DOCSLIB.ORG

Civilian Space Policy and Applications

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Civilian Space Policy and Applications Civilian Space Policy and Applications June 1982 NTIS order #PB82-234444 Library of Congress Catalog Card Number 82-600564 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402 . Foreword This assessment responds to a request to the Office of Technology Assessment (OTA) from the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation for an evaluation of the present state and possible future directions of space applications technologies in the civilian sector. Four technologies are examined in detail: satellite communications, land remote sensing, materials processing in space, and space transportation. In addition, the assessment investigates the national policy that has guided the development of these and other applications technologies. For the past quarter century, the United States has been the acknowledged world leader in the exploration of space and the use of technologies developed to operate in the space environment. Now, however, the United States faces increasing foreign competition in many areas of the space program, particularly in applications with commercial promise. Civilian Space Policy and Applications examines several means for addressing this competitive challenge. In particular, it investigates the options available for the future deployment of U.S. land remote-sensing systems, and explores the status of advanced satellite communications research within the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Further, the report assesses the potential for manufacturing useful products in space and for commercializing space transportation systems. OTA was greatly aided by the advice of the project advisory panel, as well as by participants in several specialized workshops. The contributions of contractors, who provided important analyses, and of numerous individuals and organizations that gave generously of their time and knowledge, are gratefully appreciated. Director .,. Ill .—— . — . — Civilian Space Policy and Applications Advisory Panel Jerry Grey, Chairman American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Fred E. Bradley Michael B. McElroy McDonnell Douglas Astronautics Co. Center for Earth and Planetary Physics Sam Brown Harvard University Private Consultant James A. Michener John G. Burke Author Department of History Bernard J. O’Keefe University of California EG&G, Inc. Hal Clement (Harry Stubbs) Thomas O. Paine Author Northrop Corp. Terry Dawson, Jr. Merton J. Peck The Analytic Sciences Corp. Department of Economics Hugh Downs Yale University American Broadcasting Co. Charles Sheldon * Daniel J. Fink Science Policy Research Division General Electric Co. Congressional Research Service Arnold Frutkin Marcia Smith The Burroughs Corp. Science Policy Research Division “ Congressional Research Service Eilene Galloway International Institute of Space Law of the Martin Summerfield Princeton Combustion Research Laboratories, Inc. Ivan Getting Verner E. Suomi Consultant Space Science & Engineering Center University of Wisconsin Willis M. Hawkins . Lockheed Corp. Anthony F. C. Wallace Department of Anthropology Ida R. Hoos University of Pennsylvania Space Sciences Laboratory University of California Roy A. Welch Department of Geography James A. Loveli University of Georgia Fisk Telephone Systems, Inc. NOTE: The Advisory Panel provided advice and comment throughout the assessment, but the members do not necessarily approve, disapprove, or endorse the report for which OTA assumes full responsibility. * Deceased, iv Civilian Space Policy and Applications Project Staff John Andelin, Assistant Director OTA Science, Information, and Natural Resources Division Ray A. Williamson, Project Director Adam Wasserman Philip P. Chandler, II Richard DalBello* Gordon Law Richard Marsten** Thomas Thornberg*** Contributors Scott Finer Donna Valtri Administrative Staff paula Walden Jannie Coles Marion Fitzhugh Jean G. Monroe Contractors Trudy Bell Leonard David Russell Drew Rowland lnlow John Logsdon Thomas Potts Edward Risley OTA Publishing Staff John C. Holmes, Publishing Officer John Bergling Kathie S. Boss Debra M. Datcher Joe Henson ● In-house contractor ● ● project Director until March 1981. ***On detail from NASA (Septem!xr 1980 September 1981) Workshop on Policy Alternatives Jerry Grey, Chairman