DOCSLIB.ORG

Wessex Route Strategic Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Wessex Route Strategic Plan Route Strategic Plan Wessex Route Moving People, Building for the Future Version 3.75 February 2018 Wessex Route Strategic Plan Contents 1. Foreword and summary ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 2. Stakeholder priorities ............................................................................................................................................................................................. 9 3. Route objectives ................................................................................................................................................................................................... 15 4. Activity Prioritisation on a page ........................................................................................................................................................................... 23 5. Activities & expenditure ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 31 6. Customer focus & capacity strategy .................................................................................................................................................................... 61 7. Cost competiveness & delivery strategy .............................................................................................................................................................. 64 8. Culture strategy .................................................................................................................................................................................................... 74 rd 9. Strategy for commercial focus – 3 party contributions ..................................................................................................................................... 79 10. CP6 regulatory framework ................................................................................................................................................................................... 85 11. Sign-off ................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 87 Appendix A Joint performance activity prioritisation by lead route TOC ................................................................................................................................ 88 Appendix B Key assumptions ................................................................................................................................................................................................... 90 Appendix C Route context ....................................................................................................................................................................................................... 93 Appendix D Scenario planning ................................................................................................................................................................................................. 98 Appendix E CP6 regulatory framework – Other Single Till Income ....................................................................................................................................... 107 Appendix F Long term forecast ............................................................................................................................................................................................. 108 Appendix G Glossary of terms ............................................................................................................................................................................................... 113 Appendix H Wessex Route Freight and National Passenger Operators ................................................................................................................................ 114 Appendix I Strategic Plan and Enterprise Risk Alignment Methodology ............................................................................................................................. 120 Appendix J Scorecard Definitions ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 121 Appendix K Regulatory floor methodologies ........................................................................................................................................................................ 122 Network Rail 2 Wessex Route Strategic Plan 1. Foreword and summary This Strategic Plan is the first step on a sustained period of growth that resignalling schemes at Feltham and Farncombe to Petersfield, securing extends beyond the horizons of CP6 to deliver our vision of “trusted by much needed 3rd party funding and creating a framework for a diverse our customers to deliver a safe and reliable railway”. and adaptive organisation, agile processes and new technology in order to direct the whole energy of the business to bringing about the We have come a long way in CP5, establishing a route based structure, improvements our customers deserve. building the first deep alliance between NR and lead TOC, establishing a new route operational centre at Basingstoke, strengthening the leadership structure and delivering the most complex engineering enhancement project at Waterloo in a century. There is now much to do in CP6. First and foremost, safety is the fundamental prerequisite of how we run our business. We operate a safe railway for our passengers and continually invest in ways to reduce the risk of harm to our workforce. In CP6 we will remain committed to improving public safety, particularly in reducing risk at level crossings. Our punctuality will improve through making smarter use of information and technology to prevent more Asset Failures than ever and adopting a bold, fully devolved operating model, in partnership with South Western Railway, to recover more quickly from an incident. However, the benefits Andy Mellors, Managing Director, South Western Railway: of these initiatives are constrained by the fact that the growth in demand is overwhelming the capacity of our existing network. “We support the plan that NR Wessex has submitted and sign up to the vision and outcomes that the Wessex Route aspires to achieve in the long So here the really exciting challenge begins … we will commence the