DOCSLIB.ORG

Airborne Magnetic Andelectromagnetic Surveys

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

THESE TERMS GOVERN YOUR USE OF THIS DOCUMENT Your use of this Ontario Geological Survey document (the “Content”) is governed by the terms set out on this page (“Terms of Use”). By downloading this Content, you (the “User”) have accepted, and have agreed to be bound by, the Terms of Use. Content: This Content is offered by the Province of Ontario’s Ministry of Northern Development and Mines (MNDM) as a public service, on an “as-is” basis. Recommendations and statements of opinion expressed in the Content are those of the author or authors and are not to be construed as statement of government policy. You are solely responsible for your use of the Content. You should not rely on the Content for legal advice nor as authoritative in your particular circumstances. Users should verify the accuracy and applicability of any Content before acting on it. MNDM does not guarantee, or make any warranty express or implied, that the Content is current, accurate, complete or reliable. MNDM is not responsible for any damage however caused, which results, directly or indirectly, from your use of the Content. MNDM assumes no legal liability or responsibility for the Content whatsoever. Links to Other Web Sites: This Content may contain links, to Web sites that are not operated by MNDM. Linked Web sites may not be available in French. MNDM neither endorses nor assumes any responsibility for the safety, accuracy or availability of linked Web sites or the information contained on them. The linked Web sites, their operation and content are the responsibility of the person or entity for which they were created or maintained (the “Owner”). Both your use of a linked Web site, and your right to use or reproduce information or materials from a linked Web site, are subject to the terms of use governing that particular Web site. Any comments or inquiries regarding a linked Web site must be directed to its Owner. Copyright: Canadian and international intellectual property laws protect the Content. Unless otherwise indicated, copyright is held by the Queen’s Printer for Ontario. It is recommended that reference to the Content be made in the following form: Ontario Geological Survey 2014. Airborne magnetic and electromagnetic surveys, residual magnetic field contours with electromagnetic anomalies and Keating coefficients, Nestor Falls area; Ontario Geological Survey, Map 82 635, scale 1:20 000. Use and Reproduction of Content: The Content may be used and reproduced only in accordance with applicable intellectual property laws. Non-commercial use of unsubstantial excerpts of the Content is permitted provided that appropriate credit is given and Crown copyright is acknowledged. Any substantial reproduction of the Content or any commercial use of all or part of the Content is prohibited without the prior written permission of MNDM. Substantial reproduction includes the reproduction of any illustration or figure, such as, but not limited to graphs, charts and maps. Commercial use includes commercial distribution of the Content, the reproduction of multiple copies of the Content for any purpose whether or not commercial, use of the Content in commercial publications, and the creation of value-added products using the Content. Contact: FOR FURTHER PLEASE CONTACT: BY TELEPHONE: BY E-MAIL: INFORMATION ON The Reproduction of MNDM Publication Local: (705) 670-5691 the Content Services Toll-Free: 1-888-415-9845, ext. 5691 [email protected] (inside Canada, United States) The Purchase of MNDM Publication Local: (705) 670-5691 MNDM Publications Sales Toll-Free: 1-888-415-9845, ext. 5691 [email protected] (inside Canada, United States) Crown Copyright Queen’s Printer Local: (416) 326-2678 Toll-Free: 1-800-668-9938 [email protected] (inside Canada, United States) L3100> L2981> L3040> L2741> L2681> L2921> L2861> L2621> < <L3250 L L < L L L L2421> <L3190 L3180> L3160> L3140> <L3090 L3060> <L3050 