DOCSLIB.ORG

Section 2.5.1 Geologic Characterization Information

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Section 2.5.1 Geologic Characterization Information Clinch River Nuclear Site Early Site Permit Application Part 2, Site Safety Analysis Report SUBSECTION 2.5.1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Title Page 2.5 Geology, Seismology, and Geotechnical Engineering ............................... 2.5.1-1 2.5.1 Geologic Characterization Information ...................................... 2.5.1-1 2.5.1.1 Regional Geology (within the 200-Mile Regional Radius) ................................................................... 2.5.1-1 2.5.1.2 Local Geology ....................................................... 2.5.1-32 2.5.1.3 References ........................................................... 2.5.1-82 2.5.1-i Revision 0 Clinch River Nuclear Site Early Site Permit Application Part 2, Site Safety Analysis Report SUBSECTION 2.5.1 LIST OF TABLES Number Title 2.5.1-1 Stratigraphic Units Encountered at the Clinch River Nuclear Site 2.5.1-2 Clinch River Nuclear Stratigraphic Boundaries 2.5.1-3 Average Thickness and Variability of Each Stratigraphic Unit 2.5.1-4 Lithologic Adjectives and Modifiers 2.5.1-5 Summary of Petrographic Examination 2.5.1-6 Description of Mapped Karst Features 2.5.1-7 Occurrence of Karst Depressions by Geologic Unit in the 5-Mile Site Radius 2.5.1-8 Occurrence of Cave Entrances by Geologic Unit in the 5-Mile Site Radius 2.5.1-9 Chemistry, Mineralogy, and Petrography of Rock Core 2.5.1-10 Mineralogy of Rock Core from Clinch River Breeder Reactor Project 2.5.1-11 Cavities in Boreholes Drilled at Clinch River Nuclear Site, 1973–1978 and 2013 2.5.1-12 Definition of Joint Condition Ratings 2.5.1-13 Summary of Average Joint Condition Ratings at 5-ft Intervals 2.5.1-14 Summary of Joint Condition Ratings at Outcrop Location Numbers 2, 8, and 9 2.5.1-15 Summary of Geological Strength Index per Stratigraphic Unit 2.5.1-16 Summary of Fracture Zones (≥ Approximately 0.9 ft thick) using 100- and 200-Series Borings 2.5.1-17 Summary of Shear-Fracture Zones (≥ Approximately 0.9 ft thick) using 100- and 200-Series Borings 2.5.1-18 List of Oil and Gas Well Permits in Roane County, Tennessee 2.5.1-ii Revision 0 Clinch River Nuclear Site Early Site Permit Application Part 2, Site Safety Analysis Report SUBSECTION 2.5.1 LIST OF FIGURES Number Title 2.5.1-1 Map of Physiographic Provinces 2.5.1-2 Geologic Time Scale 2.5.1-3 Map of Lithotectonic Tectonic Terranes, Provinces and Major Tectonic Boundaries 2.5.1-4 Regional Distribution of Carbonate Rocks 2.5.1-5 Map of Sinkhole and Cave Development for the State of Tennessee 2.5.1-6 Sinkhole Types 2.5.1-7 Shaded Relief Map of Eastern North America Demonstrating the Extent of the Appalachian Orogenic Belt 2.5.1-8 Geologic Time Scale with Orogenic Events 2.5.1-9 Sequential Development of Appalachians Profiles 2.5.1-10 North American Rifted Margin 2.5.1-11 Facies Diagram of Stable Shelf Strata 2.5.1-12 Alleghanian Zipper Tectonics 2.5.1-13 Mesozoic Features Map 2.5.1-14 Site Vicinity Stratigraphic Columns 2.5.1-15 