DOCSLIB.ORG

Rural Ontario Institute

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

September 11, 2018 Page 1 of 101 C 15 - CW Info September 11, 2018 Page 2 of 101 C 15 - CW Info FOCUS ON RURAL ONTARIO 2017 FACT SHEET SERIES September 11, 2018 Page 3 of 101 C 15 - CW Info September 11, 2018 Page 4 of 101 C 15 - CW Info on Rural Ontario The Rural Ontario Institute (ROI) is a non-profit organization committed to developing leaders and facilitating collaboration on issues and opportunities facing rural and northern Ontario. This edition of Focus on Rural Ontario Fact Sheet Series includes 30 fact sheets on various socio-economic themes, with new added features such as maps and downloadable spreadsheets which include ranked data for all census subdivisions (CSD) in the province. The following themes are included: • Selected Demographics • Housing • Income Levels • Income Sources. Each theme has several Fact Sheets at census division (CD) and census subdivision level of geography and downloadable data for every jurisdiction in the province. Fact Sheets are on the Rural Ontario website at: www.ruralontarioinstitute.ca/knowledge-centre/focus-on-rural-ontario Your feedback is important to us. Please keep us posted on how you are using these Fact Sheets by emailing us at [email protected]. We look forward to hearing from you. September 11, 2018 Page 5 of 101 C 15 - CW Info on Rural Ontario Author Acknowledgement Ray Bollman Former chief of Statistics Canada Rural Research Group Former editor of the Rural and Small Town Canada Analysis Bulletins Other Contributors The maps were provided by the Rural Policy Branch, in the Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs. This information is included with the understanding that it is not guaranteed to be accurate, correct or complete and conclusions drawn from such information are the responsibility of the user. The Rural Ontario Institute acknowledges the Ontario Ministry of Agriculture and Food and Rural Affairs for their financial support of this project. September 11, 2018 Page 6 of 101 C 15 - CW Info Table of Contents SELECTED DEMOGRAPHICS 1 Children under 15 by census division 3 Children under 15 by census subdivision 7 Children under 15: Change by census division 9 Children under 15: Change by census subdivision 13 Children in lone-parent families by census division 15 Children in lone-parent families by census subdivision 19 Children in lone-parent families: Change by census division 21 Children in lone-parent families: Change by census subdivision 25 Seniors 80 years and over: Change by census division 27 Seniors 80 years and over: Change by census subdivision HOUSING 31 Dwellings needing major repairs by census division 33 Dwellings needing major repairs by census subdivision 37 Dwellings without suitable bedrooms by census division 39 Dwellings without suitable bedrooms by census subdivision 43 Dwellings needing repairs or lacking bedrooms by census division 45 Dwellings needing repairs or lacking bedrooms by census subdivision INCOME: LEVELS 49 Average income by census division 51 Average income by census subdivision 55 Population in low income by census division 57 Population in low income by census subdivision 61 Children in low income by census division 63 Children in low income by census subdivision 67 Seniors in low income by census division 69 Seniors in low income by census subdivision INCOME: SOURCES 73 Percent with employment income by census division 75 Percent with employment income by census subdivision 79 Percent with Employment Insurance regular benefits by census division 81 Percent with Employment Insurance regular benefits by census subdivision 85 Percent with Social Assistance by census division 87 Percent with Social Assistance by census subdivision 91 Expanded Excel Tables September 11, 2018 Page 7 of 101 C 15 - CW Info September 11, 2018 Page 8 of 101 C 15 - CW Info on Rural Ontario i Children under 15 years by census division Vol. 5, No. 1, 2018 Highlights • Census divisions within each type of geographic group (metro, partially non-metro and non- metro census divisions) show a range above and below the provincial average in terms of the proportion of children in the population. • While non-metro census divisions in 2016 have a wide range in the share of the population that was under 15 years of age, there are more below the provincial average than above. • Among non-metro census divisions, the range from top to bottom is wider than in any other type of geography – ranging from a low of 9.5% in the Haliburton census division to a high of 22% in the Kenora census division. Why look at children under 15 years? share were: Haliburton (9.5%), Prince Edward Demography matters. Demographic patterns drive (11.6%) and Muskoka (12.6%). the demand for both physical infrastructure and social programs and services. Areas with a greater Discussion population in a given age group should focus their