Food Security in Iceland Present Vulnerabilities, Possible Solutions

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Food Security in Iceland Present Vulnerabilities, Possible Solutions Food Security in Iceland Present Vulnerabilities, Possible Solutions Orri Jóhannsson Lokaverkefni til MA-gráðu í alþjóðasamskiptum Félagsvísindasvið Food Security in Iceland Present Vulnerabilities, Possible Solutions Orri Jóhannsson Lokaverkefni til MA-gráðu í alþjóðasamskiptum Leiðbeinandi: Alyson Bailes Stjórnmálafræðideild Félagsvísindasvið Háskóla Íslands Júní 2011 Ritgerð þessi er lokaverkefni til MA-gráðu í alþjóðasamskiptum og er óheimilt að afrita ritgerðina á nokkurn hátt nema með leyfi rétthafa. © Orri Jóhannsson 2011 Reykjavík, Ísland 2011 Abstract Food insecurity is a major worldwide problem. This problem is only likely to grow as food prices increases and resources get scarcer. Numerous international institutions and experts predict that conflicts over food will become more common as water and food resources become more valuable. Iceland’s small and import oriented economy is not immune from this development and the influence of this global trend can already be felt in Iceland. Higher global food and resource prices combined with the devaluation of the Icelandic Króna have already made food imports more difficult for Iceland. This has prompted debate on the subject of food security and the value of strong domestic food production, although this discussion has not yet spread through society as a whole. Based on extensive research into economic data, consultation with experts and conducting a questionnaire among the public, this thesis attempts to shed light on the country’s food situation, its vulnerabilities, and its strengths. Questions are asked about how Iceland stands in this regard and what threats and risks potentially endanger the food security of the nation. The state of preparedness (or lack thereof) within the administration is examined and questions are asked about what Iceland could do to improve in this area. The general findings are that the Icelandic authorities have no comprehensive contingency plans for food security and no plans for emergency food reserves. Finally, suggestions are made about areas for improvement so that food security can be safeguarded. iii iv Útdráttur Fæðuóöryggi er mikið vandamál í heiminum. Umfang vandans á aðeins eftir að aukast þar sem matvælaverð fer hækkandi og öll aðföng verða stöðugt erfiðari. Fjöldi alþjóðastofnana og sérfræðinga spá því að vopnuð átök vegna deilna um vatn og matvæli eigi eftir að verða algengari þar sem slíkur varningur verður sífellt verðmætari. Smár og innflutningsmiðaður efnahagur Íslands er ekki ónæmur fyrir þessari hnattrænu þróun og áhrif hennar má þegar finna á Íslandi. Hærra matvæla- og aðfangaverð á heimsmarkaði ásamt falli krónunnar hafa þegar gert innflutningi erfitt um vik. Þessi þróun hefur vakið upp umræðu um fæðuöryggi þjóðarinnar og þýðingu þess að búa yfir sterkri innlendri matvælaframleiðslu. Með því að framkvæma viðamikla rannsókn á hagtölum, leita álits hjá sérfræðingum og með því að leggja fyrir spurningalista meðal almennings reynir þessi ritgerð að varpa ljósi á ástand matvælageirans hér á landi, veikleika hans og styrk. Spurt er hvernig Ísland standi í þessu tilliti og hvaða ógnir og hættur steðji hugsanlega að fæðuöryggi í landinu. Viðbúnaður (eða skortur á honum) innan stjórnsýslunnar er skoðaður og spurningar lagðar fram um hvað Ísland geti gert til að bæta sig í því tilliti. Helstu niðurstöður eru þær að íslensk stjórnvöld hafa hvorki gert neinar víðtækar viðbúnaðaráætlanir fyrir fæðuöryggi né neyðaráætlanir varðandi matvælabirgðir. Því eru í ritgerðinni gerðar tillögur um úrbætur svo fæðuöryggi verði tryggt. v vi Preface The idea of writing about food security came to me during the financial crisis in autumn of 2008. The uncertainty at the time surrounding reliability of imports and credit facilities for Icelandic importers abroad, along with newspaper and television reports of people hoarding food, evoked thoughts of ‘what if’ scenarios. I asked myself what would happen if the country were totally closed off from the outside world. Could Icelanders gather their own food without outside help? Most of the people I approached with this subject idea were convinced that Iceland would easily manage and hinted that there was in fact no point in looking further into this. Of course, they could only rely on their common sense (combined with patriotism) to reach this conclusion, because little if any research had been done on food security before. This egged me on