Chapter 8: Competition Policy

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Chapter 8: Competition Policy Chapter 11 - Agriculture & Rural Development Iceland AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT I. HORIZONTAL 2 II. MARKET MEASURES 41 III. DIRECT PAYMENTS TO FARMERS 73 IV. RURAL DEVELOPMENT POLICY 79 V. QUALITY POLICY 116 VI. ORGANIC FARMING 118 VII. STATISTICS 120 ANNEX 11:8 A CUSTOMS TARIFFS FOR AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTS ANNEX 11:8 B ICELANDIC IMPORT REGIME FOR PAP’S ACCORDING TO PROTOCOL 3 TO THE EEA AGREEMENT ANNEX 11:22 IMPORTS & EXPORTS OF AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTS IN 2004-2008 1/ 141 Chapter 11 - Agriculture & Rural Development Iceland I. HORIZONTAL Explanatory note on references to laws and monetary values Icelandic laws, regulations (and other secondary legislation) and treaties are published in the Government Gazette (Stjórnartíðindi)1. A consolidated version of laws in force is available at the website of Althingi (The Parliament of Iceland).2 A consolidated version of regulations in force is available at the Government website.3 Monetary values are listed in Icelandic krona (ISK). The rounded average Central Bank of Iceland exchange rate was EUR 1 = ISK 180 on 2 September 2009. However it should be kept in mind that the value of the krona has fluctuated in the last few years from below ISK 70 to over ISK 180 per euro at the official exchange rate (more if rates of EU banks are used). The euro value may therefore not give an accurate view, depending on the time of transactions. 1. Please provide, with an indication of recent and expected future developments, a general description of: - the national and regional farm income policy, production and structural policy (in particular rural development policy) - the budget earmarked and used for this general agricultural policy framework - the administrative structure in place at the national and/or regional level (e.g. Ministry of Agriculture, Intervention/Paying Agencies, Advisory Boards, etc.) involved in agricultural policy formulation, execution, monitoring, and control, and a) Is there a paying agency in charge of the management of your agricultural policy? If yes, please submit information on the way it operates. If no, please provide information on the institution in charge of the management of your agricultural policy (Ministry of Agriculture, regional offices, marketing boards, etc.)? In both cases, information on the structures of the organisation(s) involved should also be provided. b) When receiving applications for aids, how are they processed, controlled, authorized and paid? Please provide flowcharts describing the main processes and procedures with regard to the management and internal control system (if existing) together with a description of any system used for the administration and control of support schemes. - farmers’ organisations and their role in the agricultural and rural development policy formulation, implementation and monitoring as well as regarding their advisory role for farmers, - farm advisory services and farmer's register, - the method and frequency of information transmission to beneficiaries/general public (on applications and on other general agricultural and rural development issues). 1 www.stjornartidindi.is 2 www.althingi.is 3 http://www.reglugerd.is/interpro/dkm/WebGuard.nsf/key2/forsida 2/ 141 Chapter 11 - Agriculture & Rural Development Iceland 1. Introduction Conditions for agriculture in Iceland are limited by the country‟s geographical location and geological formation, being located between 63.3 and 66.7° north (Arctic Circle) on the Atlantic Ridge. The total area is 103,000 square kilometres. The climate is dominated by the surrounding ocean with average temperature of approximately 10°C in July and around -1°C in January. Annual precipitation ranges from approximately 400 to over 3,000 mm. The growing season is short, around four months. The island is young on the geological calendar, consisting almost exclusively of volcanic rocks, lava and sediment and has still many active volcanoes. Thus, there are large areas in the country which are very vulnerable to wind and water erosion. Figure 1.1: The surface of Iceland Source: The Icelandic Institute of Natural History 1998. Potentially arable land below 200 m altitude (i.e. land that can be cultivated), partly vegetated and partly barren, amounts to some 15% of the total surface, 18% of the area lies between 200 and 400 m and 58% above 400 m altitude. These conditions constrict agricultural production in Iceland. Because of the cool climate very few farms lie above 300 meters altitude and over 90% of the farms below 200 meters. In certain areas there is limited land for cultivation, which restricts the possibility of farms to grow and increase production. Traditional agriculture is primarily based on grass, by natural