DOCSLIB.ORG

RASMAG/14 − WP/25 21-25/02/2011 International Civil Aviation Organization the Fourteenth Meeting of the Regional Airspace Safe

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
RASMAG/14 − WP/25 21-25/02/2011 International Civil Aviation Organization the Fourteenth Meeting of the Regional Airspace Safe RASMAG/14 − WP/25 21-25/02/2011 International Civil Aviation Organization The Fourteenth Meeting of the Regional Airspace Safety Monitoring Advisory Group (RASMAG/14) Bangkok, Thailand, 21 − 25 February 2011 Agenda Item 5: Airspace Safety Monitoring Activities/Requirements in Asia/Pacific Region UPDATED ESTIMATE OF RVSM LONG TERM HEIGHT MONITORING BURDEN FOR THE AUSTRALIAN AIRSPACE MONITORING AGENCY (AAMA) (Presented by Australia) SUMMARY This paper presents the results of the review and update of the anticipated monitoring burden for aircraft registered and operated by Australia, Indonesia and Papua New Guinea following the implementation of long term height monitoring requirements in November 2010. 1. Introduction 1.1. The Long Term Height Monitoring Impact Statement developed by RASMAG was endorsed by APANPIRG/20 in September 2009. That statement included a determination by each of the Asia/Pacific Regional Monitoring Agencies (RMAs) of the anticipated monitoring burden for each State within the region. RASMAG/12 tasked the RMAs to review and update that data. The Australian Airspace Monitoring Agency (AAMA) provided anticipated monitoring burden data in WP/21 at RASMAG/13. This current paper provides an update to that data. 2. Discussion 2.1 The AAMA had previously supplied data on its anticipated monitoring burden following the implementation of long term height monitoring in November 2010. That data was based on a review of the current RVSM approvals data for the State airspaces that the AAMA is responsible for. 2.2 A review of the most recent RVSM approvals databases determined that the monitoring burden continues to vary, specifically in the case of Australian and Indonesian operators. The former has seen a decrease of 18 in the total number of airframes required to be monitored to a total of 124. The latter increased by 11 to a total of 72. Overall the revised monitoring burden for the AAMA is expected to be approximately 200 airframes over the two year period commencing November 2010. While the AAMA has responsibility for State airspace for both the Solomon Islands and Nauru, aircraft utilised by operators within those States are Australian registered aircraft and therefore included in the count for that State. 2.3 Appendix A provides details of the monitoring burden based on the minimum monitoring requirements agreed at the recent RMACG/5 meeting in May 2010. RASMAG/14 − WP/25 2 3. Actions by the Meeting 3.1 The meeting is invited to: a) review the information provided in the paper and Appendix A; and b) use the information to update the current monitoring burden anticipated for the Asia/Pacific RMAs. RASMAG/14 − WP/25 APPENDIX A Appendix A: Estimated RVSM Monitoring Burden for Asia/Pacific Region as a result of Long Term Height Monitoring Requirements of Annex 6 - Period from Nov 2010 to Nov 2012 (Data estimated by Asia/Pacific RVSM Regional Monitoring Agencies) AAMA Monitoring Burden (compiled October 2010) AUSTRALIA: Resultant Aircraft MMR Total # Total # of Monitoring Operator Operator Name Monitoring Group Category Airframes under Aircraft ADS-B Burden (# (e.g. [A342, A343]) (1, 2 or 3) Monitoring Unit Approved Airframes) AGC STRATEGIC AIRLINES PTY. LTD. A320 1 2 2 0 STRATEGIC AIRLINES PTY. LTD. A330 1 1 1 1 IGA SKYTRADERS PTY LTD A320 1 1 1 0 STRATEGIC AIRLINES PTY. LTD. 1 1 1 0 NATIONAL JET SYSTEMS PTY. LTD. B712 1 1 1 0 CELIJET AVIATION SOLUTIONS PTY LTD C525 1 2 2 0 DICK SMITH ADVENTURE PTY LTD 1 1 1 0 EDWARDS COACHES PTY. LIMITED 1 1 1 0 GOJET PTY. LTD. 1 1 1 0 PROFESSIONAL JET AVIATION PTY LTD 1 1 1 0 SOUTHERN AIR SERVICES PTY LTD 1 1 1 0 STRATEGIC AIR CHARTER PTY LTD 1 1 1 0 Flight Options (Australia) C560 1 1 1 0 HEATHGATE RESOURCES PTY LTD 1 1 1 0 JET CITY PTY. LTD. 1 1 1 0 MAXEM AVIATION PTY LTD 1 1 1 0 Business Aviation Solutions C650 1 1 1 0 INGHAMS ENTERPRISES PTY LIMITED 1 1 1 0 LYNDEN AVIATION PTY LIMITED 1 1 1 0 PROFESSIONAL JET AVIATION PTY LTD 1 1 1 0 A - 1 Resultant Aircraft MMR Total # Total # of Monitoring Operator Operator Name Monitoring Group Category Airframes under Aircraft ADS-B Burden (# (e.g. [A342, A343]) (1, 2 or 3) Monitoring Unit Approved Airframes) EXECUTIVE AIRLINES PTY. LTD. C680 1 2 2 0 IGA TWENTIETH SUPER PACE NOMINEES PTY. LTD. 1 1 1 0 BALMORAL AIR PTY. LTD. C750 1 1 1 0 Business Aviation Solutions 1 1 1 0 JET CITY PTY. LTD. 1 1 1 0 AIR NATIONAL AUSTRALIA PTY. LTD. CL600 1 1 1 0 AVWEST PTY LTD 1 1 1 0 MAXEM AVIATION PTY LTD 1 1 1 0 REVESCO AVIATION PTY LTD 1 1 1 0 MARCPLAN CHARTER PTY. LTD. E135-E145 1 1 1 0 CAPITEQ LIMITED E170-190 1 3 2 0 NETWORK AVIATION PTY LTD F100 1 2 2 0 LLOYD AVIATION JET CHARTER PTY. LTD. F900 1 1 1 0 TINKLER AVIATION PTY LTD 1 1 1 0 EXECUJET AUSTRALIA PTY LIMITED GLEX 1 1 1 0 GANDEL INVESTMENTS PTY. LTD. 1 1 1 0 PRATT AVIATION PTY LTD 1 1 1 0 WALKER AIR PTY LIMITED 1 1 1 0 CROWN MELBOURNE LIMITED GLF4 1 1 1 0 EXECUJET AUSTRALIA PTY LIMITED 1 1 1 0 GARUDA AVIATION PTY LTD 1 1 1 0 MARCPLAN CHARTER PTY. LTD. 1 1 1 0 CROWN MELBOURNE LIMITED GLF5 1 1 1 0 LITTLE AVIATION PTY. LIMITED 1 1 1 0 AVWEST PTY LTD H25B-800 1 1 1 0 GOJET PTY. LTD. 1 1 1 0 MARCPLAN CHARTER PTY. LTD. 1 2 2 0 IGA NANTAY PTY LTD 1 2 2 0 A - 2 Resultant Aircraft MMR Total # Total # of Monitoring Operator Operator Name Monitoring Group Category Airframes under Aircraft ADS-B Burden (# (e.g. [A342, A343]) (1, 2 or 3) Monitoring Unit Approved Airframes) PROFESSIONAL JET AVIATION PTY LTD 1 1 1 1 RAMSAY AIRCHARTER PTY LIMITED 1 1 1 0 Remorex Pty Ltd 1 1 1 0 STATE OF QUEENSLAND 1 1 1 0 TATARY PTY. LTD. 1 1 1 0 CAREFLIGHT (QLD) LIMITED LJ45 1 1 1 0 EXECUJET AUSTRALIA PTY LIMITED 1 1 1 0 PACIFIC FLIGHT SERVICES PTY LTD 1 1 1 0 SINGAPORE FLYING COLLEGE PTE LTD 1 4 2 0 EXECUJET AUSTRALIA PTY LIMITED LJ60 1 2 2 0 GOJET PTY. LTD. PRM1 1 1 1 0 SYDNEY JET CHARTER PTY LIMITED 1 1 1 0 AIR NATIONAL AUSTRALIA PTY. LTD. BD700 2 1 1 0 EXECUJET AUSTRALIA PTY LIMITED 2 1 1 0 TATARY PTY. LTD. 2 1 1 0 STATE OF QUEENSLAND BE30 2 1 1 0 BUSINESS AVIATION SOLUTIONS PTY LTD BE40 2 3 2 0 PROFESSIONAL JET AVIATION PTY LTD 2 1 1 0 Morgan & Co C25A 2 1 1 0 CCJ PTY LTD C510 2 1 1 0 ERCEG, Ivan 21 10 FLIGHT OPTIONS (AUSTRALIA) PTY LTD 2 1 1 0 IGA SINGAPORE FLYING COLLEGE PTE LTD 2 1 1 0 SKYPAC AVIATION PTY LTD 2 1 1 0 A - 3 Resultant Aircraft MMR Total # Total # of Monitoring Operator Operator Name Monitoring Group Category Airframes under