DOCSLIB.ORG

Links Between Agricultural Management and Wader Populations in Sub-Arctic Landscapes

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Links Between Agricultural Management and Wader Populations in Sub-Arctic Landscapes Links between agricultural management and wader populations in sub-arctic landscapes Lilja Jóhannesdóttir Faculty of Life and Environmental Sciences School of Engineering and Natural Sciences University of Iceland 2017 Links between agricultural management and wader populations in sub-arctic landscapes Lilja Jóhannesdóttir Dissertation submitted in partial fulfilment of a Philosophiae Doctor degree in biology Advisor Dr. Tómas Grétar Gunnarsson PhD Committee Professor Jennifer A. Gill Dr. José A. Alves Opponents Dr. Hlynur Óskarsson Dr. James Pearce-Higgins Faculty of Life and Environmental Sciences School of Engineering and Natural Sciences University of Iceland Reykjavik, June 2017 Links between agricultural management and wader populations in sub-arctic landscapes Agriculture and wader populations in Iceland Dissertation submitted in partial fulfilment of a Philosophiae Doctor degree in Biology Copyright © 2017 Lilja Jóhannesdóttir All rights reserved Faculty of Life and Environmental Sciences School of Engineering and Natural Sciences University of Iceland Sæmundargata 2 101 Reykjavík Iceland Telephone: 525 4000 Bibliographic information: Lilja Jóhannesdóttir, 2017, Links between agricultural management and wader populations in sub-arctic landscapes, PhD dissertation, Faculty of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Iceland, 129 pp. ISBN 978-9935-9344-5-1 Printing: Háskólaprent Reykjavik, Iceland, June 2017 Abstract The development and expansion of agriculture throughout the world has been a major driver of biodiversity loss in recent decades. Icelandic agriculture is currently not as intense and widespread as in many other western countries, and the effects of agriculture on biodiversity in Iceland and similar farming systems are largely unknown. Iceland supports big populations of several wader species of international importance and the aim of this thesis is to explore the links between agriculture and breeding wader populations. This was done by surveying waders in agricultural landscapes across Iceland and by carrying out a questionnaire survey among farmers. Surveys of wader density in areas of varying agricultural management intensity throughout lowland Iceland revealed high densities of breeding waders in all three management categories. However densities are generally lower on more intensely managed land, suggesting possible negative effects of future expansion of agriculture, given that the majority of farmers questioned for the study reported they were likely to expand cultivated land in the coming years. The volcanic nature of Iceland and varying temperatures have a strong influence on bird distribution and abundance, and interact with the effects of cultivated land on birds. In areas further from volcanic activity, wader density increases when there is more cultivated land around but the reverse occurs in areas with high levels of historic volcanic ash fall. This suggests that the location of cultivated land expansion can partly determine future effects on birdlife. Currently there are few efforts towards protecting these species in Iceland and, when questioned about their views towards birdlife, farmers reported that they do not currently take bird conservation into consideration in their land use management, although they do consider it important to have rich birdlife on their land and were positive towards participating in proposed conservation management. Cooperation with farmers, who own most of the lowlands, will therefore be crucial in maintaining these widespread and internationally important wader breeding populations. Útdráttur Hnignun líffræðilegrar fjölbreytni í heiminum á síðustu áratugum má að stórum hluta rekja til aukinnar útbreiðslu og ákefðar í landbúnaði. Íslenskur landbúnaður hefur enn ekki náð sömu ákefð og útbreiðslu og víða í vestrænum ríkjum og áhrif landbúnaðar á líffræðilega fjölbreytni eru að mestu óþekkt hérlendis, sem og í öðrum sambærilegum landbúnaðarkerfum. Ísland er mikilvægt varpsvæði margra ábyrgðartegunda og hér finnast stórir stofnar vaðfugla. Markmið doktorsverkefnisins er að skýra tengsl landbúnaðar og vaðfuglastofna á norrænum slóðum með mælingum á Íslandi. Þetta var gert bæði með að meta þéttleika vaðfugla á landbúnaðarsvæðum sem og að spyrja bændur um fyrirætlanir þeirra í landnýtingu og viðhorf þeirra til fuglalífs