Last of the Wild
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Dufourspitze 4634M £1699
Icicle Mountaineering Ltd | 11a Church Street Windermere | Lake District | LA23 1AQ | UK Tel +44 (0)1539 44 22 17 | [email protected] Website: www.icicle-mountaineering.ltd.uk Online: shop.icicle-mountaineering.ltd.uk 2020 trip dossier | Dufourspitze 4634m £1699 Website link | http://www.icicle-mountaineering.ltd.uk/dufourspitze.html Key features Climb Dufourspitze, the highest mountain in Switzerland and second highest in the Alps.. 5 days guiding (Monday - Friday), with flexible itinerary to take advantage of the best conditions. Previous crampon or climbing experience is required, as this is a progression from an Intro course. Led by top qualified guides (IFMGA), guiding ratio 1:2 throughout the course. All technical equipment (e.g. B3 boots, crampons, ice axe etc.) can be hired from Icicle 2020 dates; 5 - 11 Jul, 19 - 25 Jul, 26 Jul - 1 Aug, 9 - 15 Aug, 30 Aug -+- 5 Sep. Icicle® is the registered trademark of Icicle Mountaineering UK registered company 413 6635. VAT 770 137 933 20 years ‘inspirational mountain adventure holidays’ established in 2000 Icicle Mountaineering Ltd | 11a Church Street Windermere | Lake District | LA23 1AQ | UK Tel +44 (0)1539 44 22 17 | [email protected] Website: www.icicle-mountaineering.ltd.uk Online: shop.icicle-mountaineering.ltd.uk Course overview . Climb the highest summit of Monte Rosa; Dufourspitze 4634m. It's the highest mountain in Switzerland, and the second highest in all of the Alps after Mont Blanc. We offer a week long programme to attempt this peak, as your acclimatisation and flexibility for selecting a weather window are crucial. To keep the itinerary flexibilty, the guiding ratio is 1:2 throughout, so you can take advantage of the best days for the summit weather window. -
Workshop on Transboundary Wildlife Management
ALPBIONET2030 Integrative Alpine wildlife and habitat management for the next generation REPORT Workshop on Transboundary wildlife management 10 October 2017, Trenta, Triglav National Park, Slovenia (Alpbionet2030 – Work Package 2) Integrative Alpine wildlife and habitat management for the next generation A workshop to discuss tactics and devise actions for transboundary wildlife management between the wildlife managers of Transboundary Ecoregion Julian Alps, defined as the sum of Triglav Hunting Management Area and Gorenjska Hunting Management Area (Slovenia) and Tarvisiano Hunting District (Italy) with their core protected areas of Triglav National Park and Prealpi Giulie Nature Park, was held at the conference facilities of the “Dom Trenta” National Park house in Trenta. This Workshop is one of the activities of WP T.2 of the Alpbionet2030 project co- financed by the EU Alpine Space Programme. INTRODUCTION The behaviour and habitat use of animals can be strongly affected by hunting methods and wildlife management strategies. Hunting and wildlife management therefore have an influence on ecological connectivity. Lack of consistency in wildlife management between regions can cause problems for population connectivity for some species, particularly those with large home ranges, (e.g. some deer and large carnivores). Hunting seasons, feeding (or lack thereof), the existence of resting zones where hunting is prohibited, legal provisions for wildlife corridors, even administrative authority for wildlife management differ from one Alpine country to another. The Mountain Forest Protocol of the Alpine Convention (1996) asks parties to harmonise their measures for regulating the game animals, but so far this is only happening in a few isolated instances. Thus, to further the goals of ecological connectivity, ALPBIONET2030 aims coordinate wildlife management in selected pilot areas. -
Morphometric Analyses of Cave Bear Mandibles (Carnivora, Ursidae)
