Sudan, Situation Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Sudan, Situation Report SUDAN Situation Report Last updated: 7 Jan 2021 HIGHLIGHTS (7 Jan 2021) UNHCR and COR have registered over 56,000 Ethiopian refugees, relocation of refugees to new site Tunaydbah starts. About US$40 million has been pledged to UNHCR for the regional response to refugees from Tigray - 37 per cent of the requirements in Sudan, Ethiopia, and Djibouti. Despite the ongoing harvest, sorghum and millet prices atypically increased between October and December across most main production and consumption markets - FEWS NET. In urban centres, poor families are likely to have below-average food access through May 2021 due to the extremely high food prices limiting household purchasing power – FEWS NET. Humanitarians assisted 8.8 million people across Sudan between January and September 2020 - HRP Quarter 3 Monitoring Report. KEY FIGURES FUNDING (2020) CONTACTS Paola Emerson 7.1M 6.1M $1.6B $868.7M Head of Office for OCHA Sudan severely food-insecure people targeted for Required Received [email protected] people assistance in 2020 A n James Steel d ! j , r Head, Communications and Information y e 53% e r r r j d 1.1M 2.55M ! Progress Management o n refugees internally displaced people S A [email protected] FTS: https://fts.unocha.org/appeals/870/summ Alimbek Tashtankulov 23,316 1,468 ary Head of Reporting total people who contracted COVID-19-related deaths [email protected] COVID-19 56,625 8.8M Ethiopian refugees from People reached with aid Tigray (UNHCR) (Jan-Sep 2020) EMERGENCY RESPONSE (10 Jan 2021) New site starts receiving Ethiopian refugees from Tigray Key figures: · 56,625 refugees registered (8 January, UNHCR) · 23,177 refugees relocated from Hamdayet and Abdrafi and Village 8 to Um Raquba and Tunaydbah refugee camps · $157 million needed to respond to the urgent needs of up to 115,000 refugees and 22,000 host communities in Sudan and Djibouti up to June 2021. So far, $40 million has been pledged Situation Ethiopian-refugees-arrive-in-Hamdayet_Kassala_WFP-Leni- Kinzli_17Nov20 https://reports.unocha.org/en/country/sudan/ Page 1 of 11 Downloaded: 12 Jan 2021 SUDAN Situation Report Last updated: 7 Jan 2021 Since 9 November, Ethiopian asylum seekers have been arriving in eastern Sudan, fleeing a military escalation in the Tigray region in northern Ethiopia. Refugees are arriving in three locations along the border with Ethiopia in eastern Sudan, Hamdayet in Kassala State, Ludgi and Abderafi in Gedaref State and to a lesser extent into Wad Al Mahi locality in Blue Nile State. Refugees arrive exhausted from their long trek, with few belongings and need assistance. The Government of Sudan has kept its borders open to the refugee and hosting communities are supporting and sharing their resources with the new refugee arrivals. UNHCR and the Government’s Commission for Refugees (COR) are taking the lead on preparedness and response. Response UNHCR continues to register new refugee arrivals at the Sudanese-Ethiopian border. Some 800 people crossed from Ethiopia’s Tigray region into eastern Sudan in just the first few days of the new year. Since early November, more than 56,000 Ethiopian refugees have fled to neighbouring Sudan. Latest arrivals tell of being caught in the conflict and being victims of various armed groups, facing perilous situations including looting of their houses, forceful recruitment of men and boys, sexual violence against women and girls. Refugees are arriving with little more than the clothes on their backs, fatigued and in weak conditions after sometimes days of travel. More than 30 per cent of them are estimated to be under 18 and 5 per cent over 60 years old. In support of the government-led response in Sudan, UNHCR and Sudan’s Commission for Refugees (COR) continue to relocate the refugees from the arrival locations at the border to the designated refugee camps, further inland in Sudan’s Gedaref State. With the Um Rakuba refugee camp approaching its full capacity, UNHCR and its partners are striving to swiftly relocate refugees from reception sites at the border to a second, newly opened refugee camp, Tunaydbah, in order to keep refugees safe and offer them better living conditions. The new site is located some 136km from Gedaref town. As of 6 January, 2,605 refugees were relocated to Tunaydbah camp, according to the latest Ethiopia Situation - Daily New Arrivals Update from UNHCR Sudan. Hamdayet and Village 8 reception sites are overcrowded, and their close location to the border putting the safety and security of refugees increasingly at risk. Upon arrival to Tunaydbah, hot meals are being provided and 1,000 tents, aimed at sheltering up to 5,000 people, have so far been set up by partners. More tents are being pitched as the relocation is set to progress in the coming days and weeks. UNHCR, COR, and partners are scaling up their response to meet the needs of the increasing refugee population in all locations. Currently, more than 20 humanitarian partners are on the ground in Um Rakuba and another six are starting their activities in Tunaydbah to assist and engage the refugee and