DOCSLIB.ORG

Targeted Investments Typical Cross Sections

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Targeted Investments Typical Cross Sections Broadview Pinehurst Haller Lake NE NORTHGATE WAY SAND POINT WAY NE Broadview Pinehurst Bitter Lake Haller Lake NE NORTHGATE WAY Victory Heights SAND POINT WAY NE Bitter Lake Victory Heights N 105TH ST N NORTHGATE WAY NE AVE 3RD N 105TH ST N NORTHGATE WAY NE AVE 3RD MERIDIAN AVE N AVE MERIDIAN 1ST AVE NE AVE 1ST MERIDIAN AVE N AVE MERIDIAN Targeted InvestmentsNE AVE 1ST Meadowbrook Meadowbrook Typical Cross Sections 103RD ST Matthews Beach GREENWOOD AVE N AVE GREENWOOD NW 100TH ST Northgate Transit NE 103RD ST A100TH ST 3RD AVE NW AVE 3RD Matthews Beach Center 98TH ST 10rd Street NE 4 CtC 60 RW North Beach/Blue Ridge N AVE GREENWOOD NW 96TH ST Northgate Transit Center RAVENNA AVE NE A NW 100TH ST HOLMAN RD NW North College Park Maple Leaf 103rd Street NE NE 100TH ST NE 95TH ST 3RD AVE NW AVE 3RD (Northern Terminus) Crown Hill N AVE AURORA NE 92ND STB North Beach/Blue Ridge NE WAY ROOSEVELT N 90TH ST Greenwood RAVENNA AVE NE NW 96TH ST HOLMAN RD NW NELAKE CITYWAY Maple Leaf 5TH AVE NE AVE 5TH NW 85TH ST North CollegeN 85TH ST Park CORLISS WAY N NE 95TH ST WALLINGFORD AVE N AVE WALLINGFORD 5th Ave NE Wedgwood& NE 95th GREEN LAKE DR N ROOSEVELT WAY NE WAY ROOSEVELT Crown Hill N AVE AURORA NW 80TH ST LINDEN AVE N NE 92ND ST NE 80TH ST 15TH AVE NE AVE 15TH Northgate and SR522 View Ridge Loyal HeightsGreenwoodWhittier Heights N 90TH ST NE 75TH ST 25TH AVE NE AVE 25TH 15 12 10 12 11 20TH AVE NE AVE 20TH Green Lake NELAKE CITYWAY C NE 70TH ST NE RAVENNA BLVD Roosevelt Sidewalk Trac with Turn Lane Trac with Sidewalk 8TH AVE NW 8TH AVE LATONA AVE NE Sharrow Sharrow N 65TH ST N 65TH ST NE AVE 5TH NE 65TH ST NE 65TH ST NW 85TH ST N 85TH ST Ravenna Maple Leaf Concept NW 24TH AVE NE 85TH ST Phinney Ridge CORLISS WAY N 5th Ave NE & NE 85th 12TH AVE NE 12TH AVE WALLINGFORD AVE N AVE WALLINGFORD Wedgwood 20TH AVE NW 20TH AVE EAST GREEN LAKE WAY N GREEN LAKE DR N NE AVE LATONA Bryant (between 4th and 5th street) (from 3rd Ave NE to 4 Adams N 56TH ST NW MARKET ST NE 55TH ST N 100th Street NE 42 CtC 60 RW 35TH AVE NE AVE 35TH PHINNEY AVE N PHINNEY AVE 11TH AVE NE 11TH AVE 40TH AVE NE AVE 40TH NW 80TH ST West Woodland NE WAY ROOSEVELT Windermere B LEARY AVE NW LINDEN AVE N NE 80TH ST 100th Street NE 22ND AVE NE Connecting the Northgate and Maple Leaf neighborhoods,SHILSHOLE AVE NW UNIVERSITY WAY NE UNIVERSITYWAY NE 50TH ST N MARKET ST 15TH AVE NE AVE 15TH 14TH AVE NW 14TH AVE 17TH AVE NE17TH AVE NW 48TH ST NE AVE 47TH 30TH AVE NE AVE 30TH 20TH AVE NE 20TH AVE this portion extends from Northgate Transit Center to north NW 15TH AVE NW 46TH ST N 46TH ST W COMMODORE WAY N 45TH ST NE 45TH PL NE 45TH ST SR522 LEARY WAY NW PL NE THACKERAY View Ridge of NE 75th Street. This section will be implemented in a Wallingford NE7TH AVE University District Laurelhurst NE 75TH ST Loyal Heights Whittier Heights GILMAN AVE W Roosevelt & 75th 12th NE& 41ST ST75th NE 42ND ST 20TH AVE NE AVE 20TH BALLARD BR Fremont future phase (see phasing material for more information).W EMERSON PL N 40TH ST BROOKLYN AVE NEBROOKLYN AVE FREMONT AVE N AVE FREMONT 25TH AVE NE AVE 25TH W EMERSON ST N 39TH ST MONTLAKE BLVD NE STONE WAY NSTONEWAY N 36TH ST N 38TH ST Lawton Park W NICKERSON ST Space is constrained in this area, but with the addition of Green Lake UNIVERSITY