Last of the Wild

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Last of the Wild as nature intended – best practice examples of wilderness management in the Natura 2000 network last of the wild OVERVIEW OF STATUS AND MONITORING OF SOME WILDERNESS RELATED SPECIES IN THE NATURA 2000 NETWORK last of the wild OVERVIEW OF STATUS AND MONITORING OF SOME WILDERNESS RELATED SPECIES IN THE NATURA 2000 NETWORK Published by PAN Parks Foundation 2009 supported by The sole responsibility lies with the author and the Commission is not responsible for any use that may be made of the information contained here. contents contents 2 2 foreword 4 introduction 6 background 6 wilderness and wildlife 6 large spaces – large species 7 wilderness conservation in the EU 7 impetus behind further re-wilding 8 species depending on wilderness 9 large herbivores chamois 10 CENTRAL BALKAN AND RILA NATIONAL PARKS, BULGARIA MAJELLA NATIONAL PARK, ITALY ibex 14 TRIGLAV NATIONAL PARK, SLOVENIA large carnivores brown bear 17 FULUFJÄLLET NATIONAL PARK, SWEDEN RILA NATIONAL PARK, BULGARIA MAJELLA NATIONAL PARK, ITALY wolf 22 MAJELLA NATIONAL PARK, ITALY FULUFJÄLLET NATIONAL PARK, SWEDEN SOOMAA NATIONAL PARK, ESTONIA eurasian lynx 26 FULUFJÄLLET NATIONAL PARK, SWEDEN SOOMAA NATIONAL PARK, ESTONIA TRIGLAV NATIONAL PARK, SLOVENIA birds of prey white-tailed eagle 31 ARCHIPELAGO NATIONAL PARK, FINLAND conclusion 34 last of the wild – overview of status and monitoring of some wilderness related species in the natura 2000 network There are many reasons why Europe should pay more attention to its wilderness areas. Most importantly, these territories are an invaluable refuge for many species such as large mammals like the brown bear, wolf or lynx - Photo: Tamas Gereczi/gt-photo.hu foreword 4 by Hans Kampf Executive Director Large Herbivore Foundation It is more than 40 years since I realised that I wanted Secondly, at a time when they wandered and migrated to work in the field of nature conservation, preservation in enormous numbers across our regions, they influenced and development. At that time I was educated to and even created ecosystems and the landscape through consider the management of the habitats; often fenced continuous browsing, grazing, trampling and even in, relatively small parcels of nature which had to be digging. Both aspects provide an often forgotten part of carefully tended, like gardens. In past centuries that kind our nature management. of nature would have been found in agricultural areas; indeed, our present nature management seeks to copy The task of the Large Herbivore Foundation is to protect traditional agricultural methods. But we must now ask the large herbivore species in Eurasia and turn the threat ourselves whether this approach has a future; will we of extinction into their rehabilitation and preservation. able to maintain it over the coming centuries either Only a few of the Eurasian large herbivores are safe and organisationally, financially or even ecologically? many of them are seriously threatened. However, we will not succeed in allowing any of them to survive in For instance we have to prepare for the effects of climate healthy and sustainable populations if we cannot restore change. As nature managers we have a responsibility to large and unfragmented nature areas. We will not be develop tools to mitigate these effects. Thinking in an able to manage such areas through traditional ecological way, this means that we have to manage and agriculture; instead we will have to return them to design our nature so that it is resilient in the longer term natural processes and wilderness nature. and suitable for all kinds of change. We can learn from the past, when the words and the notions nature area I have learned a lot from foresters. Not from the way and nature management did not exist. At that time that they manage trees, but because they are able to wilderness areas were vast and unfragmented with room think ahead in long periods, even in centuries; indeed, in for all kinds of natural processes such as fire, water, the lifespan of the oak. It is rather easy for people to rivers and storms. Their vast scale made these areas look back into history; now I wonder how we can reach climate proof. forward in time to create a vision of the future that reflects what many creative talents have done in our In this wilderness large herbivores played a double role. past. I am certain that, if the process of creating a Firstly as food: forming the basic prey for large beautiful and wild Europe is managed properly, we will carnivores; and as carrion for a myriad of invertebrates enjoy future landscapes which deliver significant social (themselves important prey for birds, bats, badgers etc.), and economic benefits including providing long-term for a range of mammals like the wild boar in its role as protection and enhancement of a range of ecosystem the European hyena, fox and pine marten, but also for goods and services; and surely that is what we all want. birds including vulture, raven, kite and buzzard. last of the