DOCSLIB.ORG

Great Western Route Utilisation Strategy March 2010 Foreword

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Great Western Route Utilisation Strategy March 2010 Foreword Great Western Route Utilisation Strategy March 2010 Foreword I am delighted to present the Great Western Development of this strategy has followed Route Utilisation Strategy (RUS), which sets a now well-established process. Initially, an out the strategic vision for the future of this analysis was carried out into the capacity and vital part of the rail network. As well as the capability of the existing network and train Great Western Main Line itself, the strategy services taking into account major changes covers the network north to Ashchurch and planned over the next 10 years. Future Bicester Town and south to Basingstoke, demand was then analysed with a number of Salisbury and Dorchester. “Gaps” identified and options to resolve these gaps appraised. Those which demonstrated This August will see the 175th anniversary the best value for money are included in of the Great Western Railway. Today, that the strategy. railway carries tens of millions of passengers a year through the Thames Valley, the West The dominant issue is the need to provide Country and Wales. Working closely with our sufficient capacity on peak services, train operating customers, Network Rail is specifically to and from London but also for delivering an ever improving service for those Bristol and Exeter. In the short to medium term passengers, and for freight users. the approach focuses on enabling longer trains to serve these routes, particularly through the More people are choosing to travel by train, introduction of IEP, which will increase capacity and high levels of growth are predicted through new rolling stock and an enhanced to continue, particularly around London timetable, but also through train lengthening Paddington and Bristol. Demand for freight for local services. The strategy also identifies is also expected to continue to grow, as it is future opportunities presented by electrification increasingly recognised as an economically such as a further review of the local network sensible and environmentally efficient form in Bristol building on the analysis of a ‘Bristol of transport. Metro’ service. This success brings challenges. Already This RUS was initially published in the improvement work has begun – fixing consultation form in September 2009. Many the bottleneck at Reading, redoubling the issues were raised during that consultation Cotswold line, increasing the linespeed on the that have influenced several aspects of Bristol to Birmingham corridor, preparing for the strategy. Network Rail has led the Crossrail, and through development work on production of this RUS, however it has the Intercity Express Programme (IEP) and been developed with the full input of the rail electrification of the Great Western Main Line. industry including passenger and freight This investment is a massive boost for operators, the Department for Transport, passengers, businesses and communities Transport for London, Passenger Focus and along the route. When complete, more trains London TravelWatch. I thank them all for will run, with better performance and greater their contribution. environmental efficiency. Iain Coucher Chief Executive 2 Executive summary Introduction The scope area adjoins the routes of the South Within the Great Western RUS scope area The identified gaps have been analysed Route Utilisation Strategies (RUSs) seek West Main Line; Wessex; South and Central there are a significant number of major, to understand how best to address them, to establish the strategic direction of the Wales and Borders; Chilterns and the West high-profile, high-investment enhancement taking into account any schemes already railway from a systematic analysis of future Midlands. The RUS area plays a crucial role schemes planned or proposed during CP proposed. In the course of this work, options requirements of the network. They seek to in the core cross-country network, linking the which continue into the next control period have been developed on an iterative basis balance capacity, passenger and freight South Coast, Thames Valley, West Country, (Control Period 5 (CP5)) from 201 to 2019. until feasible solutions have been identified demand, operational performance and cost South Wales and South Midlands with the These major enhancement schemes include with acceptable operational performance whilst addressing the requirements of funders Midlands, Greater Manchester, Yorkshire, the the electrification of the Great Western that