DOCSLIB.ORG

Final Regulatory Assessment Final Revised

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Final Regulatory Assessment Final Revised Final Regulatory Assessment Final Revised Accessibility Guidelines for Buses, Over-the-Road Buses, and Vans (36 CFR Part 1192, Subpart B) UNITED STATES ACCESS BOARD WASHINGTON, DC United States Access Board 1331 F Street, NW – Suite 1000 Washington, DC 20004-111 www.access-board.gov Nov. 9, 2016 (This page intentionally blank.) TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................1 2. Introduction ....................................................................................................................................3 3. Background ....................................................................................................................................5 3.1. Existing Regulatory Requirements for Buses, Vans, and OTRBs .........................................5 3.2. Announcements on Fixed Route Buses – History of Compliance Issues ..............................6 3.3. Growing Use of Intelligent Transportation Systems by Transit Agencies ............................7 3.4. Final Rule – New or Revised Accessibility Requirements with Cost Impacts ......................9 4. Overview of Cost Methodology ...................................................................................................11 4.1. Automated Stop Announcement Systems – Large Transit Agencies ..................................11 4.2. Other Accessibility Requirements - Over-the-Road Buses .................................................13 4.3. Small Business Analysis ......................................................................................................14 5. Cost Model: Discussion of Significant Estimated Elements .......................................................17 5.1. Vehicles ................................................................................................................................17 5.1.1. Transit Agencies and Vehicles Used in Fixed-Route Bus Modes ...................................17 5.1.2. OTRBs .............................................................................................................................19 5.2. Automated Announcement Systems ....................................................................................21 5.2.1. Initial Costs – Onboard Equipment and Backend Systems .............................................21 5.2.2. Training and Other Labor Costs ......................................................................................24 5.2.3. Operations & Maintenance ..............................................................................................26 5.2.4. Mid-Life Software Upgrade .............................................................................................26 5.3. Over-the-Road Buses – New Requirements for Onboard Accessibility Features ...............27 5.3.1. Unit Costs ........................................................................................................................27 5.3.2. Likelihoods for Incurring Compliance Costs ...................................................................28 5.3.3. Operation & Maintenance ................................................................................................30 6. Benefits: A Qualitative & Quantitative Perspective ....................................................................30 6.1. General Discussion ..............................................................................................................31 6.2. Threshold Analyses – Automated Announcement Systems ................................................35 7. Costs: Results & Discussion ........................................................................................................38 7.1. Summary of Results .............................................................................................................38 7.1.1. Annualized Costs of New Requirements .........................................................................38 7.1.2. Annualized Costs for Automated Announcement Systems under Primary Scenario by Transit Agency Category (Tiers I, II & III) .....................................................................40 7.1.3. Annual Costs for New OTRB Accessibility Requirements .............................................41 7.2. Additional Cost Studies: Stress Tests for Selected Assumptions ........................................42 7.2.1. Unit Costs for Automated Announcement Systems ........................................................43 7.2.2. Number of Large Transit Agencies Likely to Incur Costs under Automated Announcement Systems Requirement .............................................................................44 7.2.3. Percentage of OTRBs Operating in Fixed Route Service ................................................44 7.2.4. Likelihoods of Changes that Incur OTRB Compliance Costs .........................................45 8. Alternative Regulatory Approaches: Large Transit Agencies and the VOMS 100 Threshold ....47 9. Small Business Analysis ..............................................................................................................54 APPENDICES Appendix A: Large Transit Agencies Over VOMS 100 Threshold for Fixed-Route Bus Modes (2014 NTD Data) .......................................................................................................................................... A-1 Appendix B – Unit Costs: Automated Announcement Systems .........................................................B-1 Appendix