Immunotoxicology of Environmental and Occupational Metals

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Immunotoxicology of Environmental and Occupational Metals Immunotoxicology of Environmental and Occupational Metals Edited by JUDITH T.ZELIKOFF New York University School of Medicine and PETER T.THOMAS Covance Laboratories Inc. UK Taylor & Francis Ltd, 1 Gunpowder Square, London EC4A 3DE USA Taylor & Francis Inc., 1900 Frost Road, Suite 101, Bristol, PA 19007 This edition published in the Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2005. “To purchase your own copy of this or any of Taylor & Francis or Routledge’s collection of thousands of eBooks please go to www.eBookstore.tandf.co.uk.” Copyright © Taylor & Francis Ltd 1998 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, electrostatic, magnetic tape, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner. British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. ISBN 0-203-21187-1 Master e-book ISBN ISBN 0-203-26930-6 (Adobe eReader Format) ISBN 0-7484-0390-6 (Print Edition) Library of Congress Cataloging Publication Data are available Cover design by Contents Preface v Acknowledgment vii List of contributors viii Chapter 1 Arsenic 1 Leigh Ann Burns Chapter 2 Beryllium 27 Lee S.Newman Chapter 3 Cadmium 41 Loren D.Koller Chapter 4 Chromium 63 Darryl P.Arfsten, Lesa L.Aylward, and Nathan J.Karch Chapter 5 Indium 93 Mark E.Blazka Chapter 6 Lead 111 Michael J.McCabe, Jr Chapter 7 Mercury 131 Pierluigi E.Bigazzi Chapter 8 Nickel 161 Ralph J.Smialowicz Chapter 9 Platinum 193 Kathleen Rodgers Chapter 10 Vanadium 205 Mitchell D.Cohen Chapter 11 Iron, Zinc, and Copper 229 Felix Olima Omara, Pauline Brousseau, Barry Raymond Blakley, and Michel Fournier iv Appendix Immunotoxicology Summary Tables 261 Mitchell D.Cohen Index 359 Preface Heavy metals are ubiquitous in the biosphere, where they occur as part of the natural background of chemicals to which human beings are constantly exposed. However, industrial uses of metals and other industrial and domestic processes have introduced substantial amounts of potentially toxic heavy metals into the atmosphere and into the aquatic and terrestrial environment. The toxicological effects associated with high-dose exposure to many metals including arsenic, cadmium, and mercury are well known. However, adverse effects resulting from long-term subclinical levels of exposure, comparable with environmental conditions, are less clear. Within the last few decades, experimental data have shown that low-level exposure to certain metals induces subtle changes within a host, including altered immunological competence. Environmental stressors such as metals may act directly to kill the exposed organisms or indirectly to exacerbate disease states by lowering resistance and allowing the invasion of infectious pathogens or the progression of nascent tumors. Although effects of metals are dependent upon such variables as host species and exposure parameters, including route, dose, and duration, the conclusion reached in most immunotoxicological studies is that heavy metals act to suppress immunocompetence. The most consistent finding in experimental and epidemiological studies evaluating the effects of metals on immune functions is a decreased host resistance to infectious agents. Immunotoxicity of metals may occur via direct effects upon a specific immune system component or, alternatively, via inhibition of immunoregulation, which can result in immunosuppression, hypersensitivity reactions, or autoimmune disorders. It has been postulated that metal toxicity may, at least in part, be due to autoimmunity, since an autoimmune disorder exists for all of the major target organs affected by heavy metals. The purpose of this book is to provide information on the immunotoxicological effects of important environmentally and occupationally encountered metals, for investigators in the field and those interested in expanding their knowledge in this rapidly growing area. The chapters focus on the immunotoxicological effects from highly toxic, commonly encountered metals such as arsenic, beryllium, cadmium, chromium, lead, mercury, nickel, and vanadium, while others review the effects from vi the less well-studied metals indium and platinum. The final chapter reviews the immunotoxicological effects of the major essential metals: iron, zinc, and copper. In order to better understand the overall effects associated with each particular metal, individual chapters also review their history, use, occurrence, biology, and general toxicological properties. Lastly, a series of tables have been included to provide the reader with a comprehensive summary of the immunotoxicological effects associated with the most commonly encountered environmental/occupational metals. This book, as written, should serve as an important reference source for academics, policy makers, and regulators involved with matters related to the immunotoxicology