á landi þeirra. Mat á þéttleika vaðfugla á svæðum undir mismiklum áhrifum landbúnaðar sýnir að almennt er hár þéttleiki á öllum svæðunum en þéttleikinn er lægri á svæðum undir meiri landbúnaðaráhrifum. Þetta bendir til að ef flatarmál ræktað lands eykst muni það hafa neikvæð áhrif á þéttleika vaðfugla en meirihluti þeirra bænda sem rætt var við fyrir verkefnið sögðust stefna á að auka ræktað land á komandi árum. Eldvirkni og hitastig hafa umtalsverð áhrif á fuglalíf á Íslandi, en að auki geta áhrif ræktaðs lands á þéttleika vaðfugla ráðist af þessum tveimur þáttum. Á sumum svæðum minnkar þéttleiki með aukinni útbreiðslu ræktað lands en á öðrum svæðum eykst þéttleikinn. Áhrif aukningar ræktaðs lands á vaðfuglastofna ráðast því að hluta til af staðsetningu. Það eru litlar áherslur lagðar á vernd þessara tegunda á Íslandi og þegar bændur voru spurðir út í viðhorf þeirra til fuglalífs á landi þeirra sögðust þeir almennt ekki taka mikið tillit þess við landnýtingu þrátt fyrir að telja mikilvægt að hafa ríkulegt fuglalíf. Aftur á móti voru bændur jákvæðir gagnvart þeim verndraðgerðum sem lagðar voru til en vitað er að samvinna við landeigendur er lykilatriði ef á að viðhalda þeim þáttum líffræðilegrar fjölbreytni sem hafa víðtæka útbreiðslu. List of publications This thesis is based on the following papers. Within the thesis, references to these papers will be by their Roman numerals. Paper I: Jóhannesdóttir, L., Gill, J. A., Alves, J. A., & Gunnarsson, T. G. (201X). Icelandic meadow breeding waders: status, threats and conservation challenges. International Wader Study - Submitted. Paper II: Jóhannesdóttir, L., Alves, J. A., Gill, J. A., & Gunnarsson, T. G. (201X). Use of agricultural land by breeding waders in low-intensity farming landscapes. In review. Paper III: Gunnarsson, T. G., Jóhannesdóttir, L., Alves, J. A., Þórisson, B., & Gill, J. A. (2016). Effects of spring temperature and volcanic eruptions on wader productivity. Ibis, doi: 10.1111/ibi.12449 Paper IV: Jóhannesdóttir, L., Gill, J. A., Alves, J. A., & Gunnarsson, T. G. (201X). Interacting effects of agriculture and landscape structure on breeding wader populations in Iceland. Manuscript. Paper V: Jóhannesdóttir, L., Alves, J. A., Gill, J. A., & Gunnarsson, T. G. (2017). Reconciling biodiversity conservation and agricultural expansion in the sub-arctic environment of Iceland. Ecology and Society, doi: 10.5751/es-08956-220116 Papers I and III, V are reproduced with kind permission from the publishers. In addition, some unpublished data are presented. Other publications included as an appendix in the doctoral thesis (with permission from the publisher): Jóhannesdóttir, L., Arnalds, Ó., Brink, S., & Gunnarsson, T. G. (2014). Identifying important bird habitats in a sub-arctic area undergoing rapid land-use change. Bird Study, 61(4), 544-552. doi: 10.1080/00063657.2014.962481 Author’s contribution Paper I. Lilja Jóhannesdóttir collated the data for this paper, was the leading author in collaboration with co-authors and is the corresponding author. Paper II. Lilja Jóhannesdóttir, in collaboration with co-authors, designed the methods and was responsible for all data collection. Lilja Jóhannesdóttir analysed and interpreted the results, wrote the paper together with co-authors and is the corresponding author. Paper III. Lilja Jóhannesdóttir helped with design of the methods, data analysis, writing, and is the second author on this paper. Paper IV. Lilja Jóhannesdóttir designed the methods, together with co-authors, and collected all the bird data. Sigmundur H. Brink extracted land cover information. Lilja Jóhannesdóttir analysed and interpreted results, wrote the paper together with co-authors and will be the corresponding author. Paper V. Lilja Jóhannesdóttir designed the questionnaire, in collaboration with co-authors, and carried out all of the interviews with farmers. She analysed and interpreted the results, wrote the paper together with co-authors and is the corresponding author. Table of Contents List of Figures ................................................................................................................... xiii List of Tables ..................................................................................................................... xiv Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................ xv 1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Agriculture............................................................................................................... 1 1.1.1 Intensification of agriculture .......................................................................... 1 1.1.2 Consequences of agricultural intensification ................................................. 2 1.1.3 Birds and agriculture ...................................................................................... 3 1.2 Icelandic agriculture ................................................................................................ 4 1.2.1 Location, landscape and climatic conditions ................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Freeports Inquiry Evidence for the International Trade Committee by Wildlife and Countryside Link May 2020
