Appendix 18-I: Socio-Economic Data Tables by Community

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Appendix 18-I: Socio-Economic Data Tables by Community EAST-WEST TIE TRANSMISSION PROJECT AMENDED ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT REPORT APPENDIX 18-I Socio-Economic Data Tables by Community February 2018 Report No. 1536607/2000/2219 APPENDIX 18-I SOCIO-ECONOMIC DATA TABLES BY COMMUNITY LIST OF TABLES Table 18-I-1: Population ....................................................................................................................................... 1 Table 18-I-2: Labour Force Activity ...................................................................................................................... 2 Table 18-I-3: Employment by Sector, 2011 ......................................................................................................... 3 Table 18-I-4: Incomes and Earnings, 2011 .......................................................................................................... 5 Table 18-I-5: Educational Attainment, 2011 ........................................................................................................ 6 February 2018 Project No. 1536607/2000/2219 I APPENDIX 18-I SOCIO-ECONOMIC DATA TABLES BY COMMUNITY Table 18-I-1: Population Population 2001 2006 2011 % Change 2001–2011 City of Thunder Bay 109,016 109,140 108,359 -0.6 Municipality of Wawa 3,668 3,204 2,975 -18.9 Town of Marathon 4,416 3,863 3,353 -24.1 Township of Dorion 442 379 338 -23.5 Township of Nipigon 1,964 1,752 1,631 -17.0 Township of Red Rock 1,233 1,063 942 -23.6 Township of Schreiber 1,448 901 1,126 -22.2 Municipality of Shuniah 2,466 2,913 2,737 11.0 Township of Terrace Bay 1,950 1,625 1,471 -24.6 Township of White River 993 841 607 -38.9 District of Algoma 118,567 117,461 115,870 -2.3 District of Thunder Bay 150,860 149,063 146,057 -3.2 Province of Ontario 11,410,046 12,160,282 12,851,821 12.6 Fort William First Nation 599 889 860 43.6 Michipicoten First Nation 61 54 68 11.5 Biigtigong Nishnaabeg (Heron Bay First Nation) (a) 346 383 395 14.2 Pays Plat First Nation 65 79 75 15.4 Pic Mobert North 167 137 193 15.6 Pic Mobert South 140 104 96 -31.4 Red Rock Indian Band 274 283 303 10.6 Animbiigoo Zaagi’igan Anishinaabek First Nation (Lake Nipigon Ojibway) Not available Ojibways of Batchewana Not available Biinjitwaabik Zaaging Anishinaabek First Nation (Rock Bay) Not available Bingwi Neyaashi Anishinaabek (Sand Point First Nation) Not available Ojibways of Garden River Not available Ginoogaming First Nation Not available Long Lake No. 58 First Nation Not available Missanabie Cree First Nation Not available Note: Communities without population data in the above table also do not have other data (as categorized in the tables below) available from the Statistics Canada census, and so are not included further. a) Ojibways of Pic River changed their name to Biigtigong Nishnaabeg in September 2015. Biigtigong Nishnaabeg requested that this name be used in the Environmental Assessment Report and all other references to this community will be under the name Biigtigong Nishnaabeg. % = percent February 2018 Project No. 1536607/2000/2219 1 APPENDIX 18-I SOCIO-ECONOMIC DATA TABLES BY COMMUNITY Table 18-I-2: Labour Force Activity Labour Force Activity 2011 2006 Labour Participat. Unemploy. Labour Participat. Unemploy. Community 15+ Unemployed 15+ Unemployed Force Rate (%) Rate (%) Force Rate (%) Rate (%) City of Thunder Bay 89,865 55,115 61.3 4,430 8 89,545 56,550 63.2 4,075 7.2 Municipality of Wawa 2,460 1,625 66.1 130 8 2,600 1,675 64.4 110 6.6 Town of Marathon n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 3,200 2,360 73.8 150 6.4 Township of Dorion 305 160 52.5 20 12.5 305 250 82 70 28 Township of Nipigon n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1,415 820 58 70 8.5 Township of Red Rock 780 400 51.3 70 17.5 875 475 54.3 60 12.6 Township of Schreiber 995 720 72.9 55 7.6 745 420 56.4 80 19 Municipality of Shuniah 2,430 1,530 62.8 85 5.6 2,545 1,485 58.3 155 10.4 Township of Terrace Bay 1,310 785 59.9 50 6.4 1,350 815 