Deep Ancestral Introgression Shapes Evolutionary History of Dragonflies And

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.06.25.172619; this version posted February 20, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 1 Deep ancestral introgression shapes evolutionary history of dragonflies and 2 damselflies 3 Anton Suvorov1$, Celine Scornavacca2,*, M. Stanley Fujimoto3, Paul Bodily4, Mark 4 Clement3, Keith A. Crandall5, Michael F. Whiting6,7, Daniel R. Schrider1,* and Seth M. 5 Bybee6,7,* 6 7 1Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 8 2Institut des Sciences de l’Evolution Université de Montpellier, CNRS, IRD, EPHE CC 064, 9 Place Eugène Bataillon, 34095 Montpellier Cedex 05, France. 10 3Department of Biology, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 11 4Department of Computer Science, Idaho State University, Pocatello, ID 12 5Computational Biology Institute, Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Milken 13 Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Washington, DC 14 6Department of Biology, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 15 7M.L. Bean Museum, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 16 $Correspondence: [email protected] 17 *Equal contributions 18 19 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.06.25.172619; this version posted February 20, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 20 SUMMARY 21 22 Introgression is arguably one of the most important biological processes in the evolution of 23 groups of related species, affecting at least 10% of the extant species in the animal kingdom. 24 Introgression reduces genetic divergence between species, and in some cases can be highly 25 beneficial, facilitating rapid adaptation to ever-changing environmental pressures. Introgression 26 also significantly impacts inference of phylogenetic species relationships where a strictly binary 27 tree model cannot adequately explain reticulate net-like species relationships. Here we use 28 phylogenomic approaches to understand patterns of introgression along the evolutionary history 29 of a unique, non-model insect system: dragonflies and damselflies (Odonata). We demonstrate 30 that introgression is a pervasive evolutionary force across various taxonomic levels within 31 Odonata. In particular, we show that the morphologically “intermediate” species of 32 Anisozygoptera (one of the three primary suborders within Odonata besides Zygoptera and 33 Anisoptera), which retain phenotypic characteristics of the other two suborders, experienced high 34 levels of introgression likely coming from zygopteran genomes. Additionally, we found evidence 35 for multiple cases of deep inter-superfamilial ancestral introgression. 36 37 INTRODUCTION 38 39 In recent years there has been a large body of evidence amassed demonstrating that multiple 40 parts of the Tree of Life did not evolve according to a strictly bifurcating phylogeny [1, 2]. 41 Instead, many organisms experience reticulate network-like evolution that is caused by an 42 exchange of inter-specific genetic information via various biological processes. In particular, 43 lateral gene transfer, incomplete lineage sorting (ILS) and introgression can result in gene trees 44 that are discordant with the species tree [3, 4]. Lateral transfer and introgression both involve 45 gene flow following speciation, thereby producing “reticulate” phylogenies. Incomplete lineage 46 sorting (ILS), on the other hand, occurs when three or more lineages coalesce in their ancestral 47 population. This often arises in an order that conflicts with that of the true species tree, and thus 48 involves no post-speciation gene flow and therefore does not contribute to reticulate evolution. 49 Phylogenetic species-gene tree incongruence observed in empirical data can provide insight into 50 underlying biological factors that shape the evolutionary trajectories of a set of taxa. The major bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.06.25.172619; this version posted February 20, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 51 source of reticulate evolution for eukaryotes is introgression where it affects approximately 25% 52 of flowering plant and 10% of animal species [1, 5]. Introgressed alleles can be fitness-neutral, 53 deleterious [6] or adaptive [7, 8]. For example, adaptive introgression has been shown to provide 54 an evolutionary rescue from polluted habitats in gulf killifish (Fundulus grandis) [7], yielded 55 mimicry adaptations among Heliconius butterflies [9] and archaic introgression has facilitated 56 adaptive evolution of altitude tolerance [10], immunity and metabolism in modern humans [11]. 