DOCSLIB.ORG

TCQSM Part 8

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
TCQSM Part 8 Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual—2nd Edition PART 8 GLOSSARY This part of the manual presents definitions for the various transit terms discussed and referenced in the manual. Other important terms related to transit planning and operations are included so that this glossary can serve as a readily accessible and easily updated resource for transit applications beyond the evaluation of transit capacity and quality of service. As a result, this glossary includes local definitions and local terminology, even when these may be inconsistent with formal usage in the manual. Many systems have their own specific, historically derived, terminology: a motorman and guard on one system can be an operator and conductor on another. Modal definitions can be confusing. What is clearly light rail by definition may be termed streetcar, semi-metro, or rapid transit in a specific city. It is recommended that in these cases local usage should prevail. AADT — annual average daily ATP — automatic train protection. AADT—accessibility, transit traffic; see traffic, annual average ATS — automatic train supervision; daily. automatic train stop system. AAR — Association of ATU — Amalgamated Transit Union; see American Railroads; see union, transit. Aorganizations, Association of American Railroads. AVL — automatic vehicle location system. AASHTO — American Association of State AW0, AW1, AW2, AW3 — see car, weight Highway and Transportation Officials; see designations. organizations, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. absolute block — see block, absolute. AAWDT — annual average weekday traffic; absolute permissive block — see block, see traffic, annual average weekday. absolute permissive. ABS — automatic block signal; see control acceleration — increase in velocity per unit system, automatic block signal. time; in transit, usually measured in feet per second squared (meters per second squared) AC — alternating current. or, in the United States, sometimes in miles ADA — Americans with Disabilities Act of per hour per second. 1990; see legislation, Americans with Disabilities access, limited (controlled access) — in Act of 1990. transportation, to have entry and exit limited ADB — advanced design bus; see bus, to predetermined points, as with rail rapid advanced design and ATTB. transit or freeways. ADT — average daily traffic; see traffic, accessibility — 1. A measure of the ability or average daily. ease of all people to travel among various ATTB — Advanced Technology Transit Bus. origins and destinations. 2. In transportation AFC — automatic fare collection; see fare modeling and planning, the sum of the travel collection system, automatic. times from one zone to all other zones in a region, weighted by the relative AGT — automated guideway transit; attractiveness of the destination zones automated guided transit; see transit system, involved. 3. In traffic assignment, a measure automated guideway. of the relative access of an area or zone to ALRT — advanced light rail transit, see population, employment opportunities, transit system, light rail. community services, and utilities. APC— automatic passenger counter. accessibility, persons with disabilities (full APM — automated people-mover, see people- accessibility) — the extent to which facilities mover. are free of barriers and usable by persons APTA — American Public Transportation with disabilities, including wheelchair users. Association; see organizations, American Public accessibility, station — a measure of the Transportation Association. ability of all people within a defined area to APTS — Advanced Public Transportation get to a specific transit station. Systems. accessibility, transit — 1. A measure of the ATC system — automatic train control availability to all people of travel to and from system. various origins and destinations by transit. 2. ATIS — Advanced Traveler Information A measure of the ability of all people to get to Systems. and from the nearest transit stop or station and their actual origin or destination. 3. In ATO — automatic train operation. Part 8/GLOSSARY Page 8-1 Glossary Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual—2nd Edition accessible station—area, fare common usage, often used to mean the agency, transit — see transit district. paid ability of persons with disabilities to use air brake — see brake, air; and brake, automatic transit. air. accessible station — see station, accessible. air distance — see distance, air. accessible vehicle — see vehicle, accessible. alight — to get off or out of a transportation accessible transit system — see transit vehicle. system, accessible. alignment — in transportation, the accessible transportation facilities — horizontal and vertical layout of a roadway, transportation facilities that are barrier-free, railroad, transit route, or other facility as it allowing their use by all travelers, including, would appear in plan and profile. The elderly, transportation disadvantaged, and alignment is usually described on the plans persons with disabilities. by the use of technical data, such as grades, access mode — see mode, access. coordinates, bearings, and horizontal and vertical curves, see also roadbed and formation. access time — see time, access. all-or-nothing trip assignment — see trip active vehicle — see vehicle, active. assignment, all-or-nothing. activity center — see major activity center. all-stop station — see station, all-stop. act — see legislation. alternate fuel — alternatives to conventional add fare — 1. an additional fare to upgrade diesel fuel for urban transit buses, intended an existing ticket. 