DOCSLIB.ORG

Mississippi Projectile Point Guide

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Archaeological Report No. 3 1 Mississippi Projectile Point Guide Samuel o. McGahey Mississippi Department ofArchives and History J ackson, Mississippi Mississippi Department ofArch ives and History Archaeological Report No. 3 1 Patrici a Galloway Series Ed ito r Elbert R. Hilliard Director Cover Illu stration: Sequence of Mississippi projectile points. ISBN : 0-9 38896-86-5 Co pyright © 2000 Revised ed ition 2004 Mississip pi Department of Arc hives and Hi story Table ofContents Acknowledgmen ts IV List of Illustration s V Introd uct ion x Paleoindian Per iod ] Early Paleo indi an Points 3 Clovis 3 Group I 3 Group II 6 Group III 8 Cum berla nd I I Middle Pal eoindian Poin ts 14 Beaver Lake 14 Q ua d 16 Coldwater 18 H inds 22 Arkabutla 25 Late Paleoindi an Points 26 Lanceolate Dal ton 27 Side-Notched Dalto n 3 1 San Patrice 33 San Patrice, val'. St.J ohns 34 San Patrice, val'. Lest River 36 Ge nei ll (Provisional) 38 Archaic Period 4 1 Early Archa ic Period 4 1 Gree nbrier 42 Cache River '15 Big Sand)' 50 Stilwell 53 Jude 56 Cave Springs 58 Decatu r 6 1 Becker (Provisio na l) 66 ii Archaeological Rep ort No. 3 I, 2000 Early Archaic Period (co n t.) St. Charles 68 Hardin 71 Scottsbluff 76 Bolen 78 Pine Tree 80 Bifurcate Tradition 85 Middle Archaic Peri od 87 Beachum 88 Cypress Creek 90 Eva 93 Morrow Mountain 97 White Springs 99 Sykes 101 Vaughn 106 Benton 108 Benton Ceremo nial Cac he T ypes II 1 Oversized Benton Points III TurkeyTail 11 3 Double Notch T ur key Tail 11 5 Double Notch Squa re Base 11 7 Oversized Cac he Blad es 117 Furr (Provisional) 117 St. Helena 121 St. Tamman y 124 Denton 128 Opossum Bayou 132 Late Archaic-Poverty Point-GulfFormat ion al 136 Mcintire 138 Pickwick 139 Ledbetter 141 Ga ry 144 Tangipah oa (Prov isiona l) 148 Little Bear Creek 152 Late Archaic Barbed (Provisional) 155 Val". Rounded Base 156 var. Straight Base 158 Co taco Creek 161 Kent 163 Flint Cree k-Pontchartrai n 165 Mud Creek 171 Sm ith sonia 173 Mississippi Proj ectile Point Guide iii Late Archa ic-Pove rty Point-GulfForma tiona l (con t.) Wade 174 Motl ey 176 Epps 178 Delhi 180 Macon 182 Wolf La ke (Provi sional) 184 Woodland Period 187 Woodland Period Dart or Spear Points 187 Baker's Creek 187 Wilson (Provisiona l) 190 Gary, var, Mayhan 192 Edwards Stemmed 194 T om bigbee Stemmed 196 Late Woodland-Mississippian Period Arrow Points 198 Colli ns 198 Mad ison 200 Scallorn 202 Bayogoula Fish tailed 204 No dena 206 Glossary 209 References Cited 211 Map Id entifying Mississippi Cou nties 219 Acknowledgments The data recorded in the process of producing this publication has come from a variety of sources, including primarily the private collections of individuals. The owners of private collections who have cooperated in the project are too numerous to list, and although some have contributed more than others, I do not think it appropriate to single any of them out for praise. If it were not for these people, the guide would not have been done. so it is to this group that lowe the most gratitude. Most of the projectile points that have been collected are in their possession. While the collecting procedures and standards of most amateur archaeologists or collectors do not meet the standards of the professional archaeological community, they have collected because ofa curiosity about the past which is shared with professionals, and this common concern is what brings us together. I have spent countless hours in the company ofnon-professionals and have almost invariably been met with hospitality and an eagerness to help by sharing information with me. I would also like to express my gratitude to the institutions that have assisted in this project by making collections available. Especially noteworthy in this category are the University of Mississippi, Mississippi State University, the Cottonlandia Museum in Greenwood, Mississippi, and the Mississippi Department ofArchives and History. Last but not least of those supporting this work have been my professional colleagues who are current or former staff members of the Mississippi Department ofArchives and History: Sam Brookes, John Connaway, Joe Giliberti, Keith Baca, and Doug Sims, who, collectively, have contributed greatly to both the accumulation of data and to the editing of the manuscript. - Samuel O. McGahey List of Illustrations Figures 1 Clovis Gro u p I Points. 4 2 Clovis Group I Points. 