57 Additionally, hybridization and introgression are important and often overlooked mechanisms of 58 invasive species establishment and spread [12]. 59 Odonata, the insect order that contains dragonflies and damselflies, lacks a strongly 60 supported backbone tree to clearly resolve higher-level phylogenetic relationships [13, 14]. 61 Current evidence places odonates together with Ephemeroptera (mayflies) as the living 62 representatives of the most ancient insect lineages to have evolved wings and active flight [15]. 63 Odonates possess unique anatomical and morphological features such as a specialized body 64 form, specialized wing venation, a distinctive form of muscle attachment to the wing base [16] 65 allowing for direct flight and accessory (secondary) male genitalia that support certain unique 66 behaviors (e.g., sperm competition). They are among the most adept flyers of all animals and are 67 exclusively carnivorous insects relying primarily on vision [17, 18] to capture prey. During their 68 immature stage they are fully aquatic and spend much of their adult life in flight. 69 Biogeographically, odonates exhibit species ranges varying from worldwide dispersal [19] to 70 island-endemic. Odonates also play crucial ecological roles in local freshwater communities, 71 being a top invertebrate predator as both adults and immatures [20]. Due to this combination of 72 characteristics, odonates are quickly becoming model organisms to study specific questions in 73 ecology, physiology and evolution [21, 22]. However, the extent of introgression at the genomic 74 scale within Odonata remains largely unknown. 75 Two early attempts to tackle introgression/hybridization patterns within Odonata were 76 undertaken in [23, 24]. The studies showed that two closely related species of damselflies, 77 Ischnura graellsii and I. elegans, can hybridize under laboratory conditions and that genital 78 morphology of male hybrids shares features with putative hybrids from I. graellsii–I. elegans 79 natural allopatric populations [23]. The existence of abundant hybridization and introgression in 80 natural populations of I. graellsii and I. elegans has received further support from an analysis of 81 microsatellite data [25]. Putative hybridization events have also been identified in a pair of bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.06.25.172619; this version posted February 20, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 82 calopterygoid damselfly species, Mnais costalis and M. pruinosa based on the analyses of two 83 molecular loci (mtDNA and nucDNA) [26], and between Calopteryx virgo and C. splendens 84 using 16S ribosomal DNA and 40 random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) markers [27]. A 85 more recent study identified an inter-specific hybridization between two cordulegasterid 86 dragonfly species, Cordulegaster boltonii and C. trinacriae using two molecular markers 87 (mtDNA and nucDNA) and geometric morphometrics [28]. Furthermore, in various biological 88 systems, the empirical evidence shows that hybridization can potentially lead to intermediate 89 phenotypes [29] observed at molecular level (e.g. semidominant expression in inter-specific 90 hybrids [30]) as well as organismal morphology (e.g. [31-33]). The Anisozygoptera suborder, 91 which contains only three extant species, retains traits shared with both dragonflies and 92 damselflies (hence its taxonomic name), ranging from morphology and anatomical structures 93 [34] to behavior and flight biomechanics [35]. These characteristics could suggest a hybrid origin 94 of this suborder. The potential introgression scenario for Anisozygoptera is yet to be formally 95 tested using genome-wide data. 96 Here we present a comprehensive analysis of transcriptomic data from 83 odonate 97 species. First, we reconstruct a robust phylogenetic backbone using up to 4341 genetic loci for 98 the order and discuss its evolutionary history spanning from the Carboniferous period (~360 99 mya) to present day. Furthermore, in light of the “intermediate” phenotypic nature of 100 Anisozygoptera, we investigate phylogenetic signatures of introgression within Odonata. Most
Recommended publications
  • The Superfamily Calopterygoidea in South China: Taxonomy and Distribution. Progress Report for 2009 Surveys Zhang Haomiao* *PH D

