Sustainability Appraisal & Strategic Environmental Assessment

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Sustainability Appraisal & Strategic Environmental Assessment Essex Replacement Minerals Local Plan: Pre-Submission Draft Sustainability Appraisal and Strategic Environmental Assessment Environmental Report: Non Technical Summary November 2012 Environmental Report - Non-Technical Summary November 2012 Place Services at Essex County Council Environmental Report - Non-Technical Summary November 2012 Contents 1 Introduction and Methodology ........................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background ......................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 The Replacement Minerals Local Plan: Pre-Submission Draft............................................ 1 1.3 Sustainability Appraisal and Strategic Environmental Assessment .................................... 1 1.4 The Aim and Structure of this Report .................................................................................. 2 2 Sustainability Context, Baseline and Objectives.............................................................. 3 2.1 Introduction.......................................................................................................................... 3 2.2 Plans & Programmes .......................................................................................................... 3 2.3 Baseline Information / Key Sustainability Issues................................................................. 5 2.4 Sustainability Objectives ................................................................................................... 12 2.5 Appraisal of Policies .......................................................................................................... 13 3 Appraisal of Spatial Vision, Aims and Strategic Objectives.......................................... 15 3.1 Introduction........................................................................................................................ 15 3.2 The Spatial Vision ............................................................................................................. 15 3.3 Aims and Strategic Objectives .......................................................................................... 17 4 Appraisal of the Strategic Policies, ‘The Strategy’ and Strategic Priorities ................ 20 4.1 Introduction........................................................................................................................ 20 4.2 Policy S1 Presumption in Favour of Sustainable Development ........................................ 20 4.3 The Strategy and Policy S2 Strategic Priorities for Minerals Development....................... 21 4.4 Policy S3 Climate Change................................................................................................. 23 4.5 Policy S4 Reducing the Use of Mineral Resources........................................................... 24 4.6 Policy S5 Creating and Safeguarding a Network of Aggregate Recycling Facilities ......... 26 4.7 Policy S6 Provision for Sand and Gravel Extraction ......................................................... 28 4.8 Policy S7 Provision for Industrial Minerals ........................................................................ 29 4.9 Policy S8 Safeguarding Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves .................................. 31 4.10 Policy S9 Safeguarding Mineral Transhipment Sites and Secondary Processing Facilities32 4.11 Policy S10 Protecting and Enhancing the Environment and Local Amenity...................... 35 4.12 Policy S11 Access and Transport ..................................................................................... 37 4.13 Policy S12 Mineral Site Restoration and After Use ........................................................... 38 5 Appraisal of The Minerals Provision Figure.................................................................... 41 5.1 Introduction........................................................................................................................ 41 5.2 Sub National Aggregate ‘Apportionment’ .......................................................................... 41 5.3 Alternative Considered ...................................................................................................... 43 6 Preferred Minerals Sites for Primary Mineral Extraction ............................................... 46 6.1 Introduction........................................................................................................................ 46 6.2 Policy P1 Preferred Sites for Primary Sand and Gravel Extraction................................... 47 6.3 Policy P2 Preferred Sites for Industrial Minerals ............................................................... 54 Place Services at Essex County Council Environmental Report - Non-Technical Summary November 2012 7 Development Management Policies................................................................................. 56 7.1 Introduction........................................................................................................................ 56 7.2 Policy DM1 Development Management Criteria ............................................................... 56 7.3 Policy DM2 Planning Conditions and Legal Agreements .................................................. 58 7.4 Policy DM3 Primary Processing Plant............................................................................... 59 7.5 Policy DM4 Secondary Processing Plant .......................................................................... 