meets whole-industry value-for-money and stakeholders. Network Rail is developing North East and Scotland. Main Line; the Intercity Express Programme criteria. In some cases there may be further (IEP); European Rail Traffic Management work required to identify additional benefits a programme of RUSs, in conjunction with Timeframe rail industry partners and wider stakeholders, System (ERTMS); the Reading Station Area in order to demonstrate a sufficiently strong The Great Western RUS primarily focuses which when complete, will cover the entire rail Redevelopment and Crossrail. Although economic return. on the next 10 years to 2019 but has also network in Great Britain. This programme of predominantly within the Thames Valley considered the implications of growth in The Great Western RUS has been developed RUSs includes a Network RUS which reviews area, these schemes will resolve a number of demand over the next 0 years in the context as a result of considerable analysis and close national issues such as stations, depots, rolling current and future issues across the whole of of the Government’s 2007 White Paper collaboration between Network Rail, the stock and electrification as well as presenting the RUS area. The implementation of these “Delivering a Sustainable Railway”. Department for Transport, the passenger and interventions will significantly change the scenarios and forecasts for long distance freight operators, Transport for London, the The period from 1 April 2009 to 1 March capacity and capability of the network. passenger and freight markets with the Office of Rail Regulation, Welsh Assembly 201 is Network Rail’s current Control Period established Freight RUS providing a strategy Through the inclusion of these improvements Government, Passenger Focus and London (CP). Any known commitments to 201 to meet anticipated freight demand to 201. in the base, the RUS has been able to identify TravelWatch. that have either formed the High Level Output This Great Western RUS provides a further further prospective “Gaps”. The focus of Specification (HLOS) or have committed step towards achieving national coverage and options to address these gaps being to input funding through other funding streams have has followed the now well-established process. recommendations for the longer-term strategy been included as part of the Great Western to inform the Department for Transport’s (DfT) Scope RUS base. Such capacity schemes and next HLOS for CP5. The Great Western RUS sets out the strategic other enhancements are described further in vision for a particular part of the rail network. Chapter 4. Process The scope of the RUS is extensive and The starting point for the Great Western RUS CP marks a start of a new era for rail in Britain diverse; the focal element being the Great has been to analyse the current base position as this is the first review since the passing Western Main Line (GWML) which operates of the network, combined with any committed of the Railways Act 2005, and introduces a over 20 miles and creates main line links schemes and known interventions. Demand new process whereby the Secretary of State from London to the West of England and South analysis has been undertaken to ascertain issues a High Level Output Specification and Wales. Extending from this are radial routes to the expected level of growth over the next a Statement of Funds Available which sets Oxford, the Cotswolds, Birmingham, the South 10 years taking into account the anticipated the scene for the next five years. From this, Coast and South West. Branch lines into the drivers of change. The combined analysis Network Rail has embarked on a national London suburbs, to the Devon and Cornish identifies where supply and demand is programme of expenditure targeted at building coast and dedicated freight only lines complete mismatched now, and where it is expected to a bigger and better railway through over 500 the mix of routes considered. be mismatched in the future. schemes and projects aimed at providing extra capacity or capability for passengers and freight customers – this is the biggest expansion of Britain’s railways since the 180s. 5 Gaps performance pinch-points and local and In developing the RUS, there were a number London Paddington and Reading. A scenario The key themes that have emerged from regional connectivity. The following table of uncertainties. This is especially apparent matrix was developed to manage the known the analysis of the current railway and what presents the gaps identified and taken with regards to the proposed timetables for proposals for IEP, electrification and Crossrail