DOCSLIB.ORG

Materials Science Needs and Is Getting Quantitative Methods Gerd Ceder and Jerzy Bernholc

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Materials Science Needs and Is Getting Quantitative Methods Gerd Ceder and Jerzy Bernholc Physics Today Materials Science Needs and Is Getting Quantitative Methods Gerd Ceder and Jerzy Bernholc Citation: Physics Today 53(2), 75 (2000); doi: 10.1063/1.882979 View online: http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.882979 View Table of Contents: http://scitation.aip.org/content/aip/magazine/physicstoday/53/2?ver=pdfcov Published by the AIP Publishing Reuse of AIP Publishing content is subject to the terms at: https://publishing.aip.org/authors/rights-and-permissions. Download to IP: 67.180.152.84 On: Wed, 22 Jun 2016 14:26:45 Further, Rhodes states that implo- results suggests that the recessional LETTERS (continued from page 15) sion, the key development beyond velocities measured by Tifft could be awrence Cranberg compares the “Los Alamos Primer” phase, is written as integral multiples of H0, attributable to Seth Neddermeyer, so that v = nؒH d , where n is an L Oppenheimer with Fermi. As 0 0 postdoc of the former’s and student and Rhodes quotes John Manley, integer and d0 is a basic unit of dis- of the latter’s, I feel that some thing who was there, as saying that Ned- tance (1 Mpc). This equation is basi- should be said. Certainly Fermi was dermeyer faced “stiff opposition” cally a quantized form of Hubble’s a marvelous model for a physicist, from Oppenheimer and others.2 law, and it implies that galaxies are and I don’t know who could stand I stand by my original letter, but located only at certain distances the comparison. Cranberg blames that letter will have served a higher d = nd0 away from us, at least in Oppie for not being, as Fermi was, purpose than evaluating Oppen- the near universe. Just how far out successful in experiment as well as heimer’s role in the A-bomb project this equation would apply is not theory. But who else was? Einstein? if it focuses attention on the under- clear, but it does hold for our near- Feynman? Schwinger? Von Neu- lying and recurring general ques- est galactic neighbor, M31 (the mann? In this, Fermi was probably tions about the requirements for Andromeda galaxy), which is unique in our century. Cranberg leadership of large-scale scientific- known to be approximately 1 Mpc credits development of the A-bomb to engineering endeavors. And I hope away (corresponding to n = 1 in the President Roosevelt, and its use to that both the letter and this ex- above formula). President Truman, and he takes change will continue to stimulate A quantized Hubble’s law might Oppie to task for not having made constructive discussion of those be masked by other effects farther any technical contributions. requirements—surely a topic worthy out, but it does suggest that the I am not happy that the bomb of further discussion in the pages of Hubble constant may play a role in was developed, and much less so both PHYSICS TODAY and APS News. the large-scale universe similar to that it was used, and I do not admire that played by Planck’s constant in Oppie for having been the director of References the atomic domain—that is, in giv- the project. But I have only heard 1. R. Rhodes, The Making of the Atomic ing rise to structure in the universe. good things about his wartime direc- Bomb, Simon and Schuster, New York (1986), p. 460. References tion of Los Alamos, never any criti- 2. Rhodes, pp. 466–67. 1. For a review of his work on redshift cism. In fact, from all that I have LAWRENCE CRANBERG quantization since 1976, see W. G. read, Oppie was an excellent direc- Austin, Texas Tifft, Astrophys. Space Sci. 227, 25 tor. And before the war, he had been (1995). the outstanding leader and teacher 2. For a review of their work on the prob- of theoretical physics in the US. He Does H Play Role in lem, see B. N. C. Guthrie, W. M. Napi- brought into existence the first Am- 0 er, Astron. Astrophys. 