Population Francophone De L'ontario Par Subdivision De Recensement

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Population Francophone De L'ontario Par Subdivision De Recensement Population francophone de l'Ontario par subdivision de recensement Population % de Municipalité (Subdivision de recensement) Population totale francophone francophones Abitibi 70 IRI 01900 145 5 3.4% Addington Highlands TP 00000 2,260 40 1.8% Adelaide-Metcalfe TP 00000 2,985 25 0.8% Adjala-Tosorontio TP 00000 10,970 170 1.5% Admaston/Bromley TP 00000 2,935 50 1.7% Ajax T 00000 119,215 2,525 2.1% Akwesasne (Part) 59 IRI 03300 1,470 20 1.4% Alberton TP 00000 965 15 1.6% Alderville First Nation IRI 01200 495 10 2.0% Alfred and Plantagenet TP 00000 9,550 7,440 77.9% Algoma 20000 112,725 7,595 6.7% Algoma, Unorganized, North Part NO 00000 5,740 315 5.5% Algonquin Highlands TP 00100 2,355 30 1.3% Alnwick/Haldimand TP 00000 6,860 95 1.4% Amaranth TP 00000 4,075 50 1.2% Amherstburg T 00000 21,770 715 3.3% Armour TP 00000 1,410 35 2.5% Armstrong TP 00000 1,170 695 59.4% Arnprior T 00000 8,610 400 4.6% Aroland 83 IRI 02300 365 0 0.0% Arran-Elderslie MU 00000 6,740 30 0.4% Ashfield-Colborne-Wawanosh TP 00000 5,420 40 0.7% Asphodel-Norwood TP 00000 3,990 45 1.1% Assiginack TP 00100 1,015 45 4.4% Athens TP 00000 2,955 65 2.2% Atikokan T 00000 2,705 85 3.1% Attawapiskat 91A IRI 03300 1,500 5 0.3% Augusta TP 00000 7,340 270 3.7% Aurora T 00000 54,955 1,100 2.0% Aylmer T 00000 7,425 40 0.5% Baldwin TP 00000 620 105 16.9% Bancroft T 00000 3,770 60 1.6% Barrie CY 00000 140,090 3,715 2.7% Bayham MU 00000 7,400 65 0.9% Bear Island 1 IRI 01900 150 0 0.0% Bearskin Lake IRI 01100 355 0 0.0% Beckwith TP 00000 7,645 460 6.0% Belleville CY 00000 49,885 930 1.9% Big Grassy River 35G IRI 01900 235 0 0.0% Billings TP 00000 605 55 9.1% Black River-Matheson TP 00000 2,415 740 30.6% Blandford-Blenheim TP 00000 7,390 60 0.8% Blind River T 00000 3,430 635 18.5% Bluewater MU 00000 6,990 60 0.9% Bonfield TP 00000 1,975 565 28.6% Bonnechere Valley TP 00000 3,630 120 3.3% Bracebridge T 00000 15,770 230 1.5% Bradford West Gwillimbury T 00000 34,990 600 1.7% Brampton CY 00000 591,670 8,930 1.5% Brant 20000 133,350 1,650 1.2% Population francophone de l'Ontario par subdivision de recensement Population % de Municipalité (Subdivision de recensement) Population totale francophone francophones Brant CY 00000 36,185 350 1.0% Brantford CY 00000 96,560 1,305 1.4% Brethour TP 00900 95 10 10.5% Brighton MU 00000 11,230 305 2.7% Brock TP 00000 11,405 110 1.0% Brockton MU 00000 9,295 60 0.6% Brockville CY 00000 21,145 710 3.4% Brooke-Alvinston MU 00000 2,410 20 0.8% Bruce 00000 67,190 765 1.1% Bruce Mines T 00000 580 15 2.6% Brudenell, Lyndoch and Raglan TP 00000 1,505 20 1.3% Burk's Falls VL 00000 980 15 1.5% Burlington CY 00000 181,150 4,125 2.3% Burpee and Mills TP 00000 340 10 2.9% Caledon T 00000 66,275 865 1.3% Callander MU 00000 3,865 430 11.1% Calvin MU 00000 515 75 14.6% Cambridge CY 00000 128,600 2,185 1.7% Carleton Place T 00000 10,320 535 5.2% Carling TP 00000 1,125 30 2.7% Carlow/Mayo TP 00000 865 15 1.7% Casey TP 00000 370 200 54.1% Casselman VL 00000 3,500 2,850 81.4% Cat Lake 63C IRI 00200 565 5 0.9% Cavan Monaghan TP 00000 8,620 100 1.2% Central Elgin MU 00000 12,550 130 1.0% Central Frontenac TP 00000 4,335 75 1.7% Central Huron MU 00000 7,565 65 0.9% Central Manitoulin MU 00000 2,055 85 4.1% Centre Hastings MU 00000 4,755 50 1.1% Centre Wellington TP 00000 27,660 345 1.2% Chamberlain TP 00000 335 20 6.0% Champlain TP 00000 8,570 5,440 63.5% Chapleau TP 00000 1,940 705 36.3% Chapple TP 00000 630 10 1.6% Charlton and Dack MU 00100 685 55 8.0% Chatham-Kent 00000 101,085 2,970 2.9% Chatham-Kent MU 00000 100,685 2,970 2.9% Chatsworth TP 00000 6,570 50 0.8% Chippewas of Georgina Island First Nation IRI 01200 260 0 0.0% Chisholm TP 00000 1,290 180 14.0% Christian Island 30 IRI 00100 615 10 1.6% Christian