wild – overview of status and monitoring of some wilderness related species in the natura 2000 network 5 by Vlado Vancura Conservation Manager PAN Parks Foundation I grew up in a ranger house at the edge of Tatra to find effective ways of protecting remaining wilderness National Park in Slovakia. During my childhood areas of Europe that are more resilient as the nature I was in daily contact with what is still the wildest that once existed on our continent. area of the park to this day. Large-spanning, dark forests giving home to countless species; red deer, wild PAN Parks Foundation aims at protecting Europe’s boar, chamois and brown bear, with lynx and wolves wilderness in a way that may support the widest just a few meters beyond my backyard. This experience spectrum of life forms in their natural environment, and was deeply inscribed in my soul and wilderness became at the same time serve as attractive grounds for people my life-long passion. to visit, both for pleasure and education. Our main ambition with this publication is to present that there But soon I had to face the intensification of agriculture, are numerous species in Europe that require wilderness which led to the extinction of numerous species areas as a safe homeland for their healthy survival. The alongside the modernisation of forestry operations. descriptions of brown bear, lynx, wolf, chamois, ibex and This, as we all know, has resulted in a network of roads white-tailed eagle will show that proper wilderness penetrating protected areas, disturbing wilderness species management, employing non-intervention techniques and and destroying their natural habitats. Later on I realized regular monitoring can greatly contribute to the long- that the deterioration I was experiencing had already term survival of these wilderness-dependent species, and happened in many parts of Europe, with the kind of in turn help maintain diverse ecosystems on our highly wilderness I witnessed as a child long gone. developed continent. In my professional life I keep being reminded of the Wilderness has been an illuminating master for me all challenges we face in trying to properly conserve the through my life. It has shown me how everything is remaining wilderness areas of Europe. Growing ecological linked to the fragile web of life, sometimes quite threats such as the loss of biodiversity or the effects of evidently but many times in a less visible way. The climate change trigger an increasingly ecological- intricate connections within all life forms of any given conscious thinking throughout Europe, resulting in a ecosystem work in a naturally healthy way if left paradigm shift towards the re-instalment of natural undisturbed – hence it is our major responsibility to use processes in large protected areas. our skills, knowledge, capacity and resources for the The stubborn implementation of command-and-control development of protected wilderness areas where wildlife resource management, however, is still a threat on can thrive in the most natural form possible. wilderness species and their favoured habitats. For these reasons, following the identification and analysis of natural resource management, our major task today is introduction BACKGROUND As a result of traditional management measures, applied 6 extensively for centuries, there is a very low percentage Biodiversity – the variation of life forms in a given of preserved wilderness areas left in Europe: and those ecosystem, biome, or the entire Earth – is of crucial areas, as well as wilderness-dependent species are under importance not just from an ecological perspective but immense pressure. According to the Millennium ethically, emotionally, environmentally and economically Ecosystems Assessment, almost half of our wildlife is in as well. As the European Union’s Biodiversity Action Plan serious decline and valuable ecosystems have become of 2008 concludes, diverse ecosystems “form the degraded and fragmented. In 2001, the European Union foundation on which we build our societies.” set the ambitious goal of halting the decline of biodiversity by 2010, but despite enormous efforts and The countless living organisms of varying population the investment of millions of Euros, it is unlikely that this density and population dynamics require very different ambitious goal will be achieved, due primarily to the circumstances to live and thrive in. Some species have lack of a complex and comprehensive approach focusing adapted to living in cities, some others require vast open on the protection of biodiversity in actively managed countryside landscapes that are actively managed, and landscapes as well as in wild ecosystems. there are numerous important species that depend on wilderness and are simply unable to survive in areas WILDERNESS AND WILDLIFE where human impact alters their natural living conditions. It is our responsibility to look after the Wilderness is best understood as a multidimensional habitats of all the different species and create and concept, consisting of biological and social elements.