B-1: Initial (One-Time) Costs for Onboard Bus Equipment ..............................................B-1 Appendix B-2: Initial (One-Time) Costs for Backend System ...........................................................B-3 Appendix B-3: Training Cost Assumptions/Labor Costs ....................................................................B-7 Appendix B-4: Annual Costs – Operation & Maintenance .................................................................B-9 Appendix B-5: Mid-life Software Upgrade Costs ............................................................................B-10 Appendix C – Unit Costs: New Accessibility Requirements for OTRBs ...........................................C-1 Appendix D – OTRB Accessibility Requirements: Likelihood of Incurring Costs ........................... D-1 Appendix E-1: Annual Costs for Automated Announcement Systems under Primary Scenario by Transit Agency Category (Tiers I, II & III) ......................................................................................... E-1 Appendix E-2: Annual Costs for Automated Announcement Systems under Low Scenario by Transit Agency Category (Tiers I, II & III) ..................................................................................................... E-4 Appendix E-3: Annual Costs for Automated Announcement Systems under High Scenario by Transit Agency Category (Tiers I, II & III) ..................................................................................................... E-7 Appendix F-1: Annual Costs for Over-the-Road Buses (OTRBs) under Primary Scenario ............... F-1 Appendix F-2: Annual Costs for Over-the-Road Buses (OTRBs) under Low Scenario .................... F-2 Appendix F-3: Annual Costs for Over-the-Road Buses (OTRBs) under High Scenario .................... F-3 Appendix G: Small Business Data ..................................................................................................... G-1 Appendix H: Federal Statistics on Prevalence of Certain Categories of Functional Disabilities, U.S. Non-Institutionalized Population ....................................................................................................... H-1 Appendix I: Data Sources and Methodology for Threshold Analyses of Automated Announcement Systems ................................................................................................................................................. I-1 Appendix J: Key Characteristics of Transit Agencies Reporting Bus Modes of Service (2014 NTD Annual Data) ........................................................................................................................................ J-1 LIST OF TABLES Table 1 – Total Number and Percentages of Small Businesses in Four OTRB-Related NAICS Codes ........................................................................................................................................15 Table 2 – Assumed Characteristics of Large Transit Agencies Subject to Automated Announcement Requirement, by Category (Tiers I, I & III) .................................................................18 Table 3 – Assumed Characteristics of “New” Large Transit Agencies that Cross VOMS 100 Threshold during Regulatory Timeframe ..............................................................................................19 Table 4 - Estimated Size of Total OTRB Fleet in the United States, 2015 ...........................................20 Table 5 - Estimated Hourly Wages for Vehicle Operators and Mechanics ..........................................24 Table 6 - Estimated Annual Wages for IT/GIS Specialist and IT Project Manager .............................25 Table 7 - Estimated Mid-Life Software Upgrade Costs (Onboard Equipment & Backend Systems) ................................................................................................................................................26 Table 8 – Per Vehicle Unit
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Strategies for High Intensity Bus: Best Practices for Operating Buses in Managed Lanes Velyjah Southern, Et Al, Texas Southern University
    Texas Southern University From the SelectedWorks of Earthea Nance, PhD (Stanford University, 2004) 2017 Strategies for High Intensity Bus: Best Practices for Operating Buses in Managed Lanes Velyjah Southern, et al, Texas Southern University Available at: https://works.bepress.com/nanceea/25/ 1 Invited Student Paper: Strategies for High Intensity Bus: Best Practices for Operating 2 Buses in Managed Lanes 3 4 5 6 7 Velyjha Southern 8 Graduate Research Assistant 9 Texas Southern University 10 3100 Cleburne St. Houston, TX 77004 11 713-313-4365 (p) 713-313-4821 (f) 12 [email protected] 13 14 Earthea Nance, Ph.D. 15 Associate Professor 16 Texas Southern University 17 3100 Cleburne St. Houston, TX 77004 18 713-313-4854 (p) 713-313-7153 (f) 19 [email protected] 20 21 Carol Abel Lewis, Ph.D. 22 Professor and Director, CTTR 23 Texas Southern University 24 3100 Cleburne St. Houston, TX 77004 25 713-313-7924 (p) 713-313-4821 (f) 26 Jermaine Potts 27 Graduate Research Assistant 28 Texas Southern University 29 3100 Cleburne St. Houston, TX 77004 30 713-313-4365 (p) 713-313-4821 (f) 31 32 33 Prepared for consideration for 34 Presentation at the 96th Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting 35 Washington D.C. January 2017 36 37 Word Count: 6,237 (Body) + 1,250 (Tables and Figures) = 7,487 38 References= 18 39 Submission date: November 14, 2016 40 41 42 Southern, Nance, Lewis, and Potts 2 1 2 3 4 5 ABSTRACT 6 This paper examines high intensity bus (HIB) service in managed lanes in the US.