host community with shelter, health, food and nutrition services. Once more, the Government of Sudan is generously keeping its border open to refugees, but additional support is needed to complement the authorities’ response. In particular, it is critical to further improve water and sanitation conditions in the refugee camps and reception areas, as well as to ramp up COVID-19 prevention measures, including isolation facilities. Additional funding is also required to sustain shelter projects and improve the living conditions of refugees in the camps, especially in anticipation of the next rainy season expected to start in May. On 22 December, UNHCR and partners launched the Regional Refugee Preparedness and Response Plan for the Ethiopia Situation (Tigray). The plan covers the period from November 2020 through to June 2021 and foresees to reach up to 115,000 refugees and 22,000 host communities in Sudan and Djibouti. As at the end of 2020, US$40 million has been pledged to UNHCR for the regional response to the emergency in Ethiopia’s Tigray region, which covers only 37 per cent of the financial requirements in Sudan, Ethiopia, and Djibouti. For more details on response and gaps please visit the UNHCR Sudan refugee situation operational portal. FORECAST (7 Jan 2021) Sorghum and millet prices atypically continue to increase despite harvest Despite the ongoing harvest, in November and December, the retail prices of sorghum and millet have atypically increased across most main production and consumption markets, the FEWS NET reported in its December 2020 Sudan Food Security Outlook Update. In most markets, prices have reported a 10- 20 per cent monthly increase between October through December. Across main markets, sorghum sold on average for 82 SDG/kg in December 2020 compared to 70 and 72 SDG/kg for October and November, respectively. According to the Central Bank of Sudan (CBoS), the exchange rate for 1 US$ is 55 SDG, while the rate in the parallel market is 262 SDG. Current sorghum and millet prices remained on average 240-300 per cent higher than respective 2019 prices and seven times above the five-year average. This unseasonal increase in sorghum and millet prices is impacted by the rapid depreciation of the Sudanese Pound and extremely high production and transportation costs, delays in the harvest, a lower than anticipated harvest, and limited carryover stock at the market and household level. Higher than https://reports.unocha.org/en/country/sudan/ Page 2 of 11 Downloaded: 12 Jan 2021 SUDAN Situation Report Last updated: 7 Jan 2021 typical cereal demand during the harvest period is keeping market supplies low as big traders seek to build their stocks in anticipation of high prices in the lean season and increased demand by humanitarian actors providing support to Ethiopian refugees in eastern Sudan. Projected Outlook through May 2021 The latest projection update from the Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC) on food security in Sudan estimated that 7.1 million people (16 per cent of the population) faced acute food insecurity in October-December 2020. Meanwhile, the ongoing main agricultural season harvest is improving household food access from own production and in-kind payments from agricultural labour, according to FEWS NET. Food security outcomes for many areas will improve to Minimal (IPC Phase 1) and Stressed (IPC Phase 2). However, Crisis (IPC Phase 3) outcome will likely persist among IDPs in SPLM-N controlled areas of South Kordofan, IDPs and conflict-affected families in Jebel Marra in Darfur and newly arrived refugees in eastern Sudan through February 2021. However, emergency food assistance needs are expected to remain above typical levels through the harvest period due to the continued influx of refugees from Ethiopia, protracted displacement in Darfur and South Kordofan, and the economic impact of COVID-19, along with the persistent macro-economic crisis. In urban centers, poor households are likely to have below-average food access through May 2021 due to the extremely high food prices limiting household purchasing power. Together with the second wave of COVID-19, the continued macroeconomics crisis will continue reducing household access to income- earning opportunities. Poor urban households will likely continue facing difficulty meeting their basic food needs, driving an increase in the number of households facing Stressed (IPC Phase 2) acute food insecurity outcomes. If further COVID-19 containment measures are imposed, the number of urban poor households facing Crisis (IPC phases 3) outcomes are expected to increase, particularly with the beginning of the lean season in April/May 2021, FEWS NET said. For more information and detail, please see the FEWS NET update at this link EMERGENCY RESPONSE (7 Jan 2021) Record number of people – 8.8 million – receive humanitarian assistance in January-September 2020 Despite challenges related to COVID-19 containment measures, low funding, access to fuel and cash, humanitarian agencies reached 8.8 million people across Sudan with some form of humanitarian assistance between January and September 2020.
