Eglinton Crosstown Light Rail Transit Project East of Black Creek Drive To

Eglinton Crosstown Light Rail Transit Project East of Black Creek Drive to Jane Street And the Maintenance and Storage Facility Environmental Noise and Vibration Assessment

Novus Reference No. 12-0167 Version No. Final March 27, 2013

NOVUS PROJECT TEAM: Scientist: Kevin Carr, P.Phys. Specialist: Brad Pridham, P.Eng., Ph.D. Specialist: R. L. Scott Penton, P.Eng. Project Manager: Scott Shayko, Hon.B.Comm, B.Sc.

Air Quality | Sound, Vibration & EMI/RFI | Sustainable Water | Wind & Climate Novus Environmental Inc. | 150 Research Lane, Suite 105, Guelph, Ontario, Canada N1G 4T2 e-mail [email protected] tel 226.706.8080 fax 226.706.8081

This page intentionally left blank for 2-sided printing purposes

Environmental Noise and Vibration Assessment March 19, 2013

Table of Contents

1.0 Introduction ...... 1 1.1 Project Background ...... 1 1.1.1 2010 Environmental Project Report ...... 1 1.1.2 Current Study - 2013 Environmental Project Report Addendum ...... 2 1.2 Key Features Within the Study Area ...... 2 1.3 Nature of the Surrounding Area ...... 3 1.3.1 Jane Street to Western Portal ...... 4 1.3.2 Tunnel Section ...... 4 1.3.3 MSF and Stations ...... 4 1.3.4 Mount Dennis to West of Keele Street ...... 4

2.0 Noise and Vibration Assessment Criteria ...... 4 2.1 Noise From LRT Surface Operations ...... 5 2.2 Noise From “Stationary” Operations ...... 5 2.3 Vibration From LRT Operations ...... 7 2.3.1 Residential ...... 7 2.3.2 Vibration-Sensitive Industrial / Commercial Uses ...... 7 2.4 Ground-Borne Noise from LRT Operations ...... 8 2.5 Construction Noise ...... 9 2.5.1 Provincial Policy ...... 9 2.5.2 City of Toronto Noise Bylaw ...... 9 2.6 Construction Vibration ...... 9

3.0 Assessment Procedures ...... 10 3.1 Operational Noise Modelling ...... 11 3.1.1 Surface Operations ...... 11 3.1.2 “Stationary” Operations ...... 11 3.2 Operational Vibration Modelling ...... 13 3.3 Construction Noise Modelling ...... 14 3.4 Construction Vibration Modelling ...... 14

4.0 Jane Street to Western Portal ...... 14 4.1 Operational Noise ...... 14 4.1.1 LRT Surface Operations ...... 14 4.1.2 “Stationary” Operations ...... 15 4.2 Operational Vibration ...... 15 4.3 Construction Noise ...... 16 4.4 Construction Vibration ...... 16

5.0 Tunnel Section ...... 17 5.1 Operational Noise ...... 17 5.2 Operational Vibration ...... 17 5.3 Construction Noise ...... 18

Novus Environmental | i

March 19, 2013 Environmental Noise and Vibration Assessment

5.4 Construction Vibration ...... 18

6.0 MSF and Stations ...... 18 6.1 Operational Noise ...... 19 6.1.1 LRT Surface Operations ...... 19 6.1.2 “Stationary” Operations ...... 19 6.1.3 Potential Mitigation Options ...... 20 6.2 Operational Vibration ...... 22 6.3 Construction Noise ...... 22 6.4 Construction Vibration ...... 22

7.0 Mount Dennis to West of Keele Street ...... 23 7.1 Operational Noise ...... 23 7.1.1 LRT Surface Operations ...... 23 7.1.2 “Stationary” Operations ...... 23 7.2 Operational Vibration ...... 23 7.3 Construction Noise ...... 24 7.4 Construction Vibration ...... 24

8.0 Conclusions ...... 25 8.1 Operational Noise ...... 25 8.1.1 Surface Operations ...... 25 8.1.2 “Stationary” Operations ...... 25 8.2 Operational Vibration ...... 25 8.3 Construction Noise ...... 25 8.4 Construction Vibration ...... 26

References ...... 27

Novus Environmental | ii

Environmental Noise and Vibration Assessment March 19, 2013

List of Tables

Table 1: Noise Limits for LRT Surface Operations ...... 5 Table 2: Noise Limits for LRT Ancillary Operations (Stations, Vent Shafts) ...... 6 Table 3: Vibration Criteria for Vibration Sensitive Uses ...... 8 Table 4: NPC-115 Maximum Noise Emission Levels for Typical Construction Equipment ...... 9 Table 5: City of Toronto Vibration By-law – Construction Vibration Limits ...... 10 Table 6: Generic Sound Power Level for Station Fans (3/4 Speed Operation) ...... 12 Table 7: Generic Silencer Insertion Losses ...... 13 Table 8: LRT Surface Operations at Tunnel Portal and East - Predicted Sound Levels, Daytime .... 15 Table 9: LRT Surface Operations at Tunnel Portal and East - Predicted Sound Levels, Night- time ...... 15 Table 10: Distance From Track Centreline to Meet Vibration Criteria ...... 15 Table 11: Construction Activity Zone of Influence By Activity ...... 17 Table 12: “Stationary” Noise Impacts – Predicted Sound Levels ...... 20 Table 13: “Stationary” Noise Impacts – Predicted Sound Levels – Mitigated ...... 21 Table 14: LRT Surface Operations at Tunnel Portal and East - Predicted Sound Levels, Daytime .... 23 Table 15: LRT Surface Operations at Tunnel Portal and East - Predicted Sound Levels, Night- time ...... 23

List of Figures

Figure 1: Study Area Figure 2: Key Track Features Within the Study Area Figure 3: Nature of the Surrounding Area Figure 4: Generic Vibration Criterion (VC) Curves for Vibration-Sensitive Equipment - Showing also the ISO Guidelines for People in Buildings (From Gordon) Figure 5: Jane Street to Western Portal – Operational Noise Figure 6: Jane Street to Western Portal – Predicted Operational Vibration Levels Figure 7: Jane Street to Western Portal – Construction Vibration Zone of Influence Figure 8: Tunnel Section – Predicted Operational Vibration Levels Figure 9: Tunnel Section – Construction Vibration Zone of Influence Figure 10: MSF and Stations – Predicted Off-Site Noise Levels Figure 11: MSF and Stations – Predicted Off-Site Noise Levels Including Mitigation Figure 12: MSF and Stations – Predicted Operational Vibration Levels Figure 13: MSF and Stations – Construction Vibration Zone of Influence Figure 14: Mount Dennis to West of Keele Street – Operational Noise Figure 15: Mount Dennis to West of Keele Street – Predicted Operational Vibration Levels Figure 16: Mount Dennis to West of Keele Street – Construction Vibration Zone of Influence

List of Appendices

Appendix A: Traffic Data

Novus Environmental | iii

March 19, 2013 Environmental Noise and Vibration Assessment

This page intentionally left blank for 2-sided printing purposes

Novus Environmental | iv

Environmental Noise and Vibration Assessment March 19, 2013

1.0 Introduction

Novus Environmental Inc. (Novus) was retained by McCormick Rankin (MRC), a member of MMM Group, to assess the potential environment noise and vibration impacts from construction and operation of the proposed Eglinton Light Rail Transit (LRT) project, for the section between East of Black Creek Drive to Jane Street, in Toronto, Ontario. This section includes a Maintenance and Storage Facility (MSF).

1.1 Project Background

1.1.1 2010 Environmental Project Report

In 2008, a Provincial Environmental Assessment under Ontario Regulation (O. Reg.) 231/08, the “Transit Project Assessment Process” Regulation, was initiated for a 33-km light rail transit (LRT) project in the Eglinton Avenue corridor in the City of Toronto. The project, named the Eglinton Crosstown LRT, linked Pearson International Airport in the west to Kennedy Station in the east. It included:

 A surface LRT section primarily in the centre of Eglinton Avenue between Pearson International Airport and east of Black Creek Drive;  An underground LRT section below Eglinton Avenue from east of Black Creek Drive to east of Brentcliffe Road;  A surface LRT section in the centre of Eglinton Avenue between east of Brentcliffe Road and Don Mills Road;  A short underground LRT section below Eglinton Avenue at Don Mills Road; and  A surface LRT section from Don Mills Road to Kennedy Road.

In Spring 2009, during the planning phase of the Project, the Province of Ontario announced an investment of $8.15B ($2008) for the Eglinton Crosstown LRT and three other LRT lines: Scarborough RT Conversion/Extension, Finch West LRT, and Sheppard East LRT. These projects were part of a wider municipal plan initially known as Transit City, and identified as part of the Top 15 priority projects in the Metrolinx Big Move.

An Environmental Project Report (EPR) was completed in March 2010 under O. Reg. 231/08 and was approved by the Ontario Ministry of the Environment in May of 2010.

About the same time as the approval of the EPR, Metrolinx, the Provincial agency providing funding for the project, had indicated that the project would be divided into two phases at Jane Street due to funding limitations. As a result, the 19-km section from Jane Street to Kennedy Station would receive funding immediately and undergo implementation, while the 14-km section from Jane Street to Pearson International Airport would be deferred. Work has progressed on the first phase of the Project, including commencement in the summer of 2011 of constructing the launch site in which tunnel boring machines will be deployed to build the underground section.

Novus Environmental | 1

March 19, 2013 Environmental Noise and Vibration Assessment

1.1.2 Current Study - 2013 Environmental Project Report Addendum

While undertaking subsequent preliminary design, recommended changes to the initial project have been identified and are being reviewed under O.Reg. 231/08. There are three changes to the project description that require completion of an EPR Addendum. They are:

1. Change in alignment between the tunnel portal location east of Black Creek Drive and Jane Street; 2. A new Maintenance and Storage Facility north of Eglinton Avenue and west of Black Creek Drive; and 3. Change in alignment between Brentcliffe Road and the Don Valley Parkway.

This environmental noise and vibration assessment addresses the potential noise and vibration impacts from operation of the LRT system in the study area; and the potential noise and vibration impacts from construction.

The noise impacts of the entire Eglinton LRT project were previously assessed as part of the Class Environmental Assessment (EA) process. Appendix H of the original EA provides the environmental noise and vibration impact assessment, conducted by J. E. Coulter Associates Ltd., dated February 2010.

This assessment is an update to the original EA for the study section between east of Black Creek Drive to Jane Street, and examines the effects of the revised LRT design in this area. The study area is identified in Figure 1. Key changes in this area include:

 Addition of the MSF;  Shift of the LRT alignment from the centre median of Eglinton Avenue West to the north side of Eglinton Avenue West right-of-way;  New elevated LRT structure over Black Creek and Black Creek Drive;  Removal of the previously proposed Black Creek Stop;  New Mount Dennis Station located underground at the railway corridor which consolidates the previous Black Creek Drive and Weston Road stations;  Surface bus terminal located on the former Kodak Lands;  Revised connecting track configuration between the LRT mainline and the proposed MSF; and  Extended underground LRT between Mount Dennis Station and a new LRT portal within the centre median of Eglinton Avenue West, just east of Jane Street.

1.2 Key Features Within the Study Area

The proposed LRT line within the study area will consist of at-grade, tunnel, and elevated sections. The LRT line will run along or to just to the north of the existing Eglinton Avenue alignment. Moving from east to west, the proposed LRT line will consist of:

 The tunnel portal / connection to Eglinton Avenue, starting at approximately 350 m west of Keele Street, at approx. Station 106+300;

Novus Environmental | 2

Environmental Noise and Vibration Assessment March 19, 2013

 An elevated structure, varying between 0 and approximately 6 m above grade, running over Black Creek Drive and Keelesdale Drive, running from approx. Station 106+300 to 105+900;  The proposed Mount Dennis Station, located underground, which will include station entrances and ventilation shafts (at approx. Station 105+600, straddling the Canadian Pacific Rail corridor);  The Proposed Bus Station and Passenger Pick-Up and Drop-Off (PPUDO), approximately north of the proposed Mount Dennis Station, at the approx. Station 105+700;  The Proposed Maintenance Storage Facility (MSF) north of Eglinton Avenue and west of Black Creek Drive, bounded on the west by the Canadian Pacific Railway corridor and Industry Drive on the north;  Cross-over boxes are located at grade immediately to the east of the Mount Dennis station (at approx. Station 105+800), and on elevated structure at the crossing of Keelesdale Drive (at approx. Station 106+000);  Tunnel section from Mount Dennis Station to a tunnel portal, at approx. Station 105+000;  At-grade section from the tunnel portal at approx. Station 105+000, extending at-grade past the western-most edge of the study area.

The approximate location of the track features are shown in Figures 2a and 2b.

The Mount Dennis Station and elevated structure will be constructed using open construction, and the tunnel section from the station to the western portal will be constructed using “cut and cover” techniques. The eastern portion of the tunnel will be constructed using tunnel boring machines (TBMs).

1.3 Nature of the Surrounding Area

In undertaking the review of potential noise and vibration impacts, the study area has been broken up into four sections:

1) Jane Street to Western Portal, which examines impacts from the western study limit (approx. Station 104+700) to the tunnel portal at approx. Station 105+000. 2) Tunnel Section, which examines impacts from the tunnel section, from the western portal to the Mount Dennis Station (from approx. Station 105+000 to approx. Station 105+600). 3) MSF and Stations, which examines impacts surrounding the MSF, including impacts from the Bus Station, PPUDO, Mount Dennis Station, and Vents. 4) Mount Dennis to West of Keele Street, which examines impacts from approx. Station 105+900 to the eastern study limit (approx. Station 106+400).

Figures 3a through 3d are maps showing these sections and highlighting the nature of the surrounding area.

Novus Environmental | 3

March 19, 2013 Environmental Noise and Vibration Assessment

1.3.1 Jane Street to Western Portal

 Park land borders Eglinton Avenue to the north and south (see Figure 3a).

1.3.2 Tunnel Section

 Along both sides of Eglinton Avenue, there are residential and commercial properties, with high- rise residential just east of the proposed western portal (see Figure 3b).  At the intersection of Eglinton Avenue and Weston Road, there is a bank, and 2 churches. The bank will be acquired as part of this project.  At the intersection of Eglinton Avenue and the CP/GO Rail line, there is a daycare, which will be acquired as part of this project (see Figure 3b).

1.3.3 MSF and Stations

 Eglinton Avenue in this area is significantly in-cut (see Figure 3c).  There is a CP/GO Rail line bordering the western edge of the proposed MSF property.  Along the southwestern border of the proposed MSF property, there are residential properties, with 2 high-rise residential properties south of the western corner of the proposed site.  To the north of the MSF, along Industry Street, there is a church.  Southeast of the proposed site, is Keelesdale Drive, which is to be closed as part of this project. The residential property along this street is to be acquired as part of this project.

1.3.4 Mount Dennis to West of Keele Street

 Eglinton Avenue is significantly in-cut from Weston Road to Black Creek Drive (see Figure 3d).  Eglinton Avenue is bordered by park land for the majority of this section.  To the south of the intersection of Eglinton Avenue and Black Creek Drive there is a No Frills.  East of the proposed West Launch Shaft, there are residential properties to the south of Eglinton, and the City of York Museum to the north.

2.0 Noise and Vibration Assessment Criteria

The noise and vibration criteria used in this assessment are consistent with those used in the original EA analysis, and are based on protocols developed by the Ministry of the Environment (MOE) and Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) for previous transit system expansions (MOE/TTC 1993, MOE 1995). Additional criteria for ground-borne noise impacts were developed based on criteria from the U.S. Federal Transit Authority (FTA). Details on the guidelines are provided below.

