DOCSLIB.ORG

Bentham and Hooker's System of Classification of Angiospermic Plant

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bentham and Hooker's System of Classification of Angiospermic Plant Plant Taxonomy Prof.(Dr.) Punam Jeswal Head B.Sc (Hons.) Part ll Botany Department Bentham and Hooker's System of Classification of Angiospermic Plant Bentham and Hooker's System - Two British Botanists associated with Royal Botanic Gardens. George Bentham and Joseph Dalton Hooker jointly published a system of classification in three volumes of Genera Plantarum, published in Latin from 1862 to 1883. Silent features - 1. This system was fundamentally based on that of Augustin Pyramus de Candolle (1778-1841), but disagreed in many respects. 2. They emphasized much on the nature of perianth, especially number of whorls (one or two) and if two, whether the members of inner whorl(petals) are free or fused. 3. In Genera Plantarum, 97, 205 species under 7,569 genera of seed plants known to them, have been described and classified. 4. The spermatophytes are divided into three classes viz. Dicotyledons, Gymnospermae and Monocotyledons, which are further divided into 3 subclasses, 21 series, 25 cohorts(orders) and 202 natural orders (families). 5. Out of 202 families recognized by them, three belong to Gymnospermae and 199 to angiosperms. 6. The dicots are divided into three subclasses viz. Polypetalae, Gamopetalae and Monochlamydeae, depending on the free or fused nature of petal or perianth in one whorl. 7. The Family -Ranunculaceae (Ranales) are considered to be most primitive, therefore placed in the beginning and Family- Gramineae (Poaceae) are considered to be most advanced, therefore placed in the end. Spermatophyta or Phanerogams 3 Classes Dicotyledons Gymnospermae Monocotyledons 3 Subclasses Polypetalae Gamopetalae Monochlamydeae 3 Series 3 Series Series Series Thalamiflorae Disciflorae Calyciflorae Inferae Heteromerae Bicrpellatae 1 Curvembryeae 2 Multiovulatae aquaticae 3.Multiovulatae terrestris 4.Micrembryeae 5 Daphnales 6 Achlamydosporeae 7 Unisexuales 8 Ordines anomali 1. Microsperme 2. Epigynae 3. Coronarieae 4. Calycinae 5. Nudiflorae 6. Apocarpae 7. Glumaceae Fig. Outline Classification of Bentham and hooker Critical comments - Since Charles Darwin was a close friend of Hooker therefore, he was inclined to reorganized the whole system according to the theory of evolution. However, Bentham did not accept the essential of Darwin's work and conceived pre-evolutionary thought that species are special creations, therefore constant and immutable. Thus, the system could not attain phylogenetic status, yet both the ideas are very well reflected in this system and concluded as to be natural one with following merits and demerits. Merits - 1. The system is very useful from practical point of view because of greater number of categories; each category is well defined with distinguishing characters. 2. Although the system is not phylogenetic, yet placing of Ranales in the beginning of the dicots, justify the order being most primitive among the flowering plants. Similarly, the placing of Umbellales in the end of Polypetalae also reflects phylogenetic pattern because this order is regarded as most advanced among polypetalous group. 3. placing of monocots after the dicots is justified by majority of taxonomists today and favour the origin of monocots from dicots. 4. The natural orders(families) of disputed nature were placed under Ordines anomali. 5. The larger taxa were divided into smaller subcategories to bring more clarity. 6. The system is very handy for the purpose of quick identification of plants in the field. Demerits - 1. Placing of Gymnospermae between Dicotyledons and Monocotyledons is extremely objectionable because Gymnosperms constitute a different class than angiosperms. 2. Several important floral characters have not been given proper respect, which they deserve. 3. In this system several closely related families (natural orders) have been separated and placed under different orders (cohorts). Concurrently numbers of unrelated families have been closely placed. 