5 3 Known Distribution of Clovis Group I Points. 6 4 Clovis Group II Points. 7 5 Known Distribution of Clovis Group II Points (Redstone). 8 6 Clovis Group III Points. 9 7 Clov is Group III Points. 10 8 Kn own Distribution of Clovis Group III Points. 11 9 Cu mberland Points. 12 10 Cu mberland Points. 13 11 Kn own Distribution of Cum be rland Points. 14 12 Beaver Lak e Points. 15 13 Known Distribution of Beaver Lak e Points. 16 14 Qua d Points. 17 15 Known Dist ribu tion of Quad Points. 18 16 Co ldwater Poi nts. 19 17 Co ldwa ter Poin ts. 20 18 Known Distribu tion ofCo ldwa ter Poi n ts. 2 1 19 H inds Points. 22 20 H inds Points. 23 2 1 Kn own Distribution of Hinds Points. 24 22 Ar ka butla Po ints. 25 23 Known Distribu tion of Ar kabutla Points. 26 24 La nceolate Dalton Points. 28 25 Lan ceolate Dal ton Points. 29 26 Lanceolate Dalt on Points. 30 27 Known Distribution of Lan ceolate Dalton Points. 3 1 28 Side-notched Dalton Points. 32 29 Side-notche d Dalt on Points. 33 30 Know n Distribution of Side-no tched Dalton Points. 34 31 San Patrice, var, St. Johns Points. 35 32 Kn own Distrib ution ofSan Patrice, var , St. Lohns Points. 36 33 San Patrice, var, LeafRi ver Points. 37 34 Known Distribu tion of San Patrice var. Lea f River Poin ts. 38 35 Ge neill Poi n ts. 39 36 Known Distribution of Geneill Points. 40 vi Archaeological Report No . 31, 2000 Figures, continued 37 Greenbrier Points. 43 38 Green brie r Points. 44 39 Known Distribution of Greenbrier Points. 45 40 Cac he River Points. 46 41 Cac he River Points. 47 42 Cache River Points. 48 43 Known Distribution of Cac he River Points. 49 44 Big Sandy Points. 50 45 Big Sandy Points . 51 46 Known Distribution of Big Sandy Points. 52 47 Stilwell Points . 54 48 Sti lwell Points. 55 49 Known Distribution ofStilwell Points. 56 50 Jude Points. 57 5 1 Known Distribution ofJude Point s. 58 52 Cave Spring Points. 59 53 Cave Spring Points. 60 54 Known Distribution of Cave Spring Points. 6 1 55 Decatur Points. 62 56 Decatur Points. 63 57 Decatur Points. 64 58 Known Distribution of Decatur Points. 65 59 Becker Points. 66 60 Becker Points. 67 6 1 Known Distribution of Becker Points. 68 62 St . Charles Points. 69 63 St. Cha rles Points. 70 64 Kno wn Distribution of St. Charles Points. 7 1 65 Hard in Points. 72 66 H ard in Points. 73 67 Hard in Points. 74 68 Hardin Points. 75 69 Known Distribution of Hardin Points. 76 70 Scottsbluff Points. 77 7 1 Known Distribution of Scottsbluff Points. 78 72 Bolen Points. 79 73 Known Distribution of Bolen Points. 80 74 Pine Tree Poin ts. 8 1 75 Pine Tree Points. 82 76 Pine Tree Point s. 83 77 Known Distribution of Pin e Tree Points. 84 78 Bifurcate Tradition Points. 86 79 Known Distribution of Bifurcate Tradition Points. 87 Mississippi Projectile Point Guide Vll Figures, continued 80 Beachum Points. 89 81 Known distribution of Beachu m Points. 89 82 Cypress Creek Points. 91 83 Cypress Creek Points. 92 84 Cypress Creek Points. 93 85 Known Disribution of Cypress Creek Points. 93 86 Eva Points. 94 87 Known Distribution of Eva Point s. 95 88 Morr ow Mountain Points. 96 89 Known Distribution of Morrow Mountain Points. 97 90 Wh ite Springs Poin ts. 98 91 Known Distribution ofWhite Springs Points. 99 92 Sykes Points from 22-Mo-876 . 100 93 Sykes Points fro m 22-Mo-876. 101 94 Sykes Points from 22-Cb-623. 102 95 Sykes Points from 22-C b-623 . 103 96 Sykes Points fro m 22-Cb-623. 104 97 Known Distribution ofSykes Points. 105 98 Vau ghn Points. 106 99 Known Distribution of Vaughn Points. 107 100 Benton Points. 108 101 Benton Points. 109 102 Known Distribution of Benton Points. 110 103 Oversize Benton Points. 112 104 Known Distribution of Benton Cache T ypes. 11 3 105 TurkeyTail Points. 114 106 Double Notch Turkey Tail Points. 115 107 Dou ble Notch Squa re Base Points. 116 108 Oversize Cache Blad es. 118 109 Furr Points. 119 110 Known Distribution ofFurr Points. 120 III St. Helena Points. 122 112 St. Helena Points. 123 113 Known Distribution ofSt. Helen a Points. 124 114 St. T ammany Points. 125 115 St. T ammany Points. 126 116 St. Tammany Points. 127 117 Known Distributi on of St. T amman y Points. 128 118 Den ton Points. 129 119 Denton Points. 130 120 Den ton Points. 131 121 Known Distribution of Denton Points. 132 122 O possum Bayou Points. 134 viii Archaeological Report No. 3 1,2000 Figures, continu ed 123 Opossum Bayou Points. 135 124 Known Distributi on of Opossum Bayou Points. 136 125 Mclntire Points.
Recommended publications
  • Self-Injury & Suicide: Reducing the Risk

