Catsclem - Dieren

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Catsclem - Dieren CATSCLEM - DIEREN INSECTEN INSECTS INSECTEN INSECTS INSECTA Het lichaam van een insect bestaat uit 3 delen: de kop, het borststuk en het achterlijf. Op hun kop hebben ze een paar antennen of voelsprieten, een paar ogen, en de monddelen. Een insect heeft drie paar poten en (meestal) twee paar vleugels. ALGEMEEN GENERAL Entomologie - Entomology Entomologie voor Beginners Entomology for Beginners A Glossary of Entomological terms Entomology Index of Internet Resources Nederlandse Entomologische Vereniging - NEV ------------------------------------------- Insecten - Algemene introductie Introduction to Taxonomy Insect Taxonomy and Classification Classification of Bugs Bug Index Introduction to Insect Anatomy Insect Body-parts Verdauung (Digestion) Insect Identifier MOFEP Arthropods Key Wikipedia: Lijst van Insecten Insects Insect Life Cycles Museumkennis: Hoe groeit een insect? Museumkennis: Kunnen alle insecten vliegen? Insects on WWW Insect Drawings Gallery AgNic: A Guide to Online Insect Systematic Resources The Wonderful World of Insects A Glossary of Entomological Cockroach terms glossary BuzzWords: a glossary of arthropod terms For young entomologists Spider glossary Compiled by Ed Nieuwenhuys AESHNIDAE <==o AESHNIDAE () |--o Oplonaeschninae | |-- †Basiaeschna | `-- Oplonaeschna |--o Gynacanthinae | |== other genera? | `--o Gynacantha [incl. Triacanthagyna; Acanthagyna] | |-- G. trifida [Triacanthagyna trifida] | |-- G. nervosa [Acanthagyna nervosa] | `== other species? `--o Aeshninae |--o Polycanthagynini | |-- "Aeshna" petalura | `--o Polycanthagyna | |-- P. erythromelas | |-- P. melanictera | `-- P. ornithocephala |--o Aeshnini | |== numerous other genera? | `--o Aeshna [Aeschna] | |-- A. cyanea | |-- A. juncea | `-- A. caerulea `--o Anacini [Anactinini; Anactini] |--o Amphiaeschnina | |-- "Aeshna" mixta | |-- "Aeshna" affinis | |-- Hesperaeschna californica | |-- Hesperaeschna biliosa | |-- Neureclipa | |-- Amphiaeschna | |-- Castoraeschna | |-- Coryphaeschna | |-- Oreaeschna | `-- Remartinia `--o Anacina |-- Anaciaeschna `-- Anax [incl. Hemianax] AESHNOPTERA <==o AESHNOPTERA () |?- †Cymatophlebiella euryptera (incertae sedis) |-- †Mesuropetaloidea `--o Aeshnomorpha [?] () |-- Austropetaliida [?] [Austropetaliata] `--o Panaeshnida [?] |--o †Progobiaeshnidae [?] | |?- †Gobiaeshna occulta | `-- †Progobiaeshna liaoningensis [?] `--o Aeshnida |-- †Cymatophlebioidea [?] `--o Paneuaeshnida [?] () |-- †Paracymatophlebia splendida [?] [Paracymatophlebiidae[?]] `--o Euaeshnida |-- †Eumorbaeshna jurassica [?] [Eumorbaeschnidae[?]] `--o Neoaeshnida |-- Gomphaeschnidae `--o Aeshnodea |--o Allopetaliidae | |-- †Baissaeshna prisca | `-- Allopetalia `--o Euaeshnodea [?] |--o Brachytronidae | |?-o Epiaeschninae | | |-- Nasiaeschna | | `-- Epiaeschna | `--o Brachytroninae | |-- Brachytron | `-- Aeschnophlebia `--o Aeshnoidea |-- Telephlebiidae `-- Aeshnidae () AMPHIPTERYGIDA <==o AMPHIPTERYGIDA |--o Diphlebiidae | |--o Philoganga [Anisoneura] [Philoganginae] | | |-- P. loringae | | |-- P. montana [Anisoneura montana] | | |-- P. robusta | | `-- P. vetusta | `--o Diphlebia [Dineura, Dinvra] [Diphlebiinae] | |-- D. coerulescens | |-- D. euphoeoides [incl. D. reinholdi ] | |-- D. hybridoides | |-- D. lestoides [Amphipteryx lestoides] | `-- D. nymphoides `--o AMPHIPTERYGOIDEA |?