DOCSLIB.ORG

Irish Biodiversity: a Taxonomic Inventory of Fauna

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Irish Biodiversity: a Taxonomic Inventory of Fauna Irish Biodiversity: a taxonomic inventory of fauna Irish Wildlife Manual No. 38 Irish Biodiversity: a taxonomic inventory of fauna S. E. Ferriss, K. G. Smith, and T. P. Inskipp (editors) Citations: Ferriss, S. E., Smith K. G., & Inskipp T. P. (eds.) Irish Biodiversity: a taxonomic inventory of fauna. Irish Wildlife Manuals, No. 38. National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of Environment, Heritage and Local Government, Dublin, Ireland. Section author (2009) Section title . In: Ferriss, S. E., Smith K. G., & Inskipp T. P. (eds.) Irish Biodiversity: a taxonomic inventory of fauna. Irish Wildlife Manuals, No. 38. National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of Environment, Heritage and Local Government, Dublin, Ireland. Cover photos: © Kevin G. Smith and Sarah E. Ferriss Irish Wildlife Manuals Series Editors: N. Kingston and F. Marnell © National Parks and Wildlife Service 2009 ISSN 1393 - 6670 Inventory of Irish fauna ____________________ TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary.............................................................................................................................................1 Acknowledgements.............................................................................................................................................2 Introduction ..........................................................................................................................................................3 Methodology........................................................................................................................................................................3 Species overview .................................................................................................................................................................5 International and national protection............................................................................................................................. 7 Species of conservation concern........................................................................................................................................9 Biodiversity information management.......................................................................................................................... 11 Species Inventory...............................................................................................................................................12 Kingdom Bacteria (Monera).............................................................................................................................12 Kingdom Protozoa .............................................................................................................................................13 Kingdom Animalia............................................................................................................................................15 Phylum Myxozoa .............................................................................................................................................................. 15 Phylum Placozoa .............................................................................................................................................................. 16 Phylum Porifera ................................................................................................................................................................ 17 Phylum Cnidaria............................................................................................................................................................... 22 Phylum Ctenophora.......................................................................................................................................................... 29 Phylum Mesozoa............................................................................................................................................................... 30 Phylum Platyhelminthes ................................................................................................................................................. 31 Phylum Gnathostomulida ............................................................................................................................................... 36 Phylum Gastrotricha........................................................................................................................................................ 37 Phylum Rotifera................................................................................................................................................................ 38 Phylum Kinorhyncha........................................................................................................................................................ 39 Phylum Loricifera ............................................................................................................................................................. 40 Phylum Cycliophora......................................................................................................................................................... 41 Phylum Acanthocephala.................................................................................................................................................. 42 Phylum Entoprocta........................................................................................................................................................... 44 Phylum Nematoda ............................................................................................................................................................ 45 Phylum Nemertea.............................................................................................................................................................. 48 Phylum Nematomorpha................................................................................................................................................... 49 Phylum Bryozoa................................................................................................................................................................ 50 Phylum Phoronida............................................................................................................................................................ 54 Phylum Brachiopoda........................................................................................................................................................ 55 Phylum Mollusca .............................................................................................................................................................. 56 Phylum Priapulida ........................................................................................................................................................... 66 Phylum Sipuncula............................................................................................................................................................. 67 Phylum Echiura................................................................................................................................................................. 68 Phylum Annelida............................................................................................................................................................... 