Recommended publications
  • Dufourspitze 4634M £1699
    Icicle Mountaineering Ltd | 11a Church Street Windermere | Lake District | LA23 1AQ | UK Tel +44 (0)1539 44 22 17 | [email protected] Website: www.icicle-mountaineering.ltd.uk Online: shop.icicle-mountaineering.ltd.uk 2020 trip dossier | Dufourspitze 4634m £1699 Website link | http://www.icicle-mountaineering.ltd.uk/dufourspitze.html Key features Climb Dufourspitze, the highest mountain in Switzerland and second highest in the Alps.. 5 days guiding (Monday - Friday), with flexible itinerary to take advantage of the best conditions. Previous crampon or climbing experience is required, as this is a progression from an Intro course. Led by top qualified guides (IFMGA), guiding ratio 1:2 throughout the course. All technical equipment (e.g. B3 boots, crampons, ice axe etc.) can be hired from Icicle 2020 dates; 5 - 11 Jul, 19 - 25 Jul, 26 Jul - 1 Aug, 9 - 15 Aug, 30 Aug -+- 5 Sep. Icicle® is the registered trademark of Icicle Mountaineering UK registered company 413 6635. VAT 770 137 933 20 years ‘inspirational mountain adventure holidays’ established in 2000 Icicle Mountaineering Ltd | 11a Church Street Windermere | Lake District | LA23 1AQ | UK Tel +44 (0)1539 44 22 17 | [email protected] Website: www.icicle-mountaineering.ltd.uk Online: shop.icicle-mountaineering.ltd.uk Course overview . Climb the highest summit of Monte Rosa; Dufourspitze 4634m. It's the highest mountain in Switzerland, and the second highest in all of the Alps after Mont Blanc. We offer a week long programme to attempt this peak, as your acclimatisation and flexibility for selecting a weather window are crucial. To keep the itinerary flexibilty, the guiding ratio is 1:2 throughout, so you can take advantage of the best days for the summit weather window.
    [Show full text]
  • Workshop on Transboundary Wildlife Management
    ALPBIONET2030 Integrative Alpine wildlife and habitat management for the next generation REPORT Workshop on Transboundary wildlife management 10 October 2017, Trenta, Triglav National Park, Slovenia (Alpbionet2030 – Work Package 2) Integrative Alpine wildlife and habitat management for the next generation A workshop to discuss tactics and devise actions for transboundary wildlife management between the wildlife managers of Transboundary Ecoregion Julian Alps, defined as the sum of Triglav Hunting Management Area and Gorenjska Hunting Management Area (Slovenia) and Tarvisiano Hunting District (Italy) with their core protected areas of Triglav National Park and Prealpi Giulie Nature Park, was held at the conference facilities of the “Dom Trenta” National Park house in Trenta. This Workshop is one of the activities of WP T.2 of the Alpbionet2030 project co- financed by the EU Alpine Space Programme. INTRODUCTION The behaviour and habitat use of animals can be strongly affected by hunting methods and wildlife management strategies. Hunting and wildlife management therefore have an influence on ecological connectivity. Lack of consistency in wildlife management between regions can cause problems for population connectivity for some species, particularly those with large home ranges, (e.g. some deer and large carnivores). Hunting seasons, feeding (or lack thereof), the existence of resting zones where hunting is prohibited, legal provisions for wildlife corridors, even administrative authority for wildlife management differ from one Alpine country to another. The Mountain Forest Protocol of the Alpine Convention (1996) asks parties to harmonise their measures for regulating the game animals, but so far this is only happening in a few isolated instances. Thus, to further the goals of ecological connectivity, ALPBIONET2030 aims coordinate wildlife management in selected pilot areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Morphometric Analyses of Cave Bear Mandibles (Carnivora, Ursidae)
    Revue de Paléobiologie, Genève (décembre 2018) 37 (2): 379-393 ISSN 0253-6730 Morphometric analyses of cave bear mandibles (Carnivora, Ursidae) Gennady F. BARYSHNIKOV1*, Andrei Yu. PUZACHENKO2 & Svetlana V. BARYSHNIKOVA1 1 Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Universitetskaya nab. 1, 199034 Saint Petersburg, Russia 2 Institute of Geography, Russian Academy of Sciences, Staromonetnyi per. 29, 109017 Moscow, Russia * Corresponding author: E-mail: [email protected] Abstract Morphometric variability of cave and brown bears and their ancestors (Ursus minimus and U. etruscus) is examined using multivariate statistics based on measurements of 679 mandibles from 90 localities in Northern Eurasia. The variability is dependent on sexual dimorphism in size: it is well seen in big cave bears (U. spelaeus, U. kanivetz = ingressus, U. kudarensis), whose males are nearly 25% larger than females. In the morphological space, we identified two main types of mandibles: the “arctoid” type [U. minimus, U. etruscus, U. arctos, U. rodei (?)], and the “spelaeoid” type (U. spelaeus spelaeus, U. s. eremus, U. kanivetz, U. kudarensis). The intermediate “deningeroid” type includes U. deningeri, U. savini, U. rossicus (males), and U. spelaeus ladinicus. An additional unit is formed by female sample of U. rossicus. The mandible bones are less informative for understanding of cave bear evolution, because in comparison to crania, they have a rather simple shape. Keywords Ursus, cave bears, morphometrics, variations, mandible, evolution, adaptation, Pleistocene. Résumé Analyse morphométrique de la mandibule chez les ours des cavernes. - La variabilité morphométrique des ours des cavernes, des ours bruns et de leurs ancêtres (Ursus minimus et U. etruscus) est étudiée à partir des mesures de 679 mandibules de 90 sites d’Eurasie du nord, à l’aide des méthodes d’analyses statistiques multivariées.
