DOCSLIB.ORG

Kent Station Parking and Access Improvements Project

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Kent Station Parking and Access Improvements Project Attachment B Noise Technical Analysis Memorandum Kent Station Parking and Access Improvements Noise Technical Analysis Memorandum 401 South Jackson Street Seattle, WA 98104-2826 September 2019 Table of Contents 1.0 Noise Technical Analysis ........................................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Fundamental Concepts of Noise ............................................................................................................................ 3 3.0 Fundamental Concepts of Vibration ..................................................................................................................... 7 4.0 Regulatory Setting ....................................................................................................................................................... 8 5.0 Environmental Setting ............................................................................................................................................. 14 6.0 Noise and Vibration Impact Analysis ................................................................................................................. 17 7.0 References ..................................................................................................................................................................... 26 Appendix A Noise Measurements List of Figures Figure 1. FTA Noise Impact Guidelines .......................................................................................................................... 10 Figure 2. Noise Monitoring and Receptor Locations ................................................................................................ 16 List of Tables Table 1. Typical A-Weighted Noise Levels ....................................................................................................................... 5 Table 2. Human Response to Continuous Vibration .................................................................................................... 8 Table 3. Maximum Vibration Levels for Preventing Damage to Buildings......................................................... 8 Table 4. Activity Categories and Noise Abatement Criteria ................................................................................... 11 Table 5. Washington Administrative Code Maximum Allowable Sound Levels ........................................... 12 Table 6. Allowable Short-Term Exceedances of Maximum Allowable Levels ............................................... 13 Table 7. Summary of Noise Monitoring Results ......................................................................................................... 15 Table 8. Commonly Used Construction Equipment Noise Emission Levels ................................................... 18 Table 9. Typical Construction Equipment Vibration Levels .................................................................................. 19 Table 10. FTA Noise Impact Assessment of Operation of the Proposed Parking Garage and Bus Layover Facility ....................................................................................................................................... 20 Table 11. City of Kent Code Impact Assessment of Operation of the Proposed Parking Garage and Bus Layover Facility ............................................................................................................................... 21 Table 12. Traffic Noise Levels due to Realignment of Railroad Avenue N ...................................................... 21 Table 13. Predicted Noise Levels from Construction Activitiesa ......................................................................... 22 Table 14. Construction Equipment Vibration Levels by Distance ...................................................................... 24 Noise Technical Analysis Memorandum - Kent i Kent Station Parking and Access Improvements: Noise Technical Analysis Memorandum List of Acronyms and Abbreviations ADA Americans with Disabilities Act CFR Code of Federal Regulations City City of Kent CNEL Community Noise Equivalent Level dB decibels dBA A-weighted decibels DNL Day/Night Level FHWA Federal Highway Administration FTA Federal Transit Administration FTA Manual FTA Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Hz Hertz kHz kilohertz Ldn Day/Night Level Leq Equivalent Sound Level Leq(h) Equivalent Sound Level occurring during a 1-hour period Lmax Maximum Sound Level Lxx Percentile-Exceeded Sound Level mPa micropascals NAC Noise Abatement Criteria PPV peak particle velocity