DOCSLIB.ORG

Inside... a Roundtable Discussion of J.C.A

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Inside... a Roundtable Discussion of J.C.A assp rt The Newsletter of the Society for Historians of American Foreign Relations P Volume 40, Issue 3, January 2010 Inside... A Roundtable Discussion of J.C.A. Stagg’s Borderlines in Borderlands­­­­ An Overview of the Peace History Society Teaching Humanitarian Intervention in the Classroom Taking American History Overseas ..and much more! Passport The Newsletter of the Society for Historians of American Foreign Relations Editorial Office: Mershon Center for International Security Studies 1501 Neil Avenue Columbus OH 43201 [email protected] 614-292-1681 (phone) 614-292-2407 (fax) Executive Director Peter L. Hahn, The Ohio State University Editor Mitchell Lerner, The Ohio State University-Newark Production Editor Julie Rojewski, Michigan State University Editorial Assistant Matt Yates, The Ohio State University Cover Photo “Portrait of James Madison by James Vanderlyn.” Courtesy of The Montpelier Foundation. Editorial Advisory Board and Terms of Appointment: W. Taylor Fain, University of North Carolina—Wilmington (2008-2010) Elizabeth Kelly Gray, Towson University (2009-2011) Robert Brigham, Vassar College (2010-2012) Passport is published three times per year (April, September, January), by the Society for Historians of American Foreign Relations, and is distributed to all members of the Society. Submissions should be sent to the attention of the editor, and are acceptable in all formats, although electronic copy by email to [email protected] is preferred. Submis- sions should follow the guidelines articulated in the Chicago Manual of Style. Manuscripts accepted for publication will be edited to conform to Passport style, space limitations, and other requirements. The author is responsible for accuracy and for obtaining all permissions necessary for publication. Manuscripts will not be returned. Interested advertisers can find relevant information on the web at: http://www.shafr.org/newsletter/passportrates.htm, or can contact the editor. The opinions expressed in Passport do not necessarily reflect the opinions of SHAFR or of The Ohio State University. The editors of Passport wish to acknowledge the generous support of The Ohio State University, The Ohio State University—Newark, and the Mershon Center for International Security Studies. © 2010 SHAFR Page 2 Passport January 2010 Passport The Newsletter of the Society for Historians of American Foreign Relations Volume 40, Number 3, January 2010 In This Issue 4 Thoughts From SHAFR President Andrew Rotter 5 A Roundtable Discussion of J.C.A. Stagg’s Borderlines in Borderlands: James Madison and the Spanish-American Frontier, 1776-1821 J.M. Opal, David Dzurec, Brian DeLay, and J.C.A. Stagg 14 Taking History Overseas Douglas Karsner, Ron Eisenman, and David Koistinen 25 A Classroom Simulation on Humanitarian Intervention Philip Nash 28 The Background and Activities of the Peace History Society Lawrence S. Wittner 34 Frances Bolton and Africa: 1955-58 Andy DeRoche 38 The Diplomatic Pouch 59 In Memoriam: Saki R. Dockrill 60 In Memoriam: Eduard M. Mark 61 In Memoriam: Ernest R. May Passport January 2010 Page 3 Thoughts From SHAFR President Andrew Rotter am honored to serve as president order to prevent them. We offer space to of SHAFR, and I am happy to witnesses of violence, recording and thus report that the organization is honoring their testimony. We expose to the in Igood shape. Despite losses to our light of day the perpetrators of violence, endowment—a phrase that every the reckless makers of war, the genocidal administrator of everything has uttered regimes and the agents of quotidian sometime in the past year—we remain cruelties that must never be allowed in a strong position financially, able to to seem ordinary. “How can you read fund our prizes and travel and research that stuff?” asks my wife. Peering over fellowships for members, support another my copy of Stuart Miller’s “Benevolent summer institute, and shoulder the costs Assimilation,” John Dower’s War without associated with our own conference and Mercy, or Samantha Power’s “A Problem our activities at the AHA and OAH. We from Hell,” I answer, “Someone has to.” continue to get out the word on these As I read and teach these and other, and other initiatives, to internationalize similar books, and as I reflect on the and diversify our membership and material I use in my writing, I try to our scholarship, to reach out to other adhere to a few simple rules concerning organizations in and outside the my awkward relationship to violence. discipline, and to find sustenance in the work we share, First, I keep in mind what many have written: that especially the essays published in Diplomatic History and violence, especially mass violence, cannot be grasped nor the papers presented at the SHAFR meeting each June. morally dispensed with using mere words. “It is stronger For all this I thank my predecessors (Richard Immerman, than me,” wrote the French historian Alain Forest on his Tom Schwartz, and Frank Costigliola), SHAFR meeting visit to