The Cumberland Plateau and Interior Low Plateaus in Tennessee 2.5.1-16 Mississippian Stratigraphic Units in Tennessee 2.5.1-17 Pennsylvanian System in Tennessee 2.5.1-18 (Sheet 1 of 2) Lithotectonic Terrane Map 2.5.1-18 (Sheet 2 of 2) Lithotectonic Terrane Map—Blue Ridge Zoom 2.5.1-19 (Sheet 1 of 2) Site Region Geologic Map 2.5.1-19 (Sheet 2 of 2) Site Region Geologic Map 2.5.1-20 Aeromagnetic and Gravity Maps 2.5.1-21 Current Compressive Stress—Eastern United States 2.5.1-22 Landslide Hazard Map for the Clinch River Nuclear Site Region 2.5.1-23 LiDAR Digital Elevation Model Coverage 2.5.1-24 Local Physiography with Local Nomenclature for Valleys and Ridges 2.5.1-25 Field Reconnaissance Way Points 2.5.1-26 (Sheet 1 of 4) Clinch River Terraces Within the Site Area (Inset A) 2.5.1-iii Revision 0 Clinch River Nuclear Site Early Site Permit Application Part 2, Site Safety Analysis Report SUBSECTION 2.5.1 LIST OF FIGURES (CONTINUED) Number Title 2.5.1-26 (Sheet 2 of 4) Clinch River Terraces Within the Site Area (Inset B) 2.5.1-26 (Sheet 3 of 4) Clinch River Terraces Within the Site Area (Inset C) 2.5.1-26 (Sheet 4 of 4) Clinch River Terraces Within the Site Area (Inset D) 2.5.1-27 Simplified Site Vicinity Geologic Map 2.5.1-28 Stratigraphic Column with Sea Level Curve 2.5.1-29 (Sheet 1 of 2) Site Location Geologic Map Showing Borings 2.5.1-29 (Sheet 2 of 2) Site Location Geologic Map Showing Borings 2.5.1-30 Geologic Cross-Section K–K′ of the Clinch River Nuclear Site 2.5.1-31 Subsurface Investigation Borehole and Geologic Cross-Section K–K′ Locations 2.5.1-32 Schematic Appalachian Detachment 2.5.1-33 (Sheet 1 of 2) Tectonic Map Cross-Sections—Valley and Ridge 2.5.1-33 (Sheet 2 of 2) Tectonic Map Cross-Sections—Locations 2.5.1-34 Site Area Geologic Map 2.5.1-35 Site Area Cross-Section 2.5.1-36 (Sheet 1 of 5) Seismic Reflection SRL-1—Without Interpretation 2.5.1-36 (Sheet 2 of 5) Seismic Reflection SRL-1—With Interpretation 2.5.1-36 (Sheet 3 of 5) Seismic Reflection SRL-2—Without Interpretation 2.5.1-36 (Sheet 4 of 5) Seismic Reflection SRL-2—With Interpretation 2.5.1-36 (Sheet 5 of 5) Explanation for Seismic Line Figures 2.5.1-37 (Sheet 1 of 2) Site Location Geologic Map 2.5.1-37 (Sheet 2 of 2) Site Location Geologic Map 2.5.1-38 (Sheet 1 of 11) Acoustic Televiewer Data and Outcrop Mapping—Strike of Bedding 2.5.1-38 (Sheet 2 of 11) Acoustic Televiewer Data and Outcrop Mapping—Strike and Dip of Bedding Planes 2.5.1-38 (Sheet 3 of 11) Acoustic Televiewer Data and Outcrop Mapping—Strike of Fractures 2.5.1-38 (Sheet 4 of 11) Acoustic Televiewer Data and Outcrop Mapping—Orientation of all Fractures 2.5.1-38 (Sheet 5 of 11) Acoustic Televiewer Data and Outcrop Mapping—Strike and Dip of Primary Fracture Sets 2.5.1-iv Revision 0 Clinch River Nuclear Site Early Site Permit Application Part 2, Site Safety Analysis Report SUBSECTION 2.5.1 LIST OF FIGURES (CONTINUED) Number Title 2.5.1-38 (Sheet 6 of 11) Acoustic Televiewer Data and Outcrop Mapping—Orientation of Fractures in the Benbolt Formation 2.5.1-38 (Sheet 7 of 11) Acoustic Televiewer and Outcrop Mapping—Orientation of Fractures in