term. However, SWR are not able to sign off on the PPM targets included development and design of a complex programme of capacity within the submission due to the shortfall between these and the franchise enhancements, namely CrossRail2, Digital Railway and Clapham Junction targets set. We, at SWR, urge the ORR to take up all the options that the redevelopment for implementation in CP7 and CP8. Key to this long term Wessex Route has included within its costed options which will further outlook is that in CP6 we must prepare the infrastructure to seamlessly help to deliver the much needed performance of this essential part of the absorb the necessary service alterations, including DR enabled rail network. “ Network Rail 3 Wessex Route Strategic Plan 1.1. Summary dwell times, sub-threshold delay from crowding and tight headways. Consequently, the route struggles to recover service from incidents in key Wessex Route provides a vital economic artery into London; 80% of the areas at peak times. 234m journeys per annum are commuters who rightly expect a reliable and available seat to work, in return for a £1bn passenger revenue. Works in CP5 have lengthened platforms at Waterloo to enable a 10 car suburban service, and later in the control period we will bring the former international terminal back into service providing extra capacity and much needed performance resilience on the Windsor lines. Furthermore, there are other important journeys on the route. The freight link between Southampton and Basingstoke allows export goods to travel from the Midlands to the growing port at Southampton. Other areas such as Weymouth, Dorset and the South coast are popular destinations for recreational travel. The new franchise South Western Railway is keen to exploit these opportunities as well as growing connectivity on the South Coast. These factors combine to provide challenging access periods in which to maintain and renew heavily used ageing assets. Wessex has the shortest average access period on the UK Network. The last train leaves Waterloo at 01.05 arriving in Southampton at 02.56, and the first empty coaching stock moves start again at 04.05. A key output for CP6 must therefore be to improve the efficiency of constrained access opportunities, through further evolution of planned, preventative maintenance. Faster Safer Isolations, Standard isolations, We operate and maintain Waterloo Station, the busiest station in the UK improved planning, cyclic access and the intelligent infrastructure plan and Clapham Junction, which has 2,000 train movements a day and is the will all support this. busiest interchange station in Europe. Our Strategic Route Objectives for CP6 are shown in our ‘Vision and Much of the capacity on the network has already been exploited; in the Objectives Sunburst’ diagram.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • South West Main Line Strategic Study 3 MB
    OFFICIAL South West Main Line Strategic Study Phase 1 2021 1 OFFICIAL Network Rail Table of Contents 1.0 Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................................ 3 2.0 Long-Term Planning Process ........................................................................................................................... 6 3.0 The South West Main Line Today................................................................................................................. 8 4.0 Strategic Context ..............................................................................................................................................13 5.0 South West Main Line - Demand ................................................................................................................25 6.0 Capacity Analysis ..............................................................................................................................................34 7.0 Intervention Feasibility ...................................................................................................................................59 8.0 Emerging Strategic Advice ............................................................................................................................62 Appendix A – Safety Baseline .....................................................................................................................................74 Appendix B – Development
    [Show full text]
  • Tracks the Monthly Magazine of the Inter City Railway Society
    Tracks the monthly magazine of the Inter City Railway Society Volume 40 No.7 July 2012 Inter City Railway Society founded 1973 www.icrs.org.uk The content of the magazine is the copyright of the Society No part of this magazine may be reproduced without prior permission of the copyright holder President: Simon Mutten (01603 715701) Coppercoin, 12 Blofield Corner Rd, Blofield, Norwich, Norfolk NR13 4RT Chairman: Carl Watson - [email protected] (07403 040533) 14, Partridge Gardens, Waterlooville, Hampshire PO8 9XG Treasurer: Peter Britcliffe - [email protected] (01429 234180) 9 Voltigeur Drive, Hart, Hartlepool TS27 3BS Membership Secretary: Trevor Roots - [email protected] (01466 760724) (07765 337700) Mill of Botary, Cairnie, Huntly, Aberdeenshire AB54 4UD Secretary: Stuart Moore - [email protected] (01603 714735) 64 Blofield Corner Rd, Blofield, Norwich, Norfolk NR13 4SA Magazine: Editorial Manager: Trevor Roots - [email protected] details as above Editorial Team: Sightings: James Holloway - [email protected] (0121 744 2351) 246 Longmore Road, Shirley, Solihull B90 3ES Traffic News: John Barton - [email protected] (0121 770 2205) 46, Arbor Way, Chelmsley Wood, Birmingham B37 7LD Website: Website Manager: Mark Richards - [email protected] 7 Parkside, Furzton, Milton Keynes, Bucks. MK4 1BX Yahoo Administrator: Steve Revill Books: Publications Manager: Carl Watson - [email protected] details as above Publications Team: Combine & Individual / Irish: Carl Watson - [email protected] Pocket Book: Carl Watson / Trevor Roots - [email protected] Wagons: Scott Yeates - [email protected] Name Directory: Eddie Rathmill / Trevor Roots - [email protected] USF: Scott Yeates / Carl Watson / Trevor Roots - [email protected] Contents: Officials Contact List .....................................2 Traffic and Traction News................
