2016 Texas Transit Statistics, 2nd Edition Prepared by: Public Transportation Division In Cooperation with: Public transit agencies and local officials throughout the state of Texas 2016 TEXAS TRANSIT STATISTICS
PREPARED BY: PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION DIVISION TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
IN COOPERATION WITH: Public transit agencies and local officials throughout the State of Texas.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: The Texas Department of Transportation wishes to express its appreciation to city and regional officials, and transit operators for their cooperation and assistance during the year. Without their help, this report would not be possible.
DISCLAIMER: The information presented in this report is a tabulation of the data provided by transit systems throughout the State of Texas. Information on public transportation grants was provided by the Federal Transit Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, and the Texas Department of Transportation. This information has not been audited by Texas Department of Transportation Public Transportation Division.
CONTACT: Texas Department of Transportation Public Transportation Division 125 E. 11th Street Austin, Texas 78701-2483 Web E-Mail: [email protected] Phone: (512) 486-5977
PUBLISHED: April 2017 2nd Edition NOTICE
This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Federal Transit Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, in the interest of information exchange. The United States Government assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof.
This document also meets the reporting requirements of Texas Transportation Code §456.008, and Rider 14 (e), House Bill 1 (General Appropriations Act), 84th Legislature, Regular Session.
The preparation of this report was financed in part through a grant for technical studies from the United States Department of Transportation under the provision 49 U.S.C. 5304.
Copies of this report are filed in the Texas State Library, Box 12927, Austin, TX 78711-2927 Information on the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) is available on the Web at http://www.txdot.gov
For further information concerning this report, please write or call:
Texas Department of Transportation Public Transportation Division 125 East 11th Street Austin, Texas 78701-2483
(512) 486-5977
Web E-Mail: [email protected] TABLE OF CONTENTS
Preface ...... i
Introduction ...... 1
Chart 1: Texas Public Transportation Funding Formula ...... 3
Fiscal Year 2016 - Detailed Findings...... 5
Figure 1: Cities and Counties Served by Public Transportation Systems...... 8
Figure 2: Statewide Ridership FY 2015 and 2016 ...... 9
Statewide Statistics...... 11
Table 1: FY 2016 Summary of Programs ...... 11
Table 2: Operating Expense per Vehicle Revenue Mile FY 2007 thru 2016 ...... 11
Table 3: Operating Expense per Unlinked Passenger Trip FY 2007 thru 2016 ...... 11
Table 4: Unlinked Passengers per Revenue Vehicle Mile FY 2007 thru 2016 ...... 11
Table 5: Vehicles, Trips & Mileage by Program FY 2007 thru 2016 ...... 12
Table 6: Federal Financial Assistance to Texas Transit FY 2015 and 2016 ...... 13
Metropolitan Transportation Authorities (MTAs) & Urbanized Area Program (Section 5307) ...... 15
Summary: MTAs and Urbanized Area Transit Programs ...... 16
Figure 3: MTAs Unlinked Trips per Vehicle Revenue Mile FY 2007 thru 2016 ...... 17
Figure 4: Urbanized Area Program - Unlinked Passenger Trips per Vehicle Revenue Mile FY 2007 thru 2016 ...... 19
Table 7: MTAs - Performance Summary at a Glance FY 2015 and 2016 ...... 21
Table 7a: Urbanized Area Program - Performance Summary at a Glance FY 2015 and 2016 ...... 22
Figure 5: MTAs Efficiency and Effectiveness Measures FY 2007-2016 ...... 23
Figure 6: Urbanized Area Program - Efficiency and Effectiveness Measures FY 2007 thru 2016 ...... 24
Table 8: MTAs & Urbanized Area Program - Service Efficiency by System FY 2007 thru 2016 ...... 25
Table 9: MTAs & Urbanized Area Program - Cost Effectiveness by System FY 2015 and 2016 ...... 26 Table 10: MTAs & Urbanized Area Program - Service Effectiveness by System FY 2015 and 2016 ...... 27
Table 11: MTAs & Urbanized Area Program - Source Data FY 2015 and 2016 ...... 28
Table 12: MTAs & Urbanized Area Program - Unlinked Passenger Trips FY 2015 and 2016 ...... 29
Table 12a: MTAs - Passenger Boardings FY 2015 and 2016 ...... 30
Figure 7: MTAs - Percentage of Passenger Boardings by Service, FY 2016...... 30
Table 12b: Urbanized Area Program - Passenger Boardings FY 2015 and 2016 ...... 31
Figure 8: Urbanized Area Program - Percentage of Passenger Boardings by Service , FY 2016.....31
Table 13: MTAs & Urbanized Area Program - Revenue Sources FY 2015 and 2016 ...... 32
Table 14: MTAs & Urbanized Area Program - Farebox Revenue and Farebox Recovery Ratio FY 2015 and 2016 ...... 33
Table 15: MTAs & Urbanized Area Program - Revenue Vehicle Fleet FY 2015 and 2016 ...... 34
Table 16: MTAs & Urbanized Area Program - Safety Incidents & Revenue Vehicle System Failures FY 2015 and 2016 ...... 35
Table 17: MTAs & Urbanized Area Program - Safety Incidents FY 2015 and 2016 ...... 36
Table 17a: MTAs & Urbanized Area Program - Safety Incidents continued FY 2015 and 2016 ...... 37
Monthly Statistics for MTAs & Urbanized Transit Agencies ...... 39
MTAs FY 2016 ...... 40
Urbanized Transit Agencies FY 2016 ...... 43
Rural Area Program (Section 5311) ...... 51
Summary: Rural Area Program ...... 52
Figure 9: Rural Area Program - Unlinked Passenger Trips per Vehicle Revenue Mile - FY 2007-2016 ...... 54
Figure 10: Rural Public Transportation Systems (Section 5311) Map ...... 55
Figure 11: Rural Area Program - Efficiency and Effectiveness Measures FY 2007-2016 ...... 56
Table 18: Rural Area Program - Performance at a Glance FY 2015 and 2016 ...... 57
Table 19: Rural Area Program - Service Efficiency and Cost Effectiveness FY 2015 and 2016 ...... 58 Table 20: Rural Area Program - Service Effectiveness FY 2015 and 2016 ...... 59
Table 21: Rural Area Program - Source Data FY 2015 and 2016 ...... 60
Table 21a: Rural Area Program - Source Data continued FY 2015 and 2016 ...... 61
Table 21b: Rural Area Program - Passenger Boardings FY 2015 and 2016 ...... 62
Figure 12: Rural Area Program - Percentage of Passenger Boardings by Service, FY 2016...... 62
Table 22: Rural Area Program - Annual Local Revenue FY 2015 and 2016 ...... 63
Table 23: Rural Area Program - Farebox Revenues and Farebox Recovery Ratio FY 2015 and 2016 ...... 64
Table 24: Rural Area Program - Incidents and Revenue Vehicle System Failures FY 2015 and 2016 ...... 65
Monthly Statistics for Rural Area Program ...... 67
Rural Transit Districts FY 2016...... 68
Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and individuals with Disabilities Program (Section 5310)...... 79
Summary: Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities Program ...... 80
Figure 13: Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities - Unlinked Trips per Vehicle Revenue Mile FY 2007-2016 ...... 82
Figure 14: Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities Efficiency and Effectiveness Measures FY 2007-2016 ...... 83
Table 25: Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities Program - Performance Summary at a Glance FY 2015 and 2016 ...... 84
Table 26: Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities Program FY 2015 ...... 85
Table 27: Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities Program FY 2016………………………………………………………………………………………………………...... 87
Table 28: Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities Program Revenues & Farebox Recovery FY 2015 ...... 89
Table 29: Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities Program Revenues and Farebox Recovery FY 2016 ...... 91
Monthly Statistics for Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and Inividuals with Disabilities Program...... 93
Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities Program FY 2016 ...... 94
Job Access and Reverse Commute Program (Section 5316) ...... 109
Job Access and Reverse Commute Program Summary ...... 110 Table 30: Job Access and Reverse Commute Program Performance Summary at a Glance FY 2015 and 2016 ...... 111
Table 31: Job Access and Reverse Commute Program Service Efficiency, Cost, and Service Effectiveness FY 2015 and 2016 ...... 112
Table 32: Job Access and Reverse Commute Program Operational Data FY 2015 and 2016 ...... 113
Table 33: Job Access and Reverse Commute Program Financial Resources FY 2015 and 2016 ...... 114
New Freedom Program (Section 5317)...... 115
New Freedom Program Summary ...... 160
Table 34: New Freedom Program (Section 5317) Performance Summary at a Glance FY 2015 and 2016 ...... 117
Table 35: New Freedom Program (Section 5317) Service Efficiency, Cost, and Service Effectiveness FY 2015 and 2016 ...... 118
Table 36: New Freedom Program (Section 5317) Operational Data FY 2015 and 2016 ...... 119
Table 37: New Freedom Program (Section 5317) Financial Resources FY 2015 and 2016 ...... 120
Definitions ...... 121
Contact listing...... 129
Contact information for Metropolitan Transportation Authorities (MTAs) ...... 130
Contact information for Urbanized Transit Systems (5307) ...... 132
Contact information for Rural Transit Districts (5311) ...... 138
Contact information for Enhanced Mobility of Seniors & Persons with Disabilities Programs (5310) ...... 145 PREFACE
The information presented in this report is a tabulation of the data provided by transit systems throughout the State of Texas. Information on public transportation grants was provided by the Federal Transit Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT), and the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT). This information has not been audited by the Texas Department of Transportation, Public Transportation Division (PTN).
This 2016 report provides detailed comparisons of annualized fiscal year (FY) 2015 and 2016 data along with the monthly FY 2016 transit statistics.
PTN is engaged in an ongoing process of improving the accuracy and consistency of this report by employing validation tools and conducting training to improve the collection, reporting and analysis of the data. PTN continues to employ the service of the Texas A&M Transportation Institute (TTI) to provide technical assistance and training on performance reporting, along with an annual transit report on the data submittals and performance results for rural and urbanized transit agencies.
FY 2016 is the tenth fiscal year in which the transit agencies used the PTN-128 web-based system to report data to PTN. Having these nine years of web-based data has enabled transit agencies, PTN, and TTI to compare annual differences by data category and analyse annual variances.
This report uses Federal Transit Administration program numbers and reporting terminology as described in the past three (3) federal transportation authorizing bills.
The Texas Transit Statistics report has been required by statute for several years. As follows:
- “Section 456.008. Commission Report On Public Transportation Providers. (a) Not later than January 1 of each year, the commission by rule shall prepare and issue to the legislature a report on public transportation providers in this state that received state or federal funding during the previous 12-month period.”
Consistent with this direction, the report for transit activities in the period September 1, 2015 through August 31, 2016 (state fiscal year 2016) is due to the legislature on January 1, 2017. This report includes preliminary data and program descriptions.
2016 Texas Transit Statistics Report i
This page intentionally left blank. INTRODUCTION
The Texas Transit Statistics Report is published annually by the Public Transportation Division (PTN). Its primary purpose is to provide information to public officials, transit agencies and other interested persons. This 2016 report summarizes the key operating and financial characteristics of Texas’ publicly assisted transit agencies.
Executive Summary
Analysis of data reported for FY 2016, coupled with a review of data collected over the last ten years, highlights four key factors impacting transit operations in Texas: • Population changes, especially when recognized in the U.S. decennial census • Motor fuel prices • Statutory changes in federal transit programs • Local changes in transit district participation and operations
Population Changes Texas’ population continues to grow statewide, as identified in the 2010 U.S. Census. However, the growth is not uniform across all transit agencies’ service areas. Rural areas adjacent to growing urbanized areas saw population and land area reclassified and included in those urbanized areas, and some urbanized areas grew faster than others. One urbanized area (Galveston) lost that status due to population shifts after Hurricane Rita; and one new urbanized area was created (San Marcos). These Census changes led to a redistribution of the state and federal formula transit funds. Rural areas adjacent to growing urbanized areas typically lost funding, compared to other rural transit districts. Urbanized areas served by urban transit districts that grew faster that the state average are receiving a larger share of the state urban transit funds; however areas that grew, but at a lower rate than average, tended to lose funds. Formerly rural areas that became part of large urbanized areas that already included a transit authority have been faced with a choice: either join (by an election) an existing transit authority and adopt its transit sales tax; or if that is not feasible, typically lose transit service (due to the fact that by state statute they are no longer eligible for state funds).
Texas’ population continues to change from year to year, even though not acknowledged in the Census or funding formulas. These on going changes trigger growth in unmet need, because they are not reflected in funding formulas except after the Census.
Nevertheless, although some rural transit districts lost population, others increased, with a net result of more Texas citizens in rural transit districts. This can help explain the overall increase in ridership reported by rural transit districts.
Motor Fuel Prices The price of motor fuel (gasoline) has a strong, positive relationship with transit ridership, especially in areas with a significant number of by-choice riders. In areas where people are more dependent upon transit (instead of using transit by choice), ridership numbers are more independent of fuel price.
During the period 2007-2016, Texas saw wide swings in motor fuel prices. This has been due to events including Hurricanes Rita and Katrina, and increased development of oil shales; plus variations in worldwide demand for fuel. Average prices went from a high of $4.02 in July 2008, to a low of $1.56 in December of that same year, and have continued to vary since. This can help explain the increases and decreases in transit ridership from year-to- year. 2016 Texas Transit Statistics Report 1 Federal Transit Statute During the period 2007-2016, there were three federal transportation authorization bills in effect: the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (known as SAFETEA-LU (effective August 2005-June 2012); MAP-21 (July 2012-November 2015), and FAST Act (effective starting December 2015). The major changes across these three bills impacting Texas transit operations were: revising the FTA 5310 program from a statewide program to separate allocations for large urban, small urban, and rural areas; consolidating the Job Access- Reverse Commute (JARC) and New Freedom programs into other, already-existing FTA programs; and creating a formula program for capital expenses related to buses and bus facilities.
The impact of these changes has been mixed. On one hand, creating a formula capital program has allowed transit to begin to address asset maintenance and replacement needs; however, the fact that the rural program was fixed at $1.25M (later $1.75M) has significantly muted the potential benefits of that program. The change to the Section 5310 program has meant reduced funds for small urban and rural areas, which previously had been prioritized by the states. Other changes have had similarly mixed impacts on transit operations and ridership.
Local Changes Several changes have occurred among rural and urban transit districts since 2007. In South Texas, two rural transit districts (Bee Community Action Agency and Community Action Council of South Texas) ceased operations; however, their constituent counties merged with other existing transit districts. McLennan County dissolved its relationship with a rural transit district and created one on its own. And a large rural transit district in North Texas saw a significant reduction in operations due to multiple factors.
Changes in county participation in rural transit are local decisions. TxDOT works to minimize disruption in service to people who depend upon public transportation, and encourages sharing of resources by neighbouring transit districts to help ensure continuation of that service. However, such changes are usually disruptive in the short run, and the benefits of these changes may take time to be realized.
Background – Data Collection and Use
Every quarter, PTN collects monthly data from individual transit agencies and then compiles it into the annual totals published here. The information contained in this report is based on Federal Transit Administration (FTA) funding categories and the National Transit Database (NTD) reporting system. The operations data for Urbanized (Section 5307), Rural (Section 5311), Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities (Section 5310), Job Access and Reverse Commute (Section 5316), and the New Freedom (Section 5317) programs come from TxDOT’s PTN-128 form, a web-based quarterly operations report.
This report shows performance-based measures of efficiency, effectiveness and safety of the transit agencies that receive financial assistance from TxDOT and/or the FTA per the reporting requirements of Texas Transportation Code §456.008 and the Texas Administrative Code (TAC) rule §31.48.
In June of 2004, the Texas Transportation Commission established formulas to allocate state and federal funds for public transportation. In June of 2006, the Commission amended the formula to better reflect the requirements of Texas Transportation Code, Chapter 461, and other statutes and to mirror the department’s goals. The revised funding formula was developed with the advice and counsel of the Public Transportation Advisory Committee (PTAC) and the technical assistance of the Texas A&M Transportation Institute (TTI).
2 2016 Texas Transit Statistics Report The performance-based funding portion of the Texas Public Transportation Funding Formula is based on data submitted by rural and the urbanized transit agencies. These rural and urbanized transit agencies have performance-based elements in their respective funding formulas that rely on the measures of “needs” and “performance”. These measures were first used to allocate funding in state fiscal year 2007 (September 2006 – August 2007).
TxDOT uses these funding formulas to distribute the federal and state funds to the 37 rural (Section 5311) transit agencies in Texas and to allocate state funds to the 30 eligible urbanized (Section 5307) transit agencies. Chart 1 (below) illustrates the state funding performance-based formula for the rural and the urbanized transit agencies in Texas.
Chart 1. Texas Public Transportation Funding Formula
State Transit Funds State Transit Funds
35% 65% Eligible35% Urban 65% EligibleProviders Urban Rural Providers Rural Providers
50% Needs 50% Performance 65% Needs 35% Performance Needs Performance Needs Performance
30% local $/ 33% local $/ 100% population 30% local $/ 75% population 33% local $/ 100% population expense 75% population expense expense expense
20% passengers / 33% rev. mi./ 20% passengers / 25% land area 33% rev. mi./ capita 25% land area expense capita expense
30% passengers / 33% passengers / 30% passengers / 33% passengers / rev. mi. rev.rev. mi.mi.
20% rev. mi. / 20%expense rev. mi. / expense
The web-based data reporting form (PTN-128) is used by transit agencies to report financial and operating data to the state. This web-based data collection and reporting tool improves data accuracy and reasonableness
This report includes performance data on the following types of transit agencies, based on size or the type of FTA funding received.
• Metropolitan Transportation Authorities (MTAs) provide public transportation in Texas’ seven largest urbanized areas. All MTAs serve urbanized areas with a population greater than 200,000. They are organized under specific state laws and granted authority to levy a dedicated sales tax. MTAs are located in Austin, Corpus Christi, Dallas, El Paso, Fort Worth, Houston, and San Antonio. None are eligible to receive state funding through TxDOT. All receive federal funds directly from FTA’s Section 5307 formula program.
• Denton County Transportation Authority (DCTA) is listed with the MTAs in this report, due to its similarities to the MTAs; however, it is a Coordinated County Transportation Authority in a urbanized area serving the “collar” counties adjacent to counties with populations of 1,000,000 or more, which includes Denton County. DCTA was successful in obtaining a
2016 Texas Transit Statistics Report 3 sales and usage tax in 2004 for the cities of Denton, Highland Village and Lewisville.
• Urban agencies - In this report, the term “Urbanized” refers to transit agencies serving a single political subdivision within an urbanized area (50,000 population and above, established by the US Census Bureau) that do not meet the state definition of an MTA. All the transit agencies in this group receive state funds through TxDOT and federal Section 5307 funds that are confirmed by TxDOT and applied for directly with FTA. With the exception of Laredo, none of these agencies are supported by a dedicated sales tax.
• Rural agencies serve areas which are outside defined urbanized areas above 50,000. Most serve multiple counties. Section 5311 agencies receive state and federal funds through TxDOT.
• Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities (Section 5310) Program recipients operate throughout the state in both urbanized and rural areas. Private nonprofit organizations or associations, public bodies that coordinate services for seniors and/or persons with disabilities, or any public body that certifies that nonprofit organizations in the area are not readily available to carry out the services are eligible to receive grants. Only federal funds are given to recipients of these grants.
• The Job Access and Reverse Commute (JARC) (Section 5316) Program provided federal funding for the provision of transportation services designed to increase access to jobs and employment-related activities. Only federal funds were given to recipients of these grants, although state funds awarded through the urbanized or rural programs could be used for match.
• The New Freedom (NF) (Section 5317) Program provided federal funding for the provision of transportation services designed to increase services to individuals with disabilities. Only federal funds were given to recipients of these grants, although state funds awarded through the urbanized or rural programs could be used for match.
Statistics Report
The introduction to each program section contains a short narrative of significant changes in the program along with detailed statistics. To meet the legislative requirement to provide an annual report showing monthly activities associated with the Section 5307, Section 5311, and Section 5310 programs, reports listing selected monthly statistics are provided at the end of each program section.
For the purpose of this report, JARC (Section 5316) data is presented by the applicable MTA, Urbanized Areas, and Rural Transit Districts as indicated in tables 32 and 33. Due to the inclusion of JARC and New Freedom data into other programs, monthly JARC and New Freedom program statistics have not been captured and are not shown.
Tables 36 and 37 provide the (New Freedom) operational and financial data for these transit agencies. Monthly statistics have not been captured and are not shown at this time.
Since the 2010 report, three new tables and figures were added to show the break-out of ridership by source for the MTA, Section 5307, and Section 5311 programs. These tables document the passenger boarding by source and the figures show the percentage of passenger boardings by service.
4 2016 Texas Transit Statistics Report Figures 3, 4, 9, and 13, representing MTAs, Urbanized Areas, Rural Transit Districts, and Section 5310 transit agencies show the unlinked passenger trips per vehicle revenue mile for FY 2007 through FY 2016.
FISCAL YEAR 2016 – Detailed Findings
This section will review transit systems funded by federal programs in the state, by comparing Fiscal Year 2016 to the previous year, and the current year to ten years earlier.
Changes in Transit Systems (2015 - 2016)
In June 2015, the rural transit district, known as the Community Action Council of South Texas, ceased operations. The Rural Economic Assistance League, Inc. and the Lower Rio Grande Valley Development Council adopted the former agency’s counties into their rural transit districts.
In August 2015, a new rural transit district, McLennan County, became eligible for state and federal formula funds. The McLennan County Transit District was created by local stakeholders, dissolving their relationship with the Heart of Texas Council of Governments.
In Fiscal Year 2016, Collin County and the City of McKinney elected to withdraw from the Texoma Area Paratransit System, thus leaving the county and City with no general public transit service. Subsequently, the City of McKinney created an urban transit district. Their operating data will be reflected in the FY 2017 Report.
Ridership Activity
Ridership activity is a measure of how much transit is used by the public. For Fiscal Year 2016, a total of 291,221,932 passenger trips were taken across all programs, statewide. That total figure is down from 291,676,379 passengers as recorded in the 2015 Edition of the Report, a 0.16% decrease. This can be compared to the 293,799,850 trips recorded in Fiscal Year 2007. Research has established that as motor fuel prices increase, transit ridership generally increases; and as motor fuel prices decrease, so does transit ridership. In FY 2007, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration, the average gasoline price was $2.71 per gallon. In 2016, it was $2.02. This may help explain why transit ridership decreased 0.9% from 2007 to 2016.
Over the past decade, passenger ridership in the Metropolitan Transit Authority services areas follows that pattern; and tended to vary with motor fuel prices, with 270 million passengers recorded in FY 2007, and 258 million passengers recorded in FY 2016. During that period, ridership went from 270 million in 2007, to 278 million in 2008, to a low of 243 million in 2010. Ridership then increased steadily to 265 million in 2014, before declining to 258 million in 2016. However, passenger ridership has steadily increased among the urbanized agencies, from 17.1 million in FY 2007, to 24.7 million in FY 2016, an increase of 44 percent. Passenger ridership has also increased among the rural transit districts, from 4.8 million in FY 2007 to an annual high of 7.3 million in 2013, but then decreasing to 5.4 million in FY 2016, which was still 11% higher than in 2007. These changes in transit ridership, involve the major trends affecting public transportation throughout the state of Texas.
Vehicle Revenue Miles Travelled
Vehicle Revenue Miles (VRM) is a measure of service supplied by transit agencies. A total of 258,820,191 vehicle revenue miles were provided by public transportation throughout the state. That total figure is up from 255,859,052 miles as recorded in the 2015 Edition of the Report, a 1.16% increase. Overall, the Fiscal Year 2016 figure is up 17 percent from 220,407,445, recorded in Fiscal Year 2007, an annual rate of increase of 1.7%.
2016 Texas Transit Statistics Report 5 Over the past decade, vehicle revenue miles traveled has increased steadily in the Metropolitan Transit Authority services areas, with over 168 million miles travelled in FY 2007, to over 196 million miles recorded in FY 2016, an increase of 16 percent. Vehicle revenue miles traveled has increased among the urbanized agencies, from 18.9 million in FY 2007, to 26 million in FY 2016, an increase of 37 percent. Vehicle revenue miles travelled has also increased among the rural transit districts, from 25.3 million in FY 2007 to 28.4 million in FY 2016, an increase of 11 percent.
Transit Ridership, VRM, and Population Connection
Demographic changes, as captured in the 2010 Census, have impacted transit operations, including ridership and VRM. Growth in most urbanized areas is largely represented by traditional single-family residences; along with similar lower density development. The observed growth in lower density areas means transit agencies must provide more and more vehicle revenue miles to cover the growth in populated land area in the cities, even though ridership is flat. These trends are especially evident in the large urbanized areas, served by metropolitan transit authorities.
Changes from rural to urban status from the 2010 US Census were reported by the US Census Bureau in March 2012 and implemented in federal fiscal year 2013. These changes reflected the fact that rural population growth largely occurred in areas near existing urban areas. When the Census Bureau reclassified areas from rural to urban, that tended to decrease population and land area in existing rural transit districts, and increased the population and land area in the urban areas. Those changes have had two main impacts: first, areas reclassified as urban tended to have higher population densities, and also were closer to economic generators (employment, education, shopping, etc.). Both of these factors would indicate a higher level of transit usage for the people in areas reclassified from rural to urban. Secondly, these changes reduced the formula funds allocated to impacted rural transit agencies. Although the Transportation Commission has awarded additional funding for a limited time to those impacted rural agencies, the Census reclassification has still been disruptive to rural transit operations.
For the urbanized areas not served by transit authorities, but instead by urban transit districts, we report growth in population, ridership, and VRM. The population in these urbanized areas went from 3.4 million in 2000 to 4.3 million in 2010. For rural areas, the population increased slightly from 5.5 million in 2000 to 6.0 million in 2010. Rural transit ridership increased from 4.8 million in 2007, to 7.3 million in 2013, but then decreased to 5.4 million in 2016. This may also be a result of the change in classification from rural to urban.
Other Impacts:
As overall ridership remained steady statewide and vehicle revenue miles have increased over the past decade, passenger trips per vehicle revenue mile has decreased from 1.33 in FY 2007 to 1.13 in FY 2016.
Passengers per capita in the 5307 urban service areas, was 15.1 for FY 2016, in contrast to 20.2 for FY 2007. Passengers per capita in the 5311 rural service areas, was 0.91 for FY 2016, in contrast to 0.84 for FY 2007. Decreasing passengers per capita (in urban areas) is an indication that transit is losing ground to population growth and congestion.
Operating Costs
As ridership remained steady through the past decade, the cost to operate transit has increased in order to serve the population growth. Operating expenses totalled $2,380,047,655 in FY 2016, up from $1,455,307,130 in FY 2007. Transit operating expenses continue to increase at an average of 6.35 percent annually. As in many other industries, salaries, wages and benefit costs contribute to
6 2016 Texas Transit Statistics Report the increase.
Safety
Safety is a vital goal of TxDOT. Furthermore, transit safety is important in maintaining confidence in public transportation service in the state. In FY 2016, there were a total of 773 safety incidents reported across the state. Although an increase from FY 2015, the change was from 0.26 incidents per 100,000 vehicles revenue miles to 0.30 incidents per 100,000 vehicles revenue miles. During the same period, the reported fatalities decreased by 14%. “Safety incidents” are events involving a transit vehicle or occurring on transit-related property, involving one or more fatalities, injuries, property damages, or certain crimes.
Revenue vehicle system failures are a primary key safety issue that has measured the level of transit activity in all agencies served. In FY 2016, there were approximately 32,849 mechanical system failures recorded. That figure is down 33 percent from the 48,746 failures recorded in 2007, with an annual rate of 3.26 percent decrease over the past decade.
2016 Texas Transit Statistics Report 7 FIGURE 1 Cities and Counties Served by Public Transportation Systems
Dallam Sherman Hansford Ochiltree Lipscomb
Hartley Moore Roberts Hemphill Hutchinson
Oldham Potter Carson Gray Wheeler
AMARILLO Collings- Donley Deaf Smith Randall Armstrong worth
Parmer Castro Swisher Briscoe Hall Childress Hardeman
Bailey Lamb Hale Wilbarger Floyd Motley Cottle Wichita Foard LUBBOCK Clay Red Grayson Lamar TEXARKANA WICHITA FALLS River Hockley Crosby Dickens King Knox Baylor Cooke SHERMAN-DENISON Lubbock Montague Fannin Bowie Cochran Archer DENTON Delta Collin Titus Jack Wise McKINNEY Yoakum Terry Lynn Garza Kent Stonewall Haskell Throck- Denton Hunt Hopkins Cass Young Morris
morton Franklin NETS GRAND PRAIRIE Camp Rock- Rains Marion Palo Parker wall Wood Upshur Gaines Dawson Pinto Tarrant Borden Scurry Fisher Jones FORT Dallas MESQUITE Harrison Stephens Kaufman Van Shackelford Gregg LONGVIEW WORTH DALLAS Zandt Smith Taylor Hood ARLINGTON Andrews Martin Howard Eastland Ellis Mitchell Callahan Johnson Henderson ODESSA MIDLAND Nolan Erath TYLER Rusk Panola ABILENE Somervell Navarro EL PASO Hill El Cherokee Loving Winkler Ector Anderson Shelby Paso Midland Glasscock Coke Runnels Brown Comanche Bosque Nacogdoches Hudspeth Sterling Coleman Mc Limestone Freestone Tom Hamilton Lennan Ward Culberson Crane Green Mills WACO Houston San Sabine Reeves Upton Reagan Coryell Irion Concho Leon Angelina Augustine SAN ANGELO Mc Falls Culloch San Saba Lampasas TEMPLE Trinity Bell Polk Robertson Madison Tyler Pecos Schleicher Menard COLLEGE STATION-BRYAN Newton Burnet Milam Jasper Jeff Davis KILLEEN Walker Crockett Mason Llano semirG Williamson Brazos San Jacinto Hardin Sutton Kimble Burleson CONROE- Blanco Travis Lee THE WOODLANDS Gillespie Montgomery Liberty Terrell AUSTIN Washington Waller Orange SAN MARCOS BEAUMONT Presidio Kerr Bastrop Harris Jefferson Edwards Hays Austin Brewster Val Verde Kendall HOUSTON PORT ARTHUR Caldwell Fayette Chambers Real Comal Bandera Colorado Fort Guadalupe Bend Bexar Galveston Gonzales Kinney Lavaca TEXAS CITY Uvalde Medina SAN ANTONIO Wharton Brazoria Wilson Dewitt LAKE JACKSON-ANGLETON Maverick Jackson Zavala Frio Atascosa Karnes Matagorda Victoria Goliad Calhoun VICTORIA Mc Bee Refugio Dimmit La Salle Mullen Live Oak San ansas Patricio Ar Webb Jim Wells Nueces LAREDO Duval CORPUS CHRISTI
Kleberg
Jim Texas Department of Transportation Zapata Brooks Hogg Kenedy March 2016
Starr Hidalgo Willacy
Cameron McALLEN HARLINGEN BROWNSVILLE
Cities served by metropolitan transit authorities Cities/Counties served by coordinated county transportation authority Cities served by urban transit systems Counties served by rural transit systems
8 2016 Texas Transit Statistics Report FIGURE 2: STATEWIDE RIDERSHIP FISCAL YEARS 2015 AND 2016
Unlinked Passenger Trip Data
300
250
200
150
100
50 No.UnlinkedofPassengerTrips millions)(in 06TxsTastSaitc eot9 Texas Transit Statistics Report 2016 MTA Urbanized Rural Seniors & IWD JARC NF
MTA Urbanized Rural Seniors & IWD JARC NF 2015 258,893,848 24,375,089 6,057,232 434,178 1,853,236 62,796 2016 259,166,800 24,670,220 5,360,416 466,909 1,511,951 45,636
Note: Figure 2: represents Unlinked Passenger Trip data - JARC's unlinked passenger trip data shown for informational purpose only; actual data is included in the MTA, 5307, 5311 & 5310 Programs. This page intentionally left blank.
10 2016 Texas Transit Statistics Report STATEWIDE STATISTICS: The following represents Fiscal Year 2016: TABLE 1 - FY 2016 SUMMARY OF PROGRAMS Total Unlinked Vehicle Agencies Revenue Passenger Operating Expense Revenue Miles Vehicles Trips Program MTA* 8 4,950 259,166,800 195,662,426 $2,161,049,289 Urbanized (5307) 30 931 24,670,220 25,953,570 $117,896,524 Rural (5311) 37 1,699 5,360,416 28,424,057 $90,545,090 Enhanced Mobility of Seniors & Individuals with 61 201 466,909 4,557,627 $4,955,237 Disabilities Program (5310) Total (MTA, 5307, 5311 and 5310 programs) 136 7,781 289,664,345 254,597,680 $2,374,446,140 JARC (5316) 19 53 1,511,951 3,711,101 $3,350,000 New Freedom (5317) 13 20 45,636 511,410 $2,251,515 Grand Total 168 7,854 291,221,932 258,820,191 $2,380,047,655
The following tables provide an overview of service efficiency, cost effectiveness and service effectiveness by funding categories. TABLE 2 - OPERATING EXPENSES PER VEHICLE REVENUE MILE Annualized % Change 2015 to Service Efficency: 2007 2015 2016 Change 2007- 2016 2016 Program MTA $6.57 $9.00 $8.51 2.95% -5.44% Urbanized (5307) $3.88 $4.52 $4.73 2.19% 4.65% Rural (5311) $2.52 $3.13 $3.40 3.49% 8.63% Enhanced Mobility of Seniors & Individuals with $2.55 $2.64 $3.16 2.39% 19.70% Disabilities Program (5310) JARC (5316)** NA $4.44 $2.84 NA -36.04% New Freedom (5317)** NA $2.23 $4.47 NA 100.45%
TABLE 3 - OPERATING EXPENSES PER UNLINKED PASSENGER TRIP Annualized % Change 2015 to Cost Effectiveness: 2007 2015 2016 Change 2007- 2016 2016 Program MTA $4.51 $6.46 $6.67 4.79% 3.25% Urbanized (5307) $11.15 $10.70 $15.14 3.58% 41.50% Rural (5311) $16.19 $23.17 $27.56 7.02% 18.95% Enhanced Mobility of Seniors & Individuals with $16.24 $30.12 $27.39 NA -9.06% Disabilities Program (5310) JARC (5316)** NA $19.50 $19.28 NA -1.13% New Freedom (5317)** NA $31.83 $27.16 NA -14.67%
TABLE 4 - UNLINKED PASSENGERS PER VEHICLE REVENUE MILE Annualized % Change 2015 to Service Effectiveness: 2007 2015 2016 Change 2007- 2016 2016 Program MTA 1.50 1.37 1.24 -1.73% -9.49% Urbanized (5307) 0.65 0.60 0.59 -0.92% -1.67% Rural (5311) 0.21 0.24 0.21 0.00% -12.50% Enhanced Mobility of Seniors & Individuals with 0.35 0.22 0.22 -3.71% 0.00% Disabilities Program (5310) JARC (5316)** NA 0.32 0.32 NA 0.00% New Freedom (5317)** NA 0.09 0.15 NA 66.67%
Note: Figures shown in Tables 2, 3 and 4 are averages of all transit systems by category. *Includes count for one Coordinated County Transportation Authority
2016 Texas Transit Statistics Report 11 TABLE 5: VEHICLES, TRIPS AND MILEAGE BY PROGRAM - FISCAL YEARS 2007-2016
Section 5307 Metropolitan Transit REVENUE VEHICLES IN UNLINKED VEHICLE REVENUE PASSENGER TRIPS PER Authorities - (MTA) FISCAL YEAR REPORTING AGENCIES FLEET PASSENGER TRIPS MILES VEHICLE REVENUE MILE 2007 8 4,459 270,002,029 168,545,419 1.60 2008 8 4,621 278,397,166 176,658,901 1.58 2009 8 4,773 261,566,425 180,221,900 1.45 2010 8 5,125 243,799,069 179,297,315 1.36 2011 8 4,965 252,717,548 182,114,343 1.39 2012 8 5,012 266,433,903 183,818,668 1.45 2013 8 5,060 267,641,927 185,169,025 1.45 2014 8 5,184 265,193,052 186,606,187 1.42 2015 8 4,698 258,893,848 188,757,788 1.37 2016 8 4,950 258,385,578 195,662,426 1.32
Section 5307 REVENUE VEHICLES IN UNLINKED VEHICLE REVENUE PASSENGER TRIPS PER Urbanized Area Program FISCAL YEAR REPORTING AGENCIES FLEET PASSENGER TRIPS MILES VEHICLE REVENUE MILE 2007 30 690 17,142,361 18,949,631 0.90 2008 30 746 17,783,925 19,940,814 0.89 2009 30 780 18,754,210 20,860,217 0.90 2010 30 846 21,292,163 22,993,459 0.93 2011 30 852 22,291,873 23,226,901 0.96 2012 30 830 23,617,231 24,610,937 0.96 2013 30 874 23,721,626 25,414,450 0.93 2014 30 925 24,624,416 27,163,117 0.91 2015 30 846 24,375,089 27,608,096 0.88 2016 30 931 24,670,220 25,953,570 0.95
Section 5311 REVENUE VEHICLES IN UNLINKED VEHICLE REVENUE PASSENGER TRIPS PER Rural Area Program FISCAL YEAR REPORTING AGENCIES FLEET PASSENGER TRIPS MILES VEHICLE REVENUE MILE 2007 39 1,258 4,836,320 25,284,561 0.19 2008 39 1,315 4,947,317 25,712,995 0.19 2009 39 1,476 4,906,223 26,615,625 0.19 2010 38 1,684 5,072,004 28,770,279 0.18 2011 38 1,623 5,825,030 32,321,991 0.18 2012 38 1,640 6,033,721 32,724,554 0.18 2013 39 1,786 7,297,163 33,354,326 0.22 2014 38 1,853 6,512,765 33,061,924 0.20 2015 38 1,710 6,057,232 30,922,835 0.20 2016 37 1,699 5,360,416 28,424,057 0.19
Section 5310 - Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and Individuals With Disabilities REVENUE VEHICLES IN UNLINKED VEHICLE REVENUE PASSENGER TRIPS PER Program FISCAL YEAR REPORTING AGENCIES FLEET PASSENGER TRIPS MILES VEHICLE REVENUE MILE 2007 140 556 1,255,028 6,713,365 0.19 2008 135 515 1,239,574 6,470,051 0.19 2009 123 610 1,387,753 6,474,119 0.21 2010 115 592 1,221,697 6,562,641 0.19 2011 88 270 1,037,421 5,705,267 0.18 2012 77 317 914,020 6,092,655 0.15 2013 73 180 614,462 4,054,411 0.15 2014 69 224 611,197 3,439,563 0.18 2015 61 141 434,178 2,894,051 0.15 2016 61 201 466,909 4,557,627 0.10
Section 5316 - Job Access and Reverse Commute REVENUE VEHICLES IN UNLINKED VEHICLE REVENUE PASSENGER TRIPS PER (JARC) FISCAL YEAR REPORTING AGENCIES FLEET PASSENGER TRIPS MILES VEHICLE REVENUE MILE 2007 11 NA 545,070 844,242 0.65 2008 20 NA 1,061,076 1,840,352 0.58 2009 18 NA 1,120,885 2,210,385 0.51 2010 27 NA 1,329,006 2,269,945 0.59 2011 33 90 1,697,260 3,364,822 0.50 2012 34 90 1,858,853 3,071,703 0.61 2013 34 90 2,290,225 4,075,602 0.56 2014 41 90 2,221,040 4,216,417 0.53 2015 28 27 1,853,236 3,302,917 0.56 2016 19 53 1,511,951 3,711,101 0.41
Section 5317- New REVENUE VEHICLES IN UNLINKED VEHICLE REVENUE PASSENGER TRIPS PER Freedom (NF) FISCAL YEAR REPORTING AGENCIES FLEET PASSENGER TRIPS MILES VEHICLE REVENUE MILE 2009 2 NA 19,042 70,227 0.27 2010 9 NA 64,669 473,646 0.14 2011 20 67 97,507 619,221 0.16 2012 13 57 75,794 541,813 0.14 2013 16 32 89,177 986,387 0.09 2014 22 32 95,666 1,371,844 0.07 2015 10 18 62,796 700,486 0.09 2016 13 20 45,636 511,485 0.09
MTA count of eight (8) includes one Coordinated County Transportation Authority. JARC & NF data shown for informational purpose only. Operational data are included in the MTA, 5307, 5311 & 5310 Programs. NA=Not Applicable
12 2016 Texas Transit Statistics Report TABLE 6: FEDERAL FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE TO TEXAS TRANSIT TRANSIT APPORTIONMENTS AND ALLOCATIONS FOR FISCAL YEARS 2015 and 2016 2015 2016 Section 5307 Urbanized Area Formula Apportionments MTA* $228,932,632 $236,920,480 Urbanized $56,094,282 $42,416,242 Total Urbanized Area Received $285,026,914 $279,336,722 Section 5303 Metropolitan Planning Program (MPO) and Section 5304 Statewide Transportation Planning Program Apportionments Section 5303 MPO** $8,973,408 $9,101,139 Section 5304 Statewide Transportation Planning $1,797,923 $1,823,078 Total Section 5303/5304 Received $10,771,331 $10,924,217 Section 5309, 5320, 5329, 5337 and Section 5339 Apportionments and Allocations 5309 Fixed Guideway Capital Investment Grants MTAs $50,000,000 No additional funds 5337 State of Good Repair MTAs $29,374,584 $28,872,411 5329 State Safety Oversight Program Apportionments $1,029,873 $1,075,810 5339 Bus and Bus Facilities Allocations MTAs $22,069,272 $22,222,382 Urbanized $5,819,522 $3,431,927 Rural $1,250,000 $1,750,000 Total Apportionment and Allocations Received $109,543,251 $57,352,530 Section 5310 Seniors and Persons with Disabilities Apportionments Section 5310 - Grants $18,040,080 $17,735,823 Section 5310 - State Administration $715,053 $716,837 Total Federal Apportionment $18,755,133 $18,452,660 Section 5311 Rural Area Formula Apportionments, Rural Transit Assistance Program (RTAP), and Section 5311 - Intercity Bus Allocations Section 5311 - State Administration $1,130,000 $1,130,000 Section 5311 - Intercity Bus (15%) $6,138,807 $6,266,531 Total Available to Section 5311 Rural Recipients $33,656,576 $35,123,902 Section 5311 Federal Apportionments $40,925,383 $42,520,433 RTAP Apportionments $549,206 $564,699 Section 5316 Job Access and Reverse Commute Program (JARC)
Program eliminated for FY 2013 and subsequent years from MAP-21; funding apportioned in 5307 and 5311 programs.
Section 5317 New Freedom Program (NF)
Program eliminated for FY 2013 and subsequent years from MAP-21; funding apportioned in 5310 program.
Small Transit Intensive Cities Performance Data and Apportionments Urbanized (Funds allocated in 5307 program, above) $566,363 $378,864 Grand Total Total Federal Apportionments by Formula $415,571,218 $409,151,261
Notes: *MTA includes (7) plus (1) DCTA. **Note: Section 5303/MPO Planning funds are now awarded through FHWA Source: Federal Register for FTA Apportionments & Allocations Fiscal Years 2015 and 2016.
2016 Texas Transit Statistics Report 13 This page intentionally left blank.
14 2016 Texas Transit Statistics Report METROPOLITAN TRANSIT AUTHORITIES (MTAs) & URBANIZED AREA PROGRAM
(SECTION 5307)
2016 Texas Transit Statistics Report 15 SUMMARY MTAs and URBANIZED AREA TRANSIT PROGRAMS (Section 5307)
Metropolitan Transit Authorities (MTAs):
The Section 5307 Grant Program (49 USC, Section 5307) provides capital and operating grants for public transportation projects in urbanized areas. The department continues to report data for metropolitan transit authorities (MTAs) and the urbanized transit agencies separately. The difference in the scale of operations between the two groups is such that it is inappropriate to consider them as a single, combined reporting group. TxDOT-PTN does not provide state funding to the transit authorities; however, the Texas Transportation Commission has requested reports on all transit activities, and this is done in voluntary cooperation with the MTAs. To obtain more extensive information regarding MTA services, their websites are included with contact information at the end of this report.
This report lists the Denton County Transportation Authority (DCTA) along with the seven MTAs due to its similarity in size and taxing abilities. Founded in 2002, The DCTA is a Coordinated Transportation Authority that operates in suburban Denton County, north of Dallas and Fort Worth. It operates bus service in three cities: Denton, Highland Village and Lewisville within Denton County, as well as the A-train, a regional commuter rail line to Carrollton. Data collection from the Coordinated Transportation Authority was implemented in FY 2006.
Performance Review – Metropolitan Transit Authorities (MTAs):
In FY 2016, the combined ridership number for the MTAs and the DCTA is 259.2 million riders, which remains steady, but slightly higher than the FY 2015 ridership total of 258.9 million passenger trips. Overall, ridership has declined by four (4) percent from FY 2007- 2016. The ridership of public transportation in the state is primarily used in the urbanized areas. The indicated trend of service usage is affected by local and national economic conditions (i.e. gas prices and labor fluctuations).
From FY 2015 to 2016, ridership increased by 0.11 percent, and miles traveled increased by nearly four percent, during the same period. Overall, vehicle revenue miles travelled has increased by nearly 23 percent from FY 2007-2016. This trend signifies that mass transit usage has decreased over time, with an increase of vehicle miles traveled within the metropolitan transit authorities.
Over the past fiscal year, the Houston Metro has demonstrated the greatest ridership gain among the MTAs, a ten (10) percent increase in transit users. In contrast, El Paso (at 7 percent), Fort Worth and San Antonio (both at 6 percent) has shown the greatest significant decrease in ridership. The DCTA in Denton County has demonstrated the heaviest trend regarding the increase in vehicle miles travelled in contrast to their ridership activity, with ridership up four (4) percent, and vehicle miles travelled up 47 percent, from FY 2015 to FY 2016.
16 2016 Texas Transit Statistics Report Figure 3 below displays the MTAs annualized rate of “unlinked passenger trips per vehicle revenue mile” for FY 2007-2016. The graph shows a trend factoring an overall decrease of 18 percent, over a ten-year period.
FIGURE 3: METROPOLITAN TRANSIT AUTHORITIES (MTAs) Unlinked Passenger Trips per Vehicle Revenue Mile - FY 2007-2016 2.00 1.60 1.58 1.45 1.45 1.45 1.42 1.50 1.36 1.39 1.37 1.32
1.00
0.50
0.00 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Urbanized Area Transit Programs
Also noted in the introduction of this report, the funding formula is used to allocate state funds to 30 eligible urbanized transit agencies. The state allocates money from the total legislatively appropriated funding for urbanized transit agencies to four providers in a large urbanized area with transit authorities (Arlington, NETS, Grand Prairie, and Mesquite). Population and performance statistics are compared only among these four agencies when allocating funds in this category.
The state funding formula distributes urban performance funds based on a weighted average of four indicators. The funds are then allocated based on the relative performance of the urban service providers. These four performance-based indicators are:
• Local investment per operational expense • Unlinked passenger trips per vehicle revenue mile • Vehicle revenue mile per operational expense • Unlinked passenger trip per capita (Urban only)
The indicators listed above are consistent with the performance measurement goals recommended by the Public Transportation Advisory Committee (PTAC). “Local investment per operational expense” encourages cooperation and coordination. “Unlinked passenger
2016 Texas Transit Statistics Report 17 trips per vehicle revenue mile” is a measure of service effectiveness. “Vehicle revenue mile per operational expense” reflects the efficiency of the operation. These three indicators address the goal of fiscal responsibility as well. The “unlinked passenger trips per capita” indicator acknowledges the requirement for funding assistance in cities where transit demand is generated by other than residential population, such as border, tourist, and university cities.
Local investments may fluctuate from year to year and agency to agency as a result of large capital expenditures, change in local funding, and receipt of grants or contracts (i.e. medical transportation, Job Access Reverse Commute, Section 5310, and New Freedom programs). The “unlinked passenger trips per capita“ indicator is based on the 2000 census population which does not change from year to year; therefore, only a change in the number of passengers impacts this indicator.
Besides the performance-based funding elements noted above, the urbanized transit agencies are also responsible for reporting four additional performance-based indicators that measure cost efficiency, service effectiveness, cost effectiveness and safety per the Texas Transportation Code §456.008 and §31.48 of the Texas Administrative Code (TAC).
The indicators listed below are required of recipients that receive financial assistance from TxDOT and/or FTA:
(i) Service efficiency--Operating expense per vehicle revenue hour and operating expense per vehicle revenue mile.
(ii) Cost effectiveness--Operating expense per unlinked passenger trip.