L3021> <L3011 <L2991 <L2971 <L2931 <L2911 L2901> <L2891 < <L2771 L2721> L2661> <L2571 <L2551 L2441> <L2431 <L2331 <L2291 L2881> L2761> <L2711 <L2651 L2641> L2581> L2561> L2541> <L2471 <L2451 <L2411 L2381> L2361> L2341> <L2311 L3240> L3220> L3200> <L3170 <L3150 <L3070 L3001> L2961> <L3230 <L3210 <L3130 L3080> <L2951 L2941> <L2851 L2841> <L2831 <L2811 L2781> <L2751 L2701> <L2691 <L2671 <L2631 <L2611 <L2591 L2521> <L2511 <L2491 <L2391 <L2371 <L2351 L2301> L2281> <L2271 <L2731 L2601> <L2531 L2481> L2461> L2321> <L3030 L 2 3 2 L 2 2 L T 3 8 1 4 8 5 2 5 2 1 0 2 0 0 2 0 8 7 1 3 1 0 1 7 1 1 9 0 0 > > > > > 1 94°05'19" 05' 04' 03' 02' 01' 94°00'00" 59' 58' 57' 1 56' 55' 54' 53' 52' 51' 50' 49' > 48' 47' 46' 45' 44' 93°43'00" 0 L2261> 0 0 422000 m 24 3 29 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 447000 m 23 25 26 27 28 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 0 000.0 4000.0 170 1 00.0 5 0 0 4 40 2 40 7 38 - 49°23'44" 0 0 112000.0 38 30 46 33 49°23'54" 3 90000.0 39 27 DESCRIPTIVE NOTES 0 0 0 1 116 29 135 2 VERTICAL PLATE NOMOGRAM 5 Whitefish Bay Whitefish Bay 32A < 3 88 31 78 30 66 25 5 0 L - 2 32A 74000.0 71 0 112000.0 2 102000.0 3 5 8 31 0 2 0 25000.0 3 5 0 86000.0 104000.0 1 0 0 - - 1 5 3 - 2 5 0 0 Introduction - 1 33 0 0 0 - - 2 5 0 139 11 - 88000.0 43000.0 5 0 1 4 6 31 3 33 4 334 5 27 - 1 33 2 32 0 3 7 23 1 0 38000.0 8 25 2 36000.0 37000.0 5 39000.0 40000.0 41000.0 1 31 3 37 0 0 - 3 5 0 4 114 17 T4080> 0 T4080> - Ontario Geological Survey 0 0 2 114 11 5 This survey was flown using the Geotech VTEM®Plus helicopter- 39000.0 42 8 122 9 59 6 61 12 57 9 216 1 0 101000.0 0 99000.0 162 3 2 57000.0 0 - 144 7 84 12 0 98000.0 0 0 81000.0 2 2 5 18000.0 88000.0 - 0 0 00 mounted magnetic and electromagnetic system. The aircraft 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 4 1 - . - . 0 1 5 0 1 0 8 0 0 105000.0 0 4 was also equipped with a GPS navigation system and a 0 7 32 0 7 1 0 0 0 99000.0 0 0 5 1 1 0 MAP 82 635 0 5 digital data acquisition system. 19000.0 0 - 1 . 0 0 74000.0 5 - 64000.0 0 105 11 3 . 5 0 0 3 0 0 5 9 5 76000.0 63000.0 4 1 34 65000.0 0 0 Residual Magnetic Field Map 0 2 5 24000.0 5 - 0 0 3 - 0 5 - 5 0 3 7 75000.0 5 0 1 0 . 5 AIRBORNE MAGNETIC AND 0 0 L2241> 0 - 0 107 20 0 2 1 2 - 0 8 44 2 The contours of residual magnetic intensity were generated 5 . 1 0 0 ELECTROMAGNETIC SURVEYS 0 0 from digitally recorded data. The magnetic data were corrected 49000.0 0 0 0 0 30 5 22 2 7 90000.0 2 0 0 . 0 5 0 0 for diurnal variations, levelled to the control lines and 5471000 m 0 0 5471000 m 0 0 3 4 0 0 0 5 81000.0 1 - 25000.0 - 0 1 0 2 3 0 2 2 2 0 - 5 interpolated onto a 40 m regular grid, using the minimum 0 - 0 - 5 0 0 0 0 1 - 0 0 47000.0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 Residual magnetic field contours 0 1 2 0 0 1 2 0 Martin curvature algorithm. An International Geomagnetic Reference 0 - 1 < 41000.0 - 0 0 - 1 1 McKay Island 79000.0 7 L 5 2 0 - 1 5 Island 2 0 5 Field (IGRF) correction was applied to the total magnetic field 51000.0 5 5 with electromagnetic anomalies 0 0 0 2 70000.0 4 27 3 0 0 3 0 1 data at survey altitude using the 2010 model year extrapolated 1 0 0 34000.0 10 42 5 1 5 - 1 - . 0 5 23000.0 5 5 0 0 - 0 0 2 0 to March 1, 2014. A regional correction was applied to level the and Keating coefficients 9 37 133 4 0 0 5 56000.0 0 0 81000.0 0 23' 29 22 0 35000.0 0 5 7 44 2 - 0 magnetic field to the Ontario Master Aeromagnetic Grid. 0 0 5 0 0 - 1 0 5 79 29 - - 0 0 0 4 24 5 0 3 2 29 23 53000.0 0 0 2 20 - - 5 1 64000.0 78000.0 0 57000.0 3 5 3 5 0 Magnetic declination from January 26, 2014 to March 1, 2014 45000.0 146 3 0 3 1 55000.0 0 6 4 0 0 0 NESTOR FALLS AREA 6 106000.0 0 0 109000.0 2 28 0 183 1 3 3 3 29 0 0 for the centre of the survey area was 0.1º W. Magnetic 0 5 - 2 0 3 4 2 0 61000.0 0 3 0 0 0 0 . - 2 - 0 58000.0 L2221> 0 9 5 0 0 0 5 inclination from January 26, 2014 to March 1, 2014 for the 0 1 0 0 6 5 5 128 3 5 0 65000.0 .
Recommended publications
  • Population Francophone De L'ontario Par Subdivision De Recensement