    [Show full text]
  • Annex G – Forming & Delivering a Strategy
    Swindon and Wiltshire Rail Study 09/05/2019 Reference number 107523 ANNEX G – FORMING & DELIVERING A STRATEGY SWINDON AND WILTSHIRE RAIL STUDY ANNEX G – FORMING & DELIVERING A STRATEGY IDENTIFICATION TABLE Client/Project owner Swindon and Wiltshire Local Enterprise Partnership Project Swindon and Wiltshire Rail Study Study Annex G – Forming & Delivering a Strategy Type of document Report Date 09/05/2019 File name Framework N/A Reference number 107523 Number of pages 33 APPROVAL Version Name Position Date Modifications Author J Jackson Associate 12/03/2019 Checked A Sykes Associate 13/03/2019 1 by Approved D Bishop Director 15/03/2019 by Author J Jackson Associate 09/05/2019 Checked A Sykes Associate 09/05/2019 2 by Approved A Sykes Associate 09/05/2019 by TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 6 2. IDENTIFYING THE COMPONENTS OF THE STRATEGY 7 3. NETWORK-WIDE INITIATIVES 8 4. GREAT WESTERN MAINLINE 11 RECOMMENDATIONS 11 PHASE 0: 1 TPH WESTBURY – SWINDON 12 PHASE 1: 1 TPH SOUTHAMPTON CENTRAL – SWINDON 13 PHASE 2 & 2A: GREAT WESTERN CONNECT 14 PHASE 3: EXTENSION OF GREAT WESTERN CONNECT 16 DELIVERY OF GREAT WESTERN CONNECT 16 THE SOUTH COTSWOLDS LINE 17 5. BERKS & HANTS ROUTE 18 EXTENSION OF LONDON – BEDWYN SERVICES 18 DEVIZES PARKWAY 19 EXTENSION OF LONDON – WESTBURY SERVICES TO BRISTOL (PEAK ONLY) 19 ENHANCEMENT OF PADDINGTON – EXETER SERVICES TO HOURLY 19 DELIVERING AND ENHANCED BERKS & HANTS SERVICE 19 6. WEST OF ENGLAND LINE 21 SALISBURY – LONDON JOURNEY TIME REDUCTIONS 21 PORTON STATION 22 WILTON STATION 23 ANDOVER – LUDGERSHALL LINE 23 7. TRANS WILTS CORRIDOR 24 ASHTON PARK STATION 25 THE IMPACT OF METRO WEST 25 8.
    [Show full text]
  • Hampton Court to Berrylands / Oct 2015
    Crossrail 2 factsheet: Services between Berrylands and Hampton Court New Crossrail 2 services are proposed to serve all stations between Berrylands and Hampton Court, with 4 trains per hour in each direction operating directly to, and across central London. What is Crossrail 2? Crossrail 2 in this area Crossrail 2 is a proposed new railway serving London and the wider South East that could be open by 2030. It would connect the existing National Rail networks in Surrey and Hertfordshire with trains running through a new tunnel from Wimbledon to Tottenham Hale and New Southgate. Crossrail 2 will connect directly with National Rail, London Underground, London Overground, Crossrail 1, High Speed 1 international and domestic and High Speed 2 services, meaning passengers will be one change away from over 800 destinations nationwide. Why do we need Crossrail 2? The South West Main Line is one of the busiest and most congested routes in the country. It already faces capacity constraints and demand for National Rail services into Waterloo is forecast to increase by at least 40% by 2043. This means the severe crowding on the network will nearly double, and would likely lead to passengers being unable to board trains at some stations. Crossrail 2 provides a solution. It would free up space on the railway helping to reduce congestion, and would enable us to run more local services to central London that bypass the most congested stations. Transport improvements already underway will help offset the pressure in the short term. But we need Crossrail 2 to cope with longer term growth.