(iii) Service effectiveness--Unlinked passenger trips per vehicle revenue mile and unlinked passenger trips per vehicle revenue hour.
(iv) Safety--Total incidents per 100,000 miles of service and average number of miles between revenue vehicle mechanical system failures that prevent the vehicle from completing a scheduled revenue trip.
Performance Review – Urbanized Area Transit Programs:
In FY 2016, the ridership number for the urbanized transit agencies is 24.6 million riders, which stands slightly higher than the FY 2015 ridership total of 24.4 million passenger trips. While ridership increased from FY 2015 to FY 2016, miles travelled increased slightly during the same time period.
Overall, ridership increased an annual average of over four (4) percent, from FY 2007 through FY 2016. The number of “vehicle revenue miles” increased an annual average of four (4) percent, during the same period. This trend signifies that mass transit usage has increased over time, within the urbanized transit agencies.
18 2016 Texas Transit Statistics Report Over the past fiscal year, the transit agencies serving McAllen (at 28 percent) and North Richland Hills (at 16 percent) and Grand Prairie (at 15 percent) has demonstrated the greatest ridership gains among the urbanized areas.
In contrast, San Marcos (at 28 percent), Harlingen (at 15 percent) and Beaumont (at 12 percent), has shown the greatest double-digit decrease in ridership. Due to financial issues, the McKinney and Sherman urbanized areas has had interference in public transit ridership in FY 2016.
From FY 2015 to FY 2016, the McAllen Express transit agency has demonstrated the heaviest trend regarding an increase in vehicle miles travelled. McAllen’s vehicle miles traveled rose 26 percent during the past fiscal year. Other agencies following McAllen with this significant trend are North Richland Hills (at 21 percent) and Conroe-The Woodlands (at 20 percent).
This is the tenth year the web-based PTN-128 reporting system has been used, allowing all involved parties to review and resolve any variances in the data by data category. This on- line reporting process also allows reasonableness and data quality checks that may be performed anytime throughout the year.
Figure 4 below depicts the Urbanized Area Programs annualized rate of “unlinked passenger trips per vehicle revenue mile” for FY 2007-2016. The graph shows a trend factoring an overall increase of 6 percent, over a ten-year period.
Notes: The monthly statistics are located at the end of this section. “Local and Total Revenue” is also identified as “Local and Total Investments.” The monthly statistics for “Total Revenue”
2016 Texas Transit Statistics Report 19 and “Annual Total Revenue” differ slightly from one another in this report. Monthly statistics include federal, state, and local funding in the “Total Revenue,” whereas the “Annual Total Revenue” statistics include only the local funding. Table 13 gives a brief description of the types of local contribution included in “Annual Total Revenue.”
20 2016 Texas Transit Statistics Report TABLE 7: METROPOLITAN TRANSIT AUTHORITIES (MTAs) - PERFORMANCE SUMMARY AT A GLANCE Fiscal Years 2015 and 2016
SERVICE SUPPLIED % Change FINANCIAL SOURCE % Change 2015 2016 (15-16) 2015 2016 (15-16) Vehicle Revenue Miles 188,757,788 195,662,426 3.66 Total Operating Vehicle Revenue Hours 12,842,402 13,425,377 4.54 Expenses $1,990,879,906 $2,161,049,289 8.55 Total Revenue Vehicles 4,698 4,950 5.36 Total Revenue $2,131,389,223 $2,118,535,300 -0.60
SERVICE CONSUMED % Change *SAFETY DATA % Change 2015 2016 (15-16) 2015 2016 (15-16) Unlinked Passenger Annual Safety Trips 258,893,848 259,166,800 0.11 Incidents 594 734 23.57 Actual Vehicle Miles 218,748,852 223,692,421 2.26 Total Revenue Actual Vehicle Hours 13,933,353 14,429,351 3.56 Failures 19,869 23,801 19.79
AVERAGE PERFORMANCE MEASURES: SERVICE EFFICIENCY COST EFFECTIVENESS 2015 2016 2015 2016 Operating Expense Per Operating Expense Per Vehicle Unlinked Passenger Revenue Mile $11.09 $11.04 $7.69 $8.34 Trip Operating Expense Per Vehicle Farebox Recovery $165.44 $160.97 9% 9% Revenue Hour Ratio**
SERVICE EFFECTIVENESS *SAFETY INDICATOR 2015 2016 2015 2016 Unlinked Passenger Trips Vehicle Incidents/Per 1.37 1.32 0.315 0.375 Per Vehicle Revenue Mile 100,000 Miles Avg. Miles Between Unlinked Passenger Trips Revenue Vehicle Per Vehicle Revenue Hour 20.16 19.30 10.526 12.164 System Failures
AVERAGE DEAD HEAD RATIOS: 2015 2016 Dead Head Hours 7.8% 7.0% Dead Head Miles 13.7% 12.5%
Notes: Performance measures are requirements of the Transportation Code §456.008. "Average Performance Measure" is the average of all service provided. Total Revenue Vehicle System Failures shows combined major & other mechanical system failures. For detailed breakout see Table 16. *Safety data shows safety incidents for fatalities, injuries, major and non-major in Table 17 and non-arson fires and property damages, major and non-major in Table 17a. **See Table 14 for details. NR - Not Reported
2016 Texas Transit Statistics Report 21 TABLE 7a: URBANIZED AREA PROGRAM (5307) - PERFORMANCE SUMMARY AT A GLANCE Fiscal Years 2015 and 2016
SERVICE SUPPLIED % Change FINANCIAL SOURCE % Change 2015 2016 (15-16) 2015 2016 (15-16) Vehicle Revenue Miles 27,608,096 25,953,570 -5.99 Total Operating Vehicle Revenue Hours 1,784,879 1,693,385 -5.13 Expenses $113,340,954 $117,896,524 4.02 Total Revenue Vehicles 846 931 10.05 Total Revenue $69,071,763 $70,240,418 1.69
SERVICE CONSUMED % Change *SAFETY DATA % Change 2015 2016 (15-16) 2015 2016 (15-16) Unlinked Passenger Annual Safety Trips 24,375,089 24,670,220 1.21 Incidents 50 19 -62.00 Actual Vehicle Miles 30,029,646 28,433,167 -5.32 Total Revenue Actual Vehicle Hours 1,926,897 1,822,483 -5.42 Failures 5,055 3,981 -21.25
AVERAGE PERFORMANCE MEASURES: SERVICE EFFICIENCY (i) COST EFFECTIVENESS (ii) 2015 2016 2015 2016 Operating Expense Per Operating Expense Per Vehicle Unlinked Passenger Revenue Mile $4.11 $4.54 $4.65 $4.78 Trip Operating Expense Per Vehicle Farebox Recovery $63.50 $69.62 13% 12% Revenue Hour Ratio #
SERVICE EFFECTIVENESS (iii) *SAFETY INDICATOR (iv) 2015 2016 2015 2016 Unlinked Passenger Trips Vehicle Incidents/Per 0.88 0.95 0.181 0.073 Per Vehicle Revenue Mile 100,000 Miles Avg. Miles Between Unlinked Passenger Trips Revenue Vehicle Per Vehicle Revenue Hour 13.66 14.57 18.31 15.34 System Failures
AVERAGE DEAD HEAD RATIOS: 2015 2016 Dead Head Hours 7.4% 7.1% Dead Head Miles 8.1% 8.7%
Notes: (i), (ii), (iii) and (iv) are performance measures requirements of the Transportation Code §456.008. "Average Performance Measure" is the average of all service provided. # Farebox Recovery Ratio (see Table 14 for details). Not a performance-based requirement for Transportation Code §456.008. Total Mechanical Failures shows combined major & other mechanical system failures. For detailed breakout see Table 16. *Safety data shows safety incidents for fatalities, injuries, major and non-major in Table 17 and non-arson fires and property damages, major and non-major in Table 17a. NR - Not Reported
22 2016 Texas Transit Statistics Report FIGURE 5: METROPOLITAN TRANSIT AUTHORITIES (MTAs) EFFICIENCY AND EFFECTIVENESS MEASURES FISCAL YEARS 2007-2016
Metropolitan Transit Authorites (MTA's) Service Efficiency $10.00 $9.07 $9.00 $8.51 $9.00 $7.93 $8.13 $8.00 $7.37 $6.57 $6.70 $6.66 $6.93 $7.00 $6.00 $5.00 $4.00 $3.00 $2.00 $1.00 $0.00 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Operating Expense per Vehicle Revenue Mile
Metropolitan Transit Authorites (MTA's) Cost Effectiveness $7.00 $6.51 $6.46 $6.67 $5.64 $6.00 $5.35 $5.50 $5.53 $4.73 $4.99 $5.00 $4.51 $4.00 $3.00 $2.00 $1.00 $0.00 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Operating Expense per Unlinked Passenger Trip
Metropolitan Transit Authorites (MTA's) Service Effectiveness 2.0 1.8 1.6 1.50 1.44 1.47 1.46 1.34 1.33 1.39 1.41 1.37 1.4 1.24 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Unlinked Passenger Trips per Vehicle Revenue Mile
Note: Figure 5 bar charts are averages of all transit agencies recorded during fiscal years.
2016 Texas Transit Statistics Report 23 FIGURE 6: URBANIZED AREA PROGRAM EFFICIENCY AND EFFECTIVENESS MEASURES FISCAL YEARS 2007-2016
Section 5307 Urbanized Agencies Service Efficiency $4.73 $5.00 $4.56 $4.52 $4.17 $4.22 $4.31 $4.50 $3.88 $3.98 $4.02 $3.90 $4.00 $3.50 $3.00 $2.50 $2.00 $1.50 $1.00 $0.50 $0.00 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Operating Expense per Vehicle Revenue Mile
Section 5307 Urbanized Agencies Cost Effectiveness $16.00 $15.14 $14.00 $12.34 $11.65 $11.51 $11.52 $11.15 $10.70 $12.00 $10.45$10.02$10.46 $10.00 $8.00 $6.00 $4.00 $2.00 $0.00 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Operating Expense per Unlinked Passenger Trip
Section 5307 Urbanized Agencies Service Effectiveness 0.8 0.68 0.70 0.67 0.7 0.65 0.66 0.63 0.63 0.64 0.60 0.59 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Unlinked Passenger Trips per Vehicle Revenue Mile
Note: Figure 6 bar charts are averages of all transit agencies recorded during fiscal years.
24 2016 Texas Transit Statistics Report TABLE 8: METROPOLITAN TRANSIT AUTHORITIES (MTAs) & URBANIZED AREA PROGRAM SERVICE EFFICIENCY BY SYSTEM - Fiscal Years 2015 and 2016
Operating Expense Per Vehicle Revenue Hour Operating Expense Per Vehicle Revenue Mile MTAs 2015 2016 2015 2016 Austin $ 119.84 $ 148.86 $ 8.94 $ 11.02 Corpus Christi 77.08 83.86 5.44 5.78 Dallas 313.00 321.02 20.35 21.02 Denton County* 139.87 30.39 10.76 1.89 El Paso 91.58 91.66 6.70 6.73 Fort Worth 83.30 96.08 5.99 6.84 Houston 116.37 120.53 7.89 8.45 San Antonio 90.96 97.72 5.94 6.36 Average for MTAs $ 129.00 $ 123.77 $ 9.00 $ 8.51
Operating Expense Per Vehicle Revenue Hour (i) Operating Expense Per Vehicle Revenue Mile (i) Urbanized Areas 2015 2016 2015 2016 Abilene $ 53.66 $ 53.27 $ 3.69 $ 3.70 Amarillo 76.57 82.59 5.11 5.57 Arlington 51.60 50.47 3.20 3.30 Beaumont 76.00 85.39 5.69 6.39 Brownsville 80.41 77.35 5.05 4.77 College Station-Bryan 54.22 52.53 3.50 3.67 Conroe-The Woodlands 179.63 140.65 7.44 6.23 Grand Prairie 74.19 77.31 5.72 5.54 Harlingen 66.57 70.79 3.36 3.68 Killeen (includes Copperas Cove & Harker Heights) 64.39 68.51 3.69 3.95 Lake Jackson-Angleton 66.38 69.02 2.90 3.26 Laredo 79.87 80.70 7.25 7.17 Longview 91.38 77.24 5.54 5.06 Lubbock 62.79 62.18 4.66 4.78 McAllen 47.50 53.10 2.71 2.42 McKinney n/a n/a n/a n/a Mesquite 27.64 47.79 2.00 3.55 Midland-Odessa 83.78 89.74 5.74 6.04 North Richland Hills - NETS** 52.10 52.43 3.44 3.29 Port Arthur 84.57 81.75 5.93 5.57 San Angelo 60.17 47.90 3.72 3.00 San Marcos 72.21 62.86 5.68 4.76 06TxsTastSaitc eot25 Texas Transit Statistics Report 2016 Sherman n/a 203.70 n/a 10.26 Temple 68.87 73.44 4.52 4.56 Texarkana 70.94 55.05 4.50 3.51 Texas City 118.78 102.91 6.51 5.69 Tyler 57.82 70.65 4.03 5.05 Victoria 53.42 56.30 3.61 3.83 Waco 70.14 70.14 3.79 3.92 Wichita Falls 56.62 72.96 3.49 4.54 Average for Urbanized Areas $ 71.51 $ 75.47 $ 4.52 $ 4.73 Overall Average for Section 5307 Agencies $ 84.28 $ 85.91 $ 5.51 $ 5.54
Notes: This table represents requirements of Transportation Code §456.008 Performance-based indicators. (i) TAC Requirement for Service Efficiency. *Coordinated County Transportation Authority **NETS-North East Transportation Service n/a - Not Available 26 2016 Texas Transit Statistics Report 2016 26
TABLE 9: METROPOLITAN TRANSIT AUTHORITIES (MTAs) & URBANIZED AREA PROGRAM - COST EFFECTIVENESS BY SYSTEM Fiscal Years 2015 and 2016
Unlinked Passenger Trips per Capita Operating Expense per Unlinked Passenger Trip MTAs 2015 2016 2015 2016 Austin 23.22 22.50 $ 6.17 $ 8.39 Corpus Christi 18.30 17.39 4.49 5.35 Dallas 24.56 23.57 13.43 14.48 Denton County* 8.18 8.53 6.95 1.72 El Paso 20.78 19.42 4.11 4.56 Fort Worth 7.57 7.08 5.67 7.10 Houston 16.49 18.17 5.90 5.95 San Antonio 24.15 22.71 4.96 5.84 Average for MTAs 17.91 17.42 $ 6.46 $ 6.67
Unlinked Passenger Trips per Capita Operating Expense per Unlinked Passenger Trip (ii) Urbanized Areas 2015 2016 2015 2016 Abilene 5.53 5.08 $ 5.75 $ 6.37 Amarillo 1.88 1.73 11.91 13.49 Arlington 0.68 0.33 22.29 21.67 Beaumont 3.75 3.32 9.54 10.59 Brownsville 7.17 6.93 5.23 4.91 College Station-Bryan 43.03 46.39 1.30 1.22 Conroe-The Woodlands 3.17 3.13 8.57 8.72 Grand Prairie 0.29 0.27 18.56 16.96 Harlingen 0.69 0.59 11.39 14.61 Killeen (includes Copperas Cove & Harker Heights) 2.62 2.55 8.43 9.73 Lake Jackson-Angleton 1.71 1.75 8.07 8.33 Laredo 13.40 12.96 4.45 4.64 Longview 2.64 2.53 7.47 7.35 Lubbock 16.29 16.26 2.98 3.01 McAllen 1.32 1.69 4.29 3.79 McKinney 0.63 0.05 n/a n/a Mesquite 0.11 0.27 16.89 26.90 Midland-Odessa 1.53 1.58 12.41 14.89 North Richland Hills - NETS** 0.11 0.13 29.59 29.43 Port Arthur 0.81 0.75 16.91 18.03 San Angelo 2.76 2.89 9.19 7.41 San Marcos 1.83 1.33 15.99 18.98 Sherman 2.21 0.11 n/a 113.87 Temple 2.25 2.22 14.32 15.58 Texarkana 5.56 6.08 5.80 4.66 Texas City 1.83 1.63 18.29 18.07 Tyler 1.52 1.48 11.13 13.99 Victoria 4.34 4.25 8.59 9.86 Waco 6.57 6.70 5.93 6.55 Wichita Falls 4.84 4.97 4.20 5.31 Average for Urbanized Areas 4.70 4.67 $ 10.70 $ 15.14 Overall Average for Section 5307 Agencies 7.48 7.35 $ 9.75 $ 13.31
Notes: This table represents requirements of Transportation Code §456.008 Performance-based indicators (ii) TAC Requirement for Cost Effectiveness. *Coordinated County Transportation Authority **NETS-North East Transportation Service n/a - Not Available TABLE 10: METROPOLITAN TRANSIT AUTHORITIES (MTAs) & URBANIZED AREA PROGRAM - SERVICE EFFECTIVENESS BY SYSTEM Fiscal Years 2015 and 2016
Unlinked Passenger Trips Per Vehicle Revenue Mile Unlinked Passenger Trips Per Vehicle Revenue Hour MTAs 2015 2016 2015 2016 Austin 1.45 1.31 19.44 17.74 Corpus Christi 1.21 1.08 17.16 15.67 Dallas 1.52 1.45 23.30 22.17 Denton County** 1.55 1.10 20.12 17.63 El Paso 1.63 1.48 22.27 20.12 Fort Worth 1.06 0.96 14.70 13.53 Houston 1.34 1.42 19.74 20.26 San Antonio 1.20 1.09 18.36 16.72 Average for MTAs 1.37 1.24 19.39 17.98
Unlinked Passenger Trips Per Vehicle Revenue Mile (iii) Unlinked Passenger Trips Per Vehicle Revenue Hour (iii) Urbanized Areas 2015 2016 2015 2016 Abilene 0.64 0.58 9.33 8.37 Amarillo 0.43 0.41 6.43 6.12 Arlington 0.14 0.15 2.31 2.33 Beaumont 0.60 0.60 7.96 8.07 Brownsville 0.97 0.97 15.37 15.76 College Station-Bryan 2.69 3.02 41.68 43.16 Conroe-The Woodlands 0.87 0.71 20.96 16.13 Grand Prairie 0.31 0.33 4.00 4.56 Harlingen 0.29 0.25 5.85 4.85 Killeen (includes Copperas Cove & Harker Heights) 0.44 0.41 7.64 7.04 Lake Jackson-Angleton 0.36 0.39 8.23 8.28 Laredo 1.63 1.55 17.95 17.41 Longview 0.74 0.69 12.23 10.51 Lubbock 1.56 1.58 21.05 20.63 McAllen 0.63 0.64 11.08 14.00 McKinney 0.13 0.18 1.37 1.51 Mesquite 0.12 0.13 1.64 1.78 Midland-Odessa 0.46 0.41 6.75 6.03 North Richland Hills - NETS*** 0.12 0.11 1.76 1.78 Port Arthur 0.35 0.31 5.00 4.53 San Angelo 0.40 0.40 6.55 6.46 San Marcos 0.35 0.25 4.52 3.31 06TxsTastSaitc eot27 Texas Transit Statistics Report 2016 Sherman 0.08 0.09 2.02 1.79 Temple 0.32 0.29 4.81 4.71 Texarkana 0.78 0.75 12.24 11.80 Texas City 0.36 0.32 6.49 5.70 Tyler 0.36 0.36 5.20 5.05 Victoria 0.42 0.39 6.22 5.71 Waco 0.64 0.60 11.83 10.71 Wichita Falls 0.83 0.86 13.50 13.74 Average for Urbanized Areas 0.60 0.59 9.40 9.06 Overall Average for Section 5307 Agencies 0.76 0.73 11.50 10.94
Notes: This table represents requirements of Transportation Code §456.008 Performance-based indicators (iii) TAC Requirement for Service Effectiveness.
**Coordinated County Transportation Authority ***NETS-North East Transportation Service n/a - Not Available 28 2016 Texas Transit Statistics Report 2016 28
TABLE 11: METROPOLITAN TRANSIT AUTHORITIES (MTAs) & URBANIZED AREA PROGRAM - SOURCE DATA Fiscal Years 2015 and 2016
(1) Total Operating Expense Vehicle Revenue Hours Vehicle Revenue Miles MTAs 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 Austin # $195,033,639 $257,326,132 1,627,501 1,728,650 21,823,217 23,353,375 Corpus Christi @ 26,303,771 29,779,460 341,248 355,107 4,832,697 5,147,818 Dallas # # 947,164,865 980,271,692 3,026,119 3,053,577 46,533,123 46,627,983 Denton County* # # 20,833,837 5,383,700 148,956 177,148 1,935,789 2,852,222 El Paso # 65,974,257 68,314,286 720,388 745,333 9,842,847 10,154,745 Fort Worth 44,632,472 52,300,780 535,835 544,363 7,449,045 7,646,294 Houston 480,511,016 534,337,041 4,129,049 4,433,311 60,908,564 63,200,249 San Antonio @ 210,426,049 233,336,198 2,313,306 2,387,888 35,432,506 36,679,740 MTA Sub-Total $ 1,990,879,906 $ 2,161,049,289 12,842,402 13,425,377 188,757,788 195,662,426
(1) Total Operating Expense Vehicle Revenue Hours Vehicle Revenue Miles Urbanized Areas 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 Abilene # $3,512,081 $3,573,368 65,445 67,084 952,200 966,220 Amarillo 4,394,694 4,603,603 57,394 55,741 859,190 826,135 Arlington 2,664,608 2,618,842 51,642 51,891 833,107 792,641 Beaumont 5,297,477 5,196,192 69,703 60,856 931,316 813,192 Brownsville @ 8,158,763 7,405,752 101,470 95,738 1,615,419 1,551,101 College Station-Bryan 9,592,256 9,673,463 176,901 184,148 2,742,539 2,633,660 Conroe-The Woodlands 6,519,476 6,557,387 36,293 46,623 875,735 1,053,236 Grand Prairie 758,682 795,815 10,226 10,294 132,630 143,673 Harlingen 1,062,288 1,160,469 15,957 16,393 316,597 315,524 Killeen (includes Copperas Cove & Harker Heights) 4,804,937 5,399,118 74,625 78,804 1,303,695 1,368,308 Lake Jackson-Angleton 1,033,070 1,093,746 15,562 15,847 355,991 335,179 Laredo # # 14,052,586 14,167,607 175,942 175,551 1,937,654 1,975,027 Longview 1,949,879 1,840,772 21,339 23,832 352,213 363,874 Lubbock @ 11,531,248 11,636,465 183,634 187,140 2,473,635 2,436,900 McAllen # 4,121,325 4,663,106 86,762 87,815 1,522,652 1,925,709 McKinney # # n/a n/a 78,034 5,095 824,050 42,687 Mesquite 680,306 1,018,038 24,610 21,302 340,430 286,451 Midland-Odessa 4,649,329 5,760,086 55,495 64,186 810,194 953,416 North Richland Hills - NETS** 1,074,342 1,240,855 20,621 23,666 312,334 377,658 Port Arthur 2,108,984 2,071,177 24,937 25,336 355,841 371,683 San Angelo # 2,357,044 1,994,528 39,170 41,638 633,558 664,713 San Marcos 1,546,301 1,328,952 21,415 21,140 272,438 279,403 Sherman # # n/a 805,032 67,725 3,952 1,734,818 78,489 Temple 2,912,054 3,125,966 42,283 42,566 643,730 685,360 Texarkana 1,680,246 1,477,666 23,687 26,843 373,132 420,852 Texas City @ 3,565,511 3,124,429 30,018 30,361 547,445 548,965 Tyler 2,208,482 2,705,053 38,196 38,286 548,391 536,146 Victoria # 2,373,903 2,671,877 44,441 47,461 656,874 697,964 Waco # 6,713,478 7,561,820 95,716 107,815 1,772,943 1,931,460 Wichita Falls 2,017,604 2,625,340 35,636 35,981 577,345 577,944 Urbanized Area Sub-Total $ 113,340,954 $ 117,896,524 1,784,879 1,693,385 27,608,096 25,953,570 Grand Total $ 2,104,220,860 $ 2,278,945,813 14,627,281 15,118,762 216,365,884 221,615,996
Notes: (1) Total Operating Expense includes Administrative, Purchased Transportation and Planning. # Includes JARC data. See Table 32 and Table 33 for Breakout. # # Includes New Freedom (NF) data. See Table 36 and Table 37 for Breakout. @ Includes JARC and New Freedom data. *Coordinated County Transportation Authority **NETS-North East Transportation Service TABLE 12: METROPOLITAN TRANSIT AUTHORITIES (MTAs) & URBANIZED AREA PROGRAM - UNLINKED PASSENGER TRIPS Fiscal Years 2015 and 2016
Urbanized Area Population (1) Unlinked Passenger Trips MTAs Census 2010 2015 2016 Austin # 1,362,416 31,632,038 30,661,053 Corpus Christi @ 320,069 5,857,146 5,565,485 Dallas (2) # # 2,871,343 70,508,674 67,684,422 Denton County (2)** # # 366,174 2,996,301 3,123,904 El Paso # 772,374 16,046,207 14,995,791 Fort Worth (2) 1,040,837 7,874,930 7,367,180 Houston 4,944,332 81,511,483 89,836,366 San Antonio @ 1,758,210 42,467,069 39,932,599 MTA's Total 13,435,755 258,893,848 259,166,800
Urbanized Area Population (1) Unlinked Passenger Trips Urbanized Areas Census 2010 2015 2016 Abilene # 110,421 610,493 561,352 Amarillo 196,651 368,864 341,161 Arlington (2) 175,396 119,526 120,852 Beaumont 147,922 555,006 490,824 Brownsville @ 217,585 1,559,837 1,508,601 College Station-Bryan 171,345 7,373,555 7,948,169 Conroe-The Woodlands 239,938 760,616 751,875 Grand Prairie (2) 139,824 40,868 46,911 Harlingen 135,663 93,272 79,434 Killeen (includes Copperas Cove & Harker Heights) 217,630 569,926 554,844 Lake Jackson-Angleton 74,830 128,069 131,251 Laredo # # 235,730 3,157,912 3,055,960 Longview 98,884 261,047 250,526 Lubbock @ 237,356 3,865,945 3,860,533 McAllen # 728,825 960,891 1,229,196 McKinney # # 170,030 106,844 7,700 Mesquite (2) 365,438 40,274 37,845 Midland-Odessa 244,212 374,775 386,854 North Richland Hills - NETS (2)*** 327,306 36,305 42,164 Port Arthur 153,150 124,712 114,892 San Angelo # 92,984 256,588 269,118 San Marcos 52,826 96,692 70,009 06TxsTastSaitc eot29 Texas Transit Statistics Report 2016 Sherman # # 61,900 137,104 7,070 Temple 90,390 203,289 200,685 Texarkana 52,090 289,866 316,760 Texas City @ 106,383 194,932 172,948 Tyler 130,247 198,506 193,321 Victoria # 63,683 276,204 270,868 Waco # 172,378 1,132,255 1,154,267 Wichita Falls 99,437 480,916 494,230 Urbanized Areas Total 5,310,454 24,375,089 24,670,220 GRAND TOTAL 18,746,209 283,268,937 283,837,020
Notes: (1) Source - 2010 U.S. Census SF1. (2) Population is aggregated from component census places in the agency service area. # Includes JARC ridership. See Table 32 for Breakout. # # Includes New Freedom (NF) data. See Table 36 for Breakout. @ Includes JARC and New Freedom data. **Coordinated County Transportation Authority ***NETS-North East Transportation Service 30 2016 Texas Transit Statistics Report 2016 30
TABLE 12a: MTAs - PASSENGER BOARDINGS - Fiscal Year 2015 to Fiscal Year 2016
Passenger Boardings FY2015 FY2016 Differences % Change General Public 253,755,768 254,692,601 936,833 0.37% Medical Transportation Program 0 0 Other Contract Service 3,915,143 3,461,660 -453,483 Section 5316 (JARC) 1,196,575 985,611 -210,964 -17.63% Section 5310 Enhance Mobility of Seniors & Disabled 8,029 5,933 -2,096 -26.11% Department of Aging & Disabilities 0 0 CMAQ 0 0 Head Start 0 0 Section 5317 New Freedom 18,333 20,995 2,662 14.52% Other State Programs 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 258,893,848 259,166,800 272,952 0.11%
Figure 7: MTAs - Percentage of Passenger Boardings by Service, FY 2016
Medical Transportation Program, Section 5316 General Public, 98.3% (JARC), Section 5317 New Freedom, Section 5310 Enhanced Mobility of Seniors & Disabled, Department of Aging & Disabilities, CMAQ, Head Start and Other Contract Services., 1.7% TABLE 12b: URBANIZED AREA PROGRAM - PASSENGER BOARDINGS - Fiscal Year 2015 to Fiscal Year 2016
Passenger Boardings FY2015 FY2016 Differences % Change General Public 16,298,713 15,818,458 -480,255 -2.95% Medical Transportation Program 138,310 136,163 -2,147 -1.55% Head Start Other Contract Service 7,489,189 8,147,907 658,718 8.80% Section 5316 (JARC) 302,786 323,636 20,850 6.89% Section 5317 (New Freedom) 4,780 3,545 -1,235 -25.84% Section 5310 Enhanced Mobility of Seniors & Disabled 139,598 215,699 76,101 54.51% Department of Aging & Disabilities 1,713 24,812 23,099 1348.45% Department of State Health Services Dept. of Family & Protective Srvc. Dept. of Assistive & Rehab. Srvc. TOTAL 24,375,089 24,670,220 295,131 1.21% 0
Figure 8: Urbanized - Percentage of Passenger Boardings by Service, FY 2016 Section 5310 Enhanced Section 5316 (JARC), Mobility of Seniors & 1.3% Disabled, 0.9% 06TxsTastSaitc eot31 Texas Transit Statistics Report 2016 Other Contract Service, 33.0%
General Public , 64.1%
Medical Transportation Program, 0.6% 32 2016 Texas Transit Statistics Report 2016 32 TABLE 13: METROPOLITAN TRANSIT AUTHORITIES (MTAs) & URBANIZED AREA PROGRAM REVENUE SOURCES - Fiscal Years 2015 and 2016
Total Revenue (1)* Sales Tax Revenue (2) MTAs 2015 2016 2015 2016 Austin # $ 242,881,236 $ 259,449,836 $ 208,955,503 $ 221,778,257 Corpus Christi @ 34,399,345 34,246,476 32,300,421 31,551,855 Dallas # # 678,936,474 692,941,779 522,682,161 538,735,150 Denton County* # # 27,269,248 29,752,603 0 24,582,027 El Paso # 53,073,266 53,411,472 40,255,797 41,073,376 Fort Worth 84,873,331 88,294,812 65,027,584 68,241,155 Houston 814,505,704 763,439,648 723,206,504 682,739,251 San Antonio @ 195,450,619 196,998,674 167,176,666 167,890,259 MTA Sub-Total $ 2,131,389,223 $ 2,118,535,300 $ 1,759,604,636 $ 1,776,591,330
Total Revenue (1) Sales Tax Revenue (2) Urbanized Areas 2015 2016 2015 2016 Abilene # $ 1,516,982 $ 2,066,969 Amarillo 1,558,965 1,527,359 Arlington 1,300,713 1,199,844 Beaumont 2,869,123 2,933,628 Brownsville @ 7,480,119 5,681,312 College Station-Bryan 7,569,150 9,169,093 Conroe-The Woodlands 4,605,640 4,755,188 Grand Prairie 186,801 222,645 Harlingen 223,244 285,655 Killeen (includes Copperas Cove & Harker Heights) 1,951,603 2,104,108 Lake Jackson-Angleton 355,681 274,743 Laredo** # # 9,725,650 10,506,694 $ 5,383,805 $ 6,682,597 Longview 760,610 573,532 Lubbock @ 7,619,320 8,264,845 McAllen # 3,318,096 3,371,549 McKinney # # n/a 28,613 Mesquite 266,515 648,576 Midland-Odessa 1,590,907 1,787,211 North Richland Hills - NETS*** 621,577 738,437 Port Arthur 1,088,390 864,773 San Angelo # 1,120,936 576,536 San Marcos 564,470 512,414 Sherman # # n/a 481,387 Temple 1,510,588 1,759,494 Texarkana 496,895 472,272 Texas City @ 3,622,132 2,030,411 Tyler 772,416 719,886 Victoria # 1,272,322 1,228,742 Waco # 4,175,753 4,511,240 Wichita Falls 927,165 943,262 Urbanized Areas Sub-Total $ 69,071,763 $ 70,240,418 $ 5,383,805 $ 6,682,597 GRAND TOTAL $ 2,200,460,986 $ 2,188,775,718 $ 1,764,988,441 $ 1,783,273,927 Notes: (1)* Derived revenue from sales tax, advertising on vehicles and/or property. Also includes passenger fares, non-transportation revenue such as donation, parking fees from park & ride lots, investment earnings, etc. (2) Source used for sales tax revenue data is the Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts. # Includes JARC data. See Table 33 for Breakout. *Coordinated County Transportation Authority # # Includes New Freedom (NF) data. See Table 37 for Breakout. **Laredo is the only urbanized area that collects transit sales tax. ***NETS-North East Transportation Service @ Includes JARC and New Freedom data. n/a - Not Available TABLE 14: METROPOLITAN TRANSIT AUTHORITIES (MTAs) & URBANIZED AREA PROGRAM FAREBOX REVENUE AND FAREBOX RECOVERY RATIO - Fiscal Years 2015 and 2016
Farebox Revenue Farebox Recovery Ratio (1) MTAs 2015 2016 2015 2016 Austin $ 16,248,884 $ 17,293,135 8% 7% Corpus Christi 1,674,314 1,754,953 6% 6% Dallas 65,050,457 69,926,379 7% 7% Denton County* 1,430,882 1,417,287 7% 26% El Paso 9,466,067 8,921,193 14% 13% Fort Worth 5,704,500 5,636,719 13% 11% Houston 65,971,079 63,851,222 14% 12% San Antonio 23,215,866 22,355,049 11% 10% MTA Total Farebox & Average Farebox Recovery Ratio $ 188,762,049 $ 191,155,937 10% 12%
Farebox Revenue Farebox Recovery Ratio (1) Urbanized Areas 2015 2016 2015 2016 Abilene $ 404,059 $ 394,218 12% 11% Amarillo 193,519 189,295 4% 4% Arlington 203,264 196,888 8% 8% Beaumont 535,536 477,477 10% 9% Brownsville 1,059,985 1,322,287 13% 18% College Station-Bryan 289,557 266,565 3% 3% Conroe-The Woodlands 3,853,874 3,922,513 59% 60% Grand Prairie 1,985 2,007 0% 0% Harlingen 37,363 36,092 4% 3% Killeen (includes Copperas Cove & Harker Heights) 243,851 318,608 5% 6% Lake Jackson-Angleton 65,255 63,414 6% 6% Laredo 3,317,725 3,180,929 24% 22% Longview 203,328 190,089 10% 10% Lubbock 970,781 919,904 8% 8% McAllen 549,190 471,734 13% 10% McKinney** n/a 11,947 n/a n/a Mesquite 1,248 n/a n/a n/a Midland-Odessa 287,536 329,251 6% 6% North Richland Hills - NETS*** 51,725 60,633 5% 5%
2016 Texas Transit Statistics Report 2016 33 Port Arthur 129,006 131,145 6% 6% San Angelo 157,995 112,588 7% 6% San Marcos 57,354 50,756 4% 4% Sherman n/a 15,744 n/a 2% Temple 126,268 143,604 4% 5% Texarkana 136,522 143,176 8% 10% Texas City 382,142 335,007 11% 11% Tyler 171,970 150,959 8% 6% Victoria 168,235 162,835 7% 6% Waco 759,376 730,770 11% 10% Wichita Falls 276,109 282,487 14% 11% Urbanized Areas Total Farebox & Average Farebox Recovery Ratio $ 14,634,758 $ 14,612,922 10% 10% Grand Total Farebox & Average Farebox Recovery Ratio $ 203,396,807 $ 205,768,859 10% 10%
Notes: (1) Farebox recovery ratio is defined as farebox revenue divided by total operating expenses. *Coordinated County Transportation Authority **McKinney does not collect fares. ***NETS-North East Transportation Service 34 2016 Texas Transit Statistics Report 2016 34
TABLE 15: METROPOLITAN TRANSIT AUTHORITIES (MTAs) & URBANIZED AREA PROGRAM - REVENUE VEHICLE FLEET Fiscal Years 2015 and 2016
Total Number of Buses Total Number of Rail/Trolleys MTAs 2015 2016 2015 2016 Austin 703 820 6 6 Corpus Christi 64 120 0 0 Dallas 1,038 1,094 210 210 Denton County* 60 58 8 11 El Paso 235 239 0 0 Fort Worth 239 226 0 0 Houston 1,335 1,351 73 73 San Antonio 727 742 0 0 MTAs Sub-Total 4,401 4,650 297 300
Total Number of Buses Total Number of Rail/Trolleys Urbanized Areas 2015 2016 2015 2016 Abilene 46 41 Amarillo 28 20 Arlington 28 29 Beaumont 30 29 Brownsville 33 33 College Station-Bryan 16 29 Conroe-The Woodlands 42 47 Grand Prairie 12 12 Harlingen 10 12 Killeen (includes Copperas Cove & Harker Heights) 57 53 Lake Jackson-Angleton 10 10 Laredo 70 69 Longview 13 13 Lubbock 101 107 McAllen 45 88 McKinney n/a n/a Mesquite n/a 26 Midland-Odessa 27 42 North Richland Hills - NETS** 7 7 Port Arthur 15 15 San Angelo 27 34 San Marcos 14 16 Sherman n/a 9 Temple 44 39 Texarkana 11 12 Texas City 15 15 Tyler 24 23 Victoria 43 25 Waco 63 63 Wichita Falls 15 13 Urbanized Areas Sub-Total 846 931 0 0 GRAND TOTAL 5,247 5,581 297 300
Notes: *Coordinated County Transportation Authority **NETS-North East Transportation Service n/a - Not Available TABLE 16: METROPOLITAN TRANSIT AUTHORITIES (MTAs) & URBANIZED AREA PROGRAM - TOTAL SAFETY INCIDENTS AND REVENUE VEHICLE SYSTEM FAILURES - Fiscal Years 2015 and 2016
(1) Total Safety Incidents Major Mechanical System Failures Other Mechanical System Failures MTAs 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 Austin 32 39 3,269 4,452 147 216 Corpus Christi 4 14 n/a n/a n/a n/a Dallas 152 205 1,832 1,582 1,462 1,326 Denton County* 1 219 308 27 60 El Paso 18 33 98 87 6 12 Fort Worth 5 6 818 1,609 563 839 Houston 253 287 4,114 4,039 1,642 1,881 San Antonio 134 149 3,562 2,049 2,110 5,341 MTAs Sub-Total 598 734 13,912 14,126 5,957 9,675
(1) Total Safety Incidents Major Mechanical System Failures Other Mechanical System Failures Urbanized Areas 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 Abilene 23 62 13 8 Amarillo 4 107 117 193 92 Arlington 1 1 n/a 0 n/a Beaumont 2 24 41 409 413 Brownsville 2 2 963 590 564 679 College Station-Bryan 7 2 17 29 15 63 Conroe-The Woodlands 26 22 33 46 Grand Prairie 3 7 0 n/a Harlingen 6 12 57 37 Killeen (includes Copperas Cove & Harker Heights) 4 4 101 120 14 12 Lake Jackson-Angleton 7 9 14 16 Laredo 5 1 99 76 139 106 Longview 27 8 82 60 Lubbock 7 4 575 505 110 256 McAllen 39 5 123 38 McKinney 5 n/a n/a n/a n/a Mesquite 15 17 55 40 Midland-Odessa 34 4 134 138 North Richland Hills - NETS** 0 0 0 10 Port Arthur 1 2 54 96
2016 Texas Transit Statistics Report 2016 35 San Angelo 2 8 6 3 4 San Marcos 5 8 1 2 Sherman 5 1 n/a n/a n/a 6 Temple 5 47 52 5 5 Texarkana 3 4 81 49 Texas City 7 10 17 18 Tyler 213 170 240 265 Victoria 2 1 19 11 111 88 Waco 1 2 92 87 26 3 Wichita Falls 58 45 42 27 Urbanized Areas Sub-Total 50 19 2,520 2,019 2,535 2,577 GRAND TOTAL 648 753 16,432 16,145 8,492 12,252
Notes: *Coordinated County Transportation Authority **NETS-North East Transportation Service
(1) FTA-NTD Safety Reporting is the source used for incidents data. 36 2016 Texas Transit Statistics Report 2016 36
TABLE 17: METROPOLITAN TRANSIT AUTHORITIES (MTAs) & URBANIZED AREA PROGRAM SAFETY INCIDENTS - Fiscal Years 2015 and 2016
Fatalities Injuries Injuries Major (1) Non-Major (2) MTAs 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 Austin 1 2 26 35 21 28 Corpus Christi 11 19 2 3 Dallas 7 7 55 57 70 109 Denton County* El Paso 1 1 11 17 8 17 Fort Worth 4 6 3 2 Houston 6 4 171 196 131 134 San Antonio 1 1 25 56 19 40 MTA Sub-Total 16 15 303 386 254 333
Fatalities Injuries Injuries Major (1) Non-Major (2) Urbanized Areas 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 Abilene Amarillo 4 2 Arlington Beaumont 7 Brownsville 7 2 College Station-Bryan 1 4 2 Conroe-The Woodlands Grand Prairie Harlingen Killeen (includes Copperas Cove & Harker Heights) 2 3 1 2 Lake Jackson-Angleton Laredo 15 2 1 Longview Lubbock 1 1 McAllen McKinney 3 3 Mesquite Midland-Odessa North Richland Hills - NETS** Port Arthur San Angelo 1 1 San Marcos Sherman 3 1 Temple 9 1 Texarkana Texas City Tyler Victoria 1 18 6 Waco 4 1 Wichita Falls Urbanized Area Sub-Total 2 0 65 15 19 8 Grand Total 18 15 368 401 273 341
Notes: Source: (1) Major include: 2 or more persons injured. FTA-NTD Safety and Security Reporting (2) Non-major include: 1 person injured and non-arson fire. Public Transportation Management System (PTMS) *Coordinated County Transportation Authority Blank field represents NR for this report. **NETS-North East Transportation Service TABLE 17a: METROPOLITAN TRANSIT AUTHORITIES (MTAs) & URBANIZED AREA PROGRAM SAFETY INCIDENTS cont'd. - Fiscal Years 2015 and 2016
Non-Arson Fires Transit Vehicles and Property Damages Transit Vehicles and Property Damages Major (1) Non-Major (2) MTAs 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 Austin $62,199 $8,167 $39,136 Corpus Christi $29,718 15,000 38,033 Dallas 1 446,152 582,465 271,699 372,366 Denton County 62,447 El Paso 1 153,000 192,796 8,000 121,310 Fort Worth Houston 913,124 1,624,288 591,293 1,048,986 San Antonio 110,331 108,847 69,423 622,307 MTA Sub-Total 2 0 $ 1,684,806 $ 2,600,561 $ 963,582 $ 2,242,138
Non-Arson Fires Transit Vehicles and Property Damages Transit Vehicles and Property Damages Major (1) Non-Major (2) Urbanized Areas 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 Abilene Amarillo 1 $10,000 $15,000 Arlington Beaumont 65,000 Brownsville 127,000 $63,000 College Station-Bryan 27,000 32,963 Conroe-The Woodlands Grand Prairie Harlingen Killeen (includes Copperas Cove & Harker Heights) $15,500 Lake Jackson-Angleton Laredo 30,408 8,161 Longview Lubbock 50,000 26,000 McAllen McKinney 30,000 35,000 Mesquite Midland-Odessa North Richland Hills - NETS** Port Arthur
2016 Texas Transit Statistics Report 2016 37 San Angelo 11,900 11,900 San Marcos Sherman 27,500 12,500 Temple 86,310 8,148 Texarkana Texas City Tyler Victoria Waco Wichita Falls Urbanized Area Sub-Total 1 0 $ 398,718 $ 116,000 $ 130,511 $ 48,061 Grand Total 3 0 $ 2,083,524 $ 2,716,561 $ 1,094,093 $ 2,290,199
Notes: (1) Major include: 2 or more persons injured and/or property damage greater than $25,000. (2) Non-major include: 1 person injured, non-arson fire and/or property damage of $7,500 up to $24,999. **NETS-North East Transportation Service
This page intentionally left blank.