Island 30A IRI 00900 45 0 0.0% Clarence-Rockland C 00000 24,205 15,820 65.4% Clarington MU 00000 91,270 1,815 2.0% Clearview TP 00000 13,945 195 1.4% Cobalt T 00100 1,125 200 17.8% Cobourg T 00000 19,145 375 2.0% Cochrane 00000 78,930 35,550 45.0% Cochrane T 00000 5,260 2,105 40.0% Population francophone de l'Ontario par subdivision de recensement Population % de Municipalité (Subdivision de recensement) Population totale francophone francophones Cochrane, Unorganized, North Part NO 00100 2,845 1,420 49.9% Coleman TP 00100 595 135 22.7% Collingwood T 00000 21,500 355 1.7% Conmee TP 00000 820 5 0.6% Constance Lake 92 IRI 01200 590 5 0.8% Cornwall CY 00000 45,625 11,500 25.2% Couchiching 16A IRI 01200 810 5 0.6% Cramahe TP 00000 6,355 90 1.4% Curve Lake First Nation 35 IRI 01200 1,060 5 0.5% Dawn-Euphemia TP 00000 1,965 15 0.8% Dawson TP 00000 470 15 3.2% Deep River T 00000 4,065 235 5.8% Deer Lake IRI 01200 865 5 0.6% Deseronto T 00100 1,775 15 0.8% Dokis 9 IRI 04300 345 25 7.2% Dorion TP 00000 315 25 7.9% Douro-Dummer TP 00000 6,705 70 1.0% Drummond/North Elmsley TP 00000 7,760 260 3.4% Dryden CY 00000 7,710 200 2.6% Dubreuilville TP 00000 615 520 84.6% Duck Lake 76B IRI 01900 85 5 5.9% Dufferin 00000 61,180 890 1.5% Durham 00000 640,985 13,360 2.1% Dutton/Dunwich MU 00000 3,810 45 1.2% Dysart et al MU 00000 6,185 65 1.1% Eagle Lake 27 IRI 00900 225 0 0.0% Ear Falls TP 00100 995 50 5.0% East Ferris MU 00000 4,610 1,170 25.4% East Garafraxa TP 00000 2,575 40 1.6% East Gwillimbury T 00000 23,610 375 1.6% East Hawkesbury TP 00000 3,250 2,030 62.5% East Zorra-Tavistock TP 00000 6,970 65 0.9% Edwardsburgh/Cardinal TP 00000 7,095 335 4.7% Elgin 00000 87,940 985 1.1% Elizabethtown-Kitley TP 00000 9,400 255 2.7% Elliot Lake CY 00000 10,660 1,745 16.4% Emo TP 00000 1,320 15 1.1% Englehart T 00000 1,435 95 6.6% English River 21 IRI 01300 635 0 0.0% Enniskillen TP 00000 2,665 30 1.1% Erin T 00000 11,410 210 1.8% Espanola T 00000 4,915 705 14.3% Essa TP 00100 21,055 1,485 7.1% Essex 00000 395,110 14,635 3.7% Essex T 00100 20,250 565 2.8% Evanturel TP 00000 445 65 14.6% Factory Island 1 IRI 01200 1,560 5 0.3% Faraday TP 00000 1,400 15 1.1% Fauquier-Strickland TP 00000 535 395 73.8% Fort Albany (Part) 67 IRI 02300 760 5 0.7% Population francophone de l'Ontario par subdivision de recensement Population % de Municipalité (Subdivision de recensement) Population totale francophone francophones Fort Albany (Part) 67 IRI 02300 1,400 0 0.0% Fort Erie T 00000 30,350 630 2.1% Fort Frances T 00000 7,570 90 1.2% Fort Hope 64 IRI 01200 1,015 0 0.0% Fort Severn 89 IRI 02300 360 0 0.0% Fort William 52 IRI 04300 980 10 1.0% French River / Rivière des Français M 00000 2,655 1,260 47.5% French River 13 IRI 01900 120 5 4.2% Front of Yonge TP 00000 2,595 50 1.9% Frontenac 00000 147,500 5,845 4.0% Frontenac Islands TP 00000 1,760 35 2.0% Gananoque T 00000 5,005 135 2.7% Garden River 14 IRI 01200 1,125 20 1.8% Gauthier TP 00900 140 25 17.9% Georgian Bay TP 00000 2,495 55 2.2% Georgian Bluffs TP 00000 10,455 85 0.8% Georgina T 00000 44,850 650 1.4% Gillies TP 00000 475 10 2.1% Ginoogaming First Nation IRI 03900 210 0 0.0% Goderich T 00000 7,440 85 1.1% Gordon/Barrie Island MU 00000 490 20 4.1% Gore Bay T 00000 805 15 1.9% Grand Valley T 00000 2,950 55 1.9% Gravenhurst T 00100 11,170 140 1.3% Greater Madawaska TP 00000 2,520 100 4.0% Greater Napanee T 00000 15,480 250 1.6% Greater Sudbury / Grand Sudbury 00000 159,855 44,185 27.6% Greater Sudbury / Grand Sudbury CV 00000 159,740 44,185 27.7% Greenstone MU 00100 4,590 1,190 25.9% Grey 00000 92,560 1,020 1.1% Grey Highlands MU 00000 9,735 125 1.3% Grimsby T 00000 26,925 355 1.3% Gros Cap 49 IRI 01900 75 5 6.7% Guelph CY 00000 130,780 2,335 1.8% Guelph/Eramosa TP 00000 12,725 185 1.5% Haldimand County CY 00000 45,145 450 1.0% Haldimand-Norfolk 20000 108,550 1,190 1.1% Haliburton 00000 17,905 215 1.2% Halton 00000 544,020 13,530 2.5% Halton