DOCSLIB.ORG

THE RURAL TRANSPORTATION NETWORK in TEXAS August 1999 6

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
THE RURAL TRANSPORTATION NETWORK in TEXAS August 1999 6 Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. FHWA/TX-99/1437-1 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date THE RURAL TRANSPORTATION NETWORK IN TEXAS August 1999 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Katherine F. Turnbull, George B. Dresser, and Laura L. Higgins Report 1437-1 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System 11. Contract or Grant No College Station, Texas 77843-3135 Project No.: 0-1437 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Texas Department of Transportation Research: Research and Technology Transfer Section September 1995 - August 1997 Construction Division 14. Sponsoring Agency Code P. O. Box 5080 Austin, Texas 78763-5080 15. Supplementary Notes Research performed in cooperation with the Texas Department of Transportation and the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration. Research Project Title: Role of the Rural Transportation Network in Texas and the Impact of Funding Levels 16. Abstract An efficient multimodal transportation system is critical to the economic vitality of large metropolitan areas, smaller communities, and rural areas. The transportation issues in urban areas are receiving a good deal of attention, with less focus on the needs of rural areas. This research project examines the rural transportation system in Texas. It explores the demographic and economic characteristics of the state’s rural population. The history and current status of highways, roadways, public transit services, intercity buses, airports, and railroads serving rural portions of the state are examined. Case studies are presented on selected modes. Available information on future funding needs is reviewed. A multimodal approach needed to enhance the mobility and economic development in rural parts of Texas is presented and discussed. 17. Key Words 18. Distribution Statement Rural Transportation, Rural Highways, Rural No restrictions. This document is available to the Transit, Rural Airports, Rural Economic public through NTIS: Development, Railroads National Technical Information Service 5285 Port Royal Road Springfield, Virginia 22161 19. Security Classif.(of this report) 20. Security Classif.(of this page) 21. No. of Pages 22. Price Unclassified Unclassified 120 Form DOT F 1700.7 (8-72) Reproduction of completed page authorized THE RURAL TRANSPORTATION NETWORK IN TEXAS by Katherine F. Turnbull Research Scientist Texas Transportation Institute George B. Dresser Research Scientist Texas Transportation Institute and Laura L. Higgins Assistant Research Scientist Texas Transportation Institute Report 1437-1 Project Number 0-1437 Research Project Title: Role of the Rural Transportation Network in Texas and the Impact of Funding Levels Sponsored by the Texas Department of Transportation In Cooperation with the U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration August 1999 TEXAS TRANSPORTATION INSTITUTE The Texas A&M University System College Station, Texas 77843-3135 DISCLAIMER The contents of this report reflect the views of the authors, who are responsible for the findings and conclusions presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) or the U.S. Department of Transportation. This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation, and is not intended for construction, bidding, or permit purposes. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This research was performed for the Texas Department of Transportation, in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration. Dr. Jeffery Memmott was Texas Transportation Institute’s Research Supervisor on the study. Dr. Memmott left the Institute before the completion of the study and this report. Dr. Katherine F. Turnbull, Dr. George B. Dresser, and Ms. Laura L. Higgins finished the research project and completed this report. Ms. Bonnie Duke was responsible for word processing, and Mr. John Hobbs assisted with many of the graphics. The authors would like to recognize and thank TxDOT’s Project Director, Mr. James Randall from the Transportation Planning and Programming Division, and members of the Project Panel, Ms. Linda Howard, from the Aviation Division, and Ms. Karen Dunlap from the Public Transportation Division. The help and guidance of these individuals throughout the study are greatly appreciated. TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES ........................................................... ix LIST OF TABLES ............................................................ xi CHAPTER ONE—INTRODUCTION .............................................1 Research Objectives......................................................1 Research Approach ......................................................1 Report Organization .....................................................3 CHAPTER TWO—POPULATION AND ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS OF RURAL TEXAS .....................................................5 Rural Population Trends ..................................................5 Per Capita Personal Income Trends..........................................8 Total Personal Income Trends .............................................11 Earnings ..............................................................11 General Economic Trends ................................................11 Farm and Non-Farm Income ..............................................14 Predominant Industry ....................................................14 CHAPTER THREE—RURAL ROADWAY SYSTEM IN TEXAS .....................17 Historical Overview of Rural Roadway System in Texas ........................17 State-Maintained Roadway System in Texas..................................18 Funding the State-Maintained Roadway System ...............................20 Rural Roadways and Population and Economic Characteristics ...................23 Rural Roadway Conditions and Needs ......................................24 CHAPTER FOUR—RURAL TRANSIT AND INTERCITY BUS SERVICES IN TEXAS ..................................................27 Historical Overview of Rural Transit Services in Texas .........................27 Metropolitan and Municipal Transit Systems in Texas ..........................28 Existing Rural Transit Systems in Texas.....................................29 Characteristics of Rural Transit Services in Texas .............................35 Section 5310 Program ...................................................37 Funding Rural Transit Systems in Texas .....................................38 Economic Impacts of Rural Transit Services and Case Studies ...................40 Intercity Bus Service in Texas .............................................44 Assessment of Rural Transit Services and Future Needs ........................49 CHAPTER FIVE—GENERAL AVIATION SYSTEM IN TEXAS......................61 Historical Overview of Aviation in Texas....................................61 Aviation System in Texas ................................................62 Current General Aviation Airports in Texas ..................................63 Funding General Aviation Airports in Texas ..................................70 Attributes of Viable Rural Airports in Texas..................................72 General Aviation Case Studies ............................................74 General Aviation Economic Impacts and Future Needs .........................76 CHAPTER SIX—RURAL RAILROAD SYSTEM IN TEXAS .........................79 Historical Overview of Railroads in Texas ...................................79 Freight Rail Services in Texas .............................................80 Rural Rail Transportation Districts .........................................87 Economic Impacts of Freight Railroads and Case Studies .......................91 Passenger Rail Services in Texas...........................................96 Excursion Trains in Texas ................................................98 Future Needs ..........................................................99 CHAPTER SEVEN—MULTIMODAL APPROACH TO RURAL TRANSPORTATION IN TEXAS ...........................................................101 REFERENCES .............................................................103 LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page 1. Metropolitan and Rural Counties in Texas and Composite Regions .................6 2. 1998 Estimated Population by County ........................................7 3. Percent Change in Population by County—1990 to 1998 .........................9 4. Percent of Elderly Population in Texas Counties, 1990 .........................10 5. 1992 Per Capita Personal Income by County ..................................12 6. Texas Highway Trunk System .............................................19 7. Distribution of Total TxDOT Receipts - Fiscal Year 1997 .......................22 8. Rural Public Transit Operators in Texas .....................................32 9. Thunderbird Transit Minibus ..............................................37 10. Counties with Section 5310 Vehicles .......................................39 11. Intercity Bus Routes in Texas .............................................47 12. Counties without Metropolitan, Small City, or Rural Transit Service ...............52 13. Counties without Metropolitan, Small City, Rural Transit Services, or Section
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Reporting Marks
    Lettres d'appellation / Reporting Marks AA Ann Arbor Railroad AALX Advanced Aromatics LP AAMX ACFA Arrendadora de Carros de Ferrocarril S.A. AAPV American Association of Private RR Car Owners Inc. AAR Association of American Railroads AATX Ampacet Corporation AB Akron and Barberton Cluster Railway Company ABB Akron and Barberton Belt Railroad Company ABBX Abbott Labs ABIX Anheuser-Busch Incorporated ABL Alameda Belt Line ABOX TTX Company ABRX AB Rail Investments Incorporated ABWX Asea Brown Boveri Incorporated AC Algoma Central Railway Incorporated ACAX Honeywell International Incorporated ACBL American Commercial Barge Lines ACCX Consolidation Coal Company ACDX Honeywell International Incorporated ACEX Ace Cogeneration Company ACFX General Electric Rail Services Corporation ACGX Suburban Propane LP ACHX American Cyanamid Company ACIS Algoma Central Railway Incorporated ACIX Great Lakes Chemical Corporation ACJR Ashtabula Carson Jefferson Railroad Company ACJU American Coastal Lines Joint Venture Incorporated ACL CSX Transportation Incorporated ACLU Atlantic Container Line Limited ACLX American Car Line Company ACMX Voith Hydro Incorporated ACNU AKZO Chemie B V ACOU Associated Octel Company Limited ACPX Amoco Oil Company ACPZ American Concrete Products Company ACRX American Chrome and Chemicals Incorporated ACSU Atlantic Cargo Services AB ACSX Honeywell International Incorporated ACSZ American Carrier Equipment ACTU Associated Container Transport (Australia) Limited ACTX Honeywell International Incorporated ACUU Acugreen Limited ACWR