60.4 190 23.3 Township of White River 530 390 73.6 60 15.4 695 590 84.9 45 7.6 Fort William First Nation 685 340 49.6 50 14.7 655 390 59.5 75 19.2 Michipicoten First Nation 65 30 46.2 10 33.3 50 25 50 0 0 Biigtigong Nishnaabeg n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 300 190 63.3 25 13.2 Pays Plat First Nation 65 25 38.5 10 40 105 60 57.1 15 25 Pic Mobert North 120 60 50 15 25 90 50 55.6 20 40 Pic Mobert South 70 35 50 10 28.6 55 35 63.6 15 42.9 Red Rock Indian Band 220 125 56.8 15 12 195 135 69.2 25 18.5 Thunder Bay District 6,990 56 20.2 6,435 58.6 17.1 (Indigenous) Algoma District (Indigenous) 5,500 55.1 17.5 6,125 62.9 15.9 Ontario (Indigenous) 140,685 61.9 13.9 115,150 64.6 12.3 Note: Data from shaded cells were not presented in Section 18 and are not provided here. n/a = not available; participat = participation; % = percent; + = plus; unemploy = unemployment. February 2018 Project No. 1536607/2000/2219 2 APPENDIX 18-I SOCIO-ECONOMIC DATA TABLES BY COMMUNITY Table 18-I-3: Employment by Sector, 2011 Goods Producing Sectors Service Producing Sectors , and Oil and Oil and and All Occupations All , Employment by Sector, 2011 – Total Employed Employed Total Fishing Forestry, Agriculture, Hunting and Quarrying Mining, Gas Extraction Utilities Construction Manufacturing Wholesale Trade Retail Trade and Transportation Warehousing Cultural and Information Industries City of Thunder Bay 53,885 530 715 595 3,410 2,650 1,450 6,760 2,605 1,050 Municipality of Wawa 1,585 10 155 35 100 50 0 195 55 35 Town of Marathon n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Township of Dorion 155 20 0 0 15 0 0 0 15 0 Township of Nipigon n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Township of Red Rock 380 0 25 20 30 0 0 20 35 0 Township of Schreiber 710 0 10 0 15 200 0 65 125 15 Municipality of Shuniah 1,520 30 40 40 110 40 50 170 90 0 Township of Terrace Bay 780 0 45 0 30 270 0 60 35 0 Township of White River 390 0 60 0 55 0 0 30 30 0 Fort William First Nation 325 0 10 0 25 10 0 50 10 0 Michipicoten First Nation n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Biigtigong Nishnaabeg n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Pays Plat First Nation n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Pic Mobert North n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Pic Mobert South n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Red Rock Indian Band 125 0 0 0 10 n/a 0 15 10 0 February 2018 Project No. 1536607/2000/2219 3 APPENDIX 18-I SOCIO-ECONOMIC DATA TABLES BY COMMUNITY Table 18-I-3: Employment by Sector, 2011 (continued) Service Producing Sectors (Continued) and and , and Employment by Sector, 2011 , (continued) Finance Insurance and Finance Real Estate and Rental and Leasing Scientific Professional, Technical Services and Companies of Management Enterprises Administrative, Support, Waste, Remediation Educational Services Health Social Care and Assistance Arts, Entertainment Recreation Food and Accommodation Services Other Services Administration Public City of Thunder Bay 1,575 890 2,870 10 1,705 5,145 8,565 1,220 4,335 2,570 5,220 Municipality of Wawa 15 0 150 0 45 150 220 15 180 60 115 Town of Marathon n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Township of Dorion 0 0 0 0 0 15 25 0 0 0 15 Township of Nipigon n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Township of Red Rock 0 0 0 0 0 35 55 0 45 0 45 Township of Schreiber 15 0 0 0 15 30 85 20 65 15 35 Municipality of Shuniah 0 35 60 0 40 165 235 25 85 35 220 Township of Terrace Bay 0 0 0 0 0 45 95 0 60 25 60 Township of White River 0 0 0 0 0 0 60 0 40 0 45 Fort William First Nation 0 10 0 0 15 15 35 25 20 15 70 Michipicoten First Nation n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Biigtigong Nishnaabeg n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Pays Plat First Nation 10 Pic Mobert North n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Pic Mobert South n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Red Rock Indian Band 0 0 0 0 0 10 10 0 0 0 45 n/a = not available - data for this community have been suppressed by Statistics Canada.