BR NE PACIFIC ST ImprovementsNE 70TH ST W BERTONA ST Proposed Bicycle Facilities N 35TH ST WALLINGFORD AVE N WALLINGFORD AVE Roosevelt N NORTHLAKE WAY 8TH AVE NW 8TH AVE 9’ 7 3’ 7 9’ Transit Signal Priority and possibly a new traffic signalW DRAVUS at ST 5th Transit signal priority and RapidRide enhanced 11 11 3’ NICKERSON STRoosevelt Way NE: Northbound and southbound protected 11TH AVE W 11TH AVE Sidewalk Bike Trac Trac Bike Sidewalk 22ND AVE W AVE 22ND AURORA BR AURORA Lane Buer Lane Ave and Banner Way, reliable bus speeds can be maintained. North Queen Anne Portage Bay stations and bus zones with larger shelters, Buer N 65TH ST bike lanes from Bicycle Master Plan THORNDYKE AVE W NE 65TH ST NE 65TH ST W RAYE ST Roosevelt & 65th 12th & 65th 6TH AVE N lighting, sidewalk, and curb improvements. WESTLAKE AVE N Broadview W 3RD AVE QUEEN ANNE DR Pinehurst NE 100th Street: Eastbound and westbound protected bike GILMAN DR W E AVE EASTLAKE Ravenna (looking east) 24TH AVE NW 24TH AVE Interbay Haller Lake Eastlake East Queen Anne NE NORTHGATE WAY Montlake Improvements will be consistent with Link Phinney Ridge Rooseveltlanes from & 65thBicycle – SB Master queue Plan jump lane 12th & 65th – NB queueSAND POINTjump WAY NE lane 15TH AVE W AVE 15TH Fairview/EastlakeBOSTON ST - Modify intersection Bitter Lake for transition from two-way protected BOYER AVE E SA1 5th Ave NE North of 65th St 40 CtC 56 RW 43RD AVE E 43RD AVE Northgate Station area plans. 6TH AVE W 6TH AVE 20TH AVE NW 20TH AVE 10TH AVE W 10TH AVE bike lane on west side of street on Victory Heights Northgate Transit Center Northgate and Maple Leaf EAST GREEN LAKE WAY N Madison C (Northern Terminus) QUEEN N ANNE AVE Fairview Ave N to one-way PBLs along Roosevelt & Ravenna 5th Avenue NE N 105TH ST N NORTHGATE WAY NE AVE 3RD 12th & Ravenna Eastlake NE RAVENNA BLVD MERIDIAN AVE N AVE MERIDIAN Park MAGNOLIA BR NE AVE 1ST Bryant 5th Ave NE & NE 95th Meadowbrook W GALER ST E GALER ST Westlake 103RD ST Parking and Loading* 10TH AVE E 10TH AVE 24TH AVE E24TH AVE Matthews Beach Adams ELLIOTT AVE W GREENWOOD AVE N AVE GREENWOOD N 56TH ST NW 100TH ST Northgate Transit NW MARKET ST N AVE TAYLOR 100TH ST NE 55TH ST 5th Ave NE & NE 85th NW AVE 3RD South Lake 298 existing spaces: 96% retained Center NE AVE LATONA 98TH ST NE AVE 35TH North Beach/Blue Ridge N PHINNEY AVE E ALOHA ST W OLYMPIC PL Union E MADISON ST NE AVE 40TH FAIRVIEW AVE N Stevens NE 11TH AVE RAVENNA AVE NE Windermere West WoodlandNW 96TH ST HOLMAN RD NW LEARY AVE NW NE 100th St, 2nd Ave to 5th Ave: protected bike MERCER STNorth College Park Maple Leaf DEXTER AVE N DEXTER AVE Roosevelt & 75th 12th & 75th Broadway NE 95TH ST 22ND AVE NE SHILSHOLE AVE NW Roosevelt and University 15TH AVE E15TH AVE 17TH AVE NE17TH AVE 19TH AVE E 19TH AVE EASTLAKE AVE E AVE EASTLAKE 20TH AVE NE 20TH AVE lanes UNIVERSITY WAY NE UNIVERSITYWAY AURORA AVE N AVE AURORA Crown Hill E BELLEVUE AVE NE 50TH ST NE 50TH ST NE 92ND ST 23RD E AVE Harrison/ E THOMAS ST N MARKET ST BROAD ST Roosevelt E 12TH AVE & 50th 11th & 50th WESTLAKE N AVE N AVE FAIRVIEW 14TH AVE NW 14TH AVE Denny-Blaine 9 existing loading zones: 5 remain in place Roosevelt & 65th 12th & 65th N 90TH ST DENNY WAY E DENNY WAY NW 48TH ST Greenwood NE AVE 47TH 30TH AVE NE AVE 30TH 1ST AVE STEWART ST LAKE CITY WAY NELAKE CITYWAY 11th & 50th – NB queue jump lane 8’ 7 10 10 5 8’ 8’ Roosevelt & Ravenna 12th & Ravenna Proposed