    Population Francophone De L'ontario Par Subdivision De Recensement

    Population francophone de l'Ontario par subdivision de recensement Population % de Municipalité (Subdivision de recensement) Population totale francophone francophones Abitibi 70 IRI 01900 145 5 3.4% Addington Highlands TP 00000 2,260 40 1.8% Adelaide-Metcalfe TP 00000 2,985 25 0.8% Adjala-Tosorontio TP 00000 10,970 170 1.5% Admaston/Bromley TP 00000 2,935 50 1.7% Ajax T 00000 119,215 2,525 2.1% Akwesasne (Part) 59 IRI 03300 1,470 20 1.4% Alberton TP 00000 965 15 1.6% Alderville First Nation IRI 01200 495 10 2.0% Alfred and Plantagenet TP 00000 9,550 7,440 77.9% Algoma 20000 112,725 7,595 6.7% Algoma, Unorganized, North Part NO 00000 5,740 315 5.5% Algonquin Highlands TP 00100 2,355 30 1.3% Alnwick/Haldimand TP 00000 6,860 95 1.4% Amaranth TP 00000 4,075 50 1.2% Amherstburg T 00000 21,770 715 3.3% Armour TP 00000 1,410 35 2.5% Armstrong TP 00000 1,170 695 59.4% Arnprior T 00000 8,610 400 4.6% Aroland 83 IRI 02300 365 0 0.0% Arran-Elderslie MU 00000 6,740 30 0.4% Ashfield-Colborne-Wawanosh TP 00000 5,420 40 0.7% Asphodel-Norwood TP 00000 3,990 45 1.1% Assiginack TP 00100 1,015 45 4.4% Athens TP 00000 2,955 65 2.2% Atikokan T 00000 2,705 85 3.1% Attawapiskat 91A IRI 03300 1,500 5 0.3% Augusta TP 00000 7,340 270 3.7% Aurora T 00000 54,955 1,100 2.0% Aylmer T 00000 7,425 40 0.5% Baldwin TP 00000 620 105 16.9% Bancroft T 00000 3,770 60 1.6% Barrie CY 00000 140,090 3,715 2.7% Bayham MU 00000 7,400 65 0.9% Bear Island 1 IRI 01900 150 0 0.0% Bearskin Lake IRI 01100 355 0 0.0% Beckwith TP 00000 7,645 460 6.0% Belleville CY 00000 49,885 930 1.9%
  • Rank of Pops