    The Superfamily Calopterygoidea in South China: Taxonomy and Distribution. Progress Report for 2009 Surveys Zhang Haomiao* *PH D

    International Dragonfly Fund - Report 26 (2010): 1-36 1 The Superfamily Calopterygoidea in South China: taxonomy and distribution. Progress Report for 2009 surveys Zhang Haomiao* *PH D student at the Department of Entomology, College of Natural Resources and Environment, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China. Email: [email protected] Introduction Three families in the superfamily Calopterygoidea occur in China, viz. the Calo- pterygidae, Chlorocyphidae and Euphaeidae. They include numerous species that are distributed widely across South China, mainly in streams and upland running waters at moderate altitudes. To date, our knowledge of Chinese spe- cies has remained inadequate: the taxonomy of some genera is unresolved and no attempt has been made to map the distribution of the various species and genera. This project is therefore aimed at providing taxonomic (including on larval morphology), biological, and distributional information on the super- family in South China. In 2009, two series of surveys were conducted to Southwest China-Guizhou and Yunnan Provinces. The two provinces are characterized by karst limestone arranged in steep hills and intermontane basins. The climate is warm and the weather is frequently cloudy and rainy all year. This area is usually regarded as one of biodiversity “hotspot” in China (Xu & Wilkes, 2004). Many interesting species are recorded, the checklist and photos of these sur- veys are reported here. And the progress of the research on the superfamily Calopterygoidea is appended. Methods Odonata were recorded by the specimens collected and identified from pho- tographs. The working team includes only four people, the surveys to South- west China were completed by the author and the photographer, Mr.
  • André Nel Sixtieth Anniversary Festschrift

    André Nel Sixtieth Anniversary Festschrift

    Palaeoentomology 002 (6): 534–555 ISSN 2624-2826 (print edition) https://www.mapress.com/j/pe/ PALAEOENTOMOLOGY PE Copyright © 2019 Magnolia Press Editorial ISSN 2624-2834 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/palaeoentomology.2.6.1 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:25D35BD3-0C86-4BD6-B350-C98CA499A9B4 André Nel sixtieth anniversary Festschrift DANY AZAR1, 2, ROMAIN GARROUSTE3 & ANTONIO ARILLO4 1Lebanese University, Faculty of Sciences II, Department of Natural Sciences, P.O. Box: 26110217, Fanar, Matn, Lebanon. Email: [email protected] 2State Key Laboratory of Palaeobiology and Stratigraphy, Center for Excellence in Life and Paleoenvironment, Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, China. 3Institut de Systématique, Évolution, Biodiversité, ISYEB-UMR 7205-CNRS, MNHN, UPMC, EPHE, Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Sorbonne Universités, 57 rue Cuvier, CP 50, Entomologie, F-75005, Paris, France. 4Departamento de Biodiversidad, Ecología y Evolución, Facultad de Biología, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain. FIGURE 1. Portrait of André Nel. During the last “International Congress on Fossil Insects, mainly by our esteemed Russian colleagues, and where Arthropods and Amber” held this year in the Dominican several of our members in the IPS contributed in edited volumes honoring some of our great scientists. Republic, we unanimously agreed—in the International This issue is a Festschrift to celebrate the 60th Palaeoentomological Society (IPS)—to honor our great birthday of Professor André Nel (from the ‘Muséum colleagues who have given us and the science (and still) national d’Histoire naturelle’, Paris) and constitutes significant knowledge on the evolution of fossil insects a tribute to him for his great ongoing, prolific and his and terrestrial arthropods over the years.
  • A Checklist of North American Odonata

    A Checklist of North American Odonata

    A Checklist of North American Odonata Including English Name, Etymology, Type Locality, and Distribution Dennis R. Paulson and Sidney W. Dunkle 2009 Edition (updated 14 April 2009) A Checklist of North American Odonata Including English Name, Etymology, Type Locality, and Distribution 2009 Edition (updated 14 April 2009) Dennis R. Paulson1 and Sidney W. Dunkle2 Originally published as Occasional Paper No. 56, Slater Museum of Natural History, University of Puget Sound, June 1999; completely revised March 2009. Copyright © 2009 Dennis R. Paulson and Sidney W. Dunkle 2009 edition published by Jim Johnson Cover photo: Tramea carolina (Carolina Saddlebags), Cabin Lake, Aiken Co., South Carolina, 13 May 2008, Dennis Paulson. 1 1724 NE 98 Street, Seattle, WA 98115 2 8030 Lakeside Parkway, Apt. 8208, Tucson, AZ 85730 ABSTRACT The checklist includes all 457 species of North American Odonata considered valid at this time. For each species the original citation, English name, type locality, etymology of both scientific and English names, and approxi- mate distribution are given. Literature citations for original descriptions of all species are given in the appended list of references. INTRODUCTION Before the first edition of this checklist there was no re- Table 1. The families of North American Odonata, cent checklist of North American Odonata. Muttkows- with number of species. ki (1910) and Needham and Heywood (1929) are long out of date. The Zygoptera and Anisoptera were cov- Family Genera Species ered by Westfall and May (2006) and Needham, West- fall, and May (2000), respectively, but some changes Calopterygidae 2 8 in nomenclature have been made subsequently. Davies Lestidae 2 19 and Tobin (1984, 1985) listed the world odonate fauna Coenagrionidae 15 103 but did not include type localities or details of distri- Platystictidae 1 1 bution.
  • THE DRAGONFLIES and DAMSELFLIES (ODONATA) of HALTON REGION, ONTARIO an Annotated Checklist 2017

