The Unresolved Crisis in Abyei

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Unresolved Crisis in Abyei The Unresolved Crisis in Abyei On 7 February Sudanese president Omar al-Bashir announced that South Sudan had overwhelmingly voted for secession from the North. A committee is now negotiating post-referendum arrangements, including the contentious issues of oil revenue, border demarcation, and the future status of Abyei. Ongoing clashes in Abyei have the potential to destabilize these negotiations—the Abyei Area Administration insists that the Sudan Armed Forces (SAF) are supporting Missiriya militias, while the Missiriya claim that Sudan People's Liberation Army (SPLA) troops disguised as policemen are attacking their herders as the latter proceed on their annual migration. Increased clashes could push relations between the National Congress Party (NCP) and the Sudan People's Liberation Movement (SPLM) to breaking point. As the single most volatile post-referendum issue between the two Comprehensive Peace Agreement (CPA) parties, the Abyei dispute could block or altogether derail the negotiations set to conclude before the South's declaration of independence on 9 July 2011. The 2005 CPA promised residents of Abyei a referendum to decide whether the territory will join North or South Sudan, to be held simultaneously with the vote on South Sudan's independence. The vote did not occur, however, due to a heated dispute between Khartoum and Juba over who should be eligible to vote. The CPA stipulates that voting rights should be given to the Ngok Dinka and 'other Sudanese residing in the area'. The NCP maintained that the Missiriya—semi-nomadic cattle herders who spend up to six months of the year in Abyei— should be considered residents. The SPLM held that the Missiriya are only in Abyei for a short period each year and thus should not be granted this status. Without the referendum, the status of the territory and its peoples remains uncertain, causing deep tensions at the local level. Following clashes in January between Missiriya militia forces and a Joint Integrated Police Unit (JIPU) that left over 30 dead, two meetings were organized to improve the situation. The first was held on 13 January 2011 between Missiriya and Ngok Dinka elders to discuss migration routes through the area. The elders agreed in principle that the Missiriya would be allowed to pass through Abyei in search of pastures, as long as blood compensation was paid for Ngok Dinka deaths that occurred during the last migration season and migration routes were agreed on. As of the beginning of March 2011, the Misseriya have offered to pay the compensation, but there is no agreement on the grazing routes. Despite this, Missiriya have now entered Abyei and are currently grazing their cattle around the Ragaba es Zarga, a river running through the territory, approximately 30 km from Abyei town. As they press further south, the absence of a grazing agreement will become increasingly problematic. A second agreement was signed by the northern and southern ministers of the interior and representatives of the SPLA and SAF on 17 January. This agreement focused on ensuring safe passage for returnees to Abyei, removing the road blocks in the north of the territory, and putting in place new security arrangements. As part of this agreement, the JIPU involved in the clashes was subsequently withdrawn to Abyei town, where it is currently garrisoned, and two new battalions of Joint Integrated Units (JIUs) composed of northern and southern forces were stationed in Abyei to augment the existing battalion there. Although these new units were intended to improve the security situation, in some ways they have worsened it. Some of the JIU members were taken from the 31st battalion based in South Kordofan, which was involved in heavy fighting between the SPLA and SAF in Abyei town in May 2008. In the two months following the attack, SAF steadfastly blocked access to affected areas, and the total death toll is still unknown. The Ngok Dinka are now worried that events might repeat themselves. The situation came to boiling point on 12 February when an armed northern soldier from one of the JIU battalions was prevented from entering Abyei market by the police. As he walked away, he fired his weapon, leading to hundreds of people fleeing and three northern merchants being killed. Even with the new JIU battalions now in place, headquartered at Noong and Tajalei (north of Abyei town), it is uncertain how much protection they will actually offer to local residents. On 27-28 February renewed clashes occurred between JIPU members and Missiriya in Todac that left over 20 dead and the new security arrangements looking distinctly shaky. Against a backdrop of the ongoing political stalemate and clashes on the ground, prospects for a peaceful resolution of the Abyei crisis look grim. Updated March 2011 Click here for more information on the crisis in Abyei. Click below for information on the following: • Recent militarization in Abyei • Selected armed entities operating around Abyei • Abyei and nearby oil fields (map) • Arms flows to North and South Kordofan • Armed entities in South Kordofan • The buildup of forces and arms in Blue Nile Note on sourcing: This site makes