    [Show full text]
  • Freeports Inquiry Evidence for the International Trade Committee by Wildlife and Countryside Link May 2020
    Written submission from Wildlife and Countryside Link (FRP0006) Freeports inquiry Evidence for the International Trade Committee by Wildlife and Countryside Link May 2020 Wildlife and Countryside Link (Link) is the largest environment and wildlife coalition in England, bringing together 58 organisations to use their strong joint voice for the protection of nature. Our members campaign to conserve, enhance and access our landscapes, animals, plants, habitats, rivers and seas. Together we have the support of over eight million people in the UK and directly protect over 750,000 hectares of land and 800 miles of coastline. This response is supported by the following Link members: 1. A Rocha UK 14. International Fund for Animal Welfare 2. Angling Trust 15. League Against Cruel Sports 3. Born Free Foundation 16. Marine Conservation Society 4. British Canoeing 17. Open Spaces Society 5. Buglife 18. People’s Trust for Endangered Species 6. Butterfly Conservation 19. Plantlife 7. ClientEarth 20. RSPB 8. CPRE The Countryside Charity 21. RSPCA 9. Environmental Investigation Agency 22. Salmon and Trout Conservation 10. Four Paws UK 23. Whale and Dolphin Conservation 11. Friends of the Earth 24. The Wildlife Trusts 12. Humane Society International UK 25. Woodland Trust 13. Institute of Fisheries Management 26. WWF-UK This evidence relates mainly to the following two questions posed by the Committee: What negative impacts could freeports have – and how might these be mitigated? What can the UK learn, and what competition will it face, from established freeports around the world? EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Freeports present a number of significant environmental challenges which are not considered in the government’s proposals.
    [Show full text]
  • 4000 M Peaks of the Alps Normal and Classic Routes
    rock&ice 3 4000 m Peaks of the Alps Normal and classic routes idea Montagna editoria e alpinismo Rock&Ice l 4000m Peaks of the Alps l Contents CONTENTS FIVE • • 51a Normal Route to Punta Giordani 257 WEISSHORN AND MATTERHORN ALPS 175 • 52a Normal Route to the Vincent Pyramid 259 • Preface 5 12 Aiguille Blanche de Peuterey 101 35 Dent d’Hérens 180 • 52b Punta Giordani-Vincent Pyramid 261 • Introduction 6 • 12 North Face Right 102 • 35a Normal Route 181 Traverse • Geogrpahic location 14 13 Gran Pilier d’Angle 108 • 35b Tiefmatten Ridge (West Ridge) 183 53 Schwarzhorn/Corno Nero 265 • Technical notes 16 • 13 South Face and Peuterey Ridge 109 36 Matterhorn 185 54 Ludwigshöhe 265 14 Mont Blanc de Courmayeur 114 • 36a Hörnli Ridge (Hörnligrat) 186 55 Parrotspitze 265 ONE • MASSIF DES ÉCRINS 23 • 14 Eccles Couloir and Peuterey Ridge 115 • 36b Lion Ridge 192 • 53-55 Traverse of the Three Peaks 266 1 Barre des Écrins 26 15-19 Aiguilles du Diable 117 37 Dent Blanche 198 56 Signalkuppe 269 • 1a Normal Route 27 15 L’Isolée 117 • 37 Normal Route via the Wandflue Ridge 199 57 Zumsteinspitze 269 • 1b Coolidge Couloir 30 16 Pointe Carmen 117 38 Bishorn 202 • 56-57 Normal Route to the Signalkuppe 270 2 Dôme de Neige des Écrins 32 17 Pointe Médiane 117 • 38 Normal Route 203 and the Zumsteinspitze • 2 Normal Route 32 18 Pointe Chaubert 117 39 Weisshorn 206 58 Dufourspitze 274 19 Corne du Diable 117 • 39 Normal Route 207 59 Nordend 274 TWO • GRAN PARADISO MASSIF 35 • 15-19 Aiguilles du Diable Traverse 118 40 Ober Gabelhorn 212 • 58a Normal Route to the Dufourspitze
    [Show full text]
  • THE VISITOR EXPERIENCE CHALLENGE EXPERIENCE VISITOR the Vol 16 No 2 Vol 16 Protected Areas Programme Areas Protected