    [Show full text]
  • Normal Template 2016
    APPENDIX E 2014 TEXAS STATEWIDE LOCOMOTIVE EMISSIONS INVENTORY AND 2008 THROUGH 2040 TREND INVENTORIES El Paso Redesignation Request and Maintenance Plan State Implementation Plan Revision for the One-Hour Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard Project Number 2018-029-SIP-NR Adoption April 24 2019 2014 Texas Statewide Locomotive Emissions Inventory and 2008 through 2040 Trend Inventories FINAL Prepared for: Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Air Quality Division Prepared by: Eastern Research Group, Inc. August 26, 2015 ERG No. 0345.00.003.005 2014 Texas Statewide Locomotive Emissions Inventory and 2008 through 2040 Trend Inventories TCEQ Contract No. 582-15-50416 Work Order No. 582-15-51538-02-FY2015-11 Prepared for: Cody McLain Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Emissions Assessment Section P. O. Box 13087 Bldg. E, Room 335 Austin, TX 78711-3087 Prepared by: Heather Perez Eastern Research Group, Inc. 1600 Perimeter Park Drive Suite 200 Morrisville, NC 27560 August 26, 2015 Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction ........................................................................................................ 1-1 2.0 Data Collection ................................................................................................... 2-1 2.1 Union Pacific ........................................................................................... 2-3 2.2 Kansas City Southern .............................................................................. 2-3 2.3 Texas & Northern Railway .....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Speed Train Service Between North Texas, the Brazos Valley and Greater Houston
    FOR TEXAS CENTRAL INTERNAL USE ONLY TRANSFORMING TRAVEL IN TEXAS Assessing passenger demand for high-speed train service between North Texas, the Brazos Valley and Greater Houston An updated analysis of consumer demand and ridership FOR TEXASMARKETING CENTRAL INTERNALCONTENT USE ONLY ABOUT THE PROJECT The design, construction, finance and operation of a new high-speed passenger train line connecting Houston and North Texas has been under development since 2002. This market was chosen as the most attractive after reviewing 97 pairs of cities and their potential for commercial success. The project expects to begin construction after federal permits are granted and financial close is achieved, at the earliest the end of 2019. The train will enable passengers to travel between Houston and North Texas in 90 minutes, including an intermediary stop in the Brazos Valley. This transformational project will provide a safe, productive, fast and reliable choice for travelers between the country’s fourth and fifth largest economies. These metropolitan regions collectively produce 6% of US GDP, and contain close to 50% of Texas’ population and 5% of our national population. Connecting these cities via high-speed train will not only service an existing travel market that is only increasing in size, but will create a super economy larger than that of Spain or Mexico. The location of this project is well suited in that Texas is the second largest state economy in the US and is growing at historic rates. With the sustained yearly population increase, the need for infrastructure is critical to preserve the future economic vitality of the State.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 2 Existing Conditions Summary
    Final Report New Haven Hartford Springfield Commuter Rail Implementation Study 2 Existing Conditions Chapter 2 Existing Conditions Summary This chapter is a summary of the existing conditions report, necessary for comprehension of the remaining chapters. The entire report can be found in Appendix B of this report. 2.1 Existing Passenger Services on the Line The only existing passenger rail service on the Springfield Line is a regional service operated by Amtrak. Schedules for alternatives in Chapter 3 and the Recommended Action in Chapter 4 include current Amtrak service. Most Amtrak service on the line is shuttle trains, running between Springfield and New Haven, where they connect with other Amtrak Northeast Corridor trains. One round-trip train each day operates through the corridor to Boston to the north and Washington to the south. One round trip train each day operates to and from St. Albans, Vermont from New Haven. The trains also permit connections at New Haven with Amtrak’s Northeast Corridor (Washington to Boston) service, as well as Metro North service to New York, and Shore Line East local commuter service to New London. Departures are spread throughout the day, with trains typically operating at intervals of two to three hours. Springfield line services are designed as extensions of Amtrak’s Northeast Corridor service, and are not scheduled to serve local commuter trips (home to work trips). The Amtrak fare structure was substantially reduced in price since this study began. The original fare structure from November 2002 was shown in the existing conditions report, which can be found in Appendix B.