Hills T 00000 60,765 1,405 2.3% Hamilton 00000 530,635 9,655 1.8% Hamilton C 00000 530,635 9,655 1.8% Hamilton TP 00000 10,940 170 1.6% Hanover T 00000 7,385 70 0.9% Harley TP 00000 550 185 33.6% Harris TP 00000 545 195 35.8% Hastings 00000 134,750 3,510 2.6% Hastings Highlands MU 00000 4,075 55 1.3% Havelock-Belmont-Methuen TP 00000 4,530 65 1.4% Hawkesbury T 00000 10,040 8,125 80.9% Population francophone de l'Ontario par subdivision de recensement Population % de Municipalité (Subdivision de recensement) Population totale francophone francophones Head, Clara and Maria TP 00900 250 20 8.0% Hearst T 00000 4,975 4,415 88.7% Hiawatha First Nation IRI 00100 365 5 1.4% Highlands East MU 00000 3,345 45 1.3% Hilliard TP 00900 225 55 24.4% Hilton Beach VL 00900 175 10 5.7% Hilton TP 00000 305 10 3.3% Hornepayne TP 00100 965 145 15.0% Horton TP 00000 2,885 85 2.9% Howick TP 00000 3,840 25 0.7% Hudson TP 00000 505 100 19.8% Huntsville T 00000 19,610 335 1.7% Huron 00000 58,355 465 0.8% Huron East MU 00000 9,030 60 0.7% Huron Shores MU 00000 1,665 120 7.2% Huron-Kinloss TP 00100 6,945 70 1.0% Ignace TP 00000 1,205 105 8.7% Ingersoll T 00000 12,620 120 1.0% Innisfil T 00000 36,555 615 1.7% Iroquois Falls T 00000 4,415 1,825 41.3% James TP 00000 420 105 25.0% Jocelyn TP 00000 315 10 3.2% Johnson TP 00100 750 10 1.3% Joly TP 00000 305 5 1.6% Kapuskasing T 00000 8,205 5,580 68.0% Kasabonika Lake IRI 01200 850 0 0.0% Kawartha Lakes 00000 74,240 980 1.3% Kawartha Lakes CY 00000 74,240 980 1.3% Kearney T 00000 880 15 1.7% Kee-Way-Win IRI 01200 425 0 0.0% Kenora 21100 65,150 1,290 2.0% Kenora 38B IRI 01300 420 0 0.0% Kenora CY 00000 14,830 315 2.1% Kenora, Unorganized NO 00100 6,735 200 3.0% Kerns TP 00000 360 35 9.7% Kettle Point 44 IRI 02300 1,010 5 0.5% Killaloe, Hagarty and Richards TP 00000 2,420 55 2.3% Killarney MU 00100 385 30 7.8% Kincardine MU 00000 11,220 200 1.8% King TP 00000 24,395 295 1.2% Kingfisher Lake 1 IRI
Recommended publications
  • POPULATION PROFILE 2006 Census Porcupine Health Unit
    POPULATION PROFILE 2006 Census Porcupine Health Unit Kapuskasing Iroquois Falls Hearst Timmins Porcupine Cochrane Moosonee Hornepayne Matheson Smooth Rock Falls Population Profile Foyez Haque, MBBS, MHSc Public Health Epidemiologist published by: Th e Porcupine Health Unit Timmins, Ontario October 2009 ©2009 Population Profile - 2006 Census Acknowledgements I would like to express gratitude to those without whose support this Population Profile would not be published. First of all, I would like to thank the management committee of the Porcupine Health Unit for their continuous support of and enthusiasm for this publication. Dr. Dennis Hong deserves a special thank you for his thorough revision. Thanks go to Amanda Belisle for her support with editing, creating such a wonderful cover page, layout and promotion of the findings of this publication. I acknowledge the support of the Statistics Canada for history and description of the 2006 Census and also the definitions of the variables. Porcupine Health Unit – 1 Population Profile - 2006 Census 2 – Porcupine Health Unit Population Profile - 2006 Census Table of Contents Acknowledgements . 1 Preface . 5 Executive Summary . 7 A Brief History of the Census in Canada . 9 A Brief Description of the 2006 Census . 11 Population Pyramid. 15 Appendix . 31 Definitions . 35 Table of Charts Table 1: Population distribution . 12 Table 2: Age and gender characteristics. 14 Figure 3: Aboriginal status population . 16 Figure 4: Visible minority . 17 Figure 5: Legal married status. 18 Figure 6: Family characteristics in Ontario . 19 Figure 7: Family characteristics in Porcupine Health Unit area . 19 Figure 8: Low income cut-offs . 20 Figure 11: Mother tongue .
    [Show full text]
  • Rank of Pops