Cambodia’s dreadful Tuol Sleng prison in 1982, program chairs (last year Paul Kramer, now Anne Foster “and there’s no chance of thinking or writing about it. and Naoko Shibusawa), DH editors Bob Schulzinger I pull my head instinctively down into my shoulders.” and Tom Zeiler, and Executive Director Peter Hahn, who (Forest, with Françoise Corrèze, would write about it, as makes it all work. so many with pulled down heads have needed to do.) Although past presidential columns in Passport have Second, I try not to succumb to the banality or mystique explored issues to be taken up, problems to be faced, and of violence. I allow violence its irony and dark humor, the workings of the organization itself, I would like to but I remind myself often that the frequency with which discuss something else altogether, something prompted by people inflict violence on others does not make it ordinary, encounters with colleagues and current events. Asked by normal, or acceptable. Finally, I work to prevent myself new acquaintances what I teach and write about, I often and my students from becoming inured to violence. I find myself saying that I do war and violence, broadly check in with students in the Vietnam War and atomic defined—the sorry results of diplomatic failure. I teach bomb courses to make sure they are not turning numb to a two-semester survey of U.S. foreign relations, with the what they are reading and seeing, although in some cases inevitable lowlights of Indian removal, war with Mexico, I am too late; a lifetime of playing video games can make war with Spain and the Philippines, war in Europe and a person pretty cold. And if I find myself unmoved by Asia and messy interventions in Latin America. I teach a accounts of violence, I stop reading or writing or watching course on the Vietnam War; I have done seminars on the and try to reconnect to my human, reasonably decent self. Cold War, the atomic bomb, and the morality of war; and Or I go back to the safer space of cultural foreign relations my U.S. history survey, which offers welcome relief with history, where the stakes are high but seldom a matter of units on social and cultural history, nevertheless (and life and death. necessarily) cannot leave war alone. I have written about Forgive me this grim little meditation. And by way of Vietnam and the bomb. I am, in other words, a chaser of lightening the mood, let me invite all of you to write me history’s ambulances. I suspect many of you are too. about SHAFR issues, anything at all. Are you happy with This answer, which causes many of my questioners to the direction of the organization? Do you have issues with shrink back in confusion and horror, sounds harsher than it? What might we do better, or more often? I look forward I would like. I did not enter the field in search of violence, to hearing from you; my email is [email protected]. although I was interested in figuring out the origins of the Vietnam War. Violence, including structural violence, Andrew Rotter is SHAFR President and Charles A. Dana terror, the threat of violence, theories of violence, and so Professor of History at Colgate University. on, came with that territory. I have accepted that. I also feel a responsibility not to glorify or fetishize violence; I wish to understand without forgiving. There is, of course, a politics to this: we try to explain outbreaks of violence in Page 4 Passport January 2010 A Roundtable Discussion of J.C.A. Stagg’s Borderlines in Borderlands: James Madison and the Spanish-American Frontier, 1776- 1821 J.M. Opal, David Dzurec, Brian DeLay, and J.C.A. Stagg Review of J.C.A. Stagg, forces. As the president does, so does of the republic. What, exactly, did Borderlines in Borderlands: James the nation.1 Madison intend to accomplish by Madison and the Spanish-American If this facet of executive authority sending special agents to West Frontier, 1776-1821 haunts those constitutional scholars Florida, East Florida, and Texas who believe in constitutional after word arrived that the Spanish J.M. Opal government, the inverse proposition monarchy had fled the French bedevils historians of American invasion of Iberia in 1809-10? How hat is done by the royal foreign relations: as the nation has did he understand America’s claim authority, with regard to behaved, so too has the president as spelled out in the retrocession of foreign powers,” William behaved. Such is the implicit Louisiana? Did he order, authorize, WBlackstone explained in his judgment of a formidable body of or condone the various filibusters authoritative opus, Commentaries historical literature and mythology. and armed rebellions that challenged on the Laws of England, “is the act of Robert Kagan’s new Dangerous Nation, Spanish rule in North America from the whole nation.” In the person or which Stagg challenges in a sharp 1810 to 1813? Stagg offers something institution of His Majesty, “as in a endnote, offers a recent example.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The American Experience with Diplomacy and Military Restraint I