Revue de Paléobiologie, Genève (décembre 2018) 37 (2): 379-393 ISSN 0253-6730 Morphometric analyses of cave bear mandibles (Carnivora, Ursidae) Gennady F. BARYSHNIKOV1*, Andrei Yu. PUZACHENKO2 & Svetlana V. BARYSHNIKOVA1 1 Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Universitetskaya nab. 1, 199034 Saint Petersburg, Russia 2 Institute of Geography, Russian Academy of Sciences, Staromonetnyi per. 29, 109017 Moscow, Russia * Corresponding author: E-mail: [email protected] Abstract Morphometric variability of cave and brown bears and their ancestors (Ursus minimus and U. etruscus) is examined using multivariate statistics based on measurements of 679 mandibles from 90 localities in Northern Eurasia. The variability is dependent on sexual dimorphism in size: it is well seen in big cave bears (U. spelaeus, U. kanivetz = ingressus, U. kudarensis), whose males are nearly 25% larger than females. In the morphological space, we identified two main types of mandibles: the “arctoid” type [U. minimus, U. etruscus, U. arctos, U. rodei (?)], and the “spelaeoid” type (U. spelaeus spelaeus, U. s. eremus, U. kanivetz, U. kudarensis). The intermediate “deningeroid” type includes U. deningeri, U. savini, U. rossicus (males), and U. spelaeus ladinicus. An additional unit is formed by female sample of U. rossicus. The mandible bones are less informative for understanding of cave bear evolution, because in comparison to crania, they have a rather simple shape. Keywords Ursus, cave bears, morphometrics, variations, mandible, evolution, adaptation, Pleistocene. Résumé Analyse morphométrique de la mandibule chez les ours des cavernes. - La variabilité morphométrique des ours des cavernes, des ours bruns et de leurs ancêtres (Ursus minimus et U. etruscus) est étudiée à partir des mesures de 679 mandibules de 90 sites d’Eurasie du nord, à l’aide des méthodes d’analyses statistiques multivariées. -
Freeports Inquiry Evidence for the International Trade Committee by Wildlife and Countryside Link May 2020
Written submission from Wildlife and Countryside Link (FRP0006) Freeports inquiry Evidence for the International Trade Committee by Wildlife and Countryside Link May 2020 Wildlife and Countryside Link (Link) is the largest environment and wildlife coalition in England, bringing together 58 organisations to use their strong joint voice for the protection of nature. Our members campaign to conserve, enhance and access our landscapes, animals, plants, habitats, rivers and seas. Together we have the support of over eight million people in the UK and directly protect over 750,000 hectares of land and 800 miles of coastline. This response is supported by the following Link members: 1. A Rocha UK 14. International Fund for Animal Welfare 2. Angling Trust 15. League Against Cruel Sports 3. Born Free Foundation 16. Marine Conservation Society 4. British Canoeing 17. Open Spaces Society 5. Buglife 18. People’s Trust for Endangered Species 6. Butterfly Conservation 19. Plantlife 7. ClientEarth 20. RSPB 8. CPRE The Countryside Charity 21. RSPCA 9. Environmental Investigation Agency 22. Salmon and Trout Conservation 10. Four Paws UK 23. Whale and Dolphin Conservation 11. Friends of the Earth 24. The Wildlife Trusts 12. Humane Society International UK 25. Woodland Trust 13. Institute of Fisheries Management 26. WWF-UK This evidence relates mainly to the following two questions posed by the Committee: What negative impacts could freeports have – and how might these be mitigated? What can the UK learn, and what competition will it face, from established freeports around the world? EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Freeports present a number of significant environmental challenges which are not considered in the government’s proposals. -
4000 M Peaks of the Alps Normal and Classic Routes
rock&ice 3 4000 m Peaks of the Alps Normal and classic routes idea Montagna editoria e alpinismo Rock&Ice l 4000m Peaks of the Alps l Contents CONTENTS FIVE • • 51a Normal Route to Punta Giordani 257 WEISSHORN AND MATTERHORN ALPS 175 • 52a Normal Route to the Vincent Pyramid 259 • Preface 5 12 Aiguille Blanche de Peuterey 101 35 Dent d’Hérens 180 • 52b Punta Giordani-Vincent Pyramid 261 • Introduction 6 • 12 North Face Right 102 • 35a Normal Route 181 Traverse • Geogrpahic location 14 13 Gran Pilier d’Angle 108 • 35b Tiefmatten Ridge (West Ridge) 183 53 Schwarzhorn/Corno Nero 265 • Technical notes 16 • 13 South Face and Peuterey Ridge 109 36 Matterhorn 185 54 Ludwigshöhe 265 14 Mont Blanc de Courmayeur 114 • 36a Hörnli Ridge (Hörnligrat) 186 55 Parrotspitze 265 ONE • MASSIF DES ÉCRINS 23 • 14 Eccles Couloir and Peuterey Ridge 115 • 36b Lion Ridge 192 • 53-55 Traverse of the Three Peaks 266 1 Barre des Écrins 26 15-19 Aiguilles du Diable 117 37 Dent Blanche 198 56 Signalkuppe 269 • 1a Normal Route 27 15 L’Isolée 117 • 37 Normal Route via the Wandflue Ridge 199 57 Zumsteinspitze 269 • 1b Coolidge Couloir 30 16 Pointe Carmen 117 38 Bishorn 202 • 56-57 Normal Route to the Signalkuppe 270 2 Dôme de Neige des Écrins 32 17 Pointe Médiane 117 • 38 Normal Route 203 and the Zumsteinspitze • 2 Normal Route 32 18 Pointe Chaubert 117 39 Weisshorn 206 58 Dufourspitze 274 19 Corne du Diable 117 • 39 Normal Route 207 59 Nordend 274 TWO • GRAN PARADISO MASSIF 35 • 15-19 Aiguilles du Diable Traverse 118 40 Ober Gabelhorn 212 • 58a Normal Route to the Dufourspitze -