    THE DRAGONFLIES and DAMSELFLIES (ODONATA) of HALTON REGION, ONTARIO an Annotated Checklist 2017

    THE DRAGONFLIES AND DAMSELFLIES (ODONATA) OF HALTON REGION, ONTARIO An annotated checklist 2017 First prepared by Carl J. Rothfels for the Halton NAI 2006 Updated by Brenda Van Ryswyk 2017 INTRODUCTION Jones & Holder 2000); A Preliminary Annotated List of the Odonata of Northern Bruce County The Odonata (dragonflies and damselflies) of including Bruce Peninsula National Park (Catling Halton Region have been historically under- et al. 2000b); the surveys of Sandbanks Provincial surveyed, especially when compared with both Park (Catling et al. 2000a; Bree 2001); the surveys odonate work in nearby areas (in 2000 Peel Region of Bon Echo Provincial Park (Bree 2000); and the had 71 documented species, Metropolitan Toronto surveys of Petroglyphs Provincial Park (Bree 2002; had 81, while Halton had only 49 [Catling & Bree 2004b). Brownell 2000]), and with work within Halton on other groups (e.g. birds). Fortunately, Halton was None of these regional and sub-regional works is well positioned to take advantage of the recent within or adjacent to Halton Region, concentrating renaissance in Ontario odonate study, particularly instead on the southern Carolinian Zone and the since 2000. This surge in interest culminated in the southern edge of the Canadian Shield. Since the inclusion of Odonata as one of the fauna groups distribution of odonates can vary significantly surveyed for during the Halton Natural Areas between regions, it is particularly important to fill Inventory (HNAI) in 2003 and 2004. this hole in our current understanding of Ontario odonate distributions. This checklist was first the result of the HNAI field surveys and has since been updated and expanded.
  • An Overview of Molecular Odonate Studies, and Our Evolutionary Understanding of Dragonfly and Damselfly (Insecta: Odonata) Behavior

    An Overview of Molecular Odonate Studies, and Our Evolutionary Understanding of Dragonfly and Damselfly (Insecta: Odonata) Behavior

    International Journal of Odonatology Vol. 14, No. 2, June 2011, 137–147 Dragons fly, biologists classify: an overview of molecular odonate studies, and our evolutionary understanding of dragonfly and damselfly (Insecta: Odonata) behavior Elizabeth F. Ballare* and Jessica L. Ware Department of Biological Sciences, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, 195 University Ave., Boyden Hall, Newark, NJ, 07102, USA (Received 18 November 2010; final version received 3 April 2011) Among insects, perhaps the most appreciated are those that are esthetically pleasing: few capture the interest of the public as much as vibrantly colored dragonflies and damselflies (Insecta: Odonata). These remarkable insects are also extensively studied. Here, we review the history of odonate systematics, with an emphasis on discrepancies among studies. Over the past century, relationships among Odonata have been reinterpreted many times, using a variety of data from wing vein morphology to DNA. Despite years of study, there has been little consensus about odonate taxonomy. In this review, we compare odonate molecular phylogenetic studies with respect to gene and model selection, optimality criterion, and dataset completeness. These differences are discussed in relation to the evolution of dragonfly behavior. Keywords: Odonata; mitochondrion; nuclear; phylogeny; systematic; dragonfly; damselfly Introduction Why study Odonata? The order Odonata comprises three suborders: Anisozygoptera, Anisoptera, and Zygoptera. There are approximately 6000 species of Odonata described worldwide (Ardila-Garcia & Gregory, 2009). Of the three suborders Anisoptera and Zygoptera are by far the most commonly observed and collected, because there are only two known species of Anisozygoptera under the genus Epiophlebia. All odonate nymphs are aquatic, with a few rare exceptions such as the semi-aquatic Pseudocordulia (Watson, 1983), and adults are usually found near freshwater ponds, marshes, rivers (von Ellenrieder, 2010), streams, and lakes (although some species occur in areas of mild salinity; Corbet, 1999).
  • Argia the News Journal of the Dragonfly Society of the Americas