    Rank of Pops

    Table 1.3 Basic Pop Trends County by County Census 2001 - place names pop_1996 pop_2001 % diff rank order absolute 1996-01 Sorted by absolute pop growth on growth pop growth - Canada 28,846,761 30,007,094 1,160,333 4.0 - Ontario 10,753,573 11,410,046 656,473 6.1 - York Regional Municipality 1 592,445 729,254 136,809 23.1 - Peel Regional Municipality 2 852,526 988,948 136,422 16.0 - Toronto Division 3 2,385,421 2,481,494 96,073 4.0 - Ottawa Division 4 721,136 774,072 52,936 7.3 - Durham Regional Municipality 5 458,616 506,901 48,285 10.5 - Simcoe County 6 329,865 377,050 47,185 14.3 - Halton Regional Municipality 7 339,875 375,229 35,354 10.4 - Waterloo Regional Municipality 8 405,435 438,515 33,080 8.2 - Essex County 9 350,329 374,975 24,646 7.0 - Hamilton Division 10 467,799 490,268 22,469 4.8 - Wellington County 11 171,406 187,313 15,907 9.3 - Middlesex County 12 389,616 403,185 13,569 3.5 - Niagara Regional Municipality 13 403,504 410,574 7,070 1.8 - Dufferin County 14 45,657 51,013 5,356 11.7 - Brant County 15 114,564 118,485 3,921 3.4 - Northumberland County 16 74,437 77,497 3,060 4.1 - Lanark County 17 59,845 62,495 2,650 4.4 - Muskoka District Municipality 18 50,463 53,106 2,643 5.2 - Prescott and Russell United Counties 19 74,013 76,446 2,433 3.3 - Peterborough County 20 123,448 125,856 2,408 2.0 - Elgin County 21 79,159 81,553 2,394 3.0 - Frontenac County 22 136,365 138,606 2,241 1.6 - Oxford County 23 97,142 99,270 2,128 2.2 - Haldimand-Norfolk Regional Municipality 24 102,575 104,670 2,095 2.0 - Perth County 25 72,106 73,675
  • Reliability Performance Overview February 21, 2018 Agenda

    Reliability Performance Overview February 21, 2018 Agenda

    First Nations – Reliability Performance Overview February 21, 2018 Agenda Hydro One Operations Review Historical Reliability Performance First Nations Communities Supply 2017 Transmission Reliability Transmission Reliability Improvements 2017 Distribution Reliability Distribution Grid Modernization Planned Work on Assets Serving First Nations Communities 2 Privileged and Confidential – Internal Use Only TOR 170419 Operations Performance ... HYDRO ONE OPERATIONS REVIEW 1005 Distribution Stations 3 Privileged and Confidential – Internal Use Only TOR 170419 Operations Performance ... First Nations Communities Supply Distribution Lines - “Feeders” Generating Step-Up Transmission Step-down Distribution Customer Station Lines Transmission Transformer Stations (First Nation Stations Communities) First Nations Communities: Supplied from 68 Transmission Lines, 59 Transmission Delivery Points and 109 Distribution Feeders 4 4 Privileged and Confidential – Internal Use Only TOR 170419 Operations Performance ... 2017 Transmission System Reliability Performance 2017 Year End Overall Transmission Performance: SAIDI was 42.8 min and SAIFI was 1.1 interruptions per customer delivery point. Main causes of these interruptions are 1) Weather 2) Defective Equipment and 3) Unconfirmed 5 Privileged and Confidential – Internal Use Only TOR 170419 Operations Performance ... Tx System – Primary Causes of Interruptions: (~66% from Weather & Equipment Failures) Power outage causes (2017) Weather 48% Adverse weather (freezing rain, ice, lightning) Equipment
  • Operational Review Report Submitted To: Lake of the Woods District Hospital

    Operational Review Report Submitted To: Lake of the Woods District Hospital

    www.BIGhealthcare.ca Operational Review Report Submitted to: Lake of the Woods District Hospital BIG Healthcare 60 Atlantic Avenue Suite 200 Toronto, Ontario M6K 1X9 www.BIGhealthcare.ca June 6, 2018 Benchmark Intelligence Group Inc. 60 Atlantic Avenue, Suite 200, Toronto, ON, M6K1X9 www.BIGhealthcare.ca Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................. 1 LISTING OF RECOMMENDATIONS ........................................................................................ 8 1.0 BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES .............................................................................. 17 1.1 LAKE OF THE WOODS DISTRICT HOSPITAL ................................................................... 17 1.2 PROJECT BACKGROUND ................................................................................................ 18 1.3 PROJECT OBJECTIVES .................................................................................................... 18 1.4 STEERING COMMITTEE .................................................................................................. 19 1.5 PEER FACILITIES ........................................................................................................... 19 2.0 UNDERSTANDING THE HOSPITAL ............................................................................. 21 2.1 CLINICAL ACTIVITY DATA SOURCES ............................................................................ 21 2.2 LWDH CAPACITY AND CLINICAL PROFILE .................................................................
  • Child and Youth Mental Health Outcomes Report 2017 Table of Contents

