DOCSLIB.ORG

TCRP H-52 Task 3. Mini Case Studies 36 Transit Agencies

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

TCRP H-52 Task 3. Mini Case Studies 36 Transit Agencies Image Source: Free Clip Art Reading Tips • This document is designed to print on both sides of a sheet of paper. • The Table of Contents page contains hyperlinks. You can click a transit agency’s name to navigate to its mini case study. Whenever you would like to go back to the Table of Contents page, just click the transit agency’s name at the very top of the page. Table of Contents United States California Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority Foothill Transit (GCRTA) Golden Gate Bridge, Highway and Transportation Oregon District (GGBHTD) Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation of Oregon (TriMet) Authority (Metro) Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board (Caltrain) Pennsylvania San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) Port Authority of Allegheny County Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) Texas Colorado Capital Metropolitan Transportation Authority Denver Regional Transportation District (RTD) (Capital Metro) Dallas Area Rapid Transit (DART) Connecticut Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County Connecticut Department of Transportation (METRO) (ConnDOT) Sun Metro Illinois Utah Chicago Transit Authority (CTA) Utah Transit Authority (UTA) Northeast Illinois Regional Commuter Railroad Corporation (Metra) Virginia Pace - Suburban Bus Division (Pace) Fairfax County Department of Transportation (Fairfax Connector) Massachusetts Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority Washington, D.C. (MBTA) Washington Metropolitan Area Transportation Authority (WMATA) Minnesota Metro Transit Washington Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority New Jersy (Sound Transit) New Jersey Transit (NJ TRANSIT) Clark County Public Transportation Benefi t New York Area Authority (C-TRAN) MTA Metro-North Railroad (Metro-North) Intercity Transit King County Metro Transit Division (King County North Carolina Metro) Charlotte Area Transit System (CATS) Kitsap Transit Ohio Pierce County Public Transportation Benefi t Central Ohio Transit Authority (COTA) Area Corporation (Pierce Transit) Snohomish County Public Transportation (Community Transit) (Canadian transit agencies continued on the next page) Canada Alberta Calgary Transit (CT) British Columbia South Coast British Columbia Transportation Authority (TransLink) Foothill Transit West Covina, CA Park-and-Ride Passenger Amenities Unsure/ All Some None NA Covered waiting area ☐ ☐ ☐ Enclosed waiting area ☐ ☐ ☐ Background Restroom, temporary ☐ ☐ ☐ Launched in 1988 in response to service cuts and fare Restroom, permanent ☐ ☐ ☐ increases announced by the Southern California Rapid On-site station personnel ☐ ☐ ☐ Transit District, Foothill Transit assumed responsibility for Concession, vending ☐ ☐ ☐ bus operation in the San Gabriel and Pomona Valleys, Elec. veh. charging ☐ ☐ ☐ including Pasadena and downtown Los Angeles. The Real-time info. ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ Foothill Transit Joint Powers Authority Board is comprised Ticket machines of 22 member cities and the County of Los Angeles, divided into five regional clusters. Regional representatives Park-and-Ride Security Unsure/ are elected annually to serve on a five-member executive All Some None board. Foothill Transit is mainly funded by Los Angeles NA ☐ ☐ ☐ County Proposition A and C funds, the California State On-site – all-times On-site – spec. hours ☐ ☐ ☐ Transportation Development Act, and State Transit Roaming security ☐ ☐ ☐ Assistance funds. Twenty-five percent of the transit Monitored cameras ☐ ☐ ☐ agency’s funding in generated through farebox revenues. Recording cameras ☐ ☐ ☐ Physical – fences, gated ☐ ☐ ☐ There are 330 buses in Foothill Transit’s fleet, operating 36 entry, etc. local and express bus routes in a 327 square mile service area. Shared Use of Park-and-Ride Facilities Region of Operation: West Foothill Transit owns some park-and-ride facilities and enters into formal lease/rental agreements for park-and-ride Operating Environment: Very Large Urban facilities. Between 51–75 percent of Foothill Transit’s Between 1,000 and 2,999 Parking Spaces park-and-ride facilities are provided by entities other than Foothill Transit. The transit agency operates park-and-ride Operating Context service from shared-use parking lots, as well as from park- In the last five years, Foothill Transit has significantly and-ride facilities provided by municipalities, other local or modified park-and-ride facilities by adding structured regional public agencies, and the state department of parking to increase capacity. transportation, Caltrans. Some park-and-ride facilities have a kiss-and-ride drop-off Parking Charges as of January 2016 area, parking to join transit agency sponsored vanpools, and