    Argia the News Journal of the Dragonfly Society of the Americas

    ISSN 1061-8503 TheA News Journalrgia of the Dragonfly Society of the Americas Volume 22 17 December 2010 Number 4 Published by the Dragonfly Society of the Americas http://www.DragonflySocietyAmericas.org/ ARGIA Vol. 22, No. 4, 17 December 2010 In This Issue .................................................................................................................................................................1 Calendar of Events ......................................................................................................................................................1 Minutes of the 2010 Annual Meeting of the Dragonfly Society of the Americas, by Steve Valley ............................2 2010 Treasurer’s Report, by Jerrell J. Daigle ................................................................................................................2 Enallagma novaehispaniae Calvert (Neotropical Bluet), Another New Species for Arizona, by Rich Bailowitz ......3 Photos Needed ............................................................................................................................................................3 Lestes australis (Southern Spreadwing), New for Arizona, by Rich Bailowitz ...........................................................4 Ischnura barberi (Desert Forktail) Found in Oregon, by Jim Johnson ........................................................................4 Recent Discoveries in Montana, by Nathan S. Kohler ...............................................................................................5
  • Cumulative Index of ARGIA and Bulletin of American Odonatology

    Cumulative Index of ARGIA and Bulletin of American Odonatology

    Cumulative Index of ARGIA and Bulletin of American Odonatology Compiled by Jim Johnson PDF available at http://odonata.bogfoot.net/docs/Argia-BAO_Cumulative_Index.pdf Last updated: 14 February 2021 Below are titles from all issues of ARGIA and Bulletin of American Odonatology (BAO) published to date by the Dragonfly Society of the Americas. The purpose of this listing is to facilitate the searching of authors and title keywords across all issues in both journals, and to make browsing of the titles more convenient. PDFs of ARGIA and BAO can be downloaded from https://www.dragonflysocietyamericas.org/en/publications. The most recent three years of issues for both publications are only available to current members of the Dragonfly Society of the Americas. Contact Jim Johnson at [email protected] if you find any errors. ARGIA 1 (1–4), 1989 Welcome to the Dragonfly Society of America Cook, C. 1 Society's Name Revised Cook, C. 2 DSA Receives Grant from SIO Cook, C. 2 North and Central American Catalogue of Odonata—A Proposal Donnelly, T.W. 3 US Endangered Species—A Request for Information Donnelly, T.W. 4 Odonate Collecting in the Peruvian Amazon Dunkle, S.W. 5 Collecting in Costa Rica Dunkle, S.W. 6 Research in Progress Garrison, R.W. 8 Season Summary Project Cook, C. 9 Membership List 10 Survey of Ohio Odonata Planned Glotzhober, R.C. 11 Book Review: The Dragonflies of Europe Cook, C. 12 Book Review: Dragonflies of the Florida Peninsula, Bermuda and the Bahamas Cook, C. 12 Constitution of the Dragonfly Society of America 13 Exchanges and Notices 15 General Information About the Dragonfly Society of America (DSA) Cook, C.
  • Delaware's Wildlife Species of Greatest Conservation Need