The wide range in the share of this demographic age attention on the infrastructure and program needs for group (i.e., the population under 15 years of age) these age groups. For example, children generate a implies that a differing share of the local requirement for physical infrastructure such as infrastructure budget would be focussed on children, schools and sports facilities and a requirement for both the expenditure for physical infrastructure and social investment in programs and services by investment, time and energy for social services and professionals such as teachers, pediatricians and programs for children. It also indicates, for example, sports coaches. why Ontario school boards in many rural regions are closing primary schools and consolidating high Findings schools. Overall, in Ontario in 2016, 16.4% of the population was under 15 years of age (see orange line in Figure An accompanying Fact Sheet1 shows the wider 1). variation in this demographic structure across census subdivisions within non-metro CDs. Among non-metro census divisions (CDs)1, there was a wide range in the intensity or share of the population that were children under 15 years of age. In 7 of 24 non-metro CDs, the share of the population under 15 years of age was at or above the Ontario average of 16.4%. The Kenora CD had the highest share of their population under 15 years of age (22% in 2016). The remaining 17 non-metro CDs had less than the Ontario average (16.4%) of their population under the age of 15 years. The three CDs with the lowest 1 Defined in “Rural Ontario’s Demography: Census Update 2016.” Focus on Rural Ontario (Guelph: Rural Ontario Institute, March) (http://www.ruralontarioinstitute.ca/focus-on-rural-ontario.aspx). 1 Focus on Rural Ontario | Children under 15 years by CD September 11, 2018 Page 9 of 101 C 15 - CW Info Figure 1 Ranking of census divisions by percent of population under 15 years of age, Ontario, 2016 ONTARIO AVERAGE Halton Peel York Brant Ottawa Hamilton M etro Greater Sudbury CDs Toronto Elgin Dufferin Durham Waterloo Wellington Prescott & Russell Essex Simcoe Middlesex Partially Hastings -non- Lennox & Addington metro Thunder Bay Niagara CDs Frontenac Peterborough Leeds & Grenville Sudbury Kenora Perth Oxford Rainy River Cochrane Huron Chatham-Kent Renfrew Manitoulin Haldimand-Norfolk Bruce Stormont, Dundas & Glengarry Lambton Timiskaming Lanark Non- Nipissing metro Grey CDs Algoma Northumberland Kawartha Lakes Parry Sound Muskoka Prince Edward Haliburton 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 Percent of population under 15 years of age, 2016 Chart by Source: Statistics Canada. Census of Population, 2016, Table 98-400-X2016004. [email protected] Rural Ontario Institute gratefully acknowledges the work of Ray Bollman in preparing this edition of Focus on Rural Ontario. Questions on data sources can be directed to [email protected]. Any comments or discussions can be directed to [email protected]. i This is a companion to the Focus on Rural Ontario Fact Sheet entitled “Children under 15 years by census subdivision.” 2 Focus on Rural Ontario | Children under 15 years by CD September 11, 2018 Page 10 of 101 C 15 - CW Info on Rural Ontario Children under 15 years: Numbers by census subdivisioni Vol 5, No. 2, 2018 Highlights • In 2016, among census subdivisions (CSDs) within non-metro census divisions (CDs), the number of children under 15 years of age, as a percent of the total population, ranged from 2.9% to 42.1%. • Compared to the distribution of CSDs in partially-non-metro or metro CDs, there is a wider distribution of CSDs in non-metro CDs in terms of the percent of the population that are children (i.e., relatively more CSDs have a high share of children and relatively more CSDs have a low share of children). Why look at children under 15 years? CDs, there are more CSDs within non-metro CDs Demographic structure drives the demand for both with a few children and more CSDs with many physical and social infrastructure. The number of children (Table 2). In 2016, 17% of the CSDs had a children implies the need for specific infrastructure population with fewer than 12% being children (under (such as schools and sports facilities) and social 15 years) and 31% of the CSDs had over 20% of programming and services (such as those provided their population being children. by teachers, pediatricians and sports coaches). Discussion Findings A wide range in the share of children in the Table 1 displays the top 5 and bottom 5 census population of a community means there is a wide subdivisions1 (CSDs) in the metro and partially-non- range in the demand for infrastructure and social metro geography categories as sorted by percent of programming needed for children. population that is children. It also shows the top 10 and bottom 10 CSDs within non-metro Ontario.
Recommended publications
  • Population Francophone De L'ontario Par Subdivision De Recensement