    Protected Areas Programme Protected Areas Programme Vol 16 No 2 THE VISITOR EXPERIENCE CHALLENGE 2006 Vol 16 No 2 THE VISITOR EXPERIENCE CHALLENGE 2006 © 2006 IUCN, Gland, Switzerland Vol 16 No 2 ISSN: 0960-233X THE VISITOR EXPERIENCE CHALLENGE CONTENTS Editorial JULIANNA PRISKIN AND STEPHEN F. MCCOOL 1 Managing for visitor experiences in protected areas: promising opportunities and fundamental challenges STEPHEN F. MCCOOL 3 A typology of tourists to protected areas JANET COCHRANE 10 Managing for visitor experiences in Canada’s national heritage places ED JAGER, CAROL SHEEDY, FRANCES GERTSCH, TED PHILLIPS AND GREG DANCHUK 18 Monitoring visitor experiences in protected areas ROBYN BUSHELL AND TONY GRIFFIN 25 2006 Providing wilderness experience opportunities in Europe’s certified PAN parks ZOLTÁN KUN AND MYLÈNE VAN DER DONK 34 Managing tourism visitor experiences in marine settings: the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park ANDREW SKEAT, LISHA MULQUEENY, HILARY SKEAT AND CHRIS BRIGGS 41 Problems and solutions to visitor congestion at Yellow Mountain National Park, China RUI YANG AND YOUBO ZHUANG 47 Perspectives of the tourism industry on the elements affecting visitor satisfaction in protected areas GIULIA CARBONE 53 Résumés/Resumenes 58 Subscription/advertising details inside back cover Protected Areas Programme Vol 16 No 2 THE VISITOR EXPERIENCECHALLENGE 2006 ■ Each issue of Parks addresses a particular theme: 16.1. Community Conserved Areas 16.2. The Visitor Experience Challenge ■ Parks is the leading global forum for information on issues relating to protected area establishment and management ■ Parks puts protected areas at the forefront of contemporary environmental issues, such as The international journal for protected area managers ISSN: 0960-233X biodiversity conservation and ecologically sustainable development Published twice a year by the World Commission on Protected Areas (WCPA) of IUCN – the Subscribing to Parks World Conservation Union.
    [Show full text]
  • Tech Ice & Classics £1199
    Icicle Mountaineering Ltd | 11a Church Street Windermere | Lake District | LA23 1AQ | UK Tel +44 (0)1539 44 22 17 | [email protected] Website: www.icicle-mountaineering.ltd.uk Online: shop.icicle-mountaineering.ltd.uk 2020 trip dossier | Tech Ice & Classics £1199 Website link | http://www.icicle-mountaineering.ltd.uk/classics.html Key features A course for those wanting to climb classic Alpine routes around Chamonix and Mont Blanc. 5 days guiding (Monday - Friday), 6 night B&B accommodation in Chamonix. Develop your mountaineering skills, style points and techniques on the many different routes. Led by top qualified guides (IFMGA), ratio 1:2 throughout to keep the itinerary flexible. All technical equipment (e.g. B3 boots, crampons, ice axe etc.) can be hired from Icicle 2020 dates; 5 - 11 Jul, 19 – 25 Jul, 26 Jul – 1 Aug, 2 - 8 Aug, 9 – 15 Aug, 16 – 22 Aug, 23 - 29 Aug, 30 Aug – 5 Sep. Icicle® is the registered trademark of Icicle Mountaineering UK registered company 413 6635. VAT 770 137 933 20 years ‘inspirational mountain adventure holidays’ established in 2000 Icicle Mountaineering Ltd | 11a Church Street Windermere | Lake District | LA23 1AQ | UK Tel +44 (0)1539 44 22 17 | [email protected] Website: www.icicle-mountaineering.ltd.uk Online: shop.icicle-mountaineering.ltd.uk Course overview For those who enjoy mountaineering climbing classic routes, this course allows you to push your skills (grade III ice or UK Severe or US Grade 5.9) to attempt some of the major mixed and ice mountaineering routes around Chamonix and the Mont Blanc Massif.