of metals. Judith T.Zelikoff Peter T.Thomas Acknowledgment We would like to thank the individual authors for their time and effort on this project. We also gratefully acknowledge Dr Mitchell Cohen for his editorial comments and preparation of the immunotoxicology tables. viii List of Contributors LEIGH ANN BURNS Dow Corning PIERLUIGI E.BIGAZZI Department of Corporation Mail No. CO3101 2200 Pathology University of Connecticut West Salzburg Road Midland, MI 48686 Health Center Farmington, CT 06030 USA USA LEE S.NEWMAN Division of RALPH J.SMIALOWICZ National Environmental and Occupational Health Health and Environmental Effects Sciences National Jewish Medical and Research Laboratory US Environmental Research Center; and Department of Protection Agency MD-92 Research Medicine and Department of Triangle Park, NC 27711 USA Preventative Medicine and Biometrics KATHLEEN RODGERS Livingston University of Colorado School of Research Center University of Southern Medicine 1400 Jackson Street Denver, California 1321 North Mission Road Los CO 80206 USA Angeles, CA 90033 USA LOREN D.KOLLER College of MITCHELL D.COHEN Institute of Veterinary Medicine Oregon State Environmental Medicine New York University Corvallis, OR 97331–4801 University Medical Center Long USA Meadow Road Tuxedo, NY 10987 USA DARRYL P.ARFSTEN Karch & FELIX OMILA OMARA TOXEN Associates Inc. 1701 K Street N.W., University of Quebec at Montreal Suite 1000 Washington, DC 20006 USA Montreal, Quebec Canada H3C 3P8 LESA L.AYLWARD Karch & PAULINE BROUSSEAU Concordia Associates Inc. 1701 K Street N.W., University Montreal, Quebec Canada Suite 1000 Washington, DC 20006 USA H3G 1M8 NATHAN J.KARCH Karch & BARRY RAYMOND BLAKLEY Associates Inc. 1701 K Street N.W., Department of Veterinary Physiological Suite 1000 Washington, DC 20006 USA Sciences University of Saskatchewan MARK E.BLAZKA Colgate Saskatoon, Saskatchewan Canada S7N E.Palmolive 909 River Road 0W0 Piscataway, NJ 08855–1343 USA MICHEL FOURNIER TOXEN University of Quebec at Montreal Montreal, Quebec Canada H3C 3P8 MICHAEL J.McCABE, J.R. Institute of Chemical Toxicology Wayne State University 2727 Second Avenue Detroit, MI 48201–2654 USA 1 Arsenic LEIGH ANN BURNS Dow Corning Corporation, Mail No. CO3101, 2200 West Salzburg Road, Midland, MI 48686, USA 1.1 Introduction This chapter will briefly review the history of arsenic as a medicinal and toxic compound, its exposure, disposition, mechanism of action, toxicology, and immunotoxicology in mammalian systems. It is, however, impossible to review in depth all of these components within the confines of this chapter. This review is intended to provide the reader enough information with which to comprehend the more extensive review of the immunotoxicology of arsenic. For more detailed information, the reader is referred to the following references (Squibb and Fowler, 1983; Dickerson, 1994; Burns et al., 1995; Goyer, 1996) which were used to compile the material presented herein: Occupational Medicine 3rd Edition, Casarett and Doull’s Toxicology: The Basic Science of Poisons 5th Edition, and Biological and Environmental Effects of Arsenic. In addition, the following may be used interchangeably throughout this chapter: arsenite and inorganic trivalent arsenic (As3 +); arsenate and inorganic pentavalent arsenic (As5+). 1.2 History Arsenic has held the attention of scientists and authors (e.g. Arsenic and Old Lace) for hundreds of years due to its use as both a medicinal agent and a poison. Thus, its history is rather complex. The use of arsenic compounds as medicinal agents can be traced back to the time of Hippocrates (460–377 BC) when realgar (AsS) was used to treat ulcers. In the Middle Ages arsenicals possessed popularity as medicinal, suicidal, and homicidal agents. It was during this time that arsenous oxide (white arsenic) became recognized by many as an effective poisoning agent. By the 1800s, arsenicals were widely used in prescribed tonics, with the therapeutic dosage for these tonics being determined by establishing a NOEL (no observable effect level) for toxic symptoms. It has been suggested by some scholars that instead of being 2 IMMUNOTOXICOLOGY OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND OCCUPATIONAL METALS deliberately poisoned by arsenic (as many historians have postulated), the French leader Napoleon was actually being treated with arsenical compounds. Arsenic compounds, particularly the sulfides, have also been used commercially in the production of dyes and pigments. Realgar and orpiment possess orange-red and bright yellow pigments and were extensively employed in
Recommended publications
  • Industry Compliance Programme