John Logsdon Robert Shaw American Institute of Aeronautics Technoscience Associates Exxon Enterprises and Astronautics Arthur Morrissey Jerome Simonoff Russell Drew Office of Science and Technology Citibank Science and Technology Consultants Policy David Williamson Executive Office of the President Louis Friedman NASA Headquarters Planetary Society Willis Shapley Private Consultant Ronald Konkel Planning Offices National Bureau of Standards Workshop on Commercialization of Land Remote Sensing Ralph Bernstein Robert Greenberg Charles Sheffield IBM Scientific Center Private Consultant Earth Satellite Corp. Dennis Burnett Leonard Jaffe Don Walklet COMSAT Computer Sciences Corp. Terra-Mar Associates Charles Dannaman Vladimir Naleskewicz R. Gordon Williams Space Operations Group Satellite Systems Engineering TRW Electronics and Defense General Electric Co. David Ferguson Information Systems and Services Workshop Materials Processing in Space Darrell Branscome Charles Fritts John Logsdon Committee on Science and National Productivity Group Graduate Program in Science, Technology U.S. General Accountimz Office Technology, and Public Policy U.S. House-of Representatives Laurence Gilchrist George Washington University Joseph E. Coleman Space Applications Board Louis Testardi McDonnell Douglas Astronautics Co. National Research Council Material Processing in Space Divison David Cummings James A. Kirk National Aeronautics and Space Universities Space Research Department of Mechanical Administration Associations Engineering Donald Edgecombe The University of Maryland Battelle Columbus Laboratories Workshop on International Issues in Commercial Space Systems Jean-Pierre Fouquet Ryo Kimura Wilfred Mellors Scientific Attache for S~ace Affairs International Space Division European Space Agency o Science & Technology Embassy of France Kenneth Pederson Agency Embassy of Japan Tadahico Inada International Affairs NASDA Representative Sebastian Lasher NASA Headquarters Embassy of Japan INTELSAT Workshop on Space Transportation Issues W. C. Armstrong Gilbert Keyes Robert White Northrop Services, Inc. Boeing Aerospace Co. General Dynamics Corp. William French Gilbert Moore James Wilson United Technology Corp. Thiokol Corp. McDonnell Douglas Astronautics Co, Chuck Gould Morgan Sanborn Kenneth Zitek Rockwell International Corp. Rockwell International Corp. Martin Marietta Aerospace Corp. Don Ingram Charles Tringali Grumman Aerospace Corp. Lockheed Corp. vi Workshop on Remote Sensing: Government User Concerns Wolf Drews Charles parrish Edward Risley World Bank Earth Resources Data Analysis Department of the Interior Roland Inlow Charles Paul William Wigton OAO Agency for International Department of Agriculture Development Ahmed Meer Richard Williams Department of State Irv Pikus U.S. Geological Survey National Science Foundation James Nycum U.S. Genera! Accounting Office Bruce Rado Georgia State Department of National Resources Acknowledge ments OTA thanks the following people who took time to provide information or to review part or all of the study. john Alic S. E. James William Raney Office of Technology Assessment FSD Houston NASA Headquarters IBM Corp. john Benson Edward Risley Private Consultant David Johnson U.S. Geological Survey National Oceanic and Atmospheric Department of the Interior Marjorie Blumenthal Administration Office of Technology Assessment A. Schnapf D. J. Jones, Jr. RCA Astroelectronics Division Harvey Brooks General Dynamic Convair Division RCA Corp. Harvard University Systems Development Corp. Willis Shapley j. R. Burnett Thomas Karas Private Consultant Defense Systems Group Private Consultant TWR, Inc. peter Sharfman G. W. Keyes Office of Technology Assessment R. P. Buschmann Boeing Aerospace Co. Lockheed Corp. Michael Simon R. L. Kline National Aeronautics and Space Joseph Coleman Grumman Aerospace Corp. Administration McDonnell Douglas Astronautics CO. Sebastian Lasher Delbert Smith William Colglazier INTELSAT COMSAT Harvard University Pamela Mack Norman Terrell Burt CowIan Private Consultant Arms Control and Disarmament Private Consultant Agency Joseph Mahon Kenneth Craib National Aeronautics and Space Louis Testardi Resource Development Corp. Administration Materials Processing in Space Ray Crowe!! Division M. J. Maltagliati Office of Technology Assessment National Aeronautics and Space Aerospace Industries Association of Administration Jean