    [Show full text]
  • Restoring the North – Challenges and Opportunities
    Restoring the North – Challenges and opportunities Restoring the North – Challenges and opportunities International Restoration Conference, Iceland, October 20-22, 2011 Book of abstracts Restoring the North – Challenges and opportunities International Restoration Conference, Iceland, October 20-22, 2011 Book of abstracts Soil Conservation Service of Iceland and Agricultural University of Iceland Restoring the North – Challenges and opportunities Selfoss, Iceland, October 20-22, 2011 Thursday, October 20. 08:20 Registration 08:50 Conference opening, Guðmundur Halldórsson 09:00 Address from the Minister for the Environment Session I: Restoration in the North – Challenges and opportunities 09:20 Special challenges and opportunities for restoration in the North .................................. 5 Bruce Forbes 10:00 Peatland and forest restoration in Finnish conservation areas ....................................... 6 Päivi Virnes 10:20 Coffee/tea 10:40 Hekluskógar – large scale restoration of birch woodlands with minimum inputs ........... 7 Hreinn Óskarsson, Guðmundur Halldórsson & Ása L. Aradóttir 11:00 Vegetation recovery after transplantation in an alpine environment, Bitdal, Norway .... 8 Scientific committee: Line Rosef & Per Anker Pedersen Ása L. Aradóttir, Agricultural University of Iceland 11:20 Dam removal: enhancing or degrading ecological integrity? ......................................... 9 Dagmar Hagen, Norwegian Institute for Nature Research Birgitta Malm Renöfält Guðmundur Halldórsson, Soil Conservation Service of Iceland
    [Show full text]
  • Conflict Between Conservation and Recreation at Oulanka National Park?
    Conflict between conservation and recreation at Oulanka National Park? By Mark Baas Student no.: 860206024080 Supervised by: Ramona van Marwijk René van der Duim Wageningen University and Research Centre Department of Environmental Sciences Chairgroup of Socio Spatial Analysis Msc. Leisure Tourism and Environment Course code: SAL-80433 Wageningen, 4. March 2010 Summary During the early years of Oulanka National Park (ON), trails and facilities were constructed in biodiversity rich areas. Managers in that time believed that biodiversity would give people a richer visitor experience. As this is currently questioned, research is necessary to investigate the relation between biodiversity and visitors experience. However, the dataset available did not provide sufficient data to explain these interrelations. Additionally, exploratory research was needed to investigate if there were actual indications for a potential conflict between the conservation function and the recreation function of Oulanka National Park. Therefore this research tried to explore: (1) whether there is a conflict between different functions of ONP by spatial analyzing biodiversity hotspots, facility density and visitor usage; (2) which groups of visitors can be distinguished based on their motivations for visiting ONP; (3) whether visitors and different groups of visitors perceive environmental impacts; (4) whether there is a difference in group composition and visitor perception of environmental impacts at different locations throughout the park. The spatial analysis regarding the identification of conflict zones indicated that there is indeed a conflict between conservancy and recreation at ONP. From the visitor sample, three motivational groups were distinguished. Nature was the primary motivation for all visitors. One group was less motivated by anything else than nature.