69 Phylum Tardigrada........................................................................................................................................................... 76 Phylum Pogonophora....................................................................................................................................................... 77 Phylum Arthropoda.......................................................................................................................................................... 78 Subphylum Chelicerata .................................................................................................................................................... 78 Subphylum Crustacea....................................................................................................................................................... 85 Subphylum Myriapoda..................................................................................................................................................... 94 Subphylum Hexapoda....................................................................................................................................................... 96 Phylum Echinodermata.................................................................................................................................................. 112 Phylum Chaetognatha.................................................................................................................................................... 117 Phylum Hemichordata ................................................................................................................................................... 118 Phylum Chordata............................................................................................................................................................ 119 Subphylum Urochordata...............................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Global Assessment of Parasite Diversity in Galaxiid Fishes
    diversity Article A Global Assessment of Parasite Diversity in Galaxiid Fishes Rachel A. Paterson 1,*, Gustavo P. Viozzi 2, Carlos A. Rauque 2, Verónica R. Flores 2 and Robert Poulin 3 1 The Norwegian Institute for Nature Research, P.O. Box 5685, Torgarden, 7485 Trondheim, Norway 2 Laboratorio de Parasitología, INIBIOMA, CONICET—Universidad Nacional del Comahue, Quintral 1250, San Carlos de Bariloche 8400, Argentina; [email protected] (G.P.V.); [email protected] (C.A.R.); veronicaroxanafl[email protected] (V.R.F.) 3 Department of Zoology, University of Otago, P.O. Box 56, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +47-481-37-867 Abstract: Free-living species often receive greater conservation attention than the parasites they support, with parasite conservation often being hindered by a lack of parasite biodiversity knowl- edge. This study aimed to determine the current state of knowledge regarding parasites of the Southern Hemisphere freshwater fish family Galaxiidae, in order to identify knowledge gaps to focus future research attention. Specifically, we assessed how galaxiid–parasite knowledge differs among geographic regions in relation to research effort (i.e., number of studies or fish individuals examined, extent of tissue examination, taxonomic resolution), in addition to ecological traits known to influ- ence parasite richness. To date, ~50% of galaxiid species have been examined for parasites, though the majority of studies have focused on single parasite taxa rather than assessing the full diversity of macro- and microparasites. The highest number of parasites were observed from Argentinean galaxiids, and studies in all geographic regions were biased towards the highly abundant and most widely distributed galaxiid species, Galaxias maculatus.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity and Community Structure of Pelagic Cnidarians in the Celebes and Sulu Seas, Southeast Asian Tropical Marginal Seas
    Deep-Sea Research I 100 (2015) 54–63 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Deep-Sea Research I journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/dsri Diversity and community structure of pelagic cnidarians in the Celebes and Sulu Seas, southeast Asian tropical marginal seas Mary M. Grossmann a,n, Jun Nishikawa b, Dhugal J. Lindsay c a Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University (OIST), Tancha 1919-1, Onna-son, Okinawa 904-0495, Japan b Tokai University, 3-20-1, Orido, Shimizu, Shizuoka 424-8610, Japan c Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology (JAMSTEC), Yokosuka 237-0061, Japan article info abstract Article history: The Sulu Sea is a semi-isolated, marginal basin surrounded by high sills that greatly reduce water inflow Received 13 September 2014 at mesopelagic depths. For this reason, the entire water column below 400 m is stable and homogeneous Received in revised form with respect to salinity (ca. 34.00) and temperature (ca. 10 1C). The neighbouring Celebes Sea is more 19 January 2015 open, and highly influenced by Pacific waters at comparable depths. The abundance, diversity, and Accepted 1 February 2015 community structure of pelagic cnidarians was investigated in both seas in February 2000. Cnidarian Available online 19 February 2015 abundance was similar in both sampling locations, but species diversity was lower in the Sulu Sea, Keywords: especially at mesopelagic depths. At the surface, the cnidarian community was similar in both Tropical marginal seas, but, at depth, community structure was dependent first on sampling location Marginal sea and then on depth within each Sea. Cnidarians showed different patterns of dominance at the two Sill sampling locations, with Sulu Sea communities often dominated by species that are rare elsewhere in Pelagic cnidarians fi Community structure the Indo-Paci c.
    [Show full text]
  • Twenty Thousand Parasites Under The
    ADVERTIMENT. Lʼaccés als continguts dʼaquesta tesi queda condicionat a lʼacceptació de les condicions dʼús establertes per la següent llicència Creative Commons: http://cat.creativecommons.org/?page_id=184 ADVERTENCIA. El acceso a los contenidos de esta tesis queda condicionado a la aceptación de las condiciones de uso establecidas por la siguiente licencia Creative Commons: http://es.creativecommons.org/blog/licencias/ WARNING. The access to the contents of this doctoral thesis it is limited to the acceptance of the use conditions set by the following Creative Commons license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/?lang=en Departament de Biologia Animal, Biologia Vegetal i Ecologia Tesis Doctoral Twenty thousand parasites under the sea: a multidisciplinary approach to parasite communities of deep-dwelling fishes from the slopes of the Balearic Sea (NW Mediterranean) Tesis doctoral presentada por Sara Maria Dallarés Villar para optar al título de Doctora en Acuicultura bajo la dirección de la Dra. Maite Carrassón López de Letona, del Dr. Francesc Padrós Bover y de la Dra. Montserrat Solé Rovira. La presente tesis se ha inscrito en el programa de doctorado en Acuicultura, con mención de calidad, de la Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. Los directores Maite Carrassón Francesc Padrós Montserrat Solé López de Letona Bover Rovira Universitat Autònoma de Universitat Autònoma de Institut de Ciències Barcelona Barcelona del Mar (CSIC) La tutora La doctoranda Maite Carrassón Sara Maria López de Letona Dallarés Villar Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona Bellaterra, diciembre de 2016 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Cuando miro atrás, al comienzo de esta tesis, me doy cuenta de cuán enriquecedora e importante ha sido para mí esta etapa, a todos los niveles.
