Alternatives Feedback Report

(Reflecting stakeholder and public input received in 2021)

Northwest Corridor Alternatives Feedback Report This report summarizes community engagement efforts and public feedback for the LinkUS: Northwest Corridor Mobility Study conducted during the year 2021.

Table of Contents

Executive Summary ...... 3 Primary Components ...... 3 Key Takeaways ...... 3 Background and Overview ...... 4 Round 1 Engagement ...... 4 Purpose and Objectives of Round 2 Engagement ...... 4 Stakeholder and Public Meetings ...... 5 Participation...... 5 Key Takeaways ...... 5 Detailed Responses ...... 6 Online Open House ...... 6 Outreach and Equitable Engagement Efforts ...... 7 Online Open House Survey Results ...... 8 Appendices ...... 20 Appendix A. Stakeholder Workshops, Mentimeter Results ...... 20 Appendix B. Public Open House Meetings, Mentimeter Results ...... 32 Appendix C. Preliminary Public Feedback Summary ...... 49 Appendix D. Open House Public Survey Results ...... 23

Executive Summary As of March 5, 2021, over 1,200 individuals have shared their insights and opinions through the first and second rounds of public engagement for the LinkUS: Northwest Corridor Mobility Initiative. During the second round of public engagement, an estimated 400 individuals were engaged through virtual meetings, an online open house, and a feedback survey.

Primary Components Round 2 engagement consisted of three primary components:  Two 1.5-hour virtual stakeholder workshops  Two 1.5-hour virtual public meetings  Online open house and public survey

Key Takeaways There was general consistency in overall sentiment and priorities for the corridor. These include:

General Support for Rapid Transit Improvements  There was general support for rapid transit improvements, regardless of the specific mode of transit. Many respondents noted the need for more public transit options and alternatives to motor vehicles. Respondents recognized the need for a public transit option in the Northwest Corridor as the region continues to grow. Type of Transit Infrastructure  Respondents have stressed the need for dedicated transit lanes and signal priority to ensure fast travel times and travel reliability, thoughtful station design and locations (i.e. enclosed stations for inclement weather), environmental consideration (i.e. electric vehicles), and some continued support for LRT.

Active Transportation Options – Connectivity & Accessibility  In particular, participants want to see pedestrian and bicyclists improvements. Most important to respondents were safety improvements for pedestrians at roadway crossings, separated bicycle facilities, and accessible facilities for all ages and abilities.

Affordability & Equity  Participants have advocated for affordability in both new housing developments as well as making transit cost effective for riders. Other considerations included connecting underserved areas and reaching more residents that need to connect to major employment centers.

Frequently Asked Questions  Many participants posed questions on the project implementation timeline, funding, ridership costs, accessibility, active transportation improvements, environmental impacts, commuter accommodations, equity, transit stations, and affordable housing.

Background and Overview The Northwest Corridor Mobility Initiative is the first major corridor initiative to be launched under the LinkUS program. This initiative is an extension of foundational planning efforts such as MORPC’s Insight 2050 Corridor Concepts Study, COTA’s NextGen Plan, and the City of Columbus’ Connect Columbus initiative. Community engagement conducted for each of these past planning efforts informed the initial identification of the Northwest Corridor as a priority for implementation of high capacity transit, other mobility improvements, and coordinated growth strategies.

Round 1 Engagement Round 1 engagement began in the summer of 2020 until December 2020. Round 1 accomplished three primary objectives: 1) Inform stakeholders and the general public about the LinkUS: Northwest Corridor Initiative; 2) Provide an opportunity for the public and other stakeholders to engage with the findings from the LinkUS Framework Strategy and the Northwest Corridor Foundations Report; and, 3) Synthesize and integrate initial community perspectives to help shape the technical analysis and drafting of initial concepts.

The second round of public engagement began in January 2021 to showcase the technical evaluations that had been completed in 2020, receive feedback from the public on route alternatives, and explore other dimensions within the project such as development, active transportation facilities, and land use considerations.

Purpose and Objectives of Round 2 Engagement The second period of community engagement (i.e. “Round 2”) served the following objectives:

 Share the technical evaluation with the public and initial mode recommendations  Receive feedback on route alternatives  Provide information on other project considerations such as active transportation facilities and land use considerations

Primary Components Round 2 engagement consisted of two primary components:

 Two 1.5-hour stakeholder meetings  Two 1.5-hour public meetings  Online open house and public survey

As of March 5, 2021, and estimated 400 individuals* shared their insights and opinions through one of these two engagement venues.

*Note: It is assumed there is some overlap of individuals who participated in virtual meetings and who participated in the online survey.

Stakeholder and Public Meetings Stakeholder meetings were conducted prior to the online open house going live in order to reach a wider audience. Two virtual stakeholder meetings took place on January 26, 2021 and January 28, 2021. Two virtual public meetings were held at 12pm and 6pm on February 10th in order to give an overview of the latest study findings. The meetings showed conceptual imagery for Bus Rapid Transit as the mode recommendation, displayed the route alternatives and comparisons using high-level metrics information, briefly touched on development opportunity areas, and encouraged participants to spend time perusing the online open house and answer the feedback survey.

Participation Approximately 99 individuals attended the stakeholder and public meetings. 42 participants joined the stakeholder meetings and 57 individuals participated in the public open house meetings.

Key Takeaways Overarching takeaways from the workshops are presented below, with answers to questions posed throughout the meetings:

When considering the routing and construction of Rapid Transit within the Northwest Corridor, how would you prioritize the following?  Travel reliability - 6.2  Travel time - 6.0  Connection to major employment destinations - 5.9  Costs to construct - 3.9  Construction duration - 3.5

These results were very similar to the online survey results.

Survey feedback emphasizes walkable development and integration with surrounding neighborhoods at future station areas. What does success look like?  Wider sidewalks, walkable, space for pedestrians, complete streets, above and beyond ADA requirements  Higher density, mixed use and mixed income development  Less auto-centric, less space dedicated to parking  Safety – lighting, crosswalks, separated bike facilities  Access and connections to amenities, stations, biking/walking trails  Enclosed stations, development along transit stops, multi-modal hubs

Participants highlighted safety improvements, accessibility, connectivity, and robust transit stations, similar to the needs outlined by survey respondents.

Selected responses: “Less real estate dedicated to car parking.”

“Pedestrian and separated bicycle facilities feeding into the transit stations/hubs from neighborhoods. Destinations within short walking distance of transit hubs.”

“Dense mixed-use development. Station stops need to have amenities that allow riders dignity.”

“A fast, efficient, safe, clean and reliable (schedule) BRT that links key community nodes along the corridor that allows you to commute to and from work, play and home.”

Detailed Responses See Appendix A for Mentimeter live polling results for the stakeholder workshops and Appendix B for live polling results for the open house public meetings.

Online Open House After completing the second phase of the corridor planning work, members of the public were invited to provide their feedback on the planning efforts thus far. The online open house was structured to allow for participants to review information at their own pace and participate in the planning process at a time that would work best for them.

The online open house and survey were open from February 1, 2021 to March 5, 2021.* A total of 324 individuals completed the survey during that time period.

Multiple ways to engage were presented and advertised via the online open house, LinkUS newsletter, and email blasts to stakeholders:

 Review open house materials via the webpage, which supplied an overview of the technical evaluation performed to-date and alternative concepts on which to provide feedback.  The open house had its own survey for direct feedback on the materials shared online.  Video recordings of the overview presentations were also available for participants to view at their leisure.

The online open house was structured as a web-based ArcGIS “story map” embedded into the LinkUS Columbus website. The page was divided into categories including a welcome and introduction statement, an overview of engagement thus far, rapid transit information, transit route options for the Northwest Corridor and connections to downtown, bicycle and pedestrian facilities, land use and development, and the feedback survey.

*Note: The online survey remains open at the time of preparing this report. Results reported herein reflect responses as of the date noted. Additional responses, if provided, will be incorporated into final reporting.

Outreach and Equitable Engagement Efforts A wide variety of methods and outlets were employed to advertise the survey and encourage participation. Efforts were made to reach multiple, diverse audiences, representing people who live in, work in, or who may travel through the Northwest Corridor for other reasons. Direct email promotions were sent to all individuals participating in the first round of Stakeholder Workshops. The LinkUS Monthly Newsletter was sent to a broad audience, and an expanded social media strategy was employed to promote engagement. Stakeholders were asked to amplify outreach by promoting through their own email and social media networks.

The LinkUS Initiative includes an Equitable Engagement Strategy aimed at expanding the diversity and quality of engagement through reaching as many representative voices as possible. Outreach efforts were monitored for effectiveness and adjusted where possible to improve participation rates over the course of the survey period. Early observations indicated an imbalance in the ratio of male to female respondents and lower participation in non-white demographic groups. Additional outreach efforts were employed to expand representation in participation, including additional targeted stakeholder emails and social media promotion. The online survey period was extended beyond the original target date to provide additional opportunities for engagement. On February 18, Project Team members provided an overview presentation to the Columbus area Equity Now Coalition (ENC) to showcase the online engagement opportunities for both the Northwest and East-West Corridor projects. Other supplemental efforts included in-field promotional efforts with a focus on COTA bus stops in neighborhoods along the corridor with high minority and renter household populations.

Pandemic conditions have continued to present challenges for outreach, particularly in reaching demographic groups that have traditionally been more difficult to engage due to work or family obligations that do not align well with available engagement opportunities. Those with limited digital access are presented with additional challenges given the current reliance on virtual meetings and web-based engagement. However, it is likely that virtual engagement opportunities have also presented new options for some individuals who may have found a more traditional, in-person open house experience difficult to attend. The Project Team recommends the provision of additional engagement resources in subsequent phases of work for the Northwest Corridor. As the project advances to detailed design along a selected transit alignment, more targeted engagement is recommended in neighborhoods in close proximity to planned station locations, as well as with ridership of existing COTA lines along the corridor. Engagement efforts are detailed in Appendix C within the preliminary public feedback summary presentation slides.

Online Open House Survey Results There were 324 survey respondents to the online open house, over roughly a one-month time period. See Appendix D for the complete survey results. Question 1. How supportive are you regarding the addition of a modern Rapid Transit choice along the Northwest Corridor? Rate with 1 being not important at all and 7 being very important.

The majority of respondents (88.6%) ranked the addition of a modern Rapid Transit choice along the Northwest Corridor a 5 or above, with 66.4% ranking it as very important. Only 5.2% thought the addition of a modern Rapid Transit choice was not important at all.

1.5% 1.5% 3.1% 5.2% Most Important

6 7.4% 5

4 14.8% 3

66.4% 2

Not Important

Figure 1. How supportive are you regarding the addition of a modern Rapid Transit choice along the Northwest Corridor? There were 112 additional comments, which covered the following major themes:

 Emphasis on a “true” Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) system with dedicated lanes and signal priority; travel time reliability, high quality investment  General support for some sort of rapid transit improvements  Some continued preference for light rail  Connections to neighborhoods and places of interest (downtown, Arena District, University)  Sustainable infrastructure, such as electric vehicles, reducing GHG emissions, and protecting water quality, open space, and the riverfront  Acknowledgement of future growth and increased need for a rapid transit option Selected responses: “Functionality is key, focus on improvements that increase speed and reliability - give us true BRT.” “I would prefer Bus Rapid Transit over light rail (for now at least).” “This is long overdue! As a resident near one of the proposed stations I would love to have this as an option for running daily errands around Olentangy River Road, or even getting into downtown.”

“The current highway and secondary road network cannot support any increase in traffic that more development will inevitably bring.” Question 2. When considering the routing and construction of Rapid Transit within the Northwest Corridor, how would you prioritize the following? Rate each variable below with 1 being not important at all and 7 being very important.

 Construction duration (what could be built quickest)  Travel time (the fastest route)  Travel reliability (the route with the least delay)  Connection to major employment destinations  Costs to construct Travel reliability ranked highest, with 89.6% of respondents ranking the variable a 5 or higher in importance. 45.1% rated travel reliability as most important. Respondents also ranked connection to major employers highly, with 84.9% rating the variable a 5 or higher, followed by travel time with 82.1% of respondents rating the variable a 5 or higher. The least important variables were construction duration (42.8% of respondents ranked a 3 or lower) and costs to construct, with ratings of 3 or lower comprising 37.0% of respondents. The average for those variables were 3.6 and 3.7, respectively.

Table 1. When considering the routing and construction of Rapid Transit within the Northwest Corridor, how would you prioritize the following?

Travel Connection Travel Time Costs to Construction Reliability to Major Construct Duration Employers Mode 7 7 7 4 4 Median 6 6 6 4 4 Mean 6.0 5.8 5.6 3.7 3.6

There were 90 additional comments. Major themes included travel time reliability, connecting to places of employment and major attractions, and ensuring high quality investments, regardless of cost and time to construct. Selected responses: “Columbus needs to have something- I'd be happy to pay higher taxes for this or for the city to tax corporations at a higher rate.” “Connecting destinations (job centers and neighborhoods) should be the strongest priority.” “What's most important is to have a well-constructed, reliable network.” Question 3. Three Rapid Transit route alternatives are being evaluated for the Northwest Corridor (see below). Only one route will be recommended for construction.

A subset of survey respondents answered question three, with 171 responses for question 3a and 117 responses for question 3b. The percentages shown for each route are approximated and gauge the general trends for this subset of responses.

Percentages were estimated for each route, with Route 1: Olentangy River Rd. being the most favorable option. Respondents preferred Route 1 for its directness, speed, and connections to workforce. Route 2: Kenny Rd to West Campus was also favored by respondents since it would serve more residents, connect to employment and major locations, and connect Upper Arlington and The Ohio State University campus. Route 3: Kenny Rd to Upper Arlington was considered the most unfavorable route per respondents due to its route length, perceived indirectness, and longer travel time.

Figure 2. Northwest Corridor Transit Route Alternatives Diagram Below are approximate percentages for each route and major reasons for approval or disapproval of each route. Some respondents liked or disliked all of the route options.

a. Is there anything you like about some or all of the routes?  Route 1: Olentangy River Rd (± 42%) o Direct, fast, cost effective, connections to workforce  Route 2: Kenny Rd to West Campus (± 30%) o Serves more residents, connect to jobs and major locations (Innovation District, West Campus), connect Upper Arlington and OSU  Route 3: Kenny Rd to Upper Arlington (± 23%) o Equity, connects residential and commercial areas, reach underserved populations  All Routes (± 6%) o Connections to major roads, employers, and workforce General comments included prioritizing the most equitable and sustainable route options, and ensuring adequate last mile connections. Selected responses: “I think route 1 is good because it's fast and direct. I would definitely take this over driving.”

“The first route has fast travel time, highest population and job growth, and is most affordable. I couldn't image going with any other choice.” “I like option 2 since it still better serve more residents by the year 2050. I think connecting OSU’s west campus to the rest of Columbus would be vital for the longevity of the greater Columbus area.” “I like Option 2 the most. It seems to reach the most businesses, and it also seems to reach high traffic areas of Lane Ave.” “#3 Population served and jobs served should be most important.” “Option 3 appears to impact more population and very recent housing developments. There would be likely more use by working citizens that the other routes. This route also would provide more access to retail development.” b. Is there anything you dislike about some or all of the routes?  Route 1: Olentangy River Rd (± 11%) o Concerns that ORR is less user friendly, serves less existing residents  Route 2: Kenny Rd to West Campus (± 28%) o Already served by OSU CABS, slower than route 1 and has more deviations  Route 3: Kenny Rd to Upper Arlington (± 61%) o Route length, longer travel time, indirect Other issues included too many deviations and jogs in some routes, detouring through Upper Arlington, and impacts on existing neighborhoods and infrastructure. Selected responses: “1 is most direct, but serves less people/communities. If the goal is to provide reliable transportation options for travel to work, then the more communities the better. Then balancing with reliable, reasonable travel times so people can get to work and home on time.” “2 makes sense, but I don't think it is necessary. Students, faculty, employees can take the CABS bus to west campus if needed.” “Option 3 appears to cover more neighborhoods, but many of those neighborhoods are higher income (> $100,000 median income) and unlikely to use a BRT alternative. It also has the highest travel time, which would greatly deter any riders.” Question 4. Multiple Rapid Transit connections from the Northwest Corridor to Downtown are also being considered (see below). Only one route will be recommended for construction.

A subset of survey respondents answered question four, with 200 responses for question 4a and 102 responses for question 4b. The percentages shown for each route are approximated and estimate the general trends for this subset of responses. Percentages for each route are estimated below, showing Route 1: Goodale and Vine with the greatest number of positive responses, followed by Route 2: Neil to Spring and Long. Option 1 was favored due to its short travel time, connections to downtown, and serving many people. Respondents disliked option 3, West Broad Street, the most due to the route’s length and disconnect from major destinations.

Figure 3. Downtown Connection Route Alternatives Diagram Below are approximate percentages for each route and major reasons for approval or disapproval of each route. a. Is there anything you like about some or all of the routes?  Downtown Route 1: Goodale/Vine (± 31%) o Connects to Arena District, downtown core, and the Short North; shortest travel time, serves the most people, connects to jobs/workforce  Downtown Route 2: Neil to Spring and Long (± 30%) o Connects to the Arena District, downtown core, and the Short North; major employers, entertainment venues  Downtown Route 3(a): West Broad Street (± 26%) o Links East-West connection, serves more people, encourages Franklinton and Scioto Peninsula development, uses Broad St., access to major employers (CoverMyMeds)  Downtown Route 3b: Souder Connector (± 10%) o Connects to Franklinton, encourages investment and development General comments included an idea for a downtown loop, combining several of the Downtown connection alternatives, and connecting to other destinations such as the airport, Discovery District, and other corridors. Many respondents also indicated the need to connect to the Arena District as well as to Franklinton. Support for routes 1 and 2 comprised approximately 60% of all responses and highlighted the importance of connecting to the Arena District. Proponents of route 3 accounted for roughly 35% of all responses and specified the importance of connecting to Franklinton.

Selected responses: “I like route #1 best because we need better transit in the actual downtown core. It would also be the quickest route and serve the most jobs.” “#2 is the BEST option here. It brings you into the heart of the Arena District. Any type of mass transit needs to connect and/or go through your major entertainment areas. This gets people to ride it; maybe not as much at first but once they see how well it works; they will consider it in the future.” “Option 3: I like that this route goes through Franklinton and I want to see Franklinton continue to grow.” “Route 3b would establish a new connection between two areas that are close but not easily accessible now - it would also encourage development and investment in Franklinton.”

b. Is there anything you dislike about some or all of the routes?  Downtown Route 1: Goodale/Vine (± 30%) o Adding to congestion, already served/options available, narrow streets, disruption to High St/Neil Ave  Downtown Route 2: Neil to Spring and Long (± 17%) o Adding to congestion, options already available  Downtown Route 3(a): West Broad Street (± 50%) o Long route, out of the way, least amount of connections, convoluted, misses portions of Downtown such as the Arena District, indirect, pointless, skips businesses and housing  Downtown Route 3b: Souder Connector (± 4%) o Lack of ridership High Street was specifically mentioned by several respondents with concerns around existing congestion and transit worsening this, or transit (outside of dedicated lanes) being inhibited by motor vehicle traffic (and causing delays). Additional respondents felt that High Street was already well served by transit. Selected responses: “Route 1 uses too many narrow streets. Route 3 is out of the way and too long.” “2 is the least favorable option, as it serves both the least population and least jobs.” “Route 2 appears to serve our sports & entertainment venues best and while this should not be a key goal, given all things equal it makes sense to serve this niche that will be the jumping off point for a fair number of riders.” “Option 3 has a much higher travel time range than options 1 and 2 (a big deterrence).” “3 seems to best serve a developing neighborhood, and the most people in the future, but its travel time is much longer. 1 seems the best compromise.” “Whatever is chosen needs to service Franklinton.”

Question 5. How strongly do you feel that Rapid Transit is needed to accommodate our region's continued growth? (Select the option that best describes your opinion.)

 Traffic is fine and I'm not concerned about growth.  Things have worsened over the years but are still tolerable.  Growth is imminent and we need to begin adding travel options.  Rapid transit should be an integral part of our regional growth and economic development strategy.  I'm unclear about the relationship between regional growth, transportation, and our economic vibrancy. 76.7% of respondents felt that rapid transit should be an integral part of our regional growth and economic development strategy. 17.0% felt that growth was imminent and that we need to begin adding travel options. Only a small percentage (5.7%) were unconcerned about growth or thought conditions were still tolerable.

2.2% 0.6% 3.5% Rapid transit should be an integral part of our regional growth and economic development strategy. Growth is imminent and we need to begin adding travel options. 17.0% Traffic is fine and I'm not concerned about growth.

Things have worsened over the years but are still tolerable. 76.7% I'm unclear about the relationship between regional growth, transportation, and our economic vibrancy.

Figure 4. How strongly do you feel that Rapid Transit is needed to accommodate our region's continued growth? Question 6. When considering future development in vicinity of the Northwest Corridor, which outcome is most important to you? Rank outcomes from 1-5 with 1 being the most important.

 Ensures compatibility with existing neighborhoods  Promotes safe walk, bike, and transit connections  Includes attractive, high-quality open space  Provides a walkable mixture of uses (including housing, employment, shopping, and professional services)  Manages traffic impacts When considering the importance of future development outcomes in the Northwest Corridor, 76.0% of respondents selected “promotes safe walk, bike, and transit connections” as important or most important, with 42.9% ranking this as most important. Providing a walkable mixture of uses was very important to 30.6% of respondents and important to 33.4% of respondents. Least

important to respondents were managing traffic impacts (36.9%) followed by including attractive, high-quality open-space (32.7%).

Promotes safe walk, bike, and transit connections

Provides a walkable mixture of uses

Ensures compatibility with existing neighborhoods

Manages traffic impacts

Includes attractive, high-quality open space 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Most Important Important Neutral Not as Important Least Important

Figure 5. When considering future development in vicinity of the Northwest Corridor, which outcome is most important to you? There were 85 additional comments. Several respondents noted that all of these outcomes were equally important. Safety for pedestrians and bicyclists was highlighted, along with ensuring equitable outcomes for lower income individuals. Others mentioned the need for alternative transportation modes, enhanced bikeways, walkability and pedestrian improvements, and compatibility with existing neighborhoods. Adequate density to support development, concern for environmental impacts, and making a convenient alternative to single occupancy vehicles were also mentioned several times. Selected responses: “These are all important, but it needs to be safe and convenient in order to people to use it.” “Ideally these 5 outcomes would not be mutually exclusive (e.g., provide multi-modal transportation AND walkable mixed use).” “The most important thing to me is encouraging non-car options of travel. ‘Attractiveness’ should be the last factor considered, with function and sustainability being the most important.” “In order to age in place, Columbus has got to become less car-dependent and have improved walkable neighborhoods with practical and accessible public transit.” “If this is not faster [than] cars (including parking) it will not work.” “The most important outcomes aren't listed: providing equitable transportation options for people regardless of income, and getting people out of SOVs.”

Question 7. Many members of the public would like to see improved bicycle and pedestrian connections to and from transit and local destinations. In creating such connections, please rank the importance of the following. Rank outcomes from 1-5 with 1 being the most important.

 Connecting to existing bicycle trails  Filling sidewalk gaps  Prioritizing safety enhancements  Creating well-designed multimodal intersections  Providing places for bike parking storage 32.4% of respondents thought it was very important to connect to existing bicycle trails, followed by 25.7% wanting to fill sidewalk gaps, and 21.6% prioritizing safety enhancements as most important. Least important to respondents was providing places for bike parking storage (61.9%). However, there were several additional comments which highlighted the importance of creating all of these connections.

Connecting to existing bicycle trails

Filling sidewalk gaps

Prioritizing safety enhancements

Creating well-designed multimodal intersections

Providing places for bike parking and storage

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Most Important Important Neutral Not as Important Least Important

Figure 6. Bicycle and Pedestrian Connection Outcomes There were 72 additional comments, which focused primarily on safety improvements for pedestrians, bicyclists, and roadway crossings. Improvements in the pedestrian network were emphasized, along with creating separated facilities for both pedestrians and bicyclists. Accessibility and connections using active transportation modes for all ages and abilities was also highlighted by many respondents. Selected responses: “Access to the transit stations is paramount to its success and sustainability. The current gaps in walkways and bikeways impede development.” “If bike lanes are going to be added, really consider protecting them. The number one obstacle to me biking versus driving is how safe I feel while I'm on my bike.”

Question 8. As planning for the Northwest Corridor progresses, are there additional priority needs, considerations, or opportunities that you believe should be considered?

There were 146 responses, with the following major themes:

 Transit Infrastructure: Dedicated lanes, signal priority, station design (e.g. enclosed stations for inclement weather), Some continued advocacy for LRT  Bike Improvements: Separated facilities, connecting to bike trails  Pedestrian Focus: Safe roadway crossings, sidewalks, Senior/ADA accessibility  Connections between places, employment, neighborhoods  Equity, affordable housing  Travel time reliability  Environmental focus – EV charging, protection of rivers, water quality  COVID impacts – still relevant if people are working from home? Selected responses: “Integrating with existing neighborhoods and infrastructure, providing safe roadway crossings, and meeting the needs of all ages and abilities.” “Any changes should help mitigate the city's high economic segregation and inequality.” “Prioritize ease of use and low cost.” “Integrating with existing neighborhoods and infrastructure, providing safe roadway crossings, and meeting the needs of all ages and abilities.” “My opinion is that the most important thing that needs to be done at this point is to get some sort of premium transit implemented.” Question 9. What zip code do you live in? Most respondents lived in zip codes overlapping with the Northwest Corridor. The most commonly selected zip code aligns with Upper Arlington, followed by Grandview Heights, Clintonville, Old North, the University District, and Northwest Columbus. Question 10. What zip code do you work in? 21.5% of respondents work downtown and 20.4% work in the Ohio State University area. Other common responses included Grandview Heights (8.3%), Clintonville (5.2%), and Upper Arlington (4.8%).

Question 11. What is your gender? 59.6% of respondents identified as male, followed by 36.4% identifying as female.

3.8% 0.3%

Male Female

36.4% Prefer not to answer Non-binary 59.6%

Figure 7. What is your gender?

Question 12. What is your age? The majority of respondents (38.1%) were ages 35 – 54, followed by those aged 26 – 34 (29.6%) and ages 55 – 64 (11.0%). There were no respondents aged 18 or younger.

4.7% 35 - 54 6.3% 26 - 34 10.4% 38.1% 55 - 64

65 or older 11.0% 19 - 25 Prefer not to answer

29.6%

Figure 8. What is your age?

Question 13. Which racial group do you most closely identify with? The majority of respondents identified as White/Caucasian (82.3%), followed by prefer not to answer (10.4%), and two or more races (2.5%).

1.6% 1.6% 1.6% 2.5%

White / Caucasian

10.4% Prefer not to answer Two or more races Asian Black / African-American Other 82.3%

Figure 9. Which racial group do you most closely identify with? Question 14. Are you Hispanic or Latino? Only 3.8% of respondents were Hispanic or Latino.

Appendices

Appendix A. Stakeholder Workshops, Mentimeter Results

Appendix B. Public Open House Meetings, Mentimeter Results

Appendix C. Preliminary Public Feedback Summary

Northwest Corridor Online Key Points Open House • Survey Results as of 3.1.21 • 318 responses analyzed Preliminary Public Feedback Summary • More responses incoming Northwest Update – Public Engagement

Online Open House: Feb 1-19* Extended to March 1 for further promotion Virtual Meetings: Feb 10 • BRT Recommendation • Conceptual Imagery • Route Alternatives Comparison • High Level Metrics Info • Development Opportunity Areas • Not Specific Concepts • Brief Feedback Survey • ± 320 responses so far Demographics

• Most respondents lived in zip codes overlapping with the NWC • 41% work in the OSU area or downtown • More male than female respondents • Majority of respondents ages 35-54 and 26-34 • Mostly white respondents (82%) • 4% Hispanic or Latino Supplemental Efforts

In-Field Promotion at COTA Stops

Recent promotion at Equity Now Coalition Potential New Americans Focus Group Session Q1. How supportive are you regarding the addition of a modern Rapid Transit choice along the Northwest Corridor?

• 88% of respondents were supportive of a “Functionality is key, modern Rapid Transit choice focus on improvements • Additional comments (110 total) – major themes: that increase speed and • Emphasis on “True” BRT/dedicated lanes reliability - give us true • Some continued preference for light rail BRT.” • Emphasis on route connections to neighborhoods • Sustainable infrastructure (emphasis on electric, reducing emissions, river protection) “I would prefer Bus • Reliability, travel time Rapid Transit over light rail (for now at least).” Only a few respondents didn’t want to see any transit improvements. Q2. When considering the routing and construction of Rapid Transit within the Northwest Corridor, how would you prioritize the following?

• Travel reliability (the route with the least delay) – 6.0 1 = not important at all • Connection to major employment destinations – 5.8 7 = very important • Travel time (the fastest route) – 5.6 • Costs to construct – 3.7 “Columbus needs to • Construction duration (what could be built quickest) – 3.6 have something- I'd be happy to pay • Comments (90 total) major themes: higher taxes for this • Travel time reliability or for the city to tax • Connect to places of employment and major attractions corporations at a • Quality investments – regardless of cost/time to construct higher rate.” Q5. How strongly do you feel that Rapid Transit is needed to accommodate our region's continued growth?

2% Rapid transit should be an integral part of 1% 77% of respondents 4% our regional growth and economic felt that rapid transit development strategy. Growth is imminent and we need to begin should be an integral 17% adding travel options. part of our regional Traffic is fine and I'm not concerned growth and economic about growth. development 77% Things have worsened over the years but strategy. are still tolerable.

I'm unclear about the relationship between regional growth, transportation, and our economic vibrancy. Q6. When considering future development in vicinity of the Northwest Corridor, which outcome is most important to you?

• 42% ranked “promotes safe walk, bike, and transit Promotes safe walk, bike, and transit connections connections” as most important Provides a walkable mixture of uses • 31% ranked “provides a Ensures compatibility with existing walkable mixture of uses” as neighborhoods most important Manages traffic impacts • Both were also ranked “important” (~33-34%) Includes attractive, high-quality open space • 37% ranked managing traffic 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% impacts as least important Most Important Important Neutral Not as Important Least Important

“Ideally these 5 outcomes would not be mutually exclusive.” Q7. Many members of the public would like to see improved bicycle and pedestrian connections to and from transit and local destinations. In creating such connections, please rank the importance of the following.

• 32% ranked “connecting to existing bicycle trails” as most Connecting to existing bicycle trails important

• Almost half of all respondents Filling sidewalk gaps thought filling sidewalk gaps and prioritizing safety Prioritizing safety enhancements enhancements were important or most important Creating well-designed multimodal intersections • 62% ranked “places for bike parking” as least important Providing places for bike parking and storage

• Several respondents said 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% these were all equally important Most Important Important Neutral Not as Important Least Important Q8. As planning for the Northwest Corridor progresses, are there additional priority needs, considerations, or opportunities that you believe should be considered?

• Major themes (143 responses): • Transit Infrastructure: Dedicated lanes, signal priority, station design (e.g. enclosed stations for inclement weather), Some continued advocacy for LRT • Bike Improvements: Separated facilities, connecting to bike trails • Pedestrian Focus: Safe roadway crossings, Senior/ADA accessibility • Connections between places, employment, neighborhoods • Equity, affordable housing • Travel time reliability • Environmental focus – EV charging, protection of rivers, water quality • COVID impacts – still relevant if people are working from home? Q8. As planning for the Northwest Corridor progresses, are there additional priority needs, considerations, or opportunities that you believe should be considered?

Selected responses relating to major themes: • “Any changes should help mitigate the city's high economic segregation and inequality.” • “Prioritize ease of use and low cost.” • “Integrating with existing neighborhoods and infrastructure, providing safe roadway crossings, and meeting the needs of all ages and abilities.” • “My opinion is that the most important thing that needs to be done at this point is to get some sort of premium transit implemented.” Primary Alignment Alternatives Q3. Three Rapid Transit route alternatives are being evaluated for the Northwest Corridor

Is there anything you like about some or all of the routes? • Route 1: Olentangy River Rd (± 42%) • Direct, fast, cost effective, connections to workforce • Route 2: Kenny Rd to West Campus (± 30%) • Serves more residents, connect to jobs and major locations (Innovation District, West Campus), connect UA and OSU • Route 3: Kenny Rd to Upper Arlington (± 23%) • Equity, connects residential and commercial areas, reach underserved populations • All Routes (± 6%) • Connections to major roads, employers, and workforce • General Comments: Need for sustainability and last mile connections Q3. Three Rapid Transit route alternatives are being evaluated for the Northwest Corridor

Is there anything you dislike about some or all of the routes? • Route 1: Olentangy River Rd (± 9%) • Concerns that ORR is less user friendly, serves less existing residents • Route 2: Kenny Rd to West Campus (± 24%) • Already served by OSU CABS, slower than route 1 and has more deviations • Route 3: Kenny Rd to Upper Arlington (± 54%) • Route length, longer travel time, indirect • All Routes (± 2%) • Other issues: Too many deviations/jogs, detouring through UA, impacts on existing neighborhoods and infrastructure Downton Connection Alternatives Q4. Multiple Rapid Transit connections from the Northwest Corridor to Downtown are also being considered

Is there anything you like about some or all of the routes? • Downtown Route 1: Goodale/Vine (± 31%) • Connects to Arena District, downtown core, and the Short North; shortest travel time, serves the most people, connects to jobs/workforce • Downtown Route 2: Neil to Spring and Long (± 29%) • Connects to the Arena District, downtown core, and the Short North; major employers, entertainment venues • Downtown Route 3: West Broad Street (± 25%) • Links East-West connection, serves more people, encourages Franklinton and Scioto Peninsula development, uses Broad St., access to major employers (CoverMyMeds) • Downtown Route 3b: Souder Connector (± 11%) • Connects to Franklinton, encourages investment and development Q4. Multiple Rapid Transit connections from the Northwest Corridor to Downtown are also being considered

Is there anything you dislike about some or all of the routes? • Downtown Route 1: Goodale/Vine (± 28%) • Adding to congestion, already served/options available, narrow streets, disruptd High St/Neil Ave • Downtown Route 2: Neil to Spring and Long (± 16%) • Adding to congestion, options already available • Downtown Route 3: West Broad Street (± 48%) • Long route, out of the way, least amount of connections, convoluted, doesn’t go downtown, indirect, pointless, skips businesses and housing, misses Arena District • Downtown Route 3b: Souder Connector (± 4%) • Cost/Benefit? • General comments • Make a downtown loop, combine alternatives?, preserve High St, Connections to other destinations (CCAD/Discovery District, Airport, other corridors) Selected Survey Responses

“Mixed feelings: I like that 3 swoops west to pick up Franklinton, but that comes at the expense of the Arena District. Either way, somebody loses out, but [they’re] also not so far apart.”

“It would be nice to have a loop option where options 1, and 3b are combined. This helps connections to routes that go west on Broad Street while offering connections on High street too.”

“I think it makes more sense for their to be a downtown loop, maybe combining options 1 and 2, or 1/2 with 3a/b. . . A pedway . . . to stops of other lines could be appropriate between Long and Broad.” For Consideration Downtown Connection Hybrid Alternative

Potential Benefit Tradeoff Consideration

Direct access to Convention Separate alignments/ limited station Alt 1 Center. potential, complex traffic/ROW.

Direct access to Arena District – Concerns over intersection capacity and Alt 2 high ridership potential. existing congestion at Neil/Vine/Goodale.

Potential for initial Indirect. Higher travel time if mixed traffic. Alt 3a implementation with minimal Significant costs to create dedicated transit ROW/traffic impacts. lanes.

More direct route with potential High cost. Congestion relief (as vehicular Alt 3b travel time savings. connection) to Neil/Vine is unclear. Alt 4* Potential hybrid alternative Twin Rivers assumed as mixed traffic for consideration. Could until/if 3b connection is implemented. combine benefits of multiple Routes through multiple interchange alternatives with Phasing ramps. Design coordination necessary Options. during Project Development. Mentimeter Results

Stakeholder meetings: Jan 26 – 28 Open House public meetings: Feb 10 When considering the routing and construction of Rapid Transit within the Northwest Corridor, how would you prioritize the following?

Menti Results Online Survey Results • Travel reliability - 6.2 • Travel reliability - 6.0 • Travel time - 6.0 • Connection to major employment destinations - 5.8 • Connection to major employment destinations - 5.9 • Travel time - 5.6 • Costs to construct - 3.9 • Costs to construct - 3.7 • Construction duration - 3.5 • Construction duration - 3.6

1 = not important at all 7 = very important Survey feedback emphasizes walkable development and integration with surrounding neighborhoods at future station areas. What does success look like?

• Wider sidewalks, walkable, space for pedestrians, complete streets, above and beyond ADA requirements • Higher density, mixed use and mixed income development • Less auto-centric, less space dedicated to parking • Safety – lighting, crosswalks, separated bike facilities • Access and connections to amenities, stations, biking/walking trails • Enclosed stations, development along transit stops, multi-modal hubs Survey feedback emphasizes walkable development and integration with surrounding neighborhoods at future station areas. What does success look like?

Selected responses:

• “Less real estate dedicated to car parking.”

• “Pedestrian and separated bicycle facilities feeding into the transit stations/hubs from neighborhoods. Destinations within short walking distance of transit hubs.”

• “Dense mixed-use development. Station stops need to have amenities that allow riders dignity.”

• “A fast, efficient, safe, clean and reliable (schedule) BRT that links key community nodes along the corridor that allows you to commute to and from work, play and home.”

Appendix D. Open House Public Survey Results 1. How 2. When considering the 7. Many members of the 8. As planning for the supportive are routing and construction 3a. Three Rapid Transit 4a. Multiple Rapid Transit 5. How strongly do you 6. When considering public would like to see 13. Which Travel Northwest Corridor you regarding of Rapid Transit within route alternatives are 3b. Is there connections from the 4b. Is there feel that Rapid Transit is future development improved bicycle and racial 14. Are reliability Connection to progresses, are there 9. What 10. What the addition of a Please share the Northwest Corridor, Travel time Please share any being evaluated for the anything you Northwest Corridor to anything you needed to accommodate in vicinity of the 6. Rank 5 - Please share pedestrian connections to 7. Rank 5- Please share any 11. What 12. What group do you (the route major Costs to additional priority zip code zip code No. modern Rapid any additional how would you prioritize (the fastest additional Northwest Corridor. Is dislike about Downtown are also being dislike about some our region's continued Northwest Corridor, 6. Rank 2 6. Rank 3 6. Rank 4 Least any additional and from transit and local 7. Rank 2 7. Rank 3 7. Rank 4 Least additional is your is your you most Hispanic with the employment construct needs, considerations, do you do you Transit choice comments. the following? route) comments.2 there anything you like some or all of considered. Is there or all of the growth? (Select the which outcome is important comments.6 destinations. In creating important comments.7 gender? age? closely or least destinations or opportunities that live in? work in? along the Construction duration about some or all of the the routes? anything you like about routes? option that best most important to such connections, please identify Latino? delay) you believe should be Northwest (what could be built routes? some or all of the routes? describes your opinion.) you? rank the importance of the with? considered? Corridor? quickest) following. I like that route 2 goes I like route 2 because it Growth is imminent and Provides a walkable Ensures Includes Promotes safe Manages traffic Connecting to existing bicycle Filling sidewalk Prioritizing safety Creating well- Providing 43206 43206 Male 26 - 34 White / No through the new OSU support the entire Arena we need to begin adding mixture of uses compatibility with attractive, high- walk, bike, and impacts trails gaps enhancements designed places for bike Caucasian Innovation District on District along Neil. I like route travel options. (including housing, existing quality open transit multimodal parking and Kenny and will support 3 because it supports the employment, neighborhoods space connections intersections storage 17 4 7774 the jobs there and also CoverMyMeds campus and shopping, and gives closer access to future Franklinton professional services) Upper Arlington Development development along Lane.

It should have What's most The first route has fast 2 and 3 aren't Rapid transit should be an Promotes safe walk, Provides a Manages traffic Ensures Includes Prioritizing safety Filling sidewalk Creating well- Connecting to Providing Making sure those in the 43068 43209 Male 19 - 25 White / No happened a long important is to have travel time, highest straight, which integral part of our bike, and transit walkable mixture impacts compatibility attractive, high- enhancements gaps designed existing bicycle places for bike lowersocieconomic have Caucasian time ago; way a well- population and job makes them regional growth and connections of uses (including with existing quality open multimodal trails parking and input overdue constructured, growth, and is most seem like economic development housing, neighborhoods space intersections storage reliable network. affordable. I couldn't inconvient strategy. employment, 2 7 4 677 4 Getting that right is image going with any lines. shopping, and more important other choice. professional than getting it done services) as soon as possible.

I lived in London, I like all of them but No! Letâ€™s Looks good for Grandview They really Rapid transit should be an Provides a walkable Ensures Promotes safe Includes Manages traffic Filling sidewalk gaps Connecting to Filling sidewalk Creating well- Providing 43220 Male 65 or White / No England for 3 economic development do it! Yard and Franklinton. donâ€™t serve the integral part of our mixture of uses compatibility with walk, bike, and attractive, high- impacts existing bicycle gaps designed places for bike older Caucasian years and never and work force Northwest corridor! regional growth and (including housing, existing transit quality open trails multimodal parking and had a car. I advancement should be economic development employment, neighborhoods connections space intersections storage travelled at the forefront of the final strategy. shopping, and extensively decision! professional services) throughout Europe and enjoyed the 3 7 convenience and 4 476 5 ease of rail travel. We are light years behind so I would fully support this effort!

Make sure they have last Can you just connect 1 or 2 3 seems to have the Growth is imminent and Promotes safe walk, Ensures Includes Manages traffic Provides a Creating well-designed Filling sidewalk Connecting to Providing Prioritizing mix of affordable housing 43220 43215 Female 35 - 54 White / No mile connections around with 3 so it makes a loop and least amount of we need to begin adding bike, and transit compatibility with attractive, high- impacts walkable multimodal intersections gaps existing bicycle places for bike safety options and last mile Caucasian these routes so that covers pretty much the entire connections travel options. connections existing quality open mixture of uses trails parking and enhancements connections in the people can use them to area for connections? neighborhoods space (including storage neighboods get to the place they want housing, to employment, 46 4 7765 shopping, and professional services)

Rapid transit should be an Provides a walkable Includes attractive, Ensures Manages traffic Ensures Connecting to existing bicycle Filling sidewalk Creating well- Prioritizing Providing 43202 43202 Male 26 - 34 White / No integral part of our mixture of uses high-quality open compatibility with impacts compatibility trails gaps designed safety places for bike Caucasian regional growth and (including housing, space existing with existing multimodal enhancements parking and economic development employment, neighborhoods neighborhoods intersections storage 57 4 7744 strategy. shopping, and professional services)

it must have You must build that something is actually travel times Broad Street alignment will must be dedicated Rapid transit should be an Promotes safe walk, Provides a Includes Ensures Manages traffic pedestrian, bike Prioritizing safety Creating well- Connecting to Filling sidewalk Providing sidewalks and bike Multi task. Build the 43206 43017 Male 35 - 54 White / No dedicated lanes. gold level BRT on happening. are still kinda serve Franklinton and should lanes, no running integral part of our bike, and transit walkable mixture attractive, high- compatibility impacts and busway all enhancements designed existing bicycle gaps places for bike lanes must be Broad, Olentangy, Caucasian All new lines high. Will all connect with the Broad on shared streets. regional growth and connections of uses (including quality open with existing the things. multimodal trails parking and treated with higher Parsons and Main street (Broad, Main, there be high Street BRT and Main Street Pedestrianize the economic development housing, space neighborhoods (streets) intersections storage priority than single dedicated transit lines Olentangy, frequency BRT/railway. A central stop for Rich and/or Main strategy. employment, occupancy vehicle Parsons, etc). Pre- spurs at Bethel all three lines somewhere on street bridge and shopping, and lanes fare/all door to get to places the peninsula? run BRT buses on professional boarding, dedicated like Dublin? them. Or build a services) 6 7 1 672 1 lanes, queue Will this block long BRT jumping at traffic replace or link transfer lane at lights, etc etc. to the 73 Front and Broad or suburban Civic Center and route? broad for all 3 lines to converge.

Least disruption to High St route connects Rapid transit should be an Ensures compatibility Provides a Manages traffic Promotes safe Includes Filling sidewalk gaps Connecting to Prioritizing safety Creating well- Providing 43110 43215 Female 35 - 54 No neighborhoods through a street that will allow integral part of our with existing walkable mixture impacts walk, bike, and attractive, high- existing bicycle enhancements designed places for bike for transfer from other transit regional growth and neighborhoods of uses (including transit quality open trails multimodal parking and services and good economic development housing, connections space intersections storage 77 4 4774 connectivity with employment strategy. employment, centers shopping, and professional services)

I think route 1 is good I think routes 2 I like that routes 3a and 3b go Unless they go Rapid transit should be an Promotes safe walk, Provides a Manages traffic Includes Ensures Connecting to existing bicycle Creating well- Filling sidewalk Prioritizing Providing I still thing that #5, Connections to existing 43205 43215 Male 26 - 34 White / No because it's fast and and 3 would past the new CoverMyMeds underground, I integral part of our bike, and transit walkable mixture impacts attractive, high- compatibility trails designed gaps safety places for bike my least important, natural amenities like the Caucasian direct. I would definitely be too slow to headquarters (I work there worry that routes 1 regional growth and connections of uses (including quality open with existing multimodal enhancements parking and is important. We Olentangy River are take this over driving. be useful and and am biased...) and 2 would be too economic development housing, space neighborhoods intersections storage need more bike crucial. We can use many people congested since strategy. employment, racks all over the transportation design to would avoid traffic on high street shopping, and city. encourage residents to 87 1 7751 them in favor in the short north is professional better utilize local natural of driving. pretty bad. Route 2 services) resources. would probably solve this better than route 1.