310, 353 (1996). erican school of theoretical physics. Universe Like h Does 3. W. Freedman, Sci. Am., November As a student just after the war, I 1992, p. 54. still studied quantum mechanics in Atomic Domain? MAURICE T. RAIFORD from prewar mimeographed notes of f the many redshift studies that ([email protected]) an Oppenheimer course (the teacher Ohave been done over the years, University of Central Florida of my course was Edward Teller). As one of the most interesting has to be Orlando, Florida a young postdoc at the Institute for that of William Tifft of the Steward Advanced Study in Princeton in Observatory in Arizona. He has been 1948–49, where Oppie was the dir- studying and reporting on redshift Materials Science ector, I—like others interested in data for over two decades now, and Needs and Is Getting field theory and in particle phys- has repeatedly found a bunching of ics—eagerly attended the weekly the data around certain values.1 Quantitative Methods seminars he organized. When interpreted in terms of reces- he following comment is prompt- In short, denying Oppenheimer’s sional velocities in the usual way, Ted by my having read Jerzy leading role in physics, especially in these values are integral multiples Bernholc’s article, “Computational US physics, is hardly correct. of a certain basic value—namely, Materials Science: The Era of Ap- JACK STEINBERGER 72 km/s. Although somewhat con- plied Quantum Mechanics,” in your ([email protected]) troversial initially, these basic re- September 1999 issue (page 30). CERN sults were later confirmed by Bruce Although we must be impressed by Geneva, Switzerland Guthrie and William Napier of the the ingenuity that is often displayed Royal Observatory in the UK.2 in large-scale ab initio simulations, RANBERG REPLIES: I welcome the Furthermore, these results have the road from breaking a solid or C responses of Timothy Karpin, also proved to be very close to the molecule in a simulation to the engi- James Osborn, and Jack Steinberger. latest value reported for the Hub- neering concept of “strength” is a To add useful evidence and analysis ble constant, as announced by the long one, and unlikely to be tra- to the A-bomb story, though, I too Hubble Space Telescope H0 Key Pro- versed by using simulations only. think it best to cite sources. My ject team: 71 km/s per megaparsec Similarly, other relevant engineering reading of Richard Rhodes, for exam- (see PHYSICS TODAY, August 1999, properties, such as corrosion and ple, is that he attributes the “Los page 19). Here it is useful to note fracture resistance, phase (meta)sta- Alamos Primer” to lectures given by that, in her 1992 survey,3 team bility, microstructure formation, and Robert Serber and compiled by asso- coleader Wendy Freedman gave macroscopic transport, are often a 1 ciate lab director Edward Condon. the most probable value of H0 as complex (and unknown) combination J. Robert Oppenheimer’s role was 73 km/(s Mpc). of microscopic phenomena. evidently to convene the lectures. The closeness of all of the above What is the problem? Due to the FEBRUARY 2000 PHYSICS TODAY 75 Reuse of AIP Publishing content is subject to the terms at: https://publishing.aip.org/authors/rights-and-permissions. Download to IP: 67.180.152.84 On: Wed, 22 Jun 2016 14:26:45 lack of microscopic information, the the “minimum strength” prediction ful for having it brought to our discipline of materials science and is still quite useful. Recent measure- attention. engineering has historically devel- ments made by Richard Smalley’s3 To the best of our knowledge, the oped as an empirical and nonquanti- and Charles Lieber’s groups show possibility of spontaneous P, CP, and tative one. Now that advances in that carbon nanotubes can sustain T violation in strong interactions is computational quantum mechanics at least a 5% strain—making them attributable to T. D. Lee, as reported have made detailed microscopic the “strongest” material known! in his 1973 paper, “A Theory of Spon- information available, we find our- I must also point out that the taneous T Violation.” 1 In a modern selves searching for quantitative progress made in computer science context, Lee considered an hЈ con- materials theories with which to affected my article in another, much densate, which is equivalent to a integrate them. The true challenge, less desirable way. My overconfident region with a nonzero q angle. For therefore, is to develop theories that computer spelling checker changed example, his hЈ condensate induces will lead to the systematic coarse Alex Zettl’s name to Alex Seattle, a nonzero electric dipole moment graining of microscopic phenomena and I, for one, feel profoundly sorry of the neutron (equation 49) and into macroscopic behavior. The prob- and apologize for failing to read the P- and CP-odd contributions to lem, then, is one of detailed knowl- corrections one more time. hadron–hadron scattering ampli- edge of the phenomena at the inter- References tudes (equation 48). mediate scale, rather than one of In two 1974 papers,2 Lee, and Lee computational quantum mechanics. 