Recommended publications
  • Here Is a Copy of Correspondence with Manitouwadge From: Edo
    From: Tabatha LeBlanc To: Cathryn Moffett Subject: Manitouwadge group - letter of support Date: March 17, 2021 11:34:41 AM Attachments: <email address removed> Here is a copy of correspondence with Manitouwadge From: [email protected] <email address removed> Sent: October 28, 2020 11:00 AM To: Tabatha LeBlanc <email address removed> Cc: Owen Cranney <email address removed> ; Joleen Keough <email address removed> Subject: RE: PGM Hi Tabatha, This email is to confirm that the Township would be happy to host Generation Mining via Zoom for a 15 minute presentation to Council at 7:00 pm on Wednesday, November 11, 2020. The format will be 15 min for presentation and 10 min for Q&A. Can you please forward your presentation no later than Wednesday, November 4th to circulate to Council with their Agenda package. We will also promote the presentation online for members of the public to watch the live stream of the video through our YouTube channel. Member of the public may have questions or comments on the project so we will need to ensure that they know how and who to contact at Generation Mining. Please advise the names and positions of anyone from Generation Mining who will be present for the presentation. Please log in to the Zoom link a few minutes before 7 pm. You will be placed in a “waiting room” and staff will admit you prior to the meeting start time at 7:00 pm. Let me know if you have any questions. Thanks, Florence The Zoom meeting link is attached below: Township of Manitouwadge is inviting you to a scheduled Zoom meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • Estimating Community Labour Market Indicators Between Censuses
    Estimating Community Labour Market Indicators Between Censuses Report prepared by Dr. Bakhtiar Moazzami for The Local Employment Planning Council (LEPC) MARCH 9, 2017 Limitations: The North Superior Workforce Planning Board, your Local Employment Planning Council, recognizes the potential limitation of this document and will continue to seek out information in areas that require further analysis and action. The North Superior Workforce Planning assumes no responsibility to the user for the consequences of any errors or omissions. For further information, please contact: Madge Richardson Executive Director North Superior Workforce Planning Board Local Employment Planning Council 107B Johnson Ave. Thunder Bay, ON, P7B 2V9 [email protected] 807.346.2940 This project is funded in part by the Government of Canada and the Government of Ontario. TABLE OF CONTENTS PART I: INTRODUCTION AND THE OBJECTIVES OF THE PROJECT ................................................ 1 1.1 Objectives of the Present Project................................................................................................. 2 PART II: LABOUR MARKET INDICATORS ........................................................................................... 3 2.1. Defining Various Labour Market Indicators ............................................................................. 3 2.1.1. Labour Force Participation Rate ............................................................................................. 3 2.1.2. Employment-to-Population Ratio ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Socioeconomic Baseline Report
    STILLWATER CANADA INCORPORATED MARATHON PLATINUM GROUP METALS – COPPER PROJECT Socioeconomic Baseline Report Report submitted to: Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency 22nd Floor, Place Bell, 160 Elgin Street Ottawa, ON K1A 0H3 & ONTARIO MINISTRY OF THE ENVIRONMENT Environmental Assessment and Approvals Branch 2 St. Clair Ave W, Floor 12A Toronto, ON M4V 1L5 Report submitted by: STILLWATER CANADA INCORPORATED 357, 1100 Memorial Avenue Thunder Bay, ON P7B 4A3 In association with: gck Consulting Ltd. December 13th, 2011 i Contents List of Figures ............................................................................................................................................. viii List of Tables ................................................................................................................................................. x Abbreviations and Acronyms ...................................................................................................................... xii 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1. Project Location ........................................................................................................................... 