60 8 Implementation, Monitoring and Review......................................................................... 62 8.1 Introduction........................................................................................................................ 62 8.2 Policy IMR1 Monitoring and Review.................................................................................. 62 9 Conclusions ....................................................................................................................... 64 9.1 The Vision ......................................................................................................................... 64 9.2 Aims and Objectives.......................................................................................................... 65 9.3 Strategy Policies................................................................................................................ 66 9.4 The Minerals Provision Figure........................................................................................... 69 9.5 Preferred Sites for Sand & Gravel..................................................................................... 71 9.6 Preferred Sites for Industrial Minerals ............................................................................... 75 9.7 Development Management Policies.................................................................................. 75 9.8 Implementation, Monitoring and Review Policy................................................................. 76 10 Monitoring and Next Steps ............................................................................................... 78 10.1 Monitoring.......................................................................................................................... 78 10.2 Next Steps......................................................................................................................... 78 List of Tables Table 1: The Environmental Report Requirements ...................................................................... 2 Table 2: Plans and Programmes .................................................................................................. 3 Table 3: SA/SEA Sustainability Framework of MLP ................................................................... 12 Table 4: Example of Appraisal Format ....................................................................................... 13 Table 5: Alternative ‘Non-Preferred’ Transhipment Sites in the County ..................................... 34 Table 6: Short-Medium Term Impacts of the Preferred Sites for Sand and Gravel in the North- Eastern Area of the County .......................................................................................... 47 Table 7: Long Term Impacts of the Preferred Sites for Sand and Gravel in the North-Eastern Area of the County ................................................................................................................ 48 Table 8: Alternative ‘Non-Preferred’ Sites for Primary Sand and Gravel Extraction in the North- Eastern Area of the County .......................................................................................... 49 Table 9: Short-Medium Term Impacts of the Preferred Sites for Sand and Gravel in the Central Area of the County........................................................................................................ 51 Table 10: Long Term Impacts of the Preferred Sites for Sand and Gravel in the Central Area of the County .......................................................................................................................... 52 Table 11: Alternative ‘Non-Preferred’ Sites for Primary Sand and Gravel Extraction in the Central Area of the County........................................................................................................ 53 Place Services at Essex County Council Environmental Report - Non-Technical
Recommended publications
  • 10 December 2014 Extraordinary Council Whole Council Elections For
    10 December 2014 Extraordinary Council Whole Council Elections for Brentwood Borough Council Report of: Ben Bix, Corporate and Democratic Services Manager Wards Affected: All This report is: Public 1. Executive Summary 1.1 This report advises Council of its power to change its electoral scheme to whole council elections. Brentwood Borough Council operates an election scheme by thirds 1, holding a Borough election three years out of four. The typical cost to the Council of a shared election is £69,000; the cost of a sole Borough Council election is £95,000. Whole council elections offer a potential saving of between £138,000 and £195,000 over a four year cycle. The Council can change its electoral cycle should it resolve to do so. 1.2 In order to resolve to change its electoral cycle, the Council must: a) Have taken reasonable steps to consult such persons as it thinks appropriate on the proposed change; b) Convene an extraordinary meeting of Council to consider the proposed change; c) Have at least two-thirds of those voting at the extraordinary meeting of Council vote in favour of the proposed change; and d) Ensure that the year for the first ordinary whole council election is specified in the resolution. This cannot be the same year(s) as whole council elections for the County Council. 1.3 This report facilitates steps b), c) and d) above. Step a) was initiated by Ordinary Council on 22 October 2014. 2. Recommendation that: Council decides whether to retain a scheme of elections by thirds or change to a scheme of whole council elections.