informal ridesharing. All park-and-ride facilities have Foothill Transit does not charge for parking at bicycle parking. Foothill Transit has different policies for park-and-ride facilities. weekend use at park-and-ride facilities, and the transit agency allows the facilities to be used for special event Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) parking. Foothill Transit has standard operating procedures (SOPs) for management, facility maintenance, safety and security Modes Operated at park-and-ride facilitates, and asset management. Motor Bus (MB) ☐ Streetcar Rail (SR) ☐ Trolley Bus (TB) ☐ Heavy Rail (HR) Contracted Parking Management ☐ Commuter Bus (CB) ☐ Commuter Rail (CR) The transit agency contracts with a private vendor specifically to provide park-and-ride management. ☐ Bus Rapid Transit (RB) ☐ Ferry (FB) ☐ Light Rail (LR) ☐ Vanpool (VP) Maintenance and State-of-Good-Repair Excludes demand response modes. Foothill Transit has SOPs for facility and asset management. Park-and-ride facilities are integrated into Parking by Mode Foothill Transit’s asset management plan. Modes Stations/Lots Spaces Bus 11 2,838 Planning, Estimating and Managing Rail 0 0 Demand for Parking Ferry 0 0 Foothill Transit has a formal process to plan for park-and- Total 11 2,838 ride facilities. The transit agency regularly measures park- Source: APTA 2014 Infrastructure Database and-ride facility utilization, but does not use a specific Foothill Transit West Covina, CA demand estimation model or methodology to estimate TCRP H-52 References demand for park-and-ride facilities for public National Transit Database (NTD), 2013 transportation. American Public Transit Association (APTA) Foothill Transit has no park-and-ride facilities where Infrastructure Database – 2014 Edition demand for parking regularly exceeds the supply of TCRP Project H-52: Decision-Making Toolbox to Plan parking spaces available. The transit agency’s H-52 and Manage Park-and-Ride Facilities for Public response explained that, despite not exceeding demand, Transportation Foothill Transit provides a list of other park-and-ride facility locations owned and operated by the state or Transit Agency References municipalities in case customers need to park elsewhere Foothill Transit http://foothilltransit.org/ (due to congestion or closure). Within the last five years, at least one of the transit agency’s park-and-ride facilities has experienced low demand on a regular basis. Foothill Transit manages low demand by offering free parking or promotional fares, and modifying transit service to encourage use of available parking. Design Features Foothill Transit has coordinated park-and-ride facility design features to complement adjacent developments or neighborhoods. The transit agency did not provide examples. Transit Oriented Development (TOD) Foothill Transit has financially participated in at least one TOD on or adjacent to a park-and-ride facility for public transportation; however, the transit agency did not provide information about this TOD experience. Public-Private Partnerships (P3s) According to the transit agency’s H-52 response, Foothill Transit has not participated in a public-private partnership associated with park-and-ride facilities. Challenges A specific challenge facing the transit agency is monitoring parking spaces. Foothill Transit is building a new shared- use parking structure that will be shared with Los Angeles Metro (to provide access to that transit agency’s Gold Line light rail) and a municipality. Although proper signage will be installed, the transit agency is concerned the commuters using light rail will use Foothill Transit’s dedicated parking spaces for bus service. As of December 2015, the transit agency did not have plans or budget to hire a parking attendant to monitor the parking spaces. However, Foothill Transit may need to budget for this position in the future if parking availability becomes an issue for Foothill Transit customers. Innovation As of 2013, Foothill Transit’s bus fleet is comprised entirely of CNG and all-electric vehicles. In 2014, the transit agency began operating the first fast-charge electric bus line in the United States, Line 291 between La Verne, CA, and Pomona, CA. Last Updated: February 2016 Golden Gate Bridge, Highway and Transportation District (GGBHTD) San Francisco, CA Park-and-Ride Passenger Amenities Unsure/ All Some None NA Covered waiting area ☐ ☐ ☐ Enclosed waiting area ☐ ☐ ☐ Restroom, temporary ☐ ☐ ☐ Restroom, permanent ☐ ☐ ☐ On-site station personnel ☐ ☐ ☐ Concession, vending ☐ ☐ ☐ Background Elec. veh. charging ☐ ☐ The Golden Gate Bridge Highway and Transportation Real-time info. ☐ ☐ ☐ District (GGBHTD) was created under the Bridge and Ticket machines ☐ ☐ ☐ Highway Act of 1923. GGBHTD operates and maintains
Recommended publications
  • Strategies for High Intensity Bus: Best Practices for Operating Buses in Managed Lanes Velyjah Southern, Et Al, Texas Southern University