pasturage and making fodder in the form of hay or silage from cultivated grass fields. Total cultivated grassland amounts to 120,000 hectares. Crop production is currently small scale, almost exclusively barley for feed 3/ 141 Chapter 11 - Agriculture & Rural Development Iceland for use on the farms and not for sale. This cultivation, however, has been increasing rapidly in the last few years and barley is now grown on over 4,000 hectares yielding 15,000-16,000 tons and provides 10-12% of all grain used for livestock feed. Private ownership of farm holdings is the most common ownership in Iceland as shown in Table 1.1 and family farming is the most typical form. Table 1.1: Ownership of agricultural holdings in 2008 (No of farms*) Farmers and associates 3,223 State owned 239 Municipalities 114 Others 714 Total 4,290 *) Not all with agricultural production 2. Agriculture and the National Economy As in other western countries, Icelandic society has undergone extensive structural changes in the past decades resulting in emigration from the rural to the urban areas. The source of employment has shifted from agriculture and fisheries to industries and services. At present, 6.5% of the population live in the rural areas and less than 3% of the total workforce is employed in agriculture, which in 2007 provided 1.4% of the gross domestic production (GDP). In 2006 there were 3,045 farms in Iceland, i.e. operational units paying the levy on agricultural production applied according to Act No 84/1997 which is obligatory for all farms with agricultural income in excess of ISK 500,000 a year. Table 1.2: Key figures Rural population 2009 6.5% No of operational farms 2006 3,045 Proportion of manpower in agriculture 2008 2.5% Proportion of GDP from agriculture 2007 1.4% Gross farm income, incl. support payments 2008 (estim.) 27,588 (mISK)4 Producer support estimate (PSE) 2008 51% Despite these relatively low figures on the national scale, agriculture remains an important sector outside the densely populated south-west corner of the country. In fact agriculture is the backbone for livelihood and employment in the more remote rural areas and provides the basis on which various services and new initiatives are built. It can be argued that the public and political willingness to support agriculture to the current level is to the larger extent, based on two pillars; food security and the vital role that agriculture plays in rural society. A. Agriculture by Sectors Livestock production provides 87% of farm income from agricultural production, the remainder deriving from horticulture and potato growing (figure 3). 4 mISK = million Icelandic Krona 4/ 141 Chapter 11 - Agriculture & Rural Development Iceland Table 1.3: Annual turnover on agricultural production Annual turnover on agricultural production Calendar Calendar Calendar Calendar Year 2005 Year 2006 Year Year 2008e 2007e5 1. Bovine products (incl. sales of live 10,495,749 11,258,185 12,102,549 12,955,778 animals and direct payments) 2. Sheep/goat products (incl. sales of live 4,921,460 5,295,831 5,693,019 6,094,376 animals and direct payments) 3. Horse products (incl. sales of live 625,189 776,923 831,696 890,330 animals) 4. Pig products (incl. sales of live animals) 1,159,822 1,420,673 1,520,830 1,628,049 5. Poultry products (incl. sales of live birds; 995,341 1,248,294 1,336,299 1,430,508 excluding eggs) 6. Eggs 650,013 444,703 476,055 509,617 7. Potatoes 349,392 643,528 688,897 737,464 8. Swede (yellow turnips) 45,287 60,629 64,903 69,478 9. Other vegetables and flowers 2,096,685 1,962,820 2,101,199 2,249,333 10. Pelts from mink and foxes (including 296,426 506,015 541,689 579,878 sales of live animals) 11. Eiderdown 172,492 174,632 186,944 200,123 12. Forestry products (incl. sales of forestry 119,681 42,624 45,629 48,846 plants) 13. Sales of hay and various other 144,872 169,321 181,258 194,037 agricultural products Total 22,072,408 24,004,177 25,770,964 27,587,817 Agricultural production at farmgate in years 2005 and 2006 with estimates for years 2007 and 2008; in ISK 000s (value incl. direct payments) Source: (1) The State Financial Management Authority (years 2005 and 2006); (2) Agricultural Economics Institute (years 2007e, 2008e). Traditionally, agricultural production in Iceland rested on sheep and cattle with horses for work and transport. While this has changed greatly over the last decades, dairy and sheep farming are still the dominating sectors in terms of both employment and production as well as in supporting rural habitation. There are at present 738 dairy farms and 1,955 sheep farms with support entitlements (see later). A typical dairy farmer keeps 30-40 cows and a sheep farmer 300-600 sheep, while the variation is considerable and the development is towards larger farm size. During the past decade consumption patterns have changed considerably, with consumption switching from sheep meat to pork and poultry.
