Transactions of the Norfolk and Norwich Naturalists' Society

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Transactions of the Norfolk and Norwich Naturalists' Society 20 NOV 2Q02 I FXCHA^O'-"> 1 Norfolk Bird Report - 2001 Editor: Giles Dunmore Editorial 95 Review of the Year 98 Wetland Bird Surveys for Breydon and The Wash 1 05 Norfolk Bird Atlas 1 07 Systematic List 1 09 Introductions, Escapes, Ferals and Hybrids 248 Earliest and Latest Dates of Summer Migrants 253 Latest and Earliest Dates of Winter Migrants 254 Non-accepted and non-submitted records 255 Contributors 256 Ringing Report 258 Hunstanton Cliffs: a Forgotten Migration Hotspot 268 1 Yellow-legged Gulls in Norfolk: 1 96 -200 1 273 Marmora’s Warbler on Scolt Head - a first for Norfolk 28 Pallas’s Grasshopper Warbler at Blakeney Point - the second for Norfolk 283 Blyth’s Pipit at Happisburgh in September 1 999 - the second for Norfolk 285 Norfolk Mammal Report - 2001 Editor: Ian Keymer Editorial 287 Bats at Paston Great Barn 288 Memories of an ex-editor 298 Harvest Mice: more common than suspected? 299 Are we under-recording the Norfolk mink population? 301 National Key Sites for Water Voles in Norfolk 304 A Guide to identification of Shrews and Rodents 309 Published by NORFOLK AND NORWICH NATURALISTS’ SOCIETY Castle Museum, Norwich, NRl 3JU (Transactions Volume 35 part 2 October 2002) Please note that the page numbering in this report follows on from part 1 of the Transactions pub- lished in July 2002 ISSN 0375 7226 www.nnns.org.uk Keepsake back numbers are available from David & Iris Pauli, 8 Lindford Drive, Eaton, Norwich NR4 6LT Front cover photograph: Tree Sparrow (Richard Brooks) Back cover photograph: Grey Seal (Graeme Cresswell) NORFOLK BIRD REPORT - 2001 Editorial x On behalf of the Society 1 am pleased to present the annual report on the Birds of Norfolk. Acknowledgements The Editorial Team continues to function and comprises: • myself - Editor and Joint Recorder • Neil Lawton - Joint Recorder, • John Williamson - liaison with Norfolk Bird Club and the printers, • Julian Bhalerao - co-ordinating photographs and sketches, • Justin Lansdell - co-ordinating articles and writing Review of the Year. 1 am grateful to them for their encouragement, help, and support. The Report continues to be very much a team effort and without help from many people its production would not be possible. My thanks go to: • the other compilers of the monthly and annual Record Cards - Dave and Jacquie Bridges, Vince Hanlon, Justin Lansdell, Neil Lawton, Mick Saunt and John Williamson; • the other authors of the Systematic List - Peter Allard Chris Baker, Andy Benson, Andrew Bloomfield Dave and Jacquie Bridges, Andy Brown, Pete Clement, Keith Dye, Mick Fiszer, Vince Hanlon, Phil Heath, Gary Hibberd Ian Johnson, John Kemp, Justin Lansdell, Neil Lawton, Ben Murphy, Mick Saunt, Enid Stanford Andy Stoddart, Peter Wilson and John Williamson; • members of the County Records Committee; • authors of the articles in the Report, in particular Peter Wilson and Dawn Balmer on Yellow-legged Gulls, and Neil Lawton and Gary Hibberd on migration at Hunstanton Cliffs. • the artists and photographers who have made their work freely available; • Moss Taylor for supplying breeding details of the ongoing Norfolk Bird Atlas; • Steve Wakeham for the meteorological information; • Mike Rogers, Secretary of the British Birds Rarities Committee; • all the many individual contributors and clubs/societies, and in particular Birdline East Anglia, who have contributed records; • finally my wife Judy for her continued help in typing, layout and in many other ways. Waders and seals (Martin Woodcock) 95 The County Records Committee (Mick Fiszer, Steve Gantlett, Phil Heath, John Kemp and John Williamson) considered a total of 98 records in the year; 18 of these were rejected, mostly as a result of insufficient detail and not owing to an incorrect identification. The Committee also reviewed the list of species needing submission of a written description or photographic evidence (and subject to acceptance) prior to publication and decided to retain the present list. The list is as follows: Black-necked Grebe (at sea) Dark-breasted Barn Owl Cory’s Shearwater Bee-eater Great Shearwater Short-toed Lark Balearic Shearwater Tawny Pipit Storm Petrel Flava Wagtail (continental races except Night Heron Blue-headed and Grey-headed) Purple Heron Bluethroat (White-spotted only) White Stork Aquatic Warbler Greenland White-fronted Goose Marsh Warbler ‘Vagrant’ Canada Goose Melodious Warbler American Wigeon Dartford Warbler Ring-necked Duck Pallas’s Warbler Surf Scoter Chiffchaff {tristis race) Spotted Crake Woodchat Shrike Corncrake Raven Buff-breasted Sandpiper Rose-coloured Starling Grey Phalarope (in flight at sea) Serin Sabine’s Gull Common Rosefinch Ring-billed Gull Ortolan Bunting Caspian Gull Little Bunting Ring-necked Parakeet With regard to the submission of details, obviously the Committee would expect a far more detailed description of a species such as Ring-billed Gull (which is not only rare in the county but