    Self-Injury & Suicide: Reducing the Risk

    SELF-INJURY & SUICIDE: REDUCING THE RISK GUEST: SALLY FOOTE, DVM [00:00:00] Colleen Pelar: Hi, welcome back to UNLEASHED (at work & home). My guest today is Dr. Sally Foote of Okaw Vet Clinic in Illinois, and I asked her to talk to me today a little bit about self-injuring behavior because that's a big problem and it's something that we do sometimes when we are attempting to cope with problems and it's not usually helpful. So welcome, Dr. Foote. I'm so glad you're here today. Sally Foote, DVM: Thank you. If you hear a few background noises, that's because of my veterinary practice. I holed myself off in the exam room, but you may hear voices in the hall and just to let you know. Colleen Pelar: It's all about real life here. Things happen. We typically start with animals and then we move toward people. So we do see self-injuring behavior in animals sometimes. Can you tell me a little bit about that? When does that occur? Sally Foote, DVM: Well, I think um the most common thing many veterinarians, veterinary staff, even probably, you know pet owners that have had [00:01:00] some uh, whatever little more educated or experience with pets, we can think of, say, the dog who chronically licks their front paw chronically, maybe if their paws or at a spot on the back of their foot, and this is called an acral lick granuloma. That's the technical medical term and oftentimes what gets them to start licking is some kind of like stress, some kind of anxiety trigger, and it becomes chronic and it actually is partly a compulsive behavior.
  • The Little Clovis Point That Wasn't

    The Little Clovis Point That Wasn't

    The Little Clovis Point that Wasn’t Leo Pettipas Manitoba Archaeological Society The projectile point illustrated in Figure 1 was surface-found at FaMi-10 in the Upper Swan River valley of Manitoba (Fig. 2) in the 1960s. It is made of Swan River Chert, is edge-ground, triangular in outline, and seems to be “fluted” on one face. To all appearances it looks like an Early Indigenous (“Palaeo-Indian”) Clovis point, except for one thing – it’s very small: it’s less than 4.0 cm long, whereas “full-grown” Clovis points when newly made can reach as much as 10.0 cm in length. Archaeologist Eugene Gryba has cautiously classified it as a McKean point, and in size and shape it is indeed McKean- like. However, the bilateral grinding it displays isn’t a standard McKean trait, so I have chosen to orient this presentation around the Clovis point type. Fig. 1. (left)The miniscule point from FaMi-10. Drawing by the present writer. Fig. 2. (Right) Location of the Swan River valley in regional context (Manitoba Department of Agriculture). Actually, bona fide diminutive Clovis points are not unprecedented; several good examples (Fig. 3) were archaeologically excavated in company with typical Clovis points at the Lehner Mammoth site in Arizona. The centre specimen in Figure 3 is 3.6 cm long, slightly less than the corresponding measurement taken from the Swan River artefact. So 1 | P a g e The Little Clovis Point that Wasn’t Leo Pettipas while miniature Clovis points are rare, they’re not unheard of and so the occurrence of one from the Second Prairie Level of Manitoba shouldn’t be problematic at first blush.
  • Late Mississippian Ceramic Production on St