    [Show full text]
  • Oligochaeta: Glossoscolecidae) in the Amazon Region of Colombia
    Zootaxa 3458: 103–119 (2012) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2012 · Magnolia Press Article ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:AF03126F-70F3-4696-A73B-0DF6B6C494CE New species of earthworms (Oligochaeta: Glossoscolecidae) in the Amazon region of Colombia ALEXANDER FEIJOO M1. & LILIANA V. CELIS2 1 Facultad de Ciencias Ambientales, Universidad Tecnológica de Pereira, A.A. 097, Pereira, Colombia; E-mail: [email protected] 2 Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Sede Bogotá Abstract Three new and four known species of earthworms (Oligochaeta: Glossoscolecidae) from the department of Caquetá in Colombia’s Amazon region were studied. Species belong to the following three families: Glossoscolecidae: Andiodrilus nonuya sp. nov., Andiorrhinus (Turedrilus) yukuna sp. nov., Pontoscolex (Pontoscolex) bora sp. nov., and Pontoscolex corethrurus (Müller, 1857); Acanthodrilidae: Dichogaster (Diplothecodrilus) affinis (Michaelsen, 1890), Dichogaster (Diplothecodrilus) bolaui (Michaelsen, 1891), and Dichogaster (Diplothecodrilus) saliens (Beddard, 1893); and Ocnerodrilidae: Ocnerodrilus occidentalis Eisen, 1878. With these new records, the earthworm fauna of Colombia now contains 139 species. Keys to differentiate species of Andiodrilus Michaelsen, 1900, Andiorrhinus (Turedrilus) Righi, 1993, and Pontoscolex (Pontoscolex) (Müller, 1857) are provided. Key words. Andiodrilus, Andiorrhinus, Pontoscolex, Clitellata, Caquetá, Amazonia Resumen Se estudiaron tres especies nuevas y cuatro conocidas
    [Show full text]
  • A Systematic and Experimental Analysis of Their Genes, Genomes, Mrnas and Proteins; and Perspective to Next Generation Sequencing
    Crustaceana 92 (10) 1169-1205 CRUSTACEAN VITELLOGENIN: A SYSTEMATIC AND EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF THEIR GENES, GENOMES, MRNAS AND PROTEINS; AND PERSPECTIVE TO NEXT GENERATION SEQUENCING BY STEPHANIE JIMENEZ-GUTIERREZ1), CRISTIAN E. CADENA-CABALLERO2), CARLOS BARRIOS-HERNANDEZ3), RAUL PEREZ-GONZALEZ1), FRANCISCO MARTINEZ-PEREZ2,3) and LAURA R. JIMENEZ-GUTIERREZ1,5) 1) Sea Science Faculty, Sinaloa Autonomous University, Mazatlan, Sinaloa, 82000, Mexico 2) Coelomate Genomic Laboratory, Microbiology and Genetics Group, Industrial University of Santander, Bucaramanga, 680007, Colombia 3) Advanced Computing and a Large Scale Group, Industrial University of Santander, Bucaramanga, 680007, Colombia 4) Catedra-CONACYT, National Council for Science and Technology, CDMX, 03940, Mexico ABSTRACT Crustacean vitellogenesis is a process that involves Vitellin, produced via endoproteolysis of its precursor, which is designated as Vitellogenin (Vtg). The Vtg gene, mRNA and protein regulation involve several environmental factors and physiological processes, including gonadal maturation and moult stages, among others. Once the Vtg gene, mRNAs and protein are obtained, it is possible to establish the relationship between the elements that participate in their regulation, which could either be species-specific, or tissue-specific. This work is a systematic analysis that compares the similarities and differences of Vtg genes, mRNA and Vtg between the crustacean species reported in databases with respect to that obtained from the transcriptome of Callinectes arcuatus, C. toxotes, Penaeus stylirostris and P. vannamei obtained with MiSeq sequencing technology from Illumina. Those analyses confirm that the Vtg obtained from selected species will serve to understand the process of vitellogenesis in crustaceans that is important for fisheries and aquaculture. RESUMEN La vitelogénesis de los crustáceos es un proceso que involucra la vitelina, producida a través de la endoproteólisis de su precursor llamado Vitelogenina (Vtg).