Recommended publications
  • Humanitarian Situation Report No. 19 Q3 2020 Highlights
    Sudan Humanitarian Situation Report No. 19 Q3 2020 UNICEF and partners assess damage to communities in southern Khartoum. Sudan was significantly affected by heavy flooding this summer, destroying many homes and displacing families. @RESPECTMEDIA PlPl Reporting Period: July-September 2020 Highlights Situation in Numbers • Flash floods in several states and heavy rains in upriver countries caused the White and Blue Nile rivers to overflow, damaging households and in- 5.39 million frastructure. Almost 850,000 people have been directly affected and children in need of could be multiplied ten-fold as water and mosquito borne diseases devel- humanitarian assistance op as flood waters recede. 9.3 million • All educational institutions have remained closed since March due to people in need COVID-19 and term realignments and are now due to open again on the 22 November. 1 million • Peace talks between the Government of Sudan and the Sudan Revolu- internally displaced children tionary Front concluded following an agreement in Juba signed on 3 Oc- tober. This has consolidated humanitarian access to the majority of the 1.8 million Jebel Mara region at the heart of Darfur. internally displaced people 379,355 South Sudanese child refugees 729,530 South Sudanese refugees (Sudan HNO 2020) UNICEF Appeal 2020 US $147.1 million Funding Status (in US$) Funds Fundi received, ng $60M gap, $70M Carry- forward, $17M *This table shows % progress towards key targets as well as % funding available for each sector. Funding available includes funds received in the current year and carry-over from the previous year. 1 Funding Overview and Partnerships UNICEF’s 2020 Humanitarian Action for Children (HAC) appeal for Sudan requires US$147.11 million to address the new and protracted needs of the afflicted population.
    [Show full text]
  • Sudan's Spreading Conflict (II): War in Blue Nile
    Sudan’s Spreading Conflict (II): War in Blue Nile Africa Report N°204 | 18 June 2013 International Crisis Group Headquarters Avenue Louise 149 1050 Brussels, Belgium Tel: +32 2 502 90 38 Fax: +32 2 502 50 38 [email protected] Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................... i Recommendations..................................................................................................................... iii I. Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1 II. A Sudan in Miniature ....................................................................................................... 3 A. Old-Timers Versus Newcomers ................................................................................. 3 B. A History of Land Grabbing and Exploitation .......................................................... 5 C. Twenty Years of War in Blue Nile (1985-2005) ........................................................ 7 III. Failure of the Comprehensive Peace Agreement ............................................................. 9 A. The Only State with an Opposition Governor (2007-2011) ...................................... 9 B. The 2010 Disputed Elections ..................................................................................... 9 C. Failed Popular Consultations ...................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Amir Warns Against Oil Dependence, Terrorism
    SUBSCRIPTION WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 29, 2014 MUHARRAM 5, 1436 AH www.kuwaittimes.net Amir on Bahrain Macy’s heads Anelka makes brotherly bans main overseas with nightmarish visit to opposition branch in comeback Saudi Arabia3 group 7 Abu21 Dhabi in19 India Amir warns against oil Max 33º Min 21º dependence, terrorism High Tide 01:50 & 16:10 Low Tide PM calls to ‘tighten belts’ Speaker blasts opposition 09:25 & 21:25 40 PAGES NO: 16326 150 FILS • from the editor’s desk It’s time to get to work By Abd Al-Rahman Al-Alyan [email protected] is Highness the Amir Sheikh Sabah Al- Ahmad Al-Jaber Al-Sabah opened the 14th Hsession of Kuwait’s National Assembly yes- terday, urging lawmakers and the government to control spending and diversify Kuwait’s economy in the face of