2. an additional fare paid to reduce pollution, includes methanol, on exit from a distance based fare system propane, CNG (compressed natural gas), when there are insufficient funds remaining LNG (liquefied natural gas), hydrogen (for on a stored value ticket, see also fare, fuel cells) and biomass derived fuels. All differential. carry premium costs that trend in larger or adult cash fare — see fare, adult cash. more cost-conscious operators toward “clean advanced design bus — see bus, advanced diesel” solutions. See also buses, hybrid. design. alternating-current motor — see motor, Advanced Public Transportation Systems — alternating-current. collection of technologies to increase alternative fuel — see fuel, alternative. efficiency of public transportation systems Amalgamated Transit Union — see union, and offer users greater access to information transit. on system operation. amenity, passenger — see passenger amenity. Advanced Railroad Grade Crossing — American Association of State Highway and National ITS Architecture Market Package Transportation Officials — see organizations, that manages highway traffic at highway-rail intersections where operational requirements American Association of State Highway and demand advanced features (e.g., where rail Transportation Officials. speeds are greater than 80 mph or 128 km/h). American Public Transit Association — see It includes all capabilities from the Standard organizations, American Public Transportation Railroad Grade Crossing Market Package and Association. augments these with additional safety American Public Transportation features to mitigate the risks associated with Association — see organizations, American higher rail speeds. Public Transportation Association. Advanced Traveler Information Systems — a.m. peak — see peak. technologies that provide travelers and Amtrak — see U.S. Government, National transportation professionals with the Railroad Passenger Corporation. information they need to make decisions, annual average daily traffic — see traffic, from daily individual travel decisions to annual average daily. larger-scale decisions that affect the entire system, such as those concerning incident annual average weekday traffic — see traffic, management. annual average weekday. advisory committee — see organizations, area, auto-free — see auto-free zone. citizen advisory committee. area, auto-restricted — see auto-restricted aerial lift — ropeways on which passengers zone. are transported in cabins or on chairs and area, coverage — in transit operations, the that circulate in one direction between geographical area that a transit system is terminals without reversing the travel path. considered to serve, normally based on aerial structure — in transportation, any acceptable walking distances (e.g., ¼ mile, 0.4 structure other than a culvert that carries a km) from loading points. For suburban rail roadway or track or other guideway above transit that depends on automobile access an earth or water surface; see also guideway, (park-and-ride or kiss-and-ride), coverage elevated. may extend several miles (kilometers). Coverage is usually computed for transit- aerial tramway — ropeways on which supportive areas. See also area, service. passengers are transported in cable- supported carriers and are not in contact area, fare paid — 1. An area that a passenger with the ground or snow surface, and in may enter only after having paid a fare or which the carrier(s) reciprocate between with proper credentials. 2. The area in a terminals. Also called a reversible tramway. station that is set off by barriers, gates, or other structures to permit ready access to agencies, federal — see U.S. Government. transit only by those who have paid fares or agency, regional planning — see secured passes before entering. organizations, regional planning agency. Glossary Page 8-2 Part 8/GLOSSARY Transit Capacity and Quality of Service
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Transit Ready City Report
    City of Rochester Comprehensive Access and Mobility Plan Transit Ready City Report Cover photo from patrickashley via wikimedia Table of Contents Page 1 Introduction ..................................................................................................... 1-1 2 Priority Corridors .............................................................................................. 2-1 Identification.....................................................................................................2-1 Land Use and Development............................................................................2-3 Street Design and Public Realm ......................................................................2-3 3 Stations and Stops ........................................................................................... 3-1 Basic Bus Stops..................................................................................................3-1 Enhanced Bus Stops .........................................................................................3-1 Transfer Points ...................................................................................................3-1 Stop Hierarchy and Requirements...................................................................3-4 Supportive Right-of-Way Considerations.........................................................3-5 Evolution of the Transit Center .........................................................................3-8 Connections to Intercity Services ....................................................................3-9