the Blackford Formation 2.5.1-38 (Sheet 8 of 11) Acoustic Televiewer Data and Outcrop Mapping—Orientation of Fractures in the Eidson Formation 2.5.1-38 (Sheet 9 of 11) Acoustic Televiewer Data and Outcrop Mapping—Orientation of Fractures in the Fleanor Shale 2.5.1-38 (Sheet 10 of 11) Acoustic Televiewer Data and Outcrop Mapping—Orientation of Fractures in the Newala Limestone 2.5.1-38 (Sheet 11 of 11) Acoustic Televiewer Data and Outcrop Mapping—Orientation of Fractures in the Rockdell Formation 2.5.1-39 Site Area Map 2.5.1-40 Karst Features near Copper Ridge Cave 2.5.1-41 Generalized Geologic Map of the Oak Ridge Area 2.5.1-42 Conceptual Model for Karst Systems in the Oak Ridge Area 2.5.1-43 Examples of Karst Depressions Mapped from LiDAR Data 2.5.1-44 Location of Karst Field Reconnaissance 2.5.1-45 Field Photographs of Karst Depressions 2.5.1-46 Surface Karst Features and Site Topography Associated with CRBRP Investigations (1973) 2.5.1-47 Distribution of Mapped Karst Features in the Site Area 2.5.1-48 Field Photographs of Cave Features 2.5.1-49 Carbonate Content of Rock Core Samples by Stratigraphic Unit 2.5.1-50 Clinch River Breeder Reactor Project Geologic Map 2.5.1-51 Cross-Section Distribution of Cavities in Rock Core 2.5.1-52 Cavity Size and Elevation in Borings 2.5.1-53 Model Showing Types of Phreatic and Water Table Caves 2.5.1-54 Photograph of Completed Clinch River Breeder Reactor Project Excavation, 1983 2.5.1-55 Dissolution of Limestone Interbeds in the Blackford Formation 2.5.1-56 (Sheet 1 of 3) Scatter Plots of Geological Strength Index per Bedrock Unit 2.5.1-56 (Sheet 2 of 3) Scatter plots of Geological Strenth Index per Bedrock Unit 2.5.1-v Revision 0 Clinch River Nuclear Site Early Site Permit Application Part 2, Site Safety Analysis Report SUBSECTION 2.5.1 LIST OF FIGURES (CONTINUED) Number Title 2.5.1-56 (Sheet 3 of 3) Scatter Plots of Geological Strength Index per Bedrock Unit 2.5.1-57 (Sheet 1 of 3) Portion of GSI Chart Showing 1.5 JCond89 Against RQD/2 and GSI per Bedrock Unit (Extended to Show RQD/2 > 40) 2.5.1-57 (Sheet 2 of 3) Portion of GSI Chart Showing 1.5 JCond89 Against RQD/2 and GSI per Bedrock Unit (Extended to Show RQD/2 > 40) 2.5.1-57 (Sheet 3 of 3) Portion of GSI Chart Showing 1.5 JCond89 Against RQD/2 and GSI per Bedrock Unit (Extended to Show RQD/2 > 40) 2.5.1-58 Estimates of Geological Strength Index at Outcrop Locations 2, 8, and 9 2.5.1-59 (Sheet 1 of 2) Scatter Plot of Fracture Zone Apparent Thickness—Against Drilled Depth to Fracture Zone Bottom (Using the 100- and 200-Series Borings) 2.5.1-59 (Sheet 2 of 2) Scatter Plot of Fracture Zone Apparent Thickness—Against Elevation of Fracture Zone Bottom (Using the 100- and 200-Series Borings) 2.5.1-60 (Sheet 1 of 2) Scatter Plot of Shear-Fracture Zone Apparent Thickness—Against Drilled Depth to Shear-Fracture Zone Bottom (Using 100- and 200-Series Borings) 2.5.1-60 (Sheet 2 of 2) Scatter Plot of Shear-Fracture Zone Apparent Thickness—Against Elevation of Shear-Fracture Zone Bottom (Using 100- and 200-Series Borings) 2.5.1-61 (Sheet 1 of 2) Map showing the Water Resource Permit Application