DOCSLIB.ORG

Wessex LTPP Route Study Guildford – Station Capacity Pre-GRIP Feasibility Report - Addendum

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Wessex LTPP Route Study Guildford – Station Capacity Pre-GRIP Feasibility Report - Addendum Wessex LTPP Route Study Guildford – Station Capacity Pre-GRIP Feasibility Report - Addendum 29 November 2016 Issue 2.6 Addendum Contents 1. Executive Summary .............................................................................................................. 7 2. Background ........................................................................................................................... 8 2.1 Future Train Service Aspirations ................................................................................... 9 3. Methodology ........................................................................................................................ 12 4. Constraints .......................................................................................................................... 13 4.1 Existing Station Overview ............................................................................................ 13 4.2 Flooding Risk ............................................................................................................... 14 4.3 Buried/Other Services .................................................................................................. 15 4.4 Land Ownership/Development .................................................................................... 15 4.5 Environmental/Heritage considerations ....................................................................... 18 4.6 Ground Conditions ....................................................................................................... 18 4.7 Threats & Opportunities ............................................................................................... 18 4.7.1 Solum Development ....................................................................................... 18 4.7.2 Farnham Road Bridge .................................................................................... 20 4.7.3 North Downs Line Electrification .................................................................... 21 5. Addendum Options for Increasing Guildford Station Capacity ...................................... 22 5.1 Options Overview ........................................................................................................ 22 5.1.1 Option 1 – New bay platform P0 to east ........................................................ 22 5.1.2 Option 2 – New island platform to east .......................................................... 22 5.1.3 Option 3 – New viaduct .................................................................................. 22 5.1.4 Option 4 – Terminating platform at Guildford’s London Road Station ........... 23 5.1.5 Option 5 – Extend platform P2 to the south and construct a new island platform to the north ....................................................................................... 23 5.1.6 Option 6 – Construct a raised platform P0 above existing platforms P1 & P2 on the east side of the station. ....................................................................... 23 5.1.7 Option 7 – Track re-configuration to north and a new side platform P0 ........ 23 5.2 Options Summary ........................................................................................................ 25 5.3 Option 1 – New bay platform P0 to East ...................................................................... 26 5.3.1 Option 1A – New bay platform P0 to east with reduced platform P1/P2 width26 5.3.2 Construction Considerations .......................................................................... 26 5.3.3 Permanent Way Considerations .................................................................... 27 5.3.4 General Items ................................................................................................ 27 5.3.5 Bill of Quantities ............................................................................................. 27 5.4 Option 2 ....................................................................................................................... 31 5.4.1 Option 2A ....................................................................................................... 31 5.4.2 Construction Considerations .......................................................................... 32 5.4.3 Permanent Way Considerations .................................................................... 32 5.4.4 General Items ................................................................................................ 32 5.4.5 Bill of Quantities ............................................................................................. 33 Guildford Station – Station Capacity – Addendum version 2.6 29th November 2016 Network Rail Infrastructure Projects - Strictly Private and Confidential 5.5 Option 3 ....................................................................................................................... 36 5.5.1 Construction Considerations .......................................................................... 36 5.5.2 Permanent Way Considerations .................................................................... 37 5.5.3 General Items ................................................................................................ 37 5.5.4 Bill of Quantities ............................................................................................. 38 5.6 Option 4 ....................................................................................................................... 41 5.7 Option 5 ....................................................................................................................... 41 5.8 Option 6 ....................................................................................................................... 41 5.9 Option 7 ....................................................................................................................... 42 5.9.1 Construction Considerations .......................................................................... 43 5.9.2 Permanent Way Considerations .................................................................... 43 5.9.3 General Items ................................................................................................ 44 5.9.4 Bill of Quantities ............................................................................................. 44 6. General Construction Considerations for all options ..................................................... 47 6.1 Construction Methodology ........................................................................................... 47 6.2 Construction Programme ............................................................................................. 47 7. Electrical System ................................................................................................................ 49 7.1 Background .................................................................................................................. 49 7.2 Intervention .................................................................................................................. 