difficult to identify) than a species such as a White Stork. Written descriptions should consist of a brief note of the circumstances of the observation (weather, distance from bird, any other observers, etc), followed by a description of the actual bird(s) and details of any other species nearby for comparison. Written notes should state clearly how a bird was identified. Observers are also requested to include a note of their previous experience of the species and, if relevant, a brief outline of how any confusable species were eliminated. Copies of field sketches (however poor artistically) are often invaluable together with written field notes. It should be noted that on occasions observers may be asked for further details of species not contained in the above list - if records relate to unusual dates, localities, etc. Editorial Material: Articles for consideration, artwork, photographs and transparencies should continue to be submitted to me at 49 Nelson Road, Sheringham, Norfolk NR26 8DA. Submission of Records All records for the Systematic List should continue to be submitted to me at 49 Nelson Road, 96 Sheringham, Norfolk NR26 8DA. Preferably these should be submitted on a monthly basis or, if this is not possible, on a 3-monthly or 6-monthly basis. Obviously records can be accepted annually after the end of the year but all observers are requested to submit their notes within a shorter time scale if possible to reduce the pressure of recording in January/February the following year. Receipt of late records causes a major problem in drafting the Systematic List and observations received after February’ of the following year cannot be guaranteed for inclusion in the Report. All records should be listed in the order of species appearing in this Report. Notes will not normally be acknowledged but names of all contributors will be published. To obtain as complete coverage as possible records ‘phoned-in’ to Birdline East Anglia have been frequently used in the compilation of the List. However, records of national and local rarities have only been included where considered and accepted by the appropriate Committee. During the year 1 spend a considerable amount of time ‘chasing’ descriptions of both county and national rarities. 1 would request that finders of such birds should submit details to me as soon as possible and certainly not left to the end of the year. In the case of national rarities these should be submitted in duplicate. Obviously if other observers have particularly good views of a rarity for example, but were not the finder, then additional descriptions would be gratefully received. As far as I am aware there are still several outstanding records awaiting a decision from the British Birds Rarities Committee, mainly as a result of late submission of descriptions. At the time of writing this editorial (August 2002) considerable progress has been made on the computerisation of records. The monthly records for January-April 2002 have been inputted onto the new system but owing to the time factor involved, especially in the short term, it is clear that additional help is needed to input records. Volunteers are therefore requested, the only initial requirements being an interest in bird recording and the availability of a home computer. Giles Dunmore Review of Year 2001 Justin Lansdell (with weather patterns provided by Steve Wakeham) An unsettled start to January failed to deter keen observers from enjoying the now familiar crop of special birds remaining from before the New Year celebrations. Among familiar friends. Common Cranes strutted serenely around the Broads, a mobile band of Shore Larks roamed Holkham Bay, the (by now elderly) Black-winged Stilt continued to draw admiring glances at Titchwell and a Rough-legged Buzzard once again took up residence on the vast marshes of Haddiscoe. However, it was hoards of every layman’s favourite, the Waxwing, which drew most attention and it soon became obvious that we were at the forefront of the largest influx since 1996. Less high profile, but no less dramatic, thousands of Guillemots accumulated off the north coast culminating in an estimated 20,000 in the Cley area; whatever caused this unusual build-up, few other species responded, although a number of Pomarine Skuas were unable to resist an opportunistic meal. The mild start to the year both in Norfolk and further east kept numbers of wildfowl, and particular Taiga Bean Geese and Whitefronts, at modest levels although sawbills were widespread and in the case of Red-breasted Mergansers plentiful. By the 9th a building high pressure to the north and strengthening winds from the east dragged increasingly cold air from the continent for ten days. With them came quality birds with a brief Arctic Redpoll at Swanton Novers, a White-billed Diver off Titchwell and an inland Slavonian Grebe (the first of four at Hickling during the year) the most notable, before milder weather returned. Despite a period of very windy and unsettled conditions, the last few days of the month confirmed it as the sunniest January since 1959.