Aircraft ADS-B Burden (# (e.g. [A342, A343]) (1, 2 or 3) Monitoring Unit Approved Airframes) CHINA SOUTHERN WEST AUSTRALIAN FLYING COLLEGE PTY LTD C550-552 2 1 1 0 MAXEM AVIATION PTY LTD 2 1 1 0 PROFESSIONAL JET AVIATION PTY LTD 2320 EXECUTIVE AIRLINES PTY. LTD. C550-B 2 1 1 0 PROFESSIONAL JET AVIATION PTY LTD 2 1 1 0 BALMORAL AIR PTY. LTD. F2TH 2 1 1 0 SYDNEY JET CHARTER PTY LIMITED 2 1 1 0 BOSTON L.H.F. PTY LTD H25C 2 1 1 0 AIR NATIONAL AUSTRALIA PTY. LTD. LJ35-36 2 1 1 0 CAREFLIGHT (QLD) LIMITED 2 1 1 0 JET CITY PTY. LTD. 2 2 1 0 JV AVIATION MANAGEMENT SERVICES PTY LTD 2 1 1 0 PACIFIC FLIGHT SERVICES PTY LTD 2 1 1 0 JST JETSTAR AIRWAYS PTY LIMITED A320 1 48 2 42 JETSTAR AIRWAYS PTY LIMITED A330 1 7 2 7 NJS NATIONAL JET SYSTEMS PTY. LTD. B712 1 10 2 0 OZW SKYWEST AIRLINES (AUSTRALIA) PTY LTD F100 1 9 2 0 QFA QANTAS AIRWAYS LIMITED A330 1 17 2 17 QANTAS AIRWAYS LIMITED B737CL 1 21 2 0 QANTAS AIRWAYS LIMITED B737NX 1 41 2 25 QFA QANTAS AIRWAYS LIMITED B744-10 1 14 2 14 QANTAS AIRWAYS LIMITED B744-5 1 16 2 16 QANTAS AIRWAYS LIMITED B747CL 1 3 2 0 QANTAS AIRWAYS LIMITED B767 1 21 2 0 QANTAS AIRWAYS LIMITED A380 2 7 4 7 A - 4 Resultant Aircraft MMR Total # Total # of Monitoring Operator Operator Name Monitoring Group Category Airframes under Aircraft ADS-B Burden (# (e.g. [A342, A343]) (1, 2 or 3) Monitoring Unit Approved Airframes) RON NAURU AIR CORPORATION B737CL 1 2 2 0 TGW TIGER AIRWAYS AUSTRALIA PTY LIMITED A320 1 9 2 8 UTY ALLIANCE AIRLINES PTY LTD F100 1 11 2 0 VAU VIRGIN BLUE INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES PTY LTD B773 1 4 2 0 VOZ VIRGIN BLUE AIRLINES PTY LIMITED B737NX 1 57 2 26 VIRGIN BLUE AIRLINES PTY LIMITED E170-190 1 21 2 0 GRAND TOTALS: 420 125 164 *Monitoring burden of aircraft not ADS-B approved: 103 INDONESIA: Resultant Total # of Aircraft MMR Total # Monitoring Aircraft ADS-B Operator Operator Name Monitoring Group Category Airframes under Burden (# Approved (e.g. [A342, A343]) (1, 2 or 3) Monitoring Unit Airframes) AFE AIRFAST INDONESIA B732 2 1 1 0 E135-145 1 1 1 0 MD80 1 2 2 0 AWQ INDONESIA AIRASIA A320 1 11 2 0 AWQ B737CL 1 11 2 0 BTV BATAVIA AIR A320 1 6 2 0 A330 1 1 1 0 BTV B737CL 1 24 2 0 CGR CARDIG AIR CARGO B737CL 1 2 2 0 GIA GARUDA INDONESIA A330 1 10 2 4 B737CL 1 41 2 0 B737NX 1 40 2 39 B744-5 1 3 2 3 JLB UNKNOWN BE30 2 1 1 0 H25B-800 1 1 1 0 A - 5 Resultant Total # of Aircraft MMR Total # Monitoring Aircraft ADS-B Operator Operator Name Monitoring Group Category Airframes under Burden (# Approved (e.g.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Liste-Exploitants-Aeronefs.Pdf
    EN EN EN COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, XXX C(2009) XXX final COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No xxx/2009 of on the list of aircraft operators which performed an aviation activity listed in Annex I to Directive 2003/87/EC on or after 1 January 2006 specifying the administering Member State for each aircraft operator (Text with EEA relevance) EN EN COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No xxx/2009 of on the list of aircraft operators which performed an aviation activity listed in Annex I to Directive 2003/87/EC on or after 1 January 2006 specifying the administering Member State for each aircraft operator (Text with EEA relevance) THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, Having