    [Show full text]
  • Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment Airport Business Park
    Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment for Airport Business Park Southend on behalf of Henry Boot Developments Ltd (South) October 2015 Contact: Simon Neesam Technical Director The Landscape Partnership The Granary, Sun Wharf Deben Road Woodbridge Suffolk IP12 1AZ t: 01394 380 509 www.thelandscapepartnership.com The Landscape Partnership Ltd is a practice of Chartered Landscape Architects, Chartered Town Planners and Chartered Environmentalists, registered with the Landscape Institute and a member of the Institute of Environmental Management & Assessment and the Arboricultural Association. The Landscape Partnership Registered office Greenwood House 15a St Cuthberts Street Bedford MK40 3JG Registered in England No. 2709001 Status: For planning, Issue 02 Airport Business Park, Southend Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment Contents Report Executive Summary 1 Introduction 2 Methodology and assumptions 3 Site location 4 Landscape-related designations 5 Landscape features and landscape character 6 Views 7 Proposed development and landscape strategy 8 Effects on landscape-related designations 9 Effects on landscape features and landscape character 10 Effects on views 11 Summary and Conclusion Appendices Appendix 1: Methodology Appendix 2: National Character Area Profiles, extracts from NCA 81: Greater Thames Estuary and NCA 111: Northern Thames Basin Appendix 3: Essex Landscape Character Assessment, extract for LCA G3: South Essex Coastal Towns Appendix 4: Figures and photographs (presented in separate A3 document): Figure 1 Location plan
    [Show full text]
  • Essex County Council Primary School Admissions Brochure South Essex
    Schools Admission Policies Directory 2021/2022 South Essex Basildon, Brentwood, Castle Point and Rochford Districts Apply online at www.essex.gov.uk/admissions Page 2 South Essex Online admissions Parents and carers who live in the Essex You will be able to make your application County Council area (excluding those online from 9 November 2020. living in the Borough of Southend-on-Sea or in Thurrock) can apply for their child’s The closing date for primary applications is 15 January 2021. This is the statutory national school place online using the Essex closing date set by the Government. Online Admissions Service at: www.essex.gov.uk/admissions The online application system has a number of benefits for parents and carers: • you can access related information through links on the website to find out more about individual schools, such as home to school transport or inspection reports; • when you have submitted your application you will receive an email confirming this; • You will be told the outcome of your online application by email on offer day if you requested this when you applied. Key Points to Remember • APPLY ON TIME - closing date 15 January 2021. • Use all 4 preferences. • Tell us immediately in writing (email or by letter) about any address change. • Make sure you read and understand the Education Transport Policy information on www.essex. gov.uk/schooltransport if entitlement to school transport is important to you. School priority admission (catchment) areas are not relevant to transport eligibility. Transport is generally only provided to the nearest available school where the distance criteria is met.
    [Show full text]
  • South Essex Outline Water Cycle Study Technical Report
    South Essex Outline Water Cycle Study Technical Report Final September 2011 Prepared for South Essex: Outline Water Cycle Study Revision Schedule South Essex Water Cycle Study September 2011 Rev Date Details Prepared by Reviewed by Approved by 01 April 2011 D132233: S. Clare Postlethwaite Carl Pelling Carl Pelling Essex Outline Senior Consultant Principal Consultant Principal Consultant WCS – First Draft_v1 02 August 2011 Final Draft Clare Postlethwaite Rob Sweet Carl Pelling Senior Consultant Senior Consultant Principal Consultant 03 September Final Clare Postlethwaite Rob Sweet Jon Robinson 2011 Senior Consultant Senior Consultant Technical Director URS/Scott Wilson Scott House Alençon Link Basingstoke RG21 7PP Tel 01256 310200 Fax 01256 310201 www.urs-scottwilson.com South Essex Water Cycle Study Limitations URS Scott Wilson Ltd (“URS Scott Wilson”) has prepared this Report for the sole use of Basildon Borough Council, Castle Point Borough Council and Rochford District Council (“Client”) in accordance with the Agreement under which our services were performed. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the professional advice included in this Report or any other services provided by URS Scott Wilson. This Report is confidential and may not be disclosed by the Client or relied upon by any other party without the prior and express written agreement of URS Scott Wilson. The conclusions and recommendations contained in this Report are based upon information provided by others and upon the assumption that all relevant information has been provided by those parties from whom it has been requested and that such information is accurate. Information obtained by URS Scott Wilson has not been independently verified by URS Scott Wilson, unless otherwise stated in the Report.
    [Show full text]
  • Electoral Changes) Order 2004
    STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS 2004 No. 2813 LOCAL GOVERNMENT, ENGLAND The County of Essex (Electoral Changes) Order 2004 Made - - - - 28th October 2004 Coming into force in accordance with article 1(2) Whereas the Boundary Committee for England(a), acting pursuant to section 15(4) of the Local Government Act 1992(b), has submitted to the Electoral Commission(c) recommendations dated April 2004 on its review of the county of Essex: And whereas the Electoral Commission have decided to give effect, with modifications, to those recommendations: And whereas a period of not less than six weeks has expired since the receipt of those recommendations: Now, therefore, the Electoral Commission, in exercise of the powers conferred on them by sections 17(d) and 26(e) of the Local Government Act 1992, and of all other powers enabling them in that behalf, hereby make the following Order: Citation and commencement 1.—(1) This Order may be cited as the County of Essex (Electoral Changes) Order 2004. (2) This Order shall come into force – (a) for the purpose of proceedings preliminary or relating to any election to be held on the ordinary day of election of councillors in 2005, on the day after that on which it is made; (b) for all other purposes, on the ordinary day of election of councillors in 2005. Interpretation 2. In this Order – (a) The Boundary Committee for England is a committee of the Electoral Commission, established by the Electoral Commission in accordance with section 14 of the Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act 2000 (c.41). The Local Government Commission for England (Transfer of Functions) Order 2001 (S.I.