Pierre Fouquet America, Inc. French Embassy P. S. Visher Wilfred Mellors Hughes Aircraft Co. J. L. Gait European Space Agency International and Business Affairs M. 1. Yarymoych Arthur Morrisey Planning North American Aerospace Martin Marietta Aerospace Corp. General Electric Co. Operations Charles Parrish Rockwell International Corp. G. J. Gleghorn The Naisbett Group TRW DSSG Charles Yost Kenneth Pederson National Aeronautics and Space Noel Hinners International Affairs Administration National Air & Space Museum NASA Headquarters S. L. Zieberg Roland Inlow R. A. Pepping Martin Marietta Aerospace Corp. OAO McDonnell Douglas Astronautics Co Tadahiko lnada Ian Pryke NASDA Representative European Space Agency Embassy of Japan VII Contents Chapter Page 1. Executive Summary . 3 2. Introduction . 21 3. issues and Findings . 27 4. Development
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Aeronautics and Space Report of the President, 1976 Activities
    Aeronautics and Space Report of the President 19 76 Activities NOTE TO READERS: ALL PRINTED PAGES ARE INCLUDED, UNNUMBERED BLANK PAGES DURING SCANNING AND QUALITY CONTROL CHECK HAVE BEEN DELETED Aeronautics and Space Report of the President 1976 Activities National Aeronautics and Space Administration Washington, D.C. 20546 Table of Contents Page Page I. Summary of U.S. Aeronautics and Space Ac- X. National Academy of Sciences, National Acad- tivities of 1976 _________________________ 1 emy .of Engineering, National Research 67 Introduction _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ __ 1 Council _______________________________ Space _______________________________ 1 Introduction _ _ _____ _ ______ __ _ ______ __ 67 Aeronautics __ __________ ____ __________ 4 Aerospace Science _ _ _ __ - _ _ _ __ _ __ _ __ _ - - - 67 The Heritage ________________________ 5 Space Applications .................... 69 .. 70 11. National Aeronautics and Space Administration G Aerospace Engineering _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ - - - - - 6 Education ____________________-------71 Introduction _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 72 Applications to Earth __________________ 6 XI. Office of Telecommunications Policy __i____-- 10 Introduction __ __ __________ _____ ____ __ 72 Science ______________________________ 72 Space Transportation __________________ 15 International Satellite Systems _____ _ _____ 18 Direct Broadcast Satellites ______________ 72 Space Research and Technology _ _ ___ ____ 73 Tracking and Data Acquisition __________ 19 Frequency Management _____ __ _ __ _ ___ __ 20 Domestic Satellite Applications __________ 73 International Affairs ___________________ 74 User Affairs ________________________ 23 XII.
    [Show full text]
  • Pioneer Venus Spacecraft Volume 1 Executive Summary
    FINAL REPORT SYSTEM DESIGN OF THE PIONEER VENUS SPACECRAFT VOLUME 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY By cS. D.DORFMAN E.. t July 1973 0 197 *MO P;cCO S Prepared Under UFContract P4. No. NAS S By SHUGHES AIRCRAFT COMPANY EL SEGUNDO, CALIFORNIA AMES For Sr AMES RESEARCH CENTER U U NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND OH 0:44 SPACE ADMINISTRATION i' $li FINAL REPORT SYSTEM DESIGN OF THE PIONEER VENUS SPACECRAFT VOLUME 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY By S. D.DORFMAN July 1973 Prepared Under Contract No. NAS2-D' "750 By HUGHES AIRCRAFT COMPANY EL SEGUNDO, CALIFORNIA For AMES RESEARCH CENTER NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION HS-507-0760 PREFACE The Hughes Aircraft Company Pioneer Venus final report is based on study task reports prepared during performance of the "System Design Study of the Pioneer Spacecraft. " These task reports were forwarded to Ames Research Center as they were completed during the nine months study The significant phase. results from these task reports, along with study results developed after task report publication dates, are reviewed in this final report to provide complete study documentation. Wherever appropriate, the task reports are cited by referencing a task number and Hughes report refer- ence number. The task reports can be made available to the ally interested reader specific- in the details omitted in the final report for the sake of brevity. This Pioneer Venus Study final report describes the following configurations: baseline * "Thor/Delta Spacecraft Baseline" is the baseline presented at the midterm review on 26 February 1973. * "Atlas/Centaur Spacecraft Baseline" is the baseline resulting from studies conducted since the midterm, but prior to receipt of the NASA execution phase RFP, and subsequent to decisions to launch both the multiprobe and orbiter missions in 1978 and use the Atlas/Centaur launch vehicle.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings, ITC/USA