- Pseudolestes mirabilis [Pseudolestidae] |--o Thaumatoneuridae | |--o †Dysagrioninae | | |--o †Petrolestini | | | |-- †Petrolestes | | | `-- †Congqingia | | `--o †Dysagrionini | | |-- †Dysagrion | | `-- †Phenacolestes | `--o Thaumatoneurinae | |-- †Euarchistigma atrophium [Euarchistigmatini] | `-- Thaumatoneura inopinata [Thaumatoneurini ] `--o Amphipterygidae |--o Rimanellinae | |-- Rimanella arcana [Rima arcana] | `--o Pentaphlebia | |-- P. gamblesi | `-- P. stahli `--o Amphipteryginae |--o Amphipteryx | |-- A. agrioides | `-- A. longicaudatus `--o Devadatta |-- D. argyoides [Tetraneura argyoides] |-- D. ducatrix |-- D. multinervosa `-- D. podolestoides [Devadatta filipina] ANISOPTERA <==o Anisoptera () |?- †Pritykiniella deichmuelleri [Anisoptera incertae sedis] |?- †Kazakhophlebiella aktassica [Anisoptera incertae sedis] |-- Petalurida `--o Euanisoptera |-- Aeshnoptera () `--o Exophytica |-- Gomphides () `-- Cavilabiata () APTERYGOTA <==o SubKlasse Apterygota Order Collembola (Springstaarten) (Springtails) Order Diplura (Dubbelstaarten) (Diplurans) Order Protura (Poottasters) (Proturans) Order Thysanura (Zilvervisjes) (Bristletails) ------------------- Insecten: Onderklasse Apterygota Apterygota Subclass Apterygota Zie ook: Uniramia Uniramous Anthropods ARTHROPODA ANTHROPODA GELEEDPOTIGEN <==o Arthropoda () (After Conway Morris, 1993 Hou & Bergström, 1997 and Gon, 2001-2002) |?-+?- Tardigrada (Beerdiertjes) (Waterbears) [are Aschelmithes??] | `--+-- Lobopoda [Onychophora sensu lato] (Lobopods) (Velvet Worms) | `-- Uniramia (Uniramous Arthropods, i.e. Myriapods & Insects) `--+?- †Kerygmachela kierkegaardi [possibly a anomalocarid] |?- †Pambdelurion whittingtoni [possibly a anomalocarid] `--+-- †Radiodonta ["Anomalocaria"] `-- Schizoramia (Crustaceans & Chelicerates) ---------------- <==o Anthropoda () (After Hwang et al., 2001) |--+-- Myriapoda (Duizend- en Miljoenpootachtigen) | `-- Chelicerata (Spin- en Schorpioenachtigen) `--o Pancrustacea |-- Hexapoda (Zespotigen) (Sixlegged) `-- Crustacea (Kreeftachtigen) (Crustaceans) ---------------- <==o Arthropoda () |-- Lobopoda (Lobopods) `--+-- Tardigrada (Waterbears) `--o Euarthropoda |-- Pycnogonida () `--+-- Euchelicerata () `--o Mandibulata () |--o †Euthycarcinoidea | `--o †Euthycarciniformes | |-- †Apankura machu | `== other Eeuthycercinoids `--+-- Myriapoda [Millipedia] (Duizend- en Miljoenpootachtigen) (Myriapods) `--o Pancrustacea |-- Hexapoda (Zespotigen) (Sixlegged) `-- Crustacea (Kreeftachtigen) (Crustaceans) ---------------- <==o Anthropoda () |-- Lobopoda (Lobopods) `--+-- Tardigrada (Beerdiertjes) (Waterbears) `--+-- †Kerygmachela kierkegaardi [possibly a anomalocarid] |?- †Pambdelurion whittingtoni [possibly a anomalocarid] `--+-- †Radiodonta ["Anomalocaria"] `--+?- †Habeliidae |?- †Molariidae |?- †Bradoriida |?-o †Acanthomeridiida | `-- †Acanthomerididae |?-o †Tuzoiida | `-- †Tuzoiidae |--o †Leanchoiliida | |-- †Leanchoiliidae | |-- †Actaeidae | `-- †Alalcomenaeidae `--+--o †Proschizoramia | `--o †Yohoniida | `-- †Yohoiidae `--+--o †Sanctacaridea | `--o †Sanctacarida | `-- †Sanctacarididae `--+--+--o †Fortiforcipida | | `-- †Fortiforcipidae | `--+-- †Occacaris | `--+-- †Clypecaris | `--+--o †Yunnata | | `--o †Fuxianhuiida | | |-- †Fuxianhuiidae | | `-- †Chengjiangocarididae | `--o †Paracrustacea | `--o †Canadaspidida | |-- †Canadasipididae | |-- †Hymenocarididae [jr. synon. to Canadaspididae?] | `-- †Perspicarididae `--o Euanthropoda [Schizoramia] |--+?