    Late Mississippian Ceramic Production on St

    LATE MISSISSIPPIAN CERAMIC PRODUCTION ON ST. CATHERINES ISLAND, GEORGIA Anna M. Semon A dissertation submitted to the faculty at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Anthropology. Chapel Hill 2019 Approved by: Vincas P. Steponaitis C. Margaret Scarry R. P. Stephen Davis Anna Agbe-Davis John Scarry © 2019 Anna M. Semon ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii ABSTRACT Anna M. Semon: Late Mississippian Ceramic Production on St. Catherines Island, Georgia (Under the direction of Vincas P. Steponaitis) This dissertation examines Late Mississippian pottery manufacturing on St. Catherines Island, Georgia. Data collected from five ceramic assemblages, three village and two mortuary sites, were used to characterize each ceramic assemblage and examine small-scale ceramic variations associated with learning and making pottery, which reflect pottery communities of practice. In addition, I examined pottery decorations to investigate social interactions at community and household levels. This dissertation is organized in six chapters. Chapter 1 provides the background, theoretical framework, and objectives of this research. Chapter 2 describes coastal Georgia’s culture history, with focus on the Mississippian period. Chapters 3 and 4 present the methods and results of this study. I use both ceramic typology and attribute analyses to explore ceramic variation. Chapter 3 provides details about the ceramic typology for each site. In addition, I examine the Mississippian surface treatments for each assemblage and identified ceramic changes between middle Irene (A.D. 1350–1450), late Irene (A.D. 1450–1580), and early Mission (A.D. 1580–1600) period.
  • I. a Consideration of Tine and Labor Expenditurein the Constrijction Process at the Teotihuacan Pyramid of the Sun and the Pover

    I. a Consideration of Tine and Labor Expenditurein the Constrijction Process at the Teotihuacan Pyramid of the Sun and the Pover

    I. A CONSIDERATION OF TINE AND LABOR EXPENDITURE IN THE CONSTRIJCTION PROCESS AT THE TEOTIHUACAN PYRAMID OF THE SUN AND THE POVERTY POINT MOUND Stephen Aaberg and Jay Bonsignore 40 II. A CONSIDERATION OF TIME AND LABOR EXPENDITURE IN THE CONSTRUCTION PROCESS AT THE TEOTIHUACAN PYRAMID OF THE SUN AND THE POVERTY POINT 14)UND Stephen Aaberg and Jay Bonsignore INTRODUCT ION In considering the subject of prehistoric earthmoving and the construction of monuments associated with it, there are many variables for which some sort of control must be achieved before any feasible demographic features related to the labor involved in such construction can be derived. Many of the variables that must be considered can be given support only through certain fundamental assumptions based upon observations of related extant phenomena. Many of these observations are contained in the ethnographic record of aboriginal cultures of the world whose activities and subsistence patterns are more closely related to the prehistoric cultures of a particular area. In other instances, support can be gathered from observations of current manual labor related to earth moving since the prehistoric constructions were accomplished manually by a human labor force. The material herein will present alternative ways of arriving at the represented phenomena. What is inherently important in considering these data is the element of cultural organization involved in such activities. One need only look at sites such as the Valley of the Kings and the great pyramids of Egypt, Teotihuacan, La Venta and Chichen Itza in Mexico, the Cahokia mound group in Illinois, and other such sites to realize that considerable time, effort and organization were required.
  • Middle and Late Archaic Mortuary Patterning: an Example from the Western Tennessee Valley

    Middle and Late Archaic Mortuary Patterning: an Example from the Western Tennessee Valley