    Strategies for High Intensity Bus: Best Practices for Operating Buses in Managed Lanes Velyjah Southern, Et Al, Texas Southern University

    Texas Southern University From the SelectedWorks of Earthea Nance, PhD (Stanford University, 2004) 2017 Strategies for High Intensity Bus: Best Practices for Operating Buses in Managed Lanes Velyjah Southern, et al, Texas Southern University Available at: https://works.bepress.com/nanceea/25/ 1 Invited Student Paper: Strategies for High Intensity Bus: Best Practices for Operating 2 Buses in Managed Lanes 3 4 5 6 7 Velyjha Southern 8 Graduate Research Assistant 9 Texas Southern University 10 3100 Cleburne St. Houston, TX 77004 11 713-313-4365 (p) 713-313-4821 (f) 12 [email protected] 13 14 Earthea Nance, Ph.D. 15 Associate Professor 16 Texas Southern University 17 3100 Cleburne St. Houston, TX 77004 18 713-313-4854 (p) 713-313-7153 (f) 19 [email protected] 20 21 Carol Abel Lewis, Ph.D. 22 Professor and Director, CTTR 23 Texas Southern University 24 3100 Cleburne St. Houston, TX 77004 25 713-313-7924 (p) 713-313-4821 (f) 26 Jermaine Potts 27 Graduate Research Assistant 28 Texas Southern University 29 3100 Cleburne St. Houston, TX 77004 30 713-313-4365 (p) 713-313-4821 (f) 31 32 33 Prepared for consideration for 34 Presentation at the 96th Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting 35 Washington D.C. January 2017 36 37 Word Count: 6,237 (Body) + 1,250 (Tables and Figures) = 7,487 38 References= 18 39 Submission date: November 14, 2016 40 41 42 Southern, Nance, Lewis, and Potts 2 1 2 3 4 5 ABSTRACT 6 This paper examines high intensity bus (HIB) service in managed lanes in the US.
  • How Transportation Network Companies Could Replace Public Transportation in the United States Matthew L

    How Transportation Network Companies Could Replace Public Transportation in the United States Matthew L

    University of South Florida Scholar Commons Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate School November 2017 How Transportation Network Companies Could Replace Public Transportation in the United States Matthew L. Kessler University of South Florida, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd Part of the Civil Engineering Commons, Public Policy Commons, and the Urban Studies and Planning Commons Scholar Commons Citation Kessler, Matthew L., "How Transportation Network Companies Could Replace Public Transportation in the United States" (2017). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/7045 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. How Transportation Network Companies Could Replace Public Transportation in the United States by Matthew L. Kessler A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Engineering Science Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering College of Engineering University of South Florida Co-Major Professor: Steven E. Polzin, Ph.D. Co-Major Professor: Abdul. R. Pinjari, Ph.D. Xuehao Chu, Ph.D. Martin D. Hanlon, Ph.D. Date of Approval: October 23, 2017 Keywords: TNC, Supplantment, Transit Agency, Ride-sourcing, Smartphone app Copyright © 2017, Matthew L. Kessler DEDICATION This page is dedicated in memory of my beloved uncle, Joel “Jerry” Kessler, my grandparents: Miriam Sylvia and William Berkowitz, Gertrude and Sam Kessler. Lifelong friend MariaLita Viafora, and a special friend, Michael R.
  • Public Hearing Will Pertaintoapplicablefares Asmodified

