Mr. Jefferson's Sickle: Thomas Worthington and The

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Mr. Jefferson's Sickle: Thomas Worthington and The Mr. Jefferson’s Sickle: Thomas Worthington and the Implementation of the Agrarian Republic Research Thesis Presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for graduation with research distinction in History in the undergraduate colleges of The Ohio State University By Joseph T. Ross The Ohio State University March 2015 Project Advisor: Professor John L. Brooke, Department of History Committee Member: Professor Lucy M. Murphy, Department of History Committee Member: Professor Andrew R. L. Cayton, Miami University Ross 2 Table of Contents Acknowledgements………………………………………………………………………………..3 Abbreviations……………………………………………………………………………………...4 The Jeffersonian Commonwealth: An Introduction………………………………………………6 Chapter 1: “Fair Objects of Speculation:” Land Companies and Oligarchy…………………….18 Chapter 2: “A Very Great Quantity of Land Has Been Sold:” Harringtonian Land Reform……44 Chapter 3: “A Government of Our Own Choice:” Democratization and Deliberation………….74 Epilogue: “An Incapacity to Bear Up Any Other Than Free Men”…………………………….101 Ross 3 Acknowledgements There are a lot of people who I am grateful towards for helping me to conduct this project. First I would like to thank Nathaniel Swigger for his help in securing two Ohio State Newark Student Research Grants, which I utilized to conduct and present this research. I was also the recipient of one of Ohio State’s 2014 Undergraduate Research Office Summer Research Fellowships, which provided the means for much of the research. During my trips both in and out of state I met many wonderful people who were gracious enough to help me in my endeavor. They include Janet Ackley, the archivist at the Ross County Probate Court Archive, who was very helpful in reference questions, as well as entertainment for the grueling process of probate research; Doug Perks of the Jefferson County Museum, who provided excellent knowledge and insight into the lives of many of Thomas Worthington’s Virginia peers; and also Patricia Medert of the Ross County Historical Society who is a walking encyclopedia of knowledge and understanding in regards to Chillicothe’s history, as well as a wonderful interpreter of Worthington’s handwriting. I am grateful to Karah Walser who was an excellent companion on my various trips and who helped with the “busy work” associated with record finding. Much of my historical methodology would not be the same without the many long, engaging, and joyful (though sometimes painful) conversations with Jim Weeks. Pieces of the research were read over by Dr/ Eric MacGilvray and Dr. Andrew Cayton, both of who gave remarks on my historical interpretation and understanding of the historiography. This project would not have existed if not for the prodding from Dr. Mike Mangus, whose guidance in Ohio history got me excited about the topic. Dr. Lucy Murphy was a voice of reason in the earliest stages, reigning in useless rambling and helping me to present my arguments in a more coherent and precise manner while also considering different avenues I had not thought of. I am a better historian for it. My family has been supportive throughout the entire endeavor, such as my grandfather allowing me to use an empty bedroom for my study, my Aunt Patty providing lodging for my trip to Washington D.C., and my mom and stepdad lending interest to a topic they would normally have no enthusiasm for. Finally, I would like to thank Dr. John Brooke, who has developed into an ideal mentor. The time he has given to this project despite his busy schedule, as well as his advice, counsel, and encouragement will always be appreciated and never forgotten. Ross 4 Abbreviations JAH—Journal of American History JER—Journal of the Early Republic. Letters of Congress—Letters of Members of the Continental Congress, ed. Edmund C. Burnett (Washington: Carnegie Institution of Washington, 1921-1936). LRHL—The Letters of Richard Henry Lee, ed. James Curtis Ballagh (New York: The Macmillan Company, 1914). New Nation Votes—A New Nation Votes: American Election Returns, 1787-1825, Tufts University Digital Arches, http://elections.lib.tufts.edu/ OHS—Ohio Historical Society, Columbus, OH. Papers of Adams—The Adams Papers, Series III: General Correspondence and Other Papers of the Adams Statesmen, Papers of John Adams, ed. Robert Taylor, et. al. (Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1977-). Papers of Jefferson—The Papers of Thomas Jefferson, ed. Julian P. Boyd, et. al. (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1950-). Papers of Madison—The Papers of James Madison, William T. Hutchinson, et. al., eds. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1956-1977; Charlottesville: The University of Virginia Press, 1977-). Papers of Mason—The Papers of George Mason, 1725-1792, ed. Robert A. Rutland (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1970). Papers of Washington—The Papers of George Washington: Confederation Series, ed. W. W. Abbot, 6 vols. (Charlottesville: The University of Virginia Press, 1992-1997). Political Parties—Kenneth C. Martis, The Historical Atlas of Political Parties in the United States Congress (New York: Macmillan, 1989). PTW— Papers of Thomas Worthington, MIC 35, Ohio Historical Society, Columbus, OH. RCHS—Ross County Historical Society, Chillicothe, OH. RCPCA—Ross County Probate Court Archives, Chillicothe, OH. St. Clair Papers— William Henry Smith, ed., The St. Clair Papers: The Life and Public Services of Arthur St. Clair…, 2 vols. (Cincinnati: Robert Clarke & Co., 1882). Territorial Papers—Clarence Edwin Carter, ed., The Territorial Papers of the United States, 28 vols. (Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1934). TWP— Thomas Worthington Papers, MIC 96, Ohio Historical Society, Columbus, OH. WMQ—The William and Mary Quarterly. Works of Harrington—James Harringtion, The Political Works of James Harrington, ed. J. G. A. Pocock (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1977). Ross 5 Portrait of Thomas Worthington by Charles Wilson Peale, oil on canvas, 1814. Ross 6 The Jeffersonian Commonwealth: An Introduction In 1785 Thomas Jefferson wrote in his Notes on the State of Virginia that “those who labour in the earth are the chosen people of God, if ever he had a chosen people.” For Jefferson, the “genuine virtue” of the American republic rested on the shoulders of an agrarian based class of freeholders, because “corruption of morals in the mass of cultivators is a phaenomenon of which no age nor nation has furnished an example.”1 Several questions come to mind after reading such passages. What was the agrarian republic Jefferson envisioned? How did he develop these ideas? Why did he choose freeholders, commonly referred to as yeomen? Were these ideas influential, and who did they influence? Did these ideas ever manifest themselves, and if so what were their results? Without even answering these questions some historians have lately dismissed the ideal altogether. John Ashworth argues that such passages “cannot be read literally” and that “Jefferson had not the slightest intention of conferring praise upon all of ‘those who labor in the earth.’”2 The late Roger G. Kennedy considered the ideal a “lost cause,” and with Adam Rothman and Walter Johnson focused mostly on the supposed influence of Jefferson to the resurgence of agrarian capitalism and chattel slavery, with an emphasis on their expansion into 3 the Mississippi Valley following the Louisiana Purchase. 1 Thomas Jefferson, Notes on the State of Virginia (1785; New York: Penguin Books, 1999), 170. 2 John Ashworth, Slavery, Capitalism, and Politics in the Antebellum Republic: Volume 1: Commerce and Compromise, 1820-1850 (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1995), 21. 3 Roger G. Kennedy, Mr. Jefferson’s Lost Cause: Land, Farmers, Slavery, and the Louisiana Purchase (New York: Oxford University Press, 2003); Adam Rothman, Slave Country: American Expansion and the Origins of the Deep South (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2005); and Walter Johnson, River of Dark Dreams: Slavery and Empire in the Cotton Kingdom (Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2013). See also Christopher Michael Curtis, Jefferson’s Freeholders and the Politics of Ownership in the Old Dominion (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2013), which argues that reforms in Virginia, enacted Ross 7 While these studies are important explanations of the relationship between land, slavery, and capitalism, it seems unfair to either dismiss or to credit Jefferson’s vision and its influence without understanding what he meant. These authors also ignore the other half of America’s early western expansion: the Northwest Territory. In a new approach to Jefferson’s ideal this study looks into the political life of Thomas Worthington, the “father of Ohio statehood,” and one of Jefferson’s most prominent protégés. A Virginian, Worthington manumitted his inherited slaves in 1797 when he was twenty-three years old and then moved to the Northwest Territory, settling in Chillicothe. In a political career that spanned thirty years and earned him two trips to the U.S. Senate and the governorship of Ohio, Worthington worked diligently to promote and construct Jefferson’s agrarian republic of freeholders. Considering the rapidly expanding economic domain of slavery and the Virginian heritage of Ohio’s most prominent politician, an obvious question then is why did slavery not take root and flourish in the Old Northwest as it had in the Southwest? For some historians such as Peter S. Onuf, Article VI of the Northwest Ordinance stamped out the spread of slavery by prohibiting it in the territory, part of the various compromises between North and South during the Constitutional Convention.4 Such an emphasis on any institutional framework was laid to rest by Paul Finkelman’s body of work, which describes the ambivalence towards slavery in the territory. Human bondage continued amongst various French inhabitants, under the eyes of federal officials, including Governor Arthur St. Clair, and its vestiges remained among American by Jefferson and his followers, resulted in the replacement of land with slaves as the ultimate measure of political power. 4 Peter S.