    PART I: THE AmERICAN EXPERIENCE WITH DIPLOMACY AND MILITARY RESTRAINT i. Orphaned Diplomats: The American Struggle to Match Diplomacy with Power Jeremi Suri E. Gordon Fox Professor of History and Director, European Union Center of Excellence, University of Wisconsin, Madison Benjamin Franklin spent the American Revolution in Paris. He had helped to draft the Declaration of Independence in the summer of 1776, one of the most radical documents of the eighteenth century—sparking rebellion on both sides of the Atlantic Ocean. Serving as a representative for the Continental Congress in France during the next decade, Franklin became a celebrity. He was the enlightened idealist from the frontier, the man of principled action who enthralled onlookers in the rigid European class societies of the 1770s and ’80s. Franklin embodied the American critique of Old World society, economy, and diplomacy. He was one of many American revolutionaries to take aim at the degenerate world of powdered wigs, fancy uniforms, and silver-service dinners where the great men of Europe decided the fate of distant societies. Franklin was a representative of the enduring American urge to replace the diplomacy of aristocrats with the openness and freedom of democrats.1 Despite his radical criticisms of aristocracy, Franklin was also a prominent participant in Parisian salons. To the consternation of John Adams and John Jay, he dined most evenings with the most conservative elements of French high society. Unlike Adams, he did not refuse to dress the part. For all his frontiers- man claims, Franklin relished high-society silver-service meals, especially if generous portions of wine were available for the guests.
    [Show full text]
  • Minting America: Coinage and the Contestation of American Identity, 1775-1800
    ABSTRACT MINTING AMERICA: COINAGE AND THE CONTESTATION OF AMERICAN IDENTITY, 1775-1800 by James Patrick Ambuske “Minting America” investigates the ideological and culture links between American identity and national coinage in the wake of the American Revolution. In the Confederation period and in the Early Republic, Americans contested the creation of a national mint to produce coins. The catastrophic failure of the paper money issued by the Continental Congress during the War for Independence inspired an ideological debate in which Americans considered the broader implications of a national coinage. More than a means to conduct commerce, many citizens of the new nation saw coins as tangible representations of sovereignty and as a mechanism to convey the principles of the Revolution to future generations. They contested the physical symbolism as well as the rhetorical iconology of these early national coins. Debating the stories that coinage told helped Americans in this period shape the contours of a national identity. MINTING AMERICA: COINAGE AND THE CONTESTATION OF AMERICAN IDENTITY, 1775-1800 A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Miami University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Department of History by James Patrick Ambuske Miami University Oxford, Ohio 2006 Advisor______________________ Andrew Cayton Reader_______________________ Carla Pestana Reader_______________________ Daniel Cobb Table of Contents Introduction: Coining Stories………………………………………....1 Chapter 1: “Ever to turn brown paper
    [Show full text]
  • Pen & Parchment: the Continental Congress
    Adams National Historical Park National Park Service U.S. Department of Interior PEN & PARCHMENT INDEX 555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555 a Letter to Teacher a Themes, Goals, Objectives, and Program Description a Resources & Worksheets a Pre-Visit Materials a Post Visit Mterialss a Student Bibliography a Logistics a Directions a Other Places to Visit a Program Evaluation Dear Teacher, Adams National Historical Park is a unique setting where history comes to life. Our school pro- grams actively engage students in their own exciting and enriching learning process. We hope that stu- dents participating in this program will come to realize that communication, cooperation, sacrifice, and determination are necessary components in seeking justice and liberty. The American Revolution was one of the most daring popular movements in modern history. The Colonists were challenging one of the most powerful nations in the world. The Colonists had to decide whether to join other Patriots in the movement for independence or remain loyal to the King. It became a necessity for those that supported independence to find ways to help America win its war with Great Britain. To make the experiment of representative government work it was up to each citi- zen to determine the guiding principles for the new nation and communicate these beliefs to those chosen to speak for them at the Continental Congress. Those chosen to serve in the fledgling govern- ment had to use great statesmanship to follow the directions of those they represented while still find- ing common ground to unify the disparate colonies in a time of crisis. This symbiotic relationship between the people and those who represented them was perhaps best described by John Adams in a letter that he wrote from the Continental Congress to Abigail in 1774.