THE VISITOR EXPERIENCE CHALLENGE EXPERIENCE VISITOR the Vol 16 No 2 Vol 16 Protected Areas Programme Areas Protected
Protected Areas Programme Protected Areas Programme Vol 16 No 2 THE VISITOR EXPERIENCE CHALLENGE 2006 Vol 16 No 2 THE VISITOR EXPERIENCE CHALLENGE 2006 © 2006 IUCN, Gland, Switzerland Vol 16 No 2 ISSN: 0960-233X THE VISITOR EXPERIENCE CHALLENGE CONTENTS Editorial JULIANNA PRISKIN AND STEPHEN F. MCCOOL 1 Managing for visitor experiences in protected areas: promising opportunities and fundamental challenges STEPHEN F. MCCOOL 3 A typology of tourists to protected areas JANET COCHRANE 10 Managing for visitor experiences in Canada’s national heritage places ED JAGER, CAROL SHEEDY, FRANCES GERTSCH, TED PHILLIPS AND GREG DANCHUK 18 Monitoring visitor experiences in protected areas ROBYN BUSHELL AND TONY GRIFFIN 25 2006 Providing wilderness experience opportunities in Europe’s certified PAN parks ZOLTÁN KUN AND MYLÈNE VAN DER DONK 34 Managing tourism visitor experiences in marine settings: the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park ANDREW SKEAT, LISHA MULQUEENY, HILARY SKEAT AND CHRIS BRIGGS 41 Problems and solutions to visitor congestion at Yellow Mountain National Park, China RUI YANG AND YOUBO ZHUANG 47 Perspectives of the tourism industry on the elements affecting visitor satisfaction in protected areas GIULIA CARBONE 53 Résumés/Resumenes 58 Subscription/advertising details inside back cover Protected Areas Programme Vol 16 No 2 THE VISITOR EXPERIENCECHALLENGE 2006 ■ Each issue of Parks addresses a particular theme: 16.1. Community Conserved Areas 16.2. The Visitor Experience Challenge ■ Parks is the leading global forum for information on issues relating to protected area establishment and management ■ Parks puts protected areas at the forefront of contemporary environmental issues, such as The international journal for protected area managers ISSN: 0960-233X biodiversity conservation and ecologically sustainable development Published twice a year by the World Commission on Protected Areas (WCPA) of IUCN – the Subscribing to Parks World Conservation Union. -
Tech Ice & Classics £1199
Icicle Mountaineering Ltd | 11a Church Street Windermere | Lake District | LA23 1AQ | UK Tel +44 (0)1539 44 22 17 | [email protected] Website: www.icicle-mountaineering.ltd.uk Online: shop.icicle-mountaineering.ltd.uk 2020 trip dossier | Tech Ice & Classics £1199 Website link | http://www.icicle-mountaineering.ltd.uk/classics.html Key features A course for those wanting to climb classic Alpine routes around Chamonix and Mont Blanc. 5 days guiding (Monday - Friday), 6 night B&B accommodation in Chamonix. Develop your mountaineering skills, style points and techniques on the many different routes. Led by top qualified guides (IFMGA), ratio 1:2 throughout to keep the itinerary flexible. All technical equipment (e.g. B3 boots, crampons, ice axe etc.) can be hired from Icicle 2020 dates; 5 - 11 Jul, 19 – 25 Jul, 26 Jul – 1 Aug, 2 - 8 Aug, 9 – 15 Aug, 16 – 22 Aug, 23 - 29 Aug, 30 Aug – 5 Sep. Icicle® is the registered trademark of Icicle Mountaineering UK registered company 413 6635. VAT 770 137 933 20 years ‘inspirational mountain adventure holidays’ established in 2000 Icicle Mountaineering Ltd | 11a Church Street Windermere | Lake District | LA23 1AQ | UK Tel +44 (0)1539 44 22 17 | [email protected] Website: www.icicle-mountaineering.ltd.uk Online: shop.icicle-mountaineering.ltd.uk Course overview For those who enjoy mountaineering climbing classic routes, this course allows you to push your skills (grade III ice or UK Severe or US Grade 5.9) to attempt some of the major mixed and ice mountaineering routes around Chamonix and the Mont Blanc Massif. -
Restoring the North – Challenges and Opportunities