Recommended publications
  • Yorktown Victory Center Replacement Will Be Named 'American Revolution Museum at Yorktown'
    DISPATCH A Newsletter of the Jamestown-Yorktown Foundation • Spring 2012 Yorktown Victory Center Replacement Will Be Named ‘American Revolution Museum at Yorktown’ Along with a physical transforma- bonds, is estimated at $46 tion of the Yorktown Victory Center will million. Private donations come a new name – “American Revolu- to the Jamestown-Yorktown tion Museum at Yorktown” – adopted Foundation, Inc., will sup- May 10 by the Jamestown-Yorktown port elements of gallery Foundation Board of Trustees and and outdoor exhibits and endorsed by the Jamestown-Yorktown educational resources. Foundation, Inc., Board of Directors. “The new name high- Recommended by a board naming lights the core offering of study task force, the new name will the museum, American be implemented upon completion of Revolution history,” said the museum replacement, and in the Frank B. Atkinson, who meantime the Yorktown Victory Center chaired the naming study will continue in operation as a museum task force comprised of 11 The distinctive two-story main entrance of the American of the American Revolution. members of the Jamestown- Revolution Museum at Yorktown will serve as a focal point Construction is expected to start Yorktown Foundation for arriving visitors. in the second half of 2012 on the proj- and Jamestown-Yorktown name were identified, and research ect, which includes an 80,000-square- Foundation, Inc., boards, “and the in- was undertaken on names currently in foot structure that will encompass ex- clusion of the word ‘Yorktown’ provides use. Selected names were tested with panded exhibition galleries, classrooms a geographical anchor. We arrived Yorktown Victory Center visitors and and support functions, and reorganiza- at this choice through a methodical reviewed by a trademark attorney and tion of the 22-acre site.
    [Show full text]
  • Minting America: Coinage and the Contestation of American Identity, 1775-1800
    ABSTRACT MINTING AMERICA: COINAGE AND THE CONTESTATION OF AMERICAN IDENTITY, 1775-1800 by James Patrick Ambuske “Minting America” investigates the ideological and culture links between American identity and national coinage in the wake of the American Revolution. In the Confederation period and in the Early Republic, Americans contested the creation of a national mint to produce coins. The catastrophic failure of the paper money issued by the Continental Congress during the War for Independence inspired an ideological debate in which Americans considered the broader implications of a national coinage. More than a means to conduct commerce, many citizens of the new nation saw coins as tangible representations of sovereignty and as a mechanism to convey the principles of the Revolution to future generations. They contested the physical symbolism as well as the rhetorical iconology of these early national coins. Debating the stories that coinage told helped Americans in this period shape the contours of a national identity. MINTING AMERICA: COINAGE AND THE CONTESTATION OF AMERICAN IDENTITY, 1775-1800 A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Miami University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Department of History by James Patrick Ambuske Miami University Oxford, Ohio 2006 Advisor______________________ Andrew Cayton Reader_______________________ Carla Pestana Reader_______________________ Daniel Cobb Table of Contents Introduction: Coining Stories………………………………………....1 Chapter 1: “Ever to turn brown paper
    [Show full text]
  • The American Founding and the Federal Era (1785-Early-1800S)
    Lesson 4 The American Founding and the Federal Era (1785-early-1800s) Words such as “virtue,” “piety” and “learning” are emphasized in the writings of our Founding Fathers and therefore appear in many of our governmental documents. In fact, when modern political scientists examined seventy-six of the most representative pamphlets and essays written by our Founders, they found the word “virtue” stressed over 300 times.1 Additionally, various synonyms meaning the same thing (such as “religion,” “morality,” and “knowledge”) also frequently appear in official writings (such as in the famous Northwest Ordinance, by which territories become states).2 Significantly, to our Founders, “religion” meant Christianity; “morality” or “virtue” meant Biblical character; and “knowledge” meant information or skills acquired within the framework of a Biblical worldview. The Founders consistently emphasized the elements of religion and morality (or piety and virtue) as the indispensable foundation and supports of our American system of government. They believed that if these pillars were lost, then our nation would eventually collapse. Notice some of their representative declarations affirming this: [I]t is religion and morality alone which can establish the principles upon which freedom can securely stand. 