    [Show full text]
  • Submissions to the Call for Evidence from Organisations
    Submissions to the call for evidence from organisations Ref Organisation RD - 1 Abbey Flyer Users Group (ABFLY) RD - 2 ASLEF RD - 3 C2c RD - 4 Chiltern Railways RD - 5 Clapham Transport Users Group RD - 6 London Borough of Ealing RD - 7 East Surrey Transport Committee RD – 8a East Sussex RD – 8b East Sussex Appendix RD - 9 London Borough of Enfield RD - 10 England’s Economic Heartland RD – 11a Enterprise M3 LEP RD – 11b Enterprise M3 LEP RD - 12 First Great Western RD – 13a Govia Thameslink Railway RD – 13b Govia Thameslink Railway (second submission) RD - 14 Hertfordshire County Council RD - 15 Institute for Public Policy Research RD - 16 Kent County Council RD - 17 London Councils RD - 18 London Travelwatch RD – 19a Mayor and TfL RD – 19b Mayor and TfL RD - 20 Mill Hill Neighbourhood Forum RD - 21 Network Rail RD – 22a Passenger Transport Executive Group (PTEG) RD – 22b Passenger Transport Executive Group (PTEG) – Annex RD - 23 London Borough of Redbridge RD - 24 Reigate, Redhill and District Rail Users Association RD - 25 RMT RD - 26 Sevenoaks Rail Travellers Association RD - 27 South London Partnership RD - 28 Southeastern RD - 29 Surrey County Council RD - 30 The Railway Consultancy RD - 31 Tonbridge Line Commuters RD - 32 Transport Focus RD - 33 West Midlands ITA RD – 34a West Sussex County Council RD – 34b West Sussex County Council Appendix RD - 1 Dear Mr Berry In responding to your consultation exercise at https://www.london.gov.uk/mayor-assembly/london- assembly/investigations/how-would-you-run-your-own-railway, I must firstly apologise for slightly missing the 1st July deadline, but nonetheless I hope that these views can still be taken into consideration by the Transport Committee.
    [Show full text]
  • Agenda Document for Economy, Transport and Environment Select
    Public Document Pack NOTICE OF MEETING Meeting Economy, Transport and Environment Select Committee Date and Time Wednesday 1st July, 2020 at 2.30 pm Place Virtual Teams Meeting - Microsoft Teams Enquiries to [email protected] John Coughlan CBE Chief Executive The Castle, Winchester SO23 8UJ FILMING AND BROADCAST NOTIFICATION This meeting will be webcast on the County Council’s website AGENDA 1. APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE To receive any apologies for absence. 2. DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST All Members who believe they have a Disclosable Pecuniary Interest in any matter to be considered at the meeting must declare that interest and, having regard to the circumstances described in Part 3 Paragraph 1.5 of the County Council's Members' Code of Conduct, leave the meeting while the matter is discussed, save for exercising any right to speak in accordance with Paragraph 1.6 of the Code. Furthermore all Members with a Non-Pecuniary interest in a matter being considered at the meeting should consider whether such interest should be declared, and having regard to Part 5, Paragraph 2 of the Code, consider whether it is appropriate to leave the meeting while the matter is discussed, save for exercising any right to speak in accordance with the Code. 3. MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING (Pages 5 - 10) To confirm the minutes of the previous meeting 4. DEPUTATIONS To receive any deputations notified under Standing Order 12. 5. CHAIRMAN'S ANNOUNCEMENTS To receive any announcements the Chairman may wish to make. 6. TRANSPORT FOR SOUTH EAST STRATEGY (Pages 11 - 184) For the Economy, Transport & Environment Select Committee to pre- scrutinise a report regarding Transport for the South East’s Proposal to Government to establish a statutory sub national transport body for the South East, to be known as Transport for the South East (TfSE).