1. R. E. Rudd, J. Q. Broughton, Phys. Rev. B 58, R5893 (1998). E. B. Tadmor, and Gian Carlo Wick, discussed how GERD CEDER metastable vacuum states, such as ([email protected]) G. S. Smith, N. Bernstein, E. Kaxiras, Phys. Rev. B 59, 235 (1999). those with ∀hЈ¬ Þ 0, arise in effective Massachusetts Institute of Technology 2. M. Buongiorno Nardelli, B. I. Yakob- hadronic theories, and can form Cambridge, Massachusetts son, J. Bernholc, Phys. Rev.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Revisiting One World Or None
    Revisiting One World or None. Sixty years ago, atomic energy was new and the world was still reverberating from the shocks of the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Immediately after the end of the Second World War, the first instinct of the administration and Congress was to protect the “secret” of the atomic bomb. The atomic scientists—what today would be called nuclear physicists— who had worked on the Manhattan project to develop atomic bombs recognized that there was no secret, that any technically advanced nation could, with adequate resources, reproduce what they had done. They further believed that when a single aircraft, eventually a single missile, armed with a single bomb could destroy an entire city, no defense system would ever be adequate. Given this combination, the world seemed headed for a period of unprecedented danger. Many of the scientists who had worked on the Manhattan Project felt a special responsibility to encourage a public debate about these new and terrifying products of modern science. They formed an organization, the Federation of Atomic Scientists, dedicated to avoiding the threat of nuclear weapons and nuclear proliferation. Convinced that neither guarding the nuclear “secret” nor any defense could keep the world safe, they encouraged international openness in nuclear physics research and in the expected nuclear power industry as the only way to avoid a disastrous arms race in nuclear weapons. William Higinbotham, the first Chairman of the Association of Los Alamos Scientists and the first Chairman of the Federation of Atomic Scientists, wanted to expand the organization beyond those who had worked on the Manhattan Project, for two reasons.
    [Show full text]
  • I. I. Rabi Papers [Finding Aid]. Library of Congress. [PDF Rendered Tue Apr
    I. I. Rabi Papers A Finding Aid to the Collection in the Library of Congress Manuscript Division, Library of Congress Washington, D.C. 1992 Revised 2010 March Contact information: http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.mss/mss.contact Additional search options available at: http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.mss/eadmss.ms998009 LC Online Catalog record: http://lccn.loc.gov/mm89076467 Prepared by Joseph Sullivan with the assistance of Kathleen A. Kelly and John R. Monagle Collection Summary Title: I. I. Rabi Papers Span Dates: 1899-1989 Bulk Dates: (bulk 1945-1968) ID No.: MSS76467 Creator: Rabi, I. I. (Isador Isaac), 1898- Extent: 41,500 items ; 105 cartons plus 1 oversize plus 4 classified ; 42 linear feet Language: Collection material in English Location: Manuscript Division, Library of Congress, Washington, D.C. Summary: Physicist and educator. The collection documents Rabi's research in physics, particularly in the fields of radar and nuclear energy, leading to the development of lasers, atomic clocks, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and to his 1944 Nobel Prize in physics; his work as a consultant to the atomic bomb project at Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory and as an advisor on science policy to the United States government, the United Nations, and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization during and after World War II; and his studies, research, and professorships in physics chiefly at Columbia University and also at Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Selected Search Terms The following terms have been used to index the description of this collection in the Library's online catalog. They are grouped by name of person or organization, by subject or location, and by occupation and listed alphabetically therein.