    Population Francophone De L'ontario Par Subdivision De Recensement

    Population francophone de l'Ontario par subdivision de recensement Population % de Municipalité (Subdivision de recensement) Population totale francophone francophones Abitibi 70 IRI 01900 145 5 3.4% Addington Highlands TP 00000 2,260 40 1.8% Adelaide-Metcalfe TP 00000 2,985 25 0.8% Adjala-Tosorontio TP 00000 10,970 170 1.5% Admaston/Bromley TP 00000 2,935 50 1.7% Ajax T 00000 119,215 2,525 2.1% Akwesasne (Part) 59 IRI 03300 1,470 20 1.4% Alberton TP 00000 965 15 1.6% Alderville First Nation IRI 01200 495 10 2.0% Alfred and Plantagenet TP 00000 9,550 7,440 77.9% Algoma 20000 112,725 7,595 6.7% Algoma, Unorganized, North Part NO 00000 5,740 315 5.5% Algonquin Highlands TP 00100 2,355 30 1.3% Alnwick/Haldimand TP 00000 6,860 95 1.4% Amaranth TP 00000 4,075 50 1.2% Amherstburg T 00000 21,770 715 3.3% Armour TP 00000 1,410 35 2.5% Armstrong TP 00000 1,170 695 59.4% Arnprior T 00000 8,610 400 4.6% Aroland 83 IRI 02300 365 0 0.0% Arran-Elderslie MU 00000 6,740 30 0.4% Ashfield-Colborne-Wawanosh TP 00000 5,420 40 0.7% Asphodel-Norwood TP 00000 3,990 45 1.1% Assiginack TP 00100 1,015 45 4.4% Athens TP 00000 2,955 65 2.2% Atikokan T 00000 2,705 85 3.1% Attawapiskat 91A IRI 03300 1,500 5 0.3% Augusta TP 00000 7,340 270 3.7% Aurora T 00000 54,955 1,100 2.0% Aylmer T 00000 7,425 40 0.5% Baldwin TP 00000 620 105 16.9% Bancroft T 00000 3,770 60 1.6% Barrie CY 00000 140,090 3,715 2.7% Bayham MU 00000 7,400 65 0.9% Bear Island 1 IRI 01900 150 0 0.0% Bearskin Lake IRI 01100 355 0 0.0% Beckwith TP 00000 7,645 460 6.0% Belleville CY 00000 49,885 930 1.9%
  • Rank of Pops

    Rank of Pops

    Table 1.3 Basic Pop Trends County by County Census 2001 - place names pop_1996 pop_2001 % diff rank order absolute 1996-01 Sorted by absolute pop growth on growth pop growth - Canada 28,846,761 30,007,094 1,160,333 4.0 - Ontario 10,753,573 11,410,046 656,473 6.1 - York Regional Municipality 1 592,445 729,254 136,809 23.1 - Peel Regional Municipality 2 852,526 988,948 136,422 16.0 - Toronto Division 3 2,385,421 2,481,494 96,073 4.0 - Ottawa Division 4 721,136 774,072 52,936 7.3 - Durham Regional Municipality 5 458,616 506,901 48,285 10.5 - Simcoe County 6 329,865 377,050 47,185 14.3 - Halton Regional Municipality 7 339,875 375,229 35,354 10.4 - Waterloo Regional Municipality 8 405,435 438,515 33,080 8.2 - Essex County 9 350,329 374,975 24,646 7.0 - Hamilton Division 10 467,799 490,268 22,469 4.8 - Wellington County 11 171,406 187,313 15,907 9.3 - Middlesex County 12 389,616 403,185 13,569 3.5 - Niagara Regional Municipality 13 403,504 410,574 7,070 1.8 - Dufferin County 14 45,657 51,013 5,356 11.7 - Brant County 15 114,564 118,485 3,921 3.4 - Northumberland County 16 74,437 77,497 3,060 4.1 - Lanark County 17 59,845 62,495 2,650 4.4 - Muskoka District Municipality 18 50,463 53,106 2,643 5.2 - Prescott and Russell United Counties 19 74,013 76,446 2,433 3.3 - Peterborough County 20 123,448 125,856 2,408 2.0 - Elgin County 21 79,159 81,553 2,394 3.0 - Frontenac County 22 136,365 138,606 2,241 1.6 - Oxford County 23 97,142 99,270 2,128 2.2 - Haldimand-Norfolk Regional Municipality 24 102,575 104,670 2,095 2.0 - Perth County 25 72,106 73,675
  • Socioeconomic Baseline Report