regard to Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 2003 establishing a system for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community and amending Council Directive 96/61/EC1, and in particular Article 18a(3)(a) thereof, Whereas: (1) Directive 2003/87/EC, as amended by Directive 2008/101/EC2, includes aviation activities within the scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community (hereinafter the "Community scheme"). (2) In order to reduce the administrative burden on aircraft operators, Directive 2003/87/EC provides for one Member State to be responsible for each aircraft operator. Article 18a(1) and (2) of Directive 2003/87/EC contains the provisions governing the assignment of each aircraft operator to its administering Member State. The list of aircraft operators and their administering Member States (hereinafter "the list") should ensure that each operator knows which Member State it will be regulated by and that Member States are clear on which operators they should regulate.
    [Show full text]
  • Analisa Harapan Dan Persepsi Penumpang Terhadap Kualitas Makanan Yang Disediakan Oleh Maskapai Penerbangan Domestik Di Indonesia
    ANALISA HARAPAN DAN PERSEPSI PENUMPANG TERHADAP KUALITAS MAKANAN YANG DISEDIAKAN OLEH MASKAPAI PENERBANGAN DOMESTIK DI INDONESIA Christine Tantrisna dan Kanya Prawitasari Alumnus Program Manajemen Perhotelan, Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Kristen Petra Surabaya Abstrak: Penumpang pesawat terbang memiliki harapan tertentu terhadap maskapai penerbangan yang digunakan, salah satunya dari segi kualitas makanan yang disediakan selama penerbangan. Apa yang penumpang terima belum tentu sesuai dengan apa yang diharapkan. Penelitian ini mengukur perbedaan harapan dan persepsi penumpang terhadap kualitas makanan berdasarkan 7 variabel yaitu: warna, penampilan, bentuk, tekstur, aroma, tingkat kematangan, dan rasa. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa ada gap yang signifikan antara harapan dan persepsi. Kata kunci: harapan, persepsi, kualitas makanan, maskapai penerbangan domestik, indonesia. Abstract: Passengers have certain expectations about the airline they use; one of them is about food quality served during flight. What passengers get is not always suitable with what they expect. This research examines the difference between expectation and perception of food quality by seven variables, namely: color, performance, shape, texture, aroma, degree of doneness, and taste. The result shows that there is a significant gap between expectation and perception. Keywords: expectation, perception, food quality, domestic airlines, indonesia. Sebagai bisnis yang bergerak di sektor jasa atau bahwa kualitas makanan memegang peranan penting layanan, bisnis penerbangan menyediakan beberapa dalam mempengaruhi mereka dalam memilih fasilitas bagi para penumpang dimana salah satunya maskapai penerbangan. Ditambah lagi, 39% respon- adalah fasilitas pemberian makanan dan minuman den mengatakan bahwa mereka mengharapkan saat penerbangan atau yang biasa disebut inflight kualitas makanan yang lebih baik ketika kompetisi catering. Layanan inflight catering telah dimulai mulai muncul di rute tertentu.
    [Show full text]
  • Foreign ICAO 3LD Additions, Deletions, and Modifications (Excluding U.S.)