1 1.2. Surrounding Land Uses ............................................................................................................... 3 1.3. Exploration History of the Site ..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Community Profiles for the Oneca Education And
    FIRST NATION COMMUNITY PROFILES 2010 Political/Territorial Facts About This Community Phone Number First Nation and Address Nation and Region Organization or and Fax Number Affiliation (if any) • Census data from 2006 states Aamjiwnaang First that there are 706 residents. Nation • This is a Chippewa (Ojibwe) community located on the (Sarnia) (519) 336‐8410 Anishinabek Nation shores of the St. Clair River near SFNS Sarnia, Ontario. 978 Tashmoo Avenue (Fax) 336‐0382 • There are 253 private dwellings in this community. SARNIA, Ontario (Southwest Region) • The land base is 12.57 square kilometres. N7T 7H5 • Census data from 2006 states that there are 506 residents. Alderville First Nation • This community is located in South‐Central Ontario. It is 11696 Second Line (905) 352‐2011 Anishinabek Nation intersected by County Road 45, and is located on the south side P.O. Box 46 (Fax) 352‐3242 Ogemawahj of Rice Lake and is 30km north of Cobourg. ROSENEATH, Ontario (Southeast Region) • There are 237 private dwellings in this community. K0K 2X0 • The land base is 12.52 square kilometres. COPYRIGHT OF THE ONECA EDUCATION PARTNERSHIPS PROGRAM 1 FIRST NATION COMMUNITY PROFILES 2010 • Census data from 2006 states that there are 406 residents. • This Algonquin community Algonquins of called Pikwàkanagàn is situated Pikwakanagan First on the beautiful shores of the Nation (613) 625‐2800 Bonnechere River and Golden Anishinabek Nation Lake. It is located off of Highway P.O. Box 100 (Fax) 625‐1149 N/A 60 and is 1 1/2 hours west of Ottawa and 1 1/2 hours south of GOLDEN LAKE, Ontario Algonquin Park.
    [Show full text]
  • Aboriginal Peoples in the Superior-Greenstone Region: an Informational Handbook for Staff and Parents
    Aboriginal Peoples in the Superior-Greenstone Region: An Informational Handbook for Staff and Parents Superior-Greenstone District School Board 2014 2 Aboriginal Peoples in the Superior-Greenstone Region Acknowledgements Superior-Greenstone District School Board David Tamblyn, Director of Education Nancy Petrick, Superintendent of Education Barb Willcocks, Aboriginal Education Student Success Lead The Native Education Advisory Committee Rachel A. Mishenene Consulting Curriculum Developer ~ Rachel Mishenene, Ph.D. Student, M.Ed. Edited by Christy Radbourne, Ph.D. Student and M.Ed. I would like to acknowledge the following individuals for their contribution in the development of this resource. Miigwetch. Dr. Cyndy Baskin, Ph.D. Heather Cameron, M.A. Christy Radbourne, Ph.D. Student, M.Ed. Martha Moon, Ph.D. Student, M.Ed. Brian Tucker and Cameron Burgess, The Métis Nation of Ontario Deb St. Amant, B.Ed., B.A. Photo Credits Ruthless Images © All photos (with the exception of two) were taken in the First Nations communities of the Superior-Greenstone region. Additional images that are referenced at the end of the book. © Copyright 2014 Superior-Greenstone District School Board All correspondence and inquiries should be directed to: Superior-Greenstone District School Board Office 12 Hemlo Drive, Postal Bag ‘A’, Marathon, ON P0T 2E0 Telephone: 807.229.0436 / Facsimile: 807.229.1471 / Webpage: www.sgdsb.on.ca Aboriginal Peoples in the Superior-Greenstone Region 3 Contents What’s Inside? Page Indian Power by Judy Wawia 6 About the Handbook 7
    [Show full text]
  • How We Prosper Together: Regional Economic Development Strategic