falling oil prices. “Here again, we are witnessing another cycle of sliding oil prices as a result of economic and politi- cal factors hitting the global economy, which is negatively affecting the national economy,” the KUWAIT: (From left) HH the Amir Sheikh Sabah Al-Ahmad Al-Sabah, HH the Prime Minister Sheikh Jaber Al-Mubarak Al-Sabah and Speaker Marzouq Al-Ghanem attend the opening session of the new parliamentary term yesterday. — Photos by Yasser Al-Zayyat and KUNA Amir said. “I call on you, government and Assembly, to shoulder your national responsibility to issue the required legislation and decisions to By B Izzak safeguard our oil and fiscal wealth which is not for KUWAIT: His Highness the Amir Sheikh Sabah Al- us alone but also for our future generations,” Ahmad Al-Sabah yesterday opened the new parliamen- Sheikh Sabah said.
    [Show full text]
  • (I): War in South Kordofan
    Sudan’s Spreading Conflict (I): War in South Kordofan Africa Report N°198 | 14 February 2013 International Crisis Group Headquarters Avenue Louise 149 1050 Brussels, Belgium Tel: +32 2 502 90 38 Fax: +32 2 502 50 38 [email protected] Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................... i Recommendations..................................................................................................................... iii I. Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1 II. The Roots of Persistent Conflict ....................................................................................... 3 A. Continued Marginalisation ........................................................................................ 4 B. Changing Ethnic Dynamics ....................................................................................... 8 III. Failure of the CPA ............................................................................................................. 11 IV. Outbreak of Fighting and the Still-born Framework Agreement ................................... 17 V. All-Out Conflict ................................................................................................................ 20 VI. The Humanitarian Crisis .................................................................................................. 27 VII. Regional and Wider
    [Show full text]
  • Regaining Livelihoods for Pastoralist and Nomadic Communities in Sudan
    REGAINING LIVELIHOODS FOR PASTORALIST AND NOMADIC COMMUNITIES IN SUDAN West Kordofan State has been affected by the continuing war in South Kordofan, the Darfur conflict and the civil war in South Sudan. The secession of South Sudan worsened the predicament of nomads in the area, as movements to the country were blocked. As a result, animals find themselves concentrated in a narrow area with limited resources during the dry season. Diseases that are preventable by vaccination are still considered major threats to animal production. Taking into account the lack of veterinary services in the area for a number of years, which has led to the spread of dangerous transboundary animal diseases, West Kordofan is considered a serious focus for the spread of diseases, undermining Sudan’s role as an important livestock-exporting agent in the region. In this context, the project provided an opportunity to build the capacity of both veterinarians and veterinary institutions. ©FAO/Albert Gonzalez Farran WHAT DID THE PROJECT DO? KEY FACTS Animal health services were upgraded and major animal Contribution diseases controlled through the provision of vaccination and USD 500 000 treatment services, training of veterinarians and community animal health workers and the promotion of disease Duration surveillance and veterinary diagnostic capabilities in West October 2014 – September 2017 Kordofan State. Resource Partners FAO IMPACT Partners The training of veterinarians and community animal health Federal Ministry of Livestock, State workers, as well as the capacity development of the El Fula Ministry of Animal Resources and Veterinary Laboratory through the provision of modern Fisheries for West Kordofan state equipment and tools, will directly contribute to the project’s Beneficiaries sustainability in West Kordofan State.