4. Subclass - Monochlamydeae is very heterogeneous and superfluous group because the families placed under different series of this class exhibit closer affinities with different families of Polypetalae, therefore various families therein can very well be distributed among various taxa of subclass- Polypetalae. Some important instances are - (a) Families like Amarantaceae and chenopodiaceae (subclass- Monochlamydeae; series- Curembryae) show affinities with family-Caryophyllaceae (order-Caryophyllinae, series- Thalamiflorae, subclass- Polypetalae). (b) Family- Podostemaceae ( subclass- Monochlamydeae; series- Multiovulatae Aquaticae) are closely related to family- Saxifragaceae or Crassulaceae(order- Rosales, series-Calyciflorae, subclass-Polypetalae). (c) Family- Laurinaeae (subclass-Monochlamydeae; series- Daphnales) are closely related to family- Magnoliaceae(order-Ranales, series- Thalamiflorae, subclass- Polypetalae). (d) Family- Platanaceae (subclass-Monochlamydeae; series- Unisexuales) are regarded as allied to Rosales (family-Rosaceae, subfamily- Spiraeoideae. 5. In monocots, the authors did not follow the same principles as for dicots, instead they have placed the advanced series Microspermae (family- Orchidaceae) in the beginning, which is objectionable. It should be kept in the last not in the beginning. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Natural Selection: Charles Darwin & Alfred Russel Wallace
    Search | Glossary | Home << previous | next > > Natural Selection: Charles Darwin & Alfred Russel Wallace The genius of Darwin (left), the way in which he suddenly turned all of biology upside down in 1859 with the publication of the Origin of Species , can sometimes give the misleading impression that the theory of evolution sprang from his forehead fully formed without any precedent in scientific history. But as earlier chapters in this history have shown, the raw material for Darwin's theory had been known for decades. Geologists and paleontologists had made a compelling case that life had been on Earth for a long time, that it had changed over that time, and that many species had become extinct. At the same time, embryologists and other naturalists studying living animals in the early 1800s had discovered, sometimes unwittingly, much of the A visit to the Galapagos Islands in 1835 helped Darwin best evidence for Darwin's formulate his ideas on natural selection. He found theory. several species of finch adapted to different environmental niches. The finches also differed in beak shape, food source, and how food was captured. Pre-Darwinian ideas about evolution It was Darwin's genius both to show how all this evidence favored the evolution of species from a common ancestor and to offer a plausible mechanism by which life might evolve. Lamarck and others had promoted evolutionary theories, but in order to explain just how life changed, they depended on speculation. Typically, they claimed that evolution was guided by some long-term trend. Lamarck, for example, thought that life strove over time to rise from simple single-celled forms to complex ones.
    [Show full text]
  • The Correspondence of Julius Haast and Joseph Dalton Hooker, 1861-1886
    The Correspondence of Julius Haast and Joseph Dalton Hooker, 1861-1886 Sascha Nolden, Simon Nathan & Esme Mildenhall Geoscience Society of New Zealand miscellaneous publication 133H November 2013 Published by the Geoscience Society of New Zealand Inc, 2013 Information on the Society and its publications is given at www.gsnz.org.nz © Copyright Simon Nathan & Sascha Nolden, 2013 Geoscience Society of New Zealand miscellaneous publication 133H ISBN 978-1-877480-29-4 ISSN 2230-4495 (Online) ISSN 2230-4487 (Print) We gratefully acknowledge financial assistance from the Brian Mason Scientific and Technical Trust which has provided financial support for this project. This document is available as a PDF file that can be downloaded from the Geoscience Society website at: http://www.gsnz.org.nz/information/misc-series-i-49.html Bibliographic Reference Nolden, S.; Nathan, S.; Mildenhall, E. 2013: The Correspondence of Julius Haast and Joseph Dalton Hooker, 1861-1886. Geoscience Society of New Zealand miscellaneous publication 133H. 219 pages. The Correspondence of Julius Haast and Joseph Dalton Hooker, 1861-1886 CONTENTS Introduction 3 The Sumner Cave controversy Sources of the Haast-Hooker correspondence Transcription and presentation of the letters Acknowledgements References Calendar of Letters 8 Transcriptions of the Haast-Hooker letters 12 Appendix 1: Undated letter (fragment), ca 1867 208 Appendix 2: Obituary for Sir Julius von Haast 209 Appendix 3: Biographical register of names mentioned in the correspondence 213 Figures Figure 1: Photographs