    Public Hearing Will Pertaintoapplicablefares Asmodified

    Proposed Changes in Fares, Crossing Charges, and Service Hearings will be held on proposed changes in fares at the locations, dates, and times noted below. The public is invited to comment on the proposed changes which are summarized below and pertain, as applicable, to MTA Long Island Rail Road (LIRR), MTA Metro-North Railroad (Metro-North), MTA New York City Transit (NYCT), the Manhattan and Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority (MaBSTOA), and MTA Bus and to crossing charges on MTA Bridges &Tunnels (Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority). The fare and toll proposals allow for a range of options to be considered; increases to fares or crossing charges may be less than the maximum amounts specified. Following the hearings, after considering public comment, the Boards of the MTA and its affiliated agencies will decide which potential fare adjustments to adopt. Space limitations prevent newspaper publication of each proposed new fare or crossing charge. For more complete descriptions of these potential changes, please consult information posted at MTA stations and on the MTA website, www.mta.info, or call (646) 252-6777. Following hearings, one or more of the proposed changes listed below could be adopted: NYCT, MaBSTOA, MTA Bus, SIR: LIRR & Metro North: Fares for Subway (NYCT), Local Bus (NYCT, MaBSTOA, and MTA Bus), and SIR: • Increase monthly tickets up to 4% and not more than $15. Increase weekly Base Single Ride Fare (currently $3.00 for Single Ride Ticket, and $2.75 for tickets up to 4% and not more than $5.75. Increase fares in an amount from 0 cash payment and Pay-Per-Ride (zero) to 10% on all other ticket types, with any increase greater than 6% held MetroCard®): to a maximum increase of $0.50 per trip.
  • SR 520 Bridge Replacement and HOV Program ESSB 6392 Design

    SR 520 Bridge Replacement and HOV Program ESSB 6392 Design

    ESSB 6392: Design Refi nements and Transit Connections Workgroup | Appendix A: White papers Appendix A: White papers | ESSB 6392 Legislative Report ESSB 6392: Design Refinements and Transit Connections Workgroup Turning, Queuing, and Channelization Introduction How was turning, queuing, and channelization addressed in the preferred alternative? Lane channelization and turn pocket storage lengths were identified in the preferred alternative based on initial information available from the SDEIS. However, storage lengths and channelization were not analyzed in detail for the preferred alternative, as they were developed to fit within the environmental and operational effects evaluated in the SDEIS. Further analysis was requested to address the channelization and storage lengths as originally defined in the preferred alternative. What issues are we trying to resolve? As part of the design refinements associated with ESSB 6392, the project team sought confirmation that the number of lanes shown in the preferred alternative was necessary based on traffic forecasts and operations. In comment letters on the SDEIS, the Seattle City Council and Mayor expressed a desire for WSDOT to reduce the width of the corridor and associated roadways wherever possible in order to limit environmental impacts of the project. These comments echo those heard from many community members as well, asking that the project team eliminate any unneeded lanes. Specific areas studied included: • Reducing the westbound off-ramp to a single lane. • Reducing the number of turn lanes needed at the intersections of 24th Avenue and East Lake Washington Boulevard, and Montlake Boulevard and Lake Washington Boulevard. • Reducing the number of lanes on Montlake Boulevard through the interchange.
  • Jo U Rn a L O F P U B Lic T Ransp O Rta Tio N