49 7.3 25kV OLE Electrification .............................................................................................. 49 7.4 750V DC Electrification ................................................................................................ 51 7.5 Specific Areas to Note ................................................................................................. 52 7.5.1 Guildford ........................................................................................................ 52 7.6 Power Supply ............................................................................................................... 52 7.6.1 Security of Power Supply ............................................................................... 53 7.7 Options 1 and 2 Specific DC Electrification Issues ...................................................... 54 7.8 Option 3 Specific DC Electrification Issues .................................................................. 54 7.9 Options 4 to 7 Specific DC Electrification Issues ......................................................... 55 7.10 Signalling ..................................................................................................................... 56 7.10.1 Operational Requirements Specification ........................................................ 56 7.10.2 SSI Interlocking capacity ................................................................................ 56 7.10.3 Ergonomics .................................................................................................... 56 7.10.4 Layout, Signal Positioning and Sighting ......................................................... 56 7.10.5 Train Dispatch ................................................................................................ 56 7.10.6 DC Immunity and EMC .................................................................................. 56 7.10.7 Train Detection ............................................................................................... 56 7.10.8 Point Operating Equipment ............................................................................ 57 7.10.9 Train Protection and Warning System (TPWS) ............................................. 57 7.10.10 Signalling Maintenance and “PRAMS” ........................................................... 57 7.10.11 Summary .......................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Solent Connectivity May 2020
    Solent Connectivity May 2020 Continuous Modular Strategic Planning Page | 1 Page | 2 Table of Contents 1.0 Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................................... 6 2.0 The Solent CMSP Study ................................................................................................................................... 10 2.1 Scope and Geography....................................................................................................................... 10 2.2 Fit with wider rail industry strategy ................................................................................................. 11 2.3 Governance and process .................................................................................................................. 12 3.0 Context and Strategic Questions ............................................................................................................ 15 3.1 Strategic Questions .......................................................................................................................... 15 3.2 Economic context ............................................................................................................................. 16 3.3 Travel patterns and changes over time ............................................................................................ 18 3.4 Dual-city region aspirations and city to city connectivity ................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Members and Parish/Neighbourhood Councils RAIL UPDATE
    ITEM 1 TRANSPORT COMMITTEE NEWS 07 MARCH 2000 This report may be of interest to: All Members and Parish/Neighbourhood Councils RAIL UPDATE Accountable Officer: John Inman Author: Stephen Mortimer 1. Purpose 1.1 To advise the Committee of developments relating to Milton Keynes’ rail services. 2. Summary 2.1 West Coast Main Line Modernisation and Upgrade is now in the active planning stage. It will result in faster and more frequent train services between Milton Keynes Central and London, and between Milton Keynes Central and points north. Bletchley and Wolverton will also have improved services to London. 2.2 Funding for East-West Rail is now being sought from the Shadow Strategic Rail Authority (SSRA) for the western end of the line (Oxford-Bedford). Though the SSRA have permitted a bid only for a 60 m.p.h. single-track railway, excluding the Aylesbury branch and upgrade of the Marston Vale (Bedford-Bletchley) line, other Railtrack investment and possible developer contributions (yet to be investigated) may allow these elements to be included, as well as perhaps a 90 m.p.h. double- track railway. As this part of East-West Rail already exists, no form of planning permission is required; however, Transport and Works Act procedures are to be started to build the missing parts of the eastern end of the line. 2.3 New trains were introduced on the Marston Vale line, Autumn 1999. A study of the passenger accessibility of Marston Vale stations identified various desirable improvements, for which a contribution of £10,000 is required from this Council.
    [Show full text]
  • Wimbledon, 1951-53 (And a Few Other Railway Memories)
    Wimbledon, 1951-53 (and a few other railway memories) JDB, August 2013, minor additions and corrections May/August 2015 Neither this nor its companion piece “Derby Day, 1949” lays claim to any particular literary or other merit; they are merely pieces of first-hand reportage which may perhaps be of interest to future transport historians. In September 1951, I started going to school in Wimbledon. This involved a train journey morning and evening, an experience which put me off commuting for life but which also led to an interest in railways that still survives. In particular, one of the ways of walking from the station to school followed a footpath alongside the railway for the first half mile or so. Wimbledon is seven miles out of Waterloo, on what was originally the main line of the London and Southampton Railway. In due course, this became the London and South Western, then it was grouped into the Southern Railway, and by 1951 it had become part of British Railways. The lines from Waterloo divide at Clapham Junction, a line towards Windsor and Reading branching off to the north, and there are several connections between the two. One is at Putney, where a steep climb leads up to East Putney station on the Wimbledon branch of the London Underground District Line, and a Waterloo to Wimbledon suburban service via East Putney used this until 1941. Wimbledon station had been completely rebuilt in 1929, and in 1951 it comprised ten platforms. Four were terminal platforms for the District Line, this side of the station being essentially self-contained though there was a connection from the East Putney line to the main line just outside.