    [Show full text]
  • Jo U Rn a L O F P U B Lic T Ransp O Rta Tio N
    Vo Volume 12, No. 3, 2009 lume 12, No. 3 Journal of Public Public of Journal Tr Brian Caulfield A Stated Preference Analysis of Real-Time ansp Margaret O’Mahony Public Transit Stop Information or Laura Eboli A New Customer Satisfaction Index for Gabriella Mazzulla Evaluating Transit Service Quality ta tion Ahmed M. El-Geneidy Bus Transit Service Planning and Operations in a John Hourdos Competitive Environment Jessica Horning Matthew H. Hardy Transit Response to Congestion Pricing Opportunities: Policy and Practice in the U.S. John Pucher Integrating Bicycling and Public Transport in North America Ralph Buehler Mario G. Beruvides The Concept of a Regional Maintenance Center James L. Simonton Natalie M. Waters Ean Ng Siva Chaivichitmalakul Cheng-Chu Chiu-Wei Pelin Z. Altintas Phil Nash 2009 Luis Barroso Paul Moon N C T R JOURNAL OF Public Transportation Volume 12, No. 3, 2009 ISSN 1077-291X TheJournal of Public Transportation is published quarterly by National Center for Transit Research Center for Urban Transportation Research University of South Florida • College of Engineering 4202 East Fowler Avenue, CUT100 Tampa, Florida 33620-5375 Phone: (813) 974-3120 Fax: (813) 974-5168 Email: [email protected] Website: www.nctr.usf.edu/jpt/journal.htm © 2009 Center for Urban Transportation Research Volume 12, No. 3, 2009 ISSN 1077-291X CONTENTS A Stated Preference Analysis of Real-Time Public Transit Stop Information Brian Caulfield, Margaret O’Mahony ...............................................................................................1 A New Customer Satisfaction Index for Evaluating Transit Service Quality Laura Eboli, Gabriella Mazzulla ....................................................................................................... 21 Bus Transit Service Planning and Operations in a Competitive Environment Ahmed M.
    [Show full text]
  • Bus Driver Fatigue and Stress Issues Study
    Bus Driver Fatigue and Stress Issues Study DTGH61-99-Z-00027 Final Report December 8, 1999 Prepared for Mr. Phil Hanley, HMCE-10 Federal Highway Administration Office of Motor Carriers 400 Seventh Street, SW, Room 4432A Washington, DC 20590 Prepared by Arrowhead Space & Telecommunications, Inc. 803 W. Broad Street, Suite 400 Falls Church, VA 22046 (703) 241-2801 voice (703) 241-2802 fax www.arrowheadsat.com Bus Driver Fatigue and Stress Issues Study Table of Contents I. Introduction 1 II. Approach 3 III. Literature Search 6 IV. Video Search 10 V. World Wide Web Search 11 VI. Industry Advisory Panel 32 VII. Federal and State Officials 35 VIII. Focus Group Sessions 36 IX. Identification of Issues from Focus Group Sessions and Phone Survey 39 X. Countermeasures 49 Appendix A: Focus Group and Phone Survey Participants Appendix B:Issues Identified at Focus Group Sessions Appendix C:Travel Industry Focus Group Report Appendix D:Safety Study Performed by Greyhound Lines, Inc. Bus Driver Fatigue and Stress Issues Study Final Report November 18, 1999 I INTRODUCTION Arrowhead Space and Telecommunications, Inc. conducted a research project to identify unique aspects of operations within the motorcoach industry which may produce bus driver fatigue and stress. Funding for and oversight of the study was provided by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), Office of Motor Carriers (OMC). The purpose of this study is to (1) identify from direct interaction with motorcoach owners, safety directors, operations managers, and drivers those fatigue-inducing stresses which they believe are unique to the motorcoach industry; (2) evaluate the relative influence of these stresses on bus driver fatigue; (3) provide relevant feedback to the FHWA/OMC for its use in future decisions which will affect the motorcoach industry; and (4) develop an outreach video to help motorcoach drivers understand the effects of fatigue, the stresses that induce it, and means to reduce it.