- Pycnogonida () | `-- Euchelicerata () `--+--o †Xenopoda | |--o †Emeraldellida | | `-- †Emeraldellidae | `--o †Limulavida | `-- †Sidneyiidae `--o Mandibulata () |-- Myriapoda [Millipedia] (Duizend- en Miljoenpootachtigen) `--o Pancrustacea |-- Hexapoda (Zespotigen) (Sixlegged) `-- Crustacea (Kreeftachtigen) (Crustaceans) ------------------------------------------------ Wat zijn Geleedpotigen Geleedpotigen (Arthropoda) Elke ketter heeft zijn letter MOFEP Arthropods Key ASELLOTA <==o Asellota |--o Aselloidea | |-- Asellidae (Waterpissebedden) (Freshwater Isopods) | `-- Stenasellidae |--o Stenetrioidea [incl. Pseudojaniroidea] | |-- Pseudojaniridae | `-- Stenetriidae |--o Gnathostenetroidoidea | |-- Gnathostenetroididae | |-- Protojaniridae | `-- Vermectiadidae `--o Janiroidea |-- Acanthaspidiidae |-- Acanthomunnopsidae |-- Antiasidae |-- Dentrotiidae [Dendrotionidae] |-- Desmosomatidae [incl. Pseudomesidae] |-- Echinothambematidae |-- Haplomunnidae |-- Haploniscidae |-- Ischnomesidae |-- Janirellidae |-- Janiridae |-- Joeropsidae |-- Katianiridae |-- Macrostylidae |-- Mesosignidae (Star-shaped Isopods) |-- Microparasellidae |-- Mictosomatidae |-- Munnidae |--o Munnopsididae [Munnopsidae; incl. Eurycopidae and Ilyarachnidae] | |-- Eurycopinae [Eurycopidae] | |-- Ilyarachninae [Ilyarachnidae] | `-- Munnopsidinae [Munnopsididae] |-- Nannoniscidae |-- Paramunnidae [incl. Abyssianiridae and Pleurogniidae] |-- Pleurocopidae |-- Schistosomatidae |-- Santiidae `-- Thambematidae -------------------------------------- Family Acanthaspidiidae Genus Acanthaspidia Species Acanthaspidia acanthonotus Species Acanthaspidia bifurcata Species Acanthaspidia bifurcatoides Species Acanthaspidia curtispinosa Species Acanthaspidia decorata Species Acanthaspidia drygalskii Species Acanthaspidia hanseni Species Acanthaspidia iolanthoidea Species Acanthaspidia laevis Species Acanthaspidia longiramosa Species Acanthaspidia mucronata Species Acanthaspidia natalensis Species Acanthaspidia neonotus Species Acanthaspidia pleuronotus Species Acanthaspidia porrecta Species Acanthaspidia rostrata Species Acanthaspidia sulcatacornia Species Acanthaspidia typhlops Genus Ianthopsis Species Ianthopsis beddardi Species Ianthopsis bovallii Species Ianthopsis caudata Species Ianthopsis certus Species Ianthopsis laevis Species Ianthopsis monodi Species Ianthopsis multispinosa Species Ianthopsis nasicornis Species Ianthopsis neglecta Species Ianthopsis nodosa Species Ianthopsis pulchra Species Ianthopsis ruseri Species Ianthopsis studeri ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Systematics of the Asellota (Isopoda) Suborder Asellota AUSTROPETALIIDA <==o AUSTROPETALIIDA [?] [Austropetaliata] |-- Anchipetalia auriculata [Archipetaliidae] `--o Austropetaliidae
Recommended publications
  • A Description of the Remarkable Larva of Pseudolestes Mirabilis Kirby (Odonata: Pseudolestidae)
    International Journal of Odonatology Vol. 14, No. 2, June 2011, 105–110 A description of the remarkable larva of Pseudolestes mirabilis Kirby (Odonata: Pseudolestidae) Xin Yu* and Wenjun Bu Institute of Entomology, College of Life Sciences, Nankai University, Tianjin, 300071, PR China (Received 3 March 2011; final version received 26 May 2011) The larva of the Chinese endemic Pseudolestes mirabilis is described and figured for the first time. Speci- mens were collected from Hainan, the only known locality for this