3 [R]eligion and virtue are the only foundations...of republicanism and of all free governments. 4 Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious 5 people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other. JOHN ADAMS , SIGNER OF THE DECLARATION [R]eligion and good morals are the only solid foundations of public liberty and happiness. 6 While the people are virtuous, they cannot be subdued; but when once they lose their virtue, they will be ready to surrender their liberties to the first external or internal invader.
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 May Christopher Rivera.Pdf (1.964Mb)
    School of Graduate Studies Colorado State University–Pueblo 2200 Bonforte Boulevard Pueblo, Colorado 81001 (719) 549–2100 “INTO DUST AND OBSCURITY”: SILAS DEANE AND THE DRAFTING OF THE 1778 TREATY OF ALLIANCE by Christopher Michael-Anthony Rivera _____________________ A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS IN HISTORY COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY–PUEBLO Pueblo, Colorado, USA MAY 2015 Master’s Thesis Committee: Advisor: Dr. Matthew L. Harris Dr. Paul Conrad Dr. Brigid Vance STATEMENT BY THE AUTHOR This thesis has been submitted and approved for the partial fulfillment of requirements for an advanced degree at Colorado State University–Pueblo. It is deposited in the University Library and available to borrowers of the library. Brief quotations from this thesis are allowed without special permission, provided that, accurate acknowledgment of their source is indicated. Requests for permission to use extended quotations, or to reproduce the manuscript in whole or in part, may be granted by the History Graduate Program or the Graduate Studies Director in History in the interest of scholarship. In all other instances, however, permission must be obtained from the author. Signed: __________________________________________________ __________________________________________ APPROVAL BY THESIS ADVISOR THIS THESIS HAS BEEN APPROVED ON THE DATE SHOWN BELOW: ________________________________ ____________ Dr. Matthew Harris Date Committee Chair Professor of History ________________________________ ____________ Graduate Studies Director in History Date Dr. Matthew Harris “INTO DUST AND OBSCURITY”: SILAS DEANE AND THE DRAFTING OF THE 1778 TREATY OF ALLIANCE by Christopher Michael-Anthony Rivera Silas Deane’s role during the American Revolution has been examined by numerous academics, including George Clark, Jonathan Dull, Julian Boyd, Richard Morris, David Jayne Hill, and Walter Isaacson.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliotheca Sacra
    Tlte American Republic. 135 ART I C LEV Ill. THE AMERICAN REPUBLIC AND THE DEBS INSURRECTION. BY MR. Z. SWIFT HOLBROOK. THE American Republic is the fruitage of a religious inspiration. Our democratic institutions, ollr notions of lib­ erty and equality, had their origin with men who practised every form of self-denial, that they might be free from hie­ rarchical authority and worship God according to the dic­ tates of conscience. They were not men, like the colony that landed at Jamestown in 1607, moved by the spirit of adventure or by the desire to acquire,-both worthy and useful passions when subordinated to higher ends,-but they came to an unknown land, braving the perils of the sea and enduring the privations incident to such a perilous journey, that they might have freedom to worship God. To what extent these men had caught the inspiration of Luther and had given it a new interpretation, need not here be traced; but the age was one of discovery, of hero­ ism, of adventure, of awakened intellect,-giving the world the revival of faith, hope, and learning. It was the Eliza­ bethan Age in literature. It was the period of the centuries when, freed from the bonds of ecclesiastical authority, indi­ vidualism burst the barriers which had restrained it, and men took on new conceptions of liberty and of individual worth. Man as an individual, a unit, free and independent in his re­ lations to the unseen, and bound by social compacts only because thus his individualism found higher freedom and fuller .development,-this was the conception that inspired [Jan.