    [Show full text]
  • Dev-Plan.Chp:Corel VENTURA
    On Track for the 21st Century A Development Plan for the Railways of Wales and the Borders Tua’r Unfed Ganrif ar Ugain Cynllun Datblygu Rheilffyrdd Cymru a’r Gororau Railfuture Wales 2nd Edition ©September 2004 2 On Track for the 21st Century Section CONTENTS Page 1 Executive summary/ Crynodeb weithredol ......5 2 Preface to the Second Edition .............9 2.1 Some positive developments . 9 2.2 Some developments ‘in the pipeline’ . 10 2.3 Some negative developments . 10 2.4 Future needs . 10 3 Introduction ..................... 11 4 Passenger services .................. 13 4.1 Service levels . 13 4.1.1 General principles .............................13 4.1.2 Service levels for individual routes . ................13 4.2 Links between services: “The seamless journey” . 26 4.2.1 Introduction .................................26 4.2.2 Connectional policies ............................27 4.2.3 Through ticketing ..............................28 4.2.4 Interchanges .................................29 4.3 Station facilities . 30 4.4 On-train standards . 31 4.4.1 General principles .............................31 4.4.2 Better trains for Wales and the Borders . ...............32 4.5 Information for passengers . 35 4.5.1 Introduction .................................35 4.5.2 Ways in which information could be further improved ..........35 4.6 Marketing . 36 4.6.1 Introduction .................................36 4.6.2 General principles .............................36 5 Freight services .................... 38 5.1 Introduction . 38 5.2 Strategies for development . 38 6 Infrastructure ..................... 40 6.1 Introduction . 40 6.2 Resignalling . 40 6.3 New lines and additional tracks / connections . 40 6.3.1 Protection of land for rail use ........................40 6.3.2 Route by route requirements ........................41 6.3.3 New and reopened stations and mini-freight terminals ..........44 On Track for the 21st Century 3 Section CONTENTS Page 7 Political control / planning / funding of rail services 47 7.1 Problems arising from the rail industry structure .
    [Show full text]
  • PORTSMOUTH) BRANCH on WOKING STATION Iain Wakeford 2014
    THE IMPACT OF THE GUILDFORD (& PORTSMOUTH) BRANCH ON WOKING STATION Iain Wakeford 2014 William Prosser’s Patent Principle was to use normal wooden wheels and rails, but have guide wheels at 45º to hold the carriages on the tracks. ven before the railway was opened to On the 29th December 1843 the London & the agreement the Guildford Junction Railway Woking Common there were plans to South Western decided to support the new line, were to complete the line by the 1st May 1845 E build a branch line to Guildford. In March but only on the condition that Prosser's system using iron rails instead of wood, with 1838 the London & Southampton Railway put was dropped. The Guildford Junction Railway earthworks and bridges wide enough for forward plans for a five and a half mile line, Act was passed on the 10th May 1844 and on doubling. The line was to terminate in a field which was revised in 1840 to include an the 27th September they agreed to sell out to owned by the Earl of Onslow, just to the north of extension to Farnham Road, Guildford. The the London & South Western for £75,000. By the Guildford to Farnham turnpike road. When scheme involved a completely level track, with the line was opened five days late, on the 5th a huge embankment 42 feet above the Hoe May 1845, Woking became an important Stream at Mayford. This was abandoned and in railway junction and to cope the station was 1843 a new company, announced plans to partially rebuilt.
    [Show full text]
  • Capacity Utilisation and Performance at Railway Stations
    Capacity Utilisation and Performance at Railway Stations John Armstrong a,b,1, John Preston a a Transportation Research Group, Faculty of Engineering and the Environment, Southampton Boldrewood Innovation Campus, University of Southampton Burgess Road, Southampton SO16 7QF, UK b Arup, 13 Fitzroy Street, London W1T 4BQ, UK 1 E-mail: [email protected], Phone: +44 (0) 23 8059 9575 Abstract As traffic levels increase on railways in Britain and elsewhere, improved understanding of the trade-offs between capacity provision/utilisation and service quality is increasingly important, as Infrastructure Managers and Railway Undertakings seek to maximise capacity provision without an unacceptable loss of service reliability and punctuality. This is particularly true of the stations and junctions forming the nodes of railway networks, as they tend to be the capacity bottlenecks, and the relationships between capacity utilisation and performance are less well understood for nodes than for their intermediate links. Following on from initial work undertaken for the OCCASION project on the calculation of nodal Capacity Utilisation Indices, and on the application of the techniques developed for OCCASION to the recalibration of the Capacity Charge element of the Track Access Charges on Britain’s railways, one of the objectives of the DITTO Rail Systems project is the further investigation of the relationship(s) between capacity utilisation and performance, as indicated by levels of congestion-related reactionary delay, at railway stations and junctions. Historic timetable and delay data for selected stations have been used to investigate these relationships, which take the expected form and tend to suggest lower maximum capacity utilisation levels for stations than for the links between them.