    [Show full text]
  • DE60LF Continuation of Chuck Tauscher's' April Slide Presentation
    OFFICIAL NEWSLEITER OF THE OMNIBUS SOCIETY OF AMERICA, INC. MAY 2008 Welcome to another issue of The Green Pennant Special, than waiting until sufficient capital funds are available to the official publication of The Omnibus Society of America. purchase. Through this publication we hope to keep our readers -, informed of events happening in the transit industry in Chicago and other cities in the United States. Visit the Omnibus Society of America website at ..www.osabus.com ''. At osabus.com we will be posting upcoming fan trips and meetings information, as well as membership information. Please visit our site when you have a chance and give us your opinions and comments. • MAY MEETING The May meeting of the Omnibus Society of America will be held on May 2, 2008, in the Anderson Pavilion of Swedish Covenant Hospital, 2751 W. Winona Avenue, Chicago, Illinois. The meeting will start at 7:30 pm. Our program for the evening, "Unfiled, Part 2," will be a DE60LF continuation of Chuck Tauscher's' April slide presentation. Delivery of the New Flyer Hybrid articulated buses will begin in August 2008. The hospital is on California near Foster. Winona is one half-block south of Foster. By public transportation, take In December, the Chicago Transit Board approved the 92 Foster to California. From the Ravenswood Brown reassignment of a contract option from King County Metro, Line, take the 93 North California from Kimball, get off after Seattle's public transit agency, for the 60-foot hybrid buses it turns onto California from Foster and walk back south. manufactured by New Flyer Industries.
    [Show full text]
  • Skål USA Executive Committee - Monthly Conference Call Meeting Agenda Monday, April 5Th, 2021 4:00PM EDT
    Skål USA Executive Committee - Monthly Conference Call Meeting Agenda Monday, April 5th, 2021 4:00PM EDT Type of Meeting: Monthly Conference Call Call-in mode: Go-to-Meeting hosted by ABA Meeting Facilitator: Jim Dwyer, President Invitees: Skål USA Executive Committee ______________________________________________________________________________ PLEASE DO NOT USE SPEAKERPHONES. IF USING YOUR COMPUTER PLEASE USE HEADPHONES. Call to Order - President Jim Dwyer Roll Call – Richard Scinta President’s Update – Jim Dwyer • Approval of Consent Agenda 1. President’s Written Report – Jim Dwyer 2. March (Feb Month end) Financial Report – Art Allis 3. VP Administrator’s Written Report – Richard Scinta 4. IS Councilor’s Written report – Holly Powers 5. VP Membership’s Written report – Tom Moulton 6. VP of PR & Communication’s Written report – Pam Davis 7. Directors of Membership’s Written reports (2) – Morgan Maravich & Mark Irgang • Skal Canada Website – Team Discussion • Streamyard EC Ratification • Bylaws and Articles of Incorporation Modifications - Holly • Articles of Incorporation Review – Holly and Richard International Skål Councilor – Holly Powers Financial Report – Art Allis Administration Update – Richard Scinta • Philanthropic Events VP Membership – Tom Moulton • New Career Center Discussion – New Benefit Approval Director Membership – Morgan Maravich Mark Irgang VP Communications – Pam Davis Next Meeting: Monday, May 3rd, 2021 4:00 PM EST Skal USA President Report March 2021 Einstein “the definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result Dwyer “Negativity is the cornerstone of failure” Meetings and Zooms • International Skål Zoom with Skål Miami and Skal Sydney • International Zoom with Skal Mexico and proposed the twinning of Skal Mexico City and Skal New Jersey which may take place on May 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 11 ) LAKELAND TOURS, LLC, Et Al.,1 ) Case No