to look at this myself and do my own research, not to prove anybody wrong, but to see if the situation was really so simple and clear cut. During my work on this thesis I have benefited from the great support and help of friends and family. I would especially like to thank Valgerður Guðrún Bjarkadóttir for immense patience and help during the writing and my children Markús Einar and Elín Birna for not being too cross over limited playtime with their father. I would also like to thank Jón Kristinn Ragnarsson for good suggestions, encouragement, and weird attempts at reverse psychology to spur me on. He and Anna Hugadóttir get credit for invaluable help with proofing the thesis. Special thanks must also go out to all of the one hundred and twelve accommodating individuals who took time out of their lives to answer my questionnaire. Finally yet importantly, I would like to thank Alyson Bailes for excellent guidance, well-considered comments, and interest in the well-being of this project. This thesis is the final assignment in the MA studies of International Relations at the University of Iceland. It accounts for 30 ECTS credits and the instructor was Alyson Bailes, Adjunct Professor at the University of Iceland. Orri Jóhannsson vii viii Table of Contents Abstract .................................................................................................................................. iii Útdráttur .................................................................................................................................. v Preface ................................................................................................................................... vii 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................... 1 2 Concepts ............................................................................................................... 4 2.1 Food Security – A Definition ................................................................................. 4 2.2 Realism .................................................................................................................... 6 2.2.1 Historical Roots .............................................................................................................. 7 2.2.2 Modern Political Realism and Neorealism ..................................................................... 8 2.2.3 Realism and food security ............................................................................................ 10 2.3 Human Security .................................................................................................... 12 2.3.1 What is Human Security? ............................................................................................. 12 2.3.2 The 1994 Human Development Report ........................................................................ 15 2.3.3. Two main theoretical schools of human security......................................................... 16 2.3.3.1 Freedom from Fear ............................................................................................... 17 2.3.3.2 Freedom from Want .............................................................................................. 18 2.3.4 In Practice ..................................................................................................................... 19 2.4 Securitisation ......................................................................................................... 20 2.4.1 What is Securitisation? ................................................................................................. 20 2.4.2 Who has the Power to Securitise? ................................................................................. 21 2.4.3 Securitisation of the Icelandic Food Issue .................................................................... 23 3 Iceland’s Situation ............................................................................................ 27 3.1 The Icelandic Food Security Dialogue ................................................................ 27 3.1.1 Three Influential Events ............................................................................................... 28 3.1.2 Búnaðarþing 2008: The Start of a Dialogue ................................................................. 30 3.1.3 Beyond the 2008 Búnaðarþing ..................................................................................... 32 3.1.4 The Public View ........................................................................................................... 36 3.2 Food in Iceland ...................................................................................................... 39 3.2.1 Consumption ................................................................................................................. 39 3.2.2 Production ..................................................................................................................... 42 3.2.3 Imports .........................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Food Security and Identity: Iceland