Recommended publications
  • River Glaven State of the Environment Report
    The River Glaven A State of the Environment Report ©Ashley Dace and licensed for reuse under this Creative ©Evelyn Simak and licensed for reuse under this Creative Commons Licence Commons Licence © Ashley Dace and licensed for reuse under this C reative ©Oliver Dixon and licensed for reuse under this Creative Commons Licence Commons Licence Produced by Norfolk Biodiversity Information Service Spring 201 4 i Norfolk Biodiversity Information Service (NBIS) is a Local Record Centre holding information on species, GEODIVERSITY , habitats and protected sites for the county of Norfolk. For more information see our website: www.nbis.org.uk This report is available for download from the NBIS website www.nbis.org.uk Report written by Lizzy Oddy, March 2014. Acknowledgements: The author would like to thank the following people for their help and input into this report: Mark Andrews (Environment Agency); Anj Beckham (Norfolk County Council Historic Environment Service); Andrew Cannon (Natural Surroundings); Claire Humphries (Environment Agency); Tim Jacklin (Wild Trout Trust); Kelly Powell (Norfolk County Council Historic Environment Service); Carl Sayer (University College London); Ian Shepherd (River Glaven Conservation Group); Mike Sutton-Croft (Norfolk Non-native Species Initiative); Jonah Tosney (Norfolk Rivers Trust) Cover Photos Clockwise from top left: Wiveton Bridge (©Evelyn Simak and licensed for reuse under this Creative Commons Licence); Glandford Ford (©Ashley Dace and licensed for reuse under this Creative Commons Licence); River Glaven above Glandford (©Oliver Dixon and licensed for reuse under this Creative Commons Licence); Swan at Glandford Ford (© Ashley Dace and licensed for reuse under this Creative Commons Licence). ii CONTENTS Foreword – Gemma Clark, 9 Chalk Rivers Project Community Involvement Officer.
    [Show full text]
  • Contents of Volume 14 Norwich Marriages 1813-37 (Are Distinguished by Letter Code, Given Below) Those from 1801-13 Have Also Been Transcribed and Have No Code
    Norfolk Family History Society Norfolk Marriages 1801-1837 The contents of Volume 14 Norwich Marriages 1813-37 (are distinguished by letter code, given below) those from 1801-13 have also been transcribed and have no code. ASt All Saints Hel St. Helen’s MyM St. Mary in the S&J St. Simon & St. And St. Andrew’s Jam St. James’ Marsh Jude Aug St. Augustine’s Jma St. John McC St. Michael Coslany Ste St. Stephen’s Ben St. Benedict’s Maddermarket McP St. Michael at Plea Swi St. Swithen’s JSe St. John Sepulchre McT St. Michael at Thorn Cle St. Clement’s Erh Earlham St. Mary’s Edm St. Edmund’s JTi St. John Timberhill Pau St. Paul’s Etn Eaton St. Andrew’s Eth St. Etheldreda’s Jul St. Julian’s PHu St. Peter Hungate GCo St. George Colegate Law St. Lawrence’s PMa St. Peter Mancroft Hei Heigham St. GTo St. George Mgt St. Margaret’s PpM St. Peter per Bartholomew Tombland MtO St. Martin at Oak Mountergate Lak Lakenham St. John Gil St. Giles’ MtP St. Martin at Palace PSo St. Peter Southgate the Baptist and All Grg St. Gregory’s MyC St. Mary Coslany Sav St. Saviour’s Saints The 25 Suffolk parishes Ashby Burgh Castle (Nfk 1974) Gisleham Kessingland Mutford Barnby Carlton Colville Gorleston (Nfk 1889) Kirkley Oulton Belton (Nfk 1974) Corton Gunton Knettishall Pakefield Blundeston Cove, North Herringfleet Lound Rushmere Bradwell (Nfk 1974) Fritton (Nfk 1974) Hopton (Nfk 1974) Lowestoft Somerleyton The Norfolk parishes 1 Acle 36 Barton Bendish St Andrew 71 Bodham 106 Burlingham St Edmond 141 Colney 2 Alburgh 37 Barton Bendish St Mary 72 Bodney 107 Burlingham