Sites Within Approximately 10 Miles of the Clinch River Nuclear Site 2.5.1-61 (Sheet 2 of 2) Map Showing the Water Resource Permit Application Sites Within Approximately 10 Miles of the Clinch River Nuclear Site 2.5.1-62 Map Showing the Location of Geologic Cross-Section A-A' to Basement 2.5.1-63 (Sheet 1 of 2) Geologic Cross-Section A-A' Ground Surface to Basement 2.5.1-63 (Sheet 2 of 2) Geologic Cross-Section A-A' Ground Surface to Basement 2.5.1-vi Revision 0 Clinch River Nuclear Site Early Site Permit Application Part 2, Site Safety Analysis Report 2.5 GEOLOGY, SEISMOLOGY, AND GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING 2.5.1 Geologic Characterization Information The geological and seismological information presented in this subsection was developed from a review of previous reports for the proposed Clinch River Breeder Reactor, published geologic literature, and interpretations of data obtained as part of the surface and subsurface field investigations.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Detrital Zircon Provenance and Lithofacies Associations Of
    geosciences Article Detrital Zircon Provenance and Lithofacies Associations of Montmorillonitic Sands in the Maastrichtian Ripley Formation: Implications for Mississippi Embayment Paleodrainage Patterns and Paleogeography Jennifer N. Gifford 1,*, Elizabeth J. Vitale 1, Brian F. Platt 1 , David H. Malone 2 and Inoka H. Widanagamage 1 1 Department of Geology and Geological Engineering, University of Mississippi, Oxford, MS 38677, USA; [email protected] (E.J.V.); [email protected] (B.F.P.); [email protected] (I.H.W.) 2 Department of Geography, Geology, and the Environment, Illinois State University, Normal, IL 61790, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: jngiff[email protected]; Tel.: +1-(662)-915-2079 Received: 17 January 2020; Accepted: 15 February 2020; Published: 22 February 2020 Abstract: We provide new detrital zircon evidence to support a Maastrichtian age for the establishment of the present-day Mississippi River drainage system. Fieldwork conducted in Pontotoc County,Mississippi, targeted two sites containing montmorillonitic sand in the Maastrichtian Ripley Formation. U-Pb detrital zircon (DZ) ages from these sands (n = 649) ranged from Mesoarchean (~2870 Ma) to Pennsylvanian (~305 Ma) and contained ~91% Appalachian-derived grains, including Appalachian–Ouachita, Gondwanan Terranes, and Grenville source terranes. Other minor source regions include the Mid-Continent Granite–Rhyolite Province, Yavapai–Mazatzal, Trans-Hudson/Penokean, and Superior. This indicates that sediment sourced from the Appalachian Foreland Basin (with very minor input from a northern or northwestern source) was being routed through the Mississippi Embayment (MSE) in the Maastrichtian. We recognize six lithofacies in the field areas interpreted as barrier island to shelf environments. Statistically significant differences between DZ populations and clay mineralogy from both sites indicate that two distinct fluvial systems emptied into a shared back-barrier setting, which experienced volcanic ash input.