    [Show full text]
  • Founding-Era Jus Ad Bellum and the Domestic Law of Treaty Withdrawal
    DANIEL J. HESSEL Founding-Era Jus Ad Bellum and the Domestic Law of Treaty Withdrawal ABSTRACT. The Constitution provides no textual guidance for how, as a matter of domestic law, the United States can withdraw from an Article II treaty. The Supreme Court has not clarified matters. In the face of this uncertainty, government officials and scholars alike have long debated whether the President may unilaterally withdraw from a treaty or whether Congress has a role to play. This Note contributes to the debate by examining the relationship between treaty withdrawal and war powers through an originalist lens. Through close assessment of the contemporaneous jus ad bellum, the Note concludes that, at the Founding, treaty withdrawal presented a clear justification for war. Treaty withdrawal therefore implicates the War Powers Clause, which assigns primary responsibility for initiating war to Congress. Because the Founders and their contemporaries likely saw treaty withdrawal as a matter of war and peace, and because the Constitution entrusts Congress with the power to commence war, this Note concludes that the original understanding of the Constitution supports a role for Congress in treaty withdrawal. AUTHO R. Yale Law School, J.D. 2016. I am indebted to Professors Oona Hathaway and Lea Brilmayer for their supervision and guidance. I am grateful to Rebecca Crootof and Professors Bruce Ackerman, Curtis Bradley, Harold Hongju Koh, and Michael Reisman for their insights, and to my family members and friends who read early drafts of this Note. For their constructive feedback, careful editing, and patience, I thank Alexander Kazam, Elizabeth Ingriselli, Charlie Bridge, Rebecca Lee, Michael Clemente, and the editors of the Yale Lawjournal.
    [Show full text]
  • Conference Program
    The Peace History Society 2011 Conference “The Inter-personal as Political: Individual Witness for Peace and Justice in a Global Perspective” October 20-22, 2011 Barry University, Miami Shores, FL The Peace History Society is grateful for the support of… Barry University Dean Karen Callaghan and the College of Arts and Sciences Chair George Cvejanovich and the Department of History and Political Science Conference and Event Services Office of Communication and Marketing 2011 Program Co‐Chairs David Hostetter Amy Schneidhorst 2011 Barry University Arrangements E. Timothy Smith History Department Assistants Valery Charles Fernando Granthon David Zaret Peace History Society Officers and Executive Board President: Doug Rossinow, Metropolitan State University Vice President: Christy Snider, Berry College Secretary: Ian Lekus, Harvard University Treasurer: David Hostetter, Robert C. Byrd Center for Legislative Studies Peace History Society Board Harriet Alonso, The City College of New York Marc Becker, Truman State University Frances Early, Mount Saint Vincent University Mike Foley, The College of Staten Island of Cuny Heather Fryer, Creighton University David Hostetter, Robert C. Byrd Center for Legislative Studies Charles F. Howlett, Molloy College Kathleen Kennedy, Missouri State University Ian Lekus, Harvard University Marian Mollin, Virginia Tech University Robert Shaffer, Shippensburg University Geoff Smith, Queens University (Canada) E. Timothy Smith, Barry University Ex‐Officio Members: Virginia S. Williams, Winthrop University (past
    [Show full text]
  • A Republican Abroad: John Adams and the Diplomacy of the American Revolution