    [Show full text]
  • Georgian Farmhouse in Unspoilt Position
    Georgian farmhouse in unspoilt position Grove House, Irstead, Norfolk Freehold Entrance hall • Drawing room • Dining room • Kitchen/ breakfast room with Aga • Study • Utility room • Old dairy Studio • Cloakroom/WC • Cellar • Six bedrooms • Family bathroom • Shower room • Outbuildings including barn Garaging • Mooring rights nearby • Mature gardens and grounds in all about 0.48 of an acre The Property traditionally constructed of red Grove House is a most brick and providing garaging attractive Grade II listed and workshop/storage space. Georgian farmhouse of circa The land in all extends to about 1820 with earlier origins 0.48 of an acre. believed to date to the 17th century. The house has elegant Situation and well-proportioned rooms Irstead is a small unspoilt rural typical of the period and lit by hamlet lying between Horning fine sash windows. Much and Neatishead. The village of period detail remains Neatishead is about half a mile throughout the house which and has a community village was acquired by the current shop and traditional pub. There owners in 1991 and who carried is a new village hall which hosts out a sensitive and faithful a number of local events. The programme of renovation and village of Irstead itself is about restoration. a mile and there is access via a boardwalk with fine walks Outside around the periphery of Barton The house is approached by a Broad nearby. The bustling gravelled drive to the east of riverside village of Horning the house which finishes in a (about two miles) has further large gravelled turning and everyday shopping including a parking space to the north of delicatessen, three public the house.
    [Show full text]
  • Accounting for National Nature Reserves
    Natural England Research Report NERR078 Accounting for National Nature Reserves: A Natural Capital Account of the National Nature Reserves managed by Natural England www.gov.uk/naturalACCOUNTING FOR-england NATIONAL NATURE RESERVES Natural England Research Report NERR078 Accounting for National Nature Reserves: A Natural Capital Account of the National Nature Reserves managed by Natural England Tim Sunderland1, Ruth Waters1, Dan Marsh2, Cat Hudson1 and Jane Lusardi1 Published 21st February 2019 1 Natural England 2 University of Waikato, New Zealand This report is published by Natural England under the Open Government Licence - OGLv3.0 for public sector information. You are encouraged to use, and reuse, information subject to certain conditions. For details of the licence visit Copyright. Natural England photographs are only available for non commercial purposes. If any other information such as maps or data cannot be used commercially this will be made clear within the report. ISBN 978-1-78354-518-6 © Natural England 2018 ACCOUNTING FOR NATIONAL NATURE RESERVES Project details This report should be cited as: SUNDERLAND, T., WATERS, R.D., MARSH, D. V. K., HUDSON, C., AND LUSARDI, J. (2018). Accounting for National Nature Reserves: A natural capital account of the National Nature Reserves managed by Natural England. Natural England Research Report, Number 078 Project manager Tim Sunderland Principal Specialist in Economics Horizon House Bristol BS1 5TL [email protected] Acknowledgements We would like to thank everyone who contributed to this report both within Natural England and externally. ii Natural England Research Report 078 Foreword England’s National Nature Reserves (NNRs) are the crown jewels of our natural heritage.