Project Kent Station Parking and Access Improvements Project SPL sound pressure level VdB vibration decibels WAC Washington Administrative Code WSDOT Washington State Department of Transportation Noise Technical Analysis Memorandum - Kent ii Kent Station Parking and Access Improvements: Noise Technical Analysis Memorandum 1.0 Noise Technical Analysis Summary This report evaluates noise levels associated with construction and operation of access improvements for the Kent Station Parking and Access Improvements Project (Project). Improvements include a new parking garage, bicycle lockers, crosswalks, proximate bus stop accommodations, and Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) features. The analysis found that operation of the Project would not exceed Federal Transit Administration (FTA) or City of Kent (City) noise thresholds. Construction of the Project is anticipated to exceed FTA daytime noise guidelines. To address these potential impacts during construction, a noise control plan is recommended to be in place prior to construction. The plan would include best practices to reduce equipment noise levels at the nearest noise-sensitive receivers during construction of the Project. Construction during nighttime hours would be minimized or avoided to reduce the potential for negative community reaction during construction. Introduction Sound Transit, in cooperation with the City, is proposing to construct and operate parking and access improvements for the Kent Station in the City of Kent, Washington. The purpose of this report is to describe the existing noise environment in the area and evaluate potential noise and vibration impacts based on construction and operation of the Project. Based on findings of the impact assessment, recommendations for noise abatement measures are discussed. The FTA Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual (FTA Manual) (Federal Transit Administration 2018) provides FTA guidance for assessment of noise and vibration impacts from construction and operation of transit, parking, and associated facilities. The guidance outlines the requirements for preparation of technical reports. The City regulations and the Sound Transit Design Criteria Manual were also used in the analysis. Project Description The Project would include a new parking garage serving patrons of the Sounder South Rail system at the Kent Station in Kent, Washington. The site of the proposed garage (project site) is bounded by E Pioneer Street on the south, E James Street on the north, BNSF Railway on the west, and a realigned Railroad Avenue N on the east. Construction of the parking garage would require realignment of a portion of Railroad Avenue N between E Pioneer Street and E James Street. The parking garage would have 3 levels and approximately 534 parking stalls. The Project would also include pedestrian, bicycle, and transit amenities adjacent to and near the project site to enhance overall access to the Kent Station and improve safety. As part of final design, the following amenities would be finalized in collaboration with the City and King County Metro as part of their permitting and approval process. The following are the proposed amenities: ▪ Adjacent to the project site, amenities would include painted crosswalks, traffic signals, lighting, and signage. Noise Technical Analysis Memorandum - Kent 1 Kent Station Parking and Access Improvements: Noise Technical Analysis Memorandum ▪ At the intersection of W James Street and 2nd Avenue N, amenities would include a painted curb extension,1 new crosswalks, curbs that are ADA compliant, and rectangular rapid-flashing beacons. Sound Transit and the City will coordinate the improvements at this intersection, given that the City was recently selected to receive Sound Transit System Access Funds for these improvements. ▪ Sound Transit proposes the following traffic-related improvements: • At Railroad Avenue N and E James Street: o Prohibit eastbound left turn from garage’s eastern driveway and pick-up/drop- off loop. o Reconfigure east and west legs of Central Avenue N/E Pioneer Street to have exclusive left-turn lane and shared through/right-turn lane. Revise phasing to include protective and permissive eastbound and westbound left phases. • At Railroad Avenue N/E Smith Street: o Prohibit southbound through and southbound left-turn movements except for buses if needed. • At Central Avenue N/E James Street: o Extend the westbound left-turn pocket length as much as possible without taking property. • At E James Street west of Central Avenue N: o Install a “type c” curb (commonly called “c-curb”) median on E James Street between the eastbound left-turn pocket and the adjacent through lane. ▪ At Railroad Avenue N and W Smith Street, amenities would include installing a painted curb extension, rapid flashing beacons, a hardscape median with pedestrian refuge, restriping of crosswalks, and curbs that are ADA compliant.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Motion No. M2020-69 Funding Agreement for Capped Contribution for Rapidride C Line Improvements