38 2016 Texas Transit Statistics Report MONTHLY STATISTICS FOR MTAs AND URBANIZED TRANSIT AGENCIES
(MTA), (CTA) &
(SECTION 5307)
2016 Texas Transit Statistics Report 39 40 2016 Texas Transit Statistics Report 2016 40
METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITIES (MTAs) - FISCAL YEAR 2016
MTA Data Item Sep-15 Oct-15 Nov-15 Dec-15 Jan-16 Feb-16 Mar-16 Apr-16 May-16 Jun-16 Jul-16 Aug-16 FY 2016 Total Capital Metro Ridership 3,127,787 3,210,552 2,585,233 2,247,889 2,297,360 2,626,817 2,732,650 2,587,713 2,379,864 2,224,275 2,172,773 2,468,140 30,661,053 Transportation Mileage 1,928,414 2,071,240 1,860,504 1,885,612 1,839,828 1,923,354 2,073,277 1,971,899 1,929,111 1,929,299 1,909,627 2,031,210 23,353,375 Authority - Revenue Austin Federal Grants $ 6,347,998 $ - $ 1,239 $ - $ 5,069,861 $ 3,696,616 $ 4,175,562 $ 3,569,900 $ 9,629,482 $ 6,223,217 $ 3,019,880 $ 6,402,403 $ 48,136,158 Other Grants 000000000000 0 Farebox 2,150,822 1,119,904 1,602,806 1,653,556 1,231,766 1,232,389 1,729,175 1,175,303 1,325,603 1,253,912 1,538,992 1,278,907 17,293,135 Contract Revenue 1,923,988 268,891 725,912 866,006 564,692 966,608 697,362 785,328 2,177,998 618,088 604,145 687,706 10,886,724 Other Revenue 21,404,582 17,077,232 16,912,383 23,708,730 16,841,751 16,150,186 21,233,212 19,681,514 17,546,330 22,075,610 19,162,598 19,475,849 231,269,977 Total Revenue $ 31,827,390 $ 18,466,027 $ 19,242,340 $ 26,228,292 $ 23,708,070 $ 22,045,799 $ 27,835,311 $ 25,212,045 $ 30,679,413 $ 30,170,827 $ 24,325,615 $ 27,844,865 $ 307,585,994 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 1.62 1.55 1.39 1.19 1.25 1.37 1.32 1.31 1.23 1.15 1.14 1.22 1.31
Regional Ridership 517,181 538,881 447,932 451,552 443,478 462,332 438,726 444,159 450,927 439,345 440,030 490,942 5,565,485 Transportation Mileage 429,479 451,277 401,501 420,101 413,625 416,673 444,539 434,845 427,526 437,829 420,135 450,288 5,147,818 Authority (The B) - Revenue Corpus Christi Federal Grants $ 319,468 $ 291,138 $ 3,415 $ 77,562 $ 188,702 $ 496,385 $ 343,433 $ 398,830 $ 343,281 $ 214,783 $ 88,373 $ 9,885 $ 2,775,255 Other Grants 0 0 26,690 0 0 0 6,616 13,736 120,070 53,694 0 196,194 417,000 Farebox 164,956 152,864 140,960 155,046 137,599 150,688 138,341 138,063 141,607 133,768 137,492 163,569 1,754,953 Contract Revenue 000000000000 0 Other Revenue 3,444,841 2,561,312 2,614,229 2,780,900 2,698,413 2,626,065 3,115,169 2,188,908 2,392,768 3,694,191 2,546,597 1,828,130 32,491,523 Total Revenue $ 3,929,265 $ 3,005,314 $ 2,785,294 $ 3,013,508 $ 3,024,714 $ 3,273,138 $ 3,603,559 $ 2,739,537 $ 2,997,726 $ 4,096,436 $ 2,772,462 $ 2,197,778 $ 37,438,731 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 1.20 1.19 1.12 1.07 1.07 1.11 0.99 1.02 1.05 1.00 1.05 1.09 1.08
Dallas Area Rapid Ridership 6,167,781 7,037,034 5,396,556 5,464,725 5,296,231 5,439,006 5,602,708 5,431,222 5,282,925 5,393,730 5,046,757 6,125,747 67,684,422 Transit (DART) - Mileage 3,901,834 4,026,447 3,631,711 3,886,470 3,801,968 3,776,990 4,010,410 3,870,158 3,904,619 3,930,992 3,804,723 4,081,661 46,627,983 Dallas Revenue Federal Grants$ 7,557,912 $ 10,503,677 $ 5,453,110 $ 307,181 $ 190,138 $ - $ 120,356 $ 134,648 $ 12,408,976 $ - $ 9,335,145 $ 2,122,634 $ 48,133,777 Other Grants 000000124,589 0000127,879 252,468 Farebox 6,464,266 7,209,925 5,569,637 5,676,836 5,547,663 5,679,711 5,852,123 5,828,107 5,802,930 5,435,102 5,249,935 5,610,144 69,926,379 Contract Revenue 54,835 103,453 0 14,582 18,245 13,443 54,994 369,200 1 22,177 35,818 25,228 711,976 Other Revenue 59,581,979 46,960,535 43,739,338 66,546,525 46,122,873 44,512,412 60,244,950 48,619,292 46,120,801 62,875,973 49,776,438 47,202,308 622,303,424 Total Revenue $ 73,658,992 $ 64,777,590 $ 54,762,085 $ 72,545,124 $ 51,878,919 $ 50,205,566 $ 66,397,012 $ 54,951,247 $ 64,332,708 $ 68,333,252 $ 64,397,336 $ 55,088,193 $ 741,328,024 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 1.58 1.75 1.49 1.41 1.39 1.44 1.40 1.40 1.35 1.37 1.33 1.50 1.45
Denton County Ridership 422,639 412,360 326,240 165,479 213,248 351,698 296,072 312,755 194,996 136,803 117,999 173,615 3,123,904 Transit Authority - Mileage 240,115 268,862 235,070 196,711 215,828 260,273 263,207 268,430 239,771 224,194 206,528 233,233 2,852,222 Dallas Revenue Federal Grants $ 344,320 $ 307,212 $ 76,187 $ 343,565 $ 623,541 $ 252,449 $ 592,821 $ 24,579 $ 573,301 $ 168,907 $ 1,681,132 $ 65,930 $ 5,053,944 Other Grants 000049,300 0 0 18,290 0 0 713,441 1,927 782,958 Farebox 131,528 164,616 115,445 101,717 114,441 124,410 131,830 119,770 100,945 100,151 94,576 117,858 1,417,287 Contract Revenue 375,731 541,584 334,568 194,022 190,131 402,420 346,727 433,678 358,150 210,984 150,579 198,335 3,736,909 Other Revenue 2,454,918 2,023,603 1,637,697 2,654,106 1,874,332 1,455,123 2,114,507 2,092,357 2,014,623 2,137,461 2,109,294 2,030,386 24,598,407 Total Revenue $ 3,306,497 $ 3,037,015 $ 2,163,897 $ 3,293,410 $ 2,851,745 $ 2,234,402 $ 3,185,885 $ 2,688,674 $ 3,047,019 $ 2,617,503 $ 4,749,022 $ 2,414,436 $ 35,589,505 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 1.76 1.53 1.39 0.84 0.99 1.35 1.12 1.17 0.81 0.61 0.57 0.74 1.10 METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITIES (MTAs) - FISCAL YEAR 2016
MTA Data Item Sep-15 Oct-15 Nov-15 Dec-15 Jan-16 Feb-16 Mar-16 Apr-16 May-16 Jun-16 Jul-16 Aug-16 FY 2016 Total Sun Metro - Ridership 1,360,309 1,383,620 1,237,655 1,205,522 1,177,688 1,238,356 1,283,266 1,252,457 1,239,307 1,189,259 1,141,456 1,286,896 14,995,791 El Paso Mileage 829,694 870,891 808,608 837,022 826,005 814,437 882,066 846,903 869,194 849,110 817,577 903,238 10,154,745 Revenue Federal Grants$ 1,138,871 $ 1,294,723 $ 2,512,196 $ 2,870,319 $ 1,689,740 $ 1,612,925 $ 3,457,069 $ 1,330,771 $ 1,205,666 $ 1,120,198 $ 404,590 $ 1,166,344 $ 19,803,412 Other Grants 000000000000 0 Farebox 802,758 850,811 716,602 709,089 700,278 732,732 776,631 775,822 735,128 694,941 670,189 756,212 8,921,193 Contract Revenue 000000000000 0 Other Revenue 3,304,712 3,187,512 3,490,935 3,172,335 3,386,621 4,710,793 5,263,957 3,196,471 4,057,557 3,296,172 3,382,141 4,041,073 44,490,279 Total Revenue $ 5,246,341 $ 5,333,046 $ 6,719,733 $ 6,751,743 $ 5,776,639 $ 7,056,450 $ 9,497,657 $ 5,303,064 $ 5,998,351 $ 5,111,311 $ 4,456,920 $ 5,963,629 $ 73,214,884 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 1.64 1.59 1.53 1.44 1.43 1.52 1.45 1.48 1.43 1.40 1.40 1.42 1.48
Fort Worth Ridership 679,818 695,788 577,356 618,469 577,902 572,651 609,739 598,385 591,722 608,014 599,774 637,562 7,367,180 Transit Authority Mileage 635,764 669,541 609,255 645,698 620,277 622,021 665,850 631,513 632,250 629,668 621,728 662,729 7,646,294 (THE T) - Revenue Ft. Worth Federal Grants$ 1,033,605 $ 1,033,605 $ 1,042,941 $ 1,038,273 $ 1,038,273 $ 1,038,273 $ 1,038,273 $ 1,038,273 $ 1,038,273 $ 1,038,273 $ 1,038,273 $ 1,038,273 $ 12,454,608 Other Grants 000000000000 0 Farebox 502,375 490,992 467,279 587,002 415,924 464,933 552,623 485,486 397,334 415,066 401,074 456,631 9,466,067 Contract Revenue 000000000000 0 Other Revenue 6,198,479 6,808,723 6,460,675 6,102,035 6,844,146 7,966,157 6,017,649 8,926,457 6,267,291 6,663,163 7,423,994 6,979,324 43,607,199 Total Revenue $ 7,734,459 $ 8,333,320 $ 7,970,895 $ 7,727,310 $ 8,298,343 $ 9,469,363 $ 7,608,545 $ 10,450,216 $ 7,702,898 $ 8,116,502 $ 8,863,341 $ 8,474,228 $ 65,527,874 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 1.07 1.04 0.95 0.96 0.93 0.92 0.92 0.95 0.94 0.97 0.96 0.96 0.96
Metropolitan Ridership 7,768,083 8,207,455 7,261,227 7,244,758 7,325,296 7,572,278 8,136,007 7,008,883 7,226,467 7,379,532 7,035,577 7,670,803 89,836,366 Transit Authority Mileage 5,227,531 5,460,838 5,081,123 5,349,232 5,149,092 5,093,773 5,444,061 5,127,683 5,293,480 5,283,544 5,194,811 5,495,081 63,200,249 of Harris County - Revenue Houston Federal Grants$ 4,265,572 $ - $ 184,526 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 49,759,289 $ 748,269 $ 4,010,910 $ 58,968,566 Other Grants 14,042,062 0 934,075 0 5,224,567 440,320 536,338 1,160,039 192,120 527,604 2,456,337 1,466,613 26,980,075 Farebox 6,136,538 5,684,276 5,023,914 5,207,333 4,821,668 5,263,978 6,177,508 5,010,474 5,145,064 5,191,556 4,723,268 5,465,645 63,851,222 Contract Revenue 634 0 582 177 85,554 217 191,934 122,028 164,066 124,583 121,357 66,820 877,952 2016 Texas Transit Statistics Report 2016 41 Other Revenue 61,172,393 59,807,901 58,778,142 72,298,427 53,478,139 48,876,150 63,403,287 54,954,240 54,074,628 64,971,860 54,885,357 52,009,950 698,710,474 Total Revenue $ 85,617,199 $ 65,492,177 $ 64,921,239 $ 77,505,937 $ 63,609,928 $ 54,580,665 $ 70,309,067 $ 61,246,781 $ 59,575,878 $ 120,574,892 $ 62,934,588 $ 63,019,938 $ 849,388,289 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 1.49 1.50 1.43 1.35 1.42 1.49 1.49 1.37 1.37 1.40 1.35 1.40 1.42
VIA Metropolitan Ridership 3,622,179 3,699,697 3,268,743 3,335,549 3,270,320 3,351,707 3,378,753 3,285,871 3,167,462 3,148,136 3,100,163 3,304,019 39,932,599 Transit - Mileage 3,028,032 3,139,286 2,919,305 3,016,740 2,985,252 2,968,003 3,187,834 3,057,537 3,064,534 3,074,825 3,037,411 3,200,981 36,679,740 San Antonio Revenue Federal Grants$ 2,149,745 $ 2,205,021 $ 2,205,021 $ 2,205,021 $ 2,205,021 $ 2,205,021 $ 2,205,021 $ 2,205,021 $ 2,305,021 $ 2,315,021 $ 2,315,021 $ 2,315,021 $ 26,834,976 Other Grants 000000000000 0 Farebox 1,886,675 1,935,641 1,851,588 1,873,256 1,882,030 1,844,461 1,866,597 1,883,872 1,909,284 1,798,834 1,773,772 1,849,039 22,355,049 Contract Revenue 401,770 104,396 239,638 218,445 231,771 214,843 287,412 287,071 75,589 250,852 171,196 118,793 2,601,776 Other Revenue 14,737,327 13,994,216 12,076,948 19,013,399 13,117,676 12,737,867 16,144,487 14,125,971 11,773,570 17,336,635 14,118,402 12,865,351 172,041,849 Total Revenue $ 19,175,517 $ 18,239,274 $ 16,373,195 $ 23,310,121 $ 17,436,498 $ 17,002,192 $ 20,503,517 $ 18,501,935 $ 16,063,464 $ 21,701,342 $ 18,378,391 $ 17,148,204 $ 223,833,650 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 1.20 1.18 1.12 1.11 1.10 1.13 1.06 1.07 1.03 1.02 1.02 1.03 1.09 42 2016 Texas Transit Statistics Report 2016 42
METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITIES (MTAs) - FISCAL YEAR 2016
MTA Data Item Sep-15 Oct-15 Nov-15 Dec-15 Jan-16 Feb-16 Mar-16 Apr-16 May-16 Jun-16 Jul-16 Aug-16 FY 2016 Total GRAND TOTALS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2016
Data Item Sep-15 Oct-15 Nov-15 Dec-15 Jan-16 Feb-16 Mar-16 Apr-16 May-16 Jun-16 Jul-16 Aug-16 FY 2016 Total Ridership Metropolitan 23,665,777 25,185,387 21,100,942 20,733,943 20,601,523 21,614,845 22,477,921 20,921,445 20,533,670 20,519,094 19,654,529 22,157,724 259,166,800 Mileage Transportation 16,220,863 16,958,382 15,547,077 16,237,586 15,851,875 15,875,524 16,971,244 16,208,968 16,360,485 16,359,461 16,012,540 17,058,421 195,662,426 Authorities - Revenue Fiscal Year 2016 Federal Grants 23,157,491 15,635,376 11,478,635 6,841,921 11,005,276 9,301,669 11,932,535 8,702,022 27,504,000 60,839,688 18,630,683 17,131,400 $222,160,696 Other Grants 14,042,062 0 960,765 0 5,273,867 440,320 667,543 1,192,065 312,190 581,298 3,169,778 1,792,613 28,432,501 Farebox 18,239,918 17,609,029 15,488,231 15,963,835 14,851,369 15,493,302 17,224,828 15,416,897 15,557,895 15,023,330 14,589,298 15,698,005 191,155,937 Contract Revenue 2,756,958 1,018,324 1,300,700 1,293,232 1,090,393 1,597,531 1,578,429 1,997,305 2,775,804 1,226,684 1,083,095 1,096,882 18,815,337 Other Revenue 172,299,231 152,421,034 145,710,347 196,276,457 144,363,951 139,034,753 177,537,218 153,785,210 144,247,568 183,051,065 153,404,821 146,432,371 1,908,564,026 Total Revenue $ 230,495,660 $ 186,683,763 $ 174,938,678 $ 220,375,445 $ 176,584,856 $ 165,867,575 $ 208,940,553 $ 181,093,499 $ 190,397,457 $ 260,722,065 $ 190,877,675 $ 182,151,271 $ 2,369,128,497 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 1.46 1.49 1.36 1.28 1.30 1.36 1.32 1.29 1.26 1.25 1.23 1.30 1.32 NR - Not Reported URBANIZED TRANSIT AGENCIES - FISCAL YEAR 2016
UTA Data Item Sep-15 Oct-15 Nov-15 Dec-15 Jan-16 Feb-16 Mar-16 Apr-16 May-16 Jun-16 Jul-16 Aug-16 FY 2016 Total ABILENE Ridership 50,688 50,727 43,641 46,566 44,190 45,347 47,370 44,864 43,751 49,446 44,284 50,478 561,352 Mileage 81,054 84,304 74,932 77,941 76,389 78,822 87,149 77,321 78,919 85,209 76,785 87,395 966,220 Revenue Federal Grants $87,517 $ 137,153 $ 273,554 $ 143,087 $ 91,298 $ 113,218 $ 126,053 $ 133,058 $ 168,300 $ 18,480 $ 45,641 $941 $ 1,338,300 State Grants 19,785 45,012 44,289 15,296 80,298 77,461 262 7,680 65,750 111,348 53,942 97,683 618,806 Farebox 42,602 27,651 29,416 29,841 32,853 43,327 28,600 31,321 34,293 28,447 32,689 33,178 394,218 Contract Revenue 9,414 12,036 16,275 4,711 35,776 12,696 4,717 5,230 4,769 4,677 5,230 94,845 210,376 Other Revenue 102,575 71,776 196,590 100,110 60,850 14,208 98,028 100,632 156,536 98,510 108,738 353,822 1,462,375 Total Revenue $ 261,893 $ 293,628 $ 560,124 $ 293,045 $ 301,075 $ 260,910 $ 257,660 $ 277,921 $ 429,648 $ 261,462 $ 246,240 $ 580,469 $ 4,024,075 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.63 0.60 0.58 0.60 0.58 0.58 0.54 0.58 0.55 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58
AMARILLO Ridership 30,361 30,644 25,461 26,604 26,723 28,578 29,972 28,155 28,449 28,065 27,367 30,782 341,161 Mileage 72,842 72,194 60,670 65,775 64,322 67,452 72,799 71,776 70,593 66,746 68,254 72,712 826,135 Revenue Federal Grants $ 186,263 $ 197,848 $ 231,144 $ 210,069 $ 207,176 $ 234,474 $ 188,445 $ 186,214 $ 211,183 $ 202,201 $ 208,077 $ 238,001 $ 2,501,095 State Grants - 122,703 164,178 135,169 153,098 ------575,148 Farebox 19,257 13,403 14,081 15,515 13,598 14,499 15,338 14,447 15,421 18,686 15,996 19,054 189,295 Contract Revenue ------0 Other Revenue 145,735 18,787 16,743 18,723 5,014 175,337 150,712 149,176 164,950 153,886 164,112 174,889 1,338,064 Total Revenue $ 351,255 $ 352,741 $ 426,146 $ 379,476 $ 378,886 $ 424,310 $ 354,495 $ 349,837 $ 391,554 $ 374,773 $ 388,185 $ 431,944 $ 4,603,602 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.40 0.42 0.42 0.41 0.39 0.40 0.42 0.40 0.42 0.41
ARLINGTON Ridership 10,848 11,699 9,888 10,266 9,555 9,632 10,534 10,430 9,094 9,753 8,830 10,323 120,852 Mileage 75,163 77,097 65,243 67,715 65,512 66,589 68,830 66,690 59,143 60,649 58,770 61,240 792,641 Revenue Federal Grants $55,453 $ 108,713 $ 130,193 $ 104,038 $ 154,603 $ 102,012 $ 100,947 $ 108,714 $ 112,785 $ 104,553 $ 46,226 $ 35,565 $ 1,163,802
2016 Texas Transit Statistics Report 2016 43 State Grants - 64,594 79,463 65,892 52,996 ------262,945 Farebox 18,280 17,002 17,236 17,948 12,871 14,752 17,758 16,875 14,771 15,985 16,552 16,858 196,888 Contract Revenue ------0 Other Revenue 192,118 1,178 1,177 1,177 49,813 78,546 78,007 83,491 86,983 80,100 197,680 152,686 1,002,956 Total Revenue $ 265,851 $ 191,487 $ 228,069 $ 189,055 $ 270,283 $ 195,310 $ 196,712 $ 209,080 $ 214,539 $ 200,638 $ 260,458 $ 205,109 $ 2,626,591 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.14 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.14 0.15 0.16 0.15 0.16 0.15 0.17 0.15
BEAUMONT Ridership 43,926 46,618 40,961 44,293 42,116 44,923 40,069 38,388 37,389 37,031 35,974 39,136 490,824 Mileage 67,464 69,958 63,753 68,477 65,959 66,071 71,400 67,042 65,647 69,687 65,492 72,242 813,192 Revenue Federal Grants $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 39,240 $ 97,823 $ 243,656 $ 402,468 $ 65,918 $ 391,011 $ 398,523 $ 427,887 $ 2,066,526 State Grants ------351,812 5,717 - - 357,529 Farebox 45,526 39,320 38,098 39,143 44,922 43,617 36,797 41,980 33,766 37,972 34,013 42,323 477,477 Contract Revenue ------0 Other Revenue 435,886 412,566 403,400 346,545 362,475 310,206 183,843 - 1,230 - - - 2,456,151 Total Revenue $ 481,412 $ 451,886 $ 441,498 $ 385,688 $ 446,637 $ 451,646 $ 464,296 $ 444,448 $ 452,726 $ 434,700 $ 432,536 $ 470,210 $ 5,357,683 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.65 0.67 0.64 0.65 0.64 0.68 0.56 0.57 0.57 0.53 NR NR 0.60
See footnote at the end of Table 44 2016 Texas Transit Statistics Report 2016 44
URBANIZED TRANSIT AGENCIES - FISCAL YEAR 2016
UTA Data Item Sep-15 Oct-15 Nov-15 Dec-15 Jan-16 Feb-16 Mar-16 Apr-16 May-16 Jun-16 Jul-16 Aug-16 FY 2016 Total BROWNSVILLE Ridership 138,991 138,835 124,968 129,193 121,833 124,588 129,053 130,551 117,803 112,621 114,004 126,161 1,508,601 Mileage 137,457 133,403 122,590 126,744 126,576 126,074 132,180 129,867 129,856 128,674 126,465 131,215 1,551,101 Revenue Federal Grants $ 714,918 $ - $ - $ - $ 1,939 $ - $ - $ 1,238,646 $ 95,083 $ 123,124 $ 242,331 $ 74,405 $ 2,490,446 State Grants 214,328 3,791 230,132 217,979 571,533 3,636 6,590 115,985 125,928 24,623 159,813 30,637 1,704,975 Farebox 89,193 93,696 82,727 179,409 186,250 109,675 89,189 94,575 107,955 95,931 84,957 108,730 1,322,287 Contract Revenue 30,566 - 65,339 63,463 77,013 7,417 140,846 176,936 30,690 17,575 67,139 275,371 952,355 Other Revenue 973,008 76,317 64,191 148,543 461,295 64,826 63,596 317,422 302,074 285,326 268,833 381,239 3,406,670 Total Revenue $ 2,022,013 $ 173,804 $ 442,389 $ 609,394 $ 1,298,030 $ 185,554 $ 300,221 $ 1,943,564 $ 661,730 $ 546,579 $ 823,073 $ 870,382 $ 9,876,733 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 1.01 1.04 1.02 1.02 0.96 0.99 0.98 1.01 0.91 0.88 0.90 NR 0.97
COLLEGE STATION - BRYAN Ridership 1,410,705 1,191,709 778,564 504,841 502,343 971,761 770,071 877,911 255,402 176,027 148,351 360,484 7,948,169 Mileage 281,227 285,283 252,190 189,995 185,538 258,602 237,783 268,045 176,594 209,302 124,979 164,122 2,633,660 Revenue Federal Grants $29,467 $ 10,624 $ 227,057 $ 12,138 $ 201,138 $ 2,741 $ 142,583 $ 208,622 $ 191,718 $ 149,717 $ 235,784 $ 212,494 $ 1,624,083 State Grants 486 94,532 162,590 791 379,658 150,885 21,545 2,533 6,013 47,510 - - 866,543 Farebox 21,671 25,148 19,025 24,053 26,801 25,432 22,662 19,173 19,010 19,142 19,192 25,256 266,565 Contract Revenue 80,841 135,728 116,334 149,944 81,476 89,078 102,030 85,676 526,031 124,905 92,413 97,834 1,682,290 Other Revenue 801,689 787,037 625,983 527,506 492,020 710,525 635,374 726,780 607,520 563,278 335,583 406,943 7,220,238 Total Revenue $ 934,154 $ 1,053,069 $ 1,150,989 $ 714,432 $ 1,181,093 $ 978,661 $ 924,194 $ 1,042,784 $ 1,350,292 $ 904,552 $ 682,972 $ 742,527 $ 11,659,719 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 5.02 4.18 3.09 2.66 2.71 3.76 3.24 3.28 1.45 0.84 1.19 2.20 3.02
CONROE - THE WOODLANDS Ridership 67,821 67,637 58,169 56,001 62,727 64,921 69,406 58,751 59,580 61,641 57,849 67,372 751,875 Mileage 87,406 91,186 80,528 84,816 84,689 88,183 92,702 84,477 87,976 91,661 84,512 95,100 1,053,236 Revenue Federal Grants $ 233,283 $ 250,055 $ 232,734 $ 276,786 $ 200,107 $ 189,242 $ 187,351 $ 148,256 $ 132,997 $ 153,697 $ 149,861 $ 150,177 $ 2,304,546 State Grants 10,376 10,905 10,403 10,979 10,818 10,779 11,260 10,997 10,805 11,298 11,137 11,223 130,980 Farebox 345,561 349,075 286,116 262,958 321,139 334,517 345,556 301,705 339,916 350,515 310,816 374,639 3,922,513 Contract Revenue 50,541 50,547 50,756 48,112 48,112 46,052 52,032 40,020 32,503 31,505 32,503 32,498 515,181 Other Revenue 18,975 19,112 20,894 19,159 19,061 19,098 19,226 105,300 19,065 19,197 19,165 19,242 317,494 Total Revenue $ 658,736 $ 679,694 $ 600,903 $ 617,994 $ 599,237 $ 599,688 $ 615,425 $ 606,278 $ 535,286 $ 566,212 $ 523,482 $ 587,779 $ 7,190,714 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.78 0.74 0.72 0.66 0.74 0.74 0.75 0.70 0.68 0.67 0.68 0.71 0.71
GRAND PRAIRIE Ridership 4,024 4,291 3,829 3,621 3,491 3,904 4,128 4,126 3,972 3,929 3,526 4,070 46,911 Mileage 12,046 12,909 10,367 10,588 10,954 12,939 13,470 12,554 12,284 12,451 10,096 13,015 143,673 Revenue Federal Grants $25,159 $ 30,550 $ 26,301 $ 33,990 $ 29,839 $ 30,331 $ 24,065 $ 42,085 $ 27,048 $ 28,574 $ 30,798 $ 33,289 $ 362,029 State Grants - 12,283 11,681 12,298 10,754 21,438 22,429 31,731 22,051 22,473 23,128 20,875 211,141 Farebox - 122 - 168 134 206 100 177 260 215 335 290 2,007 Contract Revenue 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 18,000 Other Revenue - 12,283 11,681 12,298 10,754 19,732 20,830 30,053 20,292 20,757 21,294 22,664 202,638 Total Revenue $26,659 $ 56,738 $ 51,163 $ 60,254 $ 52,981 $ 73,207 $ 68,924 $ 105,546 $ 71,151 $ 73,519 $ 77,055 $ 78,618 $ 795,815 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.33 0.33 0.37 0.34 0.32 0.30 0.31 0.33 0.32 0.32 0.35 0.31 0.33
HARLINGEN Ridership 8,440 8,149 6,840 6,200 5,864 6,890 6,709 6,145 6,118 6,380 5,654 6,045 79,434 Mileage 26,056 27,330 22,628 26,359 26,158 27,483 29,983 24,795 25,459 27,306 24,394 27,573 315,524 Revenue Federal Grants $ 2,133,453 $ 44,978 $ 47,874 $ 81,860 $ 161,530 $ 40,943 $ 60,957 $ 51,696 $ 44,260 $ 40,002 $ 28,695 $ 109,431 $ 2,845,679 State Grants 20,609 28,386 27,659 46,259 12,947 32,974 50,606 33,332 22,812 - - - 275,584 Farebox 419 3,878 2,372 2,733 3,021 2,701 2,992 2,059 2,930 3,518 1,822 7,647 36,092 Contract Revenue ------0 Other Revenue 6,710 9,772 8,951 18,493 - 126 - 3,985 14,159 39,522 52,944 94,901 249,563 Total Revenue $ 2,161,191 $ 87,014 $ 86,856 $ 149,345 $ 177,498 $ 76,744 $ 114,555 $ 91,072 $ 84,161 $ 83,042 $ 83,461 $ 211,979 $ 3,406,918 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.32 0.30 0.30 0.24 0.22 0.25 0.22 0.25 0.24 0.23 0.23 0.22 0.25
See footnote at the end of Table URBANIZED TRANSIT AGENCIES - FISCAL YEAR 2016
UTA Data Item Sep-15 Oct-15 Nov-15 Dec-15 Jan-16 Feb-16 Mar-16 Apr-16 May-16 Jun-16 Jul-16 Aug-16 FY 2016 Total KILLEEN Ridership 50,679 53,811 48,863 67,810 22,008 45,934 45,693 47,364 43,456 43,092 43,119 43,015 554,844 (COPPERAS COVE & HARKER HEIGHTS) Mileage 119,735 124,124 117,402 167,291 54,452 106,013 109,817 117,075 107,808 119,027 112,174 113,390 1,368,308 Revenue Federal Grants $ 134,398 $ 229,331 $ 236,024 $ 223,011 $ 250,183 $ 226,541 $ 214,259 $ 266,711 $ 237,340 $ 292,478 $ 244,116 $ 380,843 $ 2,935,235 State Grants 81,221 139,450 150,678 25,292 - 26,543 4,341 - - 16,295 24,124 35,800 503,744 Farebox 29,865 27,559 15,564 38,105 17,591 29,204 29,658 27,764 28,465 25,239 21,903 27,691 318,608 Contract Revenue 12,089 19,613 21,209 102,861 187,533 172,639 18,645 129,648 170,360 197,502 199,782 291,904 1,523,785 Other Revenue - 24,550 - 32,600 - - 143,226 61,339 - - - - 261,715 Total Revenue $ 257,573 $ 440,503 $ 423,475 $ 421,869 $ 455,307 $ 454,927 $ 410,129 $ 485,462 $ 436,165 $ 531,514 $ 489,925 $ 736,238 $ 5,543,087 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.42 0.43 0.42 0.41 0.40 0.43 0.42 0.40 0.40 0.36 0.38 0.38 0.41
LAKE JACKSON - ANGLETON Ridership 11,277 11,651 9,796 10,818 10,503 11,196 11,367 11,480 10,866 10,057 9,967 12,273 131,251 Mileage 28,053 29,067 24,497 27,273 25,070 26,022 29,832 29,278 28,039 28,678 28,089 31,281 335,179 Revenue Federal Grants $31,982 $ 48,149 $ 41,532 $ 47,267 $ 41,411 $ 50,170 $ 65,138 $ 43,778 $ 61,211 $ 39,029 $ 43,439 $ 81,853 $ 594,959 State Grants 15,262 15,004 14,374 16,139 16,236 17,949 22,547 16,194 19,914 20,915 24,425 29,042 228,001 Farebox 7,612 5,188 4,595 4,395 5,568 4,428 6,130 3,848 6,817 4,680 4,014 6,139 63,414 Contract Revenue ------0 Other Revenue 11,684 17,879 19,452 16,443 17,218 19,128 15,702 19,755 20,253 13,380 12,048 28,387 211,329 Total Revenue $66,540 $ 86,220 $ 79,953 $ 84,244 $ 80,433 $ 91,675 $ 109,517 $ 83,575 $ 108,195 $ 78,004 $ 83,926 $ 145,421 $ 1,097,703 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.42 0.43 0.38 0.39 0.39 0.35 0.35 0.39 0.39
LAREDO Ridership 266,465 273,858 249,605 261,802 235,633 250,818 261,108 254,202 250,942 240,597 243,005 267,925 3,055,960 Mileage 166,321 179,939 153,351 159,059 155,865 157,947 170,823 164,580 165,875 166,880 162,539 171,848 1,975,027 Revenue Federal Grants $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 3,260,305 $ - $ 3,260,305 State Grants 25,715 201,411 225,819 246,654 12,024 1,145 24,851 4,207 124,342 181,300 202,196 33,175 1,282,839 Farebox 279,554 309,940 248,418 275,780 228,961 259,383 270,508 265,792 260,478 248,988 249,659 283,468 3,180,929 Contract Revenue ------0 Other Revenue 1,390,060 629,009 519,213 543,615 943,654 805,717 657,435 302,889 207,439 226,693 236,264 863,777 7,325,765 2016 Texas Transit Statistics Report 2016 45 Total Revenue $ 1,695,329 $ 1,140,360 $ 993,450 $ 1,066,049 $ 1,184,639 $ 1,066,245 $ 952,794 $ 572,888 $ 592,259 $ 656,981 $ 3,948,424 $ 1,180,420 $ 15,049,838 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 1.60 1.52 1.63 1.65 1.51 1.59 1.53 1.54 1.51 1.44 1.50 1.56 1.55
LONGVIEW Ridership 21,091 22,299 19,067 19,889 20,238 22,513 21,980 21,016 18,615 21,625 20,321 21,872 250,526 Mileage 29,687 32,465 26,846 29,278 29,575 29,726 32,712 30,768 29,844 30,610 29,753 32,610 363,874 Revenue Federal Grants $89,364 $ 196,330 $ 93,987 $ 102,347 $ 41,644 $ 66,965 $ 148,384 $ 123,202 $ 83,041 $ 98,092 $ 47,759 $ 72,405 $ 1,163,520 State Grants 26,512 211,085 30,815 40,167 23,511 23,513 30,077 45,271 22,965 18,577 - - 472,493 Farebox 16,561 17,471 14,571 15,442 14,560 18,318 14,477 15,195 16,974 15,128 14,966 16,426 190,089 Contract Revenue 3,080 - 14,628 ------17,708 Other Revenue 33,044 49,790 23,975 19,713 49,882 18,283 21,050 23,063 16,819 22,289 44,771 43,056 365,735 Total Revenue $ 168,561 $ 474,676 $ 177,976 $ 177,669 $ 129,597 $ 127,079 $ 213,988 $ 206,731 $ 139,799 $ 154,086 $ 107,496 $ 131,887 $ 2,209,545 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.71 0.69 0.71 0.68 0.68 0.76 0.67 0.68 0.62 0.71 0.68 0.67 0.69
See footnote at the end of Table 46 2016 Texas Transit Statistics Report 2016 46
URBANIZED TRANSIT AGENCIES - FISCAL YEAR 2016
UTA Data Item Sep-15 Oct-15 Nov-15 Dec-15 Jan-16 Feb-16 Mar-16 Apr-16 May-16 Jun-16 Jul-16 Aug-16 FY 2016 Total LUBBOCK Ridership 741,898 571,691 417,027 138,677 212,200 482,456 373,276 419,939 199,439 104,804 98,901 100,225 3,860,533 Mileage 237,761 253,613 215,343 158,791 162,286 235,905 223,088 236,592 198,264 170,614 164,931 179,712 2,436,900 Revenue Federal Grants $ 122,302 $ 263,526 $ 319,843 $ 263,978 $ 257,329 $ 240,878 $ 232,194 $ 292,674 $ 219,880 $ 202,175 $ 401,842 $ 210,643 $ 3,027,264 State Grants - - - - 120,418 - 55,016 163,018 318,386 36,321 17,324 14,520 725,003 Farebox 121,675 86,662 89,073 51,038 64,716 91,530 66,384 53,864 107,454 66,005 57,774 63,729 919,904 Contract Revenue 646,973 551,286 455,009 208,889 223,289 525,217 430,079 513,651 262,101 195,793 194,388 122,988 4,329,663 Other Revenue 741,222 62,420 124,773 320,499 129,679 92,143 173,374 162,583 293,674 317,714 201,549 395,648 3,015,278 Total Revenue $ 1,632,172 $ 963,894 $ 988,698 $ 844,404 $ 795,431 $ 949,768 $ 957,047 $ 1,185,790 $ 1,201,495 $ 818,008 $ 872,877 $ 807,528 $ 12,017,112 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 3.12 2.25 1.94 0.87 1.31 2.05 1.67 1.77 1.01 0.61 0.60 0.56 1.58
MCALLEN Ridership 122,554 123,571 108,726 87,135 87,110 104,283 101,365 113,863 89,775 93,995 98,440 98,379 1,229,196 Mileage 179,577 184,632 178,303 158,912 167,040 165,452 179,579 172,802 150,594 136,911 120,021 131,886 1,925,709 Revenue Federal Grants $ 3,107,033 $ 101,677 $ 328,729 $ 333,204 $ 140,610 $ 90,657 $ 149,782 $ 196,785 $ 99,804 $ 224,257 $ 123,494 $ 131,951 $ 5,027,983 State Grants 305,493 267,513 50,708 52,254 17,450 54,237 112,742 113,411 21,945 181,594 - 74,701 1,252,048 Farebox 34,857 41,949 36,766 39,227 41,585 38,795 39,252 35,618 41,053 36,950 36,974 48,708 471,734 Contract Revenue 42,259 18,195 699,393 9,835 9,669 6,379 12,757 9,394 4,442 19,851 5,008 47,466 884,648 Other Revenue 306,895 170,426 170,244 172,181 110,357 91,117 96,154 213,448 154,771 183,661 164,985 180,928 2,015,167 Total Revenue $ 3,796,537 $ 599,760 $ 1,285,840 $ 606,701 $ 319,671 $ 281,185 $ 410,687 $ 568,656 $ 322,015 $ 646,313 $ 330,461 $ 483,754 $ 9,651,580 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.68 0.67 0.61 0.55 0.52 0.63 0.56 0.66 0.60 0.69 0.82 0.75 0.64
MCKINNEY Ridership 4,122 3,578 NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR 7,700 Mileage 21,786 20,901 NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR 42,687 Revenue 00 Federal Grants $ - $ - NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR $ - State Grants 7,182 4,765 NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR 11,947 Farebox 8,333 8,333 NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR 16,666 Contract Revenue 0 0 NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR 0 Other Revenue NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR 0 Total Revenue $15,515 $ 13,098 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 28,613 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.19 0.17 NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR 0.18
MESQUITE Ridership 3,676 3,794 3,041 3,201 2,971 3,100 3,305 3,064 3,064 3,003 2,569 3,057 37,845 Mileage 24,881 26,409 21,848 20,408 22,638 24,665 25,049 24,886 23,161 25,902 20,512 26,092 286,451 Revenue Federal Grants ------247,459 $ 247,459 State Grants ------160,163 160,163 Farebox ------0 Contract Revenue 39,245 39,245 39,245 39,245 39,245 39,245 39,245 39,245 39,245 39,245 39,245 39,245 470,940 Other Revenue 3,623 3,623 3,623 3,623 3,623 3,623 39,095 35,874 20,503 18,969 21,271 20,186 177,636 Total Revenue $42,868 $ 42,868 $ 42,868 $ 42,868 $ 42,868 $ 42,868 $ 78,340 $ 75,119 $ 59,748 $ 58,214 $ 60,516 $ 467,053 $ 1,056,198 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.15 0.14 0.14 0.16 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.12 0.13 0.12 0.13 0.12 0.13
See footnote at the end of Table URBANIZED TRANSIT AGENCIES - FISCAL YEAR 2016
UTA Data Item Sep-15 Oct-15 Nov-15 Dec-15 Jan-16 Feb-16 Mar-16 Apr-16 May-16 Jun-16 Jul-16 Aug-16 FY 2016 Total MIDLAND - ODESSA Ridership 33,719 33,231 29,093 29,879 29,363 31,489 32,428 29,845 39,210 31,832 30,530 36,235 386,854 Mileage 80,379 83,105 74,971 75,278 75,458 77,940 84,921 80,966 77,819 80,964 77,147 84,468 953,416 Revenue Federal Grants $ 391,931 $ 383,566 $ 235,681 $ 355,476 $ 330,953 $ 277,193 $ 354,083 $ 277,092 $ 278,998 $ 277,713 271,328 276,480 $ 3,710,494 State Grants 81,413 41,675 73,024 107,075 107,706 46,696 3,387 - - - - - 460,976 Farebox 24,618 26,825 23,865 20,486 20,934 33,058 18,861 38,983 15,723 53,413 28,037 24,448 329,251 Contract Revenue 22,125 22,125 22,125 22,125 22,125 22,125 22,125 22,125 22,125 22,125 22,125 22,125 265,500 Other Revenue 59,984 134,522 29,330 26,518 72,627 64,373 177,297 167,703 120,660 72,436 118,638 148,372 1,192,460 Total Revenue $ 580,071 $ 608,713 $ 384,025 $ 531,680 $ 554,345 $ 443,445 $ 575,753 $ 505,903 $ 437,506 $ 425,687 $ 440,128 $ 471,425 $ 5,958,681 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.42 0.40 0.39 0.40 0.39 0.40 0.38 0.37 0.50 NR NR NR 0.41
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS - NETS* Ridership 3,238 3,571 3,016 3,033 3,021 3,571 3,712 3,793 3,631 3,771 3,558 4,249 42,164 Mileage 27,939 30,176 25,533 26,847 27,931 33,432 35,273 34,088 31,520 34,713 32,852 37,354 377,658 Revenue Federal Grants $63,613 $ - $ - $ 35,582 $ 35,521 $ 40,514 $ 43,631 $ 41,290 $ 37,006 $ 42,065 $ 39,842 $ 44,347 $ 423,411 State Grants - 75,310 40,824 ------116,134 Farebox 4,464 5,358 4,057 4,397 4,513 5,118 5,145 5,562 5,077 5,560 5,212 6,170 60,633 Contract Revenue 52,057 - 33,787 55,164 54,945 62,696 67,889 63,552 56,865 64,851 61,477 15,770 589,053 Other Revenue 7,425 18,828 10,206 ------52,292 88,751 Total Revenue $ 127,559 $ 99,496 $ 88,874 $ 95,143 $ 94,979 $ 108,328 $ 116,665 $ 110,404 $ 98,948 $ 112,476 $ 106,531 $ 118,579 $ 1,277,982 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.12 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11
PORT ARTHUR Ridership 11,397 10,250 6,146 10,818 7,869 10,987 10,201 9,625 9,280 9,689 8,619 10,011 114,892 Mileage 31,917 32,034 28,182 30,810 27,554 29,498 32,039 30,333 32,918 32,162 28,472 35,764 371,683 Revenue Federal Grants $ 104,350 $ 53,159 $ 87,057 $ 80,090 $ 73,473 $ 81,753 $ 55,491 $ 90,509 $ 69,747 $ 72,909 $ 70,208 $ 68,595 $ 907,341 2016 Texas Transit Statistics Report 2016 47 State Grants - 75,963 - - - - 73,081 150,021 - - - - 299,065 Farebox 11,544 10,919 10,301 11,510 9,256 10,165 10,862 9,261 12,294 12,312 9,916 12,805 131,145 Contract Revenue ------Other Revenue 80,423 12,876 87,056 80,090 73,473 81,753 13,872 22,627 69,747 72,909 70,207 68,595 733,628 Total Revenue $ 196,317 $ 152,917 $ 184,414 $ 171,690 $ 156,202 $ 173,671 $ 153,306 $ 272,418 $ 151,788 $ 158,130 $ 150,331 $ 149,995 $ 2,071,179 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.36 0.32 0.22 0.35 0.29 0.37 0.32 0.32 0.28 0.30 0.30 0.28 0.31
SAN ANGELO Ridership 24,622 26,597 22,810 20,196 20,173 22,379 22,889 22,507 20,757 21,763 21,327 23,098 269,118 Mileage 53,724 58,335 51,227 51,088 51,824 55,397 59,305 57,478 53,814 57,159 55,688 59,674 664,713 Revenue Federal Grants $59,711 $ 52,289 $ 177,682 $ 52,555 $ 276,682 $ 82,942 $ 98,948 $ 186,061 $ 83,338 $ 123,904 $ 115,981 $ 68,858 $ 1,378,951 State Grants 253,664 84,233 127,787 16,175 - 13,303 - - - 283,642 4,545 6,289 789,638 Farebox 12,243 9,561 8,524 8,300 8,042 9,556 9,901 9,722 8,766 9,296 9,075 9,602 112,588 Contract Revenue 25,567 15,956 17,019 8,603 2,772 7,795 5,256 5,467 15,637 40,769 90,338 152,504 387,683 Other Revenue 8,183 20,198 3,759 8,476 1,059 5,259 6,859 6,059 2,859 539 539 12,476 76,265 Total Revenue $ 359,368 $ 182,237 $ 334,771 $ 94,109 $ 288,555 $ 118,855 $ 120,964 $ 207,309 $ 110,600 $ 458,150 $ 220,478 $ 249,729 $ 2,745,125 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.46 0.46 0.45 0.40 0.39 0.40 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.38 0.38 0.39 0.40
See footnote at the end of Table 48 2016 Texas Transit Statistics Report 2016 48
URBANIZED TRANSIT AGENCIES - FISCAL YEAR 2016
UTA Data Item Sep-15 Oct-15 Nov-15 Dec-15 Jan-16 Feb-16 Mar-16 Apr-16 May-16 Jun-16 Jul-16 Aug-16 FY 2016 Total SAN MARCOS Ridership 6,216 5,963 5,538 6,251 5,541 5,677 6,271 5,187 5,640 6,070 5,308 6,347 70,009 Mileage 24,721 22,049 20,034 22,814 20,076 22,043 26,918 24,836 25,015 25,044 22,149 23,704 279,403 Revenue Federal Grants $48,635 $ 57,819 $ 48,552 $ 51,263 $ 48,827 $ 48,290 $ 52,803 $ 47,660 $ 48,002 $ 1,640,682 $ 53,205 $ 64,689 $ 2,210,427 State Grants 19,469 20,319 11,052 13,764 11,327 10,790 15,303 10,160 10,502 21,862 15,705 27,188 187,441 Farebox 4,589 4,293 4,004 4,211 3,591 3,962 4,694 3,726 3,600 4,095 3,564 6,427 50,756 Contract Revenue 1,666 1,666 1,666 1,666 1,666 1,666 1,666 1,666 1,666 1,666 1,666 1,666 19,992 Other Revenue 29,166 37,500 37,500 37,500 37,500 37,500 37,500 37,500 37,500 37,500 37,500 37,500 441,666 Total Revenue $ 103,525 $ 121,597 $ 102,774 $ 108,404 $ 102,911 $ 102,208 $ 111,966 $ 100,712 $ 101,270 $ 1,705,805 $ 111,640 $ 137,470 $ 2,910,282 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.25 0.27 0.28 0.27 0.28 0.26 0.23 0.21 0.23 0.24 0.24 0.27 0.25
SHERMAN Ridership NR NR NR NR NR NR NR 505 1,312 1,752 1,719 1,782 7,070 Mileage NR NR NR NR NR NR NR 7,219 14,510 19,577 18,172 19,011 78,489 Revenue Federal Grants NR NR NR NR NR NR NR$ 52,464 $ 66,167 $ 67,117 $ 66,614 $ 68,486 $ 320,848 State Grants NR NR NR NR NR NR NR 2,797 - - - - 2,797 Farebox NR NR NR NR NR NR NR 586 2,558 4,607 4,149 3,844 15,744 Contract Revenue NR NR NR NR NR NR NR - - - - 0 0 Other Revenue NR NR NR NR NR NR NR 80,731 95,749 95,910 95,443 97,810 465,643 Total Revenue $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 136,578 $ 164,474 $ 167,634 $ 166,206 $ 170,140 $ 805,032 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile NR NR NR NR NR NR NR 0.07 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09
TEMPLE Ridership 18,042 18,548 16,908 23,460 7,974 16,920 16,416 16,987 16,463 16,027 15,978 16,962 200,685 Mileage 58,235 57,539 56,366 79,362 26,356 55,321 57,208 63,234 58,963 62,993 51,470 58,313 685,360 Revenue Federal Grants $52,528 $ 137,937 $ 134,918 $ 117,791 $ 37,318 $ - $ - $ 5,565 $ 125,825 $ 151,811 $ 148,093 $ 213,254 $ 1,125,040 State Grants 43,586 61,046 87,526 49,274 ------241,432 Farebox 12,580 5,054 8,054 16,429 10,188 13,545 13,872 14,135 11,892 13,786 11,338 12,731 143,604 Contract Revenue 57,367 17,085 11,763 50,312 79,016 235,686 216,302 273,519 101,457 111,420 112,685 150,621 1,417,233 Other Revenue 4,423 36,318 - - 123,500 - 27,916 - - - - 6,500 198,657 Total Revenue $ 170,484 $ 257,440 $ 242,261 $ 233,806 $ 250,022 $ 249,231 $ 258,090 $ 293,219 $ 239,174 $ 277,017 $ 272,116 $ 383,106 $ 3,125,966 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.31 0.32 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.31 0.29 0.27 0.28 0.25 0.31 0.29 0.29
TEXARKANA Ridership 26,250 28,204 22,792 26,015 24,827 23,803 26,442 28,753 27,157 27,656 26,089 28,772 316,760 Mileage 31,168 32,117 28,548 29,738 34,438 34,705 38,855 38,143 36,902 38,296 37,207 40,735 420,852 Revenue Federal Grants $93,034 $ 63,033 $ 72,219 $ 69,626 $ 58,912 $ 56,429 $ 52,023 $ 66,542 $ 55,936 $ 59,040 $ 69,772 $ 56,757 $ 773,323 State Grants 28,000 12,000 25,000 340,270 22,000 18,000 20,000 590,933 313,910 20,000 25,277 69,736 1,485,126 Farebox 11,101 12,932 11,569 13,552 11,392 12,974 10,490 11,488 12,766 10,573 10,946 13,393 143,176 Contract Revenue - 23,465 - 15,893 - - - 15,893 - 15,893 - - 71,144 Other Revenue 30,607 12,081 24,450 21,995 18,944 21,488 14,974 17,448 21,889 15,878 31,771 26,427 257,952 Total Revenue $ 162,742 $ 123,511 $ 133,238 $ 461,336 $ 111,248 $ 108,891 $ 97,487 $ 702,304 $ 404,501 $ 121,384 $ 137,766 $ 166,313 $ 2,730,721 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.84 0.88 0.80 0.87 0.72 0.69 0.68 0.75 0.74 0.72 0.70 0.71 0.75
See footnote at the end of Table URBANIZED TRANSIT AGENCIES - FISCAL YEAR 2016
UTA Data Item Sep-15 Oct-15 Nov-15 Dec-15 Jan-16 Feb-16 Mar-16 Apr-16 May-16 Jun-16 Jul-16 Aug-16 FY 2016 Total TEXAS CITY Ridership 15,057 16,671 14,312 14,562 13,598 14,583 14,931 14,119 13,528 13,967 12,713 14,907 172,948 Mileage 43,899 47,864 43,802 43,842 41,877 41,945 47,024 50,179 46,706 46,831 43,686 51,310 548,965 Revenue Federal Grants $69,783 $ 105,320 $ 157,115 $ 205,670 $ 112,538 $ 267,183 $ 162,590 $ 62,458 $ 128,614 $ 103,221 $ 164,878 $ 224,923 $ 1,764,293 State Grants 21,584 21,007 22,098 21,492 21,458 25,614 20,507 18,892 22,281 24,640 24,247 26,607 270,427 Farebox 29,946 27,531 26,895 25,375 23,547 27,373 29,288 31,472 28,392 29,391 25,766 30,031 335,007 Contract Revenue 32,574 57,138 45,844 108,778 50,564 63,969 68,699 54,979 64,929 63,300 56,420 55,416 722,610 Other Revenue 71,713 46,560 104,283 97,466 80,373 106,879 88,656 55,946 69,600 65,962 72,350 113,006 972,794 Total Revenue $ 225,600 $ 257,556 $ 356,235 $ 458,781 $ 288,480 $ 491,018 $ 369,740 $ 223,747 $ 313,816 $ 286,514 $ 343,661 $ 449,983 $ 4,065,131 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.34 0.35 0.33 0.33 0.32 0.35 0.32 0.28 0.29 0.30 0.29 0.29 0.32
TYLER Ridership 16,707 18,279 15,667 16,215 14,737 16,470 16,159 16,232 15,284 15,771 14,767 17,033 193,321 Mileage 43,324 46,809 40,804 44,348 40,405 44,493 46,563 46,164 43,808 48,308 43,217 47,903 536,146 Revenue Federal Grants $ 154,154 $ 162,614 $ 95,825 $ 170,649 $ 99,579 $ 170,897 $ 136,522 $ 120,394 $ 150,931 $ 117,650 $ 130,559 $ 134,638 $ 1,644,412 State Grants 66,675 38,866 51,093 64,119 54,750 70,040 30,136 - - 138,031 - 2,640 516,350 Farebox 12,177 13,164 9,748 12,413 11,659 12,403 12,735 12,907 12,248 13,592 13,032 14,881 150,959 Contract Revenue - - - 7,236 ------7,236 Other Revenue 77,990 26,684 8,874 24,023 5,777 17,372 46,140 52,299 75,787 62,466 64,940 99,339 561,691 Total Revenue $ 310,996 $ 241,328 $ 165,540 $ 278,440 $ 171,765 $ 270,712 $ 225,533 $ 185,600 $ 238,966 $ 331,739 $ 208,531 $ 251,498 $ 2,880,648 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.39 0.39 0.38 0.37 0.36 0.37 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.33 0.34 0.36 0.36
VICTORIA Ridership 23,492 27,177 21,422 24,024 23,104 22,908 23,002 21,468 20,797 21,539 19,817 22,118 270,868 Mileage 56,949 61,459 53,298 48,020 56,947 58,588 61,733 57,484 57,864 61,819 57,881 65,922 697,964 Revenue Federal Grants $48,621 $ 69,915 $ 68,905 $ 99,156 $ 156,726 $ 130,520 $ 114,099 $ 133,585 $ 116,170 $ 51,337 $ 142,002 $ 86,981 $ 1,218,017 State Grants 36,067 57,451 53,988 40,168 38,301 13,803 18,986 754 - - - - 259,518 Farebox 14,754 15,794 13,268 15,085 13,569 14,451 14,096 14,261 10,196 12,113 11,624 13,624 162,835
2016 Texas Transit Statistics Report 2016 49 Contract Revenue 36,606 74,153 27,977 21,070 21,853 28,871 88,734 66,274 38,227 58,380 102,395 67,077 631,617 Other Revenue 8,185 16,408 8,683 21,284 69,773 41,320 11,063 30,534 61,387 21,604 91,527 52,522 434,290 Total Revenue $ 144,233 $ 233,721 $ 172,821 $ 196,763 $ 300,222 $ 228,965 $ 246,978 $ 245,408 $ 225,980 $ 143,434 $ 347,548 $ 220,204 $ 2,706,277 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.41 0.44 0.40 0.50 0.41 0.39 0.37 0.37 0.36 0.35 0.34 0.34 0.39
WACO Ridership 133,956 131,347 110,313 95,740 99,494 110,744 94,916 93,190 65,100 60,094 57,889 101,484 1,154,267 Mileage 179,969 173,862 155,886 158,894 160,706 166,724 165,543 156,935 142,777 161,960 151,552 156,652 1,931,460 Revenue Federal Grants $ 301,275 $ 238,696 $ 238,696 $ 276,940 $ 253,495 $ - $ 240,844 $ 184,369 $ 217,286 $ 161,559 $ 309,867 $ 295,799 $ 2,718,826 State Grants - - - - - 208,277 - - - - 208,277 - 416,554 Farebox 60,486 71,314 71,239 66,376 59,260 61,411 60,138 53,668 54,689 59,952 49,729 62,508 730,770 Contract Revenue 360,934 257,676 251,257 265,221 316,479 126,463 234,754 273,763 247,369 302,834 235,895 194,016 3,066,661 Other Revenue 35,908 51,163 51,111 63,890 33,712 133,899 24,564 72,043 50,602 88,309 59,882 48,726 713,809 Total Revenue $ 758,603 $ 618,849 $ 612,303 $ 672,427 $ 662,946 $ 530,050 $ 560,300 $ 583,843 $ 569,946 $ 612,654 $ 863,650 $ 601,049 $ 7,646,620 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.74 0.76 0.71 0.60 0.62 0.66 0.57 0.59 0.46 0.37 0.38 NR 0.60
See footnote at the end of Table 50 2016 Texas Transit Statistics Report 2016 50
URBANIZED TRANSIT AGENCIES - FISCAL YEAR 2016
UTA Data Item Sep-15 Oct-15 Nov-15 Dec-15 Jan-16 Feb-16 Mar-16 Apr-16 May-16 Jun-16 Jul-16 Aug-16 FY 2016 Total WICHITA FALLS Ridership 50,841 53,823 45,299 32,170 35,716 47,819 42,059 46,629 34,793 34,553 32,146 38,382 494,230 Mileage 49,870 52,270 45,894 45,033 47,896 47,647 50,380 49,340 45,740 48,071 45,668 50,135 577,944 Revenue Federal Grants $ - $ - $ 440,962 $ - $ 374,661 $ - $ 252,085 $ - $ - $ - $ 276,090 $ - $ 1,343,798 State Grants ------252,085 - - - - 86,195 338,280 Farebox 24,609 27,551 22,331 19,865 20,880 22,595 23,060 25,530 24,079 22,673 24,972 24,342 282,487 Contract Revenue ------0 Other Revenue 166,779 39,833 41,203 39,795 44,636 47,576 51,686 40,969 48,779 46,986 44,804 47,729 660,775 Total Revenue $ 191,388 $ 67,384 $ 504,496 $ 59,660 $ 440,177 $ 70,171 $ 578,916 $ 66,499 $ 72,858 $ 69,659 $ 345,866 $ 158,266 $ 2,625,340 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 1.02 1.03 0.99 0.71 0.75 1.00 0.83 0.95 0.76 0.72 0.70 0.77 0.86 GRAND TOTALS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2016
Data Item Sep-15 Oct-15 Nov-15 Dec-15 Jan-16 Feb-16 Mar-16 Apr-16 May-16 Jun-16 Jul-16 Aug-16 FY 2016 Total Urbanized Ridership 3,351,103 2,988,223 2,261,762 1,719,280 1,694,922 2,548,194 2,234,832 2,379,089 1,450,667 1,266,550 1,212,621 1,562,977 24,670,220 Transit Mileage 2,330,610 2,402,433 2,115,036 2,095,496 1,934,491 2,205,678 2,282,958 2,274,947 2,078,412 2,148,204 1,942,927 2,142,378 25,953,570 Agencies - Revenue Fiscal Year 2016 Federal Grants 8,338,227 2,943,282 3,946,584 3,346,573 3,676,732 2,641,716 3,446,933 4,710,898 3,128,588 4,936,398 7,365,330 4,011,151 $52,492,412 State Grants 1,277,427 1,709,304 1,695,181 1,537,506 1,717,283 827,083 795,751 1,317,916 1,459,416 1,166,146 794,140 726,474 15,023,627 Farebox 1,304,077 1,296,693 1,111,913 1,213,754 1,211,401 1,256,995 1,198,543 1,155,694 1,231,843 1,218,764 1,109,022 1,308,942 14,617,641 Contract Revenue 1,505,404 1,297,414 1,891,126 1,184,628 1,253,033 1,449,494 1,507,276 1,778,538 1,619,916 1,313,791 1,320,209 1,662,846 17,783,675 Other Revenue 5,744,010 2,819,496 2,617,345 2,722,265 3,277,069 2,980,034 2,896,179 2,919,649 2,740,827 2,623,781 2,536,838 3,949,662 37,827,155 Total Revenue $ 18,169,145 $ 10,066,189 $ 11,262,149 $ 10,004,726 $ 11,135,518 $ 9,155,322 $ 9,844,682 $ 11,882,695 $ 10,180,590 $ 11,258,880 $ 13,125,539 $ 11,659,075 $137,744,510 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 1.44 1.24 1.07 0.82 0.88 1.16 0.98 1.05 0.70 0.59 0.62 0.73 0.95 *NETS - Contract Revenues is for General Public Service from another 5307 or 5311 transit agency. NR - Not Reported RURAL AREA PROGRAM
(SECTION 5311)
2016 Texas Transit Statistics Report 51 SUMMARY RURAL TRANSIT PROGRAMS (Section 5311)
The Section 5311 Grant Program (49 USC, Section 5311) provides capital, planning, operating, and administrative grants for public transportation projects in rural areas. The rural transit agencies have mandates to report performance as described in the Texas Transportation Code, §456.008 and the Texas Administrative Code (TAC), §31.36 and §31.48.