    FOOD SECURITY AND IDENTITY: ICELAND A thesis submitted to Kent State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts by Gina Marie Butrico August, 2013 Thesis written by Gina Butrico A.A.S., Middlesex County College, 2009 B.A., Kent State University, 2011 M.A., Kent State University, 2013 Approved by ___________________________________, Advisor Dr. David H. Kaplan, Ph.D. ___________________________________, Chair, Department of Geography Dr. Mandy Munro-Stasiuk, Ph.D. ___________________________________, Associate Dean for Graduate Affairs, Raymond A. Craig, Ph.D. College of Arts and Sciences ii TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Figures ..........................................................................................................v List of Tables ....................................................................................................... viii Acknowledgements ................................................................................................ ix Chapter I. Introduction .................................................................................................1 Food Security in Iceland ..............................................................................3 Food Identity in Iceland ...............................................................................5 Site Selection ...............................................................................................6 Food Geography...........................................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • Conflict, Conservation, and the Whooper Swan in Iceland
    Feathered majesty in the grainfield? Conflict, conservation, and the whooper swan in Iceland Shauna Laurel Jones Faculty of Life and Environmental Sciences University of Iceland 2018 Feathered majesty in the grainfield? Conflict, conservation, and the whooper swan in Iceland Shauna Laurel Jones 60 ECTS thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of a Magister Scientiarum degree in Environment and Natural Resources MS Committee Karl Benediktsson Edda R. H. Waage Master’s Examiner Gunnþóra Ólafsdóttir Faculty of Life and Environmental Sciences School of Engineering and Natural Sciences University of Iceland Reykjavik, May 2018 Feathered majesty in the grainfield? Conflict, conservation, and the whooper swan in Iceland Conflict, conservation, and swans in Iceland 60 ECTS thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of a Magister Scientiarum degree in Environment and Natural Resources Copyright © 2018 Shauna Laurel Jones All rights reserved Faculty of Life and Environmental Sciences School of Engineering and Natural Sciences University of Iceland Sturlugata 7 101 Reykjavik Iceland Telephone: 525 4000 Bibliographic information: Jones, S. L., 2018, Feathered majesty in the grainfield? Conflict, conservation, and the whooper swan in Iceland, Master’s thesis, Faculty of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Iceland, 90 pp. Abstract This thesis investigates relationships between cultural values and conservation practices, focusing on the whooper swan (Cygnus cygnus) in Iceland. Conflicts between farmers and swans in Iceland have triggered debates
    [Show full text]
  • Future Opportunities for Bioeconomy in the West Nordic Countries
    Future Opportunities for Bioeconomy in the West Nordic Countries Sigrún Elsa Smáradóttir Lilja Magnúsdóttir Birgir Örn Smárason Gunnar Þórðarson Birgit Johannessen Elísabet Kemp Stefánsdóttir Birgitte Jacobsen Unn Laksá Hrönn Ólína Jörundsdóttir Svein Ø. Solberg Rólvur Djurhuus Sofie Erbs-Maibing Bryndís Björnsdóttir Ragnhildur Gunnarsdóttir Kjartan Hoydal Guðmundur Óli Hreggviðsson Guðmundur Bjarki Ingvarsson Amalie Jessen Hörður G. Kristinsson Daði Már Kristófersson Nette Levermann Business Development Nuka Møller Lund Josephine Nymand Skýrsla Matís 37-14 Ólafur Reykdal Janus Vang Desember 2014 Helge Paulsen Sveinn Margeirsson ISSN 1670-7192 Titill / Title Future Opportunities for Bioeconomy in the West Nordic Countries / Framtíðartækifæri í Vest-Norræna lífhagkerfinu