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION N JO 7340.470 NOTICE FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION Air Traffic Organization Policy Effective Date: July 11, 2018 Cancellation Date: July 11, 2019 SUBJ: Foreign ICAO 3LD Additions, Deletions, and Modifications (excluding U.S.) 1. Purpose of This Notice. This notice modifies FAA Order JO 7340.2, Contractions, Chapter 3, Sections 1, 2, and 3, !CAO Aircraft Company Three-Letter Identifier and/or Telephony Designator. This notice reflects recent changes initiated by countries other than the United States (U.S.) including new ICAO three letter designators (3LDs), deletions ofdefunct ICAO 3LDs, and modifications to ICAO 3LDs, associated telephonies, and companies/agencies. This Notice supplements FAA Order JO 7340.2 until the additions and modifications are incorporated into the Order. This Notice does not replace or substitute for GENOTs issued by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Air Traffic Organization (ATO) for ICAO 3LDs assigned and authorized for U.S. aircraft operators. 2. Audience. This notice applies to the following Air Traffic Organization (ATO) service units: Air Traffic Services, and System Operations Services; ATO Safety and Technical Training; and all associated air traffic control facilities. This notice is informational in nature and does not require documentation as supplemental training in FAA Form 3120-1, Training and Proficiency Record. 3. Where Can I Find This Notice? This notice is available on the MyFAA employee website at https://employees.faa.gov/tools_resources/orders_ notices/ and on the air traffic publications website at http://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/. 4. Source Document. The source document for the ICAO 3LD additions and modifications contained in this notice is ICAO Document 8585, Designatorsfor Aircraft Operating Agencies, Aeronautical Authorities, and Services.
    [Show full text]
  • Vol-5, Issue 2
    International Journal of Management Sciences and Business Research, Feb-2016 ISSN (2226-8235) Vol-5, Issue 2 Analysis on the Factors Causing Airlines Bankruptcy: Cases in Indonesia Author’s Details: (1)Suharto Abdul Majid-Faculty of Economic and Business, Padjadjaran University, Bandung, Indonesia (2) Sucherly - Faculty of Economic and Business, Padjadjaran University, Bandung, Indonesia (3) Umi Kaltum- Faculty of Economic and Business, Padjadjaran University, Bandung, Indonesia Abstract the high growth of national aviation services after the aviation deregulation in 2000 has given a positive impact on the increase of national economic activities, especially in tour and trade. In the same time, however, it negatively impacts the aviation business itself, making many airline companies stop their operation and then go to bankruptcy. The aim of this research is to analyze the factors causing bankruptcy to some national airline companies in Indonesia after the aviation deregulation in the periods of 2001-2010 and 2011-2015. It is an exploratory research with a qualitative descriptive approach emphasizing on evaluating the factors causing bankruptcy to a number of domestic airlines in Indonesia. The method of data collection is an interview with the format of focus group discussion (FGD), while the data analysis uses factor analysis method. The results of this research show that there are two main factors that cause bankruptcy to a number of domestic airlines in Indonesia. They are both internal and external factors of the companies. Key words: Airline companies bankruptcy, internal factors, and external factors. INTRODUCTION Since the implementation of the national aviation deregulation policy in 2000, the growth of aviation business in Indonesia increases rapidly.
    [Show full text]
  • The Indonesia Dassault Falcon 7X Wu Zhendong Metrics & Mood Jets & Helicopters
    FOURTH QUARTER 2015 THE INDONESIA PERSPECTIVE THE CHECKUP : DASSAULT FALCON 7X INDUSTRY INSIDER: WU ZHENDONG ASIA-PACIFIC OUTLOOK: METRICS & MOOD CURRENT MARKET SUMMARIES: JETS & HELICOPTERS THE WORLD STANDARD Intercontinental range, record-setting speed, advanced technology, unrivaled utility and top-rated worldwide product support. The World Standard™ isn’t just a company tagline, it’s a benchmark by which all others must be measured. BEIJING (北京): +86 10 8535 1866 HONG KONG (香港): +852 2918 1600 SINGAPORE (新加坡): +65 6572 7777 GULFSTREAM.COM G650ER, G650, G600, G500, G550, G450, G280 and G150 are trademarks or registered trademarks of Gulfstream Aerospace Corporation in the U.S. and other countries. THE WORLD STANDARD Intercontinental range, record-setting speed, advanced technology, unrivaled utility and top-rated worldwide product support. The World Standard™ isn’t just a company tagline, it’s a benchmark by which all others must be measured. BEIJING (北京): +86 10 8535 1866 HONG KONG (香港): +852 2918 1600 SINGAPORE (新加坡): +65 6572 7777 GULFSTREAM.COM G650ER, G650, G600, G500, G550, G450, G280 and G150 are trademarks or registered trademarks of Gulfstream Aerospace Corporation in the U.S. and other countries. TWO WAYS TWO WAYS TO CONQUER THE WORLD. TO CONQUER THE WORLD. 广告 two ways to conquer the world. Now you have two choices for superior, ultra-long-range capability. The 5,950 nm Falcon 7X—the fastest selling Falcon ever (and with Now you have two choices for superior, ultra-long-range capability. The 5,950 nm Falcon 7X—the fastest selling Falcon ever (and with good reason). Or the new, 6,450 nm Now you have two choices for superior, ultra-long-range capability.good Thereason).