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Curriculum Vitae Stephen S. Curran, Ph.D. Department of Coastal
    Curriculum vitae Stephen S. Curran, Ph.D. Department of Coastal Sciences The University of Southern Mississippi Gulf Coast Research Laboratory 703 East Beach Drive Phone: (228) 238-0208 Ocean Springs, MS 39564 Email: [email protected] Research and Teaching Interests: I am an organismal biologist interested in the biodiversity of metazoan parasitic animals. I study their taxonomy using traditional microscopic and histological techniques and their genetic interrelationships and systematics using ribosomal DNA sequences. I also investigate the effects of extrinsic factors on aquatic environments by using parasite prevalence and abundance as a proxy for total biodiversity in aquatic communities and for assessing food web dynamics. I am also interested in the epidemiology of viral diseases of crustaceans. University Teaching Experience: •Instructor for Parasites of Marine Animals Summer class, University of Southern Mississippi, Gulf Coast Research Laboratory (2011-present). •Co-Instructor (with Richard Heard) for Marine Invertebrate Zoology, University of Southern Mississippi, Gulf Coast Research Laboratory (2007). •Intern Mentor, Gulf Coast Research Laboratory. I’ve instructed 16 interns during (2003, 2007- present). •Graduate Teaching Assistant for Animal Parasitology, Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Connecticut (Spring 1995). •Graduate Teaching Assistant for Introductory Biology for Majors, Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Connecticut (Fall 1994). Positions: •Assistant Research
    [Show full text]
  • A Case Study of the Exotic Peregrine Earthworm Morphospecies Pontoscolex Corethrurus Shabnam Taheri, Céline Pelosi, Lise Dupont
    Harmful or useful? A case study of the exotic peregrine earthworm morphospecies Pontoscolex corethrurus Shabnam Taheri, Céline Pelosi, Lise Dupont To cite this version: Shabnam Taheri, Céline Pelosi, Lise Dupont. Harmful or useful? A case study of the exotic peregrine earthworm morphospecies Pontoscolex corethrurus. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, Elsevier, 2018, 116, pp.277-289. 10.1016/j.soilbio.2017.10.030. hal-01628085 HAL Id: hal-01628085 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01628085 Submitted on 5 Jan 2018 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Harmful or useful? A case study of the exotic peregrine earthworm MARK morphospecies Pontoscolex corethrurus ∗ ∗∗ S. Taheria, , C. Pelosib, L. Duponta, a Université Paris Est Créteil, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, CNRS, INRA, IRD, Université Paris-Diderot, Institut d’écologie et des Sciences de l'environnement de Paris (iEES-Paris), Créteil, France b UMR ECOSYS, INRA, AgroParisTech, Université Paris-Saclay, 78026 Versailles, France ABSTRACT Exotic peregrine earthworms are often considered to cause environmental harm and to have a negative impact on native species, but, as ecosystem engineers, they enhance soil physical properties. Pontoscolex corethrurus is by far the most studied morphospecies and is also the most widespread in tropical areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Chitons (Mollusca: Polyplacophora) Known from Benthic Monitoring Programs in the Southern California Bight
    ISSN 0738-9388 THE FESTIVUS A publication of the San Diego Shell Club Volume XLI Special Issue June 11, 2009 Chitons (Mollusca: Polyplacophora) Known from Benthic Monitoring Programs in the Southern California Bight Timothy D. Stebbins and Douglas J. Eernisse COVER PHOTO Live specimen of Lepidozona sp. C occurring on a piece of metal debris collected off San Diego, southern California at a depth of 90 m. Photo provided courtesy of R. Rowe. Vol. XLI(6): 2009 THE FESTIVUS Page 53 CHITONS (MOLLUSCA: POLYPLACOPHORA) KNOWN FROM BENTHIC MONITORING PROGRAMS IN THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA BIGHT TIMOTHY D. STEBBINS 1,* and DOUGLAS J. EERNISSE 2 1 City of San Diego Marine Biology Laboratory, Metropolitan Wastewater Department, San Diego, CA, USA 2 Department of Biological Science, California State University, Fullerton, CA, USA Abstract: About 36 species of chitons possibly occur at depths greater than 30 m along the continental shelf and slope of the Southern California Bight (SCB), although little is known about their distribution or ecology. Nineteen species are reported here based on chitons collected as part of long-term, local benthic monitoring programs or less frequent region-wide surveys of the entire SCB, and these show little overlap with species that occur at depths typically encountered by scuba divers. Most chitons were collected between 30-305 m depths, although records are included for a few from slightly shallower waters. Of the two extant chiton lineages, Lepidopleurida is represented by Leptochitonidae (2 genera, 3 species), while Chitonida is represented by Ischnochitonidae (2 genera, 6-9 species) and Mopaliidae (4 genera, 7 species).