    [Show full text]
  • Cambridgeshire & Essex Butterfly Conservation
    Butterfly Conservation Regional Action Plan For Anglia (Cambridgeshire, Essex, Suffolk & Norfolk) This action plan was produced in response to the Action for Butterflies project funded by WWF, EN, SNH and CCW This regional project has been supported by Action for Biodiversity Cambridgeshire and Essex Branch Suffolk branch BC Norfolk branch BC Acknowledgements The Cambridgeshire and Essex branch, Norfolk branch and Suffolk branch constitute Butterfly Conservation’s Anglia region. This regional plan has been compiled from individual branch plans which are initially drawn up from 1997-1999. As the majority of the information included in this action plan has been directly lifted from these original plans, credit for this material should go to the authors of these reports. They were John Dawson (Cambridgeshire & Essex Plan, 1997), James Mann and Tony Prichard (Suffolk Plan, 1998), and Jane Harris (Norfolk Plan, 1999). County butterfly updates have largely been provided by Iris Newbery and Dr Val Perrin (Cambridgeshire and Essex), Roland Rogers and Brian Mcllwrath (Norfolk) and Richard Stewart (Suffolk). Some of the moth information included in the plan has been provided by Dr Paul Waring, David Green and Mark Parsons (BC Moth Conservation Officers) with additional county moth data obtained from John Dawson (Cambridgeshire), Brian Goodey and Robin Field (Essex), Barry Dickerson (Huntingdon Moth and Butterfly Group), Michael Hall and Ken Saul (Norfolk Moth Survey) and Tony Prichard (Suffolk Moth Group). Some of the micro-moth information included in the plan was kindly provided by A. M. Emmet. Other individuals targeted with specific requests include Graham Bailey (BC Cambs. & Essex), Ruth Edwards, Dr Chris Gibson (EN), Dr Andrew Pullin (Birmingham University), Estella Roberts (BC, Assistant Conservation Officer, Wareham), Matthew Shardlow (RSPB) and Ken Ulrich (BC Cambs.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Recommendations on the Future Electoral Arrangements for Essex County Council
    Draft recommendations on the future electoral arrangements for Essex County Council August 2003 © Crown Copyright 2003 Applications for reproduction should be made to: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office Copyright Unit. The mapping in this report is reproduced from OS mapping by The Electoral Commission with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, © Crown Copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown Copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. Licence Number: GD 03114G. This report is printed on recycled paper. 2 Contents page What is The Boundary Committee for England? 5 Summary 7 1 Introduction 17 2 Current electoral arrangements 21 3 Submissions received 25 4 Analysis and draft recommendations 27 5 What happens next? 57 Appendices A Draft recommendations for Essex County Council: detailed mapping 59 B Code of practice on written consultation 61 3 4 What is The Boundary Committee for England? The Boundary Committee for England is a committee of The Electoral Commission, an independent body set up by Parliament under the Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act 2000. The functions of the Local Government Commission for England were transferred to The Electoral Commission and its Boundary Committee on 1 April 2002 by the Local Government Commission for England (Transfer of Functions) Order 2001 (SI 2001 No. 3692). The Order also transferred to The Electoral Commission the functions of the Secretary of State in relation to taking decisions on recommendations for changes to local authority electoral arrangements and implementing them. Members of the Committee: Pamela Gordon (Chair) Professor Michael Clarke CBE Robin Gray Joan Jones CBE Anne M.