    Table 1.3 Basic Pop Trends County by County Census 2001 - place names pop_1996 pop_2001 % diff rank order absolute 1996-01 Sorted by absolute pop growth on growth pop growth - Canada 28,846,761 30,007,094 1,160,333 4.0 - Ontario 10,753,573 11,410,046 656,473 6.1 - York Regional Municipality 1 592,445 729,254 136,809 23.1 - Peel Regional Municipality 2 852,526 988,948 136,422 16.0 - Toronto Division 3 2,385,421 2,481,494 96,073 4.0 - Ottawa Division 4 721,136 774,072 52,936 7.3 - Durham Regional Municipality 5 458,616 506,901 48,285 10.5 - Simcoe County 6 329,865 377,050 47,185 14.3 - Halton Regional Municipality 7 339,875 375,229 35,354 10.4 - Waterloo Regional Municipality 8 405,435 438,515 33,080 8.2 - Essex County 9 350,329 374,975 24,646 7.0 - Hamilton Division 10 467,799 490,268 22,469 4.8 - Wellington County 11 171,406 187,313 15,907 9.3 - Middlesex County 12 389,616 403,185 13,569 3.5 - Niagara Regional Municipality 13 403,504 410,574 7,070 1.8 - Dufferin County 14 45,657 51,013 5,356 11.7 - Brant County 15 114,564 118,485 3,921 3.4 - Northumberland County 16 74,437 77,497 3,060 4.1 - Lanark County 17 59,845 62,495 2,650 4.4 - Muskoka District Municipality 18 50,463 53,106 2,643 5.2 - Prescott and Russell United Counties 19 74,013 76,446 2,433 3.3 - Peterborough County 20 123,448 125,856 2,408 2.0 - Elgin County 21 79,159 81,553 2,394 3.0 - Frontenac County 22 136,365 138,606 2,241 1.6 - Oxford County 23 97,142 99,270 2,128 2.2 - Haldimand-Norfolk Regional Municipality 24 102,575 104,670 2,095 2.0 - Perth County 25 72,106 73,675
    [Show full text]
  • First Nations' Community Well-Being in the 21St Century
    Tom Flanagan GAINING GROUND, LOSING GROUND First Nations’ Community Well-Being in the 21st Century 2019 2019 • Fraser Institute Gaining Ground, Losing Ground First Nations’ Community Well-Being in the 21st Century by Tom Flanagan fraserinstitute.org Contents Executive summary / i The Community Well-Being Index / 2 Progress and Regress / 4 Gaining Ground / 7 Losing Ground / 11 Location, Location, Location? / 13 Policy Implications / 16 References / 20 About the Author / 23 Acknowledgments / 23 Publishing Information / 24 Supporting the Fraser Institute / 25 Purpose, Funding, and Independence / 26 About the Fraser Institute / 27 Editorial Advisory Board / 28 fraserinstitute.org Flanagan x Gaining Ground, Losing Ground x i Executive summary In May 2019, the Government of Canada released the tables for the Community Well- Being Index (CWB) based on the 2016 census. This provides an opportunity to revisit the issue of First Nations’ standard of living and quality of life. Some First Nations made rapid progress from 2001 to 2016, as measured by the CWB. Others lost ground, in some cases substantial ground. This report will examine both groups in a search for factors associated with First Nations’ progress and regress. The good news for First Nations reserve communities is that their average CWB increased steadily over the 35 years from 1981 to 2016. Less good is the news that the gap between First Nations and other Canadian communities, after seeming to narrow a little in the 1990s, widened again and was almost as great in 2016 (19.1 points) as it was in 1981 (19.5 points). CWB scores are used in this paper to construct a new variable called Community Well-Being Change, 2001–2016, abbreviated as CWB-C.
    [Show full text]
  • Reliability Performance Overview February 21, 2018 Agenda
    First Nations – Reliability Performance Overview February 21, 2018 Agenda Hydro One Operations Review Historical Reliability Performance First Nations Communities Supply 2017 Transmission Reliability Transmission Reliability Improvements 2017 Distribution Reliability Distribution Grid Modernization Planned Work on Assets Serving First Nations Communities 2 Privileged and Confidential – Internal Use Only TOR 170419 Operations Performance ... HYDRO ONE OPERATIONS REVIEW 1005 Distribution Stations 3 Privileged and Confidential – Internal Use Only TOR 170419 Operations Performance ... First Nations Communities Supply Distribution Lines - “Feeders” Generating Step-Up Transmission Step-down Distribution Customer Station Lines Transmission Transformer Stations (First Nation Stations Communities) First Nations Communities: Supplied from 68 Transmission Lines, 59 Transmission Delivery Points and 109 Distribution Feeders 4 4 Privileged and Confidential – Internal Use Only TOR 170419 Operations Performance ... 