Appendix a Rapidride Roosevelt Project Scoping Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Appendix a Rapidride Roosevelt Project Scoping Report Appendix A RapidRide Roosevelt Project Scoping Report THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK FINAL REPORT RAPIDRIDE ROOSEVELT PROJECT SCOPING REPORT Prepared for Seattle Department of Transportation March 2019 (Updated January 2020) THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents ......................................................................................................................... iii Acronyms and Abbreviations ........................................................................................................v 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Project Overview ............................................................................................................................ 1-1 2. Scoping process .............................................................................................................. 2-1 2.1 Overview of Scoping Process ................................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 Notification Process ..................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.3 Public and Agency/Tribal Scoping Meetings...................................................................... 2-2 3. Agency/Tribal Scoping .................................................................................................. 3-1 3.1 Agencies and Tribes Invited to Participate .......................................................................... 3-1 3.2 Agency/Tribal Scoping Meeting .............................................................................................. 3-1 4. Public Scoping ................................................................................................................ 4-1 4.1 Public Scoping Meeting .............................................................................................................. 4-1 4.2 Summary of Comments Received ........................................................................................... 4-1 4.2.1 Overview of Comments Received During Scoping ........................................... 4-1 4.2.2 Public Comment Summary ......................................................................................... 4-2 4.2.3 Comments Received after the Close of the Scoping Period .......................... 4-4 5. Next Steps ....................................................................................................................... 5-1 Appendices A Scoping Materials B Agency and Tribal Coordination Plan C Agency and Tribal Comments D Comments Received During Scoping Figures Figure 1-1 RapidRide Roosevelt Corridor .................................................................................................. 1-2 Tables Table 4-1 Key Comment Categories .......................................................................................................... 4-2 SL0215181403SEA iii THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ADA Americans with Disabilities Act EA Environmental Assessment FONSI Finding of No Significant Impact FTA Federal Transit Administration KCM King County Metro NEPA National Environmental Policy Act PBL protected bicycle lane SDOT Seattle Department of Transportation SEPA State Environmental Policy Act TPSS traction power substation WSDOT Washington State Department of Transportation SL0215181403SEA v THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 1. INTRODUCTION Early and continuing coordination with the general public, agencies, and tribes is an essential part of the environmental process. It helps planners determine the necessary scope of environmental documentation and the level of analysis required, and to identify potential impacts and avoidance, minimization, and/or mitigation measures and related environmental requirements. To begin this process of engagement, the Seattle Department of Transportation (SDOT) and the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) conducted scoping from December 4, 2017, to January 12, 2018, for the RapidRide Roosevelt Project. The scoping process provides an initial opportunity for interested agencies, tribes, and members of the public to comment on the purpose and need, alternatives to be studied, and issues to be addressed in the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Environmental Assessment (EA). 1.1 Project Overview SDOT, in cooperation with FTA, is proposing the RapidRide Roosevelt Project. King County Metro is a funding partner and the transit agency operator. The project would provide electric trolley bus rapid transit service along a 6-mile corridor between Downtown Seattle and the Roosevelt neighborhood in northeast Seattle. The RapidRide Roosevelt Project would also serve the Belltown, South Lake Union, Eastlake, and University District neighborhoods. The RapidRide Roosevelt route extends from Third Ave in downtown Seattle to NE 65th Street; however, project improvements would only be provided north of Third Ave along Virginia and Stewart Streets to the northern end of the route and would include: • 26 new RapidRide stations (13 for each direction of travel) from Third Ave to NE 65th St with service south to 9 existing stations along Third Ave in Downtown Seattle to the International District. Stations would be identifiable as part of the RapidRide system and include real-time arrival information and off-board payment. • New poles and overhead wires added north of the University Bridge to power trolley buses. • A new traction power substation or TPSS (source of electric power) in the northern portion of the project. • Northern bus layover options, where buses would park between runs. • Protected bicycle lanes along 11th/12th Avenues NE, Eastlake Ave E, and Fairview Ave N. • Sidewalk improvements to meet Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accessibility requirements. • Intersection upgrades to improve safety for pedestrians accessing the stations, including sidewalk repairs and crosswalk striping. • Paving along sections of 11th and 12th Avenues NE and Eastlake Ave E. Bus service will be provided along Third Ave south of Virginia and Stewart Streets using existing RapidRide stations. Figures 1-1 illustrates the proposed RapidRide Roosevelt route. SL0215181403SEA 1-1 SECTION 1 – INTRODUCTION Figure 1-1 RapidRide Roosevelt Corridor SL0215181403SEA 1-2 . 