    [Show full text]
  • UC San Diego UC San Diego Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    UC San Diego UC San Diego Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title The new prophet : Harold C. Urey, scientist, atheist, and defender of religion Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3j80v92j Author Shindell, Matthew Benjamin Publication Date 2011 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO The New Prophet: Harold C. Urey, Scientist, Atheist, and Defender of Religion A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in History (Science Studies) by Matthew Benjamin Shindell Committee in charge: Professor Naomi Oreskes, Chair Professor Robert Edelman Professor Martha Lampland Professor Charles Thorpe Professor Robert Westman 2011 Copyright Matthew Benjamin Shindell, 2011 All rights reserved. The Dissertation of Matthew Benjamin Shindell is approved, and it is acceptable in quality and form for publication on microfilm and electronically: ___________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________ Chair University of California, San Diego 2011 iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Signature Page……………………………………………………………………...... iii Table of Contents……………………………………………………………………. iv Acknowledgements………………………………………………………………….
    [Show full text]
  • ABSTRACT Title of Dissertation: the PRINCIPAL UNCERTAINTY: U.S
    ABSTRACT Title of Dissertation: THE PRINCIPAL UNCERTAINTY: U.S. ATOMIC INTELLIGENCE, 1942-1949 Vincent Jonathan Houghton, Doctor of Philosophy, 2013 Dissertation directed by: Professor Jon T. Sumida Department of History The subject of this dissertation is the U. S. atomic intelligence effort against both Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union in the period 1942-1949. Both of these intelligence efforts operated within the framework of an entirely new field of intelligence: scientific intelligence. Because of the atomic bomb, for the first time in history a nation’s scientific resources – the abilities of its scientists, the state of its research institutions and laboratories, its scientific educational system – became a key consideration in assessing a potential national security threat. Considering how successfully the United States conducted the atomic intelligence effort against the Germans in the Second World War, why was the United States Government unable to create an effective atomic intelligence apparatus to monitor Soviet scientific and nuclear capabilities? Put another way, why did the effort against the Soviet Union fail so badly, so completely, in all potential metrics – collection, analysis, and dissemination? In addition, did the general assessment of German and Soviet science lead to particular assumptions about their abilities to produce nuclear weapons? How did this assessment affect American presuppositions regarding the German and Soviet strategic threats? Despite extensive historical work on atomic intelligence, the current historiography has not adequately addressed these questions. THE PRINCIPAL UNCERTAINTY: U.S. ATOMIC INTELLIGENCE, 1942-1949 By Vincent Jonathan Houghton Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Maryland, College Park, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 2013 Advisory Committee: Professor Jon T.
    [Show full text]
  • Newly Opened Correspondence Illuminates Einstein's Personal Life
    CENTER FOR HISTORY OF PHYSICS NEWSLETTER Vol. XXXVIII, Number 2 Fall 2006 One Physics Ellipse, College Park, MD 20740-3843, Tel. 301-209-3165 Newly Opened Correspondence Illuminates Einstein’s Personal Life By David C. Cassidy, Hofstra University, with special thanks to Diana Kormos Buchwald, Einstein Papers Project he Albert Einstein Archives at the Hebrew University of T Jerusalem recently opened a large collection of Einstein’s personal correspondence from the period 1912 until his death in 1955. The collection consists of nearly 1,400 items. Among them are about 300 letters and cards written by Einstein, pri- marily to his second wife Elsa Einstein, and some 130 letters Einstein received from his closest family members. The col- lection had been in the possession of Einstein’s step-daughter, Margot Einstein, who deposited it with the Hebrew University of Jerusalem with the stipulation that it remain closed for twen- ty years following her death, which occurred on July 8, 1986. The Archives released the materials to public viewing on July 10, 2006. On the same day Princeton University Press released volume 10 of The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein, con- taining 148 items from the collection through December 1920, along with other newly available correspondence. Later items will appear in future volumes. “These letters”, write the Ein- stein editors, “provide the reader with substantial new source material for the study of Einstein’s personal life and the rela- tionships with his closest family members and friends.” H. Richard Gustafson playing with a guitar to pass the time while monitoring the control room at a Fermilab experiment.