    [Show full text]
  • Seasonal Changes in Host Phenotype Manipulation by an Acanthocephalan: Time to Be Transmitted?
    219 Seasonal changes in host phenotype manipulation by an acanthocephalan: time to be transmitted? D. P. BENESH1*, T. HASU2,O.SEPPA¨ LA¨ 3 and E. T. VALTONEN2 1 Department of Evolutionary Ecology, Max-Planck-Institute for Evolutionary Biology, August-Thienemann-Strasse 2, 24306 Plo¨n, Germany 2 Department of Biological and Environmental Science, POB 35, FI-40014 University of Jyva¨skyla¨, Finland 3 EAWAG, Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, and ETH-Zu¨rich, Institute of Integrative Biology (IBZ), U¨ berlandstrasse 133, PO Box 611, CH-8600, Du¨bendorf, Switzerland (Received 23 July 2008; revised 25 September and 7 October 2008; accepted 7 October 2008; first published online 18 December 2008) SUMMARY Many complex life cycle parasites exhibit seasonal transmission between hosts. Expression of parasite traits related to transmission, such as the manipulation of host phenotype, may peak in seasons when transmission is optimal. The acanthocephalan Acanthocephalus lucii is primarily transmitted to its fish definitive host in spring. We assessed whether the parasitic alteration of 2 traits (hiding behaviour and coloration) in the isopod intermediate host was more pronounced at this time of year. Refuge use by infected isopods was lower, relative to uninfected isopods, in spring than in summer or fall. Infected isopods had darker abdomens than uninfected isopods, but this difference did not vary between seasons. The level of host alteration was unaffected by exposing isopods to different light and temperature regimes. In a group of infected isopods kept at 4 xC, refuge use decreased from November to May, indicating that reduced hiding in spring develops during winter.
    [Show full text]
  • 102 Advances in Current Natural Sciences № 6, 2015
    102 BIoLoGICaL sCIEnCEs (03.01.00, 03.02.00, 03.03.00) УДК 61 ПРедВаРИТЕЛЬНая СВОДКА ВИдоВ ВОДНыХ БеСПозВоНоЧНыХ ЖИВоТНыХ ЦеНТРалЬНОГО ПРедкаВКАЗЬя (СеВеРНый каВКАЗ) И ПРИЛЕГАЮЩИХ ГОРНыХ ТеРРИТоРИй дементьев м.С. Северо-Кавказский федеральный университет (СКФУ), Ставрополь, e-mail: [email protected] Проведен обзор водных многоклеточных животных Центрального Предкавказья и прилегающих гор- ных территорий (Северный Кавказ). В список внесены животные, которые хотя бы один раз упоминались в источнике информации – личные данные, Интернет и литература. С целью облегчения международного цитирования номенклатурное название и систематическое положение каждого отдельного вида приводилось к принятой в международной практике как международное nomen validum. Были выявлены различия между российской и международной номенклатурой видов. Расширение биоразнообразия в последние годы связа- но с ирригационным объединением водных систем рек Кубани, Терека, Дона и Волги. Работа предназначена для фиксации современного биоразнообразия и определения наиболее перспективных групп животных для дальнейшего изучения молодыми учеными. ключевые слова: Центральное Предкавказье, прилегающие горные территории, водные многоклеточные животные, от губок до млекопитающих PRELIMINARY SUMMARY AQUATIC INVERTEBRATES CENTRAL CISCAUCASIA (NORT CAUCASUS REGION) AND ADJACENT MOUNTAIN AREAS Dementev M.S. North Caucasus Federal University (NCFU), Stavropol, e-mail: [email protected] a review of aquatic multicellular animals Central Caucasus and adjacent mountain areas (north Caucasus region). In the list made by animals that even once mentioned in the source of information is personal data, Internet and literature. To facilitate international citation item name and systematic position of the individual was cited to accepted in international practice as an international nomen validum. The differences between Russian and international nomenclature of species. The expansion of biodiversity in recent years is due to the irrigation association water systems of the rivers Kuban, Terek, Don and Volga.