    International Telemetering Conference Proceedings, Volume 18 (1982) Item Type text; Proceedings Publisher International Foundation for Telemetering Journal International Telemetering Conference Proceedings Rights Copyright © International Foundation for Telemetering Download date 09/10/2021 04:34:04 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/582013 INTERNATIONAL TELEMETERING CONFERENCE SEPTEMBER 28, 29, 30, 1982 SPONSORED BY INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR TELEMETERING CO-TECHNICAL SPONSOR INSTRUMENT SOCIETY OF AMERICA Sheraton Harbor Island Hotel and Convention Center San Diego, California VOLUME XVIII 1982 1982 INTERNATIONAL TELEMETERING CONFERENCE Ed Bejarano, General Chairman Robert Klessig, Vice Chairman Norman F. Lantz, Technical Program Chairman Gary Davis, Vice Technical Chairman Alain Hackstaff, Exhibits Chairman Warren Price, Publicity Chairman Burton E. Norman, Finance Chairman Francis X. Byrnes, Local Arrangements Chairman Fran LaPierre, Registration Chairman Bruce Thyden, Golf Tournament Technical Program Committee: Lee H. Glass Karen L. Billings BOARD, INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR TELEMETERING H. F. Pruss, President W. W. Hammond, Vice-President D. R. Andelin, Asst. Secretary & Treasurer R. D. Bently, Secretary B. Chin, Director F. R. Gerardi, Director T. J. Hoban, Director R. Klessig, Director W. A. Richardson, Director C. Weaver, Director 1982 ITC/USA Program Chairman Norman F. Lantz Program Chairman The conference theme this year is “Systems and Technology in the ’80’s: Expanding Horizons.” It was selected to continue the theme which began with ITC/USA ’80. The technological advances that have occurred over the past decade have, and continue to have, a profound affect on the nature and applications of telemetry systems. It is felt that the papers and tutorials which make up this year’s conference will provide you with some insight into these “Expanding Horizons.” The technical exhibits compliment the technical sessions.
    [Show full text]
  • Photographs Written Historical and Descriptive
    CAPE CANAVERAL AIR FORCE STATION, MISSILE ASSEMBLY HAER FL-8-B BUILDING AE HAER FL-8-B (John F. Kennedy Space Center, Hanger AE) Cape Canaveral Brevard County Florida PHOTOGRAPHS WRITTEN HISTORICAL AND DESCRIPTIVE DATA HISTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORD SOUTHEAST REGIONAL OFFICE National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior 100 Alabama St. NW Atlanta, GA 30303 HISTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORD CAPE CANAVERAL AIR FORCE STATION, MISSILE ASSEMBLY BUILDING AE (Hangar AE) HAER NO. FL-8-B Location: Hangar Road, Cape Canaveral Air Force Station (CCAFS), Industrial Area, Brevard County, Florida. USGS Cape Canaveral, Florida, Quadrangle. Universal Transverse Mercator Coordinates: E 540610 N 3151547, Zone 17, NAD 1983. Date of Construction: 1959 Present Owner: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Present Use: Home to NASA’s Launch Services Program (LSP) and the Launch Vehicle Data Center (LVDC). The LVDC allows engineers to monitor telemetry data during unmanned rocket launches. Significance: Missile Assembly Building AE, commonly called Hangar AE, is nationally significant as the telemetry station for NASA KSC’s unmanned Expendable Launch Vehicle (ELV) program. Since 1961, the building has been the principal facility for monitoring telemetry communications data during ELV launches and until 1995 it processed scientifically significant ELV satellite payloads. Still in operation, Hangar AE is essential to the continuing mission and success of NASA’s unmanned rocket launch program at KSC. It is eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) under Criterion A in the area of Space Exploration as Kennedy Space Center’s (KSC) original Mission Control Center for its program of unmanned launch missions and under Criterion C as a contributing resource in the CCAFS Industrial Area Historic District.