    Global Chemical Industry Compliance Programme GC-ICP Chemical Weapons Convention December 2006 Version 1.0 GLOBAL CHEMICAL INDUSTRY COMPLIANCE PROGRAMME FOR IMPLEMENTING THE CHEMICAL WEAPONS CONVENTION The purpose of the handbook is to provide guidance to chemical facilities, traders and trading companies in developing a Global Chemical Industry Compliance Programme (GC-ICP) to comply with the Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC). The GC-ICP focuses first on determining if there is a reporting requirement to your National Authority and second on collecting the relevant support data used to complete the required reports. The GC-ICP is designed to provide a methodology to comply with the CWC and establish systems that facilitate and demonstrate such compliance. Each facility/company should also ensure that it follows its country’s CWC specific laws, regulations and reporting requirements. • Sections 2, 3, and 4 guide you through the process of determining if chemicals at your facility/ company should be reported to your National Authority for compliance with the CWC. • Section 5 provides recommended guidance on information that you may use to determine your reporting requirements under the CWC and administrative tools that your facility/company may use to ensure compliance with the CWC. • Section 6 provides a glossary of terms and associated acronyms. • Section 7 provides a listing of all National Authorities by country. CWC Global Chemical Industry Compliance Programme 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section 1 Overview What is the Chemical Weapons Convention?
    [Show full text]
  • Responding to a Chemical Warfare Agent Incident: from Sampling and Analysis to Decontamination and Waste Management Stuart Willi
    Responding to a Chemical Warfare Agent Incident: from sampling and analysis to decontamination and waste management Stuart Willison & Lukas Oudejans U. S. EPA National Homeland Security Research Center 1 Outline • Homeland Security Relevance to Chemical (Warfare Agent) Incidents and Incident Response Cycle • Identification of Gaps/Needs: PARTNER Process and Stakeholder Priorities • Current High Stakeholder Priorities • Research Efforts to meet these Needs/Gaps Selected Analytical Methods (SAM) Document CWA Method Development and Wipe Efficiency Studies on Surfaces Fate and Transport of CWAs Natural Attenuation of VX Decontamination of Vesicant/Blister CWAs HD, L, HL Analytical Method Development: Lewisite; EA 2192 Best Practices Document for Waste Media from Remediation Activities • Summary 2 Response to Contamination Events Since 9/11, multiple chemical/biotoxin contamination events have occurred in the United States and worldwide: • Several ricin incidents (2002-2014) • Deepwater Horizon oil spill (April 2010) • Kalamazoo River oil spill (July 2010) • CWA sulfur mustard clam shells (2010) • CWA chemical attacks (Syria, Middle East) (March-August 2013 and April 2014-current) • Elk River chemical spill in West Virginia (January 2014) • Toxic algae blooms in Toledo, OH (August 2014) • Arsenic-contaminated soil in Kentucky potentially containing CWA Lewisite (March 2015) • (Organophosphate-) Pesticide over- or misuse across USA in relation to bed bug epidemic (current) 3 Response Cycle Contaminant Release Reduce Vulnerabilities Lessons
    [Show full text]
  • Supplement to All Hazards Receipt Facility (AHRF) Screening Protocol
    EPA/600/R-10/155 December 2010 Supplement to All Hazards Receipt Facility (AHRF) Screening Protocol SCIENCE Office of Research and Development National Homeland Security Research Center Supplement to All Hazards Receipt Facility (AHRF) Screening Protocol December 2010 Office of Research and Development National Homeland Security Research Center Acknowledgments This document is intended to be supplementary to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) September 2008 All Hazards Receipt Facility Protocol (AHRF Protocol), and attempts to address considerations raised by stakeholders since publication of the protocol. Development of this document was funded by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) National Homeland Security Research Center (NHSRC), and includes information provided by EPA Regions 1, 6, and 10; EPA Office of Radiation and Indoor Air (ORIA), the Association of Public Health Laboratories (APHL): State Public Health Laboratories of Connecticut, Delaware, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Jersey, New York, and Virginia; and New York City; and the Canadian Defence Research and Development Laboratory. This document was prepared by CSC under Contract EP-W-06- 046. Disclaimer This document is intended to be supplementary to the guidance provided in the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) September 2008 All Hazards Receipt Facility Protocol (AHRF Protocol), and attempts to address considerations raised by stakeholders since publication of the protocol. This supplement assumes that: • The September 2008 AHRF Protocol was developed and provided as a guide; implementation of the protocol and the screening equipment included in the protocol may vary among locations, depending on the goals and capabilities of the laboratory to which the facility is attached.