Rapid transit should be an Provides a walkable Promotes safe Manages traffic Ensures Includes Creating well-designed Filling sidewalk Connecting to Providing Prioritizing 43201 43201 Male 26 - 34 Prefer not No integral part of our mixture of uses walk, bike, and impacts compatibility attractive, high- multimodal intersections gaps existing bicycle places for bike safety to answer regional growth and (including housing, transit with existing quality open trails parking and enhancements economic development employment, connections neighborhoods space storage 97 6 4671 strategy. shopping, and professional services) 1. How 2. When considering the 7. Many members of the 8. As planning for the supportive are routing and construction 3a. Three Rapid Transit 4a. Multiple Rapid Transit 5. How strongly do you 6. When considering public would like to see 13. Which Travel Northwest Corridor you regarding of Rapid Transit within route alternatives are 3b. Is there connections from the 4b. Is there feel that Rapid Transit is future development improved bicycle and racial 14. Are reliability Connection to progresses, are there 9. What 10. What the addition of a Please share the Northwest Corridor, Travel time Please share any being evaluated for the anything you Northwest Corridor to anything you needed to accommodate in vicinity of the 6. Rank 5 - Please share pedestrian connections to 7. Rank 5- Please share any 11. What 12. What group do you (the route major Costs to additional priority zip code zip code No. modern Rapid any additional how would you prioritize (the fastest additional Northwest Corridor. Is dislike about Downtown are also being dislike about some our region's continued Northwest Corridor, 6. Rank 2 6. Rank 3 6. Rank 4 Least any additional and from transit and local 7. Rank 2 7. Rank 3 7. Rank 4 Least additional is your is your you most Hispanic with the employment construct needs, considerations, do you do you Transit choice comments. the following? route) comments.2 there anything you like some or all of considered. Is there or all of the growth? (Select the which outcome is important comments.6 destinations. In creating important comments.7 gender? age? closely or least destinations or opportunities that live in? work in? along the Construction duration about some or all of the the routes? anything you like about routes? option that best most important to such connections, please identify Latino? delay) you believe should be Northwest (what could be built routes? some or all of the routes? describes your opinion.) you? rank the importance of the with? considered? Corridor? quickest) following. I want to see the I'd rather pay more Route 1 is easiest to I don't love the 1 and 2 are the most direct I don't like using Rapid transit should be an Promotes safe walk, Provides a Includes Ensures Manages traffic Filling sidewalk gaps Creating well- Prioritizing safety Connecting to Providing sWe should do a 43214 43214 Female 26 - 34 White / No transit operate in for a better service explain and the fastest! If turn offs on and make the most sense. I Twin River for integral part of our bike, and transit walkable mixture attractive, high- compatibility impacts designed enhancements existing bicycle places for bike comprehensive zoning Caucasian exclusive right of that connects one goal of this project is routes 2 and 3. do wish both operated on the 3a/3b. Doesn't regional growth and connections of uses (including quality open with existing multimodal trails parking and plan for the entire corridor way. people to popular to get current residents to If those same east-west road. Keeping seem like an area economic development housing, space neighborhoods intersections storage to orient buildings toward destinations. It's start choosing transit, the connections buses on the same road helps that is going to strategy. employment, Olentangy River Road, also important to system needs to be easy are necessary, new riders navigate the produce new riders. shopping, and decrease setback from completely change to navigate. Minimizing consider system. professional the road, lower the speed the streetscape the turns helps achieve additional east- services) limit on ORR, consider along the corridor that! Also, every time the west routes narrowing the roadway to and on connecting bus turns it adds delay to and improved allow for peds/bikes, and arterials. People the route. pedestrian/biki require new buildings need to feel safe ng constructed adjacent to while walking and connections. bus stops to build an biking to stations. awning to accommodate Another important transit riders. point, people won't walk or bike to 10 7 1 777 1 stations if we build the bare minimum of ped/bike infrastructure. The walking/biking experience needs to be pleasant and comfortable. We should aim high!

The worker and It is difficult to Limiting carbon Unclear how The use of the term rapid Hasn't the City Traffic is fine and I'm not Ensures compatibility Includes attractive, Promotes safe Provides a Manages traffic concern about Prioritizing safety Will this still be important 43221 43221 Female 65 or White / No residential interpret the emissions from cars is much more transit is misleading. Can we already spent concerned about growth. with existing high-quality open walk, bike, and walkable mixture impacts urban heat enhancements if people are working from older Caucasian numbers do not graphic bar charts. tempting. But what the impervious have subways? enough money neighborhoods space transit of uses island impacts home? seem high What do the 3 emissions be like from surface that helping out connections (including resulting from enough now or in columns represent? construction and you are talking OhioHealth? Why is housing, increased 2050 to warrant What is SOV? implementation? about creating. this the first employment, impervious the expense. It looks like corridor? High shopping, and surfaces and low 11 1 4 444 4 Olentangy Street has professional canopy River Road will connections every services) expand to 8 10 minutes. Do lanes of other parts of town impervious have this level of surface.H service?

Unable to get 1 is most effective 3 is least 3 will serve the new CMM HQ Thatâ€™s about all Growth is imminent and Promotes safe walk, Provides a Ensures Ensures Includes Prioritizing safety Connecting to Filling sidewalk Creating well- Providing Signing & facilities for EV 43221 43212 Male 55 - 64 White / No ridership to cover desirable best 3 will serve we need to begin adding bike, and transit walkable mixture compatibility with compatibility attractive, high- enhancements existing bicycle gaps designed places for bike charging Caucasian costs. travel options. connections of uses (including existing with existing quality open trails multimodal parking and housing, neighborhoods neighborhoods space intersections storage 12 3 2 667 5 employment, shopping, and professional services)

Functionality is Speed and Its clear that the If we're going Route 1 & 2 make the most Route 2 appears to Rapid transit should be an Provides a walkable Promotes safe Includes Ensures Manages traffic Connecting to existing bicycle Filling sidewalk Creating well- Prioritizing Providing If we're to give up on light 43205 43215 Male 26 - 34 White / No key, focus on reliability above all Olentangy alignment to sell BRT to sense due to the time. serve our sports & integral part of our mixture of uses walk, bike, and attractive, high- compatibility impacts trails gaps designed safety places for bike rail as a community we Caucasian improvements delivers better than all the the community Ridership in this area will be entertainment regional growth and (including housing, transit quality open with existing multimodal enhancements parking and sure as hell better deliver that increase others. Perhaps future this route all about connecting with venues best and economic development employment, connections space neighborhoods intersections storage true latin american style speed and components of the study needs to employment centers while this should strategy. shopping, and brt reliability - give can look at how to best to deliver downtown so it does not make not be a key goal, professional services) us true BRT... no connect to Henderson & convenience sense to go through the given all things 13 7 CMAX 4 776 5 UA with better connecting (speed & expense of 3A & 3B just to equal it makes service. reliability) add more time to the trip. sense to serve this above all else niche that will be so lets stick to the jumping off Olentangy point for a fair number of riders.

Supporting BRT All look good. Nope. The Franklinton route. Rapid transit should be an Provides a walkable Promotes safe Ensures Includes Manages traffic Prioritizing safety Creating well- Connecting to Filling sidewalk Providing N/a 43207 43223 Male 35 - 54 White / No should be high integral part of our mixture of uses walk, bike, and compatibility with attractive, high- impacts enhancements designed existing bicycle gaps places for bike Caucasian priority for future regional growth and (including housing, transit existing quality open multimodal trails parking and development in economic development employment, connections neighborhoods space intersections storage 14 7 Columbus. 3 546 4 strategy. shopping, and professional services)

route 2 would support and route three route 3b would establish a Rapid transit should be an Provides a walkable Promotes safe Includes Ensures Manages traffic Creating well-designed Filling sidewalk Prioritizing safety Connecting to Providing 43201 43215 Male 35 - 54 White / No encourage dense mixed- would slow new connection between two integral part of our mixture of uses walk, bike, and attractive, high- compatibility impacts multimodal intersections gaps enhancements existing bicycle places for bike Caucasian use development down the route areas that are close but not regional growth and (including housing, transit quality open with existing trails parking and underway and planned for and make it easily accessible now - it economic development employment, connections space neighborhoods storage 157 6 7764 OSU west campus less efficient would also encourage strategy. shopping, and development and investment professional services) in Franklinton

I like how route 3 serves Route 1 and 2 Rapid transit should be an Promotes safe walk, Includes attractive, Provides a Ensures Manages traffic Connecting to existing bicycle Creating well- Providing places Prioritizing Filling sidewalk Placemaking will be key. 43202 43215 Male 26 - 34 White / No an area that would not be do not serve integral part of our bike, and transit high-quality open walkable mixture compatibility impacts trails designed for bike parking safety gaps Caucasian serving anyone or very many people regional growth and connections space of uses (including with existing multimodal and storage enhancements few people if it were from economic development housing, neighborhoods intersections 167 2 4753 entirely along Olentangy Henderson to strategy. employment, River rd. North shopping, and broadway. professional services)

Rapid transit should be an Provides a walkable Promotes safe Ensures Includes Manages traffic Prioritizing safety Connecting to Creating well- 43212 43054 Female 35 - 54 White / No integral part of our mixture of uses walk, bike, and compatibility with attractive, high- impacts enhancements existing bicycle designed Caucasian regional growth and (including housing, transit existing quality open trails multimodal economic development employment, connections neighborhoods space intersections 176 5 4675 strategy. shopping, and professional services) 1. How 2. When considering the 7. Many members of the 8. As planning for the supportive are routing and construction 3a. Three Rapid Transit 4a. Multiple Rapid Transit 5. How strongly do you 6. When considering public would like to see 13. Which Travel Northwest Corridor you regarding of Rapid Transit within route alternatives are 3b. Is there connections from the 4b. Is there feel that Rapid Transit is future development improved bicycle and racial 14. Are reliability Connection to progresses, are there 9. What 10. What the addition of a Please share the Northwest Corridor, Travel time Please share any being evaluated for the anything you Northwest Corridor to anything you needed to accommodate in vicinity of the 6. Rank 5 - Please share pedestrian connections to 7. Rank 5- Please share any 11. What 12. What group do you (the route major Costs to additional priority zip code zip code No. modern Rapid any additional how would you prioritize (the fastest additional Northwest Corridor. Is dislike about Downtown are also being dislike about some our region's continued Northwest Corridor, 6. Rank 2 6. Rank 3 6. Rank 4 Least any additional and from transit and local 7. Rank 2 7. Rank 3 7. Rank 4 Least additional is your is your you most Hispanic with the employment construct needs, considerations, do you do you Transit choice comments. the following? route) comments.2 there anything you like some or all of considered. Is there or all of the growth? (Select the which outcome is important comments.6 destinations. In creating important comments.7 gender? age? closely or least destinations or opportunities that live in? work in? along the Construction duration about some or all of the the routes? anything you like about routes? option that best most important to such connections, please identify Latino? delay) you believe should be Northwest (what could be built routes? some or all of the routes? describes your opinion.) you? rank the importance of the with? considered? Corridor? quickest) following. I think it's I would rather have I like that route 1 is mostly I dislike the I like that routes 1/2 connect I dislike the large Rapid transit should be an Provides a walkable Promotes safe Manages traffic Ensures Includes Creating well-designed Prioritizing Providing places Connecting to Filling sidewalk I think that rail transit 43202 43210 Male 19 - 25 Black / No extremely the best option that a straight shot, but I also sections of through the Arena District detour and multiple integral part of our mixture of uses walk, bike, and impacts compatibility attractive, high- multimodal intersections safety for bike parking existing bicycle gaps should stay under African- important to takes years than to like that route 2 takes a routes where it and, especially, the path route turns route 3a takes regional growth and (including housing, transit with existing quality open enhancements and storage trails consideration for this American expand transit get whatever option short detour through may be 2 takes before going to High to get to economic development employment, connections neighborhoods space corridor and future mobility and can be done West Campus. difficult/danger Street. I like that the one-way Franklinton. strategy. shopping, and planning projects. I also move away from cheaper and faster ous to get to pair in route 2 is only a block professional services) believe that right-of-way using cars and and then regret it in the stops on apart. I like that route 3 goes is an absolute necessity big, empty the future. foot. I dislike through the Scioto Peninsula. in creating transit options parking lots. the long detour I like route 3b more than 3a that are actually viable Rapid Transit is on route 3. I because 3b is more direct. I versus cars. I also think 18 7 necessary to get 1 775 4 dislike that the like that route 3 considers it's very important to people to use routes don't future downtown transit make it easy to get to and transit because connect around the downtown it's faster and directly to area. Lastly, I would more convenient downtown appreciate consideration of some sort of membership card for frequent transit riders

#2 makes the most #3 seems #3 will connect to scioto pen. Rapid transit should be an Ensures compatibility Provides a Promotes safe Manages traffic Includes Pretty upset Prioritizing safety Filling sidewalk Creating well- Connecting to Providing Future corridor options 43202 43137 Male 19 - 25 White / No sense. It could be used to pointless. Which will obviously benefit integral part of our with existing walkable mixture walk, bike, and impacts attractive, high- about the enhancements gaps designed existing bicycle places for bike such as one from UA to Caucasian transform lane Ave in a those residents. Also, it would regional growth and neighborhoods of uses (including transit quality open Lennox plans. multimodal trails parking and OSU on lane ave. Crew future project, connecting benefit franklinton residents. economic development housing, connections space intersections storage stadium connectivity. 197 5 7774 UA to OSU main campus. strategy. employment, Donâ€™t rule out light shopping, and rail to the suburbs. professional services)

Route 3 is too Promotes safe walk, Provides a Ensures Includes Manages traffic Prioritizing safety Creating well- Filling sidewalk Connecting to Providing Male Prefer White / No much of a bike, and transit walkable mixture compatibility with attractive, high- impacts enhancements designed gaps existing bicycle places for bike not to Caucasian deviation. connections of uses (including existing quality open multimodal trails parking and answer Better to feed housing, neighborhoods space intersections storage 207 4 5764 routes 1 or 2 employment, with other shopping, and options professional services)

Route 2 connection to Growth is imminent and Promotes safe walk, Manages traffic Ensures Provides a Includes Filling sidewalk gaps Prioritizing Creating well- Connecting to Providing Statistically valid survey 43221 43215 Male 35 - 54 Prefer not Prefer not OSU West Campus we need to begin adding bike, and transit impacts compatibility with walkable mixture attractive, high- safety designed existing bicycle places for bike of population in service to answer to answer travel options. connections existing of uses quality open enhancements multimodal trails parking and area neighborhoods (including space intersections storage housing, 216 3 5665 employment, shopping, and professional services)

I'm most concerned I really like routes 1 and 2 I know route 3 If option 1 is Growth is imminent and Provides a walkable Promotes safe Includes Ensures Manages traffic Creating well-designed Connecting to Filling sidewalk Providing Prioritizing Can we remove any low 43202 43016 Male 35 - 54 White / No with a great end adds a selected, I would we need to begin adding mixture of uses walk, bike, and attractive, high- compatibility impacts multimodal intersections existing bicycle gaps places for bike safety head dams for water Caucasian product. The time connection to want it to take Vine travel options. (including housing, transit quality open with existing trails parking and enhancements quality and recreation to construct and UA, but it adds Ave, not Goodale employment, connections space neighborhoods storage also? cost are of lesser a lot of travel along the park. The shopping, and importance. time and some merge at the I-670 professional services) cost off ramp, Goodale and Dennison is 227 3 6764 tricky. It's been suggested to remove the off ramp and expand the park, which I like.

Access to the arena district Rapid transit should be an Promotes safe walk, Provides a Ensures Includes Manages traffic Connecting to existing bicycle Prioritizing Providing places Filling sidewalk Creating well- 43202 43210 Female 26 - 34 White / No integral part of our bike, and transit walkable mixture compatibility with attractive, high- impacts trails safety for bike parking gaps designed Caucasian regional growth and connections of uses (including existing quality open enhancements and storage multimodal economic development housing, neighborhoods space intersections 237 6 6774 strategy. employment, shopping, and professional services)

Route 2 connecting to Rapid transit should be an Promotes safe walk, Provides a Includes Manages traffic Ensures Connecting to existing bicycle Filling sidewalk Creating well- Prioritizing Providing 43220 43017 Male 35 - 54 White / No west campus and avoids integral part of our bike, and transit walkable mixture attractive, high- impacts compatibility trails gaps designed safety places for bike Caucasian conflict at 315 and lennox regional growth and connections of uses (including quality open with existing multimodal enhancements parking and economic development housing, space neighborhoods intersections storage 247 2 6674 strategy. employment, shopping, and professional services)

It is important Connecting I prefer alternatives 1 and Route 3 The connection through 1 and 2 add Rapid transit should be an Provides a walkable Promotes safe Includes Ensures Manages traffic We have to Connecting to existing bicycle Creating well- Prioritizing safety Filling sidewalk Providing 43214 43215 Male 35 - 54 White / No that we get these destinations (job 2. Diverting to West diverts too far Franklinton is strongly additional integral part of our mixture of uses walk, bike, and attractive, high- compatibility impacts densify the trails designed enhancements gaps places for bike Caucasian routes centers and campus makes some away from preferred. Arena District is too congestion to an regional growth and (including housing, transit quality open with existing corridors as multimodal parking and established as neighborhoods) sense but keeping the Olentangy congested and Franklinton already tight area. economic development employment, connections space neighborhoods much as intersections storage soon as possible should be the route as close to River Road route connects an emerging strategy. shopping, and possible. so we can both strongest priority. Olentangy River Road is growth corridor. New projects professional services) get ahead of critical for speed and like CoverMyMeds and Scioto growth and also predictability. Peninsula will become really 25 7 4 667 4 demonstrate to important assets. the real estate community where growth should occur.

Direct route for #1 seems #2 winds through a #1 is less intuitive. Rapid transit should be an Provides a walkable Promotes safe Includes Ensures Manages traffic Filling sidewalk gaps Connecting to Creating well- Prioritizing Providing 43203 43215 Male 35 - 54 White / No desirable. destination district. #3 going into integral part of our mixture of uses walk, bike, and attractive, high- compatibility impacts existing bicycle designed safety places for bike Caucasian Franklinton seems regional growth and (including housing, transit quality open with existing trails multimodal enhancements parking and like a distration. economic development employment, connections space neighborhoods intersections storage 267 2 6762 strategy. shopping, and professional services) 1. How 2. When considering the 7. Many members of the 8. As planning for the supportive are routing and construction 3a. Three Rapid Transit 4a. Multiple Rapid Transit 5. How strongly do you 6. When considering public would like to see 13. Which Travel Northwest Corridor you regarding of Rapid Transit within route alternatives are 3b. Is there connections from the 4b. Is there feel that Rapid Transit is future development improved bicycle and racial 14. Are reliability Connection to progresses, are there 9. What 10. What the addition of a Please share the Northwest Corridor, Travel time Please share any being evaluated for the anything you Northwest Corridor to anything you needed to accommodate in vicinity of the 6. Rank 5 - Please share pedestrian connections to 7. Rank 5- Please share any 11. What 12. What group do you (the route major Costs to additional priority zip code zip code No. modern Rapid any additional how would you prioritize (the fastest additional Northwest Corridor. Is dislike about Downtown are also being dislike about some our region's continued Northwest Corridor, 6. Rank 2 6. Rank 3 6. Rank 4 Least any additional and from transit and local 7. Rank 2 7. Rank 3 7. Rank 4 Least additional is your is your you most Hispanic with the employment construct needs, considerations, do you do you Transit choice comments. the following? route) comments.2 there anything you like some or all of considered. Is there or all of the growth? (Select the which outcome is important comments.6 destinations. In creating important comments.7 gender? age? closely or least destinations or opportunities that live in? work in? along the Construction duration about some or all of the the routes? anything you like about routes? option that best most important to such connections, please identify Latino? delay) you believe should be Northwest (what could be built routes? some or all of the routes? describes your opinion.) you? rank the importance of the with? considered? Corridor? quickest) following. This would be Accessibility to I think population and job Rapid transit should be an Provides a walkable Promotes safe Includes Ensures Manages traffic Connecting to existing bicycle Providing Creating well- Prioritizing Filling sidewalk 43214 43214 Male 35 - 54 White / No fantastic employment centers should be integral part of our mixture of uses walk, bike, and attractive, high- compatibility impacts trails places for bike designed safety gaps Caucasian combined with centers and prioritized over transport regional growth and (including housing, transit quality open with existing parking and multimodal enhancements redevelopment of housing should be speed #3 economic development employment, connections space neighborhoods storage intersections 27 7 the kohls site. 5 447 1 a priority. strategy. shopping, and professional services)

Growth is imminent and Provides a walkable Manages traffic Promotes safe Includes Ensures Creating well-designed Prioritizing Connecting to Filling sidewalk Providing 43221 43231 Male 35 - 54 White / No we need to begin adding mixture of uses impacts walk, bike, and attractive, high- compatibility multimodal intersections safety existing bicycle gaps places for bike Caucasian travel options. (including housing, transit quality open with existing enhancements trails parking and employment, connections space neighborhoods storage 287 5 7654 shopping, and professional services)

I'm very 1 or 2 is the best option. 3 3a seems Rapid transit should be an Promotes safe walk, Includes attractive, Provides a Ensures Manages traffic A bike lane was Creating well-designed Prioritizing Providing places Connecting to Filling sidewalk I would choose to Iâ€™m very supportive of 43212 43201 Male 26 - 34 White / No supportive of the would greatly diminish ridiculous. 3b or 2 integral part of our bike, and transit high-quality open walkable mixture compatibility impacts included on king multimodal intersections safety for bike parking existing bicycle gaps ride my bike to the choice, but I do not Caucasian choice, but I do speed being so indirect seem to be the best regional growth and connections space of uses (including with existing Ave, but it is enhancements and storage trails work every day, think that rapid buses are not think that options economic development housing, neighborhoods extremely but I cannot safely the correct option. I rapid buses are strategy. employment, dangerous. do so donâ€™t think speed will the correct shopping, and There are no be of essence. I myself option. I professional safe biking would probably still drive donâ€™t think services) connections in if it was a bus. That is not speed will be of grandview or the fast, typically is essence. I myself campus area unreliable, and would probably including 5th, frustrating. But if it were a still drive if it was olentangy, 3rd, train that could get there a bus. That is not etc way faster without stop fast, typically is lights and traffic, I would unreliable, and take it over driving every frustrating. But if time. If youâ€™re going it were a train to spend this much that could get money on infrastructure, there way faster donâ€™t do it on 29 7 without stop 4 777 1 something that meets lights and traffic, I halfway and people end would take it over up not using or that is driving every regretted in the future time. If when Columbus is much youâ€™re going larger to spend this much money on infrastructure, donâ€™t do it on something that meets halfway and people end up not using or that is regretted in the future when Columbus is much larger

I like that 1 and 2 are 1 is most 2 has the opportunity to 3 has a long Growth is imminent and Promotes safe walk, Manages traffic Provides a Ensures Includes I believe it has to Connecting to existing bicycle Creating well- Prioritizing safety Providing Filling sidewalk 43026 43215 Female 35 - 54 White / No under 30 minutes direct, but connect to the Arena District. maximum time. we need to begin adding bike, and transit impacts walkable mixture compatibility attractive, high- function first and trails designed enhancements places for bike gaps Caucasian maximum travel time. serves less 1 has the opportunity to Combined it would travel options. connections of uses (including with existing quality open foremost. multimodal parking and people/commu connect to the Convention be close to one hour housing, neighborhoods space Without a short intersections storage nities. If the Center. to get from Bethel employment, enough travel goal is to Road all the way shopping, and time, I would be provided downtown, and that professional concerned it reliable seems too long for services) would be viewed transportation people that have as a less options for alternative methods attractive travel to work, such as cars to use transportation then the more the Rapid Transit alternative. communities route. Secondary to 307 1 7771 the better. that is the Then aesthetic. balancing with reliable, reasonable travel times so people can get to work and home on time.

Please make this None Route 1 has the shortest Routes 2 and Route 1 serves the most Route 2 mostly Growth is imminent and Promotes safe walk, Provides a Includes Manages traffic Ensures None Filling sidewalk gaps Prioritizing Connecting to Creating well- Providing Connect bicycle Create complete streets 43147 retired Male 65 or White / No a full featured travel time and is most 3 deviate into population and jobs and has avoids High Street we need to begin adding bike, and transit walkable mixture attractive, high- impacts compatibility safety existing bicycle designed places for bike facilities not only for safe and comfortable older Caucasian BRT like the direct,Route 2 is second more local the shortest travel times travel options. connections of uses (including quality open with existing enhancements trails multimodal parking and into Olentangy biking and walking on all Cleveland routes housing, space neighborhoods intersections storage Trail but also into arterials 31 7 Healthline not 4 556 3 employment, Dublin, Hilliard BRT lite shopping, and and Powell professional services)

Please do this! Rapid transit should be an Provides a walkable Promotes safe Manages traffic Includes Ensures Young people Connecting to existing bicycle Creating well- Prioritizing safety Filling sidewalk Providing Please require all new 43220 43220 Female 26 - 34 White / No integral part of our mixture of uses walk, bike, and impacts attractive, high- compatibility want walkability trails designed enhancements gaps places for bike developments (residential Caucasian regional growth and (including housing, transit quality open with existing multimodal parking and or commercial) to build a economic development employment, connections space neighborhoods intersections storage sidewalk during strategy. shopping, and construction. So much of 32 7 2 556 3 professional services) this area is not walkable because there are no sidewalks!

Connection to my I like route 1, as I work at I dislike that route 2 includes the arena Rapid transit should be an Promotes safe walk, Manages traffic Provides a Includes Ensures Connecting to existing bicycle Prioritizing Creating well- Filling sidewalk Providing I bike for pleasure 43201 43210 Male 26 - 34 White / No work and frequency OSU and would be much route 2 is district, but 3b is also good. integral part of our bike, and transit impacts walkable mixture attractive, high- compatibility trails safety designed gaps places for bike and to commute to Caucasian are the largest more likely to use this further from regional growth and connections of uses (including quality open with existing enhancements multimodal parking and OSU. The biggest factors for me. transit option if it is close the medical economic development housing, space neighborhoods intersections storage barrier to biking on to the medical center. center. strategy. employment, the west bank of shopping, and the Olentangy is 336 3 5775 professional negotiating services) Olentangy River Road. 1. How 2. When considering the 7. Many members of the 8. As planning for the supportive are routing and construction 3a. Three Rapid Transit 4a. Multiple Rapid Transit 5. How strongly do you 6. When considering public would like to see 13. Which Travel Northwest Corridor you regarding of Rapid Transit within route alternatives are 3b. Is there connections from the 4b. Is there feel that Rapid Transit is future development improved bicycle and racial 14. Are reliability Connection to progresses, are there 9. What 10. What the addition of a Please share the Northwest Corridor, Travel time Please share any being evaluated for the anything you Northwest Corridor to anything you needed to accommodate in vicinity of the 6. Rank 5 - Please share pedestrian connections to 7. Rank 5- Please share any 11. What 12. What group do you (the route major Costs to additional priority zip code zip code No. modern Rapid any additional how would you prioritize (the fastest additional Northwest Corridor. Is dislike about Downtown are also being dislike about some our region's continued Northwest Corridor, 6. Rank 2 6. Rank 3 6. Rank 4 Least any additional and from transit and local 7. Rank 2 7. Rank 3 7. Rank 4 Least additional is your is your you most Hispanic with the employment construct needs, considerations, do you do you Transit choice comments. the following? route) comments.2 there anything you like some or all of considered. Is there or all of the growth? (Select the which outcome is important comments.6 destinations. In creating important comments.7 gender? age? closely or least destinations or opportunities that live in? work in? along the Construction duration about some or all of the the routes? anything you like about routes? option that best most important to such connections, please identify Latino? delay) you believe should be Northwest (what could be built routes? some or all of the routes? describes your opinion.) you? rank the importance of the with? considered? Corridor? quickest) following. It goes by west campus Rapid transit should be an Provides a walkable Promotes safe Ensures Manages traffic Includes Connecting to existing bicycle Filling sidewalk Prioritizing safety Creating well- Providing Male 35 - 54 White / No integral part of our mixture of uses walk, bike, and compatibility with impacts attractive, high- trails gaps enhancements designed places for bike Caucasian regional growth and (including housing, transit existing quality open multimodal parking and economic development employment, connections neighborhoods space intersections storage 347 4 7774 strategy. shopping, and professional services)

Mode doesn't Route 1 is most direct Route 3's 1 runs through higher-activity 1 and 2 being split Rapid transit should be an Promotes safe walk, Provides a Includes Ensures Manages traffic Transit is an Filling sidewalk gaps Connecting to Creating well- Providing Prioritizing Olentangy River Connecting the urban 43201 43212 Male 19 - 25 White / No matter too much, and thus the most useful major areas, which is a plus. It's also onto different streets integral part of our bike, and transit walkable mixture attractive, high- compatibility impacts important part of existing bicycle designed places for bike safety Road is especially neighborhoods on either Caucasian but having some transit route. 2 features an deviation fastest. eastbound vs regional growth and connections of uses (including quality open with existing ensuring the trails multimodal parking and enhancements in need of a side of the corridor: high-capacity acceptable deviation and threatens its westbound is a little economic development housing, space neighborhoods area's intersections storage redesign. Harrison West and 5th by transit is serves slightly more usefulness as awkward. 3 is a bit strategy. employment, sustainability. Northwest, Uni District important people/jobs. a mover of too lengthy and shopping, and Currently the Area and places to the people, which rather too indirect. professional core of the west, Grandview Yard is its main services) corridor, and Columbus purpose. Olentangy River Road, is almost exclusively car- 35 7 3 555 4 focused and a real barrier to stitching together the urban neighborhoods shaping up on either side of it.

I like branching into If it only runs Traffic is fine and I'm not Manages traffic Ensures Provides a Includes Connecting to existing bicycle Filling sidewalk Prioritizing safety Creating well- Providing 43017 43215 Male 35 - 54 White / No neighborhoods along SR315 concerned about growth. impacts compatibility with walkable mixture attractive, high- trails gaps enhancements designed places for bike Caucasian where is the existing of uses (including quality open multimodal parking and end of the neighborhoods housing, space intersections storage 362 2 6522 route? employment, shopping, and professional services)

Connection to I like route 3b and it's direct I dislike running the Rapid transit should be an Promotes safe walk, Provides a Includes Ensures Manages traffic Easy access and Filling sidewalk gaps Prioritizing Connecting to Creating well- Providing Ensuring bike Travel times are going to 43206 43215 Male 26 - 34 White / No the east side of connection to Franklinton then BRT directly along integral part of our bike, and transit walkable mixture attractive, high- compatibility impacts connections to safety existing bicycle designed places for bike lanes are clean be crucial considering the Caucasian the river could Downtown High St. which is regional growth and connections of uses (including quality open with existing residential areas enhancements trails multimodal parking and and not used as extensive be busy the way it is. economic development housing, space neighborhoods will be important intersections storage loading zones is accommodation for problematic. Connecting to the strategy. employment, especially in just as important driving and parking in CBUS to run along shopping, and inclement as having bike Columbus. 377 4 5674 High St. would be a professional weather. lanes. good option to services) consider.

I am not excited #2 connects residential #1 why would Traffic is fine and I'm not Ensures compatibility Includes attractive, Provides a Roads should be Filling sidewalk gaps Creating well- Providing Where is the see above about fewer car neighborhoods with lots you undertake concerned about growth. with existing high-quality open walkable mixture widened to designed places for bike planning for lanes in a of professionals, grad a project to do neighborhoods space of uses (including included multimodal parking and disabled and congested students, and young the least you housing, dedicated bus intersections storage elderly with corridor where urban adults to the can do? How a employment, lanes, as mobility only some people corridor. It also looks like straight bus shopping, and opposed to car challenges? will ride COTA this is a nice middle of the line does more professional lanes being road option with much of for workforce services) repurposed your data. It scores higher advancement on workforce is beyond 38 2 4 444 4 advancement and logic.#3 how is economic development providing more than option 3, and has resources to highest jobs served by the Arlington 2050 than any option. Its area more max travel time is less "equitable?" than the max for #1. Lots to like.

I work from home, Option2: reliable trip Option 3: Option 3: I like that this route Options 1 & 2: Rapid transit should be an Promotes safe walk, Ensures Provides a Includes Manages traffic The current Connecting to existing bicycle Providing Prioritizing safety Filling sidewalk Creating well- All of these things Connections to grocery 43205 43205 Female 26 - 34 White / No so connection to length variable trip goes through Franklinton and Shoving yet another integral part of our bike, and transit compatibility with walkable mixture attractive, high- impacts options for biking trails places for bike enhancements gaps designed feel pretty stores would be great Caucasian major employment length, general I want to see Franklinton transit option here regional growth and connections existing of uses (including quality open on the road are parking and multimodal important to me destinations doesn't trip length - 40 continue to grow. seems excessive economic development neighborhoods housing, space awful (seriously I storage intersections honestly. Also I really affect me. minutes is a given that there are strategy. employment, have to cross think the most lot... already many shopping, and traffic coming off important thing for options. Plus professional the freeway on me about bike construction in services) 3rd?? wtf. Also storage would be these areas biking up that hill to have a security 397 4 6724 (especially near the is really difficult) person. Any lock convention center) so It would be can be cut if sucks. great to see someone really safer/better wants to steal a options bike.

Reliable, fast travel I like connections between Rapid transit should be an Promotes safe walk, Provides a Includes Manages traffic Ensures Connecting to existing bicycle Prioritizing Creating well- Filling sidewalk Providing Commuter service to 43214 43015 Male 26 - 34 White / No crucial to attracting Franklinton and Downtown integral part of our bike, and transit walkable mixture attractive, high- impacts compatibility trails safety designed gaps places for bike broader region including Caucasian ridership, so 1 seems like along Broad Street corridor in regional growth and connections of uses (including quality open with existing enhancements multimodal parking and Delaware County the best approach to 3a and 3b economic development housing, space neighborhoods intersections storage 407 1 6552 corridor strategy. employment, shopping, and professional services) 1. How 2. When considering the 7. Many members of the 8. As planning for the supportive are routing and construction 3a. Three Rapid Transit 4a. Multiple Rapid Transit 5. How strongly do you 6. When considering public would like to see 13. Which Travel Northwest Corridor you regarding of Rapid Transit within route alternatives are 3b. Is there connections from the 4b. Is there feel that Rapid Transit is future development improved bicycle and racial 14. Are reliability Connection to progresses, are there 9. What 10. What the addition of a Please share the Northwest Corridor, Travel time Please share any being evaluated for the anything you Northwest Corridor to anything you needed to accommodate in vicinity of the 6. Rank 5 - Please share pedestrian connections to 7. Rank 5- Please share any 11. What 12. What group do you (the route major Costs to additional priority zip code zip code No. modern Rapid any additional how would you prioritize (the fastest additional Northwest Corridor. Is dislike about Downtown are also being dislike about some our region's continued Northwest Corridor, 6. Rank 2 6. Rank 3 6. Rank 4 Least any additional and from transit and local 7. Rank 2 7. Rank 3 7. Rank 4 Least additional is your is your you most Hispanic with the employment construct needs, considerations, do you do you Transit choice comments. the following? route) comments.2 there anything you like some or all of considered. Is there or all of the growth? (Select the which outcome is important comments.6 destinations. In creating important comments.7 gender? age? closely or least destinations or opportunities that live in? work in? along the Construction duration about some or all of the the routes? anything you like about routes? option that best most important to such connections, please identify Latino? delay) you believe should be Northwest (what could be built routes? some or all of the routes? describes your opinion.) you? rank the importance of the with? considered? Corridor? quickest) following. I like route 2 if the OSU Route 3 travels Route 1 provides stations None of the routes Rapid transit should be an Provides a walkable Manages traffic Promotes safe Ensures Includes stations need to Filling sidewalk gaps Creating well- Providing places Prioritizing Connecting to Biking should get Free and convenient and 43212 43215 Male 26 - 34 Other No development materializes through too near the short north and provide access truly integral part of our mixture of uses impacts walk, bike, and compatibility attractive, high- be location designed for bike parking safety existing bicycle some attention but dense parking for stations (and they could pitch in much low would encourage people to directly to north regional growth and (including housing, transit with existing quality open within walking multimodal and storage enhancements trails far more focus for people to utilize the some funding). However, density use BRT to access that area. high street in the economic development employment, connections neighborhoods space distance of target intersections should be on system by parking near a positioning an additional suburban area Otherwise, the short north, short north (route 1 strategy. shopping, and population. pedestrians, who station and riding into the station closer to the more and does not with very little parking and is still south of the professional services) Required biking will make up a city. Also, more focus on dense development at the connect dense development / short north. will drastically much greater access/stations near area Shops on Lane (and enough dense attractions, will continue to Utilizing neil, 5th, decrease people percent of the attractions such as the future Arlington Gateway) employment rely heavily/entirely on and 3rd street could willing to use the ridership short north, arena district, would be very covenant to centers/attracti rideshare services for its provide more direct system. People population. and convention center a large population of ons. Ridership patrons to get to, which access to the short will already Further, walkers (this will drastically commuters who could would be low. creates untenable congestion north and still route struggle to adapt will be able to walk increase younger park and ride from this Routes 1 and many days and nights. No to downtown on the to the changes in any weather, ridership with disposable area 2 are better BRT route addresses this same route, which involved in not biking is not income). Also, a focus on but the railroad area except route 1 of this would drastically driving practical for how people will use the tracks are a proposal, which makes it the increase ridership. everywhere, not portions of the system during different massive only one worth pursuing. route 3 passes very placing stations year bc of weather times of the year and the barrier for Many riders from the southern few nodes of directly within and the other corresponding typical most people to half of the Northwest corridor interest (at this point densely hassles of trying to weather of that time 417 5 5471 access the would utilize the BRT if in time at least) and populated ride to various should heavily be route via getting off at high/vine or doesnt come close developments destinations considered. Bikers dont foot/bike. I'd high/goodale were an option. to the arena district, will remove (clothing, bike in the winter/the like to see the which, behind the these potenital cleanliness, snow. Covered BRT line take short north, is the riders entirely. comfort, safety sidewalks would increase advantage of second more Also, free and equipment, and ridership in the rain / streets like important district efficient parking helmet hair (it may snow. Stations that are Rail St. in that needs to be at most/all sound ridiculous heated in the winter, Grandview services by BRT. stations will be but it is a barrier cooled in the summer, yard, Kenny route 3 would be a required to stopping most covered, and protected Rd. Etc which waste. encourage people who have from wind, rain and the would be people to park considered using elements will create a much more and ride. Parking bike transportation more "subway" type accessible by garages will be daily from doing system that people would foot for most needed (covered so). . be willing to use all year potential parking for around. riders. Many inclimate people will not weather and to use BRT if it preserve requires a bike density)If it is too 1 is most direct and 2 is waste of Connecting Olentangy River Rapid transit should be an Provides a walkable Promotes safe Ensures Includes Manages traffic MOST Filling sidewalk gaps Prioritizing Creating well- Connecting to Providing Dedicated 43212 43215 Male 35 - 54 White / No understandable as a first resources - Rd to Souder is no brainer if integral part of our mixture of uses walk, bike, and compatibility with attractive, high- impacts IMPORTANT -- safety designed existing bicycle places for bike protected bike Caucasian real transit line; 3 is most served by local not cost/row prohibitive; i think regional growth and (including housing, transit existing quality open Mix of enhancements multimodal trails parking and lanes!!!! Plan for interesting from current- and CABS, eventually all of these should economic development employment, connections neighborhoods space affordability and intersections storage youth, commuters, >future land use can be served be part of the overall high strategy. shopping, and actively erasing etc.. not just joy perspective better through capacity network, possibly as professional services) barriers for rides or fitness improvements downtown terminus routes or marginalized enthusiasts 427 4 7764 locally instead loops that could also be run populations!!! of looping the as local surge loops.. main line out...

Will there ever be a Rapid transit should be an Includes attractive, Ensures Promotes safe Manages traffic Provides a Connecting to existing bicycle Prioritizing Creating well- Providing Filling sidewalk 43015 43229 Female 35 - 54 White / No connector to Powell integral part of our high-quality open compatibility with walk, bike, and impacts walkable trails safety designed places for bike gaps Caucasian and the city of regional growth and space existing transit mixture of uses enhancements multimodal parking and Delaware? economic development neighborhoods connections (including intersections storage Transportation strategy. housing, options are limited. employment, 436 4 7564 shopping, and professional services)

More frequent One factor that I The get to the major They are all #2 connects the sports #3 covers a lot of Growth is imminent and Promotes safe walk, Provides a Includes Ensures Manages traffic Our roads are Prioritizing safety Providing Filling sidewalk Creating well- Connecting to Safety 43209 43219 Male 35 - 54 Two or No bus service and think gets lost is employers. I like how 2 blocked from venues more closely and land that doesn't we need to begin adding bike, and transit walkable mixture attractive, high- compatibility impacts scary, especially enhancements places for bike gaps designed existing bicycle more races safe pedestrian that the cost to ride and 3 offer access to existing offers a good balance of seem like it will be travel options. connections of uses (including quality open with existing for pedestrians parking and multimodal trails and bike facilities transit can be too existing neighborhoods. neighborhoods destinations and low travel developed densely. housing, space neighborhoods and bikers and storage intersections seems adequate expensive, by time Also, it makes for a employment, safety should be especially for 315/train/river long trip to the shopping, and #1. households with and the Arena district. professional 44 4 1 775 7 kids. If we're going associated services) to use public land, dangerous the transit needs to pedestrian and be accessible to the bike crossings. public.

It can be a fools Directness of Route 1 too much 2 seems like a good 1 is too far north Rapid transit should be an Promotes safe walk, Provides a Includes Ensures Manages traffic Connecting to existing bicycle Prioritizing Prioritizing safety Creating well- Providing 43023 43210 Male 55 - 64 White / No errand to build a travel time for compromise. 1 is too far integral part of our bike, and transit walkable mixture attractive, high- compatibility impacts trails safety enhancements designed places for bike Caucasian system of marginal route 3 north. 3 looks difficult regional growth and connections of uses (including quality open with existing enhancements multimodal parking and value because of economic development housing, space neighborhoods intersections storage 457 6 7562 too much concern strategy. employment, about initial costs. shopping, and professional services)

depends on development 3a seems less Growth is imminent and Provides a walkable Promotes safe Ensures Manages traffic Includes Connecting to existing bicycle Filling sidewalk Prioritizing safety Providing Creating well- 43026 43210 Male 55 - 64 White / No along the routes and desirable we need to begin adding mixture of uses walk, bike, and compatibility with impacts attractive, high- trails gaps enhancements places for bike designed Caucasian avoiding delays travel options. (including housing, transit existing quality open parking and multimodal employment, connections neighborhoods space storage intersections 467 4 5664 shopping, and professional services) 1. How 2. When considering the 7. Many members of the 8. As planning for the supportive are routing and construction 3a. Three Rapid Transit 4a. Multiple Rapid Transit 5. How strongly do you 6. When considering public would like to see 13. Which Travel Northwest Corridor you regarding of Rapid Transit within route alternatives are 3b. Is there connections from the 4b. Is there feel that Rapid Transit is future development improved bicycle and racial 14. Are reliability Connection to progresses, are there 9. What 10. What the addition of a Please share the Northwest Corridor, Travel time Please share any being evaluated for the anything you Northwest Corridor to anything you needed to accommodate in vicinity of the 6. Rank 5 - Please share pedestrian connections to 7. Rank 5- Please share any 11. What 12. What group do you (the route major Costs to additional priority zip code zip code No. modern Rapid any additional how would you prioritize (the fastest additional Northwest Corridor. Is dislike about Downtown are also being dislike about some our region's continued Northwest Corridor, 6. Rank 2 6. Rank 3 6. Rank 4 Least any additional and from transit and local 7. Rank 2 7. Rank 3 7. Rank 4 Least additional is your is your you most Hispanic with the employment construct needs, considerations, do you do you Transit choice comments. the following? route) comments.2 there anything you like some or all of considered. Is there or all of the growth? (Select the which outcome is important comments.6 destinations. In creating important comments.7 gender? age? closely or least destinations or opportunities that live in? work in? along the Construction duration about some or all of the the routes? anything you like about routes? option that best most important to such connections, please identify Latino? delay) you believe should be Northwest (what could be built routes? some or all of the routes? describes your opinion.) you? rank the importance of the with? considered? Corridor? quickest) following. Columbus needs I'm not worried #2 seems like it has the I don't love the I like route #1 best because Rapid transit should be an Provides a walkable Promotes safe Includes Ensures Manages traffic Creating well-designed Filling sidewalk Providing places Connecting to Prioritizing I think Columbus is finally 43123 Female 19 - 25 White / No PROPER public about the cost to best possible outcome choice of we need better transit in the integral part of our mixture of uses walk, bike, and attractive, high- compatibility impacts multimodal intersections gaps for bike parking existing bicycle safety taking the right steps but Caucasian transit and to construct because and effects for the people Olentangy actual downtown core. It regional growth and (including housing, transit quality open with existing and storage trails enhancements its playing it too safe to decrease its our investment in living within it. River Road would also be the quickest economic development employment, connections space neighborhoods address the actual scale reliance on cars transit is miniscule because it's route and serve the most jobs. strategy. shopping, and of the problem. I'd like to in comparison to not very professional services) see some proposals here the astronomical residential in for traffic calming and amount we spend many parts, actively disincentivizing on widening our and also not car use. highways each very year. All pedestrian- investements in friendly, which better transit will would pay for themselves discourage in the benefits to ridership. I equity and the think North environment. High Street, which is extremely 47 7 4 576 3 walkable and active and connects many important sites is the most logical location for a light rail or BRT. North High Street (Short North to OSU) actually does have the density to support a light rail in opposition to Olentangy River Road, so I'm curious 48 4 7 5 7 7 7 2 the direct route to Downtown Rapid transit should be an Promotes safe walk, Provides a Includes Ensures Manages traffic Connecting to existing bicycle Prioritizing Creating well- Providing Filling sidewalk 43215 43054 Male 35 - 54 White / No for Conventions, Theaters and integral part of our bike, and transit walkable mixture attractive, high- compatibility impacts trails safety designed places for bike gaps Caucasian ALL sports regional growth and connections of uses (including quality open with existing enhancements multimodal parking and economic development housing, space neighborhoods intersections storage 497 6 7676 strategy. employment, shopping, and professional services)

Light Rail Rapid transit should be an Provides a walkable Includes attractive, Promotes safe Manages traffic Connecting to existing bicycle Creating well- Prioritizing safety Filling sidewalk Providing Male 26 - 34 Black / Prefer not integral part of our mixture of uses high-quality open walk, bike, and impacts trails designed enhancements gaps places for bike African- to answer regional growth and (including housing, space transit multimodal parking and American economic development employment, connections intersections storage 50 7 1 776 1 strategy. shopping, and professional services)

like 3a covers the main post Growth is imminent and Manages traffic Ensures Promotes safe Provides a Includes Connecting to existing bicycle Prioritizing Creating well- Filling sidewalk Providing 43235 43215 Female 35 - 54 White / No office and other government we need to begin adding impacts compatibility with walk, bike, and walkable mixture attractive, high- trails safety designed gaps places for bike Caucasian buildings as well as new travel options. existing transit of uses quality open enhancements multimodal parking and development on McKinnley neighborhoods connections (including space intersections storage housing, 514 4 5544 employment, shopping, and professional services)

Very important, Alternative 3 serves the Routing on 3 seems to best Rapid transit should be an Promotes safe walk, Provides a Ensures Includes Manages traffic Built a better Filling sidewalk gaps Prioritizing Creating well- Providing Connecting to Do the easy, fast, Make walking the easiest, 43202 43202 Male 35 - 54 White / No but it's more most people while still Olentangy serve a developing integral part of our bike, and transit walkable mixture compatibility with attractive, high- impacts alternative to safety designed places for bike existing bicycle cheap things first. then using Caucasian important to also access major work River Rd neighborhood, and regional growth and connections of uses (including existing quality open using a car. If the enhancements multimodal parking and trails Build side walks, bikes/scooters/etc., then prioritize such places like Riverside seems to the most people in economic development housing, neighborhoods space city grows, do intersections storage cross walks, add bus, then cars. In the projects to Hospital and OSU. But it's reduce the future, but it's strategy. employment, not built more pedestrian traffic order of cost to build and disadvantaged a lot slower than the other people's travel time is much shopping, and roads. Remove a signals. maintain. And do not neighborhoods. two routes. Why does it access to this longer. 1 seems the professional lane from large Everybody starts build against traffic have to go back to bus route; best compromise. services) roads and every trip walking. rules/expectations, like Olentangy and Bethel? there are not reserve it as bus Every single bikes going the opposite many people lane. And person walking is direction on a one way living East of it enforce it. If a person not street, like Summit St, or and close people see that driving. Not driving bike lanes on the left enough to the car takes saves much more when slow traffic always have longer, they'll on fewer roads to goes to the right lane, like 52 6 2 565 3 convenient use what's build and maintain on N 4th St. walking better, faster. It than building a access. How's needs a transit side walk or bike this connected system that's lane. to existing bus better though, lines, e.g. on faster, more Kenny Rd? reliable, convenient. And it'll take 10 years or so.

