DOCSLIB.ORG

Cambridgeshire & Essex Butterfly Conservation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Cambridgeshire & Essex Butterfly Conservation Butterfly Conservation Regional Action Plan For Anglia (Cambridgeshire, Essex, Suffolk & Norfolk) This action plan was produced in response to the Action for Butterflies project funded by WWF, EN, SNH and CCW This regional project has been supported by Action for Biodiversity Cambridgeshire and Essex Branch Suffolk branch BC Norfolk branch BC Acknowledgements The Cambridgeshire and Essex branch, Norfolk branch and Suffolk branch constitute Butterfly Conservation’s Anglia region. This regional plan has been compiled from individual branch plans which are initially drawn up from 1997-1999. As the majority of the information included in this action plan has been directly lifted from these original plans, credit for this material should go to the authors of these reports. They were John Dawson (Cambridgeshire & Essex Plan, 1997), James Mann and Tony Prichard (Suffolk Plan, 1998), and Jane Harris (Norfolk Plan, 1999). County butterfly updates have largely been provided by Iris Newbery and Dr Val Perrin (Cambridgeshire and Essex), Roland Rogers and Brian Mcllwrath (Norfolk) and Richard Stewart (Suffolk). Some of the moth information included in the plan has been provided by Dr Paul Waring, David Green and Mark Parsons (BC Moth Conservation Officers) with additional county moth data obtained from John Dawson (Cambridgeshire), Brian Goodey and Robin Field (Essex), Barry Dickerson (Huntingdon Moth and Butterfly Group), Michael Hall and Ken Saul (Norfolk Moth Survey) and Tony Prichard (Suffolk Moth Group). Some of the micro-moth information included in the plan was kindly provided by A. M. Emmet. Other individuals targeted with specific requests include Graham Bailey (BC Cambs. & Essex), Ruth Edwards, Dr Chris Gibson (EN), Dr Andrew Pullin (Birmingham University), Estella Roberts (BC, Assistant Conservation Officer, Wareham), Matthew Shardlow (RSPB) and Ken Ulrich (BC Cambs. & Essex). We thank Nick Greatorex-Davies for information on sites in the national butterfly monitoring scheme, Dr Ruth Feber (BC Threatened Fritillaries Officer) for the latest update on Heath Fritillary in the region, Dr Tom Brereton (BC Monitoring and Species Ecologist) for some information on monitoring and Charlie Rugeroni (BC) for his financial management of the project. This work was financially supported by English Nature as a contribution to the Species Recovery Programme; their nominated officer for the project was Dr. David Sheppard. Written by Dr J. Joy with assistance from Dr N. Bourn. 2000 Registered Office of Butterfly Conservation: Manor Yard, East Lulworth, Wareham, Dorset, BH20 5QP. Registered in England No. 2206468 Registered Charity No. 254937. 2 Contents Page Number(s) 1. Introduction 1.1 Executive Summary 6-7 1.2 Background 8 1.3 General Aims 8 2. High and Medium Priority Butterflies and Moths 2.1 Priority List for Anglia Butterflies 9 2.2 Methods used for assigning priorities in Anglia 10-13 2.3 High Priority Macro-moths in Anglia 14-16 2.4 Medium Priority Macro-moths in Anglia 17-18 2.5 Medium Priority Micro-moths in Anglia 19-21 3. Species Accounts 3.1 High Priority Butterflies 3.2a Dingy Skipper 22-23 3.1b Grizzled Skipper 24-25 3.1c Swallowtail 26-27 3.1d Black Hairstreak 28-29 3.1e Silver-studded Blue 30-31 3.1f Heath Fritillary 32-34 3.2 Medium Priority Butterflies 3.2a White-letter Hairstreak 35-36 3.2b Small Blue 37-38 3.2c Brown Argus 39-40 3.2d Chalkhill Blue 41 3.2e White Admiral 42-43 3.2f Small Pearl-bordered Fritillary 44 3.2g Dark Green Fritillary 45-46 3.2h Marbled White 47-48 3.3 Low Priority Butterflies 3.3a Green Hairstreak 49-50 3.3b Silver-washed Fritillary 51 3.3c Wall 51 3.3d Grayling 52-53 3.3e Other low priority butterflies 54 3.3f Migrant butterflies 55 3.4 Nationally Important Extinct Butterfly Species 3.4a Wood White 56 3.4b Brown Hairstreak 56 3.4c Large Copper 57 3.4d Pearl-bordered Fritillary 58 3.5 High Priority Macro-Moths Notes on Norfolk high priority moths 59 1. Reed Leopard 60 3 2. The Triangle 61 3. Ground Lackey 62 4. Tawny Wave 63-64 5. Bright Wave 65 6. Chalk Carpet 66 7. Barberry Carpet 67 8. Fletcher’s Pug 68 9. Scarce Pug 69 10. Grey Carpet 70-71 11. Barred Tooth-striped 72-73 12. Narrow-bordered Bee Hawk-moth 74 13. Scarce Vapourer 75 14. Dotted Footman 76 15. Small Dotted Footman 77 16. Pigmy Footman 78 17. Lunar Yellow Underwing 79-80 18. Square-spotted Clay 81 19. Pale Shining Brown 82 20. Bordered Gothic 83-84 21. White-spotted Pinion 85 22. Concolorous 86 23. Fenn’s Wainscot 87 24. Fisher’s Estuarine Moth 88-89 25. White-mantled Wainscot 90 26. Rush Wainscot 91-92 27. Marbled Clover 93-94 28. Silver Barred 95 29. Four-spotted 96 30. Buttoned Snout 97 31. Common Fan-foot 98 32. Shaded Fan-foot 99 33. Clay Fan-foot 100 34. Olive Crescent 101 3.6 Medium Priority Macro-moths 102-104 4. Key Areas and Sites in Anglia 105 Map 1 – Location of key areas and sites 4.1 Cambridgeshire 106-108 4.2 Essex 109-113 4.3 