    Child and Youth Mental Health Outcomes Report 2017 Table of Contents

    Northwestern Health Unit Child and Youth Mental Health Outcomes Report 2017 Table of Contents Acknowledgements .................................................................................................................................... 2 Executive summary .................................................................................................................................... 3 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 4 NWHU catchment area map ..................................................................................................................... 5 Mortality ....................................................................................................................................................... 6 Suicide ..................................................................................................................................................... 6 Hospitalization............................................................................................................................................. 7 Intentional self-harm .............................................................................................................................. 7 Mental and behavioural disorders ....................................................................................................... 9 Substance misuse ...............................................................................................................................
  • Targeted Residential Fire Risk Reduction a Summary of At-Risk Aboriginal Areas in Canada

    Targeted Residential Fire Risk Reduction a Summary of At-Risk Aboriginal Areas in Canada

    Targeted Residential Fire Risk Reduction A Summary of At-Risk Aboriginal Areas in Canada Len Garis, Sarah Hughan, Paul Maxim, and Alex Tyakoff October 2016 Executive Summary Despite the steady reduction in rates of fire that have been witnessed in Canada in recent years, ongoing research has demonstrated that there continue to be striking inequalities in the way in which fire risk is distributed through society. It is well-established that residential dwelling fires are not distributed evenly through society, but that certain sectors in Canada experience disproportionate numbers of incidents. Oftentimes, it is the most vulnerable segments of society who face the greatest risk of fire and can least afford the personal and property damage it incurs. Fire risks are accentuated when property owners or occupiers fail to install and maintain fire and life safety devices such smoke alarms and carbon monoxide detectors in their homes. These life saving devices are proven to be highly effective, inexpensive to obtain and, in most cases, Canadian fire services will install them for free. A key component of driving down residential fire rates in Canadian cities, towns, hamlets and villages is the identification of communities where fire risk is greatest. Using the internationally recognized Home Safe methodology described in this study, the following Aboriginal and Non- Aboriginal communities in provinces and territories across Canada are determined to be at heightened risk of residential fire. These communities would benefit from a targeted smoke alarm give-away program and public education campaign to reduce the risk of residential fires and ensure the safety and well-being of all Canadian citizens.
  • Northwestern Health Unit Catchment Area Regional COVID-19 Cases

    Northwestern Health Unit Catchment Area Regional COVID-19 Cases

    March 30, 2021 07:30 a.m. COVID-19 Statistics: Northwestern Health Unit Catchment Area Northwestern Health Unit (NWHU) receives lab confirmation about COVID-19 cases when testing is complete. Before sharing this information with media or posting it to our website, we have to be sure of the facts. We conduct a full investigation on each case to ensure that the report is about a resident of the NWHU area and to determine what risk there is to the community. We act quickly to ensure that positive cases and contacts are in isolation – this is important for minimizing risk to the community. We ask that you wait to share any information about cases until NWHU has confirmed and shared them on our webpage or social media. NWHU updates data on our website by 1 pm, (not including statutory holidays) with any new information. For reasons of privacy, NWHU does not release the location of the residence of people who test positive for COVID-19. For more information see Ontario's COVID-19 data tool. Regional COVID-19 Cases within the NWHU Catchment Area Health Hub Active Cases Resolved Cases Total Cases Atikokan 0 17 17 Dryden 9 29 38 Emo 0 8 8 Fort Frances 0 41 41 Kenora 10 387 397 Rainy River 0 28 28 Red Lake 0 20 20 Sioux Lookout 16 113 129 Other ** 0 5 5 Totals 35 648 683 Atikokan Dryden Emo Fort Frances Kenora Rainy River Red Lake Sioux Lookout Other ** 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 Resolved Cases Active Cases 1 • Source: Case and Contact Management System (CCM).
  • Respondent's Factum