    [Show full text]
  • 129 the Use of Joint Patterns for Understanding The
    129 THE USE OF JOINT PATTERNS FOR UNDERSTANDING THE ALLEGHANIAN OROGENY IN THE UPPER DEVONIAN APPALACHIAN BASIN, FINGER LAKES DISTRICT, NEW YORK TERRY ENGELDER Department of Geosciences, Pennsylvania State University University Park, Pennsylvania 16802 REGIONAL SIGNIFICANCE Abundantevidence (deformed fo ssils) for layer parallel shortening in western New York indicates the extent to which the Alleghanian Orogeny affected the Appalachian Plateau (Engelder and Engelder, 1977). In addition to low amplitude ( 100 m) long wave length ( 15 km) folds the Upper Devonian sediments of western New York contain many< mesoscopic-scale structures< including joints that can be systematically related to the Alleghanian Orogeny. Based on the nonorthogonality of cleavage and joints, the Alleghanian Orogeny in the Finger Lakes District of New York consists of at least two phases which Geiser and Engelder (1983) correlate with folding and cross-cutting cleavages in the Appalachian Valley and Ridge. To the southeast of the Finger Lakes District the earlier Lackawanna Phase is manifested by formation of the Lackawanna syncline and Green Pond outlier and the development of a northeast-striking disjunctive cleavage within the Appalachian Valley and Ridge mainly fromthe Kingston Arch of the Hudson Valley southwestward beyond Port Jervis, Pennsylvania (Fig. 1). Within the Finger Lakes Distric� New York, a Lackawanna Phase cleavage is absent; and one fm ds instead a cross-fold joint set which is consistent in orientation with a Lackawanna Phase compression. In bedded siltstone-shale sequences (i.e. the Genesee Group) this cross-fold joint set favors development in the siltstones 1# 2#). Main Phase (stops and The is seen as the refolding of the Lackawanna syncline and Green Pond outlier, as well as the development of the major folds in central Pennsylvania.
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Cross Section
    Geologic Cross Section I–I′ Through the Appalachian Basin from the Eastern Margin of the Illinois Basin, Jefferson County, Kentucky, to the Valley and Ridge Province, Scott County, Virginia By Robert T. Ryder, Michael H. Trippi, and Christopher S. Swezey Pamphlet B to accompany Scientific Investigations Map 3343 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior SALLY JEWELL, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Suzette M. Kimball, Acting Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2015 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment—visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod/. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this information product, for the most part, is in the public domain, it also may contain copyrighted materials as noted in the text. Permission to reproduce copy- righted items must be secured from the copyright owner. Suggested citation: Ryder, R.T., Trippi, M.H., and Swezey, C.S., 2015, Geologic cross section I–I′ through the Appalachian basin from the eastern margin of the Illinois basin, Jefferson County, Kentucky, to the Valley and Ridge province, Scott County, Virginia: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Map 3343, 2 sheets and pamphlet A, 41 p.; pamphlet B, 102 p., http://dx.doi.org/10.3133/sim3343.
    [Show full text]
  • IC-29 Geology and Ground Water Resources of Walker County, Georgia
    IC 29 GEORGIA STATE DIVISION OF CONSERVATION DEPARTMENT OF MINES, MINING AND GEOLOGY GARLAND PEYTON, Director THE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Information Circular 29 GEOLOGY AND GROUND-WATER RESOURCES OF WALKER COUNTY, GEORGIA By Charles W. Cressler U.S. Geological Survey Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. Geological Survey ATLANTA 1964 CONTENTS Page Abstract _______________________________________________ -··---------------------------- _____________________ ----------------·----- _____________ __________________________ __ 3 In trodu ction ------------------------------------------ ________________________________ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3 Purpose and scope ------------------------------"--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3 Previous inv es tigati o ns ____ _____ ________ _______ __________ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 5 Geo Io gy _________________________________________________________________ --- ___________________ -- ___________ ------------- __________________ ---- _________________ ---- _______ 5 Ph ys i ogr a p hy ______________________________________________________ ---------------------------------------- __________________ -------------------------------- 5 Geo Io gi c his tory __________________________ _ __ ___ ___ _______ _____________________________________________ ------------------------------------------------- 5 Stratigraphy -·· __________________
    [Show full text]
  • Scenic Landforms of Virginia
    Vol. 34 August 1988 No. 3 SCENIC LANDFORMS OF VIRGINIA Harry Webb . Virginia has a wide variety of scenic landforms, such State Highway, SR - State Road, GWNF.R(T) - George as mountains, waterfalls, gorges, islands, water and Washington National Forest Road (Trail), JNFR(T) - wind gaps, caves, valleys, hills, and cliffs. These land- Jefferson National Forest Road (Trail), BRPMP - Blue forms, some with interesting names such as Hanging Ridge Parkway mile post, and SNPMP - Shenandoah Rock, Devils Backbone, Striped Rock, and Lovers Leap, National Park mile post. range in elevation from Mt. Rogers at 5729 feet to As- This listing is primarily of those landforms named on sateague and Tangier islands near sea level. Two nat- topographic maps. It is hoped that the reader will advise ural lakes occur in Virginia, Mountain Lake in Giles the Division of other noteworthy landforms in the st& County and Lake Drummond in the City of Chesapeake. that are not mentioned. For those features on private Gaps through the mountains were important routes for land always obtain the owner's permission before vis- early settlers and positions for military movements dur- iting. Some particularly interesting features are de- ing the Civil War. Today, many gaps are still important scribed in more detail below. locations of roads and highways. For this report, landforms are listed alphabetically Dismal Swamp (see Chesapeake, City of) by county or city. Features along county lines are de- The Dismal Swamp, located in southeastern Virginia, scribed in only one county with references in other ap- is about 10 to 11 miles wide and 15 miles long, and propriate counties.