    20-11647-jlg Doc 205 Filed 09/30/20 Entered 09/30/20 13:16:46 Main Document Pg 1 of 105 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ) In re: ) Chapter 11 ) LAKELAND TOURS, LLC, et al.,1 ) Case No. 20-11647 (JLG) ) Debtors. ) Jointly Administered ) AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE I, Julian A. Del Toro, depose and say that I am employed by Stretto, the claims and noticing agent for the Debtors in the above-captioned case. On September 25, 2020, at my direction and under my supervision, employees of Stretto caused the following document to be served via first-class mail on the service list attached hereto as Exhibit A, via electronic mail on the service list attached hereto as Exhibit B, and on three (3) confidential parties not listed herein: Notice of Filing Third Amended Plan Supplement (Docket No. 200) Notice of (I) Entry of Order (I) Approving the Disclosure Statement for and Confirming the Joint Prepackaged Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization of Lakeland Tours, LLC and Its Debtor Affiliates and (II) Occurrence of the Effective Date to All (Docket No. 201) [THIS SPACE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK] ________________________________________ 1 A complete list of each of the Debtors in these chapter 11 cases may be obtained on the website of the Debtors’ proposed claims and noticing agent at https://cases.stretto.com/WorldStrides. The location of the Debtors’ service address in these chapter 11 cases is: 49 West 45th Street, New York, NY 10036. 20-11647-jlg Doc 205 Filed 09/30/20 Entered 09/30/20 13:16:46 Main Document Pg 2 of 105 20-11647-jlg Doc 205 Filed 09/30/20 Entered 09/30/20 13:16:46 Main Document Pg 3 of 105 Exhibit A 20-11647-jlg Doc 205 Filed 09/30/20 Entered 09/30/20 13:16:46 Main Document Pg 4 of 105 Exhibit A Served via First-Class Mail Name Attention Address 1 Address 2 Address 3 City State Zip Country Aaron Joseph Borenstein Trust Address Redacted Attn: Benjamin Mintz & Peta Gordon & Lucas B.
    [Show full text]
  • Bus Transit Fare Collection Practices
    T R A N S I T C O O P E R A T I V E R E S E A R C H P R O G R A M SPONSORED BY The Federal Transit Administration TCRP Synthesis 26 Bus Transit Fare Collection Practices A Synthesis of Transit Practice Transportation Research Board National Research Council TCRP OVERSIGHT AND PROJECT TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE 1997 SELECTION COMMITTEE CHAIRMAN OFFICERS MICHAEL S. TOWNES Peninsula Transportation District Chair: DAVID N. WORMLEY, Dean of Engineering, Pennsylvania State University Commission Vice Chair: SHARON D. BANKS, General Manager, AC Transit Executive Director: ROBERT E. SKINNER, JR., Transportation Research Board, National Research Council MEMBERS SHARON D. BANKS MEMBERS AC Transit LEE BARNES BRIAN J. L. BERRY, Lloyd Viel Berkner Regental Professor, Bruton Center for Development Studies, Barwood Inc University of Texas at Dallas GERALD L. BLAIR LILLIAN C. BORRONE, Director, Port Commerce Department, The Port Authority of New York and New Indiana County TransitAuthority Jersey (Past Chair, 1995) SHIRLEY A. DELIBERO DAVID G. BURWELL, President, Rails-to-Trails Conservancy New Jersey Transit Corporation E. DEAN CARLSON, Secretary, Kansas Department of Transportation ROD J. DIRIDON JAMES N. DENN, Commissioner. Minnesota Department of Transportation International Institute for Surface JOHN W. FISHER, Director, ATLSS Engineering Research Center, Lehigh University Transportation Policy Study DENNIS J. FITZGERALD, Executive Director, Capital District Transportation Authority SANDRA DRAGGOO DAVID R. GOODE, Chairman, President, and CEO, Norfolk Southern Corporation CATA DELON HAMPTON, Chairman & CEO, Delon Hampton & Associates LOUIS J. GAMBACCINI LESTER A. HOEL, Hamilton Professor, University of Virginia, Department of Civil Engineering SEPTA JAMES L.