Rapid transit should be an Promotes safe walk, Ensures Provides a Manages traffic Includes Connecting to existing bicycle Prioritizing Creating well- Filling sidewalk Providing 43212 43125 Male 35 - 54 Hispanic Yes integral part of our bike, and transit compatibility with walkable mixture impacts attractive, high- trails safety designed gaps places for bike regional growth and connections existing of uses (including quality open enhancements multimodal parking and economic development neighborhoods housing, space intersections storage 537 2 5574 strategy. employment, shopping, and professional services)

I like the directness and I like the speed of 1 Rapid transit should be an Promotes safe walk, Provides a Includes Ensures Manages traffic Car traffic should Creating well-designed Prioritizing Filling sidewalk Providing Connecting to Build affordable public 43221 43221 Male 26 - 34 White / No speed of route 1 integral part of our bike, and transit walkable mixture attractive, high- compatibility impacts be deprioritized multimodal intersections safety gaps places for bike existing bicycle housing Caucasian regional growth and connections of uses (including quality open with existing enhancements parking and trails economic development housing, space neighborhoods storage 547 4 7751 strategy. employment, shopping, and professional services) 1. How 2. When considering the 7. Many members of the 8. As planning for the supportive are routing and construction 3a. Three Rapid Transit 4a. Multiple Rapid Transit 5. How strongly do you 6. When considering public would like to see 13. Which Travel Northwest Corridor you regarding of Rapid Transit within route alternatives are 3b. Is there connections from the 4b. Is there feel that Rapid Transit is future development improved bicycle and racial 14. Are reliability Connection to progresses, are there 9. What 10. What the addition of a Please share the Northwest Corridor, Travel time Please share any being evaluated for the anything you Northwest Corridor to anything you needed to accommodate in vicinity of the 6. Rank 5 - Please share pedestrian connections to 7. Rank 5- Please share any 11. What 12. What group do you (the route major Costs to additional priority zip code zip code No. modern Rapid any additional how would you prioritize (the fastest additional Northwest Corridor. Is dislike about Downtown are also being dislike about some our region's continued Northwest Corridor, 6. Rank 2 6. Rank 3 6. Rank 4 Least any additional and from transit and local 7. Rank 2 7. Rank 3 7. Rank 4 Least additional is your is your you most Hispanic with the employment construct needs, considerations, do you do you Transit choice comments. the following? route) comments.2 there anything you like some or all of considered. Is there or all of the growth? (Select the which outcome is important comments.6 destinations. In creating important comments.7 gender? age? closely or least destinations or opportunities that live in? work in? along the Construction duration about some or all of the the routes? anything you like about routes? option that best most important to such connections, please identify Latino? delay) you believe should be Northwest (what could be built routes? some or all of the routes? describes your opinion.) you? rank the importance of the with? considered? Corridor? quickest) following. I would use rapid Route 3 would Routes 1 & 2 connect the Route 3 wouldn't be Rapid transit should be an Provides a walkable Manages traffic Ensures Promotes safe Includes Connecting to existing bicycle Filling sidewalk Creating well- Prioritizing Providing Will the downtown 43016 43215 Male 55 - 64 White / No transit to get to take too long Arena District. Better for after viable until the integral part of our mixture of uses impacts compatibility with walk, bike, and attractive, high- trails gaps designed safety places for bike workforce grow or shrink Caucasian the Arena District to get to the hours use Broad St route is regional growth and (including housing, existing transit quality open multimodal enhancements parking and due to more people final stop completed. economic development employment, neighborhoods connections space intersections storage working remotely 55 7 4 566 5 strategy. shopping, and professional services)

Get over the Cost and no no Three brings Franklinton into One doesn't cut into Growth is imminent and Ensures compatibility Provides a Promotes safe Manages traffic Includes Make sure it isn't Filling sidewalk gaps Connecting to Prioritizing safety Creating well- Providing interconnectivity Make it have actual 43214 43015 Prefer not Prefer Prefer not Prefer not whole BRT thing construction the fold (which it should) the heart enough we need to begin adding with existing walkable mixture walk, bike, and impacts attractive, high- the same flavor- existing bicycle enhancements designed places for bike first and foremost. character. Columbus has to answer not to to answer to answer and focus on duration are minor and looks more like travel options. neighborhoods of uses (including transit quality open less, no trails multimodal parking and It doesn't make grown into one giant answer light in the big picture. it's for the short housing, connections space character, sliced intersections storage sense to improve suburb and it's trash and rail/commuter Think big. If rail north. employment, white bread safety if no one is it makes me want to trains where isn't built now, it shopping, and garbage that is using it because it move out. 56 1 CARS GET OFF 1 777 1 never will be. It's professional being built all doesn't go THE ROAD only getting more services) over Columbus anywhere. expensive, and more difficult to fit in.

Growth is imminent and Ensures compatibility Promotes safe Manages traffic Provides a Includes Connecting to existing bicycle Prioritizing Creating well- Filling sidewalk Providing NO 43123 43207 Male 35 - 54 Prefer not Prefer not we need to begin adding with existing walk, bike, and impacts walkable mixture attractive, high- trails safety designed gaps places for bike to answer to answer travel options. neighborhoods transit of uses quality open enhancements multimodal parking and connections (including space intersections storage housing, 575 4 5455 employment, shopping, and professional services)

We want rail!!! We want a rail I think a rail on The route in Rapid transit should be an Provides a walkable Promotes safe Manages traffic Includes Ensures More Filling sidewalk gaps Providing Creating well- Connecting to Prioritizing Enough with buses. If 43026 43235 Male 35 - 54 Prefer not Yes Not buses!!!! system!!! Enough Bethel, downtown should integral part of our mixture of uses walk, bike, and impacts attractive, high- compatibility density...more places for bike designed existing bicycle safety Columbus want to be to answer Enough of spending more connecting to be a loop like in regional growth and (including housing, transit quality open with existing rapid transit parking and multimodal trails enhancements considered an innovative, Columbus!!! Get on streets that are Sawmill, which Chicago. The Hub, economic development employment, connections space neighborhoods options would storage intersections modern city, it will need up to date and ripped up, redone would run which disperses to strategy. shopping, and ultimately to stop thinking so stop being so only to be ripped up north and each of the professional services) improve conservatively and be conservative!!!! again with the BRT south and then corridors. traffic...less cars more open to high that you are the rail on on the road density. That is what proposing!!! Bethel people want. We are tired connecting to of having to go in our car 58 1 3 567 2 Olentangy everywhere or wait on a would be bus that pollutes the air. perfect We want to be able to walk or talk a train to go places. To walk to the grocery store or local convenient store.

Even though I'm The bump outs of #2 and No #2 is the BEST option here. It I don't like the fact Rapid transit should be an Provides a walkable Promotes safe Manages traffic Ensures Includes Creating well-designed Prioritizing Connecting to Filling sidewalk Providing Make sure to keep in 43212 43140 Male 35 - 54 White / No a strong #3. Those should be brings you into the heart of the that the terminus is integral part of our mixture of uses walk, bike, and impacts compatibility attractive, high- multimodal intersections safety existing bicycle gaps places for bike mind how the current Caucasian supporter of light combined to make a #4 Arena District. Any type of Broad and High. A regional growth and (including housing, transit with existing quality open enhancements trails parking and COTA system and CoGo rail; this is a step option. This covers alot mass transit needs to connect major station should economic development employment, connections neighborhoods space storage will need to be modified in the right of current construction but and/or go through your major be somewhere strategy. shopping, and to help support this new direction. allows for high density entertainment areas. This around Spring/Long professional services) rapid transit method. Announce station projects to sprout up. #1 gets people to ride it; maybe & 3rd/4th St. This Sometimes it feels like locations with would probably be the not as much at first but once would allow new new ideas are proposed new zoning rules easiest and cheapest but they see how well it works; lines to extend but integration is an for high density why? If you're going to do they will consider it in the North from there afterthought. development will this, then do it right; not future. going through the only be approved just because it's the East side of in that 1/2 mile easiest route. campus; then use 59 6 3 566 3 radius. Indianola to connect Clintonville. Maybe bounce over to High St to collect Worthington and Campus View area.

Route 2 in particular Growth is imminent and Promotes safe walk, Manages traffic Provides a Ensures Includes Connecting to existing bicycle Filling sidewalk Creating well- Prioritizing Providing Female 26 - 34 White / No we need to begin adding bike, and transit impacts walkable mixture compatibility attractive, high- trails gaps designed safety places for bike Caucasian travel options. connections of uses (including with existing quality open multimodal enhancements parking and housing, neighborhoods space intersections storage 605 5 6565 employment, shopping, and professional services)

I think this is a Good transit is fast, I like that Route 1 is I worry that I like that option 1 hits the All of these options Rapid transit should be an Provides a walkable Promotes safe Ensures Includes Provides a Infill Filling sidewalk gaps Connecting to Prioritizing safety Creating well- Providing More bridges 43202 43215 Male 26 - 34 White / No great idea, but it frequent, and "on simple and direct. none of the whole High Street spine, go through a dead integral part of our mixture of uses walk, bike, and compatibility with attractive, high- walkable development existing bicycle enhancements designed places for bike across the river, Caucasian might make more the way". On the routes directly including Nationwide/ north zone so the faster regional growth and (including housing, transit existing quality open mixture of uses would make trails multimodal parking and and more public sense to improve way means it goes hit job or downtown. The new road in they move the economic development employment, connections neighborhoods space (including transit intersections storage trailheads to the service on directly into activity population Option 3B would be really better. It might be strategy. shopping, and housing, successful here. Greenway Trail. existing popular centers. center east of nice and might give interesting to try to professional services) employment, Preserving open transit corridors the Olentangy. transit/bikes advantage over connect 3B to Crew shopping, and space around first. If it's not a The deviations cars if transit/bike-only. stadium. professional the river is zero sum game in 2 & 3 would services) valuable. I think I'd support be annoying to connecting this multiple corridor sit through so area to projects at once. would need to surrounding be very well neighborhoods justified. is the most Crosstown important 61 6 4 777 4 connections "compatibility and TOD infill with existing development neighborhoods" will be key to consideration. I success. live right across the Olentangy but can't walk there currently. 1. How 2. When considering the 7. Many members of the 8. As planning for the supportive are routing and construction 3a. Three Rapid Transit 4a. Multiple Rapid Transit 5. How strongly do you 6. When considering public would like to see 13. Which Travel Northwest Corridor you regarding of Rapid Transit within route alternatives are 3b. Is there connections from the 4b. Is there feel that Rapid Transit is future development improved bicycle and racial 14. Are reliability Connection to progresses, are there 9. What 10. What the addition of a Please share the Northwest Corridor, Travel time Please share any being evaluated for the anything you Northwest Corridor to anything you needed to accommodate in vicinity of the 6. Rank 5 - Please share pedestrian connections to 7. Rank 5- Please share any 11. What 12. What group do you (the route major Costs to additional priority zip code zip code No. modern Rapid any additional how would you prioritize (the fastest additional Northwest Corridor. Is dislike about Downtown are also being dislike about some our region's continued Northwest Corridor, 6. Rank 2 6. Rank 3 6. Rank 4 Least any additional and from transit and local 7. Rank 2 7. Rank 3 7. Rank 4 Least additional is your is your you most Hispanic with the employment construct needs, considerations, do you do you Transit choice comments. the following? route) comments.2 there anything you like some or all of considered. Is there or all of the growth? (Select the which outcome is important comments.6 destinations. In creating important comments.7 gender? age? closely or least destinations or opportunities that live in? work in? along the Construction duration about some or all of the the routes? anything you like about routes? option that best most important to such connections, please identify Latino? delay) you believe should be Northwest (what could be built routes? some or all of the routes? describes your opinion.) you? rank the importance of the with? considered? Corridor? quickest) following. All for increased I like they are all I'm not sure I prefer option 3. Seems like Rapid transit should be an Provides a walkable Promotes safe Manages traffic Includes Ensures Most important Filling sidewalk gaps Prioritizing Creating well- Connecting to Providing Ensuring that new 43140 43215 Female 26 - 34 White / No transportation promoting equity. going through there is the opportunity to gain integral part of our mixture of uses walk, bike, and impacts attractive, high- compatibility to me is safety designed existing bicycle places for bike options are efficient for Caucasian options citywide. West Campus efficiencies by using some of regional growth and (including housing, transit quality open with existing increased transit enhancements multimodal trails parking and riders from both a cost is necessary, it the East/West LinkUs project. economic development employment, connections space neighborhoods options. Not that intersections storage and time perspective. is pretty well strategy. shopping, and I don't think the covered by professional services) existing CABS. neighborhoods are important, but I think they 62 7 4 556 4 are going to change dramatically anyways as a result of this and future growth.

limited turns and dirct worry about Whatever is chosen Things have worsened Ensures compatibility Promotes safe Provides a Includes Manages traffic Connecting to existing bicycle Filling sidewalk Creating well- Prioritizing Providing help improve our 43201 43210 Male 26 - 34 White / No connection the stress on needs to service over the years but are still with existing walk, bike, and walkable mixture attractive, high- impacts trails gaps designed safety places for bike neighborhoods, not Caucasian high street. Franklinton tolerable. neighborhoods transit of uses (including quality open multimodal enhancements parking and replace our Where are connections housing, space intersections storage neighborhoods 637 1 6763 stations and employment, what do they shopping, and look like? professional services)

Rapid transit should be an Promotes safe walk, Provides a Includes Ensures Manages traffic Creating well-designed Filling sidewalk Connecting to Filling sidewalk Providing 315 needs to be 43201 43215 Male 35 - 54 White / No integral part of our bike, and transit walkable mixture attractive, high- compatibility impacts multimodal intersections gaps existing bicycle gaps places for bike eliminated to open up the Caucasian regional growth and connections of uses (including quality open with existing trails parking and river area for economic development housing, space neighborhoods storage development and 647 4 5764 strategy. employment, recreation between shopping, and downtown and Kinnear professional Road. services)

I like options 1&2 due to no I think I prefer option 2. Once no Rapid transit should be an Promotes safe walk, Provides a Manages traffic Ensures Includes In my view, Prioritizing safety Filling sidewalk Creating well- Providing Connecting to I think connecting It seems like quite a 43221 43210 Male 35 - 54 White / No directness, but I think people get to High St, there integral part of our bike, and transit walkable mixture impacts compatibility attractive, high- these are all enhancements gaps designed places for bike existing bicycle to existing bicycle challenge -- it's a Caucasian option 3 is most useful are other existing options to regional growth and connections of uses (including with existing quality open facets of the multimodal parking and trails trails has great massive undertaking, that because it serves more complete their journeys. economic development housing, neighborhoods space same issue -- intersections storage value, but to needs to be done very people and integrates strategy. employment, sides of the encourage more well in a short amount of more of the area west of shopping, and same multi-sided people to abandon time! The real priority will 315. professional coin, if you will. I single-occupancy be to get community services) definitely don't motor-vehicles as excitement and buy-in, in think the their primary form large part to remove the previous auto- of everyday stigmas that public transit centric transportation it's and alternative development more important in transportation modes 657 3 4552 was very my view to make have as being *solely* for concerned with "regular" streets the benefit of the any of these safer for biking economically crucial and walking. disadvantaged. development factors at all, so these are all welcome considerations.

I like 1 and 2 I like 2, it runs through the not crazy about the Rapid transit should be an Promotes safe walk, Includes attractive, Provides a Ensures Manages traffic Connecting to existing bicycle Filling sidewalk Prioritizing safety Creating well- Providing 43212 43215 Female 55 - 64 White / No Arena District Broad Street one integral part of our bike, and transit high-quality open walkable mixture compatibility impacts trails gaps enhancements designed places for bike Caucasian regional growth and connections space of uses (including with existing multimodal parking and economic development housing, neighborhoods intersections storage 665 2 6664 strategy. employment, shopping, and professional services)

Line 3 services a large 1 Takes you by Nationwide, Rapid transit should be an Promotes safe walk, Provides a Includes Ensures Manages traffic Connecting to existing bicycle Providing Creating well- Filling sidewalk Prioritizing 43201 43082 Male 26 - 34 Black / No residential area. Lane Ave short north, Goodale park and integral part of our bike, and transit walkable mixture attractive, high- compatibility impacts trails places for bike designed gaps safety African- detour on 2 goes to area the new Hilton expansion. regional growth and connections of uses (including quality open with existing parking and multimodal enhancements American with future development economic development housing, space neighborhoods storage intersections 676 4 6763 already planned. strategy. employment, shopping, and professional services)

reliability is #1!! If 1 is a straight shot - very I dislike 3 for I am truly for the more you can Growth is imminent and Manages traffic Ensures Promotes safe Provides a Includes Filling sidewalk gaps Prioritizing Connecting to Creating well- Providing 43123 43207 Female 35 - 54 Prefer not Prefer not in the end you have nice... BUT 3 would about the help, the better... whichever we need to begin adding impacts compatibility with walk, bike, and walkable mixture attractive, high- safety existing bicycle designed places for bike to answer to answer a reliable, safe and appear to reach more same reason I route serves the most people travel options. existing transit of uses quality open enhancements trails multimodal parking and fast transportation people - very nice. like it... adding neighborhoods connections (including space intersections storage system that gets that many housing, people where they stops makes employment, need to be, when my ride long. shopping, and they need to be but that the professional 684 2 6762 there, he cost and selfish part of services) time to build should me. for the be least of the betterment of worry, all, I like it a lot.

no yes yes yes Traffic is fine and I'm not Manages traffic Includes attractive, Promotes safe Ensures Provides a Providing places for bike Connecting to Filling sidewalk Prioritizing Creating well- north-south bike 43215 43085 Prefer not Prefer Prefer not Prefer not concerned about growth. impacts high-quality open walk, bike, and compatibility walkable parking and storage existing bicycle gaps safety designed boulevard west of to answer not to to answer to answer space transit with existing mixture of uses trails enhancements multimodal olentangy from third to answer connections neighborhoods (including intersections lane housing, employment, 691 1 7727 shopping, and professional services) 1. How 2. When considering the 7. Many members of the 8. As planning for the supportive are routing and construction 3a. Three Rapid Transit 4a. Multiple Rapid Transit 5. How strongly do you 6. When considering public would like to see 13. Which Travel Northwest Corridor you regarding of Rapid Transit within route alternatives are 3b. Is there connections from the 4b. Is there feel that Rapid Transit is future development improved bicycle and racial 14. Are reliability Connection to progresses, are there 9. What 10. What the addition of a Please share the Northwest Corridor, Travel time Please share any being evaluated for the anything you Northwest Corridor to anything you needed to accommodate in vicinity of the 6. Rank 5 - Please share pedestrian connections to 7. Rank 5- Please share any 11. What 12. What group do you (the route major Costs to additional priority zip code zip code No. modern Rapid any additional how would you prioritize (the fastest additional Northwest Corridor. Is dislike about Downtown are also being dislike about some our region's continued Northwest Corridor, 6. Rank 2 6. Rank 3 6. Rank 4 Least any additional and from transit and local 7. Rank 2 7. Rank 3 7. Rank 4 Least additional is your is your you most Hispanic with the employment construct needs, considerations, do you do you Transit choice comments. the following? route) comments.2 there anything you like some or all of considered. Is there or all of the growth? (Select the which outcome is important comments.6 destinations. In creating important comments.7 gender? age? closely or least destinations or opportunities that live in? work in? along the Construction duration about some or all of the the routes? anything you like about routes? option that best most important to such connections, please identify Latino? delay) you believe should be Northwest (what could be built routes? some or all of the routes? describes your opinion.) you? rank the importance of the with? considered? Corridor? quickest) following. i like option I sddfgf cxvvc Rapid transit should be an Promotes safe walk, Ensures Manages traffic Provides a Includes Filling sidewalk gaps Creating well- Connecting to Prioritizing Providing 43228 Female 26 - 34 White / Yes integral part of our bike, and transit compatibility with impacts walkable mixture attractive, high- designed existing bicycle safety places for bike Caucasian regional growth and connections existing of uses quality open multimodal trails enhancements parking and economic development neighborhoods (including space intersections storage strategy. housing, 707 6 7666 employment, shopping, and professional services)

Like that choice #2 would Not interested #3a&b both service #2 seems limited in Rapid transit should be an Promotes safe walk, Provides a Manages traffic Includes Ensures Easy wheelchair Filling sidewalk gaps Connecting to Prioritizing safety Creating well- Providing 43222 43222 Male 35 - 54 White / No service OSU's Martha that choice #3 Franklinton. usefulness on a integral part of our bike, and transit walkable mixture impacts attractive, high- compatibility accessibility a existing bicycle enhancements designed places for bike Caucasian Morehouse medical takes an personal level regional growth and connections of uses (including quality open with existing must! trails multimodal parking and center. extended economic development housing, space neighborhoods intersections storage 716 7 4445 detour through strategy. employment, Upper shopping, and Arlington. professional services)

I would like to I would like to see a I prefer route 1 as it I dislike routes I don't know enough about this I'm unclear about the Ensures compatibility Promotes safe Provides a Includes Manages traffic Creating well-designed Prioritizing Filling sidewalk Providing Connecting to 43212 Retired Female 65 or Prefer not Prefer not see a "show of route constructed appears to be the least 2 and 3 as end of the corridor to relationship between with existing walk, bike, and walkable mixture attractive, high- impacts multimodal intersections safety gaps places for bike existing bicycle older to answer to answer hands" so to that would be the obstructive to the existing they appear to comment. regional growth, neighborhoods transit of uses (including quality open enhancements parking and trails speak, as to how least disruptive to neighborhoods. be directed transportation, and our connections housing, space storage many people the residents who through economic vibrancy. employment, would actuallly already are living in existing shopping, and use this system the corridor...of neighborhoods professional and how often. whom I am one. . Route 2 is services) directed down Kinnear Rd. which boarders the University View neighborhood. I don't think having this transit system running 72 3 5 344 7 directly on the street where people have their homes is not the right thing to do and inconsiderate. This plan does not fit in with the existing neighborhood.

I like option 2 since it still The Franklinton corridor Rapid transit should be an Promotes safe walk, Provides a Includes Manages traffic Ensures Creating well-designed Providing Connecting to Prioritizing Filling sidewalk 43201 Male 19 - 25 White / No better serve more option has a great chance at integral part of our bike, and transit walkable mixture attractive, high- impacts compatibility multimodal intersections places for bike existing bicycle safety gaps Caucasian residents by the year providing more options for regional growth and connections of uses (including quality open with existing parking and trails enhancements 2050. I think connecting underserved communities/ economic development housing, space neighborhoods storage OSUâ€™s west campus more residents while also strategy. employment, to the rest of Columbus giving people a chance to shopping, and 737 5 6772 would be vital for the connect the future East/West professional longevity of the greater corridor. services) Columbus area.

Growth is imminent and Ensures compatibility Provides a Manages traffic Includes Promotes safe Connecting to existing bicycle Creating well- Providing places Prioritizing Filling sidewalk 43202 43210 Female 35 - 54 White / No we need to begin adding with existing walkable mixture impacts attractive, high- walk, bike, and trails designed for bike parking safety gaps Caucasian travel options. neighborhoods of uses (including quality open transit multimodal and storage enhancements housing, space connections intersections 747 3 7775 employment, shopping, and professional services)

Build It! Build It! Connecting more people None. Connection to main roads. Needs to connect to Rapid transit should be an Promotes safe walk, Provides a Manages traffic Ensures Includes Build It! Filling sidewalk gaps Connecting to Creating well- Providing Prioritizing Build It! Improve access to rapid 43214 43215 Male 55 - 64 White / No to rapid transit. the Discovery integral part of our bike, and transit walkable mixture impacts compatibility attractive, high- existing bicycle designed places for bike safety transit. And Build It! Caucasian District and regional growth and connections of uses (including with existing quality open trails multimodal parking and enhancements Columbus State. economic development housing, neighborhoods space intersections storage 75 7 2 446 4 strategy. employment, shopping, and professional services)

Our It will not work as Route number 1 is the Dislike the Routes 1 and 2 likely connect Route 3a looks too Rapid transit should be an Promotes safe walk, Provides a Ensures Includes Manages traffic Stop focusing so Filling sidewalk gaps Connecting to Prioritizing safety Providing Creating well- What does Better transit than 43206 43215 Female 26 - 34 White / No transportation intended if the route best. Keep it straight and detour to OSU people to the most complicated with integral part of our bike, and transit walkable mixture compatibility with attractive, high- impacts much on traffic existing bicycle enhancements places for bike designed "creating well- Cleveland Ave. High Caucasian system will fail if is not direct. Please direct. Connectivity to the West Campus destinations. There is already that weird jog to the regional growth and connections of uses (including existing quality open for cars. When trails parking and multimodal designed quality bike facilities. New we don't invest in avoid the options route can be provided by on route 2, and a bus lane on High Street that west. Again, keep it economic development housing, neighborhoods space people see a storage intersections multimodal zoning code that allows high quality and that detour off the park and ride stations, the detour to should ONLY be used for as direct as strategy. employment, nice transit intersections" the right kind of high capacity main corridor. feeder transit routes, Upper buses, so Route 1 makes the possible, as few shopping, and option that gets mean??? development along that transit that Rapid transit only bicycle facilities, and Arlington on most sense. turns as possible. professional them somewhere corridor. actually works. works if it doesn't walking. This is how rapid Route 3. That services) faster, they'll have to make turns, transit works everywhere type of routing choose transit. 76 7 4 774 4 sit in traffic, or stop else in the world. is for regular at every traffic bus lines, and light.. is why they take so long to get anywhere. 1. How 2. When considering the 7. Many members of the 8. As planning for the supportive are routing and construction 3a. Three Rapid Transit 4a. Multiple Rapid Transit 5. How strongly do you 6. When considering public would like to see 13. Which Travel Northwest Corridor you regarding of Rapid Transit within route alternatives are 3b. Is there connections from the 4b. Is there feel that Rapid Transit is future development improved bicycle and racial 14. Are reliability Connection to progresses, are there 9. What 10. What the addition of a Please share the Northwest Corridor, Travel time Please share any being evaluated for the anything you Northwest Corridor to anything you needed to accommodate in vicinity of the 6. Rank 5 - Please share pedestrian connections to 7. Rank 5- Please share any 11. What 12. What group do you (the route major Costs to additional priority zip code zip code No. modern Rapid any additional how would you prioritize (the fastest additional Northwest Corridor. Is dislike about Downtown are also being dislike about some our region's continued Northwest Corridor, 6. Rank 2 6. Rank 3 6. Rank 4 Least any additional and from transit and local 7. Rank 2 7. Rank 3 7. Rank 4 Least additional is your is your you most Hispanic with the employment construct needs, considerations, do you do you Transit choice comments. the following? route) comments.2 there anything you like some or all of considered. Is there or all of the growth? (Select the which outcome is important comments.6 destinations. In creating important comments.7 gender? age? closely or least destinations or opportunities that live in? work in? along the Construction duration about some or all of the the routes? anything you like about routes? option that best most important to such connections, please identify Latino? delay) you believe should be Northwest (what could be built routes? some or all of the routes? describes your opinion.) you? rank the importance of the with? considered? Corridor? quickest) following. Supportive yes, Prefer route 1 I do not Prefer a route that involves A route that favors Rapid transit should be an Ensures compatibility Promotes safe Provides a Manages traffic Must not Prioritizing safety Filling sidewalk Connecting to Creating well- Providing None 43201 43201. Female 65 or Two or No but also with the support routes West Broad. Affordability for West Broad it integral part of our with existing walk, bike, and walkable mixture impacts negatively enhancements gaps existing bicycle designed places for bike 43202, older more races caveat that this 2 and 3 where one seems SoHud rate regional growth and neighborhoods transit of uses (including impact existing trails multimodal parking and 43215 encourages I find it hard to higher for economic economic development connections housing, neighborhoods!! intersections storage economic growth believe it development strategy. employment, that often supports potential shopping, and bypasses the â€œequityâ€â professional very communities €”the route services) it is intended to needs to serve, leaving promote local businesses workforce stranded and development decreased walk and for ability in those existing and communities older parts of 77 6 2 357 3 the city. Innovation is not well defined enough to be a factorâ€”do you mean ability to evolve? Isnâ€™t this sustainability?

prefer #3 as it avoids all move through population 3 avoids places Rapid transit should be an Provides a walkable Ensures Manages traffic Promotes safe Includes Creating well-designed Prioritizing Filling sidewalk Connecting to Providing 43202 43202 Male 65 or White / No traffic at the shopping centers where lots of folks -- integral part of our mixture of uses compatibility with impacts walk, bike, and attractive, high- multimodal intersections safety gaps existing bicycle places for bike older Caucasian center students especially - regional growth and (including housing, existing transit quality open enhancements trails parking and - would have economic development employment, neighborhoods connections space storage 786 3 6664 greater access strategy. shopping, and professional services)

#3 Population served and #3 Population served and jobs Rapid transit should be an Manages traffic Ensures Promotes safe Promotes safe Provides a Connecting to existing bicycle Creating well- Filling sidewalk Prioritizing 43202 43202 Female 35 - 54 White / jobs served should be served should be most integral part of our impacts compatibility with walk, bike, and walk, bike, and walkable trails designed gaps safety Caucasian most important important regional growth and existing transit transit mixture of uses multimodal enhancements economic development neighborhoods connections connections (including intersections strategy. housing, employment, 797 4 4474 shopping, and professional services)

Rapid Transit will I like the speed and I dislike the Options 1 and 3 seem to Rapid transit should be an Provides a walkable Manages traffic Ensures Includes Promotes safe Connecting to existing bicycle Filling sidewalk Creating well- Prioritizing Providing 43230 43054 Male 55 - 64 White / No provide an affordability of Route 1 impact on check the greatest number of integral part of our mixture of uses impacts compatibility with attractive, high- walk, bike, and trails gaps designed safety places for bike Caucasian effective workforce boxes. regional growth and (including housing, existing quality open transit multimodal enhancements parking and transportation advancement economic development employment, neighborhoods space connections intersections storage solution for the of Route 3 strategy. shopping, and growing professional services) 80 6 population. The 3 476 5 continual widening of collector roads is unsustainable.

1 and 2 appear to have Route 3 has to Route 2 connect into the Both 3a and 3b Rapid transit should be an Provides a walkable Promotes safe Includes Ensures Manages traffic Filling sidewalk gaps Connecting to Prioritizing safety Creating well- Providing 43214 43215 Male 26 - 34 White / No the best potential in much center of downtown which is make little sense integral part of our mixture of uses walk, bike, and attractive, high- compatibility impacts existing bicycle enhancements designed places for bike Caucasian serving new growth divergence preferable from a transit given the coming regional growth and (including housing, transit quality open with existing trails multimodal parking and connectivity standpoint E/W study economic development employment, connections space neighborhoods intersections storage 817 5 6641 strategy. shopping, and professional services)

They have this in I think a line like I like the one that green. i think a Rapid transit should be an Promotes safe walk, Manages traffic Ensures Includes Provides a Providing places for bike Creating well- Connecting to Filling sidewalk Yes, rapid transit 43215 retired Male 65 or Italian No Indianapolis. this to downtown separate link integral part of our bike, and transit impacts compatibility with attractive, high- walkable parking and storage designed existing bicycle gaps connection to downtown older Imagine how would make more to Arlington regional growth and connections existing quality open mixture of uses multimodal trails from bottom end embarrassing it sense. right now it would be economic development neighborhoods space (including intersections is to be appears to stop at better. strategy. housing, ENVIOUS of goodale? employment, Indianapolis? shopping, and Iâ€™m not professional 82 7 5 666 4 happy that services) lightrail is still off the plans but I have only lived in cities with subways and lightrails.

I would prefer rail I like the idea of no, just don't Rapid transit should be an Provides a walkable Promotes safe Includes Ensures Manages traffic Filling sidewalk gaps Connecting to Creating well- Prioritizing Providing Please consider putting 43220 43219 Female 26 - 34 White / No but I suppose urbanizing the Kenny make the integral part of our mixture of uses walk, bike, and attractive, high- compatibility impacts existing bicycle designed safety places for bike in rail transit Caucasian BRT is ok since it Road and Bethel Road Microcenter regional growth and (including housing, transit quality open with existing trails multimodal enhancements parking and can be retrofitted shopping areas and move. economic development employment, connections space neighborhoods intersections storage 83 7 to rail later 5 677 1 making it easier to strategy. shopping, and commute from these professional services) areas with transit.

You get what you Option 3 would be Rapid transit should be an Provides a walkable Promotes safe Manages traffic Includes Ensures Prioritizing safety Connecting to Creating well- Filling sidewalk Providing Walking to movies, 43220 Retired Female Prefer Prefer not Prefer not pay for. better if the extra integral part of our mixture of uses walk, bike, and impacts attractive, high- compatibility enhancements existing bicycle designed gaps places for bike restaurants and shops is not to to answer to answer extension were regional growth and (including housing, transit quality open with existing trails multimodal parking and very important to me. answer further north. In that economic development employment, connections space neighborhoods intersections storage Sidewalks should be a way it would service strategy. shopping, and major consideration of the large multi professional services) this effort. cultural community living North of Henderson and not 847 6 6772 the wealthier Upper Arlington community who are unlikely to use any transit other than their cars. 1. How 2. When considering the 7. Many members of the 8. As planning for the supportive are routing and construction 3a. Three Rapid Transit 4a. Multiple Rapid Transit 5. How strongly do you 6. When considering public would like to see 13. Which Travel Northwest Corridor you regarding of Rapid Transit within route alternatives are 3b. Is there connections from the 4b. Is there feel that Rapid Transit is future development improved bicycle and racial 14. Are reliability Connection to progresses, are there 9. What 10. What the addition of a Please share the Northwest Corridor, Travel time Please share any being evaluated for the anything you Northwest Corridor to anything you needed to accommodate in vicinity of the 6. Rank 5 - Please share pedestrian connections to 7. Rank 5- Please share any 11. What 12. What group do you (the route major Costs to additional priority zip code zip code No. modern Rapid any additional how would you prioritize (the fastest additional Northwest Corridor. Is dislike about Downtown are also being dislike about some our region's continued Northwest Corridor, 6. Rank 2 6. Rank 3 6. Rank 4 Least any additional and from transit and local 7. Rank 2 7. Rank 3 7. Rank 4 Least additional is your is your you most Hispanic with the employment construct needs, considerations, do you do you Transit choice comments. the following? route) comments.2 there anything you like some or all of considered. Is there or all of the growth? (Select the which outcome is important comments.6 destinations. In creating important comments.7 gender? age? closely or least destinations or opportunities that live in? work in? along the Construction duration about some or all of the the routes? anything you like about routes? option that best most important to such connections, please identify Latino? delay) you believe should be Northwest (what could be built routes? some or all of the routes? describes your opinion.) you? rank the importance of the with? considered? Corridor? quickest) following. Growth is imminent and Ensures compatibility Promotes safe Manages traffic Provides a Includes Filling sidewalk gaps Connecting to Prioritizing safety Providing Creating well- 43224 43229 Male 55 - 64 White / we need to begin adding with existing walk, bike, and impacts walkable mixture attractive, high- existing bicycle enhancements places for bike designed Caucasian travel options. neighborhoods transit of uses quality open trails parking and multimodal connections (including space storage intersections housing, 852 1 5526 employment, shopping, and professional services)

This is the way of I trust you to know #1 looks like Clintonville #3 looks like a They all look fine. What about Rapid transit should be an Promotes safe walk, Provides a Includes Manages traffic Ensures Iâ€™d make lots Prioritizing safety Filling sidewalk Creating well- Connecting to Providing 43214 43214 Female 65 or White / No the future. Our best but think the residents might use it longer route connecting CSCC and integral part of our bike, and transit walkable mixture attractive, high- impacts compatibility of sacrifices to enhancements gaps designed existing bicycle places for bike older Caucasian community will community will be more but pick the one you but if it CCAD? regional growth and connections of uses (including quality open with existing see you multimodal trails parking and fall behind if we more supportive if determine will be used increases the economic development housing, space neighborhoods succeed. I want intersections storage 86 7 donâ€™t get 4 554 4 the route is quick & most. I want it to be a number who strategy. employment, to support you. started on this easy to use. success. I assume you use it, Iâ€™m shopping, and now. could add connectors for it. professional later. services)

Route 1 is most intuitive Prefer 3b or 1 3a Rapid transit should be an Provides a walkable Promotes safe Includes Ensures Manages traffic Prioritizing safety Filling sidewalk Creating well- Connecting to Providing 43202 Male 26 - 34 White / No for riders integral part of our mixture of uses walk, bike, and attractive, high- compatibility impacts enhancements gaps designed existing bicycle places for bike Caucasian regional growth and (including housing, transit quality open with existing multimodal trails parking and economic development employment, connections space neighborhoods intersections storage 877 3 7751 strategy. shopping, and professional services)

Route 3 hits the largest 1 seems Rapid transit should be an Promotes safe walk, Ensures Provides a Includes Manages traffic Filling sidewalk gaps Connecting to Creating well- Prioritizing Providing 43220 43212 Female 35 - 54 White / No number of housing pointless when integral part of our bike, and transit compatibility with walkable mixture attractive, high- impacts existing bicycle designed safety places for bike Caucasian developments it takes regional growth and connections existing of uses (including quality open trails multimodal enhancements parking and additional economic development neighborhoods housing, space intersections storage 886 1 3673 travel to get to strategy. employment, actual transit shopping, and professional services)

Options two Rapid transit should be an Promotes safe walk, Provides a Includes Ensures Manages traffic Providing places for bike Connecting to Filling sidewalk Prioritizing Providing Bike lanes must be 43214 43215 Prefer not 35 - 54 Prefer not Prefer not and three that integral part of our bike, and transit walkable mixture attractive, high- compatibility impacts parking and storage existing bicycle gaps safety places for bike separated and protected to answer to answer to answer leave regional growth and connections of uses (including quality open with existing trails enhancements parking and from car traffic. If my Olentangy economic development housing, space neighborhoods storage grandmother or daughter River Rd seem strategy. employment, wouldnâ€™t be less optimal shopping, and comfortable and safe, we from a travel professional shouldnâ€™t call it bike time and services) infrastructure. reliability standpoint. If 897 2 6751 upper Arlington and west campus need coverage, they should be separate routes.

Connection to #2 seems most Donâ€™t see Rapid transit should be an Includes attractive, Provides a Promotes safe Manages traffic Ensures High to medium Creating well-designed Connecting to Prioritizing safety Filling sidewalk Providing Bike parking Open spaces like parks 43214 43214 Male 26 - 34 White / No attractions is as promising. #1 is second. the value integral part of our high-quality open walkable mixture walk, bike, and impacts compatibility quality, high multimodal intersections existing bicycle enhancements gaps places for bike becomes less are crucial to quality of Caucasian important as connecting regional growth and space of uses (including transit with existing density housing trails parking and necessary if the life and will make areas connection to what #3 economic development housing, connections neighborhoods that is walkable storage transit includes attractive to live, work, employment. connects VS strategy. employment, to transit is ways to bring the and play. A balance of what shopping, and important to its bike with you, development and open 907 3 6762 youâ€™re professional effectiveness. which happens spaces is crucial. losing by services) Eliminate the most of the time in diverting that daily need for other cities. much from cars. Olentangy.

Rapid transit should be an Ensures compatibility Promotes safe Provides a Includes Manages traffic Filling sidewalk gaps Creating well- Providing places Connecting to Prioritizing 43201 Female 19 - 25 White / No integral part of our with existing walk, bike, and walkable mixture attractive, high- impacts designed for bike parking existing bicycle safety Caucasian regional growth and neighborhoods transit of uses (including quality open multimodal and storage trails enhancements economic development connections housing, space intersections 917 2 5552 strategy. employment, shopping, and professional services)

I'd rather see Rapid transit should be an Provides a walkable Promotes safe Includes Ensures Manages traffic Filling sidewalk gaps Prioritizing Creating well- Providing Connecting to LRT 43201 43210 Female 26 - 34 White / No light rail than bus integral part of our mixture of uses walk, bike, and attractive, high- compatibility impacts safety designed places for bike existing bicycle Caucasian transit. I think regional growth and (including housing, transit quality open with existing enhancements multimodal parking and trails that would be economic development employment, connections space neighborhoods intersections storage better for short strategy. shopping, and north and professional services) downtown businesses, and 92 7 cut drunk driving 1 777 1 too. A lot of people don't use buses who would use LRT.

like olentangy route Rapid transit should be an Promotes safe walk, Includes attractive, Promotes safe Provides a Filling sidewalk gaps Connecting to Prioritizing safety Creating well- Providing 43212 43212- Female 65 or White / No integral part of our bike, and transit high-quality open walk, bike, and walkable existing bicycle enhancements designed places for bike 1419 older Caucasian regional growth and connections space transit mixture of uses trails multimodal parking and economic development connections (including intersections storage strategy. housing, employment, 933 4 4454 shopping, and professional services) 1. How 2. When considering the 7. Many members of the 8. As planning for the supportive are routing and construction 3a. Three Rapid Transit 4a. Multiple Rapid Transit 5. How strongly do you 6. When considering public would like to see 13. Which Travel Northwest Corridor you regarding of Rapid Transit within route alternatives are 3b. Is there connections from the 4b. Is there feel that Rapid Transit is future development improved bicycle and racial 14. Are reliability Connection to progresses, are there 9. What 10. What the addition of a Please share the Northwest Corridor, Travel time Please share any being evaluated for the anything you Northwest Corridor to anything you needed to accommodate in vicinity of the 6. Rank 5 - Please share pedestrian connections to 7. Rank 5- Please share any 11. What 12. What group do you (the route major Costs to additional priority zip code zip code No. modern Rapid any additional how would you prioritize (the fastest additional Northwest Corridor. Is dislike about Downtown are also being dislike about some our region's continued Northwest Corridor, 6. Rank 2 6. Rank 3 6. Rank 4 Least any additional and from transit and local 7. Rank 2 7. Rank 3 7. Rank 4 Least additional is your is your you most Hispanic with the employment construct needs, considerations, do you do you Transit choice comments. the following? route) comments.2 there anything you like some or all of considered. Is there or all of the growth? (Select the which outcome is important comments.6 destinations. In creating important comments.7 gender? age? closely or least destinations or opportunities that live in? work in? along the Construction duration about some or all of the the routes? anything you like about routes? option that best most important to such connections, please identify Latino? delay) you believe should be Northwest (what could be built routes? some or all of the routes? describes your opinion.) you? rank the importance of the with? considered? Corridor? quickest) following. wish we could let's spend the i sort of like the west it's unclear to Growth is imminent and Provides a walkable Promotes safe Includes Manages traffic Ensures Prioritizing safety Creating well- Filling sidewalk Connecting to Providing 43202 43210 Female 35 - 54 White / No get this money to get campus element of the me how we need to begin adding mixture of uses walk, bike, and attractive, high- impacts compatibility enhancements designed gaps existing bicycle places for bike Caucasian throughout the something that will 2nd route, as an OSU people will get travel options. (including housing, transit quality open with existing multimodal trails parking and city; unsure why serve us the best employee (though not on to the BRT employment, connections space neighborhoods intersections storage the NW corridor and last us the west campus). how will from shopping, and is the focus longest. this intersect with or affect elsewhere. is it professional services) the CABS routes, meant to be though? (if at all) only for those in walking/biking distnace, or are there going to be park n 94 7 2 567 1 rides? i just wish the whole city were more connected b/c otherwsie i see people still being very car dependent

route 1 seems most cost Rapid transit should be an Manages traffic Promotes safe Ensures Provides a Includes makr the Connecting to existing bicycle Creating well- Prioritizing safety Filling sidewalk Providing 43214 43219 Prefer not 35 - 54 Prefer not Prefer not effective, KISS concept integral part of our impacts walk, bike, and compatibility with walkable mixture attractive, high- developments trails designed enhancements gaps places for bike to answer to answer to answer regional growth and transit existing of uses quality open compact, dont multimodal parking and economic development connections neighborhoods (including space take up more intersections storage strategy. housing, land than 957 7 7776 employment, necessary shopping, and professional services)

I like the High street route, No It looks like route 1 should be Rapid transit should be an Promotes safe walk, Provides a Includes Manages traffic Ensures By meeting the Connecting to existing bicycle Prioritizing Creating well- Filling sidewalk Providing 43214 Male 65 or Prefer not Prefer not second choice would be the first priority, in it serves integral part of our bike, and transit walkable mixture attractive, high- impacts compatibility criteria 1- 4 it trails safety designed gaps places for bike older to answer to answer the Olentangy route greater numbers. regional growth and connections of uses (including quality open with existing seems that enhancements multimodal parking and economic development housing, space neighborhoods compatibility with intersections storage strategy. employment, existing 966 4 6665 shopping, and neighborhoods professional would be easily services) accommodated.