Höfundar / Authors Sigrún Elsa Smáradóttir, Lilja Magnúsdóttir, Birgir Örn Smárason, Gunnar Þórðarson, Birgit Johannessen, Elísabet Kemp Stefánsdóttir, Birgitte Jacobsen, Unn Laksá, Hrönn Ólína Jörundsdóttir, Svein Ø. Solberg, Rólvur Djurhuus, Sofie Erbs-Maibing, Bryndís Björnsdóttir, Ragnhildur Gunnarsdóttir, Kjartan Hoydal, Guðmundur Óli Hreggviðsson, Guðmundur Bjarki Ingvarsson, Amalie Jessen, Hörður G. Kristinsson, Daði Már Kristófersson, Nette Levermann, Nuka Møller Lund, Josephine Nymand, Ólafur Reykdal, Janus Vang, Helge Paulsen, Sveinn Margeirsson Skýrsla / Report no. 37-14 Útgáfudagur / Date: December 2014 Verknr. / Project no. Styrktaraðilar /Funding: The Nordic Council of Ministers Arctic Co-operation Programme, NKJ (Nordic Joint Committee for Agricultural and Food Research), AG-Fisk (Working Group for Fisheries Co-operation), SNS (Nordic Forest Research), NordGen (the Nordic Genetic Resource Centre) and Matis. Ágrip á íslensku: Skýrslan gefur yfirlit yfir lífauðlindir á Íslandi, Færeyjum og Grænlandi, nýtingu þeirra og framtíðartækifæri sem byggja á grænum vexti. Skýrslan er góður grunnur fyrir markvissa stefnumótun og áherslur í nýsköpun fyrir framtíðaruppbyggingu á svæðinu. Á grunni verkefnisins hefur verið mótuð framkvæmdaráætlun með fjórum megin- áherslum; 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Halldór Laxness - Wikipedia
    People of Iceland on Iceland Postage Stamps Halldór Laxness - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halldór_Laxness Halldór Laxness Halldór Kiljan Laxness (Icelandic: [ˈhaltour ˈcʰɪljan ˈlaxsnɛs] Halldór Laxness ( listen); born Halldór Guðjónsson; 23 April 1902 – 8 February 1998) was an Icelandic writer. He won the 1955 Nobel Prize in Literature; he is the only Icelandic Nobel laureate.[2] He wrote novels, poetry, newspaper articles, essays, plays, travelogues and short stories. Major influences included August Strindberg, Sigmund Freud, Knut Hamsun, Sinclair Lewis, Upton Sinclair, Bertolt Brecht and Ernest Hemingway.[3] Contents Early years 1920s 1930s 1940s 1950s Born Halldór Guðjónsson Later years 23 April 1902 Family and legacy Reykjavík, Iceland Bibliography Died 8 February 1998 Novels (aged 95) Stories Reykjavík, Iceland Plays Poetry Nationality Icelandic Travelogues and essays Notable Nobel Prize in Memoirs awards Literature Translations 1955 Other Spouses Ingibjörg Einarsdóttir References (m. 1930–1940) External links [1] Auður Sveinsdóttir (m. 1945–1998) Early years Laxness was born in 1902 in Reykjavík. His parents moved to the Laxnes farm in nearby Mosfellssveit parish when he was three. He started to read books and write stories at an early age. He attended the technical school in Reykjavík from 1915 to 1916 and had an article published in the newspaper Morgunblaðið in 1916.[4] By the time his first novel was published (Barn náttúrunnar, 1919), Laxness had already begun his travels on the European continent.[5] 1 of 9 2019/05/19, 11:59 Halldór Laxness - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halldór_Laxness 1920s In 1922, Laxness joined the Abbaye Saint-Maurice-et-Saint-Maur in Clervaux, Luxembourg where the monks followed the rules of Saint Benedict of Nursia.
    [Show full text]
  • Iceland's Implementation of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development
    June 2019 Iceland's Implementation of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development Voluntary National Review Government of Iceland Prime Minister’s Office Contents PRESS BOX TO GO TO CHAPTER Message from the Prime Minister very Friday at noon, hundreds of young people gather out- side Althingi, Iceland’s Parliament, insisting on radical action against climate change. They are a part of an international Emovement of young people who rightly point out the fact that today’s decisions determine their future. Climate change is a crisis for humanity as a whole; rendering traditional territorial borders meaningless. International collaboration is the only way forward. The Millennium Development Goals, adopted in 2000, were often referred to as “the world’s biggest promise”. They were a global agreement to reduce poverty and human deprivation. And they did. The MDGs lifted more than one billion people out of extreme poverty. The goals provided access to water and sanitation; drove down child mortality; drastically improved maternal health; cut the number of children out of school; and made huge advances in combatting HIV/AIDS and malaria. The Sustainable Development Goals are a bold commitment to finish what has been started. Coinciding with the historic Paris Agreement on climate change, the SDGs are the promise our young people are calling for, of sustainability, equality and wellbeing for all. The SDGs are also an important reminder that sustainable development is not just an issue for faraway places. Each and every one of us has both rights and obligations in this context. While some of the SDGs might feel distant from our daily lives, they encompass everything that makes life worthwhile, such as education, water, peace and equality, to name just a few.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring Organic Agriculture in Iceland Through the Lens of Ecological Ethics: Implications for Kyrgyzstan