Norfolk 114-117 4.4 Suffolk 118-121 5. Survey 122 6. Monitoring 123-124 7. Management 125-126 4 8. Other Activities 126 9. Review 126 10. References 127-130 Appendix 1 - Priority Ratings for British Butterflies 131 Appendix 2 – Tetrad Records 1995-99 132 Appendix 3 – Moth Species Log Book Numbers 133-136 Appendix 4 – Definitions of the Status of British Moths 137 Appendix 5 – Maps of Key Areas 138 Appendix 6 – Key to Abbreviations 154 5 1.1 Executive Summary This plan highlights the main conservation priorities for butterfly species and high priority moths in the Anglia region as well as identifying some of the most important habitats for Lepidoptera. The intention is for actions and targets for high priority species to be implemented in the next five years, actions for medium priority species to be implemented in the next ten years and actions for other species to be implemented in the next ten years once targets for higher priority species have been achieved. However, as Butterfly Conservation must also be able to react to unforeseen circumstances, there may well be some actions undertaken in the next decade which were not conceived at this time. The main conservation priorities identified for Butterfly Conservation branches in the Anglia region are as follows: a) Species Protection • To safeguard all surviving populations of high and medium priority species. • To seek opportunities to extend breeding areas of high and medium priority species. • To encourage survey work to determine the current status of all high and medium priority species in areas where this is unknown. • To support ecological research which may assist the long term conservation of high and medium priority species • To increase the level of moth recording and knowledge of the habitat requirements of high and medium priority moths. While moths have been taken into account in the key areas and key sites section of this plan, there are only separate species accounts for the high priority macro-moths. Long term aims should be to produce species action plans for all medium priority moths identified in this plan, to include more details of sites which are important for particular moth species and to draw up similar plans for key micro-lepidoptera. b) Monitoring • To continue to monitor butterfly transects. • To maintain contact with other organisations involved in monitoring in the Anglia region to make best use of all available information and to provide feedback and encouragement. • To increase the level of monitoring of high and medium priority species (both butterflies and moths) in key areas and sites so that any changes in abundance can quickly be identified. 6 c) Liaison • To closely collaborate with all possible partners to ensure that actions and targets identified in this plan are implemented within the proposed timescales • To provide feedback to landowners and land managers and provide them with management recommendations which are realistic and could be maintained in the long term. • To continue to build on relationships with other conservation groups in the Anglia region and raise the profile of Butterfly Conservation through publicity and education. • To publish the results from monitoring work, management regimes and research projects so that the information can be disseminated both regionally and nationally. 7 1.2 Background The Action for Butterflies Project and Regional Action Plans: Their role within Butterfly Conservation and the Biodiversity planning process. Background to the Biodiversity planning process At the Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro in 1992, the UK Government signed the Convention on Biological Diversity which required the development of a national strategy. In early 1994, the Government produced the UK Biodiversity Action Plan which adopted a systematic approach whereby targets are used to focus conservation action. This has since ensured that there is now considerable effort going into the production of Local Biodiversity Action Plans through the Agenda 21 process. Butterfly Conservation is attempting to maximise the benefits for butterflies and moths and their habitats through the Action for Butterflies project. The Action for Butterflies Project The project began in 1994 and is funded by the World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF- UK) and the Country Agencies (English Nature, Scottish Natural Heritage, Countryside Council for Wales). It aims to place the conservation work of the Society within an overall framework, aiding the Society at national and local level to develop priorities for action. National Species Action Plans have already been written for the 25 most threatened butterflies. Butterfly Conservation branches are also producing Regional Action Plans for each of 14 regions in the UK to guide action at a local level.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Norfolk Local Flood Risk Management Strategy