Restoring the North – Challenges and opportunities Restoring the North – Challenges and opportunities International Restoration Conference, Iceland, October 20-22, 2011 Book of abstracts Restoring the North – Challenges and opportunities International Restoration Conference, Iceland, October 20-22, 2011 Book of abstracts Soil Conservation Service of Iceland and Agricultural University of Iceland Restoring the North – Challenges and opportunities Selfoss, Iceland, October 20-22, 2011 Thursday, October 20. 08:20 Registration 08:50 Conference opening, Guðmundur Halldórsson 09:00 Address from the Minister for the Environment Session I: Restoration in the North – Challenges and opportunities 09:20 Special challenges and opportunities for restoration in the North .................................. 5 Bruce Forbes 10:00 Peatland and forest restoration in Finnish conservation areas ....................................... 6 Päivi Virnes 10:20 Coffee/tea 10:40 Hekluskógar – large scale restoration of birch woodlands with minimum inputs ........... 7 Hreinn Óskarsson, Guðmundur Halldórsson & Ása L. Aradóttir 11:00 Vegetation recovery after transplantation in an alpine environment, Bitdal, Norway .... 8 Scientific committee: Line Rosef & Per Anker Pedersen Ása L. Aradóttir, Agricultural University of Iceland 11:20 Dam removal: enhancing or degrading ecological integrity? ......................................... 9 Dagmar Hagen, Norwegian Institute for Nature Research Birgitta Malm Renöfält Guðmundur Halldórsson, Soil Conservation Service of Iceland -
Conflict Between Conservation and Recreation at Oulanka National Park?
Conflict between conservation and recreation at Oulanka National Park? By Mark Baas Student no.: 860206024080 Supervised by: Ramona van Marwijk René van der Duim Wageningen University and Research Centre Department of Environmental Sciences Chairgroup of Socio Spatial Analysis Msc. Leisure Tourism and Environment Course code: SAL-80433 Wageningen, 4. March 2010 Summary During the early years of Oulanka National Park (ON), trails and facilities were constructed in biodiversity rich areas. Managers in that time believed that biodiversity would give people a richer visitor experience. As this is currently questioned, research is necessary to investigate the relation between biodiversity and visitors experience. However, the dataset available did not provide sufficient data to explain these interrelations. Additionally, exploratory research was needed to investigate if there were actual indications for a potential conflict between the conservation function and the recreation function of Oulanka National Park. Therefore this research tried to explore: (1) whether there is a conflict between different functions of ONP by spatial analyzing biodiversity hotspots, facility density and visitor usage; (2) which groups of visitors can be distinguished based on their motivations for visiting ONP; (3) whether visitors and different groups of visitors perceive environmental impacts; (4) whether there is a difference in group composition and visitor perception of environmental impacts at different locations throughout the park. The spatial analysis regarding the identification of conflict zones indicated that there is indeed a conflict between conservancy and recreation at ONP. From the visitor sample, three motivational groups were distinguished. Nature was the primary motivation for all visitors. One group was less motivated by anything else than nature. -
Reviewing the Coherence and Effectiveness of Implementation of Multilateral Biodiversity Agreements in Estonia
Stockholm Environment Institute Tallinn Centre, Publication No 25, Project Report – 2014 Reviewing the coherence and effectiveness of implementation of multilateral biodiversity agreements in Estonia Kaja Peterson, Piret Kuldna, Plamen Peev, Meelis Uustal Reviewing the coherence and effectiveness of implementation of multilateral biodiversity agreements in Estonia Kaja Peterson, Piret Kuldna, Plamen Peev, Meelis Uustal Reference: Peterson, K., Kuldna, P., Peev, P. and Uustal, M. 2014. Reviewing the coherence and effectiveness of implementation of multilateral biodiversity agreements in Estonia. Project Report, SEI Tallinn, Tallinn: 70 p. Project no 41064 Stockholm Environment Institute Tallinn Centre Lai Str 34 Tallinn 10133 Estonia www.seit.ee January–December 2013 Language editor: Stacey