    Motion No. M2020-69 Funding Agreement for Capped Contribution for RapidRide C Line Improvements Meeting: Date: Type of action: Staff contact: System Expansion Committee 11/12/2020 Recommend to Board Don Billen, Executive Director, Board 11/19/2020 Final action PEPD Cathal Ridge, Executive Corridor Director- Central Corridor Chris Rule, HCT Project Manager – Central Corridor Proposed action Authorizes the chief executive officer to execute an agreement with the City of Seattle and King County to reimburse the City of Seattle for $1,730,000 and King County Metro for $2,800,000 to provide a total funding contribution of $4,530,000 for bus speed and reliability improvements to the RapidRide C Line serving West Seattle to South Lake Union. Key features summary • This action authorizes Sound Transit to enter into an inter-local agreement with the City of Seattle and King County to reimburse the City and County for costs of up to $4.53 million for speed and reliability improvements to the RapidRide C Line. • The Sound Transit 3 (ST3) System Plan includes a capped capital contribution of $65 million for bus capital enhancements to design and construct transit priority improvements that improve speed and reliability for the Madison BRT project and the RapidRide C and D Lines. • In 2018 the Sound Transit Board established the RapidRide C and D Improvements project and approved an initial study of potential improvements performed by the West Seattle and Ballard Link Extensions project team. • In September the Board of Directors moved that staff bring forward an agreement for a limited near- term authorization for RapidRide C Line improvements pending a more comprehensive program realignment.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Win Back America's Transit Riders
    Who’sDrew to add cover On Board 11 Charts done 2019 How to Win Back America’s Transit Riders TransitCenter works to improve public transit in ways that make cities more just, environmentally sustainable, and economically vibrant. We believe that fresh thinking can change the transportation landscape and improve the overall livability of cities. We commission and conduct research, convene events, and produce publications that inform and improve public transit and urban transportation. For more information, please visit www.transitcenter.org. Publication Date: February 2019 1 Whitehall Street, 17th Floor, New York, NY 10004 www.TransitCenter.org @transitcenter Facebook.com/transitctr Who’s On Board 2019 How to Win Back America’s Transit Riders Acknowledgments Steven Higashide and Mary Buchanan of TransitCenter are the authors of this report. David Bragdon and Tabitha Decker provided additional writing and editorial review. The authors are grateful for thoughtful review from Evelyn Blumenberg, Nicholas Klein, Alan Lehto, Tom Mills, Michelle Poyourow, Jarrett Walker, Aaron Weinstein, and TransitCenter’s Jon Orcutt and Hayley Richardson. Resource Systems Group (RSG) served as the lead research consultant, conducting focus groups, developing the survey questionnaire, and analyzing survey results. The authors gratefully acknowledge RSG’s project manager Ben Cummins. Greg Spitz and Alex Levin of RSG and Jed Lam of Aeffect also contributed to the research. The authors thank Emily Drexler of the Chicago Transit Authority for assistance with recruiting for focus groups, as well as Linda Young and Preeti Shankar of the Center for Neighborhood Technology for providing AllTransit data. Contents Executive Summary 1 All Transit Ridership is Local 6 Findings 14 1.
    [Show full text]
  • CITY of BELLEVUE CITY COUNCIL Summary Minutes of Extended
    CITY OF BELLEVUE CITY COUNCIL Summary Minutes of Extended Study Session May 11, 2015 Conference Room 1E-113 6:00 p.m. Bellevue, Washington PRESENT: Mayor Balducci1, Deputy Mayor Wallace, and Councilmembers Chelminiak, Lee, Robertson, Robinson, and Stokes ABSENT: None. Kirkland City Council: Mayor Amy Walen, Deputy Mayor Penny Sweet, and Councilmembers Jay Arnold, Dave Asher, Shelley Kloba, Doreen Marchione, and Toby Nixon 1. Executive Session Mayor Balducci called the meeting to order at 6:05 p.m. The Executive Session was moved to the end of the meeting due to the joint meeting with the Kirkland City Council. 2. Oral Communications Oral Communications were moved to occur following the joint meeting discussion. 