Bicycle Facilities Bus layover on NE 100th St, 2nd Ave to 5th Ave: MADRONA DR 15TH AVE 15TH AVE NW 15TH AVE 23RD AVE NW 46TH ST ALASKAN WAY E PINE ST Side- Park- Trac with Trac Bike Park- Side- N 46TH ST 19TH AVE W COMMODORE WAY NE AVE 5TH Sidewalk/Path (O Street) OLIVE WAY E PIKE ST walk ing Sharrow Lane ing walk NW 85TH ST N 85TH ST PL NE THACKERAY protected bike lanesNE 45TH PL BROADWAY NE 45TH ST Belltown CORLISS WAY N EBike UNION LaneST Madrona M LWAY KING JR N 45TH ST WALLINGFORD AVE N AVE WALLINGFORD Westlake StationRoosevelt & 45th 11th & 45thWedgwood Roosevelt & 50th 11th & 50th Protected Bike Lane GREEN LAKE DR N Mann LEARY WAY NW PIKE ST 14TH AVE PINE ST SENECA ST First Hill Neighborhood Greenway Roosevelt & 45th 11th & 45th Pike-Market CBD NE WAY ROOSEVELT NW 80TH ST BOREN AVE 12TH AVE Sharrows LINDEN AVE N 6TH AVE MinorNE 80TH ST E CHERRY ST Roosevelt & 45th – SB queue jump lane 34TH AVE *Estimated – to be refined as project progresses 3RD AVE MADISON ST University District Laurelhurst GILMAN AVE W NE 41ST ST Roosevelt & 42nd 0 0.5 1.0 Miles Eastlake & 41st NE AVE 15TH E JEFFERSON ST High Capacity Transit Corridor LAKEWASHINGTON BLVD NE 42ND ST BROOKLYN AVE NEBROOKLYN AVE BALLARD BR RooseveltSR522 & 42nd View Ridge Eastlake Fremont Yesler Terrace NE 75TH ST Eastlake & 41st Loyal HeightsEastlake & Harvard Whittier Heights Bicycle Facility E YESLER WAY W EMERSON PL N 40TH ST Leschi Eastlake & Hamlin N AVE FREMONT S JACKSON ST 25TH AVE NE AVE 25TH Green Lake NE AVE 20TH W EMERSON ST N 39TH ST NE 70TH ST MONTLAKE BLVD NE STONE WAY NSTONEWAY S AVE 23RD NE RAVENNA BLVD Roosevelt 8TH AVE NW 8TH AVE Eastlake & Lynn LATONA AVE NE N 36TH ST N 38TH ST Lawton Park W NICKERSON ST UNIVERSITY BR N 65TH ST N 65TH ST NE 65TH ST NE 65TH ST Eastlake & Gareld Ravenna NE PACIFIC ST 24TH AVE NW 24TH AVE W BERTONA ST Phinney RidgeN 35TH ST 12TH AVE NE 12TH AVE South Lake Union and Downtown N WALLINGFORD AVE Eastlake & Harvard 20TH AVE NW 20TH AVE Fairview & Aloha EAST GREEN LAKE WAY N LATONA AVE NE AVE LATONA W DRAVUS ST Eastlake from Allison to Harvard – NBN NORTHLAKE dedicated WAY Bryant NICKERSON ST AdamsW 11TH AVE Fairview & Thomas curb lane and queue jumpN 56TH at ST Harvard NW MARKET ST Portage Bay NE 55TH ST 22ND AVE W AVE 22ND 35TH AVE NE AVE 35TH PHINNEY AVE N PHINNEY AVE 11TH AVE NE 11TH AVE AURORA BR AURORA 40TH AVE NE AVE 40TH Virginia & 9th West Woodland NE WAY ROOSEVELT Windermere LEARY AVE NW North Queen Anne Stewart & 9th 22ND AVE NE SHILSHOLE AVE NW Eastlake & Hamlin UNIVERSITY WAY NE UNIVERSITYWAY NE 50TH ST Stewart & 3rd N MARKET ST THORNDYKE AVE W NW 14TH AVE 17TH AVE NE17TH AVE NW 48TH ST NE AVE 47TH 30TH AVE NE AVE 30TH W RAYE ST NE 20TH AVE 15TH AVE NW 15TH AVE NW 46TH ST 6TH AVE N W COMMODORE WAY N 46TH ST WESTLAKE AVE N NE 45TH PL NE 45TH ST 3RD AVE W 3RD AVE QUEEN ANNE DR N 45TH ST GILMAN DR W LEARY WAY NW PL NE THACKERAY Interbay Wallingford Eastlake
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Motion No. M2020-02 Funding & Cooperative Agreement with City of Seattle for Northgate Access Improvements