    How We Prosper Together: Regional Economic Development Strategic Plan for Superior East and Neighbouring Communities Final Strategy May 2019 Page Left Blank How we Prosper Together: Regional Economic Development Strategy Page 1 Table of Contents Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 4 Purpose of the Regional Economic Development Strategic Plan ....................................................... 9 Research Methodology .................................................................................................................................... 10 Background & Stakeholder Engagement .............................................................................. 13 Economic Analysis and Target Sector Assessment – Key Findings ................................................... 13 Target Sector Trends and Best Practices .......................................................................................... 14 Commercial Gap Assessment – Key Findings ................................................................................... 28 One-on-One Interviews – Key Findings ............................................................................................ 27 Random Sample Business Survey – Key Findings ............................................................................. 28 Focus Group Discussions – Key Findings .......................................................................................... 34 SOARR Assessment
    [Show full text]
  • Anishinabek-PS-Annual-Report-2020
    ANNUAL REPORT 2020 ANISHINABEK POLICE SERVICE Oo’deh’nah’wi…nongohm, waabung, maamawi! (Community…today, tomorrow, together!) TABLE OF CONTENTS Mission Statement 4 Organizational Charts 5 Map of APS Detachments 7 Chairperson Report 8 Chief of Police Report 9 Inspector Reports - North, Central, South 11 Major Crime - Investigative Support Unit 21 Recruitment 22 Professional Standards 23 Corporate Services 24 Financial 25 Financial Statements 26 Human Resources 29 Use of Force 31 Statistics 32 Information Technology 34 Training & Equipment 35 MISSION STATEMENT APS provides effective, efficient, proud, trustworthy and accountable service to ensure Anishinabek residents and visitors are safe and healthy while respecting traditional cultural values including the protection of inherent rights and freedoms on our traditional territory. VISION STATEMENT Safe and healthy Anishinabek communities. GOALS Foster healthy, safe and strong communities. Provide a strong, healthy, effective, efficient, proud and accountable organization. Clarify APS roles and responsibilities regarding First Nation jurisdiction for law enforcement. 4 APS ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE - BOARD STRUCTURE ANISHINABEK POLICE SERVICE POLICE COUNCIL POLICE GOVERNING AUTHORITY POLICE GOVERNING Garden River First Nation AUTHORITY COMMITEES Curve Lake First Nation Sagamok Anishnawbek First Nation Discipline Commitee Fort William First Nation Operations Commitee POLICE CHIEF Biigtigong Nishnaabeg Finance Commitee Netmizaaggaming Nishnaabeg Cultural Commitee Biinjitiwaabik Zaaging Anishinaabek
    [Show full text]
  • Aroland First Nation
    Ginoogaming First Nation Community Profile Road X Road – Winter X Air X Boat X Ginoogaming First Nation is located on the northeast shore of Long Lake, 1 km south of the town of Long Lac, with access through the town from Highway 11 Ginoogaming First Nation occupies an area of 70 sq. km or 26 sq. miles (17,280 acres). Ginoogaming First Nation Community Profile PTO: Nishnawbe-Aski Nation TC: Matawa First Nations Management Population: 718 On Reserve: 160 Off Reserve: 616 CONTACT INFORMATION Ginoogaming First Nation LANGUAGES P.O. Box 89 Longlac, ON P0T 2A0 Linguistic Affiliation: Ojibway / Oji-Cree Phone: 807-876-2249 Mother Tongue: English Toll Free: 1-888-570-8942 Fax: 807-876-2495 Traditional languages of Ojibway and Oji-Cree are spoken. Many young people are not fluent in their OVERVIEW language and English is most commonly used. GOVERNANCE Election System YES NO Electoral X Custom X Term of office: 2 years ELECTORAL RIDINGS (F) Thunder Bay - Superior North (P) Thunder Bay - Superior North CHIEF & COUNCIL ACCESSIBILITY TITLE Chief Accessible by YES NO Councilors 1 Ginoogaming First Nation Community Profile Councilors Transportation X Councilors Councilors Councilors Councilors Community Band Office Staff Recreation YES NO COMMENTS Facilities Phone: 807-876-2249 or 876-2242 Outdoor rink Toll Free: 1-888-570-8942 Real ice – Fax: 807-876-2495 Arena X needs improvement- TITLE TEL not useable Finance Department Calls to all Band Needs Bingo Manager Office staff are Community Hall X improvement Welfare Administrator referred through Playground