    [Show full text]
  • South Kordofan and Blue Nile Country Report
    1 June 2016 (COI up to 1 April 2016) South Kordofan and Blue Nile Country Report Explanatory Note Sources and databases consulted List of Acronyms CONTENTS 1. Background information 1.1. Geographical information (map of Sudan; maps of South Kordofan and Blue Nile) 1.2. Background to the current state of the conflict 2. Actors involved in the conflict 2.1. Government forces 2.1.1. Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF) 2.1.2. Rapid Support Forces (RSF) 2.1.3. National Intelligence and Security Service (NISS) 2.1.4. Law enforcement 2.1.5. Paramilitary militias 2.1.5.1. Popular Defence Forces (PDF) 2.1.6. Defection from government forces 2.1.7. Immunity from human rights abuses 2.2. Armed opposition groups 2.2.1. Sudan People’s Liberation Movement/Army – North (SPLM/A-N) 2.2.2. Sudan Revolutionary Front (SRF) 2.2.3. Human rights abuses committed by armed opposition groups 3. Current state of the conflict/peace negotiations 3.1. Territorial control 3.2. Peace negotiations 4. Security situation: impact of the conflict on civilians 4.1. Aerial bombing campaigns and ground attacks 4.1.1. Casualties caused by aerial bombing campaigns and ground attacks between 1 July 2014 and 1 April 2016 4.1.1.1. Two Areas 4.1.1.2. South Kordofan 4.1.1.3. Blue Nile 4.2. Unexploded ordinance (UXO) 4.2.1. South Kordofan 4.2.2. Blue Nile 4.3. Forced displacement 4.3.1. South Kordofan 4.3.2. Blue Nile 4.4. Denial of humanitarian access 1 4.4.1.
    [Show full text]
  • West Kordofan 27Nov2014-A1
    Sudan: West Kordofan State Administrative Map (January 2015) Jebrat El Sheikh El Malha Sodari NORTH KORDOFAN Abu Shanab Mukhaizana Ibrahim Wad Arabi Ummat Arifa Eshangyei Zankor Tulu Umm Leyuna Quraynat An Nimr Ankosh Hills Bara Sagha Foga Foga Wells Bur Islam Umm Keddada Salim Ermil Post Galusa Abu Rakhei Fag Al Qash Sakramoj Umm Bel Abu Turayah Umm Diti Tuleih Wells Umm Asal Abu Fandok Rahad Umm Aradeiba Abu Dazza Abu Shawag Rahad Ferakit El Mes Iyal Bakhit Gamaniya Hanatir Wad Umm Asamm Udayd Karenka Abu Gezira Umm Sunt Umm Naala Mahbub Umm Zimam Dam Gamad Sarariya Qurad Kul Muhammadayn Shabakati Ireida Nialota NORTH Shaluf Nabalat Al Hajanah El Musein El Obeid Qawz Ar Rayy Iyal Basharo Junga Jura Wad Kutna Kinyeir DARFUR Umm Habila Burayr Humayr Jabir Abu Kabisa Faki Uzayriq Wad Bandah Mustafa Ati Hamir Ath Thiran Wad Salim El Nehoud Nawaiat Madani Wad Banda Kordofan Wad Murdi Faafaa Shiekan Wad Ashqar Fofaya Maarka Ujaymi Umm Qereia Shwein Shalluf Qoz Sidada Humayr Sibil Holi Kokada El Umda Hugeir Dagalos Sherati Markib Kuldu Humayl Sibil Humayr Ar Ru'us Salim Umm Gamur Wad Bahr Hamdan Hamir Doma Suqa El Gamal Abu Dik Sallama Abu Mareiqa Al Hagga Umm Ginah Barud Abu Daql Abu Zabad Targannu Buta Et Tuleih Abekr Adila Umm Defeis Ruqaybah Zarga Duwaynah Saata Um Dites Dardog Amara Umm Ghutays En Nehoud Et Tom Halal Dagma Qireiwid Abu Humayrah Nus Es Sikka Kileigau El Bedeiriya Tuwayr Fanyer Hamar Dirrah Gamal Idris Abu Umm Duluk Shaqq Qurayn Ash Sha Umm Busa Abu Qalb Lingu Humayr Dirrah Awlad Ghanam Rahad Ad Duwaykah Khashum Tayyibah
    [Show full text]
  • Sudan Transition and Conflict Mitigation (Stcm) Program
    SUDAN TRANSITION AND CONFLICT MITIGATION (STCM) PROGRAM January 31, 2014 This publication was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared by AECOM. SUDAN TRANSITION AND CONFLICT MITIGATION (STCM) PROGRAM FINAL REPORT AUGUST 1, 2010 – JANUARY 31, 2014 Submitted to: U.S. Agency for International Development/Sudan’s Office for Transition and Conflict Mitigation (OTCM) Office of Sudan and South Sudan Programs (AFR/SSSP) U.S. Agency for International Development Prepared for: Contract no. DOT-I-00-08-00050-00, Task Order 01 Prepared by: AECOM International Development TERMINOLOGY NOTE The significant contextual changes that occurred over the life of the program, including the birth of the independent Republic of South Sudan (RoSS) on July 9, 2011 and the split of the USAID Mission into two separate missions in Sudan/South Sudan resulted in unique requirements for project terminology. To maintain consistency, the reader will find that all general references to AECOM International Development are as AECOM, AECOM International Sudan (AIS) or AECOM International South Sudan (AISS), depending upon the activities and location; references to the donor will be as USAID; and references to the program will be as STCM, SSTCM, or STCM/SSTCM. Disclaimer: This report is made possible by the generous support of the American people through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). The contents are the responsibility of AECOM and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United