    Jo U Rn a L O F P U B Lic T Ransp O Rta Tio N

    Vo Volume 12, No. 3, 2009 lume 12, No. 3 Journal of Public Public of Journal Tr Brian Caulfield A Stated Preference Analysis of Real-Time ansp Margaret O’Mahony Public Transit Stop Information or Laura Eboli A New Customer Satisfaction Index for Gabriella Mazzulla Evaluating Transit Service Quality ta tion Ahmed M. El-Geneidy Bus Transit Service Planning and Operations in a John Hourdos Competitive Environment Jessica Horning Matthew H. Hardy Transit Response to Congestion Pricing Opportunities: Policy and Practice in the U.S. John Pucher Integrating Bicycling and Public Transport in North America Ralph Buehler Mario G. Beruvides The Concept of a Regional Maintenance Center James L. Simonton Natalie M. Waters Ean Ng Siva Chaivichitmalakul Cheng-Chu Chiu-Wei Pelin Z. Altintas Phil Nash 2009 Luis Barroso Paul Moon N C T R JOURNAL OF Public Transportation Volume 12, No. 3, 2009 ISSN 1077-291X TheJournal of Public Transportation is published quarterly by National Center for Transit Research Center for Urban Transportation Research University of South Florida • College of Engineering 4202 East Fowler Avenue, CUT100 Tampa, Florida 33620-5375 Phone: (813) 974-3120 Fax: (813) 974-5168 Email: [email protected] Website: www.nctr.usf.edu/jpt/journal.htm © 2009 Center for Urban Transportation Research Volume 12, No. 3, 2009 ISSN 1077-291X CONTENTS A Stated Preference Analysis of Real-Time Public Transit Stop Information Brian Caulfield, Margaret O’Mahony ...............................................................................................1 A New Customer Satisfaction Index for Evaluating Transit Service Quality Laura Eboli, Gabriella Mazzulla ....................................................................................................... 21 Bus Transit Service Planning and Operations in a Competitive Environment Ahmed M.
  • Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) What Is the MUTCD?

    Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) What Is the MUTCD?

    National Committee on Uniform Traffic Control Devices Bus/BRT Applications Introduction • I am Steve Andrle from TRB standing in for Randy McCourt, DKS Associates and 2019 ITE International Vice President • I co-manage with Claire Randall15 TRB public transit standing committees. • I want to bring you up to date on planned bus- oriented improvements to the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) What is the MUTCD? • Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) – Standards for roadway signs, signals, and markings • Authorized in 23 CFR, Part 655: It is an FHWA document. • National Committee on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (NCUTCD) develops content • Sponsored by 19 organizations including ITE, AASHTO, APTA and ATSSA (American Traffic Safety Services Association) Background • Bus rapid transit, busways, and other bus applications have expanded greatly since the last edition of the MUTCD in 2009 • The bus-related sections need to be updated • Much of the available research speaks to proposed systems, not actual experience • The NCUTCD felt it was a good time to survey actual systems to see what has worked, what didn’t work, and to identify gaps. National Survey • The NCUTCD established a task force with APTA and FTA • Working together they issued a survey in April of 2018. I am sure some of you received it. • The results will be released to the NCUTCD on June 20 – effectively now • I cannot give you any details until the NCUTCD releases the findings Survey Questions • Have you participated in design and/or operations of
  • Motion No. M2020-69 Funding Agreement for Capped Contribution for Rapidride C Line Improvements

    Motion No. M2020-69 Funding Agreement for Capped Contribution for Rapidride C Line Improvements

    Motion No. M2020-69 Funding Agreement for Capped Contribution for RapidRide C Line Improvements Meeting: Date: Type of action: Staff contact: System Expansion Committee 11/12/2020 Recommend to Board Don Billen, Executive Director, Board 11/19/2020 Final action PEPD Cathal Ridge, Executive Corridor Director- Central Corridor Chris Rule, HCT Project Manager – Central Corridor Proposed action Authorizes the chief executive officer to execute an agreement with the City of Seattle and King County to reimburse the City of Seattle for $1,730,000 and King County Metro for $2,800,000 to provide a total funding contribution of $4,530,000 for bus speed and reliability improvements to the RapidRide C Line serving West Seattle to South Lake Union. Key features summary • This action authorizes Sound Transit to enter into an inter-local agreement with the City of Seattle and King County to reimburse the City and County for costs of up to $4.53 million for speed and reliability improvements to the RapidRide C Line. • The Sound Transit 3 (ST3) System Plan includes a capped capital contribution of $65 million for bus capital enhancements to design and construct transit priority improvements that improve speed and reliability for the Madison BRT project and the RapidRide C and D Lines. • In 2018 the Sound Transit Board established the RapidRide C and D Improvements project and approved an initial study of potential improvements performed by the West Seattle and Ballard Link Extensions project team. • In September the Board of Directors moved that staff bring forward an agreement for a limited near- term authorization for RapidRide C Line improvements pending a more comprehensive program realignment.
  • Ctfastrak Existing Condition