It seems like it should go #2 seems like the larger route would 3A is too Rapid transit should be an Provides a walkable Promotes safe Includes Manages traffic Ensures Connecting to existing bicycle Filling sidewalk Providing places Prioritizing Creating well- all of these plans should 43214 43214 Female 65 or White / No farther into the actual the best choice probably not be used a lot convoluted, 3B integral part of our mixture of uses walk, bike, and attractive, high- impacts compatibility trails gaps for bike parking safety designed include replacing or older Caucasian Northwest (i.e. Sawmill for travel time without the downtown might be a good regional growth and (including housing, transit quality open with existing and storage enhancements multimodal expanding green space Road area) and possible connection. choice. #1 would economic development employment, connections space neighborhoods intersections elsewhere to mitigate any total jobs add a lot of strategy. shopping, and construction. The served congestion to professional services) Olentangy River needs 975 5 6675 already crowded careful protection from High St. and narrow the impact of the Vine St. additional construction and traffic.

Make sure If it doesn't make Route 3 hits the ever- Route 1 serves the most Rapid transit should be an Provides a walkable Promotes safe Manages traffic Ensures Includes Density done Filling sidewalk gaps Connecting to Prioritizing safety Creating well- Providing Thank you for Require developers to 43221 43221 Male 35 - 54 White / No increased density financial sense for growing Riverside people and is the least cost integral part of our mixture of uses walk, bike, and impacts compatibility attractive, high- right beats existing bicycle enhancements designed places for bike making cycling pay their fair share of Caucasian is included along people to ride it or if Hospital and touches lots regional growth and (including housing, transit with existing quality open sprawl every trails multimodal parking and and walking a these improvements, these corridors it is not reliable, the of apartments as well as economic development employment, connections neighborhoods space time intersections storage safer option for especially if they're 98 7 3 667 5 investment will fail. Upper Arlington city hall strategy. shopping, and people making money on the professional services) increased density standards.

To slow Rapid transit should be an Manages traffic Provides a Ensures Includes Promotes safe Creating well-designed Filling sidewalk Connecting to Prioritizing Providing Use existing train tracks 43235 43215 Prefer not 35 - 54 Prefer not Prefer not integral part of our impacts walkable mixture compatibility with attractive, high- walk, bike, and multimodal intersections gaps existing bicycle safety places for bike and run street cars on to answer to answer to answer regional growth and of uses (including existing quality open transit trails enhancements parking and them. Buy them and economic development housing, neighborhoods space connections storage lease them back to the 997 2 6764 strategy. employment, freight companies. shopping, and professional services)

Theyâ€™re all great NA I prefer 1 or 2 Rapid transit should be an Provides a walkable Ensures Promotes safe Includes Manages traffic Connecting to existing bicycle Filling sidewalk Prioritizing safety Creating well- Providing 43202 Male 26 - 34 White / No integral part of our mixture of uses compatibility with walk, bike, and attractive, high- impacts trails gaps enhancements designed places for bike Caucasian regional growth and (including housing, existing transit quality open multimodal parking and economic development employment, neighborhoods connections space intersections storage 1007 4 5571 strategy. shopping, and professional services)

Connect bethel to 71!! No Bethel needs to be connected No Growth is imminent and Promotes safe walk, Provides a Promotes safe Ensures Manages traffic Filling sidewalk gaps Prioritizing Creating well- Connecting to Providing No. Beware that the 43202 43202 Female 35 - 54 White / No we need to begin adding bike, and transit walkable mixture walk, bike, and compatibility impacts safety designed existing bicycle places for bike aging population in this Caucasian travel options. connections of uses (including transit with existing enhancements multimodal trails parking and area hates change a d housing, connections neighborhoods intersections storage wants every development 1017 6 7761 employment, to somehow be a dog shopping, and park... professional services)

jobs served travel time 2 seems like it would serve all seem like good Growth is imminent and Ensures compatibility Promotes safe Provides a Manages traffic Includes Filling sidewalk gaps Prioritizing Creating well- Providing Connecting to 43212 43210 Female 35 - 54 White / No the most people options to me we need to begin adding with existing walk, bike, and walkable mixture impacts attractive, high- safety designed places for bike existing bicycle Caucasian travel options. neighborhoods transit of uses (including quality open enhancements multimodal parking and trails connections housing, space intersections storage 1027 4 7774 employment, shopping, and professional services)

Route 3 through Upper Lack of clear Route 3 includes a developing Travel time Rapid transit should be an Provides a walkable Promotes safe Ensures Includes Manages traffic Connecting to existing bicycle Creating well- Prioritizing safety Providing Filling sidewalk 43221 43210 Female 35 - 54 White / No Arlington adds service to connection to area that should serve more variability for route 3 integral part of our mixture of uses walk, bike, and compatibility with attractive, high- impacts trails designed enhancements places for bike gaps Caucasian many more people in OSU main people and encourage more does not instill regional growth and (including housing, transit existing quality open multimodal parking and newly developed high rise campus. How development confidence in economic development employment, connections neighborhoods space intersections storage 1035 4 6374 buildings will bike paths reliability strategy. shopping, and or CABS professional services) service link? 1. How 2. When considering the 7. Many members of the 8. As planning for the supportive are routing and construction 3a. Three Rapid Transit 4a. Multiple Rapid Transit 5. How strongly do you 6. When considering public would like to see 13. Which Travel Northwest Corridor you regarding of Rapid Transit within route alternatives are 3b. Is there connections from the 4b. Is there feel that Rapid Transit is future development improved bicycle and racial 14. Are reliability Connection to progresses, are there 9. What 10. What the addition of a Please share the Northwest Corridor, Travel time Please share any being evaluated for the anything you Northwest Corridor to anything you needed to accommodate in vicinity of the 6. Rank 5 - Please share pedestrian connections to 7. Rank 5- Please share any 11. What 12. What group do you (the route major Costs to additional priority zip code zip code No. modern Rapid any additional how would you prioritize (the fastest additional Northwest Corridor. Is dislike about Downtown are also being dislike about some our region's continued Northwest Corridor, 6. Rank 2 6. Rank 3 6. Rank 4 Least any additional and from transit and local 7. Rank 2 7. Rank 3 7. Rank 4 Least additional is your is your you most Hispanic with the employment construct needs, considerations, do you do you Transit choice comments. the following? route) comments.2 there anything you like some or all of considered. Is there or all of the growth? (Select the which outcome is important comments.6 destinations. In creating important comments.7 gender? age? closely or least destinations or opportunities that live in? work in? along the Construction duration about some or all of the the routes? anything you like about routes? option that best most important to such connections, please identify Latino? delay) you believe should be Northwest (what could be built routes? some or all of the routes? describes your opinion.) you? rank the importance of the with? considered? Corridor? quickest) following. It is needed but Build correctly Route 1 most direct. At The jogs in 2 Not especially Why have. Couldn't Rapid transit should be an Promotes safe walk, Provides a Ensures Manages traffic Includes Bike and cars Prioritizing safety Connecting to Filling sidewalk Creating well- Providing See comments Impact on traffic on 43221 43221 Female 55 - 64 White / No also needs to once, not build fast the moment Olentangy and 3 I think the Northwest integral part of our bike, and transit walkable mixture compatibility with impacts attractive, high- are not a good enhancements existing bicycle gaps designed places for bike above feeder routes, existing and Caucasian provide but sloppily. Do it River Road is the biggest could be better Corridor end in a regional growth and connections of uses (including existing quality open mix when road trails multimodal parking and commuter services, and 43210 connections to in sections working headache for Pedestrians served by hub that would economic development housing, neighborhoods space speeds are over intersections storage expandability since existing COTA from the center out. and bikes. having COTA allow commuters to strategy. employment, 25 mph and/or Columbus seems to bus routes. Communicate with routes that transfer to existing shopping, and have a high continuing to expand its Access to RT the public clearly linked up to COTA routes to professional volume of traffic. metropolitan foot print. should not what and when hubs on the complete their services) Ideally bike Making sure that the require users to construction is Olentangy commute. paths and project compliments cross car traffic to occurring. Plan route. Downtown is pedestrian initiatives planned by access. There alternative traffic already congested. walkways are other central Ohio also needs to be reroutes carefully. totally separated communities. places that users from the road could be dropped and on street 104 5 2 456 5 of and picked up, parking. When and to park cars ever possible if traveling from both bikes and further out. pedestrians should not have to interact with traffic crossing under or over streets.

Considerations Too much Things have worsened Ensures compatibility Includes attractive, Manages traffic Provides a Promotes safe Connecting to existing bicycle Filling sidewalk Prioritizing safety Creating well- Providing Considerations for rapid 43221 43210 Female 35 - 54 White / No should be put on disruption of over the years but are still with existing high-quality open impacts walkable mixture walk, bike, and trails gaps enhancements designed places for bike transit should be put on Caucasian hold until current tolerable. neighborhoods space of uses transit multimodal parking and hold until resolution of the resolution of the neighborhoods (including connections intersections storage pandemic and pandemic and housing, determination of return to determination of employment, business and associated 105 2 7 547 7 return to shopping, and traffic patterns business and professional associated traffic services) patterns

All except 1 3a and 3b potentially add Rapid transit should be an Promotes safe walk, Provides a Ensures Includes Manages traffic Filling sidewalk gaps Connecting to Providing places Creating well- Prioritizing Any "safety 43206 43206 Male 35 - 54 White / No make major access to rapid growing scioto integral part of our bike, and transit walkable mixture compatibility with attractive, high- impacts existing bicycle for bike parking designed safety enhancements" Caucasian diversions that pennisula area. regional growth and connections of uses (including existing quality open trails and storage multimodal enhancements considered should make economic development housing, neighborhoods space intersections not limit cycle or 1067 5 7741 connections strategy. employment, pedestrian access from other shopping, and in favor of autos. routes (east of professional the river) more services) dificult.

We need Overall, I want the river to I don't like the I like 1 because I perceive it Rapid transit should be an Promotes safe walk, Includes attractive, Provides a Manages traffic Ensures Prioritizing safety Connecting to Creating well- Providing Filling sidewalk 43081 43210 Female Prefer White / No alternatives to be protected and to allow route going will allow more low income integral part of our bike, and transit high-quality open walkable mixture impacts compatibility enhancements existing bicycle designed places for bike gaps not to Caucasian cars that are some wild spaces for along people options for regional growth and connections space of uses (including with existing trails multimodal parking and answer inexpensive and habitat. Olentangy transportation to work. economic development housing, neighborhoods intersections storage environmentally River Road, at strategy. employment, friendly. least I don't shopping, and 107 7 5 557 5 see how that professional wouldn't services) overload that area.

I think this is a Again, I don't want No - again - not helpful to Everything - No - again - not helpful to Everything - again - Things have worsened Promotes safe walk, Ensures Provides a Includes Manages traffic Where are the Prioritizing safety Filling sidewalk Creating well- Connecting to Providing Where are the Poor people having better 43230 43210 Female 35 - 54 White / No waste of money this, I don't want to people who need it the again - not people who need it the most not helpful to people over the years but are still bike, and transit compatibility with walkable mixture attractive, high- impacts options for the enhancements gaps designed existing bicycle places for bike options for poor and affordable Caucasian and would pay for it, I don't most helpful to who need it the tolerable. connections existing of uses (including quality open poor people? multimodal trails parking and people? Why are transportation options increase traffic think it will help the people who most neighborhoods housing, space Increase ride intersections storage you wasting jams. It wouldn't people who need need it the employment, options to job money on making help people who the most help when most shopping, and sites so they can things pretty and already have it comes to professional work - IE: easy for people transportation transportation, and I services) Amazon, Kroger, that don't need issues. I don't don't want the and other more of it? Why want to pay for years of warehouses. not figure out how this nor do I want construction to use COTA, 108 1 to deal with the 7 777 7 messes. What rideshare, and construction happens if one of other options for issues. Find a the machines people who could way to utilize the breaks down? The use it? options we whole line is cut off. already have. That makes more sense.

OptionOpti ttttewtw ll I'm unclear about the Manages traffic Provides a Ensures Promotes safe Includes Creating well-designed Prioritizing Connecting to Filling sidewalk Providing ghjghj 43201 Female 26 - 34 White / No relationship between impacts walkable mixture compatibility with walk, bike, and attractive, high- multimodal intersections safety existing bicycle gaps places for bike Caucasian regional growth, of uses (including existing transit quality open enhancements trails parking and transportation, and our housing, neighborhoods connections space storage 1093 5 6666 economic vibrancy. employment, shopping, and professional services)

I like the simplicity of 1 I like 3, but not if the cost to Growth is imminent and Provides a walkable Promotes safe Includes Ensures Manages traffic Filling sidewalk gaps Prioritizing Connecting to Creating well- Providing My opinion is that the 43202 43215 Male 55 - 64 White / No untie the knot is excessive we need to begin adding mixture of uses walk, bike, and attractive, high- compatibility impacts safety existing bicycle designed places for bike most important thing that Caucasian travel options. (including housing, transit quality open with existing enhancements trails multimodal parking and needs to be done at this employment, connections space neighborhoods intersections storage point is to get some sort 1107 1 7656 shopping, and of premium transit professional services) implemented.

I like route three you can They all Rapid transit should be an Ensures compatibility Promotes safe Provides a Manages traffic Includes Connecting to existing bicycle Prioritizing Providing places Filling sidewalk 43220 43210 Female 35 - 54 White / No get more residential areas should do the integral part of our with existing walk, bike, and walkable mixture impacts attractive, high- trails safety for bike parking gaps Caucasian track to kenny regional growth and neighborhoods transit of uses (including quality open enhancements and storage between lane economic development connections housing, space and kinear strategy. employment, with the shopping, and development professional occurring there services) 1117 4 7775 or have an option for transport to that location 1. How 2. When considering the 7. Many members of the 8. As planning for the supportive are routing and construction 3a. Three Rapid Transit 4a. Multiple Rapid Transit 5. How strongly do you 6. When considering public would like to see 13. Which Travel Northwest Corridor you regarding of Rapid Transit within route alternatives are 3b. Is there connections from the 4b. Is there feel that Rapid Transit is future development improved bicycle and racial 14. Are reliability Connection to progresses, are there 9. What 10. What the addition of a Please share the Northwest Corridor, Travel time Please share any being evaluated for the anything you Northwest Corridor to anything you needed to accommodate in vicinity of the 6. Rank 5 - Please share pedestrian connections to 7. Rank 5- Please share any 11. What 12. What group do you (the route major Costs to additional priority zip code zip code No. modern Rapid any additional how would you prioritize (the fastest additional Northwest Corridor. Is dislike about Downtown are also being dislike about some our region's continued Northwest Corridor, 6. Rank 2 6. Rank 3 6. Rank 4 Least any additional and from transit and local 7. Rank 2 7. Rank 3 7. Rank 4 Least additional is your is your you most Hispanic with the employment construct needs, considerations, do you do you Transit choice comments. the following? route) comments.2 there anything you like some or all of considered. Is there or all of the growth? (Select the which outcome is important comments.6 destinations. In creating important comments.7 gender? age? closely or least destinations or opportunities that live in? work in? along the Construction duration about some or all of the the routes? anything you like about routes? option that best most important to such connections, please identify Latino? delay) you believe should be Northwest (what could be built routes? some or all of the routes? describes your opinion.) you? rank the importance of the with? considered? Corridor? quickest) following. 2 1 Growth is imminent and Manages traffic Manages traffic Includes Includes Provides a Filling sidewalk gaps Connecting to Prioritizing safety Creating well- Providing Riverfront access 43204 43215 Male 35 - 54 White / No we need to begin adding impacts impacts attractive, high- attractive, high- walkable existing bicycle enhancements designed places for bike Caucasian travel options. quality open quality open mixture of uses trails multimodal parking and space space (including intersections storage housing, employment, 1126 4 7774 shopping, and professional services)

Rapid transit should be an Includes attractive, Promotes safe Ensures Provides a Manages traffic make your maps Connecting to existing bicycle Creating well- Prioritizing safety Filling sidewalk Providing what does filling river health. movement of 43202 43210 Female 35 - 54 White / No integral part of our high-quality open walk, bike, and compatibility with walkable mixture impacts north on the top trails designed enhancements gaps places for bike sidewalk gaps wildlife. Caucasian regional growth and space transit existing of uses and west on the multimodal parking and mean? economic development connections neighborhoods (including left and put a intersections storage strategy. housing, directional key. 1135 4 5545 employment, basic, people. shopping, and professional services)

If it was available, I favor route 1 because of I would use I favor routes 1 and 2 and 3b does not seem Rapid transit should be an Promotes safe walk, Ensures Provides a Includes Manages traffic Creating well-designed Filling sidewalk Connecting to Prioritizing Providing 43214 43210 Male 55 - 64 White / No I would use it. where I live (The Knolls) Route 3 if it would support any of the much of a valuable integral part of our bike, and transit compatibility with walkable mixture attractive, high- impacts multimodal intersections gaps existing bicycle safety places for bike Caucasian but would use Route 2. looked like routes, but do not go service for current regional growth and connections existing of uses (including quality open trails enhancements parking and there was downtown for work so have no demographics for economic development neighborhoods housing, space storage ridership, and strong feelings. these areas. But I strategy. employment, not just a am not well shopping, and useless time- informed to know for professional wasting loop. I sure. services) work at OSU in central 114 7 4 777 6 campus area and know that it is reasonably easy to get to west campus on OSU buses.

Maximum use of People with few Equity is considered. Use of Kenny #3 would use existing #2 chops up vine st, Growth is imminent and Promotes safe walk, Manages traffic Ensures Provides a Includes Environmental Connecting to existing bicycle Creating well- Prioritizing safety Filling sidewalk Providing Working with Exurb car and bus hubs 43123 43210 Female 55 - 64 White / No existing median resources to access rd bisects infrastructure and promote limiting potential we need to begin adding bike, and transit impacts compatibility with walkable mixture attractive, high- protection is the trails designed enhancements gaps places for bike suburban, state, Caucasian strips and roads â€œlast mile â€œ established downtown development for redevelopment, and travel options. connections existing of uses quality open most important multimodal parking and county, and should be transportation must neighborhoods long term environmental gets too close to neighborhoods (including space consideration intersections storage exurban considered to be prioritized for . Too much sustainability. It avoids natural natural waters, housing, due to ongoing communities to avoid cutting social equity. overlap of the waters and green spaces. risking employment, climate damage. connect safe through Scioto River, environmental shopping, and Prompt efficient â€œlast mileâ€ established which is a impact. professional action is bike/walk trails. I neighborhoods. fragile services) necessary. am in Grove City 115 7 6 253 4 ecosystem. and canâ€™t bike 315 should be out of my hugged. neighborhood due to rural state 104 having no bike berm for safety. I have to drive.

Rapid transit should be an Provides a walkable Promotes safe Manages traffic Ensures Includes Creating well-designed Filling sidewalk Prioritizing safety Connecting to Providing 43202 43210 Female 35 - 54 White / No integral part of our mixture of uses walk, bike, and impacts compatibility attractive, high- multimodal intersections gaps enhancements existing bicycle places for bike Caucasian regional growth and (including housing, transit with existing quality open trails parking and economic development employment, connections neighborhoods space storage 1167 4 5572 strategy. shopping, and professional services)

I like that route three has Rapid transit should be an Ensures compatibility Promotes safe Provides a Includes Manages traffic Creating well-designed Filling sidewalk Prioritizing safety Connecting to Providing Equity is paramount. Any 43202 43210 Female 35 - 54 White / No the highest equity rating. integral part of our with existing walk, bike, and walkable mixture attractive, high- impacts multimodal intersections gaps enhancements existing bicycle places for bike changes should help Caucasian regional growth and neighborhoods transit of uses (including quality open trails parking and mitigate the city's high economic development connections housing, space storage economic segregation 1177 4 5674 strategy. employment, and inequality. Increase shopping, and affordable housing!! professional services)

The routing of Equity and I would like to see Yes, I dislike Rapid transit should be an Ensures compatibility Promotes safe Provides a Includes Manages traffic Connecting to existing bicycle Prioritizing Creating well- Providing Filling sidewalk EQUITY. Columbus is 43224 43210 Female 26 - 34 White / No the Rapid Transit environmental environmental that they cater integral part of our with existing walk, bike, and walkable mixture attractive, high- impacts trails safety designed places for bike gaps already a segregated city. Caucasian favors higher justice should also consideration as a to high income regional growth and neighborhoods transit of uses (including quality open enhancements multimodal parking and These plans seem to income be top priorities. priority. In other words, neighborhoods economic development connections housing, space intersections storage cater to primarily white neighborhoods which route will be less . Why not strategy. employment, neighborhoods while who do not have disruptive to the river invest in parts shopping, and leaving POC to rely on public wildlife? of the city that professional neighborhoods behind. transit. Why is really NEED services) this not being improved planned for the public east side where a transportation. majority of folks rely on the bus as their only transportation option? Most people in upper arlington and 118 1 grandview have 4 474 4 cars. Please prioritize lower- income neighborhoods that have already suffered from racial and economic injustice in Columbus's city planning processes. 1. How 2. When considering the 7. Many members of the 8. As planning for the supportive are routing and construction 3a. Three Rapid Transit 4a. Multiple Rapid Transit 5. How strongly do you 6. When considering public would like to see 13. Which Travel Northwest Corridor you regarding of Rapid Transit within route alternatives are 3b. Is there connections from the 4b. Is there feel that Rapid Transit is future development improved bicycle and racial 14. Are reliability Connection to progresses, are there 9. What 10. What the addition of a Please share the Northwest Corridor, Travel time Please share any being evaluated for the anything you Northwest Corridor to anything you needed to accommodate in vicinity of the 6. Rank 5 - Please share pedestrian connections to 7. Rank 5- Please share any 11. What 12. What group do you (the route major Costs to additional priority zip code zip code No. modern Rapid any additional how would you prioritize (the fastest additional Northwest Corridor. Is dislike about Downtown are also being dislike about some our region's continued Northwest Corridor, 6. Rank 2 6. Rank 3 6. Rank 4 Least any additional and from transit and local 7. Rank 2 7. Rank 3 7. Rank 4 Least additional is your is your you most Hispanic with the employment construct needs, considerations, do you do you Transit choice comments. the following? route) comments.2 there anything you like some or all of considered. Is there or all of the growth? (Select the which outcome is important comments.6 destinations. In creating important comments.7 gender? age? closely or least destinations or opportunities that live in? work in? along the Construction duration about some or all of the the routes? anything you like about routes? option that best most important to such connections, please identify Latino? delay) you believe should be Northwest (what could be built routes? some or all of the routes? describes your opinion.) you? rank the importance of the with? considered? Corridor? quickest) following. Columbus needs Spending a little 2 serves more people and upper 3 seems to be in the most 1 High street is Rapid transit should be an Promotes safe walk, Provides a Ensures Manages traffic Includes Connecting to existing bicycle Filling sidewalk Prioritizing safety Creating well- Providing serving low income areas 43224 43214 Male 26 - 34 White / No more public more time and runs faster Arlington is a needed area developed and integral part of our bike, and transit walkable mixture compatibility with impacts attractive, high- trails gaps enhancements designed places for bike and lowering Caucasian transit, but in money to bring light wealthy area needs this less than regional growth and connections of uses (including existing quality open multimodal parking and dependance on personal lower income rail to struggling and its Broad economic development housing, neighborhoods space intersections storage vehicles communities areas would be residents don't strategy. employment, 119 7 3 557 3 worth the need this shopping, and investment service as professional much as services) Franklinton or Linden

more on high street the better! Rapid transit should be an Promotes safe walk, Ensures Manages traffic Provides a Includes Prioritizing safety Connecting to Filling sidewalk Creating well- Providing 43230 43210 Male 35 - 54 White / No integral part of our bike, and transit compatibility with impacts walkable mixture attractive, high- enhancements existing bicycle gaps designed places for bike Caucasian regional growth and connections existing of uses quality open trails multimodal parking and economic development neighborhoods (including space intersections storage strategy. housing, 1207 1 7661 employment, shopping, and professional services)

If it involves Traffic is fine and I'm not Manages traffic Ensures Promotes safe Includes Prioritizing safety Connecting to Filling sidewalk Prefer not Prefer Prefer not Prefer not elimination of concerned about growth. impacts compatibility with walk, bike, and attractive, high- enhancements existing bicycle gaps to answer not to to answer to answer 1211 4 4444 roadways, I am existing transit quality open trails answer against it. neighborhoods connections space Rapid transit should be an Promotes safe walk, Provides a Ensures Manages traffic Includes Creating well-designed Prioritizing Connecting to Filling sidewalk Providing 43082 43210 Male 55 - 64 White / No integral part of our bike, and transit walkable mixture compatibility with impacts attractive, high- multimodal intersections safety existing bicycle gaps places for bike Caucasian regional growth and connections of uses (including existing quality open enhancements trails parking and economic development housing, neighborhoods space storage 1227 4 5572 strategy. employment, shopping, and professional services)

I like that they're all near Would be nice Would really like Rapid transit should be an Promotes safe walk, Ensures Manages traffic Provides a Includes Connecting to existing bicycle Providing Filling sidewalk Prioritizing Creating well- not increase unnecessary 43212 43210 Female 26 - 34 White / No major streets to have something that integral part of our bike, and transit compatibility with impacts walkable mixture attractive, high- trails places for bike gaps safety designed traffic for cars Caucasian something a includes around the regional growth and connections existing of uses quality open parking and enhancements multimodal little closer to 5th avenue area economic development neighborhoods (including space storage intersections Grandview further north strategy. housing, 1237 4 7776 Heights area employment, shopping, and professional services)

Like them all , seem to hit I perfer 2 - it's I like 3b Rapid transit should be an Promotes safe walk, Manages traffic Ensures Includes Prioritizing Creating well- Filling sidewalk Connecting to 43201 43202 Male 35 - 54 White / No all the main spots more integral part of our bike, and transit impacts compatibility attractive, high- safety designed gaps existing bicycle Caucasian reasonable regional growth and connections with existing quality open enhancements multimodal trails 1247 4 5574 time wise for economic development neighborhoods space intersections people to strategy. utilize Selfishly, route 2 provides Growth is imminent and Promotes safe walk, Provides a Manages traffic Ensures Includes Connecting to existing bicycle Creating well- Filling sidewalk Prioritizing Providing 43212 43210 Male 35 - 54 White / No a viable option for me. we need to begin adding bike, and transit walkable mixture impacts compatibility attractive, high- trails designed gaps safety places for bike Caucasian travel options. connections of uses (including with existing quality open multimodal enhancements parking and housing, neighborhoods space intersections storage 1255 3 5553 employment, shopping, and professional services)

Construction of Growth is imminent and Promotes safe walk, Manages traffic Includes Ensures Provides a Connecting to existing bicycle Prioritizing Creating well- Filling sidewalk Providing 43214 43210 Male 35 - 54 White / No Ohio Health at we need to begin adding bike, and transit impacts attractive, high- compatibility walkable trails safety designed gaps places for bike Caucasian Northwest Blvd and travel options. connections quality open with existing mixture of uses enhancements multimodal parking and 315 restricts flow space neighborhoods (including intersections storage and congestion housing, needs to be employment, 1265 2 7574 alleviated shopping, and professional services)

Yes! Columbus Route 2 seems to be the Route 2 skirts Route 1 seems the best to get Route 3 seems too Rapid transit should be an Provides a walkable Promotes safe Ensures Includes Manages traffic Filling sidewalk gaps Prioritizing Creating well- Connecting to Providing 43215 43210 Prefer not Prefer Prefer not Prefer not needs a rapid best balance of around OSU to offices; Route 3 potentially out of the way integral part of our mixture of uses walk, bike, and compatibility with attractive, high- impacts safety designed existing bicycle places for bike to answer not to to answer to answer transit option. population served, jobs better for residential areas. regional growth and (including housing, transit existing quality open enhancements multimodal trails parking and answer served, and goals. economic development employment, connections neighborhoods space intersections storage 127 7 4 777 4 strategy. shopping, and professional services)

The attempt to connect Option 3 Option 1 seems to be the Option 3 has a Rapid transit should be an Provides a walkable Promotes safe Includes Ensures Manages traffic Filling sidewalk gaps Creating well- Connecting to Prioritizing Providing How are people If not already included, 43210 43210 Male 19 - 25 White / Yes people to job centers. The appears to most efficient and cover the much higher travel integral part of our mixture of uses walk, bike, and attractive, high- compatibility impacts designed existing bicycle safety places for bike expected to walk transit signal priority Caucasian lower travel times on cover more most daily riders. But option 2 time range than regional growth and (including housing, transit quality open with existing multimodal trails enhancements parking and anywhere if should definitely be a Options 1 and 2 are good neighborhoods would be useful on game days options 1 and 2 (a economic development employment, connections space neighborhoods intersections storage sidewalks component of this BRT as well. I would be , but many of for the Clippers, Crew, and big deterrence). strategy. shopping, and arenâ€™t system, as with deterred by slow travel those Blue Jackets. However, do professional services) provided? segregated ROW and times. neighborhoods regular attendees of these low headways (ideally 5 are higher sporting events live along the min or less on the peak). income (> proposed BRT route? $100,00 median 1287 2 5562 income) and unlikely to use a BRT alternative. It also has the highest travel time, which would greatly deter any riders. 1. How 2. When considering the 7. Many members of the 8. As planning for the supportive are routing and construction 3a. Three Rapid Transit 4a. Multiple Rapid Transit 5. How strongly do you 6. When considering public would like to see 13. Which Travel Northwest Corridor you regarding of Rapid Transit within route alternatives are 3b. Is there connections from the 4b. Is there feel that Rapid Transit is future development improved bicycle and racial 14. Are reliability Connection to progresses, are there 9. What 10. What the addition of a Please share the Northwest Corridor, Travel time Please share any being evaluated for the anything you Northwest Corridor to anything you needed to accommodate in vicinity of the 6. Rank 5 - Please share pedestrian connections to 7. Rank 5- Please share any 11. What 12. What group do you (the route major Costs to additional priority zip code zip code No. modern Rapid any additional how would you prioritize (the fastest additional Northwest Corridor. Is dislike about Downtown are also being dislike about some our region's continued Northwest Corridor, 6. Rank 2 6. Rank 3 6. Rank 4 Least any additional and from transit and local 7. Rank 2 7. Rank 3 7. Rank 4 Least additional is your is your you most Hispanic with the employment construct needs, considerations, do you do you Transit choice comments. the following? route) comments.2 there anything you like some or all of considered. Is there or all of the growth? (Select the which outcome is important comments.6 destinations. In creating important comments.7 gender? age? closely or least destinations or opportunities that live in? work in? along the Construction duration about some or all of the the routes? anything you like about routes? option that best most important to such connections, please identify Latino? delay) you believe should be Northwest (what could be built routes? some or all of the routes? describes your opinion.) you? rank the importance of the with? considered? Corridor? quickest) following. I'm fully I would support a Route #2 All align to general values I Rapid transit should be an Promotes safe walk, Provides a Includes Ensures Manages traffic I have nearly Creating well-designed Filling sidewalk Prioritizing safety Connecting to Providing Don't limit the focus to 43202 43215 Male 35 - 54 White / No supportive of corridor that seems less support. I'd give the greatest integral part of our bike, and transit walkable mixture attractive, high- compatibility impacts zero concern multimodal intersections gaps enhancements existing bicycle places for bike transportation - Caucasian creating moder emphasizes useful than #1 support to whatever option regional growth and connections of uses (including quality open with existing about traffic trails parking and incorporate appropriate Rapid Transit excellent inter- given OSU's provides the greatest support economic development housing, space neighborhoods impacts insofar storage stormwater mitigation, choices neighborhood connectivity to lower-income residents and strategy. employment, as they relate to prioritize permeable throughout connectivity and via CABS and does not enrich an area that is shopping, and single- surfaces, and be bold Columbus. I am reliability, that the already dominated by housing professional passenger about increasing biomass concerned about supports the widest convenience of and commercial options only services) automobiles. I (not just turfgrass!) and prioritizing one of variety of Woody Hayes available to higher-income am also green cover. the wealthier transportation for accessing residents. unconcerned corridors in the modes without West Campus. with compatibility city. privileging speed. I am with existing STRONGLY neighborhoods if OPPOSED to the issues are #3 - do not NIMBY. I'm subsidize concerned about Upper neighborhood Arlington at the impacts such as cost of lower-income 129 4 5 466 5 Columbus. neighborhoods being relatively disadvantaged by not receving these benefits, or becoming spillovers for drivers who shift their drives to increase pass- through traffic to those neighborhoods.

This sounds like There's a problem I like that the routes A more I think anywhere we can Growth is imminent and Promotes safe walk, Manages traffic Ensures Includes Provides a Right now these Prioritizing safety Creating well- Connecting to Providing Filling sidewalk Many people bike As an OSU employee 43214 43210 Female 26 - 34 White / No a good idea to with Columbus connect to Bethel Rd sustainable connect the OSU West we need to begin adding bike, and transit impacts compatibility with attractive, high- walkable are not very enhancements designed existing bicycle places for bike gaps this route, who lives near the (OSU Caucasian encourage public since there are lots of new route is campus to downtown/Short travel options. connections existing quality open mixture of uses walker/cyclist multimodal trails parking and including myself, proposed changes and West bussing to transportation housing developments preferred. It North is a good idea. The neighborhoods space (including friendly so intersections storage which isn't very works on West Campus, I Campus) reduce traffic, but being too slow, not which are going to attract also might quicker the time, the better so housing, anything to safe to begin with truly hope the new area I would like to reliable, or not university employees and make sense to I like 1 and 2. employment, improve that because there are will be more pedestrian see room left for frequent enough so thus create more traffic. It link the routes shopping, and safety would be no dedicated bike and cyclist friendly. There designated those would be seems to me like with existing professional a good idea. I lanes on the road should be dedicated bike cyclist paths. high priority. OSU designing a route for the bike trails. 38 services) would like to see (e.g. on Carmack lanes and turning lanes, campus bussing is most anticipated jobs minutes for a focus on Rd/Woody Hayes safe pedestrian crossings good and I've used served would make Route 3 seems walking/cycling/g Dr.). Please (especially crossing it many times, but I sense, but perhaps more way too long reen space, then consider dedicated Kenny Road), and currently would not data is needed to and I doubt worry about bike lines (not walkable sidewalks for use any Columbus determine if these people people would developing shared bike lanes) pedestrians to connect city public would consider taking use that. stores, and safe main areas. For example, transportation. As a public transit. Where I businesses, etc. intersections for it's so annoying how right side note, I live live, I need to take Kenny later. I would cyclists. It would now there is no sidewalk along one of these Rd south from Henderson hope that priority be even better if connecting Woody Hayes proposed corridor in order to get to 1960 is given to green the bike lanes Dr. to Martha Morehouse 131 6 6 777 4 routes. Kenny Rd for work. I spaces since the have protective to 1960 Kenny Rd. etc. avoid 315 or Olentangy areas are not barriers/medians There should be because it's too busy. I very attractive when next to a sidewalks on both sides drive to work, but I would and already busy road. OSU is of Kenny Road. Crossing consider bussing if there have a lot of always promoting Kenny Road from 1960 was reliable, timely, development. health and Kenny Rd, which my public transit with stops Let's preserve wellness so this colleagues and I have to either at some green should be a do, is already like playing Henderson/Olentangy space. priority. Other Frogger. Getting to main River Rd. or near campuses have campus from Kinnear Kenny/Henderson/McCoy designated bike road isn't great either. It Road). I would like my lanes but I am just seems like sidewalks commute to be more surprised that are not safe or don't sustainable by being able OSU does not connect where they to take public transit. I have this. Bikes should (e.g. why is there think the fastest route shouldn't be a bike path on Kinnear would be the most ridden on Rd. west of Kenny that enticing. People aren't sidewalks. It's ends at the railroad going to use it if it takes dangerous to track? Cyclists should not too long. Option 1 seems pedestrians and be on sidewalks. It's 1. How 2. When considering the 7. Many members of the 8. As planning for the supportive are routing and construction 3a. Three Rapid Transit 4a. Multiple Rapid Transit 5. How strongly do you 6. When considering public would like to see 13. Which Travel Northwest Corridor you regarding of Rapid Transit within route alternatives are 3b. Is there connections from the 4b. Is there feel that Rapid Transit is future development improved bicycle and racial 14. Are reliability Connection to progresses, are there 9. What 10. What the addition of a Please share the Northwest Corridor, Travel time Please share any being evaluated for the anything you Northwest Corridor to anything you needed to accommodate in vicinity of the 6. Rank 5 - Please share pedestrian connections to 7. Rank 5- Please share any 11. What 12. What group do you (the route major Costs to additional priority zip code zip code No. modern Rapid any additional how would you prioritize (the fastest additional Northwest Corridor. Is dislike about Downtown are also being dislike about some our region's continued Northwest Corridor, 6. Rank 2 6. Rank 3 6. Rank 4 Least any additional and from transit and local 7. Rank 2 7. Rank 3 7. Rank 4 Least additional is your is your you most Hispanic with the employment construct needs, considerations, do you do you Transit choice comments. the following? route) comments.2 there anything you like some or all of considered. Is there or all of the growth? (Select the which outcome is important comments.6 destinations. In creating important comments.7 gender? age? closely or least destinations or opportunities that live in? work in? along the Construction duration about some or all of the the routes? anything you like about routes? option that best most important to such connections, please identify Latino? delay) you believe should be Northwest (what could be built routes? some or all of the routes? describes your opinion.) you? rank the importance of the with? considered? Corridor? quickest) following. I like the idea, but You did not ask Prefer 3 or 2. In general They Not familiar enough to Rapid transit should be an Promotes safe walk, Provides a Manages traffic Includes Ensures Accessibility is Prioritizing safety Creating well- Providing places Connecting to Filling sidewalk I think these Connect the surrounding 43221 43210 Female 55 - 64 White / No am frustrated that about convenience. they are good, but none surround, but comment other than it integral part of our bike, and transit walkable mixture impacts attractive, high- compatibility key - people enhancements designed for bike parking existing bicycle gaps terms/descriptions neighborhoods to the Caucasian my house gets This is a great idea, would meet my needs bypass my depends on where you want regional growth and connections of uses (including quality open with existing won't use a good multimodal and storage trails need to be employers - that's why we bypassed and I but I haven't seen due to lack of access (or house. I would to go. economic development housing, space neighborhoods route if it is not intersections defined. Lack of live here. I see links to would have to convenience and perhaps explanation of have to risk my strategy. employment, accessible. definition may employers, but not the use the old access address. how to access). life crossing shopping, and result in inaccurate neighborhoods where driving route and Great to have a major roads or professional ranking. I put employees of those parking plan route, but not freeway exits services) "filling sidewalk places live. anyhow. How helpful if I have to to walk there. gaps" last because would I get to risk my life crossing Parking would I don't know what these hubs? major roads and be fruitless that means. But, it They are at freeway exits to get because I can could mean businesses, but there. Not to park remotely something I prefer. not in walkable mention how much at OSU neighborhoods. time it would take to already. I think As is some would get to access the focus on be a dangerous points. speed blinded walk to get to the you to stop. focusing on 132 7 2 477 3 access. No one will use a fast system if it is not accessible - preferably by walking to that stop or providing frequent transit to the stops.

Very supportive. The proposed BRT Again, the BRT simply The could all readily link to the Rapid transit should be an Manages traffic Includes The key need is Creating well-designed Bicyles and 43082 43210 Prefer not Prefer Prefer not Prefer not Columbus is not a will not cause commuters existing C&O trackage as well integral part of our impacts attractive, high- to get a sizeable multimodal intersections pedestrian to answer not to to answer to answer completely lags transformative or those coming as supposrt a conencting line regional growth and quality open number of improvement answer behind its peer project. Citizens in downtown to leave their to John Glenn Airpot on the economic development space people out of should focus cities in providing central Ohio simply cars. A light rail system CUOH rail line to Gahana with strategy. their cars - not mostly on the last mass transit do not consider with ground-level an extension to Newark. simply a few. mile - not for alternatives to its busses as a viable boarding on existing, cumuting greater citizens. alternative to lighly used rail lines will distances. This is personal allow larger numbers of especially automobiles. The pasengers to be more important in view CBus is an quickly transported and of the extremes in example. I ride it actually require less weather due to regularly and after infrastructure changes. climate changes, crossing Morse Look to the Cleveland which will not be Road heading north Euclid Avenue University reversed at best in into Weserville, its Circle RBT system that generations. As hardly utliized. It is consinues to carry less someone who not reliable and than a third of the used to bike simply too traffic passengers the old RTA commute from the 133 7 2 776 2 and weather rail line carries. Look also north and sensitive. Suggest to Boston and Cleveland, northeast to going big - a street where thousands of downtown daily, level rail system people use the rapid such trips are using the C&O transit rail lines (RTA in increasingly subdivision tracks Cleveland and MTS in disfficult and no from Columbus to Boston) to come longer practical Delaware/Marion/F downtown for sporting becuse of extreme ostoria. The route events, other weather is little used now by entertainment venues and conditions. CSX except for coal shopping. A RBT will trains and with simply not carry the electricity numbers needed. Also a generation RBT is too weather and coverting to natural road traffic gridlock gas, there will be sensitive. few if any coal trains using the route in the next 5- 10 years. The route Rapid transit should be an Provides a walkable Promotes safe Ensures Includes Manages traffic Creating well-designed Filling sidewalk Prioritizing safety Connecting to Providing Apt 8 43201 43212 Female 35 - 54 White / No integral part of our mixture of uses walk, bike, and compatibility with attractive, high- impacts multimodal intersections gaps enhancements existing bicycle places for bike Caucasian regional growth and (including housing, transit existing quality open trails parking and economic development employment, connections neighborhoods space storage 1347 4 6663 strategy. shopping, and professional services)

should not be an 1 is the best, but they all 2 and 3 should these don't connect Rapid transit should be an Manages traffic Provides a Promotes safe Includes Ensures why does people who ride connects to all relevant 43017 43210 Male 26 - 34 White / No act of congress and fall short be off sets like to anything integral part of our impacts walkable mixture walk, bike, and attractive, high- compatibility nothing here bikes need to areas/cities outside the Caucasian 5 years to get this NY subway regarding the NW regional growth and of uses (including transit quality open with existing mention better understand Columbus city map lines built - should be system - off corner. should be economic development housing, connections space neighborhoods connecting to the and pay attention better, faster, and peak hours not considered a strategy. employment, airport? existing to existing laws cheaper than that on a regular separate project shopping, and park and rides? basis. this professional also does not services) 1356 7 6667 fulfill the NW corner. Needs to go further west and north

i am very it should not be not sure how they no idea what Rapid transit should be an Promotes safe walk, Ensures Manages traffic Includes Provides a it should serve Filling sidewalk gaps Prioritizing Connecting to Creating well- Providing intended beneficiaries vs. 43214 43210 supportive; ***polluting*** or connect to other sustainability integral part of our bike, and transit compatibility with impacts attractive, high- walkable communities safety existing bicycle designed places for bike the people actually however, it come at the transportation options means here regional growth and connections existing quality open mixture of uses who cannot enhancements trails multimodal parking and benefitting from he should not be yet expense of green (normal people economic development neighborhoods space (including afford to bike or intersections storage project; clean technology another spaces, bike include strategy. housing, drive; it should (not yet another horrible unreliable bus routes, or considerations employment, not pollute bus system); better system--look at pedestrian safety like equity & shopping, and definitions of vague other cities for development professional words 136 7 7 676 2 examples of how in that services) to do it well. definition along with env. impacts and costs) 1. How 2. When considering the 7. Many members of the 8. As planning for the supportive are routing and construction 3a. Three Rapid Transit 4a. Multiple Rapid Transit 5. How strongly do you 6. When considering public would like to see 13. Which Travel Northwest Corridor you regarding of Rapid Transit within route alternatives are 3b. Is there connections from the 4b. Is there feel that Rapid Transit is future development improved bicycle and racial 14. Are reliability Connection to progresses, are there 9. What 10. What the addition of a Please share the Northwest Corridor, Travel time Please share any being evaluated for the anything you Northwest Corridor to anything you needed to accommodate in vicinity of the 6. Rank 5 - Please share pedestrian connections to 7. Rank 5- Please share any 11. What 12. What group do you (the route major Costs to additional priority zip code zip code No. modern Rapid any additional how would you prioritize (the fastest additional Northwest Corridor. Is dislike about Downtown are also being dislike about some our region's continued Northwest Corridor, 6. Rank 2 6. Rank 3 6. Rank 4 Least any additional and from transit and local 7. Rank 2 7. Rank 3 7. Rank 4 Least additional is your is your you most Hispanic with the employment construct needs, considerations, do you do you Transit choice comments. the following? route) comments.2 there anything you like some or all of considered. Is there or all of the growth? (Select the which outcome is important comments.6 destinations. In creating important comments.7 gender? age? closely or least destinations or opportunities that live in? work in? along the Construction duration about some or all of the the routes? anything you like about routes? option that best most important to such connections, please identify Latino? delay) you believe should be Northwest (what could be built routes? some or all of the routes? describes your opinion.) you? rank the importance of the with? considered? Corridor? quickest) following. Rebuild the Ohio Routs need Rapid transit should be an Ensures compatibility Promotes safe Provides a Manages traffic Manages traffic Revisit routs the Prioritizing safety Filling sidewalk Connecting to Providing Creating well- 43221 43212 Prefer not 35 - 54 Two or No electric rail way more stops integral part of our with existing walk, bike, and walkable mixture impacts impacts Ohio Electric enhancements gaps existing bicycle places for bike designed to answer more races system that my middle class regional growth and neighborhoods transit of uses (including Rail way covered trails parking and multimodal grand parrents communities economic development connections housing, and rebuild storage intersections 137 5 used daily. 2 667 2 Grandview strategy. employment, them. and Upper shopping, and Arlington. professional services)

Too close to Rapid transit should be an Promotes safe walk, Provides a Manages traffic Ensures Includes Prioritizing safety Connecting to Creating well- Filling sidewalk Providing 43221 43202 Male 35 - 54 White / No 315. Doesn't integral part of our bike, and transit walkable mixture impacts compatibility attractive, high- enhancements existing bicycle designed gaps places for bike Caucasian feel like it regional growth and connections of uses (including with existing quality open trails multimodal parking and opens up to economic development housing, neighborhoods space intersections storage 1385 5 4744 much of the strategy. employment, Westside. shopping, and professional services)

I like route 1's direct line. I don't see the I like option one best due to It would be nice to Growth is imminent and Provides a walkable Promotes safe Manages traffic Ensures Ensures City of Connecting to existing bicycle Creating well- Prioritizing safety Providing Filling sidewalk Consider park and ride 45103 43201 Male 26 - 34 White / No It is quick. need for route it's connection with High street have a loop option we need to begin adding mixture of uses walk, bike, and impacts compatibility compatibility Columbus trails designed enhancements places for bike gaps stations at the beginning, Caucasian 2 to meander where options 1, travel options. (including housing, transit with existing with existing should strongly multimodal parking and and midpoint of the route off Olentangy and 3b are employment, connections neighborhoods neighborhoods consider zoning intersections storage to encourage ridership. combined. This shopping, and code changes As an out of region helps connections professional services) along the route commuter I would ride to routes that go to grow upscale this route if there is 1396 5 2675 west on Broad in density parking available for me Street while offering to do so. connections on High street too.