    [Show full text]
  • The Issue of Oil and Disputed Areas in the Conflicts Between Sudan and South Sudan
    Journal of Global Peace and Conflict December 2020, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 12-18 ISSN: 2333-584X(Print), 2333-5858 (Online) Copyright © The Author(s). All Rights Reserved. Published by American Research Institute for Policy Development DOI: 10.15640/jgpc.v8n2a2 URL: http://=.doi.org/10.15640/jgpc.v8n2a2 The Issue of Oil and Disputed Areas in the Conflicts between Sudan and South Sudan Bithou M. Mayik1 & Erneo B. Ochi2 Abstract Utilization of oil resources and peaceful coexistence among communities bordering sisterly countries are imperative for sustainable development. The issue of oil and disputed areas in the conflicts between Sudan and South Sudan remain unabated. This paper sheds light on the causes, the socio-economic and political implications, and the possible strategies to resolve the conflicts over oil and borders between the two Sudans. Theories of social conflict, the cooperative, human needs as well as the conflict transformation and relevant literature were consulted. The major causes and implications of such conflicts in post-independent South Sudan were discussed. The paper reveals the consequential massive displacement of local inhabitants and loss of lives, reduced oil revenues, augmented political upheavals, and armed rebellions in the two Sudans. Seemingly, negotiations and litigations are some key strategies to resolve such devastating conflicts. The setting up of truths, political and reconciliation commission is highly needed to cease hostilities and resolve conflicts for sustainable socio-economic development of South Sudan and Sudan. Keywords: Conflicts, Agreements, Disagreements, Displacements, Disputes, Territories. 1. Introduction Oil is one of the key strategic esources incurring substantial economic benefits for sustainable development of the nations worldwide.
    [Show full text]
  • Sudan 2020 Country Refugee Response Plan
    SUDAN COUNTRY REFUGEE RESPONSE PLAN January 2020 - December 2020 FRONT COVER PHOTOGRAPH: Hayat Yawin fled war in South Sudan and lives in a refugee camp in White Nile State. © UNHCR/ROLAND SCHÖNBAUER CONTENTs - SUDAN CRP Contents SUDAN COUNTRY REFUGEE RESPONSE PLAN 2020 3 South Sudanese Refugees 16 Urban Refugees Living in Khartoum 29 Refugees Living in East Sudan 37 Central African Republican (CAR) Refugees 48 Chadian Refugees 58 2020 Sector Financial Requirements Summary 66 Acronyms 70 Annex 72 SUDAN CRP > JANUARY 2020 - DECEMBER 2020 3 2020 PLANNED RESPONSE 904,951 US$ 476.9M REFUGEES TARGETED BUDGET REQUIREMENTS 1,146,239 IN 2020 TOTAL REFUGEE POPULATION IN NEED 34 (Estimated by the end of 2020) 226,238 PARTNERS ESTIMATED HOST COMMUNITY BENEFICIARIES OVERview - SUDAN CRP Overview Sudan has a long history of hosting refugees and asylum seekers, with over 1.1 million individuals ¹ ² estimated to be living in Sudan (as of 30 November 2019). This includes refugees from the Central African Republic (CAR), Chad, the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), Eritrea, Ethiopia, Somalia, South Sudan, Syria and Yemen, who have arrived in search of safety from violence, persecution and other hazards in their countries of origin. The South Sudanese refugee emergency remains the largest refugee crisis in Africa, and Sudan hosts one of the largest populations in the region with more than 840,000 South Sudanese refugees reported to be living in Sudan, as of 30 November 2019. In East Sudan, there are more than 130,000 Eritrean and Ethiopian refugees and asylum- seekers, living in camps and urban areas across Gezira, Gedaref, Kassala, Red Sea and Sennar states.