Novus Environmental | 4

Environmental Noise and Vibration Assessment March 19, 2013

2.1 Noise From LRT Surface Operations

Operational noise limits for LRT cars running on the surface are set under the MOE/TTC “Protocols for Noise and Vibration Assessment” which were developed in 1993. The “Protocol for Noise and Vibration Assessment for the Proposed Eglinton West Rapid Transit Line” sets out the following limits for noise (MOE/TTC 1993).

Points of reception for noise include existing and approved residential development, nursing homes, group homes, hospitals, and other such institutional land uses where people reside. It does not apply to commercial or industrial land uses. Daytime points of reception are any outdoor area where noise from the LRT system may be received, 15 m or more from the track centreline. Night-time points of reception are in the plane of any bedroom window where the noise is received, more than 15 m from the track centreline. The respective guideline limits are shown in the following table:

Table 1: Noise Limits for LRT Surface Operations Time Period Guideline Limit

Daytime (0700‐2300h) 55 dBA Leq (Day), or existing ambient, whichever is higher Night‐time (2300‐0700h) 50 dBA Leq (Night), or existing ambient, whichever is higher Pass‐by 80 dBA Lmax during the pass‐by Mitigation Required: If above limits are exceeded by > 5 dB

Where required, all mitigation measures must ensure that the predicted sound levels are as close to or lower than the above limits as is technologically, economically, and administratively feasible.

2.2 Noise From “Stationary” Operations

The MSF, stations, and associated ventilation shafts are considered to be “Ancillary Facilities” under the MOE / TTC guidelines. The Mount Dennis Station will have an HVAC system for station comfort ventilation, and an emergency fire ventilation system, which will be used to supply air to the stations and tunnel system. Noise from the PPUDO and Bus Station will be dominated by bus activity. Noise from the MSF will include HVAC and LRT activity.

TTC Design Manual DM-0403-00 (TTC 1994) sets out requirements for station ventilation fans. Noise from station ventilation fans (excluding emergency ventilation fans) should not exceed 60 dBA on enclosed platforms. Noise from “Ancillary Equipment” should not exceed 60 dBA at 1 m distance in all public areas.

In addition, for these facilities, MOE Publication NPC-205 noise guidelines apply. These guidelines state that the 1-hour average sound level from the equipment (Leq (1-hr) values measured in dBA), must meet the following limits at all off-site noise sensitive points of reception:

Novus Environmental | 5

March 19, 2013 Environmental Noise and Vibration Assessment

Table 2: Noise Limits for LRT Ancillary Operations (Stations, Vent Shafts) Time Period Guideline Limit

Daytime (0700‐1900h) 50 dBA Leq (1‐hr), or existing ambient, whichever is higher Evening (1900‐2300h) 47 dBA Leq (1‐hr), or existing ambient, whichever is higher Night‐time (2300‐0700h) 45 dBA Leq (1‐hr), or existing ambient, whichever is higher Notes:  Limits for Class 1 Urban area are shown

Noise sensitive points of reception include but are not limited to:

 Permanent and seasonal residences;  Hotels, motels, campgrounds;  Noise sensitive institutional uses such as hospitals, daycares, nursing homes, and schools; and  Places of worship.

The MOE guidelines require that impacts be assessed for “predictable worst-case operating scenario”. The four tunnel ventilation fans are the dominant noise sources, and will be used in one of three modes:

a) Regular Operations

During regular operations of the LRT system, the fans operate on half (½) speed on a continuous basis during warm days.

b) Emergency Operation

In emergency operation, all fans will operate at full speed. As an emergency, this situation is excluded from the MOE’s noise guidelines.

c) Track Maintenance

During overnight track maintenance, the fans will be operated at three-quarter (¾) speed. The fans could run for extended periods of time between 0200 – 0600h.

d) Testing

Full speed testing of the fans occurs on a weekly basis. The fans are operated in both directions (supply and discharge) at full speed for up to 60 seconds for each direction (2 minute total test time).

From the above, the “predictable worst-case scenario” is the track maintenance operations, which occurs for extended periods of time, during the over-night period. Despite the 2-minute long higher sound level during full speed testing, average hourly sound levels will still be higher for maintenance operations.

The noise guidelines also provide for procedures and adjustments for addressing noise of especially annoying character, such as tonal noise, beats, impulsive noise and quasi-steady impulsive noise

Novus Environmental | 6

Environmental Noise and Vibration Assessment March 19, 2013

(MOE 1977 a,b). Based on the generic sound data provided for the tunnel ventilation fans (see Section 3.1.2) sound from the ventilation fans will likely be tonal in nature. In accordance with Publication NPC-104 guidelines, a + 5 dB penalty has been applied in predicting noise impacts from these sources (MOE 1978).

2.3 Vibration From LRT Operations

2.3.1 Residential

Ground-borne vibration from LRT operations is addressed under the MOE/ TTC Protocols. Criteria are provided for maximum vibration levels outside of the premises of the receptor (outside of the foundation). Similar to noise, the point of assessment is any outdoor point on the property more than 15 m from the track centreline.

Vibration is measured in terms of root-mean-squared (rms) vibration velocity, in (mm/s). Only vertical axis vibration is included in the assessment. For LRT systems, this is the dominant direction of vibration excitation.

The guideline limit for vibration is 0.10 mm/s rms. When vibration levels are predicted to exceed this threshold, then mitigation measures need to be investigated and implemented if they are technically, economically, and administratively feasible.

In terms of human perception, a 0.10 mm/s vibration velocity level is just perceptible for most people.

2.3.2 Vibration-Sensitive Industrial / Commercial Uses

Meeting the vibration perceptibility criteria of 0.10 mm/s discussed above is generally more than adequate for most commercial and industrial uses, which are usually less vibration-sensitive than residential uses (ISO, 1985). However, in some situations, where vibration-sensitive equipment is in use, such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) machines, or scanning electron microscopes, stricter limits are required.

For these types of installations, the vibration criteria (VC) curves are widely accepted as a basis for evaluating potential impacts at facilities where vibration-free performance is critical (Gordon 1999).

The limits are provided in terms of rms vibration velocity, in 1/3rd-octave frequency bands. For a site to comply with a particular equipment category, the measured one-third octave band velocity spectrum must lie below the appropriate criterion curve shown in Figure 4. Maximum allowed vibration levels and the types of suitable uses are discussed in Table 3 below.

Novus Environmental | 7

March 19, 2013 Environmental Noise and Vibration Assessment

Table 3: Vibration Criteria for Vibration Sensitive Uses Maximum Criterion Curve Allowable Vibration Description of Use (See Figure 1) Level Above 8 Hz (mm/s., rms) Workshop Distinctly perceptible vibration. Appropriate for general 0.800 (ISO 2613) industrial uses. Office Perceptible vibration. Appropriate for offices and non‐sensitive 0.400 (ISO 2613) areas. Barely perceptible vibration. Appropriate to sleep areas in most Residence, Day 0.200 instances. Probably adequate for computer equipment, probe (ISO 2613) test equipment and low‐power (to 20X) microscopes. Adopted for Residential Uses (overall vibration) in this Operating Theatre/ Assessment (MOE/TTC) Limit of Human 0.100 Vibration is imperceptible. Suitable for sensitive sleep areas. Perception Suitable in most instances for microscopes to 100X and for (ISO 2613) other equipment of low sensitivity. Adequate in most instances for optical microscopes to 400X, VC‐A 0.051 microbalances, optical balances, proximity and projection aligners, etc. An appropriate standard for optical microscopes to 1000X, VC‐B 0.025 inspection and lithography equipment (including steppers) to 3 micron line widths. A good standard for most lithography and inspection VC‐C 0.013 equipment to 1 micron detail size. Suitable in most instances for the most demanding equipment VC‐D 0.006 including electron microscopes (TEMs and SEMs) and E‐Beam systems, operating to the limits of their capability. Suitable in most instances for the most demanding equipment VC‐E 0.003 including electron microscopes (TEMs and SEMs) and E‐Beam systems, operating to the limits of their capability. Notes:  Adopted from Gordon, 1999.  Levels are measured in 1/3rd-octave bands between 8 Hz and 100 Hz.  Maximum allowable vibration levels below 8 Hz increase at 2v per doubling of frequency (where v is the allowed rms velocity), unless the equipment incorporates pneumatic isolation. For example, the limit at 4 Hz for VC-A equipment is (2 x 50 at 8 Hz) = 100 mm/s rms,

2.4 Ground-Borne Noise from LRT Operations

Ground-borne noise is created by ground-borne vibration transmitting into a building structure and causing the surface of interior walls and structural member to vibrate, resulting in potentially audible noise. According to the MOE/ TTC protocol, it is unlikely that audible ground-borne noise will result from vibration levels that meet the 0.10 mm/s rms residential vibration criterion. Vibration levels of 0.20 mm/s rms should generate indoor sound levels less than 35 dBA, which is reasonable for sleeping and unlikely to disturb residences (FTA 2006).

Novus Environmental | 8

Environmental Noise and Vibration Assessment March 19, 2013

2.5 Construction Noise

2.5.1 Provincial Policy

The MOE stipulates limits on noise emissions from individual items of equipment, rather than for overall construction noise. In the presence of persistent noise complaints, sound emission standards for the various types of construction equipment used on the project should be checked to ensure that they meet the specified limits contained in MOE Publication NPC-115 – “Construction Equipment”, as follows (MOE, 1977a):

Table 4: NPC-115 Maximum Noise Emission Levels for Typical Construction Equipment Maximum Sound Level [1] Type of Unit Distance (m) Power Rating (kW) (dBA) 83 15 < 75 Excavation Equipment [2] 85 15 > 75 Pneumatic Equipment [3] 85 7 ‐ Portable Compressors 76 7 ‐ Notes: [1] Maximum permissible sound levels presented here are for equipment manufactured after Jan. 1, 1981. [2] Excavation equipment includes bulldozers, backhoes, front end loaders, graders, excavators, steam rollers and other equipment capable of being used for similar applications. [3] Pneumatic equipment includes pavement breakers.

2.5.2 City of Toronto Noise Bylaw

The City of Toronto Noise By-law 111-2003 (as amended) includes provisions for addressing construction noise (Toronto 2003). Section 591-2.1 (C) addresses major transit projects, including the Eglinton Crosstown LRT project under review here.

No other provisions of the noise by-law apply to the project with the exception of (C) 3, which states that “All civil construction activities shall occur between 7:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m., except in the case of an emergency ...”

This time restriction does not apply to the welding or installation of rail, tunneling by tunnel boring machines ("TBM"), or other related rail and tunnel activities.

2.6 Construction Vibration

Construction vibration within the City is controlled by By-law 514-2008, which provides limits on maximum allowable vibration levels for construction and demolition activities (Toronto, 2008). The vibration limits are shown in the following table:

Novus Environmental | 9

March 19, 2013 Environmental Noise and Vibration Assessment

Table 5: City of Toronto Vibration By-law – Construction Vibration Limits Frequency of Vibration Maximum Allowable Peak Particle Velocity (mm/s) < 4 Hz 8 4 Hz to 10 Hz 15 > 10 Hz 25

The by-law identifies requirements for:

a) Preliminary studies of vibration impacts; b) The identification of a “vibration zone of influence”, where such a zone will extend beyond the property line / legal boundary of the construction site; c) The existence within the zone of influence of any buildings that have been designated under the Ontario Heritage Act; d) Pre-construction consultation with property owners within the zone of influence; e) Pre-construction measurements of ambient background vibration levels, and site inspections; and f) Development of a monitoring plan and continuous measurements of construction vibration during activities which may affect off-site receptors.

The vibration Zone of Influence is identified in the bylaw as the area beyond the property line of the construction site where vibration levels may exceed 5 mm/s.

It should be noted that vibration meeting the limits in Table 5 would be perceptible during the construction activity.

3.0 Assessment Procedures

As discussed previously, impacts were evaluated in four sections of the route:

1) Jane Street to Western Portal (Report Section 4), which examines impacts from the western study limit (approx. Station 104+700) to the tunnel portal at approx. Station 105+000. 2) Tunnel Section (Report Section 5), which examines impacts from the tunnel section, from the western portal to the Mount Dennis Station (from approx. Station 105+000 to approx. Station 105+600). 3) MSF and Stations (Report Section 6), which examines impacts surrounding the MSF, including impacts from the Bus Station, PPUDO, Mount Dennis Station, and Vents. 4) Mount Dennis to West of Keele Street (Report Section 7), which examines impacts from approx. Station 105+900 to the eastern study limit (approx. Station 106+400).

Novus Environmental | 10

Environmental Noise and Vibration Assessment March 19, 2013

3.1 Operational Noise Modelling

3.1.1 Surface Operations

Noise from surface LRT operations was modelled using a spreadsheet implementation of the FTA algorithms (FTA 2006). Noise emissions calculated using FTA were used as inputs for Cadna/A, a software implementation of the ISO 9613 noise propagation algorithms (ISO 1993, 1996). The modelling method accounts for:

 Source emission data/ specification of the proposed LRT vehicle (82 dBA at 7.5 m, 40 km/h);  Projected LRT vehicle speed (60 km/h);  Distance attenuation;  Screening effects of buildings, noise barriers, and topography; and  Ground attenuation.

LRT vehicle specifications were assumed to be the same as those in sub-appendix D of the 2010 EPR Noise Report (EPR Appendix H).

LRT Vehicle Movements

A total of 488 LRT vehicle movements per day were anticipated in the 2010 noise analysis (448 during the day, based on 4 min 20 sec headways, and 40 during the nighttime, based on 6 minute headways).

Other Roadway Traffic

Traffic data for major area roadways was obtained from MRC. Road traffic noise emission levels were calculated using the “Ontario Road Noise Analysis Method for Environmental Transportation (ORNAMENT)” algorithms (MOE 1989). Noise emissions calculated using ORNAMENT were used as inputs for Cadna/A, a software implementation of the ISO 9613 noise propagation algorithms.

Copies of the traffic data used in the analysis can be found in Appendix A.

3.1.2 “Stationary” Operations

Operational noise impacts from the MSF, stations, and associated ventilation equipment were modelled using Cadna/A, a computerized version of the internationally recognized ISO 9613 environmental noise propagation algorithms. Noise modelling based on ISO 9613 is the preferred approach of the MOE. The modelling method accounts for:

 Distance attenuation;  Source characteristics and directivity;  Screening effects of buildings, noise barriers, and topography;  Atmospheric absorption;  Ground attenuation; and

Novus Environmental | 11

March 19, 2013 Environmental Noise and Vibration Assessment

 Worst-case meteorological conditions (downwind, under a light temperature inversion).

The ISO 9613 noise model therefore provides a reasonable worst-case assessment of potential noise impacts, in that actual noise impacts at any given point of reception would generally be less than those predicted.

As described in ISO 9613-2, ground factor values that represent the effect of ground absorption on sound levels range between 0 and 1. Based on the specific site conditions, the ground factor values used in the modelling were a ground factor value of 0 for acoustically hard surfaces, such as asphalt and concrete, with absorptive areas (grass, trees, etc.) drawn in as local areas of ground absorption equal to 1. A default temperate of 10 ºC and 70 % relative humidity, typical of average Ontario conditions, were also used.

It should be noted that the current station design includes extending the tunnel fan and HVAC fan ventilation shafts above grade to the roof of the main entrance and secondary entrance buildings. Since emergency fire ventilation fans are assumed to be the dominant noise sources at the stations, HVAC impacts were modelled separately in order to recommend a maximum allowable sound power level for the HVAC noise emissions (the remaining sound energy between emergency fire vent impacts and the maximum allowable noise level / criteria).

Sound Emission Data

Bus activity at the proposed bus station is based on measurements of bus activity from previous studies. Bus operations were split into movements, accelerations, and idling, based on detailed queuing information provided by MRC. Bus operations are not currently planned between the hours of 01:00 and 06:00.