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Cross Section C–C' Through the Appalachian Basin from Erie
    Geologic Cross Section C–C’ Through the Appalachian Basin From Erie County, North-Central Ohio, to the Valley and Ridge Province, Bedford County, South-Central Pennsylvania By Robert T. Ryder, Michael H. Trippi, Christopher S. Swezey, Robert D. Crangle, Jr., Rebecca S. Hope, Elisabeth L. Rowan, and Erika E. Lentz Scientific Investigations Map 3172 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior KEN SALAZAR, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Marcia K. McNutt, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2012 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment, visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Suggested citation: Ryder, R.T., Trippi, M.H., Swezey, C.S. Crangle, R.D., Jr., Hope, R.S., Rowan, E.L., and Lentz, E.E., 2012, Geologic cross section C–C’ through the Appalachian basin from Erie County, north-central Ohio, to the Valley and Ridge province, Bedford County, south-central Pennsylvania: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Map 3172, 2 sheets, 70-p.
    [Show full text]
  • Overview of the Strategic and Structural Evolution of the Talladega Slate Belt, Alabama Appalachians
    fl d029-08 1st pgs page 1 The Geological Society of America Field Guide 29 2012 Overview of the stratigraphic and structural evolution of the Talladega slate belt, Alabama Appalachians James F. Tull* Department of Earth, Ocean, and Atmospheric Science, Florida State University Clinton I. Barineau* Department of Earth and Space Sciences, Columbus State University ABSTRACT The allochthonous Talladega belt of eastern-northeastern Alabama and north- western Georgia is a northeast striking, fault bounded block of lower greenschist facies metasedimentary and metaigneous rocks that formed along the margin of Lau- rentia at or outboard of the seaward edge of the Alabama promontory. Bounded by metamorphic rocks of the higher grade Neoproterozoic(?) to Carboniferous eastern Blue Ridge on the southeast and unmetamorphosed to anchimetamorphic Paleozoic rocks of the Appalachian foreland on the northwest, the Talladega belt includes shelf facies rocks of the latest Neoproterozoic/earliest Cambrian Kahatchee Mountain Group, Cambrian-Ordovician Sylacauga Marble Group, and the latest Silurian(?) to uppermost Devonian/earliest Mississippian Talladega Group. Along the southeast- ern fl ank of these metasedimentary sequences, a Middle Ordovician back-arc terrane (Hillabee Greenstone) was tectonically emplaced along a cryptic pre-metamorphic thrust fault (Hillabee thrust) and subsequently dismembered with units of the upper Talladega Group along the post-metamorphic Hollins Line fault system. Importantly, strata within the Talladega belt are critical for understanding the tectonic evolution of the southern Appalachian orogen when coupled with the geologic history of adjacent terranes. Rocks of the lower Talladega Group, the Lay Dam Formation, suggest latest Silurian-earliest Devonian tectonism that is only now being recognized in other areas of the southern Appalachians.