3. Study Session (a) Special Joint Meeting with Kirkland City Council Mayor Balducci opened the meeting and said this appears to be first time these two Councils have met. She recalled Bellevue’s previous meeting with the Redmond City Council and suggested the three cities might want to meet together in the future. Redmond Mayor Amy Walen provided opening comments. Councilmembers from both cities introduced themselves and identified how long they have served their respective cities. 1 Mayor Balducci left the meeting at 8:22 p.m. May 11, 2015 Extended Study Session Page 2 (1) Overview of Bellevue Council’s Vision and Key Initiatives Dan Stroh, Planning Director, provided a broad overview of key initiatives under the seven strategic target areas of the Council Vision adopted in 2014. He presented information on the growing population and increasing diversity. He described the Council’s adoption in December 2014 of The Diversity Advantage cultural diversity plan.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is Rapidride? March 20 Thru September 17, 2021
    D Line WEEKDAY/Entre semana D Line WEEKDAY/Entre semana SNOW/EMERGENCY SERVICE ➜ NW 100th Pl To DOWNTOWN SEATTLE ➜ To CROWN HILL 7th Ave NW SERVICIO DE EMERGENCIA/NIEVE Downtown Downtown Seattle Uptown Ballard Crown Hill Crown Hill Ballard Uptown Seattle 3rd Ave NW During most snow conditions this route NW 100th Pl 15th Ave NW Queen Anne 3rd Ave Terrace St Prefontaine 3rd Ave Mercer St & 15th Ave NW NW 100th Pl CROWN HILL Holman Rd NW will operate via its regular route shown at & & Ave N & & & Pl S & & Queen Anne & & Mary Ave NW 7th Ave NW* NW Market St* W Mercer St* Pike St* 5th Ave* Yesler Wy* Pike St* Ave N* NW Market St* 7th Ave NW* left. In the rare event that Metro declares Stop #28680 Stop #13271 Stop #2672 Stop #431 Stop #1710 Stop #1610 Stop #578 Stop #2370 Stop #14230 Stop #28680 NW 85th St an emergency, this route will continue 4:57 5:06 5:18 5:27 5:35 4:05 4:10 4:20 4:31 4:40 5:13 5:22 5:34 5:43 5:51 4:55 5:00 5:10 5:21 5:30 NW 80th St to operate as a designated Emergency 5:25 5:34 5:46 5:55 6:03 5:20 5:25 5:35 5:46 5:55 Service Network route. During such an 5:35 5:44 5:56 6:05 6:13 5:40 5:45 5:55 6:07 6:16 15th Ave NW NW 75th St 5:43 5:52 6:04 6:14 6:22 6:00 6:05 6:15 6:27 6:36 event, it is expected to operate with the 5:51 6:00 6:13 6:23 6:31 6:10 6:15 6:25 6:37 6:46 5:59 6:09 6:22 6:32 6:40 6:20 6:25 6:35 6:47 6:56 NW 70th St same route number and follow the same 6:07 6:17 6:30 6:40 6:48 6:28 6:33 6:43 6:55 7:04 Ballard High School routing as shown in this timetable.
    [Show full text]
  • Joint International Light Rail Conference
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH Number E-C145 July 2010 Joint International Light Rail Conference Growth and Renewal April 19–21, 2009 Los Angeles, California Cosponsored by Transportation Research Board American Public Transportation Association TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD 2010 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE OFFICERS Chair: Michael R. Morris, Director of Transportation, North Central Texas Council of Governments, Arlington Vice Chair: Neil J. Pedersen, Administrator, Maryland State Highway Administration, Baltimore Division Chair for NRC Oversight: C. Michael Walton, Ernest H. Cockrell Centennial Chair in Engineering, University of Texas, Austin Executive Director: Robert E. Skinner, Jr., Transportation Research Board TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD 2010–2011 TECHNICAL ACTIVITIES COUNCIL Chair: Robert C. Johns, Associate Administrator and Director, Volpe National Transportation Systems Center, Cambridge, Massachusetts Technical Activities Director: Mark R. Norman, Transportation Research Board Jeannie G. Beckett, Director of Operations, Port of Tacoma, Washington, Marine Group Chair Cindy J. Burbank, National Planning and Environment Practice Leader, PB, Washington, D.C., Policy and Organization Group Chair Ronald R. Knipling, Principal, safetyforthelonghaul.com, Arlington, Virginia, System Users Group Chair Edward V. A. Kussy, Partner, Nossaman, LLP, Washington, D.C., Legal Resources Group Chair Peter B. Mandle, Director, Jacobs Consultancy, Inc., Burlingame, California, Aviation Group Chair Mary Lou Ralls, Principal, Ralls Newman, LLC, Austin, Texas, Design and Construction Group Chair Daniel L. Roth, Managing Director, Ernst & Young Orenda Corporate Finance, Inc., Montreal, Quebec, Canada, Rail Group Chair Steven Silkunas, Director of Business Development, Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Public Transportation Group Chair Peter F. Swan, Assistant Professor of Logistics and Operations Management, Pennsylvania State, Harrisburg, Middletown, Pennsylvania, Freight Systems Group Chair Katherine F.