    Ctfastrak Existing Condition

    Hartford Line TOD Action Plan Desire & Readiness Workshop: Town of Windsor Locks October 20, 2016 State Project No. 170-3396 1 Task 8 Agenda 1. Project Background and Overview 2. TOD Principles and Precedents 3. CTrail Hartford Line Station Area Assessment • TOD Desire & Readiness Criteria • Initial Observations from the Project Team 4. Interactive Workshop • Preliminary Areas of Focus • Instructions 2 Project Background Establishing a Point of Departure in Windsor Locks • Hartford Line TOD Action Plan • Town of Windsor Locks POCD Update • Main Street Property Acquisition and • Windsor Locks TOD Study Pre-Development (OPM) • Making it Happen • CRCOG Regional Complete Streets Policy and Action Plan (OPM) • Historic Train Station Reuse Study Windsor Locks Downtown • Capitol Region Master Plan Transportation Plan 2007 2008 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Ongoing/Forthcoming • Incentive Housing Downtown TIF Zone Study District Master Plan • Capital Region POCD Town of Windsor Locks EA/EIE for NHHS Rail Program POCD 3 Project Background Initial Thoughts from the Project Team: Key Issues to Advance TOD in Windsor Locks Reinvigorate downtown/Main Street Activate and maximize development as a destination potential of catalytic sites in the station area . Address lasting impacts of urban . Target sites and recommended sequencing renewal, and change the mindset of Main have been identified, but there are Street as a pass through outstanding questions: . Find a balance between maintaining • What can be done to make sites more traffic flow and creating a pedestrian- attractive to potential developers? and bicycle-friendly downtown • Are there opportunities to assemble a critical mass of sites to enable a larger . Consider developing a downtown development proposition? parking strategy 4 Source: Windsor Locks TOD Study Project Background Funding through FTA Pilot Program for TOD Planning .
  • Full Draft Long Range Plan February 2018

    Full Draft Long Range Plan February 2018

    CONNECTING YOUR FUTURE Everett Transit DRAFT LONG RANGE PLAN Everett Transit Long Range Plan 1 Connecting Your Future 2 Connecting Your Future Table of CONTENTS i Executive Summary i 1 Why a Long Range Plan? 1 2 Transit Today and in the Future 4 3 Everett Transit’s Role 10 4 Our Plan to Move Forward 13 5 Our Financial Future 16 6 Strategy for Implementation 19 Everett Transit Draft Long Range Plan Everett Transit Long Range Plan 3 Connecting Your Future The Goals of the Plan Everett Transit provides safe, customer-focused, cost-efficient, and effective public transit and transportation management services in support of sustainable growth and a livable community. This Long Range Plan services three main goals: 1 Identify future transit service 2 Determine options for implementation 3 Establish service standards Everett Transit Draft Long Range Plan i Everett Transit Long Range Plan i How the Community Helped Develop a Growth Network Plan Everett Transit went out to the community throughout 2017 to help define the vision for transit in the future and to gather feedback on how service should be provided to support continued growth in the region. Respondents described the role they see for Everett Transit in the region and they highlighted their priorities for transit. What We Heard Provide a locally-focused transit network with high frequency and expanded service hours that connects to key destinations and regional transit services. Everett Transit Growth Network Route Frequency (Peak) !#"5 Marysville 15-20 MInutes 30 Minutes E M r a D ri
  • Sunrail.Com Not to Scale

    Sunrail.Com Not to Scale

    WELCOME ABOARD! BROCHURE LYMMO is your ride to great places M around Downtown Orlando. Whether you’re heading to work, a meal, or one of the many attractions Downtown, LYMMO’s frequent service and bus-only lanes will get you there faster. LYNX is the public transit provider for LYMMO Orange, Lime and And when you’re riding LYMMO, you Orange, Osceola and Seminole counties. never have to worry about parking. Additional connectivity with Grapefruit Lines If you don’t see your destination here, Lake and Polk counties. CONTACT US and we can connect you DIRECT SERVICE TO: to the right LYMMO. CONTACT US for information on fares, bus stops, schedules and trip planning: Amway Center Heritage Square Ready to roll? Look inside for more info... Bob Carr Theater Lake Eola Park 407-841-5969 phone County Courthouse LYNX Central Station 407-423-0787 tdd County Health Dept Orlando City Stadium Dr Phillips Center Parramore Notice of Title VI Rights: LYNX operates its programs and services without regard to race, color, golynx.com web religion, gender, age, national origin, disability, or family status in accordance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act. Any person who believes Effective: he or she has been aggrieved by any unlawful discriminatory practice APRIL 2017 related to Title VI may file a complaint in writing to LYNX Title VI Officer Desna Hunte, 455 N. Garland Avenue, Orlando, Florida 32801 or by calling THANK YOU FOR RIDING LYNX! 407-254-6117, email [email protected] or www.golynx.com. Information in other languages or accessible formats available upon request.
  • Double Line Image Rotation Amir Hossein Ashtari, Member, IEEE,Mdjannordin,Member, IEEE, and Seyed Mostafa Mousavi Kahaki, Member, IEEE