The funding formula allocates funds based on “needs” and “performance.” Each agency’s “needs” index is comprised of 75 percent population and 25 percent land area. Including land area in the needs calculation recognizes the increased cost of providing transit service to geographically large areas.
The funding formula distributes performance funding based on an average of three indicators:
• Local investment per operational expense • Unlinked passenger trips per vehicle revenue mile • Vehicle revenue miles per operational expense
Like the urbanized transit agencies, the rural transit agencies are required to report the following indicators:
(i) Service efficiency--Operating expense per vehicle mile.
(ii) Cost effectiveness--Operating expense per unlinked passenger trip.
(iii) Service effectiveness--Unlinked passenger trips per capita and unlinked passenger trips per vehicle mile.
(iv) Safety--Total incidents per 100,000 miles of service and average number of miles between revenue vehicle mechanical system failures that prevent the vehicle from completing a scheduled revenue trip.
In addition to the performance-based indicators required for formula funding and the reporting requirements of the TAC, the rural transit agencies are obligated to report annually to the Federal Transit Administration National Transit Database (FTA NTD) as state recipients. The reporting requirements are described in the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, and Efficient Transportation Equity Act: Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU). The rural transit agencies’ data is collected by TxDOT-PTN and submitted to FTA-NTD each year in January.
52 2016 Texas Transit Statistics Report Performance Review – Rural Transit Programs:
In FY 2016, the ridership number for the rural transit agencies is 5.4 million riders. Ridership decreased nearly 12 percent from the FY 2015 ridership total of 6.1 million passenger trips. In addition, vehicle revenue miles traveled decreased eight (8) percent between the two fiscal years.
In the period from FY 2007 to FY 2016, the number of unlinked passenger trips increased 11 percent. Rural transit ridership reached its peak of 7.3 million in FY 2013, and has declined 27 percent between FY 2013 and FY 2016. The number of vehicle revenue miles increased 12 percent during the past decade. After reaching the peak miles driven of 33.4 million in FY 2013, vehicle revenue miles has declined 15 percent since then.
Over the past fiscal year, the McLennan County Rural Transit District has contributed a supplementary amount of ridership being the newly formed transit agency in FY 2015. In addition, Kleberg County Human Services (up 47 percent), Concho Valley Rural Transit District (up 23 percent) and Lower Rio Grande Valley Development Council (up 13 percent) has demonstrated the greatest ridership gains among the rural agencies.
Due to financial issues, the Texoma Area Paratransit System (TAPS) has had interference in rural transit ridership in FY 2016. Aside from TAPS, the Capital Area Rural Transportation System (at 49 percent), Golden Crescent Regional Planning Commission (at 37 percent) and Alamo Area Council of Governments (at 19 percent), have shown the greatest significant decrease in ridership, from FY 2015 to FY 2016.
The Lower Rio Grande Valley Development Council has demonstrated the heaviest full year trend regarding vehicle miles travelled, up 46 percent, from FY 2015 to FY 2016. In contrast, the Golden Crescent Regional Planning Commission (at 55 percent), Heart of Texas Council of Governments (at 36 percent) and Alamo Area Council of Governments (at 27 percent), from FY 2015 to FY 2016.
Since 2013, rural transit ridership has declined due in part to the growth of urbanized areas through the loss of rural territory. The indicated trend of service usage is also affected by local and national economic conditions.
As noted in the introduction, new tables and figures are presented in this report to show the detailed break-out of ridership by programs along with passenger boarding by service.
2016 Texas Transit Statistics Report 53 Figure 9 below shows the rural transit agencies' “unlinked passenger trips per vehicle revenue mile” indicator for FY 2007-2016. The graph shows currently shows an unchanging trend during the past decade.
Notes:
The monthly statistics for agencies funded through the Section 5311 Grant Program are located at the end of this section.
In June 2015, the rural transit district known as the Community Action Council of South Texas ceased operations. As a result of the agency’s de-establishment, Zapata and Starr counties became part of the Lower Rio Grande Valley Development Council; and the remaining counties of Jim Hogg and Duval became part of the Rural Economic Assistance League, Inc. rural transit disrict. This change will be reflected in future Texas Transit Statistics reports.
Effective August 1, 2015, a new rural transit district, McLennan County, became eligible for state and federal formula funds. The McLennan County Transit District was created by local stakeholders, dissolving rural transit service in McLennan County provided by the Heart of Texas Council of Governments. This change will be reflected in future Texas Transit Statistics reports.
54 2016 Texas Transit Statistics Report FIGURE 10
Dallam Sherman Hansford Ochiltree Lipscomb Rural Public 23 Hartley Moore Hutchinson Roberts Hemphill Transportation
Oldham Potter Carson Gray Wheeler
Collings- Deaf Smith Randall Armstrong Systems Donley Worth
Parmer Castro Swisher Briscoe Hall Childress H ardeman
Bailey Lamb Hale Floyd Motley Cottle Wilbarger Foard Wichita 30 25 Lamar Red Lubbock Clay Montague River Hockley Crosby Dickens Cooke King Knox Grayson Fannin Bowie Cochran 2 Baylor Archer 34 Delta Titus Yoakum Jack Denton Collin 27 Terry Lynn Garza Kent Stonewall Haskell Throck- Young Wise Hopkins Cass
morton Morris Hunt Franklin Camp 32 Rock- 3 wall Rains Marion 24Parker Wood Upshur Gaines Palo Tarrant Dawson Borden Scurry Fisher Jones Pinto Dallas 33 Harrison Stephens Va n Shackelford Zandt Smith Gregg Johnson Kaufman 35 Hood Ellis Andrews Eastland Martin Howard Mitchell Nolan Taylor Callahan Erath 7 Henderson 12 Rusk Panola El Paso 9 6 Comanche Somervell Navarro 18 Hill Cherokee Loving Winkler Ector Midland Anderson Shelby 13 Glasscock Coke Runnels Bosque Nacogdoches Sterling Brown Limestone Coleman Freestone Hudspeth Hamilton Culberson 22 Ward Crane Mills Mc Tom Lennan Houston San Sabine Reeves Upton Reagan Leon Irion Green Concho 19 Coryell Angelina Augustine Mc Falls Culloch Lampasas 10 San Saba Bell Robertson Trinity Madison 4 37 Pecos Menard Polk Tyler Newton Jeff Davis Burnet Milam Walker Jasper Crockett Schleicher Mason Llano Williamson Brazos San Jacinto
Grimes Hardin Sutton Kimble Burleson Blanco Tr avis Lee Gillespie Montgomery Terrell Washington Orange Wa Liberty 28 Presidio 5 Hays Bastrop ller Jefferson Kerr Austin Brewster Val Verde Edwards Kendall Fayette Harris Caldwell Chambers Real Comal 11 Bandera Colorado 14 Guadalupe Lavaca 8 Fort 15 Uvalde Bexar Gonzales Bend Kinney Medina Wharton Brazoria Galveston 31 Wilson 1 Dewitt 17 Jackson Maverick 16 Zavala Frio Atascosa Karnes Matagorda Victoria Goliad KEY: Calhoun Mc Bee Refugio Dimmit La Salle Mullen Live 1. Alamo Area Council of Governments Oak 26 San Aransas 2. Ark-Tex Council of Governments Jim Patricio 36 Webb Wells 3. Aspermont Small Business Development Center, Inc. Nueces Duval 4. Brazos Transit District 5. Capital Area Rural Transportation System (CARTS) Kleberg
6. Central Texas Rural Transit District Jim Zapata Brooks 7. Cleburne, City of Hogg Kenedy 8. Colorado Valley Transit, Inc. 20 Starr 29 9. Community Services, Inc. Hidalgo Willacy SOUTH PADRE 10. Concho Valley Transit District 21 ISLAND Cameron 11. Del Rio, City of 12. East Texas Council of Governments 26. Rural Economic Assistance League, Inc. 13. El Paso, County of 27. Senior Center Resources & Public Transit, Inc. 14. Fort Bend, County of 28. South East Texas Regional Planning Commission 15. Galveston County Transit District 29. South Padre Island, City of 16. Golden Crescent Regional Planning Commission 30. South Plains Community Action Association 17. Gulf Coast Center 31. Southwest Area Regional Transit District 18. Heart of Texas Council of Governments 32. SPAN, Inc. 19. Hill Country Transit District 33. STAR Transit 20. Kleberg County Human Services 34. Texoma Area Paratransit System, Inc. 21. Lower Rio Grande Valley Development Council 35. The Transit System, Inc. 22. McLennan County Rural Transit District 36. Webb County Community Action Agency 23. Panhandle Community Services 37. West Texas Opportunities, Inc. 24. Public Transit Services Texas Department of Transportation 25. Rolling Plains Management Corporation April 1, 2016
2016 Texas Transit Statistics Report 55 FIGURE 11: RURAL AREA PROGRAM EFFICIENCY AND EFFECTIVENESS MEASURES FISCAL YEARS 2007-2016
Rural Area Program (5311) Service Efficiency $3.40 $3.50 $3.14 $3.17 $3.13 $2.85 $2.84 $2.83 $3.00 $2.67 $2.81 $2.52 $2.50 $2.00 $1.50 $1.00 $0.50 $0.00 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Operating Expense per Vehicle Revenue Mile
Rural Area Program (5311) Cost Effectiveness $27.56 $28.00 $22.95$23.17 $24.00 $21.62 $20.29 $18.93 $19.50 $19.88 $20.00 $16.19 $16.00 $14.48 $12.00 $8.00 $4.00 $0.00 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Operating Expense per Unlinked Passenger Trip
Rural Area Program (5311) Service Effectiveness 0.30 0.26 0.24 0.25 0.23 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.20 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.20
0.15
0.10
0.05
0.00 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Unlinked Passenger Trips per Vehicle Revenue Mile
Note: Figure 11 bar charts are averages of all transit agencies recorded during fiscal years.
56 2016 Texas Transit Statistics Report TABLE 18: RURAL AREA PROGRAM (5311) PERFORMANCE SUMMARY AT A GLANCE Fiscal Years 2015 and 2016
SERVICE SUPPLIED % Change FINANCIAL SOURCE % Change 2015 2016 (15-16) 2015 2016 (15-16) Vehicle Revenue Miles 30,922,835 28,424,057 -8.08 Total Operating Vehicle Revenue Hours 1,616,781 1,486,823 -8.04 Expenses $92,064,119 $90,545,090 -1.65 Total Revenue Vehicles 1,710 1,699 -0.64 Total Revenue $44,383,699 $41,488,276 -6.52
SERVICE CONSUMED % Change *SAFETY DATA % Change 2015 2016 (15-16) 2015 2016 (15-16) Unlinked Passenger Annual Safety Trips 6,057,232 5,360,416 -11.50 Incidents 12 20 66.67 Actual Vehicle Miles 36,437,323 33,642,261 -7.67 Total Revenue Actual Vehicle Hours 1,907,721 1,768,529 -7.30 Failures 5,503 5,067 -7.92
AVERAGE PERFORMANCE MEASURES: SERVICE EFFICIENCY COST EFFECTIVENESS 2015 2016 2015 2016 Operating Expense Per Operating Expense Per Vehicle Unlinked Passenger Revenue Mile $2.98 $3.19 $15.20 $16.89 Trip Operating Expense Per Vehicle Farebox Recovery $56.94 $60.90 5% 6% Revenue Hour Ratio**
SERVICE EFFECTIVENESS *SAFETY INDICATOR 2015 2016 2015 2016 Unlinked Passenger Trips Vehicle Incidents/Per 0.20 0.19 0.039 0.070 Per Vehicle Revenue Mile 100,000 Miles Avg. Miles Between Unlinked Passenger Trips Revenue Vehicle Per Vehicle Revenue Hour 3.75 3.61 17.80 17.83 System Failures
AVERAGE DEAD HEAD RATIOS: 2015 2016 Dead Head Hours 15.30% 15.93% Dead Head Miles 15.10% 15.51%
Notes: (i), (ii), (iii) and (iv) are performance measures requirements of Transportation Code §456.008. "Average Performance Measure" is the average of all service provided. # Not a performance-based requirement for Transportation Code §456.008. *Safety data includes incidents for fatalities, major and non-major injuries. Total Revenue Vehicle System Failures is combined major & other mechanical system failures. See Table 24 for detailed breakout. ** (see Table 23 for details). NR - Not Reported
2016 Texas Transit Statistics Report 57 58 2016 Texas Transit Statistics Report 2016 58
TABLE 19: RURAL AREA PROGRAM (Section 5311) SERVICE EFFICIENCY AND COST EFFECTIVENESS BY SYSTEM - Fiscal Years 2015 and 2016
Operating Expense Per Vehicle Revenue Mile (i) Operating Expense Per Unlinked Passenger Trip (ii) Rural Transit Districts (Headquarters) 2015 2016 2015 2016 Alamo Area Council of Governments (San Antonio) $ 4.19 $ 5.12 $ 36.53 $ 40.15 Ark-Tex Council of Governments (Texarkana) 3.54 2.73 30.67 29.78 Aspermont Small Business Development Ctr. (Aspermont) 2.11 2.08 52.57 52.67 Brazos Transit District (Bryan) 2.44 3.41 19.40 24.06 Capital Area Rural Transportation System (CARTS) (Austin) 3.80 3.58 14.60 27.10 Central Texas Rural Transit District (Coleman) 2.69 2.52 27.03 27.57 Cleburne City of (Cleburne) 3.23 3.18 29.82 28.62 Colorado Valley Transit (Columbus) 3.80 3.61 17.92 16.20 Community Act. Council of South Texas (Rio Grande City) 2.28 N/A 10.37 N/A Community Services, Inc. (Corsicana) 3.87 3.40 14.36 13.70 Concho Valley Rural Transit District (San Angelo) 4.00 3.56 37.50 29.28 Del Rio, City of (Del Rio) 3.08 4.20 19.76 21.65 East Texas Council of Governments (Kilgore) 2.85 2.82 32.79 33.90 El Paso County of, (El Paso) 1.99 1.53 11.26 11.30 Fort Bend County Rural Transit District (Fort Bend) 3.96 3.90 16.61 17.71 Galveston County Transit District (Galveston) 4.96 5.34 5.31 6.06 Golden Crescent Regional Planning Commission (Victoria) 2.49 2.87 16.12 13.25 Gulf Coast Center (Galveston) 3.60 5.45 30.49 47.15 Heart of Texas Council of Governments (Waco) 3.67 4.67 63.86 50.76 Hill Country Transit District (San Saba) 3.35 3.92 19.43 23.06 Kleberg County Human Services (Kingsville) 2.70 3.08 11.71 9.87 Lower Rio Grande Valley Develop. Council (McAllen) 3.26 3.82 10.60 16.07 McLennan County Rural Transit District (Waco) 1.40 2.77 30.75 51.78 Panhandle Community Services (Amarillo) 2.72 2.69 9.48 9.62 Public Transit Services (Mineral Wells) 2.88 2.93 25.27 24.66 Rolling Plains Management Corp. (Crowell) 3.11 2.53 15.13 13.83 Rural Economic Assistance League, Inc. (REAL) (Alice) 2.67 3.36 7.31 6.53 Senior Center Resources and Public Transit Inc.(Greenville) 2.64 2.61 18.23 18.59 South East Texas Regional Planning Comm. (Beaumont) 3.20 3.06 24.45 23.99 South Padre Island, Town of (South Padre Island) 3.60 3.49 2.41 2.62 South Plains Community Action Assoc. (Levelland) 3.06 3.07 21.01 20.88 Southwest Area Regional Transit District (Uvalde) 2.67 2.84 15.76 14.60 SPAN, Inc. (Denton) 2.90 3.22 26.47 28.98 STAR Transit (Terrell) 3.57 3.64 32.35 33.47 Texoma Area Paratransit System/TAPS (Sherman) NR 5.89 NR 121.38 Transit System Inc., The (Glen Rose) 3.40 3.23 52.88 58.55 Webb Co. Community Action Agency (Laredo) 3.44 3.45 8.99 9.76 West Texas Opportunities, Inc. (Lamesa) 2.63 2.37 37.93 40.57 Average for Reporting Districts $ 3.13 $ 3.40 $ 23.17 $ 27.56
Notes: (i) TAC Requirement for Service Efficiency. (ii) TAC Requirement for Cost Effectiveness. N/A - Not Applicable NR - Not Reported TABLE 20: RURAL AREA PROGRAM (Section 5311) SERVICE EFFECTIVENESS - Fiscal Years 2015 and 2016
Unlinked Passenger Trips per Capita (iii) Unlinked Passenger Trips per Vehicle Revenue Mile (iii) Rural Transit Districts (Headquarters) 2015 2016 2015 2016 Alamo Area Council of Governments (San Antonio) 0.27 0.22 0.11 0.13 Ark-Tex Council of Governments (Texarkana) 0.45 0.39 0.12 0.09 Aspermont Small Business Development Ctr. (Aspermont) 0.42 0.41 0.04 0.04 Brazos Transit District (Bryan) 0.29 0.27 0.13 0.14 Capital Area Rural Transportation System (CARTS) (Austin) 1.34 0.68 0.26 0.13 Central Texas Rural Transit District (Coleman) 0.75 0.72 0.10 0.09 Cleburne City of (Cleburne) 0.35 0.36 0.11 0.11 Colorado Valley Transit (Columbus) 0.65 0.65 0.21 0.22 Community Act. Council of South Texas (Rio Grande City) 0.86 N/A 0.22 N/A Community Services, Inc. (Corsicana) 0.60 0.53 0.27 0.25 Concho Valley Rural Transit District (San Angelo) 0.68 0.84 0.11 0.12 Del Rio, City of (Del Rio) 1.04 1.07 0.16 0.19 East Texas Council of Governments (Kilgore) 0.16 0.16 0.09 0.08 El Paso County of, (El Paso) 12.47 10.43 0.18 0.14 Fort Bend County Rural Transit District (Fort Bend) 10.01 10.27 0.24 0.22 Galveston County Transit District (Galveston) 13.39 12.31 0.93 0.88 Golden Crescent Regional Planning Commission (Victoria) 1.15 0.72 0.15 0.22 Gulf Coast Center (Galveston) 0.23 0.22 0.12 0.12 Heart of Texas Council of Governments (Waco) 0.41 0.27 0.06 0.09 Hill Country Transit District (San Saba) 0.89 0.84 0.17 0.17 Kleberg County Human Services (Kingsville) 1.89 2.79 0.23 0.31 Lower Rio Grande Valley Develop. Council (McAllen) 0.48 0.89 0.31 0.24 McLennan County Rural Transit District (Waco) NR NR 0.95 0.05 Panhandle Community Services (Amarillo) 1.49 1.45 0.29 0.28 Public Transit Services (Mineral Wells) 0.53 0.52 0.11 0.12 Rolling Plains Management Corp. (Crowell) 1.30 1.37 0.21 0.18 Rural Economic Assistance League, Inc. (REAL) (Alice) 1.44 3.08 0.37 0.52 Senior Center Resources and Public Transit Inc.(Greenville) 0.77 0.82 0.14 0.14 South East Texas Regional Planning Comm. (Beaumont) 0.73 0.71 0.13 0.13
2016 Texas Transit Statistics Report 2016 59 South Padre Island, City of (South Padre Island)* 194.18 173.96 1.50 1.33 South Plains Community Action Assoc. (Levelland) 0.78 0.73 0.15 0.15 Southwest Area Regional Transit District (Uvalde) 1.34 1.34 0.17 0.19 SPAN, Inc. (Denton) 0.87 0.85 0.11 0.11 STAR Transit (Terrell) 1.40 1.46 0.11 0.11 Texoma Area Paratransit System/TAPS (Sherman) 0.42 0.02 0.07 0.05 Transit System Inc., The (Glen Rose) 0.30 0.25 0.06 0.06 Webb Co. Community Action Agency (Laredo) 6.36 5.52 0.38 0.35 West Texas Opportunities, Inc. (Lamesa) 0.58 0.51 0.07 0.06 Average for Reporting Districts 7.06 6.60 0.24 0.21
Notes: (iii) TAC requirements for Service Effectiveness *Tourist destination with large ridership and small population. N/A - Not Applicable NR - Not Reported 60 2016 Texas Transit Statistics Report 2016 60
TABLE 21: RURAL AREA PROGRAM (Section 5311) SOURCE DATA - Fiscal Years 2015 and 2016
Total Operating Expense Vehicle Revenue Hours Vehicle Revenue Miles Rural Transit Districts (Headquarters) 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 Alamo Area Council of Governments (San Antonio) $ 4,059,810 $3,608,338 55,929 45,670 969,085 704,797 Ark-Tex Council of Governments (Texarkana) @ 3,186,845 2,665,531 50,729 48,600 901,332 976,664 Aspermont Small Business Development Ctr. (Aspermont) 840,585 816,934 15,645 16,092 398,961 392,183 Brazos Transit District (Bryan) 4,557,485 5,165,789 77,930 65,759 1,869,387 1,516,211 Capital Area Rural Transportation System (CARTS) (Austin) # 7,784,561 7,302,429 98,325 87,316 2,046,063 2,039,845 Central Texas Rural Transit District (Coleman) @ 3,891,690 3,813,370 62,619 61,350 1,444,847 1,511,486 Cleburne City of (Cleburne) 1,123,837 1,091,396 20,871 20,931 348,413 342,797 Colorado Valley Transit (Columbus) # 1,548,604 1,389,092 32,603 31,814 407,819 384,998 Community Act. Council of South Texas (Rio Grande City) 820,908 N/A 17,353 N/A 360,160 N/A Community Services, Inc. (Corsicana) 974,731 820,063 13,114 11,200 251,809 240,940 Concho Valley Rural Transit District (San Angelo) 1,463,411 1,405,964 23,631 25,681 365,987 395,236 Del Rio, City of (Del Rio) 1,008,199 1,127,426 22,766 15,691 327,841 268,734 East Texas Council of Governments (Kilgore) @ 3,114,701 3,208,411 58,673 59,672 1,091,129 1,138,945 El Paso County of, (El Paso) # 3,968,177 3,333,011 49,774 60,184 1,992,417 2,176,799 Fort Bend County Rural Transit District (Fort Bend) @ 6,348,878 6,947,788 76,399 83,468 1,605,244 1,779,654 Galveston County Transit District (Galveston) @ 4,402,628 4,619,330 61,090 58,212 887,725 864,451 Golden Crescent Regional Planning Commission (Victoria) # 3,001,805 1,551,583 59,583 22,525 1,205,647 541,206 Gulf Coast Center (Galveston) 593,288 892,005 7,673 6,743 164,940 163,817 Heart of Texas Council of Governments (Waco) # 2,970,272 2,407,819 37,193 27,447 808,732 515,790 Hill Country Transit District (San Saba) 2,861,400 3,196,584 64,847 65,269 854,508 816,264 Kleberg County Human Services (Kingsville) # 720,294 892,952 21,687 23,103 266,608 290,089 Lower Rio Grande Valley Develop. Council (McAllen) 986,618 1,683,247 17,133 23,484 302,330 440,139 McLennan County Rural Transit District (Waco) 58,238 724,122 1,984 10,680 41,523 260,979 Panhandle Community Services (Amarillo) # 3,276,094 3,234,746 74,200 73,685 1,205,495 1,203,305 Public Transit Services (Mineral Wells) 1,986,738 1,893,528 37,253 34,600 690,411 647,297 Rolling Plains Management Corp. (Crowell) 1,645,630 1,594,598 36,807 42,124 528,935 629,545 Rural Economic Assistance League, Inc. (REAL) (Alice) 1,967,113 1,928,157 52,071 54,167 736,060 573,362 Senior Center Resources and Public Transit Inc.(Greenville) # 1,215,621 1,320,576 32,255 33,995 460,980 505,888 South East Texas Regional Planning Comm. (Beaumont) 1,567,378 1,490,243 29,580 27,978 489,962 487,276 South Padre Island, City of (South Padre Island) # 1,315,495 1,282,791 20,898 20,582 365,372 367,652 South Plains Community Action Assoc. (Levelland) @ 3,270,336 3,066,400 46,001 40,908 1,069,878 998,067 Southwest Area Regional Transit District (Uvalde) # 2,501,526 2,318,429 47,343 45,249 937,582 815,957 SPAN, Inc. (Denton) 1,725,072 1,843,114 31,493 30,921 594,478 572,064 STAR Transit (Terrell) 5,148,464 5,522,573 89,910 97,082 1,440,961 1,517,598 Texoma Area Paratransit System/TAPS (Sherman) # # NR 599,249 64,671 4,674 1,304,616 101,689 Transit System Inc., The (Glen Rose) 947,917 872,343 14,918 12,327 278,940 269,934 Webb Co. Community Action Agency (Laredo) 833,638 785,541 14,104 14,174 242,505 227,889 West Texas Opportunities, Inc. (Lamesa) 4,376,132 4,129,618 77,726 83,466 1,664,153 1,744,510 Totals $ 92,064,119 $ 90,545,090 1,616,781 1,486,823 30,922,835 28,424,057 Average for Reporting Districts $ 2,488,219 $ 2,447,165 42,547 40,184 813,759 768,218
Notes: # Includes JARC data. See Table 32 and Table 33 for Breakout. # # Includes New Freedom (NF) data. See Table 36 and Table 37 for Breakout. @ Includes JARC and New Freedom (NF) data. N/A - Not Applicable NR - Not Reported TABLE 21a: RURAL AREA PROGRAM (Section 5311) SOURCE DATA (continued) - Fiscal Years 2015 and 2016
Service Area Population (1) Unlinked Passenger Trips Total Revenue Vehicles Nonurbanized Systems (Headquarters) Census 2010 2015 2016 2015 2016 Alamo Area Council of Governments (San Antonio) 407,529 111,145 89,878 93 80 Ark-Tex Council of Governments (Texarkana) @ 229,857 103,921 89,508 65 55 Aspermont Small Business Development Ctr. (Aspermont) 37,733 15,991 15,510 16 17 Brazos Transit District (Bryan) 805,898 234,920 214,724 58 55 Capital Area Rural Transportation System (CARTS) (Austin) # 398,674 533,063 269,423 134 149 Central Texas Rural Transit District (Coleman) @ 190,802 143,971 138,319 78 66 Cleburne City of (Cleburne) 106,596 37,687 38,128 18 21 Colorado Valley Transit (Columbus) # 132,858 86,394 85,764 26 24 Community Act. Council of South Texas (Rio Grande City) N/A 79,143 N/A N/A N/A Community Services, Inc. (Corsicana) 113,831 67,859 59,870 20 11 Concho Valley Rural Transit District (San Angelo) 57,196 39,027 48,014 54 18 Del Rio, City of (Del Rio) 48,879 51,021 52,080 20 22 East Texas Council of Governments (Kilgore) @ 600,618 95,172 94,647 52 45 El Paso County of, (El Paso) # 28,273 352,516 294,980 19 81 Fort Bend County Rural Transit District (Fort Bend) @ 38,177 382,153 392,264 48 71 Galveston County Transit District (Galveston) @ 61,937 829,119 762,594 32 31 Golden Crescent Regional Planning Commission (Victoria) # 161,645 186,164 117,122 64 22 Gulf Coast Center (Galveston) 86,202 19,458 18,917 6 6 Heart of Texas Council of Governments (Waco) # 114,367 46,514 47,436 25 50 Hill Country Transit District (San Saba) 164,934 147,294 138,591 70 66 Kleberg County Human Services (Kingsville) # 32,477 61,494 90,506 18 18 Lower Rio Grande Valley Develop. Council (McAllen) 132,252 93,121 104,768 42 39 McLennan County Rural Transit District (Waco) 62,528 1,894 13,984 14 15 Panhandle Community Services (Amarillo) # 231,276 345,573 336,361 85 89 Public Transit Services (Mineral Wells) 138,104 78,633 76,775 50 54 Rolling Plains Management Corp. (Crowell) 92,952 108,801 115,308 72 75 Rural Economic Assistance League, Inc. (REAL) (Alice) 247,960 269,076 295,429 78 78 Senior Center Resources and Public Transit Inc. (Greenville) # 86,129 66,674 71,040 17 17 South East Texas Regional Planning Comm. (Beaumont) 87,673 64,104 62,124 34 19 South Padre Island, City of (South Padre Island) # 2,816 546,814 489,885 10 8 South Plains Community Action Assoc. (Levelland) @ 200,627 155,639 146,878 60 54 Southwest Area Regional Transit District (Uvalde) # 118,131 158,725 158,840 62 51
2016 Texas Transit Statistics Report 2016 61 SPAN, Inc. (Denton) 75,149 65,171 63,593 31 35 STAR Transit (Terrell) 113,378 159,128 165,019 67 81 Texoma Area Paratransit System/TAPS (Sherman) # # 220,927 93,828 4,937 NR 10 Transit System Inc., The (Glen Rose) 59,672 17,926 14,898 27 27 Webb Co. Community Action Agency (Laredo) 14,574 92,728 80,502 17 18 West Texas Opportunities, Inc. (Lamesa) 198,733 115,371 101,800 128 121 Totals 5,901,364 6,057,232 5,360,416 1,710 1,699 Average for Reporting Systems 159,401 144,876 48 46
Notes: Service area population changed from original 2010 Census due to increase or decrease in transit service area coverage. (1) Source - 2010 U.S. Census SF1. # Includes JARC ridership - See Table 32 and Table 33 for Breakout. # # Includes New Freedom (NF) data - See Table 36 and Table 37 for Breakout. @ Includes JARC and NF data. N/A - Not Applicable, NR - Not Reported Population of transit service area based on Agency in operation, as of August 31, 2016. 62 2016 Texas Transit Statistics Report 2016 62
TABLE 21b: RURAL AREA PROGRAM - PASSENGER BOARDINGS - Fiscal Year 2015 to Fiscal Year 2016
Passenger Boardings FY2015 FY2016 Differences % Change General Public 3,822,681 3,299,191 -523,490 -14% Medical Transportation Program 284,841 237,287 -47,554 -17% Other Contract Service 1,085,722 1,101,109 15,387 1% Section 5316 (JARC) 329,053 201,971 -127,082 -39% Section 5310 Enhanced Mobility of Seniors & Disabled 306,894 306,961 67 0% Department of Aging & Disabilities 112,254 106,938 -5,316 -5% CMAQ 68,707 61,880 -6,827 -10% Head Start 32,454 30,431 -2,023 -6% Section 5317 New Freedom 14,384 13,763 -621 -4% Other State Programs 242 885 643 266% TOTAL 6,057,232 5,360,416 -696,816 -12%
Figure 12: Rural - Percentage of Passenger Boardings by Section 5310 Service, FY 2016 Department of Enhanced Mobility Aging & of Seniors & Disabilities Disabled 2.0% 5.6% CMAQ, Head Start, Section 5316 Section 5317 (New (JARC) Freedom) and 3.7% Other State Other Contract Programs Service 2.0% 20.6% General Public Medical 61.7% Transportation Program 4.4% TABLE 22: RURAL AREA PROGRAM (Section 5311) ANNUAL LOCAL REVENUE - Fiscal Years 2015 and 2016
Local Revenue Total Revenue (1) Rural Transit Districts (Headquarters) 2015 2016 2015 2016 Alamo Area Council of Governments (San Antonio) $ 1,362,060 $ 924,317 $ 1,558,628 $ 1,091,386 Ark-Tex Council of Governments (Texarkana) 1,171,246 696,989 1,245,139 768,257 Aspermont Small Business Development Ctr. (Aspermont) 180,447 244,725 198,916 261,486 Brazos Transit District (Bryan) 1,430,914 988,329 1,558,935 1,108,405 Capital Area Rural Transportation System (CARTS) (Austin) 4,244,533 3,304,940 4,455,041 3,467,248 Central Texas Rural Transit District (Coleman) 2,565,702 2,300,722 2,673,744 2,417,129 Cleburne City of (Cleburne) 283,808 333,368 364,823 412,339 Colorado Valley Transit (Columbus) 599,821 345,786 676,388 409,816 Community Act. Council of South Texas (Rio Grande City) NR NR 120,504 NR Community Services, Inc. (Corsicana) 153,133 196,577 235,153 266,549 Concho Valley Rural Transit District (San Angelo) 533,736 639,179 546,337 658,787 Del Rio, City of (Del Rio) 351,050 482,317 431,437 575,205 East Texas Council of Governments (Kilgore) 487,842 1,050,604 646,977 1,219,501 El Paso County of, (El Paso) 1,669,488 1,916,116 2,612,335 2,585,432 Fort Bend County Rural Transit District (Fort Bend) 2,517,224 2,307,237 3,244,234 3,080,960 Galveston County Transit District (Galveston) 4,536,703 3,619,818 4,828,552 3,888,410 Golden Crescent Regional Planning Commission (Victoria) 1,598,770 874,095 1,656,466 890,364 Gulf Coast Center (Galveston) 140,257 135,622 153,119 154,899 Heart of Texas Council of Governments (Waco) 1,187,124 941,694 1,281,371 990,077 Hill Country Transit District (San Saba) 1,462,888 2,307,500 1,539,037 2,376,674 Kleberg County Human Services (Kingsville) 219,610 458,220 250,658 479,059 Lower Rio Grande Valley Develop. Council (McAllen) 132,507 200,937 168,210 278,839 McLennan County Rural Transit District (Waco) 26,915 307,913 31,324 342,718 Panhandle Community Services (Amarillo) 1,020,321 2,065,466 1,196,756 2,224,193 Public Transit Services (Mineral Wells) 791,816 735,437 871,164 816,159 Rolling Plains Management Corp. (Crowell) 694,221 537,355 741,785 574,329 Rural Economic Assistance League, Inc. (REAL) (Alice) 411,822 235,358 499,558 342,941 Senior Center Resources and Public Transit Inc.(Greenville) 511,026 565,830 609,048 669,041 South East Texas Regional Planning Comm. (Beaumont) 575,780 489,373 654,984 561,528 South Padre Island, City of (South Padre Island) 202,208 278,643 202,208 278,643 South Plains Community Action Assoc. (Levelland) 1,201,166 1,122,582 1,486,529 1,319,576 2016 Texas Transit Statistics Report 2016 63 Southwest Area Regional Transit District (Uvalde) 1,045,921 818,783 1,224,238 966,259 SPAN, Inc. (Denton) 658,618 630,665 733,316 706,844 STAR Transit (Terrell) 2,570,994 2,875,248 2,740,151 3,054,478 Texoma Area Paratransit System/TAPS (Sherman) NR NR NR 8,732 Transit System Inc., The (Glen Rose) 539,875 337,836 583,084 370,197 Webb Co. Community Action Agency (Laredo) 142,967 102,620 267,097 202,893 West Texas Opportunities, Inc. (Lamesa) 2,037,017 1,607,009 2,096,453 1,668,923 Totals $ 39,259,530 $36,979,210 $ 44,383,699 $ 41,488,276 Average for Reporting Districts $ 1,090,543 $ 1,027,200 $ 1,199,559 $ 1,121,305
Notes:
(1) Directly generated funds, as defined in the latest edition of the Federal Transit Administration National Transit Database Reporting Manual. Examples include, but are not limited to, passenger fares, special transit fares, purchased transportation fares, park and ride revenue, other transportation revenue, charter service revenue, freight tariffs, station and vehicle concessions, advertising revenue, funds dedicated to transit at their source, taxes, cash contributions, contract revenue, general revenue, and in-kind contributions. N/A - Not Applicable, NR - Not Reported 64 2016 Texas Transit Statistics Report 2016 64
TABLE 23: RURAL AREA PROGRAM (Section 5311) FAREBOX REVENUE AND FAREBOX RECOVERY RATIO - Fiscal Years 2015 and 2016
Farebox Revenue Farebox Recovery Ratio (1) Rural Transit Districts (Headquarters) 2015 2016 2015 2016 Alamo Area Council of Governments (San Antonio) $ 196,568 $ 167,069 5% 5% Ark-Tex Council of Governments (Texarkana) 73,893 71,268 2% 3% Aspermont Small Business Development Ctr. (Aspermont) 18,469 16,761 2% 2% Brazos Transit District (Bryan) 128,021 120,076 3% 2% Capital Area Rural Transportation System (CARTS) (Austin) 210,508 162,308 3% 2% Central Texas Rural Transit District (Coleman) 108,042 116,407 3% 3% Cleburne City of (Cleburne) 81,015 78,971 7% 7% Colorado Valley Transit (Columbus) 76,567 64,030 5% 5% Community Act. Council of South Texas (Rio Grande City) 120,504 NR 15% NR Community Services, Inc. (Corsicana) 82,020 69,972 8% 9% Concho Valley Rural Transit District (San Angelo) 12,601 19,608 1% 1% Del Rio, City of (Del Rio) 80,387 92,888 8% 8% East Texas Council of Governments (Kilgore) 159,135 168,897 5% 5% El Paso County of, (El Paso) 942,847 669,316 24% 20% Fort Bend County Rural Transit District (Fort Bend) 727,010 773,723 11% 11% Galveston County Transit District (Galveston) 291,849 268,592 7% 6% Golden Crescent Regional Planning Commission (Victoria) 57,696 16,269 2% 1% Gulf Coast Center (Galveston) 12,862 19,277 2% 2% Heart of Texas Council of Governments (Waco) 94,247 48,383 3% 2% Hill Country Transit District (San Saba) 76,149 69,174 3% 2% Kleberg County Human Services (Kingsville) 31,048 20,839 4% 2% Lower Rio Grande Valley Develop. Council (McAllen) 35,703 77,902 4% 5% McLennan County Rural Transit District (Waco) 4,409 34,805 8% 5% Panhandle Community Services (Amarillo) 176,435 158,727 5% 5% Public Transit Services (Mineral Wells) 79,348 80,722 4% 4% Rolling Plains Management Corp. (Crowell) 47,564 36,974 3% 2% Rural Economic Assistance League, Inc. (REAL) (Alice) 87,736 107,583 4% 6% Senior Center Resources and Public Transit Inc.(Greenville) 98,022 103,211 8% 8% South East Texas Regional Planning Comm. (Beaumont) 79,204 72,155 5% 5% South Padre Island, City of (South Padre Island) NR NR NR NR South Plains Community Action Assoc. (Levelland) 285,363 196,994 9% 6% Southwest Area Regional Transit District (Uvalde) 178,317 147,476 7% 6% SPAN, Inc. (Denton) 74,698 76,179 4% 4% STAR Transit (Terrell) 169,157 179,230 3% 3% Texoma Area Paratransit System/TAPS (Sherman) NR 8,732 NR 1% Transit System Inc., The (Glen Rose) 43,209 32,361 5% 4% Webb Co. Community Action Agency (Laredo) 124,130 100,273 15% 13% West Texas Opportunities, Inc. (Lamesa) 59,436 61,914 1% 1% Totals $ 5,124,169 $ 4,509,066 Average for Reporting Districts $ 142,338 $ 125,252 6% 5%
Notes: (1) Farebox recovery ratio is defined as farebox revenue divided by total operating expenses. **South Padre Island does not charge fares so it is excluded from all calculations. N/A - Not Applicable NR = Not Reported TABLE 24: RURAL AREA PROGRAM - INCIDENTS AND REVENUE VEHICLE SYSTEM FAILURES Fiscal Years 2015 and 2016
Incidents and Revenue Vehicle System Failures (1) Total Safety Incidents (2) Other Mechanical System Failures Rural Transit Districts (Headquarters) 2015 2016 2015 2016 Alamo Area Council of Governments (San Antonio) 11 6 Ark-Tex Council of Governments (Texarkana) 1 177 108 Aspermont Small Business Development Ctr. (Aspermont) 4 9 Brazos Transit District (Bryan) 4 3 7 16 Capital Area Rural Transportation System (CARTS) (Austin) 235 117 Central Texas Rural Transit District (Coleman) 2 2 109 79 Cleburne City of (Cleburne) 30 19 Colorado Valley Transit (Columbus) 2 2 0 Community Act. Council of South Texas (Rio Grande City) 0 0 Community Services, Inc. (Corsicana) 5 3 Concho Valley Rural Transit District (San Angelo) 3 4 Del Rio, City of (Del Rio) 4 269 East Texas Council of Governments (Kilgore) 2 302 255 El Paso County of, (El Paso) 1 0 Fort Bend County Rural Transit District (Fort Bend) 188 209 Galveston County Transit District (Galveston) 1,670 1,381 Golden Crescent Regional Planning Commission (Victoria) 1 30 8 Gulf Coast Center (Galveston) 14 15 Heart of Texas Council of Governments (Waco) 1 21 24 Hill Country Transit District (San Saba) 1 3 17 25 Kleberg County Human Services (Kingsville) 0 15 Lower Rio Grande Valley Develop. Council (McAllen) 29 10 McLennan County Rural Transit District (Waco) 0 - Panhandle Community Services (Amarillo) 1 44 46 Public Transit Services (Mineral Wells) 109 90 Rolling Plains Management Corp. (Crowell) 0 - Rural Economic Assistance League, Inc. (REAL) (Alice) 17 2 Senior Center Resources and Public Transit Inc.(Greenville) 0 30 South East Texas Regional Planning Comm. (Beaumont) 63 59 South Padre Island, City of (South Padre Island) 46 21
06TxsTastSaitc eot65 Texas Transit Statistics Report 2016 South Plains Community Action Assoc. (Levelland) 5 8 Southwest Area Regional Transit District (Uvalde) 516 394 SPAN, Inc. (Denton) 1 2 STAR Transit (Terrell) 1 5 109 152 Texoma Area Paratransit System/TAPS (Sherman) 1 1 0 6 Transit System Inc., The (Glen Rose) 1 28 89 Webb Co. Community Action Agency (Laredo) 36 54 West Texas Opportunities, Inc. (Lamesa) 8 18 Total 12 20 3,841 3,543
Notes: (1) Public Transportation Management Systems (PTMS) and the FTA-NTD Safety Reporting are sources used for incidents data. Incidents - major include: 2 or more persons injured and non-major include: 1 person injured and non-arson fire. (2) Revenue Vehicle System Failures data includes both major and other system failures. Blank fields indicates no reported data.