    [Show full text]
  • April 26, 2021 Sent by Email Debra Sikora, Panel Chair Joint Review
    Ministry of Energy, Northern Development and Mines Ministère de l’Énergie, du Développement du Nord et des Mines April 26, 2021 Sent by email Debra Sikora, Panel Chair Joint Review Panel Marathon Palladium Project [email protected] Subject: Updated Crown list for consultation and information Dear Ms. Sikora: The Impact Assessment Agency’s (the Agency) Crown Consultation Operations Division (CCOD) would like to acknowledge receipt of the April 20, 2021 letter from the Joint Review Panel (the Panel) for the proposed Marathon Palladium Project (the Project). In this letter, the Panel has invited the CCOD to review the technical merit of the information contained in the Generation PGM Inc. Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) Addendum and supporting documents, as measured against the EIS Guidelines, related to the CCOD’s mandate and expertise. We would like to thank you for this opportunity to participate in the process. The Agency and Ontario’s consultation team (Crown consultation team), on behalf of the whole of government, are coordinating consultation activities, to the extent possible, to make best use of the environmental assessment process for the proposed Project and in order to assist the Crown in fulfilling its duty to consult with Indigenous peoples. In addition to the information received from Indigenous groups through consultation activities, the Crown consultation team will rely on the information collected by the Panel for the purpose of the environmental assessment in order to inform the Crown’s assessment of potential adverse impacts of the proposed Project on the potential or established Aboriginal or Treaty Rights. The Crown consultation team, on behalf of the whole of government, will also use the Agency’s Guidance: Assessment of Potential Impacts on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples to inform its assessment.
    [Show full text]
  • Beaudry-2006Oncj59
    COURT FILE No.: Thunder Bay #016216, 016217, 016219, 69953836, 038673, 038674,203171,015344 Citation: Ontario (Minister of Natural Resources) v. Beaudry, et al., 2006 ONCJ 59 ONTARIO COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN: Her Majesty the Queen (Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources) — AND — David Beaudry, Dean Beaudry, Yvon Beaudry, Mark Roy, Richard Ducharme, 2006 ONCJ 59 (CanLII) Shawna Ducharme, Harold Hein, and Gunnar Hult Before Justice of the Peace Bruce I. Leaman Heard on January 11 & 12, 2006 Reasons for Judgment released on March 1, 2006 Brian Wilkie .............................................................................................................. for the prosecution Fran Heath for the defendants David Beaudry, Dean Beaudry, Yvon Beaudry, Mark Roy, Richard Ducharme, Shawna Ducharme, Harold Hein and Gunnar Hult JUSTICE OF THE PEACE Leaman: Introduction [1] All of the defendants, except for Gunnar Hult were charged with offences contrary to the Fish and Wildlife Conservation Act, 1997 (“the Act”). Mr. Hult was charged with unlawfully possessing an overlimit of fish, contrary to the Ontario Fishery Regulations, 1989, made pursuant to the federal Fisheries Act. Because of considerable confusion regarding their representation by counsel, the hearing of their matters did not occur until January of 2005. Each of the defendants, through counsel, waived their s. 11(b) Charter rights. [2] Among the eight matters heard on the same dates by agreement, the facts were only in dispute as they related to the three Beaudrys. In each of the other cases, agreed statements of fact were filed. In all cases the defendants claimed Métis status. Even if the Crown can prove the charges against each defendant, the question is whether such status should result in the dismissal against each defendant due to s.