2. SCOPING PROCESS 2.1 Overview of Scoping Process The RapidRide Roosevelt Project is seeking funding from the FTA’s Small Starts program and must comply with NEPA requirements to sufficiently evaluate the project merits and possible environmental impacts. FTA determined that the appropriate environmental documentation for the RapidRide Roosevelt Project is an EA. To begin the environmental process, SDOT and FTA initiated project scoping to inform agencies, tribes, and the public about the project and the project purpose and need, as well as to develop a two-way conversation about the range of issues to be addressed in the environmental document and potential concerns related to the proposed project. A 40-day comment period began on December 4, 2017, and ended on January 12, 2018. The public, agencies, and tribes were invited to comment on the project purpose and need, alternatives, and issues to be addressed in the EA during that time. Two scoping meetings were held, one for agencies and tribes and another for the community, businesses, and residents. The meetings provided an opportunity to receive in-person information on the project’s design and to discuss potential environmental impacts. 2.2 Notification Process A number of methods were used to inform agencies, tribes, and the public of the scoping period and meetings. Appendix A, Scoping Materials, provides copies of notifications and some of the materials used for the meetings. Notifications for meetings included the following methods: • Approximately 43,000 notices (project mailers) were sent to residents and businesses within 0.25 mile of the project corridor, from the International District to the Roosevelt neighborhood, prior to the start of scoping. These mailers provided information on the time and location of the scoping meeting, background on the project, access to the project website, and information on how to provide comments and be involved in the project. The project mailer included information in Spanish, Chinese, Korean, and Arabic on how to receive translated materials. No requests for translated materials were received. • Legal notices were posted in the Seattle Daily Journal of Commerce and the Washington State Department of Ecology and City of Seattle State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) registers. • Email updates were sent to SDOT’s collected project stakeholder and interested parties list to announce the public scoping period and public scoping meeting prior to the beginning of the scoping period, and again on the day of comment period opening. • Scoping materials were made available at the Central Public Library (1000 4th Ave) and the University Branch Public Library (5009 Roosevelt Way NE). SL0215181403SEA 2-1 SECTION 2 – SCOPING PROCESS Scoping period materials and notices of the public scoping meeting were posted on the project website at https://www.seattle.gov/transportation/projects-and-programs/programs/transit- program/rapid-ride/roosevelt-rapidride. 2.3 Public and Agency/Tribal Scoping Meetings Two scoping meetings were held in December 2017. A public scoping meeting
Recommended publications
  • MEMORANDUM of AGREEMENT to Implement a Regional Reduced Fare Permit for Senior and Disabled Persons
    MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT To Implement a Regional Reduced Fare Permit for Senior and Disabled Persons This agreement is entered into as of the August 30, 2017, by and between Clallam Transit System, the City of Everett (Everett Transit), Grays Harbor Transit, Thurston County Public Transportation Benefit Authority (Intercity Transit), Jefferson Transit Authority (Jefferson Transit), King County Department of Transportation – Metro Transit Division (King County Metro), King County Marine Division (King County Water Taxi), Kitsap County Public Transportation Benefit Area (Kitsap Transit), Pierce County Ferries, Pierce County Public Transportation Benefit Area (Pierce Transit), Snohomish County Public Transportation Benefit Area Corporation (Community Transit), Washington State Department of Transportation – Ferries Division (Washington State Ferries), Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority (Sound Transit), Mason County Public Transportation Benefit Area Authority (Mason Transit Authority), Skagit Transit, and Whatcom Transportation Authority hereinafter called the “parties.” Section 1. Purpose and Changes from Prior Agreement: The purpose of this agreement is to set forth the requirements for and implementation of the Regional Reduced Fare Permit (RRFP) established in memoranda of agreement dated May 17, 1982, August 8, 1984, August 8, 1987, September 8, 1994, December 1, 2000, September 1, 2002, February 3, 2003, August 1, 2009, December 1, 2012, and June 1, 2015. This agreement supersedes these 10 prior agreements. Grays Harbor Transit has been added to this agreement as a party , including amendments to Attachments 1 and 2. Section 7 - Eligibility Certification - has been modified from the agreement dated June 1st, 2015 to indicate that photo identification is required to be provided during eligibility determination. Section 5 – Cost of Regional Reduced Fare Permit – has been changed to indicate that issuing agencies can charge any amount up to $3 for permanent, temporary, and replacement RRFP cards.