    [Show full text]
  • General Guidelines for the Design of Light Rail Transit Facilities in Edmonton
    General Guidelines for the Design of Light Rail Transit Facilities in Edmonton Robert R. Clark Retired ETS Supervisor of Special Projects 1984 2 General Guidelines for the Design of Light Rail Transit Facilities in Edmonton This report originally published in 1984 Author: Robert R. Clark, Retired ETS Supervisor of Special Projects Reformatting of this work completed in 2009 OCR and some images reproduced by Ashton Wong Scans completed by G. W. Wong In memory of my mentors: D.L.Macdonald, L.A.(Llew)Lawrence, R.A.(Herb)Mattews, Dudley B. Menzies, and Gerry Wright who made Edmonton Transit a leader in L.R.T. Table of Contents 3 Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 6 2.0 The Role Of Light Rail Transit In Edmonton's Transportation System ................................................. 6 2.1 Definition and Description of L.R.T. .................................................................................................... 6 2.2 Integrating L.R.T. into the Transportation System .............................................................................. 7 2.3 Segregation of Guideway .................................................................................................................... 9 2.4 Intrusion and Accessibility ................................................................................................................ 10 2.5 Segregation from Users (Safety) ......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Railway in Rowlands Castle
    The Railway in Rowland’s Castle Compiled by Ralph Cousins No. 60163 Tornado is a brand new engine completed in 2008. It is based on a London North Eastern Railway Peppercorn Class A1 design. It is seen here passing through Rowland’s Castle starting the climb to Buriton tunnel. Author This booklet can be viewed on line at: www. And www.thespring.co.uk/heritage/local-history-booklets/ ROWLAND’S CASTLE £6 HISTORICAL SOCIETY Illustration from the Illustrated London News of Mr Bonham Carter turning the first sod for of the Portsmouth Direct Railway at Buriton Manor on 6 August 1853. Courtesy of the Buriton Heritage Bank 1860s painting by Charles Cotton of Rowland’s Castle station which shows the original single track. 2 A Brief History of the Direct Line between Waterloo and Portsmouth The first railway boom occurred in the middle 1830s when the great trunk routes of the railways were constructed, amongst them the London and Southampton Railway, authorised in 1834 and opened throughout in 1840, and the London and Brighton Railway, authorised in 1837 and opened to Brighton in 1841 and from Brighton to Portsmouth in 1847. There was at that time no scheme for a direct line to Portsmouth for three main reasons: (a) not being a commercial port it had not the financial backing of the manufacturers in the Midlands as was the case with the London and Southampton Railway, (b) it had not the health resort attractions enjoyed by Brighton, and (c) the War Department and the Admiralty would not countenance a railway approaching the fortifications around the Dockyard.
    [Show full text]
  • Maidenhead Bridge Proposed Work
    W01-W05.Maidenhead 25/8/04 5:19 PM Page 1 W1.1 Maidenhead Bridge Proposed Work The Maidenhead Bridge over the River Thames at Maidenhead is a Grade II* listed structure. Installation of overhead electrification on top of the structure would be required. The design is being undertaken in conjunction with heritage specialists to help ensure that the impact on the structure is acceptable. Once installed, the gantries are likely to be visible on the bridge from viewpoints along the river and nearby. As an example, electrification for the Heathrow Express involved the provision of overhead electrification over Wharncliffe Viaduct in Ealing. Wharncliffe Viaduct Example of similar overhead electrification installations. Maidenhead Bridge www.crossrail.co.uk Helpdesk 0845 602 3813 Crossing the Capital Connecting the UK W01-W05.Maidenhead 25/8/04 5:19 PM Page 2 W2.1 Maidenhead Maidenhead Stabling & Turnback It is proposed that a stabling facility be provided for up I Operational noise from the use of the sidings to 6 Crossrail trains in the former goods yard to the I Dust impact on nearby buildings during west of Maidenhead station, immediately beyond the construction. Appropriate dust mitigation junction of the Bourne End Branch. techniques would be incorporated within the The proposals are to modify the track layout and train Crossrail Construction Code in order to reduce sidings at Maidenhead to enable Crossrail trains to be the risk of a dust nuisance being caused. The reversed with a new siding to be developed within the Construction Code would require the establishment existing Network Rail sidings.