Rapid transit is The routes are pretty Feels like if Personally Route 1 would be Routes 3a/3b seem Rapid transit should be an Promotes safe walk, Manages traffic Includes Provides a Includes Prioritizing safety Creating well- Providing places Filling sidewalk Connecting to 43221 43210 Female 35 - 54 White / No one thing, but straight forward and near you do 3 to more likely for me to use as a more equitable than integral part of our bike, and transit impacts attractive, high- walkable mixture attractive, high- enhancements designed for bike parking gaps existing bicycle Caucasian safe walkability major employers. wrap around consumer. 1/2. regional growth and connections quality open of uses quality open multimodal and storage trails from there to Riverside you economic development space (including space intersections destinations should also strategy. housing, would be a include the employment, primary concern bumpout in 2 shopping, and to include professional OSU's west services) campus/medic 140 5 3 765 4 al buildings as well; I wouldn't say I see anything innovative about any route though.

Columbus needs to 1 I like the short travel The travel time 1 because it serves the most Rapid transit should be an Provides a walkable Ensures Promotes safe Manages traffic Includes It needs to Creating well-designed Prioritizing Connecting to Filling sidewalk Providing Please consider those 43203 43210 Female 26 - 34 White / No have something- I'd time, 3 I like that it serves for 3 seems people and it's also got the integral part of our mixture of uses compatibility with walk, bike, and impacts attractive, high- happen no multimodal intersections safety existing bicycle gaps places for bike that live in low income Caucasian be happy to pay more people high and it's a lowest travel time regional growth and (including housing, existing transit quality open matter which enhancements trails parking and areas as well and higher taxes for this little far out economic development employment, neighborhoods connections space routes are storage students. Neighborhoods or for the city to tax strategy. shopping, and chosen. The city connecting to OSU 1417 4 7672 corporations at a professional services) proper should be campus would be great higher rate addressed too before suburbs.

Prioritizing safety Connecting to Creating well- Filling sidewalk Providing 43224 43212 Male 35 - 54 White / No enhancements existing bicycle designed gaps places for bike Caucasian 1427 4 4444 trails multimodal parking and intersections storage The equity and 3 didnâ€™t Faster travel times and Longer time in 3, Rapid transit should be an Promotes safe walk, Provides a Manages traffic Ensures Includes Connecting to existing bicycle Prioritizing Creating well- Providing Filling sidewalk 43221 43223 Female 35 - 54 White / No sustainability, workforce offer as much workforce served in 1,2, and integral part of our bike, and transit walkable mixture impacts compatibility attractive, high- trails safety designed places for bike gaps Caucasian advancement of 1,2 value for affordability regional growth and connections of uses (including with existing quality open enhancements multimodal parking and workforce economic development housing, neighborhoods space intersections storage 1437 5 5565 advancement strategy. employment, or economic shopping, and development professional services)

I like light rail The most important The Olentangy Rapid transit should be an Promotes safe walk, Provides a Includes Ensures Manages traffic Connecting to existing bicycle Filling sidewalk Providing places Prioritizing Creating well- Some car-free Incorporate better East- 43202 43210 Male 26 - 34 White / No better, but bus thing is the River, 315, integral part of our bike, and transit walkable mixture attractive, high- compatibility impacts trails gaps for bike parking safety designed streets would be West pedestrian and Caucasian rapid transit is frequency of bus and the rail regional growth and connections of uses (including quality open with existing and storage enhancements multimodal nice. Or a the very cyclist infrastructure better than service once it's road are huge economic development housing, space neighborhoods intersections least, well across the Olentangy nothing. built. Also the bus obstructions to strategy. employment, separated bike River, 315, and the rail shouldn't get stuck pedestrians shopping, and lanes that cars road. It is really bad as it in traffic. 30 people and cyclists. professional don't park in or is right now. Even in the on a bus should The bus route services) illegally cut across. campus area, there are have much higher needs to be not many good, priority than one combined with comfortable options. 144 7 2 665 1 person in a car. better The bus needs a pedestrian and lane of its own. cyclist connections across these obstacles.

This is long It needs to be fast, I like the direct-ness of I'm not sure of I like that routes 1 and 2 go I don't like the Rapid transit should be an Promotes safe walk, Provides a Manages traffic Ensures Includes These are all Filling sidewalk gaps Prioritizing Connecting to Creating well- Providing Again, these are Cost for riders both 43214 43210 Male 35 - 54 White / No overdue! As a safe, and reliable route 1. It also hits all of the benefit of through the Arena district and diversion to Broad integral part of our bike, and transit walkable mixture impacts compatibility attractive, high- important, but it safety existing bicycle designed places for bike all important frequent and infrequent. Caucasian resident near one for people or else the spots I would hitting west are close to the short north. Street in route 3. regional growth and connections of uses (including with existing quality open needs to be safe enhancements trails multimodal parking and aspects, but I Frequency of service. I of the proposed they won't use it. frequently travel. campus vs That would take me economic development housing, neighborhoods space and convenient intersections storage focus on safety as highly encourage 24-hour stations I would main campus away from my strategy. employment, in order to my top priorities. service, even if less love to have this in route 2. I frequent shopping, and people to use it. frequent at night. as an option for don't like the destinations in the professional running daily diversion to short north. services) 145 7 errands around 4 665 4 Kenny road in Olentangy River route 3. Road, or even getting into downtown. 1. How 2. When considering the 7. Many members of the 8. As planning for the supportive are routing and construction 3a. Three Rapid Transit 4a. Multiple Rapid Transit 5. How strongly do you 6. When considering public would like to see 13. Which Travel Northwest Corridor you regarding of Rapid Transit within route alternatives are 3b. Is there connections from the 4b. Is there feel that Rapid Transit is future development improved bicycle and racial 14. Are reliability Connection to progresses, are there 9. What 10. What the addition of a Please share the Northwest Corridor, Travel time Please share any being evaluated for the anything you Northwest Corridor to anything you needed to accommodate in vicinity of the 6. Rank 5 - Please share pedestrian connections to 7. Rank 5- Please share any 11. What 12. What group do you (the route major Costs to additional priority zip code zip code No. modern Rapid any additional how would you prioritize (the fastest additional Northwest Corridor. Is dislike about Downtown are also being dislike about some our region's continued Northwest Corridor, 6. Rank 2 6. Rank 3 6. Rank 4 Least any additional and from transit and local 7. Rank 2 7. Rank 3 7. Rank 4 Least additional is your is your you most Hispanic with the employment construct needs, considerations, do you do you Transit choice comments. the following? route) comments.2 there anything you like some or all of considered. Is there or all of the growth? (Select the which outcome is important comments.6 destinations. In creating important comments.7 gender? age? closely or least destinations or opportunities that live in? work in? along the Construction duration about some or all of the the routes? anything you like about routes? option that best most important to such connections, please identify Latino? delay) you believe should be Northwest (what could be built routes? some or all of the routes? describes your opinion.) you? rank the importance of the with? considered? Corridor? quickest) following. Needs to include Include campus Don't link up to Too short...needs to Rapid transit should be an Includes attractive, Promotes safe Ensures Manages traffic Provides a Prioritizing safety Filling sidewalk Creating well- Connecting to Providing Coonecting the NW 43229 43210 Male 35 - 54 White / No links to High St and neighborhoods stretch into hilltop integral part of our high-quality open walk, bike, and compatibility with impacts walkable enhancements gaps designed existing bicycle places for bike corridor to other Caucasian Cooke Rd, and east of 315 or and east of high st. regional growth and space transit existing mixture of uses multimodal trails parking and neighborhoods, not just Morse Rd. North of economic development connections neighborhoods (including intersections storage campus/downtown and Bethel. Should strategy. housing, grandview run from 161 employment, 1465 1 7654 south to shopping, and Grandview professional services)

A better way to Travel reliability is I like the innovative I wish there Routes 1 and 2 connect more Route 3 is my least Rapid transit should be an Promotes safe walk, Manages traffic Provides a Ensures Includes Creating well-designed Providing Prioritizing safety Filling sidewalk Connecting to I think the first 4 Scooters should not be 43212 43210 Female 35 - 54 White / No move people the reason I do not thinking of all three was a way to of the sports and favorite due to integral part of our bike, and transit impacts walkable mixture compatibility attractive, high- multimodal intersections places for bike enhancements gaps existing bicycle items are all a on city streets with cars. Caucasian around this take the current options better connect entertainment venues and I distance from regional growth and connections of uses (including with existing quality open parking and trails must do for the I'd like to see more bike congested area COTA route from more areas like that existing venues in economic development housing, neighborhoods space storage modern rapid rental hubs integrated is needed and I my Grandview west of 315, the Vine Ave and strategy. employment, transit to succeed - with the multimodal like the idea of a house to OSU but am hopeful Neil Ave shopping, and multimodal transit hubs in addition to modern rapid campus. If it was that pedestrian intersection professional intersections that options for safe storage of transit providing more reliable I and cycling services) are safe and easy family bikes. it helps provide would take it often. safety routes to access are a safe walking and from the key element. cycling options to neighborhood 147 6 reach the 2 576 6 streets to the stations rail stations will be incorporated in any final soluiton

Route 1 is most direct, Route 3 jogs Route 2 is quick and uses Route 1 uses too Rapid transit should be an Provides a walkable Promotes safe Manages traffic Includes Ensures Filling sidewalk gaps Prioritizing Creating well- Connecting to Providing 43214 43210 Male 26 - 34 White / No but route 2 would way too far out streets that are currently wide many narrow integral part of our mixture of uses walk, bike, and impacts attractive, high- compatibility safety designed existing bicycle places for bike Caucasian probably get some of the way, and and high capacity. streets. Route 3 is regional growth and (including housing, transit quality open with existing enhancements multimodal trails parking and funding from OSU. NIMBY-ism is out of the way and economic development employment, connections space neighborhoods intersections storage 1487 4 7653 strong in too long. strategy. shopping, and Upper professional services) Arlington.

Rapid transit should be an Promotes safe walk, Provides a Includes Ensures Manages traffic Connecting to existing bicycle Filling sidewalk Providing places Creating well- Prioritizing Male 19 - 25 White / No integral part of our bike, and transit walkable mixture attractive, high- compatibility impacts trails gaps for bike parking designed safety Caucasian regional growth and connections of uses (including quality open with existing and storage multimodal enhancements economic development housing, space neighborhoods intersections 1497 1 5672 strategy. employment, shopping, and professional services)

The NW corridor Option 3 appears to Rapid transit should be an Promotes safe walk, Provides a Manages traffic Includes Ensures Filling sidewalk gaps Connecting to Prioritizing safety Creating well- Providing Access to the 43214 43214 Male 65 or White / No is too auto- impact more population integral part of our bike, and transit walkable mixture impacts attractive, high- compatibility existing bicycle enhancements designed places for bike transit stations is older Caucasian centric and very recent housing regional growth and connections of uses (including quality open with existing trails multimodal parking and paramount to it's presenting an developments. There economic development housing, space neighborhoods intersections storage success and unsafe would be likely more use strategy. employment, sustainability. The environment for by working citizens that shopping, and current gaps in pedestrians and the other routes. This professional walkways and bicycles. While route also would provide services) bikeways impede there are spot more access to retail development. 150 7 where bike lanes 5 445 4 development. and mixed use paths recently installed, they are disparate and need to connect to each other.

They seem the small loops compromises Again, this needs to Rapid transit should be an Promotes safe walk, Provides a Includes Ensures Manages traffic Build for people Connecting to existing bicycle Filling sidewalk Creating well- Prioritizing Providing 43201 43210 Male 55 - 64 Prefer not Prefer not built in 'rapid' in be a comprehensive integral part of our bike, and transit walkable mixture attractive, high- compatibility impacts and quality of life trails gaps designed safety places for bike to answer to answer isolation from approach. Use all regional growth and connections of uses (including quality open with existing multimodal enhancements parking and other transit major freeways as economic development housing, space neighborhoods intersections storage solutions the arteries of rapid strategy. employment, around transit with shopping, and Columbus. dedicated lanes, professional There needs to stops/interchanges services) be a at each major exit 1517 3 6774 comprehensiv where there's ample e strategy for car/bike parking public transit and connections to across the local transit lines. region, not one piece at a time 1. How 2. When considering the 7. Many members of the 8. As planning for the supportive are routing and construction 3a. Three Rapid Transit 4a. Multiple Rapid Transit 5. How strongly do you 6. When considering public would like to see 13. Which Travel Northwest Corridor you regarding of Rapid Transit within route alternatives are 3b. Is there connections from the 4b. Is there feel that Rapid Transit is future development improved bicycle and racial 14. Are reliability Connection to progresses, are there 9. What 10. What the addition of a Please share the Northwest Corridor, Travel time Please share any being evaluated for the anything you Northwest Corridor to anything you needed to accommodate in vicinity of the 6. Rank 5 - Please share pedestrian connections to 7. Rank 5- Please share any 11. What 12. What group do you (the route major Costs to additional priority zip code zip code No. modern Rapid any additional how would you prioritize (the fastest additional Northwest Corridor. Is dislike about Downtown are also being dislike about some our region's continued Northwest Corridor, 6. Rank 2 6. Rank 3 6. Rank 4 Least any additional and from transit and local 7. Rank 2 7. Rank 3 7. Rank 4 Least additional is your is your you most Hispanic with the employment construct needs, considerations, do you do you Transit choice comments. the following? route) comments.2 there anything you like some or all of considered. Is there or all of the growth? (Select the which outcome is important comments.6 destinations. In creating important comments.7 gender? age? closely or least destinations or opportunities that live in? work in? along the Construction duration about some or all of the the routes? anything you like about routes? option that best most important to such connections, please identify Latino? delay) you believe should be Northwest (what could be built routes? some or all of the routes? describes your opinion.) you? rank the importance of the with? considered? Corridor? quickest) following. Since the These proposed routes Route 2, the I like Route 1 and 2 better, For Route 1, Vine Rapid transit should be an Provides a walkable Promotes safe Includes Ensures Manages traffic The goal is to Filling sidewalk gaps Prioritizing Creating well- Connecting to Providing Since this corridor I think the project should 43212 43210 Female 19 - 25 Asian No Olentangy River generally follow larger detour to avoid since they somewhat serves and Goodale seem integral part of our mixture of uses walk, bike, and attractive, high- compatibility impacts get more people safety designed existing bicycle places for bike is not pedestrian prioritize coordinating Road is less arterials with high travel the highway the arena district. too small for rapid regional growth and (including housing, transit quality open with existing to use transit, enhancements multimodal trails parking and nor cyclists with different institutions densely developed, speeds, making it easier bridge at transit (only 1 lane economic development employment, connections space neighborhoods and more intersections storage friendly at all, plus and nearby cities there might be to find spaces and design Kinnear and on 1 direction at strategy. shopping, and amenities (other the current vehicle (Grandview and Upper opportunities for rapid transit. Olentangy certain areas), plus professional services) than the travel speeds are Arlington) to avoid new centers seems the highway is a shopping very high, creating building something developed along unnecessary, physical barrier for centers a safe walking seemingly near transit the corridor. The since there is people who get on mentioned here) environment is lines on a map but not route design should not much to the bus on Goodale are needed necessary to really accessible by also consider serve at OSU but get off on Vine along the persuade and transit due to physical potential new West Campus, and vice versa . corridor to make attract people to barriers like the highway developments, and and it doesn't Route 2 misses the the corridor truly use the BRT and railroads, and to consider potential provide any convention center, transit and service and coordinate future strategic land other transfer while the Route 3 pedestrian businesses to developments and land purchases for opportunities misses the arena friendly. I think locate along the use plans that can easily future transit compared to district all together. I some corridor. be integrated into the amenities. Route 1. Route think a good adjustments in existing and future transit 3, there are too compromise is to zoning and network. 1527 7 6754 much overlap run on Neil and policies are with current then Nationwide needed to attract COTA Line 1 Blvd to High street if more small and and 72, where possible, since it essential Line 1 doesn't have businesses to currently runs physical barriers, the areas in every 10 and the route is still between the minutes due to close to the arena shopping the pandemic, and the convention centers, it would and before the center. be better if they pandemic Line can locate right 72 runs next to the transit roughly every stations. 15 minutes during peak hours, plus Kenny doesn't get congested in that section at all. If COTA Traffic is fine and I'm not Promotes safe walk, Provides a Ensures Manages traffic Includes Connecting to existing bicycle Prioritizing Creating well- Filling sidewalk Providing 3rd Avenue speed limit, 43212 43212 Non- 26 - 34 Two or Yes concerned about growth. bike, and transit walkable mixture compatibility with impacts attractive, high- trails safety designed gaps places for bike Safety, as it has become binary more races connections of uses (including existing quality open enhancements multimodal parking and more residential. Many housing, neighborhoods space intersections storage people are walking along employment, and crossing 3rd Avenue, 1533 4 6677 shopping, and with cars going over professional 40mph and little sidewalk services) available.

Traffic is fine and I'm not Manages traffic Ensures Promotes safe Includes Provides a Connecting to existing bicycle Filling sidewalk Creating well- Prioritizing Providing 43017 43065 Male 35 - 54 White / No concerned about growth. impacts compatibility with walk, bike, and attractive, high- walkable trails gaps designed safety places for bike Caucasian existing transit quality open mixture of uses multimodal enhancements parking and neighborhoods connections space (including intersections storage housing, employment, 1541 1 7777 shopping, and professional services)

The fact there is Maybe Combined with the above, Rapid transit should be an Promotes safe walk, Provides a Includes Ensures Manages traffic Filling sidewalk gaps Connecting to Creating well- Prioritizing Providing 43214 43224 Male 55 - 64 White / No discussion about consider many more can get downtown integral part of our bike, and transit walkable mixture attractive, high- compatibility impacts existing bicycle designed safety places for bike Caucasian improving public combining without the need of a car. regional growth and connections of uses (including quality open with existing trails multimodal enhancements parking and transportation Option 2 and economic development housing, space neighborhoods intersections storage 1557 6 6764 3? strategy. employment, shopping, and professional services)

I think this is a I think a phased I like that route 1 is direct I am I like that 1 and 2 allow access I think it makes Rapid transit should be an Promotes safe walk, Provides a Ensures Includes Manages traffic Top two Connecting to existing bicycle Prioritizing Creating well- Filling sidewalk Providing Identify adjacent It gets cold, wet, and 43202 43220 Male 35 - 54 White / No good idea but my implementation and efficient. concerned to the arena district and its more sense for their integral part of our bike, and transit walkable mixture compatibility with attractive, high- impacts priorities: trails safety designed gaps places for bike employers, windy here. Any chance Caucasian thought is that may be okay. Some about travel employers. to be a downtown regional growth and connections of uses (including existing quality open densification of enhancements multimodal parking and shopping districts, stops can be protected the focus should sections could be time reliability loop, maybe economic development housing, neighborhoods space developable intersections storage neighborhoods better? Perhaps place be on maximizing done cheaply and and additional combining options 1 strategy. employment, parcels-- and include them under larger access to quickly, with the congestion and 2, or 1/2 with shopping, and including improved awnings or within tubes redevelopment opportunity to do south of 3a/b. Unless a professional working with connections which block wind, etc? I'd parcels. My them again/do them Lennox. I'm transit hub is being services) CAS and OSU to (access to transit) like to see more attention impression is that right as part of concerned that built at Broad and potentially as part of this to facilitating supportive most who live in redevelopment in Route 2 is High, I don't see the sell/free up more project. Examples: land uses/amenities at at the corridor don't certain areas. This inefficient and point of getting land for two-way separated least some stops (grocery work in the would include could be there. Maybe SB development; bike lanes on stores, convenience corridor with opportunities to served by a follows 2 to Long and transit Dodridge from stores, north market like exception to work with e/w transfer at Street to High access projects Olentangy to High. places with restrooms, Olentangy developers to better woody hayes Street, then turns to connect etc.). This may require Commons to integrate stops or james north to Goodale OSUMC, working with developers OSU. I think with within proposed herrick. Add a and then west to the Battelle, West to co-develop some stops a project like this, developments at stop between rest of the line. A Campus, etc. to (PPP). From a transit and that could key large Ackerman and pedway or magic the line. I'd like traffic perspective, I'd like 156 6 change. 5 777 5 developable Riverside carpet to stops of to see ways to to see progress made at parcels. Better Hospital. other lines could be help pay for the Olentangy/Kinnear/Herric access and density appropriate project through k/315. Maybe two bonuses could be between Long and TIFs/developer roundabouts or a wider how to get them to Broad. contributions-- underpass. At this the table. maybe interchange, allowing a opportunities to SB Olentangy left/u-turn pay for stops or onto the NB 315 onramp independent at Lennox would be nice. alignments So would adding an through additional storage lane on developments the SB 315 ramp to where it may Kinnear, which seems to make sense (to backup onto 315 every be implemented morning pre covid. I'd later, if/when hope those kind of deals like that operational issues would can be be addressed as it seems implemented). like they're being ignored/not managed well 1. How 2. When considering the 7. Many members of the 8. As planning for the supportive are routing and construction 3a. Three Rapid Transit 4a. Multiple Rapid Transit 5. How strongly do you 6. When considering public would like to see 13. Which Travel Northwest Corridor you regarding of Rapid Transit within route alternatives are 3b. Is there connections from the 4b. Is there feel that Rapid Transit is future development improved bicycle and racial 14. Are reliability Connection to progresses, are there 9. What 10. What the addition of a Please share the Northwest Corridor, Travel time Please share any being evaluated for the anything you Northwest Corridor to anything you needed to accommodate in vicinity of the 6. Rank 5 - Please share pedestrian connections to 7. Rank 5- Please share any 11. What 12. What group do you (the route major Costs to additional priority zip code zip code No. modern Rapid any additional how would you prioritize (the fastest additional Northwest Corridor. Is dislike about Downtown are also being dislike about some our region's continued Northwest Corridor, 6. Rank 2 6. Rank 3 6. Rank 4 Least any additional and from transit and local 7. Rank 2 7. Rank 3 7. Rank 4 Least additional is your is your you most Hispanic with the employment construct needs, considerations, do you do you Transit choice comments. the following? route) comments.2 there anything you like some or all of considered. Is there or all of the growth? (Select the which outcome is important comments.6 destinations. In creating important comments.7 gender? age? closely or least destinations or opportunities that live in? work in? along the Construction duration about some or all of the the routes? anything you like about routes? option that best most important to such connections, please identify Latino? delay) you believe should be Northwest (what could be built routes? some or all of the routes? describes your opinion.) you? rank the importance of the with? considered? Corridor? quickest) following. I like route 1 and 3. 1 is 2 makes I like all of these routes, but I Growth is imminent and Includes attractive, Promotes safe Ensures Provides a Manages traffic Filling sidewalk gaps Connecting to Prioritizing safety Creating well- Providing 43212 43212 Female 19 - 25 White / No easy to understand sense, but I feel like routes 3a or 3b have we need to begin adding high-quality open walk, bike, and compatibility with walkable mixture impacts existing bicycle enhancements designed places for bike Caucasian (almost like the 2 COTA don't think it is the potential to improve the travel options. space transit existing of uses trails multimodal parking and bus on high) and fast. I necessary. broad street corridor whereas connections neighborhoods (including intersections storage like that route 3 is Students, high street is already housing, equitable and will reach faculty, prioritized for improvements. employment, underserved populations employees can shopping, and and connect more people take the CABS professional who need transit options bus to west services) to their jobs. campus if needed. I think route 1 does the job of getting people 1577 4 5773 to the campus, and then they can use OSU bussing service to move around the campus if needed instead of route 2.

The first is most direct the more Prefer 3b to protect High High Street is major Rapid transit should be an Ensures compatibility Promotes safe Includes Manages traffic Prioritizing safety Creating well- Connecting to Filling sidewalk Providing 43081 43205 Female 55 - 64 White / No thus limiting delays neighborhood Street corridor throughway that integral part of our with existing walk, bike, and attractive, high- impacts enhancements designed existing bicycle gaps places for bike Caucasian construction should be regional growth and neighborhoods transit quality open multimodal trails parking and 1585 5 5577 and delays in preserved economic development connections space intersections storage service strategy.

Rapid transit should be an Provides a walkable Provides a Ensures Promotes safe Includes Connecting to existing bicycle Creating well- Filling sidewalk Prioritizing Providing 43214 43235 Male 35 - 54 White / No integral part of our mixture of uses walkable mixture compatibility with walk, bike, and attractive, high- trails designed gaps safety places for bike Caucasian regional growth and (including housing, of uses (including existing transit quality open multimodal enhancements parking and economic development employment, housing, neighborhoods connections space intersections storage 1597 2 7771 strategy. shopping, and employment, professional services) shopping, and professional services)

If there is reason to Prefer route 1 due to Dislike route 3 Rapid transit should be an Promotes safe walk, Ensures Manages traffic Provides a Includes Prioritizing safety Creating well- Connecting to Filling sidewalk Providing 43017 43135 Male 26 - 34 White / No not use my car, I workforce advancement due to it's integral part of our bike, and transit compatibility with impacts walkable mixture attractive, high- enhancements designed existing bicycle gaps places for bike Caucasian would prefer to not function as regional growth and connections existing of uses quality open multimodal trails parking and use my car. typical bus economic development neighborhoods (including space intersections storage route strategy. housing, 1607 1 7771 employment, shopping, and professional services)

The arguments I think there has to Yes, #1 seems logical #2 and #3 #3 is very good because it #1 and #2 wish to Rapid transit should be an Ensures compatibility Manages traffic Promotes safe Includes Provides a The 5th ave plan Filling sidewalk gaps Prioritizing Creating well- Connecting to Providing I think the focus on There needs to be a re- 43212 43212 Male 35 - 54 Prefer not Prefer not put forth for be a clear decision and cohesive, with seem to taps into Broad St., which is put this on Neal and integral part of our with existing impacts walk, bike, and attractive, high- walkable seems to ignore safety designed existing bicycle places for bike cyclists is evaluation of making to answer to answer doing this are not of what is being minimum disruption to the involve huge pretty underutizlied at this High, which are regional growth and neighborhoods transit quality open mixture of uses the very small enhancements multimodal trails parking and somewhat every single area as hugely done, before these existing infrastructure. potential time. both heavily economic development connections space (including size of some of intersections storage misplaced, since dense as possible. 5th convincing. can really be disruptions to trafficked, heavily strategy. housing, the streets here. even though ave. is a great example. evaluated, since existing built up, and would employment, Edgehill biking increasing cycling It was a pefectly those change infrastrure. #2 be strongrly shopping, and seems fine, but has appeared, it's reasonably little road hugely. espeically, disrupted by such professional again - it's a very unlike to be as around 2000 when there since Kinnear routing. services) small street. huge as some was one large apartment is tiny and The Lennox think it to be. complex cited on W. 5th. Lane at that suggestions The street is narrow, and location has a seem interesting, cannot be meaningfully fair bit of but again - King widened. The amount of crowding and and Kinnear are traffic on it when multiple those small streets, complexes are built will embankments and Olentangy at be staggering. The near the this point is assumption is that people highway. already heavily will walk, bike, or take loaded. Pluse public transport, but the 161 1 2 212 2 the mall at reality, I believe, will be Lennox is an massive increases in excellent one for traffic, since most people the type of will drive. amenities it offers. If it's not there, then people will have to drive very long distances to the exurbs to get this type of shopping. How is that a good thing? The Olentangy/North Broadly suggestion seem fairly interesting, but N. Broadway Route 1 seems I like that 3 connects into Growth is imminent and Provides a walkable Promotes safe Ensures Includes Manages traffic Filling sidewalk gaps Connecting to Providing places Prioritizing Creating well- 43212 43212 Male 26 - 34 White / No to not cater to Franklinton we need to begin adding mixture of uses walk, bike, and compatibility with attractive, high- impacts existing bicycle for bike parking safety designed Caucasian alot of people travel options. (including housing, transit existing quality open trails and storage enhancements multimodal living more employment, connections neighborhoods space intersections 1627 2 6663 west. shopping, and professional services) 1. How 2. When considering the 7. Many members of the 8. As planning for the supportive are routing and construction 3a. Three Rapid Transit 4a. Multiple Rapid Transit 5. How strongly do you 6. When considering public would like to see 13. Which Travel Northwest Corridor you regarding of Rapid Transit within route alternatives are 3b. Is there connections from the 4b. Is there feel that Rapid Transit is future development improved bicycle and racial 14. Are reliability Connection to progresses, are there 9. What 10. What the addition of a Please share the Northwest Corridor, Travel time Please share any being evaluated for the anything you Northwest Corridor to anything you needed to accommodate in vicinity of the 6. Rank 5 - Please share pedestrian connections to 7. Rank 5- Please share any 11. What 12. What group do you (the route major Costs to additional priority zip code zip code No. modern Rapid any additional how would you prioritize (the fastest additional Northwest Corridor. Is dislike about Downtown are also being dislike about some our region's continued Northwest Corridor, 6. Rank 2 6. Rank 3 6. Rank 4 Least any additional and from transit and local 7. Rank 2 7. Rank 3 7. Rank 4 Least additional is your is your you most Hispanic with the employment construct needs, considerations, do you do you Transit choice comments. the following? route) comments.2 there anything you like some or all of considered. Is there or all of the growth? (Select the which outcome is important comments.6 destinations. In creating important comments.7 gender? age? closely or least destinations or opportunities that live in? work in? along the Construction duration about some or all of the the routes? anything you like about routes? option that best most important to such connections, please identify Latino? delay) you believe should be Northwest (what could be built routes? some or all of the routes? describes your opinion.) you? rank the importance of the with? considered? Corridor? quickest) following. I like that generally these I don't like that It makes sense to start the One concern I have Rapid transit should be an Manages traffic Promotes safe Ensures Provides a Includes Creating well-designed Connecting to Providing places Prioritizing Filling sidewalk Cost for residents 43201 43205 Female 19 - 25 White / No are all equitable options option 3 routes near Grandview, since is how this will be integral part of our impacts walk, bike, and compatibility with walkable mixture attractive, high- multimodal intersections existing bicycle for bike parking safety gaps Caucasian and sustainable. completely we have lots of commuters developed along regional growth and transit existing of uses quality open trails and storage enhancements misses a large coming into downtown for High St. It's already economic development connections neighborhoods (including space chunk of the work. Also great to see that all incredibly busy and strategy. housing, route. This possible routes meet 4/5 for pedestrians, very employment, route is the stars. unsafe. Secondly, shopping, and longest and I would option 2 professional feel like if we block the Scioto services) need this route Mile park? to reach the 1637 3 6653 most people, let's make a loop so people can still get to where they need to go without the time being so long.

Will people, post I can get from Growth is imminent and Ensures compatibility Promotes safe Includes Manages traffic Provides a Connecting to existing bicycle Filling sidewalk Prioritizing safety Providing Creating well- Senior citizen 43016 43215 Male 35 - 54 White / No Pandemic, be Hard Road to we need to begin adding with existing walk, bike, and attractive, high- impacts walkable trails gaps enhancements places for bike designed transportation; ADA Caucasian workign downtown, Downtown in travel options. neighborhoods transit quality open mixture of uses parking and multimodal or working from 25 minutes by connections space (including storage intersections home. Study car. housing, should be employment, 1646 7 6664 evalulated with this shopping, and in mind. professional services)

Route 3 engages areas 1 seems to be the most 3 seems to take Growth is imminent and Provides a walkable Promotes safe Manages traffic Ensures Includes Filling sidewalk gaps Prioritizing Connecting to Creating well- Providing continue working closely 43015 43228 Female 35 - 54 White / No that are currently efficient, and connects the people too far out of we need to begin adding mixture of uses walk, bike, and impacts compatibility attractive, high- safety existing bicycle designed places for bike with surrounding Caucasian underserved by mobility most jobs while maintain the their way, unless travel options. (including housing, transit with existing quality open enhancements trails multimodal parking and communities so we can options and could really main route in the core of there is an increase employment, connections neighborhoods space intersections storage work towards the overall 1657 3 5755 help promote new downtown. development shopping, and goal in the same development and jobs opportunity west of professional services) timeframe along the Henderson downtown. Corridor.

must be routes with higher the firectness of #1 is nice not sure why from a legacy city perspective, 3a looks wonky, and Rapid transit should be an Provides a walkable Promotes safe Includes Ensures Manages traffic walkability and Prioritizing safety Filling sidewalk Connecting to Creating well- Providing protected bike economic and racial 43201 43201 Male 26 - 34 White / No dedicated right of potential for #3 goes into it would probably be better to #1 seems too integral part of our mixture of uses walk, bike, and attractive, high- compatibility impacts transport equity enhancements gaps existing bicycle designed places for bike lanes. can't get integration. Grandview Caucasian way future/anticipated arlington, that concentrate along broad street overlapped with regional growth and (including housing, transit quality open with existing please and thank trails multimodal parking and any simpler. make and UA are racist and residential would add and do a traditional route. 670? economic development employment, connections space neighborhoods you intersections storage is safe, and people exclusionary 166 7 4 566 2 construction/pop. significant strategy. shopping, and will rideâ€”period, communities. They will growth are better travel time to professional services) end of story, thank always fight for their right get up to you very much. to hoard resources and Bethel keep "others" out.

315/Olentangy Rapid transit should be an Promotes safe walk, Provides a Ensures Includes Includes Prioritizing safety Connecting to Filling sidewalk Creating well- Providing Handicap accessible 43235 43085 Female 35 - 54 Asian No integral part of our bike, and transit walkable mixture compatibility with attractive, high- attractive, high- enhancements existing bicycle gaps designed places for bike regional growth and connections of uses (including existing quality open quality open trails multimodal parking and economic development housing, neighborhoods space space intersections storage 1677 5 7774 strategy. employment, shopping, and professional services)

inprove the roads you 1681 4 4444 already have first The only reason I The reason I don't Could creation Rapid transit should be an Provides a walkable Promotes safe Includes Ensures Manages traffic If this initiative is Prioritizing safety Creating well- Connecting to Providing Filling sidewalk Intersections with Use of trams / electricity 43211 43210 Female 26 - 34 White / No didn't give it a 7 use public transport of jobs be integral part of our mixture of uses walk, bike, and attractive, high- compatibility impacts intended to enhancements designed existing bicycle places for bike gaps clear right of way or electric powered buses Caucasian is environmental (buses) in Cbus is increased by regional growth and (including housing, transit quality open with existing increase mobility multimodal trails parking and and marked bike instead of gasoline. How impact. It looks because I can increasing economic development employment, connections space neighborhoods and quality of intersections storage lanes would be is this project sustainable like a tram sometimes walk to sustainability? strategy. shopping, and life, a great way essential in in the long run? Ten system - could the same The future is professional services) to ensure that is prioritizing safety years from now, how the vehicles not destination (up to green; so let's also promoting of bikers. Also, as sustainable will this be on an electric 40 min away) in be at the front safe walking and in the picture, project be rated? Also, a grid instead of about the same of the curve. biking lanes. having some form time-related barrier is buses? time it would take Decrease motor of barrier between relieved with real time on the bus. accidents and bikes and cars apps and digital signs at reduce pollution (where possible) is stops, indicating delays & by encouraging necessary for arrivals. 169 6 5 777 4 public respect of bike transportation, lanes. Filling biking and sidewalk gaps walking. may lead to more Discourage use pedestrians of cars in central wandering onto areas. bike lanes. 1. How 2. When considering the 7. Many members of the 8. As planning for the supportive are routing and construction 3a. Three Rapid Transit 4a. Multiple Rapid Transit 5. How strongly do you 6. When considering public would like to see 13. Which Travel Northwest Corridor you regarding of Rapid Transit within route alternatives are 3b. Is there connections from the 4b. Is there feel that Rapid Transit is future development improved bicycle and racial 14. Are reliability Connection to progresses, are there 9. What 10. What the addition of a Please share the Northwest Corridor, Travel time Please share any being evaluated for the anything you Northwest Corridor to anything you needed to accommodate in vicinity of the 6. Rank 5 - Please share pedestrian connections to 7. Rank 5- Please share any 11. What 12. What group do you (the route major Costs to additional priority zip code zip code No. modern Rapid any additional how would you prioritize (the fastest additional Northwest Corridor. Is dislike about Downtown are also being dislike about some our region's continued Northwest Corridor, 6. Rank 2 6. Rank 3 6. Rank 4 Least any additional and from transit and local 7. Rank 2 7. Rank 3 7. Rank 4 Least additional is your is your you most Hispanic with the employment construct needs, considerations, do you do you Transit choice comments. the following? route) comments.2 there anything you like some or all of considered. Is there or all of the growth? (Select the which outcome is important comments.6 destinations. In creating important comments.7 gender? age? closely or least destinations or opportunities that live in? work in? along the Construction duration about some or all of the the routes? anything you like about routes? option that best most important to such connections, please identify Latino? delay) you believe should be Northwest (what could be built routes? some or all of the routes? describes your opinion.) you? rank the importance of the with? considered? Corridor? quickest) following. Please look at Cost is always a Going down Olentangy I would It is unfair to ask this question Rapid transit should be an Manages traffic Promotes safe Provides a Includes Provides a Creating well-designed Connecting to Filling sidewalk Prioritizing Providing Columbus trails Urgently need to 43235 432215 Male 35 - 54 Prefer not No INCLUDING factor, but foresight River Rd and utlizing encourage without seeing the preliminary integral part of our impacts walk, bike, and walkable mixture attractive, high- walkable multimodal intersections existing bicycle gaps safety places for bike are already implement these to answer Bethel Rd, not must be key. The Kenny Rd makes going up potential locations for future regional growth and transit of uses (including quality open mixture of uses trails enhancements parking and amazing and have changes. stopping at lack of complete sense a way to Kenny Rd to routes. economic development connections housing, space (including storage great routes in and Bethel. The development and include more people and Godown strategy. employment, housing, around the city. density in the progress will cost communities. instead of back shopping, and employment, Accessing them area has grown us more in the long down to professional shopping, and would further over the past 10 run. Henderson services) professional enhance years with more and services) utilization. projects on the Olentangy. way. There are residences east AND west of Godown, 170 7 2 656 2 but residences ONLY west of Olentangy, effectively cutting easy access in half versus using a more centralized location.

1's simplicity. 3's equity. 2 and 3 taking They all appear to be of good 1 uses high street Rapid transit should be an Provides a walkable Promotes safe Ensures Includes Manages traffic Honestly the top Prioritizing safety Creating well- Providing places Filling sidewalk Connecting to I'd like to see a greater 43201 Male 19 - 25 White / Prefer not people way out value. where I feel a good integral part of our mixture of uses walk, bike, and compatibility with attractive, high- impacts 4 are all highly enhancements designed for bike parking gaps existing bicycle investment in walkability Caucasian to answer of the way to amount of regional growth and (including housing, transit existing quality open important. I've multimodal and storage trails and bike-ability. make transportation is economic development employment, connections neighborhoods space never felt traffic intersections additional already available. strategy. shopping, and to be bad in stops. professional services) Columbus. But I 1717 4 6753 do think public transportation should be expanded.

This is a great I like the idea of This would be a good option Growth is imminent and Promotes safe walk, Manages traffic Provides a Includes Ensures Prioritizing safety Providing Creating well- Connecting to Filling sidewalk I really like the Easy and quick 43201 43219 Male 35 - 54 White / No idea and much connecting the downtown to alleviate parking issues with we need to begin adding bike, and transit impacts walkable mixture attractive, high- compatibility enhancements places for bike designed existing bicycle gaps rendering for the connections for access to Caucasian needed to neighborhoods with downtown. travel options. connections of uses (including quality open with existing parking and multimodal trails bike lanes with a employment hubs to/from expand the northern neighborhoods housing, space neighborhoods storage intersections row of vegetation the downtown vicinity 172 7 sometimes 5 667 5 and the Easton/Polaris employment, separating the car unreliable COTA vicinity. shopping, and traffic. busing system. professional services)

We need it Get it done Nope Get it done No Rapid transit should be an Ensures compatibility Promotes safe Includes Provides a Manages traffic Get it done!! Filling sidewalk gaps Connecting to Prioritizing safety Creating well- 43201 43201 Male 26 - 34 White / No integral part of our with existing walk, bike, and attractive, high- walkable mixture impacts existing bicycle enhancements designed Caucasian regional growth and neighborhoods transit quality open of uses trails multimodal economic development connections space (including intersections strategy. housing, 1737 4 7771 employment, shopping, and professional services)

Rapid transit should be an Promotes safe walk, Manages traffic Ensures Provides a Includes Connecting to existing bicycle Prioritizing Filling sidewalk Providing Creating well- Male 26 - 34 White / No integral part of our bike, and transit impacts compatibility with walkable mixture attractive, high- trails safety gaps places for bike designed Caucasian regional growth and connections existing of uses quality open enhancements parking and multimodal economic development neighborhoods (including space storage intersections strategy. housing, 1747 3 6652 employment, shopping, and professional services)

Route 1 is the most direct Broad St route is direct and Route 1 and 2 go Rapid transit should be an Provides a walkable Promotes safe Includes Manages traffic Ensures This should Connecting to existing bicycle Filling sidewalk Providing places Creating well- Prioritizing The top options Future connections to 43215 43215 Male 26 - 34 White / No and will allow has no separation for direction through empty, integral part of our mixture of uses walk, bike, and attractive, high- impacts compatibility focus on future trails gaps for bike parking designed safety improve safety, it Hilltop, Dublin, Hilliard, Caucasian development to focus of travel. It will slow traffic undevelopable regional growth and (including housing, transit quality open with existing development and storage multimodal enhancements doesnâ€™t need other west and south side along a contiguous route along Broad St bridge and spaces near the economic development employment, connections space neighborhoods and modes of intersections to be a priority on areas. make this part of downtown river and are strategy. shopping, and transportation. its own. and Franklinton more wasting some of professional services) Old pedestrian friendly. their proximity neighborhoods and transport options 1757 2 5742 arenâ€™t working so preserving them is not as important as trying new things.

Route 1 is the most direct Routes 2 and 3b has greatest potential for It seems routes 1 Rapid transit should be an Promotes safe walk, Provides a Includes Manages traffic Ensures Prioritizing safety Filling sidewalk Creating well- Connecting to Providing All of these are 43206 43231 Male 26 - 34 White / No and likely would be the 3 are less dedicated lanes and 2 likely would integral part of our bike, and transit walkable mixture attractive, high- impacts compatibility enhancements gaps designed existing bicycle places for bike very important Caucasian fastest direct. Route 3 not have dedicated regional growth and connections of uses (including quality open with existing multimodal trails parking and has fewer lanes economic development housing, space neighborhoods intersections storage potential strategy. employment, redevelopment shopping, and 1767 3 6653 opportunities professional that would services) likely result from addition of BRT.

I like route 1 because it Route 3 seems I like route 2 because of the no Growth is imminent and Provides a walkable Promotes safe Ensures Includes Manages traffic Filling sidewalk gaps Connecting to Prioritizing safety Providing Creating well- 43235 43017 Male 26 - 34 White / No would be the fastest way to be a little too areas it covers we need to begin adding mixture of uses walk, bike, and compatibility with attractive, high- impacts existing bicycle enhancements places for bike designed Caucasian to get to shorth long for a rapid travel options. (including housing, transit existing quality open trails parking and multimodal north/downtown. transit route. employment, connections neighborhoods space storage intersections 1776 4 7633 shopping, and professional services) 1. How 2. When considering the 7. Many members of the 8. As planning for the supportive are routing and construction 3a. Three Rapid Transit 4a. Multiple Rapid Transit 5. How strongly do you 6. When considering public would like to see 13. Which Travel Northwest Corridor you regarding of Rapid Transit within route alternatives are 3b. Is there connections from the 4b. Is there feel that Rapid Transit is future development improved bicycle and racial 14. Are reliability Connection to progresses, are there 9. What 10. What the addition of a Please share the Northwest Corridor, Travel time Please share any being evaluated for the anything you Northwest Corridor to anything you needed to accommodate in vicinity of the 6. Rank 5 - Please share pedestrian connections to 7. Rank 5- Please share any 11. What 12. What group do you (the route major Costs to additional priority zip code zip code No. modern Rapid any additional how would you prioritize (the fastest additional Northwest Corridor. Is dislike about Downtown are also being dislike about some our region's continued Northwest Corridor, 6. Rank 2 6. Rank 3 6. Rank 4 Least any additional and from transit and local 7. Rank 2 7. Rank 3 7. Rank 4 Least additional is your is your you most Hispanic with the employment construct needs, considerations, do you do you Transit choice comments. the following? route) comments.2 there anything you like some or all of considered. Is there or all of the growth? (Select the which outcome is important comments.6 destinations. In creating important comments.7 gender? age? closely or least destinations or opportunities that live in? work in? along the Construction duration about some or all of the the routes? anything you like about routes? option that best most important to such connections, please identify Latino? delay) you believe should be Northwest (what could be built routes? some or all of the routes? describes your opinion.) you? rank the importance of the with? considered? Corridor? quickest) following. Rapid transit should be an Promotes safe walk, Ensures Provides a Manages traffic Includes Creating well-designed Providing Connecting to Filling sidewalk Prioritizing 43202 43202 Male 26 - 34 White / No integral part of our bike, and transit compatibility with walkable mixture impacts attractive, high- multimodal intersections places for bike existing bicycle gaps safety Caucasian regional growth and connections existing of uses (including quality open parking and trails enhancements economic development neighborhoods housing, space storage 1787 6 3652 strategy. employment, shopping, and professional services)

Rapid transit should be an Manages traffic Prioritizing safety Filling sidewalk Creating well- Connecting to Providing 43221 43221 Male 35 - 54 White / No integral part of our impacts enhancements gaps designed existing bicycle places for bike Caucasian 1797 2 7774 regional growth and multimodal trails parking and economic development intersections storage strategy. Ending at Rapid transit should be an Promotes safe walk, Provides a Manages traffic Includes Ensures Connecting to existing bicycle Filling sidewalk Creating well- Prioritizing Providing 43082 43017 Male 35 - 54 White / No Bethel integral part of our bike, and transit walkable mixture impacts attractive, high- compatibility trails gaps designed safety places for bike Caucasian regional growth and connections of uses (including quality open with existing multimodal enhancements parking and economic development housing, space neighborhoods intersections storage 1807 4 6655 strategy. employment, shopping, and professional services)

I like that option 2 serves Not really, they Option 2 includes the most Option 3 does not Rapid transit should be an Promotes safe walk, Provides a Ensures Includes Manages traffic Connecting to existing bicycle Prioritizing Filling sidewalk Creating well- Providing The opinions and 43219 43219 Female 26 - 34 White / No West Campus and avoids all have stops and seems the most pass by many integral part of our bike, and transit walkable mixture compatibility with attractive, high- impacts trails safety gaps designed places for bike concerns of the Caucasian the awkward knot at potential. easily accessible of the three places of regional growth and connections of uses (including existing quality open enhancements multimodal parking and homeowners, Kinnear/Olentangy Anything routes. employment, and I economic development housing, neighborhoods space intersections storage businesses, and would be an think the single stop strategy. employment, residents of this area improvement at Broad&High shopping, and should be given extra over what would be very professional weight when making currently heavily trafficked. services) decisions, as they are the exists. ones who will benefit most from this improvement. Developing less-desirable areas into welcoming, usable space 1817 6 5764 should also be a priority. And consider women coming home from second-shift jobs and their safety & comfort using this system at night, for example. Thank you for your hard work!