    [Show full text]
  • Advances in Space Research Forecasting the Impact of an 1859
    Advances in Space Research Forecasting the Impact of an 1859-calibre Superstorm on Satellite Resources Sten Odenwald1,2, James Green2, William Taylor1,2 1. QSS Group, Inc., 4500 Forbes Blvd., Lanham, MD, 20706. 2. NASA, Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771 Submitted: June 30, 2005, Accepted: September 25, 2005 Abstract: We have developed simple models to assess the economic impacts to the current satellite resource caused by the worst-case scenario of a hypothetical superstorm event occurring during the next sunspot cycle. Although the consequences may be severe, our worse-case scenario does not include the complete failure of the entire 937 operating satellites in the current population, which have a replacement value of ~$170-230 billion, and supporting a ~$90 billion/year industry. Our estimates suggest a potential economic loss of < $70 billion for lost revenue (~$44 billion) and satellite replacement for GEO satellites (~$24 billion) caused by a ‘once a century’ single storm similar to the 1859 superstorm. We estimate that 80 satellites (LEO, MEO, GEO) may be disabled as a consequence of a superstorm event. Additional impacts may include the failure of many of the GPS, GLONASS and Galileo satellite systems in MEO. Approximately 97 LEO satellites, which normally would not have re-entered for many decades, may prematurely de-orbit by ca 2021 as a result of the temporarily increased atmospheric drag caused by a superstorm event occurring in ca 2012. The $100 billion International Space Station may lose significant altitude, placing it in critical need for re-boosting by an amount potentially outside the range of typical Space Shuttle operations, which are in any case scheduled to end in 2010.
    [Show full text]
  • Aeronautics and Space Report of the President 1981 Activities
    Aeronautics and Space Report of the President 1981 Activities NOTE TO READERS: ALL PRINTED PAGES ARE INCLUDED, UNNUMBERED BLANK PAGES DURING SCANNING AND QUALITY CONTROL CHECK HAVE BEEN DELETED Aeronautics and Space Report of the President 1981 Activities National Aeronautics and Space Administration Washington, D.C. 20546 Con tents Page Page Summary ................................ 1 Department of Agriculture ................. 57 Communications ...................... 1 Federal Communications Commission ........ 58 Earth’s Resources and Environment ...... 2 CommunicationsSatellites .............. 58 Space Science ........................ 3 Experiments and Studies ............... 59 Space Transportation .................. 4 Department of Transportation .............. 61 International Activities ................ 5 Aviation Safety ....................... 61 Aeronautics .......................... 6 Environmental Research ............... 63 National Aeronautics and Space Air Navigation and Air Traffic Control ... 64 Administration ..................... 8 Environmental Protection Agency ........... 66 Applications to the Earth ............... 8 National Science Foundation ................ 67 Science .............................. 13 Smithsonian Institution .................... 68 Space Transportation .................. 19 Spacesciences ........................ 68 Space Research and Technology ......... 23 Lunar Research ...................... 69 Space Tracking and Data Services ........ 25 Planetary Research .................... 70 Aeronautical
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings, ITC/USA
    COMSAT SATELLITE CONTROL NETWORKS Item Type text; Proceedings Authors Johnson, Charles E. Publisher International Foundation for Telemetering Journal International Telemetering Conference Proceedings Rights Copyright © International Foundation for Telemetering Download date 28/09/2021 18:06:39 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/613091 COMSAT SATELLITE CONTROL NETWORKS Charles E. Johnson Manager Automated Test Spacecraft Engineering Communications Satellite Corporation Palo Alto, California INTRODUCTION The COMSAT family of companies is actively involved in the operation of the Intelsat, COMSAT General, and Satellite Business Systems (SBS) ground networks which currently control twenty-five communications satellites utilizing three control centers and thirteen ground stations with forty-five antennas. Satellites controlled include INTELSAT IV (7), INTELSAT IVA (5), INTELSAT V (4), COMSTAR (4), MARISAT (3), and SBS (2). COMSAT also operates a launch services network consisting of a COMSAT Launch Control Center and Intelsat ground stations, as required, to guide spacecraft to the proper orbit station. Intelsat V flight 4 was launched in March 1982. Two additional Intelsat V’s and one SBS are scheduled for launch this year. The latter will be on the first commercial shuttle mission. The ground control networks contain a commonality traceable to COMSAT’s influence in the design of the satellites and experience in the control of communications satellites dating back to the launch of the Early Bird in 1965. This paper presents an overview of operational and planned networks in which COMSAT plays a significant role. CONTROL OF THE SPACE SEGMENT The primary objective of each of these networks is to control the space segment of the satellite system so as to provide uninterrupted commercial communications service consistent with the requirements of the ground segment.