is required of it in the future is capacity forward for further analysis under the Great IEP and Crossrail services. Draft service pre- and post-implementation. Western RUS process. specifications have been used as a basis for (at stations, on trains and of the network), Capacity analysis to 2019 showed sufficient the RUS analysis; however these continue to supply to cater for forecast growth on the be developed and are yet to be finalised and current Long Distance High Speed (LDHS) 1. Paddington peak capacity confirmed. As such, the additional quantum of services with IEP (either diesel or electric) services expected from these interventions and 2. I nner suburban service pattern on the LDHS services and outer suburban their proposed calling patterns has not been 3. Paddington to Reading all day capacity services after the implementation of Crossrail. explicitly modelled. Further timetable work is The provision of freight paths in the latest 4. Paddington to Reading performance scheduled to combine and commit the service Crossrail timetable proves sufficient to specifications, along with the predicted freight 5.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • January to December 2004 RCTS Log of 60001 the Railway Observer
    RCTS Log of 60001 The Railway Observer January to December 2004 Following the naming of 60001 at Toton on 23rd February 2001, Bob Wallen, Dave Hinde and Andrew Lait have attempted to maintain as complete as possible a record of the workings of the locomotive. Acknowledgements are due to those RCTS members, and others, who have contributed the information that has enabled the following to be put together on behalf of the Society; also to Freightmaster and its editor Mark, without which many train descriptions would not be possible, and to 60gen, other e-mail groups and the Class 60 Data Site. Your reports of sightings of 60001 will contribute to the completeness of this log, please support us by sending them to us. Monthly summaries are now included in this log. The most recent summaries will be also be published in The Railway Observer every few months. January2004 Summary. After spending the New Year stabled at Cardiff Canton TMD, 60001 resumed its regular Llanwern – Lackenby steel workings interspersed with a couple of days on Hardendale lime trains. It then worked an Enterprise to Mossend and spent most of the next two weeks on oil workings to Dalston and aviation fuel workings to Linkswood and to Prestwick. Returning to Immingham on another Enterprise then spent most of the rest of January on lime and stone workings from the Peak Forest area and a couple of days on Greater Manchester ‘binliners’ before going to Immingham TMD for an A-exam and brakeblock change. Start of Stabled at Cardiff Canton TMD Month Sat.
    [Show full text]
  • A Cardiff City Region Metro: Transform, Regenerate, Connect
    A Cardiff City Region Metro: transform, regenerate, connect by Mark Barry A Cardiff City Region Metro: transform, regenerate, connect A Cardiff City Region Metro: transform, regenerate, connect Metro Consortium The Metro Consortium is a group of stakeholders who have come together with the common aim of promoting the Metro concept as a regional regeneration project and to actively lobby for a step change in the approach to and investment in, transport across the Cardiff City Region. Membership of the consortium represents a diverse range of interests from the business community, developers, major employers, planning and transport experts who proactively liaise with Welsh Government, Regional Transport Consortia, Local Government and service providers. The core membership of the Consortium includes Capita Symonds, Cardiff Business Partnership, M&G Barry Consulting, Powell Dobson Urbanists, Institute of Welsh Affairs, Jones Lang LaSalle, British Gas, Admiral, Cardiff Business School, Capita Architects, Curzon Real Estates, Paramount Office Interiors, Wardell Armstrong and J.R. Smart. www.metroconsortium.co.uk The Cardiff Business Partnership consists of leading employers in the Capital. Its mission is to represent leading businesses in the Capital of Wales, ensuring that the views of enterprise are at the heart of the development of Cardiff as a competitive business location. The Partnership aims to identify key issues facing the capital’s economy. Through its members who represent the city’s biggest employers, the Partnership has the unique ability to go beyond advocacy to action. The Partnership also serves as a resource of expertise and creative thinking for policy makers, media and others concerned with taking forward the Cardiff and Wales economy.