    Motion No. M2020-02 Funding & Cooperative Agreement with City of Seattle for Northgate Access Improvements Meeting: Date: Type of action: Staff contact: System Expansion Committee 1/09/2020 Recommend to Board Ron Lewis, DECM Executive Board 1/23/2020 Final action Director Don Davis, Executive Project Director - Northgate Link Extension Kristin Hoffman, Senior Project Manager Proposed action Authorizes the chief executive officer to execute a Funding and Cooperative Agreement with the City of Seattle to contribute funding for Northgate pedestrian and bicycle access improvements, which includes credits for Northgate Link Extension work performed by Sound Transit in support of the agreement, for a total amount not to exceed $7,336,278. Key features summary This agreement implements Sound Transit’s funding contribution to Northgate pedestrian and bicycle access improvements as directed by Board Motion No. M2012-42. The City of Seattle has completed their requirements under Motion No. M2012-42, including securing the $10 million City match for the pedestrian and bicycle bridge access improvements and completing environmental review of the proposed pedestrian and bicycle access improvements. The City of Seattle is responsible for designing, constructing and maintaining the access improvements. Under the Funding and Cooperative Agreement, Sound Transit’s contribution is capped at $10 million which includes credits for current project commitments. These credits are for design, construction, and related administrative costs incurred to accommodate the Northgate access improvements. Sound Transit will reimburse the City on a quarterly basis up to $7,336,278 which reflects credits for work already completed by Sound Transit. Sound Transit's funding obligation for the Northgate access improvement projects terminates upon the opening of Northgate Station or December 31, 2021, whichever is later.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Gaps Analysis Executive Summary
    2020 GAPS ANALYSIS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A variety of unique transportation gaps exist in North King County, an area that includes the cities of North Seattle, Shoreline, Bothell, Kenmore, Lake Forest Park, and Woodinville. These gaps may be spatial, temporal, institutional, infrastructural, or awareness gaps. Seeing these needs, a community task force supported by the North King County Mobility Coalition formed to understand the region's unique needs better. The purpose of this analysis is to: Understand the mobility challenges in the North King County region for populations with special transportation needs and, in doing so, better coordinate members and service providers to facilitate mobility improvement projects. As a result of this analysis, the North King County Mobility Coalition has identified several prioritized projects and actions for the region. Whether you’re a resident, an elected official, a human service organization, or a private business, a unified voice is required to enact these changes and ensure transportation better serves people throughout North King County. We invite you to join in on these conversations. Accomplishing projects related to the needs identified in this report will result in many benefits for the region and the people our coalition aims to serve. The most prominent recommendations for the North King County Region identified by this report are as follows: ► Directly engage with all North King County cities around transportation issues outlined in this Gaps Analysis and implement actions that will address these issues. ► Increase outreach to underserved communities, especially limited English speakers. ► Alternative services should be as low-barrier as possible with their intake process.