2017 Transmission System Reliability Performance 2017 Year End Overall Transmission Performance: SAIDI was 42.8 min and SAIFI was 1.1 interruptions per customer delivery point. Main causes of these interruptions are 1) Weather 2) Defective Equipment and 3) Unconfirmed 5 Privileged and Confidential – Internal Use Only TOR 170419 Operations Performance ... Tx System – Primary Causes of Interruptions: (~66% from Weather & Equipment Failures) Power outage causes (2017) Weather 48% Adverse weather (freezing rain, ice, lightning) Equipment
    [Show full text]
  • Operational Review Report Submitted To: Lake of the Woods District Hospital
    www.BIGhealthcare.ca Operational Review Report Submitted to: Lake of the Woods District Hospital BIG Healthcare 60 Atlantic Avenue Suite 200 Toronto, Ontario M6K 1X9 www.BIGhealthcare.ca June 6, 2018 Benchmark Intelligence Group Inc. 60 Atlantic Avenue, Suite 200, Toronto, ON, M6K1X9 www.BIGhealthcare.ca Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................. 1 LISTING OF RECOMMENDATIONS ........................................................................................ 8 1.0 BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES .............................................................................. 17 1.1 LAKE OF THE WOODS DISTRICT HOSPITAL ................................................................... 17 1.2 PROJECT BACKGROUND ................................................................................................ 18 1.3 PROJECT OBJECTIVES .................................................................................................... 18 1.4 STEERING COMMITTEE .................................................................................................. 19 1.5 PEER FACILITIES ........................................................................................................... 19 2.0 UNDERSTANDING THE HOSPITAL ............................................................................. 21 2.1 CLINICAL ACTIVITY DATA SOURCES ............................................................................ 21 2.2 LWDH CAPACITY AND CLINICAL PROFILE .................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • CSD Code Census Subdivision (CSD) Name 2011 Income Score
    2011 Income 2011 Education 2011 Housing 2011 Labour Force 2011 CWB 2011 Global Non‐ Type of 2011 NHS CSD Code Census subdivision (CSD) name Score Score Score Activity Score Score Response Province Collectivity Population 1001105 Portugal Cove South 67 36% Newfoundland and Labrador Non‐Aboriginal 160 1001113 Trepassey 90 42 95 71 74 35% Newfoundland and Labrador Non‐Aboriginal 545 1001131 Renews‐Cappahayden 78 46 95 82 75 35% Newfoundland and Labrador Non‐Aboriginal 310 1001144 Aquaforte 72 31% Newfoundland and Labrador Non‐Aboriginal 90 1001149 Ferryland 78 53 94 70 74 48% Newfoundland and Labrador Non‐Aboriginal 465 1001169 St. Vincent's‐St. Stephen's‐Peter's River 81 54 94 69 74 37% Newfoundland and Labrador Non‐Aboriginal 315 1001174 Gaskiers‐Point La Haye 71 39% Newfoundland and Labrador Non‐Aboriginal 235 1001186 Admirals Beach 79 22% Newfoundland and Labrador Non‐Aboriginal 85 1001192 St. Joseph's 72 27% Newfoundland and Labrador Non‐Aboriginal 125 1001203 Division No. 1, Subd. X 76 44 91 77 72 45% Newfoundland and Labrador Non‐Aboriginal 495 1001228 St. Bride's 76 38 96 78 72 24% Newfoundland and Labrador Non‐Aboriginal 295 1001281 Chance Cove 74 40% Newfoundland and Labrador Non‐Aboriginal 120 1001289 Chapel Arm 79 47 92 78 74 38% Newfoundland and Labrador Non‐Aboriginal 405 1001304 Division No. 1, Subd. E 80 48 96 78 76 20% Newfoundland and Labrador Non‐Aboriginal 2990 1001308 Whiteway 80 50 93 82 76 25% Newfoundland and Labrador Non‐Aboriginal 255 1001321 Division No. 1, Subd. F 74 41 98 70 71 45% Newfoundland and Labrador Non‐Aboriginal 550 1001328 New Perlican 66 28% Newfoundland and Labrador Non‐Aboriginal 120 1001332 Winterton 78 38 95 61 68 41% Newfoundland and Labrador Non‐Aboriginal 475 1001339 Division No.