    [Show full text]
  • Norfolk Vanguard Offshore Wind Farm Consultation Report Appendix 20.3 Socc Stakeholder Mailing List
    Norfolk Vanguard Offshore Wind Farm Consultation Report Appendix 20.3 SoCC Stakeholder Mailing List Applicant: Norfolk Vanguard Limited Document Reference: 5.1 Pursuant to APFP Regulation: 5(2)(q) Date: June 2018 Revision: Version 1 Author: BECG Photo: Kentish Flats Offshore Wind Farm This page is intentionally blank. Norfolk Vanguard Offshore Wind Farm Appendices Parish Councils Bacton and Edingthorpe Parish Council Witton and Ridlington Parish Council Brandiston Parish Council Guestwick Parish Council Little Witchingham Parish Council Marsham Parish Council Twyford Parish Council Lexham Parish Council Yaxham Parish Council Whinburgh and Westfield Parish Council Holme Hale Parish Council Bintree Parish Council North Tuddenham Parish Council Colkirk Parish Council Sporle with Palgrave Parish Council Shipdham Parish Council Bradenham Parish Council Paston Parish Council Worstead Parish Council Swanton Abbott Parish Council Alby with Thwaite Parish Council Skeyton Parish Council Melton Constable Parish Council Thurning Parish Council Pudding Norton Parish Council East Ruston Parish Council Hanworth Parish Council Briston Parish Council Kempstone Parish Council Brisley Parish Council Ingworth Parish Council Westwick Parish Council Stibbard Parish Council Themelthorpe Parish Council Burgh and Tuttington Parish Council Blickling Parish Council Oulton Parish Council Wood Dalling Parish Council Salle Parish Council Booton Parish Council Great Witchingham Parish Council Aylsham Town Council Heydon Parish Council Foulsham Parish Council Reepham
    [Show full text]
  • Habitats Regulations Assessment of the South Norfolk Village Cluster Housing Allocations Plan
    Habitats Regulations Assessment of the South Norfolk Village Cluster Housing Allocations Plan Regulation 18 HRA Report May 2021 Habitats Regulations Assessment of the South Norfolk Village Cluster Housing Allocations Plan Regulation 18 HRA Report LC- 654 Document Control Box Client South Norfolk Council Habitats Regulations Assessment Report Title Regulation 18 – HRA Report Status FINAL Filename LC-654_South Norfolk_Regulation 18_HRA Report_8_140521SC.docx Date May 2021 Author SC Reviewed ND Approved ND Photo: Female broad bodied chaser by Shutterstock Regulation 18 – HRA Report May 2021 LC-654_South Norfolk_Regulation 18_HRA Report_8_140521SC.docx Contents 1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Purpose of this report ............................................................................................................................................... 1 2 The South Norfolk Village Cluster Housing Allocations Plan ................................................................... 3 2.1 Greater Norwich Local Plan .................................................................................................................................... 3 2.2 South Norfolk Village Cluster Housing Allocations Plan ................................................................................ 3 2.3 Village Clusters ..........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • North Norfolk District Council (Alby
    DEFINITIVE STATEMENT OF PUBLIC RIGHTS OF WAY NORTH NORFOLK DISTRICT VOLUME I PARISH OF ALBY WITH THWAITE Footpath No. 1 (Middle Hill to Aldborough Mill). Starts from Middle Hill and runs north westwards to Aldborough Hill at parish boundary where it joins Footpath No. 12 of Aldborough. Footpath No. 2 (Alby Hill to All Saints' Church). Starts from Alby Hill and runs southwards to enter road opposite All Saints' Church. Footpath No. 3 (Dovehouse Lane to Footpath 13). Starts from Alby Hill and runs northwards, then turning eastwards, crosses Footpath No. 5 then again northwards, and continuing north-eastwards to field gate. Path continues from field gate in a south- easterly direction crossing the end Footpath No. 4 and U14440 continuing until it meets Footpath No.13 at TG 20567/34065. Footpath No. 4 (Park Farm to Sunday School). Starts from Park Farm and runs south westwards to Footpath No. 3 and U14440. Footpath No. 5 (Pack Lane). Starts from the C288 at TG 20237/33581 going in a northerly direction parallel and to the eastern boundary of the cemetery for a distance of approximately 11 metres to TG 20236/33589. Continuing in a westerly direction following the existing path for approximately 34 metres to TG 20201/33589 at the western boundary of the cemetery. Continuing in a generally northerly direction parallel to the western boundary of the cemetery for approximately 23 metres to the field boundary at TG 20206/33611. Continuing in a westerly direction parallel to and to the northern side of the field boundary for a distance of approximately 153 metres to exit onto the U440 road at TG 20054/33633.