    [Show full text]
  • Sir Arthur Eddington and the Foundations of Modern Physics
    Sir Arthur Eddington and the Foundations of Modern Physics Ian T. Durham Submitted for the degree of PhD 1 December 2004 University of St. Andrews School of Mathematics & Statistics St. Andrews, Fife, Scotland 1 Dedicated to Alyson Nate & Sadie for living through it all and loving me for being you Mom & Dad my heroes Larry & Alice Sharon for constant love and support for everything said and unsaid Maggie for making 13 a lucky number Gram D. Gram S. for always being interested for strength and good food Steve & Alice for making Texas worth visiting 2 Contents Preface … 4 Eddington’s Life and Worldview … 10 A Philosophical Analysis of Eddington’s Work … 23 The Roaring Twenties: Dawn of the New Quantum Theory … 52 Probability Leads to Uncertainty … 85 Filling in the Gaps … 116 Uniqueness … 151 Exclusion … 185 Numerical Considerations and Applications … 211 Clarity of Perception … 232 Appendix A: The Zoo Puzzle … 268 Appendix B: The Burying Ground at St. Giles … 274 Appendix C: A Dialogue Concerning the Nature of Exclusion and its Relation to Force … 278 References … 283 3 I Preface Albert Einstein’s theory of general relativity is perhaps the most significant development in the history of modern cosmology. It turned the entire field of cosmology into a quantitative science. In it, Einstein described gravity as being a consequence of the geometry of the universe. Though this precise point is still unsettled, it is undeniable that dimensionality plays a role in modern physics and in gravity itself. Following quickly on the heels of Einstein’s discovery, physicists attempted to link gravity to the only other fundamental force of nature known at that time: electromagnetism.
    [Show full text]
  • Memorial Tributes: Volume 9
    THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS This PDF is available at http://nap.edu/10094 SHARE Memorial Tributes: Volume 9 DETAILS 326 pages | 6 x 9 | HARDBACK ISBN 978-0-309-07411-7 | DOI 10.17226/10094 CONTRIBUTORS GET THIS BOOK National Academy of Engineering FIND RELATED TITLES Visit the National Academies Press at NAP.edu and login or register to get: – Access to free PDF downloads of thousands of scientific reports – 10% off the price of print titles – Email or social media notifications of new titles related to your interests – Special offers and discounts Distribution, posting, or copying of this PDF is strictly prohibited without written permission of the National Academies Press. (Request Permission) Unless otherwise indicated, all materials in this PDF are copyrighted by the National Academy of Sciences. Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Memorial Tributes: Volume 9 i Memorial Tributes NATIONAL ACADEMY OF ENGINEERING Copyright National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Memorial Tributes: Volume 9 ii Copyright National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Memorial Tributes: Volume 9 iii NATIONAL ACADEMY OF ENGINEERING OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Memorial Tributes Volume 9 NATIONAL ACADEMY PRESS Washington, D.C. 2001 Copyright National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Memorial Tributes: Volume 9 iv International Standard Book Number 0–309–07411–8 International Standard Serial Number 1075–8844 Library of Congress Catalog Card Number 20–1088636 Additional copies of this publication are available from: National Academy Press 2101 Constitution Avenue, N.W. Box 285 Washington, D.C. 20055 800– 624–6242 or 202–334–3313 (in the Washington Metropolitan Area) B-467 Copyright 2001 by the National Academy of Sciences.