    [Show full text]
  • Child and Youth Mental Health Outcomes Report 2017 Table of Contents
    Northwestern Health Unit Child and Youth Mental Health Outcomes Report 2017 Table of Contents Acknowledgements .................................................................................................................................... 2 Executive summary .................................................................................................................................... 3 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 4 NWHU catchment area map ..................................................................................................................... 5 Mortality ....................................................................................................................................................... 6 Suicide ..................................................................................................................................................... 6 Hospitalization............................................................................................................................................. 7 Intentional self-harm .............................................................................................................................. 7 Mental and behavioural disorders ....................................................................................................... 9 Substance misuse ...............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Targeted Residential Fire Risk Reduction a Summary of At-Risk Aboriginal Areas in Canada
    Targeted Residential Fire Risk Reduction A Summary of At-Risk Aboriginal Areas in Canada Len Garis, Sarah Hughan, Paul Maxim, and Alex Tyakoff October 2016 Executive Summary Despite the steady reduction in rates of fire that have been witnessed in Canada in recent years, ongoing research has demonstrated that there continue to be striking inequalities in the way in which fire risk is distributed through society. It is well-established that residential dwelling fires are not distributed evenly through society, but that certain sectors in Canada experience disproportionate numbers of incidents. Oftentimes, it is the most vulnerable segments of society who face the greatest risk of fire and can least afford the personal and property damage it incurs. Fire risks are accentuated when property owners or occupiers fail to install and maintain fire and life safety devices such smoke alarms and carbon monoxide detectors in their homes. These life saving devices are proven to be highly effective, inexpensive to obtain and, in most cases, Canadian fire services will install them for free. A key component of driving down residential fire rates in Canadian cities, towns, hamlets and villages is the identification of communities where fire risk is greatest. Using the internationally recognized Home Safe methodology described in this study, the following Aboriginal and Non- Aboriginal communities in provinces and territories across Canada are determined to be at heightened risk of residential fire. These communities would benefit from a targeted smoke alarm give-away program and public education campaign to reduce the risk of residential fires and ensure the safety and well-being of all Canadian citizens.