species. The presence of ventral paired gill tufts on S10 and sack-like caudal gills indicate that among other zygopteran families this species may be most closely related to the Amphipterygidae, but other characters, especially those of the adult suggest it may be sufficiently unique to warrant placement in its own family. Keywords: Odonata; dragonfly; Zygoptera; Pseudolestidae; Pseudolestes mirabilis; larva Introduction Pseudolestes mirabilis, the well-known Chinese endemic species, has been the subject of consid- erable recent speculation with regard to its phylogenetic position. Based on its unusual and unique adult characters the species was originally placed in its own subfamily by Kirby (1900). Calvert (1902) and Tillyard and Fraser (1938–1940) placed it in subfamily Lestinae (now Lestidae). Fraser (1957) then established the family Pseudolestidae to house Pseudolestes and several other genera, which was followed by Davies and Tobin (1984) and van Tol (2006). However recent phyloge- netic studies using molecular techniques (Bybee, Ogden, Branham & Whiting, 2008) suggest this species belongs in the Megapodagrionidae. The larvae of megapodagrionids have been divided into four groups by Kalkman, Choong, Orr and Schütte (2010): (1) species with inflated sack-like gills with a terminal filament; (2) species with flat vertical gills; (3) species in which the outer gills in life form a tube folded around the median gill; (4) species with flat horizontal gills.
    [Show full text]
  • The 6Th International Congress on Fossil Insects, Arthropods and Amber
    The 7th International Conference on Fossil Insects, Arthropods and Amber Edinburgh, Scotland 26th April – 1st May 2016 SECOND CIRCULAR LOGO Stylised reconstruction of the palaeodictyopteran Lithomantis carbonarius Woodward, 1876, from Ayr, Scotland. Drawn by Sarah Stewart. CONFERENCE VENUE National Museum of Scotland, Chambers St., Edinburgh, EH1 1JF, UK. http://www.nms.ac.uk/national-museum-of-scotland/ ORGANISING COMMITTEE Dr Andrew Ross, Principal Curator of Palaeobiology ([email protected]) Dr Yves Candela, Curator of Invertebrate Palaeobiology ([email protected]) Vicen Carrio, Palaeobiology Conservator/Preparator ([email protected]) Rachel Russell, Natural Sciences Departmental Administrator ([email protected]) Dr Sarah Stewart, Assistant Curator of Palaeobiology ([email protected]) Dr Stig Walsh, Senior Curator of Vertebrate Palaeobiology ([email protected]) http://www.nms.ac.uk/about-us/collections-departments/natural-sciences/palaeobiology/ COLLABORATION http://fossilinsects.net/ Committee: Prof. Dany Azar, President Prof. Dong Ren, Vice-President Prof. Ed Jarzembowski, Secretary Prof. Jacek Szwedo, Treasurer Prof. Michael Engel, Editor Dr Vladimir Blagoderov, Webmaster Dr Bruce Archibald, Conservation Rep. Dr Olivier Béthoux Prof. Ewa Krzeminska Dr Xavier Martinez Delclòs Dr Julian Petrulevicius Prof. Alexandr Rasnitsyn Dr Andrew Ross The Royal Society of Edinburgh, Scotland’s National Academy, is Scottish Charity No. SC000470. http://www.royalsoced.org.uk/ http://www.siriscientificpress.co.uk/ CONVENTIONEDINBURGH A PART OF MARKETINGEDINBURGH http://conventionedinburgh.com/ GENERAL INFORMATION The International Conference/Congress on Fossil Insects, Arthropods and Amber (abbreviated to Fossils x3) is the main conference for the scientific study of non-marine arthropods and amber and is usually held every three years.