Recommended publications
  • Food Security and Identity: Iceland
    FOOD SECURITY AND IDENTITY: ICELAND A thesis submitted to Kent State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts by Gina Marie Butrico August, 2013 Thesis written by Gina Butrico A.A.S., Middlesex County College, 2009 B.A., Kent State University, 2011 M.A., Kent State University, 2013 Approved by ___________________________________, Advisor Dr. David H. Kaplan, Ph.D. ___________________________________, Chair, Department of Geography Dr. Mandy Munro-Stasiuk, Ph.D. ___________________________________, Associate Dean for Graduate Affairs, Raymond A. Craig, Ph.D. College of Arts and Sciences ii TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Figures ..........................................................................................................v List of Tables ....................................................................................................... viii Acknowledgements ................................................................................................ ix Chapter I. Introduction .................................................................................................1 Food Security in Iceland ..............................................................................3 Food Identity in Iceland ...............................................................................5 Site Selection ...............................................................................................6 Food Geography...........................................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • Conflict, Conservation, and the Whooper Swan in Iceland
    Feathered majesty in the grainfield? Conflict, conservation, and the whooper swan in Iceland Shauna Laurel Jones Faculty of Life and Environmental Sciences University of Iceland 2018 Feathered majesty in the grainfield? Conflict, conservation, and the whooper swan in Iceland Shauna Laurel Jones 60 ECTS thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of a Magister Scientiarum degree in Environment and Natural Resources MS Committee Karl Benediktsson Edda R. H. Waage Master’s Examiner Gunnþóra Ólafsdóttir Faculty of Life and Environmental Sciences School of Engineering and Natural Sciences University of Iceland Reykjavik, May 2018 Feathered majesty in the grainfield? Conflict, conservation, and the whooper swan in Iceland Conflict, conservation, and swans in Iceland 60 ECTS thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of a Magister Scientiarum degree in Environment and Natural Resources Copyright © 2018 Shauna Laurel Jones All rights reserved Faculty of Life and Environmental Sciences School of Engineering and Natural Sciences University of Iceland Sturlugata 7 101 Reykjavik Iceland Telephone: 525 4000 Bibliographic information: Jones, S. L., 2018, Feathered majesty in the grainfield? Conflict, conservation, and the whooper swan in Iceland, Master’s thesis, Faculty of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Iceland, 90 pp. Abstract This thesis investigates relationships between cultural values and conservation practices, focusing on the whooper swan (Cygnus cygnus) in Iceland. Conflicts between farmers and swans in Iceland have triggered debates
    [Show full text]
  • Future Opportunities for Bioeconomy in the West Nordic Countries