    [Show full text]
  • A Simulation of the Distribution of Acartia Clausi During Oregon Upwelling, August 1973
    Journal of Plankton Research Volume 2 Number 1 1980 A simulation of the distribution of Acartia clausi during Oregon Upwelling, August 1973 J.S.Wroblewski Department of Oceanography, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia B3H4J1, Canada Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/plankt/article-abstract/2/1/43/1463810 by Old Dominion University user on 08 July 2019 (Received August 1979; revised November 1979; accepted December 1979) Abstract. The distribution of the estuarine copepod Acartia clausi in coastal waters off Oregon during an upwelling period in August 1973 is simulated. A time dependent, two dimensional (x, z, t) model relates maximum offshore extent of the copepod's four life stages (egg, nauplius, copepodite, and adult) to in- tensity of the wind stress driving the upwelling circulation, stage development time, and mortality. Realistic solutions are obtained by using actual intermittent wind forcing recorded by an anemometer at Newport. Offshore transport is overestimated when the circulation model is driven by theoretical con- tinuous winds, suggesting zooplankton may be washed out of coastal upwelling zones (e.g. off Northwest Africa) which undergo periods of prolonged upwelling. With an accurate model of offshore transport and stage development time, the mismatch between predicted and observed distributions may be used to estimate field mortality of the various stages. Introduction Zooplankton standing stock was once believed to be greater in the slope region off Oregon than over the continental shelf during the summer upwelling season. Peterson (1972) surveyed the oceanic, slope and shelf regions but did not sample the nearshore zone when making this conclusion. In a detailed study of the Oregon up- welling zone, Peterson and Miller (1975) found high concentrations of copepods in the upper 20 m of the water column within 15 km of the coast during the 1969-71 upwelling seasons, as did Myers (1975) in August, 1973.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae
    CURRICULUM VITAE Elizabeth (Beth) Anne Horvath Education: --May, 1976, Bachelor of Arts, Biology--Westmont College --August, 1981, Masters of Science, Biology--Cal. State Univ., Long Beach Dissertation Title: Experiences in Marine Science, an Introductory Text. Supplemental Research Projects: Pelagic Snails; Development in Pelagic Tunicates; SEM studies of Luminescence in Pelagic Tunicates --Selected Graduate Level Courses beyond Master's; subjects include-- Channel Island Biology, Deep Sea Biology, Conservation Biology; also Field Course: Natural History of the Galapagos Islands (UCLA) Teaching Experience: (Emphases on: Marine Biology, Invertebrate Zoology, Marine Ecology and Natural History, Zoology, Marine Mammals) --Westmont College, 1978-1998, Part time to Full time Instructor --Santa Barbara City College, 1989-1990, Instructor (Human Anatomy) --Westmont College, 1998-2013, Assistant Professor; 2013-Present, Associate Professor --AuSable, Pacific Rim: Assistant/Associate Professor, 1998-2006; 2018-Present --CCSP-New Zealand: Associate Professor, Spring, 2010, Fall, 2011, Fall, 2012 Courses Created/Developed: (Undergraduate level, most Upper Division): Marine Biology, Invertebrate Zoology, Marine Invertebrates, Marine Mammals, Marine Mammal Ecophysiology, Animal Diversity, General Zoology Rank: First Year at Westmont: Instructor (part-Time), 1978; Full-Time, 1988 Previous Rank: Instructor of Biology, 1990-1998; Assistant Professor, 1998-2013 Present Rank: Associate Professor, Fall 2013 to the present Administrative Duties Have Included:
    [Show full text]