use of military documents whose authenticity has been confirmed by a source close to the Joint Defence Board (JDB). The JDB is under the Presidency and composed of the chiefs of staff of the Sudan Armed Forces and Sudan People's Liberation Army, their deputies, and a number of senior officers. Relevant Tables, Maps, and Summaries • Potential Flashpoints, Southern Sudan and Three Areas, April 2009 (UNMIS) Map highlighting critical areas of potential inter-communal conflict • Abyei and nearby oil fields (map) • Armed Elements in the Nuba Mountains Area, August 2008 (from HSBA Issue Brief 12) Table listing armed groups of concern in the Nuba Mountains region • Nuba Mountains Map (from HSBA Issue Brief 12) Map showing the Nuba Mountains of South Kordofan and environs • Selected Armed Groups of Concern in South Sudan and Border Areas, March 2008 (fromHSBA Issue Brief 11) Map showing armed group locations and alignments, including in South Kordofan and Abyei • Selected Armed Groups Operating in South Sudan/South Kordofan, May 2008 (from HSBA Issue Brief 11) Table showing armed groups in South Sudan and South Kordofan as of May 2008 • Misseriya Militia Strengths and Redeployment from Abyei, May 2008 (from HSBA Issue Brief 11) Table showing redeployment of Debab and Abu Matrig Forces from Abyei Relevant HSBA Publications • The Drift Back to War: Insecurity and Militarization in the Nuba Mountains, HSBA Issue Brief 12, August 2008 (in Arabic) • Allies and Defectors: An Update on Armed Group Integration and Proxy Force Activity, HSBA Issue Brief 11, May 2008 (in Arabic) .
Recommended publications
  • Humanitarian Situation Report No. 19 Q3 2020 Highlights
    Sudan Humanitarian Situation Report No. 19 Q3 2020 UNICEF and partners assess damage to communities in southern Khartoum. Sudan was significantly affected by heavy flooding this summer, destroying many homes and displacing families. @RESPECTMEDIA PlPl Reporting Period: July-September 2020 Highlights Situation in Numbers • Flash floods in several states and heavy rains in upriver countries caused the White and Blue Nile rivers to overflow, damaging households and in- 5.39 million frastructure. Almost 850,000 people have been directly affected and children in need of could be multiplied ten-fold as water and mosquito borne diseases devel- humanitarian assistance op as flood waters recede. 9.3 million • All educational institutions have remained closed since March due to people in need COVID-19 and term realignments and are now due to open again on the 22 November. 1 million • Peace talks between the Government of Sudan and the Sudan Revolu- internally displaced children tionary Front concluded following an agreement in Juba signed on 3 Oc- tober. This has consolidated humanitarian access to the majority of the 1.8 million Jebel Mara region at the heart of Darfur. internally displaced people 379,355 South Sudanese child refugees 729,530 South Sudanese refugees (Sudan HNO 2020) UNICEF Appeal 2020 US $147.1 million Funding Status (in US$) Funds Fundi received, ng $60M gap, $70M Carry- forward, $17M *This table shows % progress towards key targets as well as % funding available for each sector. Funding available includes funds received in the current year and carry-over from the previous year. 1 Funding Overview and Partnerships UNICEF’s 2020 Humanitarian Action for Children (HAC) appeal for Sudan requires US$147.11 million to address the new and protracted needs of the afflicted population.
    [Show full text]
  • Sudan Food Security Outlook Report
    SUDAN Food Security Outlook February to September 2019 Deteriorating macroeconomic conditions to drive high levels of acute food insecurity in 2019 KEY MESSAGES • Food security has seasonally improved with increased cereal Current food security outcomes, February 2019 availability following the November to February harvest. However, the macroeconomic situation remains very poor and is expected to further deteriorate throughout the projection period, and this will drive continued extremely high food and non-food prices. The negative impacts of high food prices will be somewhat mitigated by the fact that livestock prices and wage labor are also increasing, though overall purchasing power will remain below average. A higher number of households than is typical will face Crisis (IPC Phase 3) or worse outcomes through September. • Between June and September, the lean season in Sudan, Crisis (IPC Phase 3) outcomes are expected in parts of Red Sea, Kassala, Al Gadarif, Blue Nile, West Kordofan, North Kordofan, South Kordofan, and Greater Darfur. Of highest concern are the IDPs in SPLM-N controlled areas of South Kordofan and SPLA-AW controlled areas of Jebel Marra, who have been inaccessible for both assessments and food assistance deliveries. IDPs in these areas are expected to be in Source: FEWS NET FEWS NET classification is IPC-compatible. IPC-compatible analysis follows Emergency (IPC Phase 4) during the August-September peak key IPC protocols but does not necessarily reflect the consensus of national of the lean season. food security partners. • The June to September 2019 rainy season is forecasted to be above average. This is anticipated to lead to flooding in mid-2019 and increase the prevalence of waterborne disease.