Noise from surface LRT operations was modelled using a spreadsheet implementation of the FTA algorithms. Noise emissions calculated using FTA were used as inputs for Cadna/A, a software implementation of the ISO 9613 noise propagation algorithms. The modelling method accounts for:

 Projected LRT vehicle speed within the MSF (10 km/h);  Distance attenuation;  Screening effects of buildings, noise barriers, and topography; and  Ground attenuation.

Base sound emission data and silencer performance for the emergency fire ventilation fans were the same as those used in the 2010 EPR study, for ¾ speed operation, typical of night-time maintenance usage.

Table 6: Generic Sound Power Level for Station Fans (3/4 Speed Operation) Sound Power Level (dB) in Each 1/1 Octave Band (Hz) Overall Sound Power 63 Hz 125 Hz 250 Hz 500 Hz 1000 Hz 2000 Hz 4000 Hz 8000 Hz dBA dBZ 109 107 123 109 108 105 100 98 116.4 123.6 Note: From sub-Appendix D of 2010 Noise Report (2010 EPR Appendix H)

Novus Environmental | 12

Environmental Noise and Vibration Assessment March 19, 2013

Table 7: Generic Silencer Insertion Losses Dynamic Silencer Insertion Loss (dB) in Each 1/1 Octave Band (Hz) 63 Hz 125 Hz 250 Hz 500 Hz 1000 Hz 2000 Hz 4000 Hz 8000 Hz 7 19 9 46 54 43 27 18 Note: From sub-Appendix D of 2010 Noise Report (2010 EPR Appendix H)

HVAC noise sources were not modelled using predicted sound level data; instead, maximum allowable sound level emissions were calculated to be the difference between the predicted emergency fire ventilation impacts and the relevant noise criteria.

Ambient Noise Levels and Applicable Guideline Limits

As discussed previously in Section 2.2, the applicable guideline limits for operational noise are the higher of the background ambient sound levels (generally due to road traffic) and the NPC-205 guideline minima.

Noise-sensitive receptors representative of worst-case impacts (highest potential sound levels from LRT station vents and lowest ambient noise levels) were identified. Traffic data for major area roadways was obtained from MRC. The lowest night-time one-hour average sound levels due to road traffic were then modelled using methods consistent with the “Ontario Road Noise Analysis Method for Environmental Transportation (ORNAMENT)” algorithms. For stationary operations including bus activity, ambient noise from between the hours of 01:00 and 06:00 was excluded from consideration. All other modelling scenarios were modelled including all potential hours of the day.

Copies of the traffic data used in the analysis can be found in Appendix A.

3.2 Operational Vibration Modelling

Vibration from surface LRT operations was modelled using a spreadsheet implementation of the U.S. Federal Transit Authority (FTA) environmental vibration model (FTA 2006). The model accounts for a number of factors including:

 Vehicle type and speed;  Track type and condition;  Presence of special track work such as double-ended pocket tracks or crossovers;  Track bed vibration mitigation treatments such as floating slabs, ballast mats, or resilient fasteners / ties; and  Distance from the track and the nature of the propagation path.

The vibration impact assessment assumes the track will be constructed using current TTC track bed and “double tie” designs, which reduce ground-borne noise and vibration. In accordance with the MOE/TTC guidelines, the assessment also assumes the vehicles are in good operating condition, with minimal wheel flats, operating on well-maintained rail, with minimal rail corrugation.

Novus Environmental | 13

March 19, 2013 Environmental Noise and Vibration Assessment

Operational vibration impacts were estimated assuming a complete lack of coupling losses – losses related to transmission from ground to building. In practice, vibration levels inside a residence are lower than those measured outside the building at grade. However, MOE/TTC guidelines require vibration criteria to be met outside the residence, at grade. Coupling losses for a standard wood- framed house have the potential to lead to vibration impacts approximately 2 times lower those outside of the structure.

Despite this conservative assumption, mitigation has been recommended in all areas showing an excess over City of Toronto vibration limits.

3.3 Construction Noise Modelling

Similar to operational noise impacts from the site ventilation equipment, noise impacts from construction activity were modelled using a software implementation of the internationally recognized ISO 9613 environmental noise propagation algorithms. The potential impacts of from the generic types of equipment anticipated to be in use were predicted.

3.4 Construction Vibration Modelling

Vibration impacts from surface construction equipment and the tunnel boring machine were predicted based on levels for generic types of construction equipment measured at various distances from the source, published in the literature (Wiss 1981, FTA 2006). This was used to identify a “zone of influence” per City of Toronto Noise Bylaw requirements.

4.0 Jane Street to Western Portal

The West Portal will be located approximately 350 m to the east of the intersection of Eglinton Avenue and Jane Street. See Figure 3a.

4.1 Operational Noise

4.1.1 LRT Surface Operations

Future “build” (with the LRT project in place) and future “no-build” (without the project) daytime and night-time sound levels resulting from the LRT operation were predicted using the LRT and ISO 9613 noise models. The results are tabulated below in Tables 8 and 9.

Novus Environmental | 14

Environmental Noise and Vibration Assessment March 19, 2013

Table 8: LRT Surface Operations at Tunnel Portal and East - Predicted Sound Levels, Daytime

Receptor Predicted Sound Level, Leq Day, dBA Change Future Build Future No‐build (dB) 40 Glenvalley Drive 59 59 0 Side Yard (1.5 m) 3597 Eglinton Avenue 65 65 0 Side Yard (1.5 m) 3588 Eglinton Avenue 65 64 1 Side Yard (1.5 m)

Table 9: LRT Surface Operations at Tunnel Portal and East - Predicted Sound Levels, Night-time

Receptor Predicted Sound Level, Leq Night, dBA Change Future Build Future No‐build (dB) 40 Glenvalley Drive 53 52 1 Facade(4.5 m) 3597 Eglinton Avenue 61 61 0 Facade (4.5 m) 3588 Eglinton Avenue 61 61 0 Facade (4.5 m)

Figures 5a and 5b show operational noise levels for the LRT line in terms of change from “future no- build” conditions. As the change between the two scenarios is less than 5 dB at all noise-sensitive receptors, under the applicable MOE/ TTC noise guidelines, noise mitigation measures are not required.

4.1.2 “Stationary” Operations

Not applicable in this area.

4.2 Operational Vibration

With respect to the EA Approved Plan, the location of the proposed tunnel is relatively unchanged in this area. Ground-borne vibration will be generated by underground operations of the LRT travelling through the tunnels and station. In assessing the potential for impacts, worst-case speeds of 60 km/h have been assumed, of an LRT vehicle passing through without stopping. The distances required to meet the criteria are provided in Table 10 below.

Table 10: Distance From Track Centreline to Meet Vibration Criteria Criteria Vibration Limit Distance From Track Centreline to Meet Guideline Limit (m) (from Table 3) (mm/s rms) Station Normal Track Elevated Track Special Track Work Residential 0.100 5 12 3 41

Novus Environmental | 15

March 19, 2013 Environmental Noise and Vibration Assessment

Figure 6 presents the predicted vibration levels versus distance for the area. There is no special track work proposed in the area. A review of the surrounding land uses indicates no particularly vibration sensitive uses in the area.

Based on the horizontal setbacks from the track centrelines, vibration impacts from normal operations were predicted to potentially exceed residential requirements along the first row of residences. However, track cross-section drawings indicate that the track will be significantly below grade in areas where the excesses have the potential to occur. As a result, actual setbacks from track to receivers are expected to exceed the critical distances outlined in Table 10 above. Therefore, mitigation is not anticipated to be required in this area.

4.3 Construction Noise

Surface construction will be required in the area. Above-ground construction activity may include:

 Removal of overburden;  Front end loaders and trucks for removal of material from the site; and  Backfilling, finishing, repaving, and landscaping.

Construction noise levels will vary over time, as the activities at the site change. Worst-case sound levels from construction activity, at the closest noise-sensitive receptors, will range from:

 58 dBA to 87 dBA, for removal of original surface (including a +10 dB annoyance penalty to the hoe ram / mounted impact hammer).  57 dBA to 68 dBA, for general excavation and removal of material.

In order to minimize the potential for construction noise complaints, a Construction Code of Practice, as outlined in Section 8.3, should be followed.

4.4 Construction Vibration

Under the City of Toronto vibration by-law, the construction vibration zone of influence is the area where vibration from construction activity is likely to exceed 5 mm/s ppv. Table 11 provides the typical setback distances required to meet 5 mm/s from various types of construction activity.

Novus Environmental | 16

Environmental Noise and Vibration Assessment March 19, 2013

Table 11: Construction Activity Zone of Influence By Activity Source Vibration Level Zone of Influence Construction Activity at 7.5 m (25 ft) Offset Distance (mm/s, ppv) (m) Pile Driver (impact) 38.6 30 Pile Driver (sonic) 18.6 18 Vibratory Roller 5.3 8 Hoe Ram 2.3 4 Large bulldozer 2.3 4 Caisson drilling / Secant Piling 2.3 4 Loaded trucks 1.9 4 Jackhammer 0.9 2 Small bulldozer 0.1 0 2.4 m dia tunneling machine in soil 1.0 3 Notes: - Zone of influence is the distance required to meet 5 mm/s ppv vibration level from typical construction activity.

Figure 7 shows the areas of influence for impact pile driving (30 m) and general construction activity (8 m).

 Vibration from pile driving and other general construction activities will not affect any surrounding structures.

Under the terms of the City Vibration By-law, a vibration control form should be provided with the Building Permit or Demolition Permit application.

5.0 Tunnel Section

The Tunnel Section from the West Portal to the Mount Dennis Station is shown in Figure 3b. Since all “stationary” noise sources are considered cumulatively, noise impacts from Mount Dennis Station are considered in Section 6: MSF and Stations.

5.1 Operational Noise

Not applicable in this area. There is no surface LRT traffic in this area. All “stationary” noise sources within this area are considered in Section 6: MSF and Stations.

5.2 Operational Vibration

With respect to the EA Approved Plan, the location of the proposed tunnel is shifted to the north. Where the previous alignment was along the Eglinton Avenue right-of-way centreline, the proposed tunnel alignment will be just to the north of the roadway.

The distances required to meet the criteria are provided in Table 10 in Section 4.2. Figure 8 presents the predicted vibration levels versus distance for the area around the station. There is no special track

Novus Environmental | 17

March 19, 2013 Environmental Noise and Vibration Assessment work proposed in the area. A review of the surrounding land uses indicates no particularly vibration sensitive uses in the area. The MOE/TTC guideline limit is predicted to be met, and as a result, no adverse vibration impacts from normal operations are anticipated.

5.3 Construction Noise

Cut-and-cover construction will be required along the majority of the Tunnel Section. Cut-and-cover construction activity may include:

 Installation of secant or soldier piling, to hold up the sides of excavations;  Removal of overburden, excavation of foundations and excavation for vent shafts and stairway shafts;  Front end loaders and trucks for removal of material from the site;  Concrete trucks and pumps for foundation and building construction; and  Backfilling, finishing, repaving, and landscaping.

Construction noise levels will vary over time, as the activities at the site change. Worst-case sound levels from construction activity, at the closest noise-sensitive receptors, will range from:

 79 dBA to 108 dBA, for removal of original surface (including a +10 dB annoyance penalty to the hoe ram / mounted impact hammer).  77 dBA to 99 dBA, for pile driving.  78 dBA to 89 dBA, for general excavation and removal of material.

In order to minimize the potential for construction noise complaints, a Construction Code of Practice, as outlined in Section 8.3, should be followed.

5.4 Construction Vibration

Figure 9 shows the areas of influence for impact pile driving (30 m) and general construction activity (8 m). For tabulated values, see Table 10 in Section 4.4.

 Vibration from pile driving and other general construction activities at the Station could affect buildings along Eglinton Avenue.

Under the terms of the City Vibration By-law, a vibration control form should be provided with the Building Permit or Demolition Permit application. Pre-construction consultation, vibration monitoring, and site inspections will likely be required. Monitoring will be required during construction.

6.0 MSF and Stations

The Proposed MSF will be located north of Eglinton Avenue and west of Black Creek Drive, bounded on the west by the Canadian Pacific Railway corridor and Industry Drive on the north. The proposed

Novus Environmental | 18

Environmental Noise and Vibration Assessment March 19, 2013

Mount Dennis Station, located underground, will be located straddling the Canadian Pacific Rail corridor. The Proposed Bus Station and Passenger PPUDO, will be located north of the Mount Dennis Station, and south of the MSF. See Figure 3c.

6.1 Operational Noise

6.1.1 LRT Surface Operations

Not applicable in this area. All LRT surface operations within this area are considered in Section 7: Mount Dennis to West of Keele Street. Surface LRT traffic within the MSF is considered part of the “stationary” impacts addressed below.

6.1.2 “Stationary” Operations

Stationary noise sources have been assessed cumulatively. Cumulative noise impacts include Bus Station activity (idling, and accelerations), HVAC and ventilation noise from the Mount Dennis Station, and LRT activity at the MSF (LRT movements, including consideration for special trackwork).

Based on the current configuration of the MSF there is a potential for wheel squeal to occur at some turns within the MSF. Since wheel squeal mechanisms and noise levels can vary greatly based on site and vehicle specific configurations, it is not possible to predict wheel squeal noise impacts to a high degree of certainty without a field investigation or further information on the vehicle and rail profile configurations. A variety of measures exist to control wheel squeal at source including but not limited to:

a) rail lubrication – grease, water, sand; b) wheel damping; c) rail fastenings and profiles; d) track curvature radius; e) railcars with radial bogies; f) changes to site layout; and g) gauge widening.

Based on conversations with MRC, wheel squeal will be addressed within the MSF. Therefore, noise emissions related to wheel squeal have not been considered further.

The number, size and location of required HVAC equipment at the MSF is unknown at this time. As part of the detailed design, the equipment should be selected and located such that the cumulative noise impact of the equipment at the closest residential receptor does not exceed 35 dBA.

The locations of the closest noise sensitive receptors are shown in Figure 10. Predicted off-site noise levels are shown in Figure 10. Compliance at worst case receptors are highlighted in Table 12. The existing CP Rail / GO Transit rail line does not currently include rail noise barriers. However, as part of another Metrolinx / GO Transit project, barriers have been recommended to the southwest of the rail corridor in order to reduce noise impacts at residences to the south and west of the proposed

Novus Environmental | 19

March 19, 2013 Environmental Noise and Vibration Assessment

MSF. Modelled noise levels include currently recommended GO Rail noise barriers to the west of the CP Rail / GO Transit rail line. Barriers were assumed to be 5.5 m in height.

Table 12: “Stationary” Noise Impacts – Predicted Sound Levels Receptor Predicted Sound Level Applicable Guideline Meets Guideline Limit Residence to the Northeast 47 54 Yes 79 Clearview Heights Church to the North 45 45 Yes 88 Industry Street Residence to the West 39 45 Yes 58 Victoria Boulevard High‐rise to the West 47 45 No 30 Denarda Trimbee Court High‐rise to the West 48 45 No 15 Oxford Street Residence to the West 50 48 No 17 Hollis Street Residence to the West 49 49 Yes 11 Hollis Street Residence to the Southwest 48 45 No 133 Brownville Avenue Residence to the Southwest 48 45 No 127 Brownville Avenue Residence to the Southwest 48 45 No 125 Brownville Avenue Residence to the Southwest 48 45 No 123 Brownville Avenue

As shown in the above table, excesses over the guideline limits are expected in a number of areas. Therefore, mitigation investigation is recommended in this area.

6.1.3 Potential Mitigation Options

Potential options for mitigating stationary source noise impacts include the installation of noise barriers surrounding the Bus Station, and/or upgrading the currently planned noise barriers to the west of the existing CP Rail / GO Transit rail line. Two potential mitigation options are presented in Figures 11a and 11b.

