Obligate and Facultative Brood Reduction in Eagles: an Examination of Factors That Influence Fratricide
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
OBLIGATE AND FACULTATIVE BROOD REDUCTION IN EAGLES: AN EXAMINATION OF FACTORS THAT INFLUENCE FRATRICIDE THOMAS C. EDWARDS,JR. •'2 AND MICHAEL W. COLLOPY3 •Departmentof Biology,University of New Mexico,Albuquerque, New Mexico87131 USA, and 3Schoolof ForestResources and Conservation, 118 Newins-Ziegler Hall, Universityof Florida, Gainesville,Florida 32611 USA ABSTRACT.--Fratricidein eagles (Accipitridae: Accipitrinae) is either obligate[second hatched nestling (C2) always dies] or facultative (C2 occasionallydies) and appearsto be a function of relative size differencesbetween siblings.Several factors,including time between hatch- ing, differencesin hatching weights, and possiblythe sex of the nestling in conjunction with its hatching sequence,influence size difference. Size differencesare modified further by feeding rates of young by adults. These factors determine the relative differencesin locomotordevelopment and coordinationand thus the ability of the first-hatchednestling to control accessto and monopolize parent-provided resources.Significantly greater (P < 0.0001) within-clutch volume differences(an indicator of disparity in hatching weight) and greater time between hatching (mode of 3 versus 2 days) are found in eagles in which fratricide is obligate (three species)than in those in which fratricide is facultative (eight species).We suggestthat these differencesare proximate mechanismsthat accountfor ob- served differencesin the frequencyof fratricide in eagles.Although size differenceis deter- mined in part by the sex and hatching sequenceof the nestling, the role of offspring sex in fratricide is not clear. Received1 November1982, accepted 21 March 1983. IN many speciesof birds the older, dominant factor leading to fratricide. Size difference de- nestling (hereafterreferred to as C1) is instru- termines the ability of a nestling to dominate mental in causing the death of its younger, and outcompete its smaller sibling(s) (Lack subordinate(C2) sibling [e.g. South Polar Skua 1954). As nestlings age and gain weight, size (Catharacta maccormicki),Proctor 1975; Brown difference typically decreases.We suggestthat Booby (Sula leucogaster),Dorward 1962; many fratricide becomesprobable when size differ- speciesof raptors,Meyburg 1974,Stinson 1979]. ence increasesand exceedsa hypothetical frat- The death of C2 may result from direct aggres- ricide threshold. Before this threshold is sion by C1, but more often indirect harassment reached, size difference is such that dominance and intimidationprevent C2 from obtainingthe is indeterminate. This does not imply a lack of resourcesnecessary for growth and survival dominance when only slight differencesexist (e.g. food, brood time). This form of brood re- (see Poole 1979) but rather that the outcome of duction, termed fratricide, is observedin many sibling aggressiveinteractions may vary. Nei- birds of prey. Within this group, it is mostcom- ther sibling can effectively dominate the other. mon in eagles(Accipitridae: Accipitrinae) with Fratricide is unlikely unless size difference is a clutch size of two. Published literature sug- great enough to ensure exclusion of C2 from geststhere are two categoriesof fratricide:an parent-provided resources.For theoretical con- obligateform where C2 invariably diesas a re- siderations of fratricide see O'Connor (1978) and suit of fratricide, and a facultative form where Stinson (1979). C2 occasionally dies (Table 1). Size difference is a function of several factors The relative size difference of siblings (cal- acting in concert. Here, using Golden Eagles culated as Dt/weight C2, where Dt = sibling (Aquilachrysaetos) as a test species,we examine weight difference) is an important proximate several factors that we feel are important in understanding fratricide in eagles. We have used data from the literature, museum speci- 2 Present address: School of Forest Resources and mens, field studies, and, where available, from Conservation, 118 Newins-Ziegler Hall, University other eagles. Comparisons also are made be- of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611 USA. tween the eaglesgrouped in the two categories 630 The Auk 100: 630-635. July 1983 July 1983] Fratricidein Eagles 631 TABLE1. Speciesof eaglesexhibiting either obligoteor facultative fratricide as defined in text. Type of Species fratricidea Hatch intervalb Source Crowned Eagle O 3 Brown and Amadon (1968) (Stephanoaetuscoronatus) Verreaux's Eagle O 3 Meyburg (1974) (Aquila verreauxii) Brown and Amadon (1968) Lesser-spottedEagle O 3-4 Meyburg (1974) (A. pomarina) Brown and Amadon (1968) Greater-spottedEagle F 2 Brown and Amadon (1968) (A. clanga) Tawny Eagle F "several days" Brown and Amadon (1968) (A. rapax) Imperial Eagle F 2 Brown and Amadon (1968) (A. heliaca) Golden Eagle F 2 Brown and Amadon (1968) (A. chrysaetos) This study Wedge-tailed Eagle F 1-4 Brown and Amadon (1968) (A. audax) African Hawk Eagle F 3 Brown (1952) (Hieraaetusfasciatus) BootedEagle F "several days" Brown and Amadon (1968) (H. pennatus) Bald Eagle F 2 Brown and Amadon (1968) (Haliaeetusleucocephalus) O - obligate, F facultative. Represents mode in days. of fratricide to determine whether or not pos- establishesdominance with a minimum of ag- sible differencesin proximate mechanismscan gressiveinteractions. Both Meyburg (1974) and account for the observed differences in the fre- Newton (1977) consider hatch interval and its quency of fratricide. effect on size difference an important factor in fratricide. METHODS AND RESULTS One result of hatching asynchronyin eagles is the establishment of a feeding hierarchy Hatchinterval.--Comparing the categoriesof among the young whereby C1 can control ac- fratricide reveals that, in general, hatching in- cessto the female and feed first (Meyburg 1974, terval is greater when fratricide is obligate Collopy 1980). The presentationof food to the rather than facultative (Table 1). The effect of young in small,easily controlled bits allows C1 time between hatching on size difference can to deny C2 accessto the female and to ensure be seen in a comparison of 1-, 2-, and 3-day adequatefood for itself. As C1 becomessatiat- hatch intervals in 12 broods of Golden Eagles ed, its response to a begging attempt by C2 studied in southwesternIdaho (Fig. 1). Nest- becomesless aggressive.An analysisof time- ling weight measurements,used to determine lapse photography and over 1,950 h of brood- size difference,were taken every 4-6 days dur- rearing observationsfrom blinds showed that ing brood rearing (Kochert 1972,Collopy 1980). parentsmade no effort to distributefood equal- The percentagesize difference was calculated ly between the nestlingsand did not interfere from sibling weight difference/weightC2. Note where C1 responded aggressivelytoward C2 that the peak value in size difference increases (Collopy 1980). Thus, if feeding ratesare low, as time between hatching increases.Although siblings do not receive equal sharesof food, not examined here, the intensity of sibling and C2, receiving less, will exhibit slower aggressionis probably greater when size dif- growth than C1. Relative size difference can ference is small and dominance less determi- rapidly increase. nate (D. Mock, pers. comm.).A large difference Hatching weight.--Data on differences in 632 EDWARDSAND COLLOPY [Auk,Vol. 100 FEMALE-FEMALE FEMALE-MALEC 20 MALE-FEMALE AH=[ do •'o AGE OF C2 (DAYS) Fig. 1. Effectof nestlingsex, hatching sequence, and time betweenhatching on siblingsize difference in 12 broodsof Golden Eaglesin southwesternIdaho. Arrows on horizontalaxes indicate point in a particular broodwhere siblingsapproach equality in size.Note verticalscale difference in Fig. lb. hatching weights of sibling eaglesare limited. weight properly, one should know the laying The lower relative hatching weight of C2 is sequencein each museum egg set. Except for documented for Verreaux's Eagle (Aquila ver- Verreaux's Eagle, however, this information is reauxii;Gargett, unpubl. data) and the African unavailable. Thus, our results represent a mag- Hawk Eagle(Hieraaetus fasciatus; Meyburg 1974) nitude of volume difference within a clutch, and is suggestedfor other large eagles (New- and, although inappropriate for testing hy- ton 1977). One possible indicator of hatching pothesesregarding hatch-weight differencesin weight is egg volume (seeParsons 1970, Howe particular species, the results can be used to 1976). Egg-volume data were obtained from comparepotential hatch-weight differencesbe- museum specimensfor eight speciesof eagles tween eaglesin which fratricide is obligate and exhibiting facultative fratricide and three those in which it is facultative. This compari- speciesin which fratricide is obligate. Volume son shows that significant differencesdo exist: was estimated from the equation V = 0.51LB2, those speciesin which fratricide is obligate ex- where L = length and B = breadth of the egg hibit greater within-clutch volume difference (Hoyt 1979). The equation (volume difference than do those defined as facultaive (n = 11, P < between eggs/volume smaller egg) was used to 0.0001, Kruskal-Wallis single-factortest). calculate the percentageof volume difference Nestlingsex and hatching sequence.--In a brood within each museum clutch examined (Table in which both nestlings obtain sufficient food 2). to maintain maximum growth, size difference To test the effect of difference in hatching peaksslightly after C2 hatches,then decreases July 1983] Fratricidein Eagles 633 TABLE2. Analysis of within-clutch egg-volume difference for eagles exhibiting