    [Show full text]
  • Essex County Fire & Rescue Service
    Essex County Fire & Rescue Service Our Values: Respect, Accountability, Openness and Involvement Strategic Risk Assessment of the Medium to Longer-Term Service Operating Environment 2009 – 2010 2 Countywide Review 2009 Contents 1. Foreword .......................................................................................................................................4 2. Introduction ..................................................................................................................................5 3. Executive Summary .................................................................................................................6 4. Climate Change in East of England ................................................................................10 5. Demographics of Essex ......................................................................................................22 6. Diversity .......................................................................................................................................26 7. Older People in Essex ...........................................................................................................32 8. County Development and Transport Infrastructure ...............................................40 9. The Changing Face of Technology ................................................................................57 10. Terrorism .....................................................................................................................................62
    [Show full text]
  • Rochford District Council Minutes
    INDEX 1988 January - December MINUTE iNDEX 1988 ALLOTMENTS Allotment Competition: 318,417,456 ANGLIAN WATER AUTHORITY Sea Bathing Water Quality: 22 Section 16 Main Sewerage Provision — South Fambridge & Ashtngdon Park Estate, Rochford: 71,181 Ferry Road, Hullbridge — Sewer Provision: 151 Eastwood Road, Rayleigh — Sewer Provision: 151 Capital Programme 1987/88 — 1991/92: 263 Privatisation: 550 ASSOCIATION OF DISTRICT COUNCILS Constitution: 392,492 Conference and Exhibition — Blackpool 1988: 412 AUDIT Complaints Procedure: 128,491(E) BRIDLEWAYS Bridleway 38 Rochford — Proposed Diversion: 70,399 Proposed Diversion of Bridleway 27, Stambridge: 340,555 BRITISH RAIL Meetings with: 460 CABLE TELEViSiON Consultation on Franchise Arrangements: 395,469 CAGEFIELD ROAD, STAMBRIDGE District Plan Working Party: 153,336 CAPITAL PROGRAMME Capital Programme 1988/89: 15 Capital Programme - Lift installation - Civic Suite: 272 Draft Capital Programme — Clements Bali. Playing Field Pavilion Extension: 451 Provision for Construction, Fitting and Furnishing of an Emergency Centre at ilockley Woods: l7,49l(c) CARAVAN SITES Halcyon Caravan Site: Riverside Trailer Park Ltd - Licence Amendments: 228 Hullbridge Yacht Club: 229 Brandyhole Yacht Station, Hullbridge: 430(a) The Dome Country Club and Caravan Park Ltd, Lower Road, Hockley: 430(b) Spacing of Caravans - Progress Report: 440,511,528 CAR PARKING Doctors Surgery Site, Websters Way: 24 Market Square, Rochford - Parking Space for Disabled: 264 Pooles Lane, Hullbridge - Bus Turning Area: 420(i),5O1,511 Hockley Village Centre: 463 Pooles Lane Car Park, Hullbridge - Trading: 562 ROC/925f88 - Extension of Public Car Park, Rear of Public Library, Southend Road, Hockley: 563(ii),588 CEMETERIES Change of use of Agricultural Land to Cemetery - ROC/561/88: 487 CHAIRMAN' S ANNOUNCEMENTS Visits to Doggetts County Primary School, Sweyne School, Westerings: 43 Radiotherapy Unit Press Conference: 43 Attendance of Pupils from Rayleigh Jnr and Gt.
    [Show full text]
  • “Safe Under Us”?
    “Safe Under US”? An investigation into widespread threats from housebuilding in the London Metropolitan Green Belt September 2016 A report published by the London Green Belt Council and the Campaign to Protect Rural England, London Branch “SAFE UNDER US”? 1 FOREWORD The battle to protect London’s Green Belt has This report tries to untangle the quagmire of policies, been continuing for over 50 years in order to pressures and incentives that Local Planning preserve this important ‘green lung’ for those Authorities are facing to develop credible Local who work in the capital and its suburbs. Plans, which increasingly include development on Green Belt land. While the government says The founders of Green Belt Policy in the UK had a it has made clear that housing need cannot vision to preserve the openness of the landscape, justify development on Green Belt, Local Planning to encourage inner city regeneration, and to Authorities say they have little choice. prevent urban sprawl in times of population As far as London’s Green Belt is concerned, growth and an expanding urban footprint. unless action is taken to ensure that ‘safe Today, as we expect population to grow and under us’ means just that, then much of the housing requirements to increase, we confront land will be lost and the important purposes similar issues as those early urban planners. of the Green Belt will be undermined. The London Metropolitan Green Belt is now At times of growth, Green Belt protections should, facing, arguably, its greatest threat – with if anything, be strengthened, not weakened over 200 sites proposed for development.