    Land Restoration Training Programme Keldnaholt, 112 Reykjavik, Iceland Final project 2019 EXPLORING ORGANIC AGRICULTURE IN ICELAND THROUGH THE LENS OF ECOLOGICAL ETHICS: IMPLICATIONS FOR KYRGYZSTAN Igor Taranov Ministry of Agriculture, Food Industry and Land Reclamation of the Kyrgyz Republic 96a, Kievskaya street, Bishkek, Kyrgyz Republic [email protected] Supervisors: Björn Helgi Barkarson Ministry for the Environment and Natural Resources [email protected] Úlfur Óskarsson Agricultural University of Iceland [email protected] ABSTRACT In view of global climate change and the pressing issue of land degradation, sustainable agricultural practices such as organic farming represent one of the viable solutions. This research contributed to better understanding of the concept of sustainability by placing emphasis on the ethical aspect in organic farmers’ decision-making and elaborated on the thresholds and opportunities for organic agriculture development in Iceland and Kyrgyzstan. The study employed semi-structured interviews and a literature survey for data collection. Twelve stakeholders in the organic sector from varied geographical regions of Iceland were interviewed. A thematic analysis of the interview transcripts was conducted. The respondents reported that organic farmers’ mindsets could be characterized through their ethical values connected to nature and society. Among the key values participants mentioned were care for the environment, with the accent placed on soil and human health, respect for nature, dedication and commitment to organic principles, and fairness to customers. The following main thresholds for the enhancement of organic agriculture in Iceland were identified: a public policy vacuum, lack of a strategic vision and political leadership, poor linkages among the stakeholders of the organic agriculture sector, inadequate system for financial support to stimulate organic conversion, and unrealized organic market potential.
    [Show full text]
  • FULLTEXT01.Pdf
    Effects of afforestation on ecosystems, landscape and rural development Proceedings of the AFFORNORD conference, Reykholt, Iceland, June 18–22, 2005 Eds. Gudmundur Halldorsson, Edda Sigurdis Oddsdottir and Olafur Eggertsson TemaNord 2007:508 Effects of afforestation on ecosystems, landscape and rural development Proceedings of the AFFORNORD conference, Reykholt, Iceland, June 18–22, 2005 TemaNord 2007:508 © Nordic Council of Ministers, Copenhagen 2007 ISBN 978-92-893-1443-5 Print: Ekspressen Tryk & Kopicenter Cover: Kjell Olsson, the Publication Unit Layout: the Publication Unit Cover photos: Olafur Eggertsson, Edda Oddsdottir, Halldor Sverrisson and Kjartan Kjartansson, Icelandic Forest Research Copies: 200 Printed on environmentally friendly paper This publication can be ordered on www.norden.org/order. Other Nordic publications are available at www.norden.org/publications Printed in Denmark Nordic Council of Ministers Nordic Council Store Strandstræde 18 Store Strandstræde 18 DK-1255 Copenhagen K DK-1255 Copenhagen K Phone (+45) 3396 0200 Phone (+45) 3396 0400 Fax (+45) 3396 0202 Fax (+45) 3311 1870 www.norden.org Editors: Gudmundur Halldorsson, Edda Sigurdis Oddsdottir and Olafur Eggertsson , Icelandic Forest Re- search, Mogilsa, 116 Reykjavík, Iceland. Scientific committee: Gudmundur Halldorsson, Iceland; Susanne Harding, Denmark; Jens Peter Skovsgaard, Denmark; Odd Egil Stabbetorp, Norway; Johan Barstad, Norway; Harald Sverdrup, Sweden; Tróndur Leivs- son, The Faroe Islands Nordic co-operation Nordic cooperation is one of the world’s most extensive forms of regional collaboration, involving Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, Sweden, and three autonomous areas: the Faroe Islands, Green- land, and Åland. Nordic cooperation has firm traditions in politics, the economy, and culture. It plays an important role in European and international collaboration, and aims at creating a strong Nordic community in a strong Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Field School Student Manual 2012