Option 1 3 barriers surrounding the proposed Bus Station (7.0 m, 4.5 m, and 5.0 m)

Option 2 1 barrier to the northwest of the proposed Bus Station (7.0 m), and 1 upgraded GO Transit barrier to south of Eglinton Avenue

Novus Environmental | 20

Environmental Noise and Vibration Assessment March 19, 2013

As shown in Figures 11a and 11b, either of the above mitigation options will lead to compliance at surrounding noise sensitive receptors. Table 13 shows mitigated noise impacts at worst-case receptors, for each of the above 2 options.

Table 13: “Stationary” Noise Impacts – Predicted Sound Levels – Mitigated Receptor Predicted Sound Level Applicable Guideline Meets Guideline Option 1 Option 2 Limit Option 1 Option 2 Residence to the Northeast 47 47 54 Yes Yes 79 Clearview Heights Church to the North 45 45 45 Yes Yes 88 Industry Street Residence to the West 36 36 45 Yes Yes 58 Victoria Boulevard High‐rise to the West 44 44 45 Yes Yes 30 Denarda Trimbee Court High‐rise to the West 45 45 45 Yes Yes 15 Oxford Street Residence to the West 48 48 48 Yes Yes 17 Hollis Street Residence to the West 47 47 49 Yes Yes 11 Hollis Street Residence to the Southwest 45 45 45 Yes Yes 133 Brownville Avenue Residence to the Southwest 45 45 45 Yes Yes 127 Brownville Avenue Residence to the Southwest 45 45 45 Yes Yes 125 Brownville Avenue Residence to the Southwest 45 45 45 Yes Yes 123 Brownville Avenue

As shown in the above table, “stationary” impacts are expected to meet the guideline limits in all worst-case areas.

It is recommended that mitigation be considered in detail during the detailed design phase of the project.

Novus Environmental | 21

March 19, 2013 Environmental Noise and Vibration Assessment

6.2 Operational Vibration

The distances required to meet the criteria are provided in Table 10 in Section 4.2. Figure 12 presents the predicted vibration levels versus distance for the area around the station. There is no special track work proposed in the area. A review of the surrounding land uses indicates no particularly vibration sensitive uses in the area. The MOE/TTC guideline limit is predicted to be met, and as a result, no adverse vibration impacts from normal operations are anticipated.

6.3 Construction Noise

Surface construction will be required throughout the MSF and Stations area. Construction activity may include:

 Front end loaders and trucks for removal of material from the site;  Concrete trucks and pumps for foundation and building construction; and  Backfilling, finishing, repaving, and landscaping.

Construction noise levels will vary over time, as the activities at the site change. Worst-case sound levels from construction activity, at the closest noise-sensitive receptors, will range from 59 dBA to 70 dBA.

In order to minimize the potential for construction noise complaints, a Construction Code of Practice, as outlined in Section 8.3, should be followed.

6.4 Construction Vibration

Figure 13 shows the areas of influence for impact pile driving (30 m) and general construction activity (8 m). For tabulated values, see Table 10 in Section 4.4.

 Vibration from pile driving and other general construction activities will not affect any surrounding structures.

Under the terms of the City Vibration By-law, a vibration control form should be provided with the Building Permit or Demolition Permit application.

Novus Environmental | 22

Environmental Noise and Vibration Assessment March 19, 2013

7.0 Mount Dennis to West of Keele Street

The Tunnel Portal / West Launch Shaft will be located approximately 250 m to the east of the intersection of Eglinton Avenue and Black Creek Drive. See Figure 3d.

7.1 Operational Noise

7.1.1 LRT Surface Operations

Table 14: LRT Surface Operations at Tunnel Portal and East - Predicted Sound Levels, Daytime

Receptor Predicted Sound Level, Leq Day, dBA Change Future Build Future No‐build (dB) 34 Hertford Avenue 63 62 1 Back Yard (1.5 m)

Table 15: LRT Surface Operations at Tunnel Portal and East - Predicted Sound Levels, Night-time

Receptor Predicted Sound Level, Leq Night, dBA Change Future Build Future No‐build (dB) 34 Hertford Avenue 54 53 1 Facade (4.5 m)

Figures 14a and 14b show operational noise levels for the LRT line in terms of change from “future no-build” conditions. As the change between the two scenarios is less than 5 dB at all noise-sensitive receptors, under the applicable MOE/ TTC noise guidelines, noise mitigation measures are not required.

7.1.2 “Stationary” Operations

Not applicable in this area.

7.2 Operational Vibration

The distances required to meet the criteria are provided in Table 10 in Section 4.2. Figure 15 presents the predicted vibration levels versus distance for the area around the station. There is no special track work proposed in the area. A review of the surrounding land uses indicates no

Novus Environmental | 23

March 19, 2013 Environmental Noise and Vibration Assessment particularly vibration sensitive uses in the area. The MOE/TTC guideline limit is predicted to be met, and as a result, no adverse vibration impacts from normal operations are anticipated.

7.3 Construction Noise

The first stage of construction will involve the excavation of the TBM launch portal. This will involve the installation of excavation shoring, soldier piles, and/or secant piles, followed by excavation. Once the TBMs are in place and operating, approximately 10 trucks per hour will be used to ship off-site the material excavated by the units. TBM excavation will take approximately 3 years to complete.

Cut-and-cover and open construction will be required for the remainder of this section. Construction activity may include:

Construction noise levels will vary over time, as the activities at the site change. Worst-case sound levels from construction activity, at the closest noise-sensitive receptors, will range from:

 67 dBA to 96 dBA, for removal of original surface (including a +10 dB annoyance penalty to the hoe ram / mounted impact hammer).  52 dBA to 74 dBA, for pile driving.  66 dBA to 77 dBA, for general excavation and removal of material.

In order to minimize the potential for construction noise complaints, a Construction Code of Practice, as outlined in Section 8.3, should be followed.

7.4 Construction Vibration

Figure 16 shows the areas of influence for impact pile driving (30 m), general construction activity (8 m) and tunnel boring (3 m). For tabulated values, see Table 10 in Section 4.4.

 Vibration from tunnel boring in the area should be less than 5 mm/s ppv at all building foundations.  Vibration from pile driving and other general construction activities will not affect any surrounding structures.

Under the terms of the City Vibration By-law, a vibration control form should be provided with the Building Permit or Demolition Permit application.

Novus Environmental | 24

Environmental Noise and Vibration Assessment March 19, 2013

8.0 Conclusions

8.1 Operational Noise

8.1.1 Surface Operations

Noise from LRT surface operations is predicted to meet the requirements of the applicable MOE/TTC guideline limits at all noise sensitive locations. No further investigation of noise mitigation is required.

8.1.2 “Stationary” Operations

Ventilation Noise

Based on the “generic” sound power emission data and silencer insertion loss data used in this assessment (Section 3.1.2), the emergency fire ventilation fans are predicted to meet the applicable MOE NPC-205 guideline limits at all noise sensitive locations.

Should noise emissions or operations vary significantly from those outlined above, noise impacts should be reassessed to assure compliance with all relevant legislative requirements.

MSF

Based on the modelled noise impacts from MSF activity, noise impacts are not anticipated.

However, it is recommended that HVAC equipment be chosen in order to minimize impacts at surrounding noise sensitive areas. HVAC selection recommendations are provided in Section 6.

There is the potential for wheel squeal to occur at some turns within the MSF. If observed, wheel squeal will be addressed through mitigation measures outlined in Section 6.1.3.

Bus Station and PPUDO

Bus activity at the Bus Station is anticipated to lead to noise levels exceeding guideline limits at some locations. Mitigation is recommended to deal with noise impacts from bus activity. Two potential mitigation options are provided in Section 6, using noise barriers.

8.2 Operational Vibration

The MOE/TTC guideline limit of 0.10 mm/s rms is predicted to be met at all locations. Therefore, no adverse vibration impacts from normal operations are anticipated.

8.3 Construction Noise

Construction noise impacts are temporary in nature, and largely unavoidable. Although for some periods and types of work, construction noise will be noticeable, with adequate controls, impacts can

Novus Environmental | 25

March 19, 2013 Environmental Noise and Vibration Assessment be minimized. This section of the report provides an evaluation of noise impacts from construction, and recommends a Code of Practice to minimize impacts.

To minimize the potential for construction noise impacts, it is recommended that provisions be written into the contract documentation for the contractor, as outlined below:

 Construction should be limited to the time periods allowed by the locally applicable bylaws (0700h to 2300h, except in the case of emergencies). If construction activities are required outside of these hours, the Contractor must seek permits / exemptions directly from the City of Toronto in advance.  There should be explicit indication that Contractors are expected to comply with all applicable requirements of the contract and local noise by-laws. Enforcement of noise control by-laws is the responsibility of the Municipality for all work done by Contractors.  All equipment should be properly maintained to limit noise emissions. As such, all construction equipment should be operated with effective muffling devices that are in good working order.  The Contract documents should contain a provision that any initial noise complaint will trigger verification that the general noise control measures agreed to are in effect.  In the presence of persistent noise complaints, all construction equipment should be verified to comply with MOE NPC-115 guidelines, as outlined in Section 2.5.1.  In the presence of persistent complaints and subject to the results of a field investigation, alternative noise control measured may be required, where reasonably available. In selecting appropriate noise control and mitigation measures, consideration should be given to the technical, administrative and economic feasibility of the various alternatives.  All blasts should be designed to meet any applicable overpressure and vibration limits established by the MOE in Publication NPC-119 and by the MTO in OPSS 120.

8.4 Construction Vibration

Zones of influence for construction activities (the area where vibration levels may exceed 5 mm/s ppv) are shown in the construction vibration sections of the report. Care should be given where structures are identified to be located within the zone of influence.

Novus Environmental | 26

Environmental Noise and Vibration Assessment March 19, 2013

References

Federal Transit Administration, 2006, Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment

Gordon, Colin, 1999, Generic Vibration Criteria for Vibration-Sensitive Equipment, Colin Gordon & Associates, 411 Borel Avenue Suite 425, San Mateo, CA 94402 USA

International Organization for Standardization, 1985, ISO 2631-1:1985, Mechanical vibration and shock -- Evaluation of human exposure to whole-body vibration -- Part 1: General requirements

International Organization for Standardization, 1996, ISO 9613-2: Acoustics – Attenuation of Sound During Propagation Outdoors Part 2: General Method of Calculation

Ontario Ministry of the Environment (MOE), 1977a, Model Municipal Noise Control Bylaw, which includes Publication NPC-115 – Construction Equipment

Ontario Ministry of the Environment (MOE), 1977b, Model Municipal Noise Control Bylaw, which includes Publication NPC-119 – Noise From Blasting

Ontario Ministry of the Environment (MOE), 1977c, Publication NPC-104: Model Municipal Noise Control By-Law

Ontario Ministry of the Environment (MOE), 1989, Ontario Road Noise Analysis Method for Environment and Transportation (ORNAMENT)

Ontario Ministry of the Environment (MOE), 1990, Sound from Trains Environmental Analysis Method (STEAM)

Ontario Ministry of the Environment (MOE) / Toronto Transit Commission (TTC), 1993, Protocol for Noise and Vibration Assessment for Proposed Eglinton West Rapid Transit Line

Ontario Ministry of the Environment (MOE), 1995, Publication NPC-205: Sound Level Limits for Stationary Sources in Class 1 & 2 Areas (Urban)

Ontario Ministry of Transportation (MTO), 2003, Ontario Provincial Standard Specification OPSS 120: General Specification for the Use of Explosives

Toronto Transit Commission (TTC), 1994, DM-0403-00 Acoustics Section

Wiss, J.F., 1981, Construction vibrations: State-of-the-Art, American Society of Civil Engineers, ASCE Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, Vol. 107, No. GT2, pp. 167-181.

Novus Environmental | 27

This page intentionally left blank for 2-sided printing purposes

Figures

Novus Environmental

This page intentionally left blank for 2-sided printing purposes

Figure No. 1 Scale: 1: 10,000

Study Area Date: 13/02/01

File No.: 12-0020 150 Research Lane, Suite 105 True Guelph, ON, Canada, N1G 4T2 Eglinton Light Rail Transit Project – East of Black North t. 226.706.8080 f.226.706.8081 Drawn By: KAC Creek Drive to Jane Street,Toronto, Ontario www.novusenv.com PPUDO BUS STATION

MOUNT DENNIS ELEVATED TRACK TUNNEL LRT TUNNEL STATION PORTAL / PORTAL LAUNCH LRT LINE SHAFT

Figure No. 2a Scale: n/a

Key Track Features Within the Study Area Date: 13/03/18 Track Mainline Drawings provided by Metrolinx File No.: 12-0020 150 Research Lane, Suite 105 True Guelph, ON, Canada, N1G 4T2 Eglinton Light Rail Transit Project – East of Black North t. 226.706.8080 f.226.706.8081 Drawn By: KAC www.novusenv.com Creek Drive to Jane Street,Toronto, Ontario SWM POND

MSF MAIN BUILDING

LRT CAR STORAGE

BUS STATION PPUDOPPUDO

Figure No. 2b Scale: n/a

Key Track Features Within the Study Area Date: 13/02/01 Maintenance and Storage Facility File No.: 12-0020 150 Research Lane, Suite 105 True Guelph, ON, Canada, N1G 4T2 Eglinton Light Rail Transit Project – East of Black North t. 226.706.8080 f.226.706.8081 Drawn By: KAC Creek Drive to Jane Street,Toronto, Ontario www.novusenv.com LRT TUNNEL PORTAL APPROX. STATION 105+000

Figure No. 3a Scale: 1: 3,000

Nature of the Surrounding Area – Date: 13/02/01 Jane Street to Western Portal File No.: 12-0020 150 Research Lane, Suite 105 True Guelph, ON, Canada, N1G 4T2 Eglinton Light Rail Transit Project – East of Black North t. 226.706.8080 f.226.706.8081 Drawn By: KAC Creek Drive to Jane Street,Toronto, Ontario www.novusenv.com PPUDOPPUDO

LRT TUNNEL PORTAL APPROX. STATION 105+000

Figure No. 3b Scale: 1: 3,000

Nature of the Surrounding Area – Date: 13/02/01 Tunnel Section File No.: 12-0020 150 Research Lane, Suite 105 True Guelph, ON, Canada, N1G 4T2 Eglinton Light Rail Transit Project – East of Black North t. 226.706.8080 f.226.706.8081 Drawn By: KAC Creek Drive to Jane Street,Toronto, Ontario www.novusenv.com MSF MAIN BUILDING

LRT CAR STORAGE

BUS STATION PPUDOPPUDO

Figure No. 3c Scale: 1: 5,000

Nature of the Surrounding Area – Date: 13/02/01 MSF and Stations File No.: 12-0020 150 Research Lane, Suite 105 True Guelph, ON, Canada, N1G 4T2 Eglinton Light Rail Transit Project – East of Black North t. 226.706.8080 f.226.706.8081 Drawn By: KAC Creek Drive to Jane Street,Toronto, Ontario www.novusenv.com MSFMSF

WEST LAUNCH SHAFT APPROX. STATION 106+300

PPUDOPPUDO

Figure No. 3d Scale: 1: 3,000

Nature of the Surrounding Area – Date: 13/02/01 Mount Dennis to West of Keele Street File No.: 12-0020 150 Research Lane, Suite 105 True Guelph, ON, Canada, N1G 4T2 Eglinton Light Rail Transit Project – East of Black North t. 226.706.8080 f.226.706.8081 Drawn By: KAC Creek Drive to Jane Street,Toronto, Ontario www.novusenv.com 10

Notes:

• Residential criterion adopted for this assessment is MOE / TTC Protocol value of 0.100 mm/s rms for overall vibration (all frequencies combined). Assuming impacts mainly occur in a narrow Workshop (ISO) 1 frequency range above 8 Hz (as is typical), then the overall limit would be equivalent to the 1/3rd‐octave band frequency limit shown in the chart. Office (ISO) • General office space and industrial workshop spaces can tolerate greater vibration levels than Residential Day (ISO) rms)

residential spaces (ISO 2631).