    [Show full text]
  • Sound Transit Transit Development Plan 2013-2018 and 2012 Annual Report
    Transit Development Plan 2013-2018 and 2012 Annual Report Public Hearing Held: July 11, 2013 Operations and Administration Committee Referral to Board: July 18, 2013 Board of Directors Approval for Submittal: July 25, 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................2 I: ORGANIZATION .....................................................................................................................2 II: PHYSICAL PLANT ................................................................................................................5 III: SERVICE CHARACTERISTICS ...........................................................................................6 IV: SERVICE CONNECTIONS ................................................................................................. 10 V: ACTIVITIES IN 2012 ............................................................................................................ 12 VI: PLANNED ACTION STRATEGIES, 2012 – 2018 .............................................................. 19 VII: PLANNED ACTIVITIES, 2012 – 2018 ............................................................................... 20 VIII: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM, 2012 – 2018 ..................................................... 23 IX: OPERATING DATA, 2012 – 2018 ...................................................................................... 23 X: ANNUAL REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES, 2012 – 2018 .............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Suggested Route Changes for Fall 2012
    Suggested route changes for fall 2012 C Line – New Map of suggested change Suggested change • The new RapidRide C Line would connect Westwood Village and downtown Seattle via Fauntleroy, Morgan Junction, and Alaska Junction, replacing Route 54 and Route 54 Express (current map). Learn more about the C Line. Reason for change • Service investment. Metro is making a service investment in the C Line, its third RapidRide line. New service hours and facilities are expected to speed service and make it more reliable, attracting higher ridership. • More network connections. The C Line would provide a frequent, direct, all-day connection between Westwood Village and downtown Seattle via Fauntleroy, Morgan Junction, and Alaska Junction. It would offer connection opportunities to many frequent routes. • Simplify service. RapidRide service has features that make it easier to use, including real-time information signs and frequent service throughout the day. Alternative service • The C Line would use the same routing as routes 54 through Fauntleroy, Morgan Junction, and Alaska Junction. Service frequency Route Minutes between buses Weekday Saturday Sunday Peak Non-Peak Night C 10 15 30-60 15 15 www.kingcounty.gov/metro/HaveASay 1 King County Metro Transit | Suggested route changes for fall 2012 D Line – New Map of suggested change Suggested change • The New RapidRide D Line would connect Crown Hill and downtown Seattle via Ballard, Interbay, and Uptown (learn more). The D Line would replace Route 15 (both local and express) (current map). Reason for change • Service investment. Metro is making a service investment in the D Line, its fourth RapidRide line.