    [Show full text]
  • Northwestern Health Unit Catchment Area Regional COVID-19 Cases
    March 30, 2021 07:30 a.m. COVID-19 Statistics: Northwestern Health Unit Catchment Area Northwestern Health Unit (NWHU) receives lab confirmation about COVID-19 cases when testing is complete. Before sharing this information with media or posting it to our website, we have to be sure of the facts. We conduct a full investigation on each case to ensure that the report is about a resident of the NWHU area and to determine what risk there is to the community. We act quickly to ensure that positive cases and contacts are in isolation – this is important for minimizing risk to the community. We ask that you wait to share any information about cases until NWHU has confirmed and shared them on our webpage or social media. NWHU updates data on our website by 1 pm, (not including statutory holidays) with any new information. For reasons of privacy, NWHU does not release the location of the residence of people who test positive for COVID-19. For more information see Ontario's COVID-19 data tool. Regional COVID-19 Cases within the NWHU Catchment Area Health Hub Active Cases Resolved Cases Total Cases Atikokan 0 17 17 Dryden 9 29 38 Emo 0 8 8 Fort Frances 0 41 41 Kenora 10 387 397 Rainy River 0 28 28 Red Lake 0 20 20 Sioux Lookout 16 113 129 Other ** 0 5 5 Totals 35 648 683 Atikokan Dryden Emo Fort Frances Kenora Rainy River Red Lake Sioux Lookout Other ** 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 Resolved Cases Active Cases 1 • Source: Case and Contact Management System (CCM).
    [Show full text]
  • July 10, 2017 Via Electronic Email: [email protected] Phillip Vinet
    July 10, 2017 Via Electronic Email: [email protected] Phillip Vinet, Mayor 2 Fifth Street P.O. Box1000 Balmertown, Ontario P0V 1C0 Greetings Mayor Vinet: RE: Far North Electoral Boundaries Commission – Release of Preliminary Report Thank you for hosting the Far North Electoral Boundaries Commission’s public information session. We are pleased to release the Preliminary Report including the Commission’s recommendations. For your reference, an electronic copy of the report has been attached to this letter. Hard copies of the Preliminary Report will follow by regular mail. The Far North Electoral Boundaries Commission will be accepting submissions on the Preliminary Report and recommendations in preparation of our final report and final recommendations due to the Honourable Minister Yasir Naqvi on August 1, 2017. Given the quickly approaching deadline of August 1, 2017 the Commission strongly encourages you to submit written submissions via email to [email protected] as soon as possible. We will be receiving written submissions until 5 p.m. on July 13 th , 2017. We look forward to hearing from you and to the release of the Commission’s final report. Respectfully, The Honourable Joyce L. Pelletier Judge, Ontario Court of Justice Chair, Far North Electoral Boundaries Commission fnebc-cdcegn.ca 101-981 Balmoral Street 1-844-853-0958 Thunder Bay, Ontario P7B 0A6 Table of Contents 1. Executive Summary .................................................................................................. 5 2. Signatures of Commissioners ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Respondent's Factum