Columbus is way I think route 1 is the best They are all Rapid transit should be an Promotes safe walk, Provides a Manages traffic Includes Ensures Creating well-designed Prioritizing Providing places Filling sidewalk Connecting to 43202 Female 26 - 34 White / No too big not to because it is direct, but west of the integral part of our bike, and transit walkable mixture impacts attractive, high- compatibility multimodal intersections safety for bike parking gaps existing bicycle Caucasian have light rail. It also cheapest. river, the plan regional growth and connections of uses (including quality open with existing enhancements and storage trails is so nice and needs to economic development housing, space neighborhoods beneficial in salt incorporate strategy. employment, lake city, which is some way to shopping, and much smaller get people professional than Columbus. from east of services) It would help the river to the mitigate traffic so train, ped 182 7 much, saving 6 476 4 bridges and money, reduce bike storage pollution and will make the thus health whole thing outcomes, and more used. noise

Rapid transit should be an Promotes safe walk, Provides a Manages traffic Includes Ensures Prioritizing safety Creating well- Filling sidewalk Connecting to Providing 43085 43215 Male 26 - 34 White / No integral part of our bike, and transit walkable mixture impacts attractive, high- compatibility enhancements designed gaps existing bicycle places for bike Caucasian regional growth and connections of uses (including quality open with existing multimodal trails parking and economic development housing, space neighborhoods intersections storage 1836 3 5564 strategy. employment, shopping, and professional services) 1. How 2. When considering the 7. Many members of the 8. As planning for the supportive are routing and construction 3a. Three Rapid Transit 4a. Multiple Rapid Transit 5. How strongly do you 6. When considering public would like to see 13. Which Travel Northwest Corridor you regarding of Rapid Transit within route alternatives are 3b. Is there connections from the 4b. Is there feel that Rapid Transit is future development improved bicycle and racial 14. Are reliability Connection to progresses, are there 9. What 10. What the addition of a Please share the Northwest Corridor, Travel time Please share any being evaluated for the anything you Northwest Corridor to anything you needed to accommodate in vicinity of the 6. Rank 5 - Please share pedestrian connections to 7. Rank 5- Please share any 11. What 12. What group do you (the route major Costs to additional priority zip code zip code No. modern Rapid any additional how would you prioritize (the fastest additional Northwest Corridor. Is dislike about Downtown are also being dislike about some our region's continued Northwest Corridor, 6. Rank 2 6. Rank 3 6. Rank 4 Least any additional and from transit and local 7. Rank 2 7. Rank 3 7. Rank 4 Least additional is your is your you most Hispanic with the employment construct needs, considerations, do you do you Transit choice comments. the following? route) comments.2 there anything you like some or all of considered. Is there or all of the growth? (Select the which outcome is important comments.6 destinations. In creating important comments.7 gender? age? closely or least destinations or opportunities that live in? work in? along the Construction duration about some or all of the the routes? anything you like about routes? option that best most important to such connections, please identify Latino? delay) you believe should be Northwest (what could be built routes? some or all of the routes? describes your opinion.) you? rank the importance of the with? considered? Corridor? quickest) following. Would like it to It's not on the I like the distance that all I like that 2 I like that #1 will probably be I think #1 will miss a Rapid transit should be an Provides a walkable Manages traffic Promotes safe Ensures Includes For traffic Prioritizing safety Connecting to Creating well- Providing Filling sidewalk What are safety 43201 43081 Male 19 - 25 White / No be truly rapid, the scales but I care three cover, if I could go and 3 get more fastest, #3 connects more of a lot of places people integral part of our mixture of uses impacts walk, bike, and compatibility attractive, high- impacts I am enhancements existing bicycle designed places for bike gaps enhancements Caucasian CMAX connected about a route that that long of a distance into real wide area of housing and want to go, and #3 regional growth and (including housing, transit with existing quality open concerned with trails multimodal parking and specifically? I me from my connects me to quickly that would help neighborhoods employers, and #2 seems to will take a lot longer economic development employment, connections neighborhoods space the existing intersections storage would like the bike apartment to my places I would go make transit more , but I think mix those aspects of both of than the other strategy. shopping, and traffic. I would lane to be suburban job but with my car, or gets feasible to use. time to turn them routes which would professional services) like the future separated from would have taken me to a transfer and cut away also be development to traffic with barriers 1.5hrs to use route that is like that will inconvenient be done in a way or even by street convenient and can slow down the that reduces parking, the way replace my car, but overall speed extra car traffic, that it is on part of not only for and make the backups and summit ave. employment and people use it delays from the Ideally sidewalk doesn't multiply the less. This new volume of cars gaps would not travel time by 4 or faster route has been matter because 5x like some should be massive over the there would be existing routes do quick to get last few years more bike lanes along and just and I am hoping and I would not have another this development have to ride on the partner route will reduce that. sidewalk 184 7 4 775 4 or spokes or Also, I value something to open space but get into the with metro parks neighborhoods and the river trails I think that it is already well done, it just needs to be connected more with the new development than it currently is

Rapid transit should be an Provides a walkable Manages traffic Promotes safe Includes Ensures Prioritizing safety Creating well- Prioritizing safety Connecting to Filling sidewalk 43203 43230 Male 19 - 25 White / No integral part of our mixture of uses impacts walk, bike, and attractive, high- compatibility enhancements designed enhancements existing bicycle gaps Caucasian regional growth and (including housing, transit quality open with existing multimodal trails economic development employment, connections space neighborhoods intersections 1857 2 4642 strategy. shopping, and professional services)

Any of these are better 3 could be too i think that broad st Growth is imminent and Promotes safe walk, Provides a Manages traffic Ensures Includes Creating well-designed Filling sidewalk Prioritizing safety Connecting to Providing 43205 43205 Male 26 - 34 White / No than none lengthy needs the most we need to begin adding bike, and transit walkable mixture impacts compatibility attractive, high- multimodal intersections gaps enhancements existing bicycle places for bike Caucasian attention. i think that travel options. connections of uses (including with existing quality open trails parking and 3 would be most housing, neighborhoods space storage 1866 3 6743 ideal and beneficial employment, in the long run shopping, and professional services)

Growth is imminent and Promotes safe walk, Provides a Includes Manages traffic Ensures Prioritizing safety Creating well- Connecting to Filling sidewalk Providing 43202 43202 Male 26 - 34 White / No we need to begin adding bike, and transit walkable mixture attractive, high- impacts compatibility enhancements designed existing bicycle gaps places for bike Caucasian travel options. connections of uses (including quality open with existing multimodal trails parking and housing, space neighborhoods intersections storage 1877 3 5672 employment, shopping, and professional services)

It is nice they go up to Bethel They do not go out Rapid transit should be an Manages traffic Provides a Includes Ensures Promotes safe Filling sidewalk gaps Creating well- Connecting to Prioritizing Providing How will it expand in the 43103 43210 Prefer not Prefer Prefer not Prefer not Road to the Suburbs integral part of our impacts walkable mixture attractive, high- compatibility walk, bike, and designed existing bicycle safety places for bike future to answer not to to answer to answer regional growth and of uses (including quality open with existing transit multimodal trails enhancements parking and answer economic development housing, space neighborhoods connections intersections storage 1887 2 6774 strategy. employment, shopping, and professional services)

We should have I always hear how I think routes 2 & 3 should be The one that goes Rapid transit should be an Ensures compatibility Provides a Manages traffic Promotes safe Includes Putting housing Creating well-designed Filling sidewalk Prioritizing safety Connecting to Providing The bike lanes Stop development of 43212 43215 Male 55 - 64 White / No done this 20 we will never get a combined, the more places it straight down integral part of our with existing walkable mixture impacts walk, bike, and attractive, high- at the Lennox multimodal intersections gaps enhancements existing bicycle places for bike that are on Summit housing west of Kenny Caucasian years ago and light rail system goes the more it will be used. Olentangy River regional growth and neighborhoods of uses (including transit quality open Center should trails parking and Street make no Road & South of Kinnear had the whole because it will I'm seeing the "population Road would serve economic development housing, connections space have been done storage sense to me. I've Road. King, 5th & 3rd city done by now never pay for itself. served" info at the top of each no purpose. strategy. employment, BEFORE all the almost hit a couple Avenues are not It doesn't need to route description. Park and shopping, and apartments were bikers on account designed for the volume 189 7 2 646 5 pay for itself, roads ride locations could probably professional added between of they are not in of traffic that there is now, don't pay for greatly increase those services) 5th & 3rd my range of vision lt alone with more themselves. numbers. I'm Avenues in the type of bike development. lanes

Growth is imminent and Provides a walkable Promotes safe Manages traffic Ensures Includes Connecting to existing bicycle Prioritizing Creating well- Providing Filling sidewalk Near East Side 43203 43219 Male 26 - 34 White / No we need to begin adding mixture of uses walk, bike, and impacts compatibility attractive, high- trails safety designed places for bike gaps Caucasian travel options. (including housing, transit with existing quality open enhancements multimodal parking and employment, connections neighborhoods space intersections storage 1907 2 6762 shopping, and professional services)

Rapid transit should be an Manages traffic Provides a Promotes safe Ensures Includes Connecting to existing bicycle Filling sidewalk Creating well- Prioritizing Providing 43214 43214 Male 26 - 34 Two or No integral part of our impacts walkable mixture walk, bike, and compatibility attractive, high- trails gaps designed safety places for bike more races regional growth and of uses (including transit with existing quality open multimodal enhancements parking and economic development housing, connections neighborhoods space intersections storage 1917 3 7753 strategy. employment, shopping, and professional services)

Rapid transit should be an Promotes safe walk, Provides a Manages traffic Includes Ensures Connecting to existing bicycle Prioritizing Providing places Creating well- Filling sidewalk 43064 Male 26 - 34 Asian No integral part of our bike, and transit walkable mixture impacts attractive, high- compatibility trails safety for bike parking designed gaps regional growth and connections of uses (including quality open with existing enhancements and storage multimodal economic development housing, space neighborhoods intersections 1927 5 5761 strategy. employment, shopping, and professional services) 1. How 2. When considering the 7. Many members of the 8. As planning for the supportive are routing and construction 3a. Three Rapid Transit 4a. Multiple Rapid Transit 5. How strongly do you 6. When considering public would like to see 13. Which Travel Northwest Corridor you regarding of Rapid Transit within route alternatives are 3b. Is there connections from the 4b. Is there feel that Rapid Transit is future development improved bicycle and racial 14. Are reliability Connection to progresses, are there 9. What 10. What the addition of a Please share the Northwest Corridor, Travel time Please share any being evaluated for the anything you Northwest Corridor to anything you needed to accommodate in vicinity of the 6. Rank 5 - Please share pedestrian connections to 7. Rank 5- Please share any 11. What 12. What group do you (the route major Costs to additional priority zip code zip code No. modern Rapid any additional how would you prioritize (the fastest additional Northwest Corridor. Is dislike about Downtown are also being dislike about some our region's continued Northwest Corridor, 6. Rank 2 6. Rank 3 6. Rank 4 Least any additional and from transit and local 7. Rank 2 7. Rank 3 7. Rank 4 Least additional is your is your you most Hispanic with the employment construct needs, considerations, do you do you Transit choice comments. the following? route) comments.2 there anything you like some or all of considered. Is there or all of the growth? (Select the which outcome is important comments.6 destinations. In creating important comments.7 gender? age? closely or least destinations or opportunities that live in? work in? along the Construction duration about some or all of the the routes? anything you like about routes? option that best most important to such connections, please identify Latino? delay) you believe should be Northwest (what could be built routes? some or all of the routes? describes your opinion.) you? rank the importance of the with? considered? Corridor? quickest) following. Bus rapid transit I'm willing to pay 1 doesn't seem to service Sharing routes with Provides a walkable Promotes safe Includes Ensures Manages traffic Prioritizing safety Connecting to Filling sidewalk Creating well- Providing 43204 43215 Male 35 - 54 White / No feels like a cheap much more in taxes the goals quite as well. street traffic is going mixture of uses walk, bike, and attractive, high- compatibility impacts enhancements existing bicycle gaps designed places for bike Caucasian response to the to support high Unless residential areas to cause the system (including housing, transit quality open with existing trails multimodal parking and existing need. quality rail. have easy access, few to fail. employment, connections space neighborhoods intersections storage Short-term, it's will utilize it. shopping, and easier to professional services) 193 2 implement, but 1 776 1 long-term it's not going to work as well as rail.

I like the brevity of route I think 3 goes I like route 1 the most as it Rapid transit should be an Promotes safe walk, Includes attractive, Includes Provides a Manages traffic Creating well-designed Connecting to Prioritizing safety Filling sidewalk Providing More protected bike 43201 43201 Male 19 - 25 White / No 1, however I think that too far out of connects the Short North, integral part of our bike, and transit high-quality open attractive, high- walkable mixture impacts multimodal intersections existing bicycle enhancements gaps places for bike lanes/bike lanes in Caucasian route 2 is the best of both the way downtown and Franklinton regional growth and connections space quality open of uses trails parking and general worlds economic development space (including storage strategy. housing, 1947 4 4565 employment, shopping, and professional services)

For "Connection to I like that Route #3 will It looks like I don't think routes 3a & 3b I think this is entirely Rapid transit should be an Provides a walkable Promotes safe Ensures Manages traffic Includes Given the Filling sidewalk gaps Creating well- Connecting to Prioritizing Providing I'm not sure what I'm definitely in favor of 43212 43212 Female 26 - 34 White / No major employment facilitate moving riders Route #2 is are already covered by a unnecessary as integral part of our mixture of uses walk, bike, and compatibility with impacts attractive, high- proposed routes designed existing bicycle safety places for bike the intent is rapid transit in this area Caucasian destinations" I am from residential areas to meant to take current COTA line, so if their there are multiple regional growth and (including housing, transit existing quality open and the desired multimodal trails enhancements parking and behind "safety of Columbus, but I hope also valuing commercial areas advantage of HAD to be a connector line, bus lines that economic development employment, connections neighborhoods space outcomes I'm intersections storage enhancements", is it's the first step in many commercial (although this could also the OSU those would be my preference facilitate moving strategy. shopping, and asked to rate it related to future expansions to destinations from be accomplished by parking lots riders from these professional services) here, I'm pedestrian & bike areas in the city that have the consumers taking a bus to access around Kenny areas (just off the disappointed by safety in relation to a greater need for perspective and Route #1, and skips a & Carmack, or top of my head I the lack of vehicle traffic or multiple, reliable, public other key NW stretch of ORR with perhaps to know #3 & #10 commitment to other pedestrians? transit. Corridor stores, restaurants & handle OSU could certainly Equity-centered Will bikes be destinations, such hotels). game-day cover this, and goals. I would allowed inside the as OSU traffic, but I riders could transfer not consider the rapid transit cars? don't see why from the NW Northwest that would be Corridor to #5 and Corridor to be an necessary hit the stretch of underserved or given that High St shown transit- 1957 4 7774 those riders here). This seems dependent. As a would like a waste of resident in the probably resources, I'd rather NW corridor utilize a small see an entirely new area, I've used section of the rapid transit corridor COTA lines #1, route and the developed 3, 5, & 31 to fact that buses elsewhere in access the same already shuttle Columbus. areas as the from campus proposed routes. to surrounding parking lots

Incorporates a high attraction Rapid transit should be an Manages traffic Provides a Includes Promotes safe Ensures Connecting to existing bicycle Filling sidewalk Creating well- Prioritizing Providing 43204 43212 Male 26 - 34 White / No area of downtown. integral part of our impacts walkable mixture attractive, high- walk, bike, and compatibility trails gaps designed safety places for bike Caucasian regional growth and of uses (including quality open transit with existing multimodal enhancements parking and economic development housing, space connections neighborhoods intersections storage 1967 4 7674 strategy. employment, shopping, and professional services)

Transit options is Setting aside 2 is the best. Rapid transit should be an Promotes safe walk, Manages traffic Ensures Provides a Includes Connecting to existing bicycle Filling sidewalk Creating well- Prioritizing Providing 43085 43215 Male 35 - 54 White / No a great idea, but the fact that it's integral part of our bike, and transit impacts compatibility with walkable mixture attractive, high- trails gaps designed safety places for bike Caucasian Bus Rapid BRT and not regional growth and connections existing of uses quality open multimodal enhancements parking and Transit is a cop- rail, you economic development neighborhoods (including space intersections storage out. Light rail, or should strategy. housing, even better, combine 2 and employment, 197 5 2 575 1 subway, is a 3. shopping, and better and more professional attractive long- services) term solution.

Route 2 looks like a good Rapid transit should be an Manages traffic Provides a Promotes safe Includes Ensures Connecting to existing bicycle Providing Prioritizing safety Filling sidewalk Creating well- 43205 43228 Male 26 - 34 White / No balance of travel time integral part of our impacts walkable mixture walk, bike, and attractive, high- compatibility trails places for bike enhancements gaps designed Caucasian while still hitting some regional growth and of uses (including transit quality open with existing parking and multimodal major locations economic development housing, connections space neighborhoods storage intersections 1987 4 6772 strategy. employment, shopping, and professional services)

How can They all flow near my Columbus They seem to serve a good There should be Rapid transit should be an Promotes safe walk, Manages traffic Ensures Includes Provides a Prioritizing safety Connecting to Filling sidewalk Providing Creating well- We need a system that 43221 43221 Prefer not Prefer Prefer not Prefer not Columbus be a home, and along 315 residents need area of transit users coming in additional routes in integral part of our bike, and transit impacts compatibility with attractive, high- walkable enhancements existing bicycle gaps places for bike designed supports the growth of to answer not to to answer to answer truly modern city routes near or to downtown this area in order to regional growth and connections existing quality open mixture of uses trails parking and multimodal this city now and in the answer without better west of the extend service to economic development neighborhoods space (including storage intersections future public transit?! Scioto River in more users/areas strategy. housing, addition to employment, 199 7 2 577 4 these 3 routes. shopping, and professional services)

I like how options 2 and 3 I do not like how Rapid transit should be an Provides a walkable Promotes safe Ensures Includes Manages traffic Connecting to existing bicycle Prioritizing Filling sidewalk Providing Creating well- 43214 43214 Male 26 - 34 White / No jog over to hit more option 3(a) does not integral part of our mixture of uses walk, bike, and compatibility with attractive, high- impacts trails safety gaps places for bike designed Caucasian populated areas immediately regional growth and (including housing, transit existing quality open enhancements parking and multimodal connect to economic development employment, connections neighborhoods space storage intersections 2007 3 6654 downtown proper strategy. shopping, and professional services)

Needs to extend Rapid transit should be an Promotes safe walk, Ensures Provides a Manages traffic 43065 43016 Male 35 - 54 White / No north further integral part of our bike, and transit compatibility with walkable mixture impacts Caucasian regional growth and connections existing of uses (including economic development neighborhoods housing, 2017 1 7711 strategy. employment, shopping, and professional services) 1. How 2. When considering the 7. Many members of the 8. As planning for the supportive are routing and construction 3a. Three Rapid Transit 4a. Multiple Rapid Transit 5. How strongly do you 6. When considering public would like to see 13. Which Travel Northwest Corridor you regarding of Rapid Transit within route alternatives are 3b. Is there connections from the 4b. Is there feel that Rapid Transit is future development improved bicycle and racial 14. Are reliability Connection to progresses, are there 9. What 10. What the addition of a Please share the Northwest Corridor, Travel time Please share any being evaluated for the anything you Northwest Corridor to anything you needed to accommodate in vicinity of the 6. Rank 5 - Please share pedestrian connections to 7. Rank 5- Please share any 11. What 12. What group do you (the route major Costs to additional priority zip code zip code No. modern Rapid any additional how would you prioritize (the fastest additional Northwest Corridor. Is dislike about Downtown are also being dislike about some our region's continued Northwest Corridor, 6. Rank 2 6. Rank 3 6. Rank 4 Least any additional and from transit and local 7. Rank 2 7. Rank 3 7. Rank 4 Least additional is your is your you most Hispanic with the employment construct needs, considerations, do you do you Transit choice comments. the following? route) comments.2 there anything you like some or all of considered. Is there or all of the growth? (Select the which outcome is important comments.6 destinations. In creating important comments.7 gender? age? closely or least destinations or opportunities that live in? work in? along the Construction duration about some or all of the the routes? anything you like about routes? option that best most important to such connections, please identify Latino? delay) you believe should be Northwest (what could be built routes? some or all of the routes? describes your opinion.) you? rank the importance of the with? considered? Corridor? quickest) following. #3 is too much I like how 3 connects with the 3a goes too far out Rapid transit should be an Promotes safe walk, Provides a Includes Ensures Manages traffic Prioritizing safety Creating well- Providing Filling sidewalk 43201 43210 Male 55 - 64 White / No of a diversion. east-west corridor. But I think of the way, and also integral part of our bike, and transit walkable mixture attractive, high- compatibility impacts enhancements designed places for bike gaps Caucasian Even if itâ€™s 1 and 2 are best since they Twin Rivers Drive is regional growth and connections of uses (including quality open with existing multimodal parking and not that much are more direct connections to too bleak. It will economic development housing, space neighborhoods intersections storage 2027 4 4672 time, people downtown. seem like a barrier strategy. employment, will perceive it to many people. shopping, and that way. professional services)

This city NEEDS a rapid We need more Rapid transit should be an Promotes safe walk, Manages traffic Provides a Ensures Includes Connecting to existing bicycle Prioritizing Filling sidewalk Creating well- Providing 43214 43214 Male 26 - 34 White / No transit system. It has a routes! integral part of our bike, and transit impacts walkable mixture compatibility attractive, high- trails safety gaps designed places for bike Caucasian great layout for it. regional growth and connections of uses (including with existing quality open enhancements multimodal parking and economic development housing, neighborhoods space intersections storage 2037 7 7771 strategy. employment, shopping, and professional services)

Route one is by far most Route three I like route 2, but 3/3b are Definitely not route Rapid transit should be an Promotes safe walk, Ensures Includes Provides a Manages traffic Connecting to existing bicycle Creating well- Filling sidewalk Prioritizing Providing Please please Unless the BRT has 43202 43215 Male 26 - 34 White / No straightforward seems good too 1 integral part of our bike, and transit compatibility with attractive, high- walkable mixture impacts trails designed gaps safety places for bike please find a place physically separated Caucasian inefficient regional growth and connections existing quality open of uses multimodal enhancements parking and to built a lanes and traffic signal economic development neighborhoods space (including intersections storage bike/pedestrian priority this will never strategy. housing, bridge over 315 work. Don't go for just employment, and kenny ross painted lanes or 2047 2 7771 shopping, and into UA something. Diddo for bike professional lanes. Painting a bike on services) the road doesn't make it a bicycle route.

Rapid transit should be an Promotes safe walk, Provides a Manages traffic Includes Ensures Creating well-designed Prioritizing Filling sidewalk Connecting to Providing integral part of our bike, and transit walkable mixture impacts attractive, high- compatibility multimodal intersections safety gaps existing bicycle places for bike regional growth and connections of uses (including quality open with existing enhancements trails parking and economic development housing, space neighborhoods storage 2056 2 2574 strategy. employment, shopping, and professional services)

Rapid transit should be an Promotes safe walk, Provides a Manages traffic Promotes safe Ensures Providing places for bike Creating well- Filling sidewalk Connecting to Prioritizing 43235 43219 Female 19 - 25 White / No integral part of our bike, and transit walkable mixture impacts walk, bike, and compatibility parking and storage designed gaps existing bicycle safety Caucasian regional growth and connections of uses (including transit with existing multimodal trails enhancements economic development housing, connections neighborhoods intersections 2067 5 7752 strategy. employment, shopping, and professional services)

Route 2 has a I like the 3a and b routes for Rapid transit should be an Provides a walkable Promotes safe Ensures Manages traffic Includes Filling sidewalk gaps Connecting to Creating well- Prioritizing Providing 43202 Male 19 - 25 Prefer not No jog to the left going through Franklinton. integral part of our mixture of uses walk, bike, and compatibility with impacts attractive, high- existing bicycle designed safety places for bike to answer in that position That places needs some more regional growth and (including housing, transit existing quality open trails multimodal enhancements parking and likely to serve direct connections to the city economic development employment, connections neighborhoods space intersections storage more to encourage development strategy. shopping, and residential and utilization on that inside professional services) areas. bend of the river, flooding or However, no flooding. that's also directly in line with the University meaning almost no students would 2076 2 6773 have easy access. The West side of campus is already a public transportation desert, and it would be sad to see that trend continue.

I like that route 3 serves No, they all Route 3 makes it easier to High St is already Rapid transit should be an Provides a walkable Promotes safe Includes Manages traffic Ensures Creating well-designed Prioritizing Filling sidewalk Connecting to Providing Sidewalks and bike 43214 43214 Male 26 - 34 White / No the largest population have benefits travel between Broad and heavily served by integral part of our mixture of uses walk, bike, and attractive, high- impacts compatibility multimodal intersections safety gaps existing bicycle places for bike paths/trails should be Caucasian Goodale West of the river BRT regional growth and (including housing, transit quality open with existing enhancements trails parking and built closer to business economic development employment, connections space neighborhoods storage entrances if there is large 2087 1 6773 strategy. shopping, and building setback from the professional services) road.

Things have worsened Provides a walkable Promotes safe Manages traffic Ensures Includes Filling sidewalk gaps Creating well- Prioritizing safety Connecting to Providing Male 26 - 34 White / No over the years but are still mixture of uses walk, bike, and impacts compatibility attractive, high- designed enhancements existing bicycle places for bike Caucasian tolerable. (including housing, transit with existing quality open multimodal trails parking and employment, connections neighborhoods space intersections storage 2095 3 5533 shopping, and professional services)

2 would be best for jobs 2 seems to best serve major 3 goes through Rapid transit should be an Promotes safe walk, Ensures Provides a Includes Manages traffic Connecting to existing bicycle Prioritizing Creating well- Filling sidewalk Providing A safer way for 43212 43213 Female 35 - 54 White / No work centers areas that fewer integral part of our bike, and transit compatibility with walkable mixture attractive, high- impacts trails safety designed gaps places for bike pedestrians to cross Caucasian people live or work regional growth and connections existing of uses (including quality open enhancements multimodal parking and Olentangy River Road in economic development neighborhoods housing, space intersections storage 2105 4 6674 strategy. employment, shopping, and professional services)

Growth is imminent and Provides a walkable Promotes safe Includes Ensures Manages traffic Prioritizing safety Creating well- Providing places Connecting to Filling sidewalk 43220 43240 Male 26 - 34 White / No we need to begin adding mixture of uses walk, bike, and attractive, high- compatibility impacts enhancements designed for bike parking existing bicycle gaps Caucasian travel options. (including housing, transit quality open with existing multimodal and storage trails employment, connections space neighborhoods intersections 2117 1 7771 shopping, and professional services) 1. How 2. When considering the 7. Many members of the 8. As planning for the supportive are routing and construction 3a. Three Rapid Transit 4a. Multiple Rapid Transit 5. How strongly do you 6. When considering public would like to see 13. Which Travel Northwest Corridor you regarding of Rapid Transit within route alternatives are 3b. Is there connections from the 4b. Is there feel that Rapid Transit is future development improved bicycle and racial 14. Are reliability Connection to progresses, are there 9. What 10. What the addition of a Please share the Northwest Corridor, Travel time Please share any being evaluated for the anything you Northwest Corridor to anything you needed to accommodate in vicinity of the 6. Rank 5 - Please share pedestrian connections to 7. Rank 5- Please share any 11. What 12. What group do you (the route major Costs to additional priority zip code zip code No. modern Rapid any additional how would you prioritize (the fastest additional Northwest Corridor. Is dislike about Downtown are also being dislike about some our region's continued Northwest Corridor, 6. Rank 2 6. Rank 3 6. Rank 4 Least any additional and from transit and local 7. Rank 2 7. Rank 3 7. Rank 4 Least additional is your is your you most Hispanic with the employment construct needs, considerations, do you do you Transit choice comments. the following? route) comments.2 there anything you like some or all of considered. Is there or all of the growth? (Select the which outcome is important comments.6 destinations. In creating important comments.7 gender? age? closely or least destinations or opportunities that live in? work in? along the Construction duration about some or all of the the routes? anything you like about routes? option that best most important to such connections, please identify Latino? delay) you believe should be Northwest (what could be built routes? some or all of the routes? describes your opinion.) you? rank the importance of the with? considered? Corridor? quickest) following. Costs are an issue I like Option 2 the most. It Option 3 I think Option 3 will be Rapid transit should be an Promotes safe walk, Provides a Ensures Includes Manages traffic The parking lots Prioritizing safety Filling sidewalk Connecting to Providing Creating well- If bike lanes are 43209 43215 Male 26 - 34 White / No only in that the seems to reach the most seems like the important in 5 years, but integral part of our bike, and transit walkable mixture compatibility with attractive, high- impacts around some of enhancements gaps existing bicycle places for bike designed going to be added, Caucasian United States is businesses, and it also travel times Options 1 and 2 will be regional growth and connections of uses (including existing quality open the buildings in trails parking and multimodal really consider generally inefficient seems to reach high might be a important right out of the gate. economic development housing, neighborhoods space this area are storage intersections protecting them. at building transit traffic areas of Lane Ave little difficult to strategy. employment, very ugly, and The number one options deal with if you shopping, and also seem like a obstacle to me 2127 2 5651 aren't exactly professional waste for most biking versus on the route. services) times of the day. driving is how safe I feel while I'm on my bike.

Rapid transit should be an Promotes safe walk, Manages traffic Ensures Provides a Includes Prioritizing safety Creating well- Filling sidewalk Connecting to Providing 43201 43215 Female 26 - 34 White / No integral part of our bike, and transit impacts compatibility with walkable mixture attractive, high- enhancements designed gaps existing bicycle places for bike Caucasian regional growth and connections existing of uses quality open multimodal trails parking and economic development neighborhoods (including space intersections storage strategy. housing, 2137 4 5674 employment, shopping, and professional services)

2 and 3 reach the most there need to 3 hits more work places Rapid transit should be an Promotes safe walk, Manages traffic Provides a Ensures Includes The system Filling sidewalk gaps Providing Prioritizing safety Connecting to Creating well- 43017 43017 Male 65 or White / No people be feeders to integral part of our bike, and transit impacts walkable mixture compatibility attractive, high- needs to be places for bike enhancements existing bicycle designed older Caucasian whatever route regional growth and connections of uses (including with existing quality open designed so parking and trails multimodal is chosen so economic development housing, neighborhoods space people want to storage intersections 2147 4 7764 people do not strategy. employment, use it feel the need shopping, and to drive professional services)

Rapid transit should be an Promotes safe walk, Manages traffic Provides a Ensures Includes Creating well-designed Connecting to Filling sidewalk Prioritizing Providing 43235 43212 Male 26 - 34 Other Yes integral part of our bike, and transit impacts walkable mixture compatibility attractive, high- multimodal intersections existing bicycle gaps safety places for bike regional growth and connections of uses (including with existing quality open trails enhancements parking and economic development housing, neighborhoods space storage 2157 4 6635 strategy. employment, shopping, and professional services)

Solid public Option 1 seems to On the That said the Neil Avenue Route 1, seems Rapid transit should be an Provides a walkable Promotes safe Ensures Includes Manages traffic While traffic will Creating well-designed Connecting to Prioritizing safety Providing Filling sidewalk We need 43212 43205 Male 35 - 54 Latino Yes transportation is provide the best flexibility surface, option option will help with Arena obvious, but I don't integral part of our mixture of uses walk, bike, and compatibility with attractive, high- impacts increase as multimodal intersections existing bicycle enhancements places for bike gaps protected bike a sign of a for future expansion (east - 1 is "far" from District / new Crew Stadium. think actually regional growth and (including housing, transit existing quality open population trails parking and lanes along Broad "Smart City" west). residential Finally, 3b would help "helps" this part of economic development employment, connections neighborhoods space increases, traffic storage Street. neighborhoods "expand" the City's the City. The strategy. shopping, and in the northwest . development in Franklinton. Nationwide campus professional services) corridor is not a / major downtown major issue. employers can still Providing high be served by option quality options 2... and Option 2 for public 216 7 5 667 4 serves the Arena transportation district (a major that are easy to destination for use and go public transit). "where you want to go" is what makes them attractive.

Rapid transit should be an Ensures compatibility Promotes safe Manages traffic Provides a Includes Connecting to existing bicycle Filling sidewalk Creating well- Prioritizing Providing 43061 43215 Male 35 - 54 White / No integral part of our with existing walk, bike, and impacts walkable mixture attractive, high- trails gaps designed safety places for bike Caucasian regional growth and neighborhoods transit of uses quality open multimodal enhancements parking and economic development connections (including space intersections storage strategy. housing, 2177 4 6775 employment, shopping, and professional services)

I do like number 2 route I like route 1 as Rapid transit should be an Ensures compatibility Promotes safe Provides a Manages traffic Includes Connecting to existing bicycle Filling sidewalk Creating well- Prioritizing Providing 43214 43214 Female 55 - 64 Prefer not Prefer not pictured above in green, going listed below for the integral part of our with existing walk, bike, and walkable mixture impacts attractive, high- trails gaps designed safety places for bike to answer to answer down Lane avenue downtown High regional growth and neighborhoods transit of uses (including quality open multimodal enhancements parking and Street shops access economic development connections housing, space intersections storage 2187 5 7614 strategy. employment, shopping, and professional services)

Route 1 is the most direct; Route 3 - the Route 1 is the quickest Route 1 misses Growth is imminent and Manages traffic Promotes safe Includes Provides a Ensures Filling sidewalk gaps Prioritizing Connecting to Providing Creating well- The depictions of the 43064 43215 Female 35 - 54 White / No Route 3 - serves the most ride time is too some possible we need to begin adding impacts walk, bike, and attractive, high- walkable mixture compatibility safety existing bicycle places for bike designed stations all show open air Caucasian people and jobs long - 25-38 riders w/o stops on travel options. transit quality open of uses with existing enhancements trails parking and multimodal facilities. This may minutes is the Goodale/Vine; again connections space (including neighborhoods storage intersections discourage use in the same as times aren't shorter housing, winter months. 2196 4 6754 driving than driving in car employment, Heated/enclosed areas to shopping, and wait in and purchase professional tickets should be highly services) considered.

This is a lifetime Dedicated lanes so the Still have to None Why havenâ€™t we Rapid transit should be an Includes attractive, Promotes safe Ensures Provides a Manages traffic Prioritizing safety Filling sidewalk Connecting to Creating well- Providing 43214 Male 35 - 54 White / No investment. Go bus is the better option abide by same considered a rapid integral part of our high-quality open walk, bike, and compatibility with walkable mixture impacts enhancements gaps existing bicycle designed places for bike Caucasian cheap and fast you than a car. traffic patterns to the airport? That regional growth and space transit existing of uses trails multimodal parking and will get a product as cars. May is needed for economic development connections neighborhoods (including intersections storage with lukewarm not work as visitors and strategy. housing, results and planned. The business travelers employment, reception. Design think I dislike alike. shopping, and right with about the bud professional innovation and is the fact I can services) 2206 1 7761 amenities and it will often times spur growth. arrive 50% quicker in a car. Bus must be equal. 1. How 2. When considering the 7. Many members of the 8. As planning for the supportive are routing and construction 3a. Three Rapid Transit 4a. Multiple Rapid Transit 5. How strongly do you 6. When considering public would like to see 13. Which Travel Northwest Corridor you regarding of Rapid Transit within route alternatives are 3b. Is there connections from the 4b. Is there feel that Rapid Transit is future development improved bicycle and racial 14. Are reliability Connection to progresses, are there 9. What 10. What the addition of a Please share the Northwest Corridor, Travel time Please share any being evaluated for the anything you Northwest Corridor to anything you needed to accommodate in vicinity of the 6. Rank 5 - Please share pedestrian connections to 7. Rank 5- Please share any 11. What 12. What group do you (the route major Costs to additional priority zip code zip code No. modern Rapid any additional how would you prioritize (the fastest additional Northwest Corridor. Is dislike about Downtown are also being dislike about some our region's continued Northwest Corridor, 6. Rank 2 6. Rank 3 6. Rank 4 Least any additional and from transit and local 7. Rank 2 7. Rank 3 7. Rank 4 Least additional is your is your you most Hispanic with the employment construct needs, considerations, do you do you Transit choice comments. the following? route) comments.2 there anything you like some or all of considered. Is there or all of the growth? (Select the which outcome is important comments.6 destinations. In creating important comments.7 gender? age? closely or least destinations or opportunities that live in? work in? along the Construction duration about some or all of the the routes? anything you like about routes? option that best most important to such connections, please identify Latino? delay) you believe should be Northwest (what could be built routes? some or all of the routes? describes your opinion.) you? rank the importance of the with? considered? Corridor? quickest) following. Rapid transit should be an Provides a walkable Promotes safe Includes Manages traffic Ensures Filling sidewalk gaps Connecting to Creating well- Prioritizing Providing 43202 43240 Male 35 - 54 White / No integral part of our mixture of uses walk, bike, and attractive, high- impacts compatibility existing bicycle designed safety places for bike Caucasian regional growth and (including housing, transit quality open with existing trails multimodal enhancements parking and economic development employment, connections space neighborhoods intersections storage 2216 6 7474 strategy. shopping, and professional services)

Growth is imminent and Ensures compatibility Includes attractive, Provides a Manages traffic Filling sidewalk gaps Creating well- Prioritizing safety Providing 43204 43204 Male 65 or White / No we need to begin adding with existing high-quality open walkable mixture impacts designed enhancements places for bike older Caucasian travel options. neighborhoods space of uses (including multimodal parking and housing, intersections storage 2227 6 6665 employment, shopping, and professional services)

Traffic is fine and I'm not 43221 Male Prefer Prefer not No 2231 1 1114 concerned about growth. not to to answer answer Prioritizing safety Creating well- Providing places Filling sidewalk 43221 43215 Female 65 or White / No enhancements designed for bike parking gaps older Caucasian 2244 4 4444 multimodal and storage intersections 3 is closest to Kingsdale Growth is imminent and Promotes safe walk, Ensures Provides a Includes Manages traffic Filling sidewalk gaps Connecting to Providing places Prioritizing Creating well- 43221 43221 Male 35 - 54 Prefer not No we need to begin adding bike, and transit compatibility with walkable mixture attractive, high- impacts existing bicycle for bike parking safety designed to answer travel options. connections existing of uses (including quality open trails and storage enhancements multimodal neighborhoods housing, space intersections 2257 2 5554 employment, shopping, and professional services)

Planning Many of the Traffic is fine and I'm not Manages traffic Ensures Includes Provides a Promotes safe Connecting to existing bicycle Providing Prioritizing safety Creating well- Filling sidewalk 43221 43210 Male 55 - 64 Prefer not No additional mass graphics show concerned about growth. impacts compatibility with attractive, high- walkable mixture walk, bike, and trails places for bike enhancements designed gaps to answer transit at this dedicated existing quality open of uses transit parking and multimodal point is futile lanes for mass neighborhoods space (including connections storage intersections because we don't transit. housing, have any idea Dedicating employment, how many people lanes to shopping, and 226 1 1 111 7 will continue to infrequent professional work from home vehicles will services) after the reduce pandemic crisis throughput. is tamed.

all look good but like 3 1 and 2 look Rapid transit should be an Provides a walkable Promotes safe Includes Manages traffic Ensures Filling sidewalk gaps Prioritizing Creating well- Providing Connecting to 43220 Female 65 or Prefer not No because gives better like faster for integral part of our mixture of uses walk, bike, and attractive, high- impacts compatibility safety designed places for bike existing bicycle older to answer access to larger suburban regional growth and (including housing, transit quality open with existing enhancements multimodal parking and trails population. populations on economic development employment, connections space neighborhoods intersections storage 2277 4 7774 north end. strategy. shopping, and professional services)

Rapid transit should be an Promotes safe walk, Provides a Includes Ensures Manages traffic Connecting to existing bicycle Providing Filling sidewalk Prioritizing Creating well- 43221 43221 Male 65 or White / No integral part of our bike, and transit walkable mixture attractive, high- compatibility impacts trails places for bike gaps safety designed older Caucasian regional growth and connections of uses (including quality open with existing parking and enhancements multimodal economic development housing, space neighborhoods storage intersections 2284 4 7764 strategy. employment, shopping, and professional services)

Needs to be able to They all have positive consider I like #2 the most for now. I We did not build the Rapid transit should be an Provides a walkable Promotes safe Ensures Includes Manages traffic The goal is to Connecting to existing bicycle Creating well- Providing places Filling sidewalk Prioritizing use by elderly who might 43221 Retired Female 65 or White / No bring people from things to offer. I would potential think #3 needs to be done city for this kind of integral part of our mixture of uses walk, bike, and compatibility with attractive, high- impacts reduce traffic trails designed for bike parking gaps safety not be able to drive but older Caucasian other communities look to the one that meets connection to down the road for E-W travel transportation so regional growth and (including housing, transit existing quality open and encourage multimodal and storage enhancements could take transit to get quickly to the jobs, the highest rating for your a train that connecting is economic development employment, connections neighborhoods space people to use the intersections around. education and goals. might ever difficult. In larger strategy. shopping, and transit to reduce shopping they come thru from cities mass transit professional services) carbon need. Cincinnati to was always a emissions and Cleveland and component of provide safe connect in planning. Hopefully alternatives for Cleveland we can afford. people who don't have a car or 2296 6 6774 can't drive and provide the ability for them to access areas they might not have been able to get to without assistance.

3 provides the most no 1 and 2 both provide access Rapid transit should be an Provides a walkable Promotes safe Ensures Includes Manages traffic Prioritizing safety Connecting to Filling sidewalk Creating well- Providing 43220 43214 Female 65 or White / No options to travel to the Short North, which will integral part of our mixture of uses walk, bike, and compatibility with attractive, high- impacts enhancements existing bicycle gaps designed places for bike older Caucasian be vital for success regional growth and (including housing, transit existing quality open trails multimodal parking and economic development employment, connections neighborhoods space intersections storage 2306 5 6745 strategy. shopping, and professional services)

I like how two of them I like route #2 for getting to the Rapid transit should be an Provides a walkable Includes attractive, Promotes safe Ensures Manages traffic Creating well-designed Prioritizing Filling sidewalk Connecting to Providing I love that we are moving 43221 43212 Female 55 - 64 White / No come in off of the main fun areas of downtown integral part of our mixture of uses high-quality open walk, bike, and compatibility impacts multimodal intersections safety gaps existing bicycle places for bike in the direction of a less Caucasian route for a potential regional growth and (including housing, space transit with existing enhancements trails parking and car dependent station economic development employment, connections neighborhoods storage community 2317 7 5766 strategy. shopping, and professional services) 1. How 2. When considering the 7. Many members of the 8. As planning for the supportive are routing and construction 3a. Three Rapid Transit 4a. Multiple Rapid Transit 5. How strongly do you 6. When considering public would like to see 13. Which Travel Northwest Corridor you regarding of Rapid Transit within route alternatives are 3b. Is there connections from the 4b. Is there feel that Rapid Transit is future development improved bicycle and racial 14. Are reliability Connection to progresses, are there 9. What 10. What the addition of a Please share the Northwest Corridor, Travel time Please share any being evaluated for the anything you Northwest Corridor to anything you needed to accommodate in vicinity of the 6. Rank 5 - Please share pedestrian connections to 7. Rank 5- Please share any 11. What 12. What group do you (the route major Costs to additional priority zip code zip code No. modern Rapid any additional how would you prioritize (the fastest additional Northwest Corridor. Is dislike about Downtown are also being dislike about some our region's continued Northwest Corridor, 6. Rank 2 6. Rank 3 6. Rank 4 Least any additional and from transit and local 7. Rank 2 7. Rank 3 7. Rank 4 Least additional is your is your you most Hispanic with the employment construct needs, considerations, do you do you Transit choice comments. the following? route) comments.2 there anything you like some or all of considered. Is there or all of the growth? (Select the which outcome is important comments.6 destinations. In creating important comments.7 gender? age? closely or least destinations or opportunities that live in? work in? along the Construction duration about some or all of the the routes? anything you like about routes? option that best most important to such connections, please identify Latino? delay) you believe should be Northwest (what could be built routes? some or all of the routes? describes your opinion.) you? rank the importance of the with? considered? Corridor? quickest) following. Working from Please do not Just stop having the 43221 43221, Female Prefer Prefer not Prefer not home seems to overbuild U.A. citizens paying for 43220, not to to answer to answer be more in style People are services we do not need 43212 answer now and by the complaining that and concentrate on time someone the growth of new improving what we have parked their car, buildings ir not and not continue to spoil they could be necessarily the the area. downtown. density they want Which direction as it is changing is it planned to the loveliness of go ? All the way the area. It used to the north end to be our best of Upper selling point. 232 1 Arlington Is their 4 444 4 only one place to get on?Parking downtown should be much more accessible now, if people need to go downtown.