    [Show full text]
  • Bureau of Engraving and Printing (BEP) Inventory Listing the Numerous BEP Historical Postage Stamp Production Folders, 2016
    Description of document: Bureau of Engraving and Printing (BEP) inventory listing the numerous BEP historical postage stamp production folders, 2016 Requested date: 19-January-2016 Released date: 01-February-2016 Posted date: 28-March-2016 Source of document: Disclosure Officer Bureau of Engraving and Printing Office of the Chief Counsel - FOIA and Transparency Services 14th & C Streets, SW, Room 419A Washington, D.C. 20228-0001 Fax: (202) 874-2951 The governmentattic.org web site (“the site”) is noncommercial and free to the public. The site and materials made available on the site, such as this file, are for reference only. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals have made every effort to make this information as complete and as accurate as possible, however, there may be mistakes and omissions, both typographical and in content. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals shall have neither liability nor responsibility to any person or entity with respect to any loss or damage caused, or alleged to have been caused, directly or indirectly, by the information provided on the governmentattic.org web site or in this file. The public records published on the site were obtained from government agencies using proper legal channels. Each document is identified as to the source. Any concerns about the contents of the site should be directed to the agency originating the document in question. GovernmentAttic.org is not responsible for the contents of documents published on the website. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY BUREAU OF ENGRAVING AND PRINTING WESTERN CURRENCY FACILITY FORT WORTH, TEXAS 76131 February 1, 2016 FOIA/PA Request No.
    [Show full text]
  • Jefferson and Franklin
    Jefferson and Franklin ITH the exception of Washington and Lincoln, no two men in American history have had more books written about W them or have been more widely discussed than Jefferson and Franklin. This is particularly true of Jefferson, who seems to have succeeded in having not only bitter critics but also admiring friends. In any event, anything that can be contributed to the under- standing of their lives is important; if, however, something is dis- covered that affects them both, it has a twofold significance. It is for this reason that I wish to direct attention to a paragraph in Jefferson's "Anas." As may not be generally understood, the "Anas" were simply notes written by Jefferson contemporaneously with the events de- scribed and revised eighteen years later. For this unfortunate name, the simpler title "Jeffersoniana" might well have been substituted. Curiously enough there is nothing in Jefferson's life which has been more severely criticized than these "Anas." Morse, a great admirer of Jefferson, takes occasion to say: "Most unfortunately for his own good fame, Jefferson allowed himself to be drawn by this feud into the preparation of the famous 'Anas/ His friends have hardly dared to undertake a defense of those terrible records."1 James Truslow Adams, discussing the same subject, remarks that the "Anas" are "unreliable as historical evidence."2 Another biographer, Curtis, states that these notes "will always be a cloud upon his integrity of purpose; and, as is always the case, his spitefulness toward them injured him more than it injured Hamilton or Washington."3 I am not at all in accord with these conclusions.