    [Show full text]
  • Reviewing the Coherence and Effectiveness of Implementation of Multilateral Biodiversity Agreements in Estonia
    Stockholm Environment Institute Tallinn Centre, Publication No 25, Project Report – 2014 Reviewing the coherence and effectiveness of implementation of multilateral biodiversity agreements in Estonia Kaja Peterson, Piret Kuldna, Plamen Peev, Meelis Uustal Reviewing the coherence and effectiveness of implementation of multilateral biodiversity agreements in Estonia Kaja Peterson, Piret Kuldna, Plamen Peev, Meelis Uustal Reference: Peterson, K., Kuldna, P., Peev, P. and Uustal, M. 2014. Reviewing the coherence and effectiveness of implementation of multilateral biodiversity agreements in Estonia. Project Report, SEI Tallinn, Tallinn: 70 p. Project no 41064 Stockholm Environment Institute Tallinn Centre Lai Str 34 Tallinn 10133 Estonia www.seit.ee January–December 2013 Language editor: Stacey Noel, SEI Africa Lay-out: Tiina Salumäe, SEI Tallinn Photos: Kaja Peterson, SEI Tallinn ISBN: 978-9949-9501-4-0 ISSN: 1406-6637 TABLE OF CONTENTS List of acronyms and abbreviations ..................................................................................................................................................7 List of figures .............................................................................................................................................................................................8 List of tables ..............................................................................................................................................................................................8 Executive summary
    [Show full text]
  • EUROPARC NBS Newsletter 1/2014
    EUROPARC NBS Newsletter 1/2014 http://us4.campaign-archive1.com/?u=5108bdfadcd892894bfe63be6&... Subscribe Share Past Issues Translate Use this area to offer a short preview of your email's content. View this email in your browser Final countdown Ongoing year is the last presidency year for Estonia and Environmental Board. We are making our best to negotiate with possible next host of Nordic-Baltic Section secretariat. Many activities lie still ahead, such as interesting seminars about wooded grasslands and health issues. We rely on your good collaborations for the upcoming newsletters and other activities! Section secretariat 1 of 10 10.04.2014 9:34 EUROPARC NBS Newsletter 1/2014 http://us4.campaign-archive1.com/?u=5108bdfadcd892894bfe63be6&... Subscribe Share Past Issues Translate President´s corner Winter in Matsalu National Park was cold, Following species are getting special but very short. Spring migration has begun attention in Estonia this year having been with first grey-lag geese, lapwings and elected so called species of the year: sky-larks here; first hundreds of whooper Ringed Seal (Pusa hispida), Common and bewick's swans have started their Kingfisher (Alcedo atthis) and Alder song festival on Matsalu bay. Some of the Buckthorn (Rhamnus frangula). spring can be seen from home via internet - the "seal camera" of Vilsandi National In spite of good weather the mood is not Park is located in the grey-seals' kinder- very much so, the thoughts being held by garden: www.looduskalender.ee/node the tense situation in Ukraine. Who knows /19354 and "owl camera" of Matsalu how far the conflict can go, and there National Park is inside a tawny owl's nest: would be then losses both among people www.looduskalender.ee/node/19372 .
    [Show full text]
  • Wetland Tourism: Estonia - Soomaa National Park
    A Ramsar Case Study on Tourism and Wetlands Wetland Tourism: Estonia - Soomaa National Park Estonia, Soomaa. Fifth Season in a Soomaa Boat. © Mati Kose Estonia’s Soomaa National Park is a Soomaa National Park is the most popular land of peat bogs, naturally meandering rivers, wilderness tourism destination of the Baltic swamp forests and meadows on the rivers’ countries. Its tourism products are based on floodplains. Its bogs and rivers began to develop wilderness experiences, the uniqueness of around 10,000 years ago when the last of the Soomaa and its cultural heritage, and the quality European ice sheets retreated northwards. Today services that are offered by the local tourism the area contains some of the best preserved and entrepreneurs and stakeholders. most extensive raised bogs in Europe. Each spring, it is subject to spectacular floods over a vast area – The Park was established under Estonian a time of the year that is known locally as the ‘fifth legislation in 1993, and joined the PAN Parks season’. Soomaa also has rich wildlife which Network of European wilderness areas in 2009. It includes golden eagles, black storks, woodpeckers, also received an EDEN (European Destinations of owls, various kinds of bog waders such as golden Excellence) award from the European Commission plovers, wood sandpipers, whimbrel, curlew, great in 2009 for promoting sustainable tourism in and snipe, and corn crake, as well as elk, wild boar, around a protected area. The site has been listed beaver, wolf, lynx, and brown bear. as a Ramsar Wetland of International Importance since 1997. The Ramsar Secretariat selected 14 case studies for a publication on wetlands and sustainable tourism, to be launched at the 11th Conference of Parties, July 2012.
    [Show full text]