    [Show full text]
  • CATA Assessment of Articulated Bus Utilization
    (Page left intentionally blank) Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................................................................... E-1 Literature Review ................................................................................................................................................................................................................E-1 Operating Environment Review ........................................................................................................................................................................................E-1 Peer Community and Best Practices Review...................................................................................................................................................................E-2 Review of Policies and Procedures and Service Recommendations ...........................................................................................................................E-2 1 LITERATURE REVIEW ........................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Best Practices in Operations ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1.1 Integration into the Existing Fleet ..........................................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Analyses of Bus Travel Time Reliability and Transit Signal Priority at the Stop-To-Stop Segment Level
    Portland State University PDXScholar Dissertations and Theses Dissertations and Theses Spring 6-2-2014 Analyses of Bus Travel Time Reliability and Transit Signal Priority at the Stop-To-Stop Segment Level Wei Feng Portland State University Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/open_access_etds Part of the Transportation Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Feng, Wei, "Analyses of Bus Travel Time Reliability and Transit Signal Priority at the Stop-To-Stop Segment Level" (2014). Dissertations and Theses. Paper 1832. https://doi.org/10.15760/etd.1831 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. Analyses of Bus Travel Time Reliability and Transit Signal Priority at the Stop-To-Stop Segment Level by Wei Feng A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Civil and Environmental Engineering Dissertation Committee: Miguel Figliozzi, Chair 1 Robert Bertini Christopher Monsere James Strathman Portland State University 2014 1 © 2014 Wei Feng 2 2 i ABSTRACT Transit travel time is affected by many factors including traffic signals and traffic condition. Transit agencies have implemented strategies such as transit signal priority (TSP) to reduce transit travel time and improve service reliability. However, due to the lack of empirical data, the joint impact of these factors and improvement strategies on bus travel time has not been studied at the stop-to-stop segment level.
    [Show full text]
  • 16Th Street Project Flyer ENGLISH
    16th Street Improvement Project We’re Moving Muni Forward As part of Muni Forward, SFMTA is adding transit and safety improvements along the 22 Fillmore route that will make it safer to walk and bike, increase the reliability of transit service and enhance the customer experience on and off the bus. Project Overview BENEFITS AT A GLANCE The 16th Street Improvement Project aims to improve transit reliability and Reduce travel travel time for the 18,000 customers who ride Muni along the corridor on time by almost an average weekday, while enhancing safety and accessibility. It will address transportation needs of current and future residents, workers and visitors to the southeastern portion of the 22 Fillmore route along 2.3 miles of 16th Street. The 25% project also features utility upgrades as well as new trees, sidewalks and bus shelters. To allow for zero-emission transit service into Mission Bay, the project includes extending the overhead contact system (OCS) that powers our trolley buses on 16th Street from Kansas to Third streets. Additionally, new bike lanes have been added to 17th Street to create a continuous route from Mission Bay to the Mission neighborhood. Wider sidewalks at intersections This project is part of Muni Forward, an ongoing initiative to create a safe, reli- and bus bulb outs for safer able and comfortable experience on and off transit. crossings for people walking and quicker bus boardings. Schedule Stay Connected Construction will occur in two phases. First will be Potrero Hill/ Sign-up to get project updates and alerts: Mission Bay, followed by the Mission neighborhood section.