    [Show full text]
  • David Tyldesley and Associates Planning, Landscape and Environmental Consultants
    DAVID TYLDESLEY AND ASSOCIATES PLANNING, LANDSCAPE AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS Habitat Regulations Assessment: Breckland Council Submission Core Strategy and Development Control Policies Document Durwyn Liley, Rachel Hoskin, John Underhill-Day & David Tyldesley 1 DRAFT Date: 7th November 2008 Version: Draft Recommended Citation: Liley, D., Hoskin, R., Underhill-Day, J. & Tyldesley, D. (2008). Habitat Regulations Assessment: Breckland Council Submission Core Strategy and Development Control Policies Document. Footprint Ecology, Wareham, Dorset. Report for Breckland District Council. 2 Summary This document records the results of a Habitat Regulations Assessment (HRA) of Breckland District Council’s Core Strategy. The Breckland District lies in an area of considerable importance for nature conservation with a number of European Sites located within and just outside the District. The range of sites, habitats and designations is complex. Taking an area of search of 20km around the District boundary as an initial screening for relevant protected sites the assessment identified five different SPAs, ten different SACs and eight different Ramsar sites. Following on from this initial screening the assessment identifies the following potential adverse effects which are addressed within the appropriate assessment: • Reduction in the density of Breckland SPA Annex I bird species (stone curlew, nightjar, woodlark) near to new housing. • Increased levels of recreational activity resulting in increased disturbance to Breckland SPA Annex I bird species (stone curlew, nightjar, woodlark). • Increased levels of people on and around the heaths, resulting in an increase in urban effects such as increased fire risk, fly-tipping, trampling. • Increased levels of recreation to the Norfolk Coast (including the Wash), potentially resulting in disturbance to interest features and other recreational impacts.
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Management Organisation East of England Marine Plans Habitats Regulations Assessment
    Marine Management Organisation East of England Marine Plans Habitats Regulations Assessment Pre-Screening European Sites Information ABP Marine Environmental Research Ltd Quayside Suite Medina Chambers Town Quay Southampton Hampshire SO12 2AQ United Kingdom Tel: +44(0)2380 711 840 Fax: +44(0)2380 711 841 www.abpmer.co.uk Marine Management Organisation East of England Marine Plans Habitats Regulations Assessment Pre-Screening European Sites Information Colin Scott, ABPmer Author Robin Jones, Hyder Consulting Natalie Frost, ABPmer Checker David Hourd, Hyder Consulting John Hartley, Hartley Anderson Stephen Hull, ABPmer Approver Nicky Hartley, Hyder Consulting Report No Hyder Ref 003-UA003460-UE21R-05 (Draft Report) ABPmer Ref R.2020a (Project Ref 4000) (Final Draft Report) Date 24 February 2012 (Draft) 28 March 20113 (Final Draft) to be accompanied by Screening Report and Appropriate Assessment Information Review - ABPmer Refs R.2020b and R.2020c This report has been prepared for Marine Management Organisation in accordance with the terms and conditions of appointment for Habitats Regulations Assessment dated 24 March 2011. Company name and reference) cannot accept any responsibility for any use of or reliance on the contents of this report by any third party. Table of Contents 1 Introduction .........................................................................................................................1 2 The Pre-Screening Approach .............................................................................................3 3
    [Show full text]
  • Habitats Regulations Assessment: Draft Scoping Report
    North Norfolk 2016 - 2036 HABITATS REGULATIONS ASSESSMENT Draft Scoping Report May 2017 North Norfolk District Council Planning Policy Team Telephone: 01263 516318 E-Mail: [email protected] Write to: Planning Policy Manager, North Norfolk District Council, Holt Road, Cromer, NR27 9EN www.north-norfolk.gov.uk/localplan All documents can be made available in Braille, audio, large print or in other languages. Please contact 01263 516318 to discuss your requirements. Draft HRA Scoping - North Norfolk District Council – Emerging Local Plan Executive Summary Habitats Regulations Assessment is required in accordance with the Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2010, (amended 2012); in order to ensure that plans and projects do not have a likely significant effect on any European designated sites for nature conservation. Such plans or projects can only proceed if the competent authority is convinced they will not have an “adverse effect on the integrity of a European site”. Where there is uncertainty over the effects then the competent authority will need to demonstrate how these can be avoided and what mitigation can be put in place. A Local Plan is the subject of Habitats Regulations Assessment, which is the responsibility of the plan-making body (in this case North Norfolk District Council) to produce. This scoping report provides the background and review of evidence to support the commencement of screening and the final Habitats Regulations Assessment of the North Norfolk Core Strategy and Site Allocations documents. This report considers: • The European designated sites within and outside the plan area affected. • The characteristics of these sites and their conservation objectives.