    [Show full text]
  • List of Honorary Fellows
    LIST OF HONORARY FELLOWS. 847 LIST OF HONORARY FELLOWS .110 AT MARCH 1897. His Royal Highness The PRINCE OF WALES. FOREIGNERS (LIMITED TO THIRTY-SIX BY LAW X.). Elected. 495 1897 Alexander Agassiz, Cambridge (Mass.). 1897 E.-H. Amagat, Paris. 1889 Marcellin Pierre Eugene Berthelot, Paris. 1895 Ludwig Boltzmann, Vienna. 1864 Rohert Wilhelm Bunsen, Heidelberg. 1897 Stanislao Cannizzaro, Rome, 1883 Luigi Cremona, Rome. 1877 Carl Gegenbaur, Heidelberg, 1888 Ernst Haeckel, Jena. 1883 Julius Hann, Vienna. 1884 Charles Hermite, Paris. 1879 Jules Janssen, Paris, 1864 Alhert von Kblliker, Wilrzhurg. 1864 Rudolph Leuckart, Leipzig, 1897 Gabriel Lippmann, Paris. 1895 fileuthere-6lie-Nicolas Mascart, Paris. 1888 Demetrius Ivanovich Mendel6ef, St Petersburg. 1895 Carl Menger, Vienna. 1886 Alphonse Milne-Edwards Paris. 1864 Theodore Mommsen, Berlin. 1897 Fridtjof Nansen, Christiania. 1881 Simon Newcomb, Washington. 1895 Max von Pettenkofer, Munich. 1895 Jules Henri Poincare, Paris. 1889 Georg Hermann Quincke, Heidelberg. 1886 Alphonse Renard, Ghent. 1897 Ferdinand von Ricbthofen, Berlin. 1897 Henry A. Rowland, Baltimore. 1897 Giovanni V. Schiaparelli, Milan, 1881 Johannes Iapetus Smith Steenstrup, Copenhagen. 1878 Otto Wilhelm Strove, St Petersburg. 1886 Tobias Robert Thaten, Upsala. 1874 Otto Torell, Lund. 1868 Rudolph Yirchow, Berlin. 1892 Gustav Wiedemann, Leipzig. 1897 Ferdinand Zirkel, Leipzig. Total, 36. 848 LIST OF HONORARY FELLOWS. BRITISH SUBJECTS (LIMITED TO TWENTY BY LAW x.). Elected. 1889 Sir Robert Stawell Ball, Kt., LL.D., F.R.S., M.R.I. A., Lowndean, Professor of Astronomy in the University of Cambridge, Cambridge 1897 The Very Rev. John Caird, D.D., LL.D., Principal of the Uni- versity of Glasgow, Glasgow. 1892 Colonel Alexander Ross Clarke, C.B., R.E., F.R.S., Redhill, Surrey 1897 George Howard Darwin, M.A., LL.D., F.R.S., Plumian Professor of Astronomy in the University of Cambridge, Cambridge.
    [Show full text]
  • The Correspondence of Peter Macowan (1830 - 1909) and George William Clinton (1807 - 1885)
    The Correspondence of Peter MacOwan (1830 - 1909) and George William Clinton (1807 - 1885) Res Botanica Missouri Botanical Garden December 13, 2015 Edited by P. M. Eckel, P.O. Box 299, Missouri Botanical Garden, St. Louis, Missouri, 63166-0299; email: mailto:[email protected] Portrait of Peter MacOwan from the Clinton Correspondence, Buffalo Museum of Science, Buffalo, New York, USA. Another portrait is noted by Sayre (1975), published by Marloth (1913). The proper citation of this electronic publication is: "Eckel, P. M., ed. 2015. Correspondence of Peter MacOwan(1830–1909) and G. W. Clinton (1807–1885). 60 pp. Res Botanica, Missouri Botanical Garden Web site.” 2 Acknowledgements I thank the following sequence of research librarians of the Buffalo Museum of Science during the decade the correspondence was transcribed: Lisa Seivert, who, with her volunteers, constructed the excellent original digital index and catalogue to these letters, her successors Rachael Brew, David Hemmingway, and Kathy Leacock. I thank John Grehan, Director of Science and Collections, Buffalo Museum of Science, Buffalo, New York, for his generous assistance in permitting me continued access to the Museum's collections. Angela Todd and Robert Kiger of the Hunt Institute for Botanical Documentation, Carnegie-Melon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, provided the illustration of George Clinton that matches a transcribed letter by Michael Shuck Bebb, used with permission. Terry Hedderson, Keeper, Bolus Herbarium, Capetown, South Africa, provided valuable references to the botany of South Africa and provided an inspirational base for the production of these letters when he visited St. Louis a few years ago. Richard Zander has provided invaluable technical assistance with computer issues, especially presentation on the Web site, manuscript review, data search, and moral support.