    [Show full text]
  • Commercial Communications Satellites DRIFTING: BS-3N; BSAT-1A, -1B, Geosynchronous Orbit Insat 1D (Between 68° & 72°E)
    Commercial Communications Satellites DRIFTING: BS-3N; BSAT-1A, -1B, Geosynchronous Orbit Insat 1D (between 68° & 72°E) 93.5°E 100.0°E 95°E 91.5°E 100.5°E 97.5°E LMI AP 2 (Gorizont 30) 105.0°E Cakra 105.5°E °E °E °E 108.0°E °E °E 109.0°E °E 110.0°E 110.5°E °E °E 88.0 TDRS-6 87.5°E °E 85.0 113.0°E warta 1, 83.0 80.0 °E 78.5 76.5 °E 116 75.0 74.0 72.0 °E 119.5°E 70.5 PALAPA B4 (I) .0°E 68.5 120.0°E Sinosat/Intelsat APR °E 66.0 °E 122.0°E P Telkom 1, AA Comstar D4) °E 123.0 2A, 2 64.0 I Thuraya 1 (I) 124.0°E alapa C2, nmarsat II F-4 (I) 62.0 Leasat F-5 (I) °E ; Intelsat 601 (I), 906 60.0 ° (aka °E Asiasat 3S Meas E C Asia °E Insat 3A Intelsat APR-1, 3B F1 57.0 128.0°E ; ar-1 Asiastar IV 56.0 °E N-SAT-110 NSS-6 55.0 53.0 Ko sat 2 fi 1 (I) °E 132.0°E at 1 134.0°E Koreasat 3 at 2E/ 704 °E r telsat 709 2 50.5 °E easat 2 P-1 S-4 7, -10 ST-1 48.0 Chinast 136.0 In Ins Esia Thaicom 2, 3Apstar 2R/Telstar 10 47.5 LMI-1 Thaicom 1 Insat 3CPA ) °E 138.0°E IpS -2 W5 t 1 142.0°E °E PAS- a 45.0 ) JCSat 4AAsiasat (6) Intelsat as (I 14 Garuda 1 tar 1 2 Inmarsat III F-1, -703 ore ya °E 144.0°E3.5°E Intelsat 902 AM-22/SESAT 2 ra 2.0 °E Intelsat 904 (aka K 4 E 146.0°E 4 NSS t 3E, Intelsat 7006 ar 1) Thu 39.0 ° JC MOST-1 r B 38.0 °E 148.0°E Insa pe*St 6.0 Apstar 5/TelstarApstar 18 N-Star1A, 6 A Sa Express 3 °E 150.0°E t pe*Sta ) N-Star B, C 3 Intelsat 7 (nee Euro d 33.0 °E 150.5°E Superbird C Eutelsat II F-2 (I) -Bir 31.0 Inmars Euro , EurasiaSat 1, nee e °E 152.0°E Apstar 1 90°E apa C1) 3 ( 30.5 E JCSa a PAS-12 9.0° 154.0°E t II F-1 -Sat 2(aka Pal 2 °E t 1B (5), 1; MBSat (I) Turksat-1C 28.5 (I) Hellas °E Agi SESAT 28.2 156.0°E R(4) Measatla 2 2 Paksat 1sat 802, Eurobird W4, at 1B (I) Intelsat[BACK-UP] 602 Intel 2) 26.0°E 157.0°E robird Optus B3 Turks (Eu 24.5°E 158.0 Arabsat 2B , 2D ), 2D °E JCSat 2A(8) Xtar-Eurird 1 S-5 23.5 °E Eurob 2C (PA 160.0°E 135°E 45°E Astra 2A, 2B IntelsatOptus 604 (I) C1 sat 3A, F-5 E Arab III 21.5° 162.0°E Superbird A 3A .0°E Inmarsat1D, 21 164.0°E Optus B1 Astra W3) Superbird B2 (4) (nee 2°E 166.0° W6 , 2C 19.