    [Show full text]
  • As a Di‘Erent Route Through Downtown Buses Continuing INTERBAY Swedish S
    N 152 St to Shoreline CC Snohomish County– to Aurora toAuroraVill toMtlk to Richmond NE 150 St toWoodinvilleviaBothell 373 5 SHORELINE 355 Village Beach Downtown Seattle toNSt Terr to Shoreline CC toUWBothell 308 512 402 405 410 412 347 348 77 330 309 toHorizonView 312 413 415 416 417 421 NE 145 St 373 308 NE 145 St ­toKenmoreP&R N 145 St 304 316 Transit in Seattle 422 425 435 510 511 65 308 toUWBothell 513 Roosevelt Wy N Frequencies shown are for daytime period. See Service Guide N 143 St 28 Snohomish County– 346 512 301 303 73 522 for a complete summary of frequencies and days of operation. 5 64 University District 5 E 304 308 For service between 1:30–4:30 am see Night Owl map. 512 810 821 855 860 E N 871 880 y 3 Av NW 3 Av Jackson Park CEDAR W Frequent Service N 135 St Golf Course OLYMPIC y Linden Av N Linden Av PARK t Bitter i Every 15 minutes or better, until 7 pm, Monday to Friday. C HILLS weekdays Lake e 372 Most lines oer frequent service later into the night and on NW 132 St Ingraham k a Ashworth Av N Av Ashworth N Meridian Av NE 1 Av NE 15 Av NE 30 Av L weekends. Service is less frequent during other times. (express) 373 77 N 130 St Roosevelt Wy NE 372 weekends 28 345 41 Link Light Rail rapid transit North- every 10 minutes BITTER LAKE acres 8 Av NW 8 Av Park 5 NW 125 St N 125 St Haller NE 125 St E RapidRide limited stop bus for a faster ride 345 Lake NE 125 St every 10–12 minutes 346 PINEHURST 8 Frequent Bus every 10–12 minutes BROADVIEW 99 347 348 continues as LAKE CITY 75 Frequent Bus every 15 minutes 41 345 NE 120 St Northwest
    [Show full text]
  • SSE Bus Reliability Paper.Pdf
    Sam Schwartz Engineering, D.P.C. 322 Eighth Avenue, 5th Floor New York, NY 10001 phone: (212) 598-9010 samschwartz.com Introduction and Methodology Transit agencies across the country are redesigning their bus networks to provide more frequent service, at headways of every 15 minutes or less. Yet the adoption of new standards and practices to provide those services with reliability has lagged. This white paper, developed by Sam Schwartz Engineering, D.P.C. in cooperation with TransitCenter, documents existing practices and offers recommendations for scheduling and dispatching of frequent bus service. It proposes elevated standards and best practices for bus operations (i.e. what transit agencies should strive to achieve) and guides agencies in their pursuit of these reliability goals. Recommendations include the following: • Agencies should use data to further their frequent service reliability goals, including customizing run times, recovery/layover times, and time bands. • Headway management is an alternative strategy to timepoint-based scheduling that may increase reliability on frequent routes. Headway management can give operators the latitude to adjust service in real-time, and it does not necessarily require more on-street supervision. • Drop-back dispatching is another reliability strategy that is underutilized for frequent bus service. • Agencies may need to create different on-time performance metrics for frequent services or make their frequent service on-time performance metrics more stringent. • Headway management, terminal dispatching techniques, and performance measurement cannot increase reliability if agencies do not also address underlying traffic and congestion issues. This white paper begins with a literature review of scheduling, dispatching, and how transit agencies define and measure reliability.