    [Show full text]
  • From Clockwork to Crapshoot: a History of Physics
    From Clockwork to Crapshoot a history of physics From Clockwork to Crapshoot a history of physics Roger G. Newton The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press Cambridge, Massachusetts • London, England • 2007 Copyright © 2007 by the President and Fellows of Harvard College All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Newton, Roger G. From clockwork to crapshoot : a history of physics / Roger G. Newton p. cm. Includes bibliographical references. ISBN-13: 978–0–674–02337–6 (alk. paper) ISBN-10: 0–674–02337–4 (alk. paper) 1. Physics—History. I. Title. QC7.N398 2007 530.09—dc22 2007043583 To Ruth, Julie, Rachel, Paul, Lily, Eden, Isabella, Daniel, and Benjamin Preface This book is a survey of the history of physics, together with the as- sociated astronomy, mathematics, and chemistry, from the begin- nings of science to the present. I pay particular attention to the change from a deterministic view of nature to one dominated by probabilities, from viewing the universe as running like clockwork to seeing it as a crapshoot. Written for the general scientifically inter- ested reader rather than for professional scientists, the book presents, whenever needed, brief explanations of the scientific issues involved, biographical thumbnail sketches of the protagonists, and descrip- tions of the changing instruments that enabled scientists to discover ever new facts begging to be understood and to test their theories. As does any history of science, it runs the risk of overemphasizing the role of major innovators while ignoring what Thomas Kuhn called “normal science.”To recognize a new experimental or observa- tional fact as a discovery demanding an explanation by a new theory takes a community of knowledgeable and active participants, most of whom remain anonymous.
    [Show full text]
  • Training Quantum Mechanics: Enrollments and Epistemology in Modern Physics
    Training Quantum Mechanics: Enrollments and Epistemology in Modern Physics David Kaiser Program in Science, Technology, and Society, MIT and Department of Physics, MIT Building E51-185 Massachusetts Institute of Technology 77 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02139 [email protected] Abstract*. The classrooms of American colleges and universities bulged like never before after World War II. Several major changes, including the G. I. Bill, brought over two million veterans into the nation’s institutions of higher education. Enrollments in nearly every department rose exponentially. Yet graduate enrollments in physics departments grew fastest, at almost twice the rate of all other fields combined. Twenty- five years later, enrollments in nearly all fields underwent a major contraction; again, physics led the way, falling faster and deeper than any other field. This paper examines some effects of these violent demographic swings on the subject of physics itself. How, in short, did the enrollment bubble affect the stuff of knowledge? I focus on how the subject of quantum mechanics—physicists’ description of matter at the atomic scale, the cornerstone of modern physics—was taught in the decades after World War II. Faced with runaway enrollments, American physicists re-crafted the subject in the classroom, accentuating those elements that could lend themselves to high throughput pedagogy—a cache of exemplars that could be routinized into problem sets and exam questions—while quietly dropping the last vestiges of “philosophy” or “interpretation” that had long been considered crucial to understanding the topic. Introduction: The Cold War Bubble “Physical scientists are in vogue these days,” announced a commentator in Harper’s a few years after the end of World War II.
    [Show full text]
  • A Brief History of Nuclear Astrophysics
    A BRIEF HISTORY OF NUCLEAR ASTROPHYSICS Stellar Origin of Energy the Elements Nuclear Astrophysics Astrophysics Nuclear Physics A BRIEF HISTORY OF NUCLEAR ASTROPHYSICS PART I THE ENERGY OF STARS Thermodynamics: the age of the Earth and the energy of the Sun 1847 : Robert Julius von Mayer Sun heated by fall of meteors 1854 : Hermann von Helmholtz Gravitational energy of protosolar nebula turns into kinetic energy of meteors Time ~ EGrav/LSun ~ 30 My 1850s : William Thompson (Lord Kelvin) Sun heated at formation from meteorite fall, now « an incadescent liquid mass » cooling age 10 – 100 My 1859: Charles Darwin Origin of species : Rate of erosion of the Weald valley is 1 inch/century or 22 miles wild (X 1100 feet high) in 300 My A gaseous, contracting and heating Sun Mean solar density : ~1.35 g/cc Sun liquid Incompressible 1860s: J. Homer Lane ; 1880s :August Ritter : Sun gaseous Compressible As it shrinks, it releases gravitational energy AND it gets hotter Earth Mayer – Kelvin - Helmholtz Helmholtz - Lane -Ritter A gaseous, contracting and heating Sun Mean solar density : ~1.35 g/cc Sun liquid Incompressible 1860s: J. Homer Lane ; 1880s :August Ritter : Sun gaseous Compressible As it shrinks, it releases gravitational energy AND it gets hotter Earth Mayer – Kelvin - Helmholtz Helmholtz - Lane -Ritter A gaseous, contracting and heating Sun Mean solar density : ~1.35 g/cc Sun liquid Incompressible 1860s: J. Homer Lane ; 1880s :August Ritter : Sun gaseous Compressible As it shrinks, it releases gravitational energy AND it gets hotter Earth Mayer – Kelvin - Helmholtz Helmholtz - Lane -Ritter A gaseous, contracting and heating Sun Mean solar density : ~1.35 g/cc Sun liquid Incompressible 1860s: J.