This page intentionally left blank.
66 2016 Texas Transit Statistics Report MONTHLY STATISTICS FOR
RURAL AREA PROGRAM
(SECTION 5311)
2016 Texas Transit Statistics Report 67 68 2016 Texas Transit Statistics Report 2016 68
RURAL TRANSIT DISTRICTS - FISCAL YEAR 2016
Data Item Sep-15 Oct-15 Nov-15 Dec-15 Jan-16 Feb-16 Mar-16 Apr-16 May-16 Jun-16 Jul-16 Aug-16 FY 2016 Total Alamo Area Ridership 8,397 8,644 7,256 7,368 7,300 7,620 8,000 7,426 7,454 6,731 6,296 7,386 89,878 Council of Mileage 67,439 64,446 57,163 60,214 55,766 56,500 63,284 56,211 59,943 52,947 49,533 61,351 704,797 Governments Revenue Federal Grants $54,399 $ 225,159 $ 143,199 $79,503 $54,983 $ 146,168 $ 101,913 $84,837 $80,326 $ 133,982 $94,715 $ 103,306 $ 1,302,490 State Grants 52,800 132,534 138,285 76,463 52,234 95,315 124,888 93,530 331,348 54,455 2,993 72,460 1,227,305 Farebox 7,714 14,934 13,256 17,854 9,820 14,675 14,052 14,625 13,133 16,468 15,284 15,254 167,069 Contract Revenue 122,521 38,112 35,988 39,489 34,620 32,723 288,482 34,097 46,842 32,831 105,846 47,289 858,840 Other Revenue 3,166 9,628 3,258 3,868 4,600 2,738 4,034 3,951 2,937 3,113 5,883 18,301 65,477 Total Revenue $ 240,600 $ 420,367 $ 333,986 $ 217,177 $ 156,257 $ 291,619 $ 533,369 $ 231,040 $ 474,586 $ 240,849 $ 224,721 $ 256,610 $ 3,621,181 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.12 0.13 0.13 0.12 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.12 0.13 0.13 NR 0.13
Ark-Tex Ridership 8,294 8,591 6,837 7,755 6,620 7,011 7,547 6,875 6,684 7,210 6,337 9,747 89,508 Council of Mileage 87,863 87,384 63,117 78,909 77,911 83,501 87,294 82,109 76,049 81,760 74,097 96,670 976,664 Governments Revenue Federal Grants $ 269,175 $ 105,767 $ 153,906 $82,619 $90,696 $83,805 $87,691 $61,625 $96,212 $37,748 $46,855 $ 148,553 $ 1,264,652 State Grants 96,145 32,106 65,604 35,923 34,414 39,113 39,240 47,894 88,575 68,880 102,754 9,123 659,771 Farebox 6,202 6,566 4,909 5,621 4,788 6,286 6,568 6,394 5,828 5,630 5,847 6,629 71,268 Contract Revenue 39,829 15,906 24,320 25,341 21,546 23,444 23,857 22,790 29,240 32,338 30,790 71,594 360,995 Other Revenue 26,732 21,232 17,772 18,745 20,441 19,928 22,197 19,316 32,029 20,193 30,473 86,936 335,994 Total Revenue $ 438,083 $ 181,577 $ 266,511 $ 168,249 $ 171,885 $ 172,576 $ 179,553 $ 158,019 $ 251,884 $ 164,789 $ 216,719 $ 322,835 $ 2,692,680 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.09 0.10 0.11 0.10 0.08 0.08 0.09 0.08 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.10 0.09
Aspermont Ridership 1,566 1,453 1,128 1,167 1,230 1,156 1,257 1,294 1,159 1,515 1,162 1,423 15,510 Small Business Mileage 38,148 32,718 33,233 32,206 31,996 31,119 33,304 31,937 30,638 31,813 30,253 34,818 392,183 Development Revenue Center Federal Grants $23,415 $36,523 $31,002 $47,829 $30,845 $35,326 $37,486 $33,097 $14,150 $13,751 $11,684 $32,826 $ 347,934 State Grants 21,486 28,115 26,771 42,119 26,157 31,753 31,113 28,291 13,448 1,979 503 - 251,735 Farebox 1,956 1,284 1,699 1,459 1,112 1,191 1,500 1,275 1,259 1,359 959 1,708 16,761 Contract Revenue - - - - - 44,221 - - 43,706 55,939 62,444 38,231 244,541 Other Revenue 184 ------184 Total Revenue $47,041 $65,922 $59,472 $91,407 $58,114 $ 112,491 $70,099 $62,663 $72,563 $73,028 $75,590 $72,765 $ 861,155 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.04 RURAL TRANSIT DISTRICTS - FISCAL YEAR 2016
Data Item Sep-15 Oct-15 Nov-15 Dec-15 Jan-16 Feb-16 Mar-16 Apr-16 May-16 Jun-16 Jul-16 Aug-16 FY 2016 Total Brazos Transit Ridership 19,720 20,080 17,493 18,062 16,885 18,096 17,710 16,542 17,487 17,857 15,948 18,844 214,724 District Mileage 130,674 131,844 113,114 119,926 118,131 119,559 131,801 126,437 122,961 141,497 123,612 136,655 1,516,211 Revenue Federal Grants $ 134,629 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 475,746 $ 250,968 $ 344,850 $ 284,107 $ 505,269 $ 518,575 $ 2,514,144 State Grants 49,835 00000352,985 339,427 359,405 200,013 225,560 16,015 1,543,240 Farebox 8,745 10,552 9,761 10,651 9,392 9,907 9,175 9,453 9,587 11,469 10,391 10,993 120,076 Contract Revenue 72,124 69,157 47,007 49,882 58,784 47,983 77,540 78,691 65,310 83,132 76,978 99,374 825,962 Other Revenue 000000162,367 00000 162,367 Total Revenue $ 265,333 $79,709 $56,768 $60,533 $68,176 $57,890 $ 1,077,813 $ 678,539 $ 779,152 $ 578,721 $ 818,198 $ 644,957 $ 5,165,789 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.14 0.15 0.13 0.13 0.14 0.13 0.13 0.14 0.14
Capital Area Ridership 28,397 26,356 23,318 21,902 20,148 25,092 23,949 23,297 20,019 19,400 17,340 20,205 269,423 Rural Mileage 204,941 168,645 145,874 179,406 165,558 160,476 188,659 171,569 165,597 170,462 159,181 159,477 2,039,845 Transportation Revenue (CARTS) Federal Grants $ 286,172 $ 253,129 $ 274,047 $ 279,890 $ 240,816 $ 240,456 $ 254,162 $ 221,564 $ 260,859 $ 249,918 $ 260,030 $ 280,881 $ 3,101,924 State Grants 76,891 84,804 78,652 50,217 41,632 87,612 52,163 79,533 50,021 52,164 59,412 20,156 733,257 Farebox 13,498 15,710 14,233 14,027 14,845 12,912 11,636 16,152 13,014 11,174 13,410 11,697 162,308 Contract Revenue 210,746 265,292 340,286 238,549 239,377 258,863 252,156 290,533 199,005 250,025 279,126 255,419 3,079,377 Other Revenue 18,790 18,790 18,790 18,790 18,790 18,790 18,790 18,790 18,790 18,790 18,790 18,873 225,563 Total Revenue $ 606,097 $ 637,725 $ 726,008 $ 601,473 $ 555,460 $ 618,633 $ 588,907 $ 626,572 $ 541,689 $ 582,071 $ 630,768 $ 587,026 $ 7,302,429 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.14 0.16 0.16 0.12 0.12 0.16 0.13 0.14 0.12 0.11 0.11 0.13 0.13
Central Texas Ridership 17,587 15,367 12,125 8,649 10,719 11,702 11,817 11,338 9,688 9,650 8,854 10,823 138,319 Rural Transit Mileage 127,263 125,423 109,271 108,049 113,558 117,989 125,629 131,848 141,881 142,870 124,449 143,256 1,511,486 District Revenue Federal Grants $93,823 $ 240,600 $ 279,408 $ 425,508 $ 363,331 $ 339,248 $ 424,807 $ 130,050 $ 192,724 $ 177,906 $ 153,540 $ 195,380 $ 3,016,325 State Grants 50,000 50,000 53,946 53,447 50,000 50,000 50,000 132,148 138,454 61,838 0 8,951 698,784 Farebox 7,207 11,553 9,266 9,074 7,832 9,459 10,393 9,298 10,051 11,290 8,824 12,160 116,407 Contract Revenue 121,859 150,302 119,775 107,113 174,936 109,827 129,433 241,784 134,999 375,746 246,049 227,285 2,139,108 Other Revenue 9,258 38,837 1,031 39,511 70 917 30,869 1,590 25,430 14 14,074 13 161,614 Total Revenue $ 282,147 $ 491,292 $ 463,426 $ 634,653 $ 596,169 $ 509,451 $ 645,502 $ 514,870 $ 501,658 $ 626,794 $ 422,487 $ 443,789 $ 6,132,238 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.14 0.12 0.11 0.08 0.09 0.10 0.09 0.09 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.08 0.09
Cleburne Ridership 3,081 3,773 2,992 3,287 3,020 3,479 3,162 3,135 2,895 3,320 2,617 3,367 38,128 (City/County Transportation) Mileage 27,818 32,385 27,155 27,778 27,370 28,885 27,960 26,606 26,456 29,984 27,142 33,258 342,797 Revenue 2016 Texas Transit Statistics Report 2016 69 Federal Grants $31,815 $32,714 $45,162 $40,920 $36,403 $39,080 $34,027 $37,465 $37,151 $48,790 $28,622 $10,518 $ 422,667 State Grants 23,345 24,813 37,922 32,085 25,185 27,044 24,761 24,870 23,218 32,249 9,417 0 284,909 Farebox 6,448 7,689 5,751 6,866 6,578 6,893 7,022 6,649 5,870 6,592 5,985 6,628 78,971 Contract Revenue 8,961 4,492 6,117 2,639 8,450 4,570 6,352 3,831 3,797 4,393 8,091 10,578 72,271 Other Revenue 10,018 38,405 24,838 23,819 6,454 10,103 5,957 10,664 11,064 18,110 31,777 69,888 261,097 Total Revenue $80,587 $ 108,113 $ 119,790 $ 106,329 $83,070 $87,690 $78,119 $83,479 $81,100 $ 110,134 $83,892 $97,612 $ 1,119,915 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.11 0.12 0.11 0.12 0.11 0.12 0.11 0.12 0.11 0.11 NR NR 0.11
Colorado Valley Ridership 9,663 9,220 8,414 7,164 7,001 9,194 5,795 5,688 5,508 5,668 6,271 6,178 85,764 Transit Mileage 31,202 33,454 31,111 31,093 30,131 31,310 33,029 28,703 41,675 31,128 30,495 31,667 384,998 Revenue Federal Grants $36,968 $76,970 $36,212 $36,748 $44,534 $38,162 $56,926 $63,350 $61,187 $46,296 $45,410 $42,932 $ 585,695 State Grants 33,796 76,109 26,696 23,073 28,718 58,386 42,484 31,186 43,780 43,679 15,028 12,000 434,935 Farebox 5,874 5,301 5,814 4,787 6,243 5,811 6,119 4,724 6,147 4,633 4,443 4,134 64,030 Contract Revenue 19,579 21,629 30,212 34,081 30,147 13,410 39,264 4,673 14,239 11,090 10,165 26,182 254,671 Other Revenue 750 750 750 750 750 750 8,497 5,424 14,988 750 28,024 28,932 91,115 Total Revenue $96,967 $ 180,759 $99,684 $99,439 $ 110,392 $ 116,519 $ 153,290 $ 109,357 $ 140,341 $ 106,448 $ 103,070 $ 114,180 $ 1,430,446 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.31 0.28 0.27 0.23 0.23 0.29 0.18 0.20 0.13 0.18 0.21 0.20 0.22 70 2016 Texas Transit Statistics Report 2016 70
RURAL TRANSIT DISTRICTS - FISCAL YEAR 2016
Data Item Sep-15 Oct-15 Nov-15 Dec-15 Jan-16 Feb-16 Mar-16 Apr-16 May-16 Jun-16 Jul-16 Aug-16 FY 2016 Total Community Ridership 5,551 5,658 4,490 4,598 4,599 4,932 4,912 5,244 5,082 4,997 4,576 5,231 59,870 Services Inc. Mileage 21,689 23,027 19,008 16,426 19,046 19,867 20,597 21,651 19,687 20,299 18,573 21,070 240,940 Revenue Federal Grants $36,888 $52,162 $34,575 $33,561 $31,285 $32,126 $20,092 $26,824 $20,717 $18,145 $10,478 $19,676 $ 336,529 State Grants 23,153 35,123 23,035 24,001 22,083 23,382 19,806 26,824 23,777 20,324 13,409 35,813 290,730 Farebox 7,438 7,439 4,710 4,422 5,517 5,225 6,630 7,173 5,214 5,316 4,258 6,630 69,972 Contract Revenue 454 484 1,370 4,990 2,846 2,803 1,651 71,644 2,424 5,515 607 3,344 98,132 Other Revenue 10,568 5,401 000020,325 17,636 12,670 4,604 12,352 14,889 98,445 Total Revenue $78,501 $ 100,609 $63,690 $66,974 $61,731 $63,536 $68,504 $ 150,101 $64,802 $53,904 $41,104 $80,352 $ 893,808 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.26 0.25 0.24 0.28 0.24 0.25 0.24 0.24 0.26 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25
Concho Valley Ridership 4,069 3,985 3,672 3,897 3,722 4,302 4,089 3,885 3,421 4,931 4,435 3,606 48,014 Transit District Mileage 35,466 33,604 31,521 28,212 30,757 31,369 33,589 31,857 33,594 33,174 31,064 41,029 395,236 Revenue Federal Grants $30,932 $28,721 $57,668 $49,003 $68,455 $2,763 $ - $ - $ - $30,979 $38,708 $50,312 $ 357,541 State Grants 30,690 31,417 121,485 67,078 71,591 58,634 53,042 0 10,897 6,520 4,545 6,289 462,188 Farebox 471 758 454 4,847 669 1,294 1,067 1,012 1,712 2,195 2,394 2,735 19,608 Contract Revenue 4,147 3,108 0 7,616 395 0 10,840 16,629 48,407 30,103 11,954 58,979 192,178 Other Revenue 117,754 27,271 31,973 27,271 27,271 30,519 33,271 28,471 23,464 33,472 28,471 37,793 447,001 Total Revenue $ 183,994 $91,275 $ 211,580 $ 155,815 $ 168,381 $93,210 $98,220 $46,112 $84,480 $ 103,269 $86,072 $ 156,108 $ 1,478,516 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.11 0.12 0.12 0.14 0.12 0.14 0.12 0.12 0.10 0.15 0.14 0.09 0.12
Del Rio, Ridership 4,032 4,240 3,386 4,038 4,313 4,563 4,758 4,672 4,329 4,556 4,369 4,824 52,080 City of Mileage 20,188 20,865 17,110 21,103 19,638 22,225 24,559 24,152 24,282 25,280 23,260 26,072 268,734 Revenue Federal Grants $25,970 $30,034 $33,544 $42,967 $52,128 $35,262 $33,425 $ - $ - $ - $ - $21,650 $ 274,980 State Grants 27,756 29,631 30,875 38,531 49,984 34,842 33,425 3,444 3,275 3,084 29,555 18,823 303,225 Farebox 8,216 8,130 8,473 9,172 6,692 5,939 7,958 7,153 7,273 8,746 6,834 8,302 92,888 Contract Revenue 2,664 1,000 1,000 26,433 8,782 22,346 20,775 23,903 20,816 24,981 23,558 25,877 202,135 Other Revenue 40,582 0 0 0 2,038 585 12,439 42,849 54,107 66,501 40,280 20,801 280,182 Total Revenue $ 105,188 $68,795 $73,892 $ 117,103 $ 119,624 $98,974 $ 108,022 $77,349 $85,471 $ 103,312 $ 100,227 $95,453 $ 1,153,410 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.19 0.22 0.21 0.19 0.19 0.18 0.18 0.19 NR 0.19
East Texas Ridership 7,937 8,638 6,970 7,489 7,479 8,398 7,878 7,975 7,807 8,187 7,310 8,579 94,647 Council of Mileage 93,723 98,997 81,890 89,160 90,060 97,837 95,670 97,843 94,994 101,971 91,635 105,165 1,138,945 Governments Revenue Federal Grants $ 126,053 $ 244,257 $ 186,284 $ 135,765 $61,645 $78,103 $56,031 $55,097 $59,287 $49,881 $24,496 $4,288 $ 1,081,187 State Grants 74,190 106,626 68,243 69,387 132,699 144,549 107,252 45,867 46,325 122,697 215,853 91,446 1,225,134 Farebox 13,863 14,338 12,175 12,951 12,999 14,581 15,348 13,504 14,329 15,179 12,753 16,877 168,897 Contract Revenue 0 196 29,342 51,292 329,351 24,688 68,543 126,351 139,412 28,190 45,856 53,752 896,973 Other Revenue 00008,401 000000145,230 153,631 Total Revenue $ 214,106 $ 365,417 $ 296,044 $ 269,395 $ 545,095 $ 261,921 $ 247,174 $ 240,819 $ 259,353 $ 215,947 $ 298,958 $ 311,593 $ 3,525,822 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.08 0.09 0.09 0.08 0.08 0.09 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 RURAL TRANSIT DISTRICTS - FISCAL YEAR 2016
Data Item Sep-15 Oct-15 Nov-15 Dec-15 Jan-16 Feb-16 Mar-16 Apr-16 May-16 Jun-16 Jul-16 Aug-16 FY 2016 Total El Paso, Ridership 23,803 23,639 21,097 20,314 22,629 25,711 27,370 27,670 26,585 24,491 23,222 28,449 294,980 County of Mileage 107,922 111,255 106,695 121,069 182,866 192,878 220,425 214,200 235,286 215,468 220,774 247,961 2,176,799 Revenue Federal Grants $81,298 $90,112 $87,973 $ 100,204 $ 106,682 $ 105,486 $ 114,432 $ 407,164 $6,768 $32,956 $93,514 $ 102,347 $ 1,328,936 State Grants 000000094,354 90,854 53,016 2,178 1,041 241,443 Farebox 44,994 47,592 44,739 44,086 52,423 60,029 60,316 66,221 63,043 57,120 62,271 66,482 669,316 Contract Revenue 85,969 88,423 85,262 88,567 93,964 95,156 100,279 101,215 102,729 98,476 98,140 103,540 1,141,720 Other Revenue 60,153 60,496 48,147 67,856 55,779 62,419 72,855 64,239 67,136 72,108 66,681 76,527 774,396 Total Revenue $ 272,414 $ 286,623 $ 266,121 $ 300,713 $ 308,848 $ 323,090 $ 347,882 $ 733,193 $ 330,530 $ 313,676 $ 322,784 $ 349,937 $ 4,155,811 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.22 0.21 0.20 0.17 0.12 0.13 0.12 0.13 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.14
Fort Bend Ridership 34,054 35,997 28,637 29,427 30,898 34,312 34,939 31,120 33,425 33,606 29,828 36,021 392,264 County Rural Mileage 139,192 153,855 130,349 145,332 135,622 153,118 158,829 143,532 151,714 153,863 144,777 169,471 1,779,654 Transit District Revenue Federal Grants $ 362,891 $ 453,659 $ 312,677 $ 301,036 $ 314,014 $ 382,524 $ 315,078 $ 340,872 $ 423,798 $ 507,820 $ 373,862 $ 351,226 $ 4,439,457 State Grants 0 6,360 5,673 5,095 8,898 10,021 8,579 10,476 11,535 7,547 11,194 9,716 95,094 Farebox 63,006 21,918 62,748 62,714 59,266 51,901 90,190 19,904 66,012 128,184 58,345 89,535 773,723 Contract Revenue 138,169 96,251 137,632 215,744 186,340 189,469 185,696 173,064 210,148 199,476 193,983 218,710 2,144,682 Other Revenue 71,423 15,708 9,194 14,502 8,087 8,509 3,127 13,459 5,872 2,771 2,958 6,945 162,555 Total Revenue $ 635,489 $ 593,896 $ 527,924 $ 599,091 $ 576,605 $ 642,424 $ 602,670 $ 557,775 $ 717,365 $ 845,798 $ 640,342 $ 676,132 $ 7,615,511 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.24 0.23 0.22 0.20 0.23 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.21 0.21 0.22
Galveston County Ridership 70,477 72,220 66,575 67,058 52,589 56,685 61,941 58,428 62,241 65,785 66,868 61,727 762,594 Rural Transit District Mileage 70,222 78,775 67,418 74,574 67,891 69,822 76,899 69,749 71,484 71,640 70,237 75,740 864,451 Revenue 2016 Texas Transit Statistics Report 2016 71 Federal Grants $ 173,659 $76,099 $52,750 $ 123,584 $ 109,619 $ 106,277 $58,982 $ 309,958 $22,672 $54,273 $ 400 $ 119,273 $ 1,207,546 State Grants 672,345 331,062 155,690 110,317 319,909 45,649 18,067 92,776 109,850 399,197 35,202 583,525 2,873,589 Farebox 22,566 24,529 21,546 23,022 20,706 21,735 20,330 20,627 21,593 24,704 23,886 23,348 268,592 Contract Revenue 353,867 171,161 168,748 226,868 211,230 439,987 215,753 167,109 189,658 202,421 188,539 130,544 2,665,885 Other Revenue 7,851 8,711 66,399 77,310 9,382 9,301 27,882 168,111 69,216 81,436 306,750 121,584 953,933 Total Revenue $ 1,230,288 $ 611,562 $ 465,133 $ 561,101 $ 670,846 $ 622,949 $ 341,014 $ 758,581 $ 412,989 $ 762,031 $ 554,777 $ 978,274 $ 7,969,545 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 1.00 0.92 0.99 0.90 0.77 0.81 NR NR NR NR NR NR 0.88
Golden Crescent Ridership 9,413 10,348 9,692 8,085 9,572 8,961 9,736 10,197 10,349 10,231 9,802 10,736 117,122 Regional Mileage 44,419 44,838 44,100 41,808 45,920 43,909 47,025 45,090 47,654 46,264 45,066 45,113 541,206 Planning Revenue Commission Federal Grants $23,166 $33,445 $28,555 $27,446 $58,773 $32,505 $45,189 $37,557 $33,138 $32,684 $59,168 $29,093 $ 440,719 State Grants 17,358 28,027 24,126 22,704 44,787 29,542 35,257 33,438 21,905 24,271 19,856 14,229 315,500 Farebox 1,168 1,651 1,535 1,563 1,198 1,252 1,273 1,252 1,419 1,160 1,347 1,451 16,269 Contract Revenue 907 5,613 658 18,674 2,032 2,228 1,695 1,994 14,180 1,441 20,145 30,508 100,075 Other Revenue 35,768 54,783 40,392 46,622 95,245 68,545 105,015 60,198 65,199 55,089 74,092 73,072 774,020 Total Revenue $78,367 $ 123,519 $95,266 $ 117,009 $ 202,035 $ 134,072 $ 188,429 $ 134,439 $ 135,841 $ 114,645 $ 174,608 $ 148,353 $ 1,646,583 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.21 0.23 0.22 0.19 0.21 0.20 0.21 0.23 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.24 0.22 72 2016 Texas Transit Statistics Report 2016 72
RURAL TRANSIT DISTRICTS - FISCAL YEAR 2016
Data Item Sep-15 Oct-15 Nov-15 Dec-15 Jan-16 Feb-16 Mar-16 Apr-16 May-16 Jun-16 Jul-16 Aug-16 FY 2016 Total Gulf Coast Ridership 1,621 1,909 1,577 1,477 1,393 1,509 1,656 1,587 1,550 1,519 1,419 1,700 18,917 Center Mileage 14,955 16,301 13,685 12,180 11,791 12,404 13,772 14,378 13,784 13,464 12,705 14,398 163,817 Revenue Federal Grants $27,312 $18,898 $19,638 $ 107,773 $8,748 $33,520 $28,785 $10,962 $23,630 $43,294 $43,879 $91,479 $ 457,918 State Grants 14,271 14,102 12,599 72,619 13,686 26,334 32,711 13,963 40,517 34,091 20,633 31,948 327,474 Farebox 3,610 702 658 3,741 510 995 1,317 1,039 1,814 1,559 949 2,383 19,277 Contract Revenue 000000000000 0 Other Revenue 0 0 0 2,203 743 22,699 15,098 3,309 31,873 9,703 14,517 35,477 135,622 Total Revenue $45,193 $33,702 $32,895 $ 186,336 $23,687 $83,548 $77,911 $29,273 $97,834 $88,647 $79,978 $ 161,287 $ 940,291 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.11 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.12 0.12
Heart of Ridership 4,324 4,370 3,675 3,744 3,748 4,230 4,329 4,580 4,324 3,407 3,179 3,526 47,436 Texas Council Mileage 40,551 44,846 44,543 44,916 40,580 42,341 43,474 47,773 46,424 39,671 46,047 34,624 515,790 of Governments Revenue Federal Grants $ 109,633 $ 114,521 $71,367 $99,651 $ 120,024 $ 125,959 $ 129,827 $ 118,817 $35,905 $ - $65,597 $23,679 $ 1,014,980 State Grants 76,328 33,497 23,615 34,514 40,363 43,696 45,863 41,092 10,142 29,666 19,637 9,646 408,059 Farebox 4,409 4,680 3,704 5,121 4,945 5,642 5,463 5,149 1,919 3,229 2,212 1,910 48,383 Contract Revenue 86,813 95,385 82,684 102,732 103,454 118,132 113,694 104,096 24,826 47,172 33,656 29,050 941,694 Other Revenue 000000000000 0 Total Revenue $ 277,183 $ 248,083 $ 181,370 $ 242,018 $ 268,786 $ 293,429 $ 294,847 $ 269,154 $72,792 $80,067 $ 121,102 $64,285 $ 2,413,116 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.11 0.10 0.08 0.08 0.09 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.09 0.09 0.07 0.10 0.09
Hill Country Ridership 11,625 14,924 13,604 16,948 6,516 12,941 12,699 12,783 12,252 10,089 7,315 6,895 138,591 Transit District Mileage 75,019 79,067 71,278 96,706 36,368 69,557 66,963 68,043 59,563 67,023 62,969 63,708 816,264 Revenue Federal Grants $ - $ 142,589 $ 119,943 $42,879 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 305,411 State Grants 142,944 105,813 98,396 161,254 6,092 0 0 2,188 0000 516,687 Farebox 7,610 7,708 6,067 6,375 5,612 6,965 6,525 6,556 6,559 3,186 2,075 3,936 69,174 Contract Revenue 7,331 6,135 6,103 27,197 252,882 232,055 237,169 281,954 280,651 260,072 253,658 400,154 2,245,361 Other Revenue 6,045 6,090 5,798 6,264 6,017 6,141 6,074 6,027 6,080 6,214 790 599 62,139 Total Revenue $ 163,930 $ 268,335 $ 236,307 $ 243,969 $ 270,603 $ 245,161 $ 249,768 $ 296,725 $ 293,290 $ 269,472 $ 256,523 $ 404,689 $ 3,198,772 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.15 0.19 0.19 0.18 0.18 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.21 0.15 0.12 0.11 0.17
Kleberg County Ridership 8,170 6,812 6,782 7,955 7,875 7,826 7,228 7,319 7,060 7,739 7,699 8,041 90,506 Human Services Mileage 26,394 24,636 24,552 24,669 24,872 25,012 24,892 25,698 24,398 20,738 20,239 23,989 290,089 Revenue Federal Grants $19,148 $20,637 $17,487 $21,880 $20,036 $17,941 $16,862 $16,442 $12,840 $43,088 $12,959 $4,850 $ 224,170 State Grants 11,952 12,314 10,773 12,834 12,029 10,466 28,438 36,964 29,411 5,952 27,408 41,473 240,014 Farebox 3,921 3,340 2,634 2,276 1,343 2,215 1,051 691 662 937 625 1,144 20,839 Contract Revenue 241,785 17,667 14,542 66,677 12,092 4,430 0 0 0 1,369 1,291 1,289 361,142 Other Revenue 14,921 17,667 14,542 16,386 12,092 21,470 000000 97,078 Total Revenue $ 291,727 $71,625 $59,978 $ 120,053 $57,592 $56,522 $46,351 $54,097 $42,913 $51,346 $42,283 $48,756 $ 943,243 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.31 0.28 0.28 0.32 0.32 0.31 0.29 0.28 0.29 0.37 0.38 0.34 0.31 RURAL TRANSIT DISTRICTS - FISCAL YEAR 2016
Data Item Sep-15 Oct-15 Nov-15 Dec-15 Jan-16 Feb-16 Mar-16 Apr-16 May-16 Jun-16 Jul-16 Aug-16 FY 2016 Total Lower Rio Ridership 10,710 11,179 10,191 9,850 7,019 7,721 7,482 8,394 8,091 7,850 8,016 8,265 104,768 Grande Valley Mileage 37,896 43,388 33,664 51,090 49,507 45,492 42,827 25,264 24,098 25,430 23,146 38,337 440,139 Development Revenue Council Federal Grants $96,268 $82,411 $53,049 $ 111,346 $6,357 $18,486 $76,782 $53,850 $59,763 $54,765 $55,192 $93,528 $ 761,797 State Grants 70,403 53,528 58,200 85,706 36,718 90,331 70,569 73,293 50,689 35,003 36,395 26,939 687,774 Farebox 22,221 9,892 6,873 8,639 6,565 5,438 6,122 1,471 1,056 3,331 3,186 3,108 77,902 Contract Revenue 5,513 0000002,582 8,532 5,871 6,025 44,976 73,499 Other Revenue 0 3,916 443 2,319 0 315 982 315 5,035 8,554 5,027 100,532 127,438 Total Revenue $ 194,405 $ 149,747 $ 118,565 $ 208,010 $49,640 $ 114,570 $ 154,455 $ 131,511 $ 125,075 $ 107,524 $ 105,825 $ 269,083 $ 1,728,410 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.28 0.26 0.30 0.19 0.14 0.17 0.17 0.33 0.34 0.31 0.35 0.22 0.24
McLennan County Ridership 1,229 1,285 1,159 959 932 1,039 1,252 1,414 1,268 1,116 1,055 1,276 13,984 Rural Transit District Mileage 26,836 24,267 21,959 18,838 16,983 18,643 22,109 25,553 23,199 19,947 21,089 21,556 260,979 Revenue Federal Grants $ 44,321 $15,948 $25,259 $17,304 $20,439 $18,636 $ 24,920 $13,087 $20,271 $22,068 $32,184 $63,975 $ 318,412 State Grants 0 0 5,665 0 18,225 0 2,090 23,755 0 0 328 12,930 62,993 Farebox 2,296 2,392 2,501 2,711 2,843 2,602 3,181 3,599 3,219 2,928 2,950 3,583 34,805 Contract Revenue 000000000000 0 Other Revenue 44,321 15,949 25,259 17,304 20,439 18,636 24,920 13,087 20,271 22,068 24,123 61,536 307,913 Total Revenue $90,938 $34,289 $58,684 $37,319 $61,946 $39,874 $55,111 $53,528 $43,761 $47,064 $59,585 $ 142,024 $ 724,123 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.05 NR NR NR 0.05
Panhandle Ridership 29,631 30,950 26,604 28,138 29,671 28,128 29,505 29,331 28,078 25,019 24,796 26,510 336,361 Community Mileage 101,100 101,110 100,220 100,010 100,500 100,630 100,645 100,450 100,415 98,920 99,655 99,650 1,203,305 Services Revenue Federal Grants $ 100,765 $ 208,635 $83,323 $ 128,230 $83,239 $16,229 $ 12,318 $41,865 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 674,604 State Grants 72,527 46,555 67,021 104,016 76,310 59,280 117,107 61,683 73,620 79,628 70,539 12,584 840,870 Farebox 8,858 12,819 18,353 13,157 12,847 17,890 14,759 15,928 13,107 9,701 7,412 13,896 158,727 Contract Revenue 63,156 73,924 85,704 430,075 61,950 70,553 211,450 85,984 314,429 338,772 187,339 142,130 2,065,466 Other Revenue 000000000000 0 Total Revenue $ 245,306 $ 341,933 $ 254,401 $ 675,478 $ 234,346 $ 163,952 $ 355,634 $ 205,460 $ 401,156 $ 428,101 $ 265,290 $ 168,610 $ 3,739,667 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.29 0.31 0.27 0.28 0.30 0.28 0.29 0.29 0.28 0.25 0.25 0.27 0.28
Public Transit Ridership 7,434 7,288 6,474 6,797 6,737 6,773 6,623 6,404 6,083 5,341 5,119 5,702 76,775 Services Mileage 59,397 59,454 52,752 54,890 55,223 57,391 59,580 52,515 49,460 53,624 40,966 52,045 647,297 Revenue
2016 Texas Transit Statistics Report 2016 73 Federal Grants $59,136 $77,302 $59,060 $87,722 $64,846 $64,251 $64,644 $56,980 $53,502 $45,798 $26,721 $18,509 $ 678,471 State Grants 37,866 239,956 28,996 41,512 30,000 38,336 28,997 28,124 32,020 37,026 44,521 46,712 634,066 Farebox 7,249 7,871 7,567 7,305 6,374 6,043 6,878 6,337 5,620 6,765 6,339 6,374 80,722 Contract Revenue 36,408 71,534 56,664 61,440 30,383 53,875 21,768 20,432 57,046 40,282 39,475 56,214 545,521 Other Revenue 9,724 33,854 33,146 13,267 8,924 11,707 4,376 5,733 4,424 34,876 26,062 3,823 189,916 Total Revenue $ 150,383 $ 430,517 $ 185,433 $ 211,246 $ 140,527 $ 174,212 $ 126,663 $ 117,606 $ 152,612 $ 164,747 $ 143,118 $ 131,632 $ 2,128,696 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.13 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.11 0.12 0.12 0.10 0.12 0.11 0.12
Rolling Plains Ridership 9,893 10,621 10,155 9,227 11,051 11,537 10,635 10,704 9,837 6,825 6,095 8,728 115,308 Management Mileage 45,992 49,831 52,386 49,373 51,016 56,463 52,235 52,970 53,295 53,511 50,144 62,329 629,545 Corporation Revenue Federal Grants $ 28,520 $77,286 $63,314 $47,723 $47,601 $40,551 $ 91,746 $52,154 $38,686 $29,103 $45,040 $64,056 $ 625,780 State Grants 4,012 45,709 32,498 22,316 19,638 34,959 66,436 41,023 32,331 34,623 38,287 24,997 396,829 Farebox 3,925 1,138 4,306 483 6,567 530 5,884 2,140 4,019 3,033 2,976 1,973 36,974 Contract Revenue 24,655 30,568 54,841 54,046 58,828 41,465 10,551 61,563 44,064 42,406 26,016 88,352 537,355 Other Revenue 000000000000 0 Total Revenue $61,112 $ 154,701 $ 154,959 $ 124,568 $ 132,634 $ 117,505 $ 174,617 $ 156,880 $ 119,100 $ 109,165 $ 112,319 $ 179,378 $ 1,596,938 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.22 0.21 0.19 0.19 0.22 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.18 0.13 NR NR 0.18 74 2016 Texas Transit Statistics Report 2016 74
RURAL TRANSIT DISTRICTS - FISCAL YEAR 2016
Data Item Sep-15 Oct-15 Nov-15 Dec-15 Jan-16 Feb-16 Mar-16 Apr-16 May-16 Jun-16 Jul-16 Aug-16 FY 2016 Total Rural Ridership 39,969 35,283 26,099 28,346 27,913 22,391 22,542 23,527 22,046 15,482 12,989 18,842 295,429 Economic Mileage 66,046 55,251 42,658 60,844 54,351 43,947 38,014 31,785 41,077 54,863 40,964 43,562 573,362 Assistance Revenue League - REAL Federal Grants $74,280 $70,266 $39,381 $78,829 $68,355 $62,122 $84,370 $61,290 $74,148 $80,219 $73,089 $86,296 $ 852,645 State Grants 61,367 59,572 74,071 63,684 51,860 50,183 63,500 51,608 63,198 68,371 61,456 70,555 739,425 Farebox 8,275 10,448 8,056 11,496 9,942 8,252 10,710 11,296 6,279 8,670 6,296 7,863 107,583 Contract Revenue 11,205 14,183 16,405 11,054 11,999 13,737 18,449 25,781 13,245 15,873 11,037 16,667 179,635 Other Revenue 3,810 4,286 3,623 3,976 5,808 5,226 5,305 4,845 5,136 4,558 4,190 4,960 55,723 Total Revenue $ 158,937 $ 158,755 $ 141,536 $ 169,039 $ 147,964 $ 139,520 $ 182,334 $ 154,820 $ 162,006 $ 177,691 $ 156,068 $ 186,341 $ 1,935,011 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.61 0.64 0.61 0.47 0.51 0.51 0.59 0.74 0.54 0.28 0.32 0.43 0.52
Senior Center Ridership 5,343 5,408 4,793 5,391 5,359 5,693 5,914 6,170 5,607 7,781 7,067 6,514 71,040 Resources and Mileage 40,283 39,827 35,178 39,397 38,754 43,072 46,000 42,236 44,082 44,792 42,511 49,756 505,888 Public Transit Revenue Federal Grants $14,472 $33,308 $10,936 $66,592 $43,782 $49,280 $35,549 $54,008 $17,058 $13,454 $31,139 $ - $ 369,578 State Grants 22,784 10,459 11,395 34,210 17,884 18,241 12,561 19,606 40,132 49,853 34,473 10,359 281,957 Farebox 4,395 2,078 4,482 4,928 13,792 4,943 5,090 4,944 4,769 8,965 4,565 40,260 103,211 Contract Revenue 12,475 60,481 9,964 11,806 11,413 12,908 5,401 7,112 5,936 3,731 8,818 8,712 158,757 Other Revenue 55,713 26,635 46,584 27,007 13,911 32,981 20,889 39,447 17,660 2,403 63,956 59,887 407,073 Total Revenue $ 109,839 $ 132,961 $83,361 $ 144,543 $ 100,782 $ 118,353 $79,490 $ 125,117 $85,555 $78,406 $ 142,951 $ 119,218 $ 1,320,576 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.13 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.13 0.13 0.15 0.13 0.17 0.17 0.13 0.14
South East Ridership 5,640 5,831 4,856 5,234 5,004 5,337 4,703 5,088 5,127 5,087 4,765 5,452 62,124 Texas Regional Mileage 42,594 43,867 36,593 40,890 39,026 42,338 38,974 41,588 39,099 39,510 38,553 44,244 487,276 Planning Revenue Commission Federal Grants $52,473 $53,636 $49,478 $49,611 $47,453 $43,793 $33,189 $74,097 $41,334 $38,192 $81,334 $36,752 $ 601,342 State Grants 48,723 48,539 44,398 42,358 47,453 43,793 27,394 58,750 7,656 0 15,206 0 384,270 Farebox 6,924 7,104 6,012 5,940 5,438 7,381 4,950 4,200 7,747 4,824 5,915 5,720 72,155 Contract Revenue 22,601 27,621 28,353 21,231 21,447 13,390 30,683 27,111 18,945 19,616 21,359 22,356 274,713 Other Revenue 0000009,788 19,030 30,782 50,233 45,097 59,730 214,660 Total Revenue $ 130,721 $ 136,900 $ 128,241 $ 119,140 $ 121,791 $ 108,357 $ 106,004 $ 183,188 $ 106,464 $ 112,865 $ 168,911 $ 124,558 $ 1,547,140 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.12 0.12 0.13 0.13 0.12 0.12 0.13 RURAL TRANSIT DISTRICTS - FISCAL YEAR 2016
Data Item Sep-15 Oct-15 Nov-15 Dec-15 Jan-16 Feb-16 Mar-16 Apr-16 May-16 Jun-16 Jul-16 Aug-16 FY 2016 Total South Padre Ridership 37,684 36,006 34,335 35,933 37,875 45,269 57,588 38,027 39,613 42,130 54,561 30,864 489,885 Island, City of Mileage 30,489 31,272 32,443 31,849 31,588 28,995 29,852 30,303 30,881 29,682 29,434 30,864 367,652 Revenue Federal Grants $ 747,990 $63,313 $43,776 $ 504,320 $51,113 $ 115,073 $51,020 $59,489 $49,211 $40,028 $ - $1,906 $ 1,727,239 State Grants 58,039 32,660 26,848 42,364 35,631 34,860 37,089 31,151 29,000 86,587 69,161 88,079 571,469 Farebox 000000000000 0 Contract Revenue 0 280 297 630 000009,414 21,088 0 31,709 Other Revenue 34,905 9,943 8,444 15,346 9,283 8,955 23,493 74,646 15,197 21,277 17,187 8,258 246,934 Total Revenue $ 840,934 $ 106,196 $79,365 $ 562,660 $96,027 $ 158,888 $ 111,602 $ 165,286 $93,408 $ 157,306 $ 107,436 $98,243 $ 2,577,351 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 1.24 1.15 1.06 1.13 1.20 1.56 1.93 1.25 1.28 NR NR NR 1.33
South Plains Ridership 14,420 14,561 12,128 10,826 11,656 12,515 12,139 12,253 12,603 11,231 10,848 11,698 146,878 Community Mileage 86,405 90,532 80,479 75,015 76,636 80,441 81,409 80,760 83,656 88,624 87,585 86,525 998,067 Action Association Revenue Federal Grants $ 160,298 $ 221,278 $ 232 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000 $ - $ 188,353 $ 281,968 $ 952,129 State Grants 178,891 221,278 234,438 149,379 33,872 0000000 817,858 Farebox 11,168 11,167 24,076 12,923 6,096 34,656 9,326 18,899 9,945 6,623 14,782 37,333 196,994 Contract Revenue 71,563 97,094 53,188 84,287 111,678 142,112 45,661 77,444 150,108 105,098 93,972 90,377 1,122,582 Other Revenue 000000000000 0 Total Revenue $ 421,920 $ 550,817 $ 311,934 $ 246,589 $ 151,646 $ 176,768 $54,987 $96,343 $ 260,053 $ 111,721 $ 297,107 $ 409,678 $ 3,089,563 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.17 0.16 0.15 0.14 0.15 0.16 0.15 0.15 NR NR NR NR 0.15
Southwest Area Ridership 11,187 11,508 11,651 11,843 12,066 12,111 12,899 13,727 14,499 14,677 16,539 16,133 158,840 Regional Mileage 73,063 73,273 70,427 53,903 58,106 60,670 68,764 68,095 75,318 78,210 68,132 67,996 815,957 Transit Revenue District Federal Grants $55,034 $72,312 $52,454 $54,491 $75,057 $62,346 $69,760 $ 101,463 $78,267 $53,441 $93,072 $85,000 $ 852,697 State Grants 30,780 40,151 28,701 50,063 40,029 35,910 38,819 48,346 47,187 54,240 75,147 15,000 504,373 Farebox 9,794 10,757 6,793 11,744 7,490 11,729 13,385 10,107 20,002 17,016 10,659 18,000 147,476 Contract Revenue 70,787 66,042 44,553 36,074 61,844 38,340 51,018 42,925 40,571 52,916 64,735 157,018 726,823 Other Revenue 4,184 4,465 9,621 17,354 3,665 4,825 3,857 7,937 12,729 4,635 16,420 2,268 91,960 Total Revenue $ 170,579 $ 193,727 $ 142,122 $ 169,726 $ 188,085 $ 153,150 $ 176,839 $ 210,778 $ 198,756 $ 182,248 $ 260,033 $ 277,286 $ 2,323,329 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.15 0.16 0.17 0.22 0.21 0.20 0.19 0.20 0.19 0.19 0.24 0.24 0.19
SPAN, Inc. Ridership 5,631 5,869 5,223 4,783 5,081 5,596 5,523 5,390 5,255 4,999 4,637 5,606 63,593 Mileage 48,687 51,173 47,080 41,451 45,435 49,966 48,872 48,755 49,604 46,236 43,078 51,727 572,064 Revenue Federal Grants $58,162 $ 110,528 $63,748 $66,236 $71,336 $69,068 $75,414 $99,061 $74,241 $80,948 $45,885 $68,746 $ 883,373 2016 Texas Transit Statistics Report 2016 75 State Grants 24,472 66,879 28,942 25,976 29,829 29,988 30,841 43,171 2,892 0 0 0 282,990 Farebox 7,252 5,718 5,861 5,000 6,365 7,866 6,303 6,587 5,878 6,384 5,474 7,491 76,179 Contract Revenue 39,735 61,828 57,104 48,422 52,760 56,566 56,060 35,475 20,020 24,402 47,596 41,264 541,232 Other Revenue 5,263 6,167 11,882 9,112 9,722 6,367 7,267 6,767 7,785 6,367 6,567 6,167 89,433 Total Revenue $ 134,884 $ 251,120 $ 167,537 $ 154,746 $ 170,012 $ 169,855 $ 175,885 $ 191,061 $ 110,816 $ 118,101 $ 105,522 $ 123,668 $ 1,873,207 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.12 0.11 0.11 0.12 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 SPAN STAR Transit Ridership 13,963 14,756 11,540 23,711 12,572 12,652 13,512 13,573 13,198 12,287 10,370 12,885 165,019 Mileage 138,410 139,894 138,658 126,567 116,203 122,676 128,767 123,159 125,241 120,603 105,842 131,578 1,517,598 Revenue Federal Grants $ 190,463 $90,447 $ 103,758 $ 214,238 $ 303,190 $ 211,827 $ 113,720 $91,750 $ 229,968 $ 236,133 $ 186,228 $ 193,198 $ 2,164,920 State Grants 22,521 99,594 93,707 30,353 0 0 29,682 29,007 5,211 87,614 0 17,171 414,860 Farebox 16,006 14,178 12,993 14,537 11,885 16,843 17,486 15,295 14,455 15,852 13,753 15,947 179,230 Contract Revenue 231,586 225,718 197,338 202,002 228,295 207,225 224,162 203,709 210,276 220,532 246,397 241,844 2,639,084 Other Revenue 387 58 37 367 22,929 7,877 37,574 121,374 8,838 18,360 10,559 7,804 236,164 Total Revenue $ 460,963 $ 429,995 $ 407,833 $ 461,497 $ 566,299 $ 443,772 $ 422,624 $ 461,135 $ 468,748 $ 578,491 $ 456,937 $ 475,964 $ 5,634,258 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.10 0.11 0.08 0.19 0.11 0.10 0.10 0.11 0.11 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.11 76 2016 Texas Transit Statistics Report 2016 76
RURAL TRANSIT DISTRICTS - FISCAL YEAR 2016
Data Item Sep-15 Oct-15 Nov-15 Dec-15 Jan-16 Feb-16 Mar-16 Apr-16 May-16 Jun-16 Jul-16 Aug-16 FY 2016 Total Texoma Area Ridership NR NR NR NR NR NR NR 354 956 1,230 1,157 1,240 4,937 Paratransit Mileage NR NR NR NR NR NR NR 10,088 22,094 24,469 22,970 22,068 101,689 System - TAPS Revenue Federal Grants $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $36,458 $49,916 $50,632 $60,178 $62,254 $ 259,438 State Grants 000000058,452 74,367 75,828 60,178 62,254 331,079 Farebox 0000000241 1,078 1,900 1,669 3,844 8,732 Contract Revenue 000000000000 0 Other Revenue 000000000000 0 Total Revenue $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $95,151 $ 125,361 $ 128,360 $ 122,025 $ 128,352 $ 599,249 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile NR NR NR NR NR NR NR 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.05 NR 0.05
The Transit Ridership 1,433 1,290 1,052 1,102 1,017 1,104 1,214 1,308 1,270 1,289 1,333 1,486 14,898 System, Inc. Mileage 22,427 22,546 18,697 19,324 20,207 22,058 24,001 26,680 22,384 23,464 22,968 25,178 269,934 Revenue Federal Grants $29,903 $25,075 $30,567 $29,900 $24,940 $28,691 $24,864 $28,991 $29,905 $34,803 $32,993 $35,280 $ 355,912 State Grants 18,035 18,072 18,531 17,732 18,689 18,106 17,231 18,245 20,666 22,022 17,167 16,411 220,907 Farebox 3,566 2,474 2,108 2,121 2,078 2,041 2,640 2,192 2,730 3,017 3,600 3,794 32,361 Contract Revenue 21,604 18,396 30,884 13,950 14,148 1,766 2,332 21,262 23,388 76,054 21,074 30,757 275,615 Other Revenue 1,598 989 4,953 1,000 1,000 27,494 20,187 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 62,221 Total Revenue $74,706 $65,006 $87,043 $64,703 $60,855 $78,098 $67,254 $71,690 $77,689 $ 136,896 $75,834 $87,242 $ 947,016 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.06 0.05 0.06 0.06 0.06
Webb County Ridership 7,732 7,730 6,594 6,943 6,581 6,968 6,697 6,514 6,426 6,287 5,689 6,341 80,502 Community Mileage 20,310 20,581 17,914 19,197 17,733 18,177 19,641 19,458 18,892 19,288 17,365 19,333 227,889 Action Agency Revenue Federal Grants $27,916 $19,099 $30,099 $34,138 $27,797 $24,767 $31,550 $26,534 $27,769 $31,690 $36,648 $26,108 $ 344,115 State Grants 15,902 11,568 16,311 19,038 13,885 12,606 20,357 14,957 16,484 20,910 21,399 55,116 238,533 Farebox 8,889 9,270 10,787 8,740 7,674 9,320 8,167 7,728 8,269 7,421 6,255 7,753 100,273 Contract Revenue 000000000000 0 Other Revenue 8,162 7,041 8,605 9,083 8,677 8,245 8,018 8,284 8,084 7,913 9,095 11,413 102,620 Total Revenue $60,869 $46,978 $65,802 $70,999 $58,033 $54,938 $68,092 $57,503 $60,606 $67,934 $73,397 $ 100,390 $ 785,541 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.38 0.38 0.37 0.36 0.37 0.38 0.34 0.33 0.34 0.33 NR NR 0.35
West Texas Ridership 8,830 8,895 7,886 8,074 8,110 8,732 8,561 8,746 8,996 8,481 7,891 8,598 101,800 Opportunities Mileage 146,229 149,285 139,555 137,099 140,482 141,930 149,308 140,702 140,353 157,470 141,528 160,569 1,744,510 Revenue Federal Grants $ 174,766 $ 194,061 $ 208,643 $ 232,897 $ 216,486 $ 240,767 $ 168,018 $46,734 $26,396 $37,289 $47,008 $96,276 $ 1,689,341 State Grants 0000025,642 63,899 284,028 192,307 235,086 157,647 60,498 1,019,107 Farebox 7,459 4,741 3,263 9,462 4,568 5,304 4,053 3,734 5,834 4,702 4,435 4,359 61,914 Contract Revenue 132,311 67,489 57,145 61,958 58,121 95,723 66,277 56,905 59,178 63,318 64,381 65,542 848,348 Other Revenue 55,437 59,691 56,567 76,337 51,057 61,824 57,704 58,696 55,164 57,322 64,905 103,957 758,661 Total Revenue $ 369,973 $ 325,982 $ 325,618 $ 380,654 $ 330,232 $ 429,260 $ 359,951 $ 450,097 $ 338,879 $ 397,717 $ 338,376 $ 330,632 $ 4,377,371 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.05 0.06 0.05 0.06 06TxsTastSaitc eot77 Texas Transit Statistics Report 2016 GRAND TOTALS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2016
Data Item Sep-15 Oct-15 Nov-15 Dec-15 Jan-16 Feb-16 Mar-16 Apr-16 May-16 Jun-16 Jul-16 Aug-16 FY 2016 Total Rural Ridership 492,510 494,684 430,460 447,541 416,900 451,286 467,561 441,979 438,272 428,001 417,774 433,448 5,360,416 Transit Mileage 2,391,252 2,401,916 2,152,850 2,273,473 2,237,582 2,342,567 2,468,652 2,379,747 2,431,212 2,469,959 2,302,038 2,572,809 28,424,057 Districts - Revenue Fiscal Year 2016 Federal Grants$ 3,862,113 $ 3,690,901 $ 2,902,474 $ 3,802,343 $ 2,965,008 $ 2,940,598 $ 3,249,325 $ 3,104,460 $ 2,696,649 $ 2,654,181 $ 2,904,250 $ 3,364,696 $ 38,136,998 State Grants 2,161,607 2,156,973 1,772,108 1,660,368 1,450,484 1,308,573 1,726,646 2,063,464 2,134,497 2,108,413 1,517,041 1,502,259 21,562,433 Farebox 367,193 328,421 358,163 369,815 343,014 385,745 402,867 333,549 370,445 431,262 343,358 475,234 4,509,066 Contract Revenue 2,261,324 1,865,471 1,823,486 2,370,859 2,494,094 2,413,995 2,516,991 2,412,643 2,536,127 2,762,995 2,550,188 2,837,908 28,846,081 Other Revenue 657,467 496,763 492,048 556,369 431,575 477,866 773,157 825,195 632,960 632,434 970,100 1,187,195 8,133,129 Total Revenue $ 9,309,704 $ 8,538,529 $ 7,348,279 $ 8,759,754 $ 7,684,175 $ 7,526,777 $ 8,668,986 $ 8,739,311 $ 8,370,678 $ 8,589,285 $ 8,284,937 $ 9,367,292 $ 101,187,707 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.21 0.21 0.20 0.20 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.18 0.17 0.18 0.17 0.19 This page intentionally left blank.