    Socioeconomic Baseline Report

    STILLWATER CANADA INCORPORATED MARATHON PLATINUM GROUP METALS – COPPER PROJECT Socioeconomic Baseline Report Report submitted to: Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency 22nd Floor, Place Bell, 160 Elgin Street Ottawa, ON K1A 0H3 & ONTARIO MINISTRY OF THE ENVIRONMENT Environmental Assessment and Approvals Branch 2 St. Clair Ave W, Floor 12A Toronto, ON M4V 1L5 Report submitted by: STILLWATER CANADA INCORPORATED 357, 1100 Memorial Avenue Thunder Bay, ON P7B 4A3 In association with: gck Consulting Ltd. December 13th, 2011 i Contents List of Figures ............................................................................................................................................. viii List of Tables ................................................................................................................................................. x Abbreviations and Acronyms ...................................................................................................................... xii 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1. Project Location ........................................................................................................................... 1 1.2. Surrounding Land Uses ............................................................................................................... 3 1.3. Exploration History of the Site ..................................................................................................
  • Aboriginal Peoples in the Superior-Greenstone Region: an Informational Handbook for Staff and Parents

    Aboriginal Peoples in the Superior-Greenstone Region: an Informational Handbook for Staff and Parents

    Aboriginal Peoples in the Superior-Greenstone Region: An Informational Handbook for Staff and Parents Superior-Greenstone District School Board 2014 2 Aboriginal Peoples in the Superior-Greenstone Region Acknowledgements Superior-Greenstone District School Board David Tamblyn, Director of Education Nancy Petrick, Superintendent of Education Barb Willcocks, Aboriginal Education Student Success Lead The Native Education Advisory Committee Rachel A. Mishenene Consulting Curriculum Developer ~ Rachel Mishenene, Ph.D. Student, M.Ed. Edited by Christy Radbourne, Ph.D. Student and M.Ed. I would like to acknowledge the following individuals for their contribution in the development of this resource. Miigwetch. Dr. Cyndy Baskin, Ph.D. Heather Cameron, M.A. Christy Radbourne, Ph.D. Student, M.Ed. Martha Moon, Ph.D. Student, M.Ed. Brian Tucker and Cameron Burgess, The Métis Nation of Ontario Deb St. Amant, B.Ed., B.A. Photo Credits Ruthless Images © All photos (with the exception of two) were taken in the First Nations communities of the Superior-Greenstone region. Additional images that are referenced at the end of the book. © Copyright 2014 Superior-Greenstone District School Board All correspondence and inquiries should be directed to: Superior-Greenstone District School Board Office 12 Hemlo Drive, Postal Bag ‘A’, Marathon, ON P0T 2E0 Telephone: 807.229.0436 / Facsimile: 807.229.1471 / Webpage: www.sgdsb.on.ca Aboriginal Peoples in the Superior-Greenstone Region 3 Contents What’s Inside? Page Indian Power by Judy Wawia 6 About the Handbook 7
  • Zone a – Prescribed Northern Zones / Zones Nordiques Visées Par Règlement Place Names Followed by Numbers Are Indian Reserves

    Zone a – Prescribed Northern Zones / Zones Nordiques Visées Par Règlement Place Names Followed by Numbers Are Indian Reserves

    Northern Residents Deductions – Places in Prescribed Zones / Déductions pour les habitants de régions éloignées – Endroits situés dans les zones visées par règlement Zone A – Prescribed northern zones / Zones nordiques visées par règlement Place names followed by numbers are Indian reserves. If you live in a place that is not listed in this publication and you think it is in a prescribed zone, contact us. / Les noms suivis de chiffres sont des réserves indiennes. Communiquez avec nous si l’endroit où vous habitez ne figure pas dans cette publication et que vous croyez qu’il se situe dans une zone visée par règlement. Yukon, Nunavut, and the Northwest Territories / Yukon, Nunavut et Territoires du Nord-Ouest All places in the Yukon, Nunavut, and the Northwest Territories are located in a prescribed northern zone. / Tous les endroits situés dans le Yukon, le Nunavut et les Territoires du Nord-Ouest se trouvent dans des zones nordiques visées par règlement. British Columbia / Colombie-Britannique Andy Bailey Recreation Good Hope Lake Nelson Forks Tahltan Liard River 3 Area Gutah New Polaris Mine Taku McDames Creek 2 Atlin Hyland Post Niteal Taku River McDonald Lake 1 Atlin Park Hyland Ranch Old Fort Nelson Tamarack Mosquito Creek 5 Atlin Recreation Area Hyland River Park Pavey Tarahne Park Muddy River 1 Bear Camp Iskut Pennington Telegraph Creek One Mile Point 1 Ben-My-Chree Jacksons Pleasant Camp Tetsa River Park Prophet River 4 Bennett Kahntah Porter Landing Toad River Salmon Creek 3 Boulder City Kledo Creek Park Prophet River Trutch Silver
  • Operational Review Report Submitted To: Lake of the Woods District Hospital