    Appendix A Norfolk Local Flood Risk Management Strategy Consultation Draft March 2015 1 Blank 2 Part One - Flooding and Flood Risk Management Contents PART ONE – FLOODING AND FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT ..................... 5 1. Introduction ..................................................................................... 5 2 What Is Flooding? ........................................................................... 8 3. What is Flood Risk? ...................................................................... 10 4. What are the sources of flooding? ................................................ 13 5. Sources of Local Flood Risk ......................................................... 14 6. Sources of Strategic Flood Risk .................................................... 17 7. Flood Risk Management ............................................................... 19 8. Flood Risk Management Authorities ............................................. 22 PART TWO – FLOOD RISK IN NORFOLK .................................................. 30 9. Flood Risk in Norfolk ..................................................................... 30 Flood Risk in Your Area ................................................................ 39 10. Broadland District .......................................................................... 39 11. Breckland District .......................................................................... 45 12. Great Yarmouth Borough .............................................................. 51 13. Borough of King’s
    [Show full text]
  • A News and Events Diary from Wildlife and Conservation Groups in the Ipswich Area
    Pantaloon Bee – see page 9 © Matt Garnham September - December 2018 A news and events Produced by the diary from wildlife and conservation groups in the Ipswich area BlueSnippets alien found White Admiral Lydia Woods in town Richard Stewart On the afternoon of Friday June 22nd my wife and I were walking down Westerfield Road in Ipswich and just past the gate into Christchurch Park we saw a white admiral on the pavement. It appeared to be a newly emerged While walking through Kiln Meadow on a warm adult but had probably been caught morning in July, I was more than a little surprised to in a vehicle slipstream. I cupped my hands around it, walked across the be confronted with a bright flash of blue! road and released the butterfly over the park railings. This was one of the On closer inspection I discovered a rather battered looking blue morpho butterfly new species I predicted for the park resting on the ground - not something you’d expect to see in Suffolk. These butterflies in future years as it has steadily been are generally found in Central and South America, although they are a popular choice colonising towards Ipswich. One was for butterfly houses – it’s likely this one escaped from the butterfly house situated at seen and photographed in The Dales Jimmy’s Farm. After taking some photos of this blue alien, I left the butterfly resting in a in 2015. With this in mind more patch of bindweed. While this was a lovely sight to see, hopefully it won’t be a regular honeysuckle, the larval food plant, occurrence.
    [Show full text]
  • Kristianstads Vattenrike Biosphere Reserve, Periodic Review 2005-2015
    This Periodic Review can also be downloaded at www.vattenriket.kristianstad.se/unesco/. Title: Kristianstads Vattenrike Biosphere Reserve. Periodic Review 2005-2015 Authors: This review is produced by the Biosphere Office, Kristianstads kommun: Carina Wettemark, Johanna Källén, Åsa Pearce, Karin Magntorn, Jonas Dahl, Hans Cronert; Karin Hernborg and Ebba Trolle. In addition a large number of people have contributed directly and indirectly. Cover photo: Patrik Olofsson/N Maps: Stadsbyggnadskontoret Kristianstads kommun PERIODIC REVIEW FOR BIOSPHERE RESERVE INTRODUCTION The UNESCO General Conference, at its 28th session, adopted Resolution 28 C/2.4 on the Statutory Framework of the World Network of Biosphere Reserves. This text defines in particular the criteria for an area to be qualified for designation as a biosphere reserve (Article 4). In addition, Article 9 foresees a periodic review every ten years The periodic review is based on a report prepared by the relevant authority, on the basis of the criteria of Article 4. The periodic review must be submitted by the national MAB Committee to the MAB Secretariat in Paris. The text of the Statutory Framework is presented in the third annex. The form which follows is provided to help States prepare their national reports in accordance with Article 9 and to update the Secretariat's information on the biosphere reserve concerned. This report should enable the International Coordinating Council (ICC) of the MAB Programme to review how each biosphere reserve is fulfilling the criteria of Article 4 of the Statutory Framework and, in particular, the three functions: conservation, development and support. It should be noted that it is requested, in the last part of the form (Criteria and Progress Made), that an indication be given of how the biosphere reserve fulfils each of these criteria.