    STUDENT MANUAL FIELD SCHOOL IN NORTH ATLANTIC ARCHAEOLOGY Vatnsfjörður, Northwest Iceland June 25-July 20, 2012 Sponsored by: Government of INSTITUTE OF UNIVERSITY CENTRE MEDIEVAL Iceland ARCHAEOLOGY OF THE WESTFJORDS WESTFJORDS SOCIETY In cooperation with: UNIVERSITY OF UNIVERSITY Northern Science and North Atlantic ICELAND OF ABERDEEN Education Centre, City Biocultural University of New York Organization Table of Contents Welcome……………………………………………………………………………………. 3 Introductions………………………………………………………………………………. 3 Iceland and Icelanders……………………………………………………………………. 3 The Westfjords…………………………………………………………………………… 4 The site of Vatnsfjörður………………………………………………………………….. 5 Field school instructors…………………………………………………………………… 7 Logistics……………………………………………………………………………………. 9 What to bring……………………………………………………………………………... 9 Travel itinerary…………………………………………………………………………… 11 Accommodation………………………………………………………………………….. 12 Health and Safety………………………………………………………………………….. 13 On-site hazards and preventative measures……………………………………………… 13 Off-site hazards and preventative measures……………………………………………… 14 Important health and safety information…………………………………………………. 14 Confidential health and safety form (to be printed, completed, and submitted)…….. 15 Field School Programme………………………………………………………………….. 16 Aims of the course………………………………………………………………………... 16 Pre-course work…………………………………………………………………………... 16 Excavation programme…………………………………………………………………… 16 Landscape survey programme……………………………………………………………. 18 Post-excavation work…………………………………………………………………….. 19 Lectures…………………………………………………………………………………..
    [Show full text]
  • What Is the Taste of CO2? the Sustainability of Icelandic Food Systems in the Face of Climate Change
    SIT Graduate Institute/SIT Study Abroad SIT Digital Collections Independent Study Project (ISP) Collection SIT Study Abroad Fall 2016 What is the Taste of CO2? The us stainability of Icelandic food systems in the face of climate change Molly Peek SIT Study Abroad Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcollections.sit.edu/isp_collection Part of the Environmental Studies Commons, Food Studies Commons, Other Food Science Commons, Other Geography Commons, and the Scandinavian Studies Commons Recommended Citation Peek, Molly, "What is the Taste of CO2? The uss tainability of Icelandic food systems in the face of climate change" (2016). Independent Study Project (ISP) Collection. 2452. https://digitalcollections.sit.edu/isp_collection/2452 This Unpublished Paper is brought to you for free and open access by the SIT Study Abroad at SIT Digital Collections. It has been accepted for inclusion in Independent Study Project (ISP) Collection by an authorized administrator of SIT Digital Collections. For more information, please contact [email protected]. What is the Taste of CO2? The sustainability of Icelandic food systems in the face of climate change By Molly Peek Project Advisor: Paul Wetzel of Smith College, Northampton MA USA Academic Director: Ragnar Honeth Home Institution: Smith College Major: Geosciences Submitted in partial fulfillment for the requirements for Iceland’s Climate Change in the Arctic, SIT Study Abroad, Fall 2016 Abstract Food security in the arctic and subarctic is an area of growing research and concern as climate change continues to alter the availability of traditional foods eaten in remote areas, especially as shipping food has questionable sustainability and contributes to rising CO2 levels.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Diversity in Iceland
    BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY IN ICELAND National Report to the Convention on Biological Diversity MINISTRY FOR THE ENVIRONMENT THE ICELANDIC INSTITUTE OF NATURAL HISTORY 2001 BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY IN ICELAND National Report to the Convention on Biological Diversity MINISTRY FOR THE ENVIRONMENT THE ICELANDIC INSTITUTE OF NATURAL HISTORY, 2001 BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY IN ICELAND National Report to the Convention on Biological Diversity MINISTRY FOR THE ENVIRONMENT Vonarstraeti 4 IS-150 Reykjavik Iceland Telephone: + 354 - 560 9600 Telefax: + 354 - 562 4566 THE ICELANDIC INSTITUTE OF NATURAL HISTORY Hlemmur 3 IS-105 Reykjavík Iceland Telephone: + 354 - 5900 500 Telefax: + 354 - 5900 595 Cover: Papaver radicatum, arctic poppies or melasól in Icelandic. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS: GENERAL OVERVIEW.....................................................................................5 PHYSICAL GEOGRAPHY........................................................................................5 DEGRADATION OF SOIL AND VEGETATION ...........................................6 LAND USE .....................................................................................................................7 GEOTHERMAL ACTIVITY .....................................................................................8 THE MARINE ENVIRONMENT ...........................................................................8 BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY...............................................................................11 FLORA...........................................................................................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • Migration and Cultural Transmission: Making a Home in Iceland
    Migration and Cultural Transmission: Making a Home in Iceland A thesis submitted for a final examination for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Anthropology as an External Student of the University of London By Nína Rós Ísberg 2010 1 Abstract The research is about the assimilation of women immigrants in Icelandic society through domesticity and the home. The focus is on the material practices that act to incorporate ‘foreign women’ into being Icelandic, accepting the ambivalence and resistances that act to preserve certain emotional attachments to former identities whilst at the same time considering the role of the senses and emotions in promoting knowledgeable, gendered subjects capable of acting in changed circumstances. In particular I look at the experience of immigrant women in making and running a home, bringing up their children and how this experience is materialized in daily activities. I focus on a group of German women who came to Iceland in 1949 to work, especially in rural areas where cheap labour was needed. Many of them stayed, married and established families and became Icelandic citizens. Immigration policies in Iceland have been strongly assimilationist and therefore the research shows the effects this assimilation has had on the identity of these women and what implications their identities have for understanding Icelandic identity in general. Comparison of this group to another younger one which has arrived in the last five to fifteen years makes apparent the role of domesticity and kinship relations in assimilating immigrant women into the Icelandic society. The research is carried out according to standard anthropological techniques of interviewing and participant observation.
    [Show full text]
  • An Overview of Barley Breeding and Variety Trials in Iceland in 1987-2014
    www.ias.is https://doi.org/10.16886/IAS.2017.02 ICEL. AGRIC. SCI. 30 (2017), 13-28 An overview of barley breeding and variety trials in Iceland in 1987-2014 Hrannar Smári Hilmarsson1, Magnus Göransson1,2, Morten Lillemo2, Þórdís Anna Kristjánsdóttir1, Jónatan Hermannsson1 and Jón Hallsteinn Hallsson1 1Agricultural University of Iceland, Keldnaholt, 112 Reykjavík, Iceland. 2Department of Plant Sciences, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, P.O. Box 5003, NO-1432 Ås, Norway. E-mail: [email protected] (corresponding author) ABSTRACT Barley is of great importance in modern agriculture and is currently the fourth most important cereal after wheat, maize, and rice. It is well adapted to a range of climatic and day-length conditions, with a distribution from Ethiopia to northern Scandinavia. Despite this, Iceland, with its sub-arctic agriculture, is considered to be at the margin of barley cultivation. Still the importance of barley has steadily increased in Icelandic agriculture, most likely as the result of positive environmental change, continuous testing of new Nordic cultivars, and an Icelandic barley breeding project. Here we present a review of the results from barley cultivar trials from 40 locations over a 28-year period in Iceland in the years 1987-2014. The results showed that yields were rising and the time from sowing to harvest was getting shorter. Also, the Icelandic genotypes were heading earlier, while showing higher yields. The results also showed that test locations were getting fewer but at the same time the number of tested genotypes was increasing. The analysis presented here highlights both the strengths and weaknesses of the current breeding program and is therefore an important basis for future breeding projects for Icelandic agriculture and possibly for other small scale breeding projects aimed at peripheral areas.
    [Show full text]