    [Show full text]
  • Submissions to the Call for Evidence from Organisations
    Submissions to the call for evidence from organisations Ref Organisation RD - 1 Abbey Flyer Users Group (ABFLY) RD - 2 ASLEF RD - 3 C2c RD - 4 Chiltern Railways RD - 5 Clapham Transport Users Group RD - 6 London Borough of Ealing RD - 7 East Surrey Transport Committee RD – 8a East Sussex RD – 8b East Sussex Appendix RD - 9 London Borough of Enfield RD - 10 England’s Economic Heartland RD – 11a Enterprise M3 LEP RD – 11b Enterprise M3 LEP RD - 12 First Great Western RD – 13a Govia Thameslink Railway RD – 13b Govia Thameslink Railway (second submission) RD - 14 Hertfordshire County Council RD - 15 Institute for Public Policy Research RD - 16 Kent County Council RD - 17 London Councils RD - 18 London Travelwatch RD – 19a Mayor and TfL RD – 19b Mayor and TfL RD - 20 Mill Hill Neighbourhood Forum RD - 21 Network Rail RD – 22a Passenger Transport Executive Group (PTEG) RD – 22b Passenger Transport Executive Group (PTEG) – Annex RD - 23 London Borough of Redbridge RD - 24 Reigate, Redhill and District Rail Users Association RD - 25 RMT RD - 26 Sevenoaks Rail Travellers Association RD - 27 South London Partnership RD - 28 Southeastern RD - 29 Surrey County Council RD - 30 The Railway Consultancy RD - 31 Tonbridge Line Commuters RD - 32 Transport Focus RD - 33 West Midlands ITA RD – 34a West Sussex County Council RD – 34b West Sussex County Council Appendix RD - 1 Dear Mr Berry In responding to your consultation exercise at https://www.london.gov.uk/mayor-assembly/london- assembly/investigations/how-would-you-run-your-own-railway, I must firstly apologise for slightly missing the 1st July deadline, but nonetheless I hope that these views can still be taken into consideration by the Transport Committee.
    [Show full text]
  • Network Rail Response to Grand Union Trains Wales Application- 30
    OFFICIAL 30 October 2020 Gareth Clancy Head of Access and Licensing By email only Dear Gareth Grand Union Trains Section 17 Application between London and Carmarthen: Capacity and Performance Assessment I am writing in response to your letter of 16 October 2020. Network Rail has been working on assessing the Grand Union Trains Ltd (GUTL) applications in good faith. We have taken a methodical and logical progression of work to assess the applications. A timeline showing the work undertaken by Network Rail to assess the GUTL applications is in Annex 1. This demonstrates the volume of work which has been undertaken to assess the applications, as well as the considerable effort by Network Rail to assist GUTL in finding compliant proposals for train slots. It is only with the latest iteration of the proposed service specification that Network Rail and GUTL are in a position to understand which parts of the proposition can have a compliant train and platform plan; this will now allow meaningful performance modelling to be carried out. The static performance analysis conducted so far on the various GUTL applications using historic performance data shows there is a potential performance risk which is why the detailed modelling is required. The Coronavirus pandemic has significantly impacted the railway industry, with a collapse in passenger numbers, which has been sustained for several months. As service levels were reduced, there was an immediate improvement in punctuality and performance on the network. Indeed, during the early months of the pandemic, punctuality reached record levels with the proportion of trains arriving on time, to the minute, rising to 80-90% and around 95% of trains routinely arriving within 5-10 minutes of their scheduled time.
    [Show full text]
  • Route Utilisation Strategy November 2008  Foreword
