at the question of what happens when texts are circulated within contexts for which they were not intended.
    [Show full text]
  • Sharpe Family
    ••• IS THE SHARPE FAMILY. 'Umitb 1RO\?al anb otber IDesce11ta. COMPILED BY T. E. SH ARP E. PRIVATELY PRINTED. ELLIOT STOCK, 62, PATERNOSTER ROW. 1901. Preface. ~HIS book is partly an abstract & partly a copy of a nzuch .L larger one, which the same compiler had printed f ~~ her · in I 87 5, itnder the title of "A Royal Descent/' & wh£ch conta£ned the pedz"grees of nine persons & fanz-ilies · (includz"ng the Sharpe famz"ly) who descended fro~n the chi{dren of Walter and Judith Stubbs of Beckbury Hall, Salop,: & . who all therefore shared the same Ro;1al descent. In the present book the then scattered-portions of pedz"gree & · other 1natters wh£ch really related to the Sharpes: only-, or we1re of particular interest to theni alone, are brouglit together;· &· 10 these are added sonze facts & letters fro1n Part I. &- Part II. of the "Additions & Correct£ons " which the same co11zpiler had printed soon after the "Royal Descent," & fronz a pape'r entitled "M-ilton, Minshull and Gouldsnzyth," · by the sanze, which was printed orz"g£nally -in " The Genealogist" oj April, 1878. The object here, in short, has been to cornpr£se· • lV Preface. -in , one small volume all.-that concerned the Sharpe f a1n£ly exclusively, & to el£1ninate all that more particularly related to other persons. Thz"s Royal descent {.:r the Sharpe pedigree & arms have . been proved & regz"stered at the College of A1"'1ns. T. E. SHARPE. Southsea, A·ug1-est Io, rgoo. Contents. PAGE... SHARPE PEDIGREE • Vlll THE DE SARS FAMILY I ANN ELLIS 3 ROYAL DESCENT OF MRS.
    [Show full text]
  • 1902 the ' Communitas Bacheleriae Angliae ' 95
    1902 THE ' COMMUNITAS BACHELERIAE ANGLIAE ' 95 the barons', wars the ' bachelors ' of the ' Burton Annals,' Wykes, Matthew Paris, and of Henry Ill's letters were, like the bachelors of Albert of Aix and Ealph Glaber, or the bachelors of Paris and Oxford and of Chaucer and Langland, simply young novices. The precise constitutional sense suggested for the passage in the ' Burton Annals' by Bishop Stubbs, and boldly adopted by some of his interpreters, cannot, therefore, be sustained. The communitas bacheleriae Angliae means no more, then, than a chance number of rash young gentle- Downloaded from men. One's excuse for dwelling at such length on so trivial a point must, however, be the importance of all the early indications of the constitutional action of the English knightly class. T. F. TOUT. http://ehr.oxfordjournals.org/ The Earliest Life of Milton. THE following life of Milton, now printed for the first time, was found in 1889 by the Eev. Andrew Clark, LL.D., in a volume of Anthony Wood's papers in the Bodleian Library,1 but, owing to the pressure of other work, he had no time to examine it. To his at Memorial University of Newfoundland on March 6, 2015 suggestion I owe the privilege of bringing it to public notice. The manuscript consists of five sheets (12 by 1\ in.), written on both sides, except the last, which is three-quarters filled on one side and on the other has only five lines of writing, carefully crossed out, which contain a first draft of a passage in the manuscript itself.2 The handwriting is of a type not uncommon in the latter part of the seventeenth century.3 The corrections are of such a sort as make it evident that the penman was the composer of the matter, or else that he was an amanuensis who, as he wrote, corrected according to the dictation of the one for whom he worked.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Jacob Boehme
    This companion will prove an invaluable resource for all those engaged in research or teaching on Jacob Boehme and his readers, as historians, philos- ophers, literary scholars or theologians. Boehme is “on the radar” of many researchers, but often avoided as there are relatively few aids to understand- ing his thought, its context and subsequent appeal. This book includes a fi ne spread of topics and specialists. Cyril O’Regan, University of Notre Dame, USA 66244-139-0FM-2pass-r02.indd244-139-0FM-2pass-r02.indd i 55/31/2013/31/2013 88:46:56:46:56 AAMM 66244-139-0FM-2pass-r02.indd244-139-0FM-2pass-r02.indd iiii 55/31/2013/31/2013 88:48:14:48:14 AAMM An Introduction to Jacob Boehme This volume brings together for the fi rst time some of the world’s leading authorities on the German mystic Jacob Boehme to illuminate his thought and its reception over four centuries for the benefi t of students and advanced scholars alike. Boehme’s theosophical works have infl uenced Western culture in profound ways since their dissemination in the early seventeenth century, and these interdisciplinary essays trace the social and cultural networks as well as the intellectual pathways involved in Boehme’s enduring impact. The chapters range from situating Boehme in the sixteenth-century Radical Reformation to discussions of his signifi cance in modern theology. They explore the major contexts for Boehme’s reception, including the Pietist movement, Russian religious thought, and Western esotericism. In addition, they focus more closely on important readers, including the religious rad- icals of the English Civil Wars and the later English Behmenists, literary fi gures such as Goethe and Blake, and great philosophers of the modern age such as Schelling and Hegel.