    [Show full text]
  • On Behalf of Nextbridge Infrastructure) Application for Leave to Construct an Electricity Transmission Line Between Thunder Bay and Wawa, Ontario
    EB-2017-0182 EB-2017-0194 EB-2017-0364 Upper Canada Transmission Inc. (on behalf of Nextbridge Infrastructure) Application for leave to construct an electricity transmission line between Thunder Bay and Wawa, Ontario -and- Hydro One Networks Inc. Application to upgrade existing transmission station facilities in the Districts of Thunder Bay and Algoma, Ontario -and- Hydro One Networks Inc. Application for leave to construct an electricity transmission line between Thunder Bay and Wawa, Ontario BOOK OF REFERENCES OF BIINJITIWAABIK ZAAGING ANISHINAABEK for CROSS-EXAMINATION OF NEXTBRIDGE PANEL DATED: October 10 2018 ESQUEGA LAW OFFICE 100 Anemki Drive, Suite 104 Fort William First Nation, ON P7J 1K4 TEL: (807) 286-1000 FAX: 1-866-391-3102 ETIENNE ESQUEGA Lawyer for the Intervenor Biinjitiwaabik Zaaging Anishinaabek 1 TAB CONTENTS PAGE 1 Excerpt concerning BZA from Section 17 of the Amended Environment 3 Assessment dated February 2018 2 Table 17-33, from Section 17 of the Amended Environment Assessment dated 5 February 2018 3 May 9, 2018 NB Meeting Summary, Response to BZA Combined Hearing 7 Interrogatory #1 to NB 4 September 19, 2018 NB Meeting Summary, Response to BZA Combined 10 Hearing Interrogatory #1 to NB 5 Response to BZA Combined Hearing Interrogatory #9 to NB 14 6 Table 2-21, from Section 2 of the Amended Environmental Assessment 16 7 Aboriginal Participation Plan for the East-West Transmission Project, dated 17 January 2, 2014 2 one lookout site near Stewart Lake, approximately 2 km north of the preferred route ROW; and one birdwatching site located near the municipality of Wawa, this location is approximately 600 m from an existing road that will be used for access and approximately 1.2 km from a temporary access road.
    [Show full text]
  • Ginoogaming First Nation Social Impact Assessment
    ` Ginoogaming First Nation Social Impact Assessment June 29, 2015 Submitted by Ginoogaming First Nation Social Impact Assessment ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS A hearty ‘Migwach’ is needed for all those community members who participated in the engagement sessions with such enthusiasm and openness. Thus project could not have been completed without you, and your input is shown in the richness of the reports and annexes. Acknowledgement is also due for Chief and Council who on occasions went out of their way to meet for extended periods outside of regular hours, to ensure that input and guidance was available. No acknowledgements would be complete without highlighting the incredible assistance and talent of the GFN staff: Conrad Chapais who initiated the assessments, Erin Smythington- Armstrong who worked tirelessly to ensure the process ran smoothly, Calvin Taylor who helped guide the engagement, and Priscila Fisher and Marianna Echum, who were always available to assist, and even ran stations at the Open House on short notice. Also, a thank you is extended to Miller Dickson Blaise and Cornerstone Consulting, who worked in partnership with Beringia in many of the engagement sessions. Thank you to Jeff Cook and Glen Hearns from Beringia Community Planning. i June 29, 2015 June Ginoogaming First Nation Social Impact Assessment EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Background Ginoogaming First Nation (GFN) is facing new resource development projects in its traditional territories, with the potential for significant impacts on the Nation and their land. The anticipated impacts could be positive in terms of increased jobs and economic development. However, there is also the risk of negative impacts such as environmental degradation, increased social and health problems associated with substance abuse, and continued erosion of traditional values.
    [Show full text]