    [Show full text]
  • One View of the Role of the NAS In
    Weapons of Mass Destruction-- 2015 Richard L. Garwin IBM Fellow Emeritus IBM Thomas J. Watson Research Center P.O. Box 218, Yorktown Heights, NY 10598 www.fas.org/RLG/ Email: [email protected] Presented in the Columbia University Physics Department Course Spring 2015 W3018 Weapons of Mass Destruction February 5 at 2:40 pm Pupin Hall Room 301 _02/05/2015_ R.L. Garwin WMD 2015.doc 1 Version 2 of 02/05/2015 Abstract: Millions of deaths and the end of civilizations can be inflicted by knife, machete, or fire, or even by the pen or the spoken word, but a weapon of mass destruction – WMD-- implies such a result more centrally imposed. Specifically, I class nuclear, , biological, and cyber weapons as WMD, relegating chemical, high-explosive, and incendiary weapons to a lesser category. Along another dimension, there are near- universal bans on states’ use of biological weapons--BW, chemical weapons--CW, antipersonnel land mines, exploding anti-personnel bullets, and even on possession of BW; not all these treaties or agreements are honored by all. This talk will focus on nuclear weapons, their effects, development, deployment, delivery, control, and on efforts to limit or eliminate them—e.g., the Nonproliferation Treaty—NPT, Limited Test Ban Treaty—LTBT, Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty—CTBT, ABM Treaty limiting systems for intercepting ballistic missiles carrying nuclear weapons, Strategic Arms Limitation or Reduction Treaties—SALT or START, etc. But mostly on the technical aspects of nuclear weapons. A key tool to learning is simple search of my web site: site:fas.org/RLG/ biological weapons Nixon that yields 18 results, including http://www.fas.org/rlg/020821-terrorism.htm _02/05/2015_ R.L.
    [Show full text]
  • (Common) Sense of the Bomb in the First Nuclear War
    Making (Common) Sense of the Bomb in the First Nuclear War James J. Farrell1 Introduction The Bomb fell on Hiroshima at 8:16:02 local time. The Bomb fell on America sixteen hours later, when the White House issued a press release from President Truman. The bomb that fell on Hiroshima exploded forty-three seconds after it fell from the bomb bay of the Enola Gay; the bomb that fell on America had been more than forty years in preparation, dating to the 1896 discovery of radium. How would Americans make sense of the new invention? Harry Truman's statement was a start, the first public pronouncement on the Bomb. But the words he pronounced had been shaped in the preceding six years. The uncommon people who created the bomb had also created a discourse that made sense of it. When President Truman and other Americans first learned about the atomic bomb in 1945, it came packaged in assumptions about war and weapons, about science and secrecy, about government and citizenship, about technology and progress that familiarized this unfamiliar weapon. The sense of these uncommon people— derived from discourses of science, nationalism, war, and consumption—became the common sense of the nuclear age. This essay traces the (social) construction of that common sense during the first nuclear war. When Harry Truman took the oath of office as President of the United States, he was like the American public; he knew virtually nothing about the atomic bomb (and no more about plans to use it on Japan). Truman had been Vice- 0026-3079/95/3602-005$ 1.50/0 5 President Truman announcing the use of the atomic bomb.
    [Show full text]