    [Show full text]
  • 16 Million People Travel Between Houston and North
    MARKETING CONTENT TRANSFORMING TRAVEL IN TEXAS Assessing passenger demand for high-speed train service between North Texas, the Brazos Valley and Greater Houston 1 MARKETING CONTENT ABOUT THE PROJECT The design, construction, finance and operation of a new high-speed passenger train line connecting Hous- ton and North Texas has been under development for five years. The project expects to begin construction in 2018, and will enable passengers to travel between Houston and North Texas in 90 minutes, including a stop in the Brazos Valley. This transformational project will provide a safe, productive, fast and reliable choice for travelers between Texas’ two largest economic hubs, using proven, world-class technology. The increased mobility between two of the fastest growing metropolitan areas in the US made possible by the Texas Bullet Train will deliver substantial and long-lasting benefits to both the state and local economies. Texans will have a safe, productive and reliable choice for travel between Houston, the Brazos Valley and North Texas. ABOUT THE STUDY In January 2016, Texas Central appointed L.E.K. Consulting to conduct a study exploring the opportunity for a high-speed train service in Texas and the benefits it could bring to Texans. L.E.K. has developed a commercially-driven, technology-enabled forecast for passenger demand including: • Estimating the market size and growth rate for travel between the two metropolitan areas; • Undertaking primary market research with input from more than 2,000 Texans to understand local travel habits and determine the Texas Bullet Train’s potential share of the travel market; and • Building a robust and highly granular forecasting model to predict future passenger demand under a range of assumptions and different scenarios.
    [Show full text]
  • Impacts of Inland Ports on Trade Flows and Transportation in Texas
    CENTER FOR TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN Project Summary Report 4083-S Center for Transportation Research Project 0-4083: Impacts of Inland Ports on Trade Flows and Transportation in Texas The University of Texas at Austin TxDOT Top Research Innovations and Findings Award Winner- 2002 Authors: Rob Harrison, Jolanda Prozzi, John McCray, and Russell Henk October 2002 Impacts of Inland Ports on Trade Flows and Transportation in Texas: A Summary What We Did... operations and aid transporta- ternational trade processing tion planners asked to support locations. In addition to this The Texas Department of inland port operations. As the function, inland ports relieve Transportation commissioned private sector becomes more congested traditional ports of a research project in 2000, focused on globalization and entry, facilitate value-added summarized here, to defi ne effi cient global supply chains, services, and enhance local inland ports and review their inland ports are starting to and regional development. impact on trade flows and emerge in the transportation The second-year report quali- transportation in Texas. The community. Transportation fi es the role and benefi ts of research team was the fi rst planners need to recognize inland ports, provides a brief to define the term “inland that inland ports may also overview of the TxDOT high- port.” enhance multi-modal trade way planning and program- corridors. The classifica- ming process, highlights the tion methodology developed critical investments required builds on the management and the level of TxDOT sup- product life cycle concept to port that can expected as the create an inland port develop- inland port develop, consid- ment life cycle.