    [Show full text]
  • Budget Book 2008/09 Contents
    BUDGET BOOK 2008/09 CONTENTS Page Number Contents Page Message from the Leader of the Council 1 REVENUE BUDGETS (pages 4 - 62) General Fund Summary Information • Strategic Director - Resources Report on the General Fund Budget 4 – 6 • General Fund Summary & General Fund Reserve Statement 7 – 9 • Council Tax 2008/09 – Summary 10 – 11 • Sources of Finance and Spending Graphs 12 – 13 • Council Tax 2008/09 for each Parish 14 – 17 • Employee Numbers and Cost 18 General Fund Detailed Information by Service Area • Community 19 – 32 • Environment 33 – 44 • Information 45 – 50 • Resources 51 – 62 Capital Budgets • General Fund 63 – 73 • Coast Protection 74 Fees and Charges (pages 75 - 94) • 76 – 79 Community 80 – 89 • Environment 90 • Information 91 – 94 • Resources Budget Book 2008/09 Budget Book 2008/09 Message from the Leader of North Norfolk District Council The budget for 2008/09 has been prepared alongside the refresh of the Corporate Plan which sets out what we intend to do for the next three years and outlines our key priorities as: o Active and Sustainable Communities o Natural Environment and Built Heritage o First Class Resource Management Setting the budget for 2008/09 has been a challenging process in light of the disappointing support in terms of financial grant that the Council is due to receive from the government for the next three years. The actual increase in grant that has been allocated to North Norfolk is only 1.1% in 2008/09 and 2009/10 and increasing only slightly in 2010/11 to 1.5%. This alone is insufficient to cover inflationary pressures before taking into account areas of growth.
    [Show full text]
  • The Meteorological Magazine Vol
    M.O. 548 AIR MINISTRY METEOROLOGICAL OFFICE THE METEOROLOGICAL MAGAZINE VOL. 80, No. 946, APRIL 1951 ESSAY ON FRONTOGENESIS AND FRONTOLYSIS By H. H. LAMB, M.A. Part III Frontolysis.—Frontolysis has tended to be dismissed in meteorological litera­ ture as a mere counterpart of frontogenesis, to be explained in terms of the same deformation field. The subject is worth separate study. We have already noticed that the frontolytic col seldom arises in practice. Fig. 12, which shows a front, A, lying quasi-stationary between the twin centres of an intense anticyclone over England and France on February 14, 1946, probably typifies an unusually close approach to the frontolytic orien­ tation of a front in the col. It was not at once clear whether the situation would prove frontolytic, but the intensely anticyclonic conditions ensured that the front would be quiescent. At the time of the chart shown in Fig. 12, the situation had already existed substantially unchanged for more than 24 hours, yet the front A is still marked by a sharp wind discontinuity. Eight hours later a small movement of the front west of Hurn airport brought a wind veer from NE. to S. and eventually to SW. and a sharp deterioration of visibility as the smoke from Bournemouth and Poole was transported in the direction of the airfield. At the same time, the low stratus lifted from about 500 to 1,000 ft. with the arrival of the drier continental air mass. Dew points over France were mainly between 20° and 30°F., and the dry-bulb temperatures show the effect of radiation cooling in the area of clear skies on Fig.
    [Show full text]