    [Show full text]
  • 4 Detailed Definition of Level 2 Alternatives
    4 DETAILED DEFINITION OF LEVEL 2 ALTERNATIVES Based on the conclusions of the Level 1 alternatives evaluation, two light rail alternatives and one BRT alternative, along with the TSM/Baseline and No Build Alternatives, were advanced to the next level of development and evaluation. The findings of the Level 1 evaluation also resulted in recommended refinements and modifications to all of the build alternatives. This chapter summarizes the detailed definitions of the No Build, TSM/Baseline, and three build alternatives carried forward for Level 2 evaluation. Additional information and more detailed alignment and station illustrations are provided in the Level 2 Definition of Alternatives Technical Memorandum (Sound Transit 2011f). The assumptions and guiding principles for the development of the Level 2 alternatives remained the same as those described in Section 3.7.1 for the Level 1 alternatives. 4.1 NO BUILD ALTERNATIVE The Level 2 No Build Alternative included only those improvements committed and funded for implementation by the transportation providers in the region. The Level 2 No Build Alternative was unchanged from that defined in Level 1. 4.1.1 Transportation Facilities Only those physical improvements currently funded and committed as of fall 2010 are included in this alternative. Within the study area, these improvements include a number of minor lane additions and modifications to eliminate choke points along I-5, traffic management, and driver information improvements on I-5; and the completion of roadway, BRT, and intersection improvements to SR 99 in Shoreline. The most significant change from today in the study area included in the No Build Alternative is the assumption that light rail extends north to Northgate.
    [Show full text]
  • Design Standards Manual October, 2009 King County Metro Graphic Standards and Guidelines
    Design Standards Manual October, 2009 King County Metro Graphic Standards and Guidelines Contents Introduction to the RapidRide Brand....................................................................1-1 RapidRide Brand Identity Trademark...................................................................................................1-3 Color Palette ...............................................................................................1-4 Proportions.................................................................................................1-5 Clear Space.................................................................................................1-6 Color ..........................................................................................................1-7 Reversed.....................................................................................................1-8 Incorrect Usage...........................................................................................1-9 In Conjunction with the King County Metro Logo .......................................1-11 Print and Electronic Applications System Brochure Cover................................................................................2-1 System Map Style........................................................................................2-2 Line Map Style ............................................................................................2-3 Metro System Map with RapidRide Lines......................................................2-5
    [Show full text]
  • North Corridor Transit Project
    Lynnwood Link Extension Lynnwood Link Extension June 2012 North Corridor Transit Project - NEXT STEPS With route and station alternatives identified, the project team will begin the now Lynnwood Link Extension analysis in order to develop the draft EIS document. This environmental review complies with state and federal law. The draft EIS will examine the potential PROJECT BACKGROUND environmental impacts and benefits of the project alternatives. Where adverse impacts are identified, the draft EIS will identify mitigation measures to avoid The Lynnwood Link Extension is part of the voter-approved Sound Transit 2 IN THIS ISSUE or minimize the impacts for each alternative. The draft EIS is anticipated to be Plan to extend mass transit throughout the region. Once completed in 2023, the Project name change published for public and agency review in mid-2013. You will have the opportunity project will be the northern extension of a light rail system that will provide more than 50 miles of service to the north, south and east of Seattle. to attend public meetings and provide formal comments on the draft EIS Route and station options document. Stay tuned for more information as the project progresses. for review OPPORTUNITIES TO LEARN MORE Next steps and schedule Thank you to those who stopped by one of the 10 drop-in sessions held in March Opportunities for the public 2012 from north Seattle to Lynnwood – we were able to speak with over 450 to learn more people and collect more than 200 comments about stations and routes. The team Field observation and testing received a lot of valuable input, which helped the Board identify route and station alternatives for further consideration.