    [Show full text]
  • Wildwood Bus Terminal to Philadelphia
    Wildwood Bus Terminal To Philadelphia Damian remains bromeliaceous after Ricki clepes surprisingly or trill any thack. Foreseeable and nodical Chris bloodiest while filled Nikki ratchets her half-hours savourily and remount hermaphroditically. Quantitative and steatitic Gaspar misunderstand while scabious Sergio decarburises her biomasses warily and refrigerated effortlessly. They are asked to family friendly destinations served by side, terminal to wildwood bus and turn right onto trenton and they can take from the result was the Good news and wildwood bus? There are shuttles on the Cape May side of the ferry terminal to take you into Cape May. BUS SCHEDULE NJ TRANSIT. Sets the list item to enabled or disabled. Did not sold at wildwood bus to philadelphia and makes bus. There are generally have questions or rail lines provide and destinations in the south jersey communities to bus terminal to wildwood philadelphia to choose? Thank you for your participation! The First Stop For Public Transit. Rental cars, FL to Tampa, so book in advance to secure the best prices! Owl Bus services running along the same route as the trains. If you completed your booking on one of our partner websites, you can purchase a Quick Trip using either cash or a credit or debit card from the SEPTA Key Fare Kiosks located at each Airport Line Terminal Stop. New Jersey communities to Center City. Would you like to suggest this photo as the cover photo for this article? One bus terminal in philadelphia is considered one bus terminal to wildwood philadelphia. This was my first time using Wanderu, Lehigh and Berks.
    [Show full text]
  • I-95 Corridor Transit and TDM Plan DRAFT
    I‐95 Corridor Transit and TDM Plan Technical Memorandum #1: Existing Service Characteristics DRAFT Prepared for: Prepared by: September 20, 2011 Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 1 2.0 I‐95 HOT/HOV Lane Project Definition ...................................................................................... 2 3.0 Demographic Characteristics and Trends .................................................................................. 5 3.1 Demographic Characteristics and Trends ..................................................................................... 5 3.2 Northern Corridor Characteristics (Fairfax and Prince William Counties) .................................... 9 3.3 Southern Corridor Characteristics (Stafford and Spotsylvania Counties) ................................... 23 4.0 Travel Pattern Characteristics ................................................................................................. 37 4.1 Existing Worker Travel Flows ...................................................................................................... 37 4.2 Projected Home‐Based Work Trips ............................................................................................. 40 5.0 Existing Transit Service Providers ............................................................................................ 42 5.1 Fairfax Connector .......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • ACRP Report 37 – Guidebook for Planning and Implementing
    AIRPORT COOPERATIVE RESEARCH ACRP PROGRAM REPORT 37 Sponsored by the Federal Aviation Administration Guidebook for Planning and Implementing Automated People Mover Systems at Airports ACRP OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE* TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD 2010 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE* CHAIR OFFICERS James Wilding CHAIR: Michael R. Morris, Director of Transportation, North Central Texas Council of Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority (re- Governments, Arlington tired) VICE CHAIR: Neil J. Pedersen, Administrator, Maryland State Highway Administration, Baltimore VICE CHAIR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR: Robert E. Skinner, Jr., Transportation Research Board Jeff Hamiel MEMBERS Minneapolis–St. Paul Metropolitan Airports Commission J. Barry Barker, Executive Director, Transit Authority of River City, Louisville, KY Allen D. Biehler, Secretary, Pennsylvania DOT, Harrisburg MEMBERS Larry L. Brown, Sr., Executive Director, Mississippi DOT, Jackson James Crites Deborah H. Butler, Executive Vice President, Planning, and CIO, Norfolk Southern Corporation, Dallas–Fort Worth International Airport Norfolk, VA Richard de Neufville William A.V. Clark, Professor, Department of Geography, University of California, Los Angeles Massachusetts Institute of Technology Eugene A. Conti, Jr., Secretary of Transportation, North Carolina DOT, Raleigh Kevin C. Dolliole Unison Consulting Nicholas J. Garber, Henry L. Kinnier Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, and Director, John K. Duval Center for Transportation Studies, University of Virginia, Charlottesville Austin Commercial, LP Jeffrey W. Hamiel, Executive Director, Metropolitan Airports Commission, Minneapolis, MN Kitty Freidheim Paula J. Hammond, Secretary, Washington State DOT, Olympia Freidheim Consulting Steve Grossman Edward A. (Ned) Helme, President, Center for Clean Air Policy, Washington, DC Jacksonville Aviation Authority Adib K. Kanafani, Cahill Professor of Civil Engineering, University of California, Berkeley Tom Jensen Susan Martinovich, Director, Nevada DOT, Carson City National Safe Skies Alliance Debra L.