    [Show full text]
  • Continental Army: Valley Forge Encampment
    REFERENCES HISTORICAL REGISTRY OF OFFICERS OF THE CONTINENTAL ARMY T.B. HEITMAN CONTINENTAL ARMY R. WRIGHT BIRTHPLACE OF AN ARMY J.B. TRUSSELL SINEWS OF INDEPENDENCE CHARLES LESSER THESIS OF OFFICER ATTRITION J. SCHNARENBERG ENCYCLOPEDIA OF THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION M. BOATNER PHILADELPHIA CAMPAIGN D. MARTIN AMERICAN REVOLUTION IN THE DELAWARE VALLEY E. GIFFORD VALLEY FORGE J.W. JACKSON PENNSYLVANIA LINE J.B. TRUSSELL GEORGE WASHINGTON WAR ROBERT LECKIE ENCYLOPEDIA OF CONTINENTAL F.A. BERG ARMY UNITS VALLEY FORGE PARK MICROFILM Continental Army at Valley Forge GEN GEORGE WASHINGTON Division: FIRST DIVISION MG CHARLES LEE SECOND DIVISION MG THOMAS MIFFLIN THIRD DIVISION MG MARQUES DE LAFAYETTE FOURTH DIVISION MG BARON DEKALB FIFTH DIVISION MG LORD STIRLING ARTILLERY BG HENRY KNOX CAVALRY BG CASIMIR PULASKI NJ BRIGADE BG WILLIAM MAXWELL Divisions were loosly organized during the encampment. Reorganization in May and JUNE set these Divisions as shown. KNOX'S ARTILLERY arrived Valley Forge JAN 1778 CAVALRY arrived Valley Forge DEC 1777 and left the same month. NJ BRIGADE departed Valley Forge in MAY and rejoined LEE'S FIRST DIVISION at MONMOUTH. Previous Division Commanders were; MG NATHANIEL GREENE, MG JOHN SULLIVAN, MG ALEXANDER MCDOUGEL MONTHLY STRENGTH REPORTS ALTERATIONS Month Fit For Duty Assigned Died Desert Disch Enlist DEC 12501 14892 88 129 25 74 JAN 7950 18197 0 0 0 0 FEB 6264 19264 209 147 925 240 MAR 5642 18268 399 181 261 193 APR 10826 19055 384 188 116 1279 MAY 13321 21802 374 227 170 1004 JUN 13751 22309 220 96 112 924 Totals: 70255 133787 1674 968 1609 3714 Ref: C.M.
    [Show full text]
  • HI 2108 Reading List
    For students of HI 2106 – Themes in modern American history and HI 2018 – American History: A survey READING LISTS General Reading: 1607-1991 Single or two-volume overviews of American history are big business in the American academic world. They are generally reliable, careful and bland. An exception is Bernard Bailyn et al, The Great Republic: a history of the American people which brings together thoughtful and provocative essays from some of America’s top historians, for example David Herbert Donald and Gordon Wood. This two-volume set is recommended for purchase (and it will shortly be available in the library). Other useful works are George Tindall, America: a Narrative History, Eric Foner, Give me Liberty and P.S. Boyer et al, The Enduring Vision all of which are comprehensive, accessible up to date and contain very valuable bibliographies. Among the more acceptable shorter alternatives are M.A. Jones, The Limits of Liberty and Carl Degler, Out of our Past. Hugh Brogan, The Penguin history of the United States is entertaining and mildly idiosyncratic. A recent highly provocative single- volume interpretative essay on American history which places war at the centre of the nation’s development is Fred Anderson and Andrew Cayton, The Dominion of War: Empire and Liberty in North America, 1500-2000 All of the above are available in paperback and one should be purchased. Anthologies of major articles or extracts from important books are also a big commercial enterprise in U.S. publishing. By far the most useful and up-to-date is the series Major problems in American History published by D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Brief History of Lebanon, Ohio
    w Vl ::::.> o ::r:: f­ � ::::.> o u A BRIEF HISTORY of LE ANON A Centennial Sl1.etch By JOSIAH }/fORROW Chairman of the Lebanon Centennial Committee Author of the Life of ThomasCoruiin History of Warren County Centennial Sketch of Warren County 1876 Aboriginal Agriculture Etc , " ,�' ' J >� LE���.Q?r· THE W,�T.:::RN STAR ptJBil�p,"�TrJ: C).'I\PAN'r 1902 Pioneers on Turtlecreek HE beautitul valley of Turtlecreek � was seen by whitemen more than a ���� c� . �' dozen sears before any of the � T:': � white race 'settled in it. Three � � � � armies marched against the Indians � t\:': through this valley, and after John � :.:' Cleves Symmes purchased the land :':1�1'@�1'(j)_�� b.etween the two Mian�is for sixty­ ���""@./)(tV{!!) SIX cents per acre, h1S surveyors began the work of surveying the tract into sections in 1789. Judge Symmes in an early letter to hIS associate, Jonathan Dayton, wrote of the great fertility of the Military range in "which to-day are Lebanon, Union Vil­ lage and Hamilton. The eminent general, George Rogers Clark, led two expeditions against the Indians on the upper waters of the Miamis from the site of Cincinnati. The first of these was in August, 1780, when he passed along Turtlecreek and crossed to the east side of the Little Miami; the second was in 1782 when he passed west of the site of Lebanon and crossed Mad river near the site of Dayton. In each of these expeditions there were about one thousand men, chiefly Kentuckians. The last and largest of the armies which marched through the valley was led by General Josiah Harmar who was the successor of Wash­ ington and Knox as commander of the United States army, though his rank was lieutenant colonel and he was general-in-chief by brevet.