    [Show full text]
  • Great Western Route Utilisation Strategy March 2010 Foreword
    Great Western Route Utilisation Strategy March 2010 Foreword I am delighted to present the Great Western Development of this strategy has followed Route Utilisation Strategy (RUS), which sets a now well-established process. Initially, an out the strategic vision for the future of this analysis was carried out into the capacity and vital part of the rail network. As well as the capability of the existing network and train Great Western Main Line itself, the strategy services taking into account major changes covers the network north to Ashchurch and planned over the next 10 years. Future Bicester Town and south to Basingstoke, demand was then analysed with a number of Salisbury and Dorchester. “Gaps” identified and options to resolve these gaps appraised. Those which demonstrated This August will see the 175th anniversary the best value for money are included in of the Great Western Railway. Today, that the strategy. railway carries tens of millions of passengers a year through the Thames Valley, the West The dominant issue is the need to provide Country and Wales. Working closely with our sufficient capacity on peak services, train operating customers, Network Rail is specifically to and from London but also for delivering an ever improving service for those Bristol and Exeter. In the short to medium term passengers, and for freight users. the approach focuses on enabling longer trains to serve these routes, particularly through the More people are choosing to travel by train, introduction of IEP, which will increase capacity and high levels of growth are predicted through new rolling stock and an enhanced to continue, particularly around London timetable, but also through train lengthening Paddington and Bristol.
    [Show full text]
  • MB Report Template 2006-12-04
    Amber Infrastructure Ltd. Proposed Care Home at Land adjoining Holywell House, Patterdown, Chippenham Transport Statement April 2018 Amber Infrastructure Ltd Proposed Care Home at Land adjoining Holywell House, Patterdown Transport Statement DOCUMENT REGISTER CLIENT: AMBER INFRSTRUCTURE LTD PROPOSED CARE HOME AT LAND ADJOINING HOLYWELL PROJECT: HOUSE, PATTERDOWN, CHIPPENHAM PROJECT CODE: CTP-17-481 REPORT TITLE: TRANSPORT STATEMENT PREPARED BY: SIMON GARNER DATE: APRIL 2018 CHECKED BY: MIKE FULLER DATE: APRIL 2018 REPORT STATUS: ISSUE Prepared by COTSWOLD TRANSPORT PLANNING LTD 121 Promenade Cheltenham Gloucestershire GL50 1NW Tel: 01242 523696 Email: [email protected] Web: www.cotswoldtp.co.uk Registered Company Address: 121 Promenade, Cheltenham, Gloucestershire, GL50 1NW. Company Number: 9228763 Amber Infrastructure Ltd Proposed Care Home at Land adjoining Holywell House, Patterdown Transport Statement List of Contents Sections 1 Introduction ....................................................................................................... 1 2 The Site and Adjacent Highway Network........................................................... 2 3 Site Accessibility ............................................................................................... 4 4 Development Proposals .................................................................................... 8 5 Forecast Trip Generation ................................................................................ 10 6 Traffic Impact Assessment .............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Corridor Evidence Base
    Transport Strategy for the South East ___ Strategic Corridor Evidence Base Client: Transport for the South East 10 December 2019 Our ref: 234337 Contents Page 4 Introduction 4 Definitions 5 Sources and Presentation 6 Strategic Corridor maps Appendices SE South East Radial Corridors SC South Central Radial Corridors SW South West Radial Corridors IO Inner Orbital Corridors OO Outer Orbital Corridors 3 | 10 December 2019 Strategic Corridor Evidence Base Introduction Introduction Definitions Table 1 | Strategic Corridor definitions 1 This document presents the evidence base 5 There are 23 Strategic Corridors in South East Area Ref Corridor Name M2/A2/Chatham Main Line underpinning the case for investment in the South England. These corridors were identified by SE1 (Dartford – Dover) East’s Strategic Corridors. It has been prepared for Transport for the South East, its Constituent A299/Chatham Main Line SE2 Transport for the South East (TfSE) – the emerging Authorities, and other stakeholders involved in the South (Faversham – Ramsgate) East M20/A20/High Speed 1/South Eastern Main Line SE3 Sub-National Transport Body for South East England development of the Economic Connectivity Review. (Dover – Sidcup) A21/Hastings Line – in support of its development of a Transport Since this review was published, the corridors have SE5 (Hastings – Sevenoaks) A22/A264/Oxted Line Strategy for South East England. been grouped into five areas. Some of the definitions SC1 (Crawley – Eastbourne) and names of some corridors cited in the Economic South M23/A23/Brighton
    [Show full text]
  • Wimbledon, 1951-53 (And a Few Other Railway Memories)
    Wimbledon, 1951-53 (and a few other railway memories) JDB, August 2013, minor additions and corrections May/August 2015 Neither this nor its companion piece “Derby Day, 1949” lays claim to any particular literary or other merit; they are merely pieces of first-hand reportage which may perhaps be of interest to future transport historians. In September 1951, I started going to school in Wimbledon. This involved a train journey morning and evening, an experience which put me off commuting for life but which also led to an interest in railways that still survives. In particular, one of the ways of walking from the station to school followed a footpath alongside the railway for the first half mile or so. Wimbledon is seven miles out of Waterloo, on what was originally the main line of the London and Southampton Railway. In due course, this became the London and South Western, then it was grouped into the Southern Railway, and by 1951 it had become part of British Railways. The lines from Waterloo divide at Clapham Junction, a line towards Windsor and Reading branching off to the north, and there are several connections between the two. One is at Putney, where a steep climb leads up to East Putney station on the Wimbledon branch of the London Underground District Line, and a Waterloo to Wimbledon suburban service via East Putney used this until 1941. Wimbledon station had been completely rebuilt in 1929, and in 1951 it comprised ten platforms. Four were terminal platforms for the District Line, this side of the station being essentially self-contained though there was a connection from the East Putney line to the main line just outside.