    Future Opportunities for Bioeconomy in the West Nordic Countries Sigrún Elsa Smáradóttir Lilja Magnúsdóttir Birgir Örn Smárason Gunnar Þórðarson Birgit Johannessen Elísabet Kemp Stefánsdóttir Birgitte Jacobsen Unn Laksá Hrönn Ólína Jörundsdóttir Svein Ø. Solberg Rólvur Djurhuus Sofie Erbs-Maibing Bryndís Björnsdóttir Ragnhildur Gunnarsdóttir Kjartan Hoydal Guðmundur Óli Hreggviðsson Guðmundur Bjarki Ingvarsson Amalie Jessen Hörður G. Kristinsson Daði Már Kristófersson Nette Levermann Business Development Nuka Møller Lund Josephine Nymand Skýrsla Matís 37-14 Ólafur Reykdal Janus Vang Desember 2014 Helge Paulsen Sveinn Margeirsson ISSN 1670-7192 Titill / Title Future Opportunities for Bioeconomy in the West Nordic Countries / Framtíðartækifæri í Vest-Norræna lífhagkerfinu Höfundar / Authors Sigrún Elsa Smáradóttir, Lilja Magnúsdóttir, Birgir Örn Smárason, Gunnar Þórðarson, Birgit Johannessen, Elísabet Kemp Stefánsdóttir, Birgitte Jacobsen, Unn Laksá, Hrönn Ólína Jörundsdóttir, Svein Ø. Solberg, Rólvur Djurhuus, Sofie Erbs-Maibing, Bryndís Björnsdóttir, Ragnhildur Gunnarsdóttir, Kjartan Hoydal, Guðmundur Óli Hreggviðsson, Guðmundur Bjarki Ingvarsson, Amalie Jessen, Hörður G. Kristinsson, Daði Már Kristófersson, Nette Levermann, Nuka Møller Lund, Josephine Nymand, Ólafur Reykdal, Janus Vang, Helge Paulsen, Sveinn Margeirsson Skýrsla / Report no. 37-14 Útgáfudagur / Date: December 2014 Verknr. / Project no. Styrktaraðilar /Funding: The Nordic Council of Ministers Arctic Co-operation Programme, NKJ (Nordic Joint Committee for Agricultural and Food Research), AG-Fisk (Working Group for Fisheries Co-operation), SNS (Nordic Forest Research), NordGen (the Nordic Genetic Resource Centre) and Matis. Ágrip á íslensku: Skýrslan gefur yfirlit yfir lífauðlindir á Íslandi, Færeyjum og Grænlandi, nýtingu þeirra og framtíðartækifæri sem byggja á grænum vexti. Skýrslan er góður grunnur fyrir markvissa stefnumótun og áherslur í nýsköpun fyrir framtíðaruppbyggingu á svæðinu. Á grunni verkefnisins hefur verið mótuð framkvæmdaráætlun með fjórum megin- áherslum; 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Halldór Laxness - Wikipedia
    People of Iceland on Iceland Postage Stamps Halldór Laxness - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halldór_Laxness Halldór Laxness Halldór Kiljan Laxness (Icelandic: [ˈhaltour ˈcʰɪljan ˈlaxsnɛs] Halldór Laxness ( listen); born Halldór Guðjónsson; 23 April 1902 – 8 February 1998) was an Icelandic writer. He won the 1955 Nobel Prize in Literature; he is the only Icelandic Nobel laureate.[2] He wrote novels, poetry, newspaper articles, essays, plays, travelogues and short stories. Major influences included August Strindberg, Sigmund Freud, Knut Hamsun, Sinclair Lewis, Upton Sinclair, Bertolt Brecht and Ernest Hemingway.[3] Contents Early years 1920s 1930s 1940s 1950s Born Halldór Guðjónsson Later years 23 April 1902 Family and legacy Reykjavík, Iceland Bibliography Died 8 February 1998 Novels (aged 95) Stories Reykjavík, Iceland Plays Poetry Nationality Icelandic Travelogues and essays Notable Nobel Prize in Memoirs awards Literature Translations 1955 Other Spouses Ingibjörg Einarsdóttir References (m. 1930–1940) External links [1] Auður Sveinsdóttir (m. 1945–1998) Early years Laxness was born in 1902 in Reykjavík. His parents moved to the Laxnes farm in nearby Mosfellssveit parish when he was three. He started to read books and write stories at an early age. He attended the technical school in Reykjavík from 1915 to 1916 and had an article published in the newspaper Morgunblaðið in 1916.[4] By the time his first novel was published (Barn náttúrunnar, 1919), Laxness had already begun his travels on the European continent.[5] 1 of 9 2019/05/19, 11:59 Halldór Laxness - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halldór_Laxness 1920s In 1922, Laxness joined the Abbaye Saint-Maurice-et-Saint-Maur in Clervaux, Luxembourg where the monks followed the rules of Saint Benedict of Nursia.