    Wales Route Utilisation Strategy November 2008 2 Foreword I am delighted to present Network Rail’s Route Principally this is in south Wales, where capacity Utilisation Strategy (RUS) for Wales. This use is at its highest. This is a result of a growth covers the entire rail network in Wales, as well in the number of trains serving Cardiff and the as some parts of the network in the English building of a number of new stations. On this border counties. part of the network, in the most populous part of the country, the RUS builds on the successful This network is extensive and diverse. past introduction of more services and the There are main line links from Wales into selective growth of the network. England, a long-distance line along the border connecting north and south Wales, a busy A major programme to renew signalling urban passenger network serving Cardiff, and equipment in the Newport and Cardiff areas branches traversing sparsely populated rural will take place in the next five to seven years, areas. Some parts of the network are subject and much of the work described in this to fluctuating demand according to the time of strategy to enhance the network is planned year, most notably on the Cambrian Coast and in conjunction with this signalling work to in the Conwy Valley. increase cost-effectiveness. The High Level Output Specification (HLOS), published in The context in which this RUS has been July 2007, contained a specific requirement to produced, as has often been the case with increase seating capacity into Cardiff during other RUSs, is one of growing demand for the morning peak.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Corridor Evidence Base
    Transport Strategy for the South East ___ Strategic Corridor Evidence Base Client: Transport for the South East 10 December 2019 Our ref: 234337 Contents Page 4 Introduction 4 Definitions 5 Sources and Presentation 6 Strategic Corridor maps Appendices SE South East Radial Corridors SC South Central Radial Corridors SW South West Radial Corridors IO Inner Orbital Corridors OO Outer Orbital Corridors 3 | 10 December 2019 Strategic Corridor Evidence Base Introduction Introduction Definitions Table 1 | Strategic Corridor definitions 1 This document presents the evidence base 5 There are 23 Strategic Corridors in South East Area Ref Corridor Name M2/A2/Chatham Main Line underpinning the case for investment in the South England. These corridors were identified by SE1 (Dartford – Dover) East’s Strategic Corridors. It has been prepared for Transport for the South East, its Constituent A299/Chatham Main Line SE2 Transport for the South East (TfSE) – the emerging Authorities, and other stakeholders involved in the South (Faversham – Ramsgate) East M20/A20/High Speed 1/South Eastern Main Line SE3 Sub-National Transport Body for South East England development of the Economic Connectivity Review. (Dover – Sidcup) A21/Hastings Line – in support of its development of a Transport Since this review was published, the corridors have SE5 (Hastings – Sevenoaks) A22/A264/Oxted Line Strategy for South East England. been grouped into five areas. Some of the definitions SC1 (Crawley – Eastbourne) and names of some corridors cited in the Economic South M23/A23/Brighton
    [Show full text]
  • Magor Station - Integrated Transport Report
    Magor Station - Integrated Transport Report Christopher Waller On behalf of MAGOR 1 | 11009776 Front and rear cover images from Tom Curtis: http://tomcurtisrailgallery.weebly.com/january-2016. html 11009776 | Magor with Undy Walkway Station - Integrated Transport Report 2 Contents 1. About This Document 4 1.1 Document Outline 4 2. Introduction 4 2.1 Local Context 4 2.2 Route Description 7 2.3 Concurrent Works 7 3. Local Plan Context 9 3.1 Monmouthshire County Council’s local plan 9 4. Project History 9 4.1 Overview 9 4.2 Wales and Borders Rail 9 4.3 GRIP 1 10 4.4 GRIP 2 10 4.5 Footfall Survey 11 4.6 Census Data 13 4.7 Seven for Severnside (Accessible Transport Plan) 13 5. Rail Market Context 13 5.1 Welsh Route Study 13 5.2 Welsh Route Study Goals 14 5.3 Technical Considerations 14 6. Comparator Projects 15 6.1 Station Proposals 15 6.2 Llanharan 15 6.3 Pontyclun Station 16 7. Integrated Transport 16 7.1 Theory / Context 16 7.2 Role of Community Rail Partnerships 16 7.3 Station Demand 17 8. Station Site and Proposal 17 8.1 Overview 17 8.2 Proposed Facilities 18 9. Access Arrangements 18 9.1 Overview 18 9.2 Bus 20 9.3 Cycle 21 9.4 Demand Responsive Travel 22 9.5 Private Cars 23 9.6 Taxis and Private Hire 23 9.7 Walking 23 9.8 Community Facilities / Co-location 24 9.9 Ticket Office / co-selling 25 10. Discussion 25 10.1 General 25 11.