    [Show full text]
  • ISTA List of Stabilized Plant Names 7Th Edition
    ISTA List of Stabilized Plant Names th 7 Edition ISTA Nomenclature Committee Chair: Dr. M. Schori Published by All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be The Internation Seed Testing Association (ISTA) reproduced, stored in any retrieval system or transmitted Zürichstr. 50, CH-8303 Bassersdorf, Switzerland in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior ©2020 International Seed Testing Association (ISTA) permission in writing from ISTA. ISBN 978-3-906549-77-4 ISTA List of Stabilized Plant Names 1st Edition 1966 ISTA Nomenclature Committee Chair: Prof P. A. Linehan 2nd Edition 1983 ISTA Nomenclature Committee Chair: Dr. H. Pirson 3rd Edition 1988 ISTA Nomenclature Committee Chair: Dr. W. A. Brandenburg 4th Edition 2001 ISTA Nomenclature Committee Chair: Dr. J. H. Wiersema 5th Edition 2007 ISTA Nomenclature Committee Chair: Dr. J. H. Wiersema 6th Edition 2013 ISTA Nomenclature Committee Chair: Dr. J. H. Wiersema 7th Edition 2019 ISTA Nomenclature Committee Chair: Dr. M. Schori 2 7th Edition ISTA List of Stabilized Plant Names Content Preface .......................................................................................................................................................... 4 Acknowledgements ....................................................................................................................................... 6 Symbols and Abbreviations ..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Two Centuries of Botanical Exploration Along the Botanists Way, Northern Blue Mountains, N.S.W: a Regional Botanical History That Refl Ects National Trends
    Two Centuries of Botanical Exploration along the Botanists Way, Northern Blue Mountains, N.S.W: a Regional Botanical History that Refl ects National Trends DOUG BENSON Honorary Research Associate, National Herbarium of New South Wales, Royal Botanic Gardens and Domain Trust, Sydney NSW 2000, AUSTRALIA. [email protected] Published on 10 April 2019 at https://openjournals.library.sydney.edu.au/index.php/LIN/index Benson, D. (2019). Two centuries of botanical exploration along the Botanists Way, northern Blue Mountains,N.S.W: a regional botanical history that refl ects national trends. Proceedings of the Linnean Society of New South Wales 141, 1-24. The Botanists Way is a promotional concept developed by the Blue Mountains Botanic Garden at Mt Tomah for interpretation displays associated with the adjacent Greater Blue Mountains World Heritage Area (GBMWHA). It is based on 19th century botanical exploration of areas between Kurrajong and Bell, northwest of Sydney, generally associated with Bells Line of Road, and focussed particularly on the botanists George Caley and Allan Cunningham and their connections with Mt Tomah. Based on a broader assessment of the area’s botanical history, the concept is here expanded to cover the route from Richmond to Lithgow (about 80 km) including both Bells Line of Road and Chifl ey Road, and extending north to the Newnes Plateau. The historical attraction of botanists and collectors to the area is explored chronologically from 1804 up to the present, and themes suitable for visitor education are recognised. Though the Botanists Way is focused on a relatively limited geographic area, the general sequence of scientifi c activities described - initial exploratory collecting; 19th century Gentlemen Naturalists (and lady illustrators); learned societies and publications; 20th century publicly-supported research institutions and the beginnings of ecology, and since the 1960s, professional conservation research and management - were also happening nationally elsewhere.