    [Show full text]
  • Iceland's Implementation of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development
    June 2019 Iceland's Implementation of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development Voluntary National Review Government of Iceland Prime Minister’s Office Contents PRESS BOX TO GO TO CHAPTER Message from the Prime Minister very Friday at noon, hundreds of young people gather out- side Althingi, Iceland’s Parliament, insisting on radical action against climate change. They are a part of an international Emovement of young people who rightly point out the fact that today’s decisions determine their future. Climate change is a crisis for humanity as a whole; rendering traditional territorial borders meaningless. International collaboration is the only way forward. The Millennium Development Goals, adopted in 2000, were often referred to as “the world’s biggest promise”. They were a global agreement to reduce poverty and human deprivation. And they did. The MDGs lifted more than one billion people out of extreme poverty. The goals provided access to water and sanitation; drove down child mortality; drastically improved maternal health; cut the number of children out of school; and made huge advances in combatting HIV/AIDS and malaria. The Sustainable Development Goals are a bold commitment to finish what has been started. Coinciding with the historic Paris Agreement on climate change, the SDGs are the promise our young people are calling for, of sustainability, equality and wellbeing for all. The SDGs are also an important reminder that sustainable development is not just an issue for faraway places. Each and every one of us has both rights and obligations in this context. While some of the SDGs might feel distant from our daily lives, they encompass everything that makes life worthwhile, such as education, water, peace and equality, to name just a few.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring Organic Agriculture in Iceland Through the Lens of Ecological Ethics: Implications for Kyrgyzstan
    Land Restoration Training Programme Keldnaholt, 112 Reykjavik, Iceland Final project 2019 EXPLORING ORGANIC AGRICULTURE IN ICELAND THROUGH THE LENS OF ECOLOGICAL ETHICS: IMPLICATIONS FOR KYRGYZSTAN Igor Taranov Ministry of Agriculture, Food Industry and Land Reclamation of the Kyrgyz Republic 96a, Kievskaya street, Bishkek, Kyrgyz Republic [email protected] Supervisors: Björn Helgi Barkarson Ministry for the Environment and Natural Resources [email protected] Úlfur Óskarsson Agricultural University of Iceland [email protected] ABSTRACT In view of global climate change and the pressing issue of land degradation, sustainable agricultural practices such as organic farming represent one of the viable solutions. This research contributed to better understanding of the concept of sustainability by placing emphasis on the ethical aspect in organic farmers’ decision-making and elaborated on the thresholds and opportunities for organic agriculture development in Iceland and Kyrgyzstan. The study employed semi-structured interviews and a literature survey for data collection. Twelve stakeholders in the organic sector from varied geographical regions of Iceland were interviewed. A thematic analysis of the interview transcripts was conducted. The respondents reported that organic farmers’ mindsets could be characterized through their ethical values connected to nature and society. Among the key values participants mentioned were care for the environment, with the accent placed on soil and human health, respect for nature, dedication and commitment to organic principles, and fairness to customers. The following main thresholds for the enhancement of organic agriculture in Iceland were identified: a public policy vacuum, lack of a strategic vision and political leadership, poor linkages among the stakeholders of the organic agriculture sector, inadequate system for financial support to stimulate organic conversion, and unrealized organic market potential.
    [Show full text]
  • FULLTEXT01.Pdf
    Effects of afforestation on ecosystems, landscape and rural development Proceedings of the AFFORNORD conference, Reykholt, Iceland, June 18–22, 2005 Eds. Gudmundur Halldorsson, Edda Sigurdis Oddsdottir and Olafur Eggertsson TemaNord 2007:508 Effects of afforestation on ecosystems, landscape and rural development Proceedings of the AFFORNORD conference, Reykholt, Iceland, June 18–22, 2005 TemaNord 2007:508 © Nordic Council of Ministers, Copenhagen 2007 ISBN 978-92-893-1443-5 Print: Ekspressen Tryk & Kopicenter Cover: Kjell Olsson, the Publication Unit Layout: the Publication Unit Cover photos: Olafur Eggertsson, Edda Oddsdottir, Halldor Sverrisson and Kjartan Kjartansson, Icelandic Forest Research Copies: 200 Printed on environmentally friendly paper This publication can be ordered on www.norden.org/order. Other Nordic publications are available at www.norden.org/publications Printed in Denmark Nordic Council of Ministers Nordic Council Store Strandstræde 18 Store Strandstræde 18 DK-1255 Copenhagen K