    [Show full text]
  • Feasibility Study in Doha, Qatar
    Journal of Unmanned Vehicle Systems AERIAL ROPEWAY SYSTEM- FEASIBILITY STUDY IN DOHA, QATAR Journal: Journal of Unmanned Vehicle Systems Manuscript ID juvs-2020-0028.R2 Manuscript Type: Article Date Submitted by the 26-Jan-2021 Author: Complete List of Authors: Tahmasseby, Shahram; Qatar University College of Engineering, aerial ropeway system, ridership, capital cost, operation and Keyword: maintenance, revenue Is the invited manuscript for Draft consideration in a Special Not applicable (regular submission) Issue, Collection, or competition? : © The Author(s) or their Institution(s) Page 1 of 30 Journal of Unmanned Vehicle Systems AERIAL ROPEWAY SYSTEM FEASIBILITY STUDY IN DOHA, QATAR Dr. Shahram TAHMASSEBY a Qatar Transportation and Traffic Center(QTTSC), College of Engineering-Qatar University, Doha, Qatar ABSTRACT Aerial ropeway systems, also called gondolas and aerial cable cars, are amongst driverless transportation modes, which are progressively drawing the attention in promoting tourism. Aerial ropeway systems have been operated in touristic spots e.g., over lakes, rivers, and hilly lands in several countries. Passengers can enjoy a view from the above and experience a stress-free and reliable trip. Furthermore, those systems can be exploited as a public transportation in urbanized and populated regions. The objective of this article is to investigate the viability of implementing a gondola line flying over Doha Bay in Qatar as a tourist attraction from the marketing, economic, and environmental point of view. In this study, the associated costs (capital, maintenance, and operating) of implementing a monocable detachable gondola technology(MDG) are estimatedDraft using international best practices in the world. The economic analysis outcome demonstrates that the revenues generated from the fares could counterweigh the required capital investment as well as operating and maintenance costs and hence the proposed gondola could be economically attractive for investors.
    [Show full text]
  • When the Wheels on the Bus Stop Going Round and Round: Occupational Injuries, Illnesses, and Fatalities in Public Transportation
    February 2015 errata On May 28, 2015, a correction was made to paragraph four under “BLS survey of occupational injuries and illnesses” in this article. The sentence, as originally published, incorrectly identified the cost of security cameras on buses as $18,000 per camera rather than per bus. When the wheels on the bus stop going round and round: occupational injuries, illnesses, and fatalities in public transportation Injuries and illnesses to bus drivers endanger not only their lives but also the lives of their passengers. In 2013, approximately 5,780 transit and intercity bus drivers experienced a days-away-from-work injury or illness while on the job. This article explores occupational injuries, illnesses, and fatalities to bus drivers and urban transit workers and examines how individual transit systems are collecting and analyzing their own employee safety data. The findings reveal that mass transit systems have taken steps to protect their employees from harm on the job and that injuries and illnesses to bus drivers and urban transit workers have declined in recent years. In October 2012, a Washington (DC) Metropolitan Area Gina Dowdell Hunter Transit Authority (WMATA) bus driver was hospitalized after [email protected] a rock was thrown through an open window and hit her Gina Dowdell Hunter is an economist in the Office 1 head while she was driving. In August 2013, a gunman of Safety, Health and Working Conditions, U.S. rushed on to a King County metro bus in downtown Seattle Bureau of Labor Statistics. and shot the driver during rush hour.2 These sorts of violent attacks involving bus drivers endanger not just the bus drivers but the passengers as well.
    [Show full text]
  • Ski & Snowboard Courses
    Ski & Snowboard Courses Icon Key ------------------------------------------------------ Welcome We have over a decade of experience running ski and snowboard courses. Knowing the ins and outs of the industry, we’ve chosen the best resorts and snow schools to give you confidence in our selection of courses. We are committed to keeping things simple and there are no hidden extras – each course clearly shows what is and isn’t included using the icon key. Aeroplane Flights Bus Transfers Hotel Accommodation Knife & Fork GUARANTEED Meals Gondola EXCELLENCE Lift Pass A training company owned and managed by Pen & Paper Exam fees snow-sports instructors, just for you. Check out our website for dates, prices and Info Visa/job advice complete course details. Wifi www.wintersportscompany.com Internet access 01736 763402 Skier Ski-in, ski-out resort Helicopter Heli-skiing/boarding Badge Membership of instructor organisation Weights Fitness programme Thumbs up Most popular courses 1 2 Course Qualifications Recommendations ------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------ All qualifications are recognised internationally, however employers usually Starting a Career require level 2 as a minimum. Complete Instructor Course 7 Career start-out on a budget United Kingdom Zero to Hero • BASI - British Association of Snowsports Instructors 8 Spend your first full season getting all the qualifications you need Canada BASI Instructor Course 11 • CSIA - Canadian Ski Instructors Alliance Includes real work experience as a level 1 instructor • CASI - Canadian Association of Snowboard Instructors Internship 13 Maximum work experience in 1 season New Zealand • NZSIA - New Zealand Snowsports Instructor Alliance Already Qualified? • SBINZ - Snowboard Instruction New Zealand Advanced Training Course 10 Dedicated level 2 & 3 training to boost your earning potential ISIA - International Ski Instructor Association Level 3 Internship The international governing body of snowsports instructors.