    [Show full text]
  • Humanism and Early Modern Philosophy Edited by Jill Kraye and M.W.F.Stone
    London Studies in the History of Philosophy Series Editors: Jonathan Wolff, Tim Crane, M.W.F.Stone and Tom Pink London Studies in the History of Philosophy is a unique series of tightly focused edited collections. Bringing together the work of many scholars, some volumes will trace the history of the formulation and treatment of a particular problem of philosophy from the Ancient Greeks to the present day, while others will provide an in-depth analysis of a period or tradition of thought. The series is produced in collaboration with the Philosophy Programme of the University of London School of Advanced Study. 1 Humanism and Early Modern Philosophy Edited by Jill Kraye and M.W.F.Stone Forthcoming 2 Proper Ambition of Science Edited by M.W.F.Stone and Jonathan Wolff Humanism and Early Modern Philosophy Edited by Jill Kraye and M.W.F.Stone London and New York First published 2000 by Routledge 11 New Fetter Lane, London EC4P 4EE Simultaneously published in the USA and Canada by Routledge 29 West 35th Street, New York, NY 10001 Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group This edition published in the Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2003. © 2000 Jill Kraye and M.W.F.Stone All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilized in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers. British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Humanism and early modern philosophy/[edited by] Jill Kraye and M.W.F.Stone.
    [Show full text]
  • Andrea Riccio's Della Torre Tomb Monument
    ANDREA RICCIO‘S DELLA TORRE TOMB MONUMENT: HUMANISM AND ANTIQUARIANISM IN PADUA AND VERONA by Rebekah Anne Carson A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctorate of Philosophy Department of Art University of Toronto @ Copyright by Rebekah Anne Carson 2010 Andrea Riccio‘s Della Torre Tomb Monument: Humanism and Antiquarianism in Padua and Verona Doctorate of Philosophy 2010 Rebekah A. Carson Department of Art University of Toronto Abstract An important masterpiece by the Paduan sculptor Andrea Riccio, the Della Torre tomb monument broke with contemporary funerary monuments in both its form and content. Understanding what enabled this break with tradition is the central issue in the study of this monument—one that has not been sufficiently addressed in previous scholarship. Despite the lack of overt references to the Christian faith on the Della Torre monument, the narrative programme is concerned with two very important Christian concerns—the necessity of a life of virtue and the health and afterlife of the soul. I argue that the narrative on the tomb, influenced by contemporary funerary oratory and poetry, presents a model of virtue for the viewer. Moreover, I argue that Riccio has illustrated the presence of this exemplar by the very structure of the monument itself. This dissertation focuses on the artistic and intellectual community surrounding the creation of this monument and, in particular, on the reconciliation of this strictly all‘antica monument with Christian thought in this period. Upon a thorough contextual examination, this unprecedented monument becomes less of an anomaly. It reflects the ii ideas of an important circle of humanists from both Padua and Verona, thus illustrating the breadth of their interests and their involvement in contemporary debates over religion, the nature and potential immortality of the soul, and the necessity of virtue.
    [Show full text]
  • Fourteen GIOVANNI PICO DELLA MIRANDOLA
    Fourteen GIOVANNI PICO DELLA MIRANDOLA 1. Life of Pico. G. Donato and Elia del Medigo. Conflict with Barbaro. The Defense of Philosophy Giovanni Pico of the Counts of Mirandola was born on 24 February 1463. In the early infancy, he was under the influence of his mother, Giulia Boiardo. At the age of fourteen, he went to study Canon Law at the university in Bolo- gna, beginning those travels throughout Italian and foreign learning centers that greatly contributed to a cultural formation, in part at least, unconnected with the Italian situation. “He went to examine not only the literary centers of Italy but also those of France in order to inquire most carefully about the illus- trious teachers of his time” (non tantum Italiae sed et Galliarum literaria gymnasia perlustrans, celebres doctores tempestatis illius scrupulosissime perquirebat). From the study of jurisprudence, starting with a compilation of the Decretals, he acquired a concrete sense of human rapports, but soon showed himself seriously interested in the knowledge of nature: “he was a covetous inquirer of the secrets of nature” (secretarum naturae rerum cupidus explorator). An episode that he later narrated shows that during the period at Bologna together with Pandolfo Collenuccio he cared for astrological issues. This proves how very early in life he was inclined to a variety of interests. After his mother died in 1478, Giovanni moved to Ferrara. In 1479, during a trip to Florence that has been clearly documented, Pico encountered Politian and, perhaps, Ficino. At the time of this first Florentine visitation, the young prince left with Politian some love elegies that later on he wanted to destroy or to be returned for corrections.
    [Show full text]