    [Show full text]
  • Joseph Hooker Takes a "Fixed Post": Transmutation And
    Joseph Hooker Takes a "Fixed Post": Transmutation and the "Present Unsatisfactory State of Systematic Botany", 1844-1860 Author(s): Richard Bellon Source: Journal of the History of Biology, Vol. 39, No. 1 (Spring, 2006), pp. 1-39 Published by: Springer Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4331989 Accessed: 24-05-2018 19:09 UTC JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://about.jstor.org/terms Springer is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Journal of the History of Biology This content downloaded from 206.253.207.235 on Thu, 24 May 2018 19:09:40 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms Journal of the History of Biology (2006) 39: 1-39 ? Springer 2006 DOI 10.007/sI 0739-004-3800-x Joseph Hooker Takes a "Fixed Post": Transmutation and the "Present Unsatisfactory State of Systematic Botany", 18 441860 RICHARD BELLON Lyman Briggs School Michigan State University E-30 Holmes Hall East Lansing, MI 48825 USA E-mail: hellonr(@.~msu.edu Abstract. Joseph Hooker first learned that Charles Darwin believed in the transmuta- tion of species in 1844. For the next 14 years, Hooker remained a "nonconsenter" to Darwin's views, resolving to keep the question of species origin "subservient to Botany instead of Botany to it, as must be the true relation." Hooker placed particular emphasis on the need for any theory of species origin to support the broad taxonomic delimitation of species, a highly contentious issue.
    [Show full text]
  • Francis and Margie Had a Good Day at Last Week's Show in Perth. Could They Top It? Well YES! Emphatically. I Don't Know
    Francis and Margie had a good day at last week’s show in Perth. Could they top it? Well YES! Emphatically. I don’t know how many first prizes they won at their home show. Winning the Forrest for the second year in succession is something few exhibitors experience. Why did they win this week and not last week? Their star plant was at home last week getting ready for its triumph this week. Their Benthamiella patagonica was the biggest plant of the species I have seen and it was very well flowered. The centre flowers were towering over the cushion just to find room to open. It is not very often that a South American let alone a Patagonian native plant wins the Forrest. If asked I would say it was Colonel and Mrs Anderson’s plant of Oreopolus glaciais, at a Glasgow show 30 years ago. In my ignorance I did not really appreci- ate their achievement. Now I know better and can state that Francis and Margie have won with a superbly well grown plant. Many Con- gratulations to both of them. It was great that the Benthamiella won in Nairn in the same year that Dutch grower, Ger van der Beuken was the SRGC travelling speak- er. Ger talked about Patagonia and its plants and if not the original introducer of the Ben- thamiella to the UK certainly brought plants for sale at our shows. Added to that Highland Show Sec- retary David organ- ised his tour and we have a happy story with all the heroes with a part to play in this Nairn show.
    [Show full text]
  • Asa Gray's Plant Geography and Collecting Networks (1830S-1860S)
    Finding Patterns in Nature: Asa Gray's Plant Geography and Collecting Networks (1830s-1860s) The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters. Hung, Kuang-Chi. 2013. Finding Patterns in Nature: Asa Gray's Citation Plant Geography and Collecting Networks (1830s-1860s). Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University. Accessed April 17, 2018 4:20:57 PM EDT Citable Link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:11181178 This article was downloaded from Harvard University's DASH Terms of Use repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA (Article begins on next page) Finding Patterns in Nature: Asa Gray’s Plant Geography and Collecting Networks (1830s-1860s) A dissertation presented by Kuang-Chi Hung to The Department of the History of Science in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the subject of History of Science Harvard University Cambridge, Massachusetts July 2013 © 2013–Kuang-Chi Hung All rights reserved Dissertation Advisor: Janet E. Browne Kuang-Chi Hung Finding Patterns in Nature: Asa Gray’s Plant Geography and Collecting Networks (1830s-1860s) Abstract It is well known that American botanist Asa Gray’s 1859 paper on the floristic similarities between Japan and the United States was among the earliest applications of Charles Darwin's evolutionary theory in plant geography. Commonly known as Gray’s “disjunction thesis,” Gray's diagnosis of that previously inexplicable pattern not only provoked his famous debate with Louis Agassiz but also secured his role as the foremost advocate of Darwin and Darwinism in the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Reader 19 05 19 V75 Timeline Pagination