    Delaware's Wildlife Species of Greatest Conservation Need

    CHAPTER 1 DELAWARE’S WILDLIFE SPECIES OF GREATEST CONSERVATION NEED CHAPTER 1: Delaware’s Wildlife Species of Greatest Conservation Need Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................................... 7 Regional Context ........................................................................................................................................... 7 Delaware’s Animal Biodiversity .................................................................................................................... 10 State of Knowledge of Delaware’s Species ................................................................................................... 10 Delaware’s Wildlife and SGCN - presented by Taxonomic Group .................................................................. 11 Delaware’s 2015 SGCN Status Rank Tier Definitions................................................................................. 12 TIER 1 .................................................................................................................................................... 13 TIER 2 .................................................................................................................................................... 13 TIER 3 .................................................................................................................................................... 13 Mammals ....................................................................................................................................................
  • The Classification and Diversity of Dragonflies and Damselflies (Odonata)*

    The Classification and Diversity of Dragonflies and Damselflies (Odonata)*

    Zootaxa 3703 (1): 036–045 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Correspondence ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2013 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3703.1.9 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:9F5D2E03-6ABE-4425-9713-99888C0C8690 The classification and diversity of dragonflies and damselflies (Odonata)* KLAAS-DOUWE B. DIJKSTRA1, GÜNTER BECHLY2, SETH M. BYBEE3, RORY A. DOW1, HENRI J. DUMONT4, GÜNTHER FLECK5, ROSSER W. GARRISON6, MATTI HÄMÄLÄINEN1, VINCENT J. KALKMAN1, HARUKI KARUBE7, MICHAEL L. MAY8, ALBERT G. ORR9, DENNIS R. PAULSON10, ANDREW C. REHN11, GÜNTHER THEISCHINGER12, JOHN W.H. TRUEMAN13, JAN VAN TOL1, NATALIA VON ELLENRIEDER6 & JESSICA WARE14 1Naturalis Biodiversity Centre, PO Box 9517, NL-2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands. E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] 2Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde Stuttgart, Rosenstein 1, 70191 Stuttgart, Germany. E-mail: [email protected] 3Department of Biology, Brigham Young University, 401 WIDB, Provo, UT. 84602 USA. E-mail: [email protected] 4Department of Biology, Ghent University, Ledeganckstraat 35, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium. E-mail: [email protected] 5France. E-mail: [email protected] 6Plant Pest Diagnostics Branch, California Department of Food & Agriculture, 3294 Meadowview Road, Sacramento, CA 95832- 1448, USA. E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected] 7Kanagawa Prefectural Museum of Natural History, 499 Iryuda, Odawara, Kanagawa, 250-0031 Japan. E-mail: [email protected] 8Department of Entomology, Rutgers University, Blake Hall, 93 Lipman Drive, New Brunswick, New Jersey 08901, USA.
  • The Damselfly and Dragonfly Watercolour Collection of Edmond

    The Damselfly and Dragonfly Watercolour Collection of Edmond

    International Journal of Odonatology, 2017 Vol. 20, No. 2, 79–112, https://doi.org/10.1080/13887890.2017.1330226 The damselfly and dragonfly watercolour collection of Edmond de Selys Longchamps: II Calopterygines, Cordulines, Gomphines and Aeschnines Karin Verspuia∗ and Marcel Th. Wasscherb aLingedijk 104, Tricht, the Netherlands; bMinstraat 15bis, Utrecht, the Netherlands (Received 3 March 2017; final version received 10 May 2017) In the nineteenth century Edmond de Selys Longchamps added watercolours, drawings and notes to his extensive collection of dragonfly and damselfly specimens. The majority of illustrations were exe- cuted by Selys and Guillaume Severin. The watercolour collection is currently part of the collection of the Royal Belgian Institute for Natural Sciences in Brussels. This previously unpublished material has now been scanned and is accessible on the website of this institute. This article presents the part of the collection concerning the following sous-familles according to Selys: Calopterygines (currently superfamilies Calopterygoidea and Epiophlebioidea), Cordulines (currently superfamily Libelluloidea), Gomphines (currently superfamily Petaluroidea, Gomphoidea, Cordulegastroidea and Aeshnoidea) and Aeschnines (currently superfamily Aeshnoidea). This part consists of 750 watercolours, 64 drawings and 285 text sheets. Characteristics and subject matter of the sheets with illustrations and text are pre- sented. The majority (92%) of all sheets with illustrations have been associated with current species names (Calopteryines 268, Cordulines 109, Gomphines 268 and Aeschnines 111). We hope the digital images and documentation stress the value of the watercolour collection of Selys and promote it as a source for odonate research. Keywords: Odonata; taxonomy; Severin; Zygoptera; Anisozygoptera; Anisoptera; watercolours; draw- ings; aquarelles Introduction The watercolour collection of Selys Edmond Michel de Selys Longchamps (1813–1900) did important work in odonate classifi- cation and taxonomy (Wasscher & Dumont, 2013; Verspui & Wasscher, 2016).
  • Dragonflies and Damselflies