    Operational Review Report Submitted To: Lake of the Woods District Hospital

    www.BIGhealthcare.ca Operational Review Report Submitted to: Lake of the Woods District Hospital BIG Healthcare 60 Atlantic Avenue Suite 200 Toronto, Ontario M6K 1X9 www.BIGhealthcare.ca June 6, 2018 Benchmark Intelligence Group Inc. 60 Atlantic Avenue, Suite 200, Toronto, ON, M6K1X9 www.BIGhealthcare.ca Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................. 1 LISTING OF RECOMMENDATIONS ........................................................................................ 8 1.0 BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES .............................................................................. 17 1.1 LAKE OF THE WOODS DISTRICT HOSPITAL ................................................................... 17 1.2 PROJECT BACKGROUND ................................................................................................ 18 1.3 PROJECT OBJECTIVES .................................................................................................... 18 1.4 STEERING COMMITTEE .................................................................................................. 19 1.5 PEER FACILITIES ........................................................................................................... 19 2.0 UNDERSTANDING THE HOSPITAL ............................................................................. 21 2.1 CLINICAL ACTIVITY DATA SOURCES ............................................................................ 21 2.2 LWDH CAPACITY AND CLINICAL PROFILE .................................................................
  • How We Prosper Together: Regional Economic Development Strategic

    How We Prosper Together: Regional Economic Development Strategic

    How We Prosper Together: Regional Economic Development Strategic Plan for Superior East and Neighbouring Communities Final Strategy May 2019 Page Left Blank How we Prosper Together: Regional Economic Development Strategy Page 1 Table of Contents Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 4 Purpose of the Regional Economic Development Strategic Plan ....................................................... 9 Research Methodology .................................................................................................................................... 10 Background & Stakeholder Engagement .............................................................................. 13 Economic Analysis and Target Sector Assessment – Key Findings ................................................... 13 Target Sector Trends and Best Practices .......................................................................................... 14 Commercial Gap Assessment – Key Findings ................................................................................... 28 One-on-One Interviews – Key Findings ............................................................................................ 27 Random Sample Business Survey – Key Findings ............................................................................. 28 Focus Group Discussions – Key Findings .......................................................................................... 34 SOARR Assessment
  • Anishinabek-PS-Annual-Report-2020

    Anishinabek-PS-Annual-Report-2020

    ANNUAL REPORT 2020 ANISHINABEK POLICE SERVICE Oo’deh’nah’wi…nongohm, waabung, maamawi! (Community…today, tomorrow, together!) TABLE OF CONTENTS Mission Statement 4 Organizational Charts 5 Map of APS Detachments 7 Chairperson Report 8 Chief of Police Report 9 Inspector Reports - North, Central, South 11 Major Crime - Investigative Support Unit 21 Recruitment 22 Professional Standards 23 Corporate Services 24 Financial 25 Financial Statements 26 Human Resources 29 Use of Force 31 Statistics 32 Information Technology 34 Training & Equipment 35 MISSION STATEMENT APS provides effective, efficient, proud, trustworthy and accountable service to ensure Anishinabek residents and visitors are safe and healthy while respecting traditional cultural values including the protection of inherent rights and freedoms on our traditional territory. VISION STATEMENT Safe and healthy Anishinabek communities. GOALS Foster healthy, safe and strong communities. Provide a strong, healthy, effective, efficient, proud and accountable organization. Clarify APS roles and responsibilities regarding First Nation jurisdiction for law enforcement. 4 APS ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE - BOARD STRUCTURE ANISHINABEK POLICE SERVICE POLICE COUNCIL POLICE GOVERNING AUTHORITY POLICE GOVERNING Garden River First Nation AUTHORITY COMMITEES Curve Lake First Nation Sagamok Anishnawbek First Nation Discipline Commitee Fort William First Nation Operations Commitee POLICE CHIEF Biigtigong Nishnaabeg Finance Commitee Netmizaaggaming Nishnaabeg Cultural Commitee Biinjitiwaabik Zaaging Anishinaabek
  • Targeted Residential Fire Risk Reduction a Summary of At-Risk Aboriginal Areas in Canada