    [Show full text]
  • King County Impact Analysis
    MEMORANDUM To: Executive Dow Constantine From: Rob Gannon, King County Metro John Taylor, Department of Local Services Date: September 18, 2019 Subject: Analysis of Initiative 976 impacts in King County Introduction. Initiative 976, “Bring back our $30 car tab fees,” would repeal or remove authority to impose certain vehicle taxes and fees; limit state and local license fees to $30 for motor vehicles weighing 10,000 pounds or less, except charges approved by voters after the measure's effective date; base vehicle taxes on Kelley Blue Book value; require regional transit authorities to retire bonds early where allowed; and either reduce or repeal taxes pledged to bonds depending on whether bonds are retired by 2020. I-976 will be on the November 2019 ballot statewide. This memo provides a summary of the potential impacts of I-976 to King County Metro, the Roads Services Division, and the regional transportation system. It is based on analysis performed by the Washington State Office of Financial Management (OFM), King County, and local jurisdictions. More information on this analysis can be found in the Technical Appendix that begins on page 4. Impacts on King County and local communities. King County does not currently collect a vehicle license fee (VLF) or motor vehicle excise tax (MVET), the taxing sources that would be repealed by Initiative 976. However, the State of Washington, Sound Transit, and 13 King County cities use these tax sources to fund mobility projects in King County, including many operated by Metro or Roads Services. It is difficult to definitively determine the effects of the initiative because its implementation will rely on future decisions of the Legislature, city councils, and Sound Transit Board, and resolution of any potential legal challenges.
    [Show full text]
  • TCRP Report 102 – Transit-Oriented
    TRANSIT COOPERATIVE RESEARCH TCRP PROGRAM REPORT 102 Transit-Oriented Sponsored by Development in the the Federal United States: Transit Administration Experiences, Challenges, and Prospects TCRP OVERSIGHT AND PROJECT TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE 2004 (Membership as of January 2004) SELECTION COMMITTEE (as of January 2004) OFFICERS CHAIR Chair: Michael S. Townes, President and CEO, Hampton Roads Transit, Hampton, VA J. BARRY BARKER Vice Chair: Joseph H. Boardman, Commissioner, New York State DOT Transit Authority of River City Executive Director: Robert E. Skinner, Jr., Transportation Research Board MEMBERS MEMBERS KAREN ANTION MICHAEL W. BEHRENS, Executive Director, Texas DOT Karen Antion Consulting SARAH C. CAMPBELL, President, TransManagement, Inc., Washington, DC GORDON AOYAGI Montgomery County Government E. DEAN CARLSON, Director, Carlson Associates, Topeka, KS RONALD L. BARNES JOHN L. CRAIG, Director, Nebraska Department of Roads Central Ohio Transit Authority DOUGLAS G. DUNCAN, President and CEO, FedEx Freight, Memphis, TN LINDA J. BOHLINGER GENEVIEVE GIULIANO, Director, Metrans Transportation Center and Professor, School of Policy, HNTB Corp. Planning, and Development, USC, Los Angeles ANDREW BONDS, JR. BERNARD S. GROSECLOSE, JR., President and CEO, South Carolina State Ports Authority Parsons Transportation Group, Inc. SUSAN HANSON, Landry University Prof. of Geography, Graduate School of Geography, Clark University JENNIFER L. DORN JAMES R. HERTWIG, President, Landstar Logistics, Inc., Jacksonville, FL FTA HENRY L. HUNGERBEELER, Director, Missouri DOT NATHANIEL P. FORD, SR. ADIB K. KANAFANI, Cahill Professor of Civil Engineering, University of California, Berkeley Metropolitan Atlanta RTA RONALD F. KIRBY, Director of Transportation Planning, Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments CONSTANCE GARBER HERBERT S. LEVINSON, Principal, Herbert S. Levinson Transportation Consultant, New Haven, CT York County Community Action Corp.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Ridership and Customer Satisfaction