DK-1255 Copenhagen K Phone (+45) 3396 0200 Phone (+45) 3396 0400 Fax (+45) 3396 0202 Fax (+45) 3311 1870 www.norden.org Editors: Gudmundur Halldorsson, Edda Sigurdis Oddsdottir and Olafur Eggertsson , Icelandic Forest Re- search, Mogilsa, 116 Reykjavík, Iceland. Scientific committee: Gudmundur Halldorsson, Iceland; Susanne Harding, Denmark; Jens Peter Skovsgaard, Denmark; Odd Egil Stabbetorp, Norway; Johan Barstad, Norway; Harald Sverdrup, Sweden; Tróndur Leivs- son, The Faroe Islands Nordic co-operation Nordic cooperation is one of the world’s most extensive forms of regional collaboration, involving Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, Sweden, and three autonomous areas: the Faroe Islands, Green- land, and Åland. Nordic cooperation has firm traditions in politics, the economy, and culture. It plays an important role in European and international collaboration, and aims at creating a strong Nordic community in a strong Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Field School Student Manual 2012
    STUDENT MANUAL FIELD SCHOOL IN NORTH ATLANTIC ARCHAEOLOGY Vatnsfjörður, Northwest Iceland June 25-July 20, 2012 Sponsored by: Government of INSTITUTE OF UNIVERSITY CENTRE MEDIEVAL Iceland ARCHAEOLOGY OF THE WESTFJORDS WESTFJORDS SOCIETY In cooperation with: UNIVERSITY OF UNIVERSITY Northern Science and North Atlantic ICELAND OF ABERDEEN Education Centre, City Biocultural University of New York Organization Table of Contents Welcome……………………………………………………………………………………. 3 Introductions………………………………………………………………………………. 3 Iceland and Icelanders……………………………………………………………………. 3 The Westfjords…………………………………………………………………………… 4 The site of Vatnsfjörður………………………………………………………………….. 5 Field school instructors…………………………………………………………………… 7 Logistics……………………………………………………………………………………. 9 What to bring……………………………………………………………………………... 9 Travel itinerary…………………………………………………………………………… 11 Accommodation………………………………………………………………………….. 12 Health and Safety………………………………………………………………………….. 13 On-site hazards and preventative measures……………………………………………… 13 Off-site hazards and preventative measures……………………………………………… 14 Important health and safety information…………………………………………………. 14 Confidential health and safety form (to be printed, completed, and submitted)…….. 15 Field School Programme………………………………………………………………….. 16 Aims of the course………………………………………………………………………... 16 Pre-course work…………………………………………………………………………... 16 Excavation programme…………………………………………………………………… 16 Landscape survey programme……………………………………………………………. 18 Post-excavation work…………………………………………………………………….. 19 Lectures…………………………………………………………………………………..
    [Show full text]
  • Food Security in Iceland Present Vulnerabilities, Possible Solutions
    Food Security in Iceland Present Vulnerabilities, Possible Solutions Orri Jóhannsson Lokaverkefni til MA-gráðu í alþjóðasamskiptum Félagsvísindasvið Food Security in Iceland Present Vulnerabilities, Possible Solutions Orri Jóhannsson Lokaverkefni til MA-gráðu í alþjóðasamskiptum Leiðbeinandi: Alyson Bailes Stjórnmálafræðideild Félagsvísindasvið Háskóla Íslands Júní 2011 Ritgerð þessi er lokaverkefni til MA-gráðu í alþjóðasamskiptum og er óheimilt að afrita ritgerðina á nokkurn hátt nema með leyfi rétthafa. © Orri Jóhannsson 2011 Reykjavík, Ísland 2011 Abstract Food insecurity is a major worldwide problem. This problem is only likely to grow as food prices increases and resources get scarcer. Numerous international institutions and experts predict that conflicts over food will become more common as water and food resources become more valuable. Iceland’s small and import oriented economy is not immune from this development and the influence of this global trend can already be felt in Iceland. Higher global food and resource prices combined with the devaluation of the Icelandic Króna have already made food imports more difficult for Iceland. This has prompted debate on the subject of food security and the value of strong domestic food production, although this discussion has not yet spread through society as a whole. Based on extensive research into economic data, consultation with experts and conducting a questionnaire among the public, this thesis attempts to shed light on the country’s food situation, its vulnerabilities, and its strengths. Questions are asked about how Iceland stands in this regard and what threats and risks potentially endanger the food security of the nation. The state of preparedness (or lack thereof) within the administration is examined and questions are asked about what Iceland could do to improve in this area.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is the Taste of CO2? the Sustainability of Icelandic Food Systems in the Face of Climate Change