    [Show full text]
  • Fossil Record of Stem Groups Employed In
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Fossil record of stem groups employed in evaluating the chronogram of insects (Arthropoda: Received: 07 April 2016 Accepted: 16 November 2016 Hexapoda) Published: 13 December 2016 Yan-hui Wang1,2,*, Michael S. Engel3,*, José A. Rafael4,*, Hao-yang Wu2, Dávid Rédei2, Qiang Xie2, Gang Wang1, Xiao-guang Liu1 & Wen-jun Bu2 Insecta s. str. (=Ectognatha), comprise the largest and most diversified group of living organisms, accounting for roughly half of the biodiversity on Earth. Understanding insect relationships and the specific time intervals for their episodes of radiation and extinction are critical to any comprehensive perspective on evolutionary events. Although some deeper nodes have been resolved congruently, the complete evolution of insects has remained obscure due to the lack of direct fossil evidence. Besides, various evolutionary phases of insects and the corresponding driving forces of diversification remain to be recognized. In this study, a comprehensive sample of all insect orders was used to reconstruct their phylogenetic relationships and estimate deep divergences. The phylogenetic relationships of insect orders were congruently recovered by Bayesian inference and maximum likelihood analyses. A complete timescale of divergences based on an uncorrelated log-normal relaxed clock model was established among all lineages of winged insects. The inferred timescale for various nodes are congruent with major historical events including the increase of atmospheric oxygen in the Late Silurian and earliest Devonian, the radiation of vascular plants in the Devonian, and with the available fossil record of the stem groups to various insect lineages in the Devonian and Carboniferous. Over half of all described living species are insects, and they dominate all terrestrial ecosystems1.
    [Show full text]
  • Odonata: Polythoridae) Melissa Sánchez-Herrera1,2* , Christopher D
    Sánchez-Herrera et al. BMC Evolutionary Biology (2020) 20:74 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-020-01638-z RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access An exploration of the complex biogeographical history of the Neotropical banner-wing damselflies (Odonata: Polythoridae) Melissa Sánchez-Herrera1,2* , Christopher D. Beatty3, Renato Nunes2,4, Camilo Salazar1 and Jessica L. Ware2,5 Abstract Background: The New World Tropics has experienced a dynamic landscape across evolutionary history and harbors a high diversity of flora and fauna. While there are some studies addressing diversification in Neotropical vertebrates and plants, there is still a lack of knowledge in arthropods. Here we examine temporal and spatial diversification patterns in the damselfly family Polythoridae, which comprises seven genera with a total of 58 species distributed across much of Central and South America. Results: Our time-calibrated phylogeny for 48 species suggests that this family radiated during the late Eocene (~ 33 Ma), diversifying during the Miocene. As with other neotropical groups, the Most Recent Common Ancestor (MRCA) of most of the Polythoridae genera has a primary origin in the Northern Andes though the MRCA of at least one genus may have appeared in the Amazon Basin. Our molecular clock suggests correlations with some major geographical events, and our biogeographical modeling (with BioGeoBEARS and RASP) found a significant influence of the formation of the Pebas and Acre systems on the early diversification of these damselflies, though evidence for the influence of the rise of the different Andean ranges was mixed. Diversification rates have been uniform in all genera except one—Polythore—where a significant increase in the late Pliocene (~ 3 mya) may have been influenced by recent Andean uplift.