    [Show full text]
  • CC HS18 Gallagher Estates Hearing Statement Matter 3.Pdf [531.85
    Core Strategy Hearing Statement Matter 3 – Policies On behalf of Gallagher Estates May 2016 Core Strategy Hearing Statement Matter 3 – Policies On behalf of Gallagher Estates Project Ref: 25514/A3/FW/jmm Status: Issue/Rev: P4 Date: 18th May 2016 Prepared by: Faith Wright Checked by: Authorised by: Barton Willmore LLP 101 Victoria Street Bristol BS1 6PU Tel: 0117 929 9677 Ref: 25514/A5/FW/jmm Date: May 2016 Email: [email protected] COPYRIGHT The contents of this document must not be copied or reproduced in whole or in part without the written consent of Barton Willmore LLP. All Barton Willmore stationery is produced using recycled or FSC paper and vegetable oil based inks. CORE STRATEGY HEARING STATEMENT Matter 3 1.0 BACKGROUND 1.1 We act on behalf of Gallagher Estates who own the majority of land at Pill Green (see enclosed plan). 1.2 We have previously made substantive submissions in respect of land in this area acting for the previous landowners RS Hill Settlement. Gallagher now owns “the Hill land” and we continue to promote the land on their behalf. Given that we have submitted significant and comprehensive representations in respect of the site to the North Somerset Core Strategy and Site Allocations Plan documents previously, we have kept our comments as succinct as possible. We will expand on the points made within these participant statements in person at the Hearing Sessions. 25514/A5/FW/jmm -1- May 2016 CORE STRATEGY HEARING STATEMENT Matter 3 2.0 MATTER 3 – POLICIES 3. In those settlements and locations where the consequential changes have significantly increased the housing requirement, can it be demonstrated that the capacity exists to deliver the increased number of homes to enable the Core Strategy housing requirement, including those of the consequential changes, to be met in the following locations, in terms of overall numbers and housing mix? a.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cranleigh Railway Line
    Reinstating Rail and River Routes from Guildford - The Cranleigh Railway Line This article relates to a planning application WA/2020/0004 dated 02 January 2020 and placed before Waverley Borough Council by the Wey and Arun Canal Trust. It concerns the conflicts of interest that arise between various organisations; together with a wider question about transport infrastructure and connectivity at both local and national levels Our colleagues at Gru- Guildford Railway Users Group recently alerted us that a Waverley Council decision is still pending for the planning application to which both Gru, The Guildford Society and others have objected. Since the application date, various transport reports and government announcements have also been made which we feel have a bearing on this decision. Opened In 1816, The Wey & Arun Junction Canal linked the Wey Navigation near Guildford to the south coast via the Arun Navigation. It was intended to provide a safe, efficient route from the River Thames and London to Portsmouth to carry goods supplying the naval dockyards. However, the arrival of the railways led to its demise and by 1871 it was formally closed and over the passing years the canal fell into a state of disrepair and non-use. WACT is gradually trying to reinstate the canal that used to connect these two navigable rivers between the Thames and the South Coast and have had loyal support and much success in restoring many miles of waterway for use by leisure craft. However, a number of canal sections remain to be joined up and the WACT have various projects towards this aim.
    [Show full text]
  • Affordable Housing Statement