    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Masters Theses Graduate School 8-1977 Middle and Late Archaic Mortuary Patterning: An Example from the Western Tennessee Valley Ann L. Magennis University of Tennessee - Knoxville Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes Part of the Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Magennis, Ann L., "Middle and Late Archaic Mortuary Patterning: An Example from the Western Tennessee Valley. " Master's Thesis, University of Tennessee, 1977. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/1340 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Ann L. Magennis entitled "Middle and Late Archaic Mortuary Patterning: An Example from the Western Tennessee Valley." I have examined the final electronic copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Master of Arts, with a major in Anthropology. Fred H. Smith, Major Professor We have read this thesis and recommend its acceptance: William M. Bass, Richard L. Jantz, Charles H. Faulkner Accepted for the Council: Carolyn R. Hodges Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official studentecor r ds.) To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Ann L.
  • Coronado National Memorial Historical Research Project Research Topics Written by Joseph P. Sánchez, Ph.D. John Howard White

    Coronado National Memorial Historical Research Project Research Topics Written by Joseph P. Sánchez, Ph.D. John Howard White

    Coronado National Memorial Historical Research Project Research Topics Written by Joseph P. Sánchez, Ph.D. John Howard White, Ph.D. Edited by Angélica Sánchez-Clark, Ph.D. With the assistance of Hector Contreras, David Gómez and Feliza Monta University of New Mexico Graduate Students Spanish Colonial Research Center A Partnership between the University of New Mexico and the National Park Service [Version Date: May 20, 2014] 1 Coronado National Memorial Coronado Expedition Research Topics 1) Research the lasting effects of the expedition in regard to exchanges of cultures, Native American and Spanish. Was the shaping of the American Southwest a direct result of the Coronado Expedition's meetings with natives? The answer to this question is embedded throughout the other topics. However, by 1575, the Spanish Crown declared that the conquest was over and the new policy of pacification would be in force. Still, the next phase that would shape the American Southwest involved settlement, missionization, and expansion for valuable resources such as iron, tin, copper, tar, salt, lumber, etc. Francisco Vázquez de Coronado’s expedition did set the Native American wariness toward the Spanish occupation of areas close to them. Rebellions were the corrective to their displeasure over colonial injustices and institutions as well as the mission system that threatened their beliefs and spiritualism. In the end, a kind of syncretism and symbiosis resulted. Today, given that the Spanish colonial system recognized that the Pueblos and mission Indians had a legal status, land grants issued during that period protects their lands against the new settlement pattern that followed: that of the Anglo-American.
  • Salinas Pueblo Missions National Monument Geologic Resource

    Salinas Pueblo Missions National Monument Geologic Resource

    Geologic Resource Evaluation Scoping Summary Salinas Pueblo Missions National Monument, New Mexico This summary highlights a geologic resource evaluation scoping session for Salinas Pueblo Missions National Monument held in Albuquerque, New Mexico, on March 29, 2006. The NPS Geologic Resources Division (GRD) organized this scoping session in order to discuss geologic resources, address the status of geologic maps and digitizing, and assess resource management issues and needs. Participants at the meeting included GRD staff, staff from Salinas Pueblo Missions and Petroglyph National Monuments, and cooperators from the US Geological Survey, New Mexico Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources, and Colorado State University (table 1). Table 1. Scoping Session Participants Name Affiliation Phone E-Mail Tim Connors NPS Geologic Resources 303-969-2093 [email protected] Division (geologist) Bruce Heise NPS Geologic Resources 303-969-2017 [email protected] Division (geologist) Katie KellerLynn Colorado State University 801-364-1716 [email protected] (geologist/research associate) Ron Kerbo NPS Geologic Resources 303-969-2097 [email protected] Division (cave specialist) Marc LeFrançois Salinas Pueblo Missions National 505-847-2585, ext. 31 [email protected] Monument (exhibit specialist) Mike Medrano Petroglyph National Monument 505-899-0205, ext. 334 [email protected] (natural resource specialist) Michael Quijano Petroglyph National Monument 505-899-0205, ext. 233 [email protected] (chief ranger) Tobin Roop Salinas Pueblo Missions National 505-847-2585, ext. 38 [email protected] Monument (archaeologist) Ren Thompson US Geological Survey (geologist) 303-236-0929 [email protected] Mike Timmons New Mexico Bureau of Geology 505-835-5237 [email protected] and Mineral Resources (geologist) Andrew Waggener Salinas Pueblo Missions National 505-847-2585, ext.
  • Paleoindian Mobility Ranges Predicted by the Distribution of Projectile Points Made of Upper Mercer and Flint Ridge Flint