    [Show full text]
  • Motion No. M2020-56 Funding Agreement for Capped Contribution to City of Seattle’S Madison BRT Project
    Motion No. M2020-56 Funding Agreement for Capped Contribution to City of Seattle’s Madison BRT Project Meeting: Date: Type of action: Staff contact: Board 9/24/2020 Final action Don Billen, Executive Director, PEPD Cathal Ridge, Executive Corridor Director- Central Corridor Chris Rule, HCT Project Manager – Central Corridor Proposed action Authorizes the chief executive officer to execute an agreement with the City of Seattle to provide a funding contribution of $29,500,000 for bus corridor improvements in support of the City of Seattle’s bus rapid transit project along the Madison Street corridor, with a contingency of $6,300,000 for a total authorized agreement amount not to exceed $35,800,000. Key features summary This action authorizes Sound Transit to enter into an inter-local agreement with the City of Seattle to partially fund the City's Madison Street BRT project beginning in 2021. The agreement would allow Sound Transit to reimburse the City for construction phase costs of up to $29.5 million, with an additional $6.3 million of contingency allocated to aid the City in meeting Federal Transit Administration (FTA) budget commitment requirements for a Small Starts grant. The Sound Transit 3 (ST3) System Plan includes a capped capital contribution of $65 million for bus capital enhancements to design and construct transit priority improvements that improve speed and reliability for the Madison BRT project and the RapidRide C and D Lines. In 2018, the Sound Transit Board established the RapidRide C and D Improvements project. In the 2020 Budget adopted by the Board, the project budget and scope was expanded to include the Madison BRT budget and scope.
    [Show full text]
  • SDOT & King County Metro: Coordination at All Levels (PDF)
    Shared Goals: Moving People by combining the strengths of DOTs and Transit Agencies Designing Cities 2016, NACTO Bill Bryant and Ben Smith September 2016 Presentation overview • Local Context • Project Examples • Service Partnerships • Coordination at All Levels 2 Local Context King County is home to 2 million people and 1.3 million jobs and is one of the fastest growing Counties in the U.S. Seattle is home to 680,000 people and 515,000 jobs Transit Demand Increasing: Recent studies project that the Central Puget Sound Region will have 30% more people by 2040. source: http://www.kingcounty.gov/operations/districting/resources.aspx 3 Local Context King County Metro Transit • Metro ridership increased faster than any of the largest 30 transit systems in the U.S. • Bus ridership growth in King County and Seattle have outpaced other major U.S urban areas since 2004. Source: http://metro.kingcounty.gov/am/reports/2015/metro-2015-strategic-plan-progress-report.pdf 4 Local Context Coordination at all levels From the directors on down 6 Coordination at all levels Balancing all modes while enhancing transit 7 Coordination at all levels Multi-modal corridor: Broadway, Capitol Hill 8 Project Examples • Frequency • Vehicles – 10 minutes or better peak and 15 • Branded, fewer seats, wifi, hybrid minutes or better off-peak power,, 3 doors • Span • Fare Collection – 18 to 24 hours of service each day, • On-board and/or off-board ORCA seven days per week readers • Transit priority treatments • Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) – Queue jumps and
    [Show full text]
  • Suggested Route Changes for Fall 2012
    Suggested route changes for fall 2012 C Line – New Map of suggested change Suggested change • The new RapidRide C Line would connect Westwood Village and downtown Seattle via Fauntleroy, Morgan Junction, and Alaska Junction, replacing Route 54 and Route 54 Express (current map). Learn more about the C Line. Reason for change • Service investment. Metro is making a service investment in the C Line, its third RapidRide line. New service hours and facilities are expected to speed service and make it more reliable, attracting higher ridership. • More network connections. The C Line would provide a frequent, direct, all-day connection between Westwood Village and downtown Seattle via Fauntleroy, Morgan Junction, and Alaska Junction. It would offer connection opportunities to many frequent routes. • Simplify service. RapidRide service has features that make it easier to use, including real-time information signs and frequent service throughout the day. Alternative service • The C Line would use the same routing as routes 54 through Fauntleroy, Morgan Junction, and Alaska Junction. Service frequency Route Minutes between buses Weekday Saturday Sunday Peak Non-Peak Night C 10 15 30-60 15 15 www.kingcounty.gov/metro/HaveASay 1 King County Metro Transit | Suggested route changes for fall 2012 D Line – New Map of suggested change Suggested change • The New RapidRide D Line would connect Crown Hill and downtown Seattle via Ballard, Interbay, and Uptown (learn more). The D Line would replace Route 15 (both local and express) (current map). Reason for change • Service investment. Metro is making a service investment in the D Line, its fourth RapidRide line.