    Written submission from Wildlife and Countryside Link (FRP0006) Freeports inquiry Evidence for the International Trade Committee by Wildlife and Countryside Link May 2020 Wildlife and Countryside Link (Link) is the largest environment and wildlife coalition in England, bringing together 58 organisations to use their strong joint voice for the protection of nature. Our members campaign to conserve, enhance and access our landscapes, animals, plants, habitats, rivers and seas. Together we have the support of over eight million people in the UK and directly protect over 750,000 hectares of land and 800 miles of coastline. This response is supported by the following Link members: 1. A Rocha UK 14. International Fund for Animal Welfare 2. Angling Trust 15. League Against Cruel Sports 3. Born Free Foundation 16. Marine Conservation Society 4. British Canoeing 17. Open Spaces Society 5. Buglife 18. People’s Trust for Endangered Species 6. Butterfly Conservation 19. Plantlife 7. ClientEarth 20. RSPB 8. CPRE The Countryside Charity 21. RSPCA 9. Environmental Investigation Agency 22. Salmon and Trout Conservation 10. Four Paws UK 23. Whale and Dolphin Conservation 11. Friends of the Earth 24. The Wildlife Trusts 12. Humane Society International UK 25. Woodland Trust 13. Institute of Fisheries Management 26. WWF-UK This evidence relates mainly to the following two questions posed by the Committee: What negative impacts could freeports have – and how might these be mitigated? What can the UK learn, and what competition will it face, from established freeports around the world? EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Freeports present a number of significant environmental challenges which are not considered in the government’s proposals.
    [Show full text]
  • Restoring the North – Challenges and Opportunities
    Restoring the North – Challenges and opportunities Restoring the North – Challenges and opportunities International Restoration Conference, Iceland, October 20-22, 2011 Book of abstracts Restoring the North – Challenges and opportunities International Restoration Conference, Iceland, October 20-22, 2011 Book of abstracts Soil Conservation Service of Iceland and Agricultural University of Iceland Restoring the North – Challenges and opportunities Selfoss, Iceland, October 20-22, 2011 Thursday, October 20. 08:20 Registration 08:50 Conference opening, Guðmundur Halldórsson 09:00 Address from the Minister for the Environment Session I: Restoration in the North – Challenges and opportunities 09:20 Special challenges and opportunities for restoration in the North .................................. 5 Bruce Forbes 10:00 Peatland and forest restoration in Finnish conservation areas ....................................... 6 Päivi Virnes 10:20 Coffee/tea 10:40 Hekluskógar – large scale restoration of birch woodlands with minimum inputs ........... 7 Hreinn Óskarsson, Guðmundur Halldórsson & Ása L. Aradóttir 11:00 Vegetation recovery after transplantation in an alpine environment, Bitdal, Norway .... 8 Scientific committee: Line Rosef & Per Anker Pedersen Ása L. Aradóttir, Agricultural University of Iceland 11:20 Dam removal: enhancing or degrading ecological integrity? ......................................... 9 Dagmar Hagen, Norwegian Institute for Nature Research Birgitta Malm Renöfält Guðmundur Halldórsson, Soil Conservation Service of Iceland
    [Show full text]
  • Food Security and Identity: Iceland