    Targeted Residential Fire Risk Reduction a Summary of At-Risk Aboriginal Areas in Canada

    Targeted Residential Fire Risk Reduction A Summary of At-Risk Aboriginal Areas in Canada Len Garis, Sarah Hughan, Paul Maxim, and Alex Tyakoff October 2016 Executive Summary Despite the steady reduction in rates of fire that have been witnessed in Canada in recent years, ongoing research has demonstrated that there continue to be striking inequalities in the way in which fire risk is distributed through society. It is well-established that residential dwelling fires are not distributed evenly through society, but that certain sectors in Canada experience disproportionate numbers of incidents. Oftentimes, it is the most vulnerable segments of society who face the greatest risk of fire and can least afford the personal and property damage it incurs. Fire risks are accentuated when property owners or occupiers fail to install and maintain fire and life safety devices such smoke alarms and carbon monoxide detectors in their homes. These life saving devices are proven to be highly effective, inexpensive to obtain and, in most cases, Canadian fire services will install them for free. A key component of driving down residential fire rates in Canadian cities, towns, hamlets and villages is the identification of communities where fire risk is greatest. Using the internationally recognized Home Safe methodology described in this study, the following Aboriginal and Non- Aboriginal communities in provinces and territories across Canada are determined to be at heightened risk of residential fire. These communities would benefit from a targeted smoke alarm give-away program and public education campaign to reduce the risk of residential fires and ensure the safety and well-being of all Canadian citizens.
  • Kenora—Rainy River 35

    Kenora—Rainy River 35

    Hudson Bay FORT SEVERN 89 POLAR BEAR Provincial Park PEAWANUCK ke La e rc ie P SEVERN RIVER Provincial Park SACHIGO LAKE 2 SACHIGO LAKE 1 BEARSKIN LAKE WAPEKEKA 2 S ach KITCHENUHMAYKOOSIB AAK 84 (BIG TROUT LAKE) igo Lake FAWN RIVER Provincial Park WAPEKEKA 1 Big Trout Lake KASABONIKA LAKE OPASQUIA Provincial Park WAWAKAPEWIN MUSKRAT DAM LAKE WINISK RIVER Provincial Park WEBEQUIE TIMMINS--JAMES BAY SANDY LAKE 88 KINGFISHER LAKE 1 Lake Sandy KEE-WAY-WIN WEAGAMOW LAKE 87 WUNNUMIN 1 WUNNUMIN 2 NIBINAMIK DEER LAKE DISTRICT OF KENORA, UNORGANIZED M is s is a L a k NORTH SPIRIT LAKE KENORA--RAINY RIVER e PIPESTONE RIVER Provincial Park LANSDOWNE HOUSE OTOSKWIN-ATTAWAPISKAT RIVER Provincial Park NESKANTAGA MACDOWELL LAKE POPLAR HILL PIKANGIKUM 14 MARTEN FALLS 65 Y W H 8 0 CAT LAKE 8 FORT HOPE 64 ALBANY RIVER Provincial Park TOWNSHIP OF PICKLE LAKE Y W H 9 9 5 WOODLAND CARIBOU Provincial Park OSNABURGH 63B Trout Lake D R R O SLATE FALLS S S TROUT LAKE Provincial Park E G U N MUNICIPALITY OF RED LAKE D AY R TH B SOU MISHKEEGOGAMANG Y W H DISTRICT OF COCHRANE, UNORGANIZED 8 61 OGOKI RIVER Provincial Park LITTLE CURRENT RIVER Provincial Park 1 WABAKIMI Provincial Park 0 5 PAKWASH Provincial Park H W Y ST. RAPHAEL LAKE Provincial Park SEDGMAN LAKE Provincial Park TOWNSHIP OF EAR FHAWLY LS 657 804 HWY D L R AL 643 HWY DF IN W WHITESAND Provincial Park WEST ENGLISH RIVER Provincial Park WABAUSKANG 21 OJIBWAY NATION OF SAUGEEN Lac Seul 5 16 HW WHITESAND 5 Y AROLAND 83 Y N 2 4 HW 5 58 H W LAC SEUL (KEJICK BAY) WINDIGO BAY Provincial Park Y LAC SEUL (WHITEFISH
  • Health Profile – Thunder Bay District Integrated District Network