    [Show full text]
  • Of the President
    Aeronautics and Space Report of the President 1977 Activities NOTE TO READERS: ALL PRINTED PAGES ARE INCLUDED, UNNUMBERED BLANK PAGES DURING SCANNING AND QUALITY CONTROL CHECK HAVE BEEN DELETED Aeronautics and Space Report of the President 1977 Activities National Aeronautics and Space Administration Washington, D.C. 20546 Table of Contents Page Page I. Summary of U.S. Aeronautics and VI. Department of the Interior __________ 66 Space Activities of 1977 __________ 1 Introduction ____ __________ _ _ __ 66 Introduction _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ - 1 Earth Resources Observation Communications _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ - 1 Systems Program _____________ 66 Earth's Resources _______ _______ 2 National Cartographic Informa- Space Science __________________ 5 tion Center __________________ 67 Transportation _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ __ 7 Monitoring the Environment ___ 67 Space Energy __________________ 11 Research _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ 68 11. National.. Aeronautics and Space International Activities _________ 69 Administration _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - 13 VII. Department of Transportation _______ 70 Introduction _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 13 Introduction _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ - _ _ - _ _ - _ - _ 70 Applications to Earth _ _______ _ __ 13 Air Safety ..................... 70 Science _______________________ 18 Air Traffic Control and Air Space Transportation _ _______ __ _ 22 Navigation - _ - _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ 72 Space Research and Technology- - 26 OST Research Support __________ 7.3 Tracking and Data Acquisition __ 27 NASA Energy Programs ________ 28 Aeronautical Research and Appendixes Development _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ 29 111.
    [Show full text]
  • Classification of Geosynchronous Objects
    esoc European Space Operations Centre Robert-Bosch-Strasse 5 D-64293 Darmstadt Germany T +49 (0)6151 900 F +49 (0)6151 90495 www.esa.int CLASSIFICATION OF GEOSYNCHRONOUS OBJECTS Produced with the DISCOS Database Prepared by T. Flohrer Reference GEN-DB-LOG-00086-OPS-GR Issue 14 Revision 1 Date of Issue 17 February 2012 Status Issued Document Type TN Distribution open European Space Agency Agence spatiale européenne Abstract This is a status report on geosynchronous objects as of the end of 2011. Based on orbital data in ESA’s DISCOS database and on orbital data provided by KIAM the situation near the geostationary ring (here defined as orbits with mean motion between 0.9 and 1.1 revolutions per day, eccentricity smaller than 0.2 and inclination below 70 deg) is analysed. From 1234 objects for which orbital data are available, 406 are controlled inside their longitude slots, 629 are drifting above, below or through GEO, 172 are in a libration orbit and 18 whose status could not be determined. Furthermore, there are 74 uncontrolled objects without orbital data (of which 66 have not been cata- logued). Thus the total number of known objects in the geostationary region is 1307 . During 2011 at least sixteen spacecraft reached end-of-life. Thirteen of them were reorbited following the IADC recommendations, one of those below the GEO protected region. Three spacecraft were reorbited too low. We identified one spacecraft that seems to be abandoned or could not make any reorbiting manouevre at all in 2009 and is now librating inside the geostationary ring.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Space Science and Spacecraft Applications