    S.C.C. File No. 35475 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA (ON APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO) B E T W E E N: HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Appellant - and - CLIFFORD KOKOPENACE Respondent - and - ABORIGINAL LEGAL SERVICES OF TORONTO INC., THE ADVOCATES’ SOCIETY, CANADIAN ASSOCIATION OF ELIZABETH FRY SOCIETIES, THE DAVID ASPER CENTRE FOR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS, NATIVE WOMEN’S ASSOCIATION OF CANADA, NISHNAWBE ASKI NATION and WOMEN’S LEGAL EDUCATION AND ACTION FUND INC. Interveners RESPONDENT’S FACTUM DOUCETTE BONI SANTORO FURGIUELE GOWLING LAFLEUR HENDERSON LLP 20 Dundas Street West, Suite 1100 160 Elgin Street, Suite 2600 Toronto, ON M5G 2G8 Ottawa, ON K1P 1C3 Delmar Doucette & Angela Ruffo Tel.: (416) 597-6907 Brian A. Crane Q.C. Fax: (416) 342-1766 Tel.: (613) 233-1781 Email: [email protected] Fax: (613) 563-9869 [email protected] Email: [email protected] SACK GOLDBLATT MITCHELL LLP Ottawa Agent for the Respondent/Moving Party, 20 Dundas Street West, Suite 1100 Clifford Kokopenace Toronto, ON M5G 2G8 Jessica Orkin Tel.: (416) 979-4381 Fax: (416) 979-4430 Email: [email protected] Counsel for the Respondent/Moving Party, Clifford Kokopenace ORIGINAL TO: THE REGISTRAR OF THIS HONOURABLE COURT COPIES TO: HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN BURKE-ROBERTSON LLP Crown Law Office Criminal 441 MacLaren Street, Suite 200 720 Bay Street, 10th Floor Ottawa, ON K2P 2H3 Toronto, ON M5G 2K1 Robert E. Houston, Q.C. Gillian E. Roberts Deborah Calderwood Tel.: (613) 236-9665 Tel.: (416) 326-2304 Fax: (613) 235-4430 Fax: (416) 326-4656 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] [email protected] Ottawa Agent for the Appellant/Responding Counsel for the Appellant/Responding Party, Party, Her Majesty the Queen Her Majesty the Queen AND TO: ABORIGINAL LEGAL SERVICES OF COMMUNITY LEGAL SERVICES TORONTO INC.
    [Show full text]
  • Timmins—James Bay 93
    PEAWANUCK Hudson Bay POLAR BEAR Provincial Park DISTRICT OF KENORA, UNORGANIZED KENORA--RAINY RIVER ATTAWAPISKAT 91A WINISK RIVER Provincial Park WEBEQUIE FORT ALBANY 67 TIMMINS---JAMES BAY FORT ALBANY 67 M is s is a L a k e OTOSKWIN-ATTAWAPISKAT RIVER Provincial Park D T R TOWN OF MOOSONEE S Y H A B C FACTORIYR ISLAND 1 B MARTEN FALLS 65 TIDEWATER Provincial Park MOOSE FACTORY 68 FORT HOPE 64 ALBANY RIVER Provincial Park KESAGAMI Provincial Park OGOKI RIVER Provincial Park LITTLE CURRENT RIVER Provincial Park WILLIAMS ISLAND Provincial Park DISTRICT OF COCHRANE, UNORGANIZED CORAL RAPIDS Provincial Park Y SEDGMAN LAKE Provincial Park HW SEXTANT RAPIDS Provincial Park 4 ADAM CREEK Provincial Park 63 ke La a Ar MATTAGAMI RIVER BEACH AND AEOLIAN DEPOSIT Provincial Park 643 HWY NEW POST 69 AROLAND 83 N T WY WI 4 H N L 58 AK ES RD NAKINA MORAINE Provincial Park LITTLE ABITIBI Provincial Park FUSHIMI LAKE Provincial Park 6 C 6 CONSTANCE LAKE 92 L CASGRAIN 3 O GROUNDHOG RIVER WATERWAY Provincial Park HANLAN H U 5 T W 8 I E 3 Y R STODDART H GILL R W McCOWAN 5 EILBER D Y McMILLAN 8 STUDHOLME Y 1 C Y 3 1 8 W HW N H 1 W O 1 TOWN OF HEARST Y 0 H H N 1 TOWNSHIP OF MATTICE-VAL COTÉ W T 4 C D H 8 R E Y DEVITT R 5 E THORNING W S WAY M S R Y 1 11 1 B WY I HW IDINGTON E WILLIAMSON H Y KENDALL O Y W L 3 H G 8 H 5 N A N RENE BRUNELLE Provincial Park CH A Y THUNDER BAY--SUPERIOR NORTH 2 ANN A NORTH DRIFTWOOD RIVER Provincial Park AM R H TOWNSHIP OL F VAL R ITA-HARTY 5 R I T FAUQUIER D 7 D B Y 1 McCREA 9 GINOOGAMING FIRST NATIONH 3 P 6 H W LOWTHER I STAUNTON T D 1 Y TOWNSHIP OF MOONBEAM W 1 Y R Y 6 SHETLAND R D Y 2 H R S Y W TOWNSHIP OF OPASATIKA D D SEP MACHIN W 5 W SON R ST.
    [Show full text]