    [Show full text]
  • HSL Report Template. Issue 1. Date 04/04/2002
    Harpur Hill, Buxton, SK17 9JN Telephone: 01298 218000 Facsimile: 01298 218590 E Mail: [email protected] A survey of UK tram and light railway systems relating to the wheel/rail interface FE/04/14 Project Leader: E J Hollis Author(s): E J Hollis PhD CEng MIMechE Science Group: Engineering Control DISTRIBUTION HSE/HMRI: Dr D Hoddinott Customer Project Officer/HM Railway Inspectorate Mr E Gilmurray HIDS12F Research Management LIS (9) HSL: Dr N West HSL Operations Director Dr M Stewart Head of Field Engineering Section Author PRIVACY MARKING: D Available to the public HSL report approval: Dr M Stewart Date of issue: 14 March 2006 Job number: JR 32107 Registry file: FE/05/2003/21511 (Box 433) Electronic filename: Report FE-04-14.doc © Crown Copyright (2006) ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS To the people listed below, and their colleagues, I would like to express my thanks for all for the help given: Blackpool Borough Council Brian Vaughan Blackpool Transport Ltd Bill Gibson Croydon Tramlink Jim Snowdon Dockland Light Railway Keith Norgrove Manchester Metrolink Steve Dale Tony Dale Mark Howard Mark Terry (now with Rail Division of Mott Macdonald) Midland Metro Des Coulson Paul Morgan Fred Roberts Andy Steel (retired) National Tram Museum David Baker Geoffrey Claydon Mike Crabtree Allan Smith Nottingham Express Transit Clive Pennington South Yorkshire Supertram Ian Milne Paul Seddon Steve Willis Tyne & Wear Metro (Nexus) Jim Davidson Peter Johnson David Walker Parsons Brinkerhoff/Permanent Way Institution Joe Brown iii Manchester Metropolitan University Simon Iwnicki Julian Snow Paul Allen Transdev Edinburgh Tram Andy Wood HM Railway Inspectorate Dudley Hoddinott Dave Keay Ian Raxton iv CONTENTS 1 Introduction.............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Take Pride in the Journey
    Take pride in the journey Our Plan Introducing South Western Railway All lines lead to London. But it is the individual towns and communities along every branch of our network we are focused on serving. Our focus, our commitment. Our corner of the network Your corner of England. Together, we are unrivalled I am delighted to have been appointed Managing Director of the South Western Railway (SWR) franchise. Our future is exciting with transformational projects taking place across the franchise that will drastically improve our customers’ experience. I look forward to leading the team at the to deliver the best possible experience for the way that our customers live and work. Line. Increasing localism is driving more new South Western Railway franchise, our customers. Working together as an We will introduce more flexible season grant funding decisions to the regions. and to build on the respected foundations effective team, we will change this railway tickets and you will see the introduction We will deepen our relationships, and established by the previous operator. for the better. of an extensive pay-as-you-go smart work with stakeholders and industry Our customers can look forward to new ticketing system called Tap2Go and mobile partners to make the case for new Our investment in a fleet of 750 new and better trains, more seats, improved barcode ticketing, as well as discounted funds to be invested in our network, our vehicles to be introduced by December service frequencies, quicker journey times, tickets for young people aged between 16 services and our communities. 2020 will not only boost peak seats into enhanced stations and more flexible fare and 18.
    [Show full text]
  • Overarching CP5 Enhancements Plan
    Strategic Business Plan: Definition of CP5 enhancements January 2013 Page Introduction 3 Summary 7 England & Wales CP5 enhancement programme 9 England & Wales - Committed Projects 10 England & Wales - funds to deliver specific outcomes 37 The Electric Spine 51 London and the South East 66 North East 84 London North West 94 Wales 98 Western 101 Scotland CP5 enhancement programme 112 Scotland - Committed Projects 113 Scotland - Funds to deliver specific outcomes 120 Scotland - Other Scottish projects 128 Page 3 Introduction This document provides more detail of the enhancements proposed for Control Period 5 as summarised in Network Rail’s Strategic Business Plan (SBP). Projects within this document are grouped into a number of categories: “Committed” Projects – These are projects that the England & Wales, and Scottish governments committed to providing funding for ahead of publishing their High Level Output Specifications. Funds to Deliver Specific Outcomes – Experience of using funds in CP4 has demonstrated the value of such an approach giving the industry flexibility to determine the most cost effective way to deliver outputs. The Electric Spine - A major north-south rail electrification and capability enhancement, increasing regional and national connectivity and supporting economic development by creating a high-capability 25kV electrified passenger and freight route from the South Coast via Oxford and the Midlands to South Yorkshire. Other projects (those projects “named” in the High Level Output Specifications and projects required
    [Show full text]