    [Show full text]
  • December 9, 2019 Mr. Paul Wiedefeld General Manager and Chief
    December 9, 2019 Mr. Paul Wiedefeld General Manager and Chief Executive Officer Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority 600 Fifth Street, N.W. Washington D.C. 20001 Mr. Paul Smedberg Chairman Board of Directors Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority 600 Fifth Street, N.W. Washington D.C. 20001 Dear Mr. Wiedefeld and Mr. Smedberg: On behalf of the Transportation Trades Department, AFL-CIO (TTD), I urge you to take immediate steps to ensure that drivers and other workers currently employed at the Cinder Bed Road Metrobus facility and at Fairfax Connector receive a fair and just contract with comparable pay and benefits to those enjoyed by WMATA employees. As you know, 120 Metrobus operators represented by ATU Local 689 have been on strike since October 24th — 50 days on the picket line. More than 600 members of ATU Local 1764 have just returned to work last night after being forced to strike over unfair labor practices deployed by Metro contractor Transdev. As the General Manager and Board Chairman of WMATA, it is your responsibility to ensure that services provided to WMATA customers are reliable, and that workers are afforded the highest level of respect and dignity on the job. Today, this is simply not happening. The ongoing strike at Cinder Bed Road and the failure to resolve the labor dispute at Fairfax Connector is directly linked to WMATA’s decision to contract out these operations to Transdev. In fact, the company’s business model in Northern Virginia is premised on imposing a below- market compensation package at both Cinder Bed Road and Fairfax Connector.
    [Show full text]
  • Tcrp Report 94
    TRANSIT COOPERATIVE RESEARCH TCRP PROGRAM REPORT 94 Sponsored by the Federal Transit Administration Fare Policies, Structures and Technologies: Update TCRP OVERSIGHT AND PROJECT TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE 2003 (Membership as of March 2003) SELECTION COMMITTEE (as of October 2002) OFFICERS CHAIR Chair: Genevieve Giuliano, Director and Prof., School of Policy, Planning, and Development, USC, Los Angeles J. BARRY BARKER Vice Chair: Michael S. Townes, Exec. Dir., Transportation District Commission of Hampton Roads, Hampton, VA Transit Authority of River City Executive Director: Robert E. Skinner, Jr., Transportation Research Board MEMBERS DANNY ALVAREZ MEMBERS Miami-Dade Transit Agency KAREN ANTION MICHAEL W. BEHRENS, Executive Director, Texas DOT Karen Antion Consulting JOSEPH H. BOARDMAN, Commissioner, New York State DOT GORDON AOYAGI SARAH C. CAMPBELL, President, TransManagement, Inc., Washington, DC Montgomery County Government E. DEAN CARLSON, Secretary of Transportation, Kansas DOT JEAN PAUL BAILLY JOANNE F. CASEY, President, Intermodal Association of North America Union Internationale des Transports Publics JAMES C. CODELL III, Secretary, Kentucky Transportation Cabinet RONALD L. BARNES JOHN L. CRAIG, Director, Nebraska Department of Roads Central Ohio Transit Authority BERNARD S. GROSECLOSE, JR., President and CEO, South Carolina State Ports Authority LINDA J. BOHLINGER SUSAN HANSON, Landry University Prof. of Geography, Graduate School of Geography, Clark University HNTB Corp. LESTER A. HOEL, L. A. Lacy Distinguished Professor, Depart. of Civil Engineering, University of Virginia ANDREW BONDS, JR. HENRY L. HUNGERBEELER, Director, Missouri DOT Parsons Transportation Group, Inc. JENNIFER L. DORN ADIB K. KANAFANI, Cahill Prof. and Chair, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of FTA California at Berkeley NATHANIEL P.
    [Show full text]