    W&M ScholarWorks Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 1991 A Republican Abroad: John Adams and the Diplomacy of the American Revolution Robert Wilmer Smith College of William & Mary - Arts & Sciences Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/etd Part of the International Relations Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Smith, Robert Wilmer, "A Republican Abroad: John Adams and the Diplomacy of the American Revolution" (1991). Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects. Paper 1539625694. https://dx.doi.org/doi:10.21220/s2-ggdh-n397 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A REPUBLICAN ABROAD: JOHN ADAMS AND THE DIPLOMACY OF THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Department of History The College of William and Mary in Virginia In Partial Fulfilment Of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts By Robert W. Smith, Jr. 1991 APPROVAL SHEET This thesis is submitted in partial fulfillment the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Robert W.Smith, Jy. Approved, April 1991 Joh: . Selbv Edward P. Crapcjl Thomas F. Sheppa TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS................................ iv ABSTRACT......................................... v INTRODUCTION.....................................2 PART I. A VIRTUOUS REPUBLIC.....................5 PART II. A COMMERCIAL REPUBLIC................ 16 PART III. THE DIPLOMACY OF A SHORT WAR......... 27 PART IV. JOHN ADAMS IN PARIS...................38 PART V.
    [Show full text]
  • John Adams and the Diplomacy of the American Revolution
    University of Kentucky UKnowledge Diplomatic History History 1980 John Adams and the Diplomacy of the American Revolution James H. Hutson Library of Congress Click here to let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Thanks to the University of Kentucky Libraries and the University Press of Kentucky, this book is freely available to current faculty, students, and staff at the University of Kentucky. Find other University of Kentucky Books at uknowledge.uky.edu/upk. For more information, please contact UKnowledge at [email protected]. Recommended Citation Hutson, James H., "John Adams and the Diplomacy of the American Revolution" (1980). Diplomatic History. 4. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/upk_diplomatic_history/4 JOHN ADAMS AND THE DIPLOMACY OF THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION JAMES H. HUTSON JOHN ADAMS AND THE DIPLOMACY OF THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION THE UNIVERSITY PRESS OF KENTUCKY FOR KATHY Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Hutson, James H John Adarns and the diplomacy of the American Revolution Bibliography: p. Includes Index. 1. United States-Foreign relations-Revolution, 1775-1783 2. Adams, John, Pres. U. S., 1735- 1826. I. Title. E249.H87 973.3'2'0924 79-57575 ISBN 978-0-8 13 1-53 14-8 Copyright@ 1980 by The University Press of Kentucky Scholarly publisher for the Commonwealth serving Berea College, Centre College of Kentucky, Eastern Kentucky University, The Filson Club, Georgetown College, Kentucky Historical Society, Kentucky State University, Morehead State University, Murray State University, Northern Kentucky University, Transylvania University, University of Kentucky, University of Louisville, and Western Kentucky University. Editorial andSaLes Ofices: Lexington, Kentucky 40506 CONTENTS Acknowledgments vii Chapter 1 Formulating an American Foreign Policy 1 Chapter 2 France, 1778-1779 33 Chapter 3 France Again, 1780 5 1 Chapter 4 The Netherlands 75 Chapter 5 Dutch Recognition 102 Chapter 6 Peace Negotiations 117 Chapter 7 John Adarns and Revolutionary Diplomacy 142 Notes 157 A Note on Sources 191 Index 193 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Edmund S.