78 2016 Texas Transit Statistics Report ENHANCED MOBILITY OF SENIORS AND INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES PROGRAM
(SECTION 5310)
2016 Texas Transit Statistics Report 79 SUMMARY ENHANCED MOBILITY OF SENIORS AND INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES PROGRAM (Section 5310)
The Section 5310 Grant Program (49 USC, Section 5310) provides public transportation for the enhanced mobility of seniors and individuals with disabilities throughout the State of Texas. TxDOT administers the FTA Section 5310 program for the small urbanized and rural areas of the state, providing about one million unlinked passenger trips to seniors and individuals with disabilities annually. This program provides assistance to help local private nonprofit organizations, public transportation agencies and governmental authorities when other public transportation is unavailable, insufficient, or inappropriate to meeting the needs of the senior and disabled population. (Note: changes in the Section 5310 program due to MAP-21 and the FAST Act are reflected in this Report.)
Section 5310 program funds are allocated after state administrative expenses are deducted. The formula does not address performance. There are separate allocation calculations for small urbanized areas (population 50,000-199,999) and rural areas.
The formula for allocation of the small urbanized area apportionment includes:
(a) 25 percent distributed equally among the small urbanized areas of the state, using TxDOT district boundaries and, (b) 75 percent distributed by the small urbanized areas share of population of seniors and individuals with disabilities, using TxDOT district boundaries.
Please note that since several TxDOT districts do not include any small urbanized areas, these funds are not allocated by those districts’ boundaries for determination of awards.
Section 5310 rural area allocations are calculated in the same manner as the small urbanized area funds. Twenty-five percent is allocated equally among the TxDOT district boundaries, and seventy-five percent is allocated according to the relative share of the rural population of seniors and individuals with disabilities. All TxDOT districts have some rural population within their respective boundaries.
Section 5310 funds for projects serving small urbanized and rural areas are apportioned to the state, which in turn distributes these funds to eligible local applicants. In small urbanized and rural areas, each applicable TxDOT district establishes a local planning and development process in consultation with local stakeholders. This planning process provides local applicants with an opportunity to participate, ensures that projects meet the needs of the district’s residents, and provides for as much coordination of transportation services as possible.
The Federal Transit Administration apportions Section 5310 funds directly to large urbanized areas in accordance with the changes implemented from MAP-21. In those large urbanized areas, a selected designated recipient administers the program, including a project selection process that is established locally (See Note, Page 82). Those requesting further information should contact the designated recipient for the applicable large
80 2016 Texas Transit Statistics Report urbanized area. Contact information is provided starting on page 129.
The reduction in the number of independent Section 5310 transit agencies can be attributed to increased federal emphasis on coordination requirements. Existing rural transit agencies must enter into partnership with either a private nonprofit organization, or a state or local governmental authority that is approved by the state to coordinate services for seniors and individuals with disabilities. In addition, some independent Section 5310 transit agencies (agencies receiving only Section 5310 funds from the FTA) have entered into purchase of service (POS) contracts to foster coordination and increase efficiency. With a POS agreement, Section 5310 transportation services are contracted to other transportation agencies that may be able to provide the service more cost-effectively. These coordination efforts result in an annual combined count of Section 5310 transit providers of 61 in FY 2016.
As in previous reports, the number of mechanical system failures is not reported here due to annual variations in the number of Section 5310 transit agencies which makes it difficult to form any significant conclusions about trends in this program.
Performance Review – Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and Individuals With Disabilities Programs:
In FY 2016, the ridership number for the Section 5310 agencies is 466,909, in which ridership increased by nearly 9 percent, from 434,178 in FY 2015. Reported ridership has declined tremendously over the past decade from 1,255,028 in FY 2007, at a decrease of 63%. In addition to ridership, vehicle revenue miles declined over the past decade in the program, from 6,713,365 in FY 2007 to 4,557,627 in FY 2016 (at 47 percent). This overall decline corresponds to the significant drop in the number of independent Section 5310 transit agencies, from 140 in FY 2007 to only 61 in FY 2016. The decrease in reported measures from 2007 to 2016 may be largely explained by the fact that MAP-21 removed responsibility for the large urbanized areas from TxDOT, and therefore much of the activity in those locations is not reported to TxDOT.
2016 Texas Transit Statistics Report 81 Figure 13 below indicates a declining trend in “unlinked passenger trips per vehicle revenue mile” from FY 2007 through FY 2016.
Notes
The monthly statistics for agencies funded through the Section 5310 Grant Program are located at the end of this section.
The federal transportation bill passed in July 2012, titled “Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century”, or MAP-21, eliminated New Freedom/Section 5317 as a separate program. Funding formerly in this program, along with some project eligibility definitions, was added to the 5310 program at the national level.
In a few cases, TxDOT was asked to become the designated recipient in a large urbanized area for a limited time. See “Contact Information for the Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities Transportation Program,” on page 145, for details.
82 2016 Texas Transit Statistics Report FIGURE 14: ENHANCED MOBILITY OF SENIORS AND INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES EFFICIENCY AND EFFECTIVENESS MEASURES FISCAL YEARS 2007-2016
(Section 5310) Service Efficiency $3.50 $3.16 $3.00 $2.55 $2.56 $2.64 $2.51 $2.39 $2.50 $2.16 $2.21 $1.82 $2.00 $1.62 $1.50 $1.00 $0.50 $0.00 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Operating Expense per Vehicle Revenue Mile
(Section 5310) Cost Effectiveness $32.00 $30.12 $27.39 $28.00 $24.00 $20.00 $16.49 $16.48 $16.24 $15.16 $15.85 $16.00 $14.10 $12.50$11.80 $12.00 $8.00 $4.00 $0.00 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Operating Expense per Unlinked Passenger Trip
(Section 5310) Service Effectiveness 0.51 0.50 0.44 0.43
0.40 0.35 0.35 0.34 0.30 0.30 0.27 0.22 0.22 0.20
0.10
0.00 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Unlinked Passenger Trips per Vehicle Revenue Mile
Note: Figure 14 bar charts are averages of all transit agencies recorded during fiscal years.
2016 Texas Transit Statistics Report 83
TABLE 2 ENHANCED5: MOBILITY OF SENIORS AND INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES PROGRAM
(Section 5310)- PERFORMANCE SUMMARY ATA GLANCE - FiscalYears 2015and 2016
SERVICE SUPPLIED % Change FINANCIAL SOURCE % Change 2015 2016 (15-16) 2015 2016 (15-16) 2,894,051 4,557,627 57.48 Vehicle Revenue Miles Total Operating 182,072 260,946 43.32 Expenses $3,744,276$4,955,237 32.34 Vehicle Revenue Hours Total Revenue Total Revenue Vehicles 141 201 42.55 $7,907,122$10,121,646 28.01
SERVICE CONSUMED % Change 2015 2016 (15-16) Unlinked Passenger Trips 434,178 466,909 7.54
AVERAGE PERFORMANCE MEASURES: SERVICE EFFICIENCY COST EFFECTIVENESS 2015 2016 2015 2016
$1.29 $1.09 $8.62 $10.61 Operating Expense Operating Expense Per FareboxPerUnlinked Recovery $20.56 $18.99 13.7% 5.0% VehicleRevenue Mile Ratio**PassengerTrip Operating Expense Per VehicleRevenue Hour SERVICE EFFECTIVENESS 2015 2016 Unlinked Passenger Trips Per Vehicle Revenue Mile 0.15 0.10 Unlinked Passenger Trips Per
Vehicle Revenue Hour 2.38 1.79
Notes: "Average Performance Measure"s the average i of all service provided. Safety Data and Safety Indicators for FY 2015 excluded and 2 016from a trehis report. **Due to the Section 5316 agencies not collecting miles a ctualand h vehicleours, deadhead the ratios not a re applicable. ***See Tables 28 and 29Table for details.
84 2016 Texas Transit Statistics Report TABLE 26: ENHANCED MOBILITY OF SENIORS AND INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES PROGRAM (Section 5310) Fiscal Year 2015
Enhanced Mobility of Seniors & Individuals w/Disabilities Transit Providers (Headquarters) Total Revenue Unlinked Vehicle Revenue Vehicle Revenue Total Operating Operating Expense Operating Expense Per Unlinked Passengers Vehicles Passenger Trips Hours Miles Expenses Per Veh. Rev. Mile Unlinked Pass. Trip Per Veh. Rev. Mile Adult Day Activity & Health Center, Inc. (Lubbock)** ------Air Force Village Foundation, Inc. (San Antonio) - 361 170 1,758 - - - 0.21 Amarillo Multiservice Center for the Aging, Inc. (Amarillo) - 28,541 792 105,676 240,000 2.27 8.41 0.27 American Red Cross Greater Houston Area Chpt. (Houston) 14 24,522 16,774 335,371 1,064,594 3.17 43.41 0.07 Austin Groups for the Elderly (AGE) (Austin) 5 5,745 3,759 60,002 53,792 0.90 9.36 0.10 Austin Travis Center Integral Care (Austin) 2 2,285 - 13,104 43,224 3.30 18.92 0.17 Bastrop Co Emergency Food Pantry & Support Ctr Inc (Bastrop) 2 603 - 7,432 4,069 0.55 6.75 0.08 Big Bend Community Action Agency (Marfa) 11 1,053 2,147 52,303 384,376 7.35 365.03 0.02 Bluebonnet Trails Community MHMR (Austin)** ------Border Area Nutrition Council (Laredo)** ------Bowie Senior Citizens Project, Inc. (Bowie) - 3,290 2,324 16,530 30,559 1.85 9.29 0.20 Catholic Charities (formerly - Tarrant County/Amer. Red Cross) (Ft. Worth)** ------Centro de Salud Familiar La Fe, Inc. (El Paso)* 1 ------City of Friendswood (Friendswood)** ------Coastal Bend Center for Independent Living (Corpus Christi) - 411 - 12,142 10,228 0.84 24.89 0.03 Dallas County Department of Health & Human Services (Dallas)** ------Dawson County Senior Citzens Center (Lamesa) - 2,042 288 6,646 17,946 2.70 8.79 0.31 Eden Heights Apartments (New Braunfels)** ------Eden Hill Communities. (New Braunfels) 6 83,649 22,147 128,645 238,879 1.86 2.86 0.65 Faith in Action Caregiving (Round Rock) - 436 - 9,432 - - - 0.05 Farwell Convalescent Center (Farwell)** ------Foundation for MHMR/Permian Basin Community Ctr. (Midland) 2 410 222 4,977 1,030 0.21 2.51 0.08 Friendship Center of Montgomery County (Conroe)** ------Gateway Community Partners, Inc. (Jacksonville) 1 375 173 11,391 3,987 0.35 10.63 0.03 5 06TxsTastSaitc eot85 Texas Transit Statistics Report 2016 Good Samaritan Society White Acres (El Paso) 8,679 2,601 28,401 72,502 2.55 8.35 0.31 Greater Randolph Area Services Program (Converse) 4 4,529 1,341 22,705 73,076 3.22 16.14 0.20 Harris County Transportation (Houston) # - 57,982 -- 302,200 - 5.21 - Hays County Veterans Administration (San Marcos) - 587 200 11,611 20,508 1.77 34.94 0.05 Hockley County Sr. Cits. Assoc. (Levelland)** ------Inman Christian Center (San Antonio) - 452 129 3,139 10,501 3.35 23.23 0.14 Jim Hogg County (Hebbronville) - 1,389 760 14,421 - - - 0.10 Kirby Senior Center (Kirby) - 6,037 6,747 119,425 20,250 0.17 3.35 0.05 L.U.L.A.C. Project Amistad (El Paso) 51 109,937 81,600 1,319,552 - - - 0.08 Lubbock Independent School District- Special Education (Lubbock)** ------Marian Moss Enterprises, Inc. (Lubbock) - 1,054 69 3,725 - - - 0.28 Mary Lee Foundation (Austin) 6 10,905 1,840 30,032 53,042 1.77 4.86 0.36 Menard County (Menard County) - 32 126 4,982 3,600 0.72 112.50 0.01 MHMR Tarrant County (Fort Worth) - 14,569 3,191 110,571 33,009 0.30 2.27 0.13 See footnote at the end of Table 86 2016 Texas Transit Statistics Report 2016 86
TABLE 26: ENHANCED MOBILITY OF SENIORS AND INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES PROGRAM (Section 5310) Fiscal Year 2015
Enhanced Mobility of Seniors & Individuals w/Disabilities Transit Providers (Headquarters) Total Revenue Unlinked Vehicle Revenue Vehicle Revenue Total Operating Operating Expense Operating Expense Per Unlinked Passengers Vehicles Passenger Trips Hours Miles Expenses Per Veh. Rev. Mile Unlinked Pass. Trip Per Veh. Rev. Mile Morningside Ministries (San Antonio) - 1,408 301 4,503 47,820 10.62 33.96 0.31 Nazareth Hall Nursing Center (El Paso) 2 715 715 13,553 35,849 2.65 50.14 0.05 NDMJ, LLC (Tyler) 1 406 195 16,177 29,329 1.81 72.24 0.03 Plano Community Homes Sponsor (Plano)** ------Prairie Acres Nursing Home (Friona)** ------Presa Community Service Ctr. (San Antonio) - 7,116 7,067 78,629 266,475 3.39 37.45 0.09 Rio Concho Manor (San Angelo) 1 2,985 268 1,700 7,488 4.40 2.51 1.76 Rio Concho West (San Angelo) 1 1,193 119 1,285 5,783 4.50 4.85 0.93 Salvation Army William Booth Apts. (Tyler) 2 143 192 1,332 2,918 2.19 20.41 0.11 San Antonio AIDS Foundation (San Antonio) - 1,615 1,362 18,273 49,814 2.73 30.84 0.09 San Antonio Lighthouse (San Antonio) 1 73 46 425 821 1.93 11.25 0.17 Senior Adult Services (Farmers Branch) 5 8,679 2,189 105,099 202,380 1.93 23.32 0.08 Senior Citizen Project of Chambers County (Anahuac) 2 3,850 3,797 23,468 61,542 2.62 15.98 0.16 Seven Acres Jewish Geriatric Center (Houston) 3 2,741 2,294 25,323 118,382 4.67 43.19 0.11 Smith County (Tyler) - 1,661 1,069 20,436 60,596 2.97 36.48 0.08 St. Gregory the Great Parish (San Antonio) 2 4,047 2,544 44,328 71,550 1.61 17.68 0.09 St. Vincent De Paul Catholic Church (San Antonio)** ------Starr County Rural Transportation (Rio Grande City) 5 11,318 4,620 55,067 - - - 0.21 Texarkana Special Education Center, Inc. (Texarkana) 2 5,175 4,480 8,348 67,035 8.03 12.95 0.62 University of Texas Health Center - Tyler (Tyler) - 1,360 1,341 13,070 - - - 0.10 Wilmer Senior Center (Wilmer) 1 2,061 960 12,087 13,949 1.15 6.77 0.17 Young County Onley Senior Cub Center (Olney)** ------Zapata County (Zapata) 3 7,757 1,113 16,975 21,173 1.25 2.73 0.46 Total for Fiscal Year 2015 141 434,178 182,072 2,894,051$ 3,744,276
Average for 61 Systems 5.22 9,648 4,552 65,774 $ 98,534 $ 2.64 $ 30.12 0.22
Notes: * Indicates no longer in service. **No data reported # Purchase of Service (POS) TABLE 27: ENHANCED MOBILITY OF SENIORS AND INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES PROGRAM (Section 5310) Fiscal Year 2016
Enhanced Mobility of Seniors & Individuals w/Disabilities Transit Providers (Headquarters) Total Revenue Unlinked Vehicle Revenue Vehicle Revenue Total Operating Operating Expense Operating Expense Per Unlinked Passengers Vehicles Passenger Trips Hours Miles Expenses Per Veh. Rev. Mile Unlinked Pass. Trip Per Veh. Rev. Mile Adult Enrichment Center (San Angelo) 4,800 Affectionate Arms Adult Day Health Care Center (Victoria) - 1,883 ------Amarillo Multiservice Center for the Aging, Inc. (Amarillo) - 22,052 18,000 99,214 25,000 0.25 1.13 0.22 American Red Cross Greater Houston Area Chpt. (Houston) 16 26,967 18,278 350,807 1,067,599 3.04 39.59 0.08 Austin Groups for the Elderly (AGE) (Austin) 5 5,727 4,383 51,049 39,262 0.77 6.86 0.16 Austin Travis Center Integral Care (Austin) - 693 - 9,161 9,381 1.02 13.54 0.08 Bastrop Co Emergency Food Pantry & Support Ctr Inc (Bastrop) - 633 - 5,463 2,291 0.42 3.62 0.12 Big Bend Community Action Agency (Marfa) 11 1,128 2,837 65,735 291,907 4.44 258.78 0.02 Border Area Nutrition Council (Laredo)** ------Bowie Senior Citizens Project, Inc. (Bowie) - 3,532 -- 32,339 - 9.16 - Calhoun County Senior Citizens (Port Lavaca) 4 8,373 5,445 109,014 185,790 1.70 22.19 0.08 Catholic Charities (formerly - Tarrant County/Amer. Red Cross) (Ft. Worth)** ------Center for Life Resources (Brownwood) - - -- 4,405 - - - Centro de Salud Familiar La Fe, Inc. (El Paso) 1 18 8 166 3,146 18.95 174.78 0.11 City of Friendswood (Friendswood) - 2,969 ------Coastal Bend Center for Independent Living (Corpus Christi) - 997 - 1,014,979 - - - 0.00 Disability in Action, Inc. (Abilene) 1 7,028 976 20,475 25,517 1.25 3.63 0.34 East Coke County Hospital District dba Bronte Health and Rehab Center (Bronte) 12,000 Eden Heights Apartments (New Braunfels)** ------Eden Hill Communities (New Braunfels)** 6 90,259 11,820 101,788 248,221 2.44 2.75 0.89 Foundation for MHMR/Permian Basin Community Ctr. (Midland) 2 372 181 4,554 1,395 0.31 3.75 0.08 Friends of Elder Citizens (Palacios) 11 23,871 13,384 279,114 463,390 1.66 19.41 0.09 Friendship Center of Montgomery County (Conroe)** 6 16,465 9,984 117,330 222,105 1.89 13.49 0.14 Gateway Community Partners, Inc. (Jacksonville) - 88 93 2,639 2,275 0.86 25.85 0.03 Goliad County (Goliad) 5 7,002 4,089 66,766 201,381 3.02 28.76 0.10 Gonzales County Senior Citizens Association (Gonzales) 6 15,019 3,123 59,409 233,718 3.93 15.56 0.25 06TxsTastSaitc eot87 Texas Transit Statistics Report 2016 Good Samaritan Society White Acres (El Paso) 5 6,628 2,521 29,504 115,033 3.90 17.36 0.22 Greater Randolph Area Services Program (Converse) - 4,697 3,345 52,391 112,767 2.15 24.01 0.09 Hays County Veterans Administration (San Marcos) - 346 ------Houston Kiddie Express (Beaumont)** ------Inman Christian Center (San Antonio) - 608 166 4,217 12,949 3.07 21.30 0.14 Jim Hogg County (Hebbronville)** ------Kirby Senior Center (Kirby) - 1,150 1,306 24,832 6,127 0.25 5.33 0.05 L.U.L.A.C. Project Amistad (El Paso) 53 106,834 98,370 1,255,697 - - - 0.09 Lavaca County (Hallettsville) 14 11,012 7,263 102,589 224,256 2.19 20.36 0.11 Lubbock Independent School District- Special Education (Lubbock)** ------Marian Moss Enterprises, Inc. (Lubbock) - 628 49 3,008 - - - 0.21 Mary Lee Foundation (Austin) 6 7,496 1,424 21,712 36,326 1.67 4.85 0.35 MHMR Tarrant County (Fort Worth) 5 10,061 3,424 77,898 10,159 0.13 1.01 0.13 Morningside Ministries (San Antonio) 1 1,087 204 2,886 47,820 16.57 43.99 0.38 See footnote at the end of Table 88 2016 Texas Transit Statistics Report 2016 88
TABLE 27: ENHANCED MOBILITY OF SENIORS AND INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES PROGRAM (Section 5310) Fiscal Year 2016
Enhanced Mobility of Seniors & Individuals w/Disabilities Transit Providers (Headquarters) Total Revenue Unlinked Vehicle Revenue Vehicle Revenue Total Operating Operating Expense Operating Expense Per Unlinked Passengers Vehicles Passenger Trips Hours Miles Expenses Per Veh. Rev. Mile Unlinked Pass. Trip Per Veh. Rev. Mile Mounting Horizons (Houston) - 2,214 -- 69,992 - 31.61 - Nazareth Hall Nursing Center (El Paso) 2 771 767 19,663 31,123 1.58 40.37 0.04 NDMJ, LLC (Tyler) 22 16,706 22,515 217,107 307,708 1.42 18.42 0.08 Panhandle Independent Living Center (Amarillo)** Presa Community Service Ctr. (San Antonio)** ------Rio Concho Manor (San Angelo) 1 3,192 269 1,670 10,914 6.54 3.42 1.91 Rio Concho West (San Angelo) 1 1,406 150 1,368 7,228 5.28 5.14 1.03 Salvation Army William Booth Apts. (Tyler) 1 690 342 3,883 4,525 1.17 6.56 0.18 San Antonio AIDS Foundation (San Antonio) - 618 521 7,044 25,228 3.58 40.82 0.09 San Antonio Lighthouse (San Antonio) 1 100 28 552 - - - 0.18 Senior Adult Services (Farmers Branch) 5 10,476 2,226 127,815 231,123 1.81 22.06 0.08 Senior Citizen Project of Chambers County (Anahuac) 1 3,396 3,661 18,291 54,766 2.99 16.13 0.19 Senior Connect - Kaufman County SCS (Kaufman) 246 Seven Acres Jewish Geriatric Center (Houston) - 3,252 -- 119,887 - 36.87 - Smith County (Tyler) - 6,510 4,137 75,793 194,106 2.56 29.82 0.09 St. Gregory the Great Parish (San Antonio) - 3,984 2,520 46,310 70,875 1.53 17.79 0.09 Starr County Rural Transportation (Rio Grande City) 6 19,742 6,273 69,117 9,827 0.14 0.50 0.29 Texarkana Special Education Center, Inc. (Texarkana) 2 4,621 3,984 5,764 58,273 10.11 12.61 0.80 University of Texas Health Center - Tyler (Tyler) 1 2,036 2,400 23,605 112,000 4.74 55.01 0.09 Wilmer Senior Center (Wilmer) - 1,326 480 7,248 6,303 0.87 4.75 0.18 Zapata County (Zapata)** ------Total for Fiscal Year 2016 201 466,909 260,946 4,557,627$ 4,955,237
Average for 61 Systems 6.93 9,529 6,691 108,515 $ 112,619 $ 3.16 $ 27.39 0.24
Notes: * Indicates no longer in service. **No data reported # Purchase of Service (POS) TABLE 28: ENHANCED MOBILITY OF SENIORS AND INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES PROGRAM (Section 5310) REVENUES AND FAREBOX RECOVERY - FY 2015 Enhanced Mobility of Seniors & Individuals w/Disabilities Transit Providers FARES LOCAL REVENUE TOTAL REVENUE FAREBOX RECOVERY RATIO (1) (Headquarters) Adult Day Activity & Health Center, Inc. (Lubbock) - -- - Air Force Village Foundation, Inc. (San Antonio) - - 3,995 - Amarillo Multiservice Center for the Aging, Inc. (Amarillo) - - - - American Red Cross Greater Houston Area Chpt. (Houston) 114,182 950,412 1,064,594 10.73% Austin Groups for the Elderly (AGE) (Austin) - 1,000 52,523 - Austin Travis Center Integral Care (Austin) - -- - Bastrop Co Emergency Food Pantry & Support Ctr Inc (Bastrop) - -- - Big Bend Community Action Agency (Marfa) 2,457 408,542 410,999 0.64% Bluebonnet Trails Community MHMR (Austin) - -- - Border Area Nutrition Council (Laredo) - -- - Bowie Senior Citizens Project, Inc. (Bowie) 4,925 25,634 30,559 16.12% Catholic Charities (formerly - Tarrant County/Amer. Red Cross) (Ft. Worth) - -- - Centro de Salud Familiar La Fe, Inc. (El Paso)* - -- - City of Friendswood (Friendswood) - -- - Coastal Bend Center for Independent Living (Corpus Christi) - 10,290 10,290 - Dallas County Department of Health & Human Services (Dallas) - -- - Dawson County Senior Citzens Center (Lamesa) 402 - 402 2.24% Eden Heights Apartments (New Braunfels) - -- - Eden Hill Communities. (New Braunfels) 20,254 - 20,254 8.48% Faith in Action Caregiving (Round Rock) - 3,330 15,199 - Farwell Convalescent Center (Farwell) - -- - Foundation for MHMR/Permian Basin Community Ctr. (Midland) - -- - Friendship Center of Montgomery County (Conroe) - -- -
06TxsTastSaitc eot89 Texas Transit Statistics Report 2016 Gateway Community Partners, Inc. (Jacksonville) - 7,380 7,380 - Good Samaritan Society White Acres (El Paso) - 1,363,338 1,363,338 - Greater Randolph Area Services Program (Converse) 12,725 34,012 83,766 17.41% Harris County Transportation (Houston) # - -- - Hays County Veterans Administration (San Marcos) - 20,313 20,508 - Hockley County Sr. Cits. Assoc. (Levelland) - -- - Inman Christian Center (San Antonio) - -- - Jim Hogg County (Hebbronville) 2,231 - 2,231 - Kirby Senior Center (Kirby) - -- - L.U.L.A.C. Project Amistad (El Paso) - 3,803,767 3,803,767 - Lubbock Independent School District- Special Education (Lubbock) - -- - Marian Moss Enterprises, Inc. (Lubbock) - -- - Mary Lee Foundation (Austin) - 41,457 53,042 - Menard County (Menard County) - 3,600 3,600 - MHMR Tarrant County (Fort Worth) - 32,995 32,995 - See footnote at the end of Table 90 2016 Texas Transit Statistics Report 2016 90
TABLE 28: ENHANCED MOBILITY OF SENIORS AND INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES PROGRAM (Section 5310) REVENUE AND FAREBOX RECOVERY - FY 2015
Enhanced Mobility of Seniors & Individuals w/Disabilities Transit Providers (Headquarters) FARES LOCAL REVENUE TOTAL REVENUE FAREBOX RECOVERY RATIO (1)
Morningside Ministries (San Antonio) - 47,820 47,820 - Nazareth Hall Nursing Center (El Paso) - 35,849 35,849 - NDMJ, LLC (Tyler) 671 - 30,000 -2.29% Plano Community Homes Sponsor (Plano) - --- Prairie Acres Nursing Home (Friona) - -- Presa Community Service Ctr. (San Antonio) - 62,022 269,289 - Rio Concho Manor (San Angelo) - 7,488 7,488 - Rio Concho West (San Angelo) - 5,783 5,783 - Salvation Army William Booth Apts. (Tyler) 2,266 - 2,266 -77.66% San Antonio AIDS Foundation (San Antonio) - --- San Antonio Lighthouse (San Antonio) - -- Senior Adult Services (Farmers Branch) 22,602 164,376 202,380 11.17% - Senior Citizen Project of Chambers County (Anahuac) 165 - 51,467 0.27% Seven Acres Jewish Geriatric Center (Houston) - -- Smith County (Tyler) 2,533 1,830 60,598 4.18% - St. Gregory the Great Parish (San Antonio) - - 71,550 - St. Vincent De Paul Catholic Church (San Antonio) - -- Starr County Rural Transportation (Rio Grande City) - 9,371 9,371 - Texarkana Special Education Center, Inc. (Texarkana) - 67,035 67,035 -- University of Texas Health Center - Tyler (Tyler) - - 64,000 -- Wilmer Senior Center (Wilmer) - -- Young County Onley Senior Cub Center (Olney) - -- Zapata County (Zapata) 2,784 - 2,784 13.15% Total for Fiscal Year 2015 188,197 7,107,644 7,907,122 Average 13.70% Notes: The numerous blank spaces are due to some of the Section 5310 agencies not collecting fares or not receiving local revenue. (1) Farebox recovery ratio is defined as farebox revenue divided by total operating expenses.
Notes: * Indicates no longer in service. # Purchase of Service (POS) TABLE 29: ENHANCED MOBILITY OF SENIORS AND INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES PROGRAM (Section 5310) REVENUE AND FAREBOX RECOVERY - FY 2016
Enhanced Mobility of Seniors & Individuals w/Disabilities Transit Providers (Headquarters) FARES LOCAL REVENUE TOTAL REVENUE FAREBOX RECOVERY RATIO (1) Adult Enrichment Center (San Angelo) 4,800 Affectionate Arms Adult Day Health Care Center (Victoria) - -- Amarillo Multiservice Center for the Aging, Inc. (Amarillo) - - - - American Red Cross Greater Houston Area Chpt. (Houston) 110,607 956,992 1,067,599 10.36% Austin Groups for the Elderly (AGE) (Austin) - --- Austin Travis Center Integral Care (Austin) - -- Bastrop Co Emergency Food Pantry & Support Ctr Inc (Bastrop) - -- Big Bend Community Action Agency (Marfa) 2,029 373,265 735,056 -0.70% Border Area Nutrition Council (Laredo) - --- - Bowie Senior Citizens Project, Inc. (Bowie) 5,116 27,223 32,339 15.82% Calhoun County Senior Citizens (Port Lavaca) 4,579 181,210 185,789 2.46% - Catholic Charities (formerly - Tarrant County/Amer. Red Cross) (Ft. Worth) - -- Center for Life Resources (Brownwood) - - 4,405 - Centro de Salud Familiar La Fe, Inc. (El Paso) - --- City of Friendswood (Friendswood) - -- Coastal Bend Center for Independent Living (Corpus Christi) - - 38,358 -- Disability in Action, Inc. (Abilene) 2,688 12,601 120,088 -10.53% East Coke County Hospital District dba Bronte Health and Rehab Center (Bronte) 12,000 Eden Heights Apartments (New Braunfels) - -- Eden Hill Communities (New Braunfels) 15,186 - 17,515 6.12% - Foundation for MHMR/Permian Basin Community Ctr. (Midland) - -- Friends of Elder Citizens (Palacios) 26,119 429,522 463,390 5.64% - Friendship Center of Montgomery County (Conroe) - 27,454 222,105 - Gateway Community Partners, Inc. (Jacksonville) - 3,075 3,075 -
06TxsTastSaitc eot91 Texas Transit Statistics Report 2016 Goliad County (Goliad) 6,315 192,736 201,381 3.14% Gonzales County Senior Citizens Association (Gonzales) 490 210,467 233,718 21.00% Good Samaritan Society White Acres (El Paso) - 1,363,966 1,363,966 - Greater Randolph Area Services Program (Converse) 9,600 - 112,915 8.51% Hays County Veterans Administration (San Marcos) - -- Houston Kiddie Express (Beaumont) - --- - Inman Christian Center (San Antonio) - -- - Jim Hogg County (Hebbronville) - -- - - Kirby Senior Center (Kirby) --- L.U.L.A.C. Project Amistad (El Paso) - - 3,661,035 - Lavaca County (Hallettsville) 6,888 205,717 244,256 3.07% Lubbock Independent School District- Special Education (Lubbock) - --- Marian Moss Enterprises, Inc. (Lubbock) - --- Mary Lee Foundation (Austin) - 33,143 36,326 - See footnote at the end of Table 92 2016 Texas Transit Statistics Report 2016 92
TABLE 29: ENHANCED MOBILITY OF SENIORS AND INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES PROGRAM (Section 5310) REVENUE AND FAREBOX RECOVERY - FY 2016
Enhanced Mobility of Seniors & Individuals w/Disabilities Transit Providers (Headquarters) FARES LOCAL REVENUE TOTAL REVENUE FAREBOX RECOVERY RATIO (1) MHMR Tarrant County (Fort Worth) - - 10,174 - Morningside Ministries (San Antonio) - 47,820 47,820 - Mounting Horizons (Houston) - -- - Nazareth Hall Nursing Center (El Paso) - 31,123 31,123 - NDMJ, LLC (Tyler) 29,290 298,449 511,160 9.52% Panhandle Independent Living Center (Amarillo) Presa Community Service Ctr. (San Antonio) - -- - Rio Concho Manor (San Angelo) - 10,914 10,914 - Rio Concho West (San Angelo) - 7,228 7,228 - Salvation Army William Booth Apts. (Tyler) 1,054 - 1,054 23.29% San Antonio AIDS Foundation (San Antonio) - -- - San Antonio Lighthouse (San Antonio) - -- - Senior Adult Services (Farmers Branch) 23,139 203,385 232,656 10.01% Senior Citizen Project of Chambers County (Anahuac) - 1,167 46,490 - Senior Connect - Kaufman County SCS (Kaufman) 13,530 Seven Acres Jewish Geriatric Center (Houston) - -- - Smith County (Tyler) 10,485 50,856 194,106 5.40% St. Gregory the Great Parish (San Antonio) - - 70,875 - Starr County Rural Transportation (Rio Grande City) - 14,127 14,127 - Texarkana Special Education Center, Inc. (Texarkana) - 58,273 58,273 - University of Texas Health Center - Tyler (Tyler) - 16,000 112,000 - Wilmer Senior Center (Wilmer) - -- - Zapata County (Zapata) - -- - Total for Fiscal Year 2016 253,585 4,756,713 10,121,646 Average 9.04% Notes: The numerous blank spaces are due to some of the Section 5310 agencies not collecting fares or not receiving local revenue. (1) Farebox recovery ratio is defined as farebox revenue divided by total operating expenses.