Noel, SEI Africa Lay-out: Tiina Salumäe, SEI Tallinn Photos: Kaja Peterson, SEI Tallinn ISBN: 978-9949-9501-4-0 ISSN: 1406-6637 TABLE OF CONTENTS List of acronyms and abbreviations ..................................................................................................................................................7 List of figures .............................................................................................................................................................................................8 List of tables ..............................................................................................................................................................................................8 Executive summary -
EUROPARC NBS Newsletter 1/2014
EUROPARC NBS Newsletter 1/2014 http://us4.campaign-archive1.com/?u=5108bdfadcd892894bfe63be6&... Subscribe Share Past Issues Translate Use this area to offer a short preview of your email's content. View this email in your browser Final countdown Ongoing year is the last presidency year for Estonia and Environmental Board. We are making our best to negotiate with possible next host of Nordic-Baltic Section secretariat. Many activities lie still ahead, such as interesting seminars about wooded grasslands and health issues. We rely on your good collaborations for the upcoming newsletters and other activities! Section secretariat 1 of 10 10.04.2014 9:34 EUROPARC NBS Newsletter 1/2014 http://us4.campaign-archive1.com/?u=5108bdfadcd892894bfe63be6&... Subscribe Share Past Issues Translate President´s corner Winter in Matsalu National Park was cold, Following species are getting special but very short. Spring migration has begun attention in Estonia this year having been with first grey-lag geese, lapwings and elected so called species of the year: sky-larks here; first hundreds of whooper Ringed Seal (Pusa hispida), Common and bewick's swans have started their Kingfisher (Alcedo atthis) and Alder song festival on Matsalu bay. Some of the Buckthorn (Rhamnus frangula). spring can be seen from home via internet - the "seal camera" of Vilsandi National In spite of good weather the mood is not Park is located in the grey-seals' kinder- very much so, the thoughts being held by garden: www.looduskalender.ee/node the tense situation in Ukraine. Who knows /19354 and "owl camera" of Matsalu how far the conflict can go, and there National Park is inside a tawny owl's nest: would be then losses both among people www.looduskalender.ee/node/19372 . -
Wetland Tourism: Estonia - Soomaa National Park
A Ramsar Case Study on Tourism and Wetlands Wetland Tourism: Estonia - Soomaa National Park Estonia, Soomaa. Fifth Season in a Soomaa Boat. © Mati Kose Estonia’s Soomaa National Park is a Soomaa National Park is the most popular land of peat bogs, naturally meandering rivers, wilderness tourism destination of the Baltic swamp forests and meadows on the rivers’ countries. Its tourism products are based on floodplains. Its bogs and rivers began to develop wilderness experiences, the uniqueness of around 10,000 years ago when the last of the Soomaa and its cultural heritage, and the quality European ice sheets retreated northwards. Today services that are offered by the local tourism the area contains some of the best preserved and entrepreneurs and stakeholders. most extensive raised bogs in Europe. Each spring, it is subject to spectacular floods over a vast area – The Park was established under Estonian a time of the year that is known locally as the ‘fifth legislation in 1993, and joined the PAN Parks season’. Soomaa also has rich wildlife which Network of European wilderness areas in 2009. It includes golden eagles, black storks, woodpeckers, also received an EDEN (European Destinations of owls, various kinds of bog waders such as golden Excellence) award from the European Commission plovers, wood sandpipers, whimbrel, curlew, great in 2009 for promoting sustainable tourism in and snipe, and corn crake, as well as elk, wild boar, around a protected area. The site has been listed beaver, wolf, lynx, and brown bear. as a Ramsar Wetland of International Importance since 1997. The Ramsar Secretariat selected 14 case studies for a publication on wetlands and sustainable tourism, to be launched at the 11th Conference of Parties, July 2012.