MOE/TTC, Operating Theatre (ISO) • Specific vibration‐sensitive industrial or commercial (mm/s, 0.1 uses may require stricter limits, depending in the nature of the operation. The Vibration Criteria (VC) VC‐A, 50 micrometers

Velocity curves shown provide generic criteria for a number

of vibration sensitive uses (see text). VC‐B, 25 micrometers Vibration

VC‐C, 12.5 micrometers

0.01 VC‐D, 6 micrometers

VC‐B, 3 micrometers

0.001

Figure No. 4 Scale: n/a

Generic Vibration Criterion (VC) Curves for Vibration- Date: 13/02/01 Sensitive Equipment - Showing also the ISO Guidelines for People in Buildings (From Gordon) File No.: 12-0020 150 Research Lane, Suite 105 Guelph, ON, Canada, N1G 4T2 Eglinton Light Rail Transit Project – East of t. 226.706.8080 f.226.706.8081 Drawn By: KAC Black Creek Drive to Jane Street,Toronto, Ontario www.novusenv.com LRT TUNNEL PORTAL APPROX. STATION 105+000

Figure No. Note: 5a Scale: 1: 3,000 Grid calculated at 1.5m. Jane Street to Western Portal – Date: 13/02/01 Operational Noise in Terms of Change From Existing Conditions, Daytime File No.: 12-0020 150 Research Lane, Suite 105 Guelph, ON, Canada, N1G 4T2 True t. 226.706.8080 f.226.706.8081 Eglinton Light Rail Transit Project – East of Black North Drawn By: KAC www.novusenv.com Creek Drive to Jane Street,Toronto, Ontario LRT TUNNEL PORTAL APPROX. STATION 105+000

Figure No. Note: 5b Scale: 1: 3,000 Grid calculated at 4.5m. Jane Street to Western Portal – Date: 13/02/01 Operational Noise in Terms of Change From Existing Conditions, Night-time File No.: 12-0020 150 Research Lane, Suite 105 Guelph, ON, Canada, N1G 4T2 True t. 226.706.8080 f.226.706.8081 Eglinton Light Rail Transit Project – East of Black North Drawn By: KAC www.novusenv.com Creek Drive to Jane Street,Toronto, Ontario LRT TUNNEL PORTAL APPROX. STATION 105+000

Figure No. 6 Scale: 1: 3,000

Jane Street to Western Portal – Date: 13/02/01 Predicted Operational Vibration Levels File No.: 12-0020 150 Research Lane, Suite 105 True Guelph, ON, Canada, N1G 4T2 Eglinton Light Rail Transit Project – East of Black North t. 226.706.8080 f.226.706.8081 Drawn By: KAC Creek Drive to Jane Street,Toronto, Ontario www.novusenv.com 30m Area of Influence For Impact Pile Driving

LRT TUNNEL PORTAL APPROX. STATION 105+000

8 m Area of Influence For Secant Piling and All Other Construction Activity

Figure No. 7 Scale: 1: 3,000

Jane Street to Western Portal – Date: 13/02/01 Construction Vibration Zone of Influence File No.: 12-0020 150 Research Lane, Suite 105 True Guelph, ON, Canada, N1G 4T2 Eglinton Light Rail Transit Project – East of Black North t. 226.706.8080 f.226.706.8081 Drawn By: KAC Creek Drive to Jane Street,Toronto, Ontario www.novusenv.com LRT TUNNEL PORTAL APPROX. STATION 105+000

Figure No. 8 Scale: 1: 3,000

Tunnel Section – Date: 13/02/01 Predicted Operational Vibration Levels File No.: 12-0020 150 Research Lane, Suite 105 True Guelph, ON, Canada, N1G 4T2 Eglinton Light Rail Transit Project – East of Black North t. 226.706.8080 f.226.706.8081 Drawn By: KAC Creek Drive to Jane Street,Toronto, Ontario www.novusenv.com 30m Area of Influence For Impact Pile Driving

LRT TUNNEL PORTAL APPROX. STATION 105+000

8 m Area of Influence For Secant Piling and All Other Construction Activity

Figure No. 9 Scale: 1: 3,000

Tunnel Section – Date: 13/02/27 Construction Vibration Zone of Influence File No.: 12-0020 150 Research Lane, Suite 105 True Guelph, ON, Canada, N1G 4T2 Eglinton Light Rail Transit Project – East of Black North t. 226.706.8080 f.226.706.8081 Drawn By: KAC Creek Drive to Jane Street,Toronto, Ontario www.novusenv.com Note: Figure No. 10 Scale: 1: 6,000 Grid calculated at 4.5m. Worst‐case receptor heights vary by receptor MSF and Stations – Predicted Off-Site Date: 13/02/01 location. Noise Levels File No.: 12-0020 150 Research Lane, Suite 105 True Guelph, ON, Canada, N1G 4T2 Eglinton Light Rail Transit Project – East of Black North t. 226.706.8080 f.226.706.8081 Drawn By: KAC Creek Drive to Jane Street,Toronto, Ontario www.novusenv.com Figure No. 11a Scale: 1: 6,000

MSF and Stations – Predicted Off-Site Date: 13/02/01 Noise Levels including Mitigation Option 1 File No.: 12-0020 150 Research Lane, Suite 105 True Guelph, ON, Canada, N1G 4T2 Eglinton Light Rail Transit Project – East of Black North t. 226.706.8080 f.226.706.8081 Drawn By: KAC Creek Drive to Jane Street,Toronto, Ontario www.novusenv.com Figure No. 11b Scale: 1: 6,000

MSF and Stations – Predicted Off-Site Date: 13/02/01 Noise Levels including Mitigation Option 2 File No.: 12-0020 150 Research Lane, Suite 105 True Guelph, ON, Canada, N1G 4T2 Eglinton Light Rail Transit Project – East of Black North t. 226.706.8080 f.226.706.8081 Drawn By: KAC Creek Drive to Jane Street,Toronto, Ontario www.novusenv.com Figure No. 12 Scale: 1: 6,000

MSF and Stations – Predicted Operational Date: 13/02/01 Vibration Levels File No.: 12-0020 150 Research Lane, Suite 105 True Guelph, ON, Canada, N1G 4T2 Eglinton Light Rail Transit Project – East of Black North t. 226.706.8080 f.226.706.8081 Drawn By: KAC Creek Drive to Jane Street,Toronto, Ontario www.novusenv.com 30m Area of Influence For Impact Pile Driving

8 m Area of Influence For Secant Piling and All Other Construction Activity

Figure No. 13 Scale: 1: 6,000

MSF and Stations – Construction Vibration Date: 13/02/27 Zone of Influence File No.: 12-0020 150 Research Lane, Suite 105 True Guelph, ON, Canada, N1G 4T2 Eglinton Light Rail Transit Project – East of Black North t. 226.706.8080 f.226.706.8081 Drawn By: KAC Creek Drive to Jane Street,Toronto, Ontario www.novusenv.com WEST LAUNCH SHAFT APPROX. STATION 106+300

Note: Figure No. 14a Scale: 1: 3,000 Grid calculated at 1.5m. Mount Dennis to West of Keele Street - Date: 13/02/01 Operational Noise in Terms of Change From Existing Conditions, Daytime File No.: 12-0020 150 Research Lane, Suite 105 True Guelph, ON, Canada, N1G 4T2 Eglinton Light Rail Transit Project – East of Black North t. 226.706.8080 f.226.706.8081 Drawn By: KAC Creek Drive to Jane Street,Toronto, Ontario www.novusenv.com WEST LAUNCH SHAFT APPROX. STATION 106+300

Note: Figure No. 14b Scale: 1: 3,000 Grid calculated at 4.5m. Mount Dennis to West of Keele Street - Date: 13/02/01 Operational Noise in Terms of Change From Existing Conditions, Night-time File No.: 12-0020 150 Research Lane, Suite 105 True Guelph, ON, Canada, N1G 4T2 Eglinton Light Rail Transit Project – East of Black North t. 226.706.8080 f.226.706.8081 Drawn By: KAC Creek Drive to Jane Street,Toronto, Ontario www.novusenv.com WEST LAUNCH SHAFT APPROX. STATION 106+300

Figure No. 15 Scale: 1: 3,000

Mount Dennis to West of Keele Street - Date: 13/02/01 Predicted Operational Vibration Levels File No.: 12-0020 150 Research Lane, Suite 105 True Guelph, ON, Canada, N1G 4T2 Eglinton Light Rail Transit Project – East of Black North t. 226.706.8080 f.226.706.8081 Drawn By: KAC Creek Drive to Jane Street,Toronto, Ontario www.novusenv.com WEST LAUNCH SHAFT APPROX. STATION 106+300 30m Area of Influence For Impact Pile Driving

8 m Area of Influence For Secant Piling and All Other Construction Activity

3m Area of Influence For Mining and/or Boring

Figure No. 16 Scale: 1: 3,000

Mount Dennis to West of Keele Street – Date: 13/02/01 Construction Vibration Zone of Influence File No.: 12-0020 150 Research Lane, Suite 105 True Guelph, ON, Canada, N1G 4T2 Eglinton Light Rail Transit Project – East of Black North t. 226.706.8080 f.226.706.8081 Drawn By: KAC Creek Drive to Jane Street,Toronto, Ontario www.novusenv.com This page intentionally left blank for 2-sided printing purposes

Appendix A

Novus Environmental

This page intentionally left blank for 2-sided printing purposes

City of Toronto - Traffic Data Centre & Safety Bureau

Detailed 24-Hour Count Summary Report

WESTON RD N/B S OF EGLINTON AVE Category: 24 HOUR

Survey Date: April/06/2006

Station: 1746

Start Time: 00:00 Count Period: 0015 Minutes

TIME COUNT TIME COUNT TIME COUNT

00:00:00 36 08:00:00 100 16:00:00 117

00:15:00 41 08:15:00 110 16:15:00 124

00:30:00 29 08:30:00 96 16:30:00 146

00:45:00 19 08:45:00 143 16:45:00 166

01:00:00 25 09:00:00 118 17:00:00 137

01:15:00 23 09:15:00 80 17:15:00 142

01:30:00 27 09:30:00 85 17:30:00 139

01:45:00 15 09:45:00 68 17:45:00 150

02:00:00 10 10:00:00 81 18:00:00 128

02:15:00 16 10:15:00 79 18:15:00 145

02:30:00 12 10:30:00 76 18:30:00 130

02:45:00 10 10:45:00 74 18:45:00 135

03:00:00 16 11:00:00 94 19:00:00 121

03:15:00 15 11:15:00 92 19:15:00 121

03:30:00 17 11:30:00 87 19:30:00 114

03:45:00 13 11:45:00 87 19:45:00 123

04:00:00 16 12:00:00 93 20:00:00 99

04:15:00 14 12:15:00 98 20:15:00 106

04:30:00 16 12:30:00 92 20:30:00 90

04:45:00 12 12:45:00 90 20:45:00 98

05:00:00 13 13:00:00 98 21:00:00 101

05:15:00 15 13:15:00 102 21:15:00 94

05:30:00 24 13:30:00 90 21:30:00 90

05:45:00 38 13:45:00 80 21:45:00 73

06:00:00 52 14:00:00 92 22:00:00 93

06:15:00 83 14:15:00 103 22:15:00 86

06:30:00 106 14:30:00 113 22:30:00 75

06:45:00 112 14:45:00 108 22:45:00 64

07:00:00 109 15:00:00 127 23:00:00 55

07:15:00 80 15:15:00 127 23:15:00 57

07:30:00 116 15:30:00 109 23:30:00 51

07:45:00 104 15:45:00 118 23:45:00 46

Comment: Page 1 of 21 Printed On: 28 May, 2012 12:05:24PM City of Toronto - Traffic Data Centre & Safety Bureau

Detailed 24-Hour Count Summary Report

WESTON RD S/B N OF EGLINTON AVE Category: 24 HOUR

Survey Date: April/06/2006

Station: 1747

Start Time: 00:00 Count Period: 0015 Minutes

TIME COUNT TIME COUNT TIME COUNT

00:00:00 35 08:00:00 118 16:00:00 111

00:15:00 41 08:15:00 121 16:15:00 141

00:30:00 37 08:30:00 164 16:30:00 128

00:45:00 29 08:45:00 147 16:45:00 153

01:00:00 27 09:00:00 145 17:00:00 138

01:15:00 21 09:15:00 102 17:15:00 151

01:30:00 28 09:30:00 80 17:30:00 147

01:45:00 19 09:45:00 95 17:45:00 167

02:00:00 17 10:00:00 77 18:00:00 149

02:15:00 23 10:15:00 103 18:15:00 138

02:30:00 21 10:30:00 97 18:30:00 124

02:45:00 19 10:45:00 105 18:45:00 151

03:00:00 7 11:00:00 89 19:00:00 144

03:15:00 14 11:15:00 98 19:15:00 116

03:30:00 7 11:30:00 104 19:30:00 116

03:45:00 11 11:45:00 96 19:45:00 102

04:00:00 11 12:00:00 70 20:00:00 85

04:15:00 12 12:15:00 89 20:15:00 75

04:30:00 14 12:30:00 103 20:30:00 98

04:45:00 14 12:45:00 124 20:45:00 87

05:00:00 14 13:00:00 111 21:00:00 75

05:15:00 13 13:15:00 103 21:15:00 95

05:30:00 25 13:30:00 101 21:30:00 72

05:45:00 37 13:45:00 106 21:45:00 80

06:00:00 33 14:00:00 111 22:00:00 60

06:15:00 58 14:15:00 99 22:15:00 88

06:30:00 60 14:30:00 104 22:30:00 69

06:45:00 75 14:45:00 116 22:45:00 60

07:00:00 78 15:00:00 109 23:00:00 50

07:15:00 98 15:15:00 105 23:15:00 56

07:30:00 119 15:30:00 111 23:30:00 55

07:45:00 115 15:45:00 98 23:45:00 38

Comment: Page 2 of 21 Printed On: 28 May, 2012 12:05:24PM City of Toronto - Traffic Data Centre & Safety Bureau

Detailed 24-Hour Count Summary Report

TRETHEWEY DR N/B S OF YORE RD Category: 24 HOUR

Survey Date: October/30/2008

Station: 23915

Start Time: 00:00 Count Period: 0015 Minutes

TIME COUNT TIME COUNT TIME COUNT

00:00:00 102 08:00:00 306 16:00:00 265

00:15:00 104 08:15:00 219 16:15:00 294

00:30:00 89 08:30:00 270 16:30:00 269

00:45:00 88 08:45:00 288 16:45:00 230

01:00:00 59 09:00:00 316 17:00:00 245

01:15:00 59 09:15:00 304 17:15:00 271

01:30:00 48 09:30:00 251 17:30:00 258

01:45:00 43 09:45:00 237 17:45:00 258

02:00:00 26 10:00:00 221 18:00:00 248

02:15:00 56 10:15:00 185 18:15:00 248

02:30:00 28 10:30:00 188 18:30:00 241

02:45:00 40 10:45:00 221 18:45:00 241

03:00:00 47 11:00:00 202 19:00:00 229

03:15:00 38 11:15:00 193 19:15:00 238

03:30:00 29 11:30:00 173 19:30:00 283

03:45:00 30 11:45:00 225 19:45:00 232

04:00:00 36 12:00:00 216 20:00:00 227

04:15:00 13 12:15:00 157 20:15:00 211

04:30:00 33 12:30:00 198 20:30:00 240

04:45:00 46 12:45:00 187 20:45:00 194

05:00:00 73 13:00:00 189 21:00:00 204

05:15:00 65 13:15:00 242 21:15:00 180

05:30:00 79 13:30:00 255 21:30:00 132

05:45:00 173 13:45:00 192 21:45:00 165

06:00:00 240 14:00:00 204 22:00:00 164

06:15:00 271 14:15:00 180 22:15:00 123

06:30:00 362 14:30:00 205 22:30:00 141

06:45:00 385 14:45:00 264 22:45:00 132

07:00:00 354 15:00:00 228 23:00:00 93

07:15:00 314 15:15:00 207 23:15:00 87

07:30:00 300 15:30:00 217 23:30:00 102

07:45:00 228 15:45:00 245 23:45:00 97

Comment: Page 3 of 21 Printed On: 28 May, 2012 12:05:24PM City of Toronto - Traffic Data Centre & Safety Bureau