    [Show full text]
  • Motion No. M2020-69 Funding Agreement for Capped Contribution for Rapidride C Line Improvements
    Motion No. M2020-69 Funding Agreement for Capped Contribution for RapidRide C Line Improvements Meeting: Date: Type of action: Staff contact: System Expansion Committee 11/12/2020 Recommend to Board Don Billen, Executive Director, Board 11/19/2020 Final action PEPD Cathal Ridge, Executive Corridor Director- Central Corridor Chris Rule, HCT Project Manager – Central Corridor Proposed action Authorizes the chief executive officer to execute an agreement with the City of Seattle and King County to reimburse the City of Seattle for $1,730,000 and King County Metro for $2,800,000 to provide a total funding contribution of $4,530,000 for bus speed and reliability improvements to the RapidRide C Line serving West Seattle to South Lake Union. Key features summary • This action authorizes Sound Transit to enter into an inter-local agreement with the City of Seattle and King County to reimburse the City and County for costs of up to $4.53 million for speed and reliability improvements to the RapidRide C Line. • The Sound Transit 3 (ST3) System Plan includes a capped capital contribution of $65 million for bus capital enhancements to design and construct transit priority improvements that improve speed and reliability for the Madison BRT project and the RapidRide C and D Lines. • In 2018 the Sound Transit Board established the RapidRide C and D Improvements project and approved an initial study of potential improvements performed by the West Seattle and Ballard Link Extensions project team. • In September the Board of Directors moved that staff bring forward an agreement for a limited near- term authorization for RapidRide C Line improvements pending a more comprehensive program realignment.
    [Show full text]
  • Kent Station Parking and Access Improvements Project
    Attachment B Noise Technical Analysis Memorandum Kent Station Parking and Access Improvements Noise Technical Analysis Memorandum 401 South Jackson Street Seattle, WA 98104-2826 September 2019 Table of Contents 1.0 Noise Technical Analysis ........................................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Fundamental Concepts of Noise ............................................................................................................................ 3 3.0 Fundamental Concepts of Vibration ..................................................................................................................... 7 4.0 Regulatory Setting ....................................................................................................................................................... 8 5.0 Environmental Setting ............................................................................................................................................. 14 6.0 Noise and Vibration Impact Analysis ................................................................................................................. 17 7.0 References ..................................................................................................................................................................... 26 Appendix A Noise Measurements List of Figures Figure 1. FTA Noise Impact Guidelines .........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • How to Win Back America's Transit Riders
    Who’sDrew to add cover On Board 11 Charts done 2019 How to Win Back America’s Transit Riders TransitCenter works to improve public transit in ways that make cities more just, environmentally sustainable, and economically vibrant. We believe that fresh thinking can change the transportation landscape and improve the overall livability of cities. We commission and conduct research, convene events, and produce publications that inform and improve public transit and urban transportation. For more information, please visit www.transitcenter.org. Publication Date: February 2019 1 Whitehall Street, 17th Floor, New York, NY 10004 www.TransitCenter.org @transitcenter Facebook.com/transitctr Who’s On Board 2019 How to Win Back America’s Transit Riders Acknowledgments Steven Higashide and Mary Buchanan of TransitCenter are the authors of this report. David Bragdon and Tabitha Decker provided additional writing and editorial review. The authors are grateful for thoughtful review from Evelyn Blumenberg, Nicholas Klein, Alan Lehto, Tom Mills, Michelle Poyourow, Jarrett Walker, Aaron Weinstein, and TransitCenter’s Jon Orcutt and Hayley Richardson. Resource Systems Group (RSG) served as the lead research consultant, conducting focus groups, developing the survey questionnaire, and analyzing survey results. The authors gratefully acknowledge RSG’s project manager Ben Cummins. Greg Spitz and Alex Levin of RSG and Jed Lam of Aeffect also contributed to the research. The authors thank Emily Drexler of the Chicago Transit Authority for assistance with recruiting for focus groups, as well as Linda Young and Preeti Shankar of the Center for Neighborhood Technology for providing AllTransit data. Contents Executive Summary 1 All Transit Ridership is Local 6 Findings 14 1.