    Dragonflies and Damselflies

    Common Name: Subarctic darner SPCN Scientific Name: Aeshna subarctica Taxon: Dragonflies and Damselflies Federal Status: Not Listed Natural Heritage Program Rank: New York Status: Not Listed Global: G5 New York: S1 Tracked: Yes Synopsis: The subartic darner (Aeshna subarctica) is a circumpolar boreal species of northern latitudes. The center of its North American range is near the shore of the Hudson Bay in the southern Hudson Bay Taiga ecoregion (Donnelly 2004). The primary range for this species extends from Canada to north central Europe and across Siberia to Japan (Mead 2003). Areas in Canada where it is found include the Yukon, Northwest Territories, and western provinces eastward to Ontario, Quebec, and the Atlantic provinces. In addition to Alaska, A. subarctica has been found in northern states such as Maine, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Montana, Oregon, and Washington (Needham et al. 2000). The species is very spottily distributed and exceedingly rare in the northern United States, but more locales are being discovered through increased survey effort. Until the 1900s, A. subarctica was only known from three records from in the U.S., including one from New York. Presently, over 20 U.S. records exist (New York Natural Heritage Program 2011, Donnelly 2004). The species was recently located in Massachusetts (Nikula et al. 2001) and the distribution in Maine expanded three-fold during recent atlas efforts (Brunelle and deMaynadier 2005). Records increased in New Hampshire as well, during the dragonfly survey (P. Hunt, personal communication). As a boreal species, A. subarctica was probably much more widespread during colder times than in the recent past, so it is likely that the appearance of these glacial relict populations along the southern range margin are the result of increased collecting effort rather than a recent southward range expansion.
  • Prioritizing Odonata for Conservation Action in the Northeastern USA

    Prioritizing Odonata for Conservation Action in the Northeastern USA

    APPLIED ODONATOLOGY Prioritizing Odonata for conservation action in the northeastern USA Erin L. White1,4, Pamela D. Hunt2,5, Matthew D. Schlesinger1,6, Jeffrey D. Corser1,7, and Phillip G. deMaynadier3,8 1New York Natural Heritage Program, State University of New York College of Environmental Science and Forestry, 625 Broadway 5th Floor, Albany, New York 12233-4757 USA 2Audubon Society of New Hampshire, 84 Silk Farm Road, Concord, New Hampshire 03301 USA 3Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife, 650 State Street, Bangor, Maine 04401 USA Abstract: Odonata are valuable biological indicators of freshwater ecosystem integrity and climate change, and the northeastern USA (Virginia to Maine) is a hotspot of odonate diversity and a region of historical and grow- ing threats to freshwater ecosystems. This duality highlights the urgency of developing a comprehensive conser- vation assessment of the region’s 228 resident odonate species. We offer a prioritization framework modified from NatureServe’s method for assessing conservation status ranks by assigning a single regional vulnerability metric (R-rank) reflecting each species’ degree of relative extinction risk in the northeastern USA. We calculated the R-rank based on 3 rarity factors (range extent, area of occupancy, and habitat specificity), 1 threat factor (vulnerability of occupied habitats), and 1 trend factor (relative change in range size). We combine this R-rank with the degree of endemicity (% of the species’ USA and Canadian range that falls within the region) as a proxy for regional responsibility, thereby deriving a list of species of combined vulnerability and regional management responsibility. Overall, 18% of the region’s odonate fauna is imperiled (R1 and R2), and peatlands, low-gradient streams and seeps, high-gradient headwaters, and larger rivers that harbor a disproportionate number of these species should be considered as priority habitat types for conservation.