    Paleoindian Mobility Ranges Predicted by the Distribution of Projectile Points Made of Upper Mercer and Flint Ridge Flint

    Paleoindian Mobility Ranges Predicted by the Distribution of Projectile Points Made of Upper Mercer and Flint Ridge Flint A thesis submitted to Kent State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Masters of Arts by Amanda Nicole Mullett December, 2009 Thesis written by Amanda Nicole Mullett B.A. Western State College, 2007 M.A. Kent State University, 2009 Approved by _____________________________, Advisor Dr. Mark F. Seeman _____________________________, Chair, Department of Anthropology Dr. Richard Meindl _____________________________, Dean, College of Arts and Sciences Dr. Timothy Moerland ii TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Figures ............................................................................................................................ v List of Tables ........................................................................................................................... v List of Appendices .................................................................................................................... iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ........................................................................................................... vi Chapter I. Introduction ..................................................................................................................1 II. Background ...................................................................................................................5 The Environment.............................................................................................................5
  • Tennessee Archaeology Is Published Semi-Annually in Electronic Print Format by the Tennessee Council for Professional Archaeology

    Tennessee Archaeology Is Published Semi-Annually in Electronic Print Format by the Tennessee Council for Professional Archaeology

    TTEENNNNEESSSSEEEE AARRCCHHAAEEOOLLOOGGYY Volume 3 Spring 2008 Number 1 EDITORIAL COORDINATORS Michael C. Moore TTEENNNNEESSSSEEEE AARRCCHHAAEEOOLLOOGGYY Tennessee Division of Archaeology Kevin E. Smith Middle Tennessee State University VOLUME 3 Spring 2008 NUMBER 1 EDITORIAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE David Anderson 1 EDITORS CORNER University of Tennessee ARTICLES Patrick Cummins Alliance for Native American Indian Rights 3 Evidence for Early Mississippian Settlement Aaron Deter-Wolf of the Nashville Basin: Archaeological Division of Archaeology Explorations at the Spencer Site (40DV191) W. STEVEN SPEARS, MICHAEL C. MOORE, AND Jay Franklin KEVIN E. SMITH East Tennessee State University RESEARCH REPORTS Phillip Hodge Department of Transportation 25 A Surface Collection from the Kirk Point Site Zada Law (40HS174), Humphreys County, Tennessee Ashland City, Tennessee CHARLES H. MCNUTT, JOHN B. BROSTER, AND MARK R. NORTON Larry McKee TRC, Inc. 77 Two Mississippian Burial Clusters at Katherine Mickelson Travellers’ Rest, Davidson County, Rhodes College Tennessee DANIEL SUMNER ALLEN IV Sarah Sherwood University of Tennessee 87 Luminescence Dates and Woodland Ceramics from Rock Shelters on the Upper Lynne Sullivan Frank H. McClung Museum Cumberland Plateau of Tennessee JAY D. FRANKLIN Guy Weaver Weaver and Associates LLC Tennessee Archaeology is published semi-annually in electronic print format by the Tennessee Council for Professional Archaeology. Correspondence about manuscripts for the journal should be addressed to Michael C. Moore, Tennessee Division of Archaeology, Cole Building #3, 1216 Foster Avenue, Nashville TN 37243. The Tennessee Council for Professional Archaeology disclaims responsibility for statements, whether fact or of opinion, made by contributors. On the Cover: Human effigy bowl from Travellers’ Rest, Courtesy, Aaron Deter-Wolf EDITORS CORNER Welcome to the fifth issue of Tennessee Archaeology.
  • A Historical Ecological Analysis of Paleoindian and Archaic Subsistence and Landscape Use in Central Tennessee

    A Historical Ecological Analysis of Paleoindian and Archaic Subsistence and Landscape Use in Central Tennessee