    [Show full text]
  • CITY of BELLEVUE CITY COUNCIL Summary Minutes of Extended
    CITY OF BELLEVUE CITY COUNCIL Summary Minutes of Extended Study Session May 11, 2015 Conference Room 1E-113 6:00 p.m. Bellevue, Washington PRESENT: Mayor Balducci1, Deputy Mayor Wallace, and Councilmembers Chelminiak, Lee, Robertson, Robinson, and Stokes ABSENT: None. Kirkland City Council: Mayor Amy Walen, Deputy Mayor Penny Sweet, and Councilmembers Jay Arnold, Dave Asher, Shelley Kloba, Doreen Marchione, and Toby Nixon 1. Executive Session Mayor Balducci called the meeting to order at 6:05 p.m. The Executive Session was moved to the end of the meeting due to the joint meeting with the Kirkland City Council. 2. Oral Communications Oral Communications were moved to occur following the joint meeting discussion. 3. Study Session (a) Special Joint Meeting with Kirkland City Council Mayor Balducci opened the meeting and said this appears to be first time these two Councils have met. She recalled Bellevue’s previous meeting with the Redmond City Council and suggested the three cities might want to meet together in the future. Redmond Mayor Amy Walen provided opening comments. Councilmembers from both cities introduced themselves and identified how long they have served their respective cities. 1 Mayor Balducci left the meeting at 8:22 p.m. May 11, 2015 Extended Study Session Page 2 (1) Overview of Bellevue Council’s Vision and Key Initiatives Dan Stroh, Planning Director, provided a broad overview of key initiatives under the seven strategic target areas of the Council Vision adopted in 2014. He presented information on the growing population and increasing diversity. He described the Council’s adoption in December 2014 of The Diversity Advantage cultural diversity plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Title VI Program 2019-2022
    Table of Contents 1.) Program Introduction 2.) Agency Information General Requirements: 3.) Notice to the Public 4.) Complaint Procedures 5.) Public Participation Plan 6.) Language Assistance Plan (LEP) 7.) Non-Elected Committees & Councils 8.) Monitoring of Sub-Recipients 9.) Equity Analysis of Facilities 10.) Board Approval of Title VI Program Requirements of Transit Providers: 11.) Major Service Change & Impact Policies 12.) Service Standards 13.) Service Policies APPENDICES A. Demographic/Service Profile Maps B. 2017 On-Board Survey and Title VI Route Designations C. Title VI Complaint Form and Summary D. 2019-2022 Title VI Program - Public Engagement/Outreach Process E. Summary of 2016-2019 Outreach Efforts F. LEP Four Factor Analysis G. Board Process and Approval of 2019-2022 Title VI Program H. Summary of 2016-2019 Service/Fare Equity Analyses 1. Program Introduction Background Community Transit’s Title VI program was revised in 2016 to comply with Circular FTA.C 4702.1B dated October 1, 2012. At that time, Community Transit implemented new procedures and policies intended to improve accountability for service provision to minority populations. This 2019 Title VI Plan is an update of the 2016 revision. It contains the results of refined analyses used to assess the distribution of benefits and impacts throughout the Community Transit service area. It describes how Community Transit promotes the engagement of minority and limited-English populations in service-related decisions. It documents maintained compliance with Title VI provisions and both internal and external reporting related to Title VI. Elements of the program include a Major Service Change Policy, a Disparate Impact Policy, a Disproportionate Burden Policy, a Public Engagement Process, and a Board Approval Process.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is Rapidride? March 20 Thru September 17, 2021
    D Line WEEKDAY/Entre semana D Line WEEKDAY/Entre semana SNOW/EMERGENCY SERVICE ➜ NW 100th Pl To DOWNTOWN SEATTLE ➜ To CROWN HILL 7th Ave NW SERVICIO DE EMERGENCIA/NIEVE Downtown Downtown Seattle Uptown Ballard Crown Hill Crown Hill Ballard Uptown Seattle 3rd Ave NW During most snow conditions this route NW 100th Pl 15th Ave NW Queen Anne 3rd Ave Terrace St Prefontaine 3rd Ave Mercer St & 15th Ave NW NW 100th Pl CROWN HILL Holman Rd NW will operate via its regular route shown at & & Ave N & & & Pl S & & Queen Anne & & Mary Ave NW 7th Ave NW* NW Market St* W Mercer St* Pike St* 5th Ave* Yesler Wy* Pike St* Ave N* NW Market St* 7th Ave NW* left. In the rare event that Metro declares Stop #28680 Stop #13271 Stop #2672 Stop #431 Stop #1710 Stop #1610 Stop #578 Stop #2370 Stop #14230 Stop #28680 NW 85th St an emergency, this route will continue 4:57 5:06 5:18 5:27 5:35 4:05 4:10 4:20 4:31 4:40 5:13 5:22 5:34 5:43 5:51 4:55 5:00 5:10 5:21 5:30 NW 80th St to operate as a designated Emergency 5:25 5:34 5:46 5:55 6:03 5:20 5:25 5:35 5:46 5:55 Service Network route. During such an 5:35 5:44 5:56 6:05 6:13 5:40 5:45 5:55 6:07 6:16 15th Ave NW NW 75th St 5:43 5:52 6:04 6:14 6:22 6:00 6:05 6:15 6:27 6:36 event, it is expected to operate with the 5:51 6:00 6:13 6:23 6:31 6:10 6:15 6:25 6:37 6:46 5:59 6:09 6:22 6:32 6:40 6:20 6:25 6:35 6:47 6:56 NW 70th St same route number and follow the same 6:07 6:17 6:30 6:40 6:48 6:28 6:33 6:43 6:55 7:04 Ballard High School routing as shown in this timetable.