    Land at Pill Green Pill, Bristol Representations to the JSP Publication Version - Transport Report for January 2018 Hydrock reference: 0870-HYD-XX-XX-RP-TP-0001-P3 Gallagher Estates Land at Pill Green, Pill, Bristol Representations to the JSP Publication Version – Transport (ref: 0870-HYD-XX-XX-RP-TP-0001-P3) DOCUMENT CONTROL SHEET Issued by: Hydrock Consultants Limited Over Court Barns Over Lane Almondsbury Bristol BS32 4DF Tel: 01454 619533 Fax: 01454 614125 www.hydrock.com Client: Gallagher Estates Project: Land at Pill Green, Pill, Bristol Document Title: Representations to the JSP Publication Version – Transport Date: January 2018 Copy No.: 03 Document Production Record Issue Purpose/Status Prepared by Checked Approved Date 01 Draft for coordination Eliot King/David Cooke James McKechnie James McKechnie 20/12/2017 02 For submission Eliot King/David Cooke Eliot King Rory McHugh 21/12/2017 03 For submission Eliot King/David Eliot King David Chapman 09/01/2018 Cooke/David Chapman Hydrock has prepared this report in accordance with the instructions of the above named client for their sole and specific use. Any other persons who may use the information contained herein do so at their own risk. i Gallagher Estates Land at Pill Green, Pill, Bristol Representations to the JSP Publication Version – Transport (ref: 0870-HYD-XX-XX-RP-TP-0001-P3) CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Overview .....................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • London and South Coast Rail Corridor Study: Terms of Reference
    LONDON & SOUTH COAST RAIL CORRIDOR STUDY DEPARTMENT FOR TRANSPORT APRIL 2016 LONDON & SOUTH COAST RAIL CORRIDOR STUDY DEPARTMENT FOR TRANSPORT FINAL Project no: PPRO 4-92-157 / 3511970BN Date: April 2016 WSP | Parsons Brinckerhoff WSP House 70 Chancery Lane London WC2A 1AF Tel: +44 (0) 20 7314 5000 Fax: +44 (0) 20 7314 5111 www.wspgroup.com www.pbworld.com iii TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..............................................................1 2 INTRODUCTION ...........................................................................2 2.1 STUDY CONTEXT ............................................................................................. 2 2.2 TERMS OF REFERENCE .................................................................................. 2 3 PROBLEM DEFINITION ...............................................................5 3.1 ‘DO NOTHING’ DEMAND ASSESSMENT ........................................................ 5 3.2 ‘DO NOTHING’ CAPACITY ASSESSMENT ..................................................... 7 4 REVIEWING THE OPTIONS ...................................................... 13 4.1 STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT.................................................................... 13 4.2 RAIL SCHEME PROPOSALS ......................................................................... 13 4.3 PACKAGE DEFINITION .................................................................................. 19 5 THE BML UPGRADE PACKAGE .............................................. 21 5.1 THE PROPOSALS ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Working Timetable
    BOOK PF WORKING TIMETABLE SUNDAY 09 DECEMBER 2012 to SATURDAY 18 MAY 2013 FREIGHT AND DEPARTMENTAL SERVICES Section PF01 OLD OAK COMMON TO READING OLD OAK COMMON TO READING Mondays to Fridays 10 December to 29 March 12345678910111213141516 Signal ID 6V32 6V32 4V32 4V32 6V43 3Q39 6O95 6V88 4V14 4V14 4V14 4V14 6V32 0G56 0A55 6V22 Orig. Dep. Time 22.10 21.01 18.30 18.30 21.24 19.12 23.36 22.34 22.14 22.14 22.08 22.08 22.10 23.44 Orig. Loc. Name Dagenham Dagenham Felixstowe Felixstowe Bow Depot Derby Westbourne Northfleet Dollands Moor Dollands Moor Dollands Moor Dollands Moor Dagenham Dagenham Down Yard Down Yard North F.L.T. North F.L.T. (Olympics) R.T.C.(Network Park (Gbrf) Lafarge Sdgs Sdgs Sdgs Sdgs Down Yard Dock A.R.C. Rail) Dest. Loc. Name Cardiff Tidal T.C.Cardiff Tidal T.C. Bristol Bristol Merehead East Ham Northfleet Westbourne South Marston South Marston South Marston South Marston Cardiff Tidal T.C. Northolt Sidings Acton T.C. Whatley Quarry Freightliner Trml Freightliner Trml Quarry E.M.U.D. Lafarge Park (Gbrf) Euro Terminl Euro Terminl Euro Terminl Euro Terminl Timing Load 60-66S16 60-66S16 75C66S12 75C66S12 60-TR40 UTU24T 60-66S24 60-66S08 75-TR40 75-TR40 75-TR40 75-TR40 60-66S16 LD75 LD60 60-59S06 Operating Characteristics QY Y Q Q Q Q QY QY Y Y Q Dates Of Operation TThO Sun Until TO WO FSX MO FSX Sun MO Until MO From MO Until MO From MWO MO MSX MSX 10/02/2013 11/02/2013 18/02/2013 11/02/2013 18/02/2013 Until Until 25/03/2013 25/03/2013 Old Oak Common C.S.
    [Show full text]