    [Show full text]
  • The Influence of Passenger Load, Driving Cycle, Fuel Price and Different
    Transportation https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-018-9925-0 The infuence of passenger load, driving cycle, fuel price and diferent types of buses on the cost of transport service in the BRT system in Curitiba, Brazil Dennis Dreier1 · Semida Silveira1 · Dilip Khatiwada1 · Keiko V. O. Fonseca2 · Rafael Nieweglowski3 · Renan Schepanski3 © The Author(s) 2018 Abstract This study analyses the infuence of passenger load, driving cycle, fuel price and four diferent types of buses on the cost of transport service for one bus rapid transit (BRT) route in Curitiba, Brazil. First, the energy use is estimated for diferent passenger loads and driving cycles for a conventional bi-articulated bus (ConvBi), a hybrid-electric two- axle bus (HybTw), a hybrid-electric articulated bus (HybAr) and a plug-in hybrid-electric two-axle bus (PlugTw). Then, the fuel cost and uncertainty are estimated considering the fuel price trends in the past. Based on this and additional cost data, replacement scenarios for the currently operated ConvBi feet are determined using a techno-economic optimisa- tion model. The lowest fuel cost ranges for the passenger load are estimated for PlugTw amounting to (0.198–0.289) USD/km, followed by (0.255–0.315) USD/km for HybTw, (0.298–0.375) USD/km for HybAr and (0.552–0.809) USD/km for ConvBi. In contrast, C the coefcient of variation ( v ) of the combined standard uncertainty is the highest for C PlugTw ( v : 15–17%) due to stronger sensitivity to varying bus driver behaviour, whereas C it is the least for ConvBi ( v : 8%).
    [Show full text]
  • Attacks on Bus Operators and Passengers
    Sensitive But Unclassified Material For Official Use Only Attacks on Bus Operators and Passengers Special Report Prepared by the ST, PT and OTRB ISACs May 4, 2015 Purpose In light of recent violent incidents targeting transit operators in numerous areas around the globe, the Surface Transportation (ST), Public Transportation (PT), and Over the Road Bus (OTRB) ISACs are providing this special report for your general security awareness. The application of any standards or guidance discussed herein is strictly voluntary. The practices implemented by rail, transit, and OTRB systems may be either more or less restrictive than any recommended practices or guidance given in this document. In some cases, federal and/or state regulations govern portions of public transit systems’ operations. In those cases, government regulations should take precedence over the information or guidance provided herein. Organizations should consult their own Agency’s/Organization’s policies and guidance before taking any actions based on the information presented in these documents. This document supplements guidance and analysis already provided in daily reports produced by the ST, PT, & OTRB ISACs. Of note, the last page of this report lists references for additional information. To contact an ST and PT ISAC analyst please call 866-784-7221, or email [email protected]. To contact an OTRB ISAC analyst please call 877-847-5510, or email [email protected] 1 Sensitive But Unclassified Material For Official Use Only Introduction The security of transit system and interstate bus operators has become an increasing concern for many metropolitan areas. Some attribute the perceived rise in attacks against operators as an artifact of increased reporting, but when that element of information is factored into the analysis, there still appears to be a notable surge in violent behavior targeting transit workers; particularly against bus drivers, who may remain the most vulnerable.