    [Show full text]
  • Hsuk London Terminal Strategy
    HSUK LONDON TERMINAL STRATEGY In the development of high speed rail systems, the issue of terminal location and onward distribution of passengers assumes almost as much importance as the more obvious question of route. The new lines are designed to carry large volumes of passengers on trains operating at high frequencies, and these factors combine to create major flows arriving at city terminals which must then be efficiently dispersed onto the local public transport networks. This demands full integration of high speed and local systems, with optimised transfer at dedicated and fit-for- purpose terminals. These issues apply at all UK cities where high speed lines are planned, but are most acute in London, where passenger flows are greatest, and congestion in the existing public transport system is most critical. The following diagrams review existing central London connectivity issues, and compare and contrast the London terminal solutions proposed for HS2, and for the alternative High Speed UK proposals. For precise details of the core High Speed UK proposals (as included in the cost estimates), see the ‘200k’ series of plans. LTS1 : LONDON MAIN LINE NETWORK CIRCA 1963 LTS2 : EXISTING CENTRAL LONDON RAIL NETWORK INCLUDING CROSSRAIL SCHEME These diagrams show the rail network of central London, dominated by the classic terminus stations of the Victorian era. These are mostly reliant for onward connectivity upon the Tube network, which tended to form ‘nodes’ around the busier/more important termini. However, the change from main line to Tube is inherently inefficient, with passengers forced to detrain en masse, and with massive congestion occurring especially at rush hours.
    [Show full text]
  • Transforming the Countryside the Electrification of Rural Britain 1St Edition Pdf, Epub, Ebook
    TRANSFORMING THE COUNTRYSIDE THE ELECTRIFICATION OF RURAL BRITAIN 1ST EDITION PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Paul Brassley | 9781472441270 | | | | | Transforming the Countryside The Electrification of Rural Britain 1st edition PDF Book New other. By , two-thirds of rural dwellings had been connected to a centrally generated supply, but the majority of farms in Britain were not linked to the mains until sometime between and Converted from 6. The Independent. The system was converted to third rail in see below. By using our services, you agree that we may use cookies. Retrieved 19 May Advertisement Hide. The Cumbernauld Line to Springburn and the remaining section of the Motherwell to Cumbernauld Line was electrified in mid See all articles in The revolution of electricity. Archived from the original on 27 August British Railways chose this as the national standard for future electrification projects outside of the third rail area in Dublin: Stationery office. In , the government's preferred option was to use diesel trains running on biodiesel , its White Paper Delivering a Sustainable Railway , [6] ruling out large-scale railway electrification for the following five years. In the s, the lines to Chingford, Enfield Town and Cheshunt were electrified at 6. Deposit Details. About this product Product Information It is now almost impossible to conceive of life in western Europe, either in the towns or the countryside, without a reliable mains electricity supply. Item Type: Book. Rail transport in Scotland is a devolved matter for the Scottish Government but they too have pursued electrification with multiple schemes in the Central Belt. During the early s, the whole of this line was converted to 6.
    [Show full text]