    Health Profile – Thunder Bay District Integrated District Network

    Health Profile – Thunder Bay District Integrated District Network May 2012 North West LHIN RLISS du Nord-Ouest Health Profile for Thunder Bay District Integrated District Network (IDN) Introduction This profile is one of a series of five profiles for each of the proposed Integrated District Networks (IDN)s. Three of the five IDN areas correspond to three of four current sub-LHIN planning areas – Rainy River District, City of Thunder Bay (and surrounding area) and Thunder Bay District (excluding city of Thunder Bay and surrounding area). The fourth and fifth proposed IDNs are formed from the current Kenora District sub-LHIN planning area. The Northern IDN is proposed to encompass Sioux Lookout and all First Nations communities north of Sioux Lookout. The remaining part of Kenora District (including Red Lake, Kenora and Dryden) will be referred to as Kenora District IDN. The map illustrates the North West LHIN’s current sub-LHIN planning areas showing communities that have acute care hospitals. Figure 1: Map of the North West LHIN The Thunder Bay District sub-LHIN planning area of the North West LHIN corresponds to the Thunder Bay District Census Division (CD) excluding the City of Thunder Bay census subdivision and the surrounding census subdivisions of Neebing, Oliver Paipoonge, Conmee, Gillies, O’Connor, Shuniah and Fort William 52. Moving forward, it is proposed that the area will be referred to as the Thunder Bay District Integrated District Network (IDN). Health Profile – Thunder Bay District Integrated District Network (Draft) 2 North West LHIN RLISS du Nord-Ouest The following table presents some of the demographic characteristics of the IDN compared to the total North West LHIN population.
  • Respondent's Factum

    Respondent's Factum

    S.C.C. File No. 35475 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA (ON APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO) B E T W E E N: HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Appellant - and - CLIFFORD KOKOPENACE Respondent - and - ABORIGINAL LEGAL SERVICES OF TORONTO INC., THE ADVOCATES’ SOCIETY, CANADIAN ASSOCIATION OF ELIZABETH FRY SOCIETIES, THE DAVID ASPER CENTRE FOR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS, NATIVE WOMEN’S ASSOCIATION OF CANADA, NISHNAWBE ASKI NATION and WOMEN’S LEGAL EDUCATION AND ACTION FUND INC. Interveners RESPONDENT’S FACTUM DOUCETTE BONI SANTORO FURGIUELE GOWLING LAFLEUR HENDERSON LLP 20 Dundas Street West, Suite 1100 160 Elgin Street, Suite 2600 Toronto, ON M5G 2G8 Ottawa, ON K1P 1C3 Delmar Doucette & Angela Ruffo Tel.: (416) 597-6907 Brian A. Crane Q.C. Fax: (416) 342-1766 Tel.: (613) 233-1781 Email: [email protected] Fax: (613) 563-9869 [email protected] Email: [email protected] SACK GOLDBLATT MITCHELL LLP Ottawa Agent for the Respondent/Moving Party, 20 Dundas Street West, Suite 1100 Clifford Kokopenace Toronto, ON M5G 2G8 Jessica Orkin Tel.: (416) 979-4381 Fax: (416) 979-4430 Email: [email protected] Counsel for the Respondent/Moving Party, Clifford Kokopenace ORIGINAL TO: THE REGISTRAR OF THIS HONOURABLE COURT COPIES TO: HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN BURKE-ROBERTSON LLP Crown Law Office Criminal 441 MacLaren Street, Suite 200 720 Bay Street, 10th Floor Ottawa, ON K2P 2H3 Toronto, ON M5G 2K1 Robert E. Houston, Q.C. Gillian E. Roberts Deborah Calderwood Tel.: (613) 236-9665 Tel.: (416) 326-2304 Fax: (613) 235-4430 Fax: (416) 326-4656 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] [email protected] Ottawa Agent for the Appellant/Responding Counsel for the Appellant/Responding Party, Party, Her Majesty the Queen Her Majesty the Queen AND TO: ABORIGINAL LEGAL SERVICES OF COMMUNITY LEGAL SERVICES TORONTO INC.