    [Show full text]
  • Comprehensive Evaluation on Transit Signal Priority System Impacts Using Field Observed Traffic Data
    Final Technical Report TNW2007-06 TransNow Budget No. 61-4161 Comprehensive Evaluation on Transit Signal Priority System Impacts Using Field Observed Traffic Data by Yinhai Wang Mark Hallenbeck Jianyang Zheng Guohui Zhang Assistant Professor Director, TRAC Graduate Research Graduate Research Assistant Assistant Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Washington Seattle, Washington 98195-2700 Sponsored by Transportation Northwest (TransNow) Washington State Department of University of Washington Transportation (WSDOT) 135 More Hall, Box 352700 310 Maple Park Avenue SE Seattle, Washington 98195-2700 PO Box 47300 Olympia, WA 98504-7300 in cooperation with U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Report prepared for: Transportation Northwest (TransNow) Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering 129 More Hall University of Washington, Box 352700 Seattle, Washington 98195-2700 June 15, 2007 Comprehensive Evaluation on Transit Signal Priority System Impacts Using Field Observed Traffic Data Page 1 TECHNICAL REPORT STANDARD TITLE PAGE 1. REPORT NO. 2. GOVERNMENT ACCESSION NO. 3. RECIPIENT’S CATALOG TNW2007-06 NO. 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5. REPORT DATE Comprehensive Evaluation on Transit Signal Priority System Impacts Using Field Observed Traffic June 15, 2007 Data 6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE 7. AUTHOR(S) 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT Yinhai Wang, Mark Hallenbeck, Jianyang Zheng and Guohui Zhang NO. TNW2007-06 9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS 10. WORK UNIT NO. Transportation Northwest Regional Center X (TransNow) Box 352700, 129 More Hall University of Washington Seattle, WA 98195-2700 11. CONTRACT GRANT NO. DTRS99-G-0010 12. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS 13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED United States Department of Transportation Final Research Office of the Secretary of Transportation Report 400 Seventh St.
    [Show full text]
  • Chair Lift Challenge" Explores How Engineers Develop Transportation Systems to Operate in Different and Sometimes Challenging Environments
    IEEE Lesson Plan: C hair Lift Challenge Explore other TryEngineering lessons at www.tryengineering.org Lesson Focus Lesson focuses on unique challenges in transportation engineering, such as devising a method for skiers or hikers to get to the top of a mountain. Students work in teams to design a "chair lift" out of everyday items that can transport a ping pong ball in a chair of their own design from the bottom of a "valley" to the top of a "mountain" along a clothes line or wire without the ball falling out. Students design their chairlift and chair on paper, execute their design, test it, reflect on the challenge, and share their experiences with the class. Lesson Synopsis The "Chair Lift Challenge" explores how engineers develop transportation systems to operate in different and sometimes challenging environments. Students work in teams to design a chair lift made out of everyday materials that can carry a ping pong ball up a rope line and back down in a controlled manner so that the ball does not fall out of a chair the team has also designed. They sketch their plans, consider material selection, build their system, test it, reflect on the challenge, and present their experiences to their class. A g e L e v e l s 8-18. Objectives Learn about engineering design and redesign. Learn how engineering can help solve society's challenges. Learn about teamwork and problem solving. Anticipated Learner Outcomes As a result of this activity, students should develop an understanding of: civil engineering engineering design teamwork Lesson Activities Students explore how engineers work to provide safe transportation options in different environments and climates.
    [Show full text]
  • Right of Passage
    Right of Passage: Reducing Barriers to the Use of Public Transportation in the MTA Region Joshua L. Schank Transportation Planner April 2001 Permanent Citizens Advisory Committee to the MTA 347 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10017 (212) 878-7087 · www.pcac.org ã PCAC 2001 Acknowledgements The author wishes to thank the following people: Beverly Dolinsky and Mike Doyle of the PCAC staff, who provided extensive direction, input, and much needed help in researching this paper. They also helped to read and re-read several drafts, helped me to flush out arguments, and contributed in countless other ways to the final product. Stephen Dobrow of the New York City Transit Riders Council for his ideas and editorial assistance. Kate Schmidt, formerly of the PCAC staff, for some preliminary research for this paper. Barbara Spencer of New York City Transit, Christopher Boylan of the MTA, Brian Coons of Metro-North, and Yannis Takos of the Long Island Rail Road for their aid in providing data and information. The Permanent Citizens Advisory Committee and its component Councils–the Metro-North Railroad Commuter Council, the Long Island Rail Road Commuters Council, and the New York City Transit Riders Council–are the legislatively mandated representatives of the ridership of MTA bus, subway, and commuter-rail services. Our 38 volunteer members are regular users of the MTA system and are appointed by the Governor upon the recommendation of County officials and, within New York City, of the Mayor, Public Advocate, and Borough Presidents. For more information on the PCAC and Councils, please visit our website: www.pcac.org.
    [Show full text]