Transit should be It should go without I like that all routes It is not clear to No strong preference - but Mixed feelings: I like Rapid transit should be an Promotes safe walk, Provides a Ensures Manages traffic Includes Ideally these 5 Prioritizing safety Creating well- Providing places Connecting to Filling sidewalk 43212 43801 Male 35 - 54 White / No one of many saying that cost to generally utilize the same me what the good to see connection that that 3 swoops west integral part of our bike, and transit walkable mixture compatibility with impacts attractive, high- outcomes would enhancements designed for bike parking existing bicycle gaps Caucasian modes of construct is basic "alignment" as benefit is for allows residents of Northwest to pick up regional growth and connections of uses (including existing quality open not be mutually multimodal and storage trails transportation important, meaning Olentangy and the bike terminating at to get downtown. Franklinton, but that economic development housing, neighborhoods space exclusive (e.g., intersections available to the costs can't be path. However, don't Bethel and comes at the strategy. employment, provide multi- citizens.. completely out of locate so as to detract Goodale. In expense of the shopping, and modal whack (higher than) from "atmosphere" of bike other words, Arena District. professional transportation the benefits. path (unique experience I'm not sure Either way, services) AND walkable in the area). Ithink the what would be somebody loses mixed use) 233 5 3 566 7 "distance" is good, insofar connected out, but that's are as the stretch is far (although also not so far apart. enough for transit to be of Grandview some benefit. Yard would is probably one destination).

renewable Rapid transit should be an Promotes safe walk, Provides a Ensures Manages traffic Includes Prioritizing safety Connecting to Creating well- Providing Filling sidewalk none 43221 43210 Female 55 - 64 White / No energy only integral part of our bike, and transit walkable mixture compatibility with impacts attractive, high- enhancements existing bicycle designed places for bike gaps Caucasian regional growth and connections of uses (including existing quality open trails multimodal parking and economic development housing, neighborhoods space intersections storage 234 6 4 665 4 strategy. employment, shopping, and professional services)

3 is best 1 not serving 3 is best 2 is too narrow Rapid transit should be an Manages traffic Provides a Promotes safe Includes Ensures Creating well-designed Prioritizing Filling sidewalk Connecting to Providing 43221 Retired Female 65 or White / No enough area service area integral part of our impacts walkable mixture walk, bike, and attractive, high- compatibility multimodal intersections safety gaps existing bicycle places for bike older Caucasian away from 315 regional growth and of uses (including transit quality open with existing enhancements trails parking and economic development housing, connections space neighborhoods storage 2357 7 6454 strategy. employment, shopping, and professional services)

Rapid transit should be an Ensures compatibility Promotes safe Provides a Manages traffic Connecting to existing bicycle Creating well- Prioritizing Filling sidewalk 43221 43221 Male 65 or Prefer not Prefer not integral part of our with existing walk, bike, and walkable mixture impacts trails designed safety gaps older to answer to answer regional growth and neighborhoods transit of uses (including multimodal enhancements economic development connections housing, intersections 2367 6 6656 strategy. employment, shopping, and professional services)

Reliable unobstructed transit Rapid transit should be an Provides a walkable Includes attractive, Manages traffic Promotes safe Ensures All of these are Filling sidewalk gaps Connecting to Prioritizing safety Creating well- Providing Once again, hard Extension to Dublin is 43221 43221 Male 65 or White / No integral part of our mixture of uses high-quality open impacts walk, bike, and compatibility actually existing bicycle enhancements designed places for bike to choose. All really important older Caucasian regional growth and (including housing, space transit with existing important and trails multimodal parking and should be done. economic development employment, connections neighborhoods should be done intersections storage 2377 4 5774 strategy. shopping, and professional services)

Bike paths and Connections to OSU and Doesnâ€™t No opinion No opinion Rapid transit should be an Promotes safe walk, Ensures Includes Provides a Manages traffic Connecting to existing bicycle Filling sidewalk Prioritizing safety Creating well- Providing As many connected bike 43221 43210 Male 35 - 54 White / No mass transit downtown connect into integral part of our bike, and transit compatibility with attractive, high- walkable mixture impacts trails gaps enhancements designed places for bike trails as possible Caucasian trivillage regional growth and connections existing quality open of uses multimodal parking and neighborhoods economic development neighborhoods space (including intersections storage very well strategy. housing, 238 7 4 657 4 employment, shopping, and professional services)

Better access the directness of the route 3 is too 1 and 2 cover more 3a skips over alot of Growth is imminent and Ensures compatibility Manages traffic Provides a Includes Promotes safe don't drive out Prioritizing safety Filling sidewalk Connecting to Creating well- Providing price and use local 43212 43212 Male 35 - 54 Prefer not Prefer not would be key routes long. no one businesses and will help more businesses and we need to begin adding with existing impacts walkable mixture attractive, high- walk, bike, and business and enhancements gaps existing bicycle designed places for bike companies with a to answer to answer along with better will use it from people housing travel options. neighborhoods of uses (including quality open transit land owners that trails multimodal parking and presence for design. planning of the end to end housing, space connections are already intersections storage 239 5 buildings. 3 666 5 employment, there. work with shopping, and them. professional services)

Love this! I like b but a may be I like 1 and 2 Things have worsened Includes attractive, Promotes safe Ensures Manages traffic Creating well-designed Connecting to Providing places Filling sidewalk Prioritizing 43212 43212 Male 35 - 54 Two or Yes beneficial for most over the years but are still high-quality open walk, bike, and compatibility with impacts multimodal intersections existing bicycle for bike parking gaps safety more races 240 7 4 775 3 people. But love and think tolerable. space transit existing trails and storage enhancements we need the lane ave connections neighborhoods coverd 1. How 2. When considering the 7. Many members of the 8. As planning for the supportive are routing and construction 3a. Three Rapid Transit 4a. Multiple Rapid Transit 5. How strongly do you 6. When considering public would like to see 13. Which Travel Northwest Corridor you regarding of Rapid Transit within route alternatives are 3b. Is there connections from the 4b. Is there feel that Rapid Transit is future development improved bicycle and racial 14. Are reliability Connection to progresses, are there 9. What 10. What the addition of a Please share the Northwest Corridor, Travel time Please share any being evaluated for the anything you Northwest Corridor to anything you needed to accommodate in vicinity of the 6. Rank 5 - Please share pedestrian connections to 7. Rank 5- Please share any 11. What 12. What group do you (the route major Costs to additional priority zip code zip code No. modern Rapid any additional how would you prioritize (the fastest additional Northwest Corridor. Is dislike about Downtown are also being dislike about some our region's continued Northwest Corridor, 6. Rank 2 6. Rank 3 6. Rank 4 Least any additional and from transit and local 7. Rank 2 7. Rank 3 7. Rank 4 Least additional is your is your you most Hispanic with the employment construct needs, considerations, do you do you Transit choice comments. the following? route) comments.2 there anything you like some or all of considered. Is there or all of the growth? (Select the which outcome is important comments.6 destinations. In creating important comments.7 gender? age? closely or least destinations or opportunities that live in? work in? along the Construction duration about some or all of the the routes? anything you like about routes? option that best most important to such connections, please identify Latino? delay) you believe should be Northwest (what could be built routes? some or all of the routes? describes your opinion.) you? rank the importance of the with? considered? Corridor? quickest) following. There is COTA for Option 1 - Olentangy river Option 3 - The Option 1 is best - most direct, Option 3 just Rapid transit should be an Ensures compatibility Includes attractive, Promotes safe Provides a Manages traffic Creating well-designed Connecting to Connecting to Providing Creating well- Bikes and timely communication 43214 43215 Female 55 - 64 White / No employment road is by far the best. Henderson/UA with Option 2 being a close wanders too much integral part of our with existing high-quality open walk, bike, and walkable mixture impacts multimodal intersections existing bicycle existing bicycle places for bike designed sidewalks are not and feedback allowance Caucasian transportation and route is the second choice. and through areas regional growth and neighborhoods space transit of uses trails trails parking and multimodal compatible and we don't need to be worst. Would where the people economic development connections (including storage intersections when motorists wandering all over be as bad as a there are most likely strategy. housing, see sidewalks, the suburbs. The COTA bus still to drive employment, they just drive most direct route wandering themselves to shopping, and faster because from Bethel to around and wherever they want professional people should be downtown is best. stopping all to go. The other two services) out of their way. A the time. A Options (1 and 2) good sidewalk 2417 5 7714 completely go through areas of system is the one indirect route. population who pictured - a would much more sidewalk for likely use the walking and one service and also the for bikes, BOTH stops along the separated by a way. natural barrier and space from the road.

I like the idea of serving I don't think The number 2 option would option 1 is the least Rapid transit should be an Provides a walkable Promotes safe Includes Ensures Manages traffic Creating well-designed Prioritizing Connecting to Providing Filling sidewalk 43214 43215 Male 35 - 54 White / No the west campus area, the Henderson serve morepeople and inspired and most integral part of our mixture of uses walk, bike, and attractive, high- compatibility impacts multimodal intersections safety existing bicycle places for bike gaps Caucasian because I think the route through UA attractions than the others as similar to what is regional growth and (including housing, transit quality open with existing enhancements trails parking and would be smoother; route option is things stand now, but the already served. economic development employment, connections space neighborhoods storage diverting around useful for this number 3 options, with 3b strategy. shopping, and Olentangy under 315. stated being most intriguing, would professional services) 2427 2 4564 That is a tight area. Also purpose. serve the changing the west campus area is Franklinton area well. seeing more growth currently.

The way it looks The plan looks like No. They look like they Please see Number 1 is far away from my They are a big Rapid transit should be an Ensures compatibility Manages traffic Promotes safe Provides a Includes When similar Providing places for bike Prioritizing Filling sidewalk Creating well- Connecting to Since it will take The biggest priority is to 43221 43223 Male Prefer Prefer not Prefer not is that the route it will be extremely will destroy riverfront above plus house. waste of money but integral part of our with existing impacts walk, bike, and walkable mixture attractive, high- ideas were tried parking and storage safety gaps designed existing bicycle much longer than make the routes not to to answer to answer doesn't go expensive and green space. they you and friends of regional growth and neighborhoods transit of uses quality open in my enhancements multimodal trails driving, bathrooms convenient to people in answer through any serve very few encourage government will get economic development connections (including space neighborhood intersections must be available the neighborhoods. neighborhoods people with slow dense richer while never strategy. housing, the traffic slowed at all stops. People do not want to and would service. development. riding the busses employment, considerably on walk 15 minutes to get to require a long Have you except for photo shopping, and the street is was a stop for a bus that takes walk to a station heard of opportunities. professional used on but another 30 minutes to get for a ride that will Covid? services) traffic on my to a destination that is 15 talk several times street increased minutes by car. In my longer than dramatically case it would take almost driving. along with an hour for a 15 minute speeds which drive and I would have made my street needed to walk a few almost unusable blocks after the bus trip. for biking or walking. Ruined a good 243 1 4 774 7 neighborhood. When the Police monitored the street they gave warnings to most drivers but only had time to write one ticket for almost 20 miles over the speed limit.

Great way to Folks need 1 and 2 would be choices Not strong but 3 B Growth is imminent and Manages traffic Ensures Promotes safe Provides a Includes All are important. Creating well-designed Prioritizing Connecting to Filling sidewalk Providing Again all are 43221 Several Male 65 or White / No meet people post dependable and west broad would we need to begin adding impacts compatibility with walk, bike, and walkable mixture attractive, high- Not sure how to multimodal intersections safety existing bicycle gaps places for bike important older Caucasian covid. Although timely routes. third choice travel options. existing transit of uses quality open separate enhancements trails parking and we will never be Where I saw transit neighborhoods connections (including space storage post covid we do work San Francisco housing, need and Chicago timely employment, socialization. and consistent shopping, and People have stops and starts professional 244 6 7 677 7 gotten a bit mean were important. services) spirited and need to dial back. It happens to mammals. 1. How 2. When considering the 7. Many members of the 8. As planning for the supportive are routing and construction 3a. Three Rapid Transit 4a. Multiple Rapid Transit 5. How strongly do you 6. When considering public would like to see 13. Which Travel Northwest Corridor you regarding of Rapid Transit within route alternatives are 3b. Is there connections from the 4b. Is there feel that Rapid Transit is future development improved bicycle and racial 14. Are reliability Connection to progresses, are there 9. What 10. What the addition of a Please share the Northwest Corridor, Travel time Please share any being evaluated for the anything you Northwest Corridor to anything you needed to accommodate in vicinity of the 6. Rank 5 - Please share pedestrian connections to 7. Rank 5- Please share any 11. What 12. What group do you (the route major Costs to additional priority zip code zip code No. modern Rapid any additional how would you prioritize (the fastest additional Northwest Corridor. Is dislike about Downtown are also being dislike about some our region's continued Northwest Corridor, 6. Rank 2 6. Rank 3 6. Rank 4 Least any additional and from transit and local 7. Rank 2 7. Rank 3 7. Rank 4 Least additional is your is your you most Hispanic with the employment construct needs, considerations, do you do you Transit choice comments. the following? route) comments.2 there anything you like some or all of considered. Is there or all of the growth? (Select the which outcome is important comments.6 destinations. In creating important comments.7 gender? age? closely or least destinations or opportunities that live in? work in? along the Construction duration about some or all of the the routes? anything you like about routes? option that best most important to such connections, please identify Latino? delay) you believe should be Northwest (what could be built routes? some or all of the routes? describes your opinion.) you? rank the importance of the with? considered? Corridor? quickest) following. It is important to I like 3 because it can 1 only serves I like 2 because it covers the 1 runs along Growth is imminent and Promotes safe walk, Ensures Manages traffic Provides a Includes Connecting to existing bicycle Prioritizing Creating well- Filling sidewalk Providing Connect the bike paths, 43220 43215 Female 35 - 54 White / No find a way to serve both UA and OSU and arena district, aep, nationwide Goodale park which we need to begin adding bike, and transit compatibility with impacts walkable mixture attractive, high- trails safety designed gaps places for bike possibly a commuter lane Caucasian reduce clintonville clintonville but and connects those areas to doesnâ€™t seem to travel options. connections existing of uses quality open enhancements multimodal parking and would help on 315? If we congestion, not UA the Grandview yard cover an area a lot neighborhoods (including space intersections storage could have a transport especially on of people would be housing, option that actually got 315. A couple regularly and same employment, me home faster and was concerns I have with along broad shopping, and better for the are the commute street for option 3 professional environment, who would times for the 3 services) say no to that! Possibly options seem the commuter lane would high so question just be enforced during if people would high traffic times and bother, due to the open to everyone any pandemic many other time. people will work from home permanently so congestion might naturally be 245 5 reduced already, 2 772 7 where would people park and what would the wait time be (if Iâ€™d have to wait 15 mins then take a 30 minute bus ride for a trip that usually takes 25 mins from my home straight to work, why would I bother)

Equity is highest concern No clear preference Rapid transit should be an Promotes safe walk, Provides a Ensures Includes Manages traffic Filling sidewalk gaps Prioritizing Connecting to Creating well- Providing 43220 43017 Female 65 or White / No for me integral part of our bike, and transit walkable mixture compatibility with attractive, high- impacts safety existing bicycle designed places for bike older Caucasian regional growth and connections of uses (including existing quality open enhancements trails multimodal parking and economic development housing, neighborhoods space intersections storage 2467 1 4556 strategy. employment, shopping, and professional services)

Near my home on Faster service No service #1 and #2 serve Nationwide Donâ€™t like the Rapid transit should be an Promotes safe walk, Manages traffic Provides a Ensures Includes Prioritizing safety Filling sidewalk Connecting to Creating well- Providing Bethel-Morse connector, 43235 43216 Male 55 - 64 White / No Bethel down Bethel Plaza, #3 does not. idea of riding three integral part of our bike, and transit impacts walkable mixture compatibility attractive, high- enhancements gaps existing bicycle designed places for bike Ackerman-Zollinger Caucasian busses for a trip that regional growth and connections of uses (including with existing quality open trails multimodal parking and connector to improve east- can now be done on economic development housing, neighborhoods space intersections storage west flow and eliminate 2477 4 7663 just one (routes #1 strategy. employment, bottlenecks or #72)) shopping, and professional services)

It is not needed Traffic is fine and I'm not Male 65 or 2481 1 1117 concerned about growth. older

Rapid transit should be an Ensures compatibility Promotes safe Manages traffic Includes Provides a Filling sidewalk gaps Connecting to Prioritizing safety Creating well- Providing 43220 43215 Female 35 - 54 White / No integral part of our with existing walk, bike, and impacts attractive, high- walkable existing bicycle enhancements designed places for bike Caucasian regional growth and neighborhoods transit quality open mixture of uses trails multimodal parking and economic development connections space (including intersections storage strategy. housing, employment, 2496 4 6665 shopping, and professional services)

Rapid transit should be an Includes attractive, Provides a Promotes safe Ensures Manages traffic Filling sidewalk gaps Connecting to Providing places Creating well- Prioritizing College Hill area of Upper 43221 43221 Female 55 - 64 White / No integral part of our high-quality open walkable mixture walk, bike, and compatibility impacts existing bicycle for bike parking designed safety Arlington needs Caucasian regional growth and space of uses (including transit with existing trails and storage multimodal enhancements sidewalks. economic development housing, connections neighborhoods intersections 2507 4 4775 strategy. employment, shopping, and professional services)

Growth is imminent and Ensures compatibility Manages traffic Includes Provides a Prioritizing safety Filling sidewalk Connecting to Creating well- Providing 43221 43221 Female 65 or White / No we need to begin adding with existing impacts attractive, high- walkable enhancements gaps existing bicycle designed places for bike older Caucasian travel options. neighborhoods quality open mixture of uses trails multimodal parking and space (including intersections storage housing, employment, 2514 3 4536 shopping, and professional services)

Rapid transit should be an Promotes safe walk, Provides a Manages traffic Includes Ensures Creating well-designed Prioritizing Connecting to Filling sidewalk Providing Male 35 - 54 White / No integral part of our bike, and transit walkable mixture impacts attractive, high- compatibility multimodal intersections safety existing bicycle gaps places for bike Caucasian regional growth and connections of uses (including quality open with existing enhancements trails parking and economic development housing, space neighborhoods storage 2527 1 6645 strategy. employment, shopping, and professional services)

I like turning away from By sticking I like that Option 2 includes I dislike the travel Rapid transit should be an Provides a walkable Includes attractive, Promotes safe Manages traffic Ensures Connecting to existing bicycle Prioritizing Creating well- Filling sidewalk Providing 43235 43016 Male 26 - 34 White / No Olentangy River Road to exclusively to the Arena District, and feel time for Option 3. integral part of our mixture of uses high-quality open walk, bike, and impacts compatibility trails safety designed gaps places for bike Caucasian hit the new developments Olentangy that it's important any BRT 26 minutes seems regional growth and (including housing, space transit with existing enhancements multimodal parking and at OSU West Campus, River Road, I proposal makes a stop in this far too long to make economic development employment, connections neighborhoods intersections storage and potentially also to wonder if area. this route practical. strategy. shopping, and bring BRT closer to the Option 1 isn't professional services) 2537 3 5663 residential areas at Kenny too limited to Rd for option 3. the number of people to whom it will be easily accessible. 1. How 2. When considering the 7. Many members of the 8. As planning for the supportive are routing and construction 3a. Three Rapid Transit 4a. Multiple Rapid Transit 5. How strongly do you 6. When considering public would like to see 13. Which Travel Northwest Corridor you regarding of Rapid Transit within route alternatives are 3b. Is there connections from the 4b. Is there feel that Rapid Transit is future development improved bicycle and racial 14. Are reliability Connection to progresses, are there 9. What 10. What the addition of a Please share the Northwest Corridor, Travel time Please share any being evaluated for the anything you Northwest Corridor to anything you needed to accommodate in vicinity of the 6. Rank 5 - Please share pedestrian connections to 7. Rank 5- Please share any 11. What 12. What group do you (the route major Costs to additional priority zip code zip code No. modern Rapid any additional how would you prioritize (the fastest additional Northwest Corridor. Is dislike about Downtown are also being dislike about some our region's continued Northwest Corridor, 6. Rank 2 6. Rank 3 6. Rank 4 Least any additional and from transit and local 7. Rank 2 7. Rank 3 7. Rank 4 Least additional is your is your you most Hispanic with the employment construct needs, considerations, do you do you Transit choice comments. the following? route) comments.2 there anything you like some or all of considered. Is there or all of the growth? (Select the which outcome is important comments.6 destinations. In creating important comments.7 gender? age? closely or least destinations or opportunities that live in? work in? along the Construction duration about some or all of the the routes? anything you like about routes? option that best most important to such connections, please identify Latino? delay) you believe should be Northwest (what could be built routes? some or all of the routes? describes your opinion.) you? rank the importance of the with? considered? Corridor? quickest) following. Yes, quick time that it takes is 3 has more options 3a offers most options Rapid transit should be an Ensures compatibility Provides a Promotes safe Includes Manages traffic the existing Prioritizing safety Creating well- Connecting to Filling sidewalk Providing pedestrian safety the existing 43221 43221 Female 65 or White / No access to very important integral part of our with existing walkable mixture walk, bike, and attractive, high- impacts neighborhoods enhancements designed existing bicycle gaps places for bike is paramount neighborhoods and older Caucasian university and regional growth and neighborhoods of uses (including transit quality open are must be multimodal trails parking and residents and the impact. downtown economic development housing, connections space respected. intersections storage 254 6 needed 7 556 5 strategy. employment, shopping, and professional services)

I like the concept In addition to major Covering Ohio State Route 3 is Without this extension, the The fact that it's Rapid transit should be an Ensures compatibility Promotes safe Provides a Manages traffic Includes Connecting to existing bicycle Filling sidewalk Creating well- Prioritizing Providing Connecting and 43220 43017 Male 35 - 54 Asian No of a rapid public employment campus is a must similar to the Northwest Corridor alone being considered integral part of our with existing walk, bike, and walkable mixture impacts attractive, high- trails gaps designed safety places for bike completing the existing transit, but the destinations, major current COTA wouldn't get workers to most separately from the regional growth and neighborhoods transit of uses (including quality open multimodal enhancements parking and bike trails alone will help focus seems attractions like Bus Route 1... of the major employers Northwest Corridor economic development connections housing, space intersections storage improve access to small. Projected sport teams, which takes downtown.... so this is a must. is a joke. They need strategy. employment, downtown from the user base of 20k- universities, ~45 minutes to occur together. shopping, and Northwest corridor. When 30k for a city of shopping plazas from Bethel Rd professional the weather is good, it almost 900k? also need to be to Goodale services) could actually be faster considered. Park. At the for me to just bike from Otherwise, this upper travel my house to downtown project would only time estimate using the existing bike benefit those who range of 38 trails rather than biking to happen to work at minutes, this the nearest rapid transit those "major whole project station, waiting for the employment would only bus, taking the bus, then 255 4 2 775 5 destinations". Also save 7 walking from the important to minutes. downtown terminus to my consider out of That's not destination downtown town visitors-- worth it. especially people who fly into Columbus who don't have a car here and would choose between public transit and renting a car.

Like that route 3 connects Rapid transit should be an Provides a walkable Includes attractive, Ensures Manages traffic Promotes safe Prioritizing safety Creating well- Connecting to Providing Filling sidewalk 43221 43210 Male 35 - 54 White / No to UA. Very important integral part of our mixture of uses high-quality open compatibility with impacts walk, bike, and enhancements designed existing bicycle places for bike gaps Caucasian regional growth and (including housing, space existing transit multimodal trails parking and economic development employment, neighborhoods connections intersections storage 2567 3 5672 strategy. shopping, and professional services)

Like 3 since it enters into Route 2 because it splits the Rapid transit should be an Promotes safe walk, Manages traffic Ensures Provides a Includes Connecting to existing bicycle Creating well- Providing places Prioritizing Filling sidewalk Male 55 - 64 White / No Upper Arlington for easier other routes and might be integral part of our bike, and transit impacts compatibility with walkable mixture attractive, high- trails designed for bike parking safety gaps Caucasian access to residents who walkable for more people regional growth and connections existing of uses quality open multimodal and storage enhancements live there. Like 2 with the economic development neighborhoods (including space intersections route around OSU west strategy. housing, 2576 4 4775 campus. Faster travel employment, time with 1. All have trade shopping, and offs. professional services)

please actually build â€œGoldâ€ that anything is turn this into a connecting to e/w transit lines not fast enough. Rapid transit should be an Promotes safe walk, Provides a Includes Ensures Manages traffic Creating well-designed Providing Filling sidewalk Connecting to Prioritizing there must be 10m headways. short end 43206 43017 Male 26 - 34 White / No build something. standard BRT happening â€˜gridâ€™ on broad integral part of our bike, and transit walkable mixture attractive, high- compatibility impacts multimodal intersections places for bike gaps existing bicycle safety grade separated to end travel times. Caucasian Columbus needs system, make regional growth and connections of uses (including quality open with existing parking and trails enhancements transit, bike and â€œThe Commuteâ€ high CABS have economic development housing, space neighborhoods storage walking paths after COVID is dead, stop capacity/high connections, strategy. employment, away from planning for it. make frequency transit not adjust the shopping, and dangerous single structrual changes for a 258 7 7 771 1 corridors line. Donâ€™t professional occupancy more sustainable city go through UA services) vehicles

We needed this Cost matters less to 2 serves the most jobs 3 has the 1 is both the shortest route 2 is the least Rapid transit should be an Promotes safe walk, Provides a Ensures Manages traffic Includes The most Prioritizing safety Connecting to Filling sidewalk Creating well- Providing Safety should be Keeping bikes out of 43202 43228 Female 26 - 34 White / No yesterday me if the benefits while still scoring high on longest travel and serves the most jobs, favorable option, as integral part of our bike, and transit walkable mixture compatibility with impacts attractive, high- important thing enhancements existing bicycle gaps designed places for bike the number one harm's way. Having Caucasian outweigh it. sustainability, while 1 has time and while 3 serves the most it serves both the regional growth and connections of uses (including existing quality open to me is trails multimodal parking and concern. The bike better signage so that the best scores in most serves the population. least population and economic development housing, neighborhoods space encouraging non- intersections storage lane on Summit is cars understand that categories, but serves least jobs, but least jobs (until strategy. employment, car options of incredibly bikes are supposed to less jobs and population it does have a 2050, that is) shopping, and travel. dangerous at use the street (when bike higher professional "Attractiveness" times because lanes are not available). I projected services) should be the cars do not stop at cannot count the number 259 7 4 566 3 population last factor stop signs. I was of times I have been the served. considered, with almost hit by a victim of an aggressive function and police officer who driver, fearing for my life. sustainability did not stop at a being the most stop sign. important.

I particularly like that 2 and 3 I like #1 the least Growth is imminent and Promotes safe walk, Provides a Includes Manages traffic Ensures Connecting to existing bicycle Prioritizing Creating well- Providing Filling sidewalk 43221 primarily Female 35 - 54 White / No have segments that connect because it is just a we need to begin adding bike, and transit walkable mixture attractive, high- impacts compatibility trails safety designed places for bike gaps in 43221 Caucasian into areas where there are straight line along travel options. connections of uses (including quality open with existing enhancements multimodal parking and things to do and businesses 315 housing, space neighborhoods intersections storage 2607 2 6664 with jobs employment, shopping, and professional services)

3 too 3a too circuitous Rapid transit should be an Provides a walkable Promotes safe Manages traffic Includes Ensures Filling sidewalk gaps Prioritizing Creating well- Connecting to Providing 43212 43212 Male 65 or White / No circuitous integral part of our mixture of uses walk, bike, and impacts attractive, high- compatibility safety designed existing bicycle places for bike older Caucasian regional growth and (including housing, transit quality open with existing enhancements multimodal trails parking and economic development employment, connections space neighborhoods intersections storage 2617 4 4765 strategy. shopping, and professional services)

Cost of service Most of the city is Rapid transit should be an Provides a walkable Manages traffic Promotes safe Ensures Includes Connecting to existing bicycle Prioritizing Creating well- Filling sidewalk Providing Connecting the rest of the 43202 43235 Male 26 - 34 White / No not served with integral part of our mixture of uses impacts walk, bike, and compatibility attractive, high- trails safety designed gaps places for bike city to it... Caucasian these regional growth and (including housing, transit with existing quality open enhancements multimodal parking and economic development employment, connections neighborhoods space intersections storage 2627 1 7771 strategy. shopping, and professional services) 1. How 2. When considering the 7. Many members of the 8. As planning for the supportive are routing and construction 3a. Three Rapid Transit 4a. Multiple Rapid Transit 5. How strongly do you 6. When considering public would like to see 13. Which Travel Northwest Corridor you regarding of Rapid Transit within route alternatives are 3b. Is there connections from the 4b. Is there feel that Rapid Transit is future development improved bicycle and racial 14. Are reliability Connection to progresses, are there 9. What 10. What the addition of a Please share the Northwest Corridor, Travel time Please share any being evaluated for the anything you Northwest Corridor to anything you needed to accommodate in vicinity of the 6. Rank 5 - Please share pedestrian connections to 7. Rank 5- Please share any 11. What 12. What group do you (the route major Costs to additional priority zip code zip code No. modern Rapid any additional how would you prioritize (the fastest additional Northwest Corridor. Is dislike about Downtown are also being dislike about some our region's continued Northwest Corridor, 6. Rank 2 6. Rank 3 6. Rank 4 Least any additional and from transit and local 7. Rank 2 7. Rank 3 7. Rank 4 Least additional is your is your you most Hispanic with the employment construct needs, considerations, do you do you Transit choice comments. the following? route) comments.2 there anything you like some or all of considered. Is there or all of the growth? (Select the which outcome is important comments.6 destinations. In creating important comments.7 gender? age? closely or least destinations or opportunities that live in? work in? along the Construction duration about some or all of the the routes? anything you like about routes? option that best most important to such connections, please identify Latino? delay) you believe should be Northwest (what could be built routes? some or all of the routes? describes your opinion.) you? rank the importance of the with? considered? Corridor? quickest) following. Rapid transit should be an Promotes safe walk, Provides a Manages traffic Ensures Includes Connecting to existing bicycle Prioritizing Filling sidewalk Filling sidewalk Providing 43207 43211 Male 35 - 54 White / No integral part of our bike, and transit walkable mixture impacts compatibility attractive, high- trails safety gaps gaps places for bike Caucasian regional growth and connections of uses (including with existing quality open enhancements parking and economic development housing, neighborhoods space storage 2636 6 5777 strategy. employment, shopping, and professional services)

best realistic it is important to get option 3 to get some Rapid transit should be an Provides a walkable Manages traffic need clarity of Creating well-designed Filling sidewalk Connecting to increase housing density 43209 43215 Male 55 - 64 Prefer not Prefer not option started and connection on Broad Street integral part of our mixture of uses impacts providing denser multimodal intersections gaps existing bicycle in proximity to transit to answer to answer demonstrate to the regional growth and (including housing, housing in trails nodes - essential to region that our economic development employment, proximity to supporting small scale future can be strategy. shopping, and transit stops retail that is needed to different than our professional services) make attractive city 264 7 7 577 5 past...the longer we locations/neighborh wait, more of the current development continues

Light Rail or I like #2. It serves a lot of #3 takes too #1 best supports the synergy Let #3 support a Rapid transit should be an Provides a walkable Promotes safe Includes Manages traffic Ensures If this is not Creating well-designed Connecting to Providing places Filling sidewalk Prioritizing 43220 Retired Male 65 or White / No Monorail. people but is still efficient much time. of downtown and is shortest West corridore. It integral part of our mixture of uses walk, bike, and attractive, high- impacts compatibility faster that cars multimodal intersections existing bicycle for bike parking gaps safety older Caucasian Dedicated right- time-wise. travel time. does not support regional growth and (including housing, transit quality open with existing (including trails and storage enhancements of-way but not on well a Northwest economic development employment, connections space neighborhoods parking) it will 265 7 the street. 4 775 2 concept. strategy. shopping, and not work. professional services)

My preference is for route 3 Rapid transit should be an Promotes safe walk, Provides a Includes Manages traffic Ensures Connecting to existing bicycle Filling sidewalk Creating well- Prioritizing Providing 43221 43210 Female 35 - 54 White / No given the large number of integral part of our bike, and transit walkable mixture attractive, high- impacts compatibility trails gaps designed safety places for bike Caucasian employees who work in health regional growth and connections of uses (including quality open with existing multimodal enhancements parking and care in that area. economic development housing, space neighborhoods intersections storage 2667 7 7776 strategy. employment, shopping, and professional services)

BRT is Putting it on 1 makes the most sense. I don't see why a Rapid transit should be an Promotes safe walk, Provides a Includes Ensures Manages traffic The most Creating well-designed Filling sidewalk Prioritizing safety Providing Connecting to 43212 43215 Female 26 - 34 White / No something Olentangy connections can't integral part of our bike, and transit walkable mixture attractive, high- compatibility impacts important multimodal intersections gaps enhancements places for bike existing bicycle Caucasian Columbus River Road be made at 5th ave regional growth and connections of uses (including quality open with existing outcomes aren't parking and trails should have seems silly. to cross the river economic development housing, space neighborhoods listed: providing storage started setting up There's not a and then go up and strategy. employment, equitable a decade ago. lot of existing down High St. BRT shopping, and transportation transit is a natural fit for professional options for connections to high street so why services) people ORR, and it's build another weird regardless of out of the way corridor when you income, and for a lot of can just merge with getting people offices/homes that. out of SOVs. 267 7 4 657 4 in the area. People aren't going to take it if it's a pain to get to, especially when it's so easy to drive everywhere here.

Rapid transit is We have to stop Equity and sustainability Rapid transit should be an Provides a walkable Promotes safe Ensures Includes Manages traffic In order to age in Filling sidewalk gaps Creating well- Prioritizing safety Providing Connecting to These seem 43202 N/A Female 55 - 64 White / No needed for all being so focused are critical integral part of our mixture of uses walk, bike, and compatibility with attractive, high- impacts place, Columbus designed enhancements places for bike existing bicycle primarily focused Caucasian areas across the on short-term goals regional growth and (including housing, transit existing quality open has got to multimodal parking and trails on bicycle issues, city to improve and develop the economic development employment, connections neighborhoods space become less car- intersections storage which is public city in long term strategy. shopping, and dependent and understandable. transportation, sustainable ways. professional services) have improved But it won't help increase walkable the aging walkability and neighborhoods population. lesson impact of with practical Lumping traffic. and accessible pedestrians and public transit. bicyclists together Otherwise, I will on paths only eventually move makes it to someplace impossible for that's easier to pedestrians (and get around in dangerous). Don't before I am "old." forget walkers, please. It's already hard to walk on 268 7 4 567 4 sidewalks because they're not taken care of, hard to walk on Olentangy trail because bicyclists dominate and make it unsafe to do so. Streets are hard to cross because they are totally car friendly. Walkability is necessary for walkers, bicyclists AND transit riders.

Rapid transit should be an Promotes safe walk, Includes attractive, Provides a Manages traffic Ensures Creating well-designed Prioritizing Filling sidewalk Connecting to Providing 43220 43221 Female 35 - 54 White / No integral part of our bike, and transit high-quality open walkable mixture impacts compatibility multimodal intersections safety gaps existing bicycle places for bike Caucasian regional growth and connections space of uses (including with existing enhancements trails parking and economic development housing, neighborhoods storage 2697 1 5751 strategy. employment, shopping, and professional services) 1. How 2. When considering the 7. Many members of the 8. As planning for the supportive are routing and construction 3a. Three Rapid Transit 4a. Multiple Rapid Transit 5. How strongly do you 6. When considering public would like to see 13. Which Travel Northwest Corridor you regarding of Rapid Transit within route alternatives are 3b. Is there connections from the 4b. Is there feel that Rapid Transit is future development improved bicycle and racial 14. Are reliability Connection to progresses, are there 9. What 10. What the addition of a Please share the Northwest Corridor, Travel time Please share any being evaluated for the anything you Northwest Corridor to anything you needed to accommodate in vicinity of the 6. Rank 5 - Please share pedestrian connections to 7. Rank 5- Please share any 11. What 12. What group do you (the route major Costs to additional priority zip code zip code No. modern Rapid any additional how would you prioritize (the fastest additional Northwest Corridor. Is dislike about Downtown are also being dislike about some our region's continued Northwest Corridor, 6. Rank 2 6. Rank 3 6. Rank 4 Least any additional and from transit and local 7. Rank 2 7. Rank 3 7. Rank 4 Least additional is your is your you most Hispanic with the employment construct needs, considerations, do you do you Transit choice comments. the following? route) comments.2 there anything you like some or all of considered. Is there or all of the growth? (Select the which outcome is important comments.6 destinations. In creating important comments.7 gender? age? closely or least destinations or opportunities that live in? work in? along the Construction duration about some or all of the the routes? anything you like about routes? option that best most important to such connections, please identify Latino? delay) you believe should be Northwest (what could be built routes? some or all of the routes? describes your opinion.) you? rank the importance of the with? considered? Corridor? quickest) following. It will be painful route 1 is most direct and route 3 takes a 1 and 2 are only viable ones route 3 is way too Rapid transit should be an Ensures compatibility Provides a Promotes safe Manages traffic Includes the route itself Prioritizing safety Connecting to Filling sidewalk Creating well- Providing safety is we need to also make 43201 43210 Female 55 - 64 White / No in the short run, best in my mind way too far far detour integral part of our with existing walkable mixture walk, bike, and impacts attractive, high- does not/should enhancements existing bicycle gaps designed places for bike paramount - sure that it connects to Caucasian but necessary for west detour regional growth and neighborhoods of uses (including transit quality open not be worried trails multimodal parking and including some things like airport access the long run! through upper economic development housing, connections space about open intersections storage type of and future passenger rail arlington strategy. employment, spaces. It should educational/adverti access at convention shopping, and connect easily to sing campaign to center professional existing open help car-centric services) spaces such as folks who either 270 7 4 577 4 scioto mile, don't get it or audubon park, refuse to get it! goodale park, olentangy trail, etc.

No No Growth is imminent and Provides a walkable Promotes safe Ensures Includes Manages traffic Filling sidewalk gaps Connecting to Prioritizing safety Creating well- Providing 43214 43212 Male Prefer White / Prefer not we need to begin adding mixture of uses walk, bike, and compatibility with attractive, high- impacts existing bicycle enhancements designed places for bike not to Caucasian to answer travel options. (including housing, transit existing quality open trails multimodal parking and answer employment, connections neighborhoods space intersections storage 2716 1 7652 shopping, and professional services)

BRT is the most #3 through #3 route would include the Rapid transit should be an Provides a walkable Manages traffic Promotes safe Includes Ensures Filling sidewalk gaps Connecting to Creating well- Prioritizing Providing Please have the stations 43065 43212 Female 35 - 54 White / No economical Upper most employers and have the integral part of our mixture of uses impacts walk, bike, and attractive, high- compatibility existing bicycle designed safety places for bike architecturally significant, Caucasian choice and most Arlington will most walkability regional growth and (including housing, transit quality open with existing trails multimodal enhancements parking and and extend the line into likely to be built not be used economic development employment, connections space neighborhoods intersections storage Delaware County 272 7 2 757 2 and will likely strategy. shopping, and be fought by professional services) residents

Growth is imminent and Promotes safe walk, Ensures Manages traffic Provides a Includes Prioritizing safety Filling sidewalk Creating well- Connecting to Providing 43212 43212 Female 35 - 54 White / No we need to begin adding bike, and transit compatibility with impacts walkable mixture attractive, high- enhancements gaps designed existing bicycle places for bike Caucasian travel options. connections existing of uses quality open multimodal trails parking and neighborhoods (including space intersections storage housing, 2731 1 1475 employment, shopping, and professional services)

Transit that is Connecting to I like the speed and workforce I'd be interested to Rapid transit should be an Ensures compatibility Provides a Promotes safe Manages traffic Includes Compatibility Connecting to existing bicycle Creating well- Filling sidewalk Prioritizing Providing Bike parking & Really connecting 43017 43215 Female 35 - 54 White / No comparable to places that people advancement of #1, the equity understand more integral part of our with existing walkable mixture walk, bike, and impacts attractive, high- with existing trails designed gaps safety places for bike storage is neighborhoods and work Caucasian car travel is want to go and in #3. about the regional growth and neighborhoods of uses (including transit quality open neighborhoods multimodal enhancements parking and important but most centers will be key to imperative to need to go should rankings/scores of economic development housing, connections space is very intersections storage folks simply want getting more people to help encourage be the highest workforce strategy. employment, subjective and to use one mode use modern Rapid mode shift. priority with costs advancement in #1 shopping, and conveying the to get to their Transit. and construction and equity in# 3. professional benefits of this destination. duration also being services) development to a factor. individual neighborhoods is key...how will they benefit? 274 7 4 447 4 Increase property values, could be a one car household and save money? Those direct relationships & benefits will be key.

Olentangy River Rd. all I think the All seem tricky, but the Neil, Broad St. seems Rapid transit should be an Provides a walkable Promotes safe Ensures Includes Prioritizing safety Creating well- Filling sidewalk Providing Connecting to All seem Ensure the Olentangy 43214 43214 Male 35 - 54 White / No the way seems the best. OSU & Kenny Vine / Goodale seems to make costly and will slow integral part of our mixture of uses walk, bike, and compatibility with attractive, high- enhancements designed gaps places for bike existing bicycle important; so even Multiuse Trail plans are Caucasian OSU West & other routes Road the most sense based on all of the NW BRT - regional growth and (including housing, transit existing quality open multimodal parking and trails least is still incorporated into these could be better served by diversions will the factors. It also directly perhaps economic development employment, connections neighborhoods space intersections storage relevant. overall LinkUS vision and frequent feeder diminish the serves Nationwide Arena & significantly, and strategy. shopping, and planning. Nothing should buses/links by CABS "rapid" Huntington Park and the new would seem to professional services) be done in isolation or an (OSU) & COTA. For the concept. BRT Crew Stadium. The others interfere with or option could later be Olentangy Route, should not bypass these destinations. complicate BRT regretted. Also - better consider dealing with the offer the options on Broad. safety is needed along tight corner at Kinnear by first/last mile or the exising O-trail north of cutting through and 1/2 mile. Bethel. The trail goes putting a station right in Leave that to very close to 315, and Lennox. Less parking walking, much of the distance needed with better transit. bicycling (with from Bethel to Antrim good Park lacks guard rails infrastructure along the highway. The for both) and fencing along the trail will feeder/link not protect trail users buses or even from a car or truck that 2757 7 7776 frequent diverts or spins out from "jitneys" that the highway across the could offer grass/snow into the even more fence. Recently the fence flexibility in was already damaged short-medium from a divergent vehicle. distance It's extremely unsafe and connections. should be a city and Option 2 is ODOT priority in the near second best if future to put in guardrails needed. along 315 throughtout Option 3 that entire stretch.. makes no sense to me. 1. How 2. When considering the 7. Many members of the 8. As planning for the supportive are routing and construction 3a. Three Rapid Transit 4a. Multiple Rapid Transit 5. How strongly do you 6. When considering public would like to see 13. Which Travel Northwest Corridor you regarding of Rapid Transit within route alternatives are 3b. Is there connections from the 4b. Is there feel that Rapid Transit is future development improved bicycle and racial 14. Are reliability Connection to progresses, are there 9. What 10. What the addition of a Please share the Northwest Corridor, Travel time Please share any being evaluated for the anything you Northwest Corridor to anything you needed to accommodate in vicinity of the 6. Rank 5 - Please share pedestrian connections to 7. Rank 5- Please share any 11. What 12. What group do you (the route major Costs to additional priority zip code zip code No. modern Rapid any additional how would you prioritize (the fastest additional Northwest Corridor. Is dislike about Downtown are also being dislike about some our region's continued Northwest Corridor, 6. Rank 2 6. Rank 3 6. Rank 4 Least any additional and from transit and local 7. Rank 2 7. Rank 3 7. Rank 4 Least additional is your is your you most Hispanic with the employment construct needs, considerations, do you do you Transit choice comments. the following? route) comments.2 there anything you like some or all of considered. Is there or all of the growth? (Select the which outcome is important comments.6 destinations. In creating important comments.7 gender? age? closely or least destinations or opportunities that live in? work in? along the Construction duration about some or all of the the routes? anything you like about routes? option that best most important to such connections, please identify Latino? delay) you believe should be Northwest (what could be built routes? some or all of the routes? describes your opinion.) you? rank the importance of the with? considered? Corridor? quickest) following. You can build 1 is straight. 2 and 2 3A/3B go through the lower- It's not necessary to Rapid transit should be an Promotes safe walk, Provides a Manages traffic Ensures Includes Focus on budget Connecting to existing bicycle Filling sidewalk Providing places Prioritizing Creating well- People won't use Prioritize ease of use and 43211 43210 Male 26 - 34 White / No fripperies later. reroute a BRT developed Grandview area. connect to High. integral part of our bike, and transit walkable mixture impacts compatibility attractive, high- and transit trails gaps for bike parking safety designed the fancy BRT if low cost. Save money for Caucasian Focus on building line when that This is good, as it provides Traffic patterns regional growth and connections of uses (including with existing quality open before and storage enhancements multimodal they can't get to further expansions. roads and bridges line should access to large shopping, there are bad economic development housing, neighborhoods space aesthetics. intersections the station. Connect to existing cross- before building instead focus employment, and education enough. Let BRT strategy. employment, Aesthetics can town lines, rather than fancy stations. on transfers to areas in the north. riders transfer to a shopping, and be retrofitted. rerouting. reliable, short- local circulator bus, professional 2767 6 5757 route local and continue the services) circulator BRT trail south. buses.

Route 1 - appears to hit Route 3 - while Rapid transit should be an Promotes safe walk, Provides a Includes Ensures Manages traffic Connecting to existing bicycle Providing Creating well- Filling sidewalk Prioritizing Bike racks on rapid- 43220 43215/43 Female 35 - 54 White / No the major employers in physically integral part of our bike, and transit walkable mixture attractive, high- compatibility impacts trails places for bike designed gaps safety transit busses. 220 Caucasian the area with the fastest convenient for regional growth and connections of uses (including quality open with existing parking and multimodal enhancements (home) route times. me personally, economic development housing, space neighborhoods storage intersections might infringe strategy. employment, 2777 4 6764 to greatly on shopping, and already-busy professional traffic areas. services)

Long overdue Routes 1&2 are closer to Rapid transit should be an Manages traffic Provides a Promotes safe Includes Ensures Creating well-designed Prioritizing Connecting to Providing Filling sidewalk 43206 43206 Female 35 - 54 White / No neighborhoods which I think is integral part of our impacts walkable mixture walk, bike, and attractive, high- compatibility multimodal intersections safety existing bicycle places for bike gaps Caucasian important (integrating modern regional growth and of uses (including transit quality open with existing enhancements trails parking and transit to economic development housing, connections space neighborhoods storage neighborhoods...people's strategy. employment, 278 7 4 766 4 lives). I also like Route 3a b/c shopping, and it completely disrupts Broad professional St. which must ben done. services)

They all consider equity. I like option #1 All serve a lot of riders. I like Option #1, Rapid transit should be an Provides a walkable Promotes safe Includes Manages traffic Ensures Connecting to existing bicycle Providing Creating well- Prioritizing Filling sidewalk 43201 43212 Male 35 - 54 Asian No because it get since it allow riders integral part of our mixture of uses walk, bike, and attractive, high- impacts compatibility trails places for bike designed safety gaps a rider from to connect regional growth and (including housing, transit quality open with existing parking and multimodal enhancements the origin to downtown near economic development employment, connections space neighborhoods storage intersections terminus High Street. Many strategy. shopping, and destinations people are familiar professional services) the quickest. with this street and Other local there are lot of 2797 7 7777 bus routes can business that the fill in the needs new riders will bring of riders not on to these the main route. businesses.