    [Show full text]
  • Technically Recoverable Shale Oil and Shale Gas Resources: United Kingdom
    Technically Recoverable Shale Oil and Shale Gas Resources: United Kingdom September 2015 Independent Statistics & Analysis U.S. Department of Energy www.eia.gov Washington, DC 20585 September 2015 This report was prepared by the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), the statistical and analytical agency within the U.S. Department of Energy. By law, EIA’s data, analyses, and forecasts are independent of approval by any other officer or employee of the United States Government. The views in this report therefore should not be construed as representing those of the Department of Energy or other Federal agencies. U.S. Energy Information Administration | Technically Recoverable Shale Oil and Shale Gas Resources i September 2015 Contents Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................................... 3 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................. 3 Resource categories ................................................................................................................................. 3 Methodology ........................................................................................................................................... 5 Key exclusions .......................................................................................................................................... 6 United Kingdom…………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………......XI-1
    [Show full text]
  • Wartburg,Tn Advance Auto Parts
    OFFERING MEMORANDUM WARTBURG,TN ADVANCE AU TO PA RT S 1105 KNOXVILLE HWY Wartburg, TN 37887 PRESENTED BY: WILL HOLMAN O: 636.628.2111 [email protected] MO #1999033650 ADDISON LIJEWSKI O: 636.628.2111 [email protected] MO #2019023222 BROKER OF RECORD: WALKER HUEY T N # 3 4 3 1 2 3 PROPERTY SUMMARY PROPERTY HIGHLIGHTS S A L E P R I C E $ 1 , 4 76 , 3 9 0 10.5 Years Remaining on Current Term 4 (5) Year Renewal Options OFFERING SUMMARY Triple Net Lease - Landlord Responsibilities limited to slab, oundation, and structural walls BUILDING SIZE: 7, 0 0 0 S F 5% Base Rent Increases at Each Option L O T S I Z E : 1 . 6 4 A c r e s Advance Auto recently extended the Lease 10 Years showing conidence in the location PRICE / SF: $ 2 1 0 . 9 1 Higher than Average Sales or Advance Auto Parts C A P R AT E : 5 . 4 5 % NOI: $ 8 0 , 4 6 3 DEMOGRAPHICS 3 MILES 5 MILES 10 MILES YEAR BUILT: 2 0 0 7 TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS 6 2 8 1 , 5 1 2 5 , 4 3 6 TOTAL POPULATION 2 , 3 2 9 5 , 2 5 3 1 6 , 1 4 5 AVERAGE HH INCOME $ 4 4 , 7 2 8 $ 4 4 , 5 9 1 $ 4 5 , 8 1 8 WARTBURG, TN ADVANCE AUTO PARTS 1105 Knoxville Hwy Wartburg, TN 37887 SVN | HOLMAN NORDEN 2 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION PROPERTY DESCRIPTION SVN | Holman Norden is pleased to present a 100% ee simple interest in an Advance Auto Parts property located at 1105 Knoxville Hwy, Wartburg, TN.
    [Show full text]
  • Curt Teich Postcard Archives Towns and Cities
    Curt Teich Postcard Archives Towns and Cities Alaska Aialik Bay Alaska Highway Alcan Highway Anchorage Arctic Auk Lake Cape Prince of Wales Castle Rock Chilkoot Pass Columbia Glacier Cook Inlet Copper River Cordova Curry Dawson Denali Denali National Park Eagle Fairbanks Five Finger Rapids Gastineau Channel Glacier Bay Glenn Highway Haines Harding Gateway Homer Hoonah Hurricane Gulch Inland Passage Inside Passage Isabel Pass Juneau Katmai National Monument Kenai Kenai Lake Kenai Peninsula Kenai River Kechikan Ketchikan Creek Kodiak Kodiak Island Kotzebue Lake Atlin Lake Bennett Latouche Lynn Canal Matanuska Valley McKinley Park Mendenhall Glacier Miles Canyon Montgomery Mount Blackburn Mount Dewey Mount McKinley Mount McKinley Park Mount O’Neal Mount Sanford Muir Glacier Nome North Slope Noyes Island Nushagak Opelika Palmer Petersburg Pribilof Island Resurrection Bay Richardson Highway Rocy Point St. Michael Sawtooth Mountain Sentinal Island Seward Sitka Sitka National Park Skagway Southeastern Alaska Stikine Rier Sulzer Summit Swift Current Taku Glacier Taku Inlet Taku Lodge Tanana Tanana River Tok Tunnel Mountain Valdez White Pass Whitehorse Wrangell Wrangell Narrow Yukon Yukon River General Views—no specific location Alabama Albany Albertville Alexander City Andalusia Anniston Ashford Athens Attalla Auburn Batesville Bessemer Birmingham Blue Lake Blue Springs Boaz Bobler’s Creek Boyles Brewton Bridgeport Camden Camp Hill Camp Rucker Carbon Hill Castleberry Centerville Centre Chapman Chattahoochee Valley Cheaha State Park Choctaw County