Detailed 24-Hour Count Summary Report

JANE ST N/B S OF EGLINTON AVE Category: 24 HOUR

Survey Date: October/30/2008

Station: 2653

Start Time: 00:00 Count Period: 0015 Minutes

TIME COUNT TIME COUNT TIME COUNT

00:00:00 64 08:00:00 245 16:00:00 238

00:15:00 48 08:15:00 264 16:15:00 251

00:30:00 52 08:30:00 259 16:30:00 227

00:45:00 26 08:45:00 250 16:45:00 257

01:00:00 33 09:00:00 257 17:00:00 251

01:15:00 18 09:15:00 225 17:15:00 228

01:30:00 28 09:30:00 170 17:30:00 222

01:45:00 25 09:45:00 156 17:45:00 253

02:00:00 26 10:00:00 177 18:00:00 267

02:15:00 13 10:15:00 160 18:15:00 231

02:30:00 22 10:30:00 139 18:30:00 189

02:45:00 16 10:45:00 131 18:45:00 213

03:00:00 13 11:00:00 148 19:00:00 186

03:15:00 13 11:15:00 136 19:15:00 159

03:30:00 17 11:30:00 159 19:30:00 178

03:45:00 13 11:45:00 187 19:45:00 156

04:00:00 11 12:00:00 170 20:00:00 144

04:15:00 21 12:15:00 159 20:15:00 176

04:30:00 22 12:30:00 138 20:30:00 140

04:45:00 19 12:45:00 157 20:45:00 135

05:00:00 18 13:00:00 179 21:00:00 161

05:15:00 30 13:15:00 179 21:15:00 146

05:30:00 32 13:30:00 182 21:30:00 136

05:45:00 66 13:45:00 178 21:45:00 116

06:00:00 77 14:00:00 190 22:00:00 120

06:15:00 98 14:15:00 157 22:15:00 126

06:30:00 105 14:30:00 202 22:30:00 110

06:45:00 168 14:45:00 184 22:45:00 90

07:00:00 149 15:00:00 213 23:00:00 88

07:15:00 172 15:15:00 215 23:15:00 89

07:30:00 185 15:30:00 231 23:30:00 87

07:45:00 214 15:45:00 258 23:45:00 53

Comment: Page 4 of 21 Printed On: 28 May, 2012 12:05:24PM City of Toronto - Traffic Data Centre & Safety Bureau

Detailed 24-Hour Count Summary Report

JANE ST S/B N OF EGLINTON AVE Category: 24 HOUR

Survey Date: October/30/2008

Station: 2654

Start Time: 00:00 Count Period: 0015 Minutes

TIME COUNT TIME COUNT TIME COUNT

00:00:00 55 08:00:00 248 16:00:00 202

00:15:00 54 08:15:00 255 16:15:00 194

00:30:00 44 08:30:00 272 16:30:00 242

00:45:00 18 08:45:00 237 16:45:00 234

01:00:00 16 09:00:00 218 17:00:00 182

01:15:00 26 09:15:00 154 17:15:00 212

01:30:00 21 09:30:00 161 17:30:00 227

01:45:00 19 09:45:00 151 17:45:00 230

02:00:00 15 10:00:00 120 18:00:00 238

02:15:00 15 10:15:00 171 18:15:00 207

02:30:00 13 10:30:00 132 18:30:00 214

02:45:00 15 10:45:00 164 18:45:00 205

03:00:00 10 11:00:00 156 19:00:00 193

03:15:00 11 11:15:00 126 19:15:00 176

03:30:00 12 11:30:00 159 19:30:00 151

03:45:00 14 11:45:00 142 19:45:00 153

04:00:00 22 12:00:00 140 20:00:00 148

04:15:00 11 12:15:00 134 20:15:00 107

04:30:00 19 12:30:00 158 20:30:00 135

04:45:00 26 12:45:00 140 20:45:00 147

05:00:00 27 13:00:00 149 21:00:00 122

05:15:00 32 13:15:00 151 21:15:00 100

05:30:00 32 13:30:00 150 21:30:00 108

05:45:00 55 13:45:00 156 21:45:00 109

06:00:00 52 14:00:00 143 22:00:00 70

06:15:00 81 14:15:00 162 22:15:00 88

06:30:00 122 14:30:00 169 22:30:00 88

06:45:00 133 14:45:00 180 22:45:00 70

07:00:00 149 15:00:00 162 23:00:00 74

07:15:00 174 15:15:00 164 23:15:00 93

07:30:00 197 15:30:00 175 23:30:00 63

07:45:00 204 15:45:00 178 23:45:00 50

Comment: Page 5 of 21 Printed On: 28 May, 2012 12:05:24PM City of Toronto - Traffic Data Centre & Safety Bureau

Detailed 24-Hour Count Summary Report

JANE ST S/B N OF LAMBTON AVE Category: 24 HOUR

Survey Date: October/30/2008

Station: 2675

Start Time: 00:00 Count Period: 0015 Minutes

TIME COUNT TIME COUNT TIME COUNT

00:00:00 64 08:00:00 232 16:00:00 179

00:15:00 57 08:15:00 229 16:15:00 200

00:30:00 47 08:30:00 255 16:30:00 237

00:45:00 39 08:45:00 262 16:45:00 248

01:00:00 18 09:00:00 258 17:00:00 214

01:15:00 22 09:15:00 229 17:15:00 193

01:30:00 23 09:30:00 175 17:30:00 239

01:45:00 19 09:45:00 153 17:45:00 227

02:00:00 25 10:00:00 138 18:00:00 248

02:15:00 14 10:15:00 175 18:15:00 229

02:30:00 16 10:30:00 144 18:30:00 236

02:45:00 10 10:45:00 150 18:45:00 220

03:00:00 18 11:00:00 173 19:00:00 223

03:15:00 12 11:15:00 164 19:15:00 192

03:30:00 17 11:30:00 131 19:30:00 177

03:45:00 15 11:45:00 161 19:45:00 151

04:00:00 18 12:00:00 155 20:00:00 164

04:15:00 15 12:15:00 145 20:15:00 145

04:30:00 15 12:30:00 144 20:30:00 131

04:45:00 25 12:45:00 151 20:45:00 143

05:00:00 29 13:00:00 144 21:00:00 136

05:15:00 34 13:15:00 143 21:15:00 145

05:30:00 36 13:30:00 161 21:30:00 108

05:45:00 41 13:45:00 135 21:45:00 116

06:00:00 66 14:00:00 168 22:00:00 100

06:15:00 70 14:15:00 153 22:15:00 96

06:30:00 111 14:30:00 162 22:30:00 88

06:45:00 137 14:45:00 170 22:45:00 75

07:00:00 138 15:00:00 174 23:00:00 72

07:15:00 161 15:15:00 184 23:15:00 92

07:30:00 172 15:30:00 173 23:30:00 83

07:45:00 160 15:45:00 191 23:45:00 65

Comment: Page 6 of 21 Printed On: 28 May, 2012 12:05:24PM City of Toronto - Traffic Data Centre & Safety Bureau

Detailed 24-Hour Count Summary Report

TRETHEWEY DR S/B N OF EGLINTON AVE Category: 24 HOUR

Survey Date: October/30/2008

Station: 3607

Start Time: 00:00 Count Period: 0015 Minutes

TIME COUNT TIME COUNT TIME COUNT

00:00:00 68 08:00:00 398 16:00:00 291

00:15:00 38 08:15:00 416 16:15:00 302

00:30:00 39 08:30:00 418 16:30:00 324

00:45:00 18 08:45:00 472 16:45:00 363

01:00:00 24 09:00:00 436 17:00:00 352

01:15:00 34 09:15:00 355 17:15:00 416

01:30:00 28 09:30:00 275 17:30:00 418

01:45:00 20 09:45:00 229 17:45:00 389

02:00:00 22 10:00:00 219 18:00:00 378

02:15:00 16 10:15:00 231 18:15:00 363

02:30:00 12 10:30:00 210 18:30:00 330

02:45:00 18 10:45:00 173 18:45:00 298

03:00:00 4 11:00:00 219 19:00:00 303

03:15:00 18 11:15:00 221 19:15:00 231

03:30:00 4 11:30:00 179 19:30:00 233

03:45:00 8 11:45:00 168 19:45:00 266

04:00:00 14 12:00:00 182 20:00:00 238

04:15:00 4 12:15:00 167 20:15:00 161

04:30:00 18 12:30:00 186 20:30:00 182

04:45:00 14 12:45:00 197 20:45:00 191

05:00:00 14 13:00:00 207 21:00:00 114

05:15:00 32 13:15:00 199 21:15:00 186

05:30:00 56 13:30:00 190 21:30:00 188

05:45:00 59 13:45:00 198 21:45:00 159

06:00:00 72 14:00:00 208 22:00:00 142

06:15:00 130 14:15:00 195 22:15:00 142

06:30:00 145 14:30:00 232 22:30:00 112

06:45:00 157 14:45:00 223 22:45:00 112

07:00:00 226 15:00:00 211 23:00:00 117

07:15:00 217 15:15:00 267 23:15:00 95

07:30:00 283 15:30:00 275 23:30:00 74

07:45:00 371 15:45:00 262 23:45:00 88

Comment: Page 7 of 21 Printed On: 28 May, 2012 12:05:24PM City of Toronto - Traffic Data Centre & Safety Bureau

Detailed 24-Hour Count Summary Report

KEELE ST N/B S OF EGLINTON AVE Category: 24 HOUR

Survey Date: October/30/2008

Station: 656

Start Time: 00:00 Count Period: 0015 Minutes

TIME COUNT TIME COUNT TIME COUNT

00:00:00 51 08:00:00 180 16:00:00 207

00:15:00 40 08:15:00 215 16:15:00 206

00:30:00 42 08:30:00 210 16:30:00 180

00:45:00 32 08:45:00 229 16:45:00 188

01:00:00 25 09:00:00 194 17:00:00 196

01:15:00 20 09:15:00 171 17:15:00 216

01:30:00 17 09:30:00 153 17:30:00 193

01:45:00 19 09:45:00 141 17:45:00 191

02:00:00 27 10:00:00 143 18:00:00 194

02:15:00 12 10:15:00 140 18:15:00 181

02:30:00 23 10:30:00 133 18:30:00 195

02:45:00 22 10:45:00 134 18:45:00 175

03:00:00 14 11:00:00 137 19:00:00 193

03:15:00 16 11:15:00 147 19:15:00 196

03:30:00 13 11:30:00 156 19:30:00 175

03:45:00 19 11:45:00 146 19:45:00 177

04:00:00 11 12:00:00 141 20:00:00 190

04:15:00 12 12:15:00 157 20:15:00 161

04:30:00 24 12:30:00 135 20:30:00 130

04:45:00 35 12:45:00 151 20:45:00 135

05:00:00 32 13:00:00 164 21:00:00 116

05:15:00 43 13:15:00 156 21:15:00 118

05:30:00 59 13:30:00 154 21:30:00 148

05:45:00 83 13:45:00 165 21:45:00 122

06:00:00 83 14:00:00 135 22:00:00 93

06:15:00 149 14:15:00 163 22:15:00 112

06:30:00 184 14:30:00 204 22:30:00 64

06:45:00 181 14:45:00 158 22:45:00 63

07:00:00 182 15:00:00 151 23:00:00 78

07:15:00 172 15:15:00 164 23:15:00 73

07:30:00 166 15:30:00 202 23:30:00 49

07:45:00 188 15:45:00 226 23:45:00 46

Comment: Page 8 of 21 Printed On: 28 May, 2012 12:05:24PM City of Toronto - Traffic Data Centre & Safety Bureau

Detailed 24-Hour Count Summary Report

EGLINTON AVE W/B E OF BICKNELL AVE Category: 24 HOUR

Survey Date: December/17/2009

Station: 2389

Start Time: 00:00 Count Period: 0015 Minutes

TIME COUNT TIME COUNT TIME COUNT

00:00:00 36 08:00:00 160 16:00:00 245

00:15:00 36 08:15:00 204 16:15:00 296

00:30:00 36 08:30:00 224 16:30:00 286

00:45:00 20 08:45:00 236 16:45:00 297

01:00:00 28 09:00:00 195 17:00:00 294

01:15:00 15 09:15:00 182 17:15:00 296

01:30:00 17 09:30:00 173 17:30:00 282

01:45:00 25 09:45:00 167 17:45:00 244

02:00:00 16 10:00:00 148 18:00:00 284

02:15:00 21 10:15:00 148 18:15:00 237

02:30:00 21 10:30:00 149 18:30:00 227

02:45:00 16 10:45:00 138 18:45:00 202

03:00:00 12 11:00:00 176 19:00:00 189

03:15:00 12 11:15:00 162 19:15:00 183

03:30:00 12 11:30:00 200 19:30:00 185

03:45:00 18 11:45:00 149 19:45:00 178

04:00:00 9 12:00:00 200 20:00:00 164

04:15:00 16 12:15:00 186 20:15:00 153

04:30:00 34 12:30:00 188 20:30:00 145

04:45:00 16 12:45:00 190 20:45:00 131

05:00:00 29 13:00:00 180 21:00:00 117

05:15:00 36 13:15:00 183 21:15:00 131

05:30:00 50 13:30:00 178 21:30:00 115

05:45:00 54 13:45:00 187 21:45:00 115

06:00:00 72 14:00:00 206 22:00:00 126

06:15:00 100 14:15:00 214 22:15:00 104

06:30:00 111 14:30:00 201 22:30:00 105

06:45:00 126 14:45:00 218 22:45:00 77

07:00:00 120 15:00:00 223 23:00:00 75

07:15:00 130 15:15:00 225 23:15:00 79

07:30:00 166 15:30:00 233 23:30:00 63

07:45:00 162 15:45:00 225 23:45:00 63

Comment: Page 9 of 21 Printed On: 28 May, 2012 12:05:24PM City of Toronto - Traffic Data Centre & Safety Bureau

Detailed 24-Hour Count Summary Report

EGLINTON AVE E/B W OF BLACK CREEK DR Category: 24 HOUR

Survey Date: December/17/2009

Station: 2392

Start Time: 00:00 Count Period: 0015 Minutes

TIME COUNT TIME COUNT TIME COUNT

00:00:00 29 08:00:00 323 16:00:00 256

00:15:00 41 08:15:00 309 16:15:00 265

00:30:00 29 08:30:00 321 16:30:00 303

00:45:00 19 08:45:00 336 16:45:00 299

01:00:00 17 09:00:00 265 17:00:00 299

01:15:00 25 09:15:00 255 17:15:00 297

01:30:00 19 09:30:00 227 17:30:00 316

01:45:00 15 09:45:00 190 17:45:00 290

02:00:00 11 10:00:00 203 18:00:00 298

02:15:00 10 10:15:00 209 18:15:00 298

02:30:00 15 10:30:00 163 18:30:00 276

02:45:00 11 10:45:00 163 18:45:00 277

03:00:00 12 11:00:00 160 19:00:00 244

03:15:00 10 11:15:00 160 19:15:00 193

03:30:00 9 11:30:00 174 19:30:00 152

03:45:00 18 11:45:00 160 19:45:00 138

04:00:00 11 12:00:00 160 20:00:00 119

04:15:00 10 12:15:00 175 20:15:00 115

04:30:00 17 12:30:00 179 20:30:00 125

04:45:00 21 12:45:00 163 20:45:00 107

05:00:00 24 13:00:00 152 21:00:00 91

05:15:00 22 13:15:00 185 21:15:00 90

05:30:00 31 13:30:00 195 21:30:00 95

05:45:00 44 13:45:00 169 21:45:00 100

06:00:00 62 14:00:00 158 22:00:00 92

06:15:00 88 14:15:00 197 22:15:00 81

06:30:00 114 14:30:00 202 22:30:00 81

06:45:00 139 14:45:00 198 22:45:00 78

07:00:00 141 15:00:00 169 23:00:00 65

07:15:00 167 15:15:00 205 23:15:00 59

07:30:00 229 15:30:00 215 23:30:00 53

07:45:00 275 15:45:00 246 23:45:00 54

Comment: Page 10 of 21 Printed On: 28 May, 2012 12:05:24PM City of Toronto - Traffic Data Centre & Safety Bureau