    [Show full text]
  • Design Standards Manual October, 2009 King County Metro Graphic Standards and Guidelines
    Design Standards Manual October, 2009 King County Metro Graphic Standards and Guidelines Contents Introduction to the RapidRide Brand....................................................................1-1 RapidRide Brand Identity Trademark...................................................................................................1-3 Color Palette ...............................................................................................1-4 Proportions.................................................................................................1-5 Clear Space.................................................................................................1-6 Color ..........................................................................................................1-7 Reversed.....................................................................................................1-8 Incorrect Usage...........................................................................................1-9 In Conjunction with the King County Metro Logo .......................................1-11 Print and Electronic Applications System Brochure Cover................................................................................2-1 System Map Style........................................................................................2-2 Line Map Style ............................................................................................2-3 Metro System Map with RapidRide Lines......................................................2-5
    [Show full text]
  • Tacoma Link, 590, 594 E6 D R 903 917 Auburn Way S
    A ub u rn W a y N 20 Pierce County Pierce County 21 To Purdy 118 South King County 183 S 298th St Service to Gig Harbor and Purdy is 509 5 152 30th St NE Page 17 Poverty Bay Brannan 100 outside of the Sound Transit service t Rd Emerald in N Park Po A Line 177 180 Park 37th y SE 304th St area and is funded by Pierce Transit. sh S 304th St S Ave 566 Downs a 179 910 910 Gig Harbor Tahlequah D wa Map 196 h Sndr 595 W 173 Steel L. 952 S 197 Auburn Municipal Airport SE Ave 124th Transit Facilities Routes Grid A Steel Hig 102 y equah e D Lake S Ave 51st 1st Ave S Ave 1st E ll S Dr 509 99 574 590 15th St NW Auburn Rd SE 312th St S 312th St a l 72nd St Transit Center 41, 42, 56, 202, 409 H7 Pioneer Wy Park S Ave 28th il a SW Dash Point Road H SE Ave 116th 901 152 a 577 592 V t l NW St C e Soundview c s Lakota A Line 901 183 180 L SE 316th St o ge 578 594 e 46th Ave NW Ave 46th Kimball Drive sa Park Auburn Park & Ride 566, 152, 919, 952 A12 Pas 173 W 919 ubur Rd Dash Point 181 164 f A n B iamond 64th St NW 179 586 595 f E lack D Reid Dr NW o S SW 320th St Federal Way N 8th St NE SE 320th St 181 t map continues on page 17 State Park 181 S y u Auburn Station Sounder, 566, 578, 497, 152, 180, 181, 186, B12 187 181 P a C KING COUNTY e 152 fiance / Tahl a 187 s W Green River e 47th Ave SW Ave 47th The Commons at 102 100 e l k PIERCE COUNTY Ave e 910 n a 197 y r H 182 167 u 4th St NE Community L 910, 915, 917, 919 D o SW Federal Way M Federal Way/ b C y 919 o a u Point t i h 903 l R n 56th St NW 26th S 320th St i A College c Pt.
    [Show full text]