    [Show full text]
  • Cass CITY CHRONICL E
    cASS CITY CHRONICL E VOL. 23. NO. 5. ~ CASS CITY, MICHIGAN, FRIDAY, JUNE 10, 1927. 8 PAGES. : ......... , , • , and roses. Robert P. Cassell of Lan- 4 ft. 9 in. by 34 ft., and bears the sing, cousin of the bride, served as monogram "C. C. H. S."; a curtain 8TH Gr, GrADU/IEs - ....... .e.......... ~,................. • ..... <;0<.~. 4.~. [.~ L.g i i H, S. I]rADUAT[S ceremony a ~ ~^'~'~:--~ klUMil N UllIII~£~"....... W-aS on a noiseless track in two sections, served to the guests. 15 ft. 6 in. by 36 ft.; a grand border Mrs. Lydia Starr and daughter, painted to match the velour curtain; WILL NLIlYiBER32 Mardell, of Cass City, mother and two tormentor wings 4 by 14 ft.; two sister of the groom, attended the ~tate Fair Honors Go to Ken- tormentor flippers 4 by 14 ft.; two wedding. Mr. McArthur is employed neutral borders 5 by 40 ft. One ex- Commencement Exercises Will i neth W. Myers of Mill- at the condensary and Mr. and Mrs. terror setting consists of a wood drop Be Held Tuesday Evening, McArthur will make their home here. ington. mounted on hollow drum roller 6½ by 32 ft; four wood wings 4½ by 14 ft; June 14. ODD FELLOW MEMORIAL wood wing flippers 4½ by 14 ft. One The highest standing on the regu- interior setting of 11 pieces may be Class of 1927. ]at eighth grade examination in Tus- SERVICE SUNDAY MORNING adapted to many interior scenes. A Stuart Y. Wilsey Charles R. Kercher cola county was received by Mar- kitchen scene is painted on the back The annual memorial service of Mary I.
    [Show full text]
  • To the William H. Harrison Papers
    THE LIB R :\ R Y () F C () N G R E ~ ~ • PRE ~ IDE ~ T S' PAP E R S I ~ D E X ~ E R I E ~ INDEX TO THE William H. Harrison Papers I I I I I I I I I I I I THE LIBRARY OF CONGRESS • PRESIDENTS' PAPERS INDEX SERIES INDEX TO THE William H. Harrison Papers MANUSCRIPT DIVISION • REFERENCE DEPARTMENT LIBRARY OF CONGRESS WASHINGTON : 1960 Library of Congress Cat~log Card Number 60-60012 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, u.s. Government Printing Office Washington 25, D.C.• Price 20 cents Preface THIS INDEX to the William Henry Harrison Papers is a direct result of the wish of the Congress and the President as expressed by Public Law 85-147 dated August 16, 1957, to inspire inforrr..ed patriotism, to provide greater security for the original manuscripts, and to make the Harrison Papers more accessible and useful to scholars and other interested persons. The law authorizes and directs the Librarian of Congress to arrange, microfilm, and index the Papers of the 23 Presidents whose manuscripts are in the Library. An appropriation to carry out the provisions of the law was approved on July 31, 1958, and actual operations began on August 25. The microfilm of the Harrison Papers became available in the summer of 1959. The microfilm of the Harrison Papers and this index are the third micrcfilm and index to be issued in this series. Positive copies of the microfilm may be purchased from the Chief, Photoduplication Service, Library of Congress, Washington 25, D.C.
    [Show full text]