Detailed 24-Hour Count Summary Report

EGLINTON AVE W/B E OF BLACK CREEK DR Category: 24 HOUR

Survey Date: December/17/2009

Station: 2393

Start Time: 00:00 Count Period: 0015 Minutes

TIME COUNT TIME COUNT TIME COUNT

00:00:00 43 08:00:00 168 16:00:00 276

00:15:00 36 08:15:00 187 16:15:00 314

00:30:00 40 08:30:00 222 16:30:00 312

00:45:00 30 08:45:00 219 16:45:00 318

01:00:00 23 09:00:00 232 17:00:00 332

01:15:00 29 09:15:00 180 17:15:00 331

01:30:00 14 09:30:00 194 17:30:00 307

01:45:00 15 09:45:00 183 17:45:00 264

02:00:00 27 10:00:00 164 18:00:00 288

02:15:00 18 10:15:00 152 18:15:00 253

02:30:00 18 10:30:00 155 18:30:00 233

02:45:00 16 10:45:00 161 18:45:00 216

03:00:00 16 11:00:00 186 19:00:00 184

03:15:00 10 11:15:00 194 19:15:00 193

03:30:00 11 11:30:00 169 19:30:00 188

03:45:00 18 11:45:00 177 19:45:00 179

04:00:00 12 12:00:00 188 20:00:00 168

04:15:00 12 12:15:00 188 20:15:00 156

04:30:00 26 12:30:00 194 20:30:00 140

04:45:00 26 12:45:00 205 20:45:00 130

05:00:00 28 13:00:00 188 21:00:00 117

05:15:00 28 13:15:00 204 21:15:00 118

05:30:00 39 13:30:00 172 21:30:00 112

05:45:00 58 13:45:00 205 21:45:00 115

06:00:00 62 14:00:00 246 22:00:00 120

06:15:00 78 14:15:00 215 22:15:00 117

06:30:00 116 14:30:00 216 22:30:00 96

06:45:00 133 14:45:00 218 22:45:00 77

07:00:00 118 15:00:00 242 23:00:00 75

07:15:00 125 15:15:00 248 23:15:00 75

07:30:00 159 15:30:00 286 23:30:00 60

07:45:00 171 15:45:00 272 23:45:00 59

Comment: Page 11 of 21 Printed On: 28 May, 2012 12:05:24PM City of Toronto - Traffic Data Centre & Safety Bureau

Detailed 24-Hour Count Summary Report

EGLINTON AVE E/B W OF JANE ST Category: 24 HOUR

Survey Date: December/17/2009

Station: 2453

Start Time: 00:00 Count Period: 0015 Minutes

TIME COUNT TIME COUNT TIME COUNT

00:00:00 47 08:00:00 351 16:00:00 324

00:15:00 47 08:15:00 341 16:15:00 341

00:30:00 46 08:30:00 369 16:30:00 337

00:45:00 34 08:45:00 393 16:45:00 358

01:00:00 26 09:00:00 348 17:00:00 352

01:15:00 21 09:15:00 318 17:15:00 363

01:30:00 25 09:30:00 269 17:30:00 355

01:45:00 27 09:45:00 247 17:45:00 353

02:00:00 21 10:00:00 229 18:00:00 368

02:15:00 9 10:15:00 224 18:15:00 355

02:30:00 23 10:30:00 219 18:30:00 339

02:45:00 23 10:45:00 185 18:45:00 350

03:00:00 14 11:00:00 204 19:00:00 332

03:15:00 17 11:15:00 173 19:15:00 253

03:30:00 13 11:30:00 180 19:30:00 172

03:45:00 23 11:45:00 181 19:45:00 196

04:00:00 17 12:00:00 195 20:00:00 135

04:15:00 10 12:15:00 177 20:15:00 153

04:30:00 23 12:30:00 152 20:30:00 129

04:45:00 25 12:45:00 183 20:45:00 132

05:00:00 32 13:00:00 181 21:00:00 105

05:15:00 19 13:15:00 176 21:15:00 116

05:30:00 36 13:30:00 202 21:30:00 121

05:45:00 48 13:45:00 192 21:45:00 107

06:00:00 82 14:00:00 208 22:00:00 106

06:15:00 87 14:15:00 176 22:15:00 99

06:30:00 116 14:30:00 215 22:30:00 90

06:45:00 142 14:45:00 218 22:45:00 98

07:00:00 186 15:00:00 204 23:00:00 94

07:15:00 157 15:15:00 191 23:15:00 78

07:30:00 259 15:30:00 243 23:30:00 94

07:45:00 285 15:45:00 281 23:45:00 73

Comment: Page 12 of 21 Printed On: 28 May, 2012 12:05:24PM City of Toronto - Traffic Data Centre & Safety Bureau

Detailed 24-Hour Count Summary Report

EGLINTON AVE W/B E OF JANE ST Category: 24 HOUR

Survey Date: December/17/2009

Station: 2454

Start Time: 00:00 Count Period: 0015 Minutes

TIME COUNT TIME COUNT TIME COUNT

00:00:00 44 08:00:00 219 16:00:00 258

00:15:00 37 08:15:00 178 16:15:00 312

00:30:00 36 08:30:00 232 16:30:00 292

00:45:00 21 08:45:00 206 16:45:00 292

01:00:00 23 09:00:00 202 17:00:00 307

01:15:00 21 09:15:00 145 17:15:00 330

01:30:00 15 09:30:00 143 17:30:00 293

01:45:00 14 09:45:00 152 17:45:00 276

02:00:00 23 10:00:00 147 18:00:00 266

02:15:00 12 10:15:00 139 18:15:00 249

02:30:00 19 10:30:00 145 18:30:00 234

02:45:00 16 10:45:00 124 18:45:00 221

03:00:00 16 11:00:00 153 19:00:00 174

03:15:00 16 11:15:00 152 19:15:00 172

03:30:00 12 11:30:00 153 19:30:00 167

03:45:00 13 11:45:00 155 19:45:00 155

04:00:00 10 12:00:00 167 20:00:00 145

04:15:00 7 12:15:00 161 20:15:00 140

04:30:00 23 12:30:00 163 20:30:00 130

04:45:00 27 12:45:00 153 20:45:00 103

05:00:00 23 13:00:00 153 21:00:00 116

05:15:00 39 13:15:00 164 21:15:00 128

05:30:00 52 13:30:00 150 21:30:00 115

05:45:00 65 13:45:00 166 21:45:00 95

06:00:00 62 14:00:00 178 22:00:00 109

06:15:00 106 14:15:00 207 22:15:00 95

06:30:00 127 14:30:00 182 22:30:00 91

06:45:00 150 14:45:00 241 22:45:00 75

07:00:00 147 15:00:00 222 23:00:00 63

07:15:00 151 15:15:00 244 23:15:00 77

07:30:00 174 15:30:00 250 23:30:00 57

07:45:00 187 15:45:00 259 23:45:00 48

Comment: Page 13 of 21 Printed On: 28 May, 2012 12:05:24PM City of Toronto - Traffic Data Centre & Safety Bureau

Detailed 24-Hour Count Summary Report

EGLINTON AVE E/B W OF KEELE ST Category: 24 HOUR

Survey Date: December/17/2009

Station: 2455

Start Time: 00:00 Count Period: 0015 Minutes

TIME COUNT TIME COUNT TIME COUNT

00:00:00 49 08:00:00 230 16:00:00 224

00:15:00 38 08:15:00 251 16:15:00 242

00:30:00 44 08:30:00 247 16:30:00 209

00:45:00 43 08:45:00 246 16:45:00 272

01:00:00 25 09:00:00 230 17:00:00 237

01:15:00 20 09:15:00 241 17:15:00 232

01:30:00 22 09:30:00 243 17:30:00 251

01:45:00 26 09:45:00 216 17:45:00 282

02:00:00 29 10:00:00 191 18:00:00 227

02:15:00 20 10:15:00 193 18:15:00 242

02:30:00 14 10:30:00 183 18:30:00 218

02:45:00 20 10:45:00 198 18:45:00 218

03:00:00 13 11:00:00 158 19:00:00 202

03:15:00 18 11:15:00 167 19:15:00 186

03:30:00 11 11:30:00 178 19:30:00 174

03:45:00 16 11:45:00 184 19:45:00 136

04:00:00 13 12:00:00 155 20:00:00 129

04:15:00 15 12:15:00 149 20:15:00 118

04:30:00 14 12:30:00 167 20:30:00 138

04:45:00 11 12:45:00 134 20:45:00 124

05:00:00 23 13:00:00 155 21:00:00 103

05:15:00 18 13:15:00 164 21:15:00 96

05:30:00 28 13:30:00 178 21:30:00 101

05:45:00 38 13:45:00 172 21:45:00 98

06:00:00 55 14:00:00 189 22:00:00 90

06:15:00 80 14:15:00 162 22:15:00 89

06:30:00 92 14:30:00 175 22:30:00 75

06:45:00 103 14:45:00 196 22:45:00 85

07:00:00 146 15:00:00 168 23:00:00 81

07:15:00 138 15:15:00 170 23:15:00 55

07:30:00 142 15:30:00 231 23:30:00 68

07:45:00 202 15:45:00 224 23:45:00 64

Comment: Page 14 of 21 Printed On: 28 May, 2012 12:05:24PM City of Toronto - Traffic Data Centre & Safety Bureau

Detailed 24-Hour Count Summary Report

EGLINTON AVE E/B W OF WESTON RD Category: 24 HOUR

Survey Date: December/17/2009

Station: 2526

Start Time: 00:00 Count Period: 0015 Minutes

TIME COUNT TIME COUNT TIME COUNT

00:00:00 44 08:00:00 220 16:00:00 244

00:15:00 25 08:15:00 225 16:15:00 245

00:30:00 26 08:30:00 223 16:30:00 259

00:45:00 17 08:45:00 252 16:45:00 287

01:00:00 22 09:00:00 245 17:00:00 286

01:15:00 11 09:15:00 197 17:15:00 306

01:30:00 16 09:30:00 184 17:30:00 282

01:45:00 17 09:45:00 157 17:45:00 306

02:00:00 13 10:00:00 152 18:00:00 256

02:15:00 13 10:15:00 144 18:15:00 281

02:30:00 10 10:30:00 166 18:30:00 270

02:45:00 18 10:45:00 127 18:45:00 250

03:00:00 9 11:00:00 135 19:00:00 247

03:15:00 13 11:15:00 123 19:15:00 232

03:30:00 8 11:30:00 143 19:30:00 165

03:45:00 10 11:45:00 131 19:45:00 149

04:00:00 13 12:00:00 146 20:00:00 131

04:15:00 5 12:15:00 156 20:15:00 93

04:30:00 12 12:30:00 179 20:30:00 100

04:45:00 10 12:45:00 189 20:45:00 89

05:00:00 20 13:00:00 162 21:00:00 104

05:15:00 23 13:15:00 170 21:15:00 86

05:30:00 22 13:30:00 203 21:30:00 82

05:45:00 22 13:45:00 173 21:45:00 72

06:00:00 47 14:00:00 187 22:00:00 85

06:15:00 51 14:15:00 158 22:15:00 88

06:30:00 62 14:30:00 195 22:30:00 80

06:45:00 95 14:45:00 201 22:45:00 65

07:00:00 126 15:00:00 186 23:00:00 72

07:15:00 110 15:15:00 179 23:15:00 54

07:30:00 116 15:30:00 212 23:30:00 79

07:45:00 184 15:45:00 219 23:45:00 55

Comment: Page 15 of 21 Printed On: 28 May, 2012 12:05:24PM City of Toronto - Traffic Data Centre & Safety Bureau

Detailed 24-Hour Count Summary Report

EGLINTON AVE W/B E OF WESTON RD Category: 24 HOUR

Survey Date: December/17/2009

Station: 2527

Start Time: 00:00 Count Period: 0015 Minutes

TIME COUNT TIME COUNT TIME COUNT

00:00:00 48 08:00:00 173 16:00:00 239

00:15:00 36 08:15:00 148 16:15:00 310

00:30:00 43 08:30:00 207 16:30:00 279

00:45:00 36 08:45:00 189 16:45:00 289

01:00:00 25 09:00:00 187 17:00:00 304

01:15:00 25 09:15:00 140 17:15:00 298

01:30:00 14 09:30:00 157 17:30:00 282

01:45:00 10 09:45:00 147 17:45:00 249

02:00:00 20 10:00:00 142 18:00:00 257

02:15:00 16 10:15:00 127 18:15:00 246

02:30:00 15 10:30:00 141 18:30:00 247

02:45:00 17 10:45:00 143 18:45:00 208

03:00:00 16 11:00:00 145 19:00:00 163

03:15:00 10 11:15:00 149 19:15:00 190

03:30:00 10 11:30:00 167 19:30:00 176

03:45:00 17 11:45:00 158 19:45:00 175

04:00:00 10 12:00:00 144 20:00:00 152

04:15:00 9 12:15:00 157 20:15:00 136

04:30:00 18 12:30:00 160 20:30:00 131

04:45:00 27 12:45:00 172 20:45:00 117

05:00:00 18 13:00:00 172 21:00:00 116

05:15:00 27 13:15:00 182 21:15:00 132

05:30:00 33 13:30:00 133 21:30:00 116

05:45:00 57 13:45:00 162 21:45:00 113

06:00:00 56 14:00:00 201 22:00:00 111

06:15:00 71 14:15:00 197 22:15:00 106

06:30:00 100 14:30:00 170 22:30:00 96

06:45:00 102 14:45:00 212 22:45:00 73

07:00:00 123 15:00:00 212 23:00:00 68

07:15:00 113 15:15:00 228 23:15:00 75

07:30:00 151 15:30:00 232 23:30:00 58

07:45:00 172 15:45:00 239 23:45:00 58

Comment: Page 16 of 21 Printed On: 28 May, 2012 12:05:24PM City of Toronto - Traffic Data Centre & Safety Bureau

Detailed 24-Hour Count Summary Report

EGLINTON AVE W/B E OF KEELE ST Category: 24 HOUR

Survey Date: December/17/2009

Station: 6557

Start Time: 00:00 Count Period: 0015 Minutes

TIME COUNT TIME COUNT TIME COUNT

00:00:00 41 08:00:00 147 16:00:00 210

00:15:00 30 08:15:00 139 16:15:00 217

00:30:00 34 08:30:00 153 16:30:00 226

00:45:00 30 08:45:00 174 16:45:00 212

01:00:00 21 09:00:00 150 17:00:00 220

01:15:00 26 09:15:00 127 17:15:00 205

01:30:00 28 09:30:00 144 17:30:00 205

01:45:00 21 09:45:00 147 17:45:00 208

02:00:00 15 10:00:00 149 18:00:00 208

02:15:00 23 10:15:00 135 18:15:00 160

02:30:00 15 10:30:00 131 18:30:00 178

02:45:00 17 10:45:00 148 18:45:00 172

03:00:00 16 11:00:00 121 19:00:00 158

03:15:00 15 11:15:00 154 19:15:00 146

03:30:00 18 11:30:00 144 19:30:00 165

03:45:00 14 11:45:00 173 19:45:00 140

04:00:00 9 12:00:00 155 20:00:00 136

04:15:00 9 12:15:00 164 20:15:00 131

04:30:00 16 12:30:00 148 20:30:00 115

04:45:00 11 12:45:00 180 20:45:00 128

05:00:00 24 13:00:00 177 21:00:00 109

05:15:00 20 13:15:00 162 21:15:00 105

05:30:00 32 13:30:00 173 21:30:00 92

05:45:00 51 13:45:00 175 21:45:00 100

06:00:00 59 14:00:00 194 22:00:00 111

06:15:00 87 14:15:00 190 22:15:00 106

06:30:00 105 14:30:00 205 22:30:00 81

06:45:00 118 14:45:00 199 22:45:00 67

07:00:00 120 15:00:00 192 23:00:00 72

07:15:00 96 15:15:00 188 23:15:00 65

07:30:00 136 15:30:00 218 23:30:00 67

07:45:00 119 15:45:00 190 23:45:00 50

Comment: Page 17 of 21 Printed On: 28 May, 2012 12:05:24PM City of Toronto - Traffic Data Centre & Safety Bureau