Buses seem so OSU campus stop is a Route 2 is the best of three They are all Rapid transit should be an Promotes safe walk, Includes attractive, Provides a Ensures Manages traffic Consider BRT Connecting to existing bicycle Prioritizing Creating well- Providing Filling sidewalk Give pedestrians more 43085 43210 Male 55 - 64 White / No 20th century, but must. not very good options. What convoluted. Why integral part of our bike, and transit high-quality open walkable mixture compatibility impacts that lets people trails safety designed places for bike gaps places to walk. Caucasian could the about using High Street? This not take 5th Avenue regional growth and connections space of uses (including with existing transport enhancements multimodal parking and dedicated would provide access to the eastbound to High? economic development housing, neighborhoods bicycles. intersections storage transitway be Short North. This would allow a strategy. employment, made available to Short North stop. shopping, and 280 7 bicyclists or 2 446 4 professional pedestrians services) during off-times like Sunday mornings?

Dedicated Congestion is not a I like that Route 3 creates Olentangy 3a/b would be a great Rapid transit should be an Promotes safe walk, Provides a Includes Ensures Manages traffic Walkability+mixt Filling sidewalk gaps Connecting to Prioritizing safety Creating well- Providing 43212 43215 Male 26 - 34 White / No transitway is key problem at the some connectivity River Road is investment considering all of integral part of our bike, and transit walkable mixture attractive, high- compatibility impacts ure of uses is existing bicycle enhancements designed places for bike Caucasian scale of some of through existing really the new residential regional growth and connections of uses (including quality open with existing important -- trails multimodal parking and Columbus's commercial areas and disconnected development planned in this economic development housing, space neighborhoods otherwise, we're intersections storage contemporaries -- residential from the area strategy. employment, just creating a would rather wait neighborhoods. greater shopping, and downtown for a more refined pedestrian professional express bus. product to be built network services) There would be a significant 281 7 2 576 5 economic development opportunity cost otherwise without well- integrating fixed transit investments

Rapid transit should be an Ensures compatibility Provides a Promotes safe Manages traffic Includes Creating well-designed Connecting to Filling sidewalk Prioritizing Providing I believe it is important to 43206 43215 Female 26 - 34 White / No integral part of our with existing walkable mixture walk, bike, and impacts attractive, high- multimodal intersections existing bicycle gaps safety places for bike consider that many folks Caucasian regional growth and neighborhoods of uses (including transit quality open trails enhancements parking and in the area do not have economic development housing, connections space storage access to smart phones strategy. employment, or other digital forms of shopping, and payment. This is a huge professional barrier for those who wish services) to use the CoGo bikes 2827 3 5574 and scooters as well as park downtown in certain areas. How will we accommodate these folks as we strive for equity? 1. How 2. When considering the 7. Many members of the 8. As planning for the supportive are routing and construction 3a. Three Rapid Transit 4a. Multiple Rapid Transit 5. How strongly do you 6. When considering public would like to see 13. Which Travel Northwest Corridor you regarding of Rapid Transit within route alternatives are 3b. Is there connections from the 4b. Is there feel that Rapid Transit is future development improved bicycle and racial 14. Are reliability Connection to progresses, are there 9. What 10. What the addition of a Please share the Northwest Corridor, Travel time Please share any being evaluated for the anything you Northwest Corridor to anything you needed to accommodate in vicinity of the 6. Rank 5 - Please share pedestrian connections to 7. Rank 5- Please share any 11. What 12. What group do you (the route major Costs to additional priority zip code zip code No. modern Rapid any additional how would you prioritize (the fastest additional Northwest Corridor. Is dislike about Downtown are also being dislike about some our region's continued Northwest Corridor, 6. Rank 2 6. Rank 3 6. Rank 4 Least any additional and from transit and local 7. Rank 2 7. Rank 3 7. Rank 4 Least additional is your is your you most Hispanic with the employment construct needs, considerations, do you do you Transit choice comments. the following? route) comments.2 there anything you like some or all of considered. Is there or all of the growth? (Select the which outcome is important comments.6 destinations. In creating important comments.7 gender? age? closely or least destinations or opportunities that live in? work in? along the Construction duration about some or all of the the routes? anything you like about routes? option that best most important to such connections, please identify Latino? delay) you believe should be Northwest (what could be built routes? some or all of the routes? describes your opinion.) you? rank the importance of the with? considered? Corridor? quickest) following. I like route #1 the most. I dislike the I like option #1 the best but it 3a seems pointless. Rapid transit should be an Promotes safe walk, Provides a Manages traffic Includes Ensures Prioritizing safety Connecting to Creating well- Providing Filling sidewalk Please speak w/Clinton 43212 43212 Female 35 - 54 White / Prefer not Route #2 is my second number of would make High St. integral part of our bike, and transit walkable mixture impacts attractive, high- compatibility enhancements existing bicycle designed places for bike gaps Township about possible Caucasian to answer favorite. stops in the unbearable to drive. regional growth and connections of uses (including quality open with existing trails multimodal parking and improvements on Kinnear Ohio State economic development housing, space neighborhoods intersections storage and get the residents area, strategy. employment, involved on that street. especially the shopping, and Lennox, on professional Route 1. I services) would highly recommend adding distinct lanes for bikes, cars and rapid transit along Kinnear. The gray bike line nearest the railroad tracks 2836 3 7743 on Kinnear is sometime mistaken as a road. I saw a driver nearly take out a pedestrian once. Also, Option #2 would need way better lighting on Kinnear Rd.

I would love more It looks like the first option Why do none Glad to see there is an option Growth is imminent and Provides a walkable Includes attractive, Manages traffic Promotes safe Ensures Filling sidewalk gaps Connecting to Prioritizing safety Creating well- Providing 43221 43215 Female 35 - 54 White / No public transit meets the most goals. of the options that meets the affordability we need to begin adding mixture of uses high-quality open impacts walk, bike, and compatibility existing bicycle enhancements designed places for bike Caucasian options. meet all five goals. travel options. (including housing, space transit with existing trails multimodal parking and stars for employment, connections neighborhoods intersections storage 284 7 4 445 7 affordability? shopping, and professional services)

The current The quickest, As the West Route 1 That there will be a dedicated I question running Rapid transit should be an Provides a walkable Promotes safe Includes Manages traffic Ensures These are hard Creating well-designed Filling sidewalk Connecting to Prioritizing Providing I'd rank the first 4 43212 43240 Female 55 - 64 White / No highway and cheapest options Campus/Grandview area doesn't include rapid transit route to route 1 past N. integral part of our mixture of uses walk, bike, and attractive, high- impacts compatibility to rank. They are multimodal intersections gaps existing bicycle safety places for bike as equally Caucasian secondary road are rarely the best grows, so does the traffic. the west side downtown. Market and through regional growth and (including housing, transit quality open with existing all important. trails enhancements parking and important. network cannot choice. Please let's Offering well connected of the the narrow streets of economic development employment, connections space neighborhoods storage support any do it right and make rapid transit (Route 2), Olentangy. the historic district. strategy. shopping, and increase in traffic Columbus a great bikeways, and sidewalks professional services) 285 7 2 675 2 that more place to live (with or should help reduce the development will without a car). number of cars on the inevitably bring. roads.

Will work best if Keep in mind I like the 2nd and 3rd rts Number 1 Rapid transit should be an Promotes safe walk, Manages traffic Provides a Ensures Manages traffic Prioritizing safety Filling sidewalk Creating well- Providing Connecting to As our population ages 43221 Female 65 or White / No there are reliable accessibilty to the best. I would suggest seems like the integral part of our bike, and transit impacts walkable mixture compatibility impacts enhancements gaps designed places for bike existing bicycle please keep in mind the older Caucasian feeder routes that stops at the times it ability to be flexible as current rapid regional growth and connections of uses (including with existing multimodal parking and trails need for socialization go deeper into is needed. populations shift which transit and not economic development housing, neighborhoods intersections storage after working hours--stay areas around the they may by 2050 very user strategy. employment, open enough to bring rapid transit friendly shopping, and people downtown to city stops. Ease of professional night activities. 286 7 4 246 4 access to the services) rapid route stops that will make or break the system

I'm supportive of Cost and time don't I like the travel time of That there isn't #1 - I like its route and travel As I previously, Rapid transit should be an Manages traffic Provides a Promotes safe Includes Ensures If this Connecting to existing bicycle Filling sidewalk Creating well- Prioritizing Providing Where I currently As I previously said, rail 43235 43215 Female 35 - 54 White / Prefer not there being rapid concern me if it's route #1 and the a firm travel time having a travel time integral part of our impacts walkable mixture walk, bike, and attractive, high- compatibility transportation trails gaps designed safety places for bike live we have no is the only form of Caucasian to answer transit but not done once and population served of route time. +/-12min +/-5min to +/-13min regional growth and of uses (including transit quality open with existing will be by bus or multimodal enhancements parking and accessible bike transportation that using busses or done right. #3 is too much. doesn't interest me economic development housing, connections space neighborhoods another form intersections storage trails (off 161 interests me. It's the most other strategy. employment, using the between Sawmill direct, its immune to transportation on shopping, and roadway I will not and Olentangy) traffic and weather roadways. professional use it. There are conditions, and can services) existing railroad expanded further north tracks in place into Powell. If we want to along 315, truly be innovative show 287 6 2 777 4 almost that passenger rail can overlapping work on existing route 1. I commercial railroad strongly believe tracks. that the rail option needs to be explored further.

Vital for growth Who will pay for the Similar to what other Access to Rapid transit should be an Ensures compatibility Provides a Promotes safe Manages traffic Connecting to existing bicycle Prioritizing Creating well- Providing Filling sidewalk Access from outside 270. 43119 43221 Male 55 - 64 White / No and access to the development of the major cities provide. downtown and integral part of our with existing walkable mixture walk, bike, and impacts trails safety designed places for bike gaps Caucasian area. route is important out to 270?? regional growth and neighborhoods of uses (including transit enhancements multimodal parking and too. economic development housing, connections intersections storage 288 7 2 757 6 strategy. employment, shopping, and professional services)

Route 1 seems like the Lack of 1 and 2 seem like the most lack of jobs serviced Rapid transit should be an Provides a walkable Manages traffic Promotes safe Includes Ensures Prioritizing safety Connecting to Providing places Filling sidewalk Creating well- More frequent pedestrian 43203 43215 Male 26 - 34 White / No best. Quickest and most economic useful and direct and length of rides integral part of our mixture of uses impacts walk, bike, and attractive, high- compatibility enhancements existing bicycle for bike parking gaps designed crossings and more Caucasian desirable stops development in route 3 regional growth and (including housing, transit quality open with existing trails and storage multimodal trash/recycling containers on route 3 economic development employment, connections space neighborhoods intersections 2897 2 6561 strategy. shopping, and professional services) 1. How 2. When considering the 7. Many members of the 8. As planning for the supportive are routing and construction 3a. Three Rapid Transit 4a. Multiple Rapid Transit 5. How strongly do you 6. When considering public would like to see 13. Which Travel Northwest Corridor you regarding of Rapid Transit within route alternatives are 3b. Is there connections from the 4b. Is there feel that Rapid Transit is future development improved bicycle and racial 14. Are reliability Connection to progresses, are there 9. What 10. What the addition of a Please share the Northwest Corridor, Travel time Please share any being evaluated for the anything you Northwest Corridor to anything you needed to accommodate in vicinity of the 6. Rank 5 - Please share pedestrian connections to 7. Rank 5- Please share any 11. What 12. What group do you (the route major Costs to additional priority zip code zip code No. modern Rapid any additional how would you prioritize (the fastest additional Northwest Corridor. Is dislike about Downtown are also being dislike about some our region's continued Northwest Corridor, 6. Rank 2 6. Rank 3 6. Rank 4 Least any additional and from transit and local 7. Rank 2 7. Rank 3 7. Rank 4 Least additional is your is your you most Hispanic with the employment construct needs, considerations, do you do you Transit choice comments. the following? route) comments.2 there anything you like some or all of considered. Is there or all of the growth? (Select the which outcome is important comments.6 destinations. In creating important comments.7 gender? age? closely or least destinations or opportunities that live in? work in? along the Construction duration about some or all of the the routes? anything you like about routes? option that best most important to such connections, please identify Latino? delay) you believe should be Northwest (what could be built routes? some or all of the routes? describes your opinion.) you? rank the importance of the with? considered? Corridor? quickest) following. Traffic is fine and I'm not Ensures compatibility Ensures Ensures Ensures Provides a Connecting to existing bicycle Connecting to Connecting to Connecting to Filling sidewalk Prefer not Prefer Prefer not Prefer not concerned about growth. with existing compatibility with compatibility with compatibility walkable trails existing bicycle existing bicycle existing bicycle gaps to answer not to to answer to answer neighborhoods existing existing with existing mixture of uses trails trails trails answer neighborhoods neighborhoods neighborhoods (including housing, employment, 2901 1 1117 shopping, and professional services)

Route 2 would connect The short travel time and Rapid transit should be an Promotes safe walk, Provides a Manages traffic Includes Ensures Filling sidewalk gaps Prioritizing Connecting to Creating well- Providing Please keep in mind 43206 43202 Female 26 - 34 White / No with the future innovation number of people served of integral part of our bike, and transit walkable mixture impacts attractive, high- compatibility safety existing bicycle designed places for bike safety measure to ensure Caucasian district at OSU, the option 1, the opportunities to regional growth and connections of uses (including quality open with existing enhancements trails multimodal parking and women, non-binary, and number of people served connect to future development economic development housing, space neighborhoods intersections storage trans individuals feel safe by Route 3 and the fact in Franklinton for Option 3 strategy. employment, when using public transit, that it reaches into shopping, and as they are the groups residential areas professional that are very likely to services) experience harassment on public transit and in public space. Ensure proper lighting, implement programs to 2917 1 7774 report harassment, add night stops so people don't have to walk as far to their destination when it is dark. Factors like these will ensure more positive experiences using transit for all people.

Growth is imminent and Provides a walkable Promotes safe Ensures Includes Manages traffic Connecting to existing bicycle Creating well- Providing places Prioritizing Filling sidewalk 43202 43210 Male 26 - 34 White / No we need to begin adding mixture of uses walk, bike, and compatibility with attractive, high- impacts trails designed for bike parking safety gaps Caucasian travel options. (including housing, transit existing quality open multimodal and storage enhancements employment, connections neighborhoods space intersections 2925 3 6655 shopping, and professional services)

Would be great Riders should be I like 1 best, since it's 1 seems best, since it's the Rapid transit should be an Promotes safe walk, Ensures Includes Provides a Manages traffic Prioritizing safety Creating well- Connecting to Filling sidewalk Providing 43209 43210 Male 35 - 54 White / Prefer not to facilitate able to make easy fastest, but there should fastest way to transfer to/from integral part of our bike, and transit compatibility with attractive, high- walkable mixture impacts enhancements designed existing bicycle gaps places for bike Caucasian to answer population transfers to be easy transfers to other the NE route. regional growth and connections existing quality open of uses multimodal trails parking and growth and ease downtown, OSU, neighborhoods. economic development neighborhoods space (including intersections storage traffic. and other strategy. housing, 293 7 2 557 4 commercial districts employment, shopping, and professional services)

I like the Northwest Not close I like the connections to the not enough Rapid transit should be an Promotes safe walk, Provides a Promotes safe Manages traffic Includes Filling sidewalk gaps Prioritizing Creating well- Connecting to Providing Improved 43212 43223 Male 26 - 34 White / No location enough to west end of downtown coverage of the integral part of our bike, and transit walkable mixture walk, bike, and impacts attractive, high- safety designed existing bicycle places for bike transit/connection options Caucasian residential south/east sides of regional growth and connections of uses (including transit quality open enhancements multimodal trails parking and overall coordinators downtown economic development housing, connections space intersections storage 2947 4 6651 strategy. employment, shopping, and professional services)

Rapid transit should be an Manages traffic Ensures Promotes safe Includes Provides a Providing places for bike Filling sidewalk Prioritizing safety Creating well- Connecting to 43212 43212 Female 35 - 54 Two or No integral part of our impacts compatibility with walk, bike, and attractive, high- walkable parking and storage gaps enhancements designed existing bicycle more races regional growth and existing transit quality open mixture of uses multimodal trails economic development neighborhoods connections space (including intersections strategy. housing, employment, 2956 6 7667 shopping, and professional services)

Rapid transit should be an Promotes safe walk, Includes attractive, Provides a Ensures Manages traffic Connecting to existing bicycle Filling sidewalk Prioritizing safety Creating well- Providing 43212 43211 Male 35 - 54 White / No integral part of our bike, and transit high-quality open walkable mixture compatibility impacts trails gaps enhancements designed places for bike Caucasian regional growth and connections space of uses (including with existing multimodal parking and economic development housing, neighborhoods intersections storage 2966 2 6653 strategy. employment, shopping, and professional services)

1 is simple and direct 3 cuts too far 3b encompasses the largest 1 and 2 are too Rapid transit should be an Manages traffic Promotes safe Ensures Provides a Includes Prioritizing safety Creating well- Filling sidewalk Connecting to Providing Educating the public to 43212 43212 Female 55 - 64 White / No into number of residents in a limited integral part of our impacts walk, bike, and compatibility with walkable mixture attractive, high- enhancements designed gaps existing bicycle places for bike the positives. Making all Caucasian established simply, affordable manner regional growth and transit existing of uses quality open multimodal trails parking and options accessible and neighborhoods economic development connections neighborhoods (including space intersections storage affordable. . strategy. housing, 2976 6 3566 employment, shopping, and professional services) 1. How 2. When considering the 7. Many members of the 8. As planning for the supportive are routing and construction 3a. Three Rapid Transit 4a. Multiple Rapid Transit 5. How strongly do you 6. When considering public would like to see 13. Which Travel Northwest Corridor you regarding of Rapid Transit within route alternatives are 3b. Is there connections from the 4b. Is there feel that Rapid Transit is future development improved bicycle and racial 14. Are reliability Connection to progresses, are there 9. What 10. What the addition of a Please share the Northwest Corridor, Travel time Please share any being evaluated for the anything you Northwest Corridor to anything you needed to accommodate in vicinity of the 6. Rank 5 - Please share pedestrian connections to 7. Rank 5- Please share any 11. What 12. What group do you (the route major Costs to additional priority zip code zip code No. modern Rapid any additional how would you prioritize (the fastest additional Northwest Corridor. Is dislike about Downtown are also being dislike about some our region's continued Northwest Corridor, 6. Rank 2 6. Rank 3 6. Rank 4 Least any additional and from transit and local 7. Rank 2 7. Rank 3 7. Rank 4 Least additional is your is your you most Hispanic with the employment construct needs, considerations, do you do you Transit choice comments. the following? route) comments.2 there anything you like some or all of considered. Is there or all of the growth? (Select the which outcome is important comments.6 destinations. In creating important comments.7 gender? age? closely or least destinations or opportunities that live in? work in? along the Construction duration about some or all of the the routes? anything you like about routes? option that best most important to such connections, please identify Latino? delay) you believe should be Northwest (what could be built routes? some or all of the routes? describes your opinion.) you? rank the importance of the with? considered? Corridor? quickest) following. I would prefer Rapid transit I like the emphasis of I really like that Route 3 Route 1 seems like Rapid transit should be an Provides a walkable Promotes safe Includes Ensures Manages traffic I think high- Creating well-designed Prioritizing Filling sidewalk Connecting to Providing Don't build Columbus is growing and 43202 43210 Male 35 - 54 White / No Bus Rapid should not be route 3 on creating creates a direct connection it might be tough to integral part of our mixture of uses walk, bike, and attractive, high- compatibility impacts intensity multimodal intersections safety gaps existing bicycle places for bike dedicated bike energy is (relatively) Caucasian Transit over light primarily a means connections to areas I between W. Broad and detangle from traffic regional growth and (including housing, transit quality open with existing development enhancements trails parking and infrastructure cheap for now, but good rail (for now at to move people to perceive to have high(er) Olentangy River Road that on High Street economic development employment, connections space neighborhoods along the rapid storage unless you are times don't always last least) and from the economic activity, doesn't exist in the current strategy. shopping, and transit corridor is prepared to (just ask Cleveland). suburbs. Please although I see that this is network. professional services) important, but maintain it at the Also, federal funding may prioritize routes that inconsistent with the please also same level as car not always be available. provide value to metrics. I think any of the consider infrastructure, Be sure to consider these people living and routes would be fine if reducing barriers including snow less favorable scenarios working all along appropriate land use to small scale removal. when evaluating the the route and that policies are implemented developments as Columbus needs alternatives. encourage to encourage well, such as to do better at development along development along the allowing two- enforcing sidewalk the route. corridor. three- and four- maintenance plexes in single requirements, family housing including snow neighborhoods, removal. What allowing auxiliary good is it to build dwelling units, more sidewalks if 298 7 2 567 3 and reducing they end up parking impassable due to minimums. poor Consider maintenance? allowing these Please prioritize things by right low stress rather than networks instead through of complete prohibitive streets. Morse Rd approval and West Broad processes. may be "complete streets" by definition, but they are in no way friendly to cyclists. And not especially friendly to pedestrians either.

Love the concept and See above. I 1, you have to have Short 3 is terrible. there Rapid transit should be an Manages traffic Promotes safe Provides a Ensures Includes Providing places for bike Connecting to Filling sidewalk Creating well- Prioritizing See above. To me, I 43212 43215 Male 35 - 54 White / No certainly understand the live in North included in this route. are plenty of integral part of our impacts walk, bike, and walkable mixture compatibility attractive, high- parking and storage existing bicycle gaps designed safety would walk or ride my Caucasian challenges on creating a Grandview Terminating at Broad and existing cota bus regional growth and transit of uses (including with existing quality open trails multimodal enhancements bike 10 mins to get on the route. The biggest and work High is a good idea for 1. That routes along Broad. economic development connections housing, neighborhoods space intersections BRT. Assuming it is $5, problem I see is having downtown but route incorporates business strategy. employment, your competition is either enough households near not close and weekend traffic. shopping, and Uber ($10-15 CBD, Short the route whereby it is enough to walk professional North) or driving myself easy enough for people to to the route. services) ($10 parking). That is use. Access to the Will I drive to the challenge for any employers is great, but if the closest public transportation people cannot easily route access model. access the route then my point and take guess is that they will the BRT? continue to drive. Probably not, but Iâ€™d love to be able to do so. If II was running this project 2996 1 5555 and maybe you have already done, I would look at. households within a 10-15 min walk to the nearest access point, and also work somewhere along the corridor. Feels to me that audience would be a little thin, but could be wrong.

Long overdue Investment yo front Rapid transit should be an Provides a walkable Manages traffic Ensures Promotes safe Includes Filling sidewalk gaps Prioritizing Creating well- Connecting to Providing Prefer to be able to get on 43212 43215 Female 35 - 54 White / No should pay integral part of our mixture of uses impacts compatibility with walk, bike, and attractive, high- safety designed existing bicycle places for bike rapid transit and walk Caucasian dividends regional growth and (including housing, existing transit quality open enhancements multimodal trails parking and from there - bike not economic development employment, neighborhoods connections space intersections storage always realistic 300 7 2 664 4 strategy. shopping, and professional services)

3 serves the most people No 3 serves the most people No Rapid transit should be an Promotes safe walk, Provides a Manages traffic Ensures Includes Creating well-designed Connecting to Filling sidewalk Prioritizing Providing Minimal fees or no fees to 43214 43085 Female 35 - 54 White / No integral part of our bike, and transit walkable mixture impacts compatibility attractive, high- multimodal intersections existing bicycle gaps safety places for bike help people with limited Caucasian regional growth and connections of uses (including with existing quality open trails enhancements parking and or no income access economic development housing, neighborhoods space storage employment and services 3017 4 7774 strategy. employment, shopping, and professional services) 1. How 2. When considering the 7. Many members of the 8. As planning for the supportive are routing and construction 3a. Three Rapid Transit 4a. Multiple Rapid Transit 5. How strongly do you 6. When considering public would like to see 13. Which Travel Northwest Corridor you regarding of Rapid Transit within route alternatives are 3b. Is there connections from the 4b. Is there feel that Rapid Transit is future development improved bicycle and racial 14. Are reliability Connection to progresses, are there 9. What 10. What the addition of a Please share the Northwest Corridor, Travel time Please share any being evaluated for the anything you Northwest Corridor to anything you needed to accommodate in vicinity of the 6. Rank 5 - Please share pedestrian connections to 7. Rank 5- Please share any 11. What 12. What group do you (the route major Costs to additional priority zip code zip code No. modern Rapid any additional how would you prioritize (the fastest additional Northwest Corridor. Is dislike about Downtown are also being dislike about some our region's continued Northwest Corridor, 6. Rank 2 6. Rank 3 6. Rank 4 Least any additional and from transit and local 7. Rank 2 7. Rank 3 7. Rank 4 Least additional is your is your you most Hispanic with the employment construct needs, considerations, do you do you Transit choice comments. the following? route) comments.2 there anything you like some or all of considered. Is there or all of the growth? (Select the which outcome is important comments.6 destinations. In creating important comments.7 gender? age? closely or least destinations or opportunities that live in? work in? along the Construction duration about some or all of the the routes? anything you like about routes? option that best most important to such connections, please identify Latino? delay) you believe should be Northwest (what could be built routes? some or all of the routes? describes your opinion.) you? rank the importance of the with? considered? Corridor? quickest) following. proximity to dense housing 38 minutes is an Growth is imminent and Promotes safe walk, Provides a Includes Manages traffic Ensures "traffic impact" Connecting to existing bicycle Prioritizing Filling sidewalk Creating well- Providing All of these are 43215 43205 Male 26 - 34 White / No (grandview yards + other egregiously long we need to begin adding bike, and transit walkable mixture attractive, high- impacts compatibility shouldn't be a trails safety gaps designed places for bike important, but Caucasian apartment buildings in route time for that travel options. connections of uses (including quality open with existing consideration - enhancements multimodal parking and when bike grandview) and the new distance. makes it housing, space neighborhoods the whole point intersections storage routes/trails aren't "Columbus Innovation virtually unusable in employment, of alternative connected, they're District" seems important. my view shopping, and transit is to give virtually unusable, route 2 appears to cover that professional some people an as the road traffic best services) escape from here is extremely traffic, and hostile to bikes. automobiles are just plain inefficient, so they shouldn't be overly catered to. The whole point of development 3027 4 7371 is to *change* a neighborhood, so "compatibility" with what's already there shouldn't be used to hold back enhancements.

It wouldn't help Cost will be a Because none of them Any thoughts Again, I don't travel that area Rapid transit should be an Ensures compatibility Manages traffic Promotes safe Includes Provides a To be functional, I don't have any Please measure for 43221 43210 Female 65 or White / No me in getting to factor, but serve me (I need to travel of transit along regularly, so let other choose. integral part of our with existing impacts walk, bike, and attractive, high- walkable it needs to preferences in this connection from Hilliard older Caucasian work but if it will ultimately, helping west to east to work, not Lane Ave.? regional growth and neighborhoods transit quality open mixture of uses manage traffic category. (the west) to Ohio State help lots of people get to work north to south), I leave the COTA doesn't economic development connections space (including and be safe. But Columbus campus. others, I'm for it. more easily and choice to others. go there. I strategy. housing, the attractive There was a COTA bus reliably would be have no choice employment, open space is for a while, but it only most important for but to drive shopping, and equally came by once, very early. users, and you down Lane professional important, don't want to build Ave. to work. services) because if it's faster if it means And I'm not functional but sacrificing meeting physically ugly, part of the the need effectively. capable of investment is biking. You wasted. From wouldn't think the images, it 303 4 3 667 4 there's an seems both are incline along possible. Lane Ave., but I've tried to bike it and couldn't make it all the way to campus.

1. The most direct 2 & 3. Indirect 1. Decreasing flow through 3. Least positive Rapid transit should be an Manages traffic Promotes safe Provides a Includes Ensures Filling sidewalk gaps Connecting to Creating well- Prioritizing Providing No 43220 43220 Male 26 - 34 White / No high street impact to high street integral part of our impacts walk, bike, and walkable mixture attractive, high- compatibility existing bicycle designed safety places for bike Caucasian traffic congestion regional growth and transit of uses (including quality open with existing trails multimodal enhancements parking and economic development connections housing, space neighborhoods intersections storage 3047 1 7711 strategy. employment, shopping, and professional services)

I like route #3 for it I would like to Connection to the Arena I think NOT Rapid transit should be an Provides a walkable Promotes safe Includes Ensures Manages traffic Filling sidewalk gaps Connecting to Prioritizing safety Creating well- Providing 43203 43215 Male 35 - 54 White / No connects a prominent see a 4th district allows access to connecting the integral part of our mixture of uses walk, bike, and attractive, high- compatibility impacts existing bicycle enhancements designed places for bike Caucasian neighborhood that, I option that sporting events and concerts. Arena District would regional growth and (including housing, transit quality open with existing trails multimodal parking and would hope, is full of connects both be a big loss. economic development employment, connections space neighborhoods intersections storage 3057 5 5674 influential individual, and OSU West strategy. shopping, and early adopters. Campus and professional services) UA.

#2 and it's west campus #2 is near CovermyMeds Rapid transit should be an Provides a walkable Promotes safe Manages traffic Ensures Includes Filling sidewalk gaps Connecting to Creating well- Providing Prioritizing 43212 Male 65 or White / No link campus and development in integral part of our mixture of uses walk, bike, and impacts compatibility attractive, high- existing bicycle designed places for bike safety older Caucasian that area regional growth and (including housing, transit with existing quality open trails multimodal parking and enhancements economic development employment, connections neighborhoods space intersections storage 3067 2 5775 strategy. shopping, and professional services)

Route 1 - fast and direct Route 3 - too Route 2 - accesses major No Rapid transit should be an Provides a walkable Promotes safe Ensures Includes Manages traffic Creating well-designed Prioritizing Filling sidewalk Connecting to Providing Integrating with existing 43228 43215 Female 26 - 34 White / Yes much of a areas of interest and looks to integral part of our mixture of uses walk, bike, and compatibility with attractive, high- impacts multimodal intersections safety gaps existing bicycle places for bike neighborhoods and Caucasian detour/slow be more direct/efficient regional growth and (including housing, transit existing quality open enhancements trails parking and infrastructure, providing economic development employment, connections neighborhoods space storage safe roadway crossings, 3077 4 7654 strategy. shopping, and and meeting the needs of professional services) all ages and abilities

Yes, please! 2 looks good Not sure what Rapid transit should be an Promotes safe walk, Provides a Ensures Manages traffic Includes Connecting to existing bicycle Creating well- Prioritizing safety Providing Prioritizing 43228 43228 Male White / No 3 connects to integral part of our bike, and transit walkable mixture compatibility with impacts attractive, high- trails designed enhancements places for bike safety Caucasian regional growth and connections of uses (including existing quality open multimodal parking and enhancements economic development housing, neighborhoods space intersections storage 308 7 4 666 4 strategy. employment, shopping, and professional services) 1. How 2. When considering the 7. Many members of the 8. As planning for the supportive are routing and construction 3a. Three Rapid Transit 4a. Multiple Rapid Transit 5. How strongly do you 6. When considering public would like to see 13. Which Travel Northwest Corridor you regarding of Rapid Transit within route alternatives are 3b. Is there connections from the 4b. Is there feel that Rapid Transit is future development improved bicycle and racial 14. Are reliability Connection to progresses, are there 9. What 10. What the addition of a Please share the Northwest Corridor, Travel time Please share any being evaluated for the anything you Northwest Corridor to anything you needed to accommodate in vicinity of the 6. Rank 5 - Please share pedestrian connections to 7. Rank 5- Please share any 11. What 12. What group do you (the route major Costs to additional priority zip code zip code No. modern Rapid any additional how would you prioritize (the fastest additional Northwest Corridor. Is dislike about Downtown are also being dislike about some our region's continued Northwest Corridor, 6. Rank 2 6. Rank 3 6. Rank 4 Least any additional and from transit and local 7. Rank 2 7. Rank 3 7. Rank 4 Least additional is your is your you most Hispanic with the employment construct needs, considerations, do you do you Transit choice comments. the following? route) comments.2 there anything you like some or all of considered. Is there or all of the growth? (Select the which outcome is important comments.6 destinations. In creating important comments.7 gender? age? closely or least destinations or opportunities that live in? work in? along the Construction duration about some or all of the the routes? anything you like about routes? option that best most important to such connections, please identify Latino? delay) you believe should be Northwest (what could be built routes? some or all of the routes? describes your opinion.) you? rank the importance of the with? considered? Corridor? quickest) following. Great idea an increase in local Q Why not both 1 for affordability 3 for the lack of jobs Growth is imminent and Ensures compatibility Manages traffic Provides a Promotes safe Includes Avoid negative Connecting to existing bicycle Creating well- Filling sidewalk Providing Prioritizing Columbus already Far amount of trash 43223 43201- Male 26 - 34 Two or No and state taxes 2 and 3? served we need to begin adding with existing impacts walkable mixture walk, bike, and attractive, high- impact of local trails designed gaps places for bike safety has a extensive control options. Bins and 43223- more races would be worth any Reaching out travel options. neighborhoods of uses (including transit quality open communities multimodal parking and enhancements bike way system. cans should be within 43224 price as long as the as much as housing, connections space unlike in the past intersections storage Reaching said reach most of the time. corridor is effective can be should employment, as seen by the system provides and efficient in my be priorities shopping, and implementing of increases opinion. most professional highways in low population served concerned. services) income areas for greatly Yes a longer example. time overall as far as 309 7 6 777 4 construction and travel time but the amount of jobs and people makes up for lost time in the long run.

I think they have Like 1 best seems to have 2 and 3 are 1 is best 2 and 3 are both Growth is imminent and Ensures compatibility Promotes safe Provides a Manages traffic Includes Creating well-designed Prioritizing Filling sidewalk Connecting to Providing maybe include uber 43204 retired Male 65 or White / Yes system like that all things covered almost equal nearly equal we need to begin adding with existing walk, bike, and walkable mixture impacts attractive, high- multimodal intersections safety gaps existing bicycle places for bike stations older Caucasian in downtown travel options. neighborhoods transit of uses (including quality open enhancements trails parking and Cleveland near connections housing, space storage 310 5 Cleveland State 5 666 5 employment, University shopping, and professional services)

3 3a Rapid transit should be an Promotes safe walk, Manages traffic Ensures Provides a Filling sidewalk gaps Prioritizing Connecting to Providing 43204 43222 Female 35 - 54 Black / No integral part of our bike, and transit impacts compatibility with walkable mixture safety existing bicycle places for bike African- regional growth and connections existing of uses enhancements trails parking and American economic development neighborhoods (including storage strategy. housing, 3117 5 7776 employment, shopping, and professional services)

Growth is imminent and Manages traffic Manages traffic Manages traffic Manages traffic Includes Prioritizing safety Creating well- Filling sidewalk Connecting to Providing 43015 43231 Male 35 - 54 White / No we need to begin adding impacts impacts impacts impacts attractive, high- enhancements designed gaps existing bicycle places for bike Caucasian 3126 3 6753 travel options. quality open multimodal trails parking and space intersections storage Good access to OSU already a busy Centrally located Aren't there bus Things have worsened Ensures compatibility Manages traffic Promotes safe Provides a Includes Filling sidewalk gaps Creating well- Prioritizing safety Connecting to Providing 43210 Male 19 - 25 White / No campus - providing corridor, routes in this area? over the years but are still with existing impacts walk, bike, and walkable mixture attractive, high- designed enhancements existing bicycle places for bike Caucasian access for students who hopefully won't Not sure this is tolerable. neighborhoods transit of uses quality open multimodal trails parking and may not have vehicular negatively fiscally responsible connections (including space intersections storage access. impact traffic considering housing, 3135 6 7557 resources already in employment, place. shopping, and professional services)

route - direct and faster Route 2 - better access to Route 1 - Higher Growth is imminent and Provides a walkable Ensures Promotes safe Includes Manages traffic Filling sidewalk gaps Prioritizing Creating well- Connecting to Providing 43203 43054 Male 35 - 54 White / No run time Arena Dist potential for delays we need to begin adding mixture of uses compatibility with walk, bike, and attractive, high- impacts safety designed existing bicycle places for bike Caucasian with High St traffic travel options. (including housing, existing transit quality open enhancements multimodal trails parking and approaching Short employment, neighborhoods connections space intersections storage 3145 2 7765 North; Route 3 - shopping, and misses large parts professional services) of downtown

This is a great Must be reliable I like 3 for equity and 1 for Travel time is From what I know about my Unless this is going Rapid transit should be an Promotes safe walk, Ensures Provides a Includes Manages traffic Please use Connecting to existing bicycle Creating well- Prioritizing safety I would like to 43224 43215 Female 55 - 64 White / No place to start for and connected. travel time, and 2 for important but community, # 3 looks to be to replace the CBus, integral part of our bike, and transit compatibility with walkable mixture attractive, high- impacts design that trails designed enhancements consider all Caucasian our city. We need Otherwise why do economic development. there must serving people most in need. no on option 1. regional growth and connections existing of uses (including quality open encourages use. multimodal choices to be more though. it? also be economic development neighborhoods housing, space (I suspect that is intersections number 1 315 7 4 676 4 enough strategy. employment, already the plan) destinations. shopping, and professional services)

2 looks like it goes into Rapid transit should be an Manages traffic Provides a Promotes safe Ensures Includes Connecting to existing bicycle Prioritizing Filling sidewalk Creating well- Providing 43231 43220 Female 35 - 54 White / No the OSU area, which integral part of our impacts walkable mixture walk, bike, and compatibility attractive, high- trails safety gaps designed places for bike Caucasian would serve a lot of regional growth and of uses (including transit with existing quality open enhancements multimodal parking and individuals who would economic development housing, connections neighborhoods space intersections storage 3167 5 6673 likely take advantage of strategy. employment, transportation options. shopping, and professional services)

Very supportive! Rapid transit should be an Provides a walkable Promotes safe Ensures Manages traffic Includes Prioritizing safety Creating well- Filling sidewalk Connecting to Providing 43026 43215 Female 26 - 34 White / No integral part of our mixture of uses walk, bike, and compatibility with impacts attractive, high- enhancements designed gaps existing bicycle places for bike Caucasian regional growth and (including housing, transit existing quality open multimodal trails parking and economic development employment, connections neighborhoods space intersections storage 317 7 4 467 4 strategy. shopping, and professional services)

Light rail or true I like all the extra places If I just want to Rapid transit should be an Provides a walkable Promotes safe Ensures Includes Manages traffic Creating well-designed Prioritizing Providing places Connecting to Filling sidewalk 3 most important 43214 43214 Male 35 - 54 White / No BRT (dedicated route 3 connects get downtown, integral part of our mixture of uses walk, bike, and compatibility with attractive, high- impacts multimodal intersections safety for bike parking existing bicycle gaps things: Safety, Caucasian lanes, queue route 3 will feel regional growth and (including housing, transit existing quality open enhancements and storage trails safety, safety ==> jumping, signal slow economic development employment, connections neighborhoods space No more LOS 318 7 priority) 2 477 1 strategy. shopping, and compromises. professional services)

1 and 2 are great in terms 3 goes off the 3 provides connection to the Things have worsened Promotes safe walk, Manages traffic Provides a Includes Ensures Filling sidewalk gaps Connecting to Prioritizing safety Creating well- Providing 43235 43215 Female 26 - 34 White / No of meeting the LinkUS direct path Scioto peninsula, 1 & 2 pass over the years but are still bike, and transit impacts walkable mixture attractive, high- compatibility existing bicycle enhancements designed places for bike Caucasian goals which could by a lot of office spaces where tolerable. connections of uses (including quality open with existing trails multimodal parking and cause delay if people could hop on the bus housing, space neighborhoods intersections storage 3196 5 4725 someone is employment, just traveling shopping, and north. professional services) 1. How 2. When considering the 7. Many members of the 8. As planning for the supportive are routing and construction 3a. Three Rapid Transit 4a. Multiple Rapid Transit 5. How strongly do you 6. When considering public would like to see 13. Which Travel Northwest Corridor you regarding of Rapid Transit within route alternatives are 3b. Is there connections from the 4b. Is there feel that Rapid Transit is future development improved bicycle and racial 14. Are reliability Connection to progresses, are there 9. What 10. What the addition of a Please share the Northwest Corridor, Travel time Please share any being evaluated for the anything you Northwest Corridor to anything you needed to accommodate in vicinity of the 6. Rank 5 - Please share pedestrian connections to 7. Rank 5- Please share any 11. What 12. What group do you (the route major Costs to additional priority zip code zip code No. modern Rapid any additional how would you prioritize (the fastest additional Northwest Corridor. Is dislike about Downtown are also being dislike about some our region's continued Northwest Corridor, 6. Rank 2 6. Rank 3 6. Rank 4 Least any additional and from transit and local 7. Rank 2 7. Rank 3 7. Rank 4 Least additional is your is your you most Hispanic with the employment construct needs, considerations, do you do you Transit choice comments. the following? route) comments.2 there anything you like some or all of considered. Is there or all of the growth? (Select the which outcome is important comments.6 destinations. In creating important comments.7 gender? age? closely or least destinations or opportunities that live in? work in? along the Construction duration about some or all of the the routes? anything you like about routes? option that best most important to such connections, please identify Latino? delay) you believe should be Northwest (what could be built routes? some or all of the routes? describes your opinion.) you? rank the importance of the with? considered? Corridor? quickest) following. I like option 3 because it I dislike that I like that option 3 utilizes W I disklike that route Rapid transit should be an Promotes safe walk, Provides a Ensures Includes Manages traffic Maximizing what Filling sidewalk gaps Prioritizing Creating well- Connecting to Providing Creating safe and I am visually impaired 43214 43215 Female 26 - 34 White / Yes capatilizes on housing, routes 1 and 2 Broad St. which offers direct 1 and 2 waste a lot integral part of our bike, and transit walkable mixture compatibility with attractive, high- impacts services that the safety designed existing bicycle places for bike easily navigable and cannot drive, so for Caucasian employment, and cover a large access to amenities along it of route space on regional growth and connections of uses (including existing quality open most vulnerable enhancements multimodal trails parking and spaces for the me designing transit shopping destinations on portion on of and within East Franklinton. streets that can't economic development housing, neighborhoods space and disabled can intersections storage most disabled like corridoes that provide the Henderson Road that Olentangy offer any stops to strategy. employment, access is key. the blind or those most access to services would be almost River Rd. that access shopping, and in wheelchairs is and provide pedestrian impossible to get to with doesn't have neighborhood professional the most connections that are safe stops along Olentangy any amentities. Route 3 services) important. for the disabled or those River Road only. The first destination does do this which with baby strollers is the two route options are not stops- is why it's the best most important. If we as good for this reason. between option for access design these systems Route 3 is the best Bethel and and equity. and spaces so it easily coming from a person Riverside serves the most who is visually impaired Hospital. A vulnerable person (like a and is always focused on route that blind person in a maximizing the most gives direct wheelchair who is access to services like access to Spanish speaking), then 3207 1 2571 grocery stores, banks, shopping, everyone wins. Look up doctors, and other services, and what San Francisco has shopping. housing is done with their BART better. stations with tactile maps and other station enhancements for the visually impaired and blind. These are all components that should go into our BRT or LRT stations.

real BRT please Option 1 would be fastest. Would High Street Rapid transit should be an Promotes safe walk, Includes attractive, Provides a Ensures Manages traffic Prioritizing safety Filling sidewalk Creating well- Connecting to Providing I probably wouldn't Equity and affordable 43202 43215 Female 26 - 34 White / No Option 3 would also add options include integral part of our bike, and transit high-quality open walkable mixture compatibility impacts enhancements gaps designed existing bicycle places for bike leave my bike all housing Caucasian some important separated transit regional growth and connections space of uses (including with existing multimodal trails parking and day at a station destinations. lanes? If not I worry economic development housing, neighborhoods intersections storage unless it was truly about getting stuck strategy. employment, secure. Prefer to in traffic on High shopping, and prioritize ease and 321 7 5 775 2 Street as buses professional ability to bring currently do. services) bikes on board buses.

Rapid transit should be an Manages traffic Ensures Promotes safe Provides a Includes Filling sidewalk gaps Prioritizing Providing places Creating well- Connecting to 43213 43201 Female 26 - 34 Black / No integral part of our impacts compatibility with walk, bike, and walkable mixture attractive, high- safety for bike parking designed existing bicycle African- regional growth and existing transit of uses quality open enhancements and storage multimodal trails American economic development neighborhoods connections (including space intersections strategy. housing, 3227 1 7171 employment, shopping, and professional services)

They all provide They are not Route 2 clearly is the best route 3 is the worst Rapid transit should be an Promotes safe walk, Provides a Includes Manages traffic Ensures Connecting to existing bicycle Filling sidewalk Prioritizing safety Providing Creating well- Consider connecting 43206 43215 Male 26 - 34 White / No accessible transit to more light rail. integral part of our bike, and transit walkable mixture attractive, high- impacts compatibility trails gaps enhancements places for bike designed outside 270 and the Caucasian people. That is very regional growth and connections of uses (including quality open with existing parking and multimodal south portion of the city important. economic development housing, space neighborhoods storage intersections 3237 2 4521 strategy. employment, shopping, and professional services)

BRT may be the Option 2 seems to be the I like the simplicity of route 1, Rapid transit should be an Promotes safe walk, Provides a Ensures Manages traffic Includes Connecting to existing bicycle Prioritizing Creating well- Filling sidewalk Providing 43212 43210 Male 26 - 34 White / No best option for best for the future of the especially if the East-West integral part of our bike, and transit walkable mixture compatibility with impacts attractive, high- trails safety designed gaps places for bike Caucasian the corridor, but area as it pertains to the Corridor will service Broad St. regional growth and connections of uses (including existing quality open enhancements multimodal parking and you still have to Innovation District and As long as the route chosen economic development housing, neighborhoods space intersections storage 324 7 convince the 5 666 2 bypassing the Olentangy 'best' services the Arena strategy. employment, public it's not a Knot. District, I think it will be a shopping, and bus. success. professional services)