    [Show full text]
  • A Revised, ANNOTATED Checklist of Victorian Dragonflies (Insecta: Odonata)
    A REVISED, ANNOTATED CHECKLIST OF Victorian DRAGONFLIES (Insecta: Odonata) I.D. ENDERS by 56 Looker Road, Montmorency, Victoria 3094, Australia E-mail: [email protected] ENDERS by , I.D. 2010. A revised, annotated checklist of the Victorian dragonflies (Insecta: Odonata). Proceedings of the Royal Society of Victoria. 122(1): 9-27. ISSN 0035-9211. Seventy-six species of Odonata are known from Victoria (26 Zygoptera; 50 Anisoptera). In the last ten years one new species Austroaeschna ingrid Theischinger, 2008 has been described from the State; Austroepigomphus praeruptus (Selys, 1857) and Pseudagrion microcephalum (Rambur, 1842) have now been recorded; and records of Rhadinosticta banksi (Tillyard, 1913) and Labidiosticta vallisi (Fraser, 1955) are judged to be erroneous. Generic names of Aeshna, and Trapezostigma have been changed. Some changes in higher level names and relationships, based on recent phylogenetic analyses, have been incorporated. Distribution maps for all species, based on museum collections, are provided. Key Words: Odonata, Zygoptera, Anisoptera, Victoria, Australia, checklist, Hemiphlebia IN the ten years since an annotated checklist of the molecular study seeks greater taxon and genome Victorian Odonata was published (Endersby 2000), sampling and, as this occurs, slow convergence be- a new species has been described from Victoria, tween the alternatives is appearing. In the meantime additional species have been recorded in the State, some framework is needed on which to list the Vic- substantial museum collection label data have be- torian fauna today. Theischinger & Endersby (2009) come available, and numerous phylogenetic stud- have tried to steer a middle course, avoiding the ex- ies have been published. Theischinger & Endersby tremes but acknowledging that change is occurring; (2009) have incorporated many of these changes into it will still annoy some but must be seen as a work in an identification guide for the adults and larvae of progress.
    [Show full text]
  • The Superfamily Calopterygoidea in South China: Taxonomy and Distribution. Progress Report for 2009 Surveys Zhang Haomiao* *PH D
    International Dragonfly Fund - Report 26 (2010): 1-36 1 The Superfamily Calopterygoidea in South China: taxonomy and distribution. Progress Report for 2009 surveys Zhang Haomiao* *PH D student at the Department of Entomology, College of Natural Resources and Environment, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China. Email: [email protected] Introduction Three families in the superfamily Calopterygoidea occur in China, viz. the Calo- pterygidae, Chlorocyphidae and Euphaeidae. They include numerous species that are distributed widely across South China, mainly in streams and upland running waters at moderate altitudes. To date, our knowledge of Chinese spe- cies has remained inadequate: the taxonomy of some genera is unresolved and no attempt has been made to map the distribution of the various species and genera. This project is therefore aimed at providing taxonomic (including on larval morphology), biological, and distributional information on the super- family in South China. In 2009, two series of surveys were conducted to Southwest China-Guizhou and Yunnan Provinces. The two provinces are characterized by karst limestone arranged in steep hills and intermontane basins. The climate is warm and the weather is frequently cloudy and rainy all year. This area is usually regarded as one of biodiversity “hotspot” in China (Xu & Wilkes, 2004). Many interesting species are recorded, the checklist and photos of these sur- veys are reported here. And the progress of the research on the superfamily Calopterygoidea is appended. Methods Odonata were recorded by the specimens collected and identified from pho- tographs. The working team includes only four people, the surveys to South- west China were completed by the author and the photographer, Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Jervis Bay Territory Page 1 of 50 21-Jan-11 Species List for NRM Region (Blank), Jervis Bay Territory
    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations.
    [Show full text]
  • André Nel Sixtieth Anniversary Festschrift
    Palaeoentomology 002 (6): 534–555 ISSN 2624-2826 (print edition) https://www.mapress.com/j/pe/ PALAEOENTOMOLOGY PE Copyright © 2019 Magnolia Press Editorial ISSN 2624-2834 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/palaeoentomology.2.6.1 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:25D35BD3-0C86-4BD6-B350-C98CA499A9B4 André Nel sixtieth anniversary Festschrift DANY AZAR1, 2, ROMAIN GARROUSTE3 & ANTONIO ARILLO4 1Lebanese University, Faculty of Sciences II, Department of Natural Sciences, P.O. Box: 26110217, Fanar, Matn, Lebanon. Email: [email protected] 2State Key Laboratory of Palaeobiology and Stratigraphy, Center for Excellence in Life and Paleoenvironment, Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, China. 3Institut de Systématique, Évolution, Biodiversité, ISYEB-UMR 7205-CNRS, MNHN, UPMC, EPHE, Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Sorbonne Universités, 57 rue Cuvier, CP 50, Entomologie, F-75005, Paris, France. 4Departamento de Biodiversidad, Ecología y Evolución, Facultad de Biología, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain. FIGURE 1. Portrait of André Nel. During the last “International Congress on Fossil Insects, mainly by our esteemed Russian colleagues, and where Arthropods and Amber” held this year in the Dominican several of our members in the IPS contributed in edited volumes honoring some of our great scientists. Republic, we unanimously agreed—in the International This issue is a Festschrift to celebrate the 60th Palaeoentomological Society (IPS)—to honor our great birthday of Professor André Nel (from the ‘Muséum colleagues who have given us and the science (and still) national d’Histoire naturelle’, Paris) and constitutes significant knowledge on the evolution of fossil insects a tribute to him for his great ongoing, prolific and his and terrestrial arthropods over the years.