    [Show full text]
  • Selected Analytical Methods for Environmental Remediation and Recovery (SAM) 2017
    EPA/600/R-17/356 | September 2017 www.epa.gov/homeland-security-research Selected Analytical Methods for Environmental Remediation and Recovery (SAM) 2017 Office of Research and Development Homeland Security Research Program This page left intentionally blank EPA/600/R-17/356 | September 2017 Selected Analytical Methods for Environmental Remediation and Recovery (SAM) 2017 UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Cincinnati, OH 45268 Office of Research and Development Homeland Security Research Program Disclaimer Disclaimer The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) through its Office of Research and Development funded and managed the research described here under Contract EP-C-15-012 to CSRA Inc. This document is undergoing review and has not been approved for publication. The contents reflect the views of the contributors and technical work groups and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Agency. Mention of trade names or commercial products in this document or in the methods referenced in this document does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. Questions concerning this document or its application should be addressed to: Romy Campisano National Homeland Security Research Center Office of Research and Development (NG16) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 26 West Martin Luther King Drive Cincinnati, OH 45268 (513) 569-7016 [email protected] Kathy Hall National Homeland Security Research Center Office of Research and Development (NG16) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 26 West Martin Luther King
    [Show full text]
  • UAH Chemical Hygiene Plan
    UAH CHEMICAL HYGIENE Effective Date: Feb. 2014 PLAN The Campus Chemical Hygiene Plan (Campus CHP) was developed to ensure the safety of laboratory employees and maintain compliance with the OSHA Laboratory Standard. In addition to OSHA regulations, this document also presents key information on the practices and procedures that must be implemented to maintain compliance with other state, federal, and local regulations required for the use and storage of hazardous chemicals. Prepared by: The Office of Environmental Health & Safety Contents 1. Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Purpose .................................................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Background on Regulatory Compliance .................................................................................... 1 1.3 Chemical Hygiene Plan Overview ................................................................................................. 2 1.4 Scope and Applicability .................................................................................................................... 3 1.5 Implementation of the Plan ............................................................................................................ 4 1.6 Availability of the Plan ..................................................................................................................... 4 1.7 Annual
    [Show full text]
  • Things to Be Done
    DRAFT MAY 2003 ANNEX 1: CHEMICAL AGENTS 1. Introduction The large-scale use of toxic chemicals as weapons first became possible during the First World War (1914–1918) thanks to the growth of the chemical industry. More than 110 000 tonnes were disseminated over the battlefields, the greater part on the western front. Initially, the chemicals were used, not to cause casualties in the sense of putting enemy combatants out of action, but rather to harass. Though the sensory irritants used were powerful enough to disable those who were exposed to them, they served mainly to drive enemy combatants out of the trenches or other cover that protected them from conventional fire, or to disrupt enemy artillery or supplies. About 10% of the total tonnage of chemical warfare agents used during the war were chemicals of this type, namely lacrimators (tear gases), sternutators and vomiting agents. However, use of more lethal chemicals soon followed the introduction of disabling chemicals. In all, chemical agents caused some 1.3 million casualties, including 90 000 deaths. During the First World War, almost every known noxious chemical was screened for its potential as a weapon, and this process was repeated during the Second World War (1939–1945), when substantial stocks of chemical weapons were accumulated, although rarely used in military operations. Between the two world wars, a high proportion of all the new compounds that had been synthesized, or isolated from natural materials, were examined to determine their utility as lethal or disabling chemical weapons. After 1945, these systematic surveys continued, together with a search for novel agents based on advances in biochemistry, toxicology and pharmacology.