    [Show full text]
  • Your Local Wildlife News Arger Fen the Seasons Have Brought Unparalleled Richness to Arger Fen
    Stowmarket Group January 2020 Your local wildlife news Arger Fen The seasons have brought unparalleled richness to Arger Fen. Will Cranstoun says now is the time to look out for snipe, barn owl and the first signs of spring. Arger Fen continues to surprise and delight scrub that will be valuable habitat for Will Cranstoun West Suffolk Sites Manager visitors through the seasons. Whilst the breeding migrant birds, cover for reptiles and 01284 728541 spring boasts carpets of bluebells, the a source of nectar and fruit for whole host of summer has seen fantastic swathes of wildlife. woodland flora burst into bloom; ranging With welcome rains through autumn BRADFIELD WOODS from pink campion, greater stitchwort, filling up many of the ponds and replenishing 01449 737996 foxgloves, vetches and orchids. As result cracked soils, we have witnessed one of the there have been good numbers of pollinators best seasons for fungi across the entire buzzing about the rides and wider open reserve. Arguably the most numerous and Giles areas of the reserve. The eastern ex-arable easily recognisable being parasol, sulphur Cawston land in various stages of early succession tuft and fly agaric. As the seasons progress Woodlands are indicative of the varying soil types and into winter look out for snipe and barn owl Warden conditions. The area known as Kingsland is flying over the Pecks Piece with roe deer now showcase to a great deal of emerging hiding along hedgerows. Joanne Atkins Wild Learning Bradfield Woods Officer Whether the sun is shining, or the rain pouring, Jo Atkins explains why there is never a better time to go into the woods.
    [Show full text]
  • Habitats Regulations Assessment of the South Norfolk Village Cluster Housing Allocations Plan
    Habitats Regulations Assessment of the South Norfolk Village Cluster Housing Allocations Plan Regulation 18 HRA Report May 2021 Habitats Regulations Assessment of the South Norfolk Village Cluster Housing Allocations Plan Regulation 18 HRA Report LC- 654 Document Control Box Client South Norfolk Council Habitats Regulations Assessment Report Title Regulation 18 – HRA Report Status FINAL Filename LC-654_South Norfolk_Regulation 18_HRA Report_8_140521SC.docx Date May 2021 Author SC Reviewed ND Approved ND Photo: Female broad bodied chaser by Shutterstock Regulation 18 – HRA Report May 2021 LC-654_South Norfolk_Regulation 18_HRA Report_8_140521SC.docx Contents 1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Purpose of this report ............................................................................................................................................... 1 2 The South Norfolk Village Cluster Housing Allocations Plan ................................................................... 3 2.1 Greater Norwich Local Plan .................................................................................................................................... 3 2.2 South Norfolk Village Cluster Housing Allocations Plan ................................................................................ 3 2.3 Village Clusters ..........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A-Razowski X.Vp:Corelventura
    Acta zoologica cracoviensia, 46(3): 269-275, Kraków, 30 Sep., 2003 Reassessment of forewing pattern elements in Tortricidae (Lepidoptera) Józef RAZOWSKI Received: 15 March, 2003 Accepted for publication: 20 May, 2003 RAZOWSKI J. 2003. Reassessment of forewing pattern elements in Tortricidae (Lepidop- tera). Acta zoologica cracoviensia, 46(3): 269-275. Abstract. Forewing pattern elements of moths in the family Tortricidae are discussed and characterized. An historical review of the terminology is provided. A new system of nam- ing pattern elements is proposed. Key words. Lepidoptera, Tortricidae, forewing pattern, analysis, terminology. Józef RAZOWSKI, Institute of Systematics and Evolution of Animals, Polish Academy of Sciences, S³awkowska 17, 31-016 Kraków, Poland. E-mail: razowski.isez.pan.krakow.pl I. INTRODUCTION Early tortricid workers such as HAWORTH (1811), HERRICH-SCHHÄFFER (1856), and others pre- sented the first terminology for forewing pattern elements in their descriptions of new species. Nearly a century later, SÜFFERT (1929) provided a more eclectic discussion of pattern elements for Lepidoptera in general. In recent decades, the common and repeated use of specific terms in de- scriptions and illustrations by FALKOVITSH (1966), DANILEVSKY and KUZNETZOV (1968), and oth- ers reinforced these terms in Tortricidae. BRADLEY et al. (1973) summarized and commented on all the English terms used to describe forewing pattern elements. DANILEVSKY and KUZNETZOV (1968) and KUZNETZOV (1978) analyzed tortricid pattern elements, primarily Olethreutinae, dem- onstrating the taxonomic significance of the costal strigulae in that subfamily. For practical pur- poses they numbered the strigulae from the forewing apex to the base, where the strigulae often become indistinct. KUZNETZOV (1978) named the following forewing elements in Tortricinae: ba- sal fascia, subterminal fascia, outer fascia (comprised of subapical blotch and outer blotch), apical spot, and marginal line situated in the marginal fascia (a component of the ground colour).