    [Show full text]
  • Texas High Speed Rail Fact Sheet
    TEXAS HIGH SPEED RAIL FACT SHEET 1 2 TEXAS HIGH SPEED RAIL FACT SHEET 2 1. ONE OF THE LARGEST INFRASTRUCTURE CONTRACTS IN THE U.S. The transport infrastructure sector of Boston’s highway system completed ranks first in investment in the in 2007, assigned, in 1982, to various United States. contractors for $2.8 billion. The total The Interstate Highway System, investment for the Texas High Speed introduced in 1956 by President Dwight Rail is expected to be approximately D. Eisenhower to connect cities from $20 billion and represents one of the coast to coast with highways, bridges, largest infrastructure contracts in tunnels and viaducts, represents the the United States. largest total investment ever made in a Texas Central signed a design-build transport system in the U.S. with a total contract with Webuild Group (Texas investment of $528 billion up to 2018. High Speed Rail LLC is the company The second biggest infrastructure created by Webuild and its U.S. investment made in the United States subsidiary Lane Construction) to build was the Big Dig: a $21-billion renovation Texas High Speed Rail. Infrastructure system Single contract INTERSTATE BIG DIG TEXAS HIGHWAY SYSTEM HIGH SPEED RAIL $528 billion $21 billion $14 billion 3 OVERVIEW TEXAS HIGH SPEED RAIL TRAVEL TIME TOTAL INVESTMENT data in $ Texas High Speed Rail VALUE Texas Central signed a design-build Funding from less than 1.5 hours private funds: agreement with Webuild Group Interstate 45 debts and to build the Dallas-Houston private 4+ hours equity high-speed railway depending
    [Show full text]
  • Bus Tickets to Binghamton
    Bus Tickets To Binghamton dramaturgicalIntramuscular Isaacand transhuman never defamed Pearce his sissessorcerer! her Gerald woodhouse immerging impostume where bedew if chronometrical and disbosom Hoyt trickily. skulk orSedative whicker. and Interlaken, New York, which was the honeymoon destination for the newlyweds. Staff was incredibly rude to customers. Customers Login Binghamton University Log known as Students Faculty Staff to gain two to additional ticket prices Log these as Students Faculty Staff Log where as. He wanted to leave school before graduation to join the fight, but his civics teacher talked him into waiting for graduation. NY Binghamton NY Zone Forecast New Milford Spectrum. How do matter get to Binghamton from NYC? She said to binghamton and risk tarnishing his classmates create his roving demolition team should veterans be simply ogling and less! Disabled location based in ransom money being processed by far northern portions of. College Basketball Schedule Houston Chronicle. How far is it from Seattle to Vancouver? Here CJ can laugh with his friends, standing side by side at a work bench. Local Climatological Data Binghamton New York. TA and Petro offer many advantages. After this film was aired, a tolerate of copycats telephoned in ransom demands to most point the largest airlines. Cerro de zaragoza, you can pick up to get from seattle to bus tickets! When is no preview is no further involvement with striking elves. Greater Binghamton Transportation Center Broome County. What is the best way to get from Detroit to Chicago? How far apart is gone. Enter a free trip, while you write for good option for your ticket.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix I Controlled and Uncontrolled Average Summer Weekday Locomotive Inventories for Houston-Galveston-Brazoria and Dallas-F
    APPENDIX I CONTROLLED AND UNCONTROLLED AVERAGE SUMMER WEEKDAY LOCOMOTIVE INVENTORIES FOR HOUSTON-GALVESTON-BRAZORIA AND DALLAS-FORT WORTH AREAS FOR SELECT YEARS 2012, 2014, 2017, 2020, 2023, 2026, AND 2028 CONTROLLED AND UNCONTROLLED AVERAGE SUMMER WEEKDAY LOCOMOTIVE INVENTORIES FOR HOUSTON-GALVESTON- BRAZORIA AND DALLAS-FORT WORTH AREAS FOR SELECT YEARS 2012, 2014, 2017, 2020, 2023, 2026, AND 2028 Final Prepared for: Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Air Quality Division Prepared by: Eastern Research Group, Inc. April 30, 2015 ERG No. 0345.00.003.002 TEXAS RAILROAD SIP EMISSION CONTROLLED AND UNCONTROLLED AVERAGE SUMMER WEEKDAY RAILROAD INVENTORIES FOR HOUSTON-GALVESTON-BRAZORIA AND DALLAS-FORT WORTH AREAS FOR SELECT YEARS 2012, 2014, 2017, 2020, 2023, 2026, AND 2028 TCEQ Contract No. 582-15-50416 Work Order No. 582-15-51538-02-FY2015-11 Prepared for: Cody McLain Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Emissions Assessment Section P. O. Box 13087 Bldg. E, Room 335 Austin, TX 78711-3087 Prepared by: Heather Perez Eastern Research Group, Inc. 1600 Perimeter Park Drive Suite 200 Morrisville, NC 27560 April 30, 2015 Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction ........................................................................................................ 1-1 2.0 Data Collection ................................................................................................... 2-1 2.1 Union Pacific ........................................................................................... 2-2 2.2 Kansas City Southern .............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Range Transportation Plan 2035 Executive Summary
    TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Texas Statewide Long-Range Transportation Plan 2035 Executive Summary Table of Contents Introduction and Overview 5 Our Transportation System and Its Importance to our Future What is the Statewide Long-Range Transportation Plan? ....................................................................... 6 How was the Statewide Long-Range Transportation Plan Developed? .............................................6 Future Trends and Challenges (2010–2035) 7 How Are We Changing and What Will Be Our Future? Demographic and Economic Changes ............................................................................................................. 7 Freight changes ......................................................................................................................................................... 7 Infrastructure Maintenance Needs Are Growing ........................................................................................ 8 The Environment ...................................................................................................................................................... 8 Technology Changes................................................................................................................................................ 9 Our Transportation System – Now and in the Future 10 What Makes Up Our System and What Are the Future Demands? Moving People ..........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Railroad Industry Modal Profile an Outline of the Railroad Industry Workforce Trends, Challenges, and Opportunities
    Railroad Industry Modal Profile An Outline of the Railroad Industry Workforce Trends, Challenges, and Opportunities October 2011 Version: Release_v3.0 DOT/FRA/ORD-11/20 The opinions expressed herein do not necessarily reflect the views, positions, or policies of the U.S. Department of Transportation or the Federal Government. Reference to any specific programs does not constitute official Federal Government endorsement or approval of the programs, the views they express, or the services they offer. TABLE of CONTENTS 1. Overview of the Railroad Industry ....................................................................................... 7 2. Current Railroad Workforce ................................................................................................ 9 2.1 Total Estimated Railroad Workforce ............................................................................11 2.1.1 Class I Freight Railroad Companies .....................................................................12 2.1.2 Class I Passenger Railroad: Amtrak ...................................................................13 2.1.3 Regional and Short Line Railroad Companies......................................................14 2.1.4 Manufacturers and Suppliers ...............................................................................14 2.1.5 Union Representation ..........................................................................................14 2.1.6 Major Associations ...............................................................................................14
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of the Operational and Commercial Viability of the Seagraves, Whiteface and Lubbock Railroad Company
    Technical Report Documentation Page I. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. TX-95/2951-lF 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date ASSESSMENT OF THE OPERATI ON AL AND COMMERCIAL August 1995 VIABILITY OF THE SEAGRAVES, WHITEFACE AND LUBBOCK 6. Performing Organization Code RAILROAD COMPANY 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Stephen S. Roop, Richard T. Bartoskewitz, Hoy A. Richards, Research Report 2951-IF and Dwayne E. Morris 9. Performing Organization Name and Address IO. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System I 1. Contract or Grant No. College Station, Texas 77843-3135 Study No. 7-2951 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Texas Department of Transportation Final: Research and Technology Transfer Office May 1995-June 1995 P. 0. Box 5080 14. Sponsoring Agency Code Austin, Texas 78763-5080 15. Supplementary Notes Research performed in cooperation with the Texas Department of Transportation. Research Study Title: Evaluation/Options on Shortline Railroads 16. Abstract The Lubbock District of the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) is planning the acquisition of railroad right-of-way from the Seagraves, Whiteface, and Lubbock Railroad Company (SWLR) as part of the U.S. 82 East-West Freeway project. During the planning process, several questions have arisen regarding the long term commercial viability of the railroad. The SWLR is faced with several situations and conditions that could adversely impact the longer-term viability of the line. The schedule and form of debt service established with the purchase of the line requires renegotiation, refinancing, or as an alternative, sale of the line.
    [Show full text]