    [Show full text]
  • Provisional Peer-Reviewed Toxicity Values for Lewisite (Casrn 541-25-3)
    EPA/690/R-15/009F l Final 9-30-2015 Provisional Peer-Reviewed Toxicity Values for Lewisite (CASRN 541-25-3) Superfund Health Risk Technical Support Center National Center for Environmental Assessment Office of Research and Development U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Cincinnati, OH 45268 AUTHORS, CONTRIBUTORS, AND REVIEWERS CHEMICAL MANAGER Dan D. Petersen, PhD, DABT National Center for Environmental Assessment, Cincinnati, OH DRAFT DOCUMENT PREPARED BY SRC, Inc. 7502 Round Pond Road North Syracuse, NY 13212 PRIMARY INTERNAL REVIEWERS Jeffery Swartout, PhD, DABT National Center for Environmental Assessment, Cincinnati, OH This document was externally peer reviewed under contract to: Eastern Research Group, Inc. 110 Hartwell Avenue Lexington, MA 02421 3136 Questions regarding the contents of this document may be directed to the U.S. EPA Office of Research and Development’s National Center for Environmental Assessment, Superfund Health Risk Technical Support Center (513-569-7300). ii Lewisite TABLE OF CONTENTS COMMONLY USED ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS .................................................. iv BACKGROUND .............................................................................................................................1 DISCLAIMERS ...............................................................................................................................1 QUESTIONS REGARDING PPRTVs ............................................................................................1 INTRODUCTION ...........................................................................................................................2
    [Show full text]
  • Lewisite (L) Team (NRT) Quick Reference Guides (Qrgs) for Chemical Warfare Agents
    NRT Quick Reference Guide: For references, please see Key References Cited/Used in National Response Lewisite (L) Team (NRT) Quick Reference Guides (QRGs) for Chemical Warfare Agents. [July 2015 Update] QRGs are intended for Federal OSC/RPMs. Agent Classification: Schedule 1 Chemical Warfare Blister (Vesicant) Agent; CAS: 541-25-3; Formula: C2H2AsCl3; Molecular Weight: 207.35 g/mol. Description: Lewisite is referred to as L-1 and is oily, colorless and odorless. When impure, it is a yellow brown through violet black liquid with a strong penetrating geranium odor. The manufacturing process affects physical properties, appearance, persistence, and analytical detection limits. Common impurities include two related compounds, lewisite 2 (L-2) and lewisite 3 (L-3). This QRG is based on L-1 but includes aspects of L-2 and L-3, and will use “L” as the collective abbreviation. L is a blister (vesicant) agent that produces immediate burning pain with blistering starting within a few hours. L is less volatile than Sarin (GB); it is much more volatile than persistent agents VX or HD. Environmental breakdown products of L are easily formed and include highly toxic arsenic (III) compounds, such as arsenites, lewisite oxide, and 2-chlorovinyl arsenous acid (CVAA); some cause similar blistering as L. Decontamination by-products of L include arsenic (V) compounds, which are generally less toxic than arsenic (III) compounds, but may be considered hazardous. Persistence: L is considered a “low to moderate persistent” chemical warfare agent. Vapor: minutes to hours; liquid: hours to days. Persistence will depend upon amount and purity of the agent, method of release, environmental conditions, and the types of surfaces and materials impacted.
    [Show full text]
  • University Micrdrilms International 300 N
    A COMPARISON OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF SEVERAL THIOLIC CHELATING AGENTS ON THE MOBILIZATION OF ARSENIC IN THE RABBIT. Item Type text; Thesis-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Hoover, Todd David. Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 24/09/2021 12:49:10 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/274892 INFORMATION TO USERS This reproduction was made from a copy of a document sent to us for microfilming. While the most advanced technology has been used to photograph and reproduce this document, the quality of the reproduction is heavily dependent upon the quality of the material submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help clarify markings or notations which may appear on this reproduction. 1.The sign or "target" for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is "Missing Page(s)". If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting through an image and duplicating adjacent pages to assure complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a round black mark, it is an indication of either blurred copy because of movement during exposure, duplicate copy, or copyrighted materials that should not have been filmed. For blurred pages, a good image of the page can be found in the adjacent frame.