    [Show full text]
  • David Tyldesley and Associates Planning, Landscape and Environmental Consultants
    DAVID TYLDESLEY AND ASSOCIATES PLANNING, LANDSCAPE AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS Habitat Regulations Assessment: Breckland Council Submission Core Strategy and Development Control Policies Document Durwyn Liley, Rachel Hoskin, John Underhill-Day & David Tyldesley 1 DRAFT Date: 7th November 2008 Version: Draft Recommended Citation: Liley, D., Hoskin, R., Underhill-Day, J. & Tyldesley, D. (2008). Habitat Regulations Assessment: Breckland Council Submission Core Strategy and Development Control Policies Document. Footprint Ecology, Wareham, Dorset. Report for Breckland District Council. 2 Summary This document records the results of a Habitat Regulations Assessment (HRA) of Breckland District Council’s Core Strategy. The Breckland District lies in an area of considerable importance for nature conservation with a number of European Sites located within and just outside the District. The range of sites, habitats and designations is complex. Taking an area of search of 20km around the District boundary as an initial screening for relevant protected sites the assessment identified five different SPAs, ten different SACs and eight different Ramsar sites. Following on from this initial screening the assessment identifies the following potential adverse effects which are addressed within the appropriate assessment: • Reduction in the density of Breckland SPA Annex I bird species (stone curlew, nightjar, woodlark) near to new housing. • Increased levels of recreational activity resulting in increased disturbance to Breckland SPA Annex I bird species (stone curlew, nightjar, woodlark). • Increased levels of people on and around the heaths, resulting in an increase in urban effects such as increased fire risk, fly-tipping, trampling. • Increased levels of recreation to the Norfolk Coast (including the Wash), potentially resulting in disturbance to interest features and other recreational impacts.
    [Show full text]
  • Schutz Des Naturhaushaltes Vor Den Auswirkungen Der Anwendung Von Pflanzenschutzmitteln Aus Der Luft in Wäldern Und Im Weinbau
    TEXTE 21/2017 Umweltforschungsplan des Bundesministeriums für Umwelt, Naturschutz, Bau und Reaktorsicherheit Forschungskennzahl 3714 67 406 0 UBA-FB 002461 Schutz des Naturhaushaltes vor den Auswirkungen der Anwendung von Pflanzenschutzmitteln aus der Luft in Wäldern und im Weinbau von Dr. Ingo Brunk, Thomas Sobczyk, Dr. Jörg Lorenz Technische Universität Dresden, Fakultät für Umweltwissenschaften, Institut für Forstbotanik und Forstzoologie, Tharandt Im Auftrag des Umweltbundesamtes Impressum Herausgeber: Umweltbundesamt Wörlitzer Platz 1 06844 Dessau-Roßlau Tel: +49 340-2103-0 Fax: +49 340-2103-2285 [email protected] Internet: www.umweltbundesamt.de /umweltbundesamt.de /umweltbundesamt Durchführung der Studie: Technische Universität Dresden, Fakultät für Umweltwissenschaften, Institut für Forstbotanik und Forstzoologie, Professur für Forstzoologie, Prof. Dr. Mechthild Roth Pienner Straße 7 (Cotta-Bau), 01737 Tharandt Abschlussdatum: Januar 2017 Redaktion: Fachgebiet IV 1.3 Pflanzenschutz Dr. Mareike Güth, Dr. Daniela Felsmann Publikationen als pdf: http://www.umweltbundesamt.de/publikationen ISSN 1862-4359 Dessau-Roßlau, März 2017 Das diesem Bericht zu Grunde liegende Vorhaben wurde mit Mitteln des Bundesministeriums für Umwelt, Naturschutz, Bau und Reaktorsicherheit unter der Forschungskennzahl 3714 67 406 0 gefördert. Die Verantwortung für den Inhalt dieser Veröffentlichung liegt bei den Autorinnen und Autoren. UBA Texte Entwicklung geeigneter Risikominimierungsansätze für die Luftausbringung von PSM Kurzbeschreibung Die Bekämpfung