    [Show full text]
  • RASG-PA ESC/29 — WP/04 14/11/17 Twenty
    RASG‐PA ESC/29 — WP/04 14/11/17 Twenty ‐ Ninth Regional Aviation Safety Group — Pan America Executive Steering Committee Meeting (RASG‐PA ESC/29) ICAO NACC Regional Office, Mexico City, Mexico, 29‐30 November 2017 Agenda Item 3: Items/Briefings of interest to the RASG‐PA ESC PROPOSAL TO AMEND ICAO FLIGHT DATA ANALYSIS PROGRAMME (FDAP) RECOMMENDATION AND STANDARD TO EXPAND AEROPLANES´ WEIGHT THRESHOLD (Presented by Flight Safety Foundation and supported by Airbus, ATR, Embraer, IATA, Brazil ANAC, ICAO SAM Office, and SRVSOP) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Flight Data Analysis Program (FDAP) working group comprised by representatives of Airbus, ATR, Embraer, IATA, Brazil ANAC, ICAO SAM Office, and SRVSOP, is in the process of preparing a proposal to expand the number of functional flight data analysis programs. It is anticipated that a greater number of Flight Data Analysis Programs will lead to significantly greater safety levels through analysis of critical event sets and incidents. Action: The FDAP working group is requesting support for greater implementation of FDAP/FDMP throughout the Pan American Regions and consideration of new ICAO standards through the actions outlined in Section 4 of this working paper. Strategic Safety Objectives: References: Annex 6 ‐ Operation of Aircraft, Part 1 sections as mentioned in this working paper RASG‐PA ESC/28 ‐ WP/09 presented at the ICAO SAM Regional Office, 4 to 5 May 2017. 1. Introduction 1.1 Flight Data Recorders have long been used as one of the most important tools for accident investigations such that the term “black box” and its recovery is well known beyond the aviation industry.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Department of Transportation Federal
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ORDER TRANSPORTATION JO 7340.2E FEDERAL AVIATION Effective Date: ADMINISTRATION July 24, 2014 Air Traffic Organization Policy Subject: Contractions Includes Change 1 dated 11/13/14 https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/atpubs/CNT/3-3.HTM A 3- Company Country Telephony Ltr AAA AVICON AVIATION CONSULTANTS & AGENTS PAKISTAN AAB ABELAG AVIATION BELGIUM ABG AAC ARMY AIR CORPS UNITED KINGDOM ARMYAIR AAD MANN AIR LTD (T/A AMBASSADOR) UNITED KINGDOM AMBASSADOR AAE EXPRESS AIR, INC. (PHOENIX, AZ) UNITED STATES ARIZONA AAF AIGLE AZUR FRANCE AIGLE AZUR AAG ATLANTIC FLIGHT TRAINING LTD. UNITED KINGDOM ATLANTIC AAH AEKO KULA, INC D/B/A ALOHA AIR CARGO (HONOLULU, UNITED STATES ALOHA HI) AAI AIR AURORA, INC. (SUGAR GROVE, IL) UNITED STATES BOREALIS AAJ ALFA AIRLINES CO., LTD SUDAN ALFA SUDAN AAK ALASKA ISLAND AIR, INC. (ANCHORAGE, AK) UNITED STATES ALASKA ISLAND AAL AMERICAN AIRLINES INC. UNITED STATES AMERICAN AAM AIM AIR REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AIM AIR AAN AMSTERDAM AIRLINES B.V. NETHERLANDS AMSTEL AAO ADMINISTRACION AERONAUTICA INTERNACIONAL, S.A. MEXICO AEROINTER DE C.V. AAP ARABASCO AIR SERVICES SAUDI ARABIA ARABASCO AAQ ASIA ATLANTIC AIRLINES CO., LTD THAILAND ASIA ATLANTIC AAR ASIANA AIRLINES REPUBLIC OF KOREA ASIANA AAS ASKARI AVIATION (PVT) LTD PAKISTAN AL-AAS AAT AIR CENTRAL ASIA KYRGYZSTAN AAU AEROPA S.R.L. ITALY AAV ASTRO AIR INTERNATIONAL, INC. PHILIPPINES ASTRO-PHIL AAW AFRICAN AIRLINES CORPORATION LIBYA AFRIQIYAH AAX ADVANCE AVIATION CO., LTD THAILAND ADVANCE AVIATION AAY ALLEGIANT AIR, INC. (FRESNO, CA) UNITED STATES ALLEGIANT AAZ AEOLUS AIR LIMITED GAMBIA AEOLUS ABA AERO-BETA GMBH & CO., STUTTGART GERMANY AEROBETA ABB AFRICAN BUSINESS AND TRANSPORTATIONS DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF AFRICAN BUSINESS THE CONGO ABC ABC WORLD AIRWAYS GUIDE ABD AIR ATLANTA ICELANDIC ICELAND ATLANTA ABE ABAN AIR IRAN (ISLAMIC REPUBLIC ABAN OF) ABF SCANWINGS OY, FINLAND FINLAND SKYWINGS ABG ABAKAN-AVIA RUSSIAN FEDERATION ABAKAN-AVIA ABH HOKURIKU-KOUKUU CO., LTD JAPAN ABI ALBA-AIR AVIACION, S.L.