Notes: * Indicates no longer in service. # Purchase of Service (POS) MONTHLY STATISTICS FOR ENHANCED MOBILITY OF SENIORS AND INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES PROGRAM
(SECTION 5310)
2016 Texas Transit Statistics Report 93 94 2016 Texas Transit Statistics Report 2016 94
ENHANCED MOBILITY OF SENIORS AND INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES - FISCAL YEAR 2016
Data Item Sep-15 Oct-15 Nov-15 Dec-15 Jan-16 Feb-16 Mar-16 Apr-16 May-16 Jun-16 Jul-16 Aug-16 FY 2016 Total ABILENE DISTRICT Disability In Action, Inc. Ridership NR NR NR NR NR 40 1,240 706 1,047 1,562 1,124 1,309 7,028 (Abilene) Mileage NR NR NR NR NR 1,469 2,808 2,046 3,402 4,020 3,015 3,715 20,475 Revenue Federal Grants $ - $ - $ - $ 4,918 $ 11,137 $ 14,345 $ 13,602 $ 11,448 $ 10,932 $ 15,756 $ 12,426 $ 10,235 $ 104,799 State Grants ------0 Farebox - - - - 211 313 451 182 399 380 311 441 2,688 Contract Revenue ------0 Other Revenue - - - - 437 1,548 1,281 1,559 1,575 2,000 2,187 2,014 12,601 Total Revenue $ - $ - $ - $ 4,918 $ 11,785 $ 16,206 $ 15,334 $ 13,189 $ 12,906 $ 18,136 $ 14,924 $ 12,690 $ 120,088 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile NR NR NR NR NR 0.03 0.44 0.35 0.31 0.39 0.37 0.35 0.34
AMARILLO DISTRICT Amarillo Multiservice Center Ridership 2,378 2,558 2,286 2,164 2,390 817 1,163 1,034 1,723 1,843 1,636 2,060 22,052 for the Aging Mileage 10,240 10,303 9,567 9,435 10,998 6,403 3,591 2,898 9,250 9,293 7,873 9,363 99,214 (Amarillo) Revenue Federal Grants $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - State Grants ------0 Farebox ------0 Contract Revenue ------0 Other Revenue ------0 Total Revenue $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.23 0.25 0.24 0.23 0.22 0.13 0.32 0.36 0.19 0.20 0.21 0.22 0.22
Panhandle Independent Ridership NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR Living Center (Amarillo)* Mileage NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR Revenue Federal Grants $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - State Grants ------0 Farebox ------0 Contract Revenue ------0 Other Revenue ------0 Total Revenue $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - System Effectiveness Riders per Mile NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR
ATLANTA DISTRICT Texarkana Special Ridership 459 369 431 320 320 320 396 360 378 448 360 460 4,621 Education Center, Inc. Mileage 378 352 380 436 543 322 469 437 481 615 697 654 5,764 (Texarkana) Revenue Federal Grants $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - State Grants 000000000000 0 Farebox 000000000000 0 Contract Revenue 000000000000 0 Other Revenue 4,822 4,779 4,729 4,774 4,966 4,790 4,774 4,965 4,790 4,920 5,108 4,856 58,273 Total Revenue $ 4,822 $ 4,779 $ 4,729 $ 4,774 $ 4,966 $ 4,790 $ 4,774 $ 4,965 $ 4,790 $ 4,920 $ 5,108 $ 4,856 $ 58,273 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 1.21 1.05 1.13 0.73 0.59 0.99 0.84 0.82 0.79 0.73 0.52 0.70 0.80
Senior Connect Ridership NR NR NR 20 14 55 26 20 27 34 16 34 246 (Atlanta) Mileage NRNRNR000000000 0 Revenue Federal Grants $ - $ - $ - $ 1,100 $770 $ 3,025 $ 1,430 $ 1,100 $ 1,485 $ 1,870 $ 880 $ 1,870 $ 13,530 State Grants ------0 Farebox ------0 Contract Revenue ------0 Other Revenue ------0 Total Revenue $ - $ - $ - $ 1,100 $ 770 $ 3,025 $ 1,430 $ 1,100 $ 1,485 $ 1,870 $ 880 $ 1,870 $ 13,530 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR See footnote at the end of Table ENHANCED MOBILITY OF SENIORS AND INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES - FISCAL YEAR 2016
Data Item Sep-15 Oct-15 Nov-15 Dec-15 Jan-16 Feb-16 Mar-16 Apr-16 May-16 Jun-16 Jul-16 Aug-16 FY 2016 Total
AUSTIN DISTRICT Austin Groups for the Elderly (AGE) Ridership 519 433 361 471 416 545 492 465 502 395 467 661 5,727 (Austin) Mileage 3,894 3,867 3,439 3,917 4,056 4,477 4,601 3,797 4,083 4,547 3,803 6,568 51,049 Revenue Federal Grants $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - State Grants ------0 Farebox ------0 Contract Revenue ------0 Other Revenue ------0 Total Revenue $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.13 0.11 0.10 0.12 0.10 0.12 0.11 0.12 0.12 0.09 0.12 0.10 0.11
Austin Travis Center Integral Ridership 21355379 0NRNRNRNR46NRNRNR 693 Care (Austin) Mileage 1,304 3,551 1,338 2,650 NR NR NR NR 318 NR NR NR 9,161 Revenue Federal Grants $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - State Grants ------0 Farebox ------0 Contract Revenue ------0 Other Revenue ------0 Total Revenue $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.16 0.02 0.28 0.00 NR NR NR NR 0.14 NR NR NR 0.08
Bastrop Co Emergency Ridership NR NR NR 123 118 124 80 62 126 NR NR NR 633 Food Pantry & Mileage NR NR NR 903 870 801 734 1,052 1,103 NR NR NR 5,463 Support Ctr Inc Revenue (Bastrop) Federal Grants $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - State Grants ------0 Farebox ------0 Contract Revenue ------0 2016 Texas Transit Statistics Report 2016 95 Other Revenue ------0 Total Revenue $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - System Effectiveness Riders per Mile NR NR NR 0.14 0.14 0.15 0.11 0.06 0.11 NR NR NR 0.12
Hays County Veterans Ridership 49 52 36 35 35 22 40 46 31 NR NR NR 346 Administration Mileage 000000000NRNRNR 0 (San Marcos) Revenue Federal Grants $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - State Grants ------0 Farebox ------0 Contract Revenue ------0 Other Revenue ------0 Total Revenue $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - System Effectiveness Riders per Mile NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR
See footnote at the end of Table 96 2016 Texas Transit Statistics Report 2016 96
ENHANCED MOBILITY OF SENIORS AND INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES - FISCAL YEAR 2016
Data Item Sep-15 Oct-15 Nov-15 Dec-15 Jan-16 Feb-16 Mar-16 Apr-16 May-16 Jun-16 Jul-16 Aug-16 FY 2016 Total Mary Lee Foundation Ridership 846 717 631 747 719 569 541 685 618 442 348 633 7496 (Austin) Mileage 2,563 2,119 1,911 1,813 1,922 1,486 1,449 1,894 2,018 1,477 1,047 2,013 21,712 Revenue Federal Grants $ 2,577 $ - $ - $ - $606 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 3,183 State Grants ------0 Farebox ------0 Contract Revenue ------0 Other Revenue 1,205 2,319 4,570 5,336 1,544 2,779 2,625 2,418 3,152 2,511 2,328 2,356 33,143 Total Revenue $ 3,782 $ 2,319 $ 4,570 $ 5,336 $ 2,150 $ 2,779 $ 2,625 $ 2,418 $ 3,152 $ 2,511 $ 2,328 $ 2,356 $ 36,326 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.33 0.34 0.33 0.41 0.37 0.38 0.37 0.36 0.31 0.30 0.33 0.31 0.35
BEAUMONT DISTRICT Houston Kiddie Express Ridership NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR (Beaumont)* Mileage NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR Revenue Federal Grants $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - State Grants 000000000000 0 Farebox 000000000000 0 Contract Revenue 000000000000 0 Other Revenue 000000000000 0 Total Revenue $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - System Effectiveness Riders per Mile NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR
Senior Citizen Project of Ridership 383 355 358 322 203 380 263 240 235 313 226 118 3,396 Chambers County (Anahuac) Mileage 2,229 2,000 1,946 2,143 1,168 2,068 1,339 1,035 1,374 1,468 956 565 18,291 Revenue Federal Grants $ 4,477 $ 4,510 $ 4,122 $ 4,486 $ 3,229 $ 3,566 $ 3,650 $ 3,478 $ 3,252 $ 3,742 $ 3,318 $ 3,493 $ 45,323 State Grants 000000000000 0 Farebox 000000000000 0 Contract Revenue 000000000000 0 Other Revenue 25 25 20 0 0 0 120 0 50 437 195 295 1,167 Total Revenue $ 4,502 $ 4,535 $ 4,142 $ 4,486 $ 3,229 $ 3,566 $ 3,770 $ 3,478 $ 3,302 $ 4,179 $ 3,513 $ 3,788 $ 46,490 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.17 0.18 0.18 0.15 0.17 0.18 0.20 0.23 0.17 0.21 0.24 0.21 0.19
BROWNWOOD DISTRICT Center for Life Resources* Ridership NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR (Brownwood) Mileage NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR Revenue Federal Grants $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 520 $ 553 $ 700 $ 1,098 $ $ 1,075 $ 459 $ 4,405 State Grants 000000000000 0 Farebox 000000000000 0 Contract Revenue 000000000000 0 Other Revenue 000000000000 0 Total Revenue $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 520 $ 553 $ 700 $ 1,098 $ - $ 1,075 $ 459 $ 4,405 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR See footnote at the end of Table ENHANCED MOBILITY OF SENIORS AND INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES - FISCAL YEAR 2016
Data Item Sep-15 Oct-15 Nov-15 Dec-15 Jan-16 Feb-16 Mar-16 Apr-16 May-16 Jun-16 Jul-16 Aug-16 FY 2016 Total
CORPUS CHRISTI DISTRICT Coastal Bend Center Ridership 126 0 147 151 9 357 183 24 NR NR NR NR 997 for Independent Living Mileage 4,183 0 4,938 5,130 158 998,663 1,454 453 NR NR NR NR 1,014,979 (Corpus Christi) Revenue Federal Grants $ 4,257 $ - $ 5,980 $ 9,071 $ 5,511 $ 13,539 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 38,358 State Grants 000000000000 0 Farebox 000000000000 0 Contract Revenue 000000000000 0 Other Revenue 000000000000 0 Total Revenue $ 4,257 $ - $ 5,980 $ 9,071 $ 5,511 $ 13,539 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 38,358 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.03 NR 0.03 0.03 0.06 0.00 0.13 0.05 NR NR NR NR 0.00
DALLAS DISTRICT Senior Adult Services Ridership 820 820 820 750 750 750 936 936 936 986 986 986 10,476 (Farmers Branch) Mileage 10,235 10,235 10,235 9,141 9,141 9,141 11,449 11,449 11,449 11,780 11,780 11,780 127,815 Revenue Federal Grants $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,533 $ 1,533 $ 1,533 $ 1,533 $ - $ - $ - $ 6,132 State Grants ------0 Farebox 3,286 3,286 3,286 1,615 1,615 1,615 1,269 1,269 1,269 1,543 1,543 1,543 23,139 Contract Revenue ------0 Other Revenue 14,934 14,934 14,934 16,311 16,311 16,311 17,494 17,494 17,494 19,056 19,056 19,056 203,385 Total Revenue $ 18,220 $ 18,220 $ 18,220 $ 17,926 $ 17,926 $ 19,459 $ 20,296 $ 20,296 $ 20,296 $ 20,599 $ 20,599 $ 20,599 $ 232,656 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08
Wilmer Senior Center Ridership 232 232 232 210 210 210 NR NR NR NR NR NR 1,326 (Wilmer) Mileage 1,268 1,268 1,268 1,148 1,148 1,148 NR NR NR NR NR NR 7,248 Revenue Federal Grants $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - State Grants 000000000000 0 Farebox 000000000000 0 Contract Revenue 000000000000 0 Other Revenue 000000000000 0 2016 Texas Transit Statistics Report 2016 97 Total Revenue $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 NR NR NR NR NR NR 0.18
EL PASO DISTRICT Big Bend Community Ridership 69 116 153 110 81 192 88 136 60 54 69 0 1,128 Action Committee, Inc. Mileage 613 4,977 5,557 7,836 6,044 10,565 4,832 7,607 7,411 4,580 4,930 783 65,735 (Marfa) Revenue Federal Grants $ 24,040 $ 20,596 $ 27,101 $ 40,590 $ 23,312 $ 35,277 $ 31,605 $ 32,362 $ 25,570 $ 26,123 $ 35,538 $ 37,648 $ 359,762 State Grants ------0 Farebox 21 73 188 177 241 287 503 271 136 80 31 21 2,029 Contract Revenue ------0 Other Revenue 27,760 34,882 31,912 29,759 27,133 29,060 31,157 32,214 34,305 31,437 32,571 31,075 373,265 Total Revenue $ 51,821 $ 55,551 $ 59,201 $ 70,526 $ 50,686 $ 64,624 $ 63,265 $ 64,847 $ 60,011 $ 57,640 $ 68,140 $ 68,744 $ 735,056 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.11 0.02 0.03 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.02
See footnote at the end of Table 98 2016 Texas Transit Statistics Report 2016 98
ENHANCED MOBILITY OF SENIORS AND INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES - FISCAL YEAR 2016
Data Item Sep-15 Oct-15 Nov-15 Dec-15 Jan-16 Feb-16 Mar-16 Apr-16 May-16 Jun-16 Jul-16 Aug-16 FY 2016 Total Centro de Salud Familiar Ridership NRNRNRNR 216NRNRNRNRNRNR 18 La Fe, Inc. (El Paso) Mileage NR NR NR NR 10 156 NR NR NR NR NR NR 166 Revenue Federal Grants $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - State Grants 000000000000 0 Farebox 000000000000 0 Contract Revenue 000000000000 0 Other Revenue 000000000000 0 Total Revenue $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - System Effectiveness Riders per Mile NR NR NR NR 0.20 0.10 NR NR NR NR NR NR 0.11
Good Samaritan Society Ridership 994 928 636 369 498 516 994 842 851 0 0 0 6,628 White Acres Mileage 2,900 2,752 2,576 2,215 3,484 2,450 2,580 2,426 1,919 2,237 1,822 2,143 29,504 (El Paso) Revenue Federal Grants $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - State Grants ------0 Farebox ------0 Contract Revenue ------0 Other Revenue 110,855 108,880 100,101 109,855 106,600 98,888 174,602 112,366 142,364 106,855 85,600 107,000 1,363,966 Total Revenue $ 110,855 $ 108,880 $ 100,101 $ 109,855 $ 106,600 $ 98,888 $ 174,602 $ 112,366 $ 142,364 $ 106,855 $ 85,600 $ 107,000 $ 1,363,966 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.34 0.34 0.25 0.17 0.14 0.21 0.39 0.35 0.44 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.22
L.U.L.A.C. Project Ridership 9,498 9,733 9,690 8,835 8,733 8,280 9,214 8,441 8,209 8,381 8,278 9,542 106,834 Amistad (El Paso) Mileage 116,794 118,511 111,214 104,808 105,396 98,858 102,921 98,666 89,053 98,969 98,690 111,817 1,255,697 Revenue Federal Grants $ 324,702 $ 332,801 $ 294,515 $ 301,173 $ 302,656 $ 288,306 $ 319,207 $ 293,339 $ 286,198 $ 293,392 $ 290,547 $ 334,199 $ 3,661,035 State Grants ------0 Farebox ------0 Contract Revenue ------0 Other Revenue ------0 Total Revenue $ 324,702 $ 332,801 $ 294,515 $ 301,173 $ 302,656 $ 288,306 $ 319,207 $ 293,339 $ 286,198 $ 293,392 $ 290,547 $ 334,199 $ 3,661,035 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.08 0.08 0.09 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.08 0.08 0.09 0.09
Nazareth Hall Nursing Ridership 68 51 79 77 63 71 79 41 52 54 53 83 771 Center (El Paso) Mileage 1,169 898 1,750 1,827 1,187 1,303 1,875 1,650 1,775 1,840 1,970 2,419 19,663 Revenue Federal Grants $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - State Grants ------0 Farebox ------0 Contract Revenue ------0 Other Revenue 2,476 2,401 2,770 3,654 2,424 2,434 2,123 2,133 2,560 2,560 3,537 2,051 31,123 Total Revenue $ 2,476 $ 2,401 $ 2,770 $ 3,654 $ 2,424 $ 2,434 $ 2,123 $ 2,133 $ 2,560 $ 2,560 $ 3,537 $ 2,051 $ 31,123 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.06 0.06 0.05 0.04 0.05 0.05 0.04 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.04
See footnote at the end of Table ENHANCED MOBILITY OF SENIORS AND INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES - FISCAL YEAR 2016
Data Item Sep-15 Oct-15 Nov-15 Dec-15 Jan-16 Feb-16 Mar-16 Apr-16 May-16 Jun-16 Jul-16 Aug-16 FY 2016 Total FORT WORTH DISTRICT Catholic Charities fka Ridership NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR Tarrant County/American Mileage NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR Red Cross (Ft. Worth)* Revenue Federal Grants $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - State Grants ------0 Farebox ------0 Contract Revenue ------0 Other Revenue ------0 Total Revenue $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - System Effectiveness Riders per Mile NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR
MHMR Tarrant County (Ft. Worth) Ridership 987 1,233 975 1,077 685 883 614 627 636 726 761 857 10,061 Mileage 6,747 7,365 6,659 7,705 5,952 7,146 6,582 5,333 5,335 6,056 5,749 7,269 77,898 Revenue Federal Grants $ 932 $ 833 $ 1,012 $ 889 $ 631 $ 1,043 $ 678 $ 532 $ 883 $ 726 $ 715 $ 1,300 $ 10,174 State Grants ------0 Farebox ------0 Contract Revenue ------0 Other Revenue ------0 Total Revenue $ 932 $ 833 $ 1,012 $ 889 $ 631 $ 1,043 $ 678 $ 532 $ 883 $ 726 $ 715 $ 1,300 $ 10,174 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.15 0.17 0.15 0.14 0.12 0.12 0.09 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.13 0.12 0.13
HOUSTON DISTRICT American Red Cross HIV/AIDS Ridership 1,946 2,318 1,806 2,053 2,258 2,409 2,257 1,951 2,520 2,539 2,199 2,711 26,967 Gtr Hou Area Chpt Mileage 24,122 25,022 22,044 29,700 31,902 29,390 32,407 24,180 25,715 35,091 31,849 39,385 350,807 (Houston) Revenue Federal Grants $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - State Grants ------0 Farebox 9,736 10,543 6,923 7,770 9,484 10,286 9,637 8,287 9,029 10,182 8,067 10,663 110,607 Contract Revenue ------0
2016 Texas Transit Statistics Report 2016 99 Other Revenue 79,700 79,700 79,700 79,700 81,044 81,044 81,044 79,012 79,012 79,012 79,012 79,012 956,992 Total Revenue $ 89,436 $ 90,243 $ 86,623 $ 87,470 $ 90,528 $ 91,330 $ 90,681 $ 87,299 $ 88,041 $ 89,194 $ 87,079 $ 89,675 $ 1,067,599 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.08 0.09 0.08 0.07 0.07 0.08 0.07 0.08 0.10 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.08
City of Friendswood Ridership 286 259 148 234 243 241 309 220 274 246 243 266 2,969 (Friendswood) Mileage 000000000000 0 Revenue Federal Grants $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - State Grants ------0 Farebox ------0 Contract Revenue ------0 Other Revenue ------0 Total Revenue $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - System Effectiveness Riders per Mile NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR
See footnote at the end of Table 100 2016 Texas Transit Statistics Report 2016 100
ENHANCED MOBILITY OF SENIORS AND INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES - FISCAL YEAR 2016
Data Item Sep-15 Oct-15 Nov-15 Dec-15 Jan-16 Feb-16 Mar-16 Apr-16 May-16 Jun-16 Jul-16 Aug-16 FY 2016 Total Montgomery County Com. Ridership 1,327 1,216 1,231 1,167 1,136 1,417 1,444 1,308 1,480 1,522 1,439 1,778 16,465 on Aging dba Mileage 9,477 8,843 8,978 8,381 8,600 10,101 9,815 9,412 9,412 10,277 10,718 13,316 117,330 The Friendship Center Revenue (Conroe) Federal Grants $ 19,245 $ 14,530 $ 10,531 $ 13,412 $ 13,456 $ 15,209 $ 32,823 $ 19,563 $ 21,557 $ 14,976 $ 10,070 $ 9,279 $ 194,651 State Grants ------0 Farebox ------0 Contract Revenue ------0 Other Revenue - - 3,154 4,249 3,320 3,293 2,406 2,938 1,536 1,027 1,106 4,425 27,454 Total Revenue $ 19,245 $ 14,530 $ 13,685 $ 17,661 $ 16,776 $ 18,502 $ 35,229 $ 22,501 $ 23,093 $ 16,003 $ 11,176 $ 13,704 $ 222,105 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.13 0.14 0.15 0.14 0.16 0.15 0.13 0.13 0.14
Mounting Horizons Ridership 124 297 443 338 417 595 NR NR NR NR NR NR 2,214 (Houston) Mileage 000000NRNRNRNRNRNR 0 Revenue Federal Grants $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - State Grants ------0 Farebox ------0 Contract Revenue ------0 Other Revenue ------0 Total Revenue $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - System Effectiveness Riders per Mile NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR
Seven Acres Jewish Ridership 209 356 189 284 264 296 254 214 332 294 312 248 3,252 Geriatric Center Mileage 000000000000 0 (Houston) Revenue Federal Grants $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - State Grants ------0 Farebox ------0 Contract Revenue ------0 Other Revenue ------0 Total Revenue $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - System Effectiveness Riders per Mile NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR
LAREDO DISTRICT Border Area Nutritional Council Ridership NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR (Laredo)* Mileage NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR Revenue Federal Grants $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - State Grants ------Farebox ------Contract Revenue ------Other Revenue ------Total Revenue $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - System Effectiveness Riders per Mile NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR
See footnote at the end of Table ENHANCED MOBILITY OF SENIORS AND INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES - FISCAL YEAR 2016
Data Item Sep-15 Oct-15 Nov-15 Dec-15 Jan-16 Feb-16 Mar-16 Apr-16 May-16 Jun-16 Jul-16 Aug-16 FY 2016 Total LUBBOCK DISTRICT Lubbock Independent School Ridership NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR District (Lubbock)* Mileage NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR Revenue Federal Grants $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - State Grants ------Farebox ------Contract Revenue ------Other Revenue ------Total Revenue $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - System Effectiveness Riders per Mile NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR
Marian Moss Enterprises, Inc. Ridership 621229820 814402086505256 628 (Lubbock) Mileage 248 327 208 84 128 64 181 67 281 291 636 493 3,008 Revenue Federal Grants $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - State Grants ------0 Farebox ------0 Contract Revenue ------0 Other Revenue ------0 Total Revenue $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.25 0.37 0.47 0.24 0.06 0.22 0.22 0.30 0.31 0.17 0.08 0.11 0.21
ODESSA DISTRICT Foundation for MHMR/ Ridership 54 43 48 30 37 23 23 10 11 16 38 39 372 Permian Basin Mileage 474 399 575 264 222 370 317 312 117 514 442 548 4,554 (Midland) Revenue Federal Grants $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - State Grants ------0 Farebox ------0
2016 Texas Transit Statistics Report 2016 101 Contract Revenue ------0 Other Revenue ------0 Total Revenue $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.11 0.11 0.08 0.11 0.17 0.06 0.07 0.03 0.09 0.03 0.09 0.07 0.08
PHARR DISTRICT Jim Hogg County Ridership NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR (Jim Hogg)* Mileage NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR Revenue Federal Grants $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - State Grants ------Farebox ------Contract Revenue ------Other Revenue ------Total Revenue $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - System Effectiveness Riders per Mile NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR See footnote at the end of Table 102 2016 Texas Transit Statistics Report 2016 102
ENHANCED MOBILITY OF SENIORS AND INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES - FISCAL YEAR 2016
Data Item Sep-15 Oct-15 Nov-15 Dec-15 Jan-16 Feb-16 Mar-16 Apr-16 May-16 Jun-16 Jul-16 Aug-16 FY 2016 Total
Starr County Rural Ridership 1,639 1,439 1,545 1,605 1,219 1,654 1,541 1,583 1,352 2,255 1,946 1,964 19,742 Transportation (Starr) Mileage 5,791 5,922 5,157 5,361 4,477 3,036 6,720 6,218 5,620 7,387 6,452 6,976 69,117 Revenue Federal Grants $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - State Grants ------0 Farebox ------0 Contract Revenue ------0 Other Revenue 1,152 1,058 1,144 1,224 904 913 1,149 1,170 1,113 1,573 1,460 1,267 14,127 Total Revenue $ 1,152 $ 1,058 $ 1,144 $ 1,224 $ 904 $ 913 $ 1,149 $ 1,170 $ 1,113 $ 1,573 $ 1,460 $ 1,267 $ 14,127 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.28 0.24 0.30 0.30 0.27 0.54 0.23 0.25 0.24 0.31 0.30 0.28 0.29
Zapata County Ridership NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR (Zapata)* Mileage NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR Revenue Federal Grants $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - State Grants ------0 Farebox ------0 Contract Revenue ------0 Other Revenue ------0 Total Revenue $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - System Effectiveness Riders per Mile NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR
SAN ANGELO DISTRICT Adult Enrichment Center Ridership NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR (San Angelo) Mileage NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR Revenue Federal Grants $ - $ - $ - $ 1,600 $ 1,600 $ 1,600 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 4,800 State Grants ------0 Farebox ------0 Contract Revenue ------0 Other Revenue ------0 Total Revenue $ - $ - $ - $ 1,600 $ 1,600 $ 1,600 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 4,800 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR
East Coke County Hospital District Ridership NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR dba Bronte Health and Mileage NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR Rehab Center Revenue Federal Grants $ - $ - $ - $ 2,400 $ 1,200 $ 1,200 $ 1,200 $ 1,200 $ 1,200 $ 1,200 $ 1,200 $ 1,200 $ 12,000 State Grants ------0 Farebox ------0 Contract Revenue ------0 Other Revenue ------0 Total Revenue $ - $ - $ - $ 2,400 $ 1,200 $ 1,200 $ 1,200 $ 1,200 $ 1,200 $ 1,200 $ 1,200 $ 1,200 $ 12,000 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR See footnote at the end of Table ENHANCED MOBILITY OF SENIORS AND INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES - FISCAL YEAR 2016
Data Item Sep-15 Oct-15 Nov-15 Dec-15 Jan-16 Feb-16 Mar-16 Apr-16 May-16 Jun-16 Jul-16 Aug-16 FY 2016 Total
Rio Concho Manor Ridership 134 169 119 374 290 306 288 334 330 246 308 294 3,192 (San Angelo) Mileage 129 138 116 223 118 129 118 154 183 139 131 92 1,670 Revenue Federal Grants $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - State Grants ------0 Farebox ------0 Contract Revenue ------0 Other Revenue 850 707 1,035 665 684 827 685 645 803 593 2,779 641 10,914 Total Revenue $ 850 $ 707 $ 1,035 $ 665 $ 684 $ 827 $ 685 $ 645 $ 803 $ 593 $ 2,779 $ 641 $ 10,914 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 1.04 1.22 1.03 1.68 2.46 2.37 2.44 2.17 1.80 1.77 2.35 3.20 1.91
Rio Concho West Ridership 45 55 48 160 130 158 138 152 70 142 118 190 1,406 (San Angelo) Mileage 73 94 95 307 66 150 94 136 43 95 72 143 1,368 Revenue Federal Grants $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - State Grants ------0 Farebox ------0 Contract Revenue ------0 Other Revenue 452 535 809 558 453 664 519 720 452 592 572 902 7,228 Total Revenue $ 452 $ 535 $ 809 $ 558 $ 453 $ 664 $ 519 $ 720 $ 452 $ 592 $ 572 $ 902 $ 7,228 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.62 0.59 0.51 0.52 1.97 1.05 1.47 1.12 1.63 1.49 1.64 1.33 1.03
SAN ANTONIO DISTRICT Eden Heights, Inc. Ridership NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR (New Braunfels)* Mileage NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR Revenue Federal Grants $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - State Grants ------2016 Texas Transit Statistics Report 2016 103 Farebox ------Contract Revenue ------Other Revenue ------Total Revenue $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - System Effectiveness Riders per Mile NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR
Eden Home for the Aged, Inc. Ridership 7,526 7,580 7,390 7,797 7,485 7,202 7,780 7,298 7,548 7,464 7,419 7,770 90,259 dba Eden Hill Communities Mileage 9,657 9,603 8,720 8,808 8,095 7,796 8,177 8,179 8,024 9,086 7,303 8,340 101,788 (New Braunfels)* Revenue Federal Grants $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,329 $ - $ - $ - $ 2,329 State Grants ------0 Farebox 2,282 857 691 1,109 1,817 806 1,047 909 1,617 1,770 1,143 1,138 15,186 Contract Revenue ------0 Other Revenue ------0 Total Revenue $ 2,282 $ 857 $ 691 $ 1,109 $ 1,817 $ 806 $ 1,047 $ 909 $ 3,946 $ 1,770 $ 1,143 $ 1,138 $ 17,515 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.78 0.79 0.85 0.89 0.92 0.92 0.95 0.89 0.94 0.82 1.02 0.93 0.89
See footnote at the end of Table 104 2016 Texas Transit Statistics Report 2016 104
ENHANCED MOBILITY OF SENIORS AND INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES - FISCAL YEAR 2016
Data Item Sep-15 Oct-15 Nov-15 Dec-15 Jan-16 Feb-16 Mar-16 Apr-16 May-16 Jun-16 Jul-16 Aug-16 FY 2016 Total Greater Randolph Ridership 382 416 370 390 408 402 328 428 417 448 328 380 4,697 Ser. Prog. Inc. Mileage 5,199 3,513 3,633 4,403 4,257 4,717 3,788 4,621 4,522 4,542 4,454 4,742 52,391 (Universal City) Revenue Federal Grants $ 4,640 $ 7,715 $ 8,325 $ 9,035 $ 8,625 $ 9,055 $ 9,425 $ 9,375 $ 8,860 $ 9,480 $ 9,045 $ 9,735 $ 103,315 State Grants ------0 Farebox 569 1,165 845 837 898 855 903 745 808 749 581 645 9,600 Contract Revenue ------0 Other Revenue ------0 Total Revenue $ 5,209 $ 8,880 $ 9,170 $ 9,872 $ 9,523 $ 9,910 $ 10,328 $ 10,120 $ 9,668 $ 10,229 $ 9,626 $ 10,380 $ 112,915 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.07 0.12 0.10 0.09 0.10 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.10 0.07 0.08 0.09
Inman Christian Ridership NR 58 51 65 62 48 54 53 52 42 64 59 608 Center (San Antonio) Mileage NR 407 348 459 398 344 359 376 338 306 458 424 4,217 Revenue Federal Grants $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - State Grants ------0 Farebox ------0 Contract Revenue ------0 Other Revenue ------0 Total Revenue $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - System Effectiveness Riders per Mile NR 0.14 0.15 0.14 0.16 0.14 0.15 0.14 0.15 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14
Kirby Senior Center Ridership NR NR NR NR NR NR 420 354 376 NR NR NR 1,150 (San Antonio) Mileage NR NR NR NR NR NR 9,301 8,052 7,479 NR NR NR 24,832 Revenue Federal Grants $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - State Grants ------Farebox ------Contract Revenue ------Other Revenue ------Total Revenue $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - System Effectiveness Riders per Mile NR NR NR NR NR NR 0.05 0.04 0.05 NR NR NR 0.05
Morningside Ministries Ridership 105 102 90 156 84 80 117 71 34 71 72 105 1,087 (San Antonio) Mileage 299 268 299 371 225 174 348 165 99 181 241 216 2,886 Revenue Federal Grants $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - State Grants ------0 Farebox ------0 Contract Revenue ------0 Other Revenue 3,985 3,985 3,985 3,985 3,985 3,985 3,985 3,985 3,985 3,985 3,985 3,985 47,820 Total Revenue $ 3,985 $ 3,985 $ 3,985 $ 3,985 $ 3,985 $ 3,985 $ 3,985 $ 3,985 $ 3,985 $ 3,985 $ 3,985 $ 3,985 $ 47,820 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.35 0.38 0.30 0.42 0.37 0.46 0.34 0.43 0.34 0.39 0.30 0.49 0.38
See footnote at the end of Table ENHANCED MOBILITY OF SENIORS AND INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES - FISCAL YEAR 2016
Data Item Sep-15 Oct-15 Nov-15 Dec-15 Jan-16 Feb-16 Mar-16 Apr-16 May-16 Jun-16 Jul-16 Aug-16 FY 2016 Total Presa Community Ridership NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR Service Ctr. (San Antonio) Mileage NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR Revenue Federal Grants $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - State Grants ------Farebox ------Contract Revenue ------Other Revenue ------Total Revenue $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - System Effectiveness Riders per Mile NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR
St. Gregory the Great Ridership 456 424 302 362 360 370 328 342 348 306 386 NR 3,984 Parish (San Antonio) Mileage 4,678 4,416 3,913 4,050 3,920 4,223 4,114 4,273 4,008 3,926 4,789 NR 46,310 Revenue Federal Grants $ 7,425 $ 7,425 $ 5,400 $ 6,075 $ 6,300 $ 6,750 $ 6,525 $ 6,525 $ 6,300 $ 5,625 $ 6,525 $ - $ 70,875 State Grants ------0 Farebox ------0 Contract Revenue ------0 Other Revenue ------0 Total Revenue $ 7,425 $ 7,425 $ 5,400 $ 6,075 $ 6,300 $ 6,750 $ 6,525 $ 6,525 $ 6,300 $ 5,625 $ 6,525 $ - $ 70,875 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.10 0.10 0.08 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.08 0.08 0.09 0.08 0.08 NR 0.09
San Antonio AIDS Ridership NR NR NR NR 30 71 104 144 125 72 72 NR 618 Foundation (San Antonio) Mileage NR NR NR NR 906 935 1,116 1,132 1,470 702 783 NR 7,044 Revenue Federal Grants $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - State Grants ------0 Farebox ------0
06TxsTastSaitc eot105 Texas Transit Statistics Report 2016 Contract Revenue ------0 Other Revenue ------0 Total Revenue $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - System Effectiveness Riders per Mile NR NR NR NR 0.03 0.08 0.09 0.13 0.09 0.10 0.09 NR 0.09
San Antonio Ridership 2861396512211188 100 Lighthouse (San Antonio) Mileage 22 31 202 78 35 13 41 17 15 40 51 7 552 Revenue Federal Grants $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - State Grants ------0 Farebox ------0 Contract Revenue ------0 Other Revenue ------0 Total Revenue $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.09 0.26 0.03 0.17 0.26 0.46 0.12 0.71 0.13 0.28 0.35 1.14 0.18
See footnote at the end of Table 106 2016 Texas Transit Statistics Report 2016 106
ENHANCED MOBILITY OF SENIORS AND INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES - FISCAL YEAR 2016
Data Item Sep-15 Oct-15 Nov-15 Dec-15 Jan-16 Feb-16 Mar-16 Apr-16 May-16 Jun-16 Jul-16 Aug-16 FY 2016 Total TYLER DISTRICT Gateway Community Ridership 26 18 6 0 15 23 NR NR NR NR NR NR 88 Partners, Inc. Mileage 1,098 929 111 0 199 302 NR NR NR NR NR NR 2,639 (Jacksonville) Revenue Federal Grants $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - State Grants ------0 Farebox ------0 Contract Revenue ------0 Other Revenue 615 615 615 - 615 615 ------3,075 Total Revenue $ 615 $ 615 $ 615 $ - $ 615 $ 615 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 3,075 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.02 0.02 0.05 NR 0.08 0.08 NR NR NR NR NR NR 0.03
NDMJ, LLC (Tyler) Ridership 1,238 1,928 1,984 1,028 1,097 1,096 684 1,669 2,320 1,880 744 1,038 16,706 Mileage 14,875 23,051 24,550 14,860 16,901 16,900 9,899 20,133 26,089 22,590 11,459 15,800 217,107 Revenue Federal Grants $ 43,503 $ 36,407 $ 37,093 $ 23,140 $ 18,358 $ 15,344 $ 9,576 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 183,421 State Grants ------Farebox 1,922 3,459 3,527 2,129 2,194 2,192 1,368 2,893 3,514 3,122 1,232 1,738 29,290 Contract Revenue ------Other Revenue - 26,569 27,278 13,371 15,358 15,344 9,576 21,485 62,580 56,400 21,087 29,401 298,449 Total Revenue $ 45,425 $ 66,435 $ 67,898 $ 38,640 $ 35,910 $ 32,880 $ 20,520 $ 24,378 $ 66,094 $ 59,522 $ 22,319 $ 31,139 $ 511,160 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.07 0.06 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.08 0.06 0.07 0.08
Salvation Army William Ridership 23 12 11 36 42 72 63 96 86 97 73 79 690 Booth Apts. (Tyler) Mileage 121 67 74 381 267 481 435 456 430 458 371 342 3,883 Revenue Federal Grants $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - State Grants ------Farebox 201 223 240 210 102 78 000000 1,054 Contract Revenue ------Other Revenue ------0 Total Revenue $ 201 $ 223 $ 240 $ 210 $ 102 $78 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,054 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.19 0.18 0.15 0.09 0.16 0.15 0.14 0.21 0.20 0.21 0.20 0.23 0.18
Smith County (Tyler) Ridership 1,168 NR NR 212 849 1,057 1,555 1,669 NR NR NR NR 6,510 Mileage 14,145 NR NR 2,574 9,950 12,566 17,924 18,634 NR NR NR NR 75,793 Revenue Federal Grants $ 33,673 $ - $ - $ 3,092 $ 19,501 $ 24,320 $ 35,691 $ 16,488 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 132,765 State Grants ------Farebox 1,752 - - 444 1,274 1,585 2,536 2,894 - - - - 10,485 Contract Revenue ------Other Revenue - - - - 4,875 6,080 8,923 30,978 - - - - 50,856 Total Revenue $ 35,425 $ - $ - $ 3,536 $ 25,650 $ 31,985 $ 47,150 $ 50,360 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 194,106 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.08 NR NR 0.08 0.09 0.08 0.09 0.09 NR NR NR NR 0.09
See footnote at the end of Table ENHANCED MOBILITY OF SENIORS AND INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES - FISCAL YEAR 2016
Data Item Sep-15 Oct-15 Nov-15 Dec-15 Jan-16 Feb-16 Mar-16 Apr-16 May-16 Jun-16 Jul-16 Aug-16 FY 2016 Total University of Texas Health Center - Ridership 168 176 152 176 168 168 184 168 168 168 170 170 2,036 Tyler (Tyler) Mileage 1,950 1,930 1,960 1,969 1,972 1,965 1,962 1,972 1,980 1,975 1,982 1,988 23,605 Revenue Federal Grants $ 8,000 $ 8,000 $ 8,000 $ 8,000 $ 8,000 $ 8,000 $ 8,000 $ 8,000 $ 8,000 $ 8,000 $ 8,000 $ 8,000 $ 96,000 State Grants ------Farebox ------Contract Revenue ------Other Revenue - - - - 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 16,000 Total Revenue $ 8,000 $ 8,000 $ 8,000 $ 8,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 112,000 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.09 0.09 0.08 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.08 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09
WICHITA FALLS DISTRICT Bowie Senior Citizens Project, Ridership NR 341 248 324 258 295 311 340 325 337 341 412 3,532 Inc. (Bowie) Mileage NR00000000000 0 Revenue Federal Grants $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - State Grants ------Farebox - 497 327 338 526 551 441 535 314 557 407 623 5,116 Contract Revenue ------Other Revenue - 2,233 2,434 2,562 2,274 2,130 2,251 3,164 2,493 2,259 2,986 2,437 27,223 Total Revenue $ - $ 2,730 $ 2,761 $ 2,900 $ 2,800 $ 2,681 $ 2,692 $ 3,699 $ 2,807 $ 2,816 $ 3,393 $ 3,060 $ 32,339 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR
YOAKUM DISTRICT Affectionate Arms Adult Ridership NR NR NR NR NR 194 299 284 283 274 238 311 1,883 Day Health Care Center Mileage NRNRNRNRNR0000000 0 (Victoria) Revenue Federal Grants $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - State Grants ------Farebox ------Contract Revenue ------2016 Texas Transit Statistics Report 2016 107 Other Revenue ------0 Total Revenue $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - System Effectiveness Riders per Mile NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR
Calhoun County Senior Citizens Ridership 1,224 672 695 687 610 699 685 735 595 616 571 584 8,373 (Port Lavaca) Mileage 7,654 8,581 8,784 10,605 10,975 11,238 9,062 9,504 6,965 6,663 9,023 9,960 109,014 Revenue Federal Grants $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - State Grants ------Farebox 338 330 433 405 324 254 403 478 362 404 374 474 4,579 Contract Revenue ------Other Revenue 11,685 19,399 13,522 18,322 17,920 16,684 14,064 16,008 12,687 15,376 13,398 12,145 181,210 Total Revenue $ 12,023 $ 19,729 $ 13,955 $ 18,727 $ 18,244 $ 16,938 $ 14,467 $ 16,486 $ 13,049 $ 15,780 $ 13,772 $ 12,619 $ 185,789 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.16 0.08 0.08 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.08 0.08 0.09 0.09 0.06 0.06 0.08
See footnote at the end of Table 108 2016 Texas Transit Statistics Report 2016 108 ENHANCED MOBILITY OF SENIORS AND INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES - FISCAL YEAR 2016
Data Item Sep-15 Oct-15 Nov-15 Dec-15 Jan-16 Feb-16 Mar-16 Apr-16 May-16 Jun-16 Jul-16 Aug-16 FY 2016 Total Friends of Elder Citizens Ridership 2,173 1,982 1,895 1,972 1,850 2,238 2,115 2,181 2,040 1,828 1,652 1,945 23,871 (Palacios) Mileage 25,427 24,646 24,188 23,172 18,766 25,195 26,008 23,494 21,889 21,855 22,403 22,071 279,114 Revenue Federal Grants $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 738 $ 1,467 $ 927 $ 1,584 $ 1,557 $ 1,476 $ 7,749 State Grants ------Farebox 2,056 2,157 1,727 1,745 1,588 1,998 1,931 2,681 2,727 2,826 1,986 2,697 26,119 Contract Revenue ------Other Revenue 37,627 36,763 34,539 41,985 32,028 30,298 33,747 32,835 40,171 28,122 48,569 32,838 429,522 Total Revenue $ 39,683 $ 38,920 $ 36,266 $ 43,730 $ 33,616 $ 32,296 $ 36,416 $ 36,983 $ 43,825 $ 32,532 $ 52,112 $ 37,011 $ 463,390 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.09 0.08 0.08 0.09 0.10 0.09 0.08 0.09 0.09 0.08 0.07 0.09 0.09
Goliad County (Goliad) Ridership 488 679 594 600 549 529 579 588 579 635 530 652 7,002 Mileage 3,601 6,103 5,188 5,756 4,525 5,255 6,322 6,331 6,178 5,875 5,472 6,160 66,766 Revenue Federal Grants $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 360 $ 160 $ 380 $ 280 $ 650 $ 500 $ 2,330 State Grants ------Farebox 503 594 515 509 570 425 508 519 545 562 430 635 6,315 Contract Revenue ------Other Revenue 12,042 19,301 15,251 16,677 15,702 15,233 15,272 21,097 14,792 14,973 16,141 16,255 192,736 Total Revenue $ 12,545 $ 19,895 $ 15,766 $ 17,186 $ 16,272 $ 15,658 $ 16,140 $ 21,776 $ 15,717 $ 15,815 $ 17,221 $ 17,390 $ 201,381 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.14 0.11 0.11 0.10 0.12 0.10 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.11 0.10 0.11 0.10
Gonzales County Senior Ridership 1,185 1,306 1,089 1,145 1,018 1,133 1,377 1,400 1,285 1,430 1,242 1,409 15,019 Citizens Association (Gonzales) Mileage 6,299 6,959 5,727 5,832 4,780 4,837 5,627 5,088 5,539 3,660 2,421 2,640 59,409 Revenue Federal Grants $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,826 $ 5,076 $ 6,750 $ 5,544 $ 2,565 $ 22,761 State Grants ------Farebox 140 50 100 - - - - 50 50 - 50 50 490 Contract Revenue ------Other Revenue 18,674 18,502 17,316 22,339 17,153 17,455 28,967 21,489 13,576 10,200 10,239 14,557 210,467 Total Revenue $ 18,814 $ 18,552 $ 17,416 $ 22,339 $ 17,153 $ 17,455 $ 28,967 $ 24,365 $ 18,702 $ 16,950 $ 15,833 $ 17,172 $ 233,718 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.20 0.21 0.23 0.24 0.28 0.23 0.39 0.51 0.53 0.25
Lavaca County (Hallettsville) Ridership 1,257 1,499 1,213 1,283 1,101 871 411 698 681 571 692 735 11,012 Mileage 9,150 10,705 8,455 9,103 8,359 8,875 8,816 6,994 7,310 8,023 7,393 9,406 102,589 Revenue Federal Grants $ 5,334 $ 1,852 $ 602 $ 2,363 $ - $ - $ 260 $ 330 $ 150 $ 360 $ 280 $ 120 $ 11,651 State Grants ------Farebox 488 496 417 553 380 550 475 481 669 770 681 928 6,888 Contract Revenue ------Other Revenue 20,740 19,544 20,282 30,450 20,452 12,137 10,031 11,660 12,123 12,975 18,898 16,425 205,717 Total Revenue $ 26,562 $ 21,892 $ 21,301 $ 33,366 $ 20,832 $ 12,687 $ 10,766 $ 12,471 $ 12,942 $ 14,105 $ 19,859 $ 17,473 $ 224,256 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.13 0.10 0.05 0.10 0.09 0.07 0.09 0.08 0.11 GRAND TOTALS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2016 Data Item Sep-15 Oct-15 Nov-15 Dec-15 Jan-16 Feb-16 Mar-16 Apr-16 May-16 Jun-16 Jul-16 Aug-16 FY 2016 Total Enhanced Mobility of Ridership 40,888 41,127 38,985 38,292 37,243 37,814 40,042 38,987 39,196 38,798 35,591 39,946 466,909 Seniors & Individuals with Mileage 309,006 310,152 296,103 297,848 292,120 1,295,512 309,635 300,643 282,677 290,558 271,235 302,138 4,557,627 Disabilities - Revenue Fiscal Year 2016 Federal Grants 482,805$ 434,669$ 402,681$ 431,344$ 424,892$ 442,632$ 476,856$ 410,426$ 385,730$ 389,864$ 387,370$ 422,079$ $ 5,091,348 State Grants 000000000000 - Farebox 23,294 23,730 19,219 17,841 21,224 21,795 21,472 22,194 21,439 22,945 16,836 21,596 253,585 Contract Revenue 000000000000 - Other Revenue 349,599 397,131 380,100 405,776 378,182 364,512 448,795 422,335 453,613 398,863 372,814 384,993 4,756,713 Total Revenue 855,698$ 855,530$ 802,000$ 854,961$ 824,298$ 828,939$ 947,123$ 854,955$ 860,782$ 811,672$ 777,020$ 828,668$ $ 10,101,646 System Effectiveness Riders per Mile 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.03 0.13 0.13 0.14 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.10 * Indicates data not reported. **No longer an agency # Purchase of Service (POS) JOB ACCESS AND REVERSE COMMUTE PROGRAM - (JARC)
(SECTION 5316)
2016 Texas Transit Statistics Report 109 SUMMARY JOB ACCESS AND REVERSE COMMUTE PROGRAM (Section 5316)
The Section 5316 Grant Program (49 USC, Section 5316) supports public transportation to and from urban and suburban workplaces. The Job Access and Reverse Commute Program, more commonly called JARC, seeks to provide public transportation services to connect welfare recipients and low income persons to places of employment and related support activities. These support activities include training, job preparation, interviews, and daycare.
On August 10, 2005, the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU) was enacted. With this enactment, JARC became a formula program to the states and large urbanized areas. On May 1, 2007, Circular 9050.1 (JARC Program Guidance and Application Instructions) went into effect. This circular issues guidance on the administration of the JARC program under 49 USC 5316, including application instructions.
TxDOT administers JARC to address the unique transportation challenges faced by welfare recipients and low income persons seeking to get and keep jobs. All JARC projects are selected in a competitive process, which is held annually for small urbanized and rural services throughout the state. Since FY 2007, JARC projects have been represented in the annual Texas Transit Statistics Report.
Also, state agencies, local government authorities, public transportation agencies, private nonprofit, and for-profit transportation organizations are eligible to receive the (JARC) Section 5316 funds administered by TxDOT. Eligible expenditures on capital, planning activities, and marketing projects are 80% reimbursable through the JARC Program. The administrative costs and operating expenses are eligible for a federal reimbursement rate of 50 percent for JARC projects.
As noted in the introduction of this report, due to the inclusion of JARC data in other program reports, monthly statistics have not been captured and are not shown at this time. The data shown on the following tables summarize JARC’s operational and financial statistics.
Notes:
The monthly statistics for agencies funded through the Section 5316 Grant Program are located at the end of this section. The federal transportation bill passed in July 2012, titled “Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century”, or MAP-21, eliminated JARC/Section 5316 as a separate program. Funding formerly in this program, along with some project eligibility definitions, were added to the Section 5307 and Section 5311 programs.
110 2016 Texas Transit Statistics Report TABLE 30: JOB ACCESS AND REVERSE COMMUTE PROGRAM - (JARC) Section 5316 PERFORMANCESUMMARY AT A GLANCE - FiscalYears 2015 and2016
SERVICE SUPPLIED % Change FINANCIAL SOURCE % Change 2015 2016 (15-16) 2015 2016 (15-16) Vehicle Revenue Miles 3,302,917 3,711,101 12.36 Total Operating Vehicle Revenue Hours 175,047 187,187 6.94 Expenses $7,073,634 $3,350,000 -52.64 Total Revenue Vehicles 27 53 96.30 Total Revenue $7,375,982 $3,355,336 -54.51
SERVICE CONSUMED % Change 2015 2016 (15-16) Unlinked Passenger Trips 1,853,236 1,511,951 -18.42
AVERAGE PERFORMANCE MEASURES: SERVICE EFFICIENCY COST EFFECTIVENESS 2015 2016 2015 2016
$2.14 $0.90 Operating Expense $3.82 $2.22 Operating Expense Per PerUnlinked VehicleRevenue Mile PassengerTrip Operating Expense Per $40.41 $17.90 VehicleRevenue Hour
SERVICE EFFECTIVENESS 2015 2016 Unlinked Passenger Trips Per Vehicle Revenue Mile 0.56 0.41 * Unlinked Passenger Trips Per Vehicle Revenue Hour 10.59 8.08
Notes: "Average Performance Measure"s the i average of all service provided. Safety Data and Safety Indicators for FY 2015 and 2excluded016 are from this report. **Due to the Section 5316 agencies not collecting actual miles vehicle and hours, tdheeadhead ratios anreot applicable. * **See Tables 28 and Table29 for details.
2016 Texas Transit Statistics Report 111 112 2016 Texas Transit Statistics Report 2016 112
TABLE 31: JOB ACCESS AND REVERSE COMMUTE PROGRAM - (JARC) SERVICE EFFICIENCY, COST, AND SERVICE EFFECTIVENESS - Fiscal Years 2015 and 2016
JARC RECIPIENTS Operating Expense per Operating Expense per Unlinked Passenger Trip per Unlinked Passenger Trip per Vehicle Revenue Mile Unlinked Passenger Trip Vehicle Revenue Hour Vehicle Revenue Mile MTAs 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 Austin NR NR NR NR 11.87 NR 0.59 NR Corpus Christi $ 0.80 NR $ 5.17 NR 3.09 NR 0.15 NR Dallas NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR El Paso NR NR NR NR 2.13 2.50 0.11 0.13 San Antonio 1.86 $ 1.53 1.33 $ 1.14 28.00 26.77 1.40 1.34 Urbanized Area Abilene $ 0.52 $ 0.20 $ 4.81 $ 1.54 2.15 2.59 0.11 0.13 Brownsville 15.70 NR 20.57 NR 15.27 NR 0.76 NR Lubbock NR NR 0.00 NR NR NR NR NR McAllen 1.82 0.62 4.26 3.22 3.83 3.83 0.43 0.19 McKinney NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR Midland-Odessa NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR San Angelo NR NR NR NR NR 6.45 NR 0.40 Sherman-Denison NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR Texas City-La Marque NR 9.76 22.45 30.49 NR 5.70 NR 0.32 Victoria 2.89 1.06 5.54 1.82 10.42 11.59 0.52 0.58 Waco 2.22 2.56 7.08 8.61 6.25 5.95 0.31 0.30 Rural Transit Districts Ark-Tex Council of Governments $ 9.37 NR $ 86.52 NR 2.17 NR 0.11 NR Capital Area Rural Transportation System NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR Central Texas Rural Transit District 20.19 $ 7.33 88.26 $ 88.30 4.58 1.66 0.23 0.08 Colorado Valley Transit NR NR 20.00 NR NR 1.87 NR 0.12 Concho Valley Transit District NR NR NR NR NR 2.74 NR 0.22 East Texas Council of Governments NR NR 6.66 NR NR NR NR NR El Paso County NR NR 6.33 NR NR NR NR NR Fort Bend County 2.03 3.66 35.40 59.66 1.15 1.23 0.06 0.06 Galveston County Rural Transit District NR 4.60 2.99 4.34 NR 15.36 NR 1.06 Golden Crescent Regional Planning Commission 0.46 NR 0.95 NR 9.71 8.42 0.49 0.42 Heart of Texas Council of Governments NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR Kleberg County Human Services 0.48 0.24 7.46 3.87 1.30 1.26 0.06 0.06 Panhandle Community Services NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR Public Transit Services NR 1.90 NR 15.86 NR 2.45 NR 0.12 Senior Center Resources and Public Transit Service NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR South Padre Island, City of NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR South Plains Community Action Association, Inc. 4.37 NR 23.92 NR 3.65 3.45 0.18 0.17 Southwest Area Regional Transit District NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR Texoma Area Paratransit System NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR Job Access and Reverse Commute Program Agencies Coastal Bend Center for Independent Living $ 1.74 $ 0.65 $ 31.41 $ 12.46 NR NR 0.06 0.05 Houston Kiddie Express NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR LULAC - Project Amistad NR NR NR NR 0.65 NR 0.10 NR Mounting Horizons NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NDMJ, LLC $ 2.12 NR 28.39 NR 1.12 NR 0.07 NR Average for Reporting Systems $ 4.44 $ 2.84 $ 19.50 $ 19.28 6.31 6.11 0.32 0.32
Notes: NR = Not Reported TABLE 32: JOB ACCESS AND REVERSE COMMUTE PROGRAM - (JARC) OPERATIONAL DATA - Fiscal Years 2015 and 2016
JARC RECIPIENTS Unlinked Passenger Trips Vehicle Revenue Miles Vehicle Revenue Hours MTAs 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 Austin 106,581 NR 179,581 NR 8,979 NR Corpus Christi 23,376 NR 151,528 NR 7,576 NR Dallas NR NR NR NR NR NR El Paso 52,500 49,826 493,994 398,437 24,700 19,922 San Antonio 1,014,118 935,785 722,336 699,081 36,216 34,954 Urbanized Area Abilene 14,082 11,645 130,924 89,822 6,546 4,491 Brownsville 20,497 NR 26,854 0 1,343 NR Lubbock 26,056 NR NR NR NR NR McAllen 132,162 220,436 308,817 1,151,267 15,441 57,563 McKinney NR NR NR NR NR NR Mesquite NR NR NR NR NR NR Midland-Odessa NR NR NR NR NR NR San Angelo 3,831 4,062 NR 10,155 NR 630 Sherman-Denison NR NR NR NR NR NR Texas City-LaMarque 2,215 1,070 NR 3,344 NR 188 Victoria 67,512 55,281 129,543 95,410 6,477 4,771 Waco 36,431 31,142 116,514 104,733 5,826 5,237 Rural Transit Districts Ark-Tex Council of Governments 1,347 NR 12,443 NR 622 NR Capital Area Rural Transportation System NR NR NR NR NR NR Central Texas Rural Transit District 8,073 1,248 35,283 15,035 1,764 752 Colorado Valley Transit 13,211 12,432 NR 56,509 NR 4,537 Concho Valley Transit District NR 2 NR 17 NR 1 East Texas Council of Governments 8,003 NR NR NR NR NR El Paso County 45,920 NR NR NR NR NR Fort Bend County 11,350 10,373 197,751 169,057 9,888 8,453 Galveston County Rural Transit District 94,180 29,435 NR 27,769 NR 1,916 Golden Crescent Regional Planning Commission 96,509 99,667 198,870 236,803 9,944 11,840 Heart of Texas Council of Governments NR NR NR NR NR NR 06TxsTastSaitc eot113 Texas Transit Statistics Report 2016 Kleberg County Human Services 14,254 33,714 219,806 537,144 10,990 26,857 Panhandle Community Services NR NR NR NR NR NR Public Transit Services NR 5,916 NR 49,300 NR 2,415 Senior Center Resources and Public Transit, Inc. NR NR NR NR NR NR South Padre Island, City of NR NR NR NR NR NR South Plains Community Action Association, Inc. 11,092 9,184 60,760 53,206 3,038 2,660 Southwest Area Regional Transit District 25,114 NR NR NR NR NR Texoma Area Paratransit System NR NR NR NR NR NR Job Access and Reverse Commute Program Agencies Coastal Bend Center for Independent Living 1,428 733 22,625 14,011 NR NR Houston Kiddie Express NR NR NR NR NR NR LULAC - Project Amistad 7,539 NR 77,370 NR 11,520 NR NDMJ, LLC 15,855 NR 212,748 NR 14,177 NR Total 1,853,236 1,511,951 3,297,746 3,711,101 175,046 187,187
Notes: NR = Not Reported *Data included in other program tables as applicable (MTA, Urbanized Area, Rural Transit Districts and 5310) 114 2016 Texas Transit Statistics Report 2016 114
TABLE 33: JOB ACCESS AND REVERSE COMMUTE PROGRAM - (JARC) FINANCIAL RESOURCES - Fiscal Years 2015 and 2016
JARC RECIPIENTS Total Revenue (1) Operating Expense MTAs 2015 2016 2015 2016 Austin NR NR NR NR Corpus Christi $ 120,825 NR $ 120,825 NR Dallas 674,102 NR 674,102 NR El Paso NR NR NR NR San Antonio 1,346,002 $ 1,070,600 1,346,002 $ 1,070,600 Urbanized Area Abilene $ 67,757 $ 17,964 $ 67,757 $ 17,964 Brownsville 421,700 NR 421,700 NR Lubbock NR NR NR NR McAllen 563,534 710,291 563,534 710,291 McKinney NR NR NR NR Mesquite NR NR NR Midland-Odessa 12,867 NR 12,867 NR San Angelo NR NR NR NR Sherman-Denison NR NR NR NR Texas City-La Marque 49,719 32,621 49,719 32,621 Victoria 373,997 100,866 373,997 100,866 Waco 258,106 268,247 258,106 268,247 Rural Transit Districts Ark-Tex Council of Governments $ 116,543 $ 59,394 $ 116,543 $ 59,394 Capital Area Rural Transportation System NR NR NR NR Central Texas Rural Transit District 712,513 110,200 712,513 110,200 Colorado Valley Transit 264,250 NR 264,250 NR Concho Valley Transit District NR NR NR NR East Texas Council of Governments 53,328 NR 53,328 NR El Paso County 290,880 NR 290,880 NR Fort Bend County 401,749 618,826 401,749 618,826 Galveston County Rural Transit District 281,810 127,703 281,810 127,703 Golden Crescent Regional Planning Commission 91,229 NR 91,229 NR Heart of Texas Council of Governments 45,175 NR 45,175 NR Kleberg County Human Services 106,324 130,329 106,324 130,329 Panhandle Community Services 13,807 NR 13,807 NR Public Transit Services NR 93,826 NR 93,826 Senior Center Resources and Public Transit Service 47,155 NR 47,155 NR South Padre Island, City of 265,268 NR 265,268 NR South Plains Community Action Association, Inc. NR NR NR NR Southwest Area Regional Transit District NR NR NR NR Texoma Area Paratransit System NR NR NR NR Job Access and Reverse Commute Program Agencies Coastal Bend Center for Independent Living $ 77,184 $ 14,469 $ 44,855 $ 9,133 Houston Kiddie Express NR NR NR NR LULAC - Project Amistad 236,395 NR NR NR NDMJ, LLC 483,763 NR 450,139 NR Total $ 7,375,982 $ 3,355,336 $ 7,073,634 $ 3,350,000
Notes: (1) Includes Passenger Fares NR = Not Reported N/A - Not Applicable NEW FREEDOM PROGRAM - (NF)
(SECTION 5317)
2016 Texas Transit Statistics Report 115 SUMMARY NEW FREEDOM PROGRAM (Section 5317)
The Section 5317 Grant Program (49 USC, Section 5317) helps individuals with disabilities by providing both new public transportation and public transportation alternatives beyond those required by the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA), including transportation to and from jobs and employment-support services.