Detailed 24-Hour Count Summary Report

BLACK CREEK DR N/B S OF EGLINTON AVE Category: 24 HOUR

Survey Date: April/15/2010

Station: 107

Start Time: 00:00 Count Period: 0015 Minutes

TIME COUNT TIME COUNT TIME COUNT

00:00:00 55 08:00:00 337 16:00:00 302

00:15:00 41 08:15:00 362 16:15:00 297

00:30:00 30 08:30:00 343 16:30:00 319

00:45:00 28 08:45:00 305 16:45:00 322

01:00:00 23 09:00:00 295 17:00:00 347

01:15:00 26 09:15:00 247 17:15:00 331

01:30:00 27 09:30:00 233 17:30:00 289

01:45:00 22 09:45:00 211 17:45:00 326

02:00:00 28 10:00:00 226 18:00:00 278

02:15:00 17 10:15:00 218 18:15:00 255

02:30:00 23 10:30:00 203 18:30:00 248

02:45:00 17 10:45:00 186 18:45:00 225

03:00:00 16 11:00:00 213 19:00:00 237

03:15:00 13 11:15:00 246 19:15:00 216

03:30:00 18 11:30:00 221 19:30:00 203

03:45:00 16 11:45:00 230 19:45:00 177

04:00:00 17 12:00:00 242 20:00:00 166

04:15:00 22 12:15:00 221 20:15:00 155

04:30:00 25 12:30:00 174 20:30:00 152

04:45:00 19 12:45:00 238 20:45:00 155

05:00:00 23 13:00:00 221 21:00:00 144

05:15:00 35 13:15:00 247 21:15:00 141

05:30:00 47 13:30:00 239 21:30:00 139

05:45:00 94 13:45:00 263 21:45:00 125

06:00:00 104 14:00:00 255 22:00:00 111

06:15:00 147 14:15:00 273 22:15:00 117

06:30:00 221 14:30:00 288 22:30:00 103

06:45:00 230 14:45:00 262 22:45:00 108

07:00:00 218 15:00:00 274 23:00:00 98

07:15:00 247 15:15:00 261 23:15:00 86

07:30:00 285 15:30:00 287 23:30:00 75

07:45:00 264 15:45:00 275 23:45:00 77

Comment: Page 18 of 21 Printed On: 28 May, 2012 12:05:24PM City of Toronto - Traffic Data Centre & Safety Bureau

Detailed 24-Hour Count Summary Report

BLACK CREEK DR S/B N OF EGLINTON AVE Category: 24 HOUR

Survey Date: April/15/2010

Station: 108

Start Time: 00:00 Count Period: 0015 Minutes

TIME COUNT TIME COUNT TIME COUNT

00:00:00 77 08:00:00 386 16:00:00 363

00:15:00 64 08:15:00 408 16:15:00 337

00:30:00 41 08:30:00 366 16:30:00 385

00:45:00 44 08:45:00 340 16:45:00 374

01:00:00 47 09:00:00 348 17:00:00 442

01:15:00 38 09:15:00 322 17:15:00 418

01:30:00 26 09:30:00 293 17:30:00 400

01:45:00 31 09:45:00 274 17:45:00 387

02:00:00 22 10:00:00 285 18:00:00 365

02:15:00 16 10:15:00 262 18:15:00 417

02:30:00 18 10:30:00 277 18:30:00 377

02:45:00 23 10:45:00 246 18:45:00 329

03:00:00 17 11:00:00 251 19:00:00 252

03:15:00 20 11:15:00 243 19:15:00 264

03:30:00 23 11:30:00 276 19:30:00 258

03:45:00 26 11:45:00 271 19:45:00 225

04:00:00 22 12:00:00 290 20:00:00 203

04:15:00 18 12:15:00 246 20:15:00 194

04:30:00 24 12:30:00 225 20:30:00 178

04:45:00 33 12:45:00 288 20:45:00 185

05:00:00 42 13:00:00 294 21:00:00 177

05:15:00 48 13:15:00 244 21:15:00 158

05:30:00 84 13:30:00 291 21:30:00 155

05:45:00 92 13:45:00 232 21:45:00 147

06:00:00 138 14:00:00 246 22:00:00 162

06:15:00 180 14:15:00 277 22:15:00 149

06:30:00 146 14:30:00 278 22:30:00 123

06:45:00 207 14:45:00 286 22:45:00 127

07:00:00 223 15:00:00 243 23:00:00 115

07:15:00 258 15:15:00 239 23:15:00 113

07:30:00 318 15:30:00 289 23:30:00 95

07:45:00 347 15:45:00 320 23:45:00 86

Comment: Page 19 of 21 Printed On: 28 May, 2012 12:05:24PM City of Toronto - Traffic Data Centre & Safety Bureau

Detailed 24-Hour Count Summary Report

BLACK CREEK DR S/B N OF PHOTOGRAPHY DR Category: 24 HOUR

Survey Date: April/15/2010

Station: 110

Start Time: 00:00 Count Period: 0015 Minutes

TIME COUNT TIME COUNT TIME COUNT

00:00:00 38 08:00:00 252 16:00:00 147

00:15:00 31 08:15:00 223 16:15:00 183

00:30:00 32 08:30:00 188 16:30:00 175

00:45:00 27 08:45:00 221 16:45:00 169

01:00:00 21 09:00:00 218 17:00:00 197

01:15:00 29 09:15:00 192 17:15:00 212

01:30:00 25 09:30:00 186 17:30:00 186

01:45:00 20 09:45:00 177 17:45:00 177

02:00:00 18 10:00:00 191 18:00:00 169

02:15:00 13 10:15:00 158 18:15:00 158

02:30:00 13 10:30:00 156 18:30:00 152

02:45:00 21 10:45:00 177 18:45:00 157

03:00:00 13 11:00:00 165 19:00:00 137

03:15:00 12 11:15:00 148 19:15:00 147

03:30:00 21 11:30:00 144 19:30:00 144

03:45:00 18 11:45:00 162 19:45:00 132

04:00:00 15 12:00:00 147 20:00:00 106

04:15:00 22 12:15:00 152 20:15:00 97

04:30:00 23 12:30:00 155 20:30:00 103

04:45:00 25 12:45:00 141 20:45:00 82

05:00:00 30 13:00:00 137 21:00:00 73

05:15:00 32 13:15:00 159 21:15:00 77

05:30:00 46 13:30:00 124 21:30:00 88

05:45:00 62 13:45:00 123 21:45:00 62

06:00:00 78 14:00:00 157 22:00:00 73

06:15:00 119 14:15:00 177 22:15:00 69

06:30:00 128 14:30:00 183 22:30:00 61

06:45:00 165 14:45:00 159 22:45:00 57

07:00:00 167 15:00:00 162 23:00:00 45

07:15:00 183 15:15:00 144 23:15:00 42

07:30:00 218 15:30:00 158 23:30:00 35

07:45:00 247 15:45:00 143 23:45:00 33

Comment: Page 20 of 21 Printed On: 28 May, 2012 12:05:24PM City of Toronto - Traffic Data Centre & Safety Bureau

Detailed 24-Hour Count Summary Report

BLACK CREEK DR N/B S OF TODD BAYLIS BLVD Category: 24 HOUR

Survey Date: April/15/2010

Station: 24338

Start Time: 00:00 Count Period: 0015 Minutes

TIME COUNT TIME COUNT TIME COUNT

00:00:00 77 08:00:00 387 16:00:00 289

00:15:00 52 08:15:00 395 16:15:00 316

00:30:00 45 08:30:00 377 16:30:00 342

00:45:00 31 08:45:00 357 16:45:00 322

01:00:00 26 09:00:00 322 17:00:00 347

01:15:00 25 09:15:00 237 17:15:00 358

01:30:00 34 09:30:00 265 17:30:00 289

01:45:00 22 09:45:00 251 17:45:00 322

02:00:00 25 10:00:00 207 18:00:00 319

02:15:00 20 10:15:00 223 18:15:00 277

02:30:00 18 10:30:00 249 18:30:00 287

02:45:00 21 10:45:00 223 18:45:00 241

03:00:00 17 11:00:00 247 19:00:00 237

03:15:00 23 11:15:00 251 19:15:00 225

03:30:00 18 11:30:00 224 19:30:00 221

03:45:00 17 11:45:00 192 19:45:00 187

04:00:00 22 12:00:00 187 20:00:00 184

04:15:00 23 12:15:00 213 20:15:00 212

04:30:00 26 12:30:00 249 20:30:00 189

04:45:00 28 12:45:00 251 20:45:00 157

05:00:00 33 13:00:00 273 21:00:00 187

05:15:00 41 13:15:00 261 21:15:00 172

05:30:00 62 13:30:00 257 21:30:00 149

05:45:00 94 13:45:00 278 21:45:00 155

06:00:00 130 14:00:00 288 22:00:00 143

06:15:00 187 14:15:00 318 22:15:00 108

06:30:00 213 14:30:00 302 22:30:00 131

06:45:00 287 14:45:00 322 22:45:00 120

07:00:00 293 15:00:00 287 23:00:00 113

07:15:00 305 15:15:00 302 23:15:00 102

07:30:00 359 15:30:00 293 23:30:00 97

07:45:00 343 15:45:00 287 23:45:00 85

Comment: Page 21 of 21 Printed On: 28 May, 2012 12:05:24PM Kevin Carr

From: Scott Shayko Sent: October-25-12 10:18 AM To: Kevin Carr Subject: FW: RE: Eglinto LRT - West Section Traffic Request

From: Andrew Shea [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: October-25-12 10:16 AM To: Scott Shayko Cc: Scott Bowers; Sarah Sheridan Subject: FW: RE: Eglinto LRT - West Section Traffic Request

Hi Scott,

Attached are the traffic growth rates provided by the City for the LRT West Section study area.

Sorry for the delay in getting this to you; I thought that we had sent it earlier.

Thanks, Andrew

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: October-04-12 5:05 PM To: Andrew Shea Cc: Scott Bowers; [email protected] Subject: FW: RE: Eglinto LRT - West Section Traffic Request

Andrew –

Here is the response from the City regarding your request for future traffic data.

David Veights, AICP Senior Project Coordinator Toronto Transit Commission, Transit Expansion Department 5160 Yonge Street, 3rd Floor North York, ON M2N 6L9  416-393-7929  416-338-0279  [email protected]

From: Vince Alfano [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: October 4, 2012 1:16 PM To: Veights, David Subject: Fwd: RE: Eglinto LRT - West Section Traffic Request

1 Hi David,

Below are the annual rates of change as calculated using the City's 2001 and 2031 AM peak hour auto driver simulations for the Eglinton Crosstown LRT project. These rates have been individually calculated for the northbound and southbound directions for the following roads, north and south of Eglinton Ave:

1. Jane St 2. Weston Rd 3. Black Creek Dr 4. Keele St

A fifth road, Bicknell Ave/Municipal Dr, was requested but this road isn't in our networks. Also requested was AADT information that we don't have.

These annual rates can be used to estimate the change in base year traffic counts to the desired 2020 horizon year.

Jane St Weston Rd Black Creek Dr Keele St Annual rate of change NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB North of Eglinton 0.2% 0.2% 0.5% 0.1% 1.1% 1.3% 0.1% 0.4% South of Eglinton 0.5% 0.2% 0.1% -0.1% 0.6% 0.7% 0.4% 0.3%

I hope this helps.

Vince

>>> Mike Wehkind 10/2/2012 2:24 PM >>>

>>> 9/26/2012 8:28 AM >>> Good morning Mike,

Further to our conversation yesterday afternoon, please send the information identified below for the year 2031, the horizon year of the Official Plan. Our Consulant will then extrapolate to the year 2020. As a check, the Consulant will also use base counts and increase those counts by 1% per year to 2020.

Thanks.

From: Veights, David Sent: September 25, 2012 7:44 AM To: 'Wehkind, Mike' Cc: Poskin, Mike; 'Andrew Shea' Subject: RE: Eglinto LRT - West Section Traffic Request

Good morning Mike.

I am following up to my earlier request regarding traffic information. Are you able to provide the information requested below? 2

From: Veights, David Sent: September 11, 2012 2:43 PM To: 'Wehkind, Mike' Cc: Poskin, Mike; 'Andrew Shea' Subject: FW: Eglinto LRT - West Section Traffic Request

Good afternoon Mike.

As you may know, the Transit Expansion Department and Metrolinx are undertaking an addendum to the Eglinton Crosstown LRT Environmental Project Report (EPR) between the area of the West Launch Site at Keelesdale Park and Jane Street. As part of that addendum effort, our consultant has requested a number of data elements that might reside with your group. The requested elements are:

Peak Hour and AADT link volumes for the year 2020 (from your EMME/2 model?), for the following road links:  Jane Street N/S of Eglinton Ave  Weston Road N/S of Eglinton Ave  Black Creek Drive N/S of Eglinton Ave  Bicknell Ave/Municipal Dr N/S of Eglinton Ave  Keele St/Trethewey Dr N/S of Eglinton Ave

I realize the Official Plan horizon year is 2031, so if interpolation is needed, the consultant can perform that effort. If the data shows traffic growth rates instead of volumes, we can accept that.

Please contact me if you have any questions.

From: Andrew Shea [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: August 27, 2012 10:24 AM To: Veights, David Cc: Scott Bowers; Poskin, Mike Subject: Eglinto LRT - West Section Traffic Request

Hi David,

3 In support of both the traffic and air quality investigations for the Elginton LRT – West Section, would it be possible to get from the City (from their EMME/2 model?) the following:

Peak Hour and AADT traffic growth rates for the year 2020, for the following road links:  Jane Street N/S of Eglinton Ave  Weston Road N/S of Eglinton Ave  Black Creek Drive N/S of Eglinton Ave  Bicknell Ave/Municipal Dr N/S of Eglinton Ave  Keele St/Trethewey Dr N/S of Eglinton Ave

Thanks, Andrew

The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review retransmission dissemination or other use of or taking any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient or delegate is strictly prohibited. If you received this in error please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. The integrity and security of this message cannot be guaranteed on the Internet. The sender accepts no liability for the content of this e- mail or for the consequences of any actions taken on the basis of information provided. The recipient should check this e-mail and any attachments for the presence of viruses. The sender accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this e-mail. This disclaimer is property of the TTC and must not be altered or circumvented in any manner.

The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review retransmission dissemination or other use of or taking any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient or delegate is strictly prohibited. If you received this in error please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. The integrity and security of this message cannot be guaranteed on the Internet. The sender accepts no liability for the content of this e-mail or for the consequences of any actions taken on the basis of information provided. The recipient should check this e-mail and any attachments for the presence of viruses. The sender accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this e-mail. This disclaimer is property of the TTC and must not be altered or circumvented in any manner.