    [Show full text]
  • Joint International Light Rail Conference
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH Number E-C145 July 2010 Joint International Light Rail Conference Growth and Renewal April 19–21, 2009 Los Angeles, California Cosponsored by Transportation Research Board American Public Transportation Association TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD 2010 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE OFFICERS Chair: Michael R. Morris, Director of Transportation, North Central Texas Council of Governments, Arlington Vice Chair: Neil J. Pedersen, Administrator, Maryland State Highway Administration, Baltimore Division Chair for NRC Oversight: C. Michael Walton, Ernest H. Cockrell Centennial Chair in Engineering, University of Texas, Austin Executive Director: Robert E. Skinner, Jr., Transportation Research Board TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD 2010–2011 TECHNICAL ACTIVITIES COUNCIL Chair: Robert C. Johns, Associate Administrator and Director, Volpe National Transportation Systems Center, Cambridge, Massachusetts Technical Activities Director: Mark R. Norman, Transportation Research Board Jeannie G. Beckett, Director of Operations, Port of Tacoma, Washington, Marine Group Chair Cindy J. Burbank, National Planning and Environment Practice Leader, PB, Washington, D.C., Policy and Organization Group Chair Ronald R. Knipling, Principal, safetyforthelonghaul.com, Arlington, Virginia, System Users Group Chair Edward V. A. Kussy, Partner, Nossaman, LLP, Washington, D.C., Legal Resources Group Chair Peter B. Mandle, Director, Jacobs Consultancy, Inc., Burlingame, California, Aviation Group Chair Mary Lou Ralls, Principal, Ralls Newman, LLC, Austin, Texas, Design and Construction Group Chair Daniel L. Roth, Managing Director, Ernst & Young Orenda Corporate Finance, Inc., Montreal, Quebec, Canada, Rail Group Chair Steven Silkunas, Director of Business Development, Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Public Transportation Group Chair Peter F. Swan, Assistant Professor of Logistics and Operations Management, Pennsylvania State, Harrisburg, Middletown, Pennsylvania, Freight Systems Group Chair Katherine F.
    [Show full text]
  • Motion No. M2020-02 Funding & Cooperative Agreement with City of Seattle for Northgate Access Improvements
    Motion No. M2020-02 Funding & Cooperative Agreement with City of Seattle for Northgate Access Improvements Meeting: Date: Type of action: Staff contact: System Expansion Committee 1/09/2020 Recommend to Board Ron Lewis, DECM Executive Board 1/23/2020 Final action Director Don Davis, Executive Project Director - Northgate Link Extension Kristin Hoffman, Senior Project Manager Proposed action Authorizes the chief executive officer to execute a Funding and Cooperative Agreement with the City of Seattle to contribute funding for Northgate pedestrian and bicycle access improvements, which includes credits for Northgate Link Extension work performed by Sound Transit in support of the agreement, for a total amount not to exceed $7,336,278. Key features summary This agreement implements Sound Transit’s funding contribution to Northgate pedestrian and bicycle access improvements as directed by Board Motion No. M2012-42. The City of Seattle has completed their requirements under Motion No. M2012-42, including securing the $10 million City match for the pedestrian and bicycle bridge access improvements and completing environmental review of the proposed pedestrian and bicycle access improvements. The City of Seattle is responsible for designing, constructing and maintaining the access improvements. Under the Funding and Cooperative Agreement, Sound Transit’s contribution is capped at $10 million which includes credits for current project commitments. These credits are for design, construction, and related administrative costs incurred to accommodate the Northgate access improvements. Sound Transit will reimburse the City on a quarterly basis up to $7,336,278 which reflects credits for work already completed by Sound Transit. Sound Transit's funding obligation for the Northgate access improvement projects terminates upon the opening of Northgate Station or December 31, 2021, whichever is later.