The New Freedom Program is authorized under the provisions of the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users, (SAFETEA–LU), enacted on August 10, 2005. The New Freedom Program grew out of the New Freedom Initiative introduced by the Administration under Executive Order 13217, “Community- Based Alternatives for Individuals with Disabilities,” on June 18, 2001. The New Freedom Program's intent is to fill the gaps between human service and public transportation services previously available and to facilitate the integration of individuals with disabilities into the workforce and the community.
On May 1, 2007, Circular FTA Circular 9045.1 (New Freedom Program Guidance and Application Instructions) went into effect. This circular issues guidance on the administration of the New Freedom program under 49 USC 5317, including application instructions.
TxDOT administers the FTA Section 5317 New Freedom Program as a formula program. All New Freedom projects are selected via a competitive process held annually for small urbanized and rural services throughout the state.
Also state agencies, local government authorities, public transportation agencies, private nonprofit and for-profit transportation organizations are eligible to receive the Section 5317 (NF) funds administered by TxDOT. The federal funds may be used to reimburse up to 80 percent of eligible capital expenditures and may be used to reimburse up to 90 percent of incremental costs related to compliance with the Clean Air Act or the ADA. Administrative costs associated with the project as well as net operating expenses are eligible for a federal reimbursement rate of 50 percent.
As noted in the introduction of this report, due to the inclusion of New Freedom data into other program reports, monthly statistics have not been captured and are not shown at this time. The data shown on the following tables summarize New Freedom’s operational and financial statistics.
Notes:
The monthly statistics for agencies funded through the Section 5317 Grant Program are located at the end of this section. The federal transportation bill passed in July 2012, titled “Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century”, or MAP-21, eliminated New Freedom/Section 5317 as a separate program. Funding formerly in this program, along with some project eligibility definitions, was added to the Section 5310 program.
116 2016 Texas Transit Statistics Report TABLE34: NEWFREEDOM PROGRAM (NF) - Section 5317 PERFORMANCESUMMARY AT A GLANCE - FiscalYears 2015 and2016
SERVICE SUPPLIED % Change FINANCIAL SOURCE % Change 2015 2016 (15-16) 2015 2016 (15-16) Vehicle Revenue Miles 700,486 511,485 -26.98 Total Operating Vehicle Revenue Hours 44,300 26,197 -40.87 Expenses $2,664,191 $2,251,515 -15.49 Total Revenue Vehicles 18 20 11.11 Total Revenue $2,934,300 $2,301,593 -21.56
SERVICE CONSUMED % Change 2015 2016 (15-16) Unlinked Passenger Trips 62,796 45,636 -27.33
AVERAGE PERFORMANCE MEASURES: SERVICE EFFICIENCY COST EFFECTIVENESS 2015 2016 2015 2016
$3.80 $4.40 Operating Expense $42.43 $49.34 Operating Expense Per PerUnlinked VehicleRevenue Mile PassengerTrip Operating Expense Per $60.14 $85.95 VehicleRevenue Hour
SERVICE EFFECTIVENESS 2015 2016 Unlinked Passenger Trips Per 0.09 0.09 * Vehicle Revenue Mile Unlinked Passenger Trips Per Vehicle Revenue Hour 1.42 1.74
Notes: "Average Performance Measure"s the i average of all service provided. No data collected at this time. **Fare revenue is not broken out separately,t is included i n ithe total revenue. Due to the Section 5317 agencies not collecting actual mvehicleiles and hours, the deadhead ratios not a re applicable.
2016 Texas Transit Statistics Report 117 118 2016 Texas Transit Statistics Report 2016 118
TABLE 35: NEW FREEDOM PROGRAM - (NF) SERVICE EFFICIENCY, COST, AND SERVICE EFFECTIVENESS Fiscal Years 2015 and 2016
NEW FREEDOM RECIPIENTS Operating Expense per Operating Expense per Unlinked Passenger Trip per Unlinked Passenger Trip per Vehicle Revenue Mile Unlinked Passenger Trip Vehicle Revenue Hour Vehicle Revenue Mile MTAs 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 Corpus Christi NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR Dallas NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR Denton County NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR San Antonio $ 2.35 $ 4.19 $ 23.74 $ 42.26 1.98 1.98 0.10 0.10 Urbanized Area Brownsville NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR Laredo NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR Longview NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR Lubbock NR $ 6.04 NR $ 37.74 NR $ 2.22 NR 0.16 McKinney NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR San Angelo NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR Sherman-Denison NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR Texas City-La Marque NR 6.70 $ 65.47 20.94 NR 5.70 NR 0.32 Victoria NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR Rural Transit Districts Ark-Tex Council of Governments $ 0.79 NR $ 14.49 NR 1.09 NR NR NR Central Texas Rural Transit District NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR East Texas Council of Governments NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR Fort Bend County 2.56 $ 0.93 21.25 $ 7.69 2.41 2.41 0.12 0.12 Galveston County Rural Transit District NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR Panhandle Community Services NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR South Plains Community Action Association NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR Texoma Area Paratransit System NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR New Freedom Program Agencies Goliad County NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR Houston Kiddie Express NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR LULAC - Project Amistad NR NR NR NR 0.66 0.87 0.05 0.04 NDMJ, LLC $ 3.22 NR $ 34.20 NR 1.28 NR 0.09 NR Average for Reporting Systems $ 2.23 $ 4.47 $ 31.83 $ 27.16 1.48 2.64 0.09 0.15
Notes: NR = Not Reported TABLE 36: NEW FREEDOM PROGRAM - (NF) OPERATIONAL DATA - Fiscal Years 2015 and 2016
NEW FREEDOM RECIPIENTS Unlinked Passenger Trips Vehicle Revenue Miles* Vehicle Revenue Hours* MTAs 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 Corpus Christi NR NR NR NR NR NR Dallas NR NR NR NR NR NR Denton County NR NR NR NR NR NR San Antonio 18,333 20,995 185,081 211,956 9,254 10,598 Urbanized Area Brownsville NR NR NR NR NR NR Laredo NR NR NR NR NR NR Longview NR NR NR NR NR NR Lubbock NR 2,888 NR 18,050 NR 1,301 McKinney NR NR NR NR NR NR San Angelo NR NR NR NR NR NR Sherman-Denison NR NR NR NR NR NR Texas City-La Marque 4,780 657 NR 2,053 NR 115 Victoria NR NR NR NR NR NR Rural Transit Districts Ark-Tex Council of Governments 925 NR 16,976 NR 849 NR Central Texas Rural Transit District NR NR NR NR NR NR East Texas Council of Governments NR NR NR NR NR NR
2016 Texas Transit Statistics Report 2016 119 Fort Bend County 13,459 13,763 111,852 114,378 5,593 5,719 Galveston County Rural Transit District NR NR NR NR NR NR Panhandle Community Services NR NR NR NR NR NR South Plains Community Action Association NR NR NR NR NR NR Texoma Area Paratransit System NR NR NR NR NR NR New Freedom Program Agencies Goliad County NR NR NR NR NR NR Houston Kiddie Express NR NR NR NR NR NR LULAC - Project Amistad 11,960 7,333 244,790 165,048 18,165 8,464 NDMJ, LLC 13,339 NR 141,787 NR 10,440 NR Total 62,796 45,636 700,486 511,485 44,301 26,197
Notes: *NR = Not Reported Data included in other program tables as applicable (MTA, Urbanized Area, Rural Transit Districts and 5310) 120 2016 Texas Transit Statistics Report 2016 120
TABLE 37: NEW FREEDOM PROGRAM - (NF) FINANCIAL RESOURCES Fiscal Years 2015 and 2016
NEW FREEDOM RECIPIENTS Total Revenue (1) Operating Expense MTAs 2015 2016 2015 2016 Corpus Christi $ 6,441 NR $ 6,441 NR Dallas 202,997 $ 278,552 202,997 $ 278,552 Denton County 8,434 4,325 8,434 4,325 San Antonio 435,267 887,284 435,267 887,284 Urbanized Area Brownsville $ 453,924 NR $ 453,924 NR Laredo 201,267 NR 201,267 NR Longview 58,846 NR 58,846 NR Lubbock 369 $ 108,996 369 $ 108,996 McKinney NR NR NR NR San Angelo 90,743 140,732 90,743 140,732 Sherman-Denison NR NR NR NR Texas City-LaMarque 312,953 13,756 312,953 13,756 Victoria NR 20,034 NR 20,034 Rural Transit Districts Ark-Tex Council of Governments $ 13,403 NR $ 13,403 NR Central Texas Rural Transit District 70,000 NR 70,000 NR East Texas Council of Governments NR NR NR NR Fort Bend County 285,993 $ 105,896 285,993 $ 105,896 Galveston County Rural Transit District NR 362,469 NR 362,469 Panhandle Communtiy Services NR 299,996 NR 299,996 South Plains Community Action Association 67,324 1,775 67,324 1,775 Texoma Area Paratransit System NR NR NR NR New Freedom Program Agencies Goliad County NR NR NR NR Houston Kiddie Express NR NR NR NR LULAC - Project Amistad $ 227,948 $ 47,778 NR NR NDMJ, LLC 498,391 30,000 $ 456,230 $ 27,700 Total $ 2,934,300 $ 2,301,593 $ 2,664,191 $ 2,251,515
Notes: (1) Includes Passenger Fares NR = Not Reported Definitions
2016 Texas Transit Statistics Report 121 DEFINITIONS FOR THE ANNUAL TEXAS TRANSIT STATISTICS REPORT
Note: Definitions are based on the FTA National Transit Database Reporting Manual and the Texas Administrative Code.
ACTUAL VEHICLE HOURS: The hours that vehicles travel while in revenue service [actual vehicle revenue hours (VRH)] plus deadhead hours. Actual vehicle hours exclude hours for charter service, school bus service, operator training, and vehicle maintenance testing.
ACTUAL VEHICLE MILES: The miles that vehicles travel while in revenue service [actual vehicle revenue miles (VRM)] plus deadhead miles. Actual vehicle miles exclude miles for charter services, school bus service, operator training, and vehicle maintenance testing.
ALLOCATION: (1) Between FTA and TxDOT, an administrative distribution of funds among the states, done for funds that do not have statutory distribution formulas: (2) Between TxDOT and grant recipients, a preliminary distribution of grant funds representing the maximum amount to be made available to a subrecipient during the fiscal year, subject to the subrecipient’s completion of and compliance with all application requirements, rules, and regulations applicable to the specific funding program.
AMERICAN RECOVERY AND REINVESTMENT ACT OF 2009 (ARRA): Commonly referred to as the Stimulus or The Recovery Act, is an economic stimulus package enacted by the 111th United States Congress in February 2009.
APPORTIONMENT: A term that refers to a statutorily prescribed division or assignment of funds. An apportionment is based on prescribed formulas in the law and consists of dividing authorized obligation authority for a specific program among the states.
AVERAGE MILES BETWEEN REVENUE VEHICLE SYSTEM FAILURES: The sum of all revenue vehicle miles divided by the aggregated sum of mechanical system failures.
COMMISSION: The Texas Transportation Commission.
COORDINATED COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY (CCTA): A transit authority organized under Chapter 460 of the Texas Transportation Code that follows county boundaries and collects a transit-dedicated sales tax.
DEADHEAD: The operating time (miles and hours) used to move a transit vehicle before revenue service begins and after revenue service ends. When transit vehicles are deadheading, they operate closed-door and are not available to passengers.
DEADHEAD RATIO: The calculation of actual vehicle miles/hours divided by the vehicle revenue miles/hours.
122 2016 Texas Transit Statistics Report DEPARTMENT: The Texas Department of Transportation.
EXPENSE, TOTAL OPERATING: The total operating cost incurred by a transit agency through its transit operation. It includes the following ten expense objects: labor, fringe benefits, service, materials & supplies, utilities, causalities/liabilities cost, taxes, purchased transportation, miscellaneous expenses, and expense transfers. These expense objects are summed by the following four functions: vehicle operations, vehicle maintenance, non-vehicle maintenance, and general administration, to find the total agency expense.
FAREBOX REVENUE: The total passenger fares earned during the report year for directly operated service, regardless of whether they are used during the report year to pay for capital and/or operating expenses. These are fares collected and/or paid for through tickets, passes, tokens, and other fare payment methods.
FAREBOX RECOVERY RATIO: The farebox revenue divided by total operating expenses.
FATALITY: A transit-caused death confirmed within 30 days of the transit incident, which occurs when there is a collision, derailment, fire, evacuation, security incident, or when a vehicle leaves the roadway.
FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION: An agency of the United States Department of Transportation.
FIXING AMERICA’S SURFACE TRANSPORTATION (FAST) ACT: Federal authorizing legislation which replaced MAP-21. A funding and authorization bill to govern United States federal surface transportation spending. The FAST Act became effective on October 1st, 2014.
FUNDS, FEDERAL: Financial assistance from the federal government to assist in paying the capital and operating costs of providing transit services.
FUNDS, LOCAL: Financial assistance from local government (below the state level) to help cover the capital and operating costs of providing transit services.
FUNDS, OTHER: Any miscellaneous funds. Examples are funds dedicated to a local government agency for transportation rather than specifically for transit, advertising revenues, and private donations.
FUNDS, STATE: Financial assistance obtained from the state government to assist in paying the capital and operating costs of providing transit revenue services.
INCIDENT: An event involving a transit vehicle or occurring on transit-related property, involving one or more fatalities, injuries, property damages, or certain crimes.
INJURY: Any physical damage or harm to a person as a result of an incident that requires immediate medical attention away from the scene. (Two or more injuries per incident are reported as Major).
2016 Texas Transit Statistics Report 123 JARC: Job Access and Reverse Commute. A public transportation project relating to the development and maintenance of transportation services designed to transport welfare recipients and eligible low-income individuals to and from jobs and activities related to their employment; or for any income level when transit is to a suburban destination.
MAJOR INCIDENTS: Any event involving the operation of a transit system if, as a result, one or more of the following occurs: an individual dies either at the time of the event or within 30 days of the event; two or more individuals suffer bodily damage as a result of the event requiring immediate medical attention away from the scene; a collision, personal casualty, or fire causes property damage in excess of $25,000; and/or a transit vehicle moving passengers in service is evacuated due to a serious life safety hazard that constitutes an imminent threat.
MAJOR MECHANICAL SYSTEM FAILURE: A failure of some element of the revenue vehicle that prevents the vehicle from completing a scheduled revenue trip or from starting the next scheduled revenue trip because actual movement is limited or because of safety concerns.
METROPOLITAN TRANSIT AUTHORITY (MTA): Agencies funded under the formula Section 5307 urbanized area program which also meet the requirements of serving an area with a population over 200,000 people, having a dedicated taxing authority, and organized according to specific state statutes.
METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION (MPO): A public organization that is designated by the governor to provide planning transportation services for an urbanized area of at least 50,000 population.
MOVING AHEAD FOR PROGRESS IN THE 21ST CENTURY (MAP-21): Federal authorizing legislation that replaced SAFETEA-LU. A funding and authorization bill to govern United States federal surface transportation spending. It was passed by Congress on June 29, 2012, and President Barack Obama signed it on July 6. Eliminated/merged some programs administered by FTA. MAP-21 became effective on October 1, 2012.
NATIONAL TRANSIT DATABASE (NTD): Established by Congress to be the Nation’s primary source for information and statistics on the transit systems of the United States. The NTD reporting system evolved from the transit industry-initiated Project FARE (Uniform Financial Accounting and Reporting Elements).
NEW FREEDOM PROGRAM: Financial assistance from Section 5317 of the Federal Transit Act. This is a formula program to encourage services and facility improvements to address the transportation needs of persons with disabilities that go beyond those required by the Americans with Disabilities Act. Funds may be used for associated capital and operating costs.
NON-ARSON FIRE: Uncontrolled combustion made evident by flame and/or smoke that requires suppression by equipment or personnel.
124 2016 Texas Transit Statistics Report NON-MAJOR INCIDENT: Existence of one or more of the following conditions: injuries requiring immediate medical attention away from the scene for one person, property damage equal to or exceeding $7,500 (but less than $25,000), and all non-arson fires not qualifying as Major Incidents.
NONURBANIZED AREA PROGRAM: Agencies funded under the formula Section 5311 nonurbanized area program, providing coverage for areas outside the urbanized areas established by the US Census Bureau.
OTHER MECHANICAL SYSTEM FAILURE: A failure of some element of the revenue vehicle that because of local policy prevents the vehicle from completing a scheduled revenue trip or from starting the next scheduled revenue trip even though the vehicle is physically able to continue in revenue service.
PASSENGER FARES: The revenue earned from carrying passengers in regularly scheduled and demand response (DR) services. Passenger fares include base fare, zone or distance premiums, express service premiums, extra cost transfers, quantity purchase discounts applicable to the passenger’s ride, and special transit fares.
PLANNING ACTIVITY PROGRAM: Grants awarded under Section 5303 to MPOs or under Section 5304 to TxDOT for transit planning and research activities.
PTN (acronym): The Public Transportation Division of theTexas Department of Transportation.
PURCHASE OF SERVICE: Transportation service provided to a public transit agency or governmental unit from a public or private transportation provider based on a written contract.
REVENUE, OTHER OPERATING: Revenue derived from (1) organizations paying money in lieu of passenger fares, etc.; (2) transit-related services such as station and vehicle concessions and advertising; and (3) non-transit related services, such as rental of vehicles and properties, investment income, and non-park-and-ride parking revenue.
REVENUE, TOTAL OPERATING: The total revenue earned by a transit agency through its transit operations. Includes passenger fares, advertising, and financial assistance for transit operations (not capital expenditures) such as federal, state and local government.
RURAL AREA PROGRAM: Agencies funded under the formula Section 5311 nonurbanized area program, providing coverage for eligible areas. See also NONURBANIZED AREA PROGRAM.
RURAL TRANSIT ASSISTANCE PROGRAM (RTAP): The funds allocated to states to undertake research, training, technical assistance and other support services to meet the needs of transit agencies in nonurbanized areas.
SAFETY INCIDENTS: Any event involving the operation of a transit system if, as a result, one or more of the following occurs: an individual dies either at the time of the event or within 30 days of the event; one or more persons suffer bodily damage as a result of the event requiring immediate medical attention away from the scene; and/or property damage
2016 Texas Transit Statistics Report 125 in excess of $25,000.
SALES TAX (DEDICATED FUNDS): Any funds raised specifically for transit purposes and dedicated at their source (e.g., sales taxes) rather than through an allocation from the pool of general funds.
SENIORS & INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES PROGRAM: Agencies funded under the formula Section 5310 program, providing transportation service to seniors and/or individuals with disabilities. Agencies may be non-profit, or a local public body if there is not a readily available non-profit agency in the area. Services may be provided by the grantee agency or purchased from another agency (typically from a nonurbanized Section 5311 agency).
STATE FISCAL YEAR (SFY): The state accounting period of 12 months that begins on September 1 of each calendar year and ends on August 31 of the following calendar year.
TRANSIT VEHICLE AND PROPERTY DAMAGES: The dollar amount required to repair or replace all vehicles (transit and non-transit) and all property/facilities (tracks, signals, and buildings) damaged during an incident to a state-designated equivalent to that which existed prior to the incident: major incidents (exceeding $25,000) and non-major incidents (exceeding $7,500 but less than $25,000).
TEXAS ADMINISTRATIVE CODE: The body of state regulations that are published and have the force of law. Find transit at Title 43 - Transportation, Part 1 – Texas Department of Transportation, Chapter 31 – Public Transportation.
UNLINKED PASSENGER TRIP: A one-way trip carrying a person from a single origin to a single destination. Passengers are counted each time they board a vehicle no matter how many vehicles they use to travel from their origin to their destination.
URBANIZED AREA: An area defined by the U. S. Census Bureau that includes one or more incorporated cities, villages, towns (central place), and the adjacent densely settled surrounding territory (urban fringe) that together have a minimum of 50,000 persons. The urban fringe generally consists of contiguous territory having a density of at least 1,000 persons per square mile. Urbanized areas do not conform to congressional districts or any other political boundaries.
URBANIZED AREA PROGRAM: Agencies funded under the formula Section 5307 urbanized area program. Both metropolitan transit authorities (MTAs) and smaller urbanized area fall in the Section 5307 urbanized area program, but are generally treated separately. In this report, “urbanized areas” fall between 50,000 and 200,000 in population or do not meet the state requirements to be classified as an MTA.
VEHICLE REVENUE HOURS: The hours that vehicles are scheduled to, or actually travel while in revenue service. Vehicle revenue hours include layover/recovery time; but exclude deadhead, operator training, and vehicle maintenance testing, as well as school bus and charter services.
126 2016 Texas Transit Statistics Report VEHICLE REVENUE MILES: The miles that vehicles are scheduled to, or actually travel while in revenue service. Vehicle revenue miles include layover/recovery time; but exclude deadhead, operator training, and vehicle maintenance testing, as well as school bus and charter services.
VEHICLES, NUMBER OF: The number of revenue vehicles available to meet the annual requirements for maximum service. Vehicles available for maximum service include spares, out-of-service vehicles, and vehicles in or awaiting maintenance, but exclude vehicles awaiting sale and emergency contingency vehicles.
WELFARE RECIPIENT: An individual who has received assistance under a state or tribal program funded under the Social Security Act, Title IV, Part A, at any time during the previous three year period, or as otherwise defined by 49 USC §5316, the Job Access and Reverse Commute program.
2016 Texas Transit Statistics Report 127 This page intentionally left blank.
128 2016 Texas Transit Statistics Report Contact list current as of this publishing.
(Most current contact information is available at www.txdot.gov)
2016 Texas Transit Statistics Report 129 METROPOLITAN TRANSIT AUTHORITIES
AUSTIN CORPUS CHRISTI
Capital Corpus Christi Metropolitan Regional Transportation Authority Transportation Authority Transit Name: Capital Metro Transit Name: The B
Linda Watson Jorge Cruz-Aedo President/CEO CEO 2910 East Fifth Street 5658 Bear Lane Austin, TX 78702-4895 Corpus Christi, TX 78405-2933 (512) 389-7504 (361) 289-2712 (512) 369-6235 Fax (361) 289-3005 Fax [email protected] [email protected] http://www.capmetro.org http://www.ccrta.org
DALLAS EL PASO
Dallas Area Rapid Transit City of El Paso Transit Name: DART Transit Name: Sun Metro
Gary Thomas Jay Banasiak President and CEO General Manager P.O. Box 660163 10151 Montana Avenue Dallas, TX 75266-0163 El Paso, TX 79925 (214) 749-3278 (915) 534-5811 (214) 749-3655 Fax (915) 541-6405 Fax [email protected] [email protected] http://www.dart.org http://www.elpasotexas.gov/sunmetro
FORT WORTH HOUSTON
Fort Worth Metropolitan Transportation Authority Transportation Authority of Harris County Transit Name: The T Transit Name: Houston METRO
Paul Ballard Thomas C. Lambert President and CEO President and CEO 1600 E. Lancaster P.O. Box 61429 Fort Worth, TX 76102-6720 Houston, TX 77208-1429 (817) 215-8700 (713) 615-6409 (817) 215-8709 Fax (713) 739-9537 Fax [email protected] [email protected] http://www.ftwa.org http://www.ridemetro.org
130 2016 Texas Transit Statistics Report METROPOLITAN TRANSIT AUTHORITIES
SAN ANTONIO COORDINATED COUNTY VIA Metropolitan Transportation Authority TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY Transit Name: VIA Denton County Transportation Authority Jeffery C. Arndt Transit Name: DCTA President and CEO P.O. Box 12489 James Witt San Antonio, TX 78212-2489 President (210) 362-2050 1955 Lakeway Drive, Suite 260 (210) 362-2570 Fax Lewisville, TX 75057 [email protected] (972) 221-4600 http://www.viainfo.net (972) 221-4601 [email protected] http://www.dcta.net
2016 Texas Transit Statistics Report 131 URBANIZED TRANSIT SYSTEMS
City of Abilene City of Amarillo Transit Name: Citylink Transit Name: Amarillo Transit System
James Oliver Michelle Bonner 1189 S Second Street P.O. Box 1971 Abilene TX 79602-1411 Amarillo TX 79105-1971 325-676-6403 806-378-4209 325-676-6407 Fax 806-378-3018 Fax [email protected] [email protected] http://www.abilenetx.com/CityLink http://amarillo.gov/
City of Arlington City of Beaumont Transit Name: HANDITRAN Transit Name: BMT – Beaumont Transit System Bob Johnson P.O. Box 90231 William Munson Arlington TX 76004-0231 550 Milam Street 817-459-5390 Beaumont TX 77701-4405 817-275-2286 Fax 409-835-7895 [email protected] 409-832-3609 Fax http://www.ci.arlington.tx.us/handitran [email protected] http://www.beaumonttransit.com
City of Brownsville Cities of College Station/Bryan Transit Name: BUS – Transit Name: Brazos Transit District – Brownsville Urban System The District
Norma Zamora Stefani Jimenez 755 International Blvd. 1759 N. Earl Rudder Freeway Brownsville TX 78520 Bryan TX 77803-5167 956-541-4881 979-778-0607 956-544-7603 Fax 979-778-3606 Fax [email protected] [email protected] http://www.cob.us/bus/index.asp http://www.btd.org
132 2016 Texas Transit Statistics Report URBANIZED TRANSIT SYSTEMS
City of Conroe City of Grand Prairie Transit Name: Conroe Connection Transit Name: The Grand Connection
Shawn Johnson Anthony Flowers P.O. Box 3066 P. O. Box 534045 Conroe TX 77305 Grand Prairie TX 75053-4045 936-522-3526 972-237-8545 936-756-6162 Fax 972-237-8544 Fax [email protected] [email protected] http://www.cityofconroe.org/departments/tra http://www.gptx.org/TransportationServices/T nsit ransit.aspx
City of Harlingen Cities of Killeen/ Transit Name: Valley Metro Copperas Cove/Harker Heights Transit Name: Hill Country Transit District – Tom Logan The HOP 510 S. Pleasantview Drive Weslaco TX 78501-4705 Robert Ator 956-969-5761 4515 W. U.S. 190 956-969-8176 Fax Belton TX 76513 [email protected] 254-933-3700 http://www.myharlingen.us 254-933-3724 Fax [email protected] http://www.takethehop.com
Cities of Lake Jackson/Angleton City of Laredo Transit Name: Transit Name: El Metro Gulf Coast Center/Connect Transit Claudia San Miguel James Hollis 1301 Farragut St 4352 E. F. Lowry Expressway 3rd Floor West Texas City TX 77591 Laredo TX 78040 409-944-4446 956-795-2288 Ext 234 409-948-6824 Fax 956-795-2258 Fax [email protected] [email protected] http://www.gcmhmr.com http://www.elmetrotransit.com/
2016 Texas Transit Statistics Report 133 URBANIZED TRANSIT SYSTEMS
City of Longview City of Lubbock Transit Name: Longview Transit Transit Name: CITIBUS
Scott Lewis Maurice Pearl P.O. Box 1952 P. O. Box 2000 Longview TX 75605 Lubbock TX 79457 903-753-2287 806-712-2000 903-753-2291 Fax 806-767-2012 Fax [email protected] [email protected] http://www.longviewtransit.com/index.php http://www.citibus.com
City of McAllen City of McKinney Transit Name: McAllen Express Transit Chandler Merritt Mario Delgado 222 N. Tennessee Street 1501 W. Hwy 83 Suite 100 McKinney TX 75069 McAllen TX 78501 972-547-7616 956-688-3500 972-547-2604 956-688-3505 Fax [email protected] [email protected] http://www.mckinneytexas.org http://www.mcallen.net
City of Mesquite Cities of Midland/Odessa Transit Name: City of Mesquite – Mesquite Transit Name: EZ Rider Transportation for Elderly and Disabled Robert Stephens Valerie Bradley P.O. Box 60808 P. O. Box 850137 Odessa TX 79711 Mesquite TX 75185-0137 432-561-9990 972-329-8329 432-561-8056 Fax 972-329-8340 Fax [email protected] [email protected] http://www.ez-rider.org http://www.cityofmesquite.com/mted
134 2016 Texas Transit Statistics Report URBANIZED TRANSIT SYSTEMS
Northeast Transportation Service City of Port Arthur Transit Name: NETS (North Richland Hills & Transit Name: PAT – Port Arthur Transit nine surrounding communities in Tarrant County) Ronald “Mack” McElhose P. O. Box 1089 Carla Forman Port Arthur TX 77641-1089 249 W. Thornhill Road 409-983-8767 North Richland Hills TX 76115 409-983-8609 Fax 817-336-8714 [email protected] 817-427-6016 Fax http://www.portarthur.net [email protected]
City of San Angelo City of San Marcos Transit Name: Concho Valley Transit District - Transit Name: San Marcos Transit-CARTS TRANSA Edna Johnson Vicente Huerta 2010 E. 6th Street (Shipping Address) P.O. Box 60050 Austin TX 78702 San Angelo TX 76906-0050 P.O. Box 6050 (Mailing Address) 325-947-8729 Austin TX 78762-6050 325-947-8286 Fax 512-481-1011 [email protected] 512-478-1110 Fax http://www.cvcog.org/cvcog/trans_rural.html [email protected] http://ridecarts.com
Cities City of Temple of Sherman/Denison/Howe Transit Name: Hill Country Transit District – Transit Name: The HOP Texoma Area Paratransit System (TAPS) Robert Ator Tim Patton 4515 W. U.S. 190 6104 Texoma Parkway Belton TX 76513 Sherman TX 75090 254-933-3700 903-868-9182 254-933-3724 Fax 903-815-7704 Fax [email protected] [email protected] http://www.takethehop.com http://www.tapsbus.com
2016 Texas Transit Statistics Report 135 URBANIZED TRANSIT SYSTEMS
City of Texarkana City of Texas City/La Marque Transit Name: Texarkana Urban Transit Transit Name: Gulf Coast Center/Connect District/T-Line Transit
Owetta Walton-Bost James Hollis 1402 Texas Blvd. 4352 E. F. Lowry Expressway Texarkana TX 75501-5014 Texas City TX 77591 903-794-0435 409-944-4446 903-794-0437 Fax 409-948-6824 Fax [email protected] [email protected] http://www.t-linebus.org http://www.gulfcoastcenter.org/connect_tran sportation.aspx
City of Tyler Transit Name: Tyler Transit System City of Victoria Transit Name: Victoria Transit Russ Jackson 210 E. Oakwood Street Lisa Cortinas Tyler TX 75702 1908 N. Laurent, Suite 600 903-595-7174 Victoria TX 77901 903-531-9418 Fax 361-578-1587 [email protected] 361-578-8865 Fax http://www.cityoftyler.org/Departments/TylerT [email protected] ransit http://www.gcrpc.org/trans_victoria_transit.ht m
City of Waco Transit Name: Waco Transit System City of Wichita Falls Transit Name: Falls Transit John Hendrickson 301 S. 8th St., Suite 100 Dennis Burket Waco TX 76701-1417 P.O. Box 1431 254-750-1900 Wichita Falls, TX 76307-1431 254-750-1901 Fax 940-761-7451 [email protected] 940-761-7419 Fax http://www.waco-texas.com [email protected] http://www.cwftx.net
136 2016 Texas Transit Statistics Report URBANIZED TRANSIT SYSTEMS
The Woodlands Township Transit Name: Brazos Transit District
Margie Lucas 1759 N. Earl Rudder Freeway Bryan TX 77803-5167 979-778-4494 979-778-3606 Fax [email protected] http://www.btd.org
2016 Texas Transit Statistics Report 137 RURAL TRANSIT DISTRICTS
Alamo Area Council of Governments Ark-Tex Council of Governments Transit Name: ART- Alamo Regional Transit Transit Name: ATCOG-TRAX
William Moseley Owetta Walton-Bost 8700 Tesoro Dr. Suite 700 P.O. Box 5307 San Antonio TX 78217-6218 Texarkana TX 75505-5307 210-362-5303 903-832-8636 210-225-5937 Fax 903-832-2672 Fax [email protected] [email protected] http://www.aacog.com/index.asp http://www.t-linebus.org
Aspermont Small Business Development Center, Inc. Brazos Transit District Transit Name: Brazos Transit District Transit Name: Double Mountain Coach RTD – The District Lisa Flowers Wendy Weedon 9660 U.S. 83 South 1759 N. Earl Rudder Freeway Aspermont TX 79502 Bryan TX 77803-5167 940-989-3538 979-778-0607 940-989-3445 Fax 979-778-3606 Fax [email protected] [email protected] http://www.btd.org
Central Texas Rural Transit Capital Area Rural District Transportation System Transit Name: CARR - City and Rural Rides Transit Name: CARTS J. R. Salazar David Marsh P.O. Box 712 2010 E. 6th Street (Shipping Address) Coleman, TX 76834-0712 Austin TX 78702 325-625-4491 P.O. Box 6050 (Mailing Address) 325-625-5044 Fax Austin TX 78762-6050 [email protected] 512-481-1011 http://www.cityandruralrides.com 512-478-1110 Fax [email protected] http://ridecarts.com
138 2016 Texas Transit Statistics Report RURAL TRANSIT DISTRICTS
Cleburne, City of Colorado Valley Transit, Inc. Transit Name: CLETRANS – Cleburne Transit Name: Colorado Valley Transit Transportation System Claudia Wicks Grady Easdon P.O. Box 940 206 N. Border Columbus, TX 78934-0940 Cleburne, TX 76031 979-732-6281 Ext. 16 817-641-1800 979-732-6283 Fax 817-645-6636 Fax [email protected] [email protected] http://www.gotransit.org http://www.ci.cleburne.tx.us
Community Action Council of Community Services, Inc. South Texas Transit Name: Community Transit Service Transit Name: Rainbow Lines Daniel Edwards P.O. Box 612 (Note: Community Action Council of South Corsicana, TX 75151-0612 Texas’ service area was merged into the Rural 903-875-3721 Economic Assistance League and Lower Rio 903-872-0561 Fax Grande Valley Development Council, effective: [email protected] June 1, 2015)
Concho Valley Rural Transit Del Rio, City of District (CVRTD) Transit Name: None Transit Name: Thunderbird Transit Elsa Reyes Vicente Huerta 109 W. Broadway P.O. Box 60050 Del Rio, TX 78840 San Angelo, TX 76906-0050 830-703-5324 325-947-8729 830-774-8697 Fax 325-947-8286 Fax [email protected] [email protected] http://www.cityofdelrio.com http://www.cvcog.org
2016 Texas Transit Statistics Report 139 RURAL TRANSIT DISTRICTS
East Texas Council of El Paso County Governments Transit Name: El Paso County Rural Transit Transit Name: East Texas Rural Transit Michael Martinez Jim Camp 500 E. San Antonio, Ste 302 3800 Stone Road El Paso, TX 79901 Kilgore, TX 75662 915-546-2215, ext. 3048 903-218-6490 915-546-2217 Fax 903-984-0120 Fax [email protected] [email protected] http://www.epcounty.com http://www.etcog.org Galveston County Rural Transit District, City of Galveston Fort Bend County Rural Transit Transit Name: Island Transit District Mike Worthy Transit Name: None 3115 Market St Galveston TX 77550-1315 Paulette Shelton 409-797-3904 12550 Emily Court, Ste 400 409-797-3901 Fax Sugar Land, TX 77478 [email protected] 281-243-6701 http://galvestontx.gov/393/Transportation 281-243-6710 Fax [email protected] http://www.fbctransit.org Gulf Coast Center Transit Name: Gulf Coast Center/Connect Transit
Golden Crescent Regional James Hollis Planning Commission 4352 E. F. Lowry Expressway Transit Name: R Transit Texas City, TX 77591 409-944-4446 Lisa Cortinas 409-948-6824 Fax 1908 N. Laurent, Suite 600 [email protected] Victoria, TX 77901 http://www.gcmhmr.com/connect_transportat 361-578-1587 ion.aspx 361-578-8865 Fax [email protected] http://www.gcrpc.org/gcrpc_transit2013.htm
140 2016 Texas Transit Statistics Report RURAL TRANSIT DISTRICTS
Heart of Texas Council of Hill Country Transit District Governments/Rural Transit Name: Transportation District The HOP Transit Name: HOTRTD – Heart of Texas Rural Carole Warlick Transportation District 906 S. High St San Saba, TX 76877-0217 Ronald “Rep” Pledger 325-372-4677 1514 S. New Road 325-372-6110 Fax Waco, TX 76711 [email protected] 254-292-1895 http://www.takethehop.com 254-759-2492 Fax [email protected] http://www.hotcog.org/pages/transportation. aspx
Lower Rio Grande Valley Kleberg County Human Services Development Council Transit Name: Paisano Express Transit Name: Valley Metro Margie Del Bosque Tom Logan 1109 E. Santa Gertrudis 510 S. Pleasantview Dr. Kingsville, TX 78363-4606 Weslaco, TX 78596 361-595-8578 956-682-3481 361-595-1352 Fax 956-631-4670 [email protected] [email protected] http://www.lrgvdc.org/riotransit.html
McLennan County Rural Transit Panhandle Community Services, District Transit Name: McLennan County Rural Transit Inc. District Transit Name: Panhandle Transit District
John Hendrickson Lylene Springer 301 S. 8th Street, Suite 100 1309 W. 8th Street Waco, TX 76701 Amarillo, TX 79120-2150 254-750-1900 806-342-6105 254-750-1901 Fax 806-372-4533 Fax [email protected] [email protected] http://www.co.mclennan.tx.us/595/McLenna http://www.co.mclennan.tx.us/595/McLenna n-County-Rural-Transit-District n-County-Rural-Transit-District
2016 Texas Transit Statistics Report 141 RURAL TRANSIT DISTRICTS
Public Transit Services Rolling Plains Management Transit Name: Public Transit Services Corporation Transit Name: SHARP Lines Rural Public Reta Brooks Transportation 7611 Highway 180 East (physical) P.O. Box 1055 (mailing address) Lezlie Carroll Mineral Wells, TX 76068-1055 P.O. Box 490 940-328-1391 Crowell, TX 79227-0490 940-328-1392 Fax 1-800-633-0852 [email protected] 940-684-1571 http://www.publictransitservices.org 940-684-1853 Fax [email protected] http://www.rollingplains.org
Rural Economic Assistance Senior Center Resources and League, Inc. Public Transit, Inc Transit Name: REAL Transit Transit Name: The Connection Public Transit System Gloria Ramos 301 Lucero Street Danny Allembaugh Alice, TX 78332-5848 4912 Lee Street 361-668-3158 Greenville, TX 75401-5032 361-664-9695 Fax 903-454-1444 (ext. 101) [email protected] 903-454-4150 Fax http://realinc.org/transportation.php [email protected] http://www.scrpt.org
Services Program for Aging South East Texas Regional Needs, Inc. Transit Name: SPAN, Inc. Planning Commission Transit Name: South East Texas Transit Deborah Robertson 1800 Malone D’Juana Fowler Denton, TX 76201-1746 2210 Eastex Freeway 940-382-2224 Beaumont, TX 77703-4929 940-383-8433 Fax 409-899-8444 Ext 254 [email protected] 409-729-7391 Fax http://www.span-transit.org [email protected] http://www.setrpc.org
142 2016 Texas Transit Statistics Report RURAL TRANSIT DISTRICTS
South Padre Island, City of South Plains Community Action Transit Name: The Wave Association Transit Name: SPARTAN Jesse Arriaga P.O. Box 3410 Brian Baker South Padre Island, TX 78597-3410 Box 610 – 411 Austin Street 956-761-3245 Levelland, TX 79336-0610 956-761-1659 Fax 806-894-3800 [email protected] 806-894-2759 Fax http://myspi.org/ [email protected] https://spartanpublictransit.com/
Southwest Area Regional Transit District STAR Transit Transit Name: Southwest Transit Transit Name: STAR Transit (formerly Kaufman Area Rural Transportation) Sarah Hidalgo-Cook 713 East Main Street Omega A. Hawkins Uvalde, TX 78801 P.O. Box 703 830-278-4155 Terrell, TX 75160-0703 830-486-0364 Fax 972-563-1422 [email protected] 972-563-1491 Fax http://www.paseoswart.org/ [email protected]
Texoma Area Paratransit System The Transit System, Inc. Transit Name: TAPS Public Transit Transit Name: The Transit System
Josh Walker Derinda Long 6104 Texoma Parkway P.O. Box 332 Sherman TX 75090 Glen Rose, TX 76043-0332 903-267-3124 254-897-2964 903-815-7704 Fax 254-897-7922 Fax [email protected] [email protected] http://www.tapsbus.com
2016 Texas Transit Statistics Report 143 RURAL TRANSIT DISTRICTS
Webb County Community Action West Texas Opportunities, Inc. Agency Transit Name: WTO - ITRAX Transit Name: El Aguila Rural Transportation Jenny Gibson Robert Martinez P.O. Box 1308 4801 Daugherty Avenue Lamesa, TX 79331-1308 Laredo, TX 78044-3881 806-872-8354 956-722-6100 806-872-5816 Fax 956-726-4524 Fax [email protected] [email protected] http://www.gowto.org http://www.webbcounty.com/CommunityActio nAgency/ElAguila/default.aspx
144 2016 Texas Transit Statistics Report CONTACT INFORMATION FOR ENHANCED MOBILITY OF SENIORS & INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM (Section 5310)
For the Large Urbanized Areas in Texas (urbanized population 200,000 and above), 49 USC Section 5310 requires a local selection process to name a designated recipient. These designated recipients are then responsible for administration of the Section 5310 program in their respective urbanized areas, including administration of a project selection process. In some cases, the local preference has been for TxDOT to act as the designated recipient for a limited time. If authorized by the commission, TxDOT will provide this service for a specified period.
The following are the current designated recipients for the Section 5310 program in Texas’ large urbanized areas:
Urbanized Area Designated Recipient (Contact Information)
Austin • TxDOT (portion of FY 2016 funds only) • Capital Area Metropolitan Transportation Authority (balance of FY 2016 funds and subsequent years) (See Metropolitan Transit Authorities listing on page 126)
Brownsville City of Brownsville (See Urbanized Transit Systems listing on page 128)
Conroe-The Woodlands • TxDOT (FY 2016 funds only) • City of Conroe (FY 2016 funds and subsequent years) 300 West Davis/P.O. Box 3066, Conroe, Texas 77305 Phone (936) 522-3030, www.CityofConroe.org
Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Regional Transportation Authority (See Metropolitan Transit Authorities listing on page 126)
Dallas-Ft. Worth-Arlington Three co-designated recipients, based upon coverage: Dallas Area Rapid Transit, Fort Worth Transportation Authority, and North Central Texas Council of Governments (NCTCOG) (See Metropolitan Transit Authorities listing on page 126 for DART and The T; for NCTCOG – Michael Morris, Director of Transportation, 616 Six Flags Drive, Arlington, TX 76011, Phone (817) 695-9241, email [email protected], website http://www.nctcog.org/trans)
Denton-Lewisville NCTCOG (See address under Dallas-Ft. Worth-Arlington)
2016 Texas Transit Statistics Report 145 Urbanized Area Designated Recipient (Contact Information) (continued)
El Paso El Paso MPO - (Michael Medina, Executive Director, 10767 Gateway Blvd. West, Suite 605, El Paso, TX 79935, Phone (915) 591-9735, email [email protected], web http://www.elpasompo.org)
Houston • TxDOT (portion of FY 2016 funds only) • Houston Metro (FY 2016 funds and subsequent years) (See Metropolitan Transit Authorities listing on page 126)
Killeen Hill Country Transit District (See Urbanized Transit Systems listing on page 128)
Laredo • TxDOT (FY 2015 funds only) • City of Laredo (FY 2016 funds and subsequent years) (See Urbanized Transit Systems listing on page 128)
Lubbock City of Lubbock/Citibus (See Urbanized Transit Systems listing on page 128)
McAllen Lower Rio Grande Valley Development Council (See Rural Transit Districts listing on page 134)
San Antonio VÍA Metropolitan Transit (See Metropolitan Transit Authorities listing on page 126)
For small urbanized and rural areas of Texas, TxDOT is the designated recipient. A complete listing of the current transit agencies operating as Section 5310 providers in those areas would be too cumbersome to list in this report. Listed below are two methods to obtain a current listing.
To obtain a list of addresses of these agencies, please contact the Texas Department of Transportation, Public Transportation Division, 125 East 11th Street, Austin, Texas, 78701- 2483 or call (512) 486-5977.
Or you can view the current transit agencies by going to TxDOT’s website.
www.txdot.gov
146 2016 Texas Transit Statistics Report