    Plant Trivia TimeLine A Chronology of Plants and People The TimeLine presents world history from a botanical viewpoint. It includes brief stories of plant discovery and use that describe the roles of plants and plant science in human civilization. The Time- Line also provides you as an individual the opportunity to reflect on how the history of human interaction with the plant world has shaped and impacted your own life and heritage. Information included comes from secondary sources and compila- tions, which are cited. The author continues to chart events for the TimeLine and appreciates your critique of the many entries as well as suggestions for additions and improvements to the topics cov- ered. Send comments to planted[at]huntington.org 345 Million. This time marks the beginning of the Mississippian period. Together with the Pennsylvanian which followed (through to 225 million years BP), the two periods consti- BP tute the age of coal - often called the Carboniferous. 136 Million. With deposits from the Cretaceous period we see the first evidence of flower- 5-15 Billion+ 6 December. Carbon (the basis of organic life), oxygen, and other elements ing plants. (Bold, Alexopoulos, & Delevoryas, 1980) were created from hydrogen and helium in the fury of burning supernovae. Having arisen when the stars were formed, the elements of which life is built, and thus we ourselves, 49 Million. The Azolla Event (AE). Hypothetically, Earth experienced a melting of Arctic might be thought of as stardust. (Dauber & Muller, 1996) ice and consequent formation of a layered freshwater ocean which supported massive prolif- eration of the fern Azolla.
    [Show full text]
  • CBHL Newsletter, No. 145 (May 2017)
    NEWSLETTER Number 145 May 2017 Screenshot of the upper part of the welcome page for the eBook consortia customers. < http://rpa.ebrary.com/login?url=http:// rpa.ebrary.com/ebrary/wilshorticultural/unauthorized > eBooks in our Libraries – the First 5 Years Janet Evans Associate Director McLean Library Pennsylvania Horticultural Society Philadephia, PA Five years ago David Sleasman, Liz Fite, and Janet Evans formed a consortium to offer eBooks to our respective constituents at Longwood Gardens, Mt. Cuba Center, and Pennsylvania Horticultural Society. Under David’s stellar leadership, we partnered with WiLS (Wisconsin Library Services), a member-driven non-profit that provides services to library organizations and their partners. The very capable WiLS staff worked with us to find a suitable eBook vendor. This was not easy; most vendors deal with large public or university libraries and offer access to eBooks as large collections consisting of a range of topics. We, however, represented a relatively small user base with specialized interests: horticulture and botany, with tangential needs in other areas covered in our collections. We had our first conference call in October 2012. We spent a year and a half setting up the consortium, finding a vendor and implementing the new platform. By the summer of 2014 we were in business – we had the ability to search, find, read, and download horticultural and botanical eBooks on the eBrary platform. Over the years, more libraries joined the consortium: the Los Angeles County Arboretum and Botanic Garden (Susan Eubank); the Morton Arboretum in Lisle, Illinois (Rita Hassert); and the Denver Botanic Gardens (Allaina Wallace).
    [Show full text]
  • Section Nomenclature
    Huitième Congrès International de Botanique - Paris, Juillet 1954 / Eighth International Botanical Congress - Paris, July 1954 Source: Taxon, Vol. 2, No. 1 (Jan., 1953), p. 14 Published by: International Association for Plant Taxonomy (IAPT) Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1217699 . Accessed: 18/09/2011 12:27 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. International Association for Plant Taxonomy (IAPT) is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Taxon. http://www.jstor.org Huitieme Congres International de Botanique - Paris, Juillet 1954 Eighth International Botanical Congress - Paris, July 1954 Section de Nomenclature Section Nomenclature Les propositions concerant le Code Inter- Proposals regarding the International Code national de la Nomenclature Botanique (1952) of Botanical Nomenclature (1952) must be doivent etre soumises au Rapporteur-Gene- submitted to the Rapporteur-GeneralDr J. ral Dr J. Lanjouw avant le ler Decembre Lanjouw before 1 December 1953. All pro- 1953. On pourra publier toutes les propo- posals can be published in Taxon. Botanists sitions dans Taxon. Les botanistes qui ont preparing proposals are earnestly requested en vue quelque proposition, sont instamment to give them the form of the example which pries d'y donner la formule qui sera publiee will be published in Taxon vol.
    [Show full text]