    [Show full text]
  • Recerca I Territori V12 B (002)(1).Pdf
    Butterfly and moths in l’Empordà and their response to global change Recerca i territori Volume 12 NUMBER 12 / SEPTEMBER 2020 Edition Graphic design Càtedra d’Ecosistemes Litorals Mediterranis Mostra Comunicació Parc Natural del Montgrí, les Illes Medes i el Baix Ter Museu de la Mediterrània Printing Gràfiques Agustí Coordinadors of the volume Constantí Stefanescu, Tristan Lafranchis ISSN: 2013-5939 Dipòsit legal: GI 896-2020 “Recerca i Territori” Collection Coordinator Printed on recycled paper Cyclus print Xavier Quintana With the support of: Summary Foreword ......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Xavier Quintana Butterflies of the Montgrí-Baix Ter region ................................................................................................................. 11 Tristan Lafranchis Moths of the Montgrí-Baix Ter region ............................................................................................................................31 Tristan Lafranchis The dispersion of Lepidoptera in the Montgrí-Baix Ter region ...........................................................51 Tristan Lafranchis Three decades of butterfly monitoring at El Cortalet ...................................................................................69 (Aiguamolls de l’Empordà Natural Park) Constantí Stefanescu Effects of abandonment and restoration in Mediterranean meadows .......................................87
    [Show full text]
  • The Norfolk & Norwich
    BRITISH MUSEUM (NATURAL HISTORY) TRANSACTIONS 2 7 JUN 1984 exchanged OF GENfcriAL LIBRARY THE NORFOLK & NORWICH NATURALISTS’ SOCIETY Edited by: P. W. Lambley Vol. 26 Part 5 MAY 1984 TRANSACTIONS OF THE NORFOLK AND NORWICH NATURALISTS’ SOCIETY Volume 26 Part 5 (May 1984) Editor P. W. Lambley ISSN 0375 7226 U: ' A M «SEUV OFFICERS OF THE SOCIETY 1984-85 j> URAL isSTORY) 2? JUH1984 President: Dr. R. E. Baker Vice-Presidents: P. R. Banham, A. Bull, K. B. Clarke, E. T. Daniels, K. C. Durrant, E. A. Ellis, R. Jones, M. J. Seago, J. A. Steers, E. L. Swann, F. J. Taylor-Page Chairman: Dr. G. D. Watts, Barn Meadow, Frost’s Lane, Gt. Moulton. Secretary: Dr. R. E. Baker, 25 Southern Reach, Mulbarton, NR 14 8BU. Tel. Mulbarton 70609 Assistant Secretary: R. N. Flowers, Heatherlands, The Street, Brundall. Treasurer: D. A. Dorling, St. Edmundsbury, 6 New Road, Heathersett. Tel. Norwich 810318 Assistant Treasurer: M. Wolner Membership Committee: R. Hancy, Tel. Norwich 860042 Miss J. Wakefield, Post Office Lane, Saxthorpe, NR1 1 7BL. Programme Committee: A. Bull, Tel. Norwich 880278 Mrs. J. Robinson, Tel. Mulbarton 70576 Publications Committee: R. Jones. P. W. Lambley & M. J. Seago (Editors) Research Committee: Dr. A. Davy, School of Biology, U.E.A., Mrs. A. Brewster Hon. Auditor. J. E. Timbers, The Nook, Barford Council: Retiring 1985; D. Fagg, J. Goldsmith, Miss F. Musters, R. Smith. Retiring 1986 Miss R. Carpenter, C. Dack, Mrs. J. Geeson, R. Robinson. Retiring 1987 N. S. Carmichael, R. Evans, Mrs.L. Evans, C. Neale Co-opted members: Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Lajiluettelo 2019