    [Show full text]
  • Sudan • South Kordofan Situation Report No
    Sudan • South Kordofan Situation Report No. 3 11 June 2011 This report is produced by OCHA in collaboration with humanitarian partners. It covers the period from 10 to 11 June 2011. The next report will be issued on or around 13 June 2011. I. HIGHLIGHTS/KEY PRIORITIES • Fighting has spread to 11 of the 19 localities in South Kordofan State. • UN flights to and from Kadugli have been suspended since 10 June, affecting ability to bring in humanitarian items. • Humanitarian agencies have started to provide assistance to affected populations where security permits. II. Situation Overview Security situation Fighting including bombardments and artillery shelling has been reported in 11 of the 19 localities in Southern Kordofan State, and has spread to Pariang County in Unity State, southern Sudan. In Kadugli, partners have reported burning of tukuls, looting of humanitarian assets and emergency relief stocks, and the presence of land mines. Increasing threats to UN national staff by Sudan Armed Forces (SAF) and Sudan People’s Liberation Army (SPLA) have been reported throughout South Kordofan State. Population movement and response As the security situation shows no sign of improvement, the number of displaced civilian populations who are in urgent need of relief assistance is increasing with unconfirmed reports of more than 53,000 people displaced. It is estimated that 30,000 to 40,000 people have fled Kadugli town; and another 23,500 have been displaced throughout South Kordofan State. As of the evening of 11 June, there are approximately 5,000 displaced people around Talodi, 3,000 people around Heiban; 10,000 people in Rashad, more than 3,000 people in Kurchi, and 2,500 in Abu Karshola.
    [Show full text]
  • The Unresolved Crisis in Abyei
    The Unresolved Crisis in Abyei Several weeks after the completion of the referendum on Southern Sudan, the unresolved crisis in Abyei continues to pose a major security threat in the contested and militarized North–South borderlands. The 2005 Comprehensive Peace Agreement (CPA) promised Abyei a referendum to decide whether the territory will join Northern or Southern Sudan, to be held simultaneously with vote on Southern independence. The Abyei vote did not occur due to a heated dispute between Khartoum and Juba over which populations residing there should be eligible to vote. Without the referendum, the current and future status of the territory and its peoples remain uncertain. As the single most volatile post-referendum issue between the two CPA parties, the Abyei dispute could block or altogether derail the North–South negotiations set to conclude before the widely expected Southern declaration of independence in July 2011. Despite attempts by the National Congress Party (NCP) and the Sudan People’s Liberation Movement (SPLM) to negotiate new security arrangements in the territory following clashes in early January between armed Misseriya militia forces and the Joint Integrated Police Unit (JIPU),1 the situation in Abyei has not improved. Panic among the Ngok Dinka, who claim native rights to the territory, and the semi- nomadic Misseriya herders, who rely on its fertile land for grazing, is perpetuating an impasse on the ground, where the main routes through Abyei remain blocked to trade from the North and to thousands of Southerners who wish to return home from Northern Sudan. The blockade is enforced by discontented Misseriya seeking the removal of the Abyei JIPU, which they view as an extension of the Southern Sudanese security apparatus.
    [Show full text]