    [Show full text]
  • FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 26-67 the Group’S Functional and Presentation Currency Is AUD ($)
    APPENDIX 4E FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2012 (PREVIOUS CORRESPONDING PERIOD: YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2011) RESULTS FOR ANNOUNCEMENT TO MARKET FY2012 FY2011 % $’000 $’000 Revenue up 14.5 273,145 238,488 Profit after tax up 44.9 25,497 17,593 Profit after tax attributable to members up 44.9 25,497 17,593 Net profit for the period attributable to members up 44.9 25,497 17,593 Profit after tax increased due to improved passenger revenue, the new income stream from Ambulance Victoria contract which commenced on 1 July 2012, improved demand for charter services, higher enrolment of trainee pilots and continuous cost-reduction programmes. Amount Franked Amount Dividends (Ordinary Shares) Per Security Per Security Final dividend: - current reporting period 9.0 cents 9.0 cents - previous reporting period 7.1 cents 7.1 cents Interim dividend: - current reporting period - - - previous reporting period - - Record date for determining entitlements to the final dividend will be 14 September 2012. Dividends will be paid on 30 November 2012 subject to approval by shareholders at the Annual General Meeting. Previous Earnings per Ordinary Current Corresponding Fully Paid Share (EPS) Period Period Basic EPS 23.1 ¢ 15.8 ¢ Diluted EPS 23.1 ¢ 15.8 ¢ Net Tangible Asset Backing Per Ordinary Security $1.54¢ $1.36¢ The attached Annual Report for the year ended 30 June 2012, prepared pursuant to Appendix 4E and ASX Listing Rule 4.3A, has been audited. For personal use only THE STORY The First 10 Years ANNUALFor personal use only REPORT FOR THE FINANCIAL YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2012 REGIONAL EXPRESS HOLDINGS LIMITED Regional Express Value Statement What does it profit a company if it gains the whole world and loses its soul Customer We believe that we can only count on ourselves for our continued success: We are committed to providing our customers with safe and reliable air transportation with heartfelt hospitality.
    [Show full text]
  • Australian ANTARCTIC Magazine ISSUE 18 2010 Australian
    AusTRALIAN ANTARCTIC MAGAZINE ISSUE 18 2010 AusTRALIAN ANTARCTIC ISSUE 2010 MAGAZINE 18 The Australian Antarctic Division, a Division of the Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts, leads Australia’s Antarctic program and seeks CONTENTS to advance Australia’s Antarctic interests in pursuit of its vision of having ‘Antarctica valued, protected EXPLORING THE SOUTHERN OCEAN and understood’. It does this by managing Australian government activity in Antarctica, providing transport Southern Ocean marine life in focus 1 and logistic support to Australia’s Antarctic research Snails and ‘snot’ tell acid story 4 program, maintaining four permanent Australian research stations, and conducting scientific research Science thrown overboard 6 programs both on land and in the Southern Ocean. Antarctica – a catalyst for science communication 8 Australia’s four Antarctic goals are: First non-lethal whale study answers big questions 9 • To maintain the Antarctic Treaty System Journal focuses on Antarctic research 11 and enhance Australia’s influence in it; • To protect the Antarctic environment; BROKE–West breaks ground in marine research 11 • To understand the role of Antarctica in EAST ANTARCTIC CENSUS the global climate system; and Shedding light on the sea floor 13 • To undertake scientific work of practical, economic and national significance. Plankton in the spotlight 15 Australian Antarctic Magazine seeks to inform the Sorting the catch 16 Australian and international Antarctic community Using fish to identify ecological regions 17 about the activities of the Australian Antarctic program. Opinions expressed in Australian Antarctic Magazine International flavour enhances Japanese research cruise 18 do not necessarily represent the position of the Australian Government.