    Lajiluettelo 2019 Artlistan 2019 Checklist 2019 Helsinki 2020 Viittausohje, kun viitataan koko julkaisuun: Suomen Lajitietokeskus 2020: Lajiluettelo 2019. – Suomen Lajitietokeskus, Luonnontieteellinen keskusmuseo, Helsingin yliopisto, Helsinki. Viittausohje, kun viitataan osaan julkaisusta, esim.: Paukkunen, J., Koponen, M., Vikberg, V., Fernandez-Triana, J., Jussila, R., Mutanen, M., Paappanen, J., Várkonyi, G. 2020: Hymenoptera, pistiäiset. – Julkaisussa: Suomen Lajitietokeskus 2020: Lajiluettelo 2019. Suomen Lajitietokeskus, Luonnontieteellinen keskusmuseo, Helsingin yliopisto, Helsinki. Citerande av publikationen: Finlands Artdatacenter 2020: Artlistan 2019. – Finlands Artdatacenter, Naturhistoriska centralmuseet, Helsingfors universitet, Helsingfors Citerande av en enskild taxon: Paukkunen, J., Koponen, M., Vikberg, V., Fernandez-Triana, J., Jussila, R., Mutanen, M., Paappanen, J., Várkonyi, G. 2020. Hymenoptera, steklar. – I: Finlands Artdatacenter 2020: Artlistan 2019. – Finlands Artdatacenter, Naturhistoriska centralmuseet, Helsingfors universitet, Helsingfors Citation of the publication: FinBIF 2020: The FinBIF checklist of Finnish species 2019. – Finnish Biodiversity Information Facility, Finnish Museum of Natural History, University of Helsinki, Helsinki Citation of a separate taxon: Paukkunen, J., Koponen, M., Vikberg, V., Fernandez-Triana, J., Jussila, R., Mutanen, M., Paappanen, J., Várkonyi, G. 2020: Hymenoptera, sawflied, wasps, ants and bee. – In: FinBIF 2020: The FinBIF checklist of Finnish species 2019. – Finnish Biodiversity
    [Show full text]
  • Transactions of the Norfolk and Norwich Naturalists' Society
    20 NOV 2Q02 I FXCHA^O'-"> 1 Norfolk Bird Report - 2001 Editor: Giles Dunmore Editorial 95 Review of the Year 98 Wetland Bird Surveys for Breydon and The Wash 1 05 Norfolk Bird Atlas 1 07 Systematic List 1 09 Introductions, Escapes, Ferals and Hybrids 248 Earliest and Latest Dates of Summer Migrants 253 Latest and Earliest Dates of Winter Migrants 254 Non-accepted and non-submitted records 255 Contributors 256 Ringing Report 258 Hunstanton Cliffs: a Forgotten Migration Hotspot 268 1 Yellow-legged Gulls in Norfolk: 1 96 -200 1 273 Marmora’s Warbler on Scolt Head - a first for Norfolk 28 Pallas’s Grasshopper Warbler at Blakeney Point - the second for Norfolk 283 Blyth’s Pipit at Happisburgh in September 1 999 - the second for Norfolk 285 Norfolk Mammal Report - 2001 Editor: Ian Keymer Editorial 287 Bats at Paston Great Barn 288 Memories of an ex-editor 298 Harvest Mice: more common than suspected? 299 Are we under-recording the Norfolk mink population? 301 National Key Sites for Water Voles in Norfolk 304 A Guide to identification of Shrews and Rodents 309 Published by NORFOLK AND NORWICH NATURALISTS’ SOCIETY Castle Museum, Norwich, NRl 3JU (Transactions Volume 35 part 2 October 2002) Please note that the page numbering in this report follows on from part 1 of the Transactions pub- lished in July 2002 ISSN 0375 7226 www.nnns.org.uk Keepsake back numbers are available from David & Iris Pauli, 8 Lindford Drive, Eaton, Norwich NR4 6LT Front cover photograph: Tree Sparrow (Richard Brooks) Back cover photograph: Grey Seal (Graeme Cresswell) NORFOLK BIRD REPORT - 2001 Editorial x On behalf of the Society 1 am pleased to present the annual report on the Birds of Norfolk.
    [Show full text]