    [Show full text]
  • HI 2108 Reading List
    For students of HI 2106 – Themes in modern American history and HI 2018 – American History: A survey READING LISTS General Reading: 1607-1991 Single or two-volume overviews of American history are big business in the American academic world. They are generally reliable, careful and bland. An exception is Bernard Bailyn et al, The Great Republic: a history of the American people which brings together thoughtful and provocative essays from some of America’s top historians, for example David Herbert Donald and Gordon Wood. This two-volume set is recommended for purchase (and it will shortly be available in the library). Other useful works are George Tindall, America: a Narrative History, Eric Foner, Give me Liberty and P.S. Boyer et al, The Enduring Vision all of which are comprehensive, accessible up to date and contain very valuable bibliographies. Among the more acceptable shorter alternatives are M.A. Jones, The Limits of Liberty and Carl Degler, Out of our Past. Hugh Brogan, The Penguin history of the United States is entertaining and mildly idiosyncratic. A recent highly provocative single- volume interpretative essay on American history which places war at the centre of the nation’s development is Fred Anderson and Andrew Cayton, The Dominion of War: Empire and Liberty in North America, 1500-2000 All of the above are available in paperback and one should be purchased. Anthologies of major articles or extracts from important books are also a big commercial enterprise in U.S. publishing. By far the most useful and up-to-date is the series Major problems in American History published by D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Program Is Organized Around the Strategies, Tactics, and Methods by Which AFSC and Others Have Struggled to Achieve Peace and Social Justice
    In April 2017, the American Friends Service Committee (AFSC), a leading peace and justice organization, celebrates its 100th anniversary. To mark this milestone, we will host a one-day symposium to showcase cutting-edge scholarship on areas of AFSC work both past and present and to inspire the next generation of research on peace and justice. The symposium will bring scholars together with past, present, and future activists, highlighting the connection between scholarship and advocacy around AFSC’s key issues. This program is organized around the strategies, tactics, and methods by which AFSC and others have struggled to achieve peace and social justice. The papers provide examples of how these approaches have been applied in the U.S. and around the world at different times. Program 8:30 AM - Welcome & kick-off: George Lakey, founder, Training for Change and leader in the field of nonviolent social change 9:00-10:30 - Morning Panel #1: Direct Service Humanitarian intervention and service as a way to encourage healing and understanding; includes domestic and international relief, reconstruction, feeding, and medical service. Chair: Emma Lapansky-Werner - Emeritus Professor of History; Emeritus Curator of the Quaker Collection, Haverford College Moderator: Linda Lewis – AFSC Country Representative, DPRK Presenters: Susan Armstrong-Reid (9:10) Three China ‘Gadabouts’: Working with the Friends Service Unit, 1947-1951. Dr. Susan Armstrong-Reid is an adjunct professor in the Department of History at the University of Guelph. Both her teaching and research focus on the transformation of Waging Peace: AFSC’s Summit for Peace and Justice 1 humanitarianism since 1945. Her third book, The China Gadabouts: the New Frontiers of Humanitarian Nursing, 1941-1951, is forthcoming with the University of British Columbia Press.
    [Show full text]
  • PHS News August 2015
    PHS News August 2015 University of Saint Joseph, Connecticut. PHS News Perhaps surprisingly given the prominence August 2015 of religion and faith to inspire peacemakers, this is the first PHS conference with its main theme on the nexus of religion and peace. The conference theme has generated a lot of interest from historians and scholars in other disciplines, including political science and religious studies. We are expecting scholars and peacemakers from around the globe in attendance: from Australia, Russia, Nigeria, Rwanda, Germany and Costa Rica. Panel topics include the American Catholic peace movement with commentary by Jon Cornell, religion and the struggle against Boko Newsletter of the Haram, and religion and the pursuit of peace Peace History Society in global contexts and many others. www.peacehistorysociety.org Our keynote speaker, Dr. Leilah Danielson, President’s Letter Associate Professor of History at Northern Arizona University, will speak directly to the larger conference themes and will reflect By Kevin J. Callahan PHS’s interdisciplinary approach. Dr. Danielson’s book, American Gandhi: A.J. Muste and the History of Radicalism in the 20th Century (University of Pennsylvania Press, 2014), examines the evolving political and religious thought of A.J. Muste, a leader of the U.S. left. For the full conference program, see pages 9-14! Make plans now to attend the conference in Connecticut in October! Greetings Peace History Society Members! We will continue our tradition of announcing the winners of the Scott Bills On behalf of the entire PHS board and Memorial Prize (for a recent book on peace executive officers, it is our honor to serve history), the Charles DeBenedetti Prize (for PHS in 2015 and 2016.