    [Show full text]
  • Sudan's Spreading Conflict (II): War in Blue Nile
    Sudan’s Spreading Conflict (II): War in Blue Nile Africa Report N°204 | 18 June 2013 International Crisis Group Headquarters Avenue Louise 149 1050 Brussels, Belgium Tel: +32 2 502 90 38 Fax: +32 2 502 50 38 [email protected] Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................... i Recommendations..................................................................................................................... iii I. Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1 II. A Sudan in Miniature ....................................................................................................... 3 A. Old-Timers Versus Newcomers ................................................................................. 3 B. A History of Land Grabbing and Exploitation .......................................................... 5 C. Twenty Years of War in Blue Nile (1985-2005) ........................................................ 7 III. Failure of the Comprehensive Peace Agreement ............................................................. 9 A. The Only State with an Opposition Governor (2007-2011) ...................................... 9 B. The 2010 Disputed Elections ..................................................................................... 9 C. Failed Popular Consultations ...................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • United States Institute of Peace Association for Diplomatic Studies and Training Sudan Experience Project
    United States Institute of Peace Association for Diplomatic Studies and Training Sudan Experience Project Interview # 19 - Executive Summary Interviewed by: Haven North Initial Interview Date: August 22, 2006 Copyright 2006 USIP & ADST The Interviewee was a high-ranking U.S. official assigned to Sudan from 1992- 95. During this time, the war between the North and the South was being “prosecuted in a brutal way” and “relief operations were being interrupted.” The U.S. “representations or charges (to both sides) were considered by both Governments “without foundation.” Therefore, “the U.S. policy was one of denouncing the excesses of the Sudanese Government, and denouncing their policies such as giving aid and refuge to terrorist organizations.” The Sudanese Government denied these charges, but came to the table to end the rebellion in the South and forge better relations with the West and the U.S. The Clinton Administration was “not as supportive of the SPLA,” but supported the IGAD, even though we did not participate in the negotiations. Former U.S. Ambassadors to Sudan Petterson and Kontos, as a private initiative, met with government and non-government representatives of the North and South. Their conclusion was that, as long as the was going on, there could be no improvement in relations with the U.S., in Sudan’s economy, or in reducing repression and human rights violations. Their recommendations were that the “U.S. should take a direct and important part in an international effort to end the war between the North and South… and reestablish a diplomatic presence. ” These recommendations were rejected by the Clinton Administration.
    [Show full text]
  • Amir Warns Against Oil Dependence, Terrorism
    SUBSCRIPTION WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 29, 2014 MUHARRAM 5, 1436 AH www.kuwaittimes.net Amir on Bahrain Macy’s heads Anelka makes brotherly bans main overseas with nightmarish visit to opposition branch in comeback Saudi Arabia3 group 7 Abu21 Dhabi in19 India Amir warns against oil Max 33º Min 21º dependence, terrorism High Tide 01:50 & 16:10 Low Tide PM calls to ‘tighten belts’ Speaker blasts opposition 09:25 & 21:25 40 PAGES NO: 16326 150 FILS • from the editor’s desk It’s time to get to work By Abd Al-Rahman Al-Alyan [email protected] is Highness the Amir Sheikh Sabah Al- Ahmad Al-Jaber Al-Sabah opened the 14th Hsession of Kuwait’s National Assembly yes- terday, urging lawmakers and the government to control spending and diversify Kuwait’s economy in the face of falling oil prices. “Here again, we are witnessing another cycle of sliding oil prices as a result of economic and politi- cal factors hitting the global economy, which is negatively affecting the national economy,” the KUWAIT: (From left) HH the Amir Sheikh Sabah Al-Ahmad Al-Sabah, HH the Prime Minister Sheikh Jaber Al-Mubarak Al-Sabah and Speaker Marzouq Al-Ghanem attend the opening session of the new parliamentary term yesterday. — Photos by Yasser Al-Zayyat and KUNA Amir said. “I call on you, government and Assembly, to shoulder your national responsibility to issue the required legislation and decisions to By B Izzak safeguard our oil and fiscal wealth which is not for KUWAIT: His Highness the Amir Sheikh Sabah Al- us alone but also for our future generations,” Ahmad Al-Sabah yesterday opened the new parliamen- Sheikh Sabah said.