    Respondent's Factum

    S.C.C. File No. 35475 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA (ON APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO) B E T W E E N: HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Appellant - and - CLIFFORD KOKOPENACE Respondent - and - ABORIGINAL LEGAL SERVICES OF TORONTO INC., THE ADVOCATES’ SOCIETY, CANADIAN ASSOCIATION OF ELIZABETH FRY SOCIETIES, THE DAVID ASPER CENTRE FOR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS, NATIVE WOMEN’S ASSOCIATION OF CANADA, NISHNAWBE ASKI NATION and WOMEN’S LEGAL EDUCATION AND ACTION FUND INC. Interveners RESPONDENT’S FACTUM DOUCETTE BONI SANTORO FURGIUELE GOWLING LAFLEUR HENDERSON LLP 20 Dundas Street West, Suite 1100 160 Elgin Street, Suite 2600 Toronto, ON M5G 2G8 Ottawa, ON K1P 1C3 Delmar Doucette & Angela Ruffo Tel.: (416) 597-6907 Brian A. Crane Q.C. Fax: (416) 342-1766 Tel.: (613) 233-1781 Email: [email protected] Fax: (613) 563-9869 [email protected] Email: [email protected] SACK GOLDBLATT MITCHELL LLP Ottawa Agent for the Respondent/Moving Party, 20 Dundas Street West, Suite 1100 Clifford Kokopenace Toronto, ON M5G 2G8 Jessica Orkin Tel.: (416) 979-4381 Fax: (416) 979-4430 Email: [email protected] Counsel for the Respondent/Moving Party, Clifford Kokopenace ORIGINAL TO: THE REGISTRAR OF THIS HONOURABLE COURT COPIES TO: HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN BURKE-ROBERTSON LLP Crown Law Office Criminal 441 MacLaren Street, Suite 200 720 Bay Street, 10th Floor Ottawa, ON K2P 2H3 Toronto, ON M5G 2K1 Robert E. Houston, Q.C. Gillian E. Roberts Deborah Calderwood Tel.: (613) 236-9665 Tel.: (416) 326-2304 Fax: (613) 235-4430 Fax: (416) 326-4656 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] [email protected] Ottawa Agent for the Appellant/Responding Counsel for the Appellant/Responding Party, Party, Her Majesty the Queen Her Majesty the Queen AND TO: ABORIGINAL LEGAL SERVICES OF COMMUNITY LEGAL SERVICES TORONTO INC.
  • ANHP Community Engagement Report on Home Care and Community Services

    ANHP Community Engagement Report on Home Care and Community Services

    2020 ANHP Community Engagement Report on Home Care and Community Services CA2 GILLIS CONSULTING SEPTEMBER 22, 2020. TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................................ 5 List of Figures .......................................................................................................................................... 6 List of Tables ........................................................................................................................................... 7 List of Appendices ................................................................................................................................... 8 Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................. 9 1 Improving the Patient Journey ..................................................................................................... 17 1.1 Key Recommendations ........................................................................................................ 20 1.1.1 Communication and Coordination ................................................................................................. 21 1.1.2 Culturally Congruent System Navigation ........................................................................................ 22 1.1.3 Transportation and Travel: ............................................................................................................
  • The Community Well-Being (CWB) Index, 2016

    The Community Well-Being (CWB) Index, 2016

    e r è Lac i v i 93° W 90° W 87° W 84° W 81° W 78° W Guillaume-Delisle 75° W 72° W 69° W R N ° 4 5 Well-Being in First Nation: N ° 7 5 The Community Well-Being (CWB) Index, 2016 Ontario Hudson Bay Fort Severn 89 !¸ Fort Severn r e iv R n r e v e Peawanuck S ·! MANITOBA CWB Index Score Range, 2016 ¸ 0 - 49 Little ¸ Sachigo Lake Severn 50 - 59 Lake Kitchenuhmaykoosib Higher scores N Aaki 84 ° ¸ ¸ 1 Sachigo Bearskin Lake indicate a greater 5 N (Big Trout La¸ ke) ° La¸ ke 1 ·! 4 ! Wapekeka 2 60 - 69 5 Big Trout Lake ! Kasabonika level of socio-economic La¸ ke NUNAVUT Sachigo Big Trout well-being. Lake Lake Kasabonika Attawapiskat ¸ Lake ^ 70 - 79 91A !P ^ r ive t R ka James Bay pis Attawapiskat wa ^ 80 - 100 tta ^ Muskrat A Dam Lake ·! Muskrat Dam Wapikopa Fort Albany Lake ¸ Kingfisher Lake Webequie (Part) 67 ¸ ¸ La¸ ke 1 Kingfisher Wunnummin Winisk Lake Sandy¸ Lake 88 Weagamow Lake Nibinamik Lake ¸ Lake !P Fort Albany La¸ ke 87 Wunnumin 1 Fort Albany ¸ !P Kee-Way-Win Su¸ mmer Beaver (Part) 67 Sandy Lake Sandy Lake North Caribou Mameigwess Lake Lake Weagamow De¸ er Lake Lake North Spirit Deer La¸ ke Lake ¸ Attawapiskat Lake ONTARIO North Spirit Factory Lake Kabania Neskantaga Lake Island 1 r e v !P Moosonee i ·! R y n a MacDowell Marten lb McInnis A Lake Lake Fa¸ lls 65 Stout Po¸ plar Hill Lake Fo¸ rt Hope 64 Eabamet Ca¸ t Lake 63C Lake Cat Lake Pickle Lake ! r e Kesagami iv R Lake i ib ¸ a Osnaburgh 63B in s is M Slate F¸ alls Bamaji Lake ¸ Ogoki Lake Lake St.
  • Ontario / Terres Du Canada