    [Show full text]
  • Report Template
    5 March 2019 Community, Health and Housing Committee Essex Faith Covenant Report of: Kim Anderson, Partnership, Leisure and Funding Manager Wards Affected: All wards This report is: Public 1. Executive Summary 1.1. The Essex Faith Covenant is joint commitment between faith communities and local priorities to a set of principles that guide engagement, aiming to remove some of the mistrust that exists and to promote open, practical working on all levels. It was launched in October 2017 to establish four pilot areas in Basildon, Braintree, Chelmsford and Colchester. The Essex Faith Covenant Steering Group (EFCSG), is broadly representative of all of the organisations and faith groups that are currently signed up to the Essex Faith Covenant and has provided oversight and support in the initial pilot areas in developing and showcasing activity and best practice. Both faith groups and public services signatories are committed to work together to proactively build relationships and trust between faith groups and public services; create opportunities to raise awareness and share learning and knowledge between faith communities, and within the public services; and seek opportunities to bring people together to serve the community, particularly the most disadvantaged. 2. Recommendations That Members agree to: 2.1 Sign up to the Essex Faith Covenant on behalf of Brentwood Borough Council and adhere to the principles as set out in Appendix A and support the priorities of the Essex Faith Covenant Steering Group (EFCSG) 3. Introduction and Background 3.1 The Essex Faith Covenant (Appendix A) was launched in October 2017 with 120 delegates attending from a broad range of faith, voluntary and public sector backgrounds.
    [Show full text]
  • Rochford District Council Minutes
    INDEX 1987 January - December MINUTE INDEX 1987 ACCESS TO INFORMATION Matters Requiring Urgent Consideration: 47 Status of Sub—Committees etc.: 1.00,170 ALLOTMENTS Agricultural Tenancies — Sweyne Park, Rayleigh: 60 Competition 1987: 249,429 Whitehouse Chase Allott. Headquarters, Renewal of Lease: 411 I ANGLIAN WATER AUTHORITY Embargo on Development: 29,320 Attendance of Representative: 141,320 Capital Development Programme 1987/88—1990: 142,321 Kingsman Farm Ditch, Rullbridge: 143 Disposal to AWA of Surplus Land at Depot: 172 Sweyne Park, Rayleigh — Pond; 243 Ferry Road Pumping Station Scheme: 320 Sea Defences: 321 Privatised Water Industry: 408,432 Kenilworth Gardens Ditch Piping: 481 AUDIT Audit Commission Profile of RDC; 81(1) External Auditors Overview of Rating Procedures: 81(3) Audit of Accounts 1985186: 81(4) External Auditors Review of Internal Audit: 81(5) Purchase of Computer for Internal Audit Section: 81(6) Cessation of Arrangements re: flullbridge Community Association: 263(E) Three Es Exercise — Performance Review: 340(C)(4) ., w r' — ;p fli BRITiSH RAIL Meetings With: 73,100,166,194,476 Level of Servicet 147(4) BR (No. 2) Bill 1987—88: 575 BUS SHELTERS Outside 118 Eastwood Road, Rayleigh: 102,149 Opp. FitzWinzarc School, Rockley Road, Rayleigh: 150 BYE—LAWS Fouling of Pleasure Grounds By Dogs: 38,100,131,194,494 CAPITAL PROGRAMME Capital Programme 1987/88: 9,455 Lift Installation at Civic Suite: 9,565 Provision of Central Beating: 43 Appointment of Specialist Consultants: 271 Engineering Works 1987/88: 272 CARAVAN SITES Caravan Sites Working Group: 45 Halcyon Caravan Park: 45,46,121,194 Crouch Caravan Park: 45 Fire Precautions: 110,194,238 Enforcement re: Gypsies: 344 Caravan Sites & Control of Development Act 1960 — Riverside Trailer Park Ltd., Wallases.
    [Show full text]