    [Show full text]
  • CODE of COLORADO REGULATIONS 6 CCR 1007-3 Part 8 Hazardous Materials and Waste Management Division
    DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT Solid and Hazardous Waste Commission/Hazardous Materials and Waste Management Division HAZARDOUS WASTE - STATEMENTS OF BASIS AND PURPOSE 6 CCR 1007-3 Part 8 [Editor’s Notes follow the text of the rules at the end of this CCR Document.] _________________________________________________________________________ Statement of Basis and Purpose – Rule-making Hearing of May 18, 1993 Hazardous Waste Management System; Identification and Listing of Hazardous Waste; Wood Preserving 8.1 Basis and Purpose. These amendments to 6 CCR 1007-3, sections 100.41(b), 261.4(a), 262.34, 261.35(b), 264.190, 264.570, 264.571264.572, 264.573264.574, 264.575, 265.190, 265.440, 265,441, 265.442, 265.443, 265.444 and 265.445 an promulgated pursuant to the authority granted the Hazardous Waste Commission in section 25-15-302(2), C.R.S. Effective June 6,1991 the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) adopted amendments to rules under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act listing as hazardous three categories of wastes from wood preserving operations that use chlorophenolic, creosote, and/or inorganic (arsenical and chromium) preservatives. The listings included wastewaters, process residuals, preservative drippage, and spent preservatives from wood preserving processes at facilities that use or have previously used chlorophenolic formulations, facilities that use creosote formulations, and facilities that use inorganic preservatives containing arsenic or chromium. The rules also included permitting and interim status standards for drip pads used to assist in the collection of treated wood drippage. The promulgation of these rules provide state equivalency with the rules of the EPA and assure authorization of the state hazardous waste program.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of the Clinical Laboratory in Managing Chemical Or Biological Terrorism
    Clinical Chemistry 46:12 1883–1893 (2000) Review The Role of the Clinical Laboratory in Managing Chemical or Biological Terrorism Saeed A. Jortani,1 James W. Snyder,1 and Roland Valdes, Jr.1,2* Background: Domestic and international acts of terror- to respond to such attacks. Accurate assessment of ism using chemicals and pathogens as weapons have resources in clinical laboratories is important because it recently attracted much attention because of several will provide local authorities with an alternative re- hoaxes and real incidents. Clinical laboratories, espe- source for immediate diagnostic analysis. It is, therefore, cially those affiliated with major trauma centers, should recommended that clinical laboratories identify their be prepared to respond rapidly by providing diagnostic current resources and the extent of support they can tests for the detection and identification of specific provide, and inform the authorities of their state of agents, so that specific therapy and victim management readiness. can be initiated in a timely manner. As first-line re- © 2000 American Association for Clinical Chemistry sponders, clinical laboratory personnel should become familiar with the various chemical or biological agents Release of chemical and biological warfare agents threat- and be active participants in their local defense pro- ens civilian populations throughout the world. Potential grams. sources of exposure include accidental release from mili- Approach: We review the selected agents previously tary factories and stockpiles,
    [Show full text]
  • The Three Schedules
    Scheduled Chemicals under the Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC) Schedule 1 Schedule 2 Schedule 3 Guidelines for Schedule 1 Guidelines for Schedule 2 Guidelines for Schedule 3 The following criteria shall be taken into account in considering whether a toxic The following criteria shall be taken into account in considering whether a toxic The following criteria shall be taken into account in considering whether a toxic chemical or precursor should be included in Schedule 1: chemical not listed in Schedule 1 or a precursor to a Schedule 1 chemical or to a chemical or precursor, not listed in other Schedules, should be included in (a) It has been developed, produced, stockpiled or used as a chemical weapon as chemical listed in Schedule 2, part A, should be included in Schedule 2: Schedule 3: defined in Article II; (a) It poses a significant risk to the object and purpose of this Convention because (a) It has been produced, stockpiled or used as a chemical weapon; (b) It poses otherwise a high risk to the object and purpose of this Convention by it possesses such lethal or incapacitating toxicity as well as other properties (b) It poses otherwise a risk to the object and purpose of this Convention because it virtue of its high potential for use in activities prohibited under this that could enable it to be used as a chemical weapon; possesses such lethal or incapacitating toxicity as well as other properties that Convention because one or more of the following conditions are met: (b) It may be used as a precursor in one of the chemical reactions
    [Show full text]