    Ontario / Terres Du Canada

    98° 97° 96° 95° 94° 93° 92° 91° 90° 89° 88° 87° 86° 85° 84° 83° 82° 81° 80° 79° 78° 77° 76° 75° 74° 73° 72° 71° CANADA LANDS - ONTARIO TERRES DU CANADA - ONTARIO 56° er iv And Other Lands Managed Under the Et autres terres gérées sous le Système R k c Canada Lands Survey System d'arpentage des terres du Canada u D 56° ck la B Hudson Bay Scale / Échelle 1:2000000 0 25 50 100 150 200 Baie d'Hudson kilom e tre s kilom ètre s r ive i R ib 1 ce ntim e tre re pre se nts 20 kilom e tre s / 1 ce ntim ètre re prése nte 20 kilom ètre s sk Ni La m be rt Conform a l Conic Proje ction, sta nd a rd pa ra lle ls 49º N a nd 77º N. Proje ction La m be rt conique conform e , pa ra llèle s sta nd a rd s 49º N e t 77º N. Fort Severn 89 MA ! NITOBA Prod uce d by the Surve yor Ge ne ra l Bra nch (SGB), Prod uit pa r la Dire ction d e l’a rpe nte ur g énéra l (DAG), Na tura l R e source s Ca na d a . R e ssource s na ture lle s Ca na d a . 55° B e av er This m a p is not to be use d for d e fining bound a rie s. It is m a inly a n ind e x Ce tte ca rte ne d oit pa s ê tre utilisée pour d éte rm ine r le s lim ite s.
  • Standard Geographical Classification (SGC) 2011 Volume I the Classification 2011 How to Obtain More Information

    Standard Geographical Classification (SGC) 2011 Volume I the Classification 2011 How to Obtain More Information

    Catalogue no. 12-571-X Standard Geographical Classification (SGC) 2011 Volume I The Classification 2011 How to obtain more information For information about this product or the wide range of services and data available from Statistics Canada, visit our website at www.statcan.gc.ca, e-mail us at [email protected], or telephone us, Monday to Friday from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., at the following numbers: Statistics Canada’s National Contact Centre Toll-free telephone (Canada and United States): Inquiries line 1-800-263-1136 National telecommunications device for the hearing impaired 1-800-363-7629 Fax line 1-877-287-4369 Local or international calls: Inquiries line 1-613-951-8116 Fax line 1-613-951-0581 Depository Services Program Inquiries line 1-800-635-7943 Fax line 1-800-565-7757 To access this product This product, Catalogue no. 12-571-X, is available free in electronic format. To obtain a single issue, visit our website at www.statcan.gc.ca and browse by “Key resource” > “Publications.” Standards of service to the public Statistics Canada is committed to serving its clients in a prompt, reliable and courteous manner. To this end, Statistics Canada has developed standards of service that its employees observe. To obtain a copy of these service standards, please contact Statistics Canada toll-free at 1-800-263-1136. The service standards are also published on www.statcan.gc.ca under “About us” > “The agency” > “Providing services to Canadians.” Statistics Canada Standards Division Standard Geographical Classification (SGC) 2011 Volume I The Classification 2011 Published by authority of the Minister responsible for Statistics Canada © Minister of Industry, 2011 All rights reserved.