    [Show full text]
  • A Brief Description of the Nobiin Language and History by Nubantood Khalil, (Nubian Language Society)
    A brief description of the Nobiin language and history By Nubantood Khalil, (Nubian Language Society) Nobiin language Nobiin (also called Mahas-Fadichcha) is a Nile-Nubian language (North Eastern Sudanic, Nilo-Saharan) descendent from Old Nubian, spoken along the Nile in northern Sudan and southern Egypt and by thousands of refugees in Europe and the US. Nobiin is classified as a member of the Nubian language family along with Kenzi/Dongolese in upper Nubia, Meidob in North Darfur, Birgid in Central and South Darfur, and the Hill Nubian languages in Southern Kordofan. Figure 1. The Nubian Family (Bechhaus 2011:15) Central Nubian Western Northern Nubian Nubian ▪ Nobiin ▪ Meidob ▪ Old Nubian Birgid Hill Nubians Kenzi/ Donglese In the 1960's, large numbers of Nobiin speakers were forcibly displaced away from their historical land by the Nile Rivers in both Egypt and Sudan due to the construction of the High Dam near Aswan. Prior to that forcible displacement, Nobiin was primarily spoken in the region between the first cataract of the Nile in southern Egypt, to Kerma, in the north of Sudan. The following map of southern Egypt and Sudan encompasses the areas in which Nobiin speakers have historically resided (from Thelwall & Schadeberg, 1983: 228). Nubia Nubia is the land of the ancient African civilization. It is located in southern Egypt along the Nile River banks and extends into the land that is known as “Sudan”. The region Nubia had experienced writing since a long time ago. During the ancient period of the Kingdoms of Kush, 1 | P a g e the Kushite/Nubians used the hieroglyphic writing system.
    [Show full text]
  • A Summary of the Comprehensive Peace Agreement
    Accord 18_43 13/12/06 13:32 Page 32 A summary of the Comprehensive Peace Agreement Machakos Protocol (2002) Power Sharing (2004) Wealth Sharing (2004) A six-year interim period [dated from Sudan will have both a national A National Land Commission, 9 July 2005] is established during government with representation from Southern Sudan Land Commission which the southern Sudanese will both sides of the north-south conflict, and state land commissions are to be have the right to govern affairs in their and a separate Government of established. A National Petroleum region and participate equitably in Southern Sudan (GoSS). The Southern Commission is to be established to the national government. Sudan Constitution and state manage petroleum resources. constitution must comply with the Peace implementation is to be 2% of oil revenue will go to oil- Interim National Constitution. conducted in ways that make the producing states in southern Sudan unity of Sudan attractive. A Government of National Unity is in proportion to their output. The to be formed. There shall be a remaining net revenue will be divided After the interim period, southern decentralized system of government, evenly with 50% allocated to the GoSS Sudan will have the right to vote in an granting more power to individual and 50% allocated to the national internationally monitored referendum states. government. The GoSS has no power either to confirm Sudan’s unity or vote to negotiate any of the oil leases for secession. Positions in the state governments are granted by the national government to be split 70:30 in favour of the NCP Shari’a law is to remain applicable in prior to the CPA.