    Double Line Image Rotation Amir Hossein Ashtari, Member, IEEE,Mdjannordin,Member, IEEE, and Seyed Mostafa Mousavi Kahaki, Member, IEEE

    3370 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON IMAGE PROCESSING, VOL. 24, NO. 11, NOVEMBER 2015 Double Line Image Rotation Amir Hossein Ashtari, Member, IEEE,MdJanNordin,Member, IEEE, and Seyed Mostafa Mousavi Kahaki, Member, IEEE Abstract— This paper proposes a fast algorithm for rotating rotation transformation has been expressed in (2). The direct images while preserving their quality. The new approach rotates determination of the rotated points is a one-pass method. images based on vertical or horizontal lines in the original image and their rotated equation in the target image. The proposed xr cos α − sin α xt method is a one-pass method that determines a based-line = . (2) yr sin α cos α yt equation in the target image and extracts all corresponding pixels on the base-line. Floating-point multiplications are performed Determining the rotated point directly using a single to calculate the base-line in the target image, and other line function such as (2) is a one-pass technique, whereas cal- coordinates are calculated using integer addition or subtraction and logical justifications from the base-line pixel coordinates in culating the rotated point using multiple functions such the target image. To avoid a heterogeneous distance between as (3), (4), and (5) is a multi-pass technique. Compared with rotated pixels in the target image, each line rotates to two multi-pass methods, one-pass methods are simple and usually adjacent lines. The proposed method yields good performance more accurate [2], [5]. However, although one-pass methods in terms of speed and quality according to the results of an are accurate, they are still inefficient because multiple analysis of the computation speed and accuracy.
  • Mobility Payment Integration: State-Of-The-Practice Scan

    Mobility Payment Integration: State-Of-The-Practice Scan

    Mobility Payment Integration: State-of-the-Practice Scan OCTOBER 2019 FTA Report No. 0143 Federal Transit Administration PREPARED BY Ingrid Bartinique and Joshua Hassol Volpe National Transportation Systems Center COVER PHOTO Courtesy of Edwin Adilson Rodriguez, Federal Transit Administration DISCLAIMER This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the U.S. Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The United States Government assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof. The United States Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. Trade or manufacturers’ names appear herein solely because they are considered essential to the objective of this report. Mobility Payment Integration: State-of-the- Practice Scan OCTOBER 2019 FTA Report No. 0143 PREPARED BY Ingrid Bartinique and Joshua Hassol Volpe National Transportation Systems Center 55 Broadway, Kendall Square Cambridge, MA 02142 SPONSORED BY Federal Transit Administration Office of Research, Demonstration and Innovation U.S. Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 AVAILABLE ONLINE https://www.transit.dot.gov/about/research-innovation FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION i FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION i Metric Conversion Table SYMBOL WHEN YOU KNOW MULTIPLY BY TO FIND SYMBOL LENGTH in inches 25.4 millimeters mm ft feet 0.305 meters m yd yards 0.914 meters m mi miles 1.61 kilometers km VOLUME fl oz fluid ounces 29.57 milliliters mL gal gallons 3.785 liter L ft3 cubic feet 0.028 cubic meters m3 yd3 cubic yards 0.765 cubic meters m3 NOTE: volumes greater than 1000 L shall be shown in m3 MASS oz ounces 28.35 grams g lb pounds 0.454 kilograms kg megagrams T short tons (2000 lb) 0.907 Mg (or “t”) (or “metric ton”) TEMPERATURE (exact degrees) o 5 (F-32)/9 o F Fahrenheit Celsius C or (F-32)/1.8 FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION i FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION ii REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No.