    SIT Graduate Institute/SIT Study Abroad SIT Digital Collections Independent Study Project (ISP) Collection SIT Study Abroad Fall 2016 What is the Taste of CO2? The us stainability of Icelandic food systems in the face of climate change Molly Peek SIT Study Abroad Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcollections.sit.edu/isp_collection Part of the Environmental Studies Commons, Food Studies Commons, Other Food Science Commons, Other Geography Commons, and the Scandinavian Studies Commons Recommended Citation Peek, Molly, "What is the Taste of CO2? The uss tainability of Icelandic food systems in the face of climate change" (2016). Independent Study Project (ISP) Collection. 2452. https://digitalcollections.sit.edu/isp_collection/2452 This Unpublished Paper is brought to you for free and open access by the SIT Study Abroad at SIT Digital Collections. It has been accepted for inclusion in Independent Study Project (ISP) Collection by an authorized administrator of SIT Digital Collections. For more information, please contact [email protected]. What is the Taste of CO2? The sustainability of Icelandic food systems in the face of climate change By Molly Peek Project Advisor: Paul Wetzel of Smith College, Northampton MA USA Academic Director: Ragnar Honeth Home Institution: Smith College Major: Geosciences Submitted in partial fulfillment for the requirements for Iceland’s Climate Change in the Arctic, SIT Study Abroad, Fall 2016 Abstract Food security in the arctic and subarctic is an area of growing research and concern as climate change continues to alter the availability of traditional foods eaten in remote areas, especially as shipping food has questionable sustainability and contributes to rising CO2 levels.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Diversity in Iceland
    BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY IN ICELAND National Report to the Convention on Biological Diversity MINISTRY FOR THE ENVIRONMENT THE ICELANDIC INSTITUTE OF NATURAL HISTORY 2001 BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY IN ICELAND National Report to the Convention on Biological Diversity MINISTRY FOR THE ENVIRONMENT THE ICELANDIC INSTITUTE OF NATURAL HISTORY, 2001 BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY IN ICELAND National Report to the Convention on Biological Diversity MINISTRY FOR THE ENVIRONMENT Vonarstraeti 4 IS-150 Reykjavik Iceland Telephone: + 354 - 560 9600 Telefax: + 354 - 562 4566 THE ICELANDIC INSTITUTE OF NATURAL HISTORY Hlemmur 3 IS-105 Reykjavík Iceland Telephone: + 354 - 5900 500 Telefax: + 354 - 5900 595 Cover: Papaver radicatum, arctic poppies or melasól in Icelandic. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS: GENERAL OVERVIEW.....................................................................................5 PHYSICAL GEOGRAPHY........................................................................................5 DEGRADATION OF SOIL AND VEGETATION ...........................................6 LAND USE .....................................................................................................................7 GEOTHERMAL ACTIVITY .....................................................................................8 THE MARINE ENVIRONMENT ...........................................................................8 BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY...............................................................................11 FLORA...........................................................................................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • Migration and Cultural Transmission: Making a Home in Iceland
    Migration and Cultural Transmission: Making a Home in Iceland A thesis submitted for a final examination for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Anthropology as an External Student of the University of London By Nína Rós Ísberg 2010 1 Abstract The research is about the assimilation of women immigrants in Icelandic society through domesticity and the home. The focus is on the material practices that act to incorporate ‘foreign women’ into being Icelandic, accepting the ambivalence and resistances that act to preserve certain emotional attachments to former identities whilst at the same time considering the role of the senses and emotions in promoting knowledgeable, gendered subjects capable of acting in changed circumstances. In particular I look at the experience of immigrant women in making and running a home, bringing up their children and how this experience is materialized in daily activities. I focus on a group of German women who came to Iceland in 1949 to work, especially in rural areas where cheap labour was needed. Many of them stayed, married and established families and became Icelandic citizens. Immigration policies in Iceland have been strongly assimilationist and therefore the research shows the effects this assimilation has had on the identity of these women and what implications their identities have for understanding Icelandic identity in general. Comparison of this group to another younger one which has arrived in the last five to fifteen years makes apparent the role of domesticity and kinship relations in assimilating immigrant women into the Icelandic society. The research is carried out according to standard anthropological techniques of interviewing and participant observation.
    [Show full text]