    [Show full text]
  • The Phylogeny of the Zygopterous Dragonflies As Based on The
    THE PHYLOGENY OF THE ZYGOPTEROUS DRAGON- FLIES AS BASED ON THE EVIDENCE OF THE PENES* CLARENCE HAMILTON KENNEDY, Ohio State University. This paper is merely the briefest outline of the writer's discoveries with regard to the inter-relationship of the major groups of the Zygoptera, a full account of which will appear in his thesis on the subject. Three papers1 by the writer discussing the value of this organ in classification of the Odonata have already been published. At the beginning, this study of the Zygoptera was viewed as an undertaking to define the various genera more exactly. The writer in no wise questioned the validity of the Selysian concep- tion that placed the Zygopterous subfamilies in series with the richly veined '' Calopterygines'' as primitive and the Pro- toneurinae as the latest and final reduction of venation. However, following Munz2 for the Agrioninae the writer was able to pick out here and there series of genera where the devel- opment was undoubtedly from a thinly veined wing to one richly veined, i. e., Megalagrion of Hawaii, the Argia series, Leptagrion, etc. These discoveries broke down the prejudice in the writer's mind for the irreversibility of evolution in the reduction of venation in the Odonata orders as a whole. Undoubt- ably in the Zygoptera many instances occur where a richly veined wing is merely the response to the necessity of greater wing area to support a larger body. As the study progressed the writer found almost invariably that generalized or connecting forms were usually sparsely veined as compared to their relatives.
    [Show full text]
  • Zootaxa, a Synopsis of the Genus Amphipteryx Selys
    Zootaxa 2531: 15–28 (2010) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2010 · Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) A synopsis of the genus Amphipteryx Selys 1853 (Odonata: Amphipterygidae) ENRIQUE GONZÁLEZ-SORIANO Instituto de Biología, UNAM, Departamento de Zoología Apartado Postal 70-153, C.P. 04510, Mexico D.F. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract The Mesoamerican damselfly genus Amphipteryx includes one already described and three more undescribed species: Amphipteryx agrioides, Selys 1853, A. chiapensis (Mexico, Chiapas, 5 mi E Rayón), A. meridionalis (Honduras, 10 mi SW Siguatepeque) and A. nataliae (Verapaz, Guatemala). Here I include keys and diagnostic illustrations of all species. Key words: Zygoptera, Amphipterygidae, Mesoamerica, Amphipteryx agrioides, Amphipteryx chiapensis, Amphipteryx meridionalis, Amphipteryx nataliae, synonymy Resumen El género mesoamericano Amphipteryx incluye una especie descrita y tres mas no descritas: Amphipteryx agrioides Selys, 1853, Amphipteryx chiapensis (Mexico, Chiapas, 5 mi E. Rayón), A. meridionalis (Honduras, 10 mi SW Siguatepeque) y A. nataliae (Verapaz, Guatemala). En este trabajo se incluyen claves e ilustraciones diagnósticas para todas las especies del género. Introduction A history of the tangled nomenclature surrounding misapplication of the name Amphipteryx agrioides Selys 1853 including its type locality, was recently documented by González-Soriano & von Ellenrieder (2009). They applied the name, based on examination of the female holotype in the IRSNB, to material later named Amphipteryx longicaudata González -Soriano 1991 from southern Mexico. These authors also considered more northerly populations from Hidalgo, Puebla and Veracruz States, Mexico, to represent true A. agrioides despite slight cercal morphological differences. Specimens determined as A.