    METRO BUS – SOUND TRANSIT LINK INTEGRATION STUDY Assessment of Ridership and Customer Satisfaction Prepared by: King County Department of Transportation Metro Service Planning Service Development Section MARCH 2017 METRO BUS – SOUND TRANSIT LINK INTEGRATION STUDY Assessment of Ridership and Customer Satisfaction March 2017 This report was prepared by King County Metro Transit. Customer satisfaction research was conducted by Pacific Market Research, LLC Department of Transportation Metro Transit Division King Street Center, KSC-TR-0415 201 S. Jackson St Seattle, WA 98104 206-553-3000 TTY Relay: 711 www.kingcounty.gov/metro Alternative Formats Available 206-477-3832 TTY Relay: 711 CONTENTS Executive Summary ................................................................................................. 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................ 7 SECTION I: RIDERSHIP ASSESSMENT ................................................ 16 Key Findings .......................................................................................................... 16 Changes in Route-Level Transit Ridership and Productivity ................................. 18 Metro Bus Ridership Changes by Neighborhood/Corridor .................................. 25 Ballard .................................................................................................................. 28 Bryant ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix a Rapidride Roosevelt Project Scoping Report
    Appendix A RapidRide Roosevelt Project Scoping Report THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK FINAL REPORT RAPIDRIDE ROOSEVELT PROJECT SCOPING REPORT Prepared for Seattle Department of Transportation March 2019 (Updated January 2020) THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents ......................................................................................................................... iii Acronyms and Abbreviations ........................................................................................................v 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Project Overview ............................................................................................................................ 1-1 2. Scoping process .............................................................................................................. 2-1 2.1 Overview of Scoping Process ................................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 Notification Process ..................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.3 Public and Agency/Tribal Scoping Meetings...................................................................... 2-2 3. Agency/Tribal Scoping .................................................................................................. 3-1 3.1 Agencies and Tribes Invited to Participate .........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Northgate Transit Oriented Development FACT SHEET
    Winter 2017 Northgate Transit Oriented Development FACT SHEET ABOUT THE PROJECT The Northgate TOD will be a King County and the City of Seattle are working together on mixed use, affordable and vibrant the Northgate Transit Oriented Development (TOD) project to community where people of all redevelop King County’s property near the Northgate Mall and future Northgate Link Light Rail Station. incomes live close to where they work, play and shop. 1st Ave NE NORTHGATE MALL WHAT IS TRANSIT NE 103rd St ORIENTED 3rd Ave NE 5th Ave NE DEVELOPMENT (TOD)? TOD is a type of community NORTHGATE THORNTON TOD PLACE development that includes housing, office, retail and/or other amenities located near public transportation 5 NE 100th St like light rail. N Successful TOD provides people from all walks of life with Today, the four-block area bounded by First Avenue NE, Third convenient, affordable housing and Avenue NE, NE 100th Street, and NE 103rd Street consists transportation options. of a bus transit center and surface parking lots. The project will replace the transit center and parking lots with market- rate and affordable housing as well as retail and commercial IMPROVED TOD MEANS: space. A portion of the redevelopment is planned to open as MORE... LESS... soon as 2021, close to when Sound Transit’s Northgate Link • Car trips and Station is scheduled to open (https://www.soundtransit.org/ • Walkable communities household northgatestation). • Transit service and ridership driving This TOD project is an opportunity to create a vibrant, inclusive • Mobility choices • Traffic community where people of all income levels live close to • Economic opportunity congestion where they work, play, and shop.
    [Show full text]