    [Show full text]
  • Veggie Van: the Power of Invention
    NEW COLLEGE A publication of the New College Alurnnae/i Association Volume 38, Summer 1997 Veggie Van: The Power of Invention Fast-food fuel powers graduates' cross-country tour By Carol Ann Wilkinson '64 Drivers caught in traffic behind Joshua and Kaia Tickell's "Veggie Van" this summer may find themselves thinking of french fries. The biodiesel these 1997 New College graduates use to power their Winnebago is cre­ ated from used cooking oil from res­ taurants and occasionally emits the familiar smell when burned. Their area of concentration at New College was "Sustainable Living." As part of their senior project on alter­ native energy, they created a portable machine that cleans and processes used vegetable oil from restaurants into biodiesel fuel. Their three-toh Josh and Koio Roman Tickell pose with their "Veggie Von" before be­ Winnebago gets 25 miles per gallon ginning a cross-country tour in June. The von gets "1,300 miles per using the vegetable oil fuel in its acre" with its biodiesel fuel and was featured on the Today show and Dateline NBC in July. unmodified diesel engine. In addition, biodiesel bums up to 75 percent cleaner than petroleum diesel. Josh In This Issue and Kaia envision biodiesel fuel as a low-cost way for large transport vehi­ Acton Interview 5 Class Notes - 90's 1 6 Radio New College 15 Alumnae/ i Fellow 11 ESP Seminars 17 cles, such as buses, to meet new Reunion Report 19 Archie Awards 10 Graduation 18 Student Grants 6 clean air standards. Boat Donations 13 Interim Dean 3 Taking the Cure 3 Josh and Kaia will take two months ClassNotes - 60's 9 NC Chronicled! 14 to travel from Sarasota to the Real Class Notes - 70's 10 NCM Web Site 12 NCM Annual Report Continued on next page Class Notes - 80's 12 President's Letter 2 (see blue insert) NCAA President's Letter A liHie bit of everything for you This issue of Nimbus has a little bit or volunteer to write one! We also Don't miss the great feature of everything we like to include in have an update on Alum Chapters about the invention by 1997 each issue: We have news about you.
    [Show full text]
  • PHS News Recommendations
    1 completed their deliberations and made their PHS News recommendations. I hope you will join me in thanking all the members of those July 2017 committees for the important work they have done so well. This includes: DeBenedetti Prize Committee: Rachel Newsletter of the Waltner Goossen (Chair), Andy Barbero, Peace History Society and Erika Kuhlman www.peacehistorysociety.org Scott Bills Prize Committee: Kevin Callahan (Chair), Chuck Howlett, and Elizabeth Agnew Elise Boulding Prize Committee: Mona Siegel (Chair), Michael Clinton, Doug Rossinow Lifetime Achievement Award Committee: Robbie Lieberman (Chair), Leilah Danielson, and Scott Bennett In 2015 I served on the Scott Bills Prize Committee and two of the things I took away from that experience were, first, the conscientiousness and hard work that the committee members put into their President’s Column considerations and second, the impressive array of work that is being done by many different scholars in furthering the study of peace. It gives me hope in a time when hope is sometimes hard to find. The prize winners will be announced at our fall conference in October. This brings me to more good work that members of the Society are doing. “Muted Voices: Conscience, Dissent, Resistance, and Civil Liberties in World War I through Today” will take place October 19-22, 2017 at the National World War I Museum and Memorial in Kansas City, Missouri. This promises to be a stimulating and enriching event that includes a musical performance, keynote addresses, paper presentations, and Deborah Buffton a memorial service remembering Although we are fully into summer, the Peace History Society continues to be Table of Contents – see page 3 busy with its work.
    [Show full text]