    [Show full text]
  • (I): War in South Kordofan
    Sudan’s Spreading Conflict (I): War in South Kordofan Africa Report N°198 | 14 February 2013 International Crisis Group Headquarters Avenue Louise 149 1050 Brussels, Belgium Tel: +32 2 502 90 38 Fax: +32 2 502 50 38 [email protected] Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................... i Recommendations..................................................................................................................... iii I. Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1 II. The Roots of Persistent Conflict ....................................................................................... 3 A. Continued Marginalisation ........................................................................................ 4 B. Changing Ethnic Dynamics ....................................................................................... 8 III. Failure of the CPA ............................................................................................................. 11 IV. Outbreak of Fighting and the Still-born Framework Agreement ................................... 17 V. All-Out Conflict ................................................................................................................ 20 VI. The Humanitarian Crisis .................................................................................................. 27 VII. Regional and Wider
    [Show full text]
  • Sudan's Comprehensive Peace Agreement at One Year Of
    Working Paper Research Unit Middle East and Africa Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik German Institute for International and Security Affairs Daniel P. Sullivan Sudan’s Comprehensive Peace Agreement at One Year of Age Cause for Celebration? Working Paper FG6, 2006/02 April 2006 Berlin Working papers are papers in the subject area of a Research Unit which are not officially published by SWP. These papers are either preliminary studies that later become papers published by SWP or papers that are published elsewhere. Your comments are always welcome. Table of Contents The Comprehensive Peace Agreement............. 1 SWP Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik German Institute for International and The Status of CPA ImplementationImplementation.................................... 1 Security Affairs Power Sharing ...........................................................................1 Ludwigkirchplatz 3−4 10719 Berlin Phone +49 30 880 07-0 Wealth Sharing.........................................................................3 Fax +49 30 880 07-100 www.swp-berlin.org Security Arrangements ..........................................................3 [email protected] Abyei: Sudan’s Kashmir..........................................................5 Elections......................................................................................6 Role of International Community......................................6 ConclusionConclusion.......................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Information on the Internally Displaced Persons (Idps)
    COI QUERY Country of Origin Sudan Main subject IDPs in Darfur and the Two Areas Question(s) Information on the internally displaced persons (IDPs) in Darfur and the Two Areas in the period of August 2019 - May 2020: - overview of numbers of IDPs and returnees: Darfur, The Two Areas, - living conditions and personal safety: Darfur, The Two Areas, - treatment by the Sovereign Council government: Darfur, The Two Areas. Date of completion 1 July 2020 Query Code Q15-2020 Contributing EU+ COI -- units (if applicable) Disclaimer This response to a COI query has been elaborated according to the EASO COI Report Methodology and EASO Writing and Referencing Guide. The information provided in this response has been researched, evaluated and processed with utmost care within a limited time frame. All sources used are referenced. A quality review has been performed in line with the above mentioned methodology. This document does not claim to be exhaustive neither conclusive as to the merit of any particular claim to international protection. If a certain event, person or organisation is not mentioned in the report, this does not mean that the event has not taken place or that the person or organisation does not exist. Terminology used should not be regarded as indicative of a particular legal position. The information in the response does not necessarily reflect the opinion of EASO and makes no political statement whatsoever. The target audience is caseworkers, COI researchers, policy makers, and decision making authorities. The answer was finalised on 1 July 2020. Any event taking place after this date is not included in this answer.
    [Show full text]
  • Looming Crisis Open Wounds in Abyei Increase Risk of New War
    Looming Crisis Open Wounds in Abyei Increase Risk of New War Maiwen Dot Pheot March 13, 2014 Introduction In Abyei, a small but strategically important disputed area on the border between Sudan and South Sudan, rising inter-communal tensions have resulted in a marked escalation in conflict in recent weeks. At this extremely sensitive moment in the nomadic Misseriya community’s seasonal migration across the Ngok Dinka homeland, these new dynamics could spark another war between Sudan and South Sudan, unless the international community acts immediately to enforce the pledge to demilitarize the area and arrest this trend. Armed youth and dissatisfied cadres within the South Sudanese army in the area seem to be interested in provoking a confrontation, both with the Misseriya community and the Sudanese government. Unaddressed anger around the South Sudan’s lukewarm response to the October 2013 referendum vote and the Ngok Dinka paramount chief’s killing has emboldened local armed actors. Armed groups aligned with South Sudan are increasingly moving to the northern parts of the area, actively confronting nomads and challenging the seasonal migration of the Misseriya community. In response to dramatically shifting realities on the ground as a result of South Sudan’s internal war, some in Abyei may be interested in instigating violence to attract international attention to the area’s unresolved status. For their part, the Misseriya are desperate to move their cattle further south in search of water and grazing pastures. Any threat to these pastoral routes raises the stakes of violence and the likelihood of bloodshed. This game of brinksmanship is putting both local communities and the broader region at great risk of war.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sudan | Agricultural Livelihoods and Food Security in the Context Of
    THE SUDAN Agricultural livelihoods and food security in the context of COVID-19 Monitoring Report January 2021 THE SUDAN Agricultural livelihoods and food security in the context of COVID-19 Monitoring Report January 2021 Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Rome, 2021 REQUIRED CITATION FAO. 2021. The Sudan | Food supply, agricultural livelihoods and food security in the context of COVID-19: Monitoring Report – January 2021. Rome. https://doi.org/10.4060/cb2262en The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Dashed lines on maps represent approximate border lines for which there may not yet be full agreement. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. ISBN: 978-92-5-133670-0 © FAO, 2021 Some rights reserved. This work is made available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- ShareAlike 3.0 IGO licence (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc- sa/3.0/igo/legalcode). Under the terms of this licence, this work may be copied, redistributed and adapted for non-commercial purposes, provided that the work is appropriately cited.
    [Show full text]