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 1839-G, H
    Stratigraphic Framework of Cambrian and Ordovician Rocks in the Central Appalachian Basin from Morrow County, Ohio, to Pendleton County, West Virginia Depositional Environment of the Fincastle Conglomerate near Roanoke, Virginia U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1839-G, H i i i I ' i ' i ' X- »-v l^,:^ Stratigraphic Framework of Cambrian and Ordovician Rocks in the Central Appalachian Basin from Morrow County, Ohio, to Pendleton County, West Virginia By ROBERT T. RYDER Depositional Environment of the Fincastle Conglomerate near Roanoke, Virginia By CHRYSA M. CULLATHER Chapters G and H are issued as a single volume and are not available separately U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1839-G, H EVOLUTION OF SEDIMENTARY BASINS-APPALACHIAN BASIN U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR MANUEL LUJAN, Jr., Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY DALLAS L. PECK, Director Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1992 For sale by Book and Open-File Report Sales U.S. Geological Survey Federal Center, Box 25425 Denver, CO 80225 Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data (revised for vol. G-H) Evoluation of sedimentary basins Appalachian basin. (U.S. Geological Survey bulletin ; 1839 A-D, G-H) Includes bibliographies. Supt. of Docs. no.:19.3:1839-G Contents: Horses in fensters of the Pulaski thrust sheet, southwestern Virginia / by Arthur P. Schultz [etc.] Stratigraphic framework of Cam­ brian and Ordovician rocks in central Appalachian basin from Morrow County, Ohio, to Pendleton County, West Virginia / by Robert T.
    [Show full text]
  • Character of the Alleghanian Orogeny in the Southern Appalachians: Part I
    Character of the Alleghanian orogeny in the southern Appalachians: Part I. Alleghanian deformation in the eastern Piedmont of South Carolina DONALD T. SECOR, JR. Department of Geology, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina 29208 ARTHUR W. SNOKE Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of Wyoming, Laramie, Wyoming 82071 KENNETH W. BRAMLETT Shell Western E and P, Inc., Box 831, Houston, Texas 77001 OLIVER P. COSTELLO Samson Resources, 801 Travis Street, Suite 1630, Houston, Texas 77002 OLLIE P. KIMBRELL Soil & Material Engineers, Inc., 3025 McNaughton Drive, Columbia, South Carolina 29223 ABSTRACT ward, 1957) is a fundamental problem. This report summarizes results of new field work and outlines interpretations concerning late Paleozoic de- The eastern Piedmont Province in South Carolina contains a formation along the Fall Line in west-central South Carolina. This infor- sequence of Cambrian volcanic and sedimentary rocks that was pene- mation is essential to development of a more general analysis of the tratively deformed (Dj) and regionally metamorphosed (Mi) to the Alleghanian orogeny in the southern Appalachians (Secor and others, greenschist facies during the early and/or middle Paleozoic. The east- 1986). era Piedmont was subsequently affected by late Paleozoic (Allegha- nian) polyphase deformation (D2-D4) and regional metamorphism. The OVERVIEW earliest Alleghanian event (D2) is associated with amphibolite facies regional metamorphism and felsic plutonism in a mid-crustal infra- In the southeastern Piedmont, late Paleozoic deformation events af- structure at ca. 295-315 Ma. The gradational interface between infra- fected a region that had previously been strongly deformed in the early structure and overlying suprastructure contained a steep M2 and/or middle Paleozoic.
    [Show full text]