    From Colonization to Domestication: A Historical Ecological Analysis of Paleoindian and Archaic Subsistence and Landscape Use in Central Tennessee Item Type text; Electronic Dissertation Authors Miller, Darcy Shane Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 28/09/2021 09:33:21 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/320030 From Colonization to Domestication: A Historical Ecological Analysis of Paleoindian and Archaic Subsistence and Landscape Use in Central Tennessee by Darcy Shane Miller __________________________ Copyright © Darcy Shane Miller 2014 A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the SCHOOL OF ANTHROPOLOGY In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 2014 2 THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA GRADUATE COLLEGE As members of the Dissertation Committee, we certify that we have read the dissertation prepared by Darcy Shane Miller, titled From Colonization to Domestication: A Historical Ecological Analysis of Paleoindian and Archaic Subsistence and Landscape Use in Central Tennessee and recommend that it be accepted as fulfilling the dissertation requirement for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy. _______________________________________________________________________ Date: (4/29/14) Vance T. Holliday _______________________________________________________________________ Date: (4/29/14) Steven L. Kuhn _______________________________________________________________________ Date: (4/29/14) Mary C. Stiner _______________________________________________________________________ Date: (4/29/14) David G. Anderson Final approval and acceptance of this dissertation is contingent upon the candidate’s submission of the final copies of the dissertation to the Graduate College.
  • Ohio Archaeologist Volume 43 No

    Ohio Archaeologist Volume 43 No

    OHIO ARCHAEOLOGIST VOLUME 43 NO. 2 SPRING 1993 Published by THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF OHIO The Archaeological Society of Ohio MEMBERSHIP AND DUES Annual dues to the Archaeological Society of Ohio are payable on the first TERM of January as follows: Regular membership $17.50; husband and wife EXPIRES A.S.O. OFFICERS (one copy of publication) $18.50; Life membership $300.00. Subscription to the Ohio Archaeologist, published quarterly, is included in the member­ 1994 President Larry L. Morris, 901 Evening Star Avenue SE, East ship dues. The Archaeological Society of Ohio is an incorporated non­ Canton, OH 44730, (216) 488-1640 profit organization. 1994 Vice President Stephen J. Parker, 1859 Frank Drive, Lancaster, OH 43130, (614)653-6642 BACK ISSUES 1994 Exec. Sect. Donald A. Casto, 138 Ann Court, Lancaster, OH Publications and back issues of the Ohio Archaeologist: Ohio Flint Types, by Robert N. Converse $10.00 add $1.50 P-H 43130,(614)653-9477 Ohio Stone Tools, by Robert N. Converse $ 8.00 add $1.50 P-H 1994 Recording Sect. Nancy E. Morris, 901 Evening Star Avenue Ohio Slate Types, by Robert N. Converse $15.00 add $1.50 P-H SE. East Canton, OH 44730, (216) 488-1640 The Glacial Kame Indians, by Robert N. Converse .$20.00 add $1.50 P-H 1994 Treasurer Don F. Potter, 1391 Hootman Drive, Reynoldsburg, 1980's & 1990's $ 6.00 add $1.50 P-H OH 43068, (614)861-0673 1970's $ 8.00 add $1.50 P-H 1998 Editor Robert N. Converse, 199 Converse Dr., Plain City, OH 1960's $10.00 add $1.50 P-H 43064,(614)873-5471 Back issues of the Ohio Archaeologist printed prior to 1964 are gener­ ally out of print but copies are available from time to time.
  • Indiana Archaeology

    Indiana Archaeology

    INDIANA ARCHAEOLOGY Volume 6 Number 1 2011 Indiana Department of Natural Resources Division of Historic Preservation and Archaeology (DHPA) ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Indiana Department of Natural Resources Robert E. Carter, Jr., Director and State Historic Preservation Officer Division of Historic Preservation and Archaeology (DHPA) James A. Glass, Ph.D., Director and Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer DHPA Archaeology Staff James R. Jones III, Ph.D., State Archaeologist Amy L. Johnson, Senior Archaeologist and Archaeology Outreach Coordinator Cathy L. Draeger-Williams, Archaeologist Wade T. Tharp, Archaeologist Rachel A. Sharkey, Records Check Coordinator Editors James R. Jones III, Ph.D. Amy L. Johnson Cathy A. Carson Editorial Assistance: Cathy Draeger-Williams Publication Layout: Amy L. Johnson Additional acknowledgments: The editors wish to thank the authors of the submitted articles, as well as all of those who participated in, and contributed to, the archaeological projects which are highlighted. The U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service is gratefully acknow- ledged for their support of Indiana archaeological research as well as this volume. Cover design: The images which are featured on the cover are from several of the individual articles included in this journal. This publication has been funded in part by a grant from the U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service‘s Historic Preservation Fund administered by the Indiana Department of Natural Resources, Division of Historic Preservation and Archaeology. In addition, the projects discussed in several of the articles received federal financial assistance from the Historic Preservation Fund Program for the identification, protection, and/or rehabilitation of historic properties and cultural resources in the State of Indiana.