    INTRODUCTION TO SPACESCIENCES AND SPACECRAFT APPLICATIONS INTRODUCTION TO SPACESCIENCES AND SPACECRAFT APPLICATIONS BRUCEA. CAMPBELL AND SAMUEL WALTER MCCANDLESS,JR. Gulf Publishing Company Houston, Texas Introduction to Space Sciences and Spacecraft Applications Copyright 0 1996 by Gulf Publishing Company, Houston, Texas. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. This book, or parts thereof, may not be reproduced in any form without permission of the publisher. Gulf Publishing Company Book Division P.O. Box 2608 Houston, Texas 77252-2608 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Campbell, Bruce A., 1955- Introduction to space sciences and spacecraft applications / Bruce A. Campbell, Samuel Walter McCandless, Jr. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-88415-411-4 1. Astronautics. 2. Space vehicles. I. McCandless, Samuel Wal- ter. 11. Title. TL791.C36 1996 629.4-dc20 96- 14936 CIP Printed on acid-free paper (=) iv Contents Acknowledgments viii About the Authors viii Preface ix CHAPTER 1 Introduction and History 1 Uses of Space, 1. History of Spaceflight, 3. ReferencedAdditional Reading, 23. Exercises, 23. PART 1 SPACE SCIENCES CHAPTER 2 Orbital Principles 26 Orbital Principles, 28. Orbital Elements, 38. Orbital Properties, 39. Useful Orbits, 44. Orbit Establishment and Orbital Maneuvers, 47. ReferencedAdditional Reading, 5 1. Exercises, 5 1. CHAPTER 3 Propulsion 53 First Principles, 54. Orbit Establishment and Orbital Maneuvers, 63. ReferencedAdditional Reading, 74. Exercises, 74. CHAPTER 4 Spacecraft Environment 76 The Sun, 76. The Earth, 87. Spacecraft Effects, 97. ReferencedAdditional Reading, 101. Exercises, 101. V PART 2 SPACECRAFT APPLICATIONS CHAPTER 5 Communications 104 Communications Theory, 104.
    [Show full text]
  • 19740027142.Pdf
    1974027142-002 AUGUST1974 PIONEERMARSSURFACEPENETRATORMISSION MissionAnalysisandOrbiterDesign NASA ContractNAS 2-8424 ir- ................. :HUr GHES: Q • _ _ _ J hPA,-F ANU C,_MMI_NIc-A],t'_,_ ,,POUP HughesRef. No. D2546 • SCG40274R 1974027142-003 i m •" CONTENTS Page r* 1. INTRODUCTION 1 2. SUMMARY 3 Z. 1 Mission Profile 3 Z. Z Penetrator Deployment Options 4 2. 3 Communications and Data Handling 6 Z. 4 Pioneer Mars Orbiter Design 7 3. MISSION ANALYSIS 11 3. 1 Pioneer Mars Orbiter Flight Mechanics 11 3.1. 1 Launch and Interplanetary Transit Phase 1Z 3.1. Z PMO Baseline Interplanetary Trajectory 15 , 3. 1. 3 PMO Mars Arrival Conditions 15 3.1.4 PMO Mars Orbit Phase 17 3. Z Mission Operations 19 3. 2. 1 Launch and Interplanetary Transit 19 3. Z.Z PMO Mars Orbit Phase Z0 3. 2. 3 Data Transmissions Zl 3. Z. 4 Operations During Eclipses and Occultations Z1 3.3 Orbiter Science Potential 21 3.4 Penetrator Deployment 23 3.4. 1 Deployment Options Z4 3.4. 2 Targeting Accuracy 96 3.4. 3 Penetrator Impact Position Determination Z6 3.4.4 Communications Geometry 26 3. 5 Communications and Data Handling Z8 3.5. 1 Penetrator/PMO Communications Link 28 3.5.2- PMO/Earth Link 30 3.6 Orbiter Dynamics Analysis 33 3.6.1 Steady State Dynamics 33 3.6. Z Penetrator Deployment Effects 35 4. PIONEER MARS ORBITER DESIGN CONCEPT 39 4. I Mission Impact on PMO Design 39 4. Z PMO Design 40 4. Z. I Configuration 40 4. Z. 2- Mass Properties 46 4.
    [Show full text]