    [Show full text]
  • New Taxa Described by Günther Theischinger (Update 2016)
    New taxa described by Günther Theischinger (update 2016) Taxa, mostly of genus and species group, described as new: up to end of 2016: 41+, 729+ ODONATA, Aeshnidae Afroaeschna Peters & Theischinger, Odonatologica 40(3): 229 (2011). Agyrtacantha browni Marinov & Theischinger, International Dragonfly Fund - Report 53:2 (2012). Agyrtacantha picta Theischinger & Richards, Odonatologica xxx (2017). Gynacantha heros Theischinger & Richards, Odonatologica 41 (4): 356 (2012). Gynacantha nourlangie Theischinger & Watson, in Watson et al., The Australian Dragonflies: 41 (1991). Gynacantha nuda Theischinger & Richards, Odonatologica 45 (3/4): 318 (2016). Pinheyschna Peters & Theischinger, Odonatologica 40(3): 232 (2011). Pinheyschna waterstoni Peters & Theischinger, Odonatologica 40(3): 235 (2011). Zosteraeschna Peters & Theischinger, Odonatologica 40(3): 241 (2011). ODONATA, Argiolestidae Argiolestes angulatus Theischinger & Richards, in Tyagi, B.K. (ed.): Odonata Biology of Dragonflies: 34 (2007). Argiolestes fornicatus Theischinger & Richards, in Tyagi, B.K. (ed.): Odonata Biology of Dragonflies: 36 (2007). Argiolestes indentatus Theischinger & Richards, Odonatologica 35(1): 386 (2006). Argiolestes trigonalis Theischinger & Richards, Odonatologica 37(2): 168 (2008). Austroargiolestes brookhousei Theischinger & O'Farrell, Odonatologica 15 (4): 409 (1986). Austroargiolestes christine Theischinger & O'Farrell, Odonatologica 15 (4): 394 (1986). Austroargiolestes elke Theischinger & O'Farrell, Odonatologica 15 (4): 396 (1986). Austroargiolestes isabellae
    [Show full text]
  • An Overview of Molecular Odonate Studies, and Our Evolutionary Understanding of Dragonfly and Damselfly (Insecta: Odonata) Behavior
    International Journal of Odonatology Vol. 14, No. 2, June 2011, 137–147 Dragons fly, biologists classify: an overview of molecular odonate studies, and our evolutionary understanding of dragonfly and damselfly (Insecta: Odonata) behavior Elizabeth F. Ballare* and Jessica L. Ware Department of Biological Sciences, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, 195 University Ave., Boyden Hall, Newark, NJ, 07102, USA (Received 18 November 2010; final version received 3 April 2011) Among insects, perhaps the most appreciated are those that are esthetically pleasing: few capture the interest of the public as much as vibrantly colored dragonflies and damselflies (Insecta: Odonata). These remarkable insects are also extensively studied. Here, we review the history of odonate systematics, with an emphasis on discrepancies among studies. Over the past century, relationships among Odonata have been reinterpreted many times, using a variety of data from wing vein morphology to DNA. Despite years of study, there has been little consensus about odonate taxonomy. In this review, we compare odonate molecular phylogenetic studies with respect to gene and model selection, optimality criterion, and dataset completeness. These differences are discussed in relation to the evolution of dragonfly behavior. Keywords: Odonata; mitochondrion; nuclear; phylogeny; systematic; dragonfly; damselfly Introduction Why study Odonata? The order Odonata comprises three suborders: Anisozygoptera, Anisoptera, and Zygoptera. There are approximately 6000 species of Odonata described worldwide (Ardila-Garcia & Gregory, 2009). Of the three suborders Anisoptera and Zygoptera are by far the most commonly observed and collected, because there are only two known species of Anisozygoptera under the genus Epiophlebia. All odonate nymphs are aquatic, with a few rare exceptions such as the semi-aquatic Pseudocordulia (Watson, 1983), and adults are usually found near freshwater ponds, marshes, rivers (von Ellenrieder, 2010), streams, and lakes (although some species occur in areas of mild salinity; Corbet, 1999).
    [Show full text]