    [Show full text]
  • As a Di‘Erent Route Through Downtown Buses Continuing INTERBAY Swedish S
    N 152 St to Shoreline CC Snohomish County– to Aurora toAuroraVill toMtlk to Richmond NE 150 St toWoodinvilleviaBothell 373 5 SHORELINE 355 Village Beach Downtown Seattle toNSt Terr to Shoreline CC toUWBothell 308 512 402 405 410 412 347 348 77 330 309 toHorizonView 312 413 415 416 417 421 NE 145 St 373 308 NE 145 St ­toKenmoreP&R N 145 St 304 316 Transit in Seattle 422 425 435 510 511 65 308 toUWBothell 513 Roosevelt Wy N Frequencies shown are for daytime period. See Service Guide N 143 St 28 Snohomish County– 346 512 301 303 73 522 for a complete summary of frequencies and days of operation. 5 64 University District 5 E 304 308 For service between 1:30–4:30 am see Night Owl map. 512 810 821 855 860 E N 871 880 y 3 Av NW 3 Av Jackson Park CEDAR W Frequent Service N 135 St Golf Course OLYMPIC y Linden Av N Linden Av PARK t Bitter i Every 15 minutes or better, until 7 pm, Monday to Friday. C HILLS weekdays Lake e 372 Most lines oer frequent service later into the night and on NW 132 St Ingraham k a Ashworth Av N Av Ashworth N Meridian Av NE 1 Av NE 15 Av NE 30 Av L weekends. Service is less frequent during other times. (express) 373 77 N 130 St Roosevelt Wy NE 372 weekends 28 345 41 Link Light Rail rapid transit North- every 10 minutes BITTER LAKE acres 8 Av NW 8 Av Park 5 NW 125 St N 125 St Haller NE 125 St E RapidRide limited stop bus for a faster ride 345 Lake NE 125 St every 10–12 minutes 346 PINEHURST 8 Frequent Bus every 10–12 minutes BROADVIEW 99 347 348 continues as LAKE CITY 75 Frequent Bus every 15 minutes 41 345 NE 120 St Northwest
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Gaps Analysis Executive Summary
    2020 GAPS ANALYSIS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A variety of unique transportation gaps exist in North King County, an area that includes the cities of North Seattle, Shoreline, Bothell, Kenmore, Lake Forest Park, and Woodinville. These gaps may be spatial, temporal, institutional, infrastructural, or awareness gaps. Seeing these needs, a community task force supported by the North King County Mobility Coalition formed to understand the region's unique needs better. The purpose of this analysis is to: Understand the mobility challenges in the North King County region for populations with special transportation needs and, in doing so, better coordinate members and service providers to facilitate mobility improvement projects. As a result of this analysis, the North King County Mobility Coalition has identified several prioritized projects and actions for the region. Whether you’re a resident, an elected official, a human service organization, or a private business, a unified voice is required to enact these changes and ensure transportation better serves people throughout North King County. We invite you to join in on these conversations. Accomplishing projects related to the needs identified in this report will result in many benefits for the region and the people our coalition aims to serve. The most prominent recommendations for the North King County Region identified by this report are as follows: ► Directly engage with all North King County cities around transportation issues outlined in this Gaps Analysis and implement actions that will address these issues. ► Increase outreach to underserved communities, especially limited English speakers. ► Alternative services should be as low-barrier as possible with their intake process.
    [Show full text]
  • Sound Transit Transit Development Plan 2013-2018 and 2012 Annual Report
    Transit Development Plan 2013-2018 and 2012 Annual Report Public Hearing Held: July 11, 2013 Operations and Administration Committee Referral to Board: July 18, 2013 Board of Directors Approval for Submittal: July 25, 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................2 I: ORGANIZATION .....................................................................................................................2 II: PHYSICAL PLANT ................................................................................................................5 III: SERVICE CHARACTERISTICS ...........................................................................................6 IV: SERVICE CONNECTIONS ................................................................................................. 10 V: ACTIVITIES IN 2012 ............................................................................................................ 12 VI: PLANNED ACTION STRATEGIES, 2012 – 2018 .............................................................. 19 VII: PLANNED ACTIVITIES, 2012 – 2018 ............................................................................... 20 VIII: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM, 2012 – 2018 ..................................................... 23 IX: OPERATING DATA, 2012 – 2018 ...................................................................................... 23 X: ANNUAL REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES, 2012 – 2018 .............................................
    [Show full text]