    [Show full text]
  • Operation Management Is a Functional Field of Business with Clear Line Management Responsibilities
    7 CHAPTER II LITERATURE REVIEW 2.1 Operations Management Operations Management is defined as the design, operation, and improvement of the systems that create and deliver the firm’s primary products and services. Like marketing and finance, operation management is a functional field of business with clear line management responsibilities. This point is important because operations management is frequently confused with operation research and management science and industrial engineering (Chase, 2001, pp.6-7). Operations management decisions at the strategic level impact the company’s long-range effectiveness in terms of how it can address its customer’s needs. Thus, for the firm to succeed, these decisions must be in alignment with the corporate strategy. Decisions made at the strategic level become the fixed conditions or operating constrains under which the term must operate in both the intermediate and short term. At the next level in the decision-making process, tactical planning primarily addresses how to efficiently schedule material and labor within the constraints of previously made strategic decisions. Issues on which Operation Management concentrates on this level include: How many workers do we need? When do we need them? Should we work overtime or put on a second shift? When should we have material delivered? Should we have a finished goods inventory? These tactical 8 decisions, in turn, become the operating constraints under which operational planning and control decisions are made (Chase, 2001, p8). 2.2 Achieving Competitive Advantage through Operations Competitive advantage implies the creation of a system that has a unique advantage over its competitors. The idea is to create customer value in an efficient and sustainable way.
    [Show full text]
  • Change 3, FAA Order 7340.2A Contractions
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION CHANGE FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 7340.2A CHG 3 SUBJ: CONTRACTIONS 1. PURPOSE. This change transmits revised pages to Order JO 7340.2A, Contractions. 2. DISTRIBUTION. This change is distributed to select offices in Washington and regional headquarters, the William J. Hughes Technical Center, and the Mike Monroney Aeronautical Center; to all air traffic field offices and field facilities; to all airway facilities field offices; to all international aviation field offices, airport district offices, and flight standards district offices; and to the interested aviation public. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. July 29, 2010. 4. EXPLANATION OF CHANGES. Changes, additions, and modifications (CAM) are listed in the CAM section of this change. Changes within sections are indicated by a vertical bar. 5. DISPOSITION OF TRANSMITTAL. Retain this transmittal until superseded by a new basic order. 6. PAGE CONTROL CHART. See the page control chart attachment. Y[fa\.Uj-Koef p^/2, Nancy B. Kalinowski Vice President, System Operations Services Air Traffic Organization Date: k/^///V/<+///0 Distribution: ZAT-734, ZAT-464 Initiated by: AJR-0 Vice President, System Operations Services 7/29/10 JO 7340.2A CHG 3 PAGE CONTROL CHART REMOVE PAGES DATED INSERT PAGES DATED CAM−1−1 through CAM−1−2 . 4/8/10 CAM−1−1 through CAM−1−2 . 7/29/10 1−1−1 . 8/27/09 1−1−1 . 7/29/10 2−1−23 through 2−1−27 . 4/8/10 2−1−23 through 2−1−27 . 7/29/10 2−2−28 . 4/8/10 2−2−28 . 4/8/10 2−2−23 .
    [Show full text]
  • Method of Working Plan
    METHOD OF WORKING PLAN Perth Airport: Weekly Runway Maintenance - 2020 Document ID: MOWP YPPH 001-20 Version Number: 2 Approval Date: 14 February 2020 Commencement Date: 3rd January 2020 Completion Date: 31st December 2020 MOWP Expiry Date: 31st December 2020 MOWP 001 -20 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Version Table of Contents ii SECTION 2 WORKS INFORMATION ...................................................................................4 2.1 Scope of works ................................................................................................................................... 4 2.2 Works Timing ...................................................................................................................................... 5 2.3 Delayed Flights ................................................................................................................................... 5 SECTION 3 RESTRICTIONS TO AIRCRAFT OPERATIONS ..............................................6 3.1 Restrictions by Stage ......................................................................................................................... 6 3.2 NOTAMS............................................................................................................................................. 7 3.3 Aircraft Emergencies .......................................................................................................................... 8 3.4 Airport Emergencies ..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]