    FOOD SECURITY AND IDENTITY: ICELAND A thesis submitted to Kent State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts by Gina Marie Butrico August, 2013 Thesis written by Gina Butrico A.A.S., Middlesex County College, 2009 B.A., Kent State University, 2011 M.A., Kent State University, 2013 Approved by ___________________________________, Advisor Dr. David H. Kaplan, Ph.D. ___________________________________, Chair, Department of Geography Dr. Mandy Munro-Stasiuk, Ph.D. ___________________________________, Associate Dean for Graduate Affairs, Raymond A. Craig, Ph.D. College of Arts and Sciences ii TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Figures ..........................................................................................................v List of Tables ....................................................................................................... viii Acknowledgements ................................................................................................ ix Chapter I. Introduction .................................................................................................1 Food Security in Iceland ..............................................................................3 Food Identity in Iceland ...............................................................................5 Site Selection ...............................................................................................6 Food Geography...........................................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • Conflict, Conservation, and the Whooper Swan in Iceland
    Feathered majesty in the grainfield? Conflict, conservation, and the whooper swan in Iceland Shauna Laurel Jones Faculty of Life and Environmental Sciences University of Iceland 2018 Feathered majesty in the grainfield? Conflict, conservation, and the whooper swan in Iceland Shauna Laurel Jones 60 ECTS thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of a Magister Scientiarum degree in Environment and Natural Resources MS Committee Karl Benediktsson Edda R. H. Waage Master’s Examiner Gunnþóra Ólafsdóttir Faculty of Life and Environmental Sciences School of Engineering and Natural Sciences University of Iceland Reykjavik, May 2018 Feathered majesty in the grainfield? Conflict, conservation, and the whooper swan in Iceland Conflict, conservation, and swans in Iceland 60 ECTS thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of a Magister Scientiarum degree in Environment and Natural Resources Copyright © 2018 Shauna Laurel Jones All rights reserved Faculty of Life and Environmental Sciences School of Engineering and Natural Sciences University of Iceland Sturlugata 7 101 Reykjavik Iceland Telephone: 525 4000 Bibliographic information: Jones, S. L., 2018, Feathered majesty in the grainfield? Conflict, conservation, and the whooper swan in Iceland, Master’s thesis, Faculty of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Iceland, 90 pp. Abstract This thesis investigates relationships between cultural values and conservation practices, focusing on the whooper swan (Cygnus cygnus) in Iceland. Conflicts between farmers and swans in Iceland have triggered debates
    [Show full text]
  • The IUCN Red List of Threatened Speciestm
    Species 2014 Annual ReportSpecies the Species of 2014 Survival Commission and the Global Species Programme Species ISSUE 56 2014 Annual Report of the Species Survival Commission and the Global Species Programme • 2014 Spotlight on High-level Interventions IUCN SSC • IUCN Red List at 50 • Specialist Group Reports Ethiopian Wolf (Canis simensis), Endangered. © Martin Harvey Muhammad Yazid Muhammad © Amazing Species: Bleeding Toad The Bleeding Toad, Leptophryne cruentata, is listed as Critically Endangered on The IUCN Red List of Threatened SpeciesTM. It is endemic to West Java, Indonesia, specifically around Mount Gede, Mount Pangaro and south of Sukabumi. The Bleeding Toad’s scientific name, cruentata, is from the Latin word meaning “bleeding” because of the frog’s overall reddish-purple appearance and blood-red and yellow marbling on its back. Geographical range The population declined drastically after the eruption of Mount Galunggung in 1987. It is Knowledge believed that other declining factors may be habitat alteration, loss, and fragmentation. Experts Although the lethal chytrid fungus, responsible for devastating declines (and possible Get Involved extinctions) in amphibian populations globally, has not been recorded in this area, the sudden decline in a creekside population is reminiscent of declines in similar amphibian species due to the presence of this pathogen. Only one individual Bleeding Toad was sighted from 1990 to 2003. Part of the range of Bleeding Toad is located in Gunung Gede Pangrango National Park. Future conservation actions should include population surveys and possible captive breeding plans. The production of the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species™ is made possible through the IUCN Red List Partnership.
    [Show full text]
  • Future Opportunities for Bioeconomy in the West Nordic Countries
    Future Opportunities for Bioeconomy in the West Nordic Countries Sigrún Elsa Smáradóttir Lilja Magnúsdóttir Birgir Örn Smárason Gunnar Þórðarson Birgit Johannessen Elísabet Kemp Stefánsdóttir Birgitte Jacobsen Unn Laksá Hrönn Ólína Jörundsdóttir Svein Ø. Solberg Rólvur Djurhuus Sofie Erbs-Maibing Bryndís Björnsdóttir Ragnhildur Gunnarsdóttir Kjartan Hoydal Guðmundur Óli Hreggviðsson Guðmundur Bjarki Ingvarsson Amalie Jessen Hörður G. Kristinsson Daði Már Kristófersson Nette Levermann Business Development Nuka Møller Lund Josephine Nymand Skýrsla Matís 37-14 Ólafur Reykdal Janus Vang Desember 2014 Helge Paulsen Sveinn Margeirsson ISSN 1670-7192 Titill / Title Future Opportunities for Bioeconomy in the West Nordic Countries / Framtíðartækifæri í Vest-Norræna lífhagkerfinu Höfundar / Authors Sigrún Elsa Smáradóttir, Lilja Magnúsdóttir, Birgir Örn Smárason, Gunnar Þórðarson, Birgit Johannessen, Elísabet Kemp Stefánsdóttir, Birgitte Jacobsen, Unn Laksá, Hrönn Ólína Jörundsdóttir, Svein Ø. Solberg, Rólvur Djurhuus, Sofie Erbs-Maibing, Bryndís Björnsdóttir, Ragnhildur Gunnarsdóttir, Kjartan Hoydal, Guðmundur Óli Hreggviðsson, Guðmundur Bjarki Ingvarsson, Amalie Jessen, Hörður G. Kristinsson, Daði Már Kristófersson, Nette Levermann, Nuka Møller Lund, Josephine Nymand, Ólafur Reykdal, Janus Vang, Helge Paulsen, Sveinn Margeirsson Skýrsla / Report no. 37-14 Útgáfudagur / Date: December 2014 Verknr. / Project no. Styrktaraðilar /Funding: The Nordic Council of Ministers Arctic Co-operation Programme, NKJ (Nordic Joint Committee for Agricultural and Food Research), AG-Fisk (Working Group for Fisheries Co-operation), SNS (Nordic Forest Research), NordGen (the Nordic Genetic Resource Centre) and Matis. Ágrip á íslensku: Skýrslan gefur yfirlit yfir lífauðlindir á Íslandi, Færeyjum og Grænlandi, nýtingu þeirra og framtíðartækifæri sem byggja á grænum vexti. Skýrslan er góður grunnur fyrir markvissa stefnumótun og áherslur í nýsköpun fyrir framtíðaruppbyggingu á svæðinu. Á grunni verkefnisins hefur verið mótuð framkvæmdaráætlun með fjórum megin- áherslum; 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Halldór Laxness - Wikipedia
    People of Iceland on Iceland Postage Stamps Halldór Laxness - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halldór_Laxness Halldór Laxness Halldór Kiljan Laxness (Icelandic: [ˈhaltour ˈcʰɪljan ˈlaxsnɛs] Halldór Laxness ( listen); born Halldór Guðjónsson; 23 April 1902 – 8 February 1998) was an Icelandic writer. He won the 1955 Nobel Prize in Literature; he is the only Icelandic Nobel laureate.[2] He wrote novels, poetry, newspaper articles, essays, plays, travelogues and short stories. Major influences included August Strindberg, Sigmund Freud, Knut Hamsun, Sinclair Lewis, Upton Sinclair, Bertolt Brecht and Ernest Hemingway.[3] Contents Early years 1920s 1930s 1940s 1950s Born Halldór Guðjónsson Later years 23 April 1902 Family and legacy Reykjavík, Iceland Bibliography Died 8 February 1998 Novels (aged 95) Stories Reykjavík, Iceland Plays Poetry Nationality Icelandic Travelogues and essays Notable Nobel Prize in Memoirs awards Literature Translations 1955 Other Spouses Ingibjörg Einarsdóttir References (m. 1930–1940) External links [1] Auður Sveinsdóttir (m. 1945–1998) Early years Laxness was born in 1902 in Reykjavík. His parents moved to the Laxnes farm in nearby Mosfellssveit parish when he was three. He started to read books and write stories at an early age. He attended the technical school in Reykjavík from 1915 to 1916 and had an article published in the newspaper Morgunblaðið in 1916.[4] By the time his first novel was published (Barn náttúrunnar, 1919), Laxness had already begun his travels on the European continent.[5] 1 of 9 2019/05/19, 11:59 Halldór Laxness - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halldór_Laxness 1920s In 1922, Laxness joined the Abbaye Saint-Maurice-et-Saint-Maur in Clervaux, Luxembourg where the monks followed the rules of Saint Benedict of Nursia.
    [Show full text]
  • Co-Management of Protected Areas: a Governance System Analysis of Vatnajökull National Park, Iceland
    land Article Co-Management of Protected Areas: A Governance System Analysis of Vatnajökull National Park, Iceland Jon Geir Petursson 1,* and Dadi Mar Kristofersson 2 1 Environment and Natural Resources, Faculties of Life and Environmental Sciences, and Sociology, Anthropology and Folkloristics, University of Iceland, 102 Reykjavik, Iceland 2 Faculty of Economics, University of Iceland, 102 Reykjavik, Iceland; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Land allocated to protected areas (PA) is expanding as are expectations about the services these areas deliver. There is a need to advance knowledge on PA governance systems, like co- management, recognising that there is no “one-size-fits-all” solution. We analyse the co-management governance system and performance of Vatnajökull National Park (VNP), Iceland. We adapt an analytical framework from the literature on environmental governance and analyse its governance system, hence actor roles, institutional arrangements and interactions. Our findings illustrate that the co-management structure was an outcome of political negotiations and a response to the lack of legitimacy of its predecessors; resulting in a tailor-made governance system set out in park- specific legislation. Although the performance is quite positive, being adaptive to changes, inclusive, promoting rural development and an appreciated facilitator of devolution and power-sharing, it has come with challenges. It has encountered problems delineating responsibilities among its actors, Citation: Petursson, J.G.; causing conflict and confusion; in settling conflicting localised issues close to local stakeholders, Kristofersson, D.M. Co-Management there have been capacity issues. We argue that the VNP co-management system is fit for its purpose, of Protected Areas: A Governance aligned with Icelandic land-use governance structures but in need of systematic improvements.
    [Show full text]
  • Iceland's Implementation of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development
    June 2019 Iceland's Implementation of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development Voluntary National Review Government of Iceland Prime Minister’s Office Contents PRESS BOX TO GO TO CHAPTER Message from the Prime Minister very Friday at noon, hundreds of young people gather out- side Althingi, Iceland’s Parliament, insisting on radical action against climate change. They are a part of an international Emovement of young people who rightly point out the fact that today’s decisions determine their future. Climate change is a crisis for humanity as a whole; rendering traditional territorial borders meaningless. International collaboration is the only way forward. The Millennium Development Goals, adopted in 2000, were often referred to as “the world’s biggest promise”. They were a global agreement to reduce poverty and human deprivation. And they did. The MDGs lifted more than one billion people out of extreme poverty. The goals provided access to water and sanitation; drove down child mortality; drastically improved maternal health; cut the number of children out of school; and made huge advances in combatting HIV/AIDS and malaria. The Sustainable Development Goals are a bold commitment to finish what has been started. Coinciding with the historic Paris Agreement on climate change, the SDGs are the promise our young people are calling for, of sustainability, equality and wellbeing for all. The SDGs are also an important reminder that sustainable development is not just an issue for faraway places. Each and every one of us has both rights and obligations in this context. While some of the SDGs might feel distant from our daily lives, they encompass everything that makes life worthwhile, such as education, water, peace and equality, to name just a few.
    [Show full text]
  • Last of the Wild
    as nature intended – best practice examples of wilderness management in the Natura 2000 network last of the wild OVERVIEW OF STATUS AND MONITORING OF SOME WILDERNESS RELATED SPECIES IN THE NATURA 2000 NETWORK last of the wild OVERVIEW OF STATUS AND MONITORING OF SOME WILDERNESS RELATED SPECIES IN THE NATURA 2000 NETWORK Published by PAN Parks Foundation 2009 supported by The sole responsibility lies with the author and the Commission is not responsible for any use that may be made of the information contained here. contents contents 2 2 foreword 4 introduction 6 background 6 wilderness and wildlife 6 large spaces – large species 7 wilderness conservation in the EU 7 impetus behind further re-wilding 8 species depending on wilderness 9 large herbivores chamois 10 CENTRAL BALKAN AND RILA NATIONAL PARKS, BULGARIA MAJELLA NATIONAL PARK, ITALY ibex 14 TRIGLAV NATIONAL PARK, SLOVENIA large carnivores brown bear 17 FULUFJÄLLET NATIONAL PARK, SWEDEN RILA NATIONAL PARK, BULGARIA MAJELLA NATIONAL PARK, ITALY wolf 22 MAJELLA NATIONAL PARK, ITALY FULUFJÄLLET NATIONAL PARK, SWEDEN SOOMAA NATIONAL PARK, ESTONIA eurasian lynx 26 FULUFJÄLLET NATIONAL PARK, SWEDEN SOOMAA NATIONAL PARK, ESTONIA TRIGLAV NATIONAL PARK, SLOVENIA birds of prey white-tailed eagle 31 ARCHIPELAGO NATIONAL PARK, FINLAND conclusion 34 last of the wild – overview of status and monitoring of some wilderness related species in the natura 2000 network There are many reasons why Europe should pay more attention to its wilderness areas. Most importantly, these territories are an invaluable refuge for many species such as large mammals like the brown bear, wolf or lynx - Photo: Tamas Gereczi/gt-photo.hu foreword 4 by Hans Kampf Executive Director Large Herbivore Foundation It is more than 40 years since I realised that I wanted Secondly, at a time when they wandered and migrated to work in the field of nature conservation, preservation in enormous numbers across our regions, they influenced and development.
    [Show full text]
  • Possible Impact of Icelandic Forestry Policy on Migratory Waterbirds
    AEWA IMPLEMENTATION REVIEW PROCESS (IRP) On-the-spot Assessment Mission in Conjunction with the Bern Convention POSSIBLE IMPACT OF ICELANDIC FORESTRY POLICY ON MIGRATORY WATERBIRDS FINAL REPORT 19 October 2016 Prepared by: Mr Dave Pritchard and Professor Colin Galbraith Picture on the cover: Planted forest in Iceland © Víctor Bautista / Flickr.com. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.0 Generic License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/ or send a letter to Creative Commons, PO Box 1866, Mountain View, CA 94042, USA. Disclaimer: The presentation of the material in this document is slightly different to that of the Bern Convention version, which is available on the Bern Convention website here*. This is due to the individual house style guides of both instruments. The content is, however, identical in both versions of the report. ____________________________ *https://wcd.coe.int/ViewDoc.jsp?p=&id=2444581&Site=&BackColorInternet=B9BDEE&BackColorIntrane t=FFCD4F&BackColorLogged=FFC679&direct=true AEWA IRP Assessment Mission on Possible Impact of Icelandic Forestry Policy on Migratory Waterbirds 2 Final Report Contents Summary.................................................................................................................................................... 4 1. Recommendations from the Mission ............................................................................................ 6 2. Introduction and Purpose of this
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring Organic Agriculture in Iceland Through the Lens of Ecological Ethics: Implications for Kyrgyzstan
    Land Restoration Training Programme Keldnaholt, 112 Reykjavik, Iceland Final project 2019 EXPLORING ORGANIC AGRICULTURE IN ICELAND THROUGH THE LENS OF ECOLOGICAL ETHICS: IMPLICATIONS FOR KYRGYZSTAN Igor Taranov Ministry of Agriculture, Food Industry and Land Reclamation of the Kyrgyz Republic 96a, Kievskaya street, Bishkek, Kyrgyz Republic [email protected] Supervisors: Björn Helgi Barkarson Ministry for the Environment and Natural Resources [email protected] Úlfur Óskarsson Agricultural University of Iceland [email protected] ABSTRACT In view of global climate change and the pressing issue of land degradation, sustainable agricultural practices such as organic farming represent one of the viable solutions. This research contributed to better understanding of the concept of sustainability by placing emphasis on the ethical aspect in organic farmers’ decision-making and elaborated on the thresholds and opportunities for organic agriculture development in Iceland and Kyrgyzstan. The study employed semi-structured interviews and a literature survey for data collection. Twelve stakeholders in the organic sector from varied geographical regions of Iceland were interviewed. A thematic analysis of the interview transcripts was conducted. The respondents reported that organic farmers’ mindsets could be characterized through their ethical values connected to nature and society. Among the key values participants mentioned were care for the environment, with the accent placed on soil and human health, respect for nature, dedication and commitment to organic principles, and fairness to customers. The following main thresholds for the enhancement of organic agriculture in Iceland were identified: a public policy vacuum, lack of a strategic vision and